Doc. No.: CLPL/F/8.

8/04

C
Audit No.:1
CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD

Corrective Action Request (CAR)

Audit Date: 12 & 13 Feb 2022

Rev. No.:

Rev. D a t e :

Page No.: 1 of 1
Auditor: Mrs.
Toraskar
Vaibhavi
01

15.02.2022

Vijay

Auditee: Mr. Nilakanth Jirage

Department: Chemical Activity Assessed: Equipment

NC No.: 2 Ref. to lab. documents&ISO/EC 17025:2017

DESCRIPTION OF NON-CONFORMITY (Nc):

reference value which cover said details

Laboratory doesn't have documentation of
& date
Signature of Auditor

CORRECTIVE ACTION PROPOSED:

corrective action and submit evidence to

NABL.
NC accepted. Lab will take necessary

13 Feb 2022
Signature of Auditee & date
CORRECTIVE ACTION:
RESPONSIBILITY & TIME REQUIRED FOR

TM &20 Days
13 Feb 2022
Signature of Auditee/ HOD/ Quality Manager & date
TAKEN:
ROOT CAUSE & CORRECTIVE ACTION

Root Cause: Lab had calculated MU on CRM due no availability of Samples.

Samples and evidence submitted to NABL.

CA: Lab has calculated MU on

(lo312
Signature of Auditee &date
cORRECTIVE ACTION VERIFIED& COMMENTS, IF ANY:

Signature of Auditor & Quality Manager & date

PREPARED BY: QM APPROÝERRY: TM

CONTROLLED COPY
 Doc. No.CLPLUF7.6/01
CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD Rev. No.

C Uncertainty of Measurement Rev. Dt:

Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES 15.02.2022

Name: Aluminium Date:
Department Chemical
Test Method: IS 8811/ASTM E415 Unit: % Range: 0.001% to 2.0%
Details of Test Equipment Used
Equipment ID: CLPL-CH+1 Measurement Uncertainity ()
%U of Parameter 1: %U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material
Used
CRM/SRMID Measurement Uncertainity (t) 0.001
TYPE AEvaluation:
X1 x2 x3 x4 x5
Readings:(x) 0.023 0.024 0.022 0.024 0.025
0.00000036 0.00000016 0.00000256 0.00000016 0.00000196
0.024
Nu. Ui reauinys (n) 5 Average
Standard Deviation s(xF 0.001140 Degree of freedom (v) 4

Standard Uncertainity U(A)= 0.0005 %

TYPE B Evaluation:
Effective
Certificate degree of
U(B) Source Diviser-k: Uncertainity Freedom:
value:
V eff
#VALUE!
Uncertainity of U{Mc= Equipment
Uncertainity of UCRM/SRM CRM 0.001 1.96 0.000510204
Coverage factor at 95%|
0.0007 2.12
Combined Uncertainity: UC) Confidence Level (K}F|

Effective degree of Freedom: Veff 16.0 %Uncertainity (%U)= 6.4797

Expanded Uncertainity: U 0.002
Result 16.0
Y= 0.0020.024 % with coverage factor k=2.12 for Confidence level of 95%& Veff

nt
PREPARED BYM APPORVEDBY: QM
 Doc. No.: CLPUF/7.6/01
CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD Rev. N0. -

Uncertainty of Measurement Rev. Dt:

Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES 15.02.2022

Name: Boron Date:
Department: Chemical 0.0001% to 0.015%%
Test Method: IS 8811/ASTM E415 Unit: % Range:
Details of Test Equipment Used
Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 |Measurement Uncertainity (t)
%U of Parameter 1: %U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
CRM/SRM ID Measurement Uncertainity (t) 0.0005
TYPE A Evaluation:
5
x1 x2 X3
Readings: (K) 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.004 0.002
0.00000196 0.00000256 0.00000016
0.00000016 0.00000036 0.002
No. of Readings (n) 5 Average
Degree of freedom (v)=|
Standard Deviation s(x)= 0.001140
Standard Uncertainity U{A)= 0.0005%
TYPE BEvaluation: Effective
degree of
Certificate Uncertainity
Source Diviser-k:
UB) value: Freedom:
eff
Uncertainity ofU(Mc)= Equipment #VALUE!
Uncertainity of U(CRMWSRM)= CRM 0.0005 1.96 0.000255102|
Coverage factor at 95%|
0.0006 2.45
Combined Uncertainity: U(C) Confidence Level (K)=

Effective degree of Freedom: V eff 6.3 %Uncertainity (%U)= 58.2034

Expanded Uncertainity: U 0.001
Result: 6.3
Y= 0.001 0.002 % with coveragefactor k=2.45 for Confidence level of 95% &Veff

PREPARED BYTM APPORVED BY: QM

 Doc. No.: CLPL/F7 6/01

CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD Rev. No.

Uncertainty of Measurement Rev. Dt:

Test Details:
Chemical Analysis by OES 15.02.2022

Name: Carbon Date

Department: Chemical
0.0015%to 1.2%
IS 8811/ % Range:
Test Method ASTM E415
Unit:

Details of Test Equipment Used ----

Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 |Measurement Uncertainity (+)

%U of Parameter 2:
6U ofParameter1:
Details of Reference Material Used 0.007 %
Measurement Uncertainity (t)
CRMISRM ID
TYPE A Evaluation:
x4 x5
x1 x2 x3
0.28
Readings: (xi) 0.28 0.27 0.25 0.26

0.00014400 0.00000400 0.00032400 0.00006400 0.00014400

0.268
No. of Readings (n) 5 Average

0.013038 Degree of freedom (v)=|

Standard Deviation s(x)=
Standard Uncertainity U{A)= 0.0058 %

TYPE B Evaluation:
Effective
Certificatee
degree off
Source Diviser-k: Uncertainity Freedom:
UB) value V eff

#VALUE!
Uncertainity of U(Mc)= Equipment

CRM 0.007 1.96 0.003571429

Uncertainity of U(CRM/SRM)=

Coverage factor at 95%|

Combined Uncertainity: U(C) 0.0068 2.31
Confidence Level (K)=|

Veff 7.6
Effective degree of Freedom: 5.894
%Uncertainity (%U)=
Expanded Uncertainity: U B.016

Result:
Y= 0.016@0.268 % with coverage factor k=2.31 for Confidence level of 95% & V 7.6

PREPARED p TM APPORVED BY QM
 Doc. No.: CLPLIF7.6/01

C CRESSC0 LABS PVT LTD

Uncertainty of Measurement
Rev. No.
Rev. Dt

Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES

Name: |Chromium 15.02.2022
Date:
|Department: Chemical
Test Method: IS8811/ASTM E415 Unit: % Range: 0.002% to 3.0%
Details of Test Equipment Used
Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity (t)
%U of Parameter 1: %U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
CRM/SRM ID Measurement Uncertainity (t) 0.003 %
TYPE AEvaluation:
Readings: () x1
0.49
2
0.50
x3 x4 x5
0.49 0.48 0.51
0.00001600 0.00003600 0.00001600 0.00019600 0.00025600|
N. ui rreauíuys (n)= 5 Average 0.4944
Standard Deviation s(x}= 0.011402 Degree offreedom (v)EL 4
Standard Uncertainity U(A)= 0.0051 %
TYPE B Evaluation:
Effective
Certificate degree of
U(B) Source
value:
Diviser-k:
Uncertainity| Freedom:
V eff
Uncertainity of U(Mc)= Equipment #VALUE!
Uncertainity of U(CRMI/SRM CRM 0.0030| 1.96 0.001530612
Coverage factor at 95%
Combined Uncertainity: Uc) 0.0053
Confidence Level (K}=|
2.57

Effective degree of Freedom: V eff 4.8

% Uncertainity (%U)= 2.7697
Expanded Uncertainity: U 0.014
Result:
Y= 0.0140.494 % with coverage factor k=2.57 for Confidence level of 95%& Veff 4.8

PREPAREDeY:TM APPORVED BY: QM

 Doc. No.: CLPL/F/7.6/01
CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD Rev. No.
Uncertainty of Measurement Rev. Dt:

Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES

Name: Cobalt Date: 15.02.2022
Department: Chemical
Test Method: IS 8811/ASTM E415 Unit: %
Range: 0.001% to 0.60%
Details of Test Equipment Usedd
Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity (t)
%U of Parameter 1:
%U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
CRM/SRM ID Measurement Uncertainity () 0.005
TYPE A Evaluation:
x3 5
Readings: (x) x1 x2
0.31 0.32 0.31 .30 0.32
0.00000400 0.00006400 0.00000400 0.00014400 0.00006400
. ui neauíínys (n)= 5 Average= 0.312
Standard Deviation s(x)= 0.008367 Degree of freedom (v)=|
Standard Uncertainity U(A)= 0.0037 %
TYPE B Evaluation:
Effective

U(B) Source
Certificate Diviser-k:
Uncertainitydegree of
value: Freedom:
Veff
Uncertainity of U(Mc)F Equipment #VALUE!
Uncertainity of U(CRWSRM)= CRM 0.005 1.96 0.00255102

Coverage factor at 95%|

Combined Uncertainity: uyC) 0.0045
Confidence Level (K)=|
2.26

Effective degree of Freedom: Veff 8.6

%Uncertainity (%U)= 3.2803
Expanded Uncertainity: U 0.010
Result:
Y= 0.010@ 0.312 %with coveragefactor k=2.26 for Confidence level of 95%&Veff 8.6

PREPARED Y TM
Cernt
APPORVED BY QM
 Doc. No.: CLPL/F7.6/01
CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD Rev. No.

C Uncertainty of Measurement Rev. Dt

Test Details:Chemical Analysis by OES Date: 15.02.2022

Name: Copper
Department: |Chemical
0.001%to 0.5%
Test Method: IS 8811/ASTM E415 Unit: % Range
Details of Test Equipment Used
Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity (t)
%U of Parameter 1: 9%U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used 0.0008 70

CRMISRM ID |Measurement Uncertainity ()

TYPE AEvaluation: x1 x2 x3 x4 x5
Readings: (x 0.078 0.080
0.080 0.079 0.081
0.00000016 0.00000036 0.00000196 0.00000256 0.00000016
Average 0.080
Nu.ui reauínys (n) 5
Standard Deviations(x 0.001140 Degree offreedom (v)F
Standard Uncertainity U(A)= 0.0005 %
TYPE B Evaluation: Effective
degree of

U(B) Source
Certificate
value:
Diviser-k: Uncertainity Freedom:
Veff_
#VALUE!
Uncertainity of U(Mc)= Equipment
|Uncertainity of U(CRM/SRM)= CRM 0.0008 1.96 0.000408163
Coverage factor at 95% 2.20
0.0007 Confidence Level (K)=
Combined Uncertainity: UC)

V eff 10.8 1.8052

Effective degree of Freedom: %Uncertainity (%U)=
Expanded Uncertainity: U o.001
Result
Confidencelevel of 95% &Veff 10.8
Y= 0.001@ 0.080% with coveragefactor k=2.20 for

APPORVED BY: QM
PREPAREDBY:TM
 Doc. No. CLPUF/76/01
CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD

C
Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES
Uncertainty of Measurement
Rev. No.

Rev Dt

Date: 15.02.2022
Name Lead
Department: Chemical
0.001% to 0.45%
Test Method: IS 8811/ASTM E415 Unit: Range
Details of Test Equipment Used
CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity () %
Equipment D:
%U of Parameter 1: 9%U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
Measurement Uncertainity (t) 0.006 o
CRM/SRM ID
TYPE AEvaluation: x2 x4 x5
x1 X3
Readings: () 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013
0.015
0.00000016 0.00000196 0.00000016 0.00000036 0.00000256
AVerage =F 0.015
No. ofReadings(n)=
Standard Deviation s(x)= 0.001140 Degree offreedom (v)F
Standard Uncertainity U(AF 0.0005 %
TYPE B Evaluation:
Effective
Source
Certificate Diviser-k: Uncertainity degree of
U(B) value Freedom:
Veff
#VALUE!
Uncertainity of U(Mc) Equipment
Uncertainity of U(CRMISRM)= CRM 0.0060 1.96 0.003061224
Coverage factor at 95%|
1.96
Combined Uncertainity: UC) .0031 Confidence Level (K)=

Effective degree of Freedom: V eff 5488.6 %Uncertainity (%U}= 41.6621

Expanded Uncertainity: U 0.006

Result:
Y 0.006@0.015 % with coverage factor k=1.96 for Confidence level of 95%&Veff 5488.6

PREPARED BY IM APPORVED BY: QM

 Doc. No.: CLPLUF/7.6/01
CRESSC0 LABS PVT LTD
C Uncertainty of Measurement
Rev. No.-
Rev. Dt:

Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES

Name: Manganese Date: 15.02.2022
Department: Chemical
IS 8811/
Test Method: ASTM E415 Unit: % Range: 0.10% to 2.6%

Details of Test Equipment Used

Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity(t)
%U of Parameter 1:
%U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
CRM/SRM ID |Measurement Uncertainity () 0.02 %
TYPE AEvaluation:
x1 x2 x3 x4 x5
Readings: (x)
1.24 1.20 1.22 1.21 1.21
0.00057600 0.0002560o 0.00001600 0.00003600 0.00003600
o. oi Reauíuys (n)F 5 Average =F 1.216
Standard Deviation s(x)= 0.015166 Degree offreedom (v 4
Standard Uncertainity U(A)= 0.0068 %
TYPE B Evaluation:
Effective
Certificate Uncertainity degreeof
U(B) Source Diviser-k:
value: Freedom:
V eff
Uncertainity of U(Mc)F Equipment #VALUE!
Uncertainity of U{CRM/SRM)= CRM 0.0200 1.96 0.010204082
Coverage factor at 95%|
Combined Uncertainity: U(C) 0.0123
Confidence Level (K)=|
1.96

Effective degree of Freedom: V eff 42.6

% Uncertainity (%U)= 1.9749
Expanded Uncertainity: U o.024
Result:
Y= 0.024@ 1.216 % with coveragefactor k=1.96 for Confidence level of 95% &Veff 42.6

mit
PREPARED B¥-TM APPORVED BY QM
 Doc. No. CLPUFI7.6/01
CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD
C
Rev. No.

Uncertainty of Measurement Rev. Dt:

Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES

Name: Molybdenum Date: 15.02.2022

Department: Chemical
Test Method: IS 8811/ASTM E415 Unit: Range: 0.001% to 2.0%
Details of Test Equipment Used
%
Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 |Measurement Uncertainity ()
%U of Parameter 1:
%U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
CRM/SRM ID Measurement Uncertainity () 0.002
TYPE A Evaluation:
x1 x2 x3 x4 5
Readings: (x) 0.1 0.15 0.17
0.17 0.18
0.0000160o 0.00019600 0.00003600 0.00025600 0.00001600
0.166
5 Average=|
Standard Deviation s(x)= 0.011402 Degree of freedom (v
Standard Uncertainity U(A)= 0.0051
TYPE BEvaluation:
Effective
Certificate Uncertainitydegree of
U(B) Source
value:
Diviser-k: Uncertainity Freedom:
Veff

Uncertainity of U(Mc)= Equipment #VALUE!

Uncertainity of U(CRM/SRM)= CRM 0.0020 1.96 0.001020408
Coverage factor at 95% 2.78
Combined Uncertainity: U(C) 0.0052 Confidence Level (K}=

Effective degree of Freedom: V eff 4.3 % Uncertainity (%U)= 8.7086

Expanded Uncertainity: U 0.014

Result
Y= 0.014@0.166 % with coverage factor k=2.78 for Confidence level of 95% &Veff 4.3

umit
PREPAREDBY: TM APPORVED BY QMA
 Doc. No: CLPLIFI7.6/01

CRESSC0 LABS PVT LTD Rev. No.-

C
Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES
Uncertainty of Measurement Rev. Dt

15.02.2022
Name: Nickel Date:
Department: Chemical
0.008% to 5.6%
Test Method: IS8811/ASTM E415 Unit: Range:
Details of Test Equipment Used
Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity (t)
%U of Parameter 1:
Details of Reference Material Used
6U ofParameter 2:
CRMISRM ID Measurement Uncertainity () 0.007
TYPE A Evaluation:
x1 x3 x4 x5
Readings: ()
0.54 0.52 0.54 0.53 0.55
0.00001600 0.00025600 0.00001600 0.00003600 0.00019600
o. Uneaunnys (n)= Average 0.536
Standard Deviation s(x 0.011402 Degree of freedom (v)F
Standard Uncertainity U(A)= |0.0051 %
TYPE B Evaluation:
Effective
Certificate degree of
U(B) Source
value:
Diviser-k: Uncertainity Freedom:
Veff
Uncertainity of U(Mc) Equipment #VALUE!
Uncertainity of U(CRM/SRM)= CRM 0.0070 1.96 0.003571429
Coverage factor at 95% Confidence
Combined Uncertainity: UC) 0.0062
Level (K)=
2.26

Effective degree of Freedom: Veff 8.9

% Uncertainity (%U)= 2.6249
Expanded Uncertainity: U 0.014
Result:
Y= 0.0140.536 % with coverage factor k=2.26for Confidence level of 95% &Veff 8.9

PREPARED-BY:TM APPORVED BY : QM
 Doc. No.: CLPUFI7.6/01

CRESSC0 LABS PVT LTD Rev. No.

C
Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES
Uncertainty of Measurement
Rev. Dt

15.02.2022
Date: -

Name: Niobium
|Chemical 0.010% to 0.80%
Department Range
Test Method IS 8811/ASTM E415 Unit
Details of Test Equipment Used
Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity (t)
%U of Parameter 2:
%U of Parameter 1:
Details of Reference Material Used I 0.003 L%
Measurement Uncertainity (t)
CRMISRM ID
TYPE AEvaluation: x3 x4
x1 x2 0.15 0.13
Readings:(x) 0.13 0.15 0.14
0.00010000 0.00010000
0.00010000 0.00010000 0.00000000
Average 0.140
N.Ui neaunínys (n)= 5
0.010000 Degree offreedom (v)F
Standard Deviation s(x)=_ 0.0045 %
Standard Uncertainity U(A)=
TYPE B Evaluation: Effective
degree of
Certificate
U(B) Source value:
Diviser-k: Uncertainity| Freedom:
V eff
Equipment #VALUE!
Uncertainity of U(Mc) 1.96 0.001530612
Uncertainity of U(CRMISRM)= CRM 0.003
Coverage factor at 95% 2.57
0.0047 Confidence Level (K}F
Combined Uncertainity: U(c)

Effective degree of Freedom: Veff 5.0 % Uncertainity (%U)= 8.6771

Expanded Uncertainity: U U0.012
Result: 5.0
level of 95% &Veff
Y 0.012 @ 0.140 % with coverage factor k=2.57 for Confidence

mt
APPORVED BY: QM
PREPARED BY: TM
 Doc. No. CLPUF7.6/01

CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD Rev. No.

Uncertainty of Measurement
Rev.Dt

Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES Date:

15.02.2022

Name: Phosphorous
0.001%to 0.10%
Department |Chemical
Range
Test Method: IS 8811/ASTM E415 Unit:
Details of Test Equipment Used |Measurement Uncetainity (t)
o

CLPL-CH-1
Equipment ID:
%U of Parameter 1: %U of Parameter2:
Details of Reference Material Used 0.0008 %
|Measurement Uncertainity(t)
CRM/SRM D
TYPE AEvaluation: x2 X3
x5
x1 0.016 0.019
Readings:() 0.018 0.014 0.017
0.00000064 0.00000484|
0.00000144 0.00000784 0.00000004
0.017
N. Ui rcauí1ys (n)
Average
0.001 Degree of freedom (v)=|
Standard Deviation s(xF 0.0009 %
Standard Uncertainity UAJ=
TYPE B Evaluation: Effective
Certificate Uncertainity degreeof
Source Diviser-k: Freedom:
U(B) value:
Veff
Equipment #VALUE!
Uncertainity of U(Mc)= 0.0008 1.96 0.000408163
Uncertainity of U(CRM/SRM CRM

Coverage factor at 95% 2.45

Combined Uncertainity: Uc) 0.0010 Confidence Level (K}=

Effective degree ofFreedom: Vef 6.0 %Uncertainity (%U)= 13.8856

Expanded Uncertainity: U 9-002
Result Veff 6.0
Y= 0.002@0.017 % withcoveragefactor k=2.45 for Confidence level of 95%&

PREPAREDBY: TM APPORVED BY: QM

 Doc. No.: CLPUFI7 6/01
CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD |Rev. No. ---

Uncertainty of Measurement Rev.Dt

Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES

IName Silicon Date:
15.02.2022

Department: Chemical
Test Method: IS 8811/ASTM E415 Unit:
% Range:
0.002% to 2.0%

Details of Test Equipment Used

Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity (t) %
%U of Parameter 1: %U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
CRM/SRM ID Measurement Uncertainity (t) 0.004 %
TYPE AEvaluation:
x1 x3 x4 x5
Readings: ()
0.23 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.25

. -.
No. Readings (n)
of =
0.00001600 0.00019600
5
0.00001600 0.00003600 |0.00025600
0.234
Average
Standard Deviation s(x) .011402 Degree of freedom (v 4

Standard Uncertainity U(AJ= 0.0051 %

TYPE B Evaluation:
Effective
Certificate Uncertainity degree of
UB) Source Diviser-k:
value: Freedom:
Veff_
Uncertainity of U(Mc)= Equipment #VALUE!
Uncertainity of U(CRM/SRM CRM 0.0040 1.96
0.002040816
Coverage factor at 95%
Combined Uncertainity: U(c) 0.0055
Confidence Level (K}
2.57

Effective degree of Freedom: Veff 5,4 % Uncertainity (%U)= 6.0321

Expanded Uncertainity: U 0.014
Result:
Y 0.014 0.234 % with coveragefactor k-2.57for Confidencelevel of95%&Veff 5.4

PREPAREDBY: TM APPORVED BY: QM

 Doc. No.: CLPLUF7 6/01
CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD Rev. No. -

C Uncertainty of Measurement Rev. Dt

Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES

15.02.2022
Name: |Sulphur Date
Department: Chemical
Test Method: 0.001% to 0.50%
IS 8811/ASTM E415 Unit Range:
Details of Test Equipment Used
EquipmentID: CLPL-CH-1 |MeasurementUncertainity(t) %

%U of Parameter 1: - -

6U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
CRMISRMID Measurement Uncertainity(t) 0.0011 2
TYPE AEvaluation:
x1 2 x3 X4 x5
Readings:(x) 0.035 0.029 0.030 0.031
0.031 L 0.0
0.032
0.00001296 0.00000576 0.00000196 0.00000016 0.00000036
. ui reauínys(n)= 5 Average 0.031
Standard Deviation s(x= 0.002302 Degree of freedom (v)= 4

Standard Uncertainity U(A) 0.0010 %

TYPE B Evaluation:
Effective
Certificate degree of
UB) Source
value
Diviser-k: Uncertainity| Freedom:
Veff
Uncertainity of U(Mc)F Equipment #VALUE!
Uncertainity of U(CRM/SRM= CRM 0.0011 1.96 0.000561224|
Coverage factor at 95%
Combined Uncertainity: UIC) 0.0012 Confidence Level (K}=
2.36

Effective degree of Freedom: V eff 6.7

%Uncertainity (%U)= 8.8131
Expanded Uncertainity:U 0:003
Result:
Y= 0.003@ 0.031 %with coverage factor k=2.36 for Confidencelevelof95%&Veff 6.7

PREPAREDBY TM APPORVED BY QM
 Doc. No: CLPL/F/7 6/01
CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD Rev. No.
Rev. Dt
Uncertainty of Measurement
Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES Date: 15.02.2022
|Name: Tin
Department Chemical
.0006% to 0.15%_
Test Method: IS 8811/ASTM E415 Unit: % Range:
Details of Test Equipment Used
EquipmentID: CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity (t)
%U of Parameter 1: %U of Parameter 2:

Details of Reference MaterialUsed 0.0016 %

CRMISRM ID Measurement Uncertainity (t)
TYPE A Evaluation:
x1 x2 5
Readings:(a) 0.071 0.072 0.070 0.072 0.074
0.00000324 0.00000004 0.00000484
0.00000064 0.00000004| 0.072
No. of Readings(n)= 5 Average
4
Standard Deviation s(xF 0.001483 Degree offreedom (v)F
Standard Uncertainity U(A)= 0.0007
TYPE BEvaluation: Effective
Certificate degree of
U(B) Source value:
Diviser-k: Uncertainity Freedom:
Veff
Uncertainity of U(Mc= Equipment #VALUE!
Uncertainity of U(CRMSRM)= CRM 0.0016 1.96 0.000816327
Coverage factor at 95% 2.06
Combined Uncertainity: UC) 0.0011 Confidence Level (K)=|

Effective degree of Freedom: Veff 25.3 3.0178

% Uncertainity (%U)=
Expanded Uncertainity: U 0.002
Result
Y 0.002 0.072 %with coveragefactor k=2.06 for Confidencelevel of 95% &Veff 25.3

PREPARED BY: TM APPORVED BY: QM

 Doc. No.: CLPLUF/7.6/01

C
CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD Rev. No. - -

Uncertainty of Measurement Rev. Dt

Test Details: Chemical Analysis by ODES

Name: Titanium Date: 15.02.2022

Department Chemical
Test Method: IS 8811/ASTM E415 Unit: Range: 0.0001% to 0.50%

Details of Test Equipment Used

Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity (t)
%U of Parameter 1:
%U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
CRM/SRMA ID Measurement Uncertainity(t) 0.002 %
TYPE A Evaluation:
x3 X5
Readings: (x) x1 K4

0.005 0.007 0.008 0.007 0.006

, -=)* 0.00000256 0.00000016 0.00000196 0.00000016 0.00000036|
No. of Readings (n)= 5 Average 0.007
Standard Deviation s(x) 0.0011401 Degree offreedom (V= 4

Standard Uncertainity U(A)= 0.0005 %

TYPE B Evaluation:
Effective
UB) Source
Certificate
Diviser-k:
Uncertainity degreeof
value: y|Freedom:
V eff
Uncertainity of U(Mc)F Equipment #VALUE!
Uncertainity ofU(CRM/SRM)= CRM 0.0020 1.96 0.001020408
Coverage factor at 95%|
Combined Uncertainity: U(C) 0.0011
Confidence Level (K)=|
1.96

Effective degree ofFreedom: Vef 100.2 % Uncertainity (%U)= 33.8758

Expanded Uncertainity: U O.002
Result:
Y= 0.002@ 0.007 % with coveragefactor k=1.96for Confidence level of95%& Veff 100.2

PREPAREDBY : TM APPORVED BY: QM

 Doc. No.: CLPL/F/7.6/01

CRESSC0 LABS PVT LTD Rev. No. --

C Uncertainty of Measurement Rev. Dt:

Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES

Name: Tungsten Date: 15.02.20222
Department: Chemical
Test Method: IS8811/ASTM E415 Unit: Range 0.05% to 0.5%
Details of Test Equipment Used
Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity ()
6U of Parameter 1: %U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
CRM/SRM ID |Measurement Uncertainity () 0.0020.002 %
TYPE AEvaluation:
x1 x2 x3 x4 5
Readings:() 0.13 0.11 0.12 0.13 12
0.00006400 0.00014400 0.00000400 0.00006400 0.00000400
0.122
5 Average
Standard Deviation s(x}= 0.008367 Degree of freedom (v)
Standard Uncertainity UA= 0.0037 %
TYPE B Evaluation:
Effective
Certificate Uncertainity degree
UB) Source
value:
Diviser-k:
Freedom:
Veff
Uncertainity of U(Mc)= Equipment #VALUE!
Uncertainity of U(CRM/SRM)= CRM 0.0020 1.96 0.001020408|
Coverage factor at 95%
Combined Uncertainity: U(C) 0.0039
Confidence Level (K)=|
2.57

Effective degree of Freedom: Veff 4.6

%Uncertainity (%U)= 8.1699
Expanded Uncertainity: U 0.010
Result:
Y= 0.010 @0.122 %with coverage factor k=2.57 for Confidencelevel of 95%&Veff 4.6

ant
PREPARED BY: TM APPORVED BY: QM
 Doc. No.: CLPUF7.6/01

CRESSC0 LABS PVT LTD Rev. No.

Uncertainty of Measurement Rev. Dt

Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES 15.02.2022

Date:
Name: Vanadium
Department: Chemical 0.0001% to 0.80%
IS 8811/ASTM E415 Unit: Range:
Test Method:
Details of Test Equipment Used
Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity ()
%U of Parameter 1: 9%0 of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used 0.006
CRM/SRM ID Measurement Uncertainity (t)
TYPE AEvaluation: x2 x3 x4 x5
x1
Readings: (%) 0.38 0.37 0.39 0.39 0.40

0.00001600 0.00001600 0.00019600

0.00003600 0.00025600
5 Average= 0.386
N. Ui Reauíuys(n) 4
Standard Deviation s(x}= 0.011402 Degree of freedom (v)
Standard Uncertainity U(A)= 0.0051 %
TYPE BEvaluation: Effective
degree of
Certificate
UB) Source value:
Diviser-k: Uncertainity Freedom:
Veff
Uncertainity of U(Mc)= Equipment #VALUE!
Uncertainity of U(CRM/SRM)= CRM 0.006 1.96 0.003061224|
Coverage factor at 95% Confidence 2.36
Combined Uncertainity: U(C) 0.0059
Level (K)

Effective degree of Freedom: V eff 74 % Uncertainity (%U)= 3.6362

Expanded Uncertainity: U 0.014
Result:
Y= 0.014@0.386 % with coveragefactor k=2.36 for Confidence level of 95% &Veff
7.4

PREPARED BY TM APPORVEDBY QM
 Doc. No.: CLPUF7.6/01
CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD Rev. No.
Uncertainty of Measurement Rev. Dt:-

Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES 15.02.2022

Name: Bismuth Date:
Department: Chemical
0.001% to 0.1%
Test Method: IS 11035/ ASTM E1251 Unit: Range:
Details of Test Equipment Used
Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity (t)
%U of Parameter 1: %Uof Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
0.008 %
CRMISRM ID Measurement Uncertainity (t)
TYPE A Evaluation:

Readings: () x2 x3
0.0753 0.0770 0.0682 0.0698 0.0685

t.-
No. of Readings (n)=
0.00001253 0.00002746 0.00001267|
5 Average =
0.00000384 0.00001063
0.07176
0.004097 Degree of freedom (v)= 4
Standard Deviation s(x}=

Standard Uncertainity U{AJ= 0.0018 o

TYPE B Evaluation: Effective

Certificate Diviser-k: Uncertainitydegree of
U(B) Source
value: nity Freedom
Veff
Uncertainity of U(Mc) Equipment
Uncertainity of U{CRM/SRM)= CRM 0.0080 1.96 0.004081633
Coverage factor at 95%| 1.96
Combined Uncertainity: U(C) 0.0045 Confidence Level (K)=

Effective degree of Freedom: V eff 142.2 %Uncertainity (%U}= 12.2198

Expanded Uncertainity: U 6.009

Result
Y= 0.009 @0.07176 % with coverage factor k=1.96 for Confidence level of 95% &Veff 142.2

PREPAREDBY TM APPORVED BY: QM

 Doc. No. CLPUF/7.6/01

CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD Rev. No.-

CH Uncertainty of Measurement Rev.Dt:

Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES 15.02.2022

Chromium
Date:
Name:
Department: Chemical 0.0010% to 0.50%

Test Method: IS 11035/ASTM E1251 Unit: % Range:

Details of Test Equipment Used Measurement Uncertainity (t)
Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1
|%U of Parameter 1: %U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used %
Measurement Uncertainity ( 0.006
CRM/SRM ID
TYPE A Evaluation: x4 x5
x1 x2 x3
Readings: (k) 0.037 0.035 0.036
0.036 0.038
0.00000036 0.00000196 0.00000016
|0.00000016 0.00000256||
5 Average 0.0364
|No. of Readings (n)
Degree of freedom (v)=| 4
Standard Deviation stx)= 0.001140

Standard Uncertainity U(A)= 0.0005 %

TYPE B Evaluation:
Effective
Certificate Uncertainity degree of
Diviser-k:
U(B) Source
value |Freedom:
eff

Uncertainity of U(Mc)F Equipment

CRM 0.006 1.96 0.003061224
Uncertainity of U(CRMSRM)
Coverage factor at 95% 1.96
Combined Uncertainity: U(C) 0.0031 Confidence Level (K)=F

Effective degree of Freedom: V eff 5488.6 % Uncertainity %U)= 16.7106

Expanded Uncertainity: U 0.006
Result 5488.6
95%&Veff
Y= 0.006 @0.0364 % with coveragefactor k=1.96 for Confidence level of

PREPARED BY: TM APPORVED BY: QM

 Doc. No.: CLPLUFI76/01
CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD
C Uncortainty of Moasuroment
Rev. No.
Rev. Dt:

Tost Detalls: Chomical Analysls by OES

15.02.2022
Name: Cobalt Date:
Department Chemical
0.0002% to 0.05%
Test Method: Is11035/ASTME1261 Unlt: % Range:
Details of Test Equipment Usod
Equipment 1D: CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity (t)
%U of Parameter 1: %U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
CRM/SRM D Measurement Uncertainity () 0.010.001 %
TYPE A Evaluation:
4 5
Readings: (M) x1 x2 x3
0.0226
0.0231 0.0233 0.0230 0.0224
0.00000005 0.00000018 0.00000001 0.00000023 0.00000008
Average= 0.02288
No. of Readings (n= 5
Standard Deviation stx}= 0.000370 Degree of freedom (v)= 4

Standard Uncertainity U(A)= 0.0002 %

TYPE B Evaluation:
Effective

Source
Certificate
Diviser-k:
Uncertainity degree of
U(B) Freedom:
value
V eff

Uncertainity of U(Mc)F Equipment

Uncertainity of U(CRM/SRM)= CRM 0.001 1.96 0.000510204
Coverage factor at 95%|
Combined Uncertainity: UC) 0.0005 1.96
Confidence Level (K)=|

Effective degree of Freedom: Veff 441.0 %Uncertainity (%U)= 4.5949

Expanded Uncertainity: U O.001
Result:
Y: 0.001 @ 0.02288 % with coveragefactor k=1.96 for Confidence level of 95% &Veff 441.0

PREPARED BY TM APPORVED BY : QM
 Doc. No.: CLPLUF76/01
CRESSCO LABS PVTLTD Rev. No.
Uncertainty of Measurement Rev. Dt

Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES

Name: Copper Da e 15.02 2022
Department Chemical
Test Method: IS 11035/ASTM E1251 Unit: Range: 0.0010% to 6.0%
Details ofTest Equipment Used
Equipment 1D: CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity (t)
%U of Parameter 1: %U of Parameter 2: -
Details of Reference Material Used
CRMISRM ID Measurement Uncertainity (t) 0.035 %

TYPE AEvaluation:
x1 x2 x3 x4 X5
Readings: ()
3.01 2.97 2.94 2.92 2.89
0.00409600 0.0005760 0.0000360 0.00067600| 0.00313600
No. of Readings (n)= 5 Average 2.946

Standard Deviation s(x)= O.046152 Degree of freedom ()=|

Standard Uncertainity U(A)= 0.0206 %
TYPE B Evaluation:
Effective
U(B) Source Certificate Diviser-k: Uncertainit degree of
value: Freedom:
Veff
Uncertainity of U(Mc)= Equipment
Uncertainity of U(CRMISRM)= CRM 0.035 1.96 0.0178571
Coverage factor at 95%|
Combined Uncertainity: UC) 0.0273
Confidence Level (K)=|
2.18

Effective degree of Freedom: Veff 12.2

Expanded Uncertainity:U .059 %Uncertainity (%U}= 2.0196

Result:
Y= 0.059 2.946 with coverage factor k=2.18 for Confidence level of 95% &Veff 12.2

PREPARED BY: TM APPORVED BY : QM

 Doc. No.: CLPLUF/7.6/01
CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD Rev. No.
Uncertainty of Measurement Rev.Dt
Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES
Name: Iron Date: 15.02.2022
Department: Chemical
Test Method: IS 11035/ASTM E1251 Unit: Range: 0.030% to 2.50%
-

Details of Test Equipment Used

Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity(t)
%U of Parameter 1: %U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
CRMISRM ID Measurement Uncertainity (t) 0.014
TYPE AEvaluation:
Readings: (%) x2 x3 x4 x5
0.93 0.96 0.92 0.91 0.92
|0.00000400 0.00102400 0.00006400 0.00032400 0.00006400
No. of Readings (n) 0.928
Average
Standard Deviation s(x}F 0.019235 Degree of freedom (V)= 4

Standard Uncertainity U(A)= 0.0086 %

TYPE B Evaluation:
Effective
Certificate degree of
U(B) Source
value:
Diviser-k: Uncertainity| Freedom:
Veff

Uncertainity ofU(Mc)= Equipment

Uncertainity of U(CRM/SRM)= CRM 0.0140 1.96 0.007142857 |
Coverage factor at 95%|
Combined Uncertainity: U(C) 0.0112
Confidence Level (K}=
2.20

Effective degree of Freedom: V eff 11.4 % Uncertainity (%U)= 2.6507

Expanded Uncertainity: U o.025
Result:
Y= 0.025 @0.928 %withcoveragefactor k=2.20 for Confidence level of95%&Veff 11.4

PREPARED BY:TM APPORVED BY: QM

 Doc. No.: CLPUF7 6/01
CRESSCO LABS PVTLTD Rev. No.
Uncertainty of Measurement Rev. Dt

Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES

Name: Lead Date: Date: 15.02.2022
Department: Chemical
Test Method: IS1035/ASTM E1251 UnitUnit: % Range: 0.0010% to 0.40%
Details of Test Equipment Used
Equipment 1D: CLPL-CH-1
Measurement Uncertainity ()
%U of Parameter 1 :
9%U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
CRMISRM ID Measurement Uncertainity (t) 0.005
TYPE AEvaluation:
Readings: () x1 x2 x3 x5
0.058 0.057 0.056 0.055 0.055

0.00000324| 0.00000064 0.00000004 0.000001 0.00000144

No. of Readings (n)= Average 0.0562
Standard Deviation s(x) 0.001304 Degree of freedom (v)=

Standard Uncertainity U(A}= 0.0006 %

TYPE B Evaluation:
Effective
Certificate Uncertain degree of
U(B) Source
value:
Diviser-k:
ity Freedom:
Veff

Uncertainity of U(Mc)= Equipment #VALUE!

|Uncertainity of U(CRMISRM CRM 0.005 196 1.96 0.002551
Coverage factor at 95%|
Combined Uncertainity: UC) 0.0026
Confidence Level (K)=
1.96

Effective degree ofFreedom: Veff 1622.5

%Uncertainity (%U}= 9.1262
Expanded Uncertainity:U 0.005
Result:
Y 0.005 @0.0562 with coverage factor k=1.96for Confidencelevel of95%& Veff 1622.5

PREPARED BY: TM APPORVED BY: QM

 Doc. No. CLPUFI7.6/01
CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD Rev. No.
R e v . Dt: -
Uncertainty of Measurement

Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES 15.02.2022

Name: Magnesium (Mg) Date:
Department: Chemical 0.0010% to 4.0%
Test Method: IS 11035 /IASTM E1251
Unit: Range:
Details of Test Equipment Used
Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity (t)
6U of Parameter 1: %U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used 0.011
CRMISRM ID Measurement Uncertainity (t)
TYPE A Evaluation:
x1 x2 x3 x4 x5
Readings:(x) 0.67 0.68 0.68 0.69 0.70
0.00019600 0.00001600 0.00001600 0.00003600 0.00025600
Average 0.684
No. of Readings (n)
Standard Deviation s(x 0.011402 Degree of freedom ()=

0.0051 %
Standard Uncertainity
U(A=
TYPE BEvaluation:
Effective
degree of
Certificate
U(B) Source
value:
Diviser-k:
UncertainityFreedom: eff

Uncertainity of U(Mc) Equipment

Uncertainity of U(CRM/SRM)= CRM 0.011 1.96 0.005612245
Coverage factor at 95% 2.09
Combined Uncertainity: U(C) 0.0076
Confidence Level (K)F

Effective degree of Freedom: V eff 19.6 % Uncertainity (%U)= 2.3169

Expanded Uncertainity: U 0.016
Result: 19.6
Y= 0.016@ 0.684 with coverage factor k=2.09 for Confidence level of 95%& Veff

PREPARED BY: TM APPORVED BY : QM

 Doc. No.: CLPLUFI7.6/01
CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD
C
Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES
Uncertainty of Measurement
Rev. No. -

Rev. Dt

Name: Manganese (Mn) Date: 15.02.2022

Department: Chemical
Test Method: IS 11035/ASTM E1251| Jnit: Range: 0.005% to 0.50%
Details of Test Equipment Used
Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity (t)
%6U of Parameter 1: %U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
CRM/SRM D Measurement Uncertainity (t) 0.002
TYPE A Evaluation:
x4 5
Readings: (*) x1 x2 X3
0.57
0.55 0.55 0.54 0.56
0.00001600 0.00001600 0.0001960o 0.00003600 0.00025600
No. of Readings (n) Average: 0.554

Standard Deviation s(x)=F 0.011402 Degree of freedom (v)F|

Standard Uncertainity U(A)= 0.0051 %

TYPE B Evaluation:
Effective

U(B) Source
Certificate
Diviser-k: Uncertainity degree of
value: Freedom:
V eff

Uncertainity of U{Mc)= Equipment #VALUE!

Uncertainity of U(CRM/SRM)= CRM 0.0020 1.96 0.001020408
Coverage factor at 95%
Combined Uncertainity: U(C) 0.0052
Confidence Level (K)=
2.78

Effective degree of Freedom: Veff 4.3

% Uncertainity (%U)= 2.60
Expanded Uncertainity:U O.014
Result:
Y 0.014 @0.554 %with coverage factor k=2.78 for Confidencelevel of 95%&Veff 4.3

PREPARED BY:TM APPORVED BY: QM

 Doc. No.: CLPUF/7.6/01
CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD Rev. No.-
Uncertainty of Measurement Rev. Dt

Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES

Name: Nickel Date: 15.02.2022
Department: Chemical
Test Method: IS 11035/ASTM E1251 Unit: Range: 0.0010% to 2.0%
Details of Test Equipment Used
Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity (t)
%U of Parameter 1: %U ofParameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
CRM/SRM ID Measurement Uncertainity () 0.001 %
TYPE A Evaluation:
x1 x2 x3 x4 5
Readings: (%)
0.096 0.092 0.091 0.090 0.090
0.00001764 0.00000004 0.00000064 0.00000324 0.00000324
No. of Readings (n =
5 Average =F 0.0918

Standard Deviation s(xj= 0.002490 Degree of freedom (v=

Standard Uncertainity U(A)= 0.0011 %

TYPE BEvaluation:
Effective
Certificate Uncertainitygreeof
U(B) Source Diviser-k:
value: Freedom:
Veff
Uncertainity of U{Mc)= Equipment #VALUE!
Uncertainity of U{CRM/SRM)= CRM 0.001 1.96 0.000510204|
Coverage factor at 95%
Combined Uncertainity: U(C) 0.0012 245
Confidence Level (K=|
Effective degree of Freedom: V eff 5.9
% Uncertainity (%U}= 3.2690
Expanded Uncertainity: U 0.003

Result:
Y- 0.003 @o.0918 %with coveragefactor k=2.45 for Confidencelevelof 95%&Veff 5.9

PREPARED BY: TM APPORVED BY : QM

 Doc. No.: CLPLUF7 6/01
CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD
C Uncertainty of Measurement
Rev. No.
Rev. Dt
Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES
Name: Silicon Date: 15.02.2022
Department: Chemical
Test Method: IS11035/ASTM E1261 Unit: Range: 0.010% to 12.0%
Details of Test Equipment Used
Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1
Measurement Uncertainity(t)
%U of Parameter 1: %U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
CRMISRM ID Measurement Uncertainity () 0.063
TYPE A Evaluation:

Readings: () x1 x3
8.02 7.97 7.99 7.95 7.94
0.00211600 0.00001600 0.00025600 0.00057600 0.00115600
No. of Readings (n= 5 Average= 7.974
Standard Deviation stxj= 0.032094 Degree of freedom (v)F 4

Standard Uncertainity U(A)= 0.0144 %

TYPE B Evaluation:
Effective
Certificate Uncertainity degree of
UB) Source
value:
Diviser-k:
UncertainityFreedom: Veff

Uncertainity of U(Mc)= Equipment #VALUE!

Uncertainity of U(CRM/SRM}= CRM 0.063 1.96 0.032142857|
Coverage factor at 95%
Combined Uncertainity: U(C) 0.0352
Confidence Level (K)=| 1.96

Effective degree of Freedom: Veff 144.7

% Uncertainity (%U)= 0.8653
Expanded Uncertainity: U O.069
Result:
|Y= 0.069 7.974 % with coverage factor k=1.96for Confidence level of 95% &Veff 144.7

em
PREPARED BY: TM APPORVED BY: QM
 Doc. No.: CLPL/FI7.6/01
CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD
C Uncertainty of Measurement
Rev. No.
Rev. Dt:-
Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES
Name: Tin Date: 15.02.2022
Department: Chemical
Test Method IS 11035/ASTM E1251 Unit:
Range: 0.0001% to 0.25%
Details of Test Equipment Used
Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 |Measurement Uncertainity ()
%U of Parameter 1: |%U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
CRM/SRM ID
TYPE A Evaluation:
Measurement Uncertainity () 0010 0.010
x1 x2 K3 x4 x5
Readings:(k) 0.142 0.146 0.1
145 0.147 0.143
0.00000676 0.00000196 0.00000016 0.00000576 0.00000256
No. of Readings (n =
5 Average 0.1446
Standard Deviation s(x} 0.002074 Degree of freedom (vJ= 4

Standard Uncertainity U(A}= 0.0009 %

TYPE B Evaluation:

Effective
Certificate degree of
UB) Source
value
Diviser-k:
Uncertainity Freedom:
Veff

Uncertainity of U(Mc) Equipment #VALUE!

Uncertainity of U{CRM/SRM)= CRM 0.0100 1.96 0.005102041

Coverage factor at 95%
Combined Uncertainity: U{C) 0.0052
Confidence Level (K)=|
1.96

Effective degree of Freedom: V eff 3910.9

% Uncertainity (%U}= 7.0289
Expanded Uncertainity: U 0.010
Result:
Y= 0.010@0.1446 %with coverage factor k=1.96for Confidencelevel of 95%& Veff 3910.9

Aml
PREPARED BY: TM APPORVED BY: QM
 Doc. No.: CLPL/FI7.6/01
CRESSC0 LABS PVT LTD
C Uncertainty of Measurement
Rev. No.
Rev. Dt:

Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES

Name: Titanium Date: 15.02.2022
Department: Chemical
0.0010% to 0.40%
Test Method: IS 11035/ASTM E1251 Unit: % Range
Details of Test Equipment Used
Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity (t) %
6U of Parameter1: 9%U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
CRMISRM ID Measurement Uncertainity () 0.0010.001 L %
TYPE A Evaluation:
x1 2 x3 x4 x5
Readings: («) 0.051
0.056 0.054 0.052 0.052
0.00000900 0.00000100 0.00000100 0.00000100 0.00000400
No. of Readings (n) = 5
Average= 0.053
Standard Deviation s(x}= 0.002000 Degree of freedom (v)=
Standard Uncertainity U(A)= 0.0009 %
TYPE B Evaluation:

Effective
Certificate degree of
U(B) Source Diviser-k: Uncertainity
value: Freedom:
V eff
Uncertainity of U(Mc)F Equipment | #VALUE!
Uncertainity of U(CRMISRM)= CRM 0.001 1.96 0.000510204|
Coverage factor at 95%
Combined Uncertainity: UIc) 0.0010
Confidence Level (K)=
2.36

Effective degree of Freedom: V eff 7.0

% Uncertainity (%U)= 4.5851
Expanded Uncertainity: U 0.002
Result:
Y= 0.002 0.053 with coverage factor k=2.36 for Confidence level of 95% &Veff 7.0

PREPARED BY: TM APPORVED BY : QM

 Doc. No.: CLPLUF/I7 6/01
CRESSCO LABS PVT LTD
C
Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES
Uncertainty of Measurement
Rev. No.
Rev. Dt

Name: Vanadium Date: 15.02.2022

Department Chemical
Test Method S 11035/ASTM E1251
Details of Test Equipment Used
Unt: Unit: Range: 0.010% to 0.050%
Equipment ID: CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncertainity (t) %

%U ofParameter1: %U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
CRM/SRM ID
TYPE AEvaluation:
Measurement Uncertainity () 0.002 0.002 %

x1 x3 5
Readings: (K)
0.0123 0.0119 0.0112 0.0117 0.0118
0.00000027 0.00000001 0.00000034 0.00000001 0.00000000
No. of Readings (n)= Average 0.01178

Standard Deviation s(x)= 0.000396 Degree of freedom (v)=F

Standard Uncertainity U(A)= 0.0002

TYPE B Evaluation:
Effective

U(B) Source Certificate| Diviser-k: Uncertainitydegreeof

value: Freedom:
Veeff
Uncertainity of U{Mc)= Equipment #VALUE!
Uncertainity of U{CRMISRM}= CRM 0.002 1.96 0.001020408
Coverage factor at 95%|
Combined Uncertainity: U{C) 0.0010
Confidence Level (K}=|
1.96

Effective degree of Freedom: Veff 4667.7

%Uncertainity (%U)= 17.2320
Expanded Uncertainity: U 0.002
|Result:
Y- 0.002 @00178 with coveragefactor k=1.96for Confidencelevelof95%&Veff 4667.7

PREPARED BY : TM APPORVED BY: QM

 Doc. No. CLPUF7 6/01
CRESSCO LABS PVTLTD Rev. No

C Uncertainty of Measurement Rev. Dt

Test Details: Chemical Analysis by OES

Name Zinc Date: 15.02.2022

Department: Chemical
Test Method: IS11035/ ASTM E1251 Unit: % Range: o.0080% to 7.0%
Details of Test Equipment Used
CLPL-CH-1 Measurement Uncerainity (t)
Equipment ID:
%U ofParameter 1: 9%U of Parameter 2:
Details of Reference Material Used
CRM/SRM ID | Measurement Uncertainity (t) I 0.013 L
TYPE AEvaluation: 5
x1 x2 x3 x4
Readings:(x) 0.86 0.86 0.85 0.84 0.87
0.00001600 0.00001600 0.00003600 0.00025600 0.00019600
No. of Readings
(n= Average: 0.856
Standard Deviation s(x}= 0.011402 Degree of freedom (v)=

Standard Uncertainity U(A= 0.0051 %

TYPE B Evaluation:
Effective

UB) Source Certficate Diviser-k: Uncertainitydegree of

value: Freedom:
Veeff

Uncertainity of U(Mc) Equipment

Uncertainity ofU(CRM/SRM CRM 0.013 1.96 0.006632653
Coverage factor at 95%
Combined Uncertainity: uc) 0.0084 2.04
Confidence Level (K)=

Effective degree of Freedom: V eff 29.0

%Uncertainity (%U)= 1.9938
Expanded Uncertainity: U 617
Result
Y 0.017 0.856 with coveragefactor k=2.04for Confidencelevelof 95%& Vef 29.0

PREPARED BY: TM APPORVED BY:QM

 recommended scope is 0.002%@0.024%
Low Alloy ASTM E 415: 0.003 % @ Adequate through 0.0010 to 0.10 % based on
120 Aluminium 0.001 % to 2.0 % Adequate
Steel 2017 0.088 % Document Review test witnessed and
availability of CRM.

based on test witnessed and 0.002%@0.024%

Test/Calibration availability of CRM for upper
Low Alloy IS 8811 : 0.003 % @ Witness,Adequate range of Aluminium content
121 Aluminium 0.001 % to 2.0 % Adequate
Steel 1998 : 2018 0.088 % through Document 1.648 in 12X15258P ,
Review recommended for requested
testing methods with range

after reviewing documents, 0.0001%@0.002

test witnessed, and %
availability of CRM,
Low Alloy IS 8811 : 0.0001 % to 0.001 % @ Adequate through laboratory can perform
122 Boron Adequate
Steel 1998 : 2018 0.015 % 0.010 % Document Review requested testing range and
test method is
recommended for
accreditation

Low Alloy ASTM E 415: 0.0001 % to 0.001 % @ Test/Calibration 0.0001%@0.002

123 Boron Adequate %
Steel 2017 0.015 % 0.010 % Witness

Low Alloy ASTM E 415: 0.0015 % to 1.2 0.007 % @ Test/Calibration 0.016%@0.268%

124 Carbon Adequate
Steel 2017 % 0.392 % Witness

Based on test witnessed and 0.016%@0.268%

availability of CRM , it is
Low Alloy IS 8811 : 0.0015 % to 1.2 0.007 % @ Adequate through
125 Carbon Adequate recommended for requested
Steel 1998: 2018 % 0.392 % Document Review
range by requested test
methods

based on test witnessed and 0.014%@0.494%

availability of CRM , review
Low Alloy ASTM E 415: 0.008 % @ Adequate through
126 Chromium 0.002 % to 3.0 % Adequate of earlier tested data, it is
Steel 2017 0.639 % Document Review
recommended for requested
range and test method
 Laboratory has CRM - IARM 0.014%@0.494%
196A -:2.35 , having various
range of chromium content ,
Low Alloy IS 8811 : 0.008 % @ Adequate through
127 Chromium 0.002 % to 3.0 % Adequate based on test witnessed,
Steel 1998 : 2018 0.639 % Document Review
review of earlier tested data,
orbis recommended scope
by requested test methods

based on test witnessed, 0.010%@0.312%

availability of CRM, it is
Low Alloy IS 8811 : 0.001 % to 0.60 0.005 % @ Adequate through
128 Cobalt Adequate recommended requested
Steel 1998: 2018 % 0.309 % Document Review
scope by requested test
method.

based on test witnessed and 0.010%@0.312%

availability of CRM for
Low Alloy ASTM E 415: 0.001 % to 0.60 0.005 % @ Adequate through
129 Cobalt Adequate requested range and test
Steel 2017 % 0.309 % Document Review
methods, it is recommended
for same.

based on test witnessed and 0.001%@0.080%

availability of CRM , review
of earlier CRM consistent
Low Alloy IS 8811 : 0.002 % @ Adequate through
130 Copper 0.001 % to 0.5 % Adequate results , recommended for
Steel 1998: 2018 0.108 % Document Review
same requested by
laboratory for same test
methods

Low Alloy ASTM E 415: 0.002 % @ Test/Calibration 0.001%@0.080%

131 Copper 0.001 % to 0.5 % Adequate
Steel 2017 0.108 % Witness

Based on test witnessed, 0.006@%0.015%

availability of test CRM
Low Alloy IS 8811 : 0.001 % to 0.45 0.0095 % @ Adequate through having various range of Pb
132 Lead Inadequate
Steel 1998: 2018 % 0.327 % Document Review and max . 0.328 in 14 X
12144. it is recommended
for same

Low Alloy ASTM E 415: 0.001 % to 0.45 0.0095 % @ Laboratory doesn't have 0.006@%0.015%
133 Lead Inadequate
Steel 2017 % 0.327 % CRM above 0.0005 % and
 not detected correctly. so it
is not recommended for
accreditation for requested
range .

Test/Calibration laboratory can perform 0.024%@1.216%

Low Alloy ASTM E 415: 0.023 % @ Witness,Adequate testing for requested range
134 Manganese 0.10 % to 2.6 % Adequate
Steel 2017 1.225 % through Document as has various range of Mn
Review content in CRM.

based on test witnessed and 0.024%@1.216%

availability of CRM, review of
Low Alloy IS 8811 : 0.023 % @ Adequate through
135 Manganese 0.10 % to 2.6 % Adequate earlier tested results, it is
Steel 1998: 2018 1.225 % Document Review
recommended for requested
Mn range by test methods

Based on test witnessed and 0.014%@0.166%

availability of CRM, and
Low Alloy ASTM E 415: 0.005 % @ Adequate through review of earlier tested data,
136 Molybdenum 0.001 % to 2.0 % Adequate
Steel 2017 0.363 % Document Review it is recommended for
requested range and test
method

Low Alloy IS 8811 : 0.005 % @ Test/Calibration 0.014%@0.166%

137 Molybdenum 0.001 % to 2.0 % Adequate
Steel 1998 : 2018 0.363 % Witness

Low Alloy ASTM E 415: 0.007 % @ Test/Calibration 0.014%@0.536%

138 Nickel 0.008 % to 5.6 % Adequate
Steel 2017 0.496 % Witness

Low Alloy IS 8811 : 0.007 % @ Test/Calibration 0.014%@0.536%

139 Nickel 0.008 % to 5.6 % Adequate
Steel 1998 : 2018 0.496 % Witness

Low Alloy IS 8811 : 0.010 % to 0.80 0.0035 % @ Test/Calibration 0.012%@0.140%

140 Niobium Adequate
Steel 1998: 2018 % 0.134 % Witness

based on test witnessed, 0.012%@0.140%

Low Alloy ASTM E 415: 0.010 % to 0.80 0.0035 % @ Adequate through
141 Niobium Adequate availability of CRM
Steel 2017 % 0.134 % Document Review
12X152261 content is 0.60
 of Niobium in Low alloy
steel, sgope is
recommended by requested
test method

based on test witnessed and 0.002%@0.017%

availability of CRM having
phosphorous CRM 12X
Low Alloy ASTM E 415: 0.001 % to 0.10 0.002 % @ Adequate through 15261 _ X is 0.090 , review
142 Phosphorous Adequate
Steel 2017 % 0.067 % Document Review of earlier tested results,
recommended for same
scope by requested test
methods

Low Alloy IS 8811 : 0.001 % to 0.10 0.002 % @ Test/Calibration 0.002%@0.017%

143 Phosphorous Adequate
Steel 1998: 2018 % 0.067 % Witness

Low Alloy ASTM E 415: 0.014 % @ Test/Calibration 0.014%@0.234%

144 Silicon 0.002 % to 2.0 % Adequate
Steel 2017 1.022 % Witness

based on test witnessed and 0.014%@0.234%

availability of CRM having
Low Alloy IS 8811 : 0.014 % @ Adequate through 1.513 in 12X 15256 X
145 Silicon 0.002 % to 2.0 % Adequate
Steel 1998: 2018 1.022 % Document Review ,recommended for requested
range by requested test
methods

based on test witnessed and 0.003%@0.031%

availability of CRM max.
Low Alloy ASTM E 415: 0.001 % to 0.50 0.002 % @ Adequate through
146 Sulphur Adequate 14X12144 having 0.325,
Steel 2017 % 0.034 % Document Review
recommended scope for
requested test methods

Low Alloy IS 8811 : 0.001 % to 0.50 0.002 % @ Test/Calibration 0.003%@0.031%

147 Sulphur Adequate
Steel 1998 : 2018 % 0.034 % Witness

base on test witnessed and 0.002%@0.072%

Low Alloy IS 8811 : 0.0006 % to 0.15 0.0017 % @ Adequate through
148 Tin Adequate availability of CRM, technical
Steel 1998: 2018 % 0.072 % Document Review
compentenct of laboratory
 personnel, it is
recommended for requested
range of testing by
requested test method.for
Sn

Low Alloy ASTM E 415: 0.0006 % to 0.15 0.0017 % @ Test/Calibration 0.002%@0.072%

149 Tin Adequate
Steel 2017 % 0.072 % Witness

based on test witnessed and 0.002%@0.007%

availability of CRM 12 15261
Low Alloy IS 8811 : 0.0001 % to 0.50 0.002 % @ Adequate through X with Ti 0.385, it is
150 Titanium Adequate
Steel 1998: 2018 % 0.101 % Document Review recommended for requested
range of scope by requested
test methods.

Test/Calibration 0.002%@0.007%
Low Alloy ASTM E 415: 0.0001 % to 0.50 0.002 % @
151 Titanium Inadequate Witness,
Steel 2017 % 0.101 %
Inadequate

Low Alloy IS 8811 : 0.002 % @ Test/Calibration 0.010%@0.122%

152 Tungsten 0.05 % to 0.5 % Adequate
Steel 1998 : 2018 0.126 % Witness

Low Alloy ASTM E 415: 0.002 % @ Test/Calibration 0.010%@0.122%

153 Tungsten 0.05 % to 0.5 % Adequate
Steel 2017 0.126 % Witness

based on test witnessed and 0.014%@0.386%

availability of CRM,
Low Alloy ASTM E 415: 0.0001 % to 0.80 0.007 % @ Adequate through
154 Vanadium Adequate recommended scope by
Steel 2017 % 0.384 % Document Review
requested test method for
Vanadium

Low Alloy IS 8811 : 0.0001 % to 0.80 0.007 % @ Test/Calibration 0.014%@0.386 %

155 Vanadium Adequate
Steel 1998 : 2018 % 0.384 % Witness

Discipline: Sub Group: Aluminium & its

Group: Metals & Alloys
Chemical alloys
 based in Witnessed, 0.009%@0.07176
availability of CRM , %
Aluminium & ASTM E 0.009 % @ Adequate through capability of technical
156 Bismuth 0.001 % to 0.1 % Adequate
its alloys 1251: 2017 0.072 % Document Review personnel, it is
recommended for scope by
requested test method

IS 0.009%@0.07176
Aluminium & 0.009 % @ Test/Calibration
157 Bismuth 11035:1984: 0.001 % to 0.1 % Adequate %
its alloys 0.072 % Witness
2019

Aluminium & ASTM E 0.0010 % to 0.50 0.012 % @ Test/Calibration 0.006%@0.0364

158 Chromium Adequate %
its alloys 1251: 2017 % 0.202 % Witness

based on widespread of 0.006%@0.0364

CRMS of Aluminium , %
IS
Aluminium & 0.0010 % to 0.50 0.012 % @ Adequate through availability of CRM, it is
159 Chromium 11035:1984: Adequate
its alloys % 0.202 % Document Review recommended for requested
2019
range by requested test
method

0.001%@0.02288
Aluminium & ASTM E 0.0002 % to 0.05 0.001 % @ Test/Calibration
160 Cobalt Adequate
its alloys 1251: 2017 % 0.023 % Witness %

IS 0.001%@0.02288
Aluminium & 0.0002 % to 0.05 0.001 % @ Test/Calibration
161 Cobalt 11035:1984: Adequate %
its alloys % 0.023 % Witness
2019

Aluminium & ASTM E 0.0010 % to 6.0 0.075 % @ Test/Calibration 0.059%@2.946%

162 Copper Adequate
its alloys 1251: 2017 % 4.342 % Witness

based on test witnessed and 0.059%@2.946%

availability of CRM and
IS detected ion is also withing
Aluminium & 0.0010 % to 6.0 0.075 % @ Adequate through
163 Copper 11035:1984: Adequate the acceptance criteria of
its alloys % 4.342 % Document Review
2019 MU value, capability of
laboratory personnel,
recommended for requested
 range by requested test
methods

Aluminium & ASTM E 0.030 % to 2.50 0.039 % @ Test/Calibration 0.025%@0.928%

164 Iron Adequate
its alloys 1251: 2017 % 1.786 % Witness

based on test witnessed of 0.025%@0.928%

Aluminium CRMs,
IS availability of CRMS,
Aluminium & 0.030 % to 2.50 0.039 % @ Adequate through
165 Iron 11035:1984: Adequate capability of laboratory
its alloys % 1.786 % Document Review
2019 personnel, requested test
range by requested test
method is recommended

0.005%@0.0562
Aluminium & ASTM E 0.0010 % to 0.40 0.012 % @ Test/Calibration
166 Lead Adequate
its alloys 1251: 2017 % 0.242 % Witness %

IS 0.005%@0.0562
Aluminium & 0.0010 % to 0.40 0.012 % @ Test/Calibration
167 Lead 11035:1984: Adequate %
its alloys % 0.242 % Witness
2019

Aluminium & ASTM E 0.0010 % to 4.0 0.015 % @ Test/Calibration 0.016%@0.684%

168 Magnesium Adequate
its alloys 1251: 2017 % 0.292 % Witness

IS 0.016%@0.684%
Aluminium & 0.0010 % to 4.0 0.015 % @ Test/Calibration
169 Magnesium 11035:1984: Adequate
its alloys % 0.292 % Witness
2019

Aluminium & ASTM E 0.005% to 0.002 % @ Test/Calibration 0.014%@0.554%

170 Manganese Adequate
its alloys 1251: 2017 0.50% 0.016 % Witness

Manga nese in Aluminium is 0.014%@0.554%

IS not detected correctly below
Aluminium & 0.005% to 0.002 % @
171 Manganese 11035:1984: Inadequate 0.0019 . recommended
its alloys 0.50% 0.016 %
2019 lower range is 0.005 to
0.50%
 Aluminium & ASTM E 0.0010 % to 2.0 0.001 % @ Test/Calibration 0.003%@0.0918
172 Nickel Adequate %
its alloys 1251: 2017 % 0.013 % Witness

IS 0.003%@0.0918
Aluminium & 0.0010 % to 2.0 0.001 % @ Test/Calibration
173 Nickel 11035:1984: Adequate %
its alloys % 0.013 % Witness
2019

Test/Calibration 0.069%@7.974%
Aluminium & ASTM E 0.010 % to 12.0 0.109 % @ Witness,Adequate
174 Silicon Adequate
its alloys 1251: 2017 % 7.666 % through Document
Review

Test/Calibration 0.069%@7.974%
IS
Aluminium & 0.010 % to 12.0 0.109 % @ Witness,Adequate
175 Silicon 11035:1984: Adequate
its alloys % 7.666 % through Document
2019
Review

Aluminium & ASTM E 0.0001 % to 0.25 0.004 % @ Test/Calibration 0.010%@0.1446

176 Tin Adequate %
its alloys 1251: 2017 % 0.005 % Witness

based on test witnessed and 0.010%@0.1446

IS availability of CRMs,
Aluminium & 0.0001 % to 0.25 0.004 % @ Adequate through
177 Tin 11035:1984: Adequate recommended scope is %
its alloys % 0.005 % Document Review
2019 same for requested test
methods

Aluminium & ASTM E 0.0010 % to 0.40 0.012 % @ Test/Calibration 0.002%@0.053%

178 Titanium Adequate
its alloys 1251: 2017 % 0.215 % Witness

IS 0.002%@0.053%
Aluminium & 0.0010 % to 0.40 0.012 % @ Test/Calibration
179 Titanium 11035:1984: Adequate
its alloys % 0.215 % Witness
2019

Vanadium in Aluminium is 0.002%@0.01178

not detected for 0.0042, %
Aluminium & ASTM E 0.010 % - 0.050 0.002 % @
180 Vanadium Inadequate showing 0.002, so
its alloys 1251: 2017 % 0.012 %
recommended range is
above 0.010 to 0.050.
 IS 0.002%@0.01178
Aluminium & 0.010 % - 0.050 0.002 % @ Test/Calibration
181 Vanadium 11035:1984: Adequate %
its alloys % 0.012 % Witness
2019

Aluminium & ASTM E 0.0080 % to 7.0 0.031 % @ Test/Calibration 0.017%@0.856%

182 Zinc Adequate
its alloys 1251: 2017 % 1.162 % Witness

IS 0.017%@0.856%
Aluminium & 0.0080 % to 7.0 0.031 % @ Test/Calibration
183 Zinc 11035:1984: Adequate
its alloys % 1.162 % Witness
2019

Sub Group: Carbon Steel (low

Discipline:
Group: Metals & Alloys carbon, medium carbon & high
Chemical
carbon steel)

ASTM E1999: 0.005 % to 0.03 0.003 % @ Test/Calibration 0.003%@0.030%

184 Cast Iron Aluminium Adequate
2018 % 0.030 % Witness

after reviewing documents, 0.003%@0.030%

interviewing , test
wiwitnesses of CRM , it is
IS 15338 : 0.005 % to 0.03 0.003 % @ Adequate through verified that laboratory
185 Cast Iron Aluminium Adequate
2003 : 2018 % 0.030 % Document Review personnel can capable to
perform test of Aluminium in
cast iron by requested all
test methods

ASTM E1999: 0.038 % @ Test/Calibration 0.038%@3.140%

186 Cast Iron Carbon 2.8 % to 4.3 % Adequate
2018 3.140 % Witness

IS 15338 : 0.038 % @ Test/Calibration 0.038%@3.140%

187 Cast Iron Carbon 2.8 % to 4.3 % Adequate
2003 : 2018 3.140 % Witness

ASTM E1999: 0.001 % @ Test/Calibration 0.001%@0.061%

188 Cast iron Chromium 0.02 % to 1.30 % Adequate
2018 0.061 % Witness
 IS 15338 : 0.001 % @ Test/Calibration 0.001%@0.061%
189 Cast Iron Chromium 0.02 % to 1.30 % Adequate
2003 : 2018 0.061 % Witness

Based on documentation 0.006 % @ 0.098

review, test witnessed ,,
ASTM E1999: 0.006 % @ Adequate through availability of CRM , it is %
190 Cast Iron Cobalt 0.02 % to 0.08 % Adequate
2018 0.098 % Document Review recommended for requested
test range by requested test
methods

Test/Calibration 0.006 % @ 0.098

IS 15338 : 0.006 % @ Witness,Adequate %
191 Cast Iron Cobalt 0.02 % to 0.08 % Adequate
2003 : 2018 0.098 % through Document
Review

ASTM E1999: 0.017 % @ Test/Calibration 0.017%@0.660%

192 Cast Iron Copper 0.01 % to 1.20 % Adequate
2018 0.660 % Witness

IS 15338 : 0.017 % @ Test/Calibration 0.017%@0.660%

193 Cast Iron Copper 0.01 % to 1.20 % Adequate
2003 : 2018 0.660 % Witness

IS 15338 : 0.017 % @ Test/Calibration 0.017%@0.806%

194 Cast Iron Manganese 0.50 % to 1.2 % Adequate
2003 : 2018 0.806 % Witness

ASTM E1999: 0.017 % @ Test/Calibration 0.017%@0.806%

195 Cast Iron Manganese 0.50 % to 1.2 % Adequate
2018 0.806 % Witness

ASTM E1999: 0.002 % @ Test/Calibration 0.002 % @ 0.026

196 Cast Iron Molybdenum 0.005 % to 0.1 % Adequate %
2018 0.026 % Witness

IS 15338 : 0.002 % @ Test/Calibration 0.002 % @ 0.026

197 Cast Iron Molybdenum 0.005 % to 0.1 % Adequate %
2003 : 2018 0.026 % Witness

ASTM E1999: 0.001 % @ Test/Calibration 0.001 % @ 0.063

198 Cast Iron Nickel 0.03 % to 0.1 % Adequate %
2018 0.063 % Witness
 IS 15338 : 0.001 % @ Test/Calibration 0.001 % @ 0.063
199 Cast Iron Nickel 0.03 % to 0.1 % Adequate %
2003 : 2018 0.063 % Witness

ASTM E1999: 0.004 % @ Test/Calibration 0.004 % @ 0.116

200 Cast Iron Phosphorous 0.01 % to 0.20 % Adequate %
2018 0.116 % Witness

IS 15338 : 0.004 % @ Test/Calibration 0.004 % @ 0.116

201 Cast Iron Phosphorous 0.01 % to 0.20 % Adequate %
2003 : 2018 0.116 % Witness

ASTM E1999: 0.015 % @ Test/Calibration 0.015 % @ 0.870

202 Cast Iron Silicon 0.50 % to 2.0 % Adequate %
2018 0.870 % Witness

IS 15338 : 0.015 % @ Test/Calibration 0.015 % @ 0.870

203 Cast Iron Silicon 0.50 % to 2.0 % Adequate %
2003 : 2018 0.870 % Witness

ASTM E1999: 0.002 % @ Test/Calibration 0.002 % @ 0.048

204 Cast Iron Sulphur 0.01 % to 0.10 % Adequate %
2018 0.048 % Witness

IS 15338 : 0.002 % @ Test/Calibration 0.002 % @ 0.048

205 Cast Iron Sulphur 0.01 % to 0.10 % Adequate %
2003 : 2018 0.048 % Witness

ASTM E1999: 0.003 % @ Test/Calibration 0.003 % @ 0.084

206 Cast Iron Titanium 0.02 % to 0.1 % Adequate %
2018 0.084 % Witness

IS 15338 : 0.003 % @ Test/Calibration 0.003 % @ 0.084

207 Cast Iron Titanium 0.02 % to 0.1 % Adequate %
2003 : 2018 0.084 % Witness

Test/Calibration 0.001 % @ 0.013

ASTM E1999: 0.001 % @ Witness,Adequate %
208 Cast Iron Vanadium 0.01 % to 0.25 % Adequate
2018 0.013 % through Document
Review

IS 15338 : 0.001 % @ Test/Calibration 0.001 % @ 0.013

209 Cast Iron Vanadium 0.01 % to 0.25 % Adequate %
2003 : 2018 0.013 % Witness
 Discipline:
Group: Metals & Alloys Sub Group: Stainless steel
Chemical

Based on test witnessed of 0.002%@0.0056

CRM , it is found that %
Laboratory doesn't detect
Stainless ASTM E 0.001 % @ Aluminium correctly in
210 Aluminium 0.010% - 0.20% Inadequate
Steel 1086: 2014 0.003 % stainless steel, so it it not
recommended for Aluminium
in stainless steel ,
recommended scope is

Stainless IS 9879 : 0.001 % @ Test/Calibration 0.002%@0.0056

211 Aluminium 0.010% - 0.20% Adequate %
steel 1998 : 2021 0.003 % Witness

based on availability of 0.003%@0.0548

CRM, test witnessed, %
Stainless ASTM E 0.0015 % to 0.40 0.0016 % @ Adequate through
212 Carbon Adequate recommended scope is
Steel 1086: 2014 % 0.044 % Document Review
0.010 to 0.20 by requested
test methods

Test/Calibration 0.003%@0.0548
Stainless IS 9879 : 0.0015 % to 0.40 0.0016 % @
213 Carbon Inadequate Witness,Inadequat %
steel 1998 : 2021 % 0.044 %
e

based on availability of 0.058%@18.176

CRM, test witnessed,, it is
Stainless ASTM E1086: 0.075 % @ Adequate through
214 Chromium 0.02 % to 27.0 % Adequate recommended, it is %
Steel 2014 17.284 % Document Review
recommended for full scope
by requested test methods

Stainless IS 9879: 0.075 % @ Test/Calibration 0.058%@18.176

215 Chromium 0.02 % to 27.0 % Adequate %
Steel 1998: 2021 17.284 % Witness

Stainless ASTM E 0.002 % @ Test/Calibration 0.014%@0.156%

216 Cobalt 0.001 % to 9.0 % Adequate
Steel 1086: 2014 0.069 % Witness
 Stainless IS 9879 : 0.002 % @ Test/Calibration 0.014%@0.156%
217 Cobalt 0.001 % to 9.0 % Adequate
Steel 1998 : 2021 0.069 % Witness

Laboratory has CRM BS 303 0.019%@0.466%

content is 0.627 , IARM
FeZ100-18, content is 0.55 ,
UNS K 92890 Copper
Stainless ASTM E 0.008 % @ Adequate through
218 Copper 0.010 % to 1.0 % Adequate content is 0.018. Based on
Steel 1086: 2014 0.632 % Document Review
availability of CRM and test
witnessed, it is
recommended scope is
0.010 t0 1.00%

Laboratory has CRM BS 303 0.019%@0.466%

content is 0.627 , IARM
FeZ100-18, content is 0.55 ,
UNS K 92890 Copper
Stainless IS 9879 : 0.008 % @
219 Copper 0.010 % to 1.0 % Inadequate content is 0.018. Based on
steel 1998 : 2021 0.632 %
availability of CRM and test
witnessed, it is
recommended scope is
0.010 t0 1.00%

Stainless ASTM E 0.037 % @ Test/Calibration 0.023%@1.202%

220 Manganese 0.01 % to 2.2 % Adequate
Steel 1086: 2014 1.794 % Witness

IS 9879 : 0.037 % @ Test/Calibration 0.023%@1.202%

221 stainless steel Manganese 0.01 % to 2.2 % Adequate
1998 : 2021 1.794 % Witness

Stainless ASTM E 0.009 % @ Test/Calibration 0.020%@0.332%

222 Molybdenum 0.001 % to 6.0 % Adequate
Steel 1086: 2014 0.412 % Witness

Stainless IS 9879 : 0.009 % @ Test/Calibration 0.020%@0.332%

223 Molybdenum 0.001 % to 6.0 % Adequate
Steel 1998 : 2021 0.412 % Witness

Stainless ASTM E 0.068 % @ Test/Calibration 0.078%@8.134%

224 Nickel 0.08 % to 22.0 % Adequate
Steel 1086: 2014 8.190 % Witness
 based on test witnessed and 0.078%@8.134%
availability of CRM review of
Stainless IS 9879 : 0.068 % @ Adequate through earlier tested data, it is
225 Nickel 0.08 % to 22.0 % Adequate
Steel 1998 : 2021 8.190 % Document Review recommended for requested
test6range by testing
methods

based on test witnessed and 0.002%@0.015%

availability of CRM , review
Stainless ASTM E 0.001 % to 0.50 0.001 % @ Adequate through
226 Niobium Adequate of earlier tested results,
Steel 1086: 2014 % 0.008 % Document Review
recommended scope is
same

based on test witnessed and 0.002%@0.015%

availability of CRMs, for
Niobium , review of earlier
Stainless IS 9879 : 0.001 % to 0.50 0.001 % @ Adequate through
227 Niobium Adequate tested data, it is
steel 1998 : 2021 % 0.008 % Document Review
recommended for requested
range by requested test
methods

based on test witnessed , 0.003%@0.0932

availability of BS 17-4PH %
(0.027) , , UNSvK92890
(0.0013), 13X 30403,
(0.083), 13X 31635,
Stainless ASTM E 0.001 % to 0.35 0.001 % @ Adequate through
228 Nitrogen Adequate 13X41001(0.0316) ,
Steel 1086: 2014 % 0.022 % Document Review
laboratory personnel
competency , laboratory
personnel perform testing
Nittogen for requested range
with requested test methods

Stainless IS 9879 : 0.001 % to 0.35 0.001 % @ Test/Calibration 0.003%@0.0932

229 Nitrogen Adequate %
Steel 1998 : 2021 % 0.022 % Witness

Based on test witnessed and 0.002%@0.0394

Stainless ASTM E1086: 0.0005 % to 0.08 0.002 % @ Adequate through availability of CRM, it is %
230 Phosphorous Adequate
Steel 2014 % 0.029 % Document Review recommended for requested
testing range by requested
 test methods I.e. ASTM E
and BIS test methods

Stainless IS 9879: 0.0005 % to 0.08 0.002 % @ Test/Calibration 0.002%@0.0394

231 Phosphorous Adequate %
Steel 1998: 2021 % 0.029 % Witness

bases on test witnessed and 0.016%@0.382%

availability of CRMs for
Stainless ASTM E 0.007 % @ Adequate through various test parameters
232 Silicon 0.005 % to 1.0 % Adequate
Steel 1086: 2014 0.408 % Document Review ranges , recommended for
requested range and test
method

IS 9879 : 0.007 % @ Test/Calibration 0.016%@0.382%

233 stainless steel Silicon 0.005 % to 1.0 % Adequate
1998 : 2021 0.408 % Witness

based on test witnessed and 0.002%@0.0466

availability of CRMs for %
Stainless ASTM E 0.0005 % to 0.35 0.038 % @ Adequate through different range of testing, vit
234 Sulphur Adequate
Steel 1086: 2014 % 0.317 % Document Review it is recommended for
requested scope by
requested test method

IS 9879 : 0.0005 % to 0.35 0.038 % @ Test/Calibration 0.002%@0.0466

235 stainless steel Sulphur Adequate %
1998 : 2021 % 0.317 % Witness

based on test witnessed, 0.002%@0.01660

availability of CRM from
%
0.0013 in 13X30403 and
Stainless ASTM E 0.0005 % to 0.60 0.002 % @ Adequate through
236 Titanium Adequate IARM 308A hashing Ti 0.46,
Steel 1086: 2014 % 0.016 % Document Review
it is recommended for
requested scope for
requested test method

Stainless IS 9879 : 0.0005 % to 0.60 0.002 % @ Test/Calibration 0.002%@0.01660

237 Titanium Adequate %
steel 1998 : 2021 % 0.016 % Witness
 Laboratory doesn't have 0.002%@0.0278
CRM upto 0.80 . Laboratory
Stainless ASTM E 0.010 %to 0.003 % @ %
238 Tungsten Inadequate has CRM of content 0.269,
Steel 1086: 2014 0.50% 0.023 %
So recommended range is
0.010 to 0.50

Stainless IS 9879 : 0.010 %to 0.003 % @ Test/Calibration 0.002%@0.0278

239 Tungsten Adequate %
Steel 1998 : 2021 0.50% 0.023 % Witness

Based on test witnessed and 0.002%@0.0676

availability of CRM range
%
IARM 308A(0.010) ,
Stainless ASTM E 0.001 % to 0.15 0.001 % @ Adequate through BS303(0.056 ) and other
240 Vanadium Adequate
Steel 1086: 2014 % 0.055 % Document Review CRM having Vanadium
content, recommended
scope range by requested
test methods

Stainless IS 9879 : 0.001 % to 0.15 0.001 % @ Test/Calibration 0.002%@0.0676

241 Vanadium Adequate %
Steel 1998 : 2021 % 0.055 % Witness

Discipline:
Group: Metals & Alloys Sub Group: Tool steel
Chemical

base on documentation 0.003%@0.016%

review, earlier test reports,
test witnessed , Aluminium
JIS G 1253: 0.006 % to 0.0006 % @
242 Die Steel Aluminium Inadequate in tool steel is recommended
2013 0.010 % 0.006 %
0.006 to 0.010. CRM is not
available to detect 0.010 to
0.030

JIS G 1253: 0.011 % @ Test/Calibration 0.034%@1.724%

243 Die Steel Carbon 0.50 % to 2.50 % Adequate
2013 0.940 % Witness

JIS G 1253: 0.043 % @ Test/Calibration 0.308%@11.718

244 Die Steel Chromium 2.0 % to 15.0 % Adequate %
2013 4.024 % Witness
 JIS G 1253: 0.045 % @ Test/Calibration 0.043%@4.972%
245 Die Steel Cobalt 0.005 % to 6.0 % Adequate
2013 4.964 % Witness

based on availability of CRM 0.002%@0.0822

and test witnessed of many %
JIS G 1253: 0.002 % @ Adequate through
246 Die Steel Copper 0.005 % to 1.0 % Adequate CRMs ,it is recommended
2013 0.043 % Document Review
for Copper for requested
range

JIS G 1253: 0.010 % @ Test/Calibration 0.015%@0.414%

247 Die Steel Mangansese 0.1 % to 0.6 % Adequate
2013 0.422 % Witness

JIS G 1253: 0.021 % @ Test/Calibration 0.028%@0.756%

248 Die Steel Molybdenum 0.40 % to 1.2 % Adequate
2013 0.673 % Witness

Test/Calibration 0.014%@0.524%
JIS G 1253: 0.005 % @
249 Die Steel Nickel 0.05 % to 1.50 % Inadequate Witness,Inadequat
2013 0.152 %
e

based on test witnessed and 0.002%@0.0254

availability of CRM, review of %
JIS G 1253: 0.003 % @ Adequate through
250 Die Steel Phosphorous 0.01 % to 0.07 % Adequate earlier tested data, itbis
2013 0.043 % Document Review
recommended for requested
range and test method

based on test witnessed and 0.021%@0.322%

availability of CRM , review
JIS G 1253: 0.020 % @ Adequate through of earlier tested data, itbis
251 Die Steel Silicon 0.10 % to 0.8 % Adequate
2013 0.2998 % Document Review recommended for same
scope of range by test
method

JIS G 1253: 0.005 % to 0.07 0.0036 % @ Test/Calibration 0.003%0.0102%

252 Die Steel Sulphur Adequate
2013 % 0.039 % Witness

JIS G 1253: 0.232 % @ Test/Calibration 0.232%@17.762

253 Die Steel Tungsten 1.0 % to 25.0 % Adequate %
2013 17.762 % Witness
 JIS G 1253: 0.026 % @ Test/Calibration 0.040%@0.91%
254 Die Steel Vanadium 0.30 % to 2.0 % Adequate
2013 1.013 % Witness