Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ultra High Performance Fiber Reinforced Concrete-A Review
Ultra High Performance Fiber Reinforced Concrete-A Review
Ultra High Performance Fiber Reinforced Concrete-A Review
Abstract
This article presents about the art of knowledge of ultra-high performance concrete
with the reinforcement of fibers. In present stage, high performance concrete has been
widely used in construction industry. In this review paper, a review about the mechanical
properties and durability properties of ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete
has been studied from the different research articles with different replacements of
mineral admixtures such silica fume, ground granulated blast furnace slag and two types
of fiber addition such as polypropylene fiber and steel fiber. The results from various
research articles showed that the addition of steel fibers in ultra-high performance
concrete was more effective in both mechanical and durability properties than the
addition of polypropylene fiber to the concrete.
1. Introduction
The addition of mineral admixture such as silica fume, fly ash and chemical
admixture increase the quality of concrete which in turn produces high performance
concrete. Further development of the concrete technology leads to the introduction of
Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC). The compressive strength of UHPC was 150
Mpa and tensile strength was 6.2 Mpa (Ali alsaman, et al., 2017). The UHPC can also be
characterized by the addition of fiber which leads to development of Ultra High
Performance Fiber Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC). UHPFRC is a composite which
contains large volume of steel fibers, low water binder ratio, and silica content and
aggregate. The material properties such as workability, strength, modulus of elasticity and
permeability has an outstanding characterization when compared to that of the
conventional concrete, and also results in good resistance to the environmental conditions.
The compressive strength were 1150 to 200 Mpa and uni axial tension of UHPFRC is 7 to
15 Mpa (Petrmaca, et al., 2013). UHPFRC shows an enhanced structural behaviour when
compared to that of the conventional concrete. The curing process for UHPFRC are
usually carried under elevated temperature or using pressure which helps to improve its
properties by quickening the hydration reaction of the binder (Petrmaca, et al., 2013).
Ground quartz can also be used as a filler material of about 8 to 9% in the
concrete. The diameter of the ground quartz is less than the Portland cement which was
helpful to fill the voids between the sand and cement. This makes the concrete denser and
thus increased the compressive strength and decrease d the permeability. Generally the
filler material size influence d the compressive strength of the concrete (Ali alsaman, et
al., 2017).
Many studies had been done by the researchers but there was only limited information for
UHPFRC. The main reason that restricts the application of UHPFRC was its high cost.
This review paper gives a study about the properties such as workability, mechanical and
durability. The main purpose of this review paper is to recap the previous process that has
been done by various research.
2. Workability
When fiber was added to the concrete it forms a definite structure and give good
resistance to the segregation of aggregates. The addition of fibers in the lightweight
concrete produces “holding effect” i.e. the fiber will be distributed uniformly in the
concrete and reduces the bleeding of the concrete which affects the slump flow than that
of the slump value. When polypropylene fiber is added to high performance concrete, it
shows the slump of 20.8% whereas the addition of steel fiber shows increase d in slump
of 54.2% (Bing chan, et al.,2005)
3. Mechanical Properties
3.1 Compressive Strength
CURING
AGE 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0%
The split tensile strength with the replacement of 10% of silica fume with cement
was 5.02Mpa at 7 days and 6.3 at 91days. The incorporation of steel fiber shows a
significant result than the addition of polypropylene fibers and silica fume. The addition
of steel fiber shows13% to 58% of strength at 28 days while the addition of polypropylene
fiber shows 13% to20% of strength (Vahidafroughsabet, et al., 2015).
The split tensile strength showed 19% higher strength when compared to normal
concrete with 0.5% of fiber volume fraction mix in high strength fiber reinforced concrete
(HSFRC) and it increased to 98.3% at 2.0% of fiber volume fraction HSFRC (Song, et al.,
2004).
There was an increase in flexural strength with increase in volume fiber content in
concrete and its curing age. Without the addition of fiber the flexural strength of UHPC
was 19Mpa at 90 days of curing. The value of flexural strength increase up to 35Mpa with
the addition of 3% of fiber volume in UHPC (Zemeiwu, et al., 2016). The flexural
strength of UHPFRC with the replacement of 0.15%, 0.30% and 0.45% of polypropylene
fiber is 8.97, 8.91 and 9.12Mpa respectively at 91 days of curing. But there was increase
in strength by using steel fiber instead of polypropylene fiber, with the replacement of
0.25%, 0.5%, 0.75 and 0.1% of steel fiber gives strength about 9.41, 10.92, 11.18, 13.10
Mpa respectively at 91 days of curing age (Vahidafroughsabet, et al., 2015).
The secant modulus of elasticity of normal concrete were 35.5Gpa, with fiber
reinforced it is found to be 29.8 Gpa. For high performance concrete it was 41.1Gpa and
for ultra high performance fiber reinforced concrete it was 47.5Gpa (Petrmaca, et al.,
2013). With the replacement of nano silica of 3% of cement content and 0.2% of
polypropylene fiber the initial modulus of elasticity of high performance fiber reinforced
concrete it was found to be 47.5Mpa and secant modulus of elasticity was 43Gpa. If the
concrete contains 10% of silica fume along with 0.2% of polypropylene fiber the value of
initial modulus of elasticity and secant modulus of elasticity was 49.7Gpa and 45.1Gpa
respectively (Saberfallah, et al., 2017).
4. Durability Properties
4.1 Chloride Migration
The chloride migration was carried out to test the permeability of structure which
affects the durability and reduces the life span. The addition of silica fume in concrete
reduced the chloride penetration. By replacing 10% of silica fume with cement there is
reduction of 76% of chloride diffusency at 28 days and by adding 30% of ground
granulated blast furnace slag there was a reduction of 31% when compared to that of the
normal concrete. If combination of both minerals with silica fume and GGBS there was
improvement in chloride penetration and reduction up to 78% was obtained. Along with
silica fume 0.6%of steel fibers showed growth in chloride migration coefficient ranging
from 558% to 1055% and with 1.2% of fiber replacement shows 672% to 1961% when
compared to that of the normal concrete without fibers (Susantoteng, et al., 2018).
With the addition of 75% of silica fume to the cement decreased the chloride
diffusion coefficient in high performance concrete. By increasing 7.5% to 15% of silica
fume doesn’t show any major growth in decrement of diffusion coefficient, similar result
were found when the combination GGBS and silica fume was used. The bulk density and
diffusivity of the concrete were inversely proportional to each other (A.elahi, et al., 2010)
5. Conclusion
1. Different fibers exhibit different holding effect when added in the concrete which was
the main reason for the reduction of surface bleeding in concrete and gives a
uniformity in concrete mix. The addition of steel fiber with adoptable amount of
replacement agents such as silica fume, GGBS shows greater workability when
compared addition of polypropylene fiber in concrete.
2. The compressive strength, flexural strength of high performance fiber reinforced
concrete can be increased by adoptable addition of mineral admixtures (10% of silica
fume or 30% of GGBS) along with proper volume of steel fibers (1.2% of steel fibers)
with the mix and by increasing the curing age of concrete upto 91 days. Addition of
steel fibers in high performance concrete shows greater performance when compared
with the addition of polypropylene fiber in high performance concrete.
3. Modulus of elasticity showed a higher value of 47.5 Gpa when adding steel fiber in
high performance concrete instead of using polypropylene fiber.
4. The durability properties was enhanced by adding admixtures peculiarly when silica
fume is added. With the combination of both silica fume and GGBS (10% of silica
fume, 30% of GGBS) there is reduction in chloride diffusivity of concrete while there
is increase in electrical resistivity of concrete with corresponds to the curing age.
5. The fiber reinforced high performance concrete showed a high resistance to chloride
penetration but there was a reduction in electrical resistivity of concrete which showed
that to apply low corrosion resistance of reinforcement bars in concrete
References
[1] Afroughsabet, V. and Ozbakkaloglu, T., 2015. Mechanical and durability properties of
high-strength concrete containing steel and polypropylene fibers. Construction and
building materials, 94, pp.73-82.
[2] Alsalman, A., Dang, C.N. and Hale, W.M., 2017. Development of ultra-high
performance concrete with locally available materials. Construction and Building
Materials, 133, pp.135-145.
[3] Chen, B. and Liu, J., 2005. Contribution of hybrid fibers on the properties of the high-
strength lightweight concrete having good workability. Cement and Concrete
Research, 35(5), pp.913-917.
[4] Elahi, A., Basheer, P.A.M., Nanukuttan, S.V. and Khan, Q.U.Z., 2010. Mechanical and
durability properties of high performance concretes containing supplementary
cementitious materials. Construction and Building Materials, 24(3), pp.292-299.
[5] Fallah, S. and Nematzadeh, M., 2017. Mechanical properties and durability of high-
strength concrete containing macro-polymeric and polypropylene fibers with nano-
silica and silica fume. Construction and building materials, 132, pp.170-187.
[6] Máca, P., Sovják, R. and Vavřiník, T., 2013. Experimental investigation of mechanical
properties of UHPFRC. Procedia engineering, 65, pp.14-19.
[7] Pourbaba, M., Asefi, E., Sadaghian, H. and Mirmiran, A., 2018. Effect of age on the
compressive strength of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced
concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 175, pp.402-410.
[8] Song, P.S. and Hwang, S., 2004. Mechanical properties of high-strength steel fiber-
reinforced concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 18(9), pp.669-673.
[9] Teng, S., Afroughsabet, V. and Ostertag, C.P., 2018. Flexural behavior and durability
properties of high performance hybrid-fiber-reinforced concrete. Construction and
Building Materials, 182, pp.504-515.
[10] Wu, Z., Shi, C., He, W. and Wu, L., 2016. Effects of steel fiber content and shape
on mechanical properties of ultra high performance concrete. Construction and
building materials, 103, pp.8-14.