Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NHRC Prelims
NHRC Prelims
NHRC Prelims
“To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity”. — Nelson Mandela
president promulgated the Protection of Human Rights Ordinance on September 28, 1993. Subsequently, the Protection of
Human Rights Bill, 1993, was passed by both the Houses of Parliament and received the assent of the President on January
8, 1994. The act came into force with retrospective effect from September 28, 1993.
● It was amended by the Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2006 and Human Rights
(Amendment) Act, 2019.
● Its headquarter is located in New Delhi and the Commission may, with the previous approval of the Central
Government, establish offices at other places in India.
● It is the watchdog of human rights in the country, i.e., the rights related to life, liberty, equality and
dignity of the individual guaranteed by Indian Constitution or embodied in the international covenants and
enforceable by courts in India.
● Section 2(1)(d) of the Protection of Human Rights Act defines Human Rights as the rights relating to life,
liberty, equality and dignity of the individual guaranteed by the Constitution or embodied in the International
Covenants and enforceable by courts in India.
▪ As per UN definition these rights are inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity,
language, religion, or any other status.
▪ Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression,
the right to work and education, and many more.
▪ These are entitled to everyone, without any discrimination.
Evolution Of Human Rights Commission
● Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly
in Paris on 10 December 1948.
● and subsequently covenants on economic, social and cultural rights, 1976 and covenants on civil and political
rights, 1976 had already laid down the legal foundations of human rights.
● It is a milestone declaration in the history of human rights which sets out, for the first time, fundamental
human rights to be universally protected.
● Human Rights Day is observed every year on 10 December, which is the anniversary of the UDHR.
● In due time the growing importance of strengthening national human rights institutions has been recognized
and in oct-1991, a UN meeting in Paris has developed a detailed set of principles i.e. Paris Principles.
● They were not binding on the member nations of the United Nations, though there was pressure on
nations to make these rights legally and enforceable and at least to establish a national organization in the
country to oversee the remedial of human rights violation.
● NHRC was established in conformity with the Paris Principles , adopted at the first international
workshop on national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights held in Paris in
October 1991, and endorsed by the General Assembly of the United Nations by its Regulations 48/134 of 20
December 1993.
● Since India was closely and actively participating in all these developments, it became obligatory to set up the
National Human Right Institute in the Country.
● These principles became the foundation for the establishment and operation of national human rights
institutions.
● In pursuant to these principles, India has enacted the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, with a view
to bring about greater accountability and strengthening of the human rights in the country.
● This act also authorized State Governments to establish State Human Right Commission.
▪ The Human Rights Council is an inter-governmental body created by the United Nations General Assembly resolution on
15 March 2006.
▪ It has replaced the former United Nations Commission on Human Rights.
▪ It is responsible for strengthening the promotion and protection of human rights around the globe and for addressing
situations of human rights violations and make recommendations on them.
▪ It has the ability to discuss all thematic human rights issues and situations that require its attention throughout the year. It
meets at the UN Office at Geneva.
▪ The Council is made up of 47 United Nations Member States which are elected by the UN General Assembly.
The specific objectives of the establishment of the commission are:
▪ (a) To strengthen the institutional arrangements through which human rights issues could be
addressed in their entirety in a more focussed manner;
▪ (b) To look into allegations of excesses, independently of the government, in a manner that would
underline the government's commitment to protect human rights, and
▪ (c) To complement and strengthen the efforts that have already been made in this direction.
● The Chairperson and other members of the Commission are appointed by the President of Indiaby warrant under his hand & seal.
Every appointment under this session is made after obtaining the recommendation of a six-member committee consisting of:
● Further, a sitting judge of the Supreme Court or a sitting chief justice of a high court can be appointed only after consultation
with the chief justice of India.
o Law Division,
o Investigation Division,
o Policy Research & Programmes Division,
o Training Division and
o Administration Division.
5. Removal:
The chairman or members shall only be removed from his office by order of president on the ground of proved
misbehaviour or incapacity. However, in these cases, the president has to refer the matter to the Supreme Court for an
inquiry. If the Supreme Court, after the inquiry, upholds the cause of removal and advises, then the president can remove
the chairman or a member.
In addition, the president can remove the chairman or any member from the office under the following circumstances:
All the above provisions are aimed at securing autonomy, independence and impartiality in the functioning of the
Commission.
The commission can look into a matter within one year of its occurrence, i.e., In other words, it is not empowered to
inquire into any matter after the expiry of one year from the date on which the act constituting violation of human rights
is alleged to have been committed.
All the decisions and orders of the Commission are examined by the Secretary-General or any other officer of the
Commission who is duly authorized by the Chairperson.
1. An officer of the rank of the Secretary to the GoI who shall be the Secretary-General of the commission; &
2. Such police & investigative staff under an officer not below the rank of a Director General of Police
3. Such officers & staff for efficient functioning of the commission.
▪ It has all the powers of a civil court and its proceedings have a judicial character.
NHRC investigates grievances regarding the violation of human rights either Suo moto or after
receiving a petition or on an order of a court.
2. It has the power to interfere in any judicial proceedings involving any allegation of violation of human rights.
3. To visit jails and detention places to study the living conditions of inmates and make recommendation thereon.
4. To review the constitutional and other legal safeguards for the protection of human rights and recommend
measures for their effective implementation.
5. To review the factors including acts of terrorism that inhibits the enjoyment of human rights and recommend
remedial measures.
6. Study treaties & other international instruments on human right & make recommendations for their effective
implementation.
8. To spread human rights literacy among various sections of the society and promote awareness of the safeguards
available for the protection of these rights through publications, media, seminars & other available means.
9. To encourage the efforts of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) working in the field of human rights.
10. To undertake such other functions as consider necessary for the promotion of human may rights.
i. call for information or report from the Central Government or any State Government or any other authority or organization
subordinate thereto within such time as may be specified by it;
provided that –
a. if the information or report is not received within the time stipulated by the Commission, it may proceed to inquire
into the complaint on its own;
b. on the other hand, if, on receipt of information or report, the Commission is satisfied either that no further inquiry is
required or that the required action has been initiated or taken by the concerned Government or authority, it may not
proceed with the complaint and inform the complainant accordingly.
ii. If the commission considers necessary, having regard to the nature of the complaint, initiate an enquiry.
What is the responsibility of the authority/State/Central Governments to which reports/recommendations have been send by the
Commission?
● The concerned authority or govt i.e., State Government/Central Government has to indicate its comments/action taken on the
report/recommendations of the Commission within a period of one month in respect of general complaints and within three months in
respect of complaints relating to armed forces, forward its comments on the report, including the action taken or proposed to be taken
thereon, to the commission.
● The Commission shall publish its enquiry report together with its recommendations made to the Central Government and the
action taken by that Government on such recommendations.
2. The Central Government and the State Government, as the case may be, shall cause the annual reports of the Commission to
be laid before each House of Parliament or the State Legislature respectively, as the case may be, along with a
memorandum of action taken or proposed to be taken on the recommendations of the Commission and the reasons for non-
acceptance of the recommendations, if any.
From the above, it is clear that the functions of the commission are mainly recommendatory in nature.
▪ It has no power to punish the violators of human rights, nor to award any relief including monetary relief to
the victim.
Notably, its recommendations are not binding on the concerned government or authority. But, it should be
informed about the action taken on its recommendations within one month. In this context, a former member of
the Commission observed 'The government cannot wash away the recommendations made by the Commission.
The commission's role may be recommendatory, advisory, yet the Government considers the cases forwarded by
it. It is, therefore, improper to say that the commission is powerless. It enjoys great material authority and no
government can ignore its recommendation":
● Moreover, the commission has limited role, powers and jurisdiction with respect to the violation of human rights by
the members of the armed forces. In this sphere, the commission may seek a report from the Central government
and make its recommendations. The Central government should inform the Commission of the action taken on the
recommendations within three months.
● It is not empowered to act when human rights violations through private parties take place.
Autonomy To NHRC
● The autonomy of the Commission derives, inter-alia, from the method of appointing its Chairperson and Members,
their fixity of tenure, and statutory guarantee thereto, the status they have been accorded and the manner in which
the staff responsible to the Commission – including its investigating agency- will be appointed and conduct
themselves.
● The financial autonomy of the Commission is spelt out in the Act.
Next
Limitations of NHRC
▪ NHRC does not have any mechanism of investigation. In majority cases, it asks the concerned Central and
State Governments to investigate the cases of the violation of Human Rights
▪ It has been termed as ‘India’s teasing illusion’ by Soli Sorabjee (former Attorney-General of India) due to its
incapacity to render any practical relief to the aggrieved party.
▪ NHRC can only make recommendations, without the power to enforce decisions.
▪ Many times NHRC is viewed as post-retirement destinations for judges and bureaucrats with political
affiliation moreover, inadequacy of funds also hamper its working.
▪ A large number of grievances go unaddressed because NHRC cannot investigate the complaint registered
after one year of incident.
▪ Government often out rightly rejects recommendation of NHRC or there is partial compliance to these
recommendations.
▪ State human rights commissions cannot call for information from the national government, which means that
they are implicitly denied the power to investigate armed forces under national control.
▪ National Human Rights Commission powers related to violations of human rights by the armed forces have
been largely restricted.
Suggestions
▪ There is need for complete revamping of NHRC to make it more effective and truly a watchdog of human
right violations in the country.
▪ NHRC efficacy can be enhanced by government if commission decisions are made enforceable.
▪ There is need to change in composition of commission by including members from civil society and
activists.
▪ Many laws in India are very old and archaic in nature by amending which government can bring more
transparency in regulations.
▪ To improve and strengthen the human rights situation in India, state and non state actors need to work in
tandem.