Function Notation Type of Transformation Change to Coordinate point f ( x )+d Vertical translation

up d units (x ; y)→(x ; y+d) f ( x )−d Vertical translation down d units (x ; y)→(x ; y−d) f ( x+c )
Horizontal translation left c units (x ; y)→(x−c ; y) f ( x−c ) Horizontal translation right c units (x ;
y)→(x+c ; y ) −f (x) Reflection in the x axis (x ; y)→(x ;−y ) f (−x) Reflection in the y axis (x ; y)→(−x ; y )
a f (x) Vertical Stretch if |a|>1 (x ; y)→(x ;a y ) Vertical compression if −1<a1 (x ; y)→( x b ; y This is a
one to one function This is a many to one function and it has an inverse. and it does not have an
inverse. (iii) RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN A FUNCTION AND ITS INVERSE (a ) How to find the inverse of a
one to one function: Given f ( x )replace it by y ↓ Interchange x∧y ↓ Make y subject. [ In cases
where you found the square root, put ± then go to the domain of f (x) to see whether you plus or
minus. Don’t leave it as ±.] (b ) The graph of a function and its inverse. f ( x )=3 x+3 3 y=x −1 3 −
function takes us from the range of f(x) back to the domain of f(x). Note that the range of f(x) is the
domain of the inverse function i.e. if asked for the domain of f −1 (x) first find the range of f(x) that
gives you the domain of the inverse function and if asked for the range of the inverse function just
give the domain of f(xy . To find the range of a function sketch the graph of the function to see the
values of y. (e ) INVERSE FUNCTION f −1 (x) f (x) domain range 2 8 1 1 1 0 range [of f −1 (x)¿ domain
[of f −1SOLVING SIMULTANEOUS EQUATIONS→ 1 LINEAR 1 QUADRATIC Make one of the variables in
the linear equation subject ↓ Substitute the variable in the quadratic equation. ↓ Solve the
quadratic and then find the solutions but you must pair them. (v) SOLVING EQUATIONS REDUCIBLE
TO QUADRATIC FORM e.g. y 4−7 y 2 +12= of x 2 is negative The line of symmetry is x=−b. (ii) THE
DISCRIMINANT From the quadratic formula x= −b± √b 2−4 ac 2 a b 2−4 ac is the discriminant because
it can tell us what type of roots the quadratic equation has. (a) b 2−4 ac>0 we get two distinct
(unequal) real roots. . (b )b 2−4 ac=0 we get one repeated real root[dvise of Atty. Almadro that he
never received a copy of the complaint up to the time that he referred the case to their Law Office.
To bolster their claim of good faith, they attached a photocopy of the letter of Atty. Almadro dated
November 9, 20003 stating that he had not actually received a copy of the complaint of Mr. Perea.
The Court is not fully convinced. A perusal of the aforesaid letter of Atty. Almadro reveals that
indeed stated that he had not received a copy of the complaint. However, in Atty. Almadro’s three
Motions for Extension of Time to Comment4 which he filed before the Court before engaging the
services of the law office, there was no mention that he had not received a copy of the complaThis
refers to an offshoot incident in the disbarment case1 filed by Edgar O. Perea against AttOLVING
QUADRATIC EQUATIONS AND QUADRATIC INEQUALITIES Quadratic Equations If it factorizes →
factorize and equate the factors to zero and get the roots. If it does not factorize → use the
quadratic formula ; x= −b± √b 2−4 ac 2 a make sure you get the a; b; and c with their correct signs.
You can use completing the square but remember when you find the square root put ±. e.g. 3 x 2−2
x−5=0 (a )make coefficient of x 2 1 x 2− 2 3 x= 5 3 (b )complete the square x 2− 2 3 x+ 1 9 = 5 3 + 1 9
→( x− 1 3 ) 2 = 16 9 ( c ) takethe square root ( x− 1 3 )=± 4 3 x= 5 3 ∨−1. Quadratic Inequalities (a)
Bring all terms to one side and factorize. (b) Equate the factors to zero and get the roots.y. Ruben L.
Almadro. Atty. Ruben L. Almadro engaged the services of the Sua & Alambra Law Offices to
represent him inSaid statement shows very clearly that Atty. Almadro has received a copy of the
complaint. For how can he prepare a draft of his comment if it were not so? This should have alerted
Atty. Alambra to verify the veracity of the claim of Atty. Almadro. Atty. Alambra should not have
relied on the statement given by Atty. Almadro. Their being classmates in the law school is not a
reason to be less cautious in his dealings with the Court. He is an officer of the court, and as such, he
owes candor, fairness and good faith to the Court.5 As explicitly stated in Rule 10.01, Canon 10 of
the Code of Professional Responsibility, for their deliberate falsehood and misrepresentation in the
preparation of the answer for respondent, and accordingly remanded the case to the IBP for further
action on the contempt proceedings. Before the Court now is the Resolution No. XVII-2005-162
dated December 17, 2005 of the Board of Governors of the IBP finding that Atty. Sua and Atty.
Alambra were less than honest and forthright in their representation before the Court and imposing
a fine of P2,000.00 each with warning that any further unprofessional conduct will be dealt with
more severely. Let it be emphasized that the subject contumacious act was committed bef