CHAPTER 3

PERMISSION MARKETING - A REVIEW OF LITERATURE

INTRODUCTION

Seth Godin coined the term permission marketing in his book – “Permission
Marketing: Turning Strangers into Friend and Friend into Customers” (1999)1.
Permission Marketing and Seth Godin have become synonyms of each other. Seth
Godin is Former Vice President, Direct Marketing, Yahoo!. Godin founded the first
company in the world to put promotional campaigns through internet. He turned this
company into the online permission marketing pioneer. Godin has been associated
with Spinnaker Software, Seth Godin Productions, Squidoo, ChangeThis, Squidoo
etc.

In his book on permission marketing, the author suggests the marketers to pass the
advertisements messages to the customers in such a form that is happily acceptable by
the customers. The author says permission marketing is useful for the companies of
any size. It is useful for not only online but also offline markets. It is useful for not
only consumer market but also business market. Permission marketing is the way to
make advertising work effectively. The era of traditional marketing will be replaced
by the era of permission marketing. Clutter will be the reason for the replacement of
traditional advertising. Advertising in TV, magazine, newspapers, websites,
billboards, inbox, events etc. disrupt the viewers or readers from their activities in
order to get attention. Godin calls it ‘Interruption Marketing.’ with the increment of
clutter, interruption gets increased through printing brand names and logo on apparel,
enhancing commercial breaks on TV, and adding number of advertising pages in
magazines. Increased advertising spending and noise in the advertisements support
the increment of interruption marketing. In addition to clutter problem, now-a-days
products are available with almost equally fine quality, durability and value.
Customers have become less caring. Though, customers keep on getting flooded by

1
Godin Seth, Permission marketing: turning strangers into friends, and friends into customers, Simon
& Schuster, New York, 1999.

33
marketing messages and communications. This includes by the way of junk e-mails,
catalogs, unsolicited calls too. Permission marketing is an alternative to interruption
marketing. In permission marketing, customers pay attention to the marketing
communication as they have opted to be marketed and rewarded with payment or
other benefits for going through marketing messages. Customers get ready for
marketing messages. The messages do not interrupt the customers. Through
permission marketing, marketers create and maintain long-tem, interactive
relationship with the customers. There are three characteristics of powerful marketing
communication. These are anticipated, personal, and relevant communications.
Permission marketing provides the customers for a chance to be marketed willingly.

There are five steps to get permission from the customers. First, marketers can offer
incentives to the customers as customer would not be ready to receive marketing
communication for free. Second, marketers can take an advantage of customers’
attention by informing them about the company’s offerings. Third, marketers can
encourage the customers constantly to continue with their permission. Fourth,
marketers try to get additional customer permission. Fifth, marketers change the
habits and behavior of the customers to generate higher profit. Permission marketing
is a process which can be measured. It is an investment and an asset for the company
which uses it. Permission marketing is nearer to new technologies such as Web
compared to other marketing methods. Permission marketing is a solution to the
failure of Interruption marketing.

Godin suggests five step cycle of getting new customers:

1. Strangers
2. Friends
3. Customers
4. Loyal customers
5. Former customers

Permission marketing begins with shifting focus from market share to share of
customer. It necessitates letting off or saying ‘no’ to 70 % of the customers to
optimize customer service and to avoid allowing such customers to spoil time and
resources of the company. Though, marketers have to use interruption marketing a

34
little while grabbing the attention of the customers who volunteer for information
exchange.

Instead of Reach, frequency helps the marketers well. There are some problems too in
frequency related marketing on the other side such as frequency advertisements are
costly, boring, and customers ignore or take them wrongly. Permission marketing
helps to build frequency. Permission marketing helps rising frequency and frequency
builds trust.

There are five major levels of permission described in this book:

1. Intravenous level
2. Points level
3. Personal Relationship levels
4. Brand trust level
5. Situation level

In addition to these five levels, Godin considers Spam as one more level.

There are four rules of permission marketing:

1. Permission is nontransferable
2. Permission is selfish
3. Permission is a process, not a moment
4. Permission can be cancelled at any time

There are some questions of which the Web marketers should try to find the answers
such as what the marketers are trying to achieve something measurable? How much
does it cost to attract and re-attract consumers to the website? There are some wrong
beliefs about web marketing such as marketers take into account the number of clicks
or hits on the website. That is not a true measure to judge success of a website.
Marketers believe that great website content can help the people to visit and revisit the
websites. Marketers, by mistake, focus more on marketing and selling through
websites. Instead, they should give more emphasis on technology. Search engines are
not so effective to generate websites traffic as believed by the companies. Further,
Godin throws light on privacy on the internet. Some companies take care about the

35
type of information collected by the website? About how these website are using this
information? To whom else does the website pass the information? What about the
opt-out facility on the web? How the websites manage the customer database? This
book by Godin offers case studies on permission marketing on the companies like
Kosher, Dreyfus Mutual Fund, American Express, Bell Atlantic, Columbia Record
Club, American Airlines, AOL, CyberGold, Value America, Amazon.com, Yoyodyne
etc. Customers can end their permission in two ways: completely or partially. In
partial break-up, customers specify particular date after which marketers should not
send any marketing communication. In other words, at the time of giving permission,
consumers specify time slot.

Sandeep Krishnamurthy (2001) analyzed the concept of permission marketing. He

presented four models on: 1

1. Direct Relationship Maintenance

2. Permission Partnership
3. Ad Market
4. Permission Pool

The degree of intensity varies from the above models to models. Here, ‘permission
intensity’ is defined as “…the degree to which a consumer empowers a marketer in
the context of a communicative relationship.”

In Direct Relationship Maintenance model, as the name of the model indicates, the
consumer directly gives permission to the marketers or the advertiser to send
additional and latest information. It involves low level of permission intensity. Second
model – Permission Partnership denotes partnership between the advertisers and a
portal. The portals receive permission from the customers to send promotional
messages from the advertisers. The portal companies also ask the advertisers
simultaneously to send their offers to the portals.

1
Krishnamurthy Sandeep, A Comprehensive Analysis of Permission Marketing, Journal of Computer-
Mediated Communication, Jan 2001, 6: 0. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00119.x

36
Thus, the portals become mediator between the customers and the marketers. This
helps in increasing website visitors too. However, it involves low permission
intensity. Third model is known as ‘Ad Marketers’. This model has high level of
permission intensity. Here, consumers give information to agent websites called
infomediaries. This information includes details about consumers’ choice,
preferences, interest etc. infomediaries find out the matching advertising companies
with the consumer preferences. Infomediaries reduce time and cost of both –
consumers and advertises. Fourth model is ‘Permission Pool’. Large number of
consumer sends their permission to large number of companies to receive promotional
messages. The companies create pool of this information and send messages to the
customers. When the consumers furnish much detailed information about their choice,
the permission intensity is considered to be high. Similarly, low permission intensity
indicates less consumer details. But the marketers may have collected detailed
consumer information through other ways such as database marketing too. So, low
permission intensity from the consumers’ side does not indicate less information with
the marketers.

There are three characteristics of high permission intensity:

1. High information quantity
2. High information quality
3. Flexibility in using information

Marketers promise better services to the consumers and consumers become ready to
provide high quantity of their details in return. Consumers think that if the quality of
information provided is not good enough, then they will not receive relevant messages
from the marketers. Therefore, to avoid trouble of junk messages, consumers provide
precise information. With increasing permission intensity, consumers also give more
freedom to the marketers to use provide information properly. Marketers use breadth
versus depth strategy. When the marketers get low intensity with more number of
consumers, it is breadth strategy. When the marketers get high intensity from less
number of consumers, the marketers are using depth strategy. We can understand this
with the help of following graphical model:

37
 Figure 5 Breadth Strategy and Depth Strategy

(Source: Krishnamurthy Sandeep, 2001)

Krishnamurthy proposed Conceptual Framework describing the consumers’
experiences with permission marketing. The model was developed to generalize
above four models. Consumers feel getting something valuable out of permission
marketing participation with the marketers. If consumers find benefits from
participation, they will be involved in permission marketing programs. The base of
conceptual framework is the interests of the consumers in permission marketing
programs. In the direct marketing, the marketers become the initiator of the
communication while in case of permission marketing, customers initiate the
communication by their willingness and tell marketers what they are interested to
know about. When the interest is lost, the permission is lost. Author gave various
propositions such as the relationship between level of consumer interests and
participation, message relevance, cost, and monetary benefits with consumer
interests and so on as given below:
1. Level of consumer participation in permission marketing programs is related
with the level of consumer interest.

38
 2. The cost of handling personal information results in low consumer interest.
3. The cost of processing messages results in low consumer interest.
4. Higher privacy cost results into lower consumer interest.
5. Higher category-message fit results into higher message relevance.
6. The relevance of the message is related with the attractiveness of the
advertisers.
7. Perception of the monetary benefit is related with the incentive size.
8. Perception of the monetary benefit is related with the volume of messages.
9. Perception of the monetary benefit is related with the time to redemption.
10. Higher permission intensity results into higher information handling cost.
11. Higher message relevance results into lower information handling cost.
12. Better instructions result into lower information handling cost.
13. Higher cognitive load results into higher message processing cost.
14. Higher message handling cost is related with volume of messages.
15. Higher message relevance results into low impact of number of messages in
message handling cost.
16. Better instructions result into lower message processing cost.
17. Privacy costs are related with internal assurance.
18. Privacy costs are related with external assurance.
19. Consumer interest in permission marketing is related with message relevance.
20. Consumer interest is related with monetary benefit.
21. Higher message relevance results into lower impact of monetary benefit on
consumer interest.

Mukerjee Kaushik (2005) described tried and tested strategies using permission
marketing such as seminars, newsletters, Kiosks, portals etc.1 Companies such as
immigration consultants organize seminar and invite target audience. Those who are
eager to buy immigration consulting services come to attend these. Customers permit
websites to send newsletter because the customers have signed up to receive the
newsletters as they are interested in these. Customers can use Kiosks when they need
these. This is non-disturbing way of marketing. Using link instead of banners is more
of using permission marketing. The author says using permission marketing will

1
Mukerjee Kaushik, Permission Marketing In Action, Indian Management, March 2005, p 68.

39
improve results not using customer mouse traps. Drèze Xavier, Assistant Professor of
Marketing at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, finds that
permission marketing helps increasing B2C (Business-to-Consumer) communication
effectiveness. 1 The internet has changed the way of doing business. Direct marketing
through e-mails is a cheap but effective medium.

Internet marketing expert Susan Sweeney allotted a full chapter on permission

marketing in her book – ‘101 Ways to Promote Your Website’ (2005).2 She
considered permission marketing as an important aspect of internet marketing. It gives
the internet marketers a better response from the customers and there is no risk of
breaking customers’ privacy. Permission marketing helps the internet marketers in
maintaining the company’s credibility in the eyes of their customers. She explains that
permission marketing is a practice of getting the target market willingly involved in
the process. The customers must be offered with something valuable to make them
ready to be involved in this process. There are opportunities for permission marketing
at the time of every visit made by the target customer, such as making website content
attractive, having own specific pages, online seminars, bookmarking, new attractions,
calendar reminder services, bulletin boards, conducting surveys and awards, offline
promotion etc. The author has given examples of using permission marketing at the
time of website visits by the visitors. It can be asking customers to join the mailing
list of the company to get intimated about new offers, contests, events etc. Customers
show their willingness to receive the information in which they feel interested.
Permission marketing helps the marketers not only retaining existing customers but
also attracting new ones. Susan described various uses of permission marketing for
internet marketing success by combining it with internet marketing tools such as
contests, newsletter, online surveys, games, reminders, special events etc. The author
mentioned the changes in laws related to privacy on internet and spamming in the
U.S. and Canada. Permission marketing is an aid to the campaigns run on internet
marketing. Continuous increasing permission from the customers helps the marketers
to target their customers more precisely, understanding and satisfying their needs and
wants better. It is always more profitable than interruption marketing. It creates better

1
Drèze Xavier, Lessons from the Front Line Two Key Ways in which the Internet has Changed
Marketing Forever, Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, vol 21, No. 4-5, 2005, p 443-
448.
2
Sweeney Susan, 101 Ways to Promote Your Website, 5th ed, New Age Int. P. Ltd., 2005.

40
company image among the customers and maintain relationship with the customers
for longer time.

Don Peppers and Martha Rogers, in their book – “The One to One Future” (2001),
suggested the marketers to change the way of treating the customers.1 Instead of
increasing number of customers into the list of the customers of the company, they
suggested to increase the list of the things offered to limited customers and thus
increase the profit. They explained to focus more on existing customers and generate
more sales. To generate more profits from the same customers, it requires longer
relationship with the customers. Peppers and Rogers suggest giving importance on
four factors while trying to make a sell to the customers. First, increase the ‘share of
wallet’ by concentrating on satisfying needs of the customers. Second, cost of
customer retention is not as high as the cost of acquiring new customers. So try to
maintain long lasting customer relationship. Third, provide variety of products or
services to the customers to increase share of wallet. Fourth, get feedback from the
customers. More information from the customers helps the marketers to serve more
offerings to the customers. One-to-one marketing helps the company to increase the
profitability. It starts from the first sale made by the marketers. Peppers, Rogers, and
Dorf give four steps for one-to-one marketing – Indentifying Customers,
Differentiating, Interacting, and Customizing.2 First two steps are analysis steps while
last two are action steps. The company must identify and contact maximum number of
customers and gather detailed information about them. The collected information
must be checked and updated. Next, company must differentiate the customers. The
customers can be differentiated on the basis of value and needs. While interacting
with customers, cost and interaction effectiveness are vital in one-to-one marketing.
Treating the customer differently is the key to customize. Customizing involves
saving customers’ time and company’s money, personalizing direct mail, finding what
customers want, etc. To check employees’ views on cultural and organizational
analysis of the company as well as customers’ internal and external perception gap,
the One-to-One Gap Tool is prepared. Employees and customers are supposed to
choose the statements related to processes, technology, knowledge strategy,

1
Peppers Don and Rogers Martha, The One to One Future; Building Business Relationships One
Customer at a Time, Piatkus, London, 2001.
2
Peppers Don, Rogers Martha, and Dorf Bob, Is Your Company Ready for One-to-One Marketing?,
Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb 1999, p 151-160.

41
partnerships, customer relationships, employee management, and competitive strategy
of the company. Customers from business and consumer market exactly want what
they want, when they want, where they want, and how they want.1 Mass marketing
and mass production give the customers nothing but too many choices. Companies
which aim to give these to the customers must use technology to provide customized
goods and services and one-to-one marketing. Mass customization and one-to-one
marketing tie producer and marketers in learning relationship. Managers need to
understand the difference between variety and customization. There are four
components to build learning relationships. These are information strategy,
production/delivery strategy, organizational strategy, and assessment strategy. Beckett
and Nayak (2008) argue that the exemplary work by Peppers and Rogers leads to
Collaborative Marketing.2 Beckett and Nayak call the active collaborator customers
as reflexive consumers. Neeraj Arora at el (2008) distinguished between two forms of
one-to-one marketing.3 These are personalization and customization. Personalization
is initiated by the firm while customization is initiated by the customer. The authors
discussed challenges and knowledge gap in understanding choices for firm and
customer. Hanson (2000) says, “Personalization is a special form of product
differentiation – it transforms a standard product or service into a specialized solution
for an individual.”4 Gilmore and Pine (1997) distinguish between two types of
customization – customization of the marketing message content, and customization
of marketing message targeting as in permission marketing. 5

Gulati and James (2005) identify four stages of customer focus for the companies
which want to get close to their customers.6 Authors list the changes which are
necessary for the organizations to move from one stage to the next. These stages are:
communal coordination, serial coordination, symbiotic coordination, and integral
coordination. First stage is about creating a centralized repository by recording each

1
Joseph Pine II, Peppers Don, Rogers Martha, Do You Want to Keep Your Customers Forever?,
Harvard Business Review, Mar-Apr 1995, p 103-114.
2
Beckett Antony and Nayak Ajit, Marketing Theory, vol. 8 no. 3, Sept 2008, p 299-317.
3
Arora Neeraj at el, Putting One-to-One Marketing to Work: Personalization, Customization, and
Choice, Marketing Letters, vol 19, No. 3, 2008, p 305-321.
4
Hanson W, Principles of Internet Marketing, Cincinnati, Ohio, South-Western College Publishing,
2000.
5
Gilmore James and Pine B J, The Four Faces of Mass Customization, Harvard Business Review, Jan–
Feb 1997, p 91-101.
6
Gulati Ranjay and James Oldroyd, The Quest for Customer Focus, Harvard Business Review, vol 83,
no 4, April 2005, p 92-101.

42
customer interaction and establishing coordination infrastructure. Second stage of
serial coordination is about inferring from collected customer information. Here, tasks
to be performed by organization units are managed and information is analyzed. The
result is shared with all the function of the organization. In third stage of symbiotic
coordination, future behavior of the customers is anticipated using past customer
interactions. It involves tracking the list of customers who are likely to switch to a
competitor, who are likely to buy new product or service, who have credit risk etc.
Fourth stage is responding customers’ need in real time. Companies require
coordinating at every stage.

S. F. Allen drew a line between permission marketer and direct marketer.1 Marketers
have got to know the difference between these two and using direct marketing or
permission marketing or both. Allen said that permission marketers put their resources
into developing revered relationship with the customers. Forcefully dumping the
products in front of the customers, in spite of the customers’ dislike will end into
broken relationship with the customers. Though customers will be ready to buy the
forced products once or twice for a short period of time, they may not prefer over long
run. By using force, marketers will lose positive long term marketing results. The base
of permission marketing is trust. Ultimately the trust gets converted into profit.
Marketers must know how to use this profitable methodology of permission
marketing. Allen said permission marketing is a fine blending of conventional
branding and consumer behavior with modern internet marketing techniques. As
described by Allen, three pillars of permission marketing are: First, cutting through
clutter. Second, empowering customers with choice. Third, shifting power of decision
making to marketers. While practicing permission marketing through email
marketing, the connection among the marketers, the advertisers, and the customers is
established. Customers eagerly pay attention to such marketers who use permission
marketing messages. Moreover, the comparative revenue earned through permission
marketing is higher than that of direct marketing over time. Permission marketing has
stronger ability to rise among the clutter and get more attention. In a way, customers
are handling over powers in the hands of the marketers to take some decisions up to

1
Allen S F , Don't Call Yourself a Permission Marketer When You Are a Direct Marketer, Financial
Times Prentice Hall, Aug 2, 2002.

43
certain extent and the marketers cannot hold and continue this power if they fail to
win the customers’ trust. Permission marketing is long-run strategic investment for
the marketers. Ansari and Mela (2003) state that customized communications can
mitigate information overload and help customer decisions.1 They developed
statistical approach for information customization on internet and applied model to
permission-based e-mail marketing. It is possible to increase click-through rates with
the help of content-targeting approach.

Bessen, Jim (1993) describes that to create computerized customer information

system is expensive and difficult.2 Marketing has become harder due to increasing
market segments and the products. Manufactures remain in fix as to what to produce.
Buyers have to select among the number of products and the advertisers have to select
among many segments and many products. New information system differs from
traditional one on the basis of scale of the database, depth of information, and degree
of information use. Companies such as The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company
(A&P), R. R. Donnelley & Sons, and Fingerhut have used this. Companies need broad
customer information system as market demands targeted marketing communications.
Consumers’ demographic and psychographic information should be used to
understand what consumers want and for how much. In the industries like
supermarkets, information overload creates information crisis for manufacturers and
managers. Hagel and Rayport (1997) observe that customers take control of their
information.3 Infomediary companies can work as custodians, agents, and brokers of
consumer information. On behalf of the customers, they can market it to the
companies. Companies must think which type of information they are collecting form
the customers, when, and how they are going to use the information.

Lee Byung-Kwan and Lee Wei-Na investigated effect of information overload on the
quality of consumer choice online by combining traditional and structural

1
Ansari A, and Mela C F, E-customization, Journal of Marketing Research, vol XL, May 2003, p 131-
145.
2
Bessen, Jim (1993), “Riding the Marketing Information Wave,” Harvard Business Review, Sept-Oct
1993, vol 71, p 150-60.
3
Hagel John III and Rayport Jeffrey F, The Coming Battle for Customer Information, Harvard
Business Review, Jan- Feb 1997, p 53-65.

44
approaches.1 They measured customers’ satisfaction, and confidence. Consumers get
too much information on number of products from different parties such as
manufacturers, retailers, internet intermediaries etc. How well the product information
is presented to the customers and how they process the information may decide
survival and profitability of the companies. The authors found that effect of
information overload on consumer choice can be well predicted by attributes like
quantity and level distribution. Online information overload generates less
satisfaction, less confident, and more confusion among the customers.

Grassfield Max (2000) developed the strategy for retailers, called Invitational
marketing.2 It was developed on the nation that “Business goes where business is
invited.” Invitational marketing is inviting customers to give opportunities to satisfy
their needs. He said that this invitation must be made with personal, written note
instead of through impersonal direct mails. He took advertising as one-way
communication. Advertisers must communicate with the customers rather than
counting them as the customer figure. Customers are part of the society of the
marketers. Along with other reasons, one of the reasons behind losing customers is
not treating them with value. He noted Reichheld and Sasser (1990) relate increasing
profit with longer customer relationship. A unique thing about his company was that
they knew their customers better than their competitors did. His company collected
information from voluntary customers for around ten years. They collected details
regarding customers’ buying patterns, personal data, sales record etc. They have their
own concept of sending individual customers a personalized message with the
salesperson’s signature. In 1992, they developed their own customer relation database
software, which is copyrighted and registered as invitational marketing. They offered
the incentives to the respondents of the messages sent to their customers to measure
how much effective it was to send personal message. Customers always like to visit
the place where the marketers know them by their name.

1
Lee Byung-Kwan and Lee Wei-Na, The Effect of Information Overload on Consumer Choice Quality
in an On-Line Environment, Psychology & Marketing, vol 21, No. 3, Mar 2004, p 159-183.
2
Grassfield Max, Invitational Marketing, Coloradobiz, 1st Mar 2000.

45
Deighton at el (1996) predict the future of interactive marketing and see a shift in
marketing practices from broadcast marketing to interactive marketing.1 Factors such
as direct marketing, database marketing, e-commerce, sales force management,
WWW etc. are forcing to reshape the marketing discipline. Mass marketing is
becoming more customized and more responsive to the customers. Authors explain
interactive marketing with reference to conversation with an ability to address and
remember individual’s response.

Jon Ingall, Managing Partner at Archibald Ingall Stretton, gives reasons for
permission marketing being the biggest issue.2 The author refers to a pitch on mobile
media in emerging markets such as China and India. Mobile phone will become an
important medium for marketing communications in China and India as internet
access though land line phones will become not so flexible. Mobile marketing
communications are less expensive, having enormous reach and compact. Ingall
suggests industry to be careful to use direct media.

Kumar at el developed a new way of predicting the customer behavior, taking base of
Daniel McFadden’s work.3 The authors developed a multivariate formula i.e.
Likelyhood Function, which accurately compute purchase and timing probabilities
with the help of software like MATLAB or Gauss. This helps the marketers to target
certain customers with certain products only and save cost of communicating the ‘to-
be-excluded’ customers to increase Return On Investment. It shows how to use the
data to find out which customer wants what and when. System such as CRM should
be used to predict which customer will buy what and when using past buying behavior
of the customer. The authors look back at the traditional methods that companies use
to predict the customers. Marketers estimate two probabilities - about a product and
about purchase time. Communicating too much or too little, both make customers
restrain from purchasing.

1
Deighton at el, The Future of Interactive Marketing, Harvard Business Review, vol 74, no. 6, Nov-
Dec 1996, p 151-160.
2
Ingall Jon, Why Permission is the Biggest Issue, Precision Marketing, 8th Aug, 2008, p 14.
3
Kumar V, Venkatesan Rajkumar, Reinartz Werner, Knowing What to Sell, When, and to Whom,
Harvard Business Review, March 2006, p 131-137.

46
Carroll, Barnes, and Eusebio see tremendous growth for Mobile Marketing area of m-
commerce in the next five years.1 They explored consumer's perceptions and attitudes
towards mobile marketing via SMS through a sequential, mixed method investigation.
They identified four factors viz. permission, content, Wireless Service Provider
(WSP) control, and the delivery of the message. It was proved that all these factors
have a significant impact on mobile marketing acceptance. A revised and empirically
tested model of consumer acceptance in Mobile Marketing was developed. The
findings suggest that marketers should be optimistic about choosing to set up mobile
marketing, and should be careful about the factors determining mobile marketing
consumer acceptance.

Karjaluoto at el. conducted an online survey and tested a theoretical framework

investigating customers' intention to involve in permission-based mobile marketing
communications with a firm in the hospitality sector and the effects of gender.2 They
found that perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived trust affect
attitude toward advertising and intention to engage in permission based mobile
communications with a firm. The study found that compared to men, women have a
stronger relationship between mobile marketing communications with intentions to
visit and actual visits. Hospitality operators should be able to use permission-based e-
mail marketing for sales promotion communications.3 Getting customers’ permission
to contact them for advertisements is in the benefit of the company. Authors
conducted a study of Perth (Australia) based hotel’s permission marketing practice.
The hotel developed following 2 X 2 matrix for testing relevance of e-mail subject
line and personalization of promotional message:

1
Carroll Amy , Barnes Stuart J, and Scornavacca Eusebio, Consumers Perceptions and Attitudes
towards SMS Mobile Marketing in New Zealand, Proceedings of the International Conference on
Mobile Business, IEEE Computer Society, USA , 2005 , p 434 – 440.
2
Karjaluoto Heikki, Lehto Heikki, Leppäniemi Matti, and Jayawardhena Chanaka, Exploring Gender
Influence on Customer’s Intention to Engage Permission-Based Mobile Marketing, Electronic Markets,
vol 18, No. 3, 2008, p 242-259.
3
Marinova Ana, Murphy Jamie, and Massey Brian, Permission E-Mail Marketing: As a Means of
Targeted Promotion, The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, vol 43, No. 1, Feb
2002, p 61-69.

47
 Figure 6 Permission marketing e-mail treatments

(Source: Marinova at el, Permission E-Mail Marketing, The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant
Administration Quarterly, vol 43, No. 1, Feb 2002, p 61-69)

Result showed that the hotel received responses to the personalized e-mails in opt-out
forms, not for visiting the website. Authors suggest that front-desk staff of the hotel
needs to be trained for handing promotional messages. Moreover, other media such as
mobile phones should be studied with reference to permission marketing campaigns.

David Reed says permission marketing has become just a matter of legal compliance
by the companies rather than providing opt-in or opt-out options.1 The author refers to
the research by the Office of Information Commissioner, stating that for consumers’
most important issues are education, crime, and personal information protection at
last. More than 50 % customers of well-known brands have opted out. Companies do
not have permission to contact them. Permission is seen as soft value. Companies fail
in rewarding the employees who increases the permission level of the company. The
author quotes Louise Ainsworth, Managing Partner, OgilvyOne. She says sales-driven
culture of the companies with targets and products to sell is a part of a problem for not
using information given by the customers. Involving customers and their view and
comments is the next level.

1
Reed David, Permission Impossible?, Marketing Week, 20th July 2006, p 39.

48
Following reviews show how literature in integrated marketing communications
components such as advertising, direct marketing, personal selling, electronic
marketing, sales promotions etc. is related with the theory and practice of permission
marketing:

3.1 Advertising

Kenny and Marshall (2000) note that new technologies will help the businesses to
approach the customers whenever and wherever the customers are ready to make a
purchase. Companies using banner advertisements and other internet marketing
compared to offline media, have 1.5 to 2.5 times higher customer acquisition costs.1
The analysts forecast that Amazon.com retains each customer for as long as 12 years.
The authors predict that in three to five years, internet will be accessible from
anywhere. They call it Ubiquitous Internet. Marketers will be able to reach customers
anytime, any day, anywhere. Marketers will have to change their strategies. Marketers
will be required to focus on context rather than on content, use technology that will
tell marketers when they are required, and they should be presented when and where
the customers is ready to buy. Today, website is the prime tool for attracting the
customers and developing customer profiles but in future, the websites will become a
small part of wider digital marketing platform. Authors suggest new corporate agenda
for companies such as becoming valued partners for the customers by anticipating and
meeting real needs of the customers, using database marketing and direct marketing,
quickly mastering upgraded technological skills, using contextual marketing etc.

Barnes Stuart J and Scornavacca Eusebio investigated the weighting of specific

criteria in the consumer's decision to opt in to a mobile advertising campaign.2
Authors analyzed the decision hierarchy for 111 respondents. They tested significant
differences between the global priorities of various groupings. Results of the study
demonstrate significant difference between the decision-making criteria of groups by

1
Kenny David and Marshall John, Contextual Marketing, Harvard Business Review, Nov-Dec 2000, p
119-125.
2
Barnes Stuart J and Scornavacca Eusebio, Uncovering Patterns in Mobile Advertising Opt-In
Behaviour: a Decision Hierarchy Approach, International Journal of Mobile Communications, vol
6, No. 4, April 2008, p 405-416.

49
income, gender, average volume of advertising messages received and the influence
of mobile advertising on their previous purchases.

3. 2. Direct Marketing

Technical definition of Direct Marketing: “Direct marketing is the planned

implementation, recording, analysis and tracking of customers’ direct response
behavior over time to derive future marketing strategies for developing long- term
customer loyalty and ensuring continued business growth.”1

Firms such as directmarketing (UK) offer postal and e-mail addresses of managers of
all the departments of almost all type of industries of UK.2 According Drèze Xavier
Direct mail is the largest and e-mail is the second largest marketing vehicle. Rogers
(1996) examined trends in mail advertising from a study of The U.S. household mail
communications inspecting how consumers feel, perceive, and respond to the
advertising mail received by them.3 Results show that households with higher income
received more advertising mail. Compared to the mail addressed to occupant or
residence, the mail addressed to household members fetched better and higher
response. Receivers gave more response to the mail from non-profit organizations
compared to the mail from business organizations. For successful campaigning
through mail, testing and quality database are better alternatives. Advertisers should
make mail more relevant to the mail recipients. Some advertisers have related radio
advertisements and television commercials with mail campaigns. It is important for
the consumers that they get less clutter, appropriate type and timing of mail, and
ability to respond these in the way they want. Telemarketing and teleselling are part
of direct marketing. Following is the difference between these two:

1
Stone Merlin, Davies Derek, and Bond Alison, Direct Hit: Winning Direct Marketing Campaigns,
MacMillan India, 1998, p 3.
2
www.electricmarketing.co.uk
3
Rogers Jean, Mail Advertising and Consumer Behavior, Psychology and Marketing, vol 13, No. 2,
March 1996, p 211–233.

50
 Table 5 Difference between Telemarketing and Teleselling

Telemarketing Teleselling
Controlled message Individual communication
Structured scripts Operator’s own method
Variety of objectives Objective to sell product/service
All results collected and analyzed Measurement haphazard – only sales
All parameters testable Impossible to test elements
Possible to plan and integrate with other media Stand-alone
No commission paid Commission paid
(Source: Stone, Davies, and Bond, Direct Hit, MacMillan India, 1998, p 176)

Taylor et al conducted a survey among Japanese and the U.S. university students to
check the impact of Japanese communication and Japanese culture on attitudes toward
direct marketing and its regulation.1 The results suggest that certain types of direct
marketing messages are less effective in Japan than in the United States. Further,
willingness by Japanese respondents to support regulation of direct marketing
practices is greater. The authors discuss managerial implications of the findings for
multinational marketers and advertisers. They suggest public policy implications for
direct marketing in Japan.

3. 3. Personal Selling

Dhawan Radha (1999) relates permission marketing with personal selling by defining
permission marketing as “…when companies take prior permission from customers to
make their sales speech.”2 The author lists the companies which have adapted
permission marketing concept. These are Hindustan Motors, Bose Audio System,
Asian Paints, JK Tyres etc. Direct marketing is different from Permission marketing
in a way that the former focuses on sales while the latter focuses on creating
awareness.

3.4 E-mail

Bluestreak, a digital marketing technology provider firm conducted a survey on

attitudes and levels of adoption towards RSS (Rich Site Summary/RDF Site

1
Taylor Charles R, Franke George R, and Maynard Michael L, Attitudes Toward Direct Marketing and
Its Regulation: A Comparison of the United States and Japan, vol 19, No. 2, Journal of Public Policy &
Marketing, Fall 2000, p 228-237.
2
Dhawan Radha, Permission Marketing, Business World, Sept 1999, p 50-51.

51
Summary/Really Simple Syndication), SMS, Blogs, message boards, and podcasts
among 1000 respondents in the UK and the US.1 The research showed that in the US,
e-mail has 100 % adoption while podcasts and RSS have 36 % and 28 % popularity
respectively. Survey found that the respondents opened one out of every three
permission-based e-mails. The Click-Through-Rate was 83 %. The survey says that e-
mail marketing has an uncertain future. SMS have second highest rate of adoption
among the respondents. The adoption rate is 95 % and 88 % in the UK and the US
respectively. Rowley (2002) summarized effective e-mail communication tips.2 E-
mail communication should be relevant and targeted. Recipients are likely to dislike
junk e-mails. Marketers can use customers’ past purchase record to filter list of the
customers to whom communication is to be made regarding new offers and new
products. Routine e-mails should be avoided. E-mails should be sent only when there
is something new and important for customers. Customers must find contact details of
a person in case customers want to respond. E-mail without response contact details
should not be sent. Setting auto-response e-mail without compromising
personalization is advisable. Convenient opt-out feature must be provided so that
recipients can stop receiving further e-mails. Training is required for customer service
agents to understand effect and legality of e-mail correspondence. Customers must
expect a reasonable date and time by which the company would respond.

3.5 Sales Promotion

Changchien et al noted that Electronic Commerce and internet have changed the way
of connecting and dealing with the customers by the companies.3 Space and time
barriers are removed. Due to low entry barrier and severe competition, attracting and
retaining new customers over internet has become challenging. In this research
authors have proposed an on-line personalized sales promotion Decision Support
System consisting marketing strategies, promotion patterns model, and personalized
promotion products. Authors developed a prototype system to show how on-line
personalized promotion Decision Support System works in electronic commerce.

1
“Email is Most Acceptable Channel for Permission-Based Marketing”, NMA, 9th Nov, 2006, p 9.
2
Rowley Jennifer, E-business – Principles and practice, Palgrave, New York, 2002.
3
Changchien Wesley, Lee Chin-Feng, and Hsu Yu-Jung, On-line Personalized Sales Promotion in
Electronic Commerce, Expert Systems with Applications, vol 27, No. 1, July, 2004

52
Premiums are used for sales promotion in direct marketing. Speed of customer
response is vital in sales promotion other promotional tools for sales promotion are
free samples, joint promotions, coupons, cash refunds, loyalty programs, sweepstakes,
free trials etc. As seen above in the case of Australian hotel industry, handing
effective sales promotion campaign using permission marketing requires training the
staff.

53
Chapter Bibliography

Books
1. Baier Martin, Elements of Direct Marketing, McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, 1985.
2. Clow Kenneth E and Baack Donald, Integrated advertising, promotion, and
marketing communications, 2nd ed, PHI, 2003.
3. Clow Kenneth E and Baack Donald, Integrated Advertising, Promotion, and
Marketing Communications, 2nd ed, PHI, 2003.
4. Godin Seth, Permission marketing: turning strangers into friends, and friends into
customers, Simon & Schuster, New York, 1999.
5. Kotler Philip, Keller Kevin Lane, Koshy Abraham, Jha Mithileshwar, Marketing
Management: a South Asian Perspective, 12th ed, Pearson Education, 2007, p 265.
6. Kuegler Thomas J. Jr., Advertising and Marketing, 3rd ed, PHI, New Delhi, 2000.
7. Laudon Kenneth and Traver Carol, E-Commerce, Pearson Education, New Delhi,
2002.
8. Lee Monle and Johnson Carla, Principles of Advertising: A Global Perspective, 1st
ed, Viva Books Private Limited, New Delhi, 2003.
9. Lovelock Christopher, Services Marketing: People, Technology, Strategy, 4th ed,
Pearson Education, Delhi, 2003.
10. Mukerjee Kaushik, Permission Marketing In Action, Indian Management, March
2005, p 68.
11. Palmer Adrian, Introduction to Marketing, Oxford Uni. Press, the U.K., 2004.
12. Peppers Don and Rogers Martha, The One to One Future; Building Business
Relationships One Customer at a Time, Piatkus, London, 2001.
13. Rafi Mohammed, Fisher Robert J, Jaworski Bernard J and Cahill Aileen M,
Internet Marketing: Building Advantage in the Networked Economy, 1st ed, New
Delhi, TMH, 2002.
14. Rowley Jennifer, E-business – Principles and practice, Palgrave, New York, 2002.
15. Rowley Jennifer, E-business – Principles and Practice, Palgrave, New York, 2002.
16. Sheehan Kim and Hoy Mariea, Flaming, Complaining, Abstaining: How Online
Users Respond to Privacy Concerns, Journal of Advertising, vol 28, No. 3, Fall
1999, p 37-51.
17. Sheth Jagdish N, Parvatiyar Atul, Handbook of Relationship Marketing, SAGE
Publications, 2002.

54
18. Smith P R and Chaffey Dave, eMarketing eXcellence: The Heart of eBusiness,
Butterworth Hwinemann, New Delhi 2001.
19. Stafford Maria R and Faber Ronald J, Advertising, Promotion, and new media,
New Delhi, 2005.
20. Stone Merlin, Davies Derek, and Bond Alison, Direct Hit: Winning Direct
Marketing Campaigns, MacMillan India, 1998.
21. Strauss Judy and Frost Raymond, E-marketing, 2nd ed, PHI, New Delhi, 2002.
22. Sweeney Susan, 101 Ways to Promote Your Website, 5th ed, New Age Int. P. Ltd.,
2005.
23. Wells William, Burnett John and Moriarty Sandra, Advertising: Principles &
Practice, 6th ed, PHI, New Delhi, 2005, p 23.
24. Zeithaml Valarie A and Bitner Jo Mary, Services Marketing: Integrating customer
focus across the firm, 3rd ed, TMH, New Delhi, 2004.

Journals/Magazines
1. “Email is Most Acceptable Channel for Permission-Based Marketing”, NMA, 9th
Nov, 2006, p 9.
2. Allen S F, Don't Call Yourself a Permission Marketer When You Are a Direct
Marketer, Financial Times Prentice Hall, Aug 2, 2002.
3. Ansari and Mela, E-customization, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. XL, May
2003, p 143.
4. Arora Neeraj at el, Putting One-to-One Marketing to Work: Personalization,
Customization, and Choice, Marketing Letters, vol 19, No. 3, 2008, p 305-321.
5. Bessen, Jim (1993), “Riding the Marketing Information Wave,” Harvard Business
Review, Sept-Oct 1993, vol 71, p 150-60.
6. Deighton at el, The Future of Interactive Marketing, Harvard Business Review,
vol 74, no. 6, Nov- Dec 1996, p 151-160.
7. Dhawan Radha, Permission Marketing, Business World, Sept 1999, p 50-51.
8. Drèze Xavier, Lessons from the Front Line Two Key Ways in which the Internet
has Changed Marketing Forever, Applied Stochastic Models in Business and
Industry, vol 21, No. 4-5, 2005, p 443-448.
9. Gagne Claire, Call Me Confused, Canadian Business, vol 77, No. 12, 6th July
2004.
10. Grassfield Max, Invitational Marketing, Coloradobiz, 1st Mar 2000.

55
11. Hagel John III and Rayport Jeffrey F, The Coming Battle for Customer
Information, Harvard Business Review, Jan- Feb 1997, p 53-65.
12. Ingall Jon, Why Permission is the Biggest Issue, Precision Marketing, 8th Aug,
2008, p 14.
13. John Hagel III and Jeffrey F. Rayport, “The coming Battle for Customer
Information”, Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb 1997, p 53.
14. Kenny David and Marshall John, Contextual Marketing, Harvard Business
Review, Nov-Dec 2000, p 119-125.
15. Kim Bartel Sheehan and Mariea Grubbs Hoy, Flaming, Complaining, Abstaining:
How Online Users Respond to Privacy Concerns, Journal of Advertising, vol 28,
No. 3, Fall 1999, p 37–51.
16. Krishnamurthy Sandeep, A Comprehensive Analysis of Permission Marketing,
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Jan 2001.
17. Kumar V, Venkatesan Rajkumar, Reinartz Werner, Knowing What to Sell, When,
and to Whom, Harvard Business Review, March 2006, p 131-137.
18. Kunal Gaurav and Madhuri Modekurti, Permission Marketing: A Shift from
Interruption to Invitation, Marketing Mastermind, April 2007, p 28-30.
19. Morozan Cristian, Enache Elena and Ţinteanu Bogdan, Aspects of Permission
Marketing, Dec 17, 2009, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1524769
20. Mukerjee Kaushik, Permission Marketing In Action, Indian Management, March
2005, p 68.
21. Reed David, Permission Impossible?, Marketing Week, 20th July 2006, p 39.
22. Reed David, Permission Impossible?, Marketing Week, 20th July 2006, p 39.
23. Sheehan Kim and Hoy Mariea, Flaming, Complaining, Abstaining: How Online
Users Respond to Privacy Concerns, Journal of Advertising, vol 28, No. 3, Fall
1999, p 37-51.
24. Singh Anurag and Kumar Brajesh, Consumer Empowerment: an Indian
Experience, Journal of Marketing and Communication, vol 4, No. 2, Sept-Dec
2008, p 57-66.
25. Zurbuchen Dana , “Tell Customers About Your 'Free Prize”, Wisconsin State
Journal, May 1, 2009, p 31.

56
Websites

1. http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/1106.html, Accessed on Aug 19, 2007

2. http://marketingadvocate.com/main/pages/MA/B2B/TopSubPermissionMarketin
g.aspx?hid=557, Accessed on Aug 19, 2007
3. www.123ecommerce.com, Accessed on Aug 19, 2007
4. www.4anything.com, Accessed on Oct 10, 2007
5. www.sethgodin.com, Accessed on Aug 1, 2007
6. www.spamcon.org, Accessed on Nov 23, 2008
7. www.themanagementor.com, Accessed on Sep 29, 2008
8. www.unwantedlinks.com, Accessed on Aug 1, 2007

57