Professional Documents
Culture Documents
03 Consumo Energía Bond + Thoughput UNSMS
03 Consumo Energía Bond + Thoughput UNSMS
0
About the Bond_Op. Work Index Spreadsheet ...
Scope :
The Bond_Op. Work Index spreadsheet was designed to estimate the Operational Work Index of a given
grinding installation of known dimensions and operating conditions, based on the traditional Bond's Law and the
Hogg & Fuersteneau Power Model (see Mill Power_Ball Mills spreadsheet for further details on such model).
Theoretical Framework :
Undoubtedly, the extensive work of Fred C. Bond ("The Third Theory of Comminution", AIME Trans.,Vol. 193, p.
484, 1952. Also in Mining Engineering, May 1952) has been widely recognized as a very significant contribution
to a first understanding of the operational response of conventional ball mills in various grinding circuits. His
Third Theory or "Law" of Comminution has become the most traditionally accepted framework for the
evaluation of existing grinding operations as well as the design of new installations :
E = 10 Wi (1/P801/2 – 1/F801/2)
where :
The Bond's Law so allows, as a first approach, to estimate the energy demand (kWh) required to grind each ton
of ore. Such Specific Energy Consumption determines in turns the Capacity of the grinding section, by the
expression :
M = P/E
where :
Bond's Work Index may be estimated directly from operational data (whenever available) from back-calculation
of the first equation above. In such case is denoted as the Operational Work Index :
Data Input :
All data required by the calculation routine must be defined in each corresponding unprotected white
background cell of the here attached Data File worksheet. Gray background cells contain the results of the
corresponding formulas there defined and are protected to avoid any accidental editing.
GRINDING TASK :
Ore Work Index, kWh/ton (metric) 12.71 Specific Energy, kWh/ton 8.37
Feed Size, F80, microns 4000 x Net Power Available, kW 3348
Product Size, P80, microns 150.0 y Number of Mills for the Task 1
Total Plant Throughput, ton/hr 400.00 Net kW / Mill 3348
Mill
MILL DIMENSIONS AND OPERATING CONDITIONS : Power, kW
2886 Balls
Eff. Diameter Eff. Length Mill Speed Charge Balls Interstitial Lift 0 Overfilling
ft ft % Critical Filling,% Filling,% Slurry Filling,% Angle, (°) 462 Slurry
18.20 29.00 50.00 38.00 38.00 100.00 34.23 3348 Net Total
L/D rpm 10.0 % Losses
1.593 8.98 3720 Gross Total
% Solids in the Mill 72.00 Charge Mill Charge Weight, tons Apparent
Ore Density, ton/m3 2.80 Volume, Ball Slurry Density
Slurry Density, ton/m3 1.86 m3 Charge Interstitial above Balls ton/m3
Balls Density, ton/m3 7.75 81.34 378.24 60.57 0.00 5.395
Toma de decision
x 3
y 4
Prod 12
X
12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
10.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
X
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
GRINDING TASK :
Ore Work Index, kWh (net)/metric ton 11.00 Specific Energy, kWh/ton 6.14
Feed Size, F80, microns 4500 x Net Power Available, kW 4124
Product Size, P80, microns 200.0 y Number of Mills for the Task 1
Total Plant Throughput, ton/hr 671.91 Net kW / Mill 4124
Mill
MILL DIMENSIONS AND OPERATING CONDITIONS : Power, kW
3555 Balls
Eff. Diameter Eff. Length Mill Speed Charge Balls Interstitial Lift 0 Overfilling
ft ft % Critical Filling,% Filling,% Slurry Filling,% Angle, (°) 569 Slurry
18.20 21.90 80.00 38.00 38.00 100.00 35.00 4124 Net Total
L/D rpm 10.0 % Losses
1.203 14.36 4583 Gross Total
% Solids in the Mill 72.00 Charge Mill Charge Weight, tons Apparent
Ore Density, ton/m3 2.80 Volume, Ball Slurry Density
Slurry Density, ton/m3 1.86 m3 Charge Interstitial above Balls ton/m3
Balls Density, ton/m3 7.75 61.43 285.64 45.74 0.00 5.395