Professional Documents
Culture Documents
God Goodness Kindness Evilness
God Goodness Kindness Evilness
Datum 1
especially by Christians, Jews, and Muslims as the one who created and rules
the universe
In the datum 1, the researcher found euphemistic terms “goodness”. This utterance
indicate that the speaker was a bit suprised by Margaret precense. The ephemistic
contain religion aspect that people try to avoid by using the word “goodness”,
“goodness” and “god” can be describe as hyponymy. In this case the word “god”
has a role/place as super ordinate and “goodness” as the sub ordinarte, considering
“goodness” is the characteristic of god. The researcher try to describe this relation
God
analysis approach.
Based on the utterance, “goodness” can be elaborated into several features, there
are the feature of [+surprise] that generated from ”goodness” and feature of
Goodness: [+surprise][+evilness][+kindness]
In this case, the word “goodness” does not hold any sensitive topic, yet it can
refer to a specific thing. Then the researcher try to replace “goodness” with the
In this utterance, “god” refer as a creator of the universe and being whorshiped by
the people, which god can be unpack into several feature, such as [+creator]
[+being worshiped][+evilness]. Unlike the word “goodness”, the word “god” here
does not hide the ultiour meaning, which the meaning relation of both words can
Goodness God
+ Evilness +
+ Kindness +
+ Surprise -
- Creator +
- Being Worshiped +
In the table above, the word “goodness” has similiar feature as “god”, these
feature are [+evilness] and [+kindness] that refer to the characteristic of god. In
addition, “goodness” and “god” don’t share several component which point out
componential analysis table, the word “goodness”does not hold the feature of [-
creator] and [-being worshiped] that included as taboo topic, which make the
word “goodness” less sensitive that the word “god”. In this case, the researcher
can take a conclusion that “goodness”can be used to replace the word “god” and it
belongs to euphemism.
Datum 2
In datum 2, the researcher found “this island” that indicate euphemistic term. The
word “this island” in the utterance has specific meaning and the speaker intend to
hide it. “This island” point out word which at that time refer to “United Kingdom”
since the speaker gives a speech to the British people. The speaker as a Mayor try
to use “this island” to denote the word “United Kingdom” in order to persuade the
people. Public figure such as the speaker usually use generalize word to deliver
their speech, so the listener will not bothered by the speaker’s utterance.
implicate or generate the word of “United Kingdom”. In semantic field theory, the
word “this island” and “United Kingdom” have part/whole relationship. This
Kingdom” which, “island”, “city”, and “countries” are the part of “United
Kingdom”, and in the other hand, “united kingdom” is the whole of those parts.
In order to supprt the description, the writer use componential analysis approach
Based on the utterance, “this island” is denote as a kind of place and area. It can
[+area][+place]
The component of “this island” does not point out specific thing which make the
meaning of word become more broader. In order to make clear the meaning of
“this island”, the researcher replace “this island” with another word according to
This utterance is appropriate, since the speaker denote a kind of place which
implicate the word “United Kingdom”. In this utterance “this island”can be define
Furthermore, the researcher provide the meaning relation of the words “this
[+area] and [+place].Yet, the word “this island” share no features of [-countries]
and [-nation] which, make this word less important. The word “United Kingdom”
can indicate the feature of [+countries] and [+nation], because United Kingdom is
consits of several countries and it included as a nation. The speaker intend to use
appropriate and not appealling if the speaker use “United Kingdom” in his
speech.So, the researcher assume that “this island” is euphemistic term that stand
2. METAPHORE
Datum 3
Margaret: “No, uhm, yes - we have always lived alongside evil. But it has
never been so patient, so avid for carnage, so eager to carry innocents with it
into oblivion”.
-innocents: A person involved by chance in a situation, especially a victim of
crime or war (oxford)
-people: The citizens of a country, especially when considered in relation to
those who govern them (oxford)
utterance, the speaker resent the act of bombing which killed and injured the
people. The word “innocents” represent the “people” who become victim in that
“inocents” is a specific term which used to denote an entity that refer to the word
people
The diagram above show that the people is the whole of “innocents”, “adult”, and
based on its meaning relation, such as [+victim] and [+child]. Then the researcher
paraphasing the word “innocents” with the intended meaning, as the following:
“No, uhm, yes - we have always lived alongside evil. But it has never been so
patient, so avid for carnage, so eager to carry the people with it into
oblivion”.
In this utterance, “innocents” is replaced by the word “the people”. The word
[+elderly]. In order to differentiate the feature of both words, the researcher use
In the table above show that the common component of “innocents” and “the
people” are [child] and [human]. In addition, the diagnostic component that
differentiate “innocents” and “the people” are [victim] [adult] and [elderly].
contain related meaning, however the speaker choose to use “innocents” instead
can take a conclusion that euphemistic tems of “innocent” is stand for the word
“the people”.
Datum 4
Parliament today, but she has put new life into the Dartford Conservative
Association. (27)
Denis: “No one is saying you don’t need a safe seat. You deserve a safe seat”.
SEAT)
opposition in an election.
-seat : the part of a chair or other piece of furniture that a person sits on
-a position in parliament
In datum 4, the researcher found euphemistic term “a safe seat”. In the utterance,
the speaker try to convince the listener and it related with political issues. The
words “a safe seat” itself does not relate something political, which it included
approach.“A safe seat” in the utterance can be elaborated into several components,
such as [+physical] [+furniture]. From these component, it can be seen that “a safe
seat” does not hold any sensitive or taboo issue, however it is obvious that the
speaker use “a safe seat” to denote something else.Then the researcher try to
“No one is saying you don’t need a position (in parliament). You deserve (a
position”.
The researcher try to replaced “a safe seat” into “a position (in parliament)” to see
utterance.To see the differences between “a safe seat” and “a position”, the
From the table above, the word “a safe seat” and “a position” donot share
thing that included in the set of furniture and “a position” is refer to a job or duty,
such as job in parlement. In this case, it can be seen that both of word do not has
meaning relation, however in disscusing political issue, usually British people use
in which the people prefer use euphemistic term “a safe seat” that does not denote
Datum 5
Denis: “But it does not come unless you learn to play the game a little.”
-game in rawson dict: War, like politics, has been long thought of as a game.
speaker try to give advice to the listener. They discuss about political issue, in
which the listener feel doubtful to not be able to enter the parliament with her
accomplishment. So the speaker convince her and give her an advice, ___ without
mentioning the sensitive issues directly. The speaker intend to use “the game” to
refer something else. In this case the researcher try to analyze the meaning of
euphemistic term “the game” and its intended meaning. Based on the utterance,
the researcher assumes that “the game” is refer to political issues and the
researcher try to describe the meaning of “the game” by relate it with the word
“politic”.In this case, the meaning relation between “the game” and “politic” is
with its literal meaning. Furthermore, the researcher will use componential
The word “the game” on the utterance can be elaborated in to several components
which refer to physical activity that has a purpose for entertaining the people. In
the other hand, word “politic” indicate several component, such as: [diplomatic]
politic refer to a activity which usually take a place in parliament. To see wether
In the table above show that the common component of word “the game” and
[parliament].The word “the game” does not share component of [diplomatic] and
[parliament] which make the word “the game” less sensitive aspect. In the other
hand, the word “politic” contain sensitive component such as [diplomatic] and
[parliament] that represent political issue. From this, the researcher found that that
the speaker intend to use the less sensitive one in order to support his utterance.
Datum 6
Margaret: “It’s all very well to talk about changing my voice, Mr Reece, but
for some of my colleagues to imagine me as their leader would be like
imagining, I don’t know, being led into battle by their chambermaid.”
utterances, the speaker discuss political issue which she use euphemistic term
does not related at all with the issue that the speaker talking about. However, the
speaker certainly use the word “chambermaid” to hide its intended meaning. Then
the researcher try to relate the word “chambermaid” with similiar word such as the
In order to support the description, the writer use componential analysis approach
“It’s all very well to talk about changing my voice, Mr Reece, but for some of
my colleagues to imagine me as their leader would be like imagining, I don’t
know, being led into battle by their subordinate.”
To differentiate the component of both words, the researcher use the table of
Chambermaid Subordinate
+ human +
+ Domestic -
+ underling +
- Office +
In the table above show that the common component of the word “chambermaid”
and “Subordinate” are [human] and [underling], mainwhile the other component
such [office] and [domestic] are the diagnostic component. Here, the speaker tent
refer to person who work for more powerful person. Therefore, the speaker use
DATUM
utterances, the speaker discuss political issue which she use euphemistic term
denotes to a tract of land surrounded by water and smaller than a continent, this
notion does not related at all with the issue that the speaker talking about.
However, the speaker certainly use the word “these island” to hide its intended
meaning. Then the researcher try to relate the word “these island” with similiar
word such as the word “Falkland island”. The meaning relation between “these
since both of word does not relate to each other. Futhermore, in semantic field
theory, the relation between “these island” and “Falkland island” is included in
In order to support the description, the writer use componential analysis approach
such as [human] [domestic]. Then the researcher paraphasing the word “these
“It’s all very well to talk about changing my voice, Mr Reece, but for some of
my colleagues to imagine me as their leader would be like imagining, I don’t
know, being led into battle by their subordinate.”
In this utterance, the researcher replace the word “island” into “Falkland island”
To differentiate the component of both words, the researcher use the table of
Chambermaid Subordinate
+ human +
+ Domestic -
+ underling +
- Office +
DATUM
You are the backbone of our nation! Small firms like Loveday’s Ice Cream.
(46)
utterances, the speaker discuss political issue which she use euphemistic term
denotes to a tract of land surrounded by water and smaller than a continent, this
notion does not related at all with the issue that the speaker talking about.
However, the speaker certainly use the word “these island” to hide its intended
meaning. Then the researcher try to relate the word “these island” with similiar
word such as the word “Falkland island”. The meaning relation between “these
since both of word does not relate to each other. Futhermore, in semantic field
theory, the relation between “these island” and “Falkland island” is included in
In order to support the description, the writer use componential analysis approach
Based on the utterance the word “these island” can be elaborated into components,
such as [human] [domestic]. Then the researcher paraphasing the word “these
“It’s all very well to talk about changing my voice, Mr Reece, but for some of
my colleagues to imagine me as their leader would be like imagining, I don’t
know, being led into battle by their subordinate.”
In this utterance, the researcher replace the word “island” into “Falkland island”
To differentiate the component of both words, the researcher use the table of
Chambermaid Subordinate
+ human +
+ Domestic -
+ underling +
- Office +
Datum 7
Based on the utterance, the speaker gives political speech in public and she try to
convince the people to help her in election. From this researcher assume that “the
test” which mentioned by the speaker is refer to “the election”. The type of
euphemistic term of “the test” is metaphore, since the word “the test” can be use
to describe the different notion which relate to taboo topic, such as political issue.
mainwhile the word “the election’ can be defined as “the act or process of
choosing someone for a public office by voting”. Therefore both of words does
not have relation, however the word “the test” can represent the word “the
approach as following:
According to the utterance, “the test” can be elaborated into several components
[political party]
To see wether “the election” is the intended meaning of euphemistic term “the
In the table above show that the common component of word “the test” and “the
[vote] [leadership contest] [political party]. The word “the test” does not share
political issue, this make the word “the test” less sensitive issue than the word “the
election”. From this, the researcher found that that the speaker intend to replace
“the election” with “the test”, consider that it is more polite and less sensitive one.
3. METONYMY
Datum 8
Evil: criminal
speaker discuss political issue which she use euphemistic term “chambermaid” to
that brings sorrow, distress, or calamity, this notion does not related at all with the
issue that the speaker talking about. However, the speaker certainly use the word
“chambermaid” to hide its intended meaning. Then the researcher try to relate the
word “evil” with similiar word such as the word “criminal”. The meaning relation
since both of word does not relate to each other. Futhermore, in semantic field
Criminal
In order to support the description, the writer use componential analysis approach
Based on the utterance the word “evil” can be elaborated into components, such as
Then the researcher paraphasing the word “chambermaid” with the intended
“It’s all very well to talk about changing my voice, Mr Reece, but for some of
my colleagues to imagine me as their leader would be like imagining, I don’t
know, being led into battle by their subordinate.”
In this utterance, the researcher replace the word “evil” into “criminal” which
To differentiate the component of both words, the researcher use the table of
evil criminal
- human +
+ Bad +
+ Harmful +
+ Immoral +
+ crime +
In the table above show that the common component of the word “chambermaid”
and “Subordinate” are [human] and [underling], mainwhile the other component
such [office] and [domestic] are the diagnostic component. Here, the speaker tent
cleaning the house, these description is shown from the component of [domestic].
refer to person who work for more powerful person. Therefore, the speaker use
4. Understatement
Datum 9
So you are proposing to go to war over these Islands. They’re thousands
of miles away, a handful of citizens, politically and economically...
insignificant, if you’ll excuse me –
utterances, the speaker discuss political issue which she use euphemistic term
denotes to a tract of land surrounded by water and smaller than a continent, this
notion does not related at all with the issue that the speaker talking about.
However, the speaker certainly use the word “these island” to hide its intended
meaning. Then the researcher try to relate the word “these island” with similiar
word such as the word “Falkland island”. The meaning relation between “these
since both of word does not relate to each other. Futhermore, in semantic field
theory, the relation between “these island” and “Falkland island” is included in
In order to support the description, the writer use componential analysis approach
such as [human] [domestic]. Then the researcher paraphasing the word “these
“It’s all very well to talk about changing my voice, Mr Reece, but for some of
my colleagues to imagine me as their leader would be like imagining, I don’t
know, being led into battle by their subordinate.”
In this utterance, the researcher replace the word “island” into “Falkland island”
To differentiate the component of both words, the researcher use the table of
Chambermaid Subordinate
+ human +
+ Domestic -
+ underling +
- Office +
In the table above show that the common component of the word “chambermaid”
and “Subordinate” are [human] and [underling], mainwhile the other component
such [office] and [domestic] are the diagnostic component. Here, the speaker tent
cleaning the house, these description is shown from the component of [domestic].
refer to person who work for more powerful person. Therefore, the speaker use
utterances, the speaker discuss political issue which she use euphemistic term
denotes to a tract of land surrounded by water and smaller than a continent, this
notion does not related at all with the issue that the speaker talking about.
However, the speaker certainly use the word “these island” to hide its intended
meaning. Then the researcher try to relate the word “these island” with similiar
word such as the word “Falkland island”. The meaning relation between “these
since both of word does not relate to each other. Futhermore, in semantic field
theory, the relation between “these island” and “Falkland island” is included in
In order to support the description, the writer use componential analysis approach
Based on the utterance the word “these island” can be elaborated into components,
such as [human] [domestic]. Then the researcher paraphasing the word “these
“It’s all very well to talk about changing my voice, Mr Reece, but for some of
my colleagues to imagine me as their leader would be like imagining, I don’t
know, being led into battle by their subordinate.”
In this utterance, the researcher replace the word “island” into “Falkland island”
To differentiate the component of both words, the researcher use the table of
Chambermaid Subordinate
+ human +
+ Domestic -
+ underling +
- Office +
OVERSTATEMENT
DATUM
- in their eyes. A single grocer’s daughter. But if you were to become the
wife of a moderately successful businessman (28)
utterances, the speaker discuss political issue which she use euphemistic term
denotes to a tract of land surrounded by water and smaller than a continent, this
notion does not related at all with the issue that the speaker talking about.
However, the speaker certainly use the word “these island” to hide its intended
meaning. Then the researcher try to relate the word “these island” with similiar
word such as the word “Falkland island”. The meaning relation between “these
since both of word does not relate to each other. Futhermore, in semantic field
theory, the relation between “these island” and “Falkland island” is included in
Based on the utterance the word “these island” can be elaborated into components,
such as [human] [domestic]. Then the researcher paraphasing the word “these
“It’s all very well to talk about changing my voice, Mr Reece, but for some of
my colleagues to imagine me as their leader would be like imagining, I don’t
know, being led into battle by their subordinate.”
In this utterance, the researcher replace the word “island” into “Falkland island”
To differentiate the component of both words, the researcher use the table of
Chambermaid Subordinate
+ human +
+ Domestic -
+ underling +
- Office +
DATUM
utterances, the speaker discuss political issue which she use euphemistic term
denotes to a tract of land surrounded by water and smaller than a continent, this
notion does not related at all with the issue that the speaker talking about.
However, the speaker certainly use the word “these island” to hide its intended
meaning. Then the researcher try to relate the word “these island” with similiar
word such as the word “Falkland island”. The meaning relation between “these
since both of word does not relate to each other. Futhermore, in semantic field
theory, the relation between “these island” and “Falkland island” is included in
In order to support the description, the writer use componential analysis approach
Based on the utterance the word “these island” can be elaborated into components,
such as [human] [domestic]. Then the researcher paraphasing the word “these
“It’s all very well to talk about changing my voice, Mr Reece, but for some of
my colleagues to imagine me as their leader would be like imagining, I don’t
know, being led into battle by their subordinate.”
In this utterance, the researcher replace the word “island” into “Falkland island”
To differentiate the component of both words, the researcher use the table of
Chambermaid Subordinate
+ human +
+ Domestic -
+ underling +
- Office +