Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Concrete Foundations 59ccc9e8e7cb9
Concrete Foundations 59ccc9e8e7cb9
It also provides a means by which forces or movements within the ground can be resisted by
the building. In some cases, foundation elements can perform a number of functions: for
example, a diaphragm wall forming part of a basement will usually be designed to carry loading
from the superstructure.
If new foundations are placed close to those of an existing building, the loading on the ground
will increase and movements to the existing building may occur. When an excavation is made,
the stability of adjacent buildings may be threatened unless the excavation is adequately
supported. This is particularly important with sands and gravels which derive their support from
lateral restraint.
The choice of foundation type or the type of foundation selected for a particular structure
is influenced by the following factors:
An essential requirement in foundations is the evaluation of the load which a structure can
safely bear. The types of foundation generally adopted for building and structures are spread
(pad), strip, balanced and cantilever or combined footings, raft and pile foundations.
For example, strip footings are usually chosen for buildings in which relatively small loads
are carried mainly on walls. When the spread footings occupy more than half the area covered
by the structure and where differential settlement on poor soil is likely to occur a raft foundation
is found to be more economical. Pad footings, piles or pile groups are more appropriate when
the structural loads are carried by columns. If differential settlements must be tightly controlled,
shallow strip or pad footings (except on rock or dense sand) will probably be inadequate so
stiffer surface rafts or deeper foundations may have to be considered as alternatives.
This type of foundation viewed as the inverse of a one-storey beam, slab and column
system. The slab rests on soil carrying the load from the beam/column system which itself
transmits the loads from the superstructure.
Figure: 3.9-2
Types of foundations
These are generally supporting columns and may be square or rectangular in plan and
in section, they may be of the slab, stepped or sloping type. The stepped footing results in
a better distribution of load than a slab footing. A sloped footing is more economical although
constructional problems are associated with the sloping surface. The isolated spread footing in
plan concrete has the advantage that the column load is transferred to the soil through dispersion
in the footing. In reinforced concrete footings, i.e. pads, the slab is treated as an inverted
cantilever bearing the soil pressure and supported by the column. Where a two-way footing is
provided it must be reinforced in two directions of the bending with bars of steel placed in the
bottom of the pad parallel to its sides.
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017
Foundations under walls or under closely spaced rows of columns sometimes require a specific
type of foundation, such as cantilever and balanced footings and strip footings.
Pad footing
Square or rectangular footing supporting a single column.
Strip footing
Long footing supporting a continuous wall.
Combined footing
Footing supporting two or more columns.
Balanced footing
Footing supporting two columns, one of which lies at or near one end.
Raft
Foundation supporting a number of columns or loadbearing walls so as to transmit
approximately uniform loading to the soil.
Pile cap
Foundation in the form of a pad, strip, combined or balanced footing in which the forces
are transmitted to the soil through a system of piles.
The plan area of the foundation should be proportioned on the following assumptions:
a. All forces are transmitted to the soil without exceeding the allowable bearing pressure
b. When the foundation is axially loaded, the reactions to design loads are uniformly
distributed per unit area or per pile. A foundation may be treated as axially loaded if the
eccentricity does not exceed 0.02 times the length in that direction
c. When the foundation is eccentrically loaded, the reactions vary linearly across the
footing or across the pile system. Footings should generally be so proportioned that zero
pressure occurs only at one edge. It should be noted that eccentricity of load can arise
in two ways: the columns being located eccentrically on the foundation; and/or the
column transmitting a moment to the foundation. Both should be taken into account and
combined to give the maximum eccentricity.
d. All parts of a footing in contact with the soil should be included in the assessment of
contact pressure
e. It is preferable to maintain a reasonably similar pressure under all foundations to avoid
significant differential settlement.
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017
A shallow foundation distributes loads from the building into the upper layers of the
ground. Shallow foundations are susceptible to any seismic effect that changes the ground
contour, such as settlement or lateral movement. Such foundations are suitable when these
upper soil layers have sufficient strength (‘bearing capacity’) to carry the load with an
acceptable margin of safety and tolerable settlement over the design life.
a) Strip footing
b) Spread or isolated footing
Figure: 3.9.1-1
Shallow Foundations
Figure: 3.9.1-2
Spread Footing
Design of Reinforcement
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017
Figure: 3.9.1-3
Figure: 3.9.1-4
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017
Figure: 3.9.1-5
Figure: 3.9.1-6
Figure: 3.9.2-2
Figure: 3.9.2-3
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017
It supports two columns as shown in fig. 3.9.3-1. It is used when the two columns are
so close to each other that their individual footings would overlap. A combine footing may be
rectangular or trapezoidal in plan. Trapezoidal footing is provided when the load on one of the
columns is larger than the other column.
A strip footing is another type of spread footing which is provided for a load bearing
wall. A strip footing can also be provided for a row of columns which are so closely spaced that
their spread footings overlap or nearly touch each other. In such a cases, it is more economical
to provide a strip footing than to provide a number of spread footings in one line. A strip footing
is also known as “continuous footing”.
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017
Figure: 3.9.4-1
Figure: 3.9.4-2
It is a large slab supporting a number of columns and walls under entire structure or a
large part of the structure. A mat is required when the allowable soil pressure is low or where
the columns and walls are so close that individual footings would overlap or nearly touch each
other. Mat foundations are useful in reducing the differential settlements on non-homogeneous
soils or where there is large variation in the loads on individual columns.
Figure: 3.9.5-1
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017
Figure: 3.9.5-2
Deep foundations act by transferring loads down to competent soil at depth and/or by
carrying loading by frictional forces acting on the vertical face of the pile. Diaphragm walls,
contiguous bored piles and secant piling methods are covered later in this chapter.
Short-bored piles have been used on difficult ground for low-rise construction for many years.
They can be designed to carry loads with limited settlements, or to reduce total or differential
settlements. They can have bases that are flat, pointed or bulbous, and shafts that are vertical or
raked. In some circumstances, piles can be constructed of other materials, such as timber or
plastics.
Piled walls or sheet piles are used to resist lateral movements, such as in forming a basement.
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017
The piling technique used to install the piles will be determined by the ground conditions,
loading requirements for the final pile as well as other factors such as access or proximity to
other buildings and the need for noise reduction.
Pile types
There are two basic types of piles:
● cast-in-place (or replacement) piles and
● driven (or displacement) piles.
Figure: 3.9.6-1
Figure: 3.9.6-2
Piles are individual columns, generally constructed of concrete or steel, that support
loading through a combination of friction on the pile shaft and end-bearing on the pile toe. The
distribution of load carried by each mechanism is a function of soil type, pile type and
settlement. They can also be used to resist imposed loading caused by the movement of the
surrounding soil, such as vertical movements of shrinking and swelling soils. Piles can be
installed vertically or may be raked to support different loading configurations.
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017
Figure: 3.9.6-3
All pile caps should generally be reinforced in two orthogonal directions on the top and
bottom faces and the amount of reinforcement should not be less than 0.0015bh in each
direction. The bending moments and the reinforcement should be calculated on critical sections
at the column faces, assuming that the pile loads are concentrated at the pile centres. This
reinforcement should be continued past the piles and bent up vertically to provide full
anchorage past the centreline of each pile.
Figure: 3.9.6-4
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017
Figure: 3.9.6-5
Figure: 3.9.6-6
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017
Figure 3.9.6-3: collapse of unbearable soil
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017
Figure 3.9.6-4: Main reinforcement in slab foundation
hd 80 cm
Width of column:
bs 50 cm
Height of column:
hs 40 cm
Design strength of reinforcement:
Figure: 3.9.1-1
P P1 Qbu P 1188 kN
Required surface area of reinforcement to punching:
P 2
Asb Asb 0.00368372 m
0.86 fyd
Reinforcement diameter:
2
2
25 mm As1 As1 0.00049087 m
4
Number of profiles:
Asb
n n 7.504 Q 0.42 hd fctm ucr Q 1512 kN
As1
Figure: 3.9.1-2
I28
3 2 6 4
A1 6.10 10 mm J1y 75.8 10 mm h1 280 mm
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017
b1 119 mm b2 119 mm
b3 119 mm
I34
3 2 6 4
A1 8.67 10 mm J1y 157 10 mm
h1 340 mm
b1 137 mm b2 137 mm
b3 137 mm
I38
3 2 6 4
A1 10.7 10 mm J1y 240 10 mm h1 380 mm
L 1.45 m p1
P p1 148.5 kN M p1 0.75 L M 161.49375 m kN
8
3 3
b2 h2 b3 h3
A2 b2 h2 A3 b3 h3 J2 J3
12 12
h1 h2 h3
A1 h2 A2 A3 h1 h2
e2
2 2 2 e2 0.21 m
A1 A2 A 3
H h1 h2 h3 H 0.42 m e1 H e2
e1 0.21 m
h1 h2 h3
a1 h2 e2 a2 e2 a3 H e2 a1 0 m
2 2 2
2 2 2 4
J J1y J2 J3 A1 a1 A2 a2 A3 a3 J 0.0004786 m
J
1.99416111
J1y
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017
Figure: 3.9.1-3
Section modulus:
J 3 J 3
Wd Wd 0.00227904 m Wh Wh 0.00227904 m
e1 e2
Stress control:
M
d d 70.86 MPa s 210 MPa
Wd
M
h h 70.8604 MPa s 210 MPa
Wh
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017
Example 3.9-2: Determination of the design bearing capacity of the soil at depth
dp =1,5 m
cef ef
cef 16 kPa ef 21 deg cd d
2 m
ef
m kN
ef 4 deg 1 21 2 1
3
m
Base area of the footing: Width: bp = 1 m Length: Lp = 6 m
Coefficient of the shape of the footing:
bp bp bp dp
sc 1 0.2
lp
sd 1
lp
sin d sb 1 0.3
lp
dc 1 0.1
bp
dp
dd 1 0.1
bp
sin 2 d id 1 ic 1 ib 1
Design bearing capacity of the soil:
bp
Rd cd N c sc dc ic 1 dp N d sd dd id 2 N b sb db ib Rd 243.077 k
2