Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Law of Evidence Question Papers
Law of Evidence Question Papers
Law of Evidence Question Papers
Q. No. 2. Explain the relevancy of the facts forming the part of same
transaction. Marks : 16
Jí¨æà ÊÜÂÊÜÖÝÃܨÜÈÉ »ÝX¿ÞXÃÜáÊÜ ÓÜíWÜ£WÜÙÜ ÓÜáÓÜí¨Üñæ¿á®Üá° ËÊÜÄÔ.
Q. No. 4. What is dying declaration ? What are the conditions for its
admissibility as evidence ? Marks : 16
ÊÜáÃÜ|PÝÆ ÖæàÚPæ Gí¨ÜÃæà®Üá ? A¨Üá ÓÝPÜÒÊÝX ÔÌàPÜÄÓÜÆá CÃÜáÊÜ
ÐÜÃÜñÜá¤WÜÙÝÊÜâÊÜâ ?
Q. No. 5. “Oral evidence must in all the cases whatever be direct” Explain
with exceptions. Marks : 16
""ÊÜåèUPÜ ÓÝQÒ¿á®Üá°, ¿ÞÊÜâ¨æà ±ÜÅPÜÃÜ|ËÃÜÈ ®æàÃÜÊÝX CÃÜñÜPÜR¨Üáª''
A±ÜÊݨÜWÜÙæãí©Wæ ËÊÜÄÔ.
P.T.O.
0601/1001 *06011001*
Q. No. 6. Define Estoppel. Explain the various kinds of Estoppel. Marks : 16
Ëí«ÜÊÜ®Üá° ÊÝÂTݯÔ. Ëí«ÜWÜÙÜ ËË«Ü ±ÜÅPÝÃÜWÜÙÜ®Üá° ËÊÜÄÔ.
Q. No. 7. What are leading questions ? When they can be asked ? Marks : 16
EñܤÃÜ ÓÜãaÜPÜ ±ÜÅÍæ°WÜÙæí¨ÜÃæà®Üá ? AÊÜâWÜÙÜ®Üá° ¿ÞÊÝWÜ PæàÙÜÖÜá¨Üá ?
Q. No. 8. Short notes :
Write short notes on any two of the following : Marks : 8×2=16
¸æàPÝ¨Ü GÃÜvÜPæR ÆZá q±Ü³~ ÃæÀáÄ :
a) Confession by co-accused
ÓÜÖÜBÃæãಿá ñܱæä³²³Wæ
b) Public document
ÓÝÊÜìg¯PÜ ¨ÜÓݤÊæàgá
c) Professional communications.
ÊÜ꣤±ÜÃÜ ÖæàÚPæWÜÙÜá.
Q. No. 9. Answer any two with reasons : Marks : 10×2=20
¸æàPÝ¨Ü GÃÜvÜPæR PÝÃÜ|WÜÙæãí©Wæ EñܤÄÔ :
a) A is accused of a crime. It is shown that soon after the crime
he is absconding his place. Is this fact relevant ?
"A'®Üá Jí¨Üá A±ÜÃÝ«Ü¨Ü BÃæãಿÞX¨Ü᪠, AÊÜ®Üá A±ÜÃÝ«Ü gÃÜáX¨Ü
ñÜPÜÒ| ñܮܰ ÓܧÙÜ©í¨Ü PÝOæ¿ÞX¨Ýª®æí¨Üá ñæãàÄÓÜÇÝX¨æ. D ÓÜíWÜ£¿áá
ÓÜáÓÜí¨ÜÊæà ?
b) The question is whether A was the legitimate son of B ? Is
the fact that A was always treated as such by the members
of the family, relevant ?
"A'®Üá "'®Ü «ÜÊÜáìg ÊÜáWÜ®æ ? Gí ±ÜÅÍæ° C¨æ. AÊܮܮÜá° ÊÝÓܤËPÜÊÝX
PÜáoáí¨Ü ÓܨÜÓÜÂÃæÆÉÃÜã "' «ÜÊÜáìg ÊÜáWÜ®æí¨æà ®Üvæ¨ÜáPæãÙÜáÛ£¤ÃÜáÊÜ
ÓÜíWÜ£¿áá ÓÜáÓÜí¨ÜÊæà ?
c) A is charged with travelling in a railway without a ticket.
A denies the charge. On whom the burden of proof lies ?
"A'®Üá ÃæçÈ®ÜÈÉ qPæàoá CÆɨæà ±ÜÅ¿Þ~ÓÜᣤ¨Ýª®æí¨Üá BÃæãà²ÓÜÇÝX¨æ.
AÊÜ®Üá B B±Ý¨Ü®æ¿á®Üá° AÆÉWÜÙ橨ݪ®æ. ¿ÞÃÜ ÊæáàÇæ ÃÜágáÊÝ£®Ü
»ÝÃÜ CÃÜáñܤ¨æ ?
________________
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
*0601* 0601
VI Semester 3 Years LL.B. Examination, December 2012
LAW OF EVIDENCE
Duration : 3 Hours Max. Marks : 100
Q. No. 1. (a) Explain the relevancy of facts forming part of the same
transaction, with suitable illustrations. Marks : 15
Jí¨æà ÊÜÂÊÜÖÜÃÜOæ¿á »ÝWÜÊÝXÃÜáÊÜ Zo®æWÜÙÜ ÓÜáÓÜí¨Üñæ¿á®Üá° ÓÜãPܤ
E¨ÝÖÜÃÜOæWÜÙæãí©Wæ ËÊÜÄÔ.
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
Define admissions and state when the statements of third
persons are admissions.
J±ÜâË
³ PæWÙÜ Ü®áÜ ° ÊÝÂTÝÂ¯Ô ÊÜáñÜᤠÊÜáãÃÜ®¿
æ á ÊÜÂQ¤WÙÜ Ü ÖæàÚPæWÙÜ áÜ ¿ÞÊÝWÜ
J±Üâ³ËPæWÜÙÝWÜáñܤÊæ Gíá¨Ü®Üá° ÖæàÚÄ.
(b) A is charged with shooting at B with intent to kill him.
Prosecution has proved a fact that A had previously shot at
B. Is it relevant ? Marks : 5
"A' ®Üá PæãÇæ ÊÜÞvÜáÊÜ E¨æªàÍÜ©í¨Ü "' ®Ü PÜvæWæ WÜáívÜá ÖÝÄÔ¨Ü
B±Ý¨Ü®æWæãÙÜWÝX¨Ýª®æ. D Êæã¨ÜÆã "A' ®Üá "' ®Ü PÜvæWæ WÜáívÜá
ÖÝÄԨܪ®Üá Gí Zo®æ¿á®Üá° A¼Áãàg®æ ÃÜágáÊÝñÜá±ÜwÔ¨æ. C¨Üá
ÓÜáÓÜí¨ÜÊæà ?
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
A is accused of receiving stolen goods knowing them to be
stolen. He wants to prove that he refused to sell them below
market value. Can he do so ?
"A' ®Üá Wæ㣤¨Ü㪠PÜÙÜÛñÜ®Ü¨Ü ÊÜÓÜá¤WÜÙÜ®Üá° ÔÌàPÜÄst B±Ý¨Ü®æWæãÙÜWÝX¨Ýª®æ.
ñÝ®Üá AÊÜâWÜÙÜ®Üá° ÊÜÞÃÜáPÜpær ¸æÇæXíñÜ PÜwÊæá ¸æÇæWæ ÊÜÞÃÜÆá
¯ÃÝPÜ Ä Ô¨Ýª X ÃÜ á gáÊÝñÜ á ±Ü w ÓÜ Æ á Cbf Ô ¨Ýª ® æ . AÊÜ ® Ü á ÖÝWæ
ÊÜÞvÜÖÜá¨æà ?
P.T.O.
0601 -2- *0601*
UNIT II
Q. No. 3. (a) Explain the rule of exclusion of hearsay evidence and state
exceptions. Marks : 15
PæàÚ £Ú¨ÜáPæãívÜ ÓÝPÜÒ$嬆 ÖæãÃÜÖÝPÜáËPæ ¯¿áÊÜáÊÜ®Üá° ËÊÜÄÔÄ ÊÜáñÜá¤
A±ÜÊݨÜWÜÙÜ®Üá° ÖæàÚÄ.
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
Explain the relevancy of character evidence in Civil and
Criminal cases.
©Êݯ ÖÝWÜã A±ÜÃÝPÜ ±ÜÅPÜÃÜ|WÜÙÜÈÉ ÎàÆ ÓÝPÜÒ$嬆 ÓÜáÓÜí¨Üñæ¿á®Üá°
ËÊÜÄÔÄ.
*0601* -3- 0601
(b) A wants to prove a will. But both the attesting witnesses to
that will are dead. Advise him. Marks : 5
"A' ®Üá Jí¨Üá ÊÜáÃÜ|ÍÝÓÜ®ÜÊÜ®Üá° ÃÜágáÊÝñÜá±ÜwÓܸæàPæí©¨Ýª®æ. B¨ÜÃæ
B ÊÜáÃÜ|ÍÝÓÜ®ÜQRÃÜáÊÜ GÃÜvÜã ÓÝQÒ ¨ÝÃÜÃÜá ÓÝÊܮܰ²³¨ÝªÃæ. AÊܯWæ ÓÜÆÖæ
¯àwÄ.
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
UNIT IV
UNIT V
________________
*0601* 0601
Sixth Semester of Three Year LL.B. Degree Examination, December 2013
LAW OF EVIDENCE
Duration : 3 Hours Max. Marks : 100
UNIT I
Q. No. 1. (a) Explain the relevancy of introductory or explanatory facts. Marks : 15
±ÜÅÓݤ±ÜPÜ ÊÜáñÜᤠËÊÜÃÜOÝñܾPÜ ñÜ¥æÂWÜÙÜ ÓÜáÓÜí¨Üñæ¿á®Üá° ËÊÜÄÔÄ.
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
Define Admissions. State the persons whose admissions are
relevant.
J±Üâ³ËPæWÜÙÜ®Üá° ÊÝÂTݯÔÄ ÊÜáñÜᤠ¿ÞÊÜ ÊÜÂQ¤WÜÙÜ J±Üâ³ËPæWÜÙÜá
ÓÜáÓÜí¨ÜÊÝWÜáÊÜÊæíá¨Ü®Üá° £ÚÔÄ.
(b) A is accused of Bs murder by beating him. At the time of
incident there was an exchange of words between A and B.
Is this fact relevant. Marks : 5
"A'®Üá "' ®Ü®áÜ ° Öæãvæ¨áÜ PæãÇæ ÊÜÞw¨Ü B±Ý¨Ü®Wæ ã
æ ÙÜWÝX¨Ýª®.æ Zo®æ¿á
ÓÜí¨Ü»Üì¨ÜÈÉ AÊÜĺÃÜ ®ÜvÜáÊæ ±ÜÃÜÓܳÃÜ ÊݨÜÊÝX¨æ Gíá¨Ü®Üá°
ñæãàÄÓÜÇÝX¨æ. D ÊÝÓܤËPÜñæ¿áá ÓÜáÓÜí¨ÜÊæà ?
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
The question is whether A robbed B. Does the fact that,
shortly before the robbery, B went to a shop with money in his
possession and showed it to third persons, is relevant ?
"A' ®Üá "'®Ü®Üá° ÓÜáÈWæ ÊÜÞw¨Ýª®æÁáà Gíá¨Üá ±ÜÅÍæ°¿ÞX¨æ. ÓÜáÈWæ
BWÜáÊÜ ÊÜááíaæ "'®Üá ñÜ®æã°í©Wæ ÖÜ|ÊÜ®Üá° ñæWæ¨ÜáPæãívÜá Jí¨Üá AíWÜwWæ
ÖæãàX¨Ü᪠ÊÜáñÜᤠñܮܰÈɨܪ ÖÜ|ÊÜ®Üá° ¸æàÃæ ÊÜÂQ¤WÜÚWæ ñæãàÄst Zo®æWÜÙÜ
ÓÝPÜÒ$ÂWÜÙÜá ÓÜáÓÜí¨ÜÊæà ?
P.T.O.
0601 -2- *0601*
UNIT II
Q. No. 2. (a) What is dying declaration ? What are the conditions for its
relevancy ? Marks : 15
ÊÜáÃÜ|PÝÈPÜ ÖæàÚPæÁáí¨ÜÃæà®Üá ? A¨ÜÃÜ ÓÜáÓÜí¨Üñæ¿á ¯¿áÊÜáWÜÙÝÊÜâÊÜâ ?
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
Explain the circumstances in which judgements of the courts
become relevant.
®Ý¿ÞÆ¿á¨Ü £à±ÜâìWÜÙÜá ÓÜáÓÜí¨ÜÊÝWÜáÊÜ ÓÜí¨Ü»ÜìWÜÙÜ®Üá° ËÊÜÄÔÄ.
(b) A is accused of murder of C. During trial A confesses,
I and B murdered C . Can this confession be considered
against B ? Marks : 5
"A'®Üá "PÜ ' GíáÊÜÊܮܮÜá° PæãÇæ ÊÜÞw¨Ü B±Ý¨Ü®æWæãÙÜWÝX¨Ýª®æ. ËaÝÃÜOæ
PÝÆPæR AÊÜ®Üá ®Ý®Üá ÊÜáñÜᤠ"' ®Üá "PÜ ' ®Ü®Üá° PæãÇæ ÊÜÞwÃÜáÊÜâ¨ÝX
ñܱæä³²³Wæ¿á®Üá° ÊÜÞwÃÜáñݤ®æ. D ñܱæä³²³Wæ¿á®Üá° "'®Ü ËÃÜá¨Ü
±ÜÄWÜ~ÓÜÖÜá¨æà ?
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
The question is whether A was legitimate son of B. Does
the fact that, A was always treated as such by the members
of the family relevant ?
"A'®Üá "'®Ü «ÜÊÜáì ÓÜÊÜá¾ñÜ ÊÜáWÜ®æà Gíá¨Üá ±ÜÅÍæ°¿Þ¨ÝWÜ, PÜáoáí¨Ü
ÓܨÜÓÜÂÄí¨Ü "A'®Ü®Üá° ¿ÞÊÝWÜÆã B Ä࣠±ÜÄWÜ~ÓÜƳvÜᣤ¨Üª®Üá Gí
ÓÜíWÜ£¿áá ÓÜáÓÜí¨ÜÊæà ?
UNIT III
Q. No. 3. (a) Oral evidence must in all the cases whatsoever be direct.
Explain with exceptions. Marks : 15
""ÊÜåèUPÜ ÓÝPÜÒ$ÂWÜÙáÜ GÇÝÉ ±ÜÅPÃÜ |
Ü WÜÙÈ
Ü É ¿ÞÊÜâ¨æà ÓÜí¨Ü»ì
Ü ËÃÜÈ ®æàÃÜÊÝX
CÃÜñÜPÜR¨Üáª''. A±ÜÊݨÜWÜÙæãí©Wæ ËÊÜÄÔÄ.
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
What are public documents ? How they are proved ?
ÓÝÊÜìg¯PÜ ¨ÜÓݤÊæàgá Gí¨ÜÃæà®Üá ? AÊÜâWÜÙÜ®Üá° ÖæàWæ ÓݹàñÜá ±ÜwÓÜÖÜá¨Üá ?
*0601* -3- 0601
UNIT IV
UNIT V
Q. No. 5. (a) Who are competent to testify under Indian Evidence Act ?
Examine the competence of the following persons as witnesses.
i) Child witness ii) Dumb witness. Marks : 15
»ÝÃÜ£à¿á ÓÝPÜÒ$ A¯¿áÊÜá¨ÜÈÉ ¿ÞÃÜá ÓÝPÜÒ$ ÖæàÙÜÆá ÓÜÊÜá¥ÜìÃÜá ?
D PæÙÜPÜívÜ ÊÜÂQ¤WÜÙÜá ÓÝQÒ¿ÞWÜÆá CÃÜáÊÜ ÓÝÊÜá¥ÜÂìÊÜ®Üá° ±ÜÄÎàÈÔÄ.
i) ÊÜáWÜá ÓÝQÒ ii) ÊÜáãPÜ ÓÝQÒ .
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
________________
*06011001* 0601/1001
VI Semester 3 Years LL.B./X Semester 5 Years B.A. LL.B./B.B.A. LL.B.
Examination, December 2015
LAW OF EVIDENCE
UNIT – I
Q. No. 1. (a) What is evidence ? State different kinds of evidence. Marks : 15
ÓÝPÜÒ$ Gí¨ÜÃæà®Üá ? ËË«Ü Äࣿá ÓÝPÜÒ$ÂWÜÙÜ®Üá° £ÚÔÄ.
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
Define admission and point out the differences between
admission and confession.
J²³Wæ¿á®Üá° ÊÝÂTÝÂ¯Ô ÊÜáñÜᤠJ²³Wæ ÊÜáñÜᤠñܱæä³²³WæWÜÙÜ ®ÜvÜáË®Ü
ÊÜÂñÝÂÓÜWÜÙÜ®Üá° ÓÜãbÔÄ.
(b) ‘A’ is tried for the murder of ‘B’ by poisoning. Is the fact, that
before the death of ‘B’, ‘A’ procured poison similar to that which
was administered to ‘B’ relevant ? Marks : 5
"' ®Ü®Üá° ËÐÜ ÖÝQ Pæãí¨Ü B±Ý¨Ü®æ¿á ÊæáàÇæ "A'®Ü®Üá° ËaÝÃÜOæWæ
JÙܱÜwÓÜÇÝÀáñÜá. "'®Üá ÓÝ¿ááÊÜâ¨ÜPÜãR Êæã¨ÜÆá AÊܯWæ ÖÝQ¨Ü
ËÐܨíÜ ñÜÖáÜ ¨æà ËÐÜ樆 áÜ ° "A'®Üá ±Üv¨
æ áÜ Pæãíw¨Üª ÓÜíWÜ£¿áá ÓÜáÓÜí¨ÜÊ
àæ ?
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
The question is whether a horse sold by ‘A’ to ‘B’ is sound.
‘A’ says to ‘B’ go and ask ‘C’, ‘C’ knows all about it. When
asked by ‘B’, ‘C’ says that the horse is not sound. Is the
statement made by ‘C’ admissable in evidence ?
"A'®Üá "'Wæ ÊÜÞÄ¨Ü PÜá¨ÜáÃæ¿áá ÓÜÌÓܧ˨æÁáàÊæíáÊÜ ±ÜÅÍæ° ? "A'®Üá "'
Wæ "PÜ 'Wæ ÖæãàX PæàÙÜá AÊܯWæ GÇÝÉ Wæ㣤¨æ. "' ®Üá "PÜ ' Wæ PæàÙÜÇÝX B
PÜá¨ÜáÃæ¿áá ÓÜÌÓܧÊÝXÆÉ Gí¨Üá "PÜ '®Üá ÖæàÙÜáÊÜ®Üá. "PÜ ' ÖæàÚPæ¿áá
ÓÝQÒ¿ÞX ÔÌàPÝÃÜÊÝWÜáÊÜâ¨æ ?
P.T.O.
0601 -2- *0601*
UNIT – II
Q. No. 2. (a) State the provisions of Indian Evidence Act relating to facts
which need not be proved. Marks : 15
»ÝÃÜ£à¿á ÓÝPÜÒ$ A¯¿áÊÜá¨Üw¿áÈÉ ÃÜáÊÜ ÓݹàñÜá ÊÜÞvܸæàPÝXÃܨÜ
ÓÜíWÜ£WÜÚWæ ÓÜíí«Ü±Üor E±Üí«ÜWÜÙÜ®Üá° £ÚÔÄ.
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
Explain the circumstance in which judgements of court become
relevant.
®Ý¿ÞÆ¿á¨Ü £à±ÜâìWÜÙÜá ÓÜáÓÜí¨ÜÊÝWÜáÊÜ ÓÜí¨Ü»ÜìWÜÙÜ®Üá° ËÊÜÄÔÄ.
(b) ‘A’ is accused of theft. During the police custody he indicated
the place where the stolen goods were hidden and the police
recovered those goods. Can this information be used against ‘A’ ? Marks : 5
"A' ®Üá PÜÙÜÛñÜ®Ü¨Ü B±Ý¨Ü®æWæãÙÜWÝX¨Ýª®æ. ±æäàÈÓÜÃÜ ÊÜÍܨÜÈɨݪWÜ PÜÙÜÛñܮܨÜ
ÊÜÓÜá¤WÜÙÜ®Üá° AvÜXÔor ÓܧÙÜ¨Ü WæY AÊÜ®Üá ÖæàÙÜÇÝX AÊÜÃÜá B ÊÜÓÜá¤WÜÙÜ®Üá°
ÊÜͱ
Ü wÜ ÔPæãíw¨ÝªÃ.æ D ÖæàÚPæ¿á®Üá° "A' ®Ü ËÃÜá¨Ü E±ÜÁãàXÓÜÖÜá¨æà ?
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
The question is whether ‘A’ was the legitimate son of ‘B’ ? Is
the fact ‘A’ was always treated as such by the members of the
family relevant ?
"A' ®Üá "'®Ü ®Ý¿á¨Ü ÊÜáWÜ®æà ? G®Üá°ÊÜâ¨Üá ®Ý¿ÞÆ¿á¨Ü ÊÜááí¨æ
CñÜÂ¥ÜìÊÝWܸæàPÝ¨Ü ±ÜÅÍæ° C¨ÝªWÜ PÜáoáí¨Ü ÓܨÜÓÜÂÃÜá ¿ÞÊÝWÜÆá
"A' ®Ü®Üá° ÖÝWæ ±ÜÄWÜ~ÓÜᣤ¨ÜªÃÜá, G®Üá°ÊÜâ¨Üá ÓÜáÓÜí¨ÜÊæà ?
UNIT – III
UNIT – IV
Q. No. 4. (a) Explain the provisions of Indian Evidence Act relating to Burden
of proof. Marks : 15
Promissory Estoppel.
BÍÝÌÓÜ®Ý ±ÜÅ£í«Ü.
0601 -4- *0601*
UNIT – V
UNIT – I
Q. No. 1. (a) Define and discuss fact, facts in issue and relevant fact. Marks : 15
ÊÝÓܤËPÜñæ, ËÊÝ¨Ü ÊÝÓܤËPÜñæWÜÙÜá ÊÜáñÜᤠÓÜáÓÜíí«Ü ÊÝÓܤËPÜñæWÜÙÜ®Üá°
ÊÝÂTÝÂ¯Ô ÊÜáñÜᤠaÜbìÔÄ.
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
P.T.O.
0601 -2- *0601*
UNIT – II
Q. No. 3. (a) What are Public Documents ? State how public documents
are proved ? Marks : 15
ÓÝÊÜìg¯PÜ ¨ÜÓݤÊæàgáWÜÙÝÊÜâÊÜâ ? ÓÝÊÜìg¯PÜ ¨ÜÓݤÊæàgáWÜÙÜ®Üá° ÖæàWæ
ÓݹàñÜá ±ÜwÓÜÖÜá¨Üá ?
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
What is “hearsay evidence” ? Are there any exceptions to this
rule ? If so enumerate them.
""ÊܨÜí£ ÓÝPÜÒ$Â'' Gí¨ÜÃæà®Üá ? C¨ÜPæRà®Ý¨ÜÃÜã A±ÜÊݨÜWÜÚÊæÁáà ?
Jí¨Üá ÊæàÙæ C¨ÜªÃæ AÊÜâWÜÙÜ®Üá° £ÚÔÄ.
(b) ‘A’ agrees in writing to pay ‘B’ of Rs. 10,000/- on 1-3-2012.
The fact that, at the same time, an oral agreement was made
that the money should not be paid till 31-3-2012. Can this fact
be proved ? Marks : 5
"A' ®Üá "' ¯Wæ ÖÜñÜᤠÓÝËÃÜ ÃÜã±ÝÀá¿á®Üá° 1–3 –2012 ÃÜí¨Üá
PæãvÜáÊÜâ¨ÝX ÃÜÊÜ~Wæ¿áÈÉ J²³PæãíwÃÜáñݤ®æ. B¨ÜÃæ A¨æà ÓÜÊÜá¿á¨ÜÈÉ
B ÖÜ|ÊÜ®Üá° 31–3 –2012 ÃÜÊÜÃæWæ PæãvܸæàPÝXÆÉÊæí¨Üá ÊÜåèUPÜÊÝX
J²³PæãíwÃÜáÊܨÜá. D ÓÜíWÜ£¿á®Üá° ÃÜágáÊÝñÜá ±ÜwÓÜÖÜá¨æ ?
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
Write a note on Secondary Evidence.
©Ì£à¿áPÜ ÓÝQÒ¿á WæY q±Ü³~ ÃæÀáÄ.
UNIT – IV
Q. No. 4. (a) Define Estoppel. Explain the different kinds of estoppel. Marks : 15
Ëí«ÜÊÜ®Üá° ÊÝÂTݯÔÄ. Ëí«Ü¨Ü ËË«Ü ±ÜÅPÝÃÜWÜÙÜ®Üá° ËÊÜÄÔÄ.
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
Explain the presumptions in cases of dowry deaths and rape
cases.
ÊÜÃܨÜQÒOæ ÓÝÊÜâWÜÙÜá ÊÜáñÜᤠAñÝÂaÝÃÜ ±ÜÅPÜÃÜ|WÜÙÜÈÉ¿á ±ÜäÊÜì
»ÝÊÜ®æWÜÙÜ®Üá° ËÊÜÄÔÄ.
0601 -4- *0601*
(b) ‘A’ is charged with travelling in a railway without a ticket. ‘A’
denies the charge. On whom the burden of proof lies ?. Marks : 5
"A' ®Üá qPæàp
CÆɨæ ÃæçÈ®ÜÈÉ ±ÜÅÊÜÞ| ÊÜÞw¨Ýª®æí¨Üá B±Ý©ÓÜÇÝX¨æ.
"A' ®Üá BÃæãà±Ü樆 áÜ ° AÆÉWÙÜ ¿
æ ááñݤ®.æ ÃÜágáÊÝ£®Ü »ÝÃÜ ¿ÞÃÜ ÊæáàȨæ ?
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
Write a note on presumption of legitimacy of a child.
ÊÜáWÜá訆 «ÜÊÜáìgñÜ嬆 PÜáÄñÜá CÃÜáÊÜ ±ÜäÊÜì»ÝÊÜ®æ PÜáÄñÜá q±Ü³~
ÃæÀáÄ.
UNIT – V
UNIT – III
2. Presumption of legitimacy.
«ÜÊÜáìgñÜÌ¨Ü PÜáÄñÜá ±ÜäÊÜì»ÝÊÜ®æ.
UNIT – V
Q. No. 5. (a) What are leading questions ? When can they be asked ? Marks : 15
EñܤÃÜ ÓÜãaÜPÜ ±ÜÅÍæ°WÜÙæí¨ÜÃæà®Üá ? AÊÜâWÜÙÜ®Üá° ¿ÞÊÝWÜ PæàÙÜÖÜá¨Üá ?
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
P.T.O.
0601/1001 -2- *06011001*
Q. No. 5. Define secondary evidence. State the circumstances when
secondary evidence relating to documents can be given. Marks : 16
©Ì£¿áPÜ ÓÝPÜÒ$ÂÊÜ®Üá° ÊÝÂTݯÔÄ. ¨ÜÓݤÊæàgáWÜÚWæ ÓÜííÔ¨Üíñæ ©Ì£¿áPÜ
ÓÝPÜÒ$ÂÊÜ®Üá° PæãvÜÖÜá¨Ý¨Ü ÓÜí¨Ü»ÜìWÜÙÜ®Üá° £ÚÔÄ.
Q. No. 6. Explain the presumptions in Dowry death and Rape cases. Marks : 16
ÊÜÃܨÜQÒOæ ÓÝÊÜâWÜÙÜá ÊÜáñÜᤠAñÝÂaÝÃÜ ±ÜÅPÜÃÜ|WÜÙÜÈÉ¿á ±ÜäÊÜì»ÝÊÜ®æWÜÙÜ®Üá°
ËÊÜÄÔÄ.
Q. No. 7. What is (i) Examination in chief it (ii) Cross examination and
(iii) re-examination of witnesses ? Under what circumstances a
party can cross examine his own witnesses ? Marks : 16
ÓÝQÒWÜÙÜ (i) ÊÜááS ËaÝÃÜOæ (ii) ±ÝqàÓÜÊÝÆá ÊÜáñÜᤠ(iii) ÊÜáÃÜáËaÝÃÜOæ
Gí¨ÜÃæà®Üá ? ¿ÞÊÜ ÓÜí¨Ü»ÜìWÜÙÜÈÉ Jº ±ÜPÜÒWÝÃÜ®Üá ñܮܰ ÓÝQÒ¿á®æ°
±ÝqàÓÜÊÝÈWæ WÜáıÜwÓÜÖÜá¨Üá ?
Q. No. 8. Write short note on any two : Marks : (2×8=16)
¸æàPÝ¨Ü GÃÜvÜPæR ÆZá q±Ü³~ ÃæÀáÄ :
(a) Expert opinion
ñÜgnÃÜ A¼±ÝÅ¿á
(b) Public Document
ÓÝÊÜìg¯PÜ ¨ÜÓݤÊæàgá
(c) Leading Questions
EñܤÃÜ ÓÜãaÜPÜ ±ÜÅÍæ°WÜÙÜá.
Q. No. 9. Answer any two with reasons : Marks : (2×10=20)
¸æàPÝ¨Ü GÃÜvÜPæR PÝÃÜ|WÜÙæãí©Wæ ËÊÜÄÔÄ :
(a) The question is whether 'A' robbed 'B'. Does the fact that
shortly before robbery 'B' went to a fair with money in his
possession and showed it to third persons, relevant ?
"A' ®Üá "' ®Ü®Üá° ÓÜáÈWæ ÊÜÞw¨Ýª®æÁáà Gíá¨Üá ±ÜÅÍæ°¿ÞX¨æ.
ÓÜáÈWæ BWÜáÊÜ ÊÜááíaæ "' ®Üá ñÜ®æã°í©Wæ ÖÜ|ÊÜ®Üá° ñæWæ¨ÜáPæãívÜá
hÝñæÅWæ ÖæãàX¨Ü᪠ÊÜáñÜᤠñܮܰÈÉÃÜáÊÜ ÖÜ|ÊÜ®Üá° ¸æàÃæ ÊÜÂQ¤WÜÚWæ ñæãàÄÔ¨Ü
Zo®æWÜÙÜ ÓÝPÜÒ$ÂWÜÙÜá ÓÜáÓÜí¨ÜÊæà ?
*06011001* -3- 0601/1001
(b) A agrees in writing to sell a horse to B for Rs. 1,000 or
Rs. 1,500. Can evidence be given to show which price was
to be given ?
"A' GíáÊÜ®Üá ñܮܰ PÜá¨ÜáÃæ¿á®Üá° "' ¯Wæ 1,000 ÃÜã.Wæ A¥ÜÊÝ
1,500 ÃÜ ã ±ÝÀáWÜ Ú Wæ ÊÜ Þ ÃÝoÊÜ Þ vÜ Æ á ÈUñÜ ÃÜ ã ±Ü ¨ Ü È É
J²³PæãÙÜáÛñݤ®æ. AÊÜ®Üá ¿ÞÊÜ ¸æÇæ¿á®Üá° PæãvܸæàPÜá Gí ÓÝPÜÒ$ÂÊÜ®Üá°
PæãvÜÖÜá¨æà ?
(c) 'A' a client says to 'B' an Attorney, "I wish to murder 'C' on
which I request you to defend me ". Is this communication
protected from disclosure ?
"A' Gí PÜQÒWÝÃÜ®Üá "' Gí ®Ý¿áÊÝ©Áãí©Wæ ñÝ®Üá "PÜ ' ®Ü®Üá°
PæãÇæ ÊÜÞvÜáÊÜâ¨ÝX ¿áÔ¨Ü᪠ñܮܰ®Üá° PݱÝvÜáÊÜíñæ PæàÚPæãÙÜáÛñݤ®æ.
D ÖæàÚPæ¿áá ×ÃÜíWÜWæãÙÜáÛËPæÀáí¨Ü ÃÜQÒÓÜƳqr¨æÁáà ?
________________
*06011001* 0601/1001
Q. No. 1. Explain “may presume”, “shall presume” and “conclusive proof”. Marks : 16
""±ÜäÊÜì»ÝÊÜ®æ ÊÜÞvÜÖÜá¨Üá'', ""±ÜäÊÜì»ÝÊÜ®æ ÊÜÞwPæãÙÜÛñÜPÜR¨Üáª'' ÊÜáñÜá¤
""¯OÝì¿áPÜ ÃÜágáÊÝñÜ ''®Üá° ÊÝÂTݯÔ.
Q. No. 2. Discuss the relevancy of facts relating to motive, preparation
and conduct. Marks : 16
E¨æઠÍÜ, Ô¨Üñ æ ÊÜáñÜᤠ®ÜvñÜ Wæ æ ÓÜííst ÓÜíWÜ£WÜÙÜ ÓÜáÓÜí¨Üñ ¿
æ á®Üá° aÜbìÔ.
Q. No. 3. Explain the circumstances in which secondary evidence relating
to documents may be given. Marks : 16
¨ÝSÇæWÜÙÜ®Üá° ÃÜágáÊÝñÜá±ÜwÓÜáÊÝWÜ ©Ì£à¿á ÓÝPÜÒ$ÂÊÜ®Üá° ¯àvÜÖÜá¨Ý¨Ü
ÓÜí¨Ü»ì
Ü WÜÙ®Ü áÜ ° ËÊÜÄÔ.
Q. No. 4. Discuss the provisions relating to ‘Character Evidence”. Marks : 16
""aÝÄñÜÅ$ ÓÝPÜÒ$Â'' PæR ÓÜíí«Ü±Üor E±Üí«ÜWÜÙÜ®Üá° aÜbìÔ.
Q. No. 5. Discuss the provisions of Indian Evidence Act relating to “Burden
of Proof”. Marks : 16
""ÃÜágáÊÝ£®Ü ÖæãOæ''Wæ ÓÜííst »ÝÃÜñÜ ÓÝPÜÒ$ A¯¿áÊÜá¨Ü
E±Üí«ÜWÙÜ ®Ü áÜ ° aÜbìÔ.
Q. No. 6. What is Estoppel ? Discuss the relevancy of Estoppel. Marks : 16
Ë»Üí¨Ü (¸ÝÀá PÜoárËPæ ) Gí¨ÜÃàæ ®Üá ? Ëí«Ü¨Ü ÓÜáÓÜí¨Üñ ¿
æ á PÜáÄñÜá aÜbìÔ.
Q. No. 7. Discuss the scope of cross-examination and explain the questions
lawful in cross-examination. Marks : 16
±Ýqà ÓÜÊÝ騆 Êݲ¤¿á WæY aÜbìÔ ÊÜáñÜᤠ±ÝqàÓÜÊÝÈ®ÜÈÉ PæàÙÜÖÜá¨Ý¨Ü
±ÜÅÍW°æ ÙÜ Ü WæY ËÊÜÄÔ.
P.T.O.
0601/1001 -2- *06011001*
Q. No. 8. Write short note on any two of the following : Marks : 8×2=16
¿ÞÊÜâ¨Ý¨ÜÃã
Ü GÃÜvPÜ Ræ q±Ü~
³ ÃæÀáÄ :
a) Hostile witness.
±ÜÅ£PÜãÆ ÓÝQÒ .
b) Public document
ÓÝÊÜìg¯PÜ ¨ÜÓݤÊæàgá.
c) Admission.
AíXàPÝÃÜ.
Q. No. 3. Who is an ‘Expert’ ? When does his opinion become relevant ? Marks : 16
"ñÜgn ' Gí¨ÜÃæ ¿ÞÃÜá ? ñÜgn®Ü A¼±ÝÅ¿á ¿ÞÊÝWÜ ÓÜáÓÜí¨ÜÊ
ÝXÃÜáñܤ¨æ ?
P.T.O.
0601/1001 -2- *06011001*
Q. No. 6. Explain the scope and extent of privilege conferred on Professional
communications as envisaged in the Indian Evidence Act. Marks : 16
»ÝÃÜ£à¿á ÓÝPÜÒ$ A¯¿áÊÜá¨ÜÈÉ ÓÜãbÔÃÜáÊÜíñæ ÊÜ꣤à¿á ÓÜíÊÜÖÜ®ÜWÜÙÜ
ËÍæàÐÝPÝÃÜ¨Ü Êݲ¤ ÊÜáñÜᤠWÝñÜÅÊÜ®Üá° ËÊÜÄÔÄ.
Q. No. 7. What are leading questions ? When can they be asked ? Marks : 16
EñܤÃÜ ÓÜãaÜPÜ ±ÜÅÍæ°WÜÙæí¨ÜÃæà®Üá ? AÊÜâWÜÙÜ®Üá° ¿ÞÊÝWÜ PæàÙÜÖÜá¨Üá ?