Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Surface Brightness and Temperature Pro Les of The Perseus Cluster
Surface Brightness and Temperature Pro Les of The Perseus Cluster
Surface Brightness and Temperature Pro Les of The Perseus Cluster
11 May 2011
Chapter 1
Introduction
The Perseus cluster (Abell 426) is the brightest x-ray source in the known universe. It is a
cluster of richness class 2 and has a cD galaxy (NGC 1275) at its centre (RA: 49.934167, DEC:
41.421667). It is located at a redshift of 0.0178 (Fadda et al. 1996). Because of the AGN it’s
surface brightness sharply peak at the very centre of the cluster. Jet of relativistic particles
from this AGN created two radio bubbles in the vicinity. Ghost bubbles are also seen in the
north-west and southern region. These bubbles were created by past AGN activity.
I worked with 3 observations of this cluster by Chandra X-ray Observatory with a total
exposure time of 216269 s. Observation IDs are 11714, 11716 and 12037. Goal of this project
is to measure the surface brightness profile and temperature profile of Perseus cluster and see if
they satisfy the theory. Another objective was to be familiarized with Ciao and XSpec, tools for
data reduction, imaging and spectroscopy. Ciao is specially designed for Chandra data analysis.
Along with Ciao, Heasoft and Xspec I also used ds9 (SAOImage) for viewing images, funtools
for counting number of photons in a selected region and gnuplot to plot the profiles.
My profiles were in good agreement with the theory and also with some other profiles
published as papers.
Iacopo Bartalucci and Rossella Martino helped me a lot regarding this project. Without
their help it would be very difficult to finish this in time.
Figure 1.1: Mosaic of 3 observations of Perseus cluster by Chandra with a total exposure time
of 216269 s.
1
Chapter 2
2
I took photons within this range only. As there are plenty of photons for Perseus cluster, I did
not have to use any binning. This script was also repeated for other observations.
3
Effective exposure map [cm2 ] is made by dithering (intentionally applied form of noise used
to randomize quantization error) an instrument map across the sky using the aspect solution.
The aspect histogram gives the amount of time the Chandra optical axis dwelt on each part of
the sky, while the instrument map provides the instantaneous effective area across the field of
view. The product is the exposure map, from which flux or surface brightness can be calculated.
I used the ”merge all” script to create exposure map. Among other things aspect solution, evt2
file of each observation were given as input to the script. This process was repeated for all the
three observations.
4
Figure 2.1: Surface brightness profile shows a strong peak towards centre due to increasing
x-ray luminosity. x-axis is scaled in pixels. For chandra 1 pixel corresponds to 0.5 arcs. Error
margins are shown by vertical bars.
Surface brightness profile peaks towards the centre due to cooling flow. Within the cooling
radius gas start to cool down emitting x-ray bremsstrahlung. As central gas cool down, gas
from outskirts flow towards centre thus increasing the density which in turn again reduce the
cooling timescale, and gas cools down even faster. So we get lots of continuum emission from
centre. But these cooling gas are reheated by central AGN and conduction from outskirts. In
the past people expected to find huge amount of cool gas in the centre due to cooling flow, but
now we can explain the lack of gas by introducing reheating concept.
5
Chapter 3
Where R(I, E) is the instrumental response and is proportional to the probability that an
incoming photon of energy E will be detected in channel I. Ideally, then, we would like to
determine the actual spectrum of a source, f(E), by inverting this equation, thus deriving f(E)
for a given set of C(I). But this is not possible in general, as such inversions tend to be non-
unique and unstable to small changes in C(I). That’s why we need fitting. We use a model
6
spectrum f(E) and see for which temperature value it fits perfectly with the observed C(I).
Than the model f(E) becomes the actual spectrum of the source.
Wabs and Mekal models were used. Wabs is an absorption model that account for absorption
in the ICM while Mekal is a thermal model that account for thermal x-ray bremsstrahlung. In
the model I froze the parameters: nH (average column density of H) and redshift. I got density
of gas at the central region of ICM using funtools and the value was 0.135 × 1022 atoms.cm−2 .
Redshift was known to be 0.0178. Finally I got 5 fits for the 5 regions.
Unfortunately, my fits were not very accurate as I got large reduced chi-squared values.
This value gives a measure of correlation between the observation and the model. My reduced
chi-squared value was always larger than 5. I think this high value is caused by some imperfect
background subtraction. Maybe I could not remove the background completely. As a result the
model, which is absolutely noise free, did not match perfectly. But the values for temperatures
in different regions were not odd. I got almost perfect values for the temperature within an
acceptable error margin.
Figure 3.1: Temperature profile declines towards the centre because of cooling flow. 5 measure-
ments within 15 to 350 arcs region are shown here. Their error margins are shown by vertical
bars.
I mathced this profile with another profile from a published paper [De Grandi and Molendi
(2002)]. It seems my values for temperature a bit different than their’s but it’s within acceptable
range. According to this paper cooling radius of Perseus begins from almost 6 arcmin or 360
arcs. That means my temperature values are just within the cooling radius. As Chandra’s field
of view is very small I had restrain myself within this limit this time. My measurements show
an almost perfect downward gradient towards the centre in agreement with the theory.