Professional Documents
Culture Documents
02.understanding Process Equipment For Operators & Engineers-61
02.understanding Process Equipment For Operators & Engineers-61
I am afraid of snakes. But the two things that I fear most are as follows:
• Hydrofluoric acid (HF) used in refinery alkylation units as a catalyst to make isooctane
for gasoline.
• A cloud of LPG (propane).
HF acid will penetrate skin and destroy bones. Clouds of LPG (propane or butane) form a
white mist, that being heavier than air, drifts across the ground searching for a source of
ignition. At which point, it will detonate with a destructive radius of ¼–½ mile. I have been
personally responsible for generating four giant clouds of LPG in Texas City in the 1970s.
• A ¾00 nipple broken off while pulling a plug on an alkylation unit contactor by an
operator using a 1600 pipe wrench.
• A 200 drain blew out due to an operator opening it too far when it was partly plugged
with hydrates (i.e., hydrocarbon-water solid ice).
• A nonstress relieved weld blew out on an 800 carbon steel pipe which had been exposed
to weak sulfuric acid.
• A 400 elbow in liquid propane service blew out massively. The elbow was below a huge
depropanizer reflux drum, which emptied to the atmosphere.
Only in the last incident, did the vapor cloud find a source of ignition. In the subsequent
detonation, the giant American Oil refinery East Plant was devastated. Also, my career at
American Oil was adversely impacted.
350 psig
Vent
15#
Steam
Steam
Pass trap
partition
baffle No flow
Condensate
dozen similar units, and had never questioned the intrinsic safety of the process design or
the process controls.
But there is something that I, and the Chicago Engineering Contractor, should have
questioned. That being, the 15 psig steam supply to the reboiler. Indirectly, this 15 psig
was the cause of the accident which I’ll describe in detail.
It has to do with the steam condensate collection header pressure. Typically, this pres-
sure is 20–30 psig. When using 50 psig steam, this is not a problem. The pressure in the
channel head is large enough to flow into the condensate line. But for the 15 psig supply
steam, allowing for losses across the steam inlet control valve, and the reboiler tubes and
outlet nozzle, the condensate pressure is likely to be 10 psig or less.
A loss of reboiler duty due to condensate back-up would result, which could only be
restored by the operators draining the steam condensate to the deck. This was precisely
the action that the operators in the New Jersey refinery were forced to do to maintain the
efficiency of the HF stripper and the required reboiler duty.
Retrofit Design
To correct this situation, I proposed two alternates to the refinery. Both options would
eliminate the dangerous practice of draining steam condensate to the ground.
344 UNDERSTANDING PROCESS EQUIPMENT FOR OPERATORS AND ENGINEERS
350 psig
50#
steam
Steam
Pass Vent trap
partition
baffle
Condensate
Both options (see Fig. 44.2) included relocation of the noncondensable (i.e., CO2) vent just
beneath the channel head pass partition baffle.
The simplest option was to replace the 15 psig steam with 50 psig. This would allow the
channel head pressure to overcome the pressure in the condensate collection line. This
was the option that was adopted by the refinery.
A more complex option was to install a condensate pump and drum, and pump the
condensate. This more expensive option would allow the continued use of the low value
15 psig steam but was rejected by the refinery due to capital cost considerations.
Steam Trap
Both the existing and the new designs used a steam trap and relied on pressuring the con-
densate into the condensate collection line. For lower pressure steam, it’s best to avoid the
problem of flashing (i.e., vapor lock) downstream of the trap, by pumping the condensate,
rather than just relying on the pressure in the channel head. Further, steam traps often
prove to be unreliable. However, if no condensate recovery is required, I will use a steam
trap, and drain the condensate into the sewer, but only for nonhazardous services.
Note that the steam condensate cannot be simply drained without holding some back
pressure. Just allowing condensate to blow-out to atmospheric pressure, would greatly
diminish the reboiler’s heat transfer efficiency, due to blowing the condensate seal.
45
Process Plant Safety
The major long-term cost of running a refinery, or I expect, any process plant, is safety. Not
the occasional “lost time injury” or occasional fatality. I am referring to incidents such as:
1. The BP, Texas City Raffinate Splitter Explosion—15 killed
2. The Unocal Amine—LPG Absorber—20 killed
3. The Amoco Asphalt Oxidizer Fire and Explosion—3 killed
4. The BP Deep Water Horizon—11 killed
5. Union Carbide—Bhopal—10,000 killed
These were multibillion dollar incidents, all of which I am personally familiar with were
the result of operators and process engineers making entirely avoidable design and/or
operational errors.
The incident at Bhopal was the result of an effort to avoid loss of production due to the
marginal design of a pump’s mechanical seal. It destroyed the Union Carbide Corporation
and killed 10,000 people.
The incident near my home in New Orleans, cost BP $20,000,000,000 (United States),
killed 11 people and spilled 5,000,000 barrels of crude oil into the Gulf of Mexico.
Often, I am retained as an expert witness in these sorts of catastrophes. The one com-
mon thread seems to be, that at some critical point in the decision-making process, that a
middle-level management person selects the wrong path, because he or she did not
understand how the equipment worked, and therefore could not foresee the ultimate
consequences of their decision.
I’ve made that sort of mistake four times at my Alkylation Unit in Texas City. I got away
with it the first three times. But, the fourth time, the law of averages prevailed, with a
resulting butane vapor cloud detonation. But that was in 1976. I’m much smarter now.