Name: Kiran Venugopal

Roll No: MBA20107

Q1)
a) Average Salary
Department Sum of Salary Count of Gender Average Salary
Admin Offices 318638 4 79659.5
IT/IS 2157945 23 93823.69565
Production 6168673 102 60477.18627
Sales 1188687 16 74292.9375
Software Engineering 467227 5 93445.4
Grand Total 10301170 150 68674.46667

*Count of Gender = Number of People in the department

Average Salary
Software Engineering

Sales

Production

IT/IS

Admin Offices
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000 90000 100000

Average Performance
Department Sum of Performance level Count of Gender Average Performance
Admin Offices 12 4 3
IT/IS 70 23 3.043478261
Production 301 102 2.950980392
Sales 45 16 2.8125
Software Engineering 14 5 2.8
Grand Total 442 150 2.946666667

Average Performance
3.1
3.05
3
2.95
2.9
2.85
2.8
2.75
2.7
2.65
Admin Offices IT/IS Production Sales Software Engineering
Average of Salary & Performance

Average Average of Salary &

Department Average Salary Performance Performance
Admin Offices 79659.5 3 39831.25
IT/IS 93823.69565 3.043478261 46913.36957
Production 60477.18627 2.950980392 30240.06863
Sales 74292.9375 2.8125 37147.875
Software
Engineering 93445.4 2.8 46724.1

Average of Salary & Performance

Software Engineering
Sales
Production
IT/IS
Admin Offices
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000
 b)
SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
0.614210
Multiple R 138
0.377254
R Square 094
Adjusted R 0.355630
Square 972
0.498982
Standard Error 003
Observations 150

ANOVA
Significa
  df SS MS F nce F
21.719775 4.343955 17.44679 1.75205E-
Regression 5 68 137 136 13
35.853557 0.248983
Residual 144 65 039    
57.573333
Total 149 33      

Coefficie Standard Lower Upper Lower Upper

  nts Error t Stat P-value 95% 95% 95.0% 95.0%
0.668185 0.2644119 2.527064 0.012582 0.145555 1.190815 0.145555 1.190815
Intercept 888 13 235 221 894 882 894 882
4.65898E 2.13318E- 2.184050 0.030577 4.42583E- 8.87538E 4.42583E- 8.87538E
Salary -06 06 066 1 07 -06 07 -06
Engagement 0.367600 0.0483718 7.599471 3.48114E 0.271989 0.463211 0.271989 0.463211
Level 586 61 65 -12 972 2 972 2
Work Life 0.125933 0.0452468 2.783263 0.006104 0.036500 0.215367 0.036500 0.215367
Balance 941 63 499 02 121 761 121 761
- - - -
SpecialProjects 0.022885 0.0208235 1.099001 0.273601 0.064044 0.018274 0.064044 0.018274
Count 111 43 769 335 408 186 408 186
- - - -
No of 0.001685 0.0068124 0.247344 0.804993 0.015150 0.011780 0.015150 0.011780
Absences 018 22 9 625 281 246 281 246

Interpretation

Firstly, we can understand that here the model itself is significant with the Significance F value being less
than 0.05 with 149 degrees of freedom. Thus, we can carry on with the analysis.

Starting with the regression statistics, since there are multiple regression models, R-square value has to be
checked first which in this case is 0.355 does indicating that only 35% of the variance in the dependent
variable is being explained by the independent variables.

Analyzing the P-values of each of the independent variable we can see that the number of absentees and the
special projects count have a P-value of greater than 0.05 (0.80 & 0.2 respectively). Here we understand that
these two particular way tables or less significant in the equation. The remaining three independent variables
on the other hand has a high significance as they have their respective P-values, less than 0.05. These are the
key drivers that affect the dependent variable that is performance level indicator the most.
Here we can generate the regression equation using these variables:

Performance level = 0.668 + 4.65 × 10-6 × (Salary) + 0.367 × (Engagement level) + 0.12 × (Work Life
Balance)
So as to obtain a better model, we can run the regression again using the significant variables.

Q2) In Order to See if the Employees were benefitted from the training provided, firstly the change in
training score is calculated (Post training score – Pre training score)

Total Number of Employees benefitted from the training

Pre_Training_Scores Post_Training_Scores Gender Batch Gender Change in Training Score

4.5 9.00 2.00 2.00 F 4.5
5.0 8.90 1.00 2.00 M 3.9
5.1 8.50 1.00 2.00 M 3.4
6.4 9.70 1.00 2.00 M 3.3
4.8 7.70 2.00 2.00 F 2.9
6.4 9.00 1.00 2.00 M 2.6
4.8 7.20 2.00 1.00 F 2.4
6.3 8.60 2.00 2.00 F 2.3
5.4 7.50 2.00 2.00 F 2.1
5.2 7.20 2.00 1.00 F 2.0
5.7 7.70 1.00 2.00 M 2.0
5.4 7.30 1.00 2.00 M 1.9
7.2 9.10 1.00 2.00 M 1.9
7.3 9.00 2.00 2.00 F 1.7
6.3 7.80 1.00 2.00 M 1.5
6.2 7.70 1.00 2.00 M 1.5
6.1 7.10 2.00 1.00 F 1.0
9.0 10.00 1.00 2.00 M 1.0
6.1 7.00 1.00 1.00 M 0.9
5.6 6.40 2.00 1.00 F 0.8
7.9 8.50 1.00 2.00 M 0.6
9.0 9.50 1.00 2.00 M 0.5
6.9 7.20 2.00 1.00 F 0.3
9.3 9.50 2.00 2.00 F 0.2
8.5 8.20 1.00 2.00 M -0.3
9.0 8.50 1.00 2.00 M -0.5
7.8 7.00 1.00 1.00 M -0.8
7.9 7.10 2.00 1.00 F -0.8
7.1 6.00 1.00 1.00 M -1.1
10.0 8.40 2.00 2.00 F -1.6
10.0 8.10 1.00 2.00 M -1.9
9.0 7.00 2.00 1.00 F -2.0
9.0 6.30 1.00 1.00 M -2.7

Total Batch 2 Employees 33

Number of Batch 2 Employees who benefitted 24
Percent of Benefitted Batch 2 Employees 72.72727273

Approximately 73% employees have benefitted from the training.

Total Number of Male employees benefitted
 Pre_Training_Scores Post_Training_Scores Gender Batch Gender Change in Training Score
5.0 8.90 1.00 2.00 M 3.9
5.1 8.50 1.00 2.00 M 3.4
6.4 9.70 1.00 2.00 M 3.3
6.4 9.00 1.00 2.00 M 2.6
5.7 7.70 1.00 2.00 M 2.0
5.4 7.30 1.00 2.00 M 1.9
7.2 9.10 1.00 2.00 M 1.9
6.3 7.80 1.00 2.00 M 1.5
6.2 7.70 1.00 2.00 M 1.5
9.0 10.00 1.00 2.00 M 1.0
6.1 7.00 1.00 1.00 M 0.9
7.9 8.50 1.00 2.00 M 0.6
9.0 9.50 1.00 2.00 M 0.5
8.5 8.20 1.00 2.00 M -0.3
9.0 8.50 1.00 2.00 M -0.5
7.8 7.00 1.00 1.00 M -0.8
7.1 6.00 1.00 1.00 M -1.1
10.0 8.10 1.00 2.00 M -1.9
9.0 6.30 1.00 1.00 M -2.7

Total Male Employees 19

Number of Male Employees who benefitted 13
Percent of Benefitted Male Employees 68.42105263

Total Number of Female employees benefitted

Pre_Training_Scores Post_Training_Scores Gender Batch Gender Change in Training Score

4.5 9.00 2.00 2.00 F 4.5
4.8 7.70 2.00 2.00 F 2.9
4.8 7.20 2.00 1.00 F 2.4
6.3 8.60 2.00 2.00 F 2.3
5.4 7.50 2.00 2.00 F 2.1
5.2 7.20 2.00 1.00 F 2.0
7.3 9.00 2.00 2.00 F 1.7
6.1 7.10 2.00 1.00 F 1.0
5.6 6.40 2.00 1.00 F 0.8
6.9 7.20 2.00 1.00 F 0.3
9.3 9.50 2.00 2.00 F 0.2
7.9 7.10 2.00 1.00 F -0.8
10.0 8.40 2.00 2.00 F -1.6
9.0 7.00 2.00 1.00 F -2.0

Total Female Employees 14

Number of Female Employees who benefitted 11
Percent of Benefitted Female Employees 78.57142857

Total Number of Batch 1 employees benefitted

Pre_Training_Scores Post_Training_Scores Gender Batch Gender Change in Training Score

4.8 7.20 2.00 1.00 F 2.4
5.2 7.20 2.00 1.00 F 2.0
6.1 7.10 2.00 1.00 F 1.0
6.1 7.00 1.00 1.00 M 0.9
5.6 6.40 2.00 1.00 F 0.8
 6.9 7.20 2.00 1.00 F 0.3
7.8 7.00 1.00 1.00 M -0.8
7.9 7.10 2.00 1.00 F -0.8
7.1 6.00 1.00 1.00 M -1.1
9.0 7.00 2.00 1.00 F -2.0
9.0 6.30 1.00 1.00 M -2.7

Total Batch 1 Employees 11

Number of Batch 1 Employees who benefitted 6
Percent of Benefitted Batch 1 Employees 54.54545455

Total Number of Batch 2 employees benefitted

Pre_Training_Scores Post_Training_Scores Gender Batch Gender Change in Training Score

4.5 9.00 2.00 2.00 F 4.5
5.0 8.90 1.00 2.00 M 3.9
5.1 8.50 1.00 2.00 M 3.4
6.4 9.70 1.00 2.00 M 3.3
4.8 7.70 2.00 2.00 F 2.9
6.4 9.00 1.00 2.00 M 2.6
6.3 8.60 2.00 2.00 F 2.3
5.4 7.50 2.00 2.00 F 2.1
5.7 7.70 1.00 2.00 M 2.0
5.4 7.30 1.00 2.00 M 1.9
7.2 9.10 1.00 2.00 M 1.9
7.3 9.00 2.00 2.00 F 1.7
6.3 7.80 1.00 2.00 M 1.5
6.2 7.70 1.00 2.00 M 1.5
9.0 10.00 1.00 2.00 M 1.0
7.9 8.50 1.00 2.00 M 0.6
9.0 9.50 1.00 2.00 M 0.5
9.3 9.50 2.00 2.00 F 0.2
8.5 8.20 1.00 2.00 M -0.3
9.0 8.50 1.00 2.00 M -0.5
10.0 8.40 2.00 2.00 F -1.6
10.0 8.10 1.00 2.00 M -1.9

Total Batch 2 Employees 22

Number of Batch 2 Employees who benefitted 18
Percent of Benefitted Batch 2 Employees 81.81818182

  Benefitted Male Benefitted Female Benefitted Batch 1 Benefitted Batch 2 Total Benefitted
Count 13 11 6 18 24
Percent 68.421% 78.571% 54.545% 81.818% 72.727%
           
           
  Males Females Batch 1 Batch 2 Total
Total 19 14 11 22 33

From the Analysis it can be concluded that

 Out of total Employees who went through the training, 24 people or approx. 73% people benefitted
from the training
 Females have benefitted more from the training (approx. 79%)
 Out of the 2 batches who went into training, Batch 2 has an 82% (approx.) benefitting percent
compared to 54% in Batch 1.