Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ethics and Governance - Sessions
Ethics and Governance - Sessions
Sessions
Things to keep in mind …
Same as before: A runaway train whose breaks have failed; Five immobile workers
ahead on the track; One immobile worker on a branch line; A linesman who can
switch the main line to branch but cannot see the train.
You are observing from an overhead bridge. Linesman only listens to you. But the
train is too close for him to switch.
There is a very fat man by your side also observing the train. If the fat man falls in
front of the train, the train will stop, but will kill the fat man.
You have only two choices:
1. Do nothing
2. Pick the fat man and throw him on the track.
(Assume that you can pick him up)
Same as before: A runaway train whose breaks have failed; Five immobile people
ahead on the track; One immobile person on a branch line; A linesman who can
switch the main line to branch but cannot see the train; Train too close for linesman
to act; Fat man by your side on the bridge
You strongly suspect that the fat man is a rapist-murderer who has been convicted
to death by hanging but has escaped from the prison.
Same as before: A runaway train whose breaks have failed; Five immobile workers
ahead on the track; One immobile worker on a branch line; A linesman who can
switch the main line to branch but cannot see the train; Train too close for linesman
to act; Fat man by your side on the bridge
The fat man ran an investment scheme in which you have lost a lot of money. In
the court case however, he has been exonerated.
Same as before: A runaway train whose breaks have failed; Five immobile people
ahead on the track; One immobile person on a branch line; A linesman who can
switch the main line to branch but cannot see the train; Train too close for linesman
to act; Fat man by your side on the bridge
The fat man is unknown to you. However, one of the five workers on the main
track tortured his wife for dowry. His wife committed suicide by burning herself.
You have two choices:
Do nothing
Pick the fat man and throw him on the track.
Notice how the terms are specified in paired binary juxtapositions. What
complicates discussions are many middle grounds … the ‘shades of grey’.
To summarize:
Concept of Ethics revolves around judgment, choice, action, conduct
Accompanied by adjectives such as ‘good’, ‘moral’, ‘right’, ‘ideal’, ‘fair’,
‘just’.
17 (c) 2019 Milind Padalkar 13 May 2021
Distinction between ethics and morality … 1
Over time, Ethics and Morality have becomes synonymous and often are
used interchangeably.
But they are quite different in many ways.
“Morality” is derived from the Latin word MORALITAS.
MORALITAS means Manners, Ways, Character.
A person who is moral or ethical is understood as a ‘good’ person.
Someone who is immoral or unethical is understood as a ‘bad’ person.
Human actions that are moral or ethical are ‘right’ thing to do. Immoral or
unethical acts are ‘wrong’ things to do.
So, the terms ‘good/bad’ generally reflect character of people, whereas
the terms ‘right/wrong’ are used to describe their actions.
Generally, ethics is study of ‘right’ and wrong human actions in groups.
Generally, morality describes the goodness in human nature, disposition,
character. ‘Character’ is normally not associated with ethics.
Ethics Morality
Describes code of right action Prescribes norms of good behaviour
Applies to groups and social settings Applies to individuals and their character
Constructed from social contexts Cultural or civilizational, evolved over time
Relative, changeable, adaptable Inherited, hard to change
Recommendatory, negotiated, accepted Prescriptive, internalized, part of belief or
through collective agreements faith systems
Ethics Morality
Describes code of right action Prescribes norms of good behaviour
Applies to groups and social settings Applies to individuals and their character
Constructed from social contexts Cultural or civilizational, evolved over time
Relative, changeable, adaptable Inherited, hard to change
Recommendatory, negotiated, accepted Prescriptive, internalized, part of belief or
through collective agreements faith systems
During the 2nd World War, many rich Jews had deposited large sums of money
and precious items with Swiss Banks. The Jews were killed during the holocaust.
The banks made no attempt to contact their descendants and return the property.
Banks claim that it is not their responsibility to contact the descendants.
Partho Dasgupta – ex-CEO of BARC was in the news for colluding with Republic TV
chief Arnab Goswami for fixing the channel TRP ratings. It is also claimed that he
borrowed Rs 54 lakhs interest-free from his company to purchase a Mercedes car
for himself.
21 (c) 2019 Milind Padalkar 13 May 2021
Class discussion
Ethics Morality
Describes code of right action Prescribes norms of good behaviour
Applies to groups and social settings Applies to individuals and their character
Constructed from social contexts Cultural or civilizational, evolved over time
Relative, changeable, adaptable Inherited, hard to change
Recommendatory, negotiated, accepted Prescriptive, internalized, part of belief or
through collective agreements faith systems
Can you propose examples of unethical or immoral acts from everyday social,
political, economic life?
Morality refers to ordering of human actions among each other, or to some end.
The idea of ‘Value’ is at the heart of morality.
Value can be viewed as something that is ‘good’ in outcomes. The end objective is
an important consideration in value.
Thus, values are the driving force for any moral system.
Concept of God has dominated the discourse from the earliest times.
It is not surprising, that the ‘good outcome’ (value) has meant happy afterlife, to be
free of sin, and ultimate reunion with God (Swarga, Moksha, Jannat, Heaven etc.)
Therefore, concept of morality has been largely driven by theological thinking.
Values are bound within their geographical, cultural contexts. They also have a
temporal (i.e. time) dimension.
Morality is an imposition of a social order towards regulation of human life, i.e. the
rule of the reason. 3
Justice and Fairness are other terms that often come up when discussing ethical or
moral positions.
Justice is different from fairness.
Justice is the operationalization of jurisprudence (body of rules, laws, tenets)
which binds the conduct of individuals, groups, organizations, and institutions.
Justice is enforced upon the human behaviors and actions through the mechanism
of Law administered through courts.
Law is simply an explicit codification of enforceable prescriptions for human
actions and behaviors.
Courts themselves may be:
Institutions deriving legitimacy from political authority of the state (judiciary),
Institutions deriving legitimacy from theological/scriptural sources (e.g. Vatican, Peeth,
Akal Takht, Fiqh Schools such as Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi, Hanbali etc., Rabbinic courts)
Idiosyncratic/autocratic arrangements such as Panchayat, King’s court, Moulavi etc.
Justice – through Law is publicly enforceable.
Discussion: Consider the case of 2019 Hyderabad gang rape of Dr Priyanka Reddy.
The rapist-murderers were caught by the police and killed in an encounter nine
days after the murder. Was this fair?
32 (c) 2019 Milind Padalkar 13 May 2021
Procedural justice
Procedural justice is concerned with the rules and procedures that are followed to
attain the outcome.
The focus is not on the outcomes or their fairness, but on adherence and
compliance with the defined process.
The rules and procedures are objectively framed.
This means the procedures do not depend upon:
Specific case facts
Conditions or the frames of mind of the receivers
Conditions or the frames of mind of the giver (judge)
Status, or prestige of the parties.
The outcomes are presumed to be fair and correct, if the procedures are diligently
followed.
Discussion: Consider the case of 2012 rape-murder of Jyoti Singh (AKA Nirbhaya).
The killers were hanged in March 2020. Was this fair?
Distributive and procedural justice form the two main streams of jurisprudence in
modern societies.
Both systems co-exist in a business organization. For example, performance
appraisals are procedural justice, while pay revisions are distributive justice. Labour
laws are procedural and act to restrain managerial excesses.
Other forms of justice systems that are not supported or recognized in modern
societies are:
Retributive justice: Best summarized by “An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth”. The
victim extracts compensation in proportion to grievance or damage caused. The state is
either absent or legitimizes the delivery by remaining a consenting party. This is a form of
plain revenge and was practiced in pre-historic societies.
Communitarian justice: Also called tribal justice. The community elders act as the judges to
frame and deliver justice. It has no legal recognition in modern societies, however the
practice continues due to the state being a mute spectator, negligent, or absent.
… Those (government servants) who seize valuable articles or precious stones from
either mines or any great manufactories shall be beheaded. Those who seize from
manufactories or from the king’s granaries articles of 1/16 to ¼ pana in value shall be
fined 12 panas; of ¼ to ½ pana in value 24 panas; of ½ to ¾ pana in value 36 panas; …
Those who seize articles of 8 to 10 panas shall be put to death.
Taken from Chapter 9 in the book “The removal of thorns”, Arthashatra
Note: Artisans were paid 10 panas per month; the labourers were paid 5 panas per month
(Chapter 3 in the book “The conduct of courtiers”)
… Any person who aims at the kingdom, who forces entrance into the king’s harem,
who instigates wild tribes or enemies (against the king), or who creates disaffection in
forts, country parts, or in the army, shall be burnt alive from head to foot. If a
Brāhman does similar acts, he shall be drowned.
Taken from Chapter 11 in the book “The removal of thorns”, Arthashatra
… [Shahjahan] kept his eye on his officials, punishing them rigorously when they fell
short in their duty. This was the reason that he kept at his court an official with several
baskets full of poisonous snakes. He would order that in his presence they should be
made to bite any official who had failed to administer justice, leaving the culprit lying
in his presence till the breath left him. … Others who had deserved death were
ordered to be thrown to mad elephants, who tore them to pieces.
Taken from Storia do Mogor, Vol 1 by Niccolao Manucci, p. 190-191
Distributive justice has long history. It has seeped in all cultures – Eastern,
Middle-eastern, and Western cultures.
It is the easiest to understand if you are an uninvolved party. What if you
are an involved party? Will it be fair to you?
What if an innocent person is punished? Or a guilty person rewarded?
Concern about wrongful justice (miscarriage) is quite ancient:
“Better 100 guilty men at liberty than one innocent in prison” (ancient Greek
thought)
“Let 20 evildoers escape death through pity, than one man unjustly condemned”
(Judge Fortesque, 1471 CE)
“Let 10 guilty escape than one innocent suffer” (English jurist Blackstone 1765
CE)
Due to a line of influential thinkers, English law moved towards procedural
justice; However, distributive justice remained the mainstay in most other
societies.
37 (c) 2019 Milind Padalkar 13 May 2021
Key points to note … 2
Discussion:
You are a country of 100 people. 5 are rich. 20 belong to the middle class. 75 are poor.
To run the country, you must extract taxes equal to 1000 every year from the people.
The rich earn 200/person, the middle class earn 40/person, and the poor earn
10/person.
Discussion:
1. Your best friend, a female, is madly in love with a boy. The boy has proposed
marriage to her. Occasionally, she has noticed a few disturbing traits in the boy.
But being romantically entangled, she hopes that she will be able to induce
positive change in him. Hence, she wants to accept his proposal and has
approached you for your opinion. You know that she wants you to corroborate.
You also know the boy and his family as a disreputable people. What will you do?
2. A very close relative of yours is suffering from a life-threatening disease. The
treatment has a cure rate of about 33%. It is however very expensive and will
impose long indebtedness on you. The relative wants to end life without
treatment. What will you do?
45 (c) 2019 Milind Padalkar 13 May 2021
Discussion: Case of the besotted friend
What would you say about the Vikas Dubey encounter (ref: Kanpur massacre of police
in 2020)
5 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akku_Yadav
48 (c) 2019 Milind Padalkar 13 May 2021
Class discussion: Akku Yadav case
Theories are lenses through which we can examine the ethical decisions.
A theory represents a philosophy, or “a way of seeing”.
Philosophy is a particular preference. Hence, theories are neither right, nor wrong.
They’re only ways of seeing and ways of explaining.
The ‘right or wrong’ belongs to the domain of person, action, or outcomes.
Therefore, the rationale for our choices belongs to such a theoretical lens.
Theoretic lenses differ based on where you apply them:
Virtue Ethics: Focuses on the character and intent of the person. The right or wrong is
about being who you are.
Deontological Ethics: Is concerned with conduct, behavior; and rules and duties. The
right or wrong is about rules determining the action and the action itself.
Consequentialist Ethics: Focuses on consequences, i.e. the value or impact of outcomes.
The right or wrong is about the outcomes, not the actions or the virtue of the actor.
We seek happiness on its own merits. Not because it gets us something else.
We also seek honor, pleasure, respect, love by themselves. These are not qualities
that we exchange for something else.
Aristotle says that man has an absolute right to be happy, and an absolute
obligation to promote happiness for others.
Virtues: Human attributes (character) which are universally valued across space and
time. Virtues lead to attainment of the highest good in society, i.e. happiness.
Truthfulness, honesty, integrity, punctuality, thrift, diligence, hard work, perseverance,
courage, fidelity, generosity are examples of such virtues.
Virtues are necessary to achieve eudaemonia. Virtues drive purposeful conduct to
achieve happiness.
Middle path: Virtue is a mean between two extreme vices. For example,
Courage is mean between cowardice and recklessness; Generosity is mean between greed
and wastefulness.
Virtues are reinforced through scriptures, literature, poetry, folklore, metaphors,
and artistic creations such as films, theatre, sculptures etc. Can you name a few?
Aristotle’s wrote about Virtue ethics in 350 BC. It remained the only philosophy until
18th century, i.e. for nearly 2100 years.
The focus remained on the “virtuous man” through the centuries. The arrival of
Abrahamic religious orders: Christianity and Islam only reinforced this focus.
The scriptures in both these orthodoxies prescribe many virtues. Ten Commandments of
Christianity; Charity, Justice, Forgiveness, Honesty, Kindness in Islam
Indian civilization too had a central focus on virtue (Sheel, Guna, Bhushan):
अश्वस्य भषू णं वेगो मत्तं स्याद गजभषू णम ् । Horse’s virtue is speed, Elephant’s is the strength.
चातुयं भष
ू णं नायाा उद्योगो नरभष ू णम ् ॥ Woman’s is wit and intellect, but industry is true virtue of all.
अक्रोधस्तपसः क्षमा बलवतां धमास्य ननर्वयााजता । Scholar’s virtue is calmness, forgiveness for the mighty.
सवेषामपप सवाकारणममदं शीलं परं भष ू णम ् ॥ Honesty for righteous, but character is the greatest of all.
अद्रोहः सवाभत
ू ेषु कमाणा मनसा गगरा । Not hurting any life form by act, thought, or speech,
अनग्र
ु हश्च दानं च शीलमेतत्प्रशस्यते ॥ Beneficence, and charity are the praiseworthy virtues. 6
Buddhist thought lists 11 virtues:
Paramitta (perfection), Daan (charity), Sheel (character), Virakti (renunciation), Pragya (wisdom),
Veerata (energy), Shanti (patience), Satya (truth), Adhishthan (fortitude), Maitra (goodwill), and
Upeksha (equanimity)
6 Taken from Shanti Parva of Mahabharata
54 (c) 2019 Milind Padalkar 13 May 2021
Arrival of new theories of ethics: Deontology
The field of ethics started to change in mid 18th century with the arrival of two
independent philosophies.
In 1785, the German philosopher Immanuel Kant introduced the concept of
Categorical Imperative as a sole moral motivation of human action. This is now
commonly known as Kantian imperative:
An objective, rationally necessary principle to unconditionally guide human actions
regardless of natural desires or gains thereof.
The only thing which is unconditionally good is ‘good will’. In old German, ‘good will’ means a
person whose actions are solely determined by Moral Law.
Moral Law is based on pure practical reason, i.e. prescriptions to actions or duties.
According to Kant, all actions based on principles and duties are good regardless of
their outcomes. Such actions are good by themselves.
The Kantian ethics came to be known as Deontological ethics. Deontological theory is
concerned with rules and duties to determine ethical conduct.
Means justify the ends in Kantian thought. If the means are good, then the ends are
good.
Discussion: Can you identify the deontological positions in the train problem?
55 (c) 2019 Milind Padalkar 13 May 2021
Consequentialism
India has had a long and deep tradition of scholars and thinkers.
Indian thought treats Ethics (Sadachar) as different from Morality (Neeti). It clearly
differentiates action from character.
Indian thought treats salvation (Moksha) as the ultimate human goal. Virtuous character,
righteous conduct are pathways to salvation. The contract is with the self.
In contrast, the Christian or Islamic life offers contract with God. Virtues, ethics, and morality
come from the teachings of God through his prophets as written down and interpreted.
Hindu traditions has a dominant focus on conduct and action (Dharma): Dharma here means
the right path and righteous conduct. Not to be confused with ‘religion’ in Abrahamic sense.
Buddhist thought focuses on virtues and not on conduct.
Very large body of literature: Includes both scholarly writings (Bhashya, Mimansa)
such as Hitopadesh, Arthashastra, Manusmriti; and metaphor-rich epics such as
Ramayana, Mahabharata, Puranas, Neeti saara, Subhashita traditions etc.
Many schools (Vidyaa) offering diverse views on virtues and conduct. E.g. Dandneeti
(political science), Anvishaki (philosophy), Trayi (Theology), Vaarta (economics),
Brihaspatya (Atheism) …
Name the virtues & righteous acts in Indian culture. Where do they come from?
58 (c) 2019 Milind Padalkar 13 May 2021
Discussion: Virtues & righteous acts
Civilizations dominated by virtue ethics focus on the quality and the character of the
individual. Assumption: Virtuous people will act ethically to get good outcomes.
By making action as a by-product of virtue, they are unable to build strong systems,
procedures, and organizations. They are inefficient and wasteful.
By neglecting outcomes, they remain weak in problem-solving, technology, and
innovation. They are easily overwhelmed by competition with better strategy &
technology.
For instance:
By the early 8th century, Islam was on the march. Buddhist India (mainly regions of Pakistan,
Afghanistan) easily collapsed against much smaller but technologically superior Arabs and
Turks. Buddhist rulers had severely neglected technologies of warfare. They remained
inwardly focused and paid no attention to events beyond their borders. Buddhist ‘sangha’
remained a congregation without organizational muscle and interfered in the statecraft and
governance. Hence, they were unprepared when the more martial Islamic armies arrived.
Virtue ethics dominated the Greek civilization. Martial character was upheld as the supreme
virtue (e.g. Sparta). It collapsed due to constant wars between the city-states. (Hollywood
film 300 is about the battle of Thermopylae between the Spartans and the Persians. It shows
the character of 300 Spartans who try to hold off a very large army of Xerxes).
Arrival of Social Contract theory in 16th – 17th century (Hobbes, Locke) and
Consequentialist ethics in the 18th century (Bentham) fundamentally changed the
Western civilization. It rapidly became “modern”.
Societies (or organizations) dominated by consequentialism:
Focus on goodness of outcomes, and therefore become superior in strategy, innovation,
technology, learning, and efficiency (production).
Fixing on goodness in outcomes means that they remain free to change rules and duties as
well as the character. They become wealthy and powerful.
Organizations characterized by consequentialism are marked by agility and adaptability.
They remain open to change, and handle innovation and technology better than others.
However, they are less human-centric, since they view workers as resources for production.
Hence people feel devalued in such organizations. … “Hire and fire”, “Use and throw”
For example:
Successful, global industrial corporations are not afraid to experiment with business models,
take risks, and innovate. They are always strongly consequentialist. Typically, they are the
leaders in every industry segments such as Apple, IBM, Netflix, Google, TCS, SBI, Reliance …
They are also more likely to be involved in ethically questionable situations. Can
you name a few such situations?
66 (c) 2019 Milind Padalkar 13 May 2021
Discussion: Pros and Cons of consequentialist cultures
Read the case and discuss in the class. What would you have done if you were
Dudley?
The Mignonette
case
Manufacturing and commerce are two critical pillars of any society. A society that
makes nothing and trades nothing cannot exist.
Guilds were the structures for production function and trade before industrial era,
i.e. manufacturing by machines and technology. Guilds are as old as the Roman era
– “collegium”.
Guilds were associations – social clans where membership was by birth, by
invitation or through long apprenticeship only. Closed to general public.
Formal or structured education existed only for religious scriptures. It did not exist
for production, commerce, or trade, because nothing was written down.
All skill development occurred through apprenticeship into guilds. Students of
production and trade learnt by observing the masters.
Apprenticeship was a long affair. It took nearly 12 years for an apprentice to
become an artisan, and another long time before he could be a master artisan.
Thus, guilds were the only structures for organized production and trade in the pre-
industrial era.
They were also the only universities for skill development.
Until the 15th century, all manufacturing was carried out by guilds. Guilds
consisted of artisans doing work by hand using elementary hand tools.
Training of the artisans happened by observing under the master artisan. The
trainee was called apprentice. It often took more than 12 years to become an
artisan.
After invention of steam engine and mechanized power, manufacturing began to
be done by machines in factories. The unit cost of production reduced
dramatically.
But the machines-based production was entirely different from artisan work:
1. Machines were expensive, requiring large upfront capital. Due to low scale of
production, no master artisan in the guild had the ability to invest.
2. Factories were expensive because they required large land and power generating
systems (steam boilers). This added to the capital cost.
3. Machines produced at high rates of production. So, the investor had to buy large
quantities of raw materials. This required huge working capital.
4. The large stockpiles of finished goods meant a big risk to the investor. What if you could
not sell? That meant unproductive working capital.
So essentially, capital risk became the roadblock. You could not use the new
technology unless you had large amount of capital acting as the money at risk.
Under guilds, capital was not a problem. Low production base, low production rates
and practically free labor (apprentice) meant that you did not need much capital.
Colonialism mitigated the problem to some extent (all of this happened in India and
elsewhere):
By obtaining the raw materials practically free (looting the colonies through taxation and
currency manipulation). This reduced the working capital for raw materials.
By creating market monopolies for machine-made products by crushing the local
production. This ensured flow of merchandise to colonies and reduced the risk of unsold
finished goods.
By getting slave labour to work in factories, farms and plantations. This made cost of
labour practically zero. E.g. Indians in Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Mauritius, West Indies, Africa, …
Still, the overall problem of the capital risk remained. Technology made better and
better machines producing better goods at faster rates.
Operating on larger scale meant that it was risky to start manufacturing ventures.
For starting any new ventures, you had to find someone willing to invest.
Such large financial risk could only be assumed by a sovereign power, e.g. the king.
From 15th century, “Joint Stock” companies were introduced as monopolies under
the British crown. The risk to capital (liability) of such joint stock companies was
assumed by the British crown. E.g. East India Company
Thus began the age of capitalism – i.e. societies organized around economics of
capital, finance, and primacy of investor as the bearer of the risk.
Investor (stakeholder) became central to organizing production and commerce.
The sovereign could assume unlimited risk, but ordinary investor could not.
Therefore, some mechanism to limit the investor’s liability became necessary:
First limited liability law was passed by the State of New York in 1811.
England passed Joint Stock Companies Act 1844, and Limited Liability Act 1855.
Colonial India passed Companies Act in 1866, amending it in 1882, 1913 & 1942.
Independent India enacted Companies Act (1956) replacing all related previous
acts. Companies Act (2013) replaced the Companies Act (1956).
Company as a financially organized unit of production is now a cornerstone of the
modern industrial economy.
Company’s liability to its shareholders is limited to the share capital given by its
shareholders. That is the maximum it owes to shareholders.
On the other hand, if the company incurs large losses and payables far in excess of
its assets, then the shareholders maximum liability to pay is limited to their capital
invested. They cannot be asked to pay more.
Thus, the limitation of liability operates to protect both the company and the
shareholders.
Capital is funds given to a company at the risk of investor.
The investor can provide funds either as an owner, or as a lender, or both as an
owner and a lender.
Thus, two main categories under which a company can raise capital:
Equity – also called share or stock
Debt – also called deposit, debenture, loan
Equity is the cheapest source of capital for the company.
Ordinary shares: Equity capital has the highest risk to the investor.
In exchange, the capital-giver receives ownership of the company.
Company receives capital from many people. It must recognize their ownership in
exact proportions of their contributions.
To do this, the company issues units, each unit having a certain value (face value or
a nominal value).
The unit is called equity, share or stock. (Equity = equal treatment)
The investor receives multiple units equal to his contribution. He is called
shareholder or stockholder.
“Ordinary” share means the holder has no special status or rights except to the
residual cash flows. Residual cash flow is the money remaining after ALL
OBLIGATIONS are settled. i.e. these are profits after taxes.
He has rights to the profits and receives them as dividends.
The only one who has voting rights and controls if he has > 51% support.
Preference shares: This is also equity capital and is the second highest in the
category of risk to the investor.
Similar to ordinary shares, preference shares are issued as units. The unit is called
preference share.
The investor receives multiple units equal to his contribution. He is called
preference shareholder or preference stockholder.
“Preference” share means the holder has a right receive a defined percentage of
profits BEFORE the equity shareholder. i.e. he must be paid first, before paying the
dividends. Preference shares stand between the equity share and debt in terms of
risk.
It is customary to name preference shares as x% preference shares. This is the
percentage of the face value that will be paid. 4% is typical.
Like equity shareholder, preference shareholder has no guaranteed dividend.
Dividends will be paid only if the company makes profits and decides against
retaining them fully or partially as Reserves & Surplus.
He may or may not have voting rights.
Secured debt: These are loans from the investors, 3rd parties, banks or other
financial institutions.
The debt is issued as a ‘commercial paper’ bearing a pre-specified rate of interest;
and is secured through mortgages on company assets.
Also called bonds, secured bonds, debentures. The bonds are issued in multiple
units, each having specific face value.
In case of a default, the lender has the right to seek possession and liquidation of
the asset. If the company refuses to cooperate, the lender can move for bankruptcy
proceedings. This is what happened with Essar Steel controlled by the Ruia
brothers, which was finally bought by Arcelor Mittal of France.
On the balance sheet, the secured debt is shown as long-term debt, or “Long-term
borrowings”.
As an inducement, the company may issue convertible debentures, i.e. bonds will
be converted into equity shares after a specified time and at a specified price. This
type of issue has been popular with investors. E.g. Reliance during Dhirubhai days.
Not issued for short-term needs.
Unsecured debt: These are loans from the investors, 3rd parties, banks or other
financial institutions.
Also called deposits, loans, or simply ‘commercial paper’.
They are not secured. In case of a default, the lender has no rights to company
assets. The lender can move for bankruptcy proceedings if the company refuses to
pay interest or the loan principal.
These bear different rates of interest, negotiated from time to time. Typically, these
rates are higher than the market, and higher than the secured debt.
The higher rates of interest are offered as compensation for the higher risk of this
investment. The defaults are numerous.
Hence the investor looks at the soundness of the company’s business, its
managerial practices, its reputation as an ethical business etc.
On the balance sheet, the unsecured debt is shown as short-term debt, or “Current
borrowings”.
Never used for long-term needs.
In these forms, it must declare the maximum capital they can raise.
This is called Authorized Capital.
Attracting as debt:
Issue of secured bonds or debentures to public. When issuing these instruments, company
must secure (as collateral) specific assets equal to the value of debt.
In case the company defaults on interest or principal, the investor can move the courts and
force the company to sell the assets and recover the dues. Defaults on secured
instruments has damaging impact on the market. E.g. IL&FS debt, DHFL bond default
The company can raise unsecured deposits from public or from banks. These generally
come at a higher rate of interest since there is no security collateral.
Interest can be compounded or paid out at quarterly/six-monthly/annually depending on
the classes of investors.
Instruments with exit options are useful for attracting risk-averse investors:
Redeemable instruments offer redemption after a fixed period, or after minimum holding
period. E.g. Infrastructure bonds such as Konkan Railway
The company can list the instruments on the stock market. This allows exit-at-will and
provides liquidity to the investors. E.g. REC bonds
Public sector companies may offer tax-free bonds to finance strategic, long-gestation
projects. E.g. NHAI, REC, PFC
Rates of interest are adjusted lower or higher depending on the nature of risk.
88 (c) 2019 Milind Padalkar 13 May 2021
Attracting capital … 3
Statutory Company: Incorporated under act of parliament: RBI, LIC, SBI etc
Registered company: Registered with the Registrar of Companies
Company limited by shares
Company limited by guarantee
Unlimited company
Private Limited company
Public Limited company
One person company
Holding and subsidiary company
Associate company
Small company
Government company
Section 8 company
Limitation of liability remains the main consideration in choosing the type.
Capital structuring and limiting the liability are essential for attracting the capital.
But they are not sufficient to prevent the occurrence of risks.
Company’s management remains accountable for managing all forms of risk.
Various risks faced by a business can be categorized into three categories: 1)
Normal business risks, 2) Risks arising from managerial errors or incompetence, 3)
Risks arising from malafide intentions (fraud)
Normal business risks:
Competitor actions in customer or labor markets. Many examples …
Own performance failures, Supply chain conflicts, Supplier defaults. Common in pharma
Adverse changes in demand markets due to changes in demographics, purchasing power …
Changes in money markets, interest rates pose risks for highly leveraged companies
Changes in labor markets such as millennials turning away from STEM disciplines
Lawsuits and court actions from stakeholders or enforcement agencies. E.g. Yes Bank
Statutory changes in taxation, import/export regimes, currency exchange rates affect firms
dependent on export/import businesses such as Oil and gas, Gems and jewelery, Food
Actions by foreign governments, e.g. Indian governments moves against Chinese firms
The problem of ethics does not arise in normal business risks, or risks arising from
managerial incompetence. The first category can be viewed as an act of nature. The
second as unintentional errors.
For the normal business risks, good governance means anticipating these risks and
acting effectively. For this to happen, agility in organizational decision making and
implementation is necessary.
For preventing managerial errors or incompetence, good governance means hiring
right people, ensuring effective organizational structures, collective decision-
making involving experts, and good project planning & execution.
Ethics comes into play for the third category, i.e. risks of fraud.
Risks arising from malafide human intentions (fraud):
Risk of fraud occurs due to intentional actions by employees, contractors,
owners, and managers.
There are many ways to commit frauds. The effect of such frauds is captured
through different documents and statements.
It is important to understand how such frauds are committed, and they reflect
on the books of accounts.
94 (c) 2019 Milind Padalkar 13 May 2021
Nature of malafide intentions: Corporate fraud
Every fraud confers an unmerited benefit to the fraudster, at the expense of other
individuals.
Corporate fraud involves individuals, managers, or owners defrauding companies
(essentially other shareholders).
Every corporate is required to prepare the statements of accounts such as Profit &
Loss statement, Balance Sheet, Cash Flow Statements, and other financial
disclosures.
The impact of a fraud is captured within one or more of the above documents.
Therefore, all corporate frauds can be classified according to the following scheme:
A. Profit & Loss account-related frauds
B. Balance Sheet frauds
C. Deliberate mis-statements of accounts
D. Inter-group company transactions
E. Off-book accounting frauds
F. Miscellaneous frauds
Corporate fraud
Miscellaneous frauds:
Compliance misdemeanors: Proxy directors, Poor governance practices,
Suppressing of information for statutory disclosures
Favouritism, bribery to public officials, CXO compensations
Insurance frauds
Manipulation of import/export transactions, Letters of credit
Fraudulent tax refund claims (GST)
Fraudulent export subsidies
Types of revenue frauds:
“Managing” revenue
Fake invoices
Mark to Market
Circular sales (Using cartels or intergroup transactions through shell companies)
Tax frauds through over- or under-invoicing
“Managing” revenue
Under this practice, the company inflates revenues for the reporting period, i.e.
current financial year. It works as follows:
Towards the end of financial year, the company issues invoices to customers and
makes “shipments” so that revenue can be recognized for the reporting period.
The higher revenues shown helps the company meet its guidance targets for the
reporting period.
It also helps the salespeople to earn commissions for meeting targets.
It required the customers to collude. After the reporting period is closed, the invoices
may be withdrawn; or the “shipments” are substituted by actual shipments later.
Some companies also issue fake or dummy invoices, typically to shell companies.
These invoices are never collectible hence it only increases Accounts Receivables on
the balance sheet. No cash comes in.
Most companies do it to a greater or lesser extent. But this practice is severely
discouraged within ethically sound companies. Market rewards such companies
Auditors apply standards of revenue recognition to disallow such practices. But
auditors are people too!
98 (c) 2019 Milind Padalkar 13 May 2021
Workings of revenue “management”
Fake invoices
Under this practice, the company simply raises fake invoices, i.e. invoices are sent
to customers who do not exist. These invoices are never collected, so you only see
a rise in the receivables on the balance sheet.
How does the company manage such uncollectible entries?
After some time, it creates a provision for bad debts and writes them off. This cannot be
done without active connivance of the auditors.
Another way to mask the rising receivables is bill discounting. Company sells the
receivables to collection agents at a discount. Typically, the collection agents are shell
companies or unlisted group companies so escape public disclosures.
Many companies maintain parallel books. This is what Satyam Computer Services
did (PwC as the auditor connived with Satyam).
Eventually, the fraud gets exposed because the fake revenue gets too large to hide
it (Satyam); or because of whistleblower actions (Enron).
The size of fake invoices in Satyam & Enron was very large. Both used such padded
revenues to increase their share prices. Enron used its high share prices to pledge
its shares to fund the missing cash. It collapsed after the fraud was exposed.
100 (c) 2019 Milind Padalkar 13 May 2021
Workings of fake invoices
Question: What problems do you expect? How will you spot this practice?
103 (c) 2019 Milind Padalkar 13 May 2021
Revenue frauds … 4a
Circular sales
Under this practice, the company sells its product in the market after
artificially routing it through a chain of companies.
For instance, it is possible for company A to sell a piece of machinery
directly to customers. But before selling the machinery, it will sell it to
company B, and then buy it back from company B at a higher price.
Now company A has basically the same product, but at a higher cost of
acquisition.
It may sell it to the customer at an inflated price (price gouging). This is
typical for MNCs who have a dominant or monopoly position in the
industry segment. The extraordinary profits are funneled back to the
overseas parent or used to bribe public officials to land big contracts.
Price gouging is common in high technology businesses: Defense
equipments, Medical imaging, Ethical drugs, High end earthmoving
equipments such as tunnel boring machines used for metro etc.
104 (c) 2019 Milind Padalkar 13 May 2021
Revenue frauds … 4b
Question: What problems do you expect? How will you spot this practice?
106 (c) 2019 Milind Padalkar 13 May 2021
Revenue frauds … 5
Tax frauds
There is a thin line between tax avoidance, tax evasion, and tax fraud:
Tax avoidance refers to planning the operations (revenues, costs and assets) to minimize
the taxes payable. Tax avoidance exploits legal provisions to save taxes.
For instance, depreciation is a tax-deductible expense on the P&L. Thus, a company may
want to manage its assets (buy, not lease) to show high depreciation and make itself a
zero-tax company. Reliance in its growth years remained a zero-tax company despite
earning large cash profits. Tax avoidance is legal. Is it ethical?
Tax evasion is intentional suppression or manipulation of data (overstating costs,
understating profits) to reduce the taxes. Tax evasion is a fraud - both illegal and unethical.
Tax fraud is an umbrella term that goes beyond evasion, and includes fraudulently claiming
tax refunds, subsidies, duty drawbacks, etc.
Revenue-based tax frauds are simple. Revenues can be inflated or understated:
Under-invoicing: Company A sells its product at an artificially lower price to book losses.
By doing this, company A evades taxes. Difference may be collected in tax havens.
Over-invoicing: Company B over-invoices to inflate revenues. The difference between
regular and inflated price may be paid back in cash or laundered through hawala route. B
may be based in low-tax locations to evade taxes.
107 (c) 2019 Milind Padalkar 13 May 2021
Workings of Under-invoicing and over-invoicing
Question: What problems do you expect? How will you spot this practice?
108 (c) 2019 Milind Padalkar 13 May 2021
Cost-related frauds … 1
Fake employees
Showing fake employees to inflate the labour costs is generally seen in manpower-
intensive unorganized sectors. Generally, in such workers are paid in cash. This
creates the room for fake entries and siphon off the funds. E.g. pre-UID MNREGA
Corporates collude with contractors providing manpower services such as security,
hospitality, healthcare, construction, real estate, etc.
At petty levels, only the operating managers are involved in the fraud, through active
connivance with HR department. Contractors return the fraudulent monies to the
managers after taking a cut. Prevention requires superior intelligence networks.
At higher levels, top managements set up contracts for “services”. The monies paid out are
returned back to the top executives, generally in cash. Or,
The contracts channelize bribes to public officials as ‘consulting fees’ into dummy accounts
typically in the names of relatives of the officials.
This fraud type is difficult to carry out if the workers are paid through formal
channels such as banks. Then they come under the scrutiny of Income Tax, EPFO,
ESIC, etc., and are easily discovered.
Fraud reduces substantially with KYC, Aadhar, or PAN cards. E.g. post-UID MNREGA.
Asset diversion
In plain language, this is a theft. It takes three variations:
Simple theft: Assets (raw materials, machinery, spare parts, finished goods) are stolen and
shown as lost. After some time, they are written off the balance sheet, and a loss is
booked to P&L. Such diversions are common for input materials such as steel, coal,
cement, and petty thefts of spare parts, inventory from retail stores etc.
Typically, these frauds are committed by lower-level employees and operating managers.
To prevent such thefts, managements must implement better surveillance, inventory
counting, and intelligence networks.
Asset transfer into shell companies at manipulated prices: Done by the owner/promoters.
Involves moving financial assets such as investments, capitalized items, contracts having
future cash flows; or physical operations, etc., to other group companies that are typically
unlisted real or shell companies. Money laundering happens through this route.
Asset diversion into parallel private supply chains: This is an organized theft at CXO levels.
The assets are diverted into supply chains set up by the fraudsters. They are then sold off
using forged stationery as legitimate goods in the market, and monies collected into
private bank accounts. For the source company, the inventory records are forged to show
the non-existent assets in warehouses. e.g. 8700 crore fraud at Reebok India in 2012.@
@ https://www.indiatoday.in/business/corporate/story/reebok-india-claims-rs-8700-crore-scam-by-former-md-coo-files-fir-in-gurgaon-103065-2012-05-23
CAPEX inflation
CAPEX inflation is commonly seen during the project phases such as setting up a
new operation, expansion of existing facilities etc., which require large capital
expenditures.
Typically done by owners/promoters. The inflation is accompanied by siphoning off
the monies either as cash or laundering into tax havens. It allows the promoters to
take back part of the invested cash. It is used to pay off public officials to clear the
numerous regulatory hurdles. This is a big contributor to the black money and
shadow economy.
The asset sits on the balance sheet at the inflated value. It casts a long shadow on
the future performance.
Higher depreciation is charged to P&L in subsequent years. This depresses the net profits
of the company. If it is a listed company, it reduces the share prices. Unless there is a
marketing hype about the company, the PE ratios remain depressed.
Inflated capital asset value allows higher maintenance to be booked, which creates further
avenues of fraud through fictitious maintenance expenses (outsourcing contracts).
Lower profits lead to lower income taxes for many years. The government is also cheated.
Cost shifting
Cost shifting takes two forms:
False capitalization: Costs that should be expensed off to P&L are capitalized. This
increases the reported profitability, since P&L does not see the costs.
This practice happens in two types of companies: a) Company not paying income taxes, so
the higher profits do not involve tax outgo, b) Company facing operational margin pressure
and wanting to show higher profits for the stock market analysts. The shifted cost sits on
the balance sheet as a depreciable/amortizable asset. Reliance in its early years extensively
employed this device as they paid zero income taxes for many years.
The higher profits lead to inflated share prices (due to higher PE ratios) on the stock
markets, which creates further scope to commit frauds such as price rigging, as was the
case with Enron.
False expensing of CAPEX: This is the reverse of the above. Costs that should be capitalized
are expensed out to P&L.
The main reason for this practice is to understate profits and save income taxes. Income
tax department watches the accounts carefully and applies penalties, if found.
Cost shifting is quite common in SMEs or family-owned businesses. Neither of
these frauds can be carried out without the connivance of auditors.
Asset impairment
Assets on balance sheet can lose value in normal business conditions.
For instance, Tata Motors’ project for producing the Nano car at Singur, West
Bengal had to be cancelled due to political resistance. Investment of around Rs
1400 crores had to be written off. The project investment was an asset on their
balance sheet. (See https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/companies/Singur-issue-Tata-
Motors-seeks-Rs-1400-cr-damages-from-Bengal/article20482179.ece)
The company may write off such assets and report a loss. This is called asset
impairment. The impairment is done through creating provisions and then writing
them off subject to the accepted accounting standards (IND AS which replaced
Indian GAAP).
Another example of assets gone bad is Anil Ambani’s telecom venture which
invested in CDMA technology which did not work in India where GSM standard is
the dominant technology. Such assets had to be written off before Jio acquired
control over the ADAG company.
Asset impairment is normal. This is not a mis-statement. No fraud is involved.