Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Accountability and Integrity Issue in Tabung Haji
Accountability and Integrity Issue in Tabung Haji
1.0 INTRODUCTION
was the first Islamic financial institution established in 1969 (Ismail, 2020).
received public attention with the purchase of land owned by 1Malaysia Development
Berhad (1MDB) May 2015. A price 43 times more expensive than 1MDB buying the
same land from the government (C. Malaysia, n.d.). Other than that, various other
issues began to arise. Among them are a warning letter from Bank Negara Malaysia
Big capital losses due to acute financial problems by TH Heavy Engineering Berhad
(THHE). It is controlled by TH, who owns 30% of the company (The Star 2016).
Institution Tabung Haji (TH) pioneer in the world's best haji management faced
announcement of the 2018 hibah declaration at 1.25 per cent (Bakar et al., 2020). It
was the lowest since 1995, and under TH, 106 strategic enterprises had their shares
It was due to equity investments worth up to RM10 billion in 2018. The main reason
political appointments have resulted in a number of failures that are currently being
reviewed. Corruption, malpractice, allegations, and misbehaviour are among them. It
APPOINTMENTS IN ADMINISTRATION OF TH
Lembaga Tabung Haji. They are related to their 1MDB company Ismee Ismail, Datuk
BY THE AUDIT.
At 10 December 2018, The news conference of Datuk Seri Dr
(which have been audited) for the Financial Year Ended 31 December
Minister said that Lembaga Tabung Haji (TH) has been paying
illegal dividends to its depositors since 2014 again. Where since 2014,
TH’s liabilities have exceeded the value of its assets. This makes TH
Act 1995.
lodged two police reports. It against several former key office bearers in
Rahim, former TH Chief Executive Officer, Tan Sri Ismee Ismail and
abused for political reasons. Another police report has been filed on
solution that will not change the original nature of the institution. It
stipulated in the Tabung Haji Act 1995 (Act 535)(Ali & Ghani, 2019).
Apart from that, Hajj management matters still remain under the
(Religious Affairs). From the point of view of TH, the Board of Directors
and its management body still have the main responsibility. Especially
Results placing Tabung Haji (TH) under the regulation of Bank Negara
situation. It is carrying out its mission in accordance with the best governance
operates on a vast scale (in terms of deposit and investment size) as follows:
ruling by the Cabinet Special Committee on Anti-Corruption. BNM will focus its
prevent or restrict PNB from carrying out its original mandate. In the national
the check and balance approach is not a new thing. It long been implemented
current Government guarantee (status quo) as provided Tabung Haji Act 1995
follow the same policy. With the formation of an Investment Panel made up of
and investment. This measure aims to ensure investments made are orderly
and guided. TH's risk appetite, as well as to ensure the payment of hibah is
22 (3) of Act 535. MOF will work closely with the Honorable Minister in the
the depositors' absolute rights and interests are not affected. It will be fine.
6.0 CONCLUSION
Key positions in the GLC cannot be turned into political gifts. The
Chairman's job is not to be a monitor but a catalyst for the GLC's performance. To
experience, qualifications, integrity, and a proven track record are all important
factors. Being an MP does not mean they have the professional qualifications.
Especially to lead a GLC or government agency. Here we would like to state that
political leaders should not be appointed to chair business entities such as GLCs.
Politicians are better off holding political positions. Leave corporate positions to
professionals and technocrats. The main principles of politics and business do not
mix are well known. They become the SOP in any mature democracy. History has
shown that when politics and business are mixed, business ruining.
The management history of GLCs and statutory bodies in Malaysia is now good.
remember Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Rahman's excellent record. He leading MAS to
become one of the leading Airlines in the region. Similarly, the story of PETRONAS
led by Tan Sri Azizan and Tan Sri Hasan Merican. It was driven to become a
Fortune 500 company. Other examples are such as FELDA, Sime Darby, CIMB,
industry.
During the previous rule, many APs were appointed as GLC Chairmen. For
example FGV, Tabung Haji, FELCRA, MARA and others. As a result, these GLCs
suffered huge losses. They had to be bailed out by the government. Worse, some
of the appointed chairmen among these politicians are facing some charges.
The government needs to learn from past experiences. When leaders fail to hold
trust, the people lose confidence and change direction. Therefore, GLCs need to
They do not follow the rules of corporate governance and transparency. They don't
even understand the basic difference between executive and non-executive
provide services and contributions to the people. It isn't just about management.
The appointed GLC leaders and chairmen must not only be competent. They must
be able to play a role in national development. Use the role of GLCs in strategic
and future sectors. They ensure profits on a beautiful "balance sheet". They are
We call on all GLC reform initiatives towards better and dynamic governance. It is
Ali, M. M., & Ghani, N. A. A. (2019). Tabung Haji: Public Concern and Future
Direction. ICR Journal, 10(1), 132–135.
Bakar, N. M. A., Yasin, N. M., & Bakar, N. H. A. (2020). The Contemporary Role of
Tabung Haji Malaysia in Fulfilling Sustainability via Islamic Social Finance.
Journal of Islamic Finance, 9(2), 59–69.
Fuad, N. A. B. A. (2019). A Pilgrimage Financial Motives: Lessons to Be Drawn from
Tabung Haji Malaysia. Hamad Bin Khalifa University (Qatar).
Ishak, M.S. 2011. Tabung Haji as an Islamic financial institution for sustainable
economic development. International Proceedings of Economics Development &
Research: 236-240.