Structural Calculation LLPH Operation Shelter (N) : Upgrade Buildings For Risk Mitigation at Ras Tanura Refinery

Saudi Aramco 2616-ENG (03/99)
PMT OPRNS
KAZ SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SAUDI ARAMCO. NO REPRODUCTION IN FULL OR IN PART SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ITS OWNER.
RAZ
ENGG CERT
MAO
NFP
ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION
REFINING and NGL PROJECTS DEPARTMENT

DESCRIPTION
RT REFINERY and JUAYMAH NGL PROJECTS DIVISION
BI-10-02062-0002
UPGRADE BUILDINGS FOR RISK MITIGATION

09/10/2020 10-02062
JO/EWO
AT RAS TANURA REFINERY

NO. DATE
REV
00
DISCIPLINE
ENGINEER
NFP
09/10/2020
DATE:
PROJECT
ENGINEER STRUCTURAL CALCULATION
MKD
DATE:
09/10 /2020 LLPH OPERATION SHELTER (N)
CERTIFIED
MAO
09/10 /2020
DATE:
CONSTRUCTION
AGENCY
RAZ
09/10 /2020
DATE:
OPERATIONS
KAZ
09/10 /2020
DATE:
CONTROL NUMBER
VERIFICATION
Prepared by
EDSD
DATE:
BY:
REVISIONCERTIFICATION
APPROVAL/CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS,
THIS INDICATES THAT REV. NO.__________
CERTIFICATE
OF THIS DRAWING IS COVERED, FOR ALL
BY DRAWING COMPLETION CERTIFICATE

00
_____________________
SEPTEMBER 2020
(DCC) NO. 10-02062-0002-001
` STRUCTURAL CALCULATION DWG.TYPE PLANT NO. INDEX DRAWING NO. SHT.NO. REV.NO.
REVISION
UPGRADE BUILDING FOR RISK MITIGATION, RAS TANURA DOC 1

035 A PE - P20084 OF
WATER INTAKE & PUMPSTATION SALT 00
ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION (IFC) RAS TANURA SAUDI ARABIA BI / EWO: 10-02062-0002 110
26 JAN 2022 EDSD/2616-0399.doc
CALCULATION SHEET
SNC-LAVALIN FAYEZ ENGINEERING, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia

PROJECT : Updrade Buildings for Risk Mitigation - RT Refinery
B.I Number : 10-02062-0002-001 Designed : AIA
Project Code No. : 510008 Checked : NFP / AKM
Calc. No. : PE-P20084 Revision : IFC
Subject : Structural Calculation - LLPH Operator Shelter - Plant No. 035 Rev. No. : 00
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Description Page Number
1.0 Design Basis ….………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4

1.1 Dictation ….…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4
1.2 Objective …………………………………………………………………………………….……………… 4
1.3 Structure Description …………………………………………………………………………………… 4
1.4 Structural System ………………………………………………………………………………………… 4
1.4.1 Superstructure ……………………………………………………………………………………… 4
1.4.2 Substructure ……………………………………………………………………………………… 4
1.5 Design Criteria ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 4
1.5.1 Design Codes and References …………………………………………………………………… 4
1.5.2 Material Specifications …………………………………………………………………………….. 5
1.5.3 Soil Parameters ……………………………………………………………………………………. 5
1.5.4 Serviceabilty Requirements ………………………………………………………………………. 5
1.5.5 Design Philosophy & Assumptions ……………………………………………………………….. 5
2.0 Design Loadings ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6

2.1 Dead Loads ….…………………………………………………………………………………………… 7
2.2 Live Loads ..……………………………………………………………………………………………… 7
2.3 Wind Loads ..……………………………………………………………………………………………… 8
2.4 Seismic Loads ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 9
2.5 Load Combination and Load Factors 11
3.0 Analysis and Design …………………………………………………………………………………………… 12

3.1 3D - Model Views ….………………………………………………………………………………………… 13
3.2 ETABS ….…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 16
3.2.1 ETABS Input Sketches….………………………………………………………………………………… 17
3.2.1.1 Loads ….……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 18
3.2.1.2 Sections….…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 23
3.2.1.3 Labels….……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 27
3.2.1.4 Diaphragms….…………………………………………………………………………………………… 30
3.2.2 ETABS Input Report….……………………………………………………………………………………… 32
3.2.3 ETABS Output….…………………………………………………………………………………………… 58
3.2.3.1 Beam Design….…………………………………………………………………………………………… 59
3.2.3.2 Column Design….…………………………………………………………………………………………… 65
3.2.3.3 Base Reactions….…………………………………………………………………………………………… 67
3.2.3.4 Drift….………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 70
3.3 SAFE….……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 73
3.3.1 Slabs….……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 74
3.3.1.1 SAFE Input Report….……………………………………………………………………………………… 75
3.3.1.2 SAFE Input Sketches….…………………………………………………………………………………… 82
3.2.1.3 Flexure Design….…………………………………………………………………………………………… 85
3.2.3.4 Deflection (Long Term)….………………………………………………………………………………… 90
3.3.2 Foundations….……………………………………………………………………………………………… 92
3.3.2.1 SAFE Input Report….……………………………………………………………………………………… 93
ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION (IFC)
26 JAN 2022
Calculation Report, LLPH Operator Shelter, Plant Plant No. 035 Page 2 of 110
CALCULATION SHEET

3.3.2.2 SAFE Input Sketches….…………………………………………………………………………………… 98

3.3.2.3 Flexure Design….…………………………………………………………………………………………… 101
3.3.2.4 Punching Check….………………………………………………………………………………………… 104
3.3.2.5 Base Pressure….…………………………………………………………………………………………… 106
4.0 APPENDICES …………………………………………………………………………..………………………… 108

Appendix - I Design Drawings …………………………………………………………………..………… 109
4.0 Appendix - II Structural Design Checklist …………………………………………………………..…. 110
4.1 Geotechnical Report ….…………………………………………………………………………………… 76
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

1.0 DESIGN BASIS
1.1 Dictation :
This calculation shall be read in conjunction with the design codes and references, as stated on Section
1.5 of this document, general notes on general drawings, construction specifications and structural
drawings.
1.2 Objective:
The purpose of this document is to prepare structural design of LLPH Operator Shelter (N) . The design
of the structure is composed of RCC structural frame system integrated with concrete foundations,
diaphragms (Solid slabs), CMU wall , interior CMU wall and non-structural items such as dry walls and
its serviceability considerations.
1.3 Structure Description :
1.3.1 Structure Name: LLPH Operator Shelter (N)

1.3.2 Structure Type: Building and other structures except those listed in Occupancy Category I,III and IV.
1.3.3 Structure Area: (please refer to Architectural Floor Plan Drawing)
1.3.4 Structure Usage: Operation Shelter
1.3.5 Structure Framing: Ordinary RCC Frames
1.3.6 Structure Height: 4.20 m
1.3.7 Structure Length: 7.65 m
1.3.8 Structure Width: 5.05 m
1.3.9 Structure Roofing System: 160 mm thk. Solid Slab .
1.3.10 Structure Wall System: 300 mm thick CMU Walls
1.4 Structural System :
1.4.1 Superstructure:
A single storey building with ordinary moment frames structural system. Roofing and walls shall be as
stated in 1.3.9 and 1.3.10 respectively.
1.4.2 Substructure / Foundation:

The foundations are reinforced concrete footings where columns are supported at the base. CMU
walls shall be supported / connected by grade beams or slabs.
1.5 Design Criteria :

1.5.1 Design Code References:
ACI 318M - 2008 - Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete
ASCE 7-05 - Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
IBC 2009 - International Building Code
Saudi Aramco Engineering Standards:

SAES-A-112 - Meteorological & Seismic Design Data
SAES-A-113 - Geotechnical Engineering Requirements
SAES-M-100 - Saudi Aramco Building Code
SAES-Q-001 - Criteria for Design and Construction of Concrete Structures
SAES-Q-005 - Concrete Foundations
09-SAMSS-097 - Ready-Mixed Concrete
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

1.5.2 Material Specifications:
Minimum compressive strength of concrete @ 28 days f'c = 35 MPa SAES-Q-001

(for structural concrete, e.g. columns, pedestal, footings
slabs and grade beams)
Minimum compressive strength of concrete @ 28 days f'c = 14 MPa SAES-Q-001

(for non-structural concrete, e.g. lean or blinding concrete)
Yield strength of Reinforcing Steel Bars (Grade 60) fy = 420 MPa SAES-Q-001
Unit weight of normal concrete c = 24 KN/m

3
Unit weight of lightweight concrete screed cs = 12 KN/m

3
1.5.3 Soil Parameters (Soil Report, G.F. # 2018/100):

Soil density s = 18 KN/m3
Net Soil Bearing Capacity ( For Static Analysis ) SBC = 200 Kpa
Angle of friction ϕ = 35 degree
1.5.4 Serviceability Requirements

Maximum allowable vertical deflection shall not exceed;
Beam and Slab deflection = L/240 ACI 318-08 (Table 9.5 (b)
Maximum lateral drift in combinations with seismic in buildings shall not exceed;
All other structures = 0.01H Table 12.12-1, ASCE 7-05
1.5.5 Design Philosophy and Assumptions:
1.5.5.1 The structure will be designed as per IBC 2009, ACI 318M-2008 and other relevant international
standards.
1.5.5.2
The building super-structural frame system is modelled, analyzed, and designed in ETABS software for
Static Load Analysis. Buildings foundations and roof slab are designed using SAFE software.
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

2.0 DESIGN LOADINGS
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

2.1 Dead Load

This includes self weight of structure and all its components per ASCE 7-05, "Minimum Design Loads for
Buildings and Other Structures, refer to Tables C3-1, C3-2 Minimum Loads unless noted otherwise.
Roof Loads :
160 mm thk. Solid slab selfweight = 3.84 KPa (derived value)

50 mm thk. Gravel = 1.25 KPa (derived value)
140 mm avg. thickness of Lightweight Lean Concrete = 1.68 KPa (derived value)
Roof insulation Layers (Refer to Arch.) = 1.00 KPa Assumed Conservatively
Ceiling = 0.3 kPa Assumed Conservatively
Electrical lighting system = 0.05 KPa ASCE 7-05
Mechanical = 0.20 KPa ASCE 7-05
Fire Sprinkler System = 0.15 KPa ASCE 7-05
Total superimposed load of Roof Slab = 8.47 KPa
CMU Walls (Fully Grouted):

300 mm thk concrete masonry wall = 6.40 kPa SABP-Q-008, Sec. Table 1
50 mm thk insulation = 0.20 kPa
Total superimposed load of CMU wall (internal) = 6.60 KPa
2.2 Live Load on Roof

Ordinary flat, pitched, and curved roofs = 20 psf = 1.0 KPa ASCE 07-05, Table 4-1
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

2.3 Wind Load

The building will be designed as per Main Wind Force Resisting System.
Location : Ras Tanura, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
V = Basic Wind Speed ( 3-Sec. Gust ) = 145.00 km/hr SAES-A-112

90.08 mph
Exposure Factor = Exposure C
P = Design Wind Pressure
P = [qz*G*Cp] - [qh*Gcpi]
G = Gust Effect Factor = 0.85 ASCE 7-2005
CpW = external wall pressure coefficient for windward wall = 0.80 ASCE 7-2005
CpL = external wall pressure coefficient for leeward wall = 0.50 ASCE 7-2005
Kzt = Topographic Factor = 1.00 ASCE 7-2005
Kd = Wind Directionality Factor = 0.85 ASCE 7-2005
I = Wind Importance Factor Occupancy Risk Category III = 1.15 ASCE 7-2005
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

2.4 Seismic Load
As per SAES-A-112, TABLE-1 Design Data:

Ss = Short Period Acceleration (Ss) in % g = 8.80 = 0.088 < 0.25
S1 = Short Period Acceleration (S1) in % g = 3.20 = 0.032 < 0.10
Site Class = C SAES-A-112

Fa = values of site coefficient = 1.20 Table 11.4-1 ASCE 7-2005
Fv = values of site coefficient = 1.70 Table 11.4-2 ASCE 7-2005
E = Seismic importance factor (Category IV) = 1.25 Table 11.5-2 ASCE 7-2005
Adjusted Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration Parameters

S ms = FaSs = 1.20 x 0.09 = 0.106 (equation 11.4-1) ASCE 7-2005
S m1 = FvS1 = 1.70 x 0.032 = 0.054 (equation 11.4-2) ASCE 7-2005
Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameters

S ds = 2/3 S ms = 0.070 (equation 11.4-3) ASCE 7-2005
S d1 = 2/3 S m1 = 0.036 (equation 11.4-4) ASCE 7-2005
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

S1 = 0.032 < 0.04 hence, SDC A

Ss = 0.088 < 0.15 hence, SDC A
11.7 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY A

11.7.1 Applicability of Seismic Requirements for Seismic Design Category A Structures.
Structures assigned to Seismic Design Category A need only to comply with the requirements of
Section 11.7.
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

2.5 Load Combination and Load Factors
Service Load Combinations as per IBC 2009

S1 = DL IBC 2009, Eq. 16-8
S2 = DL + L + T IBC 2009, Eq. 16-9
S3 = DL + 0.75T + 0.75Lr IBC 2009, Eq. 16-11
S4 = DL + W IBC 2009, Eq. 16-12
S5 = DL + 0.7E IBC 2009, Eq. 16-12
S6 = DL + 0.75L + 0.75W IBC 2009, Eq. 16-13
S7 = DL + 0.75L + 0.525E IBC 2009, Eq. 16-13
S8 = 0.6DL + W IBC 2009, Eq. 16-14
S9 0.6DL + 0.7E IBC 2009, Eq. 16-15
Factord Load Combinations as per IBC 2009

U1 = 1.4DL IBC 2009, Eq. 16-1
U2 = 1.2DL + 1.2T + 1.2L IBC 2009, Eq. 16-2
U3 = 1.2DL + 1.6L + 0.8W IBC 2009, Eq. 16-3
U4 = 1.2DL + L + 1.6W IBC 2009, Eq. 16-4
U5 = 1.2DL + L + E IBC 2009, Eq. 16-5
U6 = 0.9DL + 1.6W IBC 2009, Eq. 16-6
U7 = 0.9DL + 1.0E IBC 2009, Eq. 16-7
where:
DL = dead load L = live load E = earthquake load
W = wind load T = temperature
Note :
1- Temperature load application is not applicable for the building which is satisfying the governing standards (ACI
224.3 , Table 1.2 & PCA, Building Movement and Joint, Fig. 56) in terms of maximum building length.
2- Temperature and shrinkage reinforcement already provided to slabs as per (ACI 318-08, 7.12.2.1)
requirement.
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

B.I Number : 10-02062-0002-001 Designed
Desi ned : AIA
Project Code No. : 510008 Checked
Ch ed :: NFP / AKM
Calc. No. : PE-P20084 Revision
Re on :: IFC
Subject : Structural Calculation - LLPH Operator Shelter (N) - Plant No. 035 Rev. No.
Re No. :: 00
3.0 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed :: NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. :: 00
3.1 3D‐Model Views
26 JAN 2022
ETABS 18.0.2 5/31/2020
26 JAN 2022
Calculation Report, LLPH Operator Shelter,
C45-R1.EDB Plant Plant No. 035 3-D View Page 14 of 110
ETABS 18.0.2 5/31/2020
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed :: NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. :: 00
3.2 ETABS
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed : : NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. : 00
3.2.1 ETABS Input Sketches
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed : : NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
: Structural Calculation - LLPH Operator Shelter (N) - Plant No. 035 00
Subject Rev. No.
Re No. ::
3.2.1.1 Loads
26 JAN 2022
ETABS 18.0.2 5/31/2020
30 30
30 20 30
30 30
X
26 JAN 2022
C45-R1.EDB Plant Plant No. 035 View
Plan - GROUND - Z = 0 (m) Frame Span Loads Gravity (WALL) Page 19 of 110
ETABS 18.0.2 5/31/2020
5 5
5 5
5 5
X
26 JAN 2022
C45-R1.EDB Plant Plant No.Plan
035 View - ROOF - Z = 4.6 (m) Frame Span Loads Gravity (WALL) Page 20 of 110
ETABS 18.0.2 5/31/2020
4.65
26 JAN 2022
C45-R1.EDB Plant Plant No. 035
Plan View - ROOF - Z = 4.6 (m) Uniform Loads Gravity (SDL) Page 21 of 110
ETABS 18.0.2 5/31/2020
26 JAN 2022
C45-R1.EDB Plant Plant No. 035
Plan View - ROOF - Z = 4.6 (m) Uniform Loads Gravity (LIVE) Page 22 of 110
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed :: NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. :: 00
3.2.1.2 Sections
26 JAN 2022
ETABS 18.0.2 5/31/2020
GB - 35X50 GB - 35X50
GB - 35X60
GB - 35X60
GB - 35X60
Y
GB - 35X50 GB - 35X50
X
26 JAN 2022
C45-R1.EDB Plant Plant No. 035 Plan View - GROUND - Z = 0 (m) Page 24 of 110
ETABS 18.0.2 5/31/2020
B - 35X60 B - 35X60
B - 35X60
B - 35X60
B - 35X60
S16
B - 35X60 B - 35X60
X
26 JAN 2022
C45-R1.EDB Plant Plant No. 035 Plan View - ROOF - Z = 4.6 (m) Page 25 of 110
ETABS 18.0.2 5/31/2020
C - 35X35 - 8T16
C - 35 X 3 5
6
- 8T1
5X35
C-3
- 8T16
C-3
5X3
C - 35X35 - 8T16
5 - 8T16
5
- 8T
C - 35X3
16
C - 35X35
6
- 8T1
- 8T16
5X35
C-3
C - 35X35
C-3
5X3
5- 8T
16
5 - 8T16
- 8T16
C - 35X3
C - 35X35
- 8T16
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed :: NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. :: 00
3.2.1.3 Labels
26 JAN 2022
ETABS 18.0.2 5/31/2020
C26 B55 C33 B56 C32

B48
B57
B49
Y
X B53 B54
C3 C34 C22
26 JAN 2022
C45-R1.EDB Plant Plant No. 035 Plan View - GROUND - Z = 0 (m) Page 28 of 110
ETABS 18.0.2 5/31/2020
C26 B55 C33 B56 C32

B48
B57
B49
Y
X B53 B54
C3 C34 C22
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed :: NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. :: 00
3.2.1.4 Diaphragms
26 JAN 2022
ETABS 18.0.2 5/31/2020
D1
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed :: NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Subject Rev. No.
Re No. ::
3.2.2 ETABS Input Report
26 JAN 2022
LLPH Operator Shelter (C45)
26 JAN 2022
Table of Contents
1. Structure Data
1.1 Story Data
2. Properties
2.1 Materials
2.2 Frame Sections
2.3 Shell Sections
3. Loads
3.1 Load Patterns
3.2 Auto Wind Loading
3.3 Auto Seismic Loading
3.4 Load Cases
3.5 Load Combinations
4. Design Data
4.1 Steel Frame Design
4.2 Concrete Frame Design

26 JAN 2022
List of Tables
Table 1.1 Program Control
Table 1.2 Story Definitions
Table 2.1 Material Properties - General
Table 2.2 Frame Section Property Definitions - Summary
Table 2.3 Area Section Property Definitions - Summary
Table 3.1 Load Pattern Definitions
Table 3.2 Load Pattern Definitions - Auto Wind - ASCE 7-05
Table 3.4 Load Pattern Definitions - Auto Seismic - ASCE 7-05
Table 3.6 Load Case Definitions - Summary
Table 3.7 Load Combination Definitions
Table 4.1 Steel Frame Design Preferences - AISC 360-05
Table 4.2 Concrete Frame Design Preferences - ACI 318-08

26 JAN 2022
Structure Data 5/31/2020
1 Structure Data
This chapter provides model geometry information, including items such as story levels, point coordinates, and
element connectivity.
Table 1.1 - Program Control (Part 1 of 2)

ProgramName Version ProgLevel LicenseNum CurrUnits StlFrmCode CompBmCode
ETABS 18.0.2 Ultimate 2010-*1XDU9L5PCC84BR8 AISC 360-05 AISC 360-05

Table 1.1 - Program Control (Part 2 of 2)
CompColCode StlJstCode ConcFrmCode ConcSlbCode ShrWallCode
AISC 360-10 SJI-2010 ACI 318-08 ACI 318-08 ACI 318-08

1.1 Story Data
Table 1.2 - Story Definitions

Height Master Splice
Tower Name Similar To Color
m Story Story
T1 ROOF 4.6 No None No Magenta
T1 GROUND 1.5 No None No Gray8Dark

26 JAN 2022
Properties 5/31/2020
2 Properties
This chapter provides property information for materials, frame sections, shell sections, and links.
2.1 Materials
Table 2.1 - Material Properties - General

Material Type SymType Grade Color Notes
35MPA Concrete Isotropic Unknown Red
A416Gr270 Tendon Uniaxial Unknown Blue
A615Gr60 Rebar Uniaxial Unknown Yellow
CONC Concrete Isotropic Unknown Gray8Dark
OTHER Other Isotropic Unknown Green
STEEL Steel Isotropic Unknown Magenta
2.2 Frame Sections
Table 2.2 - Frame Section Property Definitions - Summary (Part 1 of 3)

Area J I33 I22 As2 As3 S33Pos
Name Material Shape Color
cm2 cm4 cm4 cm4 cm2 cm2 cm3
B - 35X60 35MPA Concrete Rectangular Magenta 2100 545409.5 630000 214375 1750 1750 21000
C - 35X35 - 8T16 35MPA Concrete Rectangular Blue 1225 211338 125052.1 125052.1 1020.8 1020.8 7145.8
GB - 35X50 35MPA Concrete Rectangular Red 1750 405757.3 364583.3 178645.8 1458.3 1458.3 14583.3
GB - 35X60 35MPA Concrete Rectangular Yellow 2100 545409.5 630000 214375 1750 1750 21000
CG CG PNA PNA
S33Neg S22Pos S22Neg Z33 Z22 R33 R22 Area As2
Offset 3 Offset 2 Offset 3 Offset 2
cm3 cm3 cm3 cm3 cm3 mm mm Modifier Modifier
mm mm mm mm
21000 12250 12250 31500 18375 173.2 101 0 0 0 0 1 1

7145.8 7145.8 7145.8 10718.8 10718.8 101 101 0 0 0 0 1 1
14583.3 10208.3 10208.3 21875 15312.5 144.3 101 0 0 0 0 1 1
21000 12250 12250 31500 18375 173.2 101 0 0 0 0 1 1

As3 Mass Weight
J Modifier I33 Modifier I22 Modifier
Modifier Modifier Modifier
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
2.3 Shell Sections
Table 2.3 - Area Section Property Definitions - Summary

Total
Element
Name Type Material Thickness
Type
mm
S16 Slab Shell-Thin 35MPA 160
W35 Wall Shell-Thin 35MPA 350
26 JAN 2022
5/31/2020
3 Loads
This chapter provides loading information as applied to the model.
3.1 Load Patterns
Table 3.1 - Load Pattern Definitions
Is Auto Self Weight

Name Type Auto Load
Load Multiplier
DEAD No Dead 1
LIVE No Live 0
SDL No Super Dead 0
SEISMIC No Seismic 0 ASCE 7-05
SEISMIC(1/6) Yes Seismic 0 ASCE 7-05
WALL No Dead 0
WIND No Wind 0 ASCE 7-05
WIND(1/12) Yes Wind 0 ASCE 7-05

3.2 Auto Wind Loading
Table 3.2 - Load Pattern Definitions - Auto Wind - ASCE 7-05 (Part 1 of 3)
Parapet
Is Auto Exposure Top Bottom Include User User ASCE
Name Height User Cpl e1 Ratio
Load Source Story Story Parapet Cp? Cpw Case
m
WIND No Diaphragms ROOF GROUND Yes 1 Yes 0.8 0.5 Create All 0.15
WIND(1/12) Yes Diaphragms ROOF GROUND Yes 1 Yes 0.8 0.5 1 0
WIND(10/12) Yes Diaphragms ROOF GROUND Yes 1 Yes 0.8 0.5 4 -0.15
WIND(11/12) Yes Diaphragms ROOF GROUND Yes 1 Yes 0.8 0.5 4 0.15


26 JAN 2022
5/31/2020
Wind Direction
Exposure Gust Width
e2 Ratio Speed Importance kzt Kd Angle Story Diaphragm
Type Factor Type
mph deg
0.15 91 C 1.15 1 0.85 0.85 Auto 0 ROOF D1
0 91 C 1.15 1 0.85 0.85 Auto 0 ROOF D1
-0.15 91 C 1.15 1 0.85 0.85 Auto 0 ROOF D1
0.15 91 C 1.15 1 0.85 0.85 Auto 90 ROOF D1
-0.15 91 C 1.15 1 0.85 0.85 Auto 90 ROOF D1
0 91 C 1.15 1 0.85 0.85 Auto 90 ROOF D1
0 91 C 1.15 1 0.85 0.85 Auto 0 ROOF D1
0 91 C 1.15 1 0.85 0.85 Auto 0 ROOF D1
0 91 C 1.15 1 0.85 0.85 Auto 90 ROOF D1
0 91 C 1.15 1 0.85 0.85 Auto 90 ROOF D1
0 91 C 1.15 1 0.85 0.85 Auto 0 ROOF D1
0 91 C 1.15 1 0.85 0.85 Auto 90 ROOF D1
0.15 91 C 1.15 1 0.85 0.85 Auto 0 ROOF D1

Width Depth X Y
m m m m
11 35.88 17.94 5.5
5.1 7.7 3.85 2.55
5.1 7.7 3.85 2.55
7.7 5.1 3.85 2.55
7.7 5.1 3.85 2.55
7.7 5.1 3.85 2.55
5.1 7.7 3.85 2.55
5.1 7.7 3.85 2.55
7.7 5.1 3.85 2.55
7.7 5.1 3.85 2.55
5.1 7.7 3.85 2.55
7.7 5.1 3.85 2.55
5.1 7.7 3.85 2.55

26 JAN 2022
5/31/2020
ASCE 7-05 Auto Wind Load Calculation

This calculation presents the automatically generated lateral wind loads for load pattern WIND according to ASCE
7-05, as calculated by ETABS.
Exposure Parameters
Exposure From = Diaphragms
Exposure Category = C
Wind Direction = 0 degrees
Basic Wind Speed, V [ASCE 6.5.4] V 91 mph

Windward Coefficient, Cp,wind [ASCE
Cp,wind 0.8
6.5.11.2.1]
Leeward Coefficient, Cp,lee [ASCE 6.5.11.2.1] Cp,lee 0.5

Wind Case = All Cases
Top Story = ROOF
Bottom Story = GROUND
Include Parapet = Yes, Parapet Height = 1
Factors and Coefficients
Gradient Height, zg [ASCE Table 6-2] zg 900
Emperical Exponent, α [ASCE Table 6-2] α 9.5
Velocity Pressure Exposure Coefficient, Kz; z

Kz 2.01 zg for15ft z zg
[ASCE Table 6-3]
15
Kz 2.01 zg for z 15ft
Topographical Factor, Kzt [ASCE 6.5.7.2] Kzt 1

Directionality Factor, Kd [ASCE 6.5.4.4] Kd 0.85
Importance Factor, I [ASCE 6.5.5] I 1.15
Gust Effect Factor, G [ASCE 6.5.8] G 0.85

Lateral Loading
Velocity Pressure, qz [ASCE 6.5.10 Eq. 6-15] qz 0.00256Kz Kzt Kd V2 I
Design Wind Pressure, p [ASCE 6.5.12.2.1

p qGCp,wind qh GCp,lee
Eq. 6-17]

Applied Story Forces

26 JAN 2022
5/31/2020
Story Elevation X-Dir Y-Dir Story Elevation X-Dir Y-Dir

m kN kN m kN kN
ROOF 4.6 22.1051 0 ROOF 4.6 0 33.3744
GROUND 0 0 0 GROUND 0 0 0
Base -1.5 0 0 Base -1.5 0 0

26 JAN 2022
5/31/2020

m kN kN m kN kN
ROOF 4.6 16.5788 0 ROOF 4.6 16.5788 0
Base -1.5 0 0 Base -1.5 0 0

26 JAN 2022
5/31/2020

m kN kN m kN kN
ROOF 4.6 0 25.0308 ROOF 4.6 0 25.0308
Base -1.5 0 0 Base -1.5 0 0

26 JAN 2022
5/31/2020

m kN kN m kN kN
ROOF 4.6 16.5788 -25.0308 ROOF 4.6 16.5788 25.0308
Base -1.5 0 0 Base -1.5 0 0

26 JAN 2022
5/31/2020

m kN kN m kN kN
ROOF 4.6 12.4452 -18.7898 ROOF 4.6 12.4452 -18.7898
Base -1.5 0 0 Base -1.5 0 0

26 JAN 2022
5/31/2020

m kN kN m kN kN
ROOF 4.6 12.4452 18.7898 ROOF 4.6 12.4452 18.7898
Base -1.5 0 0 Base -1.5 0 0

26 JAN 2022
5/31/2020
3.3 Auto Seismic Loading
Table 3.4 - Load Pattern Definitions - Auto Seismic - ASCE 7-05 (Part 1 of 3)
X Dir Y Dir
Is Auto X Dir Plus Y Dir Plus Bottom
Name X Dir? Minus Y Dir? Minus Ecc Ratio Top Story
Load Ecc? Ecc? Story
Ecc? Ecc?
SEISMIC No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0.05 ROOF Base
SEISMIC(1/6) Yes Yes No No No No No 0.05 ROOF Base
SEISMIC(2/6) Yes No No No Yes No No 0.05 ROOF Base
SEISMIC(3/6) Yes No Yes No No No No 0.05 ROOF Base
SEISMIC(4/6) Yes No No No No Yes No 0.05 ROOF Base
SEISMIC(5/6) Yes No No Yes No No No 0.05 ROOF Base
SEISMIC(6/6) Yes No No No No No Yes 0.05 ROOF Base

Ss And S1 TL Site
Period Type Ct and X Ss S1 Fa Fv SDS SD1
From sec Class
Program Calculated 0.016; 0.9 User Defined 0.088 0.032 8 C 1.2 1.7 0.0704 0.036267

Period Weight Base
Coeff
R Omega Cd I Used Used Shear
Used
sec kN kN
3 3 2.5 1.25 0 0 0 0
3 3 2.5 1.25 0.1 0.029333 1698.7763 49.8308
3 3 2.5 1.25 0.1 0.029333 1698.7763 49.8308
3 3 2.5 1.25 0.1 0.029333 1698.7763 49.8308
3 3 2.5 1.25 0.1 0.029333 1698.7763 49.8308
3 3 2.5 1.25 0.1 0.029333 1698.7763 49.8308
3 3 2.5 1.25 0.1 0.029333 1698.7763 49.8308

26 JAN 2022
5/31/2020
ASCE 7-05 Auto Seismic Load Calculation

This calculation presents the automatically generated lateral seismic loads for load pattern SEISMIC according to
ASCE 7-05, as calculated by ETABS.
Direction and Eccentricity
Direction = Multiple
Eccentricity Ratio = 5% for all diaphragms
Structural Period
Period Calculation Method = Program Calculated
Coefficient, Ct [ASCE Table 12.8-2] Ct 0.016ft

Coefficient, x [ASCE Table 12.8-2] x 0.9
Structure Height Above Base, hn hn 6.1 m
Long-Period Transition Period, TL [ASCE
TL 8 sec
11.4.5]

Factors and Coefficients
Response Modification Factor, R [ASCE

R 3
Table 12.2-1]
System Overstrength Factor, Ω0 [ASCE Table
Ω0 3
12.2-1]
Deflection Amplification Factor, Cd [ASCE
Cd 2.5
Table 12.2-1]
Importance Factor, I [ASCE Table 11.5-1] I 1.25

Ss and S1 Source = User Specified
Mapped MCE Spectral Response

Ss 0.088g
Acceleration, Ss [ASCE 11.4.1]
Mapped MCE Spectral Response
S1 0.032g
Acceleration, S1 [ASCE 11.4.1]
Site Class [ASCE Table 20.3-1] = C - Very
Dense Soil and Soft Rock
Site Coefficient, Fa [ASCE Table 11.4-1] Fa 1.2
Site Coefficient, Fv [ASCE Table 11.4-2] Fv 1.7

Seismic Response
MCE Spectral Response Acceleration, SMS

SMS Fa SS SMS 0.1056g
[ASCE 11.4.3, Eq. 11.4-1]
MCE Spectral Response Acceleration, SM1
SM1 Fv S1 SM1 0.0544g
[ASCE 11.4.3, Eq. 11.4-2]
Design Spectral Response Acceleration, SDS 2
SDS S SDS 0.0704g
[ASCE 11.4.4, Eq. 11.4-3] 3 MS

26 JAN 2022
5/31/2020
Design Spectral Response Acceleration, SD1 2

SD1 S SD1 0.036267g
[ASCE 11.4.4, Eq. 11.4-4] 3 M1

Equivalent Lateral Forces
SDS
Seismic Response Coefficient, CS [ASCE CS
12.8.1.1, Eq. 12.8-2] R
I
SD1
[ASCE 12.8.1.1, Eq. 12.8-3] CS,max
R
T
I
[ASCE 12.8.1.1, Eq. 12.8-5] CS,min 0.01
S1
[ASCE 12.8.1.1, Eq. 12.8-6] CS,min 0.5 forS1 0.6g
R
I
CS,min Cs CS,max

Calculated Base Shear
Period Used W V
Direction Cs
(sec) (kN) (kN)
X 0.1 0.029333 1698.7763 49.8308
Y 0.1 0.029333 1698.7763 49.8308
X + Ecc. Y 0.1 0.029333 1698.7763 49.8308
Y + Ecc. X 0.1 0.029333 1698.7763 49.8308
X - Ecc. Y 0.1 0.029333 1698.7763 49.8308
Y - Ecc. X 0.1 0.029333 1698.7763 49.8308
Applied Story Forces

26 JAN 2022
5/31/2020

m kN kN m kN kN
ROOF 4.6 35.5327 0 ROOF 4.6 0 35.5327
GROUND 0 14.2981 0 GROUND 0 0 14.2981
Base -1.5 0 0 Base -1.5 0 0

26 JAN 2022
Loads 5/31/2020
3.4 Load Cases
Table 3.6 - Load Case Definitions - Summary

Name Type
DEAD Linear Static
LIVE Linear Static
SDL Linear Static
WALL Linear Static
WIND Linear Static
SEISMIC Linear Static

3.5 Load Combinations
Table 3.7 - Load Combination Definitions
Name Type Is Auto Load Name SF Notes
DCon1 Linear Add Yes DEAD 1.4 Dead [Strength]

DCon1 SDL 1.4
DCon1 WALL 1.4
DCon2 Linear Add Yes DEAD 1.2 Dead + Live [Strength]
DCon2 LIVE 1.6
DCon2 SDL 1.2
DCon2 WALL 1.2
DCon3 Linear Add Yes DEAD 1.2 Dead + Live + Wind + Snow [Strength]
DCon3 LIVE 1
DCon3 SDL 1.2
DCon3 WALL 1.2
DCon3 WIND 1.6
DCon4 Linear Add Yes DEAD 1.2 Dead + Live - Wind + Snow [Strength]
DCon4 LIVE 1
DCon4 SDL 1.2
DCon4 WALL 1.2
DCon4 WIND -1.6
DCon5 Linear Add Yes DEAD 1.2 Dead + Wind [Strength]
DCon5 SDL 1.2
DCon5 WALL 1.2
DCon5 WIND 0.8
DCon6 Linear Add Yes DEAD 1.2 Dead - Wind [Strength]
DCon6 SDL 1.2
DCon6 WALL 1.2
DCon6 WIND -0.8
DCon7 Linear Add Yes DEAD 0.9 Dead (min) + Wind [Strength]
DCon7 SDL 0.9
DCon7 WALL 0.9
DCon7 WIND 1.6
DCon8 Linear Add Yes DEAD 0.9 Dead (min) - Wind [Strength]
DCon8 SDL 0.9
DCon8 WALL 0.9
DCon8 WIND -1.6
DCon9 Linear Add Yes DEAD 1.2 Dead + Live + Static Earthquake [Strength]
DCon9 LIVE 1
DCon9 SDL 1.2
DCon9 WALL 1.2
DCon9 SEISMIC 1
DCon10 Linear Add Yes DEAD 1.2 Dead + Live - Static Earthquake [Strength]
DCon10 LIVE 1
DCon10 SDL 1.2

26 JAN 2022
Loads 5/31/2020
DCon10 WALL 1.2

DCon10 SEISMIC -1
DCon11 Linear Add Yes DEAD 1.2 Dead + Static Earthquake [Strength]
DCon11 SDL 1.2
DCon11 WALL 1.2
DCon11 SEISMIC 1
DCon12 Linear Add Yes DEAD 1.2 Dead - Static Earthquake [Strength]
DCon12 SDL 1.2
DCon12 WALL 1.2
DCon12 SEISMIC -1
DCon13 Linear Add Yes DEAD 0.9 Dead (min) + Static Earthquake [Strength]
DCon13 SDL 0.9
DCon13 WALL 0.9
DCon13 SEISMIC 1
DCon14 Linear Add Yes DEAD 0.9 Dead (min) - Static Earthquake [Strength]
DCon14 SDL 0.9
DCon14 WALL 0.9
DCon14 SEISMIC -1
DSlbU1 Linear Add Yes DEAD 1.4
DSlbU1 SDL 1.4
DSlbU1 WALL 1.4
DSlbU2 LIVE 1.6
DSlbU2 SDL 1.2
DSlbU2 WALL 1.2
DSlbU3 LIVE 1
DSlbU3 SDL 1.2
DSlbU3 WALL 1.2
DSlbU3 WIND 1.6
DSlbU4 LIVE 1
DSlbU4 SDL 1.2
DSlbU4 WALL 1.2
DSlbU4 WIND -1.6
DSlbU5 WALL 0.9
DSlbU5 WIND 1.6
DSlbU6 WALL 0.9
DSlbU6 WIND -1.6
DSlbU7 LIVE 1
DSlbU7 SDL 1.2
DSlbU7 WALL 1.2
DSlbU7 SEISMIC 1
DSlbU8 LIVE 1
DSlbU8 SDL 1.2
DSlbU8 WALL 1.2
DSlbU8 SEISMIC -1
DSlbU9 WALL 0.9
DSlbU9 SEISMIC 1
DSlbU10 WALL 0.9

26 JAN 2022
Loads 5/31/2020
DSlbU10 SEISMIC -1
ENV - Service Envelope No UDStlS1 1
ENV - Service UDStlS2 1
UDStlD1 Linear Add No DEAD 1 Dead [Deflections]
UDStlD1 SDL 1
UDStlD1 WALL 1
UDStlD2 Linear Add No DEAD 1 Dead + Live [Deflections]
UDStlD2 LIVE 1
UDStlD2 SDL 1
UDStlD2 WALL 1
UDStlS1 Linear Add No DEAD 1 Dead [Strength]
UDStlS1 SDL 1
UDStlS1 WALL 1
UDStlS2 Linear Add No DEAD 1 Dead + Roof Live [Strength]
UDStlS2 SDL 1
UDStlS2 WALL 1
UDStlS3 Linear Add No DEAD 1 Dead + Snow [Strength]
UDStlS3 SDL 1
UDStlS3 WALL 1
UDStlS4 Linear Add No DEAD 1 Dead + Live [Strength]
UDStlS4 LIVE 1
UDStlS4 SDL 1
UDStlS4 WALL 1
UDStlS5 Linear Add No DEAD 1 Dead + Live + Wind + Snow [Strength]
UDStlS5 LIVE 0.75
UDStlS5 SDL 1
UDStlS5 WALL 1
UDStlS5 WIND 0.75
UDStlS6 Linear Add No DEAD 1 Dead + Live - Wind + Snow [Strength]
UDStlS6 LIVE 0.75
UDStlS6 SDL 1
UDStlS6 WALL 1
UDStlS6 WIND -0.75
UDStlS7 Linear Add No DEAD 1 Dead + Live + Wind + Snow [Strength]
UDStlS7 LIVE 0.75
UDStlS7 SDL 1

26 JAN 2022
Loads 5/31/2020
UDStlS7 WALL 1
UDStlS8 Linear Add No DEAD 1 Dead + Live - Wind + Snow [Strength]
UDStlS8 LIVE 0.75
UDStlS8 SDL 1
UDStlS8 WALL 1
UDStlS9 Linear Add No DEAD 1 Dead + Wind [Strength]
UDStlS9 SDL 1
UDStlS9 WALL 1
UDStlS9 WIND 1
UDStlS10 Linear Add No DEAD 1 Dead - Wind [Strength]
UDStlS10 SDL 1
UDStlS10 WALL 1
UDStlS10 WIND -1
UDStlS11 Linear Add No DEAD 1 Dead + Wind [Strength]
UDStlS11 SDL 1
UDStlS11 WALL 1
UDStlS12 Linear Add No DEAD 1 Dead - Wind [Strength]
UDStlS12 SDL 1
UDStlS12 WALL 1
UDStlS13 Linear Add No DEAD 0.6 Dead (min) + Wind [Strength]
UDStlS13 SDL 0.6
UDStlS13 WALL 0.6
UDStlS13 WIND 1
UDStlS14 Linear Add No DEAD 0.6 Dead (min) - Wind [Strength]
UDStlS14 SDL 0.6
UDStlS14 WALL 0.6
UDStlS14 WIND -1
UDStlS15 Linear Add No DEAD 0.6 Dead (min) + Wind [Strength]
UDStlS15 SDL 0.6
UDStlS15 WALL 0.6
UDStlS16 Linear Add No DEAD 0.6 Dead (min) - Wind [Strength]
UDStlS16 SDL 0.6
UDStlS16 WALL 0.6
UDStlS17 Linear Add No DEAD 1 Dead + Live + Static Earthquake [Strength]
UDStlS17 LIVE 0.75
UDStlS17 SDL 1
UDStlS17 WALL 1
UDStlS17 SEISMIC 0.525
UDStlS18 Linear Add No DEAD 1 Dead + Live - Static Earthquake [Strength]
UDStlS18 LIVE 0.75
UDStlS18 SDL 1
UDStlS18 WALL 1
UDStlS18 SEISMIC -0.525
UDStlS19 Linear Add No DEAD 1 Dead + Static Earthquake [Strength]
UDStlS19 SDL 1
UDStlS19 WALL 1
UDStlS20 Linear Add No DEAD 1 Dead - Static Earthquake [Strength]
UDStlS20 SDL 1
UDStlS20 WALL 1
UDStlS21 Linear Add No DEAD 0.6 Dead (min) + Static Earthquake [Strength]
UDStlS21 SDL 0.6
UDStlS21 WALL 0.6
UDStlS22 Linear Add No DEAD 0.6 Dead (min) - Static Earthquake [Strength]

26 JAN 2022
Loads 5/31/2020
UDStlS22 SDL 0.6

UDStlS22 WALL 0.6

26 JAN 2022
Design Data 5/31/2020
4 Design Data
This chapter provides design data and results.
4.1 Steel Frame Design
Table 4.1 - Steel Frame Design Preferences - AISC 360-05

Item Value
Multi-Response Design Step-by-Step - All
Frame Type OMF
Seismic Design Category A
Importance Factor 1.25
Design System Rho 1
Design System Sds 0
Design System R 4
Design System Omega0 2.5
Design System Cd 4.5
Design Provision ASD
Analysis Method Direct Analysis
Second Order Method General 2nd Order
Stiffness Reduction Method Tau-b Fixed
Omega (Bending) 1.67
Omega (Compression) 1.67
Omega (Tension-Yielding) 1.67
Omega (Tension-Fracture) 2
Omega (Shear) 1.67
Omega (Shear-Short Webbed Rolled I) 1.5
Omega (Torsion) 1.67
Ignore Seismic Code? No
Ignore Special Seismic Load? No
Doubler Plate Plug-Welded? Yes
HSS Welding Type ERW
Reduced HSS Thickness No
Consider Deflection? Yes
DL Ratio 120
SDL+LL Ratio 120
LL Ratio 360
Total Ratio 240
Total Camber Limit 240
Pattern Live Load Factor 0.75
D/C Ratio Limit 0.95
Maximum Iterations 1
4.2 Concrete Frame Design
Table 4.2 - Concrete Frame Design Preferences - ACI 318-08

Item Value
Multi-Response Design Step-by-Step - All
# Interaction Curves 24
# Interaction Points 11
Minimum Eccentricity? Yes
Design for BCCR? Yes
Seismic Design Category A
Design System Rho 1
Design System Sds 0
Phi (Tension) 0.9
Phi (Compression Tied) 0.65
Phi (Compression Spiral) 0.75
26 JAN 2022
Design Data 5/31/2020
Item Value
Phi (Shear and Torsion) 0.75
Phi (Shear Seismic) 0.6
Phi (Shear Joint) 0.85
Pattern Live Load Factor 0.75
Utlization Factor Limit 1

26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed :: NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. : 00
3.2.3 ETABS Output
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed : : NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Subject Rev. No.
Re No. ::
3.2.3.1 Beam Design
26 JAN 2022
C45 ‐ RC BEAMS DESIGN.xlsx
C45 : Concrete Beam Summary ‐ ACI 318‐08
Design As Top As Top As Bottom As Bottom At Shear Torsion Long Al Torsion Torsion Tran At Torsion
Story Label V Combo Warnings Errors
Section Combo cm² Combo cm² cm²/cm Combo cm² Combo cm²/cm
ROOF B48 B ‐ 35X60 DCon4 2 DCon7 0.2245 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 No Message No Message
ROOF B48 B ‐ 35X60 DCon8 1 DCon3 1 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 No Message No Message
ROOF B49 B ‐ 35X60 DCon4 2 DCon7 0.2369 DCon4 0.03 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 No Message No Message
ROOF B53 B ‐ 35X60 DCon8 0.3589 DCon9 1 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 No Message No Message
26 JAN 2022
ROOF B53 B ‐ 35X60 DCon9 0.285 DCon8 0.2682 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 No Message No Message
26 JAN 2022
ROOF B57 B ‐ 35X60 DCon8 1 DCon4 1 DCon12 0.03 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 No Message No Message
ROOF B57 B ‐ 35X60 DCon8 0.05434 DCon4 3 DCon12 0.03 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 No Message No Message
GROUND B48 GB ‐ 35X60 DCon4 5 DCon14 0 DCon14 0.03 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 No Message No Message
GROUND B48 GB ‐ 35X60 DCon4 1 DCon7 0.01884 DCon14 0.03 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 No Message No Message
GROUND B48 GB ‐ 35X60 DCon14 0 DCon3 3 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 No Message No Message
26 JAN 2022
GROUND B53 GB ‐ 35X50 DCon14 0.3251 DCon11 1 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 No Message No Message
GROUND B54 GB ‐ 35X50 DCon13 0.4869 DCon14 0.4431 DCon12 0.03 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 No Message No Message
GROUND B55 GB ‐ 35X50 DCon14 0.3251 DCon11 1 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 No Message No Message
GROUND B56 GB ‐ 35X50 DCon13 0.4869 DCon14 0.4431 DCon12 0.03 DCon14 0 DCon14 0 No Message No Message
26 JAN 2022
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned : AIA
Ch ed :: NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. :: 00
3.2.3.2 Column Design
26 JAN 2022
C45 : Concrete Column PMM Envelope
P M Major M Minor PMM Ratio or
Story Label Section Location PMM Combo
kN kN‐m kN‐m Rebar %
ROOF C3 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Top 101.6044 16 37 DCon4 0.401
ROOF C3 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Bottom 115.7164 ‐21 ‐43 DCon4 0.484
ROOF C22 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Top 112.7372 ‐20 39 DCon3 0.437
ROOF C22 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Bottom 126.8492 24 ‐45 DCon3 0.514
ROOF C26 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Top 101.6044 16 ‐37 DCon4 0.401
ROOF C26 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Bottom 115.7164 ‐21 43 DCon4 0.484
ROOF C32 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Top 112.7372 ‐20 ‐39 DCon3 0.437
ROOF C32 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Bottom 126.8492 24 45 DCon3 0.514
ROOF C33 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Top 200.0276 13 ‐49 DCon4 0.439
ROOF C33 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Bottom 214.1396 ‐16 47 DCon4 0.436
ROOF C34 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Top 200.0276 13 49 DCon4 0.439
ROOF C34 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Bottom 214.1396 ‐16 ‐47 DCon4 0.436
GROUND C3 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Top 323.0646 10 21 DCon1 0.212
GROUND C3 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Bottom 305.6272 ‐15 ‐28 DCon4 0.282
GROUND C22 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Top 349.0411 ‐14 21 DCon1 0.234
GROUND C22 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Bottom 327.1345 17 ‐28 DCon3 0.291
GROUND C26 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Top 323.0646 10 ‐21 DCon1 0.212
GROUND C26 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Bottom 305.6272 ‐15 28 DCon4 0.282
GROUND C32 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Top 349.0411 ‐14 ‐21 DCon1 0.234
GROUND C32 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Bottom 327.1345 17 28 DCon3 0.291
GROUND C33 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Top 515.1855 13 ‐14 DCon1 0.252
GROUND C33 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Bottom 473.1962 ‐12 25 DCon3 0.271
GROUND C34 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Top 515.1855 13 14 DCon1 0.252
GROUND C34 C ‐ 35X35 ‐ 8T16 Bottom 473.2005 ‐12 ‐25 DCon4 0.271
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned : AIA
Ch ed :: NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. :: 00
3.2.3.3 Base Reactions
26 JAN 2022
ETABS 18.0.2 5/31/2020
34 37 36
3 X 38 26
26 JAN 2022
C45-R1.EDB Plant Plant No. 035 Plan View - Base - Z = -1.5 (m) Page 68 of 110
C45: Joint Reactions
FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
Story Joint Label Load Case/Combo
kN kN kN kN‐m kN‐m kN‐m
Base 3 ENV ‐ Service 21.28 40.64 247.00 ‐2.00 15.00 0.32
Base 3 ENV ‐ Service 4.93 14.85 126.45 ‐23.00 ‐2.00 ‐0.29
Base 26 ENV ‐ Service ‐8.55 40.63 264.85 ‐2.00 1.00 0.30
Base 26 ENV ‐ Service ‐26.02 14.52 138.51 ‐24.00 ‐16.00 ‐0.32
Base 34 ENV ‐ Service 21.28 ‐14.85 247.00 23.00 15.00 0.29
Base 34 ENV ‐ Service 4.93 ‐40.64 126.45 2.00 ‐2.00 ‐0.32
Base 36 ENV ‐ Service ‐8.55 ‐14.52 264.85 24.00 1.00 0.32
Base 36 ENV ‐ Service ‐26.02 ‐40.63 138.51 2.00 ‐16.00 ‐0.30
Base 37 ENV ‐ Service 13.84 ‐8.17 387.15 18.00 11.00 0.26
Base 37 ENV ‐ Service ‐5.48 ‐29.66 211.69 ‐1.00 ‐7.00 ‐0.26
Base 38 ENV ‐ Service 13.84 29.66 387.15 1.00 11.00 0.26
Base 38 ENV ‐ Service ‐5.48 8.17 211.69 ‐18.00 ‐7.00 ‐0.26
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned ::
AIA
Ch ed :: NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Subject Rev. No.
Re No. ::
3.2.3.3 Drift
26 JAN 2022
ETABS 18.0.2 License #*1XDU9L5PCC84BR8
Story Response - Maximum Story Drifts

Summary Description
This is story response output for a specified range of stories and a selected load case or load combination.
Input Data
Name C45 - Story Drift
Display Type Max story drifts Story Range All Stories
Load Case SEISMIC Top Story ROOF
Output Type Max Bottom Story Base
Plot
Maximum Story Drifts
ROOF
GROUND
Base
0 80 160 240 320 400 480 560 640 720 800 E-6
Drift, Unitless
C45-R1.EDB Page 1 of 2 5/31/2020

26 JAN 2022
ETABS 18.0.2 License #*1XDU9L5PCC84BR8
Tabulated Plot Coordinates
Story Response Values
Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir

m
ROOF 4.6 Top 0.000647 0.000708
GROUND 0 Top 0.000194 0.000199
Base -1.5 Top 0 0
Maximum Story Drift Ratio = D x Cd / I

= 0.000708 x 2.5 / 1.5
= 0.0018 < 0.1
C45-R1.EDB Page 2 of 2 5/31/2020

26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed : : NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. :: 00
3.3 SAFE
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed :: NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. :: 00
3.3.1 Slabs
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed : : NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. :: 00
3.3.1.1 SAFE Input Report
26 JAN 2022
1. Model properties
This section provides model properties, including items such as material properties, section properties, and support
properties.
1.1. Material properties
Table 1: Material Properties 03 - Concrete

Material E U A UnitWt Fc LtWtConc UserModRu
p
N/mm2 1/C kN/m3 N/mm2
C35 27805.00000 0.200000 9.9000E-06 2.4000E+01 35.00000 No No
CSAC30 26667.31234 0.200000 9.9000E-06 2.3563E+01 30.00000 No No
MAT3 24870.00000 0.200000 9.9000E-06 0.0000E+00 28.00000 No No
MAT4 24870.00000 0.200000 9.9000E-06 2.4000E+01 27.50000 No No
Table 2: Material Properties 04 - Rebar

Material E UnitWt Fy Fu
N/mm2 kN/m3 N/mm2 N/mm2
CSA-G30.18Gr400 200000 7.6973E+01 400.00000 500.00000
MAT2 200000 7.6973E+01 413.68550 517.10688
2.2. Section properties
Table 3: Slab Properties 02

Table 4: Slab Properties 02 - Solid Slabs
Slab Type MatProp Thickness Ortho
mm
Col_Stiff Stiff MAT4 320.000 No
S16 Slab C35 160.000 No
26 JAN 2022
3. Load patterns
Table 4: Load Patterns

LoadPat Type SelfWtMult
DEAD DEAD 1.000000

LIVE LIVE 0.000000
SDL SUPER DEAD 0.000000
WALL SUPER DEAD 0.000000
SEISMIC(1/6) QUAKE 0.000000
WIND(1/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(2/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(3/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(4/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(5/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(6/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(7/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(8/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(9/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(10/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(11/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(12/12) WIND 0.000000
26 JAN 2022
4. Load cases
Table 5: Load Cases 02 - Static

Table 22: Load Cases 02 - Static
LoadCase InitialCond AType RelForceTol CreepCoeff ShrinkStrn
DEAD Zero Linear

LIVE Zero Linear
SDL Zero Linear
SEISMIC(1/6) Zero Linear
WALL Zero Linear
WIND(1/12) Zero Linear
D1 Zero Cracked 0.000010
D2 Zero Cracked 0.000010
D3 Zero Long Term 0.000010 2.000000 0.000500
Cracked
26 JAN 2022
Table 6: Load Cases 06 - Loads Applied
Table 23: Load Cases 06 - Loads Applied
LoadCase LoadPat SF
DEAD DEAD 1.000000

LIVE LIVE 1.000000
SDL SDL 1.000000
SEISMIC(1/6) SEISMIC(1/6) 1.000000
WALL WALL 1.000000
WIND(1/12) WIND(1/12) 1.000000
WIND(2/12) WIND(2/12) 1.000000
WIND(3/12) WIND(3/12) 1.000000
WIND(4/12) WIND(4/12) 1.000000
WIND(5/12) WIND(5/12) 1.000000
WIND(6/12) WIND(6/12) 1.000000
WIND(7/12) WIND(7/12) 1.000000
WIND(8/12) WIND(8/12) 1.000000
WIND(9/12) WIND(9/12) 1.000000
WIND(10/12) WIND(10/12) 1.000000
WIND(11/12) WIND(11/12) 1.000000
WIND(12/12) WIND(12/12) 1.000000
D1 DEAD 1.000000
D1 SDL 1.000000
D1 WALL 1.000000
D1 LIVE 1.000000
D2 DEAD 1.000000
D2 SDL 1.000000
D2 WALL 1.000000
D2 LIVE 0.250000
D3 DEAD 1.000000
D3 SDL 1.000000
D3 WALL 1.000000
D3 LIVE 0.250000
26 JAN 2022
4.1. Load combinations
Load combinations shall be as defined / shown on the ETABS input report UNO
Table 7: Load Combination for Long Term Deflection
TABLE: Load Combinations
Combo Load SF Type DSStrength DSServInit DSServNorm DSServLong AutoDesign Notes
LTD D1 1 Linear Add No No No No No
LTD D2 ‐1
LTD D3 1
26 JAN 2022
5. Design summary
This section provides design information for beams, strips, and punching checks.
5.1. Preferences
Table 8: Design Preferences 01 - Resistance Factors
Table 29: Design Preferences 01 -
Resistance Factors
PhiTen PhiComp PhiShear
0.900000 0.650000 0.750000
Table 9: Design Preferences 02 - Rebar Cover - Slabs

CoverTop CoverBot BarSize InnerLayer PTCGSTop PTCGSBotE PTCGSBotI SlabType
xt nt
mm mm mm mm mm
25.000 25.000 18 B 25.000 40.000 25.000 Two Way
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed : : NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. :: 00
3.3.1.2 SAFE Input Sketches
26 JAN 2022
C45-ROOF 5/31/2020 2:42 PM
Y X
26 JAN 2022
SAFE Calculation
2016 16.0.2 Report, LLPH Operator Shelter, Plant Plant No. 035 3-D View Page 83 of 110kN -m
C45-ROOF 5/31/2020 2:43 PM
A B C
X 2
26 JAN 2022
SAFE Calculation
2016 16.0.2 Report, LLPH Operator Shelter, Plant Plant No. 035 Plan View Page 84 of 110kN -m
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned : AIA
Ch ed :: NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. :: 00
3.3.1.3 Flexure Design
26 JAN 2022

^ůĂďŽƚƚŽŵZĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚΛyͲŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ;ĐŵϸͬŵͿ

^ůĂďŽƚƚŽŵZĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚΛzͲŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ;ĐŵϸͬŵͿ
26 JAN 2022

^ůĂďdŽƉZĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚΛyͲŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ;ĐŵϸͬŵͿ

^ůĂďdŽƉZĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚΛzͲŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ;ĐŵϸͬŵͿ
26 JAN 2022

^ůĂďŽƚƚŽŵZĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚʹɌϭϬͬϭϱϬΛyͲŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ;ĐŵϸͬŵͿ

^ůĂďŽƚƚŽŵZĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚʹɌϭϬͬϭϱϬΛzͲŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ;ĐŵϸͬŵͿ
26 JAN 2022

^ůĂďdŽƉZĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚʹɌϭϬͬϭϱϬΛyͲŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ;ĐŵϸͬŵͿ

^ůĂďdŽƉZĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚʹɌϭϬͬϭϱϬΛzͲŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ;ĐŵϸͬŵͿ
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed :: NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. :: 00
3.3.1.4 Deflection (Long Term)
26 JAN 2022

>dǀĂůƵĞƐďĂƐĞĚŽŶƌĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚŵĞƐŚͲɌϭϬͬϭϱϬ;ŵŵͿ
ůůŽǁĂďůĞ>ŽŶŐͲdĞƌŵĞĨůĞĐƚŝŽŶ;>dͿс>ͬϮϰϬсϰϭϬϬͬϮϰϬсϭϳ͘ϬϬŵŵ
DĂǆŝŵƵŵ>ŽŶŐͲdĞƌŵĞĨůĞĐƚŝŽŶ;>dͿсϲ͘ϬϬŵŵфϭϳ͘ϬϬŵŵ
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed :: NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Subject Rev. No.
Re No. ::
3.3.2 Foundations
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed : : NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. :: 00
3.3.2.1 SAFE Input Report
26 JAN 2022

1. Model properties
1.1. Material properties

Material E U A UnitWt Fc LtWtConc UserModRu
p
N/mm2 1/C kN/m3 N/mm2
C35 27805.00000 0.200000 9.9000E-06 2.4000E+01 35.00000 No No
CSAC30 26667.31234 0.200000 9.9000E-06 2.3563E+01 30.00000 No No

Material E UnitWt Fy Fu
N/mm2 kN/m3 N/mm2 N/mm2
CSA-G30.18Gr400 200000 7.6973E+01 400.00000 500.00000
1.2. Section properties

Slab Type MatProp Thickness Ortho
mm
. Stiff C35 800.000 No
F50 Footing C35 500.000 No
1.3. Support properties
Table 4: Soil Properties

Table 10: Soil Properties
Soil Subgrade NonlinOpt
kN/m3
Ks - 200 2.4000E+04 Compression Only
26 JAN 2022
2. Model loading
2.1. Load patterns

LoadPat Type SelfWtMult
DEAD DEAD 1.000000

LIVE LIVE 0.000000
SDL SUPER DEAD 0.000000
WALL SUPER DEAD 0.000000
WIND(1/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(2/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(3/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(4/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(5/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(6/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(7/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(8/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(9/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(10/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(11/12) WIND 0.000000
WIND(12/12) WIND 0.000000
DEAD_ABOVE DEAD 0.000000
LIVE_ABOVE LIVE 0.000000
SDL_ABOVE SUPER DEAD 0.000000
SEISMIC(1/6)_ABOVE QUAKE 0.000000
WALL_ABOVE SUPER DEAD 0.000000
WIND(1/12)_ABOVE WIND 0.000000
26 JAN 2022
2.2. Load combinations
Load combinations shall be as defined / shown on the ETABS input report UNO
Table 7: Load Combinations

Table 6: Load Combinations
Combo Load SF Type DSStrength DSServInit DSServNorm DSServLong
SOIL PRESSURE DStlS1 1.000000 Envelope

SOIL PRESSURE DStlS2 1.000000
SOIL PRESSURE DStlS5(1/12) 1.000000
26 JAN 2022
4. Design summary
4.1. Preferences
Table 7: Design Preferences 01 - Resistance Factors
Table 7: Design Preferences 01 -
Resistance Factors
PhiTen PhiComp PhiShear
0.900000 0.650000 0.750000

CoverTop CoverBot BarSize InnerLayer PTCGSTop PTCGSBotE PTCGSBotI SlabType
xt nt
mm mm mm mm mm
75.000 75.000 16 B 25.000 40.000 25.000 Two Way
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed : : NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. :: 00
3.3.2.2 SAFE Input Sketches
26 JAN 2022
C45 - BASE 5/31/2020 2:45 PM
A B C
F50 F50 F50

1
F50
X F50 F50
2
26 JAN 2022
SAFE Calculation
C45 - BASE 5/31/2020 2:44 PM
A B C
Ks - 200 Ks - 200 Ks - 200

1
Ks - 200
X Ks - 200 Ks - 200
2
26 JAN 2022
SAFE Calculation
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed : : NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. :: 00
3.3.2.3 Flexure Design
26 JAN 2022

&ŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐŽƚƚŽŵZĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚΛyͲŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ;ĐŵϸͬŵͿ

&ŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐŽƚƚŽŵZĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚΛzͲŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ;Đŵϸͬŵ
26 JAN 2022

&ŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐdŽƉZĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚΛyͲŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ;ĐŵϸͬŵͿ

&ŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐdŽƉZĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚΛyͲŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ;ĐŵϸͬŵͿ
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed :: NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. : 00
3.3.2.4 Punching Check
26 JAN 2022
C45 - BASE 5/31/2020 2:46 PM
A B C
0.171 0.2453 0.1552

1
0.1718 0.2466 0.156

X 2
26 JAN 2022
SAFE Calculation
2016 16.0.2 Report, LLPH Operator Shelter, Plant Plant No. 035 Punching Shear Capacity Ratios/Shear Reinforcement Page 105 of 110kN -m
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed : : NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. :: 00
3.3.2.5 Base Pressure
26 JAN 2022

^ŽŝůWƌĞƐƐƵƌĞ;<ŶͬŵϸͿ
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed : : NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Subject : Structural Calculation - LLPH Operator Shelter (N) - Plant No. 035 Rev.No.
Re No. : 00
5.0 APPENDICES
26 JAN 2022
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed :: NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. :: 00
APPENDIX - I
DESIGN DRAWINGS
26 JAN 2022
NOTES: .O
C
CALLED ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS AND M
N
1. AR
NORTH ELEVATIONS ARE IN METERS UNLESS
NOTED OTHERWISE. A
2. THIS DRAWING SHALL BE READ IN CONJUNCTION ID
MAKKA WITH THE CIVIL, ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL, UA
H
ELECTRICAL, COMMUNICATION AND OTHER S
RELEVANT DRAWINGS.
FOR ADDITIONAL GENERAL NOTES & ABBREVATIONS FO
A B C A B C
3.
REFER TO DWG. NO. RA-402083.001 &
RA-402084.001. TN
7650 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MEASURED FROM THE GRID ES
7650 LINES. NO
3550 4100 3550 4100 5. ISOLATED FOOTINGS ARE CONCENTRIC TO THE C
COLUMNS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
6. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ORIENTATION OF NE
825 825 BUILDING. TT
7. EL.+0.000 IS ASSUMED NOMINAL ELEVATION OF IR
THE GROUND FLOOR FINISH LEVEL. REFER TO W
5 5 5 200 200 CIVIL DRAWING FOR THE EXACT ELEVATION.
2 2 2 8. FOUNDATIONS DESIGNED FOR NET ALLOWABLE EH
8 8 8
1 1
BEARING CAPACITY OF 200 KPA IN ACCORDANCE T
00 00 00 TO THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FILE NO. 2018/100. TU
2 C1 C1 C1 2 9. ALL COLUMNS ARE CONCENTRIC TO GRID LINES
2
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. OH
F1 F1 F1 10. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ORIENTATION OF TI
1 BUILDING. W
RA-462177 11. ALL BELOW GRADE COLUMNS DIMENSIONS SHALL BE GN
001
INCREASED BY (25 mm) ALL AROUND. I
12. SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION JOINTS LOCATION W
AR
0 |
5
0 500 (IF REQUIRED) SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF
ACI 224.3 AND ACI-302.1R. LSTK CONTRACTOR D
5 5 SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ARAMCO SI
| | REPRESENTATIVE APPROVAL. HT
13. FOR THE LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF
P1 CMU WALLS, REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR M
OR
17 17 PLAN DRAWINGS.
9
1 91 14. HVAC EQUIPMENT PADS AND AIR STACK FOUNDATION F
00 00 00 /PEDESTAL SIZE, THICKNESS, REINFORCEMENT AND DE
2 2 ANCHOR BOLTS ARE PRELIMINARY SUBJECT TO THE
| 2 INA
2 5 5 5
AIR STACK
FOOTING 2 15.
RECEIPT OF THE RELEVANT VENDOR INFORMATION.
PAVEMENT THICKENING IS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. TB
2
8 2
8 2
8 C1 C1 C1 O
200 200 EB
825 F1 F1 F1 825 LEGEND
4854 LL
4854 F1 - ISOLATED FOOTING MARK AH
C1 - COLUMN MARK S
GB - GRADE BEAM MARK ,T
P1 - PEDESTAL MARK
RB1 - ROOF BEAM MARK RA
S1 - SLAB MARK P
FOUNDATION LAYOUT COLUMN LAYOUT (ABOVE GRADE)
SSL - STRUCTURAL SLAB LEVEL
IN
TOC - TOP OF CONCRETE
SCALE- 1 : 50 SCALE- 1 : 50 EL - ELEVATION RO
- SLAB THICKNESS
,L
LU
F
NI
NO
REFERENCE DRAWINGS IT
DWG. CONTROL FOR JO. 10-02062-0002 RD-401954 CU
GENERAL NOTES - CONCRETE WORKS RA-401987.001 DO
FDN. AND COLUMN SCHED. & DETAILS RA-402191.001 RP
BEAM AND SLAB SCHEDULE & DETAILS RA-402192.001 ER
SECTIONS & DETAILS RA-462177.001
ON
A B C MASONRY WALL SCHEDULE & TYP. DETAILS RA-460674.001 & 002
.O
7650 C
A B C
M
AR
3550 4100 2212 1950
A
7650 DIU
3550 4100 OPERATOR
AS
SHELTER
FO
B
S B
S
TOC HVAC UNIT PAD

EL.-0.012 YT
RE
5
7 PO
GB1 GB1 8 RB1 RB1
1 1
RP
TOC 5
0
0 EL. +0.000 4
2 EL
3 OS
IJ
15
EH
(TYP)
SSL
EL. +4.200
2 C T
SSL
150
RA-462177 RA-462177 ER
0 EL. -0.050
001
001
S1 160 S1 KEY PLAN A
5
0
2
B 2B 2B 500 1
B 1B 1B
R R
5 G G MW18.7xMW18.7 150x150 G 5 R INE
A WWF (ONE LAYER) 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
RE
RA-462177 P1 H
001
B METER
DE
RA-462177 CONCRETE SCALE: 1:50M
001 PEDESTAL INA
(AIR STACK) REVISION VALIDATION
TN
GB1 GB1 RB1 RB1
2 2 CO
THIS REVISION NO. 00 IS COVERED, FOR ALL APPROVAL AND CERTIFICATION
REQUIREMENTS, PER SAEP-334, UNDER DRAWING COMPLETION CERTIFICATE NO:
10-02062-0002-001
NO
DESIGN CERTIFICATION REVIEW FOR KEY DRAWINGS
REQUIRED
OTHER IT
A
(DESIGN AGENCY) (SAUDI ARAMCO)
TOC
ENGG./DATE
NFP
CERTIFIED BY/DATE CONST. AGENCY/DATE
MAO RAZ
OPERATIONS/DATE
KAZ
BY/DATE
M
RO
EL.-0.012 09/10/20 09/10/20 09/10/20 09/10/20
REV.NO. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION FN
00 09/10/20 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION I
JOB ORDER/EWO NO. THIS REVISION IS NOT TO BE USED FOR EH
10-02062-0002 CONSTRUCTION UNTIL CERTIFIED AND DATED
T
SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY DN
FIRST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN ROOF FRAMING PLAN
DRAWING TYPE
STRUCTURAL LAYOUTS FDN A
SCALE- 1 : 50 SCALE- 1 : 50 LLPH OPERATOR SHELTER GN
ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION (IFC) I
WATER INTAKE & PUMPSTATION SALT W
AR
RAS TANURA SAUDI ARABIA D
26 JAN 2022 PLANT NO. DRAWING NUMBER SHT. NO. REV. NO.
SI
035 Q RA-402190 001 00
INDEX
HT
Saudi Aramco 2615 ENG. (05/05)
RESTRICTED VECTOR CADD-01
NOTES: .O
C
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS AND M
GRID
AR
GRID
ELEVATIONS ARE IN METERS UNLESS
NOTED OTHERWISE. A
B
ROOF BEAM (REINF. NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY) WITH THE CIVIL, ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL, UA
ELECTRICAL, COMMUNICATION AND OTHER
T.O.B
CONNECTING RELEVANT DRAWINGS.
S
EL. (VARIES)
EQ EQ FLOOR BEAM 3. FOR ADDITIONAL GENERAL NOTES & ABBREVIATIONS FO
(SEE SCHEDULE) REFER TO DWG. NO. CA-401987.001.
R
M
A
E 4. ALL CONCRETE SURFACES IN DIRECT CONTACT TN
E
P B
F
WITH EARTH SHALL BE COATED WITH TWO COATS ES
S
A O OF COALTAR OR BITUMEN COATING THAT CONFORMS NO
O 0
R M TO (APCS-3) OR (APCS-10) OF (SAES-H-001).
5 C
EAB 5. ALL BELOW GRADE COLUMNS SHALL BE
FO
GN
INCREASED BY (25 mm) ALL AROUND. NE
Q )N
I
HT IT 6. SIDE BARS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR FOUNDATION TT
E (M S JOINT HOOPS MAY BE SPACED AT "2Sh"
PE
D
CE WITH THICKNESS GREATER THAN (600mm). IR
S P NN 7. ALL REINFORCEMENT DETAILS SHOWN ARE
R3 P
O m
m O CJ FOR THE DEPTH OF THE SHALLOWEST OC INDICATIVE, CONTRACTOR TO DEVELOP THE
W
O O BEAM WHEN BEAMS WITH WIDTH ƒ
/4
O 00
L H H RELEVANT SHOP DRAWINGS INCLUDING BUT NOT EH
R1 .L 1 .L S hS TIMES THE WIDTH OF THE COLUMN FRAME
A
@ B LIMITED TO BAR MARK, LENGTH, HOOK DETAIL, T
O O INTO THE FOUR SIDES OF A COLUMN, FOR ALL
GRID
C C &
10 OTHER CONDITIONS. USE HOOPS SPACED AT "Sh" O.C d Ø10 @ 50
SPLICE LENGTH, LOCATION, ETC.
TU
G
N - { 05 (S1) (STIRRUPS) OH
A IT SH.-
O TI
O MAXIMUM SPACING 50 W
F
/N OF TIES IN LAP LENGTH
05
)S GN
Q D/4 FOR DIMENSION @ IET I
E M )C
Bs BUT NOT GREATER 10 ( W
AR
U
L
H
(
THAN 4" (100mm) {
O T
H D
C IG
E S
IE
COLUMN
SI
H T VERTICAL BARS HT
F
O R
A .L (SEE SCHEDULE)
E O
L C
C
St
M
OR
R2 | N
TYP. SECTION (COLUMN WITH CONNECTING BEAM)
M
U
L 50 2 F
R4 | OF COLUMN/FOOTING O
C SCALE N.T.S
- DE
INA
TB
O
TYPICAL ISOLATED FOOTING PLAN MAXIMUM SPACING
OF TIES IN LAP LENGTH EC
"
B
" EB
SCALE NTS
S
P D/4 FOR DIMENSION IL
PS S LEGEND
O
O
O
H Bs BUT NOT GREATER S
A LL
L
.L THAN 4" (100mm) PA L
C GRADE BEAM COLUMN TYPICAL DETAIL ABBREVIATIONS: SBC - SOIL BEARING CAPACITY AH
hS
L (RFT. NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY) SSL - STRUCTURAL SLAB LEVEL
S
GRID
O HC - COLUMN CLEAR HEIGHT
C TOB - TOP OF BEAM
T.O.B Sh - SMALLER OF (BS/4) OR 100mm FGL - FINISHED GRADE LEVEL ,T
St - SMALLER OF (8 db-VERTICAL), (BS/2) EL - ELEVATION RA
LO - GREATER OF LARGEST COLUMN DIMENSION, TYP - TYPICAL P
(HC/16), 500mm CJ - CONSTRUCTION JOINT
THK - THICK IN
BS - SMALLEST COLUMN DIMENSION MM - MILLIMETER RO
BOF - BOTTOM OF FOOTING
| - CENTER LINE ,L
EQ - EQUAL LU
{ - DIAMETER F
COLUMN VERTICAL @ - AT
BARS WITH TIES. 75 05 C1 - COLUMN MARK NI
CJ F1 - ISOLATED FOOTING MARK
E
C NO
IL REFERENCE DRAWINGS IT
P
S DWG. CONTROL FOR JO. 10-02062-0002 RD-401954 CU
FOOTING GENERAL NOTES - CONCRETE WORKS RA-401987.001 DO
P
A 12mm THK. ISOLATION STRUCTURAL LAYOUTS RA-402190.001 RP
BOF EL. (SEE
L JOINT WITH FILLER BOARD FOUNDATION SCHEDULE) ER
AND SEALANT (TYP) ON
SSL FFL COMPACTED .O
SELECT FILL/ 50mm THK
LEAN CONCRETE C
FGL NATURAL GRADE M
AR
10 MILS THK. 75mm A
DIU
CLEAR COVER
POLYETHYLENE FILM
75mm CONC. VAPOR BARRIER (TYP) AS
COVER CJ (TYP) 1 TYPICAL COLUMN ELEVATION FO
5
7 R3 SCALE N.T.S
Y R4
-
YT
DAMP PROOFING RE
(SEE NOTE-4) PO
C 1{16 (SEE NOTE-6) RP
BOF
50 THK LEAN FOUNDATION SCHEDULE EL
R2 OS
CONCRETE FOUNDATION TYPE Y DIMENSIONS (mm) REINFORCEMENT
REMARKS
R1 COMPACTED SOIL AS PER MARK (mm) A B C R1 (BOTTOM) R2 (BOTTOM) R3 (TOP) R4 (TOP) EH
EQ EQ F1 ISOLATED FOOTING 1350 1600 1600 500 {16 @ 150 {16 @ 150 {12 @ 300 {12 @ 300 T
SOIL REPORT RECOMMENDATION
50 ER
B KEY PLAN A
(TYP)
INE
COLUMNS SCHEDULE RE
A S E C T I O N
(SCALE 1:10M)
H
- SCALE NTS SCALE: AS SHOWN DE
COLUMN
FOUNDATION TO FIRST FIRST TO ROOF INA
MARK REVISION VALIDATION
TN
CO
10-02062-0002-001
400 350
NO
REQUIRED
OTHER IT
A
ENGG./DATE
NFP
MAO RAZ
OPERATIONS/DATE
KAZ
BY/DATE
M
RO
09/10/20 09/10/20 09/10/20 09/10/20
8 16 8 16 REV.NO. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION FN

Ø Ø
00 09/10/20 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION I
C1 004 503 JOB ORDER/EWO NO. THIS REVISION IS NOT TO BE USED FOR EH
2Ø10 @ 150 TIES 2Ø10 @ 100 TIES 10-02062-0002 CONSTRUCTION UNTIL CERTIFIED AND DATED
T
SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
DRAWING TYPE
DN
FDN. AND COLUMN SCHED. & DETAILS FDN A
LLPH OPERATOR SHELTER GN
AR
SI
035 Q RA-402191 001 00
INDEX
HT
NOTES: .O
C
GRID GRID GRID GRID GRID M
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS AND
ELEVATIONS ARE IN METERS UNLESS AR
NOTED OTHERWISE. A
WITH THE CIVIL, ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL, UA
L1 (SPAN) L2 (SPAN) ELECTRICAL, COMMUNICATION AND OTHER
CONTINUOUS BEAM CONTINUOUS BEAM RELEVANT DRAWINGS. S
3. FOR ADDITIONAL GENERAL NOTES & ABBREVIATIONS FO
0.25L1 LAP SPLICE 0.3L1 OR 0.3L2 0.3L1 OR 0.3L2 LAP SPLICE 0.3L2 OR 0.3L3 REFER TO DWG. NO. CA-401987.001.
GREATER GREATER GREATER 4. IN CASE OF TWO ADJACENT BEAMS WITH DIFFERENT TN
ACI STANDARD TOP REINFORCEMENT, USE THE GREATER OF ES
HOOK TOP BARS @ TOP BARS TOP BARS @ TOP BARS @ TOP BARS TOP BARS @ RC BEAM RC BEAM TYPE "A" BARS.
LEFT SUPPORT 'C' BAR RIGHT SUPPORT LEFT SUPPORT 'C' BAR RIGHT SUPPORT
5. MAXIMUM CLEAR DISTANCE BETWEEN SIDE
NO
'A' BAR 'A' BAR 'A' BAR 'A' BAR C
BARS = 300mm.
6. AREA OF BOTTOM BARS "B" SHALL NOT BE LESS NE
N M THAN ONE THIRD OF TOTAL AREA OF BOTTOM TT
d d I A
A
M E
B
REINFORCEMENT. IR
7. ALL REINFORCEMENT DETAILS SHOWN ARE
INDICATIVE, CONTRACTOR TO DEVELOP THE W
150
RELEVANT SHOP DRAWINGS INCLUDING BUT NOT EH
(MIN.) COLUMN COLUMN
LIMITED TO BAR MARK, LENGTH, HOOK DETAIL, T
BOTTOM BARS BOTTOM BARS d 50 50 d SPLICE LENGTH, LOCATION, ETC.
COLUMN 0.125L1 A 'B' BAR 0.125L1 0.125L2 'B' BAR 0.125L2 COLUMN (X1) (X1) TU
EXTRA BOTTOM BARS EXTRA BOTTOM OH
SH -
'D' BAR BARS TI
'D' BAR W
L1/4 L1/2 L1/4 L2/4 L2/2 L2/4 GN
ZONE-1 ZONE-2 ZONE-1 ZONE-1 ZONE-2 ZONE-1 I
(X1) (X2) (X1) (X1) (X2) (X1) W
AR
50 50 50 50
STIRRUPS STIRRUPS D
(SEE SCHED.) (SEE SCHED.) SI
HT
TYPICAL BEAM LONGITUDINAL SECTION ADDITIONAL STIRRUPS (BEAM TO BEAM FRAMING CONNECTION) M
OR
SCALE N.T.S SCALE N.T.S F
DE
INA
TB
O
MAXIMUM NUMBER OF BARS IN SINGLE LAYER OF BEAM EB
BEAM WIDTH (MM)
LEGEND
EXTRA 'A' BARS AND BAR LL
'C' CONTINUOUS BARS EXTRA 'A' BARS AND DIAMETER GB - GRADE BEAM AH
'C' CONTINUOUS BARS (MM) 200 250 300 350 400 500 600 RB - ROOF BEAM
Ø25 SPACER BAR
THK - THICK S
Ø25 SPACER BAR
EVERY 1000mm O.C
EVERY 1000mm O.C 16 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 MM - MILLIMETER ,T
(TYP) MIN RA
(TYP) 20 2 2 3 4 5 7 8 - MINIMUM
25 2 2 2 3 4 6 8 | - CENTER LINE P
{ - DIAMETER
@ - AT IN
b - BEAM WIDTH RO
d SIDE BARS d SIDE BARS d - BEAM DEPTH
EXTRA STIRRUPS STIRRUPS EXTRA STIRRUPS STIRRUPS ,L
(AS REQ'D) (AS REQ'D) LU
50mm THK.
BEAMS SCHEDULE
F
LEAN CONCRETE
NI
EXTRA 'D' BARS AND 50 (TYP) SIZE EXTRA 'A' BAR MID SPAN STIRRUPS
'B' CONTINUOUS BARS BEAM CONTINUOUS CONTINUOUSEXTRA SIDE BARS REMARKS NO
b EXTRA 'D' BARS AND MARK WIDTH DEPTH 'C' BAR LEFT RIGHT 'B' BAR (EACH FACE) DIAMETER SPACING SPACING NO. OF
b 'B' CONTINUOUS BARS b(mm) d(mm) SUPPORT SUPPORT 'D' BAR (mm) X1(mm) X2(mm) LEGS REFERENCE DRAWINGS IT
GB1 350 500 3 {16 - - 3 {16 - 1 {12 10 150 150 2 DWG. CONTROL FOR JO. 10-02062-0002 RD-401954 CU
GB2 350 600 4 {16 - - 4 {16 - 1 {16 10 150 150 2 GENERAL NOTES - CONCRETE WORKS RA-401987.001 DO
TYPICAL FLOOR/ROOF BEAM DETAIL TYPICAL GRADE BEAM DETAIL STRUCTURAL LAYOUTS RA-402190.001 RP
SCALE N.T.S RB1 350 600 2 {16 2 {16 2 {16 4 {16 - 1 {16 10 150 150 2 ER
A S E C T I O N ON
-
SH -
SCALE N.T.S .O
C
M
AR
A
DIU
CL OF BEAM CL OF BEAM AS
SHORT SPAN FO
"A1" (SHORT BARS) "B1" (LONG BARS) YT
RE
SSL PO
ST
RP
EL
OS
"C1" (SHORT BARS) "D1" (LONG BARS)
EH
T
ER
KEY PLAN A
SOLID SLAB TYPICAL SECTION INE
SCALE N.T.S RE
H
SCALE: NTS
DE
INA
REVISION VALIDATION
TN
CO
10-02062-0002-001
NO
SOLID SLAB REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE (ROOF)
REQUIRED
OTHER IT
A
SLAB SHORT BARS (MAIN REINF.) LONG BARS (SECONDARY REINF.)

ENGG./DATE
NFP
MAO RAZ
OPERATIONS/DATE
KAZ
BY/DATE
M
RO
SLAB THICKNESS REMARKS 09/10/20 09/10/20 09/10/20 09/10/20
MARK TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM
h(mm) "A1" BARS "B1" BARS "C1" BARS "D1" BARS
REV.NO. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION FN
00 09/10/20 I
S1 160 {10 @ 150 {10 @ 150 {10 @ 150 {10 @ 150
ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION

T
SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
DRAWING TYPE
DN
BEAM AND SLAB SCHEDULE & DETAILS FDN A
LLPH OPERATOR SHELTER GN
AR
SI
035 Q RA-402192 001 00
INDEX
HT
NOTES: .O
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS AND C
ELEVATIONS ARE IN METERS UNLESS
M
AR
| OF BEAM
150 NOTED OTHERWISE. A
TOP (SEE
+5.00 ARCH'L) 2. THIS DRAWING SHALL BE READ IN CONJUNCTION ID
WITH THE CIVIL, ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL,
UA
| OF BEAM
| OF BEAM {12 @ 150 ELECTRICAL, COMMUNICATION AND OTHER
RELEVANT DRAWINGS. S
{10 @ 150 3. FOR ADDITIONAL GENERAL NOTES & ABBREVIATIONS FO
RC SLAB REFER TO DWG. NO. CA-401987.001.
CMU WALL SLAB RFT. 4. ALL CONCRETE SURFACES IN DIRECT CONTACT TN
RC COLUMN RC COLUMN SSL +4.20
WITH EARTH SHALL BE COATED WITH TWO COATS
ES
SEE ARCH'L CMU WALL OF COALTAR OR BITUMEN COATING THAT CONFORMS
ST TO (APCS-3) OR (APCS-10) OF (SAES-H-001). NO
TOC -0.012 SSL -0.05 SSL -0.05 5. HVAC EQUIPMENT PADS AND AIR STACK FOUNDATION C
FGL -0.15 /PEDESTAL SIZE, THICKNESS, REINFORCEMENT AND NE
S
T ST ANCHOR BOLTS ARE PRELIMINARY. DESIGN TO BE
FINALIZED BY CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR BASED TT
ON FINAL APPROVED VENDOR INFORMATION.
IR
RC BEAM 6. ALL REINFORCEMENT DETAILS SHOWN ARE W
RC BEAM
CMU WALL RC COLUMN
INDICATIVE, CONTRACTOR TO DEVELOP THE EH
RELEVANT SHOP DRAWINGS INCLUDING BUT NOT T
50mm THK. LEAN 50mm THK. LEAN LIMITED TO BAR MARK, LENGTH, HOOK DETAIL,
CONCRETE CONCRETE SPLICE LENGTH, LOCATION, ETC. TU
7. FOR BEAMS AND SLABS REINFORCEMENT REFER TO OH
RELEVANT DRAWINGS. TI
W
GN
A SECTION B SECTION C SECTION I
W
RA-402190 SCALE- 1 : 20M RA-402190 SCALE- 1 : 20M RA-402190 SCALE- 1 : 20M AR
001 001 001
D
SI
HT
M
OR
1950
| (SEE NOTE-5) F
150
DE
2200
(SEE NOTE-5) (MIN) INA
1100 1100 TB
ANCHOR BOLTS O
800 (BY VENDOR) EB
(SEE NOTE-5)
LEGEND
400 400 LL
SSL - STRUCTURAL SLAB LEVEL AH
FGL - FINISHED GRADE LEVEL
S
TOP - TOP OF PARAPET
TOC - TOP OF CONCRETE ,T
THK - THICK RA
)5 ADD - ADDITIONAL P
0 E-T RFT - REINFORCEMENT
0 50 CMU IN
11 42
ON
ARCH'L
- CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT
F - ARCHITECTURAL RO
)5 EE RC - REINFORCED CONCRETE
- 0
0 EF ,L
E 4 (S - - EACH FACE
0
0
T
O
N
0
0 | D TS
MM
- SLAB THICKNESS LU
2
2E 8 -
- MILLIMETER F
0 | - CENTER LINE
E
S
0
4 { - DIAMETER NI
( @ - AT NO
0 REFERENCE DRAWINGS IT
10
1 ANCHOR BOLTS CU
DWG. CONTROL FOR JO. 10-02062-0002 RD-401954
(BY VENDOR) GENERAL NOTES - CONCRETE WORKS RA-401987.001 DO
(SEE NOTE-5) STRUCTURAL LAYOUT RA-402190.001 RP
BEAM AND SLAB SCHEDULE & DETAILS RA-402192.001 ER
HVAC UNIT PAD PLAN
MASONRY WALL SCHEDULE & TYP. DETAILS
2 SLAB-ON-GRADE TYPICAL DETAILS
RA-460674.001 & 002
RA-460675.001 ON
RA-402190
001
SCALE- 1:20M .O
C
M
1 AIR STACK FOOTING PLAN AR
RA-402190
SCALE- 1:20M A
1950 DIU
001
(SEE NOTE-5) AS
ANCHOR BOLTS
(BY VENDOR)
(SEE NOTE-5) {16 @ 200 FO
|
TOC +0.00 YT
05 FGL -0.15 RE
800 7.5M HIGH ({300 MAX) 1 PO
AIR STACK (BY VENDOR) RP
REFER HVAC DWG. FOR DETAILS 507 0 DAMP PROOFING (TYP)
(SEE NOTE-4)
25mm NON-SHRINK
GROUT (SEE NOTE-5) 60 EL
800 2-{16 (TYP)
SIDE BARS (EF) OS
0 FGL -0.15 EH
5 50mm THK. LEAN T
1 CONCRETE (TYP)
{16 @ 200 ER
COMPACTED SOIL AS PER
3 NOS. CLOSED 28 {20 SOIL REPORT RECOMMENDATION KEY PLAN A
0 E TIES @ 50 (TYP)
INE
0
10
- 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
0 RE
5
6
1 TIES (TYP)
0
F S E C T I O N METER H
VERTICAL BARS 0
8 -
SCALE- 1:20M SCALE: 1:20M
DE
INA
SH -
REVISION VALIDATION
0 5 Ø 10 @ 150 TN
0
CO
5 TIES REQUIREMENTS, PER SAEP-334, UNDER DRAWING COMPLETION CERTIFICATE NO:
10-02062-0002-001
NO
REQUIRED
OTHER IT
A
{16 @ 150 ENGG./DATE

NFP
MAO RAZ
OPERATIONS/DATE
KAZ
BY/DATE
M
RO
2200 09/10/20 09/10/20 09/10/20 09/10/20
(SEE NOTE-5) 75mm CLEAR REV.NO. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION FN
COVER 00 09/10/20 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION I
T
SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY DN
D S E C T I O N
DRAWING TYPE
SECTIONS & DETAILS FDN A
SCALE- 1:20M E S E C T I O N GN
-
LLPH OPERATOR SHELTER I
SH -
-
SCALE- 1:10M W
SH -
WATER INTAKE & PUMPSTATION SALT AR
SI
035 Q RA-462177 001 00
INDEX
HT
CALCULATION SHEET

Desi ned :: AIA
Ch ed : : NFP / AKM
Re on :: IFC
Re No. :: 00
APPENDIX - II
STRUCTURAL DESIGN CHECKLIST
26 JAN 2022
STRUCTURAL CALCULATION CHECK LIST
Project: _Upgrade Buildings For Risk Mitigation - Rastanura Orginator: Ahmed El Bardony
Calc # PE-P20084 for LLPH Operation Shelter (N) Checker: Normel F. Panergo / Ammar Abu Ghadib
Date: 08/23/2020
No. Item Reference Type Yes No N/A Designers Comment

Has the calculation report been prepared in
accordance with Saudi Aramco Engineering Standard
1 SAES‐A‐204 General x
A204 'Preparation of Structural Calculations'?
2 Are the names of the responsible engineer and General
SAES‐A‐204 x
responsible checker given on the calculation?
3 Is the structural calculation organized with title General
page, table of contents, headings and page SAES‐A‐204 Cl. 10.1 ‐ 10.3 x
numbers?
4 Is the calculation methodology made clear with General
SAES‐A‐204 Cl. 10.8 x
sufficient explanatory notes?
5 Have the calculations been completed using metric General
units? Are all units used in the calculation clearly SAES‐A‐204 Cl. 5 x
identified?
Are the symbols used in the calculation clearly
recognized and consistent with AISC, ACI and other
6 SAES‐A‐204 Cl. 6 General x
international structural engineering standards?
7 Have all assumptions used in the calculation been General
SAES‐A‐204 Cl. 8 x
clearly stated?
Is the CSD Geotechnical Form included in the Refer to Geotechnical report file #
package, and are the geotechnical parameters used 2018/100
8 SAES‐A‐204 Cl. 9(b) General x
in the calculation correct and appropriate for the
design?
26 JAN 2022
Is the relevant site specific geotechnical Refer to Geotechnical report file #
investigation report referenced in the calculation? 2018/100
9 SAES‐Q‐005 Cl. 4.1.1 General x
Does the project have an approved CSD
Geotechnical Form?
Has the appropriate meteorological data been
included in the calculation? Has the data been
10 SAES‐A‐112 General x
selected from SAES‐A‐112 'Meteorological & Seismic
Design Data'?
11 Is the design criteria listed in the calculation with the General
source referenced? SAES‐A‐204 Cl. 9 x
Does the calculation include a clear derivation of all
primary load cases? Are sketches provided with load
12 location and intensity indicated? SAES‐A‐204 Cl. 10.6 General x
13 Has the designer referenced Saudi Aramco Best General
Practices (SABP's) where appropriate and applicable x
to the design?
14 For each calculation, is it made explicitly clear General
whether ASD or LRFD is being used? x
15 Have all deflection checks (sway, drift, vertical) been General
made and clearly shown in calculation with SAES‐M‐001 Cl.7.7 x
reference to criteria?
16 Has the calculation been made based on certified General
x
vendor drawings and data sheets? SAES‐M‐001 Cl. 5.2.4.6
17 Are certified vendor data sheets or drawings General
provided with the calculation for reference where x
appropriate?
18 Are the structures adequately braced? Has the General
bracing system been rationalized and optimized? x
19 Have moment connections (frames) been properly General
SAES‐A‐204 Cl. 10.9 x
identified?
Does the calculation include sketches of the main
framing complete with bracing configuration,
20 SAES‐A‐204 Cl. 10.8 General x
member fixities, member orientation indicated?
26 JAN 2022
21 Has the load path/connection between diaphragm General
and vertical resisting elements been demonstrated? x
22 Where existing structures are included in the design, General
is the calculation in accordance with clause 8 of SAES‐M‐001 Cl. 8 x
SAES‐M‐001?
23 Loads
Have thermal loads been considered and applied in
SAES‐M‐001 Cl. 5.7 x
accordance with clause 5.7 of SAES‐M‐001?
24 Does the structure need to support hydro test Loads
loads? Are load combinations with hydro test in SAES‐M‐001 Cl. 6.2.5 x
accordance with SAES‐M‐001?
25 Have wind loads been calculated in accordance with Loads
ASCE 7‐05?
Are there any loads which may be unaccounted for
such as electrical, suspended equipment, tanks,
26 HVAC or any other late design items that may have Loads x
been added by other disciplines?
27 Have earthquake loads been applied in accordance Loads
with ASCE 7‐05? SAES‐M‐001 Cl. 5.5 x
28 Have hydrostatic loads been included in the design Loads
or has the presence of such loads been ruled out
x
through geotechnical investigation?
29 Have special load conditions (ie: hydro test) been SAES‐M‐001 Cl. Loads

x
noted on the design drawings? 5.2.4.5
30 Have the dead loads used in the design been Loads
checked against the IFC drawings? x
31 Are the dead loads used for stability calculations Loads
reasonable, appropriate and not overestimated? x
32 Has the weight of fireproofing been included in the Loads
x
design calculations?
33 Are the load combinations used in the calculation Loads
complete, probable, realistic and appropriate? SAES‐M‐001 Cl. 6.1 x
26 JAN 2022
34 Are the load combinations based on ASCE 7‐05? If Loads In addition to IBC - 2009
not, has the designer justified their basis for use? SAES‐M‐001 Cl. 6.2.1 x
35 Has the designer considered unbalanced loading on Loads
x
the structure? Eccentric loads?
For flat roofs has ponding been considered? If not
minimum roof slope and roof drainage provisions
36 SAES‐M‐100 and IBC Loads x
must be made in accordance with code.
37 Are the loads used in the calculation for cable trays Loads
in accordance with the Aramco Standard? SAES‐M‐001 Cl.5.2.6 x
38 Has the structure supporting cranes been checked Crane
for the appropriate impact factors as listed in SAES‐ SAES‐M‐001 Cl. 5.6 x
M‐001?
For jib cranes; has the supporting steel been
checked (strength and deflection) as a result of the
39 worst load condition based on load size and Crane x
location? Is column checked for minor or biaxial
bending?
40 Are crane deflection limits as per Cl. 7.6 of SAES‐M‐ Crane
001?
Are computer input files included in the report and
are they complete including support locations,
41 member end conditions, loadings, boundary SAES‐A‐204 Cl. 11 Software x
conditions, load cases and load combinations?
Are the members’ orientations (strong vs. weak axis)
correct in the software model or calculation and in
42 Software x
agreement with the drawings?
Has a summary of the computer generated output
been provided which clearly indicates what results
have been achieved by the analysis? Member
43 SAES‐A‐204 Cl. 11.5 Software x
strength ratios?
Maximum deflections under service loads?
26 JAN 2022
Where the designer has used proprietary software Structural static analysis and design is
(Excel, Mathcad, etc…) for structural analysis, has performed using CSI ETABS & SAFE
44 the designer demonstrated the accuracy of the SAES‐A‐204 Cl. 11.4 Software x software's.
results? Has proprietary software been verified?
45 Are baseplate holes oversized as per SAES‐M‐ Steel
SAES‐M‐001 Cl. 7.16 x
001 and 12‐SAMSS‐007?
46 Have column base plates been sized correctly and Steel
are they included in the structural calculation? x
Has the structure been designed to accommodate
the effects of thermal expansion‐contraction?
47 SAES‐M‐001 Cl. 7.1.11 Steel x
Example: Allowing for longitudinal movement in
pipe rack design.
48 Have expansion/contraction joints in steel structures Steel
been clearly indicated and detailed on the structural x
drawings?
49 Has metal floor/roof decking and/or composite floor Steel
been designed in accordance with Steel Deck SAES‐M‐001 Cl.7.2.1 x
Institute (SDI)?
50 For metal decking; are the gauge, profile and Steel
properties clearly indicated on construction x
drawings and in calculation?
Where metal decking has been assumed to act as a
diaphragm, have the connections to the structural
51 SAES‐M‐001 Cl. 7.2.2 Steel x
frame been clearly detailed in the construction
drawings?
52 For water retaining concrete structures, have they Concrete
been designed in accordance with the provisions of SAES‐Q‐001 Cl. 4.11 x
ACI 350?
Has precast/prestressed concrete been designed
and detailed in accordance with SAES‐Q‐012 and the
53 Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI)? SAES‐M‐001 Cl.7.3.3 Concrete x
26 JAN 2022
Are the location of all expansion, isolation and
construction joints in concrete clearly indicated on
54 the construction drawings and have these been Concrete x
detailed?
55 Have the foundations been checked for stability Fdn Tie / grade beam is provided to all
against sliding and overturning with the factor of columns in all directions as recommended
safety clearly identified? SAES‐Q‐005 Cl. 4.2 x by geotechnical report.
Foundations for reciprocating machines greater than
200HP or centrifugal machines greater than 500HP
56 SAES‐Q‐007 Cl. 5.1.1 and 5.1.2 Fdn x
have been checked using dynamic analysis in
accordance with SAES‐Q‐007?
Has the thickness of footings been checked using
factored loads and has the reinforcing been checked
57 against the minimum required by ACI 318? Fdn x
58 For foundation design have existing underground Fdn
utilities that could interfere with foundation SAES‐Q‐005 Cl. 4.3.2(f) x
construction been identified?
59 For column pedestals has the anchor bolt layout Fdn To be finalized by Construction
been checked against the reinforcing bar locations x Contractor based on final approved
for clashes? vendor information
60 Has grout been specified in accordance with SAES‐Q‐ Fdn To be finalized by Construction
010 or SAES‐Q‐011 and is the minimum thickness SAES‐Q‐005 Cl. 4.3.2c x Contractor based on final approved
specified 25mm? vendor information
61 Are anchor bolts in accordance with Saudi Aramco Fdn To be finalized by Construction
Standard Drawing No. AC‐036022 (rev 8 or later)? SAES‐Q‐005 Cl. 4.8.1 x Contractor based on final approved
vendor information
62 Has the anchor bolt projection been checked against Fdn To be finalized by Construction
final grout thickness, baseplate thickness and nut x Contractor based on final approved
requirements? vendor information
63 Have allowable bearing pressures been checked Fdn
(footing sized) against working stress (service SAES‐Q‐005 Cl 4.1.2 x
loads)?
Have all anchor bolts been designed as cast‐in‐ place To be finalized by Construction
or approval granted in accordance with clause 4.8.9 Contractor based on final approved
64 SAES‐Q‐005 Cl. 4.8.9 Fdn x
of SAES‐Q‐005 for use of post installed bolts? vendor information
26 JAN 2022
65 Have anchor bolts been designed in accordance to Fdn To be finalized by Construction
ACI 318 Appendix D? SAES‐Q‐005 Cl. 4.8.4 x Contractor based on final approved
vendor information
66 Fdn To be finalized by Construction
Have all columns been designed with a minimum of SAES‐M‐001 Cl. x Contractor based on final approved
4 anchor bolts as required by SAES‐M‐001? 7.1.9(a) vendor information
Have pedestals (short columns) been designed for To be finalized by Construction
the worst combination of reaction forces including Contractor based on final approved
67 Fdn x
shear, bending, tension or compression? vendor information
68 Have anchor bolt locations for vendor supplied Fdn To be finalized by Construction

equipment been checked against the certified x Contractor based on final approved
vendor drawings for correctness? vendor information
Are notes on the drawing clear with respect to the To be finalized by Construction
placement of anchor bolts and the use of templates Contractor based on final approved
69 to hold anchor bolts in position during construction? SAES‐Q‐005 Cl. 4.8.2 Fdn x vendor information
70 Are rebar spacings adequate to allow flow of Fdn
x
concrete between bars?
71 Have additional reinforcing bars been provided Fdn
x
diagonally at sleeve locations and corners?
72 Do dowels extending from footing into pedestal Fdn
have the required development length at each end? x
Is lap splice length correct?
26 JAN 2022

Structural Calculation LLPH Operation Shelter (N) : Upgrade Buildings For Risk Mitigation at Ras Tanura Refinery

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Structural Calculation LLPH Operation Shelter (N) : Upgrade Buildings For Risk Mitigation at Ras Tanura Refinery

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Saudi Aramco 2616-ENG (03/99)

KAZ SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY

REFINING and NGL PROJECTS DEPARTMENT

RT REFINERY and JUAYMAH NGL PROJECTS DIVISION

UPGRADE BUILDINGS FOR RISK MITIGATION

AT RAS TANURA REFINERY

OF THIS DRAWING IS COVERED, FOR ALL

BY DRAWING COMPLETION CERTIFICATE

UPGRADE BUILDING FOR RISK MITIGATION, RAS TANURA DOC 1

SNC-LAVALIN FAYEZ ENGINEERING, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia

Description Page Number

1.0 Design Basis ….………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4

2.0 Design Loadings ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6

3.0 Analysis and Design …………………………………………………………………………………………… 12

SNC-LAVALIN FAYEZ ENGINEERING, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia

3.3.2.2 SAFE Input Sketches….…………………………………………………………………………………… 98

4.0 APPENDICES …………………………………………………………………………..………………………… 108

ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION (IFC)

SNC-LAVALIN FAYEZ ENGINEERING, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia

1.3.1 Structure Name: LLPH Operator Shelter (N)

1.4 Structural System :

1.4.2 Substructure / Foundation:

1.5 Design Criteria :

Saudi Aramco Engineering Standards:

ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION (IFC)

SNC-LAVALIN FAYEZ ENGINEERING, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia

1.5.2 Material Specifications:

Minimum compressive strength of concrete @ 28 days f'c = 35 MPa SAES-Q-001

Minimum compressive strength of concrete @ 28 days f'c = 14 MPa SAES-Q-001

Unit weight of normal concrete c = 24 KN/m

Unit weight of lightweight concrete screed cs = 12 KN/m

1.5.3 Soil Parameters (Soil Report, G.F. # 2018/100):

1.5.4 Serviceability Requirements

1.5.5 Design Philosophy and Assumptions:

ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION (IFC)

SNC-LAVALIN FAYEZ ENGINEERING, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia

2.0 DESIGN LOADINGS

ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION (IFC)

SNC-LAVALIN FAYEZ ENGINEERING, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia

2.1 Dead Load

160 mm thk. Solid slab selfweight = 3.84 KPa (derived value)

Total superimposed load of Roof Slab = 8.47 KPa

CMU Walls (Fully Grouted):

2.2 Live Load on Roof

ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION (IFC)

SNC-LAVALIN FAYEZ ENGINEERING, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia

2.3 Wind Load

V = Basic Wind Speed ( 3-Sec. Gust ) = 145.00 km/hr SAES-A-112

ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION (IFC)

SNC-LAVALIN FAYEZ ENGINEERING, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia

2.4 Seismic Load

As per SAES-A-112, TABLE-1 Design Data:

Site Class = C SAES-A-112

Adjusted Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration Parameters

Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameters

ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION (IFC)

SNC-LAVALIN FAYEZ ENGINEERING, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia

S1 = 0.032 < 0.04 hence, SDC A

11.7 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY A

ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION (IFC)

SNC-LAVALIN FAYEZ ENGINEERING, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia

2.5 Load Combination and Load Factors