The document outlines the ORID framework for analyzing data from Reading A to Z running record assessments. At the objective level, the purpose is to identify a problem of practice based on ELA running record data. At the reflective level, teachers felt the assessments are better for younger grades and students struggle with inference, vocabulary, and fact/opinion questions. At the interpretive level, data analysis and student performance is inconsistent due to factors like mood and attendance. The decisional level proposes using other Reading A to Z tools consistently, practicing inference and fact/opinion questions daily, and finding ways for students to better access reading materials.
The document outlines the ORID framework for analyzing data from Reading A to Z running record assessments. At the objective level, the purpose is to identify a problem of practice based on ELA running record data. At the reflective level, teachers felt the assessments are better for younger grades and students struggle with inference, vocabulary, and fact/opinion questions. At the interpretive level, data analysis and student performance is inconsistent due to factors like mood and attendance. The decisional level proposes using other Reading A to Z tools consistently, practicing inference and fact/opinion questions daily, and finding ways for students to better access reading materials.
The document outlines the ORID framework for analyzing data from Reading A to Z running record assessments. At the objective level, the purpose is to identify a problem of practice based on ELA running record data. At the reflective level, teachers felt the assessments are better for younger grades and students struggle with inference, vocabulary, and fact/opinion questions. At the interpretive level, data analysis and student performance is inconsistent due to factors like mood and attendance. The decisional level proposes using other Reading A to Z tools consistently, practicing inference and fact/opinion questions daily, and finding ways for students to better access reading materials.
The document outlines the ORID framework for analyzing data from Reading A to Z running record assessments. At the objective level, the purpose is to identify a problem of practice based on ELA running record data. At the reflective level, teachers felt the assessments are better for younger grades and students struggle with inference, vocabulary, and fact/opinion questions. At the interpretive level, data analysis and student performance is inconsistent due to factors like mood and attendance. The decisional level proposes using other Reading A to Z tools consistently, practicing inference and fact/opinion questions daily, and finding ways for students to better access reading materials.
✔ To examine the data ✔ What do you see? O ✔ To identify factual ✔ What factual statements can you Objective Level information make based on the data?
✔ To encourage ✔ What surprised you?
R participants to make ✔ What encouraged you? Reflective Level connections ✔ What discouraged you? ✔ To encourage free ✔ How does this make you feel? flow of ideas and imagination
✔ To identify patterns ✔ Describe the “Big Idea”
I and determine their ✔ What does the data tell us? Interpretive Level significance or What new insights do you have? meaning ✔ What good news is there for us ✔ To articulate to celebrate? underlying insights ✔ What doesn’t it tell us and what else might we need to know?
✔ To propose next ✔ What are our proposed next
D steps steps? Decisional Level ✔ To develop an action ✔ What decisions can we make? plan ✔ What is our action plan for ✔ To make decisions moving forward? ✔ To experience “coming together”
Toolbox for Teachers 1
ORID Teacher Team Meeting: March 14/21 Focus: To identify a problem of practice based on ELA Running Record Assessments
Conversation Step Your Comments
● to identity a problem of practice based on ELA running O record assessments Objective Level ● To analyze, assess, and discuss the use of Reading A to Z Running Record assessments in the classroom ● to understand the use of running records in the classroom ● how can running records drive instruction and guided reading groups?
● is reading A to Z a substantial assessment tool?
R ○ how do we know? Reflective Level ● Reading A to Z is useful for some students but not all students ● can serve as baseline/midline/endline assessments ● running records allow teachers to better see where a student is in comparison to others ● teachers feel that reading A to Z is better for younger grades/levels ● older students should be using higher level passages and more rigorous assessments ● based on running record data students struggle when I answering inference and fact/opinion questions Interpretive Level ● students also struggle with vocabulary ● data analysis is inconsistent ● inconsistency in students moods, attention span, emotions etc. affects running record data ● students data can improve or decline rapidly ● how do we allow students to consistently improve without regressing? ● based on attendance, participation, consistency ● consistency in running records/assessment of students is needed by the teacher ● find better/easier ways for students to access reading tools ● become more consistent with running records and D assessments Decisional Level ● push students ● use other tools from reading a to z so that it is consistent
Toolbox for Teachers 2
● tools = reading passages, comprehension questions, quizzes on skills ● practice inference questions daily -- formal and informal questions ● practice fact/opinion questions daily -- formal and informal questions