Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Examiners' Commentaries 2018: MT2116 Abstract Mathematics
Examiners' Commentaries 2018: MT2116 Abstract Mathematics
Important note
This commentary reflects the examination and assessment arrangements for this course in the
academic year 2017–18. The format and structure of the examination may change in future years,
and any such changes will be publicised on the virtual learning environment (VLE).
Unless otherwise stated, all cross-references will be to the latest version of the subject guide (2011).
You should always attempt to use the most recent edition of any Essential reading textbook, even if
the commentary and/or online reading list and/or subject guide refer to an earlier edition. If
different editions of Essential reading are listed, please check the VLE for reading supplements – if
none are available, please use the contents list and index of the new edition to find the relevant
section.
General remarks
Learning outcomes
At the end of this course and having completed the Essential reading and activities you should:
• have used basic mathematical concepts in discrete mathematics, algebra and real analysis to
solve mathematical problems in this subject
• be able to use formal notation correctly and in connection with precise statements in English
• be able to demonstrate an understanding of the underlying principle of the subjects
• be able to solve unseen mathematical problems in discrete mathematics, algebra and real
analysis
• be able to prove statements and formulate precise mathematical arguments.
We start by emphasising that you should always include your working. This means two things.
First, you should not simply write down the answer in the examination script, but you should
explain the method by which it is obtained. Secondly, you should include rough working (even if it is
messy!). The examiners want you to get the right answers, of course, but it is more important that
you prove you know what you are doing: that is what is really being examined.
We also stress that if you have not completely solved a problem, you may still be awarded marks for
a partial, incomplete, or slightly wrong, solution; but, if you have written down a wrong answer and
nothing else, no marks can be awarded. So it is certainly in your interests to include all your
workings.
1
MT2116 Abstract mathematics
In this course, precision and clarity are extremely important. It is vital that you know the key
definitions and theorems exactly, so that you can quote them and use them. It is simply not possible
to prove something using a formal definition if you only have a vague and incorrect recollection of
what that definition is. How could you use the formal definition of convergence of a sequence to
prove that a sequence converges if you do not know what it is that you need to establish, because
you do not know the definition? Well, you cannot. It is so important to know the definitions, and
there are a number of marks to be picked up simply for knowing them.
You should ensure that you have covered the bulk of the syllabus in order to perform well in the
examination: it is bad practice to concentrate only on a small range of major topics in the
expectation that there will be lots of marks obtainable for questions on these topics. The
examination paper has some element of choice: your best six questions (out of eight) count. If you
have not covered the whole syllabus, then you will be limiting your choice. Assuming you have,
however, covered the whole syllabus, it is a very good idea to take a little time to choose carefully: it
could be that a question on your favourite topic is in fact more difficult than a question on another
topic.
Every examination paper is different. You should not assume that your examination will be almost
identical to the previous year’s: for instance, just because there was a question, or a part of a
question, on a certain topic last year, you should not assume there will be one on the same topic this
year. Each year, the examiners want to test that candidates can reason precisely mathematically,
and that they know and understand a number of mathematical concepts and methods. In setting an
examination paper, they try to test whether the candidate does indeed know the methods,
understands them, and is able to use them, and not merely whether he or she vaguely remembers
them. Because of this, every year there are some questions which are likely to seem unfamiliar, or
different from previous years’ questions. You should expect to be surprised by some of the questions.
Of course, you will only be examined on material in the syllabus, so all questions can be answered
using the material of the course.
Many candidates are disappointed to find that their examination performance is poorer than they
expected. This may be due to a number of reasons, but one particular failing is ‘question
spotting’, that is, confining your examination preparation to a few questions and/or topics which
have come up in past papers for the course. This can have serious consequences.
We recognise that candidates might not cover all topics in the syllabus in the same depth, but you
need to be aware that examiners are free to set questions on any aspect of the syllabus. This
means that you need to study enough of the syllabus to enable you to answer the required number of
examination questions.
The syllabus can be found in the Course information sheet available on the VLE. You should read
the syllabus carefully and ensure that you cover sufficient material in preparation for the
examination. Examiners will vary the topics and questions from year to year and may well set
questions that have not appeared in past papers. Examination papers may legitimately include
2
Examiners’ commentaries 2018
questions on any topic in the syllabus. So, although past papers can be helpful during your revision,
you cannot assume that topics or specific questions that have come up in past examinations will
occur again.
If you rely on a question-spotting strategy, it is likely you will find yourself in difficulties
when you sit the examination. We strongly advise you not to adopt this strategy.
3
MT2116 Abstract mathematics
Important note
This commentary reflects the examination and assessment arrangements for this course in the
academic year 2017–18. The format and structure of the examination may change in future years,
and any such changes will be publicised on the virtual learning environment (VLE).
Unless otherwise stated, all cross-references will be to the latest version of the subject guide (2011).
You should always attempt to use the most recent edition of any Essential reading textbook, even if
the commentary and/or online reading list and/or subject guide refer to an earlier edition. If
different editions of Essential reading are listed, please check the VLE for reading supplements – if
none are available, please use the contents list and index of the new edition to find the relevant
section.
Candidates should answer SIX of the following EIGHT questions: THREE from Section A and
THREE from Section B. If additional questions are answered, only your best THREE answers
from Section A and your best THREE answers from Section B will count towards the final mark.
All questions carry equal marks.
Section A
Question 1
(a) Let p, q and r be statements. Construct the truth table for the statement
(p =⇒ r) ∨ (q =⇒ r). Is this statement logically equivalent to the statement
(p ∨ q) =⇒ r? Justify your answer.
All parts of this question use the material in Chapter 2 of the subject guide.
Let S1 be (p =⇒ r) ∨ (q =⇒ r) and S2 be (p ∨ q) =⇒ r.
4
Examiners’ commentaries 2018
p q r p =⇒ r q =⇒ r S1 p∨q S2
T T T T T T T T
T T F F F F T F
T F T T T T T T
F T T T T T T T
T F F F T T T F
F T F T F T T F
F F T T T T F T
F F F T T T F T
It can be seen that the statements are not logically equivalent since there are truth
assignments to p, q, r on which they take different values.
5
MT2116 Abstract mathematics
Question 2
(a) Use the method of induction to prove that the following statement is true for all
natural numbers n:
n
X 1
(−1)r r = ((−1)n (2n + 1) − 1) .
r=1
4
We have:
n
X n
X
(−1)r r = (−1)k+1 (k + 1) + (−1)r r
r=1 r=1
1
= (−1)k+1 (k + 1) + ((−1)n (2n + 1) − 1)
4
1
(−1)k (2k + 1) + 4(−1)k+1 (k + 1) − 1
=
4
1
(−1)k+1 (4k + 4 − 2k − 1) − 1
=
4
1
(−1)k+1 (2k + 3) − 1
=
4
1
(−1)k+1 (2(k + 1) + 1) − 1
=
4
as required.
(b) Use the method of induction to prove that the following statement is true for all
natural numbers n:
n
X 1
r(n2 − r 2 ) = n2 (n2 − 1).
r=1
4
6
Examiners’ commentaries 2018
We have:
k+1
X k
X
r((k + 1)2 − r2 ) = r((k + 1)2 − r2 )
r=1 r=1
k+1
X
= r((k 2 + 2k + 1)2 − r2 )
r=1
k+1
X
r(k 2 − r2 ) + (2k + 1)r
=
r=1
k
X 1
= (2k + 1) r + k 2 (k 2 − 1)
r=1
4
1 1
= (2k + 1) k(k + 1) + k 2 (k 2 − 1)
2 4
1 1
= (2k + 1) k(k + 1) + k 2 (k − 1)(k + 1)
2 4
1
= k(k + 1) [2(2k + 1) + k(k − 1)]
4
1
= k(k + 1) k 2 + 3k + 2
4
1
= k(k + 1)(k + 1)(k + 2)
4
1
= (k + 1)2 (k 2 + 2k)
4
1
= (k + 1)2 ((k + 1)2 − 1)
4
as required.
(c) Use the Euclidean algorithm to find the greatest common divisor of 403 and 182.
403 = 2.182 + 39
182 = 4.39 + 26
39 = 1.26 + 13
26 = 2.13
7
MT2116 Abstract mathematics
Question 3
x2 − 1
if x ≥ 0
f (x) =
−x2 − 1 if x < 0.
Prove that f is a bijection and determine a formula for the inverse function f −1 .
8
Examiners’ commentaries 2018
5x + y = 3
3x + 3y = 6.
Question 4
(a) Express the recurring decimal 0.8765 as a rational number p/q, where p and q
are integers.
765
999 x = 1000 x − x = 76.5765 − 0.0765 = 76.5 = .
10
This leads to:
765 765
x= =
10 × 999 9990
and all together we obtain:
√
(b) (i) Prove that 6 is irrational.
(ii) Prove that if a is rational and b is irrational, then a + b is irrational.
(iii) Prove that if x is rational, then x2 is rational.
√ √
(iv) Prove that 2 + 3 is irrational.
9
MT2116 Abstract mathematics
√ √
z 4 + a4 = (z − α)(z − ᾱ)(z − β)(z − β̄) = (z 2 − 2az + a2 )(z 2 + 2az + a2 ).
Section B
Question 5
(a) (i) For a set A of real numbers, what does it mean to say that s is an upper
bound for A?
What does it mean to say that s is the supremum of A?
(ii) For a set A of real numbers, set M (A) = {|a| | a ∈ A}. Suppose that A is a
non-empty bounded set of real numbers, with sup A > 0 > inf A and
sup A + inf A ≥ 0.
Show that sup M (A) = sup A.
Is it necessarily true that inf M (A) = 0?
Justify your answer with a proof or counterexample.
10
Examiners’ commentaries 2018
(i) To say that s is an upper bound for A means that a ≤ s for all a ∈ A. To say that s is
the supremum of A means that s is an upper bound for A and, for any t < s, t is not an
upper bound for A (that is, there is a ∈ A such that t < a ≤ s).
(ii) First we show that sup A is an upper bound on M (A). We know that inf A ≤ a ≤ sup A
for every a ∈ A. Hence:
−sup A ≤ −a ≤ −inf A.
Since sup A + inf A ≥ 0, we have −inf A ≤ sup A. Consequently, −a ≤ −inf A ≤ sup A
and |a| ≤ sup A.
Since sup A > 0, for every t < sup A, we can find a ∈ A such that t < a ≤ sup A and also
a > 0. Then |a| = a, so a ∈ M (A) and hence t is not an upper bound on M (A).
Take A = {−1, 1}. Then sup A = 1 > 0 > −1 = inf A and M (A) = {1}, so inf A = 1 > 0.
(i) Intermediate Value Theorem (Theorem 11.6 in the subject guide): suppose g is a
continuous function on the closed interval [a, b], and z lies between g(a) and g(b). Then
there is some c ∈ [a, b] with g(c) = z.
(ii) Since f is an injection and f (0) = 0, we must have f (x) 6= 0 for x ∈ (0, 1]. Since
f (x) ≥ 0, this implies that f (x) > 0 for x ∈ (0, 1].
(iii) If f is not strictly increasing, there must be y < z such that f (y) ≥ f (z). We cannot
have f (y) = f (z) because f is an injection. Hence, f (y) > f (z) > 0. This means y > 0
By the Intermediate Value Theorem, there is 0 < x < y such that f (x) = f (z). Hence, f
cannot be an injection.
Question 6
(n + 1)3/2 − n3/2
(a) Find the following limit: lim .
n→∞ n1/2
(You may use any result from the course.)
11
MT2116 Abstract mathematics
n3 + 3n2 + 3n + 1 − n3
= lim
n→∞ n2 ((1 + 1/n)3/2 + 1)
3n2 + 3n + 1
= lim
n→∞ n2 ((1 + 1/n)3/2 + 1)
n2 (3 + 3/n + 1/n2 )
= lim
n→∞ n2 ((1 + 1/n)3/2 + 1)
3 + 3/n + 1/n2
= lim
n→∞ (1 + 1/n)3/2 + 1
3 3
= = .
1+1 2
(iii) Suppose K > L. For ε = K − L > 0, there exists N1 such that, for n > N1 we have
|an − L| < ε. Hence, for n > max{N, N1 }, we have:
K < an < L + ε = L + (K − L) = K
which is a contradiction.
12
Examiners’ commentaries 2018
Question 7
(a ∗ b) ∗ c = (a ∗ b)c + (a ∗ b) + c
= (ab + a + b)c + ab + a + b + c
= a + b + c + ab + ac + bc + abc
and:
a ∗ (b ∗ c) = a ∗ (bc + b + c)
= a(bc + b + c) + a + (bc + b + c)
= a + b + c + ab + ac + bc + abc.
Hence (a ∗ b) ∗ c = a ∗ (b ∗ c).
Identity: 0 is an identity element because for all a ∈ R, we have:
a ∗ 0 = a0 + a + 0 = 0 + a + 0 = a
and:
0 ∗ a = 0a + 0 + a = 0 + 0 + a = a.
(G, ∗) is not a group because −1 does not have an inverse: −1 ∗ a = −1a − 1 + a = −1 6= 0
for every a.
13
MT2116 Abstract mathematics
Question 8
(a) Let H be a group with identity e. Prove that if x2 = e for every x ∈ H then H
is abelian.
(c) Complete the following partial group table. (You should explain how you
determined the entries in the table, but you do not have to justify that your
final answer represents a group.)
* a b c d
a a
b a
c a
d
14
Examiners’ commentaries 2018
* a b c d
a a b c d
b b a
c c a
d d
15
MT2116 Abstract mathematics
Important note
This commentary reflects the examination and assessment arrangements for this course in the
academic year 2017–18. The format and structure of the examination may change in future years,
and any such changes will be publicised on the virtual learning environment (VLE).
Unless otherwise stated, all cross-references will be to the latest version of the subject guide (2011).
You should always attempt to use the most recent edition of any Essential reading textbook, even if
the commentary and/or online reading list and/or subject guide refer to an earlier edition. If
different editions of Essential reading are listed, please check the VLE for reading supplements – if
none are available, please use the contents list and index of the new edition to find the relevant
section.
Candidates should answer SIX of the following EIGHT questions: THREE from Section A and
THREE from Section B. If additional questions are answered, only your best THREE answers
from Section A and your best THREE answers from Section B will count towards the final mark.
All questions carry equal marks.
Section A
Question 1
(a) Let p, q and r be statements. Construct the truth table for the statement
(p =⇒ r) ∨ (q =⇒ r). Is this statement logically equivalent to the statement
(p ∨ q) =⇒ r? Justify your answer.
All parts of this question uses the material in Chapter 2 of the subject guide.
Let S1 be (p =⇒ r) ∨ (q =⇒ r) and S2 be (p ∨ q) =⇒ r.
16
Examiners’ commentaries 2018
p q r p =⇒ r q =⇒ r S1 p∨q S2
T T T T T T T T
T T F F F F T F
T F T T T T T T
F T T T T T T T
T F F F T T T F
F T F T F T T F
F F T T T T F T
F F F T T T F T
It can be seen that the statements are not logically equivalent since there are truth
assignments to p, q, r on which they take different values.
(A ∩ B) \ C = (A \ C) ∩ (B \ C).
x ∈ (A ∩ B) \ C ⇐⇒ x ∈ A ∩ B, x 6∈ C
⇐⇒ (x ∈ A and x ∈ B) and (x 6∈ C)
⇐⇒ (x ∈ A \ C) and (x ∈ B \ C)
⇐⇒ x ∈ (A \ C) ∩ (B \ C).
This proves the sets on the right and left hand sides are equal. An alternative approach
would be to prove, separately, that each is contained in the other.
17
MT2116 Abstract mathematics
Question 2
(a) Use the method of induction to prove that the following statement is true for all
natural numbers n:
n
X 2r + 1 (−1)n−1
(−1)r−1 =1+ .
r=1
r(r + 1) n+1
Then:
k k
X 2r + 1 2(k + 1) + 1 X 2r + 1
(−1)r−1 = (−1)k + (−1)r−1
r=1
r(r + 1) (k + 1)(k + 1 + 1) r=1 r(r + 1)
2k + 3 (−1)k−1
= (−1)k +1+
(k + 1)(k + 2) k+1
1
= 1 + (−1)k [−(2k + 3) + (k + 2)]
(k + 1)(k + 2)
1
= 1 + (−1)k (−k − 1)
(k + 1)(k + 2)
(−1)k+1
=1+
(k + 2)
as required.
(b) Use the method of induction to prove that the following statement is true for all
natural numbers n:
n
X 1
r(n2 − r 2 ) = n2 (n2 − 1).
r=1
4
18
Examiners’ commentaries 2018
We have:
k+1
X k
X
r((k + 1)2 − r2 ) = r((k + 1)2 − r2 )
r=1 r=1
k+1
X
= r((k 2 + 2k + 1)2 − r2 )
r=1
k+1
X
r(k 2 − r2 ) + (2k + 1)r
=
r=1
k
X 1
= (2k + 1) r + k 2 (k 2 − 1)
r=1
4
1 1
= (2k + 1) k(k + 1) + k 2 (k 2 − 1)
2 4
1 1
= (2k + 1) k(k + 1) + k 2 (k − 1)(k + 1)
2 4
1
= k(k + 1) [2(2k + 1) + k(k − 1)]
4
1
= k(k + 1) k 2 + 3k + 2
4
1
= k(k + 1)(k + 1)(k + 2)
4
1
= (k + 1)2 (k 2 + 2k)
4
1
= (k + 1)2 ((k + 1)2 − 1)
4
as required.
(c) Use the Euclidean algorithm to find the greatest common divisor of 341 and 154.
341 = 2.154 + 33
154 = 4.33 + 22
33 = 1.22 + 11
22 = 2.11
Question 3
19
MT2116 Abstract mathematics
Prove that f is a bijection and determine a formula for the inverse function f −1 .
2x + y = 3
x + 2y = 3.
20
Examiners’ commentaries 2018
For a complete answer, it should be checked whether each of these is in fact a solution, and
they all are indeed solutions of the system.
Question 4
(a) Find positive integers r and s such that r/s is equal to the repeating decimal
0.30024.
24
100x − x = 0.02424 − 0.0024 = 0.024 = .
1000
So we therefore have:
24 24
x= = .
99(1000) 99000
So:
3 24 3 × 9900 + 24 29724
0.30024 = + = = .
10 99000 99000 99000
√
(b) (i) Prove that 6 is irrational.
(ii) Prove that if a is rational and b is irrational, then a + b is irrational.
(iii) Prove that if x is rational, then x2 is rational.
√ √
(iv) Prove that 2 + 3 is irrational.
21
MT2116 Abstract mathematics
Since (z − α)(z − ᾱ) = z 2 − 2 Re(α) + |α|2 , and since Re(aeiθ ) = a cos θ, it follows that:
√ √
z 4 + a4 = (z − α)(z − ᾱ)(z − β)(z − β̄) = (z 2 − 2az + a2 )(z 2 + 2az + a2 ).
Section B
Question 5
(a) (i) For a set A of real numbers, what does it mean to say that s is a lower bound
for A?
What does it mean to say that s is the infimum of A?
(ii) For a set A of real numbers, set M (A) = {−|a| | a ∈ A}. Suppose that A is a
non-empty bounded set of real numbers, with sup A > 0 > inf A and
sup A + inf A ≥ 0.
Show that inf M (A) = −sup A.
Is it necessarily true that sup M (A) = 0?
Justify your answer with a proof or counterexample.
(i) To say that s is a lower bound for A means that a ≥ s for all a ∈ A. To say that s is the
infimum of A means that s is a lower bound for A and, for any t > s, t is not a lower
bound for A (that is, there is a ∈ A such that t > a ≥ s).
22
Examiners’ commentaries 2018
(ii) First we show that −sup A is a lower bound on M (A). So, we need to show that
−|a| ≥ −sup A for all a ∈ A. This is the same as to show |a| ≤ sup A.
We know that inf A ≤ a ≤ sup A for every a ∈ A. Hence:
−sup A ≤ −a ≤ −inf A.
(i) Intermediate Value Theorem (Theorem 11.6 in the subject guide): suppose g is a
continuous function on the closed interval [a, b], and z lies between g(a) and g(b). Then
there is some c ∈ [a, b] with g(c) = z.
(ii) Since f is an injection and f (1) = 1, we must have f (x) 6= 1 for x ∈ [0, 1). Since
f (x) ≤ 1, this implies that f (x) < 1 for x ∈ [0, 1).
(iii) If f is not strictly increasing, there must be y < z such that f (y) ≥ f (z). We cannot
have f (y) = f (z) because f is an injection. Hence, f (y) > f (z). Since y < z ≤ 1, we have
f (y) < 1, by (ii), and f (z) < f (y) < 1 = f (1). By IVT, there is y < x < 1 such that
f (x) = f (z). Hence, f cannot be an injection.
Question 6
(n2 + 1)3/2 − n3
(a) Find the following limit: lim .
n→∞ n
(You may use any result from the course.)
23
MT2116 Abstract mathematics
n6 + 3n4 + 3n2 + 1 − n6
= lim
n→∞ n((n2 )3/2 (1 + 1/n2 )3/2 + n3 )
3n4 + 3n2 + 1
= lim
n→∞ n(n3 (1 + 1/n)3/2 + n3 )
n4 (3 + 3/n2 + 1/n4 )
= lim
n→∞ n4 ((1 + 1/n2 )3/2 + 1)
3 + 3/n2 + 1/n4
= lim
n→∞ (1 + 1/n2 )3/2 + 1
3 3
= = .
1+1 2
(iii) Suppose K < L. For ε = L − K > 0, there exists N1 such that, for n > N1 we have
|an − L| < ε. Hence, for n > max{N, N1 }, we have:
K > an > L − ε = L − (L − K) = K
which is a contradiction.
24
Examiners’ commentaries 2018
Question 7
(a ∗ b) ∗ c = (a ∗ b)c + (a ∗ b) + c
= (ab + a + b)c + ab + a + b + c
= a + b + c + ab + ac + bc + abc
and:
a ∗ (b ∗ c) = a ∗ (bc + b + c)
= a(bc + b + c) + a + (bc + b + c)
= a + b + c + ab + ac + bc + abc.
Hence (a ∗ b) ∗ c = a ∗ (b ∗ c).
Identity: 0 is an identity element because for all a ∈ R, we have:
a ∗ 0 = a0 + a + 0 = 0 + a + 0 = a
and:
0 ∗ a = 0a + 0 + a = 0 + 0 + a = a.
(G, ∗) is not a group because −1 does not have an inverse: −1 ∗ a = −1a − 1 + a = −1 6= 0
for every a.
25
MT2116 Abstract mathematics
Question 8
(a) Let H be a group with identity e. Prove that if x = x−1 for every x ∈ H, then
H is abelian.
(c) Complete the following partial group table. (You should explain how you
determined the entries in the table, but you do not have to justify that your
final answer represents a group.)
* a b c d
a a
b a
c b
d
26
Examiners’ commentaries 2018
* a b c d
a a b c d
b b a
c c b
d d
* a b c d
a a b c d
b b a d c
c c d a b
d d c b a
27