Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Amazon Case Study
Amazon Case Study
1. Does the people management strategy of compassion and care do good business
sense?
Yes, employers want to get the best from their employees if you show them you care about
them. I believe that in return for the care and compassion, employees’ performance will be
higher than before, they become loyal to the organization. But here, the organization needs to
think about the standards of Care and Compassion. It does not make sense that organizations
bear all the irregularities and show compassion for their employees. But I agree that the
people management strategy of care and compassion makes business sense because care
means a lot for the people, and I think care makes people liable to return in back; in
organizations if you care about your employees, the return will be the performance. So, this
is a valuable strategy, and it makes business sense after all employers need is performance
and productivity. The purpose of business is to improve people’s lives, not only to make a
profit. A profit is a requirement for survival but not the only target. It is the main target of
shareholders, but shareholders are only one of the groups of stakeholders who have made an
investment and are interested in the business. So if you look at a company as more than a
I also think that it can improve the performance and retention of the staff and reduce the need
to use “greed and fear” as management tools lowering costs further. So I believe it can also
business organization to work hard and for long hours and act smartly when it comes to
unethical behavior in the restriction of performing new and challenging tasks and
accomplishing assignments on time, leading to losses to business organizations. Innovation is
the key driver to success for a business organization in the industry that demands a highly
talented, workaholic, competitive, and passionate workforce rather than a workforce that
seeks compassion and care from team leaders. It will hinder the process of continuous
innovation and opportunity of employees’ professional growth, thus leading to the failure of
a business.
For a business organization, the most crucial motivational factor that keeps them going is the
profit generated from business operations to meet shareholders’ expectations and increase its
valuation in the stock market. Care and compassion do not generate profit and satisfy the
goals of shareholders. Hence it becomes senseless for a business to focus upon it. Investors
investigate the company's financial statistics while investing in it rather than inculcating care
2. How does the practice of keeping employees on the edge impact business in the short
and long term?
In the short run, keeping employees on edge impacts business positively in terms of
increased productivity, effectiveness, efficiency, and thus the company's overall profitability.
It will facilitate employees to take on new challenges at the workplace, explore new business
ideas, innovate, complete tasks on time and remain competitive among peers, which is
crucial for the sustainability and growth of a business organization. It will foster employees
to learn new things faster, improve morale, and a sense of achievement while performing
tasks at the workplace. It will help managers easily differentiate between the most efficient
and least efficient workforce in the organisation6, thus enabling the process of training and
Overall performance of employees at the workplace will substantiate the success of the
organisation7. The organization will be embraced with an efficient pool of talents motivated
to bring the company to the industry’s top position and increase its profitability. It will
facilitate eagerness among employees to collaborate, learn from their teammates and perform
achievers who have the capability and willpower to create history and pave the way for
success for themselves and the organization as well. It will increase accountability and boost
the coping abilities of employees at the workplace to remain confident, effective, and
efficient in accomplishing tasks assigned to them8. It helps them focus on integrating their
growth with organizational growth, work with little or no supervision, and make them
However, in the long run, keeping employees at the edge will adversely impact business
organizations on time will put employees in distress in the long run leading to a high attrition
rate, low productivity, and feeling of discontent among employees in the organization.
Keeping employees on edge affects the long term and short term impact on the employer's
brand. The employer’s brand will experience increased growth in the short run since all the
employees will ensure that they work at the optimum level to ensure they have sustained
employment. Some employers think that having people constantly feeling they are at risk of
losing their job helps to motivate them. It is the opposite. Long term, it will lead to stress,
which hurts performance. Short term, it destabilizes the team, causing conflict, undue
competition, and potentially leading to a negative impact on performance. The impact they
had was that the other employees often would run around like idiots and get nothing done.
The systems they had in place were bureaucratic, sometimes irrelevant to our jobs. Some
people do not understand that activity does not necessarily equal productivity.
Simply by letting them know that they are highly valued and appropriate, their work efforts
do not go unnoticed, and their set of job skills are essential to the growth of the business. Let
them know that the company wishes that it had more workers like them, and a slight rise here
and there would not hurt either. Just a little something to show them that they are really
appreciated there and sometimes have a small employee appreciation dinner now, and then,
nothing significant - something for efforts at work and that is all appreciated. Will keep the
workforce looking forward to each workday employed there. Little things like this will show
employees that they care about how hard they are working each day, and the jobs they are
3. Is Amazon’s employer brand as reported in the New York Times sustainable? Why or
why not?
Amazon has been criticized for putting employees working for long hours, building pressure
on employees through a peer review system, and promoting employees to attack each other at
the workplace. The work environment at Amazon is very competitive and pressure building
where employees have to compete and obstruct each other to survive at Amazon. However,
employer brand for those willing to work under pressure, learn and perform challenging tasks
and foster constant innovation and creativity for the future. The work philosophy at Amazon
is that employees have to work hard, intelligent and long, and one cannot compromise on any
enjoy the work and create history in the world. Customer satisfaction and value creation for
its customers through continuous innovation and customer support is the top priority of
Amazon.
The corporate culture of Amazon demands that employees use unconventional methods to
generate innovative solutions to the problems that exist at the workplace to succeed in
cutthroat competition prevailing in the industry and attain market leadership. Amazon as an
employer suits those ready to take challenges in the fast-changing competitive environment,
become the forefront for technological innovations, and are full of ambitions in terms of
career growth & development, success achievement, and wealth accumulation. It works on
the philosophy of facing extreme demands at the workplace instead of running away,
considering it as a problem for them but as an opportunity for career growth and
people are enthusiastic about working on cutting-edge projects with innovative ideas and
solutions and ready to learn from their team members at the workplace who are thriving on
meeting the expectations of billions of its customers and achieve success individually and for
the organization. Amazon seeks employees who shine under pressure, are high performers
and have a strong emotional quotient. It considers its employees as a pool of talent and
facilitates training of employees to increase their capability and develop their personalities.
Its training program enables employees to understand what is being expected from them and
get engaged with the work culture at Amazon. It will facilitate the smooth functioning of
employees at the workplace as per the standards and norms set by Amazon and avoid
conflicts.
Human resource activities such as training and development, performance appraisal, pay, and
perks are designed effectively and systematically to achieve the corporate and strategic goals
of Amazon, such as continuous innovation and technological advancement to create value for
its customers and increase revenue for the company. Usually, small teams are formed with
the main motive to reduce differences, promote employees' self-management, and invest a
considerable chunk of money in the training and development of its employees. The
company also supports sharing information at inter and department levels to encourage
creativity and learn things from each other to facilitate fast resolution and decision making.
Amazon’s policy to hire talented people from diverse backgrounds is the key to fulfilling its
attracting innovative people and having a firm belief in Amazon. To attract and retain talent,
It offers more incentives to employees who serve the company for more than two years than
new employees with a motive to retain such talents who are highly involved with the
organization and reduce training costs. The company offers the best pay and perks to attract
talented personnel to the organization. Performance-based incentives and signing bonuses are
Performance appraisal is based on self-evaluation and peer assessment. Before 2016, the
Performance of employees was ranked, and those who performed worst were dismissed from
the company. But now, the company has changed this policy and started a retraining program
called Pivot to train its underperforming employees and offer them a chance to improve their
performance. The company takes regular feedback regarding the working environment from
employees. It has a daily question and answers feedback program called Connections to
understand its workforce and problems faced by them. It has ‘Forte’ an Employee review
program that focuses on employees’ strengths rather than their weaknesses, thus motivating
employees positively towards the organization. Amazon plans to retrain its one lakh
employees investing $700 million. It has plans to expand its training programs. It adds new
training programs to improve the quality of its workforce and retain talented and future-ready
employees at the workplace to foster constant innovation creativity and meet its
commitments to become a top employer brand in the industry. The Amazon personnel model
described by the Times is very similar to the old pre-union sweatshop model that still exists
in some businesses in the US and abroad even today. Amazon has successfully branded the
model as embodying a modern version of traditional values, “work long, hard and smart,”
and they have spent a lot of money advertising that they care deeply for their workers,
particularly during the current pandemic. The question is whether they can successfully
reward workers psychically and with financial and other perquisites to attract and retain
enough employees to fill the positions they need. It must be working for them now, or they
would not be doing it. It is probably easier to implement sweatshop work for some groups of
employees than for others. Still, it may significantly attract creative and productive
individuals outside of the norm. For that reason, it is unlikely that they apply the model as
It is undoubtedly the case that the Times has overgeneralized and overstated the HR policies
for a company with almost 1 million employees that have nearly doubled the number of its
It is also impossible that a company as large and successful as Amazon does not vary its
employment practices among its employees while it aggressively brands its employment
practices in a way that maximizes its employment applications, enables it to be selective, and
maximizes its yield on job offers to people it wants to attract at every level.
4. Are employees thriving under Amazon’s workplace policies? Or are they just barely
surviving?
Employees are thriving and just barely surviving under Amazon's workplace policies.
Employees passionate about what they do at Amazon to innovate new products and services to
create history, earn big, and become star performers thrive under Amazon's workplace policies.
Employees ready to sacrifice their work-life balance and enjoy career advancement by fulfilling
extreme demands rising at the workplace are thriving, not surviving in Amazon. These people
are willing to work 24/7, reply to emails sent to them at midnight, highly enthusiastic, ready to
take the pain on behalf of the company to satisfy expectations of customers, meet high set
standards of performance, ready to collaborate with the workforce, learn and adopt new skills,
give innovative and creative insights, work on challenging and cutting edge projects, willing to
accept challenging jobs as an initiative to grow and prosper in their career rather than problems
and escape from it. Employees deeply rooted in Amazon's work culture and belief in working
hard, being intelligent, long, having fun, and creating history are advancing in their careers and
competitive, and fast-changing environment with a motive to do out of box things for the welfare
of the company and customers and earn a strong reputation in terms of enormous pay and
promotion. Constant criticism of ideas and opinions of peers, attending late-night meetings,
sending feedback to others' bosses anonymously to sabotage each other are some of the features
which otherwise employees thriving at Amazon do not like but for the sake of success in their
career and organizational growth, they feel correct to do so. Amazon's effective training
programs regularly help employees' career growth and personality development accept new
There are various reasons why employees find that they are merely surviving under Amazon's
policies: Employees at Amazon find they are surrounded by highly skilled and talented people
who are highly boosted to think creatively to overcome new operational challenges, devise
innovative ideas to pave the path of success and meet the expectation of the company and
and surpass their teammates to survive. Long hours of operation create mental stress and anxiety,
sometimes leading to frustration and depression. Working even at vacation and constant
overtime destroys work-life balance and thus hampers employees' well-being. Surviving
Employees find no support from management about work-life balance. Standards of performance
set at Amazon are unexpectedly too high and unavoidable, which creates pressure and distress
A culture of promoting unnecessary competition among co-workers and criticizing peers' ideas in
meetings prompts star performers to succeed in careers and low performers to quit the job. The
company's culture to not include women in top management hinders female employees' career
review process is based on rankings where managers discuss subordinates' rankings. Employees
are encouraged to criticize their peers by sending feedback to top management, and low
performers are thrown out of the company. However, Amazon has changed this policy and
launched a retraining program to give a chance to low performers to improve their performance
There is a fear in the mind of old employees that new and young employees will replace them as
Amazon encourages to promote the dismissal of senior employees with more commitments in
terms of responsibility towards family, parents due to which they will not be able to focus on
work and contribute extra time to company as compared to young employees who have fewer
commitments and more time to focus on work. Management of Amazon is not sensitive towards
employees who suffer from severe diseases such as cancer, miscarriages, or some personal crisis.
Such employees are not given adequate time to recover and perform with their highest ability,
are evaluated unreasonably on a performance scale, and dismissed. This inhuman behavior and
workplace policies hinder employees' survival at Amazon and exhibit cruelty on the part of
Arjun Shetty