Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Term Paper Pakistan Economy
Term Paper Pakistan Economy
Group Members
Abstract
Oil price shocks have raised serious concerns among the policy makers around the world,
because of its adverse impacts for the net oil importing economies. This paper has analyzed
the impact of rising oil prices along with the changing macro conditions on output using the
IS, monetary policy and augmented Phillips curve for Pakistan. Oil prices and output are
found to be strongly related, and to a great extent this relationship is non-linear, that is, after
a certain level it becomes negative. In addition, lower debt-GDP ratio, lower deficit
spending, lower real effective exchange rate, and the existence of foreign exchange reserves
Table of Contents
1.Introduction 5
2.Problem Statement 7
A. Inflation and Oil Price
3. International & Domestic Oil Prices
i. Fuel Production
ii. Increased Demand for Diesel
iii. Stringent Environmental standard
iv. Fuel Taxes
i. Oil Dependency 21
ii. Macroeconomic effect 24
iii. GDP growth and oil prices 25
iv. Balance of payment effect 27
v. Fiscal Impact 29
vi. Impacts on exports and imports 31
7. Recommendations 33
Conclusion 35
References 36
1. Introduction
The high degree of dependence on oil producing countries and any irregularities in prices and
supplies has a pervasive effect for an economy that imports crude oil to cater to its often fragile
industry. Following the sharp surge in oil prices since 2003, developing countries that rely
heavily on oil imports, are now faced with an increased threat to macroeconomic instabilities,
This brief note provides an overview of international oil price trends witnessed since 2002.
Observations are also made on how domestic furnace and high speed diesel oil price trends move
in consonance with the international oil prices. The need to focus on furnace oil and high speed
diesel oil prices trends arises from the fact that of the total production by oil refineries of major
components of crude oil, diesel constitutes the highest share of 31% with furnace oil comprising
Chart plots the annual change in the real prices of crude oil for the period 1961 to 2008. The
figure shows that the price of oil jumped sharply twice in the 1970s. In 1973-74, oil prices
increased by an incredible 222% in real terms and 257 % in nominal terms. In this sense, the
present price level is not unique. The increase in oil prices during 2003-08 occurred relatively
gradually, allowing countries more time to adjust. For example, the oil prices in real terms rose
by 13 % in 2003, 27 % in 2004 and 37% in 2005. Then it was decelerated to 16 and 8 % in 2007,
2. Problem Statement
This study will specifically focus on how this increasing trend in international and subsequently
domestic furnace and high speed diesel oil prices; translate into creating imbalances in the
economy by soaring inflation. It will also focus on how high oil prices exacerbated the balance
of payment crises, impacted the rates of other commodities and input prices and the effected the
exports and imports of the country. Consequently, the dire need of exploring alternate and
Higher oil prices directly lead to increase in food prices. As a result there was a substantial
increase in head line inflation. The recent need to import food items like wheat, sugar etc, and
depreciation of Pakistani rupee further led to an increase in food prices. Due to increase in global
oil prices and import bill of food group, headline inflation is constantly going upwards. The
impact of inflation would have been even worse, had the government not offered subsidies on oil
Figure shows the inflation experienced in food prices since 2002‐03 in major groups.
Similar to other developing countries (Ethiopia, Sri Lanka and Ukraine), Pakistan too faced
inflationary impact of rising food and oil prices which is likely to be amplified by continuing
demand pressures. Other than increase in oil prices, the surges in food prices is due to
withdrawal or reduction of subsidy on food as existing subsidy became too costly for the
government.
Soaring oil prices with increased food prices are evidently have a negative impact on growth and
drive up the cost of inputs. Both these factors are posing a great challenge to the macroeconomic
situation of Pakistan. Faced with such a situation, the low‐income households find it very
difficult to protect themselves against inflation, especially those living in urban areas.
Another channel via which high oil prices may affect macroeconomic performance is through the
high costs of production thus reducing output. This supply side channel exerts an inflationary
pressure on the economy. In addition, higher oil prices directly raise consumer prices via higher
prices of imported goods and petroleum products in the consumption basket. Another implicit
effect is felt as producers pass some part of higher input (oil) costs to the price of final goods.
Moreover, consumers who experience a loss in real income may consider seeking wage
increases, which feed back into higher production costs, and then into prices. However, when oil
prices fall, nominal wage and other price rigidities can limit the pass through to lower final
goods prices.
When the rate of inflation is high, governments may be concerned with adding it further and
hence less willing to see a full passing on of oil price increase. High oil prices has also become
an important factor (along with rising house rents and shortage of food items) contributing to
high inflation in Pakistan in the past few years. General Price level (for virtually all goods and
assets) has been increasing (9.3 percent in 2004-05 considerably very high compared to the
previous years). Even in the last two years average inflation was near 8 percent (Table 1).
Despite efforts from SBP through tight monetary policy19 (high interest rates) average inflation
The global economy has found itself in the midst of an all time oil price peak which has also
surpassed the peaks experienced during the Iranian Revolution in 1970s. This surge is having a
compounding effect on the existing macroeconomic challenges for countries whose domestic
economy is consequentially linked with the international oil market and other product prices.
World oil average prices during 2003‐04 were over 11% higher than the average prices during
2002‐03.
End of the 2004‐05 experienced a sharp upward swing in prices, with an increase of over 41%
compared to the average price/barrel in the preceding year. Newer peaks were reported in
price/barrel during 2007‐08 when a 53.4% increase in prices was witnessed, compared to 2006‐
07. Overall, there has been a 360% increase in price/barrel of oil since the first quarter of 2002‐
03 to the end of 2007‐08, with the first quarter of 2008‐09 opening into even higher average
prices and etching newer records with prices over $140/barrel on a given day. Graph shows the
Domestic Prices
Being an importer of oil, the domestic furnace oil prices in Pakistan follow the rising trend
Figure shows that domestic prices of furnace oil rose by 25% during 2004‐05 and over 50% by
year end 2005‐06. With a slight deceleration in prices during 2006‐07 (‐1.98%) prices during
2007‐08 posted a record increase of 57.36%. Holistically, it can be observed that domestic
furnace oil prices have been following very closely the general price trend observed in the
Crude oil is considered an investment to fall back on when the US dollar value is devaluated.
The current monetary policy could affect the US dollar to decline in value compare to major
commodities and thus it could cause a rise in demand for crude oil as an alternative investment,
There is also the demand for oil: if the monetary policy will work out as expected by the Fed, it
will improve the condition of the U.S. economy which will stimulate more businesses and
consequentially the demand for energy will likely to rise; as a result, there will be pressure
Therefore, it seems that in both cases the Fed’s monetary policy could further cause to crude oil
price to rise. Since, however, there are many other factors that affect crude oil price, it’s
premature to speculate that energy prices will increase in 2011 based on the Fed’s policy.
Let us first take a look at how the retail price of diesel fuel is computed. Several factors are
considered while computing the retail price of diesel fuel. These include the following –
or crude oil.
The refining, processing, procurement and distribution costs of diesel fuel include –
organizations that purchase diesel fuel from refiners or distributors and resell the fuel to
In 2008, Federal excise taxes levied on diesel fuel amounted to US 24.2 cents per gallon
while State excise taxes were US 22.0 cents per gallon on an average.
The final retail price of diesel fuel reflects the costs incurred by each unit of the supply
chain comprising refiners, marketers, distributors, and owners of retail stations. The
relative share of the various components in the final retail pump price of diesel fuel
changes with time based on market conditions and also varies across different
geographical locations. The figures below illustrate the share of each cost element in the
national average retail price of diesel fuel at $4.43 per gallon as of May 2008 and at
$2.45 per gallon as of December 2008. It can be seen that the dip in price of crude oil
from May to December is reflected in the lower proportion of crude oil price in the
Computing the retail price of diesel fuel is not as straightforward as it may appear to be. There
are several worldwide factors, political and economic, that influence supply and demand of crude
Global supply and demand of crude oil affects the price of crude oil, one of the most
important components in the retail price of diesel fuel. Member nations of the
estimated reserves of crude oil in the world and account for 40% of the global crude oil
production. The last few years witnessed unprecedented increase in crude oil prices
worldwide due to disruptions in crude oil supply during the Arab Oil Embargo of 1973,
the Iran/Iraq war in 1980, invasion of Iraq in 2003, unrest in Nigeria, and hurricanes in
the Gulf of Mexico in 2005. The trend of surging crude oil prices reversed with the recent
Refineries in the US have been operating at 90% of their production capacity for more
than a decade. Tight worldwide refining capacity and competing international demand for
inventories fall, there is competition amongst wholesalers and marketers who are willing
to bid higher for available stocks of fuel. This pushes the retail price of diesel fuel
upwards. Price spike due to insufficient supplies is a scenario commonly observed in all
commodity markets.
Prices of diesel fuel increase during the fall, dip in late winter, surge during early spring,
and again drop a bit during the summer. Demand for diesel dips in spring and summer as
the onset of the holiday season. Stores are known to increase inventories during the
(5) Geographic Variations
Retail outlets that are farthest from refineries and distribution terminals have higher
diesel fuel prices to account for the costs incurred in transportation of the fuel. Local
market conditions such as number of retail outlets, traffic patterns, State and local fees
The figure below illustrates the change in the nationwide average monthly retail price of
diesel fuel in the US from May 2002 to January 2009. The rise and fall in fuel prices in
In the US, the average price of diesel fuel has historically been lower than that of gasoline. In
October 1998, the national average price of diesel fuel was $1.039 per gallon and that of gasoline
was $1.038 per gallon. As of October 6, 2008, diesel fuel was priced at $3.875 per gallon
whereas gasoline was priced at $3.484 per gallon. The price differential comes about due to
several factors including domestic and global supply and demand forces, economic development,
and political and regulatory influences. A few of these are explained below –
As per the current refinery structure, each barrel of oil produces more gasoline than
diesel. 19% of each barrel of oil is used for the production of diesel fuel as against 47%
of each barrel that is used for production of gasoline. This implies lower production costs
Demand for diesel, especially in Asia, Europe and the Middle East grew more rapidly
than US demand for diesel. Developing countries saw an increased requirement for diesel
to support rapid industrialization. Financial incentives in Europe favored the use of diesel
over gasoline to such an extent that more than 53% of all new cars sold in the European
Effective June 1, 2006, ultra--low sulfur diesel fuel (ULSD) began to account for at least
80% of the production of refineries in the US. Sulfur is naturally present in crude oil and
the refineries were required to adopt additional measures and processes to produce
ULSD. This led to an increase in the cost of production of diesel fuel. This in turn
Effective October 1, 1997, the federal government has imposed a tax of 24.4 cents per
gallon on diesel fuel as compared to a tax of 18.4 cents per gallon on gasoline. In
addition, each state levies a diesel tax. This ranges from 8 cents per gallon in Alaska to
32.9 cents per gallon in Wisconsin. The nationwide average is about US 22 cents per
gallon. Currently, 15 states levy a greater tax on diesel than on gasoline whereas only 6
Till the beginning of 2008, booming economies worldwide led to increased consumption of
products such as diesel, gasoline and jet fuel, derived from crude oil. At the same time, world
supplies of crude oil and derived products were threatened due to political tensions in oil-rich
countries like Iran, Nigeria and Venezuela and also due to reduction in output from the aging
In the face of a weakening dollar in early 2008, the financial world began betting heavily in favor
of oil and other commodities. The Energy Department of the US government began to purchase
40,000 barrels per day (bpd) of sweet crude oil, which has low sulfur content and is low in
viscosity, for its Strategic Petroleum Reserve, thereby inflating demand for the product.
Consequently, we saw crude oil prices peaking at an astronomical amount of $147.50 per barrel
on July 11. The US Energy Department stopped filling the Strategic Petroleum Reserve on July
1st.
However, there was a drastic reversal of trend as the threat of a worldwide economic recession
began to loom large and consumption of oil-derived products began to decrease. Demand for
crude oil and derived products fell by more than 800,000 bpd in 2008, the steepest drop since
1982.
A similar trend in Europe led to a rapid rise and plunge in demand for crude oil in the European
Union (EU). In 2007, the US and the EU compelled refiners to produce ultra-low-sulfur diesel
fuel. Addition of several countries to the EU created a surge in demand for diesel and crude oil
refiners began to bid against each other to secure supplies of low-sulfur crude oil. However, the
euro began to fall against the dollar and European motorists began to feel the pinch of increasing
crude oil prices. To add to the mayhem, refiners worldwide have now begun to introduce
efficient processes and are now able to produce ultra-low-sulfur diesel from less premium grades
of crude oil. All these factors led to a great turbulence in the world market for crude oil and
Since 2003, oil prices are constantly on the rising side. End of 2007 has seen the maximum of
$100 per barrel. This rising trend in oil price in the international market has hurt the economies
of many countries in the world including that of Pakistan. The extent to which economies hurt as
a result of price shock depends on the country’s dependency on oil. Before analyzing the impact
of high oil prices at the macro level the paper will look at some of the indicators showing the
1. Oil Dependency
Oil dependency or how much vulnerable a country is to price shock can be observed from the
following indicators:
It is the percentage change in oil production minus consumption to oil consumption. This ratio
will be negative for oil importers. If its value is -1, country has no oil production and is totally
dependent on oil imports; and a positive number means that a country is a net exporter. For
Pakistan the index has remained negative from 1990-91 to 2005-06 (Table 7). It was -0.69 in
1990-91 and became -0.85 in 1999-2000 but later on started declining given the negative growth
in oil consumption in the last five years, but still the index is at -0.79. Despite the slight decline
Vulnerability to rising oil prices also depends on the intensity with which oil is used. The
intensity of oil use in energy consumption index measures the share of oil in an economy's
primary energy consumption. If a country relies only on oil to produce energy, the value of the
index is one; if no oil is used in producing its energy, the value is 0. Oil intensity in Pakistan has
declined over the years (see Table 7) because of switching to alternatives, more specifically gas
and to some extent coal. It can also be observed in Figure 3. This will be discussed in detail in
Section 4.
Energy Intensity:
This variable measure the energy intensity for an entire economy (measured as percentage
intensity is considered as the most promising route for reducing vulnerability to oil shocks
(Bacon and Kojima 2006). There are number of factors affecting energy intensity including
country's climate, size, level of development, as well as whether it produces and refines oil.
Countries that have colder climate consumes more energy, other things being equal, while
countries with a large oil contribution to GDP are likely to be more energy intensive. It also
varies with income levels. Its decline can be achieved moving away from energy intensive
industries; changing household consumption patterns away from activities which require large
amounts of energy (e.g., using less transportation); and involvement in those production
activities that are more energy efficient, in response to the rising input costs. For Pakistan energy
intensity is almost constant since 1990-91 to 2005-06 (Table 2). It indicates the efficiency with
which the energy is used. And the trend for Pakistan indicates no improvement in efficiency. All
the indicators discussed above are likely to be closely correlated with a country's susceptibility to
oil price shocks. One way to bring this information together is to measure the potential impact of
Net oil Imports in GDP: The magnitude of the direct effect of a price increase depends on the
share of net oil imports in GDP. In other words, it is an index of the relative importance of the oil
price rise to the economy in terms of the potential adjustments needed to offset it. For net
importers this ratio will be negative. Higher value of this ratio create more concerns for the
government, may be to reduce oil imports and more willingness to pass through the price to
consumer so as to stimulate a reduction in demand12. For Pakistan over the last few years, this
An immediate reaction to an oil shock is consumers and producers reduce their demand for oil
either by fuel switching or by switching to other goods or products. As a result import bill will
go down. This is a short term adjustment. In the long run, oil consumption can be reduced
through efficiency and changes in industrial structure and household consumption patterns. A
dynamic policy response will reduce the vulnerability of the economy (Bacon and Kojima 2006).
For Pakistan energy intensity (an indicator of efficiency) as discussed above has remained almost
constant. However, consumption of oil products has declined (may be as a reaction) in the last
2. Macroeconomic Effects
As discussed above, the magnitude of the direct effect of a given price increase depends on the
share of the cost of oil in national income, the degree of dependence on imported oil and the
ability of end-users to reduce their consumption and switch away from oil (IEA 2004).
Unless country is running in surplus, or has extremely large foreign exchange reserves, high oil
price is dealt by a reduction in total demand for all imported goods, so as to restore balance of
payments equilibrium. Higher oil prices leads to inflation, increased input costs, reduced non-oil
demand and lower investment in net oil importing countries. Tax revenue falls and the budget
deficit increases. It is the reduction in domestic demand (both consumption and investment)
which leads to reduced imports and reduced domestic production. If real wages are sticky
The rate of growth declines in the short term transferring income from oil importing to oil
exporting countries. The fall in final expenditure indicates that the shocks to households and
firms in terms of welfare may be large since the price they pay for imports is much higher and
has to be balanced by lower quantities (Bacon and Kojima 2006, IEA 2004).
This section will examine how the macro economy of Pakistan has behaved (output i.e., GDP,
inflation level, balance of payment and fiscal status) and the capacity of the economy to
withstand the price rise. The simplest estimate available in the literature to calculate the direct
impact of higher oil prices on GDP is based on the ratio of the net imports of oil and oil products
to GDP. If there is a zero price elasticity of demand for oil and oil products then following a rise
in the oil price, GDP will have to change by as much as the change in the value of net imports.
For Pakistan household and industrial demand for energy products such as kerosene and gasoline
is highly inelastic (Burney and Akhtar 1990). To calculate this ratio average values of GDP and
net imports for the period 2001 to 2006, correspond to a base oil price of US$ 28.21 per barrel in
2001, which increase to US$ 65.14 per barrel in 2006, that is, increase of US$ 36.93 per barrel,
equivalent to 130.9 percent increase of the base price. The ratio calculated for Pakistan comes
out to be (-5.47), it indicates the proportional loss in GDP as a result of price increase of US$
At the time oil prices have been rising, Pakistan’s economy has shown a high growth trend (for
the last five years) (Table 3) resulting in a substantial increase in the demand for energy.
Theoretically, increasing oil prices squeeze income and demand. At a given exchange rate, more
domestic output is needed to pay for the same volume of oil imports. If the domestic currency
depreciates in response to induced payments deficits, this further cuts the purchasing power of
domestic income over imported goods. Since important trading partners are also likely to suffer
income losses, slower growth of external demand aggravates these direct impacts. Higher oil
prices also squeeze aggregate supply, since rising intermediate input costs erode producers’
profits and may cause them to cut back on output. Lower profits may then result in the decline in
investment spending and cause potential output to fall over an expanded period. It is somehow
difficult to identify the factors been responsible for the high growth in Pakistan in the presence of
high oil prices. One reason might be consumers have been shielded by limiting the direct pass
through to final oil prices. The extensive use of fuel subsidies in the form of PDC was helped by
strong foreign reserves position; it may have contained output losses in the past few years.
In addition, the continued strong performance of the services sector had made contribution to the
GDP outcome. On the demand side it is the consumption expenditure that has proved to be the
main source of growth in GDP for the last couple of years, here credit flow to private sector in
the form of consumer financing played a significant role15. But since 2006-07 situation has
somewhat started changing. Private credit is showing a downward trend16 (Table 4), which may
effect GDP growth. Private sector consumed Rs. 23.533 billion from July 1st to Oct 20th,
2007against Rs. 69.870 billion in the corresponding period last year. Credit to small and medium
enterprises is also on the decline given high interest rates and undocumented trade (Khan 2008).
With this scenario it would be difficult to maintain the high growth pattern.
High price of oil in the international market, and declining volumes of exports along with private
transfers in 2006-07 resulted in the current account deficit equal to 4.9 percent of GDP (US$ 7
Large scale manufacturing has missed the growth targets in the last two years. In this year, high
oil prices, gas and electricity crisis, high cost of production, declining trend in private credit and
high interest rates because of monetary tightening, would not favour industrial growth at all.
The government has consumed its budgetary target of bank borrowing (Rs. 130 billion) by
January 2008, further borrowing from banking or non-banking sources may destabilize the
financial health (Khan 2008). It is estimated that utilization of PSDP would remain significantly
Rapidly growing economies will generally experience more rapid growth of non-oil taxation, and
hence be better able to withstand the fiscal impacts of a less than fully passing on of oil price
increase. In Pakistan, non-oil taxation is more or less the same for the last few years.
Our petroleum imports account for 24 percent of total imports (and represented up to 44 percent
of export earnings) in 2006-07. While, in 1999-2000 the share of petroleum imports was 27
percent of total imports and accounts for 33 percent of total export earnings. Improving terms of
trade would mean that a smaller volume of exports would be needed to pay for a given quantity
of imports. For Pakistan this ratio however is decreasing, that is more exports are needed to
01 02 03 04 05 06 07*
Terms of Trade (1990-91=100) 90.96 90.83 82.07 78.68 73.60 65.01 ----
Exports in US$ (growth rate) --- 2.3 20.1 13.5 16.2 14.3 3.2
Imports in US$ (growth rate) --- -7.5 20.1 21.2 38.3 31.7 8.0
Current Account including official --- 3.9 4.9 1.8 -1.4 -3.9 -4.9
Source: IMF 2008 * estimated
current
ADB (2005) has estimated the impact of high oil prices on the net import bill. By assuming 75%
rise in oil prices (approximately the increase in prices between the start of 2005 and end August),
the estimated impact on the net import bill for Pakistan is almost -4.17. Similarly, the percentage
point growth in exports that would be needed to pay for a 75% rise in the cost of imported oil is
potentially very large (i.e., 18 %) 21. This estimate is for the 75 % increase in oil prices but in
actual the prices have risen more than 100%. It means the required rate for exports growth is
much higher than this. The trend in the growth of exports can be observed in Table 5. It was only
in 2002-03, where exports growth has crossed 18 %. However, imports overall have grown quite
significantly. The government has failed to improve the export performance. However,
significant increase in imports has laid a negative impact on trade deficit. Pakistan's trade deficit
has swelled to $7.2 billion, an increase of 32.38 percent in the period July-November (2007-08)
as compared to $5.44 billion in the corresponding period last year. It is the third consecutive year
that the country is missing its export target. Trade deficit is expected to reach $9-10 billion by
Imports of petroleum group in fiscal year 2006-07 registered an increase of 12.0 percent. Within
the petroleum group, imports of petroleum products registered sharp increase of 38.6 percent
(substantial increase in furnace oil import, largely for electricity generation purpose). However,
imports of crude petroleum declined by 6.7 percent (in value terms and 10 percent in quantity
terms) because refineries operate less than their full capacity. Thus, low demand for crude oil
and so was the production of petroleum products. Current account deficit has also gone up quite
significantly (Table 5). In the current fiscal year (2007-08), from July to November, current
account deficit increased by 17 percent (US$ 4.784 billion). In the same period of 2006-07, it
In Pakistan, in the last few years, external financial sector (that is, remittances, US aid, and
foreign inflows from FDI) has shown a solid performance23. It has helped the government in the
maintenance of the fiscal situation. However, this is only a short term solution. The government
has extensively utilized this facility but has not made substantial efforts to explore other options
to reduce trade deficit or explore areas that would have decreased its fiscal burden. Because of
5. Fiscal Impact
Fuel taxes have important revenue implications for Pakistan. Oil and gas sector together accounts
for a significant share of government revenues. Taxes on Petroleum products are the largest
source of indirect revenues in Pakistan. Petroleum product prices are higher than the import
parity price because of these taxes. Petroleum products contributed Rs.120 billion to government
revenues in the form of indirect taxes (custom duty, excise taxes and sales tax) in 2006-07. It is
23.2 percent of total indirect taxes (net) 24 collected in 2006-07, while this share was only 12
percent in 2000-01. Petroleum development levy (PDL) is not included in this total. Petroleum
development levies collected in 2005-06 were Rs 24500 million25. Adding this will make total
indirect tax revenue from petroleum products to Rs. 129.6 billion for the year 2005-06 (that is
26.6 % of total indirect taxes). The share of PDL in petroleum taxes is almost 18.9 for 2005-06.
For the fiscal year 2006-07 exact figure is not available. However, the estimated sum of
development surcharge in both gas and petroleum sector is Rs. 74 billion as compared to Rs. 54
billion last year, 2006-07 (IMF Report 2008). The taxing of fuel is one of the easiest and
relatively price inelastic and income elastic, ensuring buoyant revenue as income rises and tax
As mentioned earlier, the government has used petroleum development levy to keep the end user
price constant, given the fluctuations in the international price of oil. Even when there are price
reductions in the international market, government does not transfer it to the consumer for
domestic budgetary support and increase the PDL. Revenue from the petroleum levy almost
doubled in the first half of FY2006, as the increase in domestic prices of petroleum products put
through in September and October 2005 was not reversed when global oil prices declined in
November and December. But now due to price capping, the trend in
PDL is in the downward direction, it will have a negative effect on the share of petroleum taxes.
As far as the overall fiscal deficit relative to GDP is concerned, theoretically, smaller the deficit
(or in surplus) government might not pass the whole international oil price increase at the retail
level, as government would be in a better position to survive the fiscal implication of doing so.
Considerable efforts have been made over the last seven years to maintain financial discipline by
pursuing a sound fiscal policy. Pakistan has succeeded in reducing fiscal deficit from an average
of 7 percent of GDP in the decades of 1980s and 1990s to an average of 3.5 percent during the
last seven years. However, the fiscal deficit although declined to only -2 percent in 2003-04 but
since then it is rising and has reached to -4.3 percent in 2005-06 and 2006-07 as well (Table 6). It
is expected to rise even further in 2007-08. There are apprehensions that the government may not
be able to keep the fiscal deficit within the projected limits because of freezing domestic oil and
electricity prices besides slow growth in revenue. The country would be facing huge budget
deficit of over Rs. 535 billion in FY 2008. It is estimated that if the rising oil prices are not
transferred to consumers, the government will have to bear an additional burden of Rs. 136
billion which will shoot the budget deficit to 5.4 percent of GDP (Khan 2008). The high ratio of
tax revenue to GDP is needed to reduce fiscal deficit. For Pakistan, revenue GDP ratio is shown
So is the case in Pakistan, in the light of rising fiscal burden government in the current fiscal year
has also decided to slash the PSDP (public sector development programme) for the remaining
five months of FY2007-08 by Rs. 70 billion. According to Ministry of Finance, oil prices have
remained unchanged for the last 13 months, and government was finding it difficult to pay Rs. 14
Exports have increased by only 72% since 2002‐03, whereas imports have increased by 227%.
This widening gap has caused the current account to persistently report a deficit, which is
growing at alarming levels. By the end of 2007‐08, total imports stood at around $40 billion;
more than twice that of exports. The acceleration seen in imports is largely being driven by the
surge in international oil prices and the fact that Pakistan is heavily dependent on oil imports.
This is further substantiated by the graph, which shows that the oil import bill constitutes over
35% of the total import value during the last quarter of 2007‐8 compared to 25% in the preceding
quarter. This share has increased drastically when compared to the share of 15% in early 2003‐
04. This, along with pressure from increased food prices has constantly come at a cost of
shrinking shares on other items such as Machinery and Agricultural & Other chemicals.
Source: SBP
This certainly has had a negative impact not only on the BOP but also poses as a threat to the
level of industrialization and technological improvements to the manufacturing sector which then
Term Paper Page 29
Trends in Oil Prices
translates into deteriorating exports. Imports of textile machinery have witnessed a negative
growth rate of 17% and 36 % during 2005‐06 and 2006‐07, respectively. Similarly, large‐scale
manufacturing growth too has experienced a slump with recording only 4.8% growth during
Fiscal imbalances have also been created by GoP’s continued policy of providing subsidy on oil
products to protect poor households and the domestic industry. The burden of subsidies in face of
ever increasing international prices rise, along with the depreciation of the rupee against the
dollar and the debt service burden is adding to the pressure on government budgets and
in prices of crude oil and diesel is expected to continue in 2009 and 2010 due to low demand, weak
economy, and failed attempts by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) to trim
production in order to support substantially higher prices. While oil consumption is expected to
continue to decline in 2009, increasing oil production capacity in OPEC and non-OPEC nations will lead to
surplus production. The imbalance caused by excess supply and reduced demand will be detriment to
Crude oil prices are expected to average $43 per barrel in 2009 and $55 per barrel in 2010. The
price of diesel fuel, which averaged $2.45 per gallon in December 2008, is projected to average
$2.27 in 2009. Price trends will be largely dictated by the duration and depth of the worldwide
economic downturn, the timing and pace of recovery, and actual production by OPEC refineries.
Global consumption of diesel is expected to drop by 800,000 bpd in 2009 followed by a modest
rebound in 2010 by 880,000 bpd from the previous year’s levels. Oil consumption is expected to
increase in countries that are not members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development, namely China, the Middle East and Latin America. However, decline in
consumption in OECD countries is likely to offset any increase registered by non-OECD nations.
products in the US fell by about 1.2 million bpd. This trend is expected to continue in 2009 with
consumption levels expected to fall by an additional 400,000 bpd. The expected economic
bpd.
Supply of crude oil and diesel from non-OPEC nations fell by 340,000 bpd in 2008 due to delays
and disruption of projects in the Gulf of Mexico and Central Asia. Non-OPEC supply of crude
oil is expected to increase by 180,000 bpd in 2009 and by an additional 90,000 bpd in 2010.
However, there is a lot of uncertainty pertaining to increase in supply from non-OPEC nations
since these regions face a far greater risk than OPEC nations from unexpected project delays and
the credit crunch prevalent in the market, which could render high-cost projects unviable. The
good news is that supply from nations such as the US, Azerbaijan and Brazil is more than likely
In 2008, the US produced an average of 4.9 million bpd of domestic crude oil, a decline from the
2007 production levels by 140,000 bpd. Domestic production is likely to increase in 2009 by
over 300,000 bpd to an average of 5.25 million bpd, marking the first significant increase in
production in the country since 1991. Output is further expected to increase by 50,000 bpd in
It is expected that until 2010, refineries will continue to see a drop in margins due to continued
decline in the consumption of diesel and other products in the US and other parts of the world. A
lot is dependent on the rate of recovery of world economies. The faster the recovery of global
economies, the lesser would be the decline in consumption of oil and derived products such as
diesel. While all of this information should shed some light on how prices are determined, and
possible trends in the future, nobody can truly be certain what the future holds as far as oil or
diesel fuel prices are concerned. The only thing we can be certain of is that like most economic
cycles, it will surely continue to go up and down, to what extent or extremes, we’ll just have to
7. Recommendations
For long run development oil will remain an important source of energy. What is required is to
make rational choices about the development of energy mix for the future.
The government should chalk out strategies for ensuring efficiency in use and development,
For Investor’s confidence in all energy sectors a predictable and transparent framework is
essential. Since better investor climate will in turn increase supply and help stabilize prices.
Within the framework of a national energy policy, a number of specific measures to promote
energy efficiency and diversity will help in reducing vulnerability to high oil prices (Asian
About 28% of total commercial energy is imported in Pakistan and the dependence on imported
fuels is expected to increase even further in future given the depleting gas resources.
The continuously rising trend in the oil prices in the international market will have a negative
Following are the recommendations to control the prices of fuel from further increasing.
1. Pakistan needs to explore the vast potential of its indigenous energy resources, much of
2. The government must diversify the country’s energy supply mix to reduce the risk of oil
3. In Pakistan, liquid fluids are primarily used in the transport sector and power sector.
There is a need to improve efficiency in the use of petroleum products in these sectors.
4. There is also a need for increasing the reliance on coal given the domestic availability of
5. The easiest form of substitution is in new plants required to meet incremental demand,
where the choice of the economic fuel can be made without allowing for the advantages
6. In addition transport policy can play a major role in influencing future oil dependency
7. Decision about investments in road and rail infrastructure, urban transportation systems,
vehicle taxation, and user costs will all exert an important structural influence on demand
8. The development of competitive markets in oil and other energy products is important.
Involvement of private sector to participate in the oil and energy sector is likely to be
11. At the macro level, government policy cannot completely eliminate the adverse impacts
of high oil prices but appropriate policy response can minimize it.
12. "Overly contractionary monetary and fiscal policies to contain inflationary pressures
could exacerbate the recessionary income and unemployment effects. On the other hand,
13. expansionary monetary and fiscal policies may simply delay the fall in real income
necessitated by the increase in oil prices, stoke up inflationary pressures and worsen the
14. There is also a need to rationalize taxation/levies on petroleum products to help reduce
revenues and balanced consumption of petroleum products. And may also help in the
15. In addition, since Pakistan is on the high growth path therefore, there is also a need to
16. For the improvement of balance of payment, Pakistan should made serious efforts to
17. There is a need for an autonomous regulatory authority to enable and control any possible
monopolistic and collusive behavior in the oil industry, to promote competition in all
Conclusion
Oil prices and its fluctuations continue to pose as a consequential macroeconomic concern for
both developed and developing countries. For oil importing countries like Pakistan the impact of
irregular and unexpected price hikes quickly seeps into the domestic economy, threatening the
already existing macroeconomic imbalances. Oil price hikes are aggravating the energy shortage
in Pakistan which is now feeding into increased general prices, transportation cost, slowing down
agricultural and industrial productivity and aggravated water shortages for the rural economy.
This is having an enormous financial impact on our competitiveness in the external sector,
creating record trade and BOP gaps and depleting our foreign exchange reserves. In order to
move towards attaining fiscal stability and sustainability, the need for tilting away from heavy
reliance on oil imports towards alternative energy and fuel options now becomes increasingly
important.
References
http://www.pide.org.pk/psde24/pdf/01.pdf
http://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/PDR/2007/Volume4/551-575.pdf
http://www.pide.org.pk/psde23/pdf/Afia%20Malik.pdf
http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:-u-
dbMnvx7gJ:www.sbp.org.pk/departments/ihfd/OilPriceAnalysis-30-Aug-
08.pdf+fuel+trends+in+pakistan&hl=en&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESj_BPo-
Rz9xvbUzg2eiS_xIv2zt1sCryIFaZ_SSahNhSKbOi0SyZZOA2RLOvGGbniqj1Ixka4vwjzcqYcp
FQ4skBrV6qgPgM-
SSnPpJ9GB_3rWfKeCqJp6CEjOG90LvhAxqKszN&sig=AHIEtbRweYW0PMWj6C4uiyyKB1
DDV-t7yA
http://www.dieselserviceandsupply.com/Diesel_Fuel_Prices.aspx