We thank you for your time spent taking this survey.

Your response has been recorded.

Below is a summary of your Download PDF

responses

IPTeC TEACHING PORTFOLIO MIDPOINT REVIEW

Please note that this evaluation pertains to the participant's progress thus far
with developing their teaching portfolio and that the participant will need to
update their portfolio with any additional teaching experiences in the remainder
of the IPTeC year prior to submitting their final portfolio.

Please enter the your name ( teaching mentor):

Kacey West

Please enter the participant's first and last name:

Emily Letsinger

Please enter the participant's email (this will send a copy to them to confirm
submission):

emily.letsinger@ascension.org

Teaching Log Progress:

Is the teaching log updated by the participant as lectures or presentations are
given? Does the participant appear to be on target to complete the minimum
requirements for IPTeC?
IPTeC Requirements:

Didactic (2 hours): instruction to health professionals and/or health

professional students
Experiential (6 hours): APPE or IPPE rotation teaching through facilitation
of or assessment of learners delivering topic discussions, journal clubs,
presentations, etc. **presenting to a preceptor alone without learners does
NOT count**
Precepting/co-precepting (6 hours): patient care discussions, patient care
activities, project management, etc.

All IPTeC requirements met

On track to meet all IPTeC requirements
Major changes needed to meet IPTeC requirements

Mentor comments for the participant's teaching log:

Has all upcoming teaching planned out

Teaching Philosophy:
The participant has developed a teaching philosophy that is clear, concise, and
reflective. The participant has considered his or her own personal approach to
teaching and precepting.

Yes
Some improvement needed (detailed below)
Not included

Mentor comments for the participant's teaching philosophy:

A good start- Would stick to one analogy vs two (strengths finder and servant leader) or
tie the two together more. Would like to see inclusion of personal experience or
examples of how you would apply the philosophy and how you assess learning.

Examples of Teaching:
The participant has included teaching materials (handouts, cases, presentations)
that reflect his or her teaching philosophy.
 Yes
Some improvement needed (detailed below)
Not included

Mentor comments for the participant's teaching materials:

all included

Feedback Regarding Teaching:

The participant includes feedback from lectures and presentations given from
students, peers, and/or preceptors.

Yes
Some improvement needed (detailed below)
Not included

Mentor comments for the participant's feedback:

Feedback included, may be helpful to compile into a document the average numbers

Reflection of Teaching:
Provided self-reflection following each lecture highlighting areas that he or she did
exceptionally well during the lecture, as well as opportunities for improvement. If
a lecture or presentation was repeated, did the participant adequately reflect what
was done differently to make the lecture successful?

Yes
Some improvement needed (detailed below)
Not included

Mentor comments for participant's reflection of teaching:

Good start to reflections. Would like to see some reflection on how improved from last
teaching and what personal goals to set

Portfolio Organization:
Is the portfolio organized in a clear and concise manner at this time?
 Yes
Some improvement needed (detailed below)
Portfolio not yet compiled but discussed required components to complete certificate

Mentor comments for participant's portfolio organization:

Portfolio compiled in google drive but not on website yet. Discussed with Emily
organization ideas of keeping each individual component together with each teaching
activity (ie, slides, reflection, evaluations)

Powered by Qualtrics A