The document discusses the Indian Contract Act 1872 and its provisions regarding quasi-contracts. It provides details on sections 68-72 which deal with quasi-contracts under Indian law. These include a minor or lunatic's liability for necessaries supplied, reimbursement for money paid on another's behalf, obligations for non-gratuitous acts done for others, responsibilities of finders of goods, and liability for money/things paid by mistake or coercion. The Supreme Court of India has contributed to the understanding of these provisions, but the Act may not be completely exhaustive on the subject of quasi-contracts.
The document discusses the Indian Contract Act 1872 and its provisions regarding quasi-contracts. It provides details on sections 68-72 which deal with quasi-contracts under Indian law. These include a minor or lunatic's liability for necessaries supplied, reimbursement for money paid on another's behalf, obligations for non-gratuitous acts done for others, responsibilities of finders of goods, and liability for money/things paid by mistake or coercion. The Supreme Court of India has contributed to the understanding of these provisions, but the Act may not be completely exhaustive on the subject of quasi-contracts.
The document discusses the Indian Contract Act 1872 and its provisions regarding quasi-contracts. It provides details on sections 68-72 which deal with quasi-contracts under Indian law. These include a minor or lunatic's liability for necessaries supplied, reimbursement for money paid on another's behalf, obligations for non-gratuitous acts done for others, responsibilities of finders of goods, and liability for money/things paid by mistake or coercion. The Supreme Court of India has contributed to the understanding of these provisions, but the Act may not be completely exhaustive on the subject of quasi-contracts.
Q) Discuss the contribution of the Supreme Court of India on `Quasi
Contracts'. Is the Indian Contract Act 1872, on the subject exhaustive ?
Discuss. Ans. Quasi Contract : Sections 68 to 72 deal with what is called in English Law as quasi contract. Quasi contracts are exceptional kind of contracts by which one party is bound to pay money in consideration of something done or suffered by the other party. They are not founded on actual promises, but one person has done something or paid money for another and the court comes forward on the ground of equity saying that the person receiving benefit must make compensation to the other. In other words, they are certain types of transactions in which, in fact, there being no contract between the parties the law, by special rule creates rights and obligations between them which are analogous to those created by a contract. Quasi contracts are not contracts because the obligation does not arise from volition of the parties. There is no agreement at all. In the case of quasi contacts certain obligations are imposed by law on the parties concerned. They do not result from: (i) Any express agreement. (ii) Any agreement which can as a matter of fact, be implied. This type of relation is commonly known as quasicontract. The quasi contracts are the following: (i) a minor's or lunatic's liability to pay for necessaries supplied to him (Section 68); (ii) Payment of money due to another (Section 69); (iii) Doing a non-gratuitous act for another (Section 70); (iv) The case of a finder of goods (Section 71), and (v) Case of money paid by mistake or coercion (Section 72). Now we will deal with each head alongwith its relative Section of the Indian Contract Act. Section 68. Claim for necessaries supplied to a person incapable of contracting or on his account: If a person, incapable of entering into a contract, or any one whom he is legally bound to support, is supplied by another person with necessaries suited to his condition in life, the person who has furnished such supplies is entitled to be reimbursed from the property of such incapable person. Section 69. Reimbursement of person paying money due by another, in payment of which he is interested: A person who is interested in the payment of money which another is bound by law to pay, and who therefore pays it is entitled to be reimbursed by the other. Obligation of person enjoying benefit of non-gratuitous act. Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act, provides that where a person lawfully does anything for another person, or delivers anything to him, not intending to do so gratuitously, and such other person enjoys the benefit thereof, the latter is bound to make compensation to the former in respect of, or to restore, the thing so done or delivered. The following three conditions must be established before a right of action under this Section can arise: (1) the goods are to be delivered lawfully or anything has to be done for another person lawfully; (2) the thing done or the goods delivered is so done or delivered not intending to act gratuitously; and (3) the person for whom the act is done or to whom the goods are delivered must enjoy the benefit thereof. (Union of India v. Sita Ram Jaiswal, AIR 1977 SC 329). So what Section 70 prevents is "unjust enrichment" and it applies as much to individuals as to corporations and Government. (Panna Lal v. Deputy Commissioner, Bhandara, AIR 1973 SC 1174). But in all such cases not only the two conditions but also the third condition must be fulfilled that the other party has accepted the thing delivered and has enjoyed the benefit thereof. (State of West Bengal v. M/s B.K. Mandal and Sons, AIR 1962 SC 779). Section 71 says about Responsibility of finder of goods "A person who finds goods belonging to another, and takes them into his custody, is subject to the same responsibility as a bailee." Section 72 provides about Liability of person to whom money is paid, or thing delivered, by mistake or under coercion : "A person to whom money has been paid, or anything delivered, by mistake or under coercion, must repay or return it."