Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Drag Coefficient Measurement: Separation Process Fundamentals Laboratory Group Report
Drag Coefficient Measurement: Separation Process Fundamentals Laboratory Group Report
Drag Coefficient Measurement: Separation Process Fundamentals Laboratory Group Report
EXPERIMENT 5
SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
1
TABLE OF CONTENT
3.0 Procedure
5.0 Calculation
6.0 Limitations
8.0 Reference
Objective:
2
• To analyze the phenomena of free-falling body in any fluid.
1) Terminal velocity
3) Fluid viscosity
4) Sphere diameter
Introduction.
Any solid object moving through a viscous fluid will experience a resistance or ‘drag force’. This
is one of the most important aspects of fluid mechanics and it must be remembered that common
fluids like air and water must be considered viscous in this context. An understanding of fluid
drag forces is therefore essential to the proper design of aircraft, trains, automobiles, ships,
submarines, tall structures, jetties and off-shore structures of all kinds. It is equally relevant to
the mechanics of particles falling under gravity; raindrops and parachutes in air, sand grain in air
or water and the settlement of kinds of all suspended solid particles in water. The drag force
depends on a number of variables and one of the more important is the shape of the moving
body. In this experiment only spherical objects are used. This enables the relationships between
more easily described parameters such as velocity, fluid viscosity and body density to be
explored experimentally. For spherical objects the radius is a sufficient description of the object
although the specific weight of each material used must be determined as well.
3
Stopwatch
• Araeometer
• Letter-scales
PROCEDURE:
1) Two 1.5L of water bottles were prepared. The top section was completely cut off and the
weight of each empty bottle was measured.
2) The first bottle was filled up with 100 ml of water and the second bottle was filled up
with 100ml of dishwashing liquid soap.
3) The height of both liquids was measured and the liquid level was ensured to be the same.
4) Two different sizes of marble balls were prepared. Each marble balls was weighed using
an electronic weighing scale.
5) The smaller marble ball was first dropped into the bottle filled with water. Once the ball
was dropped, the time was taken immediately and when the ball had reached to the
bottom, the time was stopped.
8) For the second part, the smaller marble ball was dropped into the bottle filled with
dishwashing liquid soap. The time for the ball to reach the bottom was taken using a
stopwatch. The same marble ball was dropped 3 times into the liquid to ensure the time
was taken correctly.
RESULT:
4
Sphere Cross-
Volume Density of
diameter sectional Area Mass (g) Force (N)
(m3 x 10-6) sphere (kg/m3)
(mm) (m2 x 10-4)
Time (s)
Sphere
Type of Velocity
diameter
liquid (ms-1)
(mm) T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 TAverage
Sample Calculation
5
To find cross-sectional area of sphere:
A = πD2 / 4
= π(15.35x10-3)2 / 4
= 1.85 x 10-4 m2
V = πD3 / 6
= π(15.35x10-3)3 / 6
= 1.89 x 10-6 m3
ρp = mass / volume
= 6.457 x 10-3 / 1.89 x 10-6
= 3416 kg/m3
F = mg
= 6.457 x 10-3 x 9.81
= 0.06334 N
6
1.06+1.06+1.03+1.20+1.05
TAverage =
5
= 1.08 s
Newton’s second law requires that the three forces acting on the sphere, gravity (FG), buoyancy
(FB), and fluid drag (FD) balance.
7
Graph of CD against Re
25
20
15 Dishwash liquid
Tap water
Re
10
0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000
CD
1.6
1.4
1.2
1 Dishwash liquid
Log10 Re
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 4.2 4.4
Log10 CD
8
Discussion:
The experiments carried out in the water tank show that the local drag coefficients of the rising
spheres, for the densities considered, are indeed those given by the values of CDE, within the
usual scatter observed for sphere drag coefficients. This is true indepedently of the oscillatory
motion with which the sphere rises. A distinct wavelength of the sphere motion is observed,
which is constant along the sphePe path. The two-dimensionality of the photographs has here no
effect on the measurement. The evaluation of the lateral amplitudes of the sphere motion has
been carried out, but it could not be done very accurately . sometimes experiences sudden
displacements Prom its general axis of motion, for which no obvious reason could be observed.
Conclution:
Prom the results of these measurements it was concluded thatthe timing device works
satisfactorily. Furthermore it showed that the drag coefficient for spheres with density ratios
down to pslpw = l. 1 is given by the value of C DH' Therefore, if there occur any changes in
sphere drag coefficients they must do so only when the density of the spheres is less than that of
the medium, i. e. , for rising spheres.
9
SAFETY MEASURES
4. Closed toe shoes and long pants must be worn in the laboratory
REFERENCE
1. http://www.yenka.com/activities/Separation_of_solids_from_liquids_-_Activity/
2. http://www.propertiesofmatter.si.edu/separatingsolsandliqs.html
3. http://amrita.olabs.co.in/?sub=73&brch=2&sim=96&cnt=1
10