Professional Documents
Culture Documents
An Intervention Plan For A Male Survivor of Interpersonal Violence
An Intervention Plan For A Male Survivor of Interpersonal Violence
An Intervention Plan For A Male Survivor of Interpersonal Violence
by
Yudhajit Roychowdhury
2037426
4 MPCL
been in a romantic relationship over the past five years, and they started to live together over
the last year. Although things were good in the beginning, the last six months or so had been
extremely difficult. He had been physically beaten by his partner causing bruising. He informed
that she tried to isolate him from his family and friends, his biggest support systems. There had
been times when verbal disagreements led to the client being locked up in a room and not
being provided with the opportunity to eat. The client also reported being raped. There were
times when he tried to confront his partner about her abusive behaviour, but got gaslit instead.
The client was extremely distressed about the ordeal. He had recently moved out to his aunt’s
place.
Assessment
Danger to life
The first thing to be considered is the threat to the life of the client (Briere & Lanktree,
2011). Things to assess under threat to life include danger immediate threat to life or loss of
physical functioning, danger of incapacitation, presence of suicidal ideation or plans, and how
unsafe the immediate environment of the client is (Brier & Scott, 2014).
Psychological stability
Clients sometimes might be in a stress of acute crisis following traumatic exposure and
the therapist’s question regarding the events might only exacerbate the situation (Brier & Scott,
2014). If the therapist judges that talking about traumatic events might activate the client’s
trauma responses in a negative manner, it is beneficial to deter discussion of such materials to a
later time when the client would be in a better state of mind (Najavits, 2005).
Effects of trauma
response to a certain triggering stimulus. The client might also show avoidance responses like
being overtly detached from the traumatic experience or actively avoiding any reminder of the
events. Emotional dysregulation and disturbance in interpersonal relationships might also arise
in response to trauma. The client might also be extremely vigilant of any signs of possible
trauma in the future. Trauma might also influence the client’s ability to form a proper working
relationship with the therapist. In extreme cases, symptoms of dissociation, PTSD, and psychosis
may appear (Brier & Scott, 2014). Since the effects of trauma are so varied, it is important to
Assessment tools
There exist multiple standardised tools that might help the clinicians in assessing the
aftereffects of trauma in the client. These include The Structured Interview for Disorders of
Extreme Stress (Pelcovitz et al., 1997), Detailed Assessment of Posttraumatic Stress (Briere,
2001), Trauma and Attachment Belief Scale (Pearlman, 2003) among others.
Intervention
The intervention for the client might be long-term and might proceed in several stages.
This stage is contingent on the existence of possible threats to the life of the client.
Prolonged starvation, as mentioned by the client, can indeed incapacitate the client or cause
serious health issues and even death. It is also important to assess whether the client has
suicidal ideation. This process needs to be approached with utmost caution, ensuring that the
questions are not intrusive or distressing to the client, but rather conveys a sense of support
and empathy.
The best course of action in the case of serious threat to life would be to arrange for the
provision of emergency medical or psychiatric services in case of serious threat to life. It is also
important to address the suicidal ideation through the use of effective therapeutic techniques.
Stage 1: Psychoeducation
(Ghafoori, Fisher, Korosteleva, & Hong, 2016). Psychoeducation can be focused on the nature of
trauma, the typical trauma responses, reframing the symptoms as trauma processing, and the
possible safety plans (Briere & Scott, 2014). The client might be prone to self-blame which is
often commonly found among trauma survivors and reduces psychological adjustment (Reich et
al., 2014). Being a man, the client might be prone to believing cultural myths surrounding
manhood and trauma which might negatively impact his recovery. Psychoeducation can be
appropriately used to bust such myths. Psychoeducation might be provided through handouts,
throughout the course of therapy, being provided whenever the need arises.
Stage 2: Distress tolerance and affect regulation
Following a traumatic experience, the client might often face distressing emotions and
thoughts and feel overwhelmed. Thus it is important to train the client in distress tolerance and
The easiest and also an effective way to deal with stress is grounding. During sessions,
the therapist can ground the client by requesting him to describe what he is feeling internally by
“I feel that something is upsetting you. Would you like to describe what it is?”
Furthermore, the therapist might also attempt to orient the client to the immediate, external
environment, indicating the safe space of therapy and his existence in the presence. This should
“I understand that talking about those past experiences might be difficult for you. But
you are here with me, and you are safe here. No harm will befall you.”
Additionally, the client can also be taught certain commonly used grounding techniques like the
54321 technique which he can apply outside the therapeutic setting in his daily life to tolerate
distress.
Further distress tolerance skills can be borrowed from the skills used in DBT. This would
include reframing the situation in a different manner to change client’s perception, engaging in
mindfulness practices and relaxation techniques, using intense pleasurable physical stimuli like
taking a hot or cold shower, shutting out external sources of additional stress, thinking neutral
emotional states (Linehan, 1993b). The therapist can facilitate this by regularly encouraging the
client to explore and elaborate on his emotions. Direct feedback regarding emotional states
might also be helpful. The client also needs to be made aware of his triggers and then be taught
adaptive coping strategies to deal with them without being emotionally overwhelmed. The
strategies might include relaxation, distraction, positive self-talk, and support system (Briere &
Scott, 2014). Proper training in mindfulness can also reduce the client’s desire to act on the
triggers. This can also make the client more receptive towards experiencing the negative
emotions instead of trying to deliberately push them away, often with a paradoxical effect (van
Dijk, 2013).
Cognitive interventions can help reduce self-blame, guilt, shame, low self-esteem,
hypervigilance, and other negative thought processes often associated with trauma survivors.
The process starts with the therapist helping the client relive the traumatic experience in
the safe environment of therapy. This can be done through a detailed verbal description of the
events or by writing about them. The idea is that by re-experiencing the events, the client
would become more aware that he has been internalising the rationalisations used by his
partner and how that is influencing his thoughts and feelings about himself. The therapist can
use techniques such as Socratic questioning to help the client explore the faulty assumptions he
has made about his experiences. Going further, the therapist can also the client to explore the
distorted beliefs he has formed about himself as a person, and then use questions to help the
beliefs, it is expected that the client will begin forming a much more coherent, detailed, and
deeper cognitive processing of the emotions, lead to reduction in symptoms (Amir, Stafford,
Freshman, & Foa, 1998), and have a positive effect on recovery (Pennebaker, 1993).
To achieve any progress in trauma work, it is important to help the client process the
experience of trauma. Central to this process is the behavioural intervention of exposure, which
not only allows the exploration of the effects of trauma, but also allows the client to realise that
the fear associated with the traumatic experience is incongruent with the safe space of therapy.
Consequently, the activation that occurs and the disparity that arises within the client can be
worked through using counterconditioning which not only validates the client’s experience but
also reduces the fear associated with it (Abueg & Fairbank, 1992). This allows the client to think
It is important to also focus on and capitalise the strengths the clients already possess. It
is contingent upon the therapist to provide a safe environment where the client can explore and
use his strengths to work on the difficulties he is facing. As the client’s distorted beliefs about
himself decreases, the therapist should provide validation to the emerging sense of positive
identity, and should teach the client to validate how to validate his own feelings and emotions.
The therapist should also encourage and assist the client in forming and maintaining fulfilling
social relationships.
Conclusion
Trauma work is a tiring experience for both the client and therapist. There are certain
nuances and precautions that the therapist needs to follow so that the client is nor harmed in
any manner. The intervention plan provided here is for a generic case of interpersonal abuse.
However, trauma can be caused by a multitude of experiences, and although the intervention
plan might look similar overall, certain additions and subtractions would need to be made based
on the nature of the trauma. It should also be noted that although the intervention has been
proposed as progressing through stages, these are not rigid structures but are rather flexible,
and the therapist should feel free to move across multiple stages as required.
References
Abueg, F. R., & Fairbank, J. A. (1992). Behavioral treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder and
behavioral approach to assessment and treatment (pp. 111–146). Allyn & Bacon.
Amir, N., Stafford, J., Freshman, M. S., & Foa, E. B. (1998). Relationship between trauma
Resources
Briere, J. N., & Lanktree, C. B. (2011). Treating Complex Trauma in Adolescents and Young Adults
Briere, J. N., & Scott, C. (2014). Principles of Trauma Therapy: A Guide to Symptoms, Evaluation,
Ghafoori, B., Fisher, D., Korosteleva, O., & Hong, M. (2016). A Randomized, Controlled Pilot
Trauma-Exposed Adults. The Journal of nervous and mental disease, 204(6), 421–430.
https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000512
Linehan, M. M. (1993a). Skills training manual for treating borderline personality disorder.
Guilford Press.
Guilford Press.
Najavits., L. M. (2002). Seeking safety A treatment Manual for PTSD and Substance Abuse (The
Pelcovitz, D., van der Kolk, B. A., Roth, S., Mandel, F., Kaplan, S., & Resick, P. (1997).
Development of a criteria set and a structured interview for disorders of extreme stress
Pennebaker, J. W. (1993). Putting stress into words: Health, linguistic, and therapeutic
Reich, C. M., Jones, J. M., Woodward, M. J., Blackwell, N., Lindsey, L. D., & Beck, J. G. (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514540800
van Dijk, S. (2013). DBT Made Simple: A Step-by-Step Guide to Dialectical Behavior Therapy.