Department of Language Education

College of Education
CENTRAL MINDANAO UNIVERSITY

COURSE SYLLABUS IN LED 62

Teaching and Assessment of Literature Studies
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022

Prepared by

CLEOPHA MAE T. PACALDO

SHIELA MAE B. TEJANO
Date: January 18, 2022

Reviewed by

FREDDIELYN B. PONTEMAYOR
Chair, Department of Language Education
Date: ______________

Approved by:

GLADYS S. ESCARLOS
Dean, College of Education
Date: ______________

P a g e 1 | 10
 Revised: January 18, 2022
VISION MISSION
A leading ASEAN University actively committed to the total To advance the frontier of knowledge through internationalization of education and
development of people for a globally sustainable environment and equitable access to quality instruction, research, extension, and production for economic
humane society. prosperity, moral integrity, social and cultural sensitivity, and environmental consciousness
through equitable access to quality instruction, research, extension, and production.
COLLEGE GOAL
The College is committed to pursue excellence and total quality education which aims to develop highly competent and morally upright teachers and leaders
comparable to international standards in the content, pedagogy, and instructional leadership.
COLLEGE OBJECTIVES
1. To produce highly competent teachers imbued with desirable character traits, equipped with scientific and evidence-based knowledge through a variety of
teaching and learning experiences that foster academic breadth and skills training;
2. To equip teachers to be effective facilitators of learning and responsive to the challenges of the global classroom through keeping abreast with the latest
trends in teaching to meet current and future needs of students and community;
3. To provide teachers with opportunities to the attainment of sustainable development to achieve a clear progression beyond basic and undergraduate
education by stressing higher competencies in knowledge application and utilization; and
4. To train teachers to apply educational theories and practices through research, extension, and production endeavors.

PROGRAM INFORMATION

Name of Program : Bachelor of Secondary Education major in English

CHED CMO Reference : CMO 75 s 2017
BOR Approval : BOR Res No.98 s. 2021

PROGRAM OUTCOMES Program Educational

Objectives
a Articulate and discuss the latest developments in the specific field of practice;
b Effectively communicate in English and Filipino, both orally and in writing;
c Work effectively and collaboratively with a substantial degree of independence in multi-disciplinary and multi-cultural teams;
d Act in recognition of professional, social, and ethical responsibility;
e Preserve and promote “Filipino historical and cultural heritage” (based on RA 7722). (Common to all programs in all types of
schools)
f Articulate the rootedness of education in philosophical, socio-cultural, historical, psychological, and political contexts;
g Demonstrate mastery of subject matter/discipline;
h Facilitate learning using a wide range of teaching methodologies and delivery modes appropriate to specific learners and their
environments;

P a g e 2 | 10
 i Develop innovative curricula, instructional plans, teaching approaches, and resources for diverse learners;
j Apply skills in the development and utilization of ICT to promote quality, relevant, and sustainable educational practices;
k Demonstrate a variety of thinking skills in planning, monitoring, assessing, and reporting learning processes and outcomes;
l Practice professional and ethical teaching standards sensitive to the local, national, and global realities;
m Pursue life-long learning for personal and professional growth thorough varied experiential and field-based opportunities.
(Common to education)
COURSE INFORMATION
Course Name Teaching and Assessment of Course Code LED 62
Literature Studies
Pre-requisite Subject LED 59 & EDUC 61 Course Credit 3 units

Course Description
This is a three-unit course that covers the study and application of different approaches, methods, and techniques in teaching literature in different genres. It
also exposes students to lesson planning, materials production, and designing and evaluating assessment tools for literature tests.

*Level I- Introductory E- Enabling D- Demonstrative

P a g e 3 | 10
Course Learning Outcomes Program Outcomes Code
a b c d e f g h i j k l m
Program Outcomes (PO) addressed by the course D D D
Specific to Bachelor of Secondary Education major in English of Central Mindanao University: Program Outcomes Code
a b c d e f g h i j k l m
CO0 Acquaint students to the national, institutional, regional, COE, Lang Ed goals; course syllabus; course I
requirements; and grading system
CO1 Identify the distinctive qualities of literature; E E
CO2 Acquire knowledge on the different views about literature and the teaching of literature; E E E E
CO3 Examine the reasons for using literature in the classroom; E E
CO4 Examine the approaches of using literature to students; E E
CO5 Determined the advantages and disadvantages of the different approaches; D
CO6 Create activities appropriate for students’ learning; D D D D
CO7 Evaluate learning materials used in teaching literature; D D D D D
CO8 Design instructional materials/teaching strategies; D D D D
CO9 Demonstrate skills in teaching literature using various methods and techniques; D D D D
CO10 Design tools or rubrics to assess reading, writing, and speaking; and D D
CO11 Design and evaluate literature tests. D D

FLEXIBLE LEARNING PLAN

Course Intended Learning Outcomes Teaching and Learning Activities
Time Learning (ILOs) Learning Content/ Topics Assessment Tasks References
Allotment Outcomes Teaching Learning
(Week) (CLOs) Activities Activities
At the end of the session, the PRELIMINARIES Online  Creative Criteria for the
students must have: A. Course orientation: discussion introduction of creative introduction:
via Google self while in a
 Shown understanding of 1. VMGO meet cosplay of your Speech Content –
the course, syllabus, class 2. The Syllabus favorite literary 25pts
policies and standards. 3. Class policies and character. Creativity – 25pts
1 week CO0 standards TOTAL – 50pts
 Shared expectations about (Individual
the course, teacher, and activity)

P a g e 4 | 10
 classmates.
 Defined literature. UNIT 1. INTRODUCTION Recorded  Short essay on
presentations students’ 1
 Discussed the nature and A. The nature and and videos different views 4
different views about different views about uploaded in about A
CO1 literature. literature the google literature.
3 weeks CO2 B. Goals of literature classroom.
CO3  Identified the goals of teaching  Quiz on the
literature teaching and the C. The use of literature in different
use of literature in the the language genres and
language classroom. classroom elements of
D. Literary Genres and literature.
 Identified the different Their Elements
genres and elements of 1. Elements of Poetry
literature. 2. Elements of Short
Story
 Distinguished the 3. Elements of Novel
4. Elements of Drama
distinctive qualities of
different types of
literature.
 Identify the different uses UNIT 2. APPROACHES  Position paper Criteria for the
of literature in teaching ON USING LITERATURE Online class on the written output:
CO4 and learning. TO THE LANGUAGE discussion effectiveness 1
CO5 LEARNERS of using Content- 50pts 2
 Examined the reasons literature in 3
4 weeks for using literature in the A. Overview language Organization- 30pts 4
classroom. a. Language-based teaching and A
approach learning. Mechanics- 20pts B
 Analyzed the different b. Literature as  Split
approaches to teaching content exchanges
literature. c. Literature for (matching TOTAL- 100pts
personal responses
enrichment from dialogues
 Determined the
d. Using literature: taken from
advantages and
when, with whom different
disadvantages of the
and why? literary pieces)

P a g e 5 | 10
 different approaches.  Fill out the
2. Traditional Approaches Matrix on
 Researched current to Teaching Literature advantages
approaches in teaching and
literature. a. Cultural Model disadvantages
b. Linguistic Model of the different
c. Personal Growth Model approaches to
teaching
literature.

MIDTERM WEEK
 Reviewed literary pieces. UNIT 3. SELECTING Recorded  Short answer Criteria for the
CO6  Selected appropriate AND EVALUATING presentations question on written output: 1
CO7 materials to be used in MATERIALS and videos factors to 2
3 weeks teaching and assessment uploaded in consider in Content- 50pts 3
of literature. 1. Selecting Texts the google selecting texts. 4
 Evaluated learning 2. Evaluating learning classroom.  Run a Organization- 30pts A
materials to be used in materials readability test B
teaching and assessment 3. Strategies for (Flesch- Mechanics- 20pts
of literature. overcoming cultural Kincaid) on
 Identified strategies to problems. selected texts / TOTAL- 100pts
overcome cultural materials to be
problems specially in the used.
use of literature in Explain and
teaching and learning. present concrete
examples of the
 Identified the factors in strategies to
selecting texts. overcome
cultural
Evaluated learning materials problems
used in teaching literature. specially in the
use of literature
in teaching and
learning.
 Reviewed literary UNIT 4. MATERIALS  Create
pieces. DESIGN AND LESSON Recorded activities Criteria for the 1

P a g e 6 | 10
 PLANNING presentations appropriate written output: 2
 Distinguished the and videos for students’ 3
distinctive qualities of 1. Teaching Poetry uploaded in learning. Content- 50pts 4
different types of 2. Teaching Short story the google A
3 weeks literature and how to 3. Teaching Plays/Drama classroom.  Design Lesson Organization- 30pts B
CO8 teach each type. Plans in
CO9 teaching Mechanics- 20pts
 Created activities different
appropriate for genres of TOTAL- 100pts
students’ learning. literature.

 Designed instructional  Teaching

materials/teaching Demonstration
strategies.

 Used different
approaches to different
groups of learners.

 Designed a Lesson
Plan in teaching
different genres of
literature.

 Demonstrated a
lesson on how to teach
the different genres of
literature.
 Designed tools or UNIT 5. DESIGNING Online class  Design tools
CO11 rubrics to assess AND EVALUATING discussion or rubrics to Criteria for the 1
CO10 reading, writing, and ASSESSMENT TOOLS assess written output: 2
speaking. reading, 3
 Designed literature A. Assessment/ writing, and Content- 50 4
tests. Evaluation in Literature speaking. A
 Evaluated literature 1. Significance of Test Organization- 30 B
3 weeks tests. 2. Classification of  Design

P a g e 7 | 10
 Test literature Mechanics- 20
B. Literary Types/Genres tests.
and their Evaluation TOTAL- 100
1. Poetry
2. Short Story
3. Play/Drama

FINAL WEEK

No RESOURCE MATERIAL
1 LCD 3 Book
2 Laptop 4 Hand-out
No LIST OF REFERENCES
1 Lazar, G. (2002). Literature and language teaching: A guide for teachers and trainers. UK: Cambridge University Press.
2 Showalter, E. (2013). Teaching literature. Malden, Ma: Blackwell Publishing.
3 Walker, M. (1997). Authentic assessment in the literature classroom. The English Journal. Vol. 86, No.1. National Council of Teachers of English. pp.
69-73. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/820786.
4 Irene, K. (2015). The use of literature in the language classroom: Methods and aims. International Journal of Information and Education Technology
1(5), 74-79.

SUPPLEMENTARY READINGS
A Daskalovzka, N. & Dimova, V. (2012). Why should literature be used in the language classroom. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 (2012)
1182 – 1186
B Duff, A. & Maley, A. (ny). Literarture. 2nd Ed. Oxford.

Evaluation Guide and Grading System

COs Assessment Tasks Weight Percent *Minimum Average for *Target and Standards
Satisfactory Rating
CO 1-2 Output 50%
Quizzes/ Exercises 20% 50% 70% of the students got at
Term Exam 30% least 50% rating

P a g e 8 | 10
 Midterm Grade 100%
CO 3-5 Output 50% 50% 70% of the students got at
Quizzes/ Exercises 20% least 50% rating
Term Exam 30%

Final-term Grade 100%

Total
Passing Percentage 50%

The final grades will correspond to the weighted average scores shown below:
Range 94-100 88-93 82-87 76-81 70-75 64-69 58-63 52-57 50-51 30-49 29-below Incomplete
Grade 1.0 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.0 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.0 4.0 5.0 INC
(removal)

Revision History
Revision number Date of Revision Date of Implementation Highlights of Revision
2 January 18, 2022 January 20, 2022 Revision of syllabus format to harmonize CMO 75 s. 2017 sample format
and CMU prescribed format

Preparation and Review

Name Signature Date Signed
CLEOPHA MAE T. PACALDO January 18, 2022
Prepared by SHIELA MAE B. TEJANO January 18, 2022
Faculty- Dept. of Language Education
Reviewed by FREDDIELYN B. PONTEMAYOR

P a g e 9 | 10
 Chair, Dept. of Language Education

Approval
Name Signature Date Signed
Approved by GLADYS S. ESCARLOS
Dean

P a g e 10 | 10