Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EXORCISM, A Roman Catholic Tradition - Hubert - Luns
EXORCISM, A Roman Catholic Tradition - Hubert - Luns
Vatican City, 3rd March 2006: This week the Vaticans Head Exorcist, 74-year old Father Amorth, repeated his condemnation of the Harry Potter books. Amorth said: You
start with Harry Potter, who seems to be a friendly wizard, but you end up with the
Devil. There is absolutely no doubt that the Prince of Darkness is concealed behind
these books. In his opinion the young readers who delve into Harry Potter become
fascinated by magic. And from there it is but a small step to Satanism and the Devil.
-2-
Devil but to cure the patients, to alleviate their suffering and to lead them to the true
freedom of Gods children. This latter assumes that it is mainly a task involving conversion and at least of a deepening of faith.
-3-
was originally intended as a normal pastoral job in the taking care of church members. At
the start of the meeting the minister had no premonition about possession and definitely
none about demonic expulsion. What happened was remarkable too because things went
so quickly. After the evil spirit had been expelled the preacher gave a good piece of
advice: The devil does not release his prey just like that. Now you must fill yourself with
the things of God and occupy yourself with them!
-4-
will never be generous of heart. They may seem generous but there will always be a
catch. This catch will always be about making demands on you which do not sit
comfortably. ()
Think of Satan and his evil works as an infectious disease. Take every precaution
to avoid coming into contact with those who carry the disease. Should you know that
you have no choice then arm yourself with Holy Water, the Blessed Crucifix and a
St Benedictine Medal. They will keep these demons at arms length. These are the
times children you must surround you and your home with blessed objects which are
blessed. Many are embarrassed to be seen with such things for fear they will be
laughed at. These will offer you protection in your home and are a great comfort
during prayer. Remember the demon lives not just in Hell but has now firmly
established his reign on earth. Prayer is the only thing that terrifies him and
renders him impotent.
-5-
authority. Meanwhile Satan goes around ferociously tying people to himself and
devouring them. I am terribly concerned about the weakness shown by the Church
and about the ease with which exorcism is dismissed as something belonging to the
past. I believe in the official office of exorcist given to us at the priestly ordination.
But I also believe in the priesthood of all believers. And that means that in principle
every Christian can be used in the fight against demons.
This attitude matches up with the final chapter of Marks gospel, where Jesus states that
believers can be recognised from their power to expel demons. With regard to the attitude
shown by priests, Gabrile Amorth adds the following: Normally priests have very little
belief in the exceptional activities of Satan. If a bishop suggests that they should perform
an exorcism, they show fear, as if thinking: If I leave the Devil alone, hell leave me alone
too. But that is wrong. The more we fight against Satan, the more afraid of us he will
become. (9) And that is precisely the reason why we should see as a positive development the fact that true exorcists are showing a growing tendency to work with lay people
from the charismatic movement who are also given an active role to play. Father Rufus
Berea of Bombay has set up an association for exorcists and lay people to assist in cases
where an episcopal mandate is not given, an initiative that cannot be said to please the
church hierarchy.
-6-
any harm. In one of his books he writes that in the case of some slight doubt his fellowexorcists agree with him that mumbling a little and making a brief prayer of exorcism in
Latin will, if applicable, not fail to work in the sense of obtaining more certainty, while the
person for whom the prayer is said will not become unnecessarily anxious. It is only
during a major exorcism, which can sometimes last for hours, that certainty grows, even if
only because the patient witnesses to the benevolent consequences of the ritual. Whatever
may be the case, sooner or later the sneaky spirit will be obliged to reveal its true nature
and then things can get rough! Father Barrajon, member of the Legionaries of Christ,
states that although there can be a prior moral certainty of possession, there is no absolute
rule of thumb because, he says: (10)
Evil always conceals itself. It often lies and will not name its name. Frans
Rosennzweig once said that a name is not noise and smoke, as Goethe named it, but
word and fire.
The name of Jesus means God saves. Isaac, Jacob all these names have a special meaning. And they always say something about who the person is. When I say
my name, I also say: this is me. No demon will ever want to say his own name. And
when his name is expressed, he is ordered with great authority (exorciso): Go
away! Get out, in the Name of Jesus!
It is the Name of Jesus against his name. It is worth mentioning here that the exorcism formulae used in the early Church are based on the very words of Jesus or Paul, those words
being enriched with references to episodes taken from the life of Jesus. It is a wonderful
closure and an impressive moment when, at the end, a prayer is uttered according to Isaiah
45:23: That is why God has raised him to such a height, given him that name that is
greater than any other name; so that everything in heaven and on earth and under the
earth must bend the knee before the name of Jesus. (Ph. 2:9-10) Then the prophet Isaiah
says: Behold, all those who were incensed against You, shall be ashamed and disgraced. (Is. 41:16)
-7-
-8-
specialists, a practice continued after the Council ended in 1965, in order to carry out the
tasks allotted by the Council. And if there was one field in which expertise was required,
then it was here. But, unfortunately, such was not the case. None of the cardinals or others
involved in drawing up the new rite of exorcism had ever conducted an exorcism nor
even attended one. Amorth explained that any suggestions put forward by exorcists came
up against a wall of lack of understanding, of ridicule and of irritation. The Devils tactic
that of making people believe that he does not exist had worked superbly well. Amorth
says: This explains why the new rite is ridiculous, an unbelievable obstacle in our work
against the Devil. It all started in 1990, when the interim rite was published and, as is
customary, was distributed world-wide with a request for commentary within two years,
thereby taking account of those working in the field. At the time Amorth put together a
working party of eighteen exorcists, all with wide experience. They immediately praised
the first chapter of the new rite in which the theological foundation was laid. This had, in
fact, been missing from the 1614 rite promulgated by Pope Paul V. But the practical
part says Amorth showed with great clarity that the makers of the rite had no idea what
they were talking about. So then we patiently provided a commentary on all the articles
and sent it to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. It was received in a cool and
businesslike way. Its effect was zero. The 1614 rite is largely based on prayers going
back to the 8th century that had proved their worth time and time again. The new prayers
were tested by Amorth and his colleagues and turned out to have no effect for the purpose
for which they had been designed. Fortunately at the last minute a lifebelt was thrown.
The then head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith was Cardinal Joseph
Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI. Together with Cardinal Jorge Medina Estevez he
attempted to introduce an article (then no. 38) stating that it was permitted to continue to
use the old rite. The suggestion was shot down, at which point Cardinal Medina, who
apparently understood what was at stake, added to the 84-page edition of the new rite of
exorcism that fell under his authority a note stating that the old rite was still valid. The
interview on which I base my story ends with the following question put by Stefano Paci:
Are you ever afraid of the Devil? Amorth: Afraid of that beast? He is the one who
should be afraid because I work in the Name of the Lord of the world. He is merely Gods
monkey.
Hubert Luns
[published in Profetisch Perspectief, autumn 2006 No 52]
[published in Positief, June 2007 No 373]
Notes
(1) Some will wonder about Don Amorths Marian theology and thus doubt the truth of
his mission. I give him the word in an interview he gave to Father Dario Dodig in July
2002. Dodigs last question was: Would you like to give us a piece of advice? whereupon
Amorth answered: Marys testament, her last words recorded in the Gospel, were
spoken at the marriage feast of Cana: Do everything He tells you. Our Lady always
leads to Jesus. That is her main concern: that we should put the words of Jesus into
practice.
(2) The (Dutch) Statenvertaling version of the Bible has in the Lords Prayer verlos ons
van den boze (deliver us from the evil one). The King James Version likewise speaks of
the evil one. But in the French translation we find (the incorrect) du mal, (= from
evil) while it should be du malin (from the evil one).
(3) The small exorcism immediately preceding baptism is a brief ceremony and can be
regarded as a pure formality to break the last remains of the demonic bonds before the
-9-
adult convert proceeds to the dawn of a new life in Jesus Christ. In the past there was also
clearly a form of exorcism in infant baptism, but after the Roman Catholic rites had been
reformed following the last Council, the formula was greatly attenuated.
(4) Some of Blumhardts books can still be purchased, such as: Dein Glaube hat dir
geholfen. Die Heilung von Kranken durch Glaubensgebet, and Sieg ber die Hlle.
(5) As signs of occult bondage within society, I look to the statistics on suicide, drug abuse
and sales of anti-depressants so I look out for signs that indicate despair, dull and
hopeless sombreness, unspeakable, that smother all belief in a loving God.
(6) Interview with Father Gabrile Amorth in 30Giorni, 29-06-2001, by Stefano Maria
Paci.
(7) Interview with Father Amadeus in Opwekking Magazine, June 2001, by Peter de
Bruijne.
(8) W.C. van Dam, who lived in the Rotterdam area, was known for his book "Demonen
eruit, in Jezus' Naam!" (1974) [Demons get out, in the Name of Jesus!] published by Kok
in Kampen (ISBN 90 242 0335 X).
(9) Interview with Father Gabrile Amorth in The Sunday Telegraph, 29-10-2000, by
Gyles Brandreth.
(10) Interview with Father Pedro Barrajon L. C. in Die Welt, 2-12-2005, by Paul Badde.
(11) a) According to Dr. Felicitas D. Goodman, in her book The Exorcism of Anneliese
Michel # 1981, it is quite possible that Anneliese died from the side effects of Tegretol
prescribed by her doctor. The active component is carbamazepine, an anti-epileptic drug
that is also prescribed during a manic phase. Once the treatment stops, as happened with
Anneliese, an epileptic condition can arise with fever and insufficient oxygen transport to
the body. The epileptic condition, of which we can speak here, is characterised by a continual series of epileptic convulsions. Anneliese showed all these symptoms. Using her
exceptional expertise in altered states of consciousness (for which she established the
Cuyamungue Institute in 1978) Dr. Goodman did some solid research into the facts and
background of the Klingenberg affair (as it became known) and she had access to all the
dossiers available. She is firmly convinced that the two priests were wrongfully sentenced
on the grounds of the conviction of the judges and experts that possession is a mental
disease and corresponds to no demonic reality at all. To know more about Dr. Goodman
and her work, visit www.ritualbodypostures.com.
b) Personally I believe that Anneliese was not killed by demons nor by the ritual of
exorcism but that God allowed her to die because she, safe in Christs sufferings on the
Cross, had offered herself as a sacrificial soul for Germany and that God had seen fit to
graciously accept her offer of sacrifice. This is, of course, no more than a personal opinion,
but by adopting it I am following an imporatnt group of interested parties. It would not
surprise me if some day the Klingenberg case is investigated by the Church again.
c) The history of the Klingenberg affair inspired a major film: The Exorcism of Emily
Rose. The film concentrates on the question of whether a particular priest is guilty of the
death of a girl possessed by demons. A sound recording made during one of Annelieses
exorcisms and used during the trial of the two priests is played during the film.
(12) Interview with Father Gabrile Amorth in 30Giorni, 29-06-2001, by Stefano Maria
Paci.
- 10 -
There were howls of laughter when Fox News published an article raising the question of whether the devil may have influenced Cho SeungHui to commit the Virginia Tech massacre. Fox just reported the comments of various Christian leaders on the subject and did not intend to
settle the question, but the cynicism of the godless media and society
was predictable and to be expected. Since the devil doesnt exist - they
say - how could anyone be so irresponsible as to try to explain away
Chos deed by recourse to the spiritual?
Well, first let me say that, as a Catholic priest, I have seen and worked with my
share of possessed and obsessed individuals. Its entirely possible for someone to
be at once responsible for his own acts and totally under the influence of the devil
in committing them. In this case, Cho pulled the trigger, but the devil was the
author of the deed. Does not Jesus call him a murderer from the beginning ?
The devil is the prime mover of all evil
in the world, but human beings freely
cooperate with him in their evil decisions. No one gets off the hook of responsibility by blaming the devil, but we
can't say that the devil is a detached
observer to crimes like this.
The evil work that Cho perpetrated
bears the classic marks of a possession
that he cooperated in. Four clear signs
of serious demonic influence were evident in his life and virtually assured
that he would commit some kind of
Cho Seung-Hui
heinous crime against humanity in
time. These are the devils tactics for the destruction of body and soul: isolate,
distort, excite, plot - and then kill.
First, it is not always clear how a demon enters someone, but it is sure that once
a demon enters a person, that demon bends all his efforts of mind and will to
overtake his hosts life and make it his own. Isolation is the best technique. By all
accounts, Cho was an isolated loner whose belonging to his demon was very far
advanced. He had no friends to speak of, no significant associates or relationships
and certainly no religious practice.
- 11 -
Second, with time and permission, the demon totally perverts all the persons
mental processes in order to translate them into demon-think. Cho's writings
leading up to the crime, and Chos now-famous video manifesto, all exhibited
signs that the process of demonic perversion of mind and values was complete.
He was verbally fantasizing in front of his classmates and teachers about killing
people in the most horrible ways. In the end he even blasphemously claimed to be
dying like Jesus Christ for the sins of others: this is perverse thinking in the
extreme.
Third, a crime of this immensity cannot be accomplished without someones total
emotional commitment. After reprogramming a persons thought patterns, the
demon excites his passions to do what he wants. Others have very credibly
explained how Chos pathetic
video images, imitating the
Korean flick Old Boy (a revenge story), were evidence of
his heightened emotions spurred by violent images. He even
ranted in imitation of the Columbine High School killers
Harris and Klebold (who killed
thirteen) evidently in solidarity
for the deed he was about to
commit. In other words, its
very difficult to sustain such an
emotional intensity, about the
evil he planned and carried
VirginiaTech students, family and friends
out, without some direct force
gather on campus for a vigil
multiplier. Graphic images provided it.
Finally, he plotted like all demons from Satan to the perpetrators of the World
Trade Center attacks : He bought guns and ammo, he planned the date and times
and places of the murders, and he even went regularly at night to work out at the
campus gym in order to look more closely at the particulars of the scene, which all
fits the characteristics of a mass murderer.
The devil must have been very happy to witness his prey blast his brains out after
perpetrating the bloody murders of thirty two innocents. That is the ultimate
victory for the devil.
As sad as the physical deaths of innocent people are, perhaps the saddest element
of the story is the likely loss of Cho Seung-Huis immortal soul by this demonic
action. The rabbis used to say that the angels weep at the loss of a soul that God
created to share in his eternal blessedness; I am sure the angels are weeping now.
Let us all commend the innocent victims of this crime, their families and the
possessed perpetrator to the Mercy of God and then re-commit ourselves to
proclaiming Christ and His victory over so that none of Gods children will ever be
lost.
In Christ,