This document outlines topics related to the interpretation of statutes and principles of legislation to be covered in June and December 2017. The June 2017 topics include: 1) Seeking the intention of the statute's maker when interpreting, 2) Explaining Heydon's rule of interpretation, 3) Explaining the parts of a statute, 4) Using other statutes to aid interpretation, 5) The presumption of prospective effect unless expressly or impliedly retrospective, 6) Explaining non-obstante and saving clauses, 7) Comparing the principles of utility and asceticism. The December 2017 topics include: 1) Explaining that interpretation means finding legislative intent, 2) Discussing the rule of literal construction, 3) Explaining principles of
This document outlines topics related to the interpretation of statutes and principles of legislation to be covered in June and December 2017. The June 2017 topics include: 1) Seeking the intention of the statute's maker when interpreting, 2) Explaining Heydon's rule of interpretation, 3) Explaining the parts of a statute, 4) Using other statutes to aid interpretation, 5) The presumption of prospective effect unless expressly or impliedly retrospective, 6) Explaining non-obstante and saving clauses, 7) Comparing the principles of utility and asceticism. The December 2017 topics include: 1) Explaining that interpretation means finding legislative intent, 2) Discussing the rule of literal construction, 3) Explaining principles of
This document outlines topics related to the interpretation of statutes and principles of legislation to be covered in June and December 2017. The June 2017 topics include: 1) Seeking the intention of the statute's maker when interpreting, 2) Explaining Heydon's rule of interpretation, 3) Explaining the parts of a statute, 4) Using other statutes to aid interpretation, 5) The presumption of prospective effect unless expressly or impliedly retrospective, 6) Explaining non-obstante and saving clauses, 7) Comparing the principles of utility and asceticism. The December 2017 topics include: 1) Explaining that interpretation means finding legislative intent, 2) Discussing the rule of literal construction, 3) Explaining principles of
INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES AND PRINCIPLES OF LEGISLATION
JUNE 2017
1. The conventional way of interpretation of statute is to seek the intention
of its maker – Explain. 2. Explain Heydon’s rule of interpretation. 3. Explain the parts of statute. 4. Discuss the reference to other statutes as n aid to interpretation of statute. 5. “It is a cardinal principle of interpretation that every statute is prima facie prospective unless it is expressly or by necessary implication made to have retrospective operation” – Explain. 6. Explain non-obstante and saving clauses. 7. Compare the principle of utility with ascetic principle. 8. Write short notes on any two: a) Golden Rules. b) Penal statute. c) Ejusdem Generis. 9. Write short notes on any two: a) Measure of pain and pleasure. b) Parliamentary history. c) Noscitur a socils.
INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES AND PRINCIPLES OF LEGISLATION
DECEMBER 2017 1. ‘Interpretation of statute means finding out the intention of the legislature’ – Explain. 2. Discuss the rule of literal construction. 3. Explain the principles regarding retrospective operation of statutes. 4. Explain the principles of interpretation of statutes affecting jurisdiction of courts. 5. ‘Penal statutes should be construed strictly and benefit of doubt should go to the subject’. Elucidate. 6. ‘Power to repeal is consistent with power to enact. Repeal may be express or implied’. Explain. 7. Discuss the principles of utility. 8. Write short notes on any two: (a) Preamble. (b) Parliamentary history. (c) Mens rea in statutory offences. 9. Solve any two of the following problems: (a) Industrial Disputes Act provides that a party cannot be represented by a legal practitioner before labour court, tribunal or national tribunal where as Advocates Act confers right to practice on every advocate before any authority. How to resolve the clash? Decide with the help of suitable rule of interpretation. (b) Suraj was held liable to be punished for contravening S.7 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 eventhough he had no guilty mind as he did not know that the food article was adulterated. He challenges his conviction. Decide with the help of appropriated rule of interpretation. (c) Employer has to pay maternity benefit by way of wages for the actual period of a woman’s absence for six weeks under Maternity Benefits Act while calculating wages he excludes Sundays. Meena questions it and claims that she should get wages for Sundays also. Advice her with the help of suitable rule.