Professional Documents
Culture Documents
At Case Study
At Case Study
Atul Terkar
Div – B
Roll no - 13
Omega batch 1
1) What were the major communication problems faced in this case? Were Shantanu’s
expectations his team were very high, or it was quite genuine.
Yes there was lack of transparency regarding the permanent hiring position in the company.
It was not specified whether the interview was a formality or not as well as other details
regarding the job description and the jury panel’s decision being the final verdict was not
specified at all.
Alon with that, the company’s policies regarding accepting job positions inside and outside
the company were not clearly specified and no distinct plan or process was specified if in
case of the same.
3) What would Shantanu have done to overcome the situation?
Shantanu could have asked for some written form of communication or proof for the hiring
situation.
Shantanu could have spoken to HR of the company to understand all his options as well as
understand the company policy thoroughly for the same instance.
Ravi should have spoken to HR regarding the vacancy /hiring position for Shantanu in
advance to avoid costing any lost opportunity to Shantanu.
Ravi could have maintained transparency regarding the interview process.
5) What were the conflicting statements said by Ravi in this case? How could he have sorted
it?
Ravi could have asked Shantanu to talk to HR about the interview process as well as the
other job offering to take a clear and sound decision.
Ravi could also have spoken to HR regarding the same job hiring and given Shantanu another
chance in some way possible.
Ravi could have avoided saying “Interview is just a formality” and could have given Shantanu
a clear picture regarding the jury’s decision and selection criterion.