Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ongc Report 105
Ongc Report 105
“PROJECT IMPETUS”
OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED
Submitted by:
V.S.S.KARTHIK.N
PRN: 09020741105
I would like to extend my special thanks to Mr. ASHOK BABU, CM (MM), ONGC
who was my mentor for this project, for his valuable initial briefing and constant
guidance through out the project, without his support the successful completion of this
project would not have been possible.
I appreciate and thank the staff of the Materials Management Department and Internal
Audit Department for cooperating through out the project.
Last but not the least; I would like to extend my gratitude to Mr.ABHAY LIDBE
for his guidance and encouragement towards the successful completion of this
project.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
INTRODUCTION
Project IMPETUS 5
Rate contracts 6
Purchase overview 7
COMPANY BACKGROUND
Financial results 11
Production and Sales 12
Organizational structure 13
CONCEPTUAL REVIEW
Procurement process 18
Guidelines for entering into RC’s 20
NEXT STEPS 46
TABLE OF ILLUSTRATIONS
S. No NAME PAGE NO
1 Procurement process 7
2 Sub steps involved in the tendering process 8
4 Operational highlights of FY 09 14
5 Financial highlights of FY 09 15
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Rate Contracts have been initiated by IMPETUS GROUP in ONGC for Supply of
Spares, Services and Overhauls. Executive Purchase Committee deliberated the
proposals of Impetus and observed that, contrary to the benefits envisaged there has
been an increase in the inventory of certain items and desired that a special study may
be carried out on all the Impetus Rate Contracts.
In the course of this project, I was required to examine and review the Stock Levels
of Materials vis-a-vis consumption where Rate Contracts were entered and to find
its impact on inventory, lead time and price. It required an in depth analysis of all the
purchases which were entered under rate contracts from April 1st 2007 to March 31st
2010.
From the study which I conducted, I found that there is a positive impact on the price
of the material and the lead time where Rate Contracts have been entered by Impetus
Group; there is a substantial decrease in the price and the lead time except in a few
cases where there are delays in delivery of the Material. However there is no decrease
in the stock levels of Material where Rate Contracts were entered, instead in many
cases there is a considerable increase in the Stock Levels without any increase in the
consumption of the Material.
Based on the study work performed it was found that
1. Purchase Orders are being placed even though sufficient quantity of
Material was lying in the Stores. The total amount of Stock (as on 31st
March 2010) which was not utilised even once from the time it was
bought is Rs. 88 Lakhs (as per sample study of 70 items out of a total
of 330 Material).
2. There was an increase in the Stock Levels.
3. In many case the Quantities purchased were more than the average
consumption during the Last three Years.
Prioritizing all the defects which were found as the result of study on the basis of
loss incurred due to that defect, the most vital problem is identified as “ procurement
disparate to consumption “. Various causes leading to this problem were analyzed and
the root cause is identified as inadequate input and internal controls of SAP/ERP and
recommendations were given on the basis of strengthening the input and internal
controls of ERP.
it is also recommended to organize regular training programs for employees to raise
the level of user awareness in SAP/ERP.
INTRODUCTION
PROJECT IMPETUS
• Minimizing Inventory.
The analysis of documentation work completed under IMPETUS Project has revealed
that the problems encountered by ONGC are:
As a methodology for bridging spares gap, Long Term Rate Contracts for 3 years
having alliances / relations with major OEMs (original equipment manufacturers)
have been finalized. For items required continuously throughout the year in large
quantities, it is advantageous to have a rate contract. The Implementation and
Procedure of Rate Contract with OEM was approved by EPC (executive purchase
committee) on 19.1.2004. The approved procedure has been incorporated in the
MM Manual.
The following are the suppliers with whom the Rate Contracts are finalized.
• CLYDE UNION
• DMW CORPORTATION.
• Ingersoll Rand.
Rate contracts are mutual agreements between the buyer and the seller to operate a
set of chosen items, during a given period of time, for a fixed price or price variation.
Under this system the rates are fixed and at times even the quantity of the selected
items. As and when the need arises the buyer issues a Purchase order directly on the
basis of the rate chart available on the supplier who in turn supplies the items.
Application of rate contract helps organizations cut down the internal administrative
lead time as individual workcentres need not go through the central purchasing
departments and can place orders directly with the suppliers. It also helps in building
Buyer-supplier relationship as the contract period is usually three years and then
there is always a chance of the same players doing the next contract. The system
works well normally in a situation where the selected items are routinely consumed.
Items for which rate contract should be concluded will be specified
and this list will be reviewed and additions made every year depending upon the past
consumption or on anticipated consumption. Rate contracts will not be entered into
in the case of items for which the market shows downward trend.
Purchase overview
To ONGC
Facility of bulk rate at lowest competitive price.
Saves time and effort in tedious and frequent tendering at multiple user
locations.
To Suppliers
My role in this project was to study the impact of IMPETUS Rate contracts on the
inventory of spares with respect to consumption, lead time of delivery & price of
materials which were entered between April 1st 2007 to March 31st 2010, and to
identify the major loop holes in the process and to recommend the necessary steps to
be taken to improve the operational efficiency.
• Study the impact of rate contracts on inventory of spares, leadtime taken for
delivery & price of the material.
• Analyze the in efficiencies that were found during the study and to find the
major causes leading to the negative impact of rate contracts on inventory,
lead time & price.
Scope of this project is limited to purchases which are under only Rate contracts
during the last 3 years in K-G basin, which belongs to only RAJHAMUNDRY
ASSET of ONGC.
COMPANY BACKGROUND
Oil and natural gas Corporation limited (ONGC) is the highest profit making public
sector Company in India. The mission of the company is to stimulate, continue and
accelerate exploratory efforts to develop and maximize the contribution of
hydrocarbons to the economy of the country. ONGC was formed in August 1956 as
commission with a Parliamentary Act. Later it has become a statutory body in 1959.
In consonance with Government of India’s liberalization policy, ONGC was
incorporated in June 93 as a Public Limited Company. With effect from February 1,
1994 the undertakings of the erstwhile Oil and Natural Gas Commission and the
reserves were transferred to Oil and Natural Gas Commission and the reserves were
transferred to Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC).
At present ONGC is a ‘Fortune Global 500 company’ and has been ranked as
Number One E&P (Exploration and Production) Company in the world as per the
Platt’s Top 250 Global Energy Company Ranking 2008. The fiscal 2008-09 can well
be termed as the year of exploration successes for ONGC as it accreted 284.81
Million Metric Tonnes of Oil Equivalent (MTOE) of Initial In-place volume of
hydrocarbons, the highest in last two decades and 56 % more than the previous year
(182.23 MTOE), with 28 discoveries (Oil:17; Gas:11) spread across the Indian
sedimentary basins. The total number of employees in ONGC are 33,035 including
technical and non technical.
Financial Results
Despite volatile oil markets and crude oil prices, ONGC has earned a Net Profit of
Rs.161,263 million (down 3.45% from Rs. 167,016 million in 2007-08).During the
year under review, ONGC registered a gross revenue of Rs. 650,494 million, (up 5.7
% from Rs. 615,426 million in 2007-08), despite sharing under recoveries of Rs.
282,252 million (Rs. 220,009 million in 2007-08), of the Public Sector Oil Marketing
Companies by way of discounts in the price of Crude Oil, Domestic LPG and PDS
Kerosene, on administrative instructions of the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas,
Government of India
Highlights
Information technology
ONGC became the first PSU to launch SAP powered “e-procurement” process. This
process will ensure standardization of the procurement process of ONGC and will
ensure transparency in the tendering process. It will also speed up procurement
process. Along with this, your Company has also institutionalized centralized
electronic payment system for employees and the vendors. The system will reduce
manual interventions thereby reducing delays in payments and improving
transparency to the satisfaction of the stakeholders.
ONGC is also implementing Project SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data
Acquisition) covering entire production and drilling facilities. The first phase of the
project covering six assets has already been commissioned. Once implemented,
production and drilling facilities can be monitored on 24x7 real-time bases.
Organizational structure
Chairman cum Managing Director supported with 6 functional Director Heads of the
company. Each Director is looking after one of the activities like Operations, Finance,
Technical, Drilling, Personnel and Exploration. Directors are responsible for effective
functioning of their segment. The entire company is administratively divided into 6
Regional Business Centers. Executive Director/Regional Director is heading each
region. All the 26 work centers fall under any one of the six regions. Every work
center head directly reports to ED/RD.
Its organizational structure is functional and centralized at top level and it is
decentralized at middle and bottom level. Hence financial, administrative authority
and responsibility has been delegated at every level.
It has always been the endeavor of ONGC to expeditiously develop discovered fields.
45 discoveries, out of 111 made during FY’03 to FY’09, have already been brought to
stream. Accelerated development and production for the remaining discovered fields
has also been launched.
During the year 2008-09, a new and dedicated business unit Eastern Offshore Asset
has been constituted with an aim to put East Coast discoveries on a fast track
development through an integrated East Coast hub.
Besides focus on exploiting brown fields and fields already discovered, it is also
important to discover new fields. ONGC has been intensifying its exploration efforts
and 28 discoveries in the last fiscal testify its resolve to that effect.
Induction of new advanced equipment as well as up gradation of existing resources
with state-of-the-art equipment to remain competitive in the global E&P business is
mandatory for the company. The process of refurbishing and upgrading the On land
Drilling and Work over rigs is already underway in various phases. ONGC has
inducted and absorbed several state-of-the-art technologies. It is also collaborating
and having alliance with technologically rich and expert companies and academia and
has also empanelled several Domain Experts on its roll.
Bulking of all high value indigenous and critical items to be procured centrally
for taking maximum advantage in price discount. Such exercise would be done
by the Headquarters Materials set up for all Regions under the group.
The above functions are to be discharged by personnel of Materials Management
discipline who will be so allocated to each Business Group both at Headquarters and
at the bases. However, the procurement of all indigenous materials except as
mentioned above is decentralized with their respective Business Group.
Materials procurement powers are to be exercised only by exception by functional
executives other than Materials Management executives by special nomination by the
Competent Authority as a stop gap arrangement till such time Materials personnel are
in position.
The Materials Management Support Groups will function strictly within the policy
guidelines and such administrative norms as may be prescribed by Director
(Technical).
Provisions of Materials Management Manual are duly approved by Executive
Committee/steering Committee and ratified by the ONGC Board. Therefore, any
deviation from the prescribed policy guidelines or norms on Materials Management
will require reference to Director (Technical) through the Director In charge of the
Business Group for approval / ratification of Competent Authority wherever
considered necessary.
CONCEPTUAL REVIEW
PURCHASING PROCESS
The process of procurement in the case of spares which were under the rate contracts
and for materials which were procured normally is shown below.
Quantity rate contract: for this contract, suppliers are bound to supply the items of
specified quantity fixed in the contract.
INDEG rate contract: the contracts fixed with only Indian suppliers
DGS&D Rate contract: The Director General of Supplies and Disposals (DGS & D)
constitutes the central purchasing organization of the Govt. of India. It is responsible
for the procurement and purchase of supplies required by the departments of Defence
Organization, Railways etc. DGS & D concludes Rate Contracts for purchase of
materials, stores, equipment etc. with various Indian and foreign firms.
Guidelines for Entering into Rate/Running Contracts
(a) Normally the duration of a rate contract should be for a specific period. In special
cases shorter or longer period of contract may be entered into. No extension to
validity of the contract is required when deliveries against outstanding supply orders
continue after expiry of the validity period. The contract will remain alive for the
purpose of delivery for all the stores ordered during the validity of the contract until
deliveries are completed.
(b) No new rate contract should be placed with the firms having backlog against
existing contracts and also if the backlog is likely to continue for the major portion of
the new contract period.
(c) Rate contract should be placed only on registered and/or reputed and established
firms, which are capable of supplying the stores as, required.
(d) Quotations for rate contracts should be invited for slab quantities and contracts
concluded, accordingly.
(e) In case where a firm has already a rate contract with any other Government
Department, Central/State Public Undertaking, etc. it should be ensured that the
contract is entered into not less favourable terms and conditions than those agreed to
by it with the other departments, undertakings etc.
Identification of problems
Methodology of study
• Collected the list of all the Suppliers and Material for which Rate
Contracts were finalized from the Materials Management Department.
• T Code ME2L was used to download all the Purchase Orders placed
during the Years 2006-07 – 31st March 2010. From this List all the cases
where the Tender Process is 10 were filtered. Tender Process 10 stands for
Rate Contracts.
• There are 330 numbers of Materials which were purchased on Rate
Contracts during the last three years. Out of this a sample of 70 numbers
of Materials was taken for analysis.
• Methodology adopted for selecting the Sample:
♦ Out of 330 Materials, all cases where the Net Price of Material was
more than Rs.50, 000 were selected (18 Nos.).
♦ After this, cases where more than 100 units of Material were
purchased during the last three Years were selected (22 Nos).
♦ Subsequently all Material which were purchased more than 4 times
during the last three Years were taken.( 30 Nos)
• The Price of the Material was taken from the website
www.etenders.ongc.co.in
• T Code MB5B & MC.9 were used to check the consumption pattern of
the Material and stock levels.
• All the cases where no Material was available in the Stores were taken.
I examined the impact of Impetus Rate Contracts on the price of the Material, Lead
time taken for delivery, consumption pattern of the materials, stock out situations, the
impact on Equipment availability and the impact on inventory level after the
implementation of impetus Rate Contracts. Based on the study performed, I found that
there is a decrease in the prices of the Material and lead time, where Rate Contracts
were entered.
Based on the review I observed that there exists some inefficiency in managing the
quantity of Spares that need to be maintained, these need to be eliminated. The
following are the main areas of concern:
• There are a few cases where there is an increase in the lead time for
delivery of Material.
• In some cases where there was no stock of Spares for more than six
months.
• There are cases where the Material was purchased repeatedly, even
though there was no consumption of that Material. There were no
controls to prevent rising of requisitions where there is a sufficient
quantity of the Material in the Stores.
• In many cases it was observed that there is an increase in the stock of
the Materials even after the Rate Contracts were finalized.
Study results
1. The following are the cases where there was increase in the Lead
time. (Such cases constitute 7 % of the sample cases)
Price Cost @
S Lead Lead fixed in which
l Material PR PO GR time time rate materia
Plant PR No. PO No.
N Code Date Date Date before after contract is
o. RC RC ( INR ) bought
( INR )
19- 30- 15- 3,52,519.8 4,37,12
1 41D1 05- 05- 12- 1 .56
210456485 1090002484 2008 4010039564 2008 2009 365 575
19- 30- 15- 7,00,887 8,76,10
2 41D1 05- 05- 12- .75
210456179 1090002484 2008 4010039564 2008 2009 300 575
03- 14- 24- 1,10,556 -
3 41D1 12- 01- 03-
215308679 1090002036 2007 4010036788 2008 2008 84 112
03- 14- 24- 2,94,254 -
4 41D1 12- 01- 03-
215330888 1090002036 2007 4010036788 2008 2008 96 112
03- 14- 24- 1,03,371.2 1,28,18
5 41D1 12- 01- 03- 1 .300
210618330 1090002036 2007 4010036788 2008 2008 84 112
2. The following are the cases where there was increase in price.
Ven
Sl Rate
Material PR PO GR dor
N PR No. PO No. Qty Amount before Diff
Code Date Date Date Cod
o. PO
e
19- 30- 15-
41D
1 05- 05- 12- 1 3,34,2 -63 1007
1
210456485 1090002484 2008 4010039564 2008 2009 3,97,270 68 ,002 85
2 41D 215308679 1090002036 03- 4010036788 14- 24- 38 2,552 2124 1012
1 12- 01- 03- -428 33
2007 2008 2008
03- 14- 24-
41D
3 12- 01- 03- 1012
1
215330888 1090002036 2007 4010036788 2008 2008 93 1,613 1543 -70 33
Out of 70 cases scrutinized, in 60 cases no prior purchase was observed in the system.
Therefore only 10 cases were found where there was either increase or decrease in
cost after RC. There is 10% decrease in the Cost of Spares after IMPETUS Rate
Contracts.
3. The following are the cases where there is no stock of Materials in the Stores. The
column Date of Last issue is the date from which there was no stock in the
Warehouse.
Current
Sl Material PR PO GR Date of Vendor
Plant PR No. PO No. Qty
No. Code Date Date Date last issue Code
Stock
19-05- 30-05- 12-08-
41D1 1 -
210456471 1090002484 2008 4010039564 2008 2008 100785
1
12-03- 28-03- 31-07-
1 0 26.09.2009
210456471 1090003572 2009 4010045211 2009 2009 100785
The spare related with asset mentioned at item No. 2 ( Material Code
210002209 )
Supplier base is near to the asset, so that this item can be supplied just in
time.
4. The following are the cases where there was no consumption, but still the Material
was purchased. In the first 13 instances there was No consumption at all and in the
next 9 instances only a few units were used.
Current Vendor
Sl Material PO GR Unit Total
Plant PR No. PO No. Qty Usage
No. Code Date Date Cost Cost
Stock Code
30- 15-
41D1 05- 12- 1 0 -
210456485 1090002484 4010039564 2008 2009 3,97,270 100785
1
28- 21-
8,10,6
03- 01- 1 0 2
32
210456485 1090003572 4010045211 2009 2010 4,05,316 100785
30- 15-
41D1 05- 12-
210456160 1090002484 4010039564 2008 2009 5 0 81,069 100785
2
28-
4,13,5
03- Not 5
55
210456160 1090003572 4010045211 2009 Recd 2 0 82,711 100785
3 30- 12-
41D1 05- 08-
210456354 1090002484 4010039564 2008 2008 60 0 2,896 100785
210456354 1090003572 4010045211 28- 21- 60 0 120 2,954 3,54,51 100785
03- 01- 2
2009 2010
14- 24-
41D1 01- 03-
210004665 1090002036 4010036788 2008 2008 18 11,602 101233
29- 29-
4 01- 05-
210004665 1090002156 4010037106 2008 2008 96 0 36,105 101233
06- 04-
47,08,46
08- 09- 162
7
210004665 1090002843 4010040654 2008 2008 48 0 29,065 101233
22- 05-
11- 02-
41A1 210073433 1090001248 4010028080 2006 2007 2 0 7,102 101233
5
28- 25-
25,05
02- 04- 3
7
41A1 210073433 1090001981 4010037830 2008 2008 1 0 8,352 101233
18- 29-
09- 10-
41 E1 210000016 1090003078 4010041448 2008 2008 2 0 3,990 101233
6
30-
7,98
12- Not 2
0
41 E1 210000016 1020024627 4010049639 2009 Recd 2 0 3,990 101233
29- 29-
18,72
7 01- 05- 6
4
41D1 210017716 1090002155 4010037097 2008 2008 6 0 3,121 101233
29- 24-
5,85
8 01- 03- 2
1
41D1 210017326 1090002155 4010037097 2008 2008 2 0 2,925 101233
29- 29-
36,8
9 01- 05- 14
37
41D1 215301970 1090002155 4010037097 2008 2008 15 0 2,631 101233
29- 28-
14,3
10 01- 03- 5
98
41D1 215307330 1090002155 4010037097 2008 2008 5 0 2,880 101233
29- 31-
2,6
11 01- 03- 10
25
41D1 215308652 1090002155 4010037097 2008 2008 10 0 263 101233
29- 31-
33,4
12 01- 03- 4
09
41D1 210073433 1090002155 4010037097 2008 2008 4 0 8,352 101233
13 22- 18-
41A1 11- 01-
220923409 1090001248 4010028080 2006 2007 1 0 8,409 101233
220923409 1090001981 4010037830 28- 25- 2 8,829 101233
02- 04-
2008 2008
28- 25-
61,8
02- 04- 7
06
220923409 1090001981 4010037830 2008 2008 3 0 8,829 101233
29- 31-
1,2
14 01- 03- 5
28
41D1 220923090 1090002155 4010037097 2008 2008 6 1 246 101233
22- 31-
2,1
15 11- 01- 9
05
41A1 220923090 1090001248 4010028080 2006 2007 10 1 234 101233
30- 25-
41D1 05- 02- 0
210004988 1090002484 4010039564 2008 2009 90 0 12,192 100785
16
28- 21-
21,27,02
03- 01- 171
6
210004988 1090003572 4010045211 2009 2010 100 19 12,439 100785
28- 13-
17 02- 07- 18 14,301
41D1 210019211 1090003312 4010044425 2009 2009 20 2 795 101233
22- 12-
11- 03-
41A1 215308280 1090001248 4010028080 2006 2007 8 0 5,451 101233
22- 16-
18 11- 03-
41A1 215308280 1090001248 4010028080 2006 2007 8 0 5,451 101233
28- 25-
1,05,6
02- 04- 17
12
41A1 215308280 1090001981 4010037830 2008 2008 2 1 6,212 101233
14- 24-
01- 03-
41D1 210030855 1090002036 4010036788 2008 2008 1 0 869 101233
29- 27-
19 01- 03-
41D1 210030855 1090002155 4010037097 2008 2008 8 869 101233
29- 31-
13,0
01- 03- 15
39
41D1 210030855 1090002156 4010037106 2008 2008 6 4 869 101233
29- 13-
3,66
20 01- 03- 7
5
41D1 215311090 1090002155 4010037097 2008 2008 8 1 524 101233
21 22- 05-
41A1 11- 02-
215301141 1090001248 4010028080 2006 2007 4 0 956 101233
22- 05-
11- 02-
215301141 1090001248 4010028080 2006 2007 25 0 956 101233
215301141 1090001981 4010037830 28- 31- 24 0 1,157 101233
02- 03-
2008 2008
13- 16-
71,6
03- 07- 59
76
215301141 1090003399 4010044730 2009 2009 24 18 1,215 101233
22- 05-
11- 02-
41A1 210000016 1090001248 4010028080 2006 2007 2 0 3,332 101233
22- 05-
22 11- 02-
41A1 210000016 1090001248 4010028080 2006 2007 2 0 3,332 101233
28- 04-
18,9
02- 06- 5
94
41A1 210000016 1090001981 4010037830 2008 2008 2 1 3,799 101233
88,51,49
Total Cost
9
5. In the following cases there was an increase in the stock levels as the purchase of
Spares was not based on the past consumption or the future requirement.
Avg Avg
Current %
Sl Material Avg PO GR PO Stock Stock
Plant PO No. PR No. increase
No. Code cons Date Date Qty Before After
Stock in Stock
RC RC
1 28- 18-
41D1 03- 01- 4 4 1.00 2.50 150.00
210456139 1 4010045211 2009 2010 1090003572
2 28- 31-
41D1 03- 07- 2 3 2.00 2.50 25.00
210456478 1 4010045211 2009 2009 1090003572
3 28- 31-
41D1 03- 07- 69 23.50 58.00 146.81
210000397 19 4010045211 2009 2009 40 1090003572
4 28- 31-
41D1 03- 07- 66 50.00 58.00 16.00
210000398 25 4010045211 2009 2009 40 1090003572
5 22- 28-
41D1 10- 11- 146 66.00 124.00 87.88
215308679 167 4010048389 2009 2009 148 1020022828
6 22- 06-
41D1 10- 03- 117 39.00 78.00 100.00
210456067 85 4010042037 2008 2009 50 1090002963
7 22- 28-
10- 11- 187 34.00 105.50 210.29
41D1 215301011 50 4010048389 2009 2009 192 1020022828
8 02- 31-
10- 10- 52 17.00 39.00 129.41
41D1 215308280 0 4010041723 2008 2008 26 1090002781
9 41D1 215301012 13 4010048389 22- 28- 50 91 34.50 1020022828 70.00 102.90
10- 11-
2009 2009
10 02- 19-
10- 11- 103 115.00 159.00 38.26
41D1 215308379 174 4010041723 2008 2008 204 1090002781
11 23- 23-
10- 02- 22 11.00 19.00 72.73
41D1 210000017 0 4010048410 2009 2010 6 1020023645
12 22- 28-
10- 11- 174 39.50 105.50 167.09
41D1 215308835 92 4010048389 2009 2009 192 1020022828
13 17-
12- Not 5 3.00 5.50 83.33
41A1 210079897 2 4010049416 2009 Recd 4 1020023313
14 22- 28-
10- 11- 352 81.00 216.00 166.67
41D1 215301843 180 4010048389 2009 2009 384 1020022828
15 29- 26-
01- 03- 21 6.50 17.00 161.54
41D1 340408205 0 4010037106 2008 2008 8 1090002156
16 28- 24-
02- 06- 92 52.00 93.00 78.85
41A1 220923405 17 4010037830 2008 2008 40 1090001981
17 22- 30-
10- 11- 177 38.50 106.00 175.32
41D1 220923405 84 4010048389 2009 2009 192 1020022828
18 23- 31-
10- 12- 45 26.50 36.00 35.85
41D1 210000016 3 4010048410 2009 2009 19 1020023645
19 13- 17-
03- 07- 23 11.00 17.00 54.55
41A1 210017422 7 4010044732 2009 2009 11 1090003399
20 29- 31-
01- 03- 9 2.00 5.50 175.00
41D1 210017422 1 4010037106 2008 2008 4 1090002156
6. In the following instances the quantity purchased was more than the Average
consumption per Year.
Avg
PO Vendor
Sl Material Consu cons Extra
Plant PO No. PO Date Amount GR Date Qt
No. Code mption per Qty
y Code
Year
1 28-03- 18-01-
41D1 4 3
210456139 4010045211 2009 7,18,478 2010 3 1 100785
2 28-03- 31-07-
41D1 2 1
210456478 4010045211 2009 2,28,980 2009 1 1 100785
3 30-05- 26-02-
41D1
210000397 4010039564 2008 52,306 2009 42 15 20 22 100785
28-03- 31-07-
41D1
210000397 4010045211 2009 53,366 2009 40 33 20 20 100785
4 28-03- 31-07-
41D1
210000398 4010045211 2009 53,366 2009 40 27 20 20 100785
5 22-10- 28-11-
41D1 215308679 4010048389 2009 2,654 2009 148 104 83 65 839783
6 30-05- 06-03-
41D1
210456067 4010039564 2008 1,660 2009 200 6 53 147 100785
22-10- 06-03-
41D1
210456067 4010042037 2008 1,685 2009 50 133 53 50 100785
7 06-08- 04-09-
41D1 215301011 4010040654 2008 656 2008 210 282 110 100 101233
22-10- 28-11-
41D1 215301011 4010048389 2009 656 2009 192 261 110 82 839783
8 02-10- 31-10-
41D1 215308280 4010041723 2008 6,548 2008 26 12 21 26 101233
22-10- 31-12-
41D1 215308280 4010048389 2009 6,548 2009 34 28 21 13 839783
9 02-10- 31-10-
41D1 215301012 4010041723 2008 2,743 2009 29 36 22 7 101233
22-10- 28-11-
41D1 215301012 4010048389 2009 2,743 2009 50 8 22 28 839783
10 41 27-05- 12-09-
E1 210019211 4010039499 2008 749 2008 5 1 3 101233
41 12-01-
E1 210019211 4010049848 2010 794 Not Recd 2 1 1 2 101233
11 22-11- 18-01-
41A1 215311090 4010028080 2006 421 2007 6 2 3 101233
13-03- 17-07-
41A1 215311090 4010044732 2009 554 2009 11 3 1 9 101233
12 02-10- 19-11-
41D1 215308379 4010041723 2008 1,862 2008 204 240 105 99 101233
23-10- 23-02-
41D1 215308379 4010048410 2009 1,862 2010 196 237 105 91 839783
13 02-10- 19-11-
41D1 210000017 4010041723 2008 2,414 2008 12 2 2 10 101233
23-10- 23-02-
41D1 210000017 4010048410 2009 2,414 2010 6 2 2 4 839783
14 22-11- 05-02-
41A1 215308835 4010028080 2006 380 2007 50 24 25 25 101233
15 06-08- 04-09-
41D1 215308835 4010040654 2008 457 2008 210 270 125 85 101233
22-10- 28-11-
41D1 215308835 4010048389 2009 457 2009 192 272 125 67 839783
16 28-02- 25-04-
41A1 210079897 4010037830 2008 712 2008 10 4 6 101233
17 17-12-
41A1 210079897 4010049416 2009 681 Not Recd 4 5 2 2 101233
18 06-08- 04-09-
41D1 215301843 4010040654 2008 318 2008 422 534 250 172 101233
22-10- 28-11-
41D1 215301843 4010048389 2009 318 2009 384 536 250 134 839783
19 29-01- 26-03-
41D1 340408205 4010037106 2008 379 2008 8 3 3 8 101233
20 28-02- 24-06-
41A1 220923405 4010037830 2008 643 2008 40 41 17 23 101233
21 06-08- 04-09-
41D1 220923405 4010040654 2008 676 2008 210 270 125 85 101233
22-10- 30-11-
41D1 220923405 4010048389 2009 676 2009 192 260 125 67 839783
22 02-10- 19-11-
41D1 210000016 4010041723 2008 3,989 2008 8 11 4 4 101233
23-10- 31-12-
41D1 210000016 4010048410 2009 3,989 2009 19 8 4 15 839783
Selection of problem
Prioritization:
The 6 different cases of inefficiencies which were found in the study and the loss
incurred due to this inefficiency are as follows:
No of cases observed: 5
Because of late supply & urgency of the material, in 3 cases the material is
bought from the OEM at much higher price and that extra price is calculated
as loss, for which supplier is not liable as per the terms and conditions agreed
in the contract.
2. Increase in price
No of cases observed: 3
The difference between the price before fixing the rate contract and price after
fixing the rate contract is calculated as loss.
No of cases observed: 10
No of cases observed: 22
No of cases observed: 20
The price of the material is calculated for the increased average stock of
inventory and, inventory carrying cost is calculated for the extra stock in
inventory.
No of cases observed: 22
The cost for the extra materials is taken and their inventory carrying cost is
added up and considered as total loss.
• In order to find the relative importance of problems & the vital few problems
in a simple, quickly interpreted, visual format. PARETO ANALYSIS is done
for all the above cases in order to distinguish the critical problems from the
less significant problems with respect to COST. It is based on the fact that 80
% of defects are caused by 20 % of causes.
Vital ( 80%)
Thus the major problems which constitutes 80 % of all the problems are :
10000000
No consumption , but material was purchased
9000000 49.73%
Quantity purchased is more than average consumption
8000000
7000000
O
S
L
6000000
As the 2 major problems states that as there is no consumption, but still
material was purchased, in some cases the consumption is very less
compared to the procurement and the quantity purchased is more than
average consumption per annum. By considering all these statements I
arrived to the major problem needs to be addressed in order to eliminate
the 80 % of defects in the system.
Impact: increase in inventory with excess purchases, thus the objective of introducing
the Rate contract is not achieved
Objective: to develop a solution for procuring the materials which were there in Rate
contract as per the consumption, thus reducing the inventory.
Goal: to reduce the loss incurred due to excess purchases for the items under Rate
contract by around 75 %.
Now I focused my efforts in analyzing this vital problem in order to identify the
probable causes whose elimination leads to improvement.
Identification of causes
UN R ELI ABLE
SU PPL I E R S
NON CLEAREANCE
STOCK I N TRANS
Causes due to inefficiency in procedure
LIST OF ALL SUB CAUSES DUE TO PEOPLE, PLANT, POLICY &
PE
PROCEDURE leading to the problem “procurement disparate to consumption”
4. Network problems.
Out of all the known possible root causes, it is not viable to attack all, so CONTROL-
IMPACT MATRIX is applied in order to sort out the root causes on the basis of its
controllability and its impact. Classification of all the causes in this matrix is arrived
by discussions with personnel’s of various departments and supported with the data
collected in some cases.
The causes which fall under HIGH IMPACT & HIGH CONTROL are viable to
address and they should be controlled first. All the causes whose impact is very high
and controlling of these inefficiencies are in our hand have to be attacked.
Findings
The vital root causes which are leading to the negative impact of Rate contracts were
identified.
Network problems.
Conclusion
LOW
are delays in delivery of the Material. However there is no decrease in the stock levels
of Material where Rate Contracts were entered, instead in many cases there is a
considerable increase in the Stock Levels without any increase in the consumption of
the Material.
The following table gives the stock of the Material of 330 items where Rate
Contracts were entered.
% increase
Consumption for the
Stock as on Amount Year on
Year
Year
2007
31-Dec-07 58,59,896 6,395,964
2008
31-Dec-08 1,65,14,549 181.82 9,885,554
2009
31-Dec-09 2,95,15,613 78.72 17,299,079
Taking the amount of loss incurred due to theses inefficiencies into consideration the
vital problem is detected as “procurement is disparate to consumption”. Week input
and internal controls of SAP/ ERP and insufficient knowledge in usage of ERP have
been identified as potential root causes which are responsible for this vital problem.
So management or the IMPETUS GROUP should focus on these identified causes
and necessary steps have to be taken in order to achieve the objectives of introducing
rate contracts.
Some necessary steps that have to be implemented by the management for the above
mentioned cause were recommended below.
Recommendations
(Lead time data being vital to reduce carrying costs of spares I would suggest
that this data be loaded in SAP also, besides loading on SRM Module so that
any material code report taken from SAP would provide the user with data on
when the order has to placed )
NEXT STEPS
Though lots of efforts have been made to analyze the factors causing for the
operational inefficiencies in maintaining the purchases through Rate contracts, still
there is lot of scope for improvement as a whole. Some of the following areas that
have been identified for future study on the above subject:
3. www.ongcreports.net
4. www.etenders.ongc.co.in
MM materials management
RC Rate contract
PR Purchase Requisition
PO Purchase Order
TC Tender Committee
L1 Low 1