Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region VII , Central Visayas
Division of City Schools – Tagbilaran City
DR. CECILIO PUTONG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee : ROWENA C. SALUTAN Name of Rater: MRS. VIRGILIA G. OMICTIN

Position: Master Teacher I Position: Principal III
Review Period: SY 2016 - 2017 Date of Review: __________________________________________
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: TAGBILARAN CITY -DCPNHS

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS TARGET EVALUATION
MFO’s KRA’s OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Weight per ACTUAL RATING SCORE*
Objective Quality Efficiency Timeliness RESULTS
BASIC 1. Profession *Conducted at least an April 2016- 5% 5
EDUCATION al Growth action research related to March 2017 Action research Action Within
SERVICES and school or classroom with Complete research 2016-2017
Develop- concerns/ problems during parts/national Conducted
ment the year/ attended relevant training/full – and utilized at
( 25%) trainings/pursued post- pledge /graduated the national/
graduate studies/recipient regional level
of scholarship grants/short or 3-day and
term courses above
national
training /PhD
graduate

4
Action research with Action Within
Complete parts research 2016-2017
/regional conducted
training /with PhD and utilized at
units the division
 level/regional
training/PhD
CAR (45 units)

3 Conducted Within
Action research with and utilized at 2016-2017
Complete the school
parts/division level/3-day
training /full-pledge and above
MA training/MA
graduate

2 Not Within
Action research with conducted 2016-2017
Complete even at the
parts/school school level/3-
level/MA CAR units day and above
training/ MA
with 36 units

1 Not action Within

No action research research 2016-2017
made/no conducted/no
training/with MA training/ with
units MA units
below 36

*Organized/conducted June 2014- 10 % Organized/ Within

/facilitated seminars , March 2015 5 – National Conducted/ 2016-2017
workshops, trainings within facilitated at
a year (school, division, least 1
regional or national ) seminar
/workshop in
the national
 level

Organized/ Within
4- Regional conducted/ 2016-2017
facilitated at
least 1
seminar
/workshop in
the regional
level

Organized/ Within
3- Division conducted/ 2016-2017
facilitated at
least 1
seminar
/workshop in
the division
level

Organized/ Within
2- School conducted/ 2016-2017
facilitated at
least 1
seminar
/workshop in
the school
level

Not Within
1- None conducted 2016-2017

* Received (school, district, June 2016- 5% Received at Within

division, regional or March 2017 5 – National least 1 award 2016-2017
national ) awards/ in the
recognition s within a year national/regio
 nal award

Received at Within
4- Division least 1 award 2016-2017
in the division
award

Received at Within
3- School least 1 award 2016-2017
in the school
award

Nominated in Within
2- any level the division 2016-2017
/school level

Not received Within

1-None any award 2016-2017

*Served as demonstration June 2016- 5% Demonstrated Within

teacher March 2017 5 – National at least once 2016-2017
in the national
level

Demonstrated Within
4- Regional at least once 2016-2017
in the regional
level

Demonstrated Within
3- Division at least once 2016-2017
in the division
level

Demonstrated Within
2- School at least once 2016-2017
 in the school
level

No Within
1-None demonstratio 2016-2017
n teaching
conducted
2. Instruction *Handled teaching loads June 2016- 20 % 5 – Regular and Handled load Whole year
al every year March 2017 prompt 1680 minutes round
Competen per day
ce (35%)
4- Regular and Handled load Whole year
prompt 1440 -1679 round
minutes per
day

3-Regular and Handled load Whole year

prompt 1200 - 1339 round
minutes per
day

2-Regular and Handled load Whole year

prompt 960 - 1199 round
minutes per
day

1-Regular and Handled load Whole year

prompt 720 – 959 round
minutes per
day

*Achieved at least 85 % of June 2016 – 5% 5 – Advanced Achieved 85% Quarterly

the students performance at March 2017 and above in
the end of the school year MPS in 4
periodical
tests

4- Proficient Achieved 74 - Quarterly

84% in MPS
in 4 periodical
 tests

3-Approaching Achieved 63 - Quarterly

Proficient 73% in MPS
in 4 periodical
tests

2-Developing Achieved 51- Quarterly

62% in MPS
in 4 periodical
tests

1-Beginning Achieved 50% Quarterly

and below in
MPS in 4
periodical
tests

*Attained 100% of the June 2016 – 10% 5 – Complete Attained 100% Quarterly
___required learning March 2017 0f ____
competencies for the competencies
students in every quarter
4-Nearly complete Attained 78 - Quarterly
99 % 0f ____
competencies

3-Practically Attained 65 - Quarterly

complete 77% 0f ____
competencies

2-above halfway Attained 51- Quarterly

64% 0f ____
competencies

1-halfway Attained 50 % Quarterly

and 0f ____
competencies
3. *Observed 100 % of the ___ June 2016- 20% 5- Complete Observed Quarterly
Instructional teachers every quarter March 2017 100% of the
Supervision ___ teachers
(40%)
4- Nearly complete Observed 78 - Quarterly
99% of the
___ teachers

3-Partially complete Observed 65- Quarterly

77% of the
___ teachers

2-above halfway Observed 51- Quarterly

64% of the
___ teachers

1-halfway Observed 50% Quarterly

and below of
the ___
teachers

*Conducted mentoring/ June 2016- 5% 5-Cautious and Coached 5 SY 2016-

coaching activities with March 2017 accurate teachers 2017
teachers quarterly
4- Cautious and Coached 4 SY 2016-
accurate teachers 2017

3-Cautious and Coached 3 SY 2016-

accurate teachers 2017

2-Cautious and Coached 2 SY 2016-

accurate teachers 2017

1-Cautious and Coached 1 SY 2016-

accurate teacher 2017

*Evaluated ___ teachers’ November 5% 5-Prompt and Evaluated 100 November

performance twice a year 2016 and deliberate % of ____ 2016 and
March 2017 teachers March
 2017
4- Prompt and Evaluated 78- November
deliberate 99 % of ____ 2015 and
teachers March
2016

3-Prompt and Evaluated 65- November

deliberate 77 % of ____ 2016 and
teachers March
2017

2-Prompt and Evaluated 51- November

deliberate 64 % of ____ 2016 and
teachers March
2017

1- Prompt and Evaluated 50 November

deliberate % and below 2016 and
of ____ March
teachers 2017
4. Plus  Member of the 10% 10
Factor SPT/Project Team
Member

OVERALL
 To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISH-
MENT

VIRGILIA G. OMICTIN ROWENA C. SALUTAN

Principal III Master Teacher I
Rater Ratee
Approved:

VIRGINIA C. ZAPANTA, Ed.D. CESO V

Schools Division Superintendent