3/30/22, 3:14 PM Scaling of Base Shear in ETABS

Articles, Principles

Scaling of Base Shear in ETABS

Seismic base shear computed from modal response
spectrum analysis should be scaled to a minimum
percentage of the static base shear.
September 1, 2020 by CCStruct

      

https://structuralcalc.com/scaling-of-base-shear-in-etabs/ 1/19
3/30/22, 3:14 PM Scaling of Base Shear in ETABS

This post presents the procedure in scaling of base shear in ETABS. It is assumed
that you are already aware of the principles of response spectrum analysis and are
using CSI ETABS as your analysis tool.

UBC-97 and ASCE 7-05 or later require that the base shear calculated using modal
response spectrum dynamic analysis should exceed or match a certain percentage
of the static base shear calculated using Equivalent Lateral Force procedure (static
analysis). The requirements of ASCE 7-05 are implemented in this example. For
completeness, relevant steps on how to set up the spectrum cases in ETABS are
presented. 

STEP 1:
An ETABS model should already be available for the project.

3D view of sample ETABS model

STEP 2:


https://structuralcalc.com/scaling-of-base-shear-in-etabs/ 2/19
3/30/22, 3:14 PM Scaling of Base Shear in ETABS

Declare the static load cases in x- and y-direction. In this example, these are
designated as EQX and EQY respectively.

The seismic parameters are project specific dependent on seismicity of the region,
the underlying soil class and type of building structure. Eccentricity in seismic
loading will not be considered for the static cases since the base shear obtained
from EQX and EQY cases would only be used for base shear scaling and not for
design, i.e. seismic design will only use the forces from dynamic analysis.

STEP 3:
Define the Response Spectrum function. The parameters you input here should
match the static case seismic parameters.


https://structuralcalc.com/scaling-of-base-shear-in-etabs/ 3/19
3/30/22, 3:14 PM Scaling of Base Shear in ETABS

STEP 4:
Define the mass source to be used in the seismic analysis specific to the project
criteria. For example, you might include 25% of the occupancy live load as part of
the mass source.

https://structuralcalc.com/scaling-of-base-shear-in-etabs/ 4/19
3/30/22, 3:14 PM Scaling of Base Shear in ETABS

STEP 5:
Define the P-delta parameters based on project specific criteria or standard 
practice. Usually, the factors of the gravity load component of the governing

https://structuralcalc.com/scaling-of-base-shear-in-etabs/ 5/19
3/30/22, 3:14 PM Scaling of Base Shear in ETABS

seismic load combination is used. For example, if the load combination includes
1.2 DEAD + 1.0 LIVE + 1.0 EARTHQUAKE, and deem that the gravity component of
this combination would produce the highest P-delta effect, you would input:

STEP 6:
Set up the modal case which must include vibration in both x- and y-direction.
There should be sufficient number of modes to achieve at such that at least 90%
total mass participation (ASCE 7-05 Section 12.9.1). In this example, Ritz method is
used with 16 modes analyzed.

https://structuralcalc.com/scaling-of-base-shear-in-etabs/ 6/19
3/30/22, 3:14 PM Scaling of Base Shear in ETABS

STEP 7:
Add two Response Spectrum cases in U1 and U2 horizontal direction. In this
example, SPECX and SPECY are defined respectively.

https://structuralcalc.com/scaling-of-base-shear-in-etabs/ 7/19
3/30/22, 3:14 PM Scaling of Base Shear in ETABS

The response spectra is to be multiplied g/R*I (ASCE 7-05 Section 12.9.2), hence an
initial scale should be entered for each response spectrum case. Note that by
defining an initial scale as a factor of g, the results obtained from the response
spectrum analysis would be a force value, e.g. in kN unit.

Sample calculation of initial scale computation:

Scale,initial = 9806.65 mm/s^2 / 5.0 * 1.0 = 1961

The adopted method for modal combination is CQC while the directional

combination is SRSS.

https://structuralcalc.com/scaling-of-base-shear-in-etabs/ 8/19
3/30/22, 3:14 PM Scaling of Base Shear in ETABS

STEP 8:
Create a load combination that combines the response from each direction SPECX
and SPECY. Two methods are commonly used:

Method 1) 100% from one direction + 30% from the other direction
Method 2) Square root of the sum of squares (SRSS) of the effect from each
direction.

The SRSS method of combination will be used in this example. This is declared as
SPECXY in the ETABS load combination definition.

For complex or irregular structures which do not have clearly defined

orthogonal directions, it may be unclear as to how the orientation
of response-spectrum analysis should be applied. In the paper
entitled Orthogonal Effects in RSA , Dr. Wilson explains that combined
directional effects may be accounted for more effectively by using an
alternative method in which the SRSS combination of two 100-percent
spectra analyses is applied in any direction, or along either orthogonal
axis. 
— CSI Knowledge Base

https://structuralcalc.com/scaling-of-base-shear-in-etabs/ 9/19
3/30/22, 3:14 PM Scaling of Base Shear in ETABS

Scale values of 1.0 are applied for each case. This can be adjusted later in the load
combination of SPECXY after the analysis has been completed. If a higher scale
factor is necessary to satisfy code requirements, this can be applied in the
combination without having to rerun the dynamic analysis. This can save hours or
even days of computer analysis time in case of a huge model!

NOTE: If Method 1 combination is preferred, the “Absolute Add”

combination type should be selected:

Combination using Absolute Add for Method 1

STEP 9:
If you have completed STEPS 1-8, you should be able to run the analysis. After the
analysis is completed, click on Display > Show Tables


https://structuralcalc.com/scaling-of-base-shear-in-etabs/ 10/19
3/30/22, 3:14 PM Scaling of Base Shear in ETABS

Select Analysis > Results > Modal Results > Modal Participating Mass Ratios

and Analysis > Results > Structure Results > Story Forces check boxes.

Select the “Modal Participating Mass Ratios” table. Verify that both “Sum UX” and
“Sum UY” have achieved at least 90% participation. If not, increase the number of
modes then rerun the analysis. For our example, 100% participation has been
achieved.

Select the “Story Forces” table. Right-click on any part of the table and choose 
“Export to Excel”
https://structuralcalc.com/scaling-of-base-shear-in-etabs/ 11/19
3/30/22, 3:14 PM Scaling of Base Shear in ETABS

STEP 10:
With the data exported in Excel, filter the data by clicking Data > Filter

The base shear will be scaled from the base of the structure, therefore select the
lowest level only. In our example, Story1.

Filter the Load Case/Combo by selecting EQX, EQY, SPECX Max, and SPECY Max.

https://structuralcalc.com/scaling-of-base-shear-in-etabs/ 12/19
3/30/22, 3:14 PM Scaling of Base Shear in ETABS

Finally, filter Location to display the Bottom forces only. The Excel table should now
look like as shown:

Create a formula at the end of each row to calculate the resultant shear:

SQRT(VX^2 + VY^2)


Get the ratio between dynamic and static base shear. In this example,
https://structuralcalc.com/scaling-of-base-shear-in-etabs/ 13/19
3/30/22, 3:14 PM Scaling of Base Shear in ETABS

Ratio,x = VSPECX/VEQX = 1804.166/1037.666

Ratio,x = 1.739

Ratio,y = VSPECY/VEQY = 1744.864/1037.666

Ratio,y = 1.682

The ratio should be greater than the minimum prescribed by the code. Based on
ASCE 7-05 Section 12.9.4, the ratio should be more than 85%. Since both
Ratio,x and Ratio,y are greater than 0.85, there is no need to further adjust the
scales, e.g. keep SPECX=1 and SPECY=1 under the load combination SPECXY.

Create other seismic load combinations in ETABS and make use of the pre-
combined SPECXY load combination. For example, the ASCE 7-05 combination

1.2 DEAD + 1.0 EQ + 1.0 LIVE

can be defined in ETABS as shown:

https://structuralcalc.com/scaling-of-base-shear-in-etabs/ 14/19
3/30/22, 3:14 PM Scaling of Base Shear in ETABS

Notice how we used the combined effect SPECXY instead of SPECX or SPECY
individually. This reduces the total number of seismic combinations we would
need to define in ETABS. ASCE 7-05 also requires us to include the vertical
component of the earthquake force in the combination (not shown in this simple
example).

STEP11:
What if the ratio between dynamic and static base shear is less than 0.85? Let’s
consider the following data derived from another theoretical ETABS analysis.

V,EQX = 10800 kN

V,EQY = 10800 kN

V,SPECX = 9850 kN

V,SPECY = 7830 kN

Ratio,x = 9850/10800 = 0.912 > 0.85, ok (don't reduce

scale!)

Ratio,y = 7830/10800 = 0.725 < 0.85, scale up!

Scale,SPECX = 1.0

Scale,SPECY = 0.85/0.725 = 1.172

This means that we need to scale up the factors as follows :

https://structuralcalc.com/scaling-of-base-shear-in-etabs/ 15/19
3/30/22, 3:14 PM Scaling of Base Shear in ETABS

Plot of story shear against building height depicting scaled and unscaled base shear.

The above diagram shows the original unscaled dynamic story shear (red lines)
and the scaled up dynamic story shear (green lines). In this example, it can be seen
that the shear force distribution for each corresponding story is lower in the
dynamic analysis procedure as compared with the static analysis procedure. This is
generally the case, therefore most structural designers prefer to apply dynamic
seismic analysis which could result to more economical design.


https://structuralcalc.com/scaling-of-base-shear-in-etabs/ 16/19
3/30/22, 3:14 PM Scaling of Base Shear in ETABS

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS:

 Subscribe 

Join the discussion

1 COMMENT Oldest 

Abo Yahya
 3 months ago

great explanation continue deeply

my question is there and difference between this scale factor and scale factor when we are
showing the results of analysis plot function that units find in two axis X&Y?

Reply 

FEATURED POSTS

Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete Calculator

BY CCSTRUCT | APRIL 15, 2021 

https://structuralcalc.com/scaling-of-base-shear-in-etabs/ 17/19
3/30/22, 3:14 PM Scaling of Base Shear in ETABS

Concrete Corbel Design to ACI 318-14

BY CCSTRUCT | JANUARY 1, 2021

Rebar Development Length Calculator to ACI 318

BY CCSTRUCT | DECEMBER 2, 2020

The Best Steel Connection Design Software

BY CCSTRUCT | OCTOBER 1, 2020

CATEGORIES

Articles (3)
Principles (2)
Software (1)
Web Calculations (5)
Analysis (1)
Handy Tools (1)
Reinforced Concrete (3)


https://structuralcalc.com/scaling-of-base-shear-in-etabs/ 18/19
3/30/22, 3:14 PM Scaling of Base Shear in ETABS

Copyright © Structural Calc 2020. All Rights Reserved.

https://structuralcalc.com/scaling-of-base-shear-in-etabs/ 19/19