Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What Were The Most Important Discoveries in Our Reviewed Paper
What Were The Most Important Discoveries in Our Reviewed Paper
Name of pupil
Name of professor
Course
Date
2
1. What were the most important discoveries in our reviewed paper, Betti et al.?
interspecies relationships. Chemical signals from plants' neighbors may influence a plant's
survival and function. This has ramifications for the peaceful cohabitation of plants and the
assembling of a community. According to several studies, root exudates have played an essential
including mixed-species plantations, is driven by root exudates. Root exudates include signaling
components that may alter relationships. Root ethylene, strigolactones, jasmonic acid, (-)-collide,
and allantoin is signaling molecules that carry information about local circumstances in the
secretion, and action, all of which are inter-and intraspecifically coordinated. Several exciting
plant-plant interactions may be discovered via root-secreted chemical signals and associated
molecular processes. However, methodological constraints and root-soil interactions mean many
roots remain undiscovered, especially species-specific signals and their underlying processes.
Studying root-secreted molecular movements and their functions will have many ecological and
agricultural ramifications.
According to Betti et al. (2021), as the minor non-coding RNAs in plants and animals,
information. Plant and animal miRNAs have a great deal of structural and functional similarity.
Most of the transcriptomes of different cell types have their structure and function determined by
miRNAs from both kingdoms. mRNA stability and translational inhibition seem to be the
primary mechanisms by which plant and animal miRNAs exercise their genetic and
3
transcriptomic effects on gene expression. A common origin and functional selection of specific
microRNAs over vast periods of evolution (for example, Arabidopsis thaliana-Homo sapiens
divergence of 1.5 billion years) may be suggested by the finding that plants and animals express
certain miRNA species such as miRNA-155, miRNA-168, and miRNA-854 family members.
When it comes to human health and illness, there is considerable debate about whether plant-
enriched miRNAs, which are involved in cross-kingdom miRNA communication, may have
physiological and pathophysiological effects. The intriguing possibility that dietary miRNAs and
sncRNAs may have the potential to contribute to both intra- and inter-kingdom signaling and, in
doing so, modulate molecular-genetic mechanisms associated with human health and disease, is
highlighted in this research paper, which highlights some recent, controversial, and remarkable
According to Strzyz (2021), RNA silencing has evolved in higher eukaryotes. Non-cell-
autonomous RNA silencing occurs in plants and certain animals, including the worm
nearby cells occurs due to silencing initiation in one or a few cells. A short-range silencing
signal, most likely 21-nt siRNAs (short interfering RNAs) generated by one of the plant Dicer
enzymes, is responsible for spreading silence in plants. In addition, the phloem system of plants,
which transports compounds from the source to the sink tissues, transmits silencing systemically.
In contrast to the short-range silencing signal, systemic silencing's messengers are primarily
unknown. Some of the genetic components of the short-range silencing spread route have been
uncovered in recent research, shedding light on multiple aspects of the mechanisms involved.
This review aims to identify the similarities and differences between the various RNA silencing
According to Betti et al. (2021), plants and the worm C. Elegans use a kind of mRNA sequence
consequence of RDR6 activity. It's been proved time and time again that, unlike transgenes in C.
elegans, endogenes in plants are resistant to RNAi-mediated silencing of sequences other than
the one targeted initially. According to Strzy (2021), endogenes are shielded from RDR action
since the same region is susceptible to transgene transitivity when produced as a transgene.
Considering that more powerful promoters than endogene expression usually control transgenic
transcription, what are the targeted sequences' RNA steady-state levels of the targeted sequences.
hand, silencing is restricted to 10–15 cells in the vicinity of the silencing source cells.
When faced with environmental stressors such as herbivore attacks and competition with
neighboring plants, plants can alter their phenotypic. Plant defense is mediated by volatile
chemicals generated by the plant itself. Volatile emissions have both advantages and
disadvantages. There has been a lot of research on how specific plants respond to volatiles in
defense. On the other hand, plants are seldom seen independently but in groups where they fight
for resources and share knowledge. Our focus here is on the impact of neighboring plants on
plant volatile-mediated defenses. Volatile molecules have a wide range of functions in the
interactions between plants and other species. We will explain how explosive signaling and
neighbor recognition are intertwined. Here are the most pressing issues that must be addressed in
the future.
According to Betti et al. (2021), exogenous RNA that has been purposefully tailored to target
specific genes seems to be taken up by plants and activated by the RNA interference (RNAi)
5
machinery; according to Betti et al. (2021), there is, however, evidence that parasitic plants
exchange short RNAs with their hosts, which suggests that RNAs may be used as signaling
secreted by host Arabidopsis cells are used to transfer short plant RNAs into Botrytis cinerea.
This phenomenon has been reported in worms and insects. Plants create micro-RNAs (miRNAs)
that operate as signaling molecules that influence gene expression in other nearby plants. To
activate RNAi, both AGO1 and RDR6 must be present for exogenous miRNAs like miR156 and
miR399. Secondary small interfering RNA synthesis is needed, as shown by this finding. This
research indicates that miRNAs are signaling molecules that allow plants to communicate with
one other.
3. Betti et al. show that extracellular miRNAs enter plant cells and silence target genes.
What is one possible pathway(s) that plants use to uptake extracellular miRNAs (or small
RNAs)?
According to Treiber, Treiber, & Meister, (2019), the canonical biogenesis route is the central
including the RNA binding protein DiGeorge Syndrome Critical Region 8 (DGCR8) and the
ribonuclease III enzyme Drosha. Drosha cleaves the pri-miRNA duplex at the base of the
distinctive hairpin structure of pri-miRNA. This causes a two nt 3′ overhang on pre-miRNA (29).
Pre-miRNAs are synthesized in the nucleus and exported to the cytoplasm by an exportin 5
(XPO5)/RanGTP complex. The terminal loop is removed, resulting in a mature miRNA duplex.
6
According to Salim et al. (2022), the mature miRNA form is named after the miRNA strand's
directionality. From the 5′ end of the pre-miRNA hairpin, the 5p strand emerges, whereas the 3p
strand emerges. ATP-dependent loading of both strands of the mature miRNA duplex into the
3p strands changes substantially depending on the cell type or cellular environment. The 5′
extremities of the miRNA duplex or a 5′ U at nucleotide position one are selected as the 5p or 3p
strand. The guide strand has the lowest 5′ stability or 5′ uracil. According to the degree of
complementarity, the unloaded passenger strand will be unwound from the guiding strand.
AGO2 cleaves and degrades miRNA passenger strands with no mismatches, resulting in a
significant strand bias. AGO2-unloaded miRNA duplexes are passively unraveled and destroyed.
According to Treiber, Treiber, & Meister (2019), uncanonical miRNA biogenesis pathways have
been identified. These routes employ alternative combinations of Drosha, Dicer, exportin 5, and
AGO2 proteins from the conventional path. Non-canonical miRNA biogenesis may be classified
resemble Dicer substrates. Mirtrons are pre-miRNAs generated from mRNA introns during
splicing. Another example is m7G-capped pre-miRNA. These nascent RNAs are exported
straight into the cytoplasm through exportin one without Drosha cleavage. According to Salim et
al. (2022), the m7G cap prohibiting 5p strand loading into Argonaute causes a substantial 3p
strand bias. On the other hand, Drosha processes Dicer-independent miRNAs from endogenous
shRNA transcripts. Because they are too short to be Dicer-substrates, these pre-miRNAs need
AGO2 to mature in the cytoplasm (38). This enhances pre-miRNA loading into AGO2 and
In N. benthamiana, the experiment we can find similar findings after RNAi suppression of the
RDR6 gene. To a certain extent, this silencing spread phenotypic resembled the endogene
silencing phenotype in that the suppression of GFP-transgene was limited to 15 cells in a range
in systemic organs. Silencing of rdr mutants by endogene silencing or transgene silencing has
been shown to have this short-range distribution without amplification. Transgenic sequences
may be silenced within a 15-cell radius after being bombarded with DNA or siRNA or even after
a viral vector induces a silencing response. In several GFP transgenic lines, it has been shown
that silencing without systemic dissemination occurs spontaneously. There was not enough
silencing signal generated in this instance to activate the relay mechanism required for further
danger would be prevented by setting a threshold for widespread RNA silencing, which is seen
According to Han et al. (2021), microRNAs (miRNAs) are short non-coding RNAs that have
emerged as critical regulators of gene expression, mainly by cleavage and translation inhibition
of the target mRNAs during or after transcription. Maintaining the integrity of the plant genome,
development, metabolism, and adaptive responses to environmental challenges are only a few of
the functions of miRNAs. According to Feng et al. (2022), the growing population of the globe
and the need for food necessitates a focus on agricultural plant enhancement to assure long-term
food security.
8
According to Feng et al. (2022), different plant gene expressions may be modulated via miRNA
control to manipulate mRNA transcript abundance. MiRNAs are emerging as the next
generation's target for genetic engineering to enhance the agronomic qualities of crops.
Understanding the possibilities and processes involved will help create appropriate tactics for
obtaining desired features with minimal trade-offs in transgenic crops. According to Han et al.
(2021), there are numerous roles for miRNAs in food and industrial crops, both conserved and
newly discovered, and recent advances in the use of miRNAs to improve plants of agronomic
importance to enhance crop yields significantly and increase tolerance of various environmental
References
Betti, F., Ladera-Carmona, M. J., Weits, D. A., Ferri, G., Iacopino, S., Novi, G., ... & Perata, P.
Plants, 7(10), 1379-1388.
Feng, Y., Liu, Q., Zhao, X., Chen, M., Sun, X., Li, H., & Chen, X. (2022). Framework Nucleic
Analytical Chemistry.
Han, Y., Jones, T. W., Dutta, S., Zhu, Y., Wang, X., Narayanan, S. P., ... & Zhang, D. (2021).
vesicles. Processes, 9(2), 356.
Salim, U., Kumar, A., Kulshreshtha, R., & Vivekanandan, P. (2022). Biogenesis,
e1680.
10
Biology, 22(12), 775-775.
Treiber, T., Treiber, N., & Meister, G. (2019). Regulation of microRNA biogenesis and its
20.