Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 216

 

 ‌
 ‌

 ‌
Political‌‌and‌‌Public‌‌International‌‌Law‌&
‌   ‌‌ ‌
Labor‌‌Law‌‌and‌‌Social‌‌Legislation‌  ‌

 
POL‌x‌LAB‌ ‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌
 
   ‌ ‌

 ‌

Compiled‌‌by‌‌RGL‌‌|‌‌USC‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

TABLE‌‌OF‌‌CONTENTS‌  ‌ Labor‌‌Standards‌ 146‌  ‌ B.‌‌Parts‌‌of‌‌a‌‌Constitution‌  ‌


 ‌
POLITICAL‌‌AND‌‌PUBLIC‌‌INTERNATIONAL‌‌LAW‌  ‌ Post-Employment‌ 164‌  ‌ 1) Constitution‌‌   of‌‌
  ‌Liberty‌‌
  ‌— ‌‌consists‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌series‌‌ of‌‌ prescriptions‌‌ 
setting‌  ‌forth‌  ‌the‌  ‌fundamental‌  ‌civil‌  ‌and‌  ‌political‌  ‌rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌‌1987‌‌Constitution‌ 2‌  ‌ Labor‌‌Relations‌ 182‌  ‌ citizens‌‌ and‌‌ imposing‌‌ limitations‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ powers‌‌ of‌‌ government‌‌ 
as‌‌a‌‌means‌‌of‌‌securing‌‌the‌‌enjoyment‌‌of‌‌those‌‌rights;‌  ‌
Basic‌‌Concepts‌ 3‌  ‌ Management‌‌Prerogative‌ 192‌  ‌
2) Constitution‌  ‌of‌  ‌Government‌‌   ‌— ‌‌series‌‌
  of‌‌
  provisions‌‌
  outlining‌‌ 
National‌‌Territory‌ 13‌  ‌ Social‌‌Legislation‌ 194‌  ‌ the‌  ‌organization‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌government,‌  ‌enumerating‌  ‌its‌  ‌powers,‌‌ 
laying‌  ‌down‌  ‌certain‌  ‌rules‌  ‌relative‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌  ‌administration,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Citizenship‌ 14‌  ‌ Jurisdiction‌‌and‌‌Remedies‌ 206‌  ‌ defining‌‌the‌‌electorate;‌‌and‌  ‌
 ‌
3) Constitution‌  ‌of‌  ‌Sovereignty‌  ‌— ‌ ‌consists‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌provisions‌‌ 
Legislative‌‌Department‌ 17‌  ‌
I.‌‌THE‌‌1987‌‌CONSTITUTION‌  ‌ pointing‌  ‌out‌‌
  the‌‌
  mode‌‌
  or‌‌
  procedure‌‌
  in‌‌
  accordance‌‌   with‌‌
  which‌‌ 
Executive‌‌Department‌ 27‌  ‌ formal‌‌changes‌‌in‌‌the‌‌fundamental‌‌law‌‌may‌‌be‌‌brought‌‌about.‌  ‌
A.‌‌Nature‌‌and‌‌Concept‌‌of‌‌a‌‌Constitution‌  ‌
Judicial‌‌Department‌ 37‌  ‌ C.‌‌Amendments‌‌and‌‌Revisions‌  ‌
B.‌‌Parts‌‌of‌‌a‌‌Constitution‌  ‌
Article‌  ‌XVII‌. ‌ ‌Section‌  ‌1.‌  ‌Any‌  ‌amendment‌  ‌to,‌  ‌or‌  ‌revision‌  ‌of,‌  ‌this‌‌ 
Constitutional‌‌Commissions‌ 41‌  ‌ C.‌‌Amendments‌‌and‌‌Revisions‌  ‌ Constitution‌‌may‌‌be‌‌proposed‌‌by:‌  ‌

Bill‌‌of‌‌Rights‌ 43‌  ‌ D.‌‌Methods‌‌of‌‌Interpreting‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌  ‌ 1. The‌  ‌Congress‌, ‌ ‌upon‌  ‌a ‌ ‌vote‌  ‌of‌  ‌three-fourths‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌its‌‌ 
 ‌ Members;‌‌or‌  ‌
Law‌‌on‌‌Public‌‌Officers‌ 73‌  ‌ 2. A‌‌constitutional‌‌convention‌. ‌ ‌
A.‌‌Nature‌‌and‌‌Concept‌‌of‌‌a‌‌Constitution‌  ‌
Administrative‌‌Law‌ ‌85‌  ‌ Section‌‌
  2.‌‌
  ‌Amendments‌‌
  ‌to‌‌
  this‌‌ Constitution‌‌ may‌‌ likewise‌‌ be‌‌ ‌directly‌‌ 
A‌  ‌constitution‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌system‌  ‌of‌  ‌fundamental‌  ‌laws‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
proposed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌people‌‌‌through‌i‌ nitiative‌u
‌ pon‌‌a‌‌petition‌‌of‌‌   ‌
Election‌‌Law‌ 9‌6 ‌ ‌ governance‌  ‌and‌  ‌administration‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌nation.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌supreme‌, ‌‌
imperious‌,‌  ‌absolute‌  ‌and‌  ‌unalterable‌  ‌except‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌authority‌‌  a. at‌  ‌least‌  ‌twelve‌  ‌per‌  ‌centum‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌total‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Local‌‌Governments‌ ‌109‌  ‌ from‌‌which‌‌it‌‌emanates.‌‌   ‌ registered‌‌voters‌,  ‌‌ ‌

It‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌defined‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌fundamental‌  ‌and‌  ‌paramount‌  ‌law‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  b. of‌  ‌which‌  ‌every‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌district‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌represented‌  ‌by‌  ‌at‌‌ 
National‌‌Economy‌‌and‌‌Patrimony‌ ‌120‌  ‌
nation.‌  ‌ least‌‌three‌‌per‌‌centum‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌registered‌‌voters‌‌therein.‌‌   ‌
Social‌‌Justice‌‌and‌‌Human‌‌Rights‌ ‌123‌  ‌ Manila‌‌Prince‌‌Hotel‌‌v.‌‌GSIS‌‌   ‌ No‌  ‌amendment‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌within‌  ‌five‌  ‌years‌  ‌following‌  ‌the‌‌ 
ratification‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌Constitution‌‌
  nor‌‌
  oftener‌‌
  than‌‌
  once‌‌
  every‌‌   ‌five‌‌
  years‌‌ 
Education,‌‌Science,‌‌Technology,‌‌Arts,‌‌Culture‌‌&‌‌Sports‌ ‌124‌  ‌ Under‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌supremacy‌, ‌ ‌if‌  ‌a ‌ ‌law‌  ‌or‌‌ 
contract‌  ‌violates‌  ‌any‌  ‌norm‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitution‌  ‌that‌  ‌law‌  ‌or‌  ‌contract‌‌  thereafter.‌  ‌

Public‌‌International‌‌Law‌ ‌125‌  ‌ whether‌‌   promulgated‌‌   by‌‌


  the‌‌  legislative‌‌
  or‌‌
  by‌‌ the‌‌ executive‌‌ branch‌‌ or‌‌  Section‌‌3.‌‌‌The‌‌Congress‌m
‌ ay,‌‌   ‌
entered‌‌  into‌‌
  by‌‌ private‌‌ persons‌‌ for‌‌ private‌‌ purposes‌‌ is‌‌ ‌null‌‌ and‌‌ void‌‌ 
a. by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌vote‌  ‌of‌  two-thirds‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌its‌  ‌Members‌, ‌ ‌call‌  ‌a ‌‌
LABOR‌‌LAW‌‌AND‌‌SOCIAL‌‌LEGISLATION‌  ‌ and‌  ‌without‌  ‌any‌‌   force‌‌
  and‌‌  effect.‌‌
  Thus,‌‌
  since‌‌   the‌‌
  Constitution‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌ 
fundamental,‌  ‌paramount‌  ‌and‌  ‌supreme‌  ‌law‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌nation,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌‌  constitutional‌‌convention,‌O ‌ R‌‌   ‌
Fundamental‌‌Principles‌ 141‌  ‌ deemed‌‌written‌‌in‌‌every‌‌statute‌‌and‌‌contract‌. ‌ ‌ b. by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌majority‌  ‌vote‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌its‌  ‌Members‌, ‌ ‌submit‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
electorate‌‌the‌‌question‌‌of‌‌calling‌‌such‌‌a‌‌convention.‌  ‌
Recruitment‌‌and‌‌Placement‌ 142‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 2‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Section‌‌
  4.‌‌
  ‌Any‌‌
  amendment‌‌
  to,‌‌
  or‌‌
  revision‌‌
  of,‌‌ this‌‌ Constitution‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌  D.‌‌Methods‌‌of‌‌Interpreting‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌  ‌ These‌‌   principles‌‌   in‌‌
  Article‌‌   II‌‌  are‌‌ ‌not‌‌ intended‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ self-executing‌‌ 
valid‌  ‌when‌  ‌ratified‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌majority‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌votes‌  ‌cast‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌‌ principles‌  ‌ready‌  ‌for‌  ‌enforcement‌  ‌through‌  ‌the‌  ‌courts.‌‌   They‌‌   are‌‌
  used‌‌ 
1) The‌‌
  Constitution‌‌   should‌‌
  be‌‌
  interpreted‌‌ in‌‌ such‌‌ a ‌‌way‌‌ as‌‌ to‌‌ give‌‌ 
plebiscite‌  ‌which‌‌  shall‌‌  be‌‌  held‌‌  ‌not‌‌ earlier‌‌ than‌‌ sixty‌‌ days‌‌ nor‌‌ later‌‌  by‌  ‌the‌  ‌judiciary‌  ‌as‌  ‌aids‌  ‌or‌  ‌as‌  ‌guides‌  ‌in‌‌
  the‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  of‌‌  its‌‌
  power‌‌   of‌‌ 
effect‌‌to‌‌the‌‌intendment‌‌of‌‌the‌‌framers.‌  ‌ judicial‌‌review,‌‌and‌‌by‌‌the‌‌legislature‌‌in‌‌its‌‌enactment‌‌of‌‌laws.‌  ‌
than‌‌ninety‌‌days‌‌   ‌
2) In‌‌case‌‌of‌‌doubt,‌‌the‌‌constitution‌‌should‌‌be‌‌considered‌‌   ‌
a. after‌‌
  the‌‌
  approval‌‌
  of‌‌ such‌‌ amendment‌‌ or‌‌ revision;‌‌ (‌Constituent‌‌  Reiterated‌‌in‌E
‌ spina‌‌v.‌‌Zamora‌  ‌
a) self-executing‌‌‌rather‌‌than‌‌non‌‌self-executing;‌‌   ‌
Assembly‌‌or‌‌Constitutional‌‌Convention‌)‌‌OR‌  ‌
b) mandatory‌r‌ ather‌‌than‌‌directory;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ While‌  ‌Section‌  ‌19,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌II‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌1987‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌requires‌  ‌the‌‌ 
b. after‌  ‌the‌  ‌certification‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Comelec‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  sufficiency‌‌
  of‌‌ 
development‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌self-reliant‌  ‌and‌  ‌independent‌  ‌national‌  ‌economy‌‌ 
the‌‌petition‌.‌‌(‌People’s‌‌Initiative‌) ‌ ‌ c) prospective‌r‌ ather‌‌than‌‌retrospective.‌  ‌ effectively‌‌  controlled‌‌   by‌‌
  Filipino‌‌   entrepreneurs,‌‌   ‌it‌‌
  does‌‌
  not‌‌ impose‌‌ 
a‌‌
  policy‌‌
  of‌‌
  Filipino‌‌   monopoly‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ economic‌‌ environment‌. ‌ ‌The‌‌ 
Lambino‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌ Manila‌‌Prince‌‌Hotel‌‌v.‌‌GSIS‌  ‌ objective‌  ‌is‌  ‌simply‌  ‌to‌  ‌prohibit‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌powers‌  ‌or‌  ‌interests‌  ‌from‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Initiative‌  ‌Petition‌  ‌Does‌  ‌Not‌  ‌Comply‌  ‌with‌  ‌Section‌  ‌2,‌‌
  Article‌‌  A‌  ‌provision‌  ‌which‌  ‌lays‌  ‌down‌  ‌a ‌ ‌general‌  ‌principle‌, ‌ ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌those‌‌  maneuvering‌  ‌our‌  ‌economic‌  ‌policies‌  ‌and‌  ‌ensure‌  ‌that‌  ‌Filipinos‌  ‌are‌‌ 
XVII‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌‌on‌‌Direct‌‌Proposal‌‌by‌‌the‌‌People‌  ‌ found‌  ‌in‌  ‌Art.‌  ‌II‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌1987‌  ‌Constitution,‌  ‌is‌  ‌usually‌  ‌not‌‌  given‌‌preference‌‌in‌‌all‌‌areas‌‌of‌‌development.‌  ‌
self-executing‌.  ‌‌ ‌
 ‌

The‌  ‌framers‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌intended‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌"‌draft‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  II.‌‌BASIC‌‌CONCEPTS‌  ‌
proposed‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌amendment‌" ‌ ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌"‌ready‌  ‌and‌‌  But‌  ‌a ‌ ‌provision‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌complete‌  ‌in‌  ‌itself‌  ‌and‌  ‌becomes‌‌   operative‌‌ 
shown‌"‌‌to‌‌the‌‌people‌‌"b ‌ efore‌"‌‌they‌‌sign‌‌such‌‌proposal.‌  ‌ without‌  ‌the‌  ‌aid‌  ‌of‌  ‌supplementary‌  ‌or‌  ‌enabling‌  ‌legislation,‌  ‌or‌  ‌that‌‌  A.‌‌Declaration‌‌of‌‌Principles‌‌and‌‌State‌‌Policies‌  ‌
which‌  ‌supplies‌  ‌sufficient‌  ‌rule‌‌   by‌‌
  means‌‌   of‌‌
  which‌‌   the‌‌
  right‌‌
  it‌‌
  grants‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Initiative‌  ‌Violates‌  ‌Section‌  ‌2,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌XVII‌  ‌Disallowing‌‌  B.‌‌Sovereignty‌  ‌
may‌  ‌be‌  ‌enjoyed‌  ‌or‌  ‌protected,‌  ‌is‌  ‌self-executing.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌a ‌‌
Revision‌‌through‌‌Initiatives‌  ‌
constitutional‌‌provision‌‌is‌s ‌ elf-executing‌  ‌ C.‌‌State‌‌Immunity‌  ‌
A‌‌
  ‌people's‌‌
  initiative‌‌
  to‌‌
  change‌‌
  the‌‌
  Constitution‌‌
  applies‌‌ ‌ONLY‌‌ to‌‌ an‌‌  1. if‌‌the‌‌nature‌‌and‌‌extent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌right‌‌conferred‌‌and‌‌   ‌
amendment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌and‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌  r‌ evision‌. ‌‌ D.‌‌Separation‌‌of‌‌Powers‌  ‌
2. the‌‌liability‌‌imposed‌‌are‌‌fixed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌constitution‌‌itself,‌‌   ‌
Revision‌b‌ roadly‌‌implies‌‌a‌‌change‌‌that‌‌   ‌ E.‌‌Checks‌‌and‌‌Balances‌  ‌
3. so‌  ‌that‌  ‌they‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌determined‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌examination‌  ‌and‌‌ 
a. alters‌  ‌a ‌ ‌basic‌  ‌principle‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌   constitution‌, ‌‌like‌‌   altering‌‌  construction‌‌of‌‌its‌‌terms,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ F.‌‌Delegation‌‌of‌‌Powers‌  ‌
the‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌separation‌  ‌of‌  ‌powers‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌system‌  ‌of‌‌ 
4. there‌‌  is‌‌
  no‌‌
  language‌‌
  indicating‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  subject‌‌ is‌‌ referred‌‌ to‌‌  G.‌‌Fundamental‌‌Powers‌‌of‌‌the‌‌State‌  ‌
checks-and-balances.‌‌   ‌
the‌‌legislature‌‌for‌‌action.‌  ‌
There‌‌is‌‌also‌‌revision‌‌if‌‌the‌‌change‌‌   ‌ Police‌‌Power‌  ‌
Unless‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌provided‌  ‌that‌‌  a ‌‌legislative‌‌
  act‌‌
  is‌‌
  necessary‌‌   to‌‌ 
b. alters‌  ‌the‌  ‌substantial‌  ‌entirety‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitution,‌  ‌as‌‌  enforce‌‌
  a ‌‌constitutional‌‌   mandate,‌‌  ‌the‌‌
  presumption‌‌   now‌‌  is‌‌ that‌‌ all‌‌  Eminent‌‌Domain‌  ‌
when‌  ‌the‌  ‌change‌  ‌affects‌  ‌substantial‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  provisions‌‌of‌‌the‌‌constitution‌‌are‌‌self-executing‌. ‌ ‌ Taxation‌  ‌
constitution‌.  ‌‌ ‌
A‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌provision‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌self-executing‌  ‌in‌‌   ‌
A‌‌
  ‌two-part‌‌  test‌‌
  is‌‌
  thus‌‌
  used:‌‌ the‌‌ quantitative‌‌ test‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ qualitative‌‌  one‌‌part‌‌and‌‌non-self-executing‌‌in‌‌another‌. ‌ ‌
test.‌  ‌The‌  ‌quantitative‌  ‌test‌  ‌examines‌  ‌only‌  ‌the‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌‌  A.‌‌Declaration‌‌of‌‌Principles‌‌and‌‌State‌‌Policies‌  ‌
provisions‌‌affected‌‌and‌‌does‌‌not‌‌consider‌‌the‌‌degree‌‌of‌‌the‌‌change.‌  ‌ Sec‌  ‌10,‌  ‌second‌  ‌par.,‌  ‌Art.‌  ‌XII‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌1987‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌
mandatory‌, ‌ ‌positive‌  ‌command‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌complete‌  ‌in‌  ‌itself‌  ‌and‌‌  The‌‌State‌‌as‌‌Parens‌‌Patriae‌ 
The‌  ‌qualitative‌  ‌test‌  ‌inquires‌  ‌into‌  ‌the‌  ‌qualitative‌  ‌effects‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  which‌‌   needs‌‌
  no‌‌  further‌‌   guidelines‌‌   or‌‌
  implementing‌‌ laws‌‌ or‌‌ rules‌‌ for‌‌ 
proposed‌‌   change‌‌   in‌‌ the‌‌ constitution.‌‌ The‌‌ main‌‌ inquiry‌‌ is‌‌ whether‌‌ the‌‌  its‌  ‌enforcement.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌per‌  ‌se‌  ‌judicially‌‌  enforceable.‌‌
  Where‌‌
  there‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌ Maynilad‌‌v.‌‌SENR‌‌‌2019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
change‌  ‌will‌  ‌"accomplish‌  ‌such‌  ‌far‌  ‌reaching‌  ‌changes‌  ‌in‌‌  the‌‌
  nature‌‌
  of‌‌  right‌‌there‌‌is‌‌a‌‌remedy.‌U ‌ bi‌‌jus‌‌ibi‌‌remedium‌. ‌ ‌ Hand-in-hand‌‌   with‌‌
  police‌‌
  power‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  promotion‌‌
  of‌‌
  general‌‌ welfare‌‌ 
our‌‌basic‌‌governmental‌‌plan‌‌as‌‌to‌‌amount‌‌to‌‌a‌‌revision.".‌  ‌
is‌‌the‌‌‌doctrine‌‌of‌‌parens‌‌patriae‌. ‌ ‌
Compare‌‌with‌‌‌Tanada‌‌v.‌‌Angara‌  ‌
Under‌‌
  the‌‌
  doctrine,‌‌
  the‌‌ state‌‌ has‌‌ the‌‌ sovereign‌‌ power‌‌ of‌‌ guardianship‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 3‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

over‌  ‌persons‌  ‌of‌  ‌disability,‌  ‌and‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌execution‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌the‌‌  The‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌international‌  ‌law‌‌   has‌‌
  been‌‌   made‌‌
  part‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  law‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  and‌‌the‌‌ICCPR.‌  ‌
legislature‌  ‌is‌  ‌possessed‌  ‌of‌  ‌inherent‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌provide‌  ‌protection‌‌   to‌  land‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌   by‌‌  any‌‌   means‌‌   imply‌‌   the‌‌
  primacy‌‌   of‌‌
  international‌‌   law‌‌ 
The‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌non-discrimination‌  ‌requires‌  ‌that‌‌   laws‌‌   of‌‌
  general‌‌ 
persons‌  ‌non‌‌   sui‌‌
  juris‌‌
  and‌‌
  to‌‌
  make‌‌   and‌‌   enforce‌‌
  rules‌‌   and‌‌  regulations‌‌  over‌  ‌national‌  ‌law‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌municipal‌  ‌sphere.‌  ‌Under‌  ‌the‌‌   ‌doctrine‌‌   of‌‌  application‌  ‌relating‌  ‌to‌  ‌elections‌  ‌be‌  ‌applied‌  ‌equally‌  ‌to‌  ‌all‌  ‌persons,‌‌ 
as‌‌it‌‌deems‌‌proper‌‌for‌‌the‌‌management‌‌of‌‌their‌‌property.‌‌   ‌ incorporation‌‌   ‌as‌‌  applied‌‌  in‌‌  most‌‌  countries,‌‌  rules‌‌ of‌‌ international‌‌  regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌orientation.‌  ‌Although‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌orientation‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌ 
Parens‌‌   patriae‌‌  means‌‌
  "father‌‌  of‌‌
  his‌‌ country",‌‌ and‌‌ refers‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ State‌‌  law‌‌
  are‌‌  given‌‌   a ‌‌standing‌‌  e
‌ qual‌, ‌‌‌not‌‌ superior‌, ‌‌to‌‌ national‌‌ legislative‌‌  specifically‌  ‌enumerated‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌status‌  ‌or‌  ‌ratio‌  ‌for‌  ‌discrimination‌  ‌in‌‌ 
as‌‌ a‌‌ ‌last-ditch‌‌ provider‌‌ of‌‌ protection‌‌ to‌‌ those‌‌ unable‌‌ to‌‌ care‌‌ and‌‌  enactments.‌  ‌ Article‌  ‌26‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌ICCPR,‌  ‌the‌  ‌ICCPR‌  ‌Human‌  ‌Rights‌  ‌Committee‌  ‌has‌‌ 
fend‌‌for‌‌themselves‌. ‌ ‌ opined‌‌   that‌‌ the‌‌ reference‌‌ to‌‌ "sex"‌‌ in‌‌ Article‌‌ 26‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌ construed‌‌ to‌‌ 
Tanada‌‌v.‌‌Angara‌  ‌ include‌‌"sexual‌‌orientation."‌‌   ‌
While‌  ‌the‌  ‌Regalian‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌is‌  ‌state‌  ‌ownership‌  ‌over‌  ‌natural‌‌ 
resources,‌  ‌police‌  ‌power‌  ‌is‌  ‌state‌‌   regulation‌‌   through‌‌   legislation,‌‌
  and‌‌  In‌  ‌its‌  ‌Declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌Principles‌  ‌and‌  ‌State‌  ‌Policies,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌‌  The‌‌
  ‌Yogyakarta‌‌   Principles‌, ‌‌consisting‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌declaration‌‌ formulated‌‌ by‌‌ 
parens‌  ‌patriae‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌default‌  ‌state‌  ‌responsibility‌  ‌to‌  ‌look‌  ‌after‌‌   the‌‌  “‌adopts‌  ‌the‌  ‌generally‌  ‌accepted‌  ‌principles‌  ‌of‌  ‌international‌  ‌law‌‌  various‌‌   international‌‌
  law‌‌ professors,‌‌ are‌‌ — ‌‌at‌‌ best‌‌ - ‌‌‌de‌‌ lege‌‌ ferenda‌‌ 
defenseless,‌‌   there‌‌  remains‌‌   a ‌‌limbo‌‌  on‌‌ a ‌‌flexible‌‌ state‌‌ policy‌‌ bringing‌‌  as‌‌  part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ land,‌‌ and‌‌ adheres‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ policy‌‌ of‌‌ peace,‌‌  —‌‌and‌‌do‌‌not‌‌constitute‌‌binding‌‌obligations‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌  ‌
these‌  ‌doctrines‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌cohesive‌  ‌whole.‌‌   We‌‌  fill‌‌
  this‌‌
  void‌‌
  through‌‌   the‌‌  equality,‌  ‌justice,‌  ‌freedom,‌  ‌cooperation‌  ‌and‌  ‌amity,‌  ‌with‌  ‌all‌‌ 
Public‌‌Trust‌‌Doctrine‌. ‌ ‌ nations‌."‌‌   By‌‌ the‌‌ ‌doctrine‌‌ of‌‌ incorporation‌, ‌‌the‌‌ country‌‌ is‌‌ bound‌‌ by‌‌  Compare‌D
‌ octrine‌‌of‌‌Transformation‌‌‌in‌U
‌ S‌‌v.‌‌Purganan‌  ‌
In‌  ‌this‌  ‌framework,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌relationship‌  ‌is‌‌   formed‌‌   — ‌‌the‌‌
  state‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌  generally‌  ‌accepted‌  ‌principles‌  ‌of‌  ‌international‌  ‌law,‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌‌ 
considered‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌automatically‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌our‌  ‌own‌  ‌laws.‌  ‌One‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  The‌  ‌US-RP‌  ‌Extradition‌  ‌Treaty‌  ‌in‌  ‌particular,‌  ‌undoubtedly‌  ‌affects‌  ‌not‌‌ 
trustee‌, ‌‌which‌‌ manages‌‌ specific‌‌ natural‌‌ resources‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ ‌trust‌‌  only‌‌  state‌‌
  organs‌‌  but‌‌
  also‌‌  private‌‌
  individuals‌‌   as‌‌
  well.‌‌
  It‌‌
  is‌‌
  said‌‌
  that,‌‌ 
principal‌‌   — ‌‌for‌‌ the‌‌ trust‌‌ principal‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ benefit‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ current‌‌  oldest‌  ‌and‌  ‌most‌  ‌fundamental‌  ‌rules‌  ‌in‌  ‌international‌  ‌law‌  ‌is‌  ‌pacta‌‌ 
in‌‌
  treaties‌‌
  of‌‌
  this‌‌
  nature,‌‌
  it‌‌
  should‌‌  behoove‌‌   the‌‌
  state‌‌
  to‌‌  undertake‌‌ or‌‌ 
and‌‌future‌‌generations‌‌—‌‌the‌b ‌ eneficiaries‌.  ‌‌ ‌ sunt‌  ‌servanda‌  ‌— ‌‌international‌‌  agreements‌‌  must‌‌  be‌‌  performed‌‌  in‌‌  adopt‌  ‌the‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌steps‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌  ‌the‌  ‌treaty‌  ‌binding‌  ‌upon‌  ‌said‌‌ 
good‌‌faith.‌‌   ‌ subjects‌‌either‌‌by‌i‌ ncorporation‌o ‌ r‌‌transformation‌. ‌ ‌
The‌‌
  public‌‌  is‌‌
  regarded‌‌ as‌‌ the‌‌ beneficial‌‌ owner‌‌ of‌‌ trust‌‌ resources,‌‌ and‌‌ 
courts‌  ‌can‌  ‌enforce‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌trust‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌even‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌‌  Existing‌‌   legislation‌‌   contrary‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  provisions‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  treaty‌‌   becomes‌‌ 
government‌‌itself.‌  ‌ SOJ‌‌v.‌‌Lantion‌  ‌
invalid,‌‌  but‌‌
  legislation‌‌   is‌‌
  necessary‌‌   to‌‌
  put‌‌
  the‌‌   treaty‌‌
  into‌‌
  effect.‌  ‌The‌‌ 
The‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌incorporation‌  ‌is‌  ‌applied‌  ‌whenever‌  ‌municipal‌‌  constitutional‌‌   requirement‌‌   that‌‌   the‌‌  treaty‌‌ be‌‌ concurred‌‌ in‌‌ by‌‌ no‌‌ less‌‌ 
DepEd‌‌v.‌‌Rizal‌‌Teachers‌‌Kilusang‌‌Bayan‌‌for‌‌Credit‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌ tribunals‌‌   are‌‌  confronted‌‌   with‌‌   situations‌‌  in‌‌ which‌‌ there‌‌ appears‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌  than‌  ‌two-thirds‌  ‌of‌‌  all‌‌
  members‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  Senate‌‌   is,‌‌
  for‌‌
  legal‌‌
  intent‌‌
  and‌‌ 
a‌  ‌conflict‌  ‌between‌  ‌a ‌ ‌rule‌  ‌of‌  ‌international‌‌   law‌‌   and‌‌
  the‌‌  provisions‌‌   of‌‌  purposes,‌  ‌an‌  ‌equivalent‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌required‌  ‌transformation‌  ‌of‌‌ 
May‌  ‌the‌  ‌DepEd‌  ‌be‌  ‌compelled‌  ‌by‌  ‌writ‌  ‌of‌  ‌mandamus‌  ‌to‌  ‌collect,‌  ‌by‌‌  treaty‌‌law‌‌into‌‌municipal‌‌law‌.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌constitution‌  ‌or‌  ‌statute‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌local‌  ‌state.‌  ‌Efforts‌  ‌should‌  ‌first‌‌
  be‌‌ 
salary‌  ‌deductions,‌  ‌the‌  ‌loan‌  ‌payments‌  ‌of‌‌   public‌‌
  school‌‌
  teachers‌‌   and‌‌ 
exerted‌‌to‌h ‌ armonize‌t‌ hem,‌‌so‌‌as‌‌to‌‌give‌‌effect‌‌to‌‌both.‌  ‌ In‌  ‌preserving‌  ‌harmony‌  ‌between‌  ‌treaty‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌  ‌municipal‌  ‌law,‌  ‌it‌‌
  is‌‌ 
remit‌‌them‌‌to‌‌the‌‌RTKBCI?‌  ‌
In‌  ‌a ‌ ‌situation,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌conflict‌  ‌is‌  ‌irreconcilable‌  ‌and‌  ‌a ‌‌ submitted‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌
RTKBCI‌  ‌has‌  ‌no‌  ‌clear‌  ‌legal‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌demand‌  ‌that‌  ‌DepEd‌  ‌act‌  ‌as‌  ‌its‌‌ 
choice‌  ‌has‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌made‌  ‌between‌  ‌a ‌ ‌rule‌  ‌of‌  ‌international‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌‌  1) That‌‌  treaty‌‌
  law‌‌
  has‌‌
  the‌‌
  effect‌‌ of‌‌ amending,‌‌ or‌‌ even‌‌ repealing‌‌ 
collecting‌  ‌and‌  ‌remitting‌  ‌agent.‌  ‌This‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌one‌  ‌of‌  ‌DepEd's‌  ‌power,‌‌ 
municipal‌‌   law,‌‌
  jurisprudence‌‌ dictates‌‌ that‌‌ ‌municipal‌‌ law‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌  an‌‌
  inconsistent‌‌   municipal‌‌   statute,‌‌  a ‌‌‌later‌‌
  enactment‌‌ being‌‌ 
duties,‌‌and‌‌functions.‌  ‌
upheld‌‌‌by‌‌the‌‌municipal‌‌courts.‌‌   ‌ controlling,‌  ‌
Teachers‌  ‌have‌  ‌no‌  ‌one‌  ‌else‌  ‌to‌  ‌turn‌  ‌to‌  ‌for‌‌
  protection‌‌   of‌‌
  their‌‌
  welfare‌‌ 
In‌‌
  the‌‌  absence‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌law‌‌
  or‌‌
  principle‌‌  of‌‌
  law,‌‌  we‌‌ must‌‌ apply‌‌ the‌‌ ‌rules‌‌ 
except‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌itself.‌  ‌For‌‌
  its‌‌
  part,‌‌
  the‌‌   State‌‌  is‌‌
  duty‌‌  bound‌‌   to‌‌
  render‌‌  2) but‌  ‌that‌  ‌an‌  ‌inconsistent‌  ‌municipal‌  ‌statute‌  ‌subsequently‌‌ 
such‌  ‌protection‌  ‌in‌  ‌observance‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌duty‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌‌  of‌‌
  fair‌‌   play‌. ‌‌An‌‌  application‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌  basic‌‌  twin‌‌  due‌‌  process‌‌  rights‌‌  of‌‌ 
passed‌‌   cannot‌‌   modify‌‌ treaty‌‌ law,‌‌ without‌‌ the‌‌ concurrence‌‌ of‌‌ 
parens‌  ‌patriae.‌  ‌In‌  ‌implementing‌  ‌the‌  ‌payroll‌  ‌deduction‌  ‌system,‌‌  notice‌‌   and‌‌  hearing‌‌   will‌‌
  not‌‌
  go‌‌
  against‌‌  the‌‌ treaty‌‌ or‌‌ the‌‌ implementing‌‌ 
the‌  ‌other‌  ‌state‌  ‌party‌  ‌thereto,‌  ‌following‌  ‌the‌  ‌generally‌‌ 
DepEd‌  ‌performed‌  ‌a ‌ ‌function‌  ‌only‌  ‌secondarily‌  ‌to‌‌   favor‌‌   RTKBCI‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌ law.‌‌  Neither‌‌   the‌‌ Treaty‌‌ nor‌‌ the‌‌ Extradition‌‌ Law‌‌ precludes‌‌ these‌‌ rights‌‌ 
accepted‌‌principle‌‌of‌p ‌ acta‌‌sunt‌‌servanda.‌  ‌
private‌  ‌lending‌  ‌institution‌‌   and‌‌  primarily‌‌   to‌‌
  protect‌‌   and‌‌   promote‌‌   the‌‌  from‌‌a‌‌prospective‌‌extraditee.‌  ‌
welfare‌‌of‌‌teachers‌‌and‌‌institutions‌‌of‌‌basic‌‌education.‌  ‌ Proceed‌‌to‌R
‌ elationship‌‌between‌‌International‌‌ 
Ang‌‌Ladlad‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ and‌‌Philippine‌‌Domestic‌‌Law‌  ‌
Adherence‌‌to‌‌International‌‌Law‌‌   ‌
We‌  ‌explicitly‌  ‌recognize‌  ‌the‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌non-discrimination‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌‌ 
Philip‌‌Morris‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ Separation‌‌of‌‌Church‌‌and‌‌State‌‌   ‌
relates‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  electoral‌‌
  participation,‌‌   enunciated‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ UDHR‌‌ 
Section‌‌6.‌‌‌The‌‌separation‌‌of‌‌Church‌‌and‌‌State‌‌shall‌‌be‌i‌ nviolable‌. ‌ ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 4‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Aglipay‌‌v.‌‌Ruiz‌  ‌ right"‌  ‌of‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌to‌  ‌"a‌‌


  ‌balanced‌‌   and‌‌
  healthful‌‌  ecology‌‌   which,‌‌
  for‌‌  same.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌first‌  ‌time‌  ‌in‌  ‌our‌  ‌nation's‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌history,‌  ‌is‌  ‌solemnly‌‌ 
What‌‌ is‌‌ guaranteed‌‌ by‌‌ our‌‌ Constitution‌‌ is‌‌ religious‌‌ liberty‌, ‌‌not‌‌ mere‌‌  Right‌‌of‌‌Indigenous‌‌Cultural‌‌Communities‌  ‌
incorporated‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌fundamental‌  ‌law."‌  ‌Their‌  ‌personality‌  ‌to‌  ‌sue‌  ‌in‌‌ 
religious‌‌   toleration.‌‌ ‌Religious‌‌ freedom‌, ‌‌however,‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌constitutional‌‌ 
behalf‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌succeeding‌  ‌generations‌  ‌can‌  ‌only‌  ‌be‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌ 
mandate‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌inhibition‌  ‌of‌  ‌profound‌  ‌reverence‌  ‌for‌  ‌religion‌‌
  and‌‌
  is‌‌  ⭐‌Tawahig‌‌v.‌‌Lapinid‌‌‌2019‌‌Leonen,‌‌J‌  ‌
concept‌  ‌of‌  i‌ ntergenerational‌  ‌responsibility‌  ‌insofar‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌‌ 
not‌  ‌a ‌‌denial‌‌
  of‌‌
  its‌‌
  influence‌‌
  in‌‌  human‌‌
  affairs.‌‌
  In‌‌
  fact,‌‌
  certain‌‌
  general‌‌ 
concessions‌  ‌are‌  ‌indiscriminately‌  ‌accorded‌  ‌to‌  ‌religious‌  ‌sects‌  ‌and‌‌  right‌‌to‌‌a‌‌balanced‌‌and‌‌healthful‌‌ecology‌i‌ s‌‌concerned.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌legal‌  ‌system's‌  ‌framework‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌protection‌  ‌of‌‌ 
denominations.‌‌   ‌ indigenous‌  ‌peoples‌  ‌was‌  ‌never‌  ‌intended‌  ‌and‌  ‌will‌  ‌not‌  ‌operate‌  ‌to‌‌ 
When‌‌   in‌‌
  doubt,‌‌   cases‌‌  must‌‌  be‌‌
  resolved‌‌
  in‌‌
  favor‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ constitutional‌‌ 
deprive‌  ‌courts‌  ‌of‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌offenses.‌  ‌Individuals‌‌ 
Here,‌  ‌the‌  ‌stamps‌  ‌were‌  ‌not‌  ‌issued‌  ‌and‌  ‌sold‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  right‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌balanced‌  ‌and‌  ‌healthful‌  ‌ecology.‌  ‌Parenthetically,‌  ‌judicial‌‌ 
belonging‌‌   to‌‌
  indigenous‌‌   cultural‌‌
  communities‌‌ who‌‌ are‌‌ charged‌‌ with‌‌ 
Roman‌‌   Catholic‌‌   Church.‌‌ Nor‌‌ were‌‌ money‌‌ derived‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ sale‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  adjudication‌‌   is‌‌
  one‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  strongest‌‌ fora‌‌ in‌‌ which‌‌ the‌‌ ‌precautionary‌‌ 
criminal‌  ‌offenses‌  ‌cannot‌‌   invoke‌‌
  the‌‌
  Indigenous‌‌   Peoples'‌‌  Rights‌‌
  Act‌‌ 
stamps‌‌   given‌‌  to‌‌
  that‌‌
  church.‌‌
  On‌‌
  the‌‌
  contrary,‌‌  it‌‌ appears‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ only‌‌  principle‌‌may‌‌find‌‌applicability.‌  ‌
of‌‌1997,‌‌to‌‌evade‌‌prosecution‌‌and‌‌liability‌‌under‌‌courts‌‌of‌‌law‌. ‌ ‌
purpose‌  ‌in‌  ‌issuing‌  ‌and‌  ‌selling‌  ‌the‌  ‌stamps‌  ‌was‌  ‌"‌to‌  ‌advertise‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Philippines‌‌and‌‌attract‌‌more‌‌tourists‌‌to‌‌this‌‌country‌."‌‌   ‌ Mosqueda‌‌v.‌‌Pilipino‌‌Banana‌‌Growers‌‌&‌‌Exporters‌‌Association‌‌  With‌  ‌respect‌  ‌to‌  ‌dispensing‌  ‌justice,‌  ‌resolving‌  ‌conflicts,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
peace-building,‌  ‌the‌  ‌application‌  ‌of‌‌   customary‌‌   laws‌‌  and‌‌
  practices‌‌ 
2016‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
is‌‌
  permissible‌‌   only‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌  extent‌‌   that‌‌   it‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌in‌‌
  harmony‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ 
Right‌‌to‌‌life‌‌of‌‌the‌‌unborn‌  ‌ The‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌health‌  ‌and‌  ‌maintaining‌  ‌environmental‌‌  national‌  ‌legal‌  ‌system‌. ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌set‌  ‌of‌  ‌customary‌  ‌laws‌  ‌and‌  ‌practices‌  ‌is‌‌ 
Imbong‌‌v.‌‌Ochoa‌‌2
‌ 014‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ integrity‌  ‌are‌  ‌privileges‌  ‌that‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌advance‌  ‌the‌  ‌interests‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌ effective‌‌
  only‌‌
  within‌‌   the‌‌
  confines‌‌   of‌‌   the‌‌
  specific‌‌   indigenous‌‌  cultural‌‌ 
group‌  ‌of‌  ‌individuals.‌  ‌The‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌of‌  ‌protecting‌  ‌human‌  ‌health‌  ‌and‌‌  community‌‌that‌‌adopted‌‌and‌‌adheres‌‌to‌‌it.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌national‌  ‌population‌  ‌program‌  ‌has‌  ‌always‌  ‌been‌‌  the‌  ‌environment‌  ‌transcend‌  ‌geographical‌  ‌locations‌  ‌and‌  ‌even‌‌ 
grounded‌‌ two‌‌ cornerstone‌‌ principles:‌‌ “‌principle‌‌ of‌‌ no-abortion‌” ‌‌ generations.‌  ‌This‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌essence‌  ‌of‌  ‌Sections‌‌   15‌‌  and‌‌  16,‌‌
  Article‌‌  II‌‌
  of‌‌  ‌Family‌‌as‌‌social‌‌institution‌  ‌
and‌‌the‌‌“p
‌ rinciple‌‌of‌‌non-coercion‌.”‌‌   ‌ the‌‌   Constitution.‌‌   In‌‌
  ‌Oposa‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Factoran,‌‌   Jr.‌‌
  ‌we‌‌ declared‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌  ⭐‌Falcis‌‌III‌‌v.‌‌Civil‌‌Registrar‌‌General‌‌‌2019‌‌Leonen‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌balanced‌  ‌and‌‌  healthful‌‌  ecology‌‌  under‌‌   Section‌‌   16‌‌
  is‌‌
  an‌‌  issue‌‌  of‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌agrees‌  ‌with‌  ‌ALFI‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌authors‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌RH-IRR‌  ‌gravely‌‌  transcendental‌  ‌importance‌  ‌with‌  ‌intergenerational‌‌  The‌‌
  Constitution‌‌
  does‌‌  not‌‌
  define‌‌
  or‌‌
  restrict‌‌
  marriage‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  basis‌‌ of‌‌ 
abused‌‌   their‌‌
  office‌‌
  when‌‌   they‌‌  redefined‌‌ the‌‌ meaning‌‌ of‌‌ abortifacient.‌‌  implications‌. ‌ ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌under‌  ‌this‌  ‌milieu‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌   questioned‌‌   ordinance‌‌  sex,‌‌gender,‌‌sexual‌‌orientation,‌‌or‌‌gender‌‌identity‌‌or‌‌expression.‌  ‌
It‌  ‌allows‌  ‌“contraceptives”‌  ‌and‌  ‌recognizes‌  ‌as‌  ‌“abortifacient”‌  ‌only‌  should‌‌be‌‌appreciated.‌  ‌
those‌‌that‌‌primarily‌i‌ nduce‌‌abortion.‌  ‌ Lacking‌  ‌a ‌ ‌manifestly‌  ‌restrictive‌  ‌textual‌  ‌definition‌  ‌of‌  ‌marriage,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Constitution‌  ‌is‌  ‌capable‌  ‌of‌  ‌accommodating‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contemporaneous‌‌ 
Evidently,‌  ‌the‌  ‌addition‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌word‌  ‌“primarily,”‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌RH-IRR‌  ‌is‌‌  Resident‌‌Marine‌‌Mammals‌‌v.‌‌Reyes‌‌2
‌ 015‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ understanding‌  ‌of‌  ‌sexual‌‌   orientation,‌‌   gender‌‌
  identity‌‌  and‌‌  expression,‌‌ 
indeed‌  ‌ultra‌  ‌vires‌. ‌‌With‌‌
  such‌‌  qualification‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  RH-IRR,‌‌   it‌‌
  appears‌‌  and‌  ‌sex‌  ‌characteristics‌‌  (SOGIESC).‌‌   ‌The‌‌  plain‌‌
  text‌‌
  and‌‌   meaning‌‌   of‌‌ 
to‌  ‌insinuate‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contraceptive‌  ‌will‌  ‌only‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌‌  The‌  ‌need‌  ‌to‌  ‌give‌  ‌the‌  ‌Resident‌  ‌Marine‌  ‌Mammals‌  ‌legal‌  ‌standing‌  ‌has‌‌ 
our‌‌constitutional‌‌provisions‌‌do‌‌not‌‌prohibit‌‌SOGIESC.‌  ‌
“abortifacient”‌  ‌if‌  ‌its‌  ‌sole‌  ‌known‌  ‌effect‌  ‌is‌  ‌abortion‌  ‌or,‌  ‌as‌  ‌pertinent‌‌  been‌‌   eliminated‌‌   by‌‌   our‌‌   Rules,‌‌   which‌‌   allow‌‌  any‌‌  Filipino‌‌   citizen,‌‌
  as‌‌ a ‌‌
here,‌‌the‌‌prevention‌‌of‌‌the‌‌implantation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌fertilized‌‌ovum.‌  ‌ steward‌‌   of‌‌
  nature,‌‌  to‌‌  bring‌‌  a ‌‌suit‌‌  to‌‌
  enforce‌‌   our‌‌  environmental‌‌ laws.‌‌  To‌  ‌continue‌  ‌to‌  ‌ground‌  ‌the‌  ‌family‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌social‌  ‌institution‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌ 
It‌‌
  is‌‌
  worth‌‌   noting‌‌  here‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌   Stewards‌‌   are‌‌
  joined‌‌  as‌‌
  real‌‌  parties‌‌
  in‌‌  concept‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌complementarity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌sexes‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌perpetuate‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Thus,‌  ‌the‌  ‌word‌  ‌“primarily”‌  ‌in‌  ‌Section‌  ‌3.01(a)‌  ‌and‌  ‌(j)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  the‌  ‌Petition‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌just‌  ‌in‌  ‌representation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌named‌  ‌cetacean‌‌  discrimination‌  ‌faced‌  ‌by‌  ‌couples,‌‌   whether‌‌   opposite-sex‌‌   or‌‌
  same-sex,‌‌ 
RH-IRR‌‌should‌‌be‌‌declared‌‌void.‌  ‌ species.‌‌   ‌ who‌‌do‌‌not‌‌fit‌‌into‌‌that‌‌mold.‌‌   ‌
Right‌‌to‌‌balanced‌‌and‌‌healthful‌‌ecology‌  ‌ Right‌‌to‌‌Quality‌‌Education‌  ‌ B.‌‌Sovereignty‌  ‌
International‌‌Service‌‌for‌‌the‌‌Acquisition‌‌of‌‌Agri-Biotech‌‌  ⭐‌Council‌‌of‌‌Teachers‌‌and‌‌Staff‌‌of‌‌Colleges‌‌and‌‌Universities‌‌of‌‌the‌‌ 
Applications‌‌v.‌‌Greenpeace‌‌Southeast‌‌Asia‌‌2 ‌ 015‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ Concurring‌‌Opinion‌‌of‌‌Justice‌‌Mendoza‌‌in‌E
‌ strada‌‌v.‌‌Arroyo‌,‌‌supra‌‌   ‌
Philippines‌‌v.‌‌Secretary‌‌of‌‌Education‌‌2
‌ 018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
Greenpeace,‌  ‌et‌  ‌al‌  ‌alleged‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌Bt‌‌
  talong‌‌
  field‌‌
  trials‌‌
  violate‌‌
  their‌‌  While‌  ‌Art.‌  ‌II,‌  ‌§1‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Constitution‌‌   says‌‌
  that‌‌
  "‌sovereignty‌‌  resides‌‌ 
While‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌‌  indeed‌‌   mandates‌‌  the‌‌  State‌‌
  to‌‌  provide‌‌  quality‌‌ 
constitutional‌‌right‌‌to‌‌health‌‌and‌‌a‌‌balanced‌‌ecology.‌  ‌ in‌  ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌and‌  ‌all‌  ‌government‌  ‌authority‌  ‌emanates‌  ‌from‌‌ 
education,‌  ‌the‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌what‌  ‌constitutes‌  ‌quality‌‌ 
them‌,"‌  ‌it‌  ‌also‌  ‌says‌  ‌that‌  ‌"‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌democratic‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Oposa‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Factoran,‌  ‌Jr.‌  ‌signaled‌  ‌an‌‌   even‌‌
  more‌‌  liberalized‌‌  policy‌‌
  on‌‌  education‌  ‌is‌  ‌best‌  ‌left‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌
  political‌‌  departments‌‌   who‌‌
  have‌‌ 
republican‌‌state.‌"  ‌‌ ‌
locus‌  ‌standi‌  ‌in‌  ‌public‌  ‌suits.‌  ‌In‌‌
  said‌‌
  case,‌‌
  we‌‌
  recognized‌‌   the‌‌
  "public‌‌  the‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌knowledge,‌  ‌expertise,‌  ‌and‌‌   resources‌‌   to‌‌  determine‌‌   the‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 5‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

public‌  ‌interest‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌predicate‌  ‌to‌  ‌good‌  ‌governance‌  ‌and‌  ‌a ‌‌ Consent‌  ‌
This‌  ‌means‌  ‌that‌  ‌ours‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌representative‌  ‌democracy‌  ‌— ‌ ‌as‌‌  working‌‌democracy‌.  ‌‌ ‌
distinguished‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌direct‌  ‌democracy‌  ‌— ‌ ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌sovereign‌‌  1) Where‌  ‌a ‌ ‌suit‌  ‌is‌  ‌filed‌  ‌NOT‌‌
  against‌‌   the‌‌
  government‌‌   itself‌‌
  or‌‌
  its‌‌ 
will‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌is‌  ‌expressed‌  ‌through‌  ‌the‌  ‌ballot,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌‌  In‌‌ our‌‌ jurisdiction,‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ also‌‌ the‌‌ rule‌‌ that‌‌ ‌the‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌ of‌‌ 
suffrage‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌an‌‌   enlightened‌‌   one‌, ‌‌hence,‌‌
  based‌‌   on‌‌
  relevant‌‌  officials‌  ‌but‌  ‌against‌  ‌one‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌entities,‌‌
  it‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  ascertained‌‌ 
election,‌  ‌referendum,‌‌   initiative,‌‌
  recall‌‌
  or‌‌
  plebiscite.‌‌  ‌Any‌‌
  exercise‌‌   of‌‌ 
facts,‌‌data‌‌and‌‌information.‌‌   ‌ whether‌‌or‌‌not‌‌the‌‌State‌‌has‌‌given‌‌its‌‌consent‌‌to‌‌be‌‌sued.‌  ‌
the‌‌powers‌‌of‌‌sovereignty‌‌in‌‌any‌‌other‌‌way‌‌is‌‌unconstitutional.‌  ‌
2) This‌  ‌ascertainment‌  ‌will‌  ‌depend‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌instance‌‌
  on‌‌
  WON‌‌ 
Indeed,‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌revolt‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌constitutional‌‌  C.‌‌State‌‌Immunity‌  ‌ the‌‌agency‌‌impleaded‌‌is‌‌incorporated‌‌‌or‌‌unincorporated.‌  ‌
principle.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌constitution‌  ‌to‌  ‌provide‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌to‌‌ 
revolt‌‌
  will‌‌  carry‌‌  with‌‌   it‌‌
  the‌‌
  seeds‌‌
  of‌‌
  its‌‌
  own‌‌ destruction.‌‌ Rather,‌‌ ‌the‌‌  Section‌‌3‌‌Art‌‌XVI.‌‌ ‌The‌‌State‌‌may‌‌not‌‌be‌‌sued‌‌without‌‌its‌‌consent.‌  ‌ 3) An‌‌  ‌incorporated‌‌   ‌agency‌‌
  has‌‌ a ‌‌charter‌‌ of‌‌ its‌‌ own‌‌ that‌‌ invests‌‌ it‌‌ 
right‌‌
  to‌‌ revolt‌‌ is‌‌ affirmed‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌natural‌‌ right.‌‌ Even‌‌ then,‌‌ it‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌  with‌  ‌a ‌ ‌separate‌  ‌juridical‌  ‌personality.‌‌   The‌‌   test‌‌
  of‌‌
  suability‌‌
  lies‌ 
exercised‌‌only‌‌for‌‌weighty‌‌and‌‌serious‌‌reasons.‌  ‌ Suit‌‌against‌‌State‌‌   ‌ in‌‌
  its‌‌  charter‌‌
  — ‌‌It‌‌
  is‌‌
  suable‌‌
  if‌‌
  its‌‌
  charter‌‌ says‌‌ so;‌‌ ‌regardless‌‌ ‌of‌‌ 
What‌  ‌took‌  ‌place‌  ‌at‌  ‌EDSA‌  ‌from‌  ‌January‌  ‌16‌  ‌to‌  ‌20,‌  ‌2001‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌‌ Arigo‌‌v.‌‌Swift‌‌2
‌ 014‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ the‌‌nature‌‌of‌‌the‌‌functions‌‌it‌‌is‌‌performing.‌  ‌
revolution‌‌ but‌‌ the‌‌ peaceful‌‌ expression‌‌ of‌‌ popular‌‌ will.‌‌ The‌‌ operative‌‌  4) Unincorporated‌  ‌agencies‌  ‌have‌  ‌no‌  ‌separate‌  ‌juridical‌‌ 
fact‌‌
  which‌‌   enabled‌‌   VP‌‌
  Arroyo‌‌   to‌‌  assume‌‌   the‌‌
  presidency‌‌   was‌‌ the‌‌ fact‌‌  While‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌appears‌  ‌to‌  ‌prohibit‌  ‌only‌  ‌suits‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌‌ 
personality‌‌
  as‌‌
  they‌‌
  are‌‌
  merged‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  general‌‌ machinery‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
that‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌a ‌ ‌crisis,‌  ‌nay‌  ‌a ‌ ‌vacuum,‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌executive‌  ‌leadership‌  without‌  ‌its‌  ‌consent,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌‌  also‌‌
  applicable‌‌   to‌‌
  complaints‌‌  filed‌‌
  against‌‌ 
which‌‌   made‌‌ the‌‌ government‌‌ rife‌‌ for‌‌ seizure‌‌ by‌‌ lawless‌‌ elements.‌‌ The‌‌  officials‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌  ‌for‌  ‌acts‌  ‌allegedly‌  ‌performed‌  ‌by‌  ‌them‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  government.‌  ‌
presidency‌  ‌was‌  ‌up‌  ‌for‌  ‌grabs,‌  ‌and‌‌   it‌‌
  was‌‌
  imperative‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌rule‌‌
  of‌‌  discharge‌‌of‌‌their‌‌duties.‌‌   ‌ a. A‌‌suit‌‌against‌‌it‌‌is‌‌necessarily‌‌against‌‌the‌‌State.‌  ‌
succession‌‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌‌be‌‌enforced.‌  ‌ The‌‌  ‌rule‌‌ ‌is‌‌ that‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ judgment‌‌ against‌‌ such‌‌ officials‌‌ will‌‌ require‌‌ the‌‌  b. Suability‌‌
  then‌‌
  depends‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  nature‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ function‌‌ it‌‌ 
state‌‌   itself‌‌
  to‌‌  perform‌‌   an‌‌
  affirmative‌‌
  act‌‌
  to‌‌
  satisfy‌‌  the‌‌
  same,‌‌
  such‌‌  as‌‌  is‌‌performing‌‌either‌‌governmental‌‌or‌‌proprietary.‌  ‌
Dissenting‌‌Opinion‌‌of‌‌Justice‌‌Puno‌‌in‌T
‌ olentino,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌v‌‌Comelec‌  ‌ the‌‌
  appropriation‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌
  amount‌‌  needed‌‌  to‌‌
  pay‌‌
  the‌‌ damages‌‌ awarded‌‌ 
against‌  ‌them,‌  ‌the‌  ‌suit‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌regarded‌  ‌as‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌  ‌itself‌‌  5) Suability‌  ‌vs.‌  ‌Liability.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Waiver‌  ‌of‌  ‌immunity‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌‌ 
The‌‌
  people‌‌ can‌‌ directly‌‌ exercise‌‌ their‌‌ sovereign‌‌ authority‌‌ through‌‌ the‌‌ 
although‌‌it‌‌has‌‌not‌‌been‌‌formally‌‌impleaded.‌  ‌ does‌‌not‌‌mean‌‌concession‌‌of‌‌its‌‌liability.‌  ‌
following‌‌modes,‌‌namely:‌‌   ‌
This‌  ‌traditional‌  ‌rule‌  ‌has‌  ‌evolved‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌restrictive‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌which‌‌  a. Suability‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌result‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌express‌  ‌or‌  ‌implied‌‌ 
1) Elections‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌the‌  p
‌ eople‌  ‌choose‌  ‌the‌  ‌representatives‌  t‌ o‌‌ 
distinguishes‌‌   ‌ consent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌State‌‌to‌‌be‌‌sued.‌  ‌
whom‌  ‌they‌  ‌will‌  ‌entrust‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌powers‌  ‌of‌‌ 
government.‌  ‌ a) sovereign‌‌and‌‌governmental‌‌acts‌‌(j‌ ure‌‌imperii‌)‌‌from‌‌   ‌
b. Liability‌  ‌is‌  ‌determined‌  ‌after‌  ‌hearing‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌basis‌  ‌of‌‌ 
2) Plebiscite‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌ratify‌  ‌any‌  ‌amendment‌  ‌to‌  ‌or‌‌  b) private,‌‌commercial‌‌and‌‌proprietary‌‌acts‌‌(j‌ ure‌‌gestionis‌).‌‌   ‌ relevant‌‌laws‌‌and‌‌established‌‌facts.‌  ‌
revision‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Constitution‌‌ and‌‌ may‌‌ introduce‌‌ amendments‌‌  Under‌  ‌the‌  ‌restrictive‌  ‌rule‌  ‌of‌  ‌state‌  ‌immunity,‌  ‌state‌  ‌immunity‌‌ 
Philippine‌‌Textile‌‌Research‌‌Institute‌‌v.‌‌CA‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
to‌‌the‌‌constitution.‌  ‌ extends‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌  ‌acts‌  ‌jure‌  ‌imperii‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌restrictive‌  ‌application‌  ‌of‌‌ 
3) Initiative‌. ‌‌— ‌‌legal‌‌
  process‌‌
  whereby‌‌   the‌‌ registered‌‌ voters‌‌ of‌‌  State‌  ‌immunity‌  ‌is‌  ‌proper‌  ‌only‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌arise‌  ‌out‌  ‌of‌‌  PTRI,‌  ‌et‌  ‌al.‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌immune‌  ‌from‌  ‌suit.‌  ‌Being‌  ‌an‌  ‌unincorporated‌‌ 
an‌‌
  LGU‌‌ may‌‌ directly‌‌ propose,‌‌ enact,‌‌ or‌‌ amend‌‌ any‌‌ ordinance‌‌  commercial‌  ‌transactions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌sovereign,‌  ‌its‌  ‌commercial‌‌  government‌  ‌agency‌  ‌that‌  ‌exercises‌  ‌a ‌ ‌governmental‌  ‌function,‌‌ 
through‌‌an‌‌election‌‌called‌‌for‌‌the‌‌purpose.‌  ‌ activities‌‌or‌‌economic‌‌affairs.‌  ‌ ordinarily,‌‌the‌‌PTRI‌‌enjoys‌‌immunity‌‌from‌‌suit.‌‌   ‌
4) Recall‌. ‌‌— ‌‌a ‌‌method‌‌
  of‌‌
  removing‌‌   a ‌‌local‌‌
  official‌‌
  from‌‌ office‌‌  The‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌immunity‌  ‌from‌  ‌suit‌  ‌will‌  ‌not‌‌
  apply‌‌  and‌‌   may‌‌
  not‌‌   be‌‌  The‌‌
  State‌‌   may‌‌   be‌‌  sued‌‌   with‌‌
  its‌‌
  consent‌. ‌‌The‌‌ State's‌‌ consent‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ 
before‌  ‌the‌  ‌expiration‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌term‌  ‌because‌  ‌of‌  ‌loss‌  ‌of‌‌  invoked‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌official‌  ‌is‌  ‌being‌  ‌sued‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌private‌  ‌and‌‌  sued‌‌
  may‌‌   be‌‌
  given‌‌   either‌‌   ‌expressly‌‌   ‌or‌‌ ‌impliedly‌. ‌‌‌Express‌‌ consent‌‌ 
confidence.‌‌   ‌ personal‌‌capacity‌‌as‌‌an‌‌ordinary‌‌citizen.‌  ‌ may‌‌
  be‌‌  made‌‌   through‌‌   a ‌‌general‌‌   law‌‌  or‌‌  a ‌‌special‌‌ law.‌‌ The‌‌ general‌‌ law‌‌ 
5) Referendum‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌can‌  ‌approve‌‌
  or‌‌
  reject‌‌
  a ‌‌law‌‌
  or‌‌  In‌‌
  this‌‌ case,‌‌ the‌‌ US‌‌ respondents‌‌ were‌‌ sued‌‌ in‌‌ their‌‌ official‌‌ capacity‌‌ as‌‌  waiving‌‌ the‌‌ immunity‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ state‌‌ from‌‌ suit‌‌ is‌‌ found‌‌ in‌‌ ‌Act‌‌ No.‌‌ 3083‌, ‌‌
an‌‌issue‌‌of‌‌national‌‌importance.‌  ‌ commanding‌‌   officers‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  US‌‌
  Navy.‌‌
  ‌The‌‌
  suit‌‌
  is‌‌
  deemed‌‌   to‌‌ be‌‌ one‌‌  where‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌government‌  ‌'consents‌  ‌and‌‌   submits‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌
  sued‌‌ 
against‌‌the‌‌US‌‌itself.‌‌‌The‌‌principle‌‌of‌‌State‌‌immunity‌‌thus‌‌applies.‌  ‌ upon‌‌   any‌‌  money‌‌   claim‌‌   involving‌‌   liability‌‌ arising‌‌ from‌‌ contract,‌‌ 
The‌  ‌1987‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌‌   enlarged‌‌   the‌‌
  democratic‌‌  space‌‌
  with‌‌  express‌  ‌or‌  ‌implied,‌  ‌which‌  ‌could‌  ‌serve‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌basis‌  ‌of‌  ‌civil‌  ‌action‌‌ 
provisions‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  electorate’s‌‌   direct‌‌
  exercise‌‌   of‌‌
  sovereignty,‌‌ but‌‌ also‌‌  between‌‌private‌‌parties.‌  ‌
highlighted‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  people‌‌   to‌‌
  information‌‌   on‌‌
  matters‌‌   of‌‌ 
PTRI‌  ‌entered‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Contract‌  ‌of‌  ‌Works‌  ‌with‌  ‌B.A.‌  ‌Ramirez.‌  ‌PTRI‌  ‌is‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 6‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

executed,‌‌carried‌‌out,‌‌or‌‌implemented‌‌by‌‌the‌‌delegate;‌‌and‌  ‌
being‌  ‌sued‌  ‌upon‌  ‌a ‌ ‌claim‌  ‌involving‌  ‌liability‌‌
  arising‌‌
  from‌‌
  a ‌‌contract.‌‌  reality‌  ‌of‌  ‌one‌  ‌overarching‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌that‌  ‌governs‌  ‌one‌‌ 
Hence,‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌law‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌waiver‌  ‌of‌  ‌immunity‌  ‌from‌  ‌suit‌‌  government‌  ‌and‌  ‌one‌  ‌nation‌  ‌for‌  ‌whose‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌all‌  ‌the‌  ‌three‌‌  b) fixes‌  ‌a ‌ ‌standard‌  ‌— ‌ ‌the‌  ‌limits‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌sufficiently‌‌ 
finds‌‌application‌. ‌ ‌ separate‌‌branches‌‌must‌‌act‌‌with‌‌unity.‌‌   ‌
determinate‌  ‌and‌  ‌determinable‌  ‌— ‌ ‌to‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌delegate‌  ‌must‌‌ 
Furthermore,‌‌   there‌‌   is‌implied‌‌
    consent‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  part‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  State‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌  A‌  ‌lesser‌  ‌known‌  ‌but‌  ‌no‌  ‌less‌  ‌important‌  ‌aspect‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌‌  conform‌‌in‌‌the‌‌performance‌‌of‌‌his‌‌functions.‌‌   ‌
subjected‌  ‌to‌  ‌suit‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌enters‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contract.‌  ‌However,‌‌  separation‌‌   of‌‌
  powers‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌  ‌principle‌‌
  of‌‌  comity‌ ‌or‌‌ the‌‌ practice‌‌ of‌‌    ‌sufficient‌‌
A‌‌   standard‌  ‌is‌‌  one‌‌  which‌‌ defines‌‌ legislative‌‌ policy,‌‌ marks‌‌ 
distinction‌‌  must‌‌   still‌‌
  be‌‌
  made‌‌  between‌‌   one‌‌   which‌‌   is‌‌
  executed‌‌   in‌‌ the‌‌  voluntarily‌  ‌observing‌  ‌inter-departmental‌  ‌courtesy‌  ‌in‌  ‌undertaking‌‌ 
its‌  ‌limits,‌  ‌maps‌  ‌out‌  ‌its‌  ‌boundaries‌  ‌and‌  ‌specifies‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌‌
  agency‌‌
  to‌‌ 
exercise‌‌
  of‌‌ its‌‌ sovereign‌‌ functions‌‌ and‌‌ another‌‌ which‌‌ is‌‌ done‌‌ in‌‌ its‌‌  their‌  ‌assigned‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌duties‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌harmonious‌  ‌working‌  ‌of‌‌ 
apply‌  ‌it.‌  ‌It‌  ‌indicates‌  ‌the‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌under‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌legislative‌‌ 
proprietary‌‌capacity‌. ‌ ‌ government.‌  ‌
command‌‌is‌‌to‌‌be‌‌effected.‌  ‌
D.‌‌Separation‌‌of‌‌Powers‌  ‌ E.‌‌Checks‌‌and‌‌Balances‌  ‌ ⭐‌Provincial‌‌
  Bus‌‌
  Operators‌‌ Association‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines‌‌ v.‌‌ DOLE‌‌ 
2018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
The‌‌   separation‌‌
  of‌‌
  powers‌‌  is‌‌
  a ‌‌fundamental‌‌   principle‌‌ in‌‌ our‌‌ system‌‌ 
Separate‌‌Opinion,‌‌Justice‌‌Puno‌,‌‌Macalintal‌‌v.‌‌Comelec,‌‌et‌‌al‌.  ‌‌ ‌
of‌  ‌government.‌  ‌It‌  ‌obtains‌  ‌not‌  ‌through‌  ‌express‌  ‌provision‌  ‌but‌  ‌by‌‌  Our‌  ‌governmental‌  ‌structure‌  ‌rests‌  ‌on‌‌   the‌‌
  principle‌‌
  of‌‌
  separation‌‌  of‌‌ 
actual‌‌division‌‌in‌‌our‌‌Constitution.‌  ‌ For‌  ‌its‌  ‌part,‌  ‌this‌  ‌Court‌  checks‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  powers‌. ‌‌In‌‌ reality,‌‌ however,‌‌ the‌‌ powers‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌ as‌‌ strictly‌‌ confined‌‌ or‌‌ 
branches‌‌   of‌‌
  government‌‌ through‌‌ judicial‌‌ review.‌‌ Since‌‌ then,‌‌ the‌‌ Court‌‌  delineated‌  ‌to‌  ‌each‌  ‌branch.‌  ‌The‌  ‌growing‌  ‌complexity‌  ‌of‌  ‌modern‌  ‌life,‌‌ 
Separate‌‌Opinion,‌‌Justice‌‌Puno‌,‌‌Macalintal‌‌v.‌‌Comelec,‌‌et‌‌al‌.  ‌‌ ‌ the‌‌
  multiplication‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ subjects‌‌ of‌‌ governmental‌‌ regulation,‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ 
has‌  ‌used‌  ‌its‌  ‌expanded‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌check‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌House‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Representatives,‌‌   the‌‌
  President,‌‌
  and‌‌
  even‌‌  of‌‌
  independent‌‌   bodies‌‌   such‌‌  increased‌  ‌difficulty‌  ‌of‌  ‌administering‌  ‌the‌  ‌laws‌  ‌require‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌  ‌principle‌‌  of‌‌
  separation‌‌   of‌‌
  powers‌‌   prevents‌‌   the‌‌   concentration‌‌ 
as‌‌the‌‌Electoral‌‌Tribunal,‌‌the‌‌Comelec,‌‌and‌‌the‌‌CSC.‌  ‌ delegation‌  ‌of‌  ‌powers‌  ‌traditionally‌  ‌belonging‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌to‌‌ 
of‌  ‌legislative,‌  ‌executive,‌  ‌and‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌powers‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌single‌  ‌branch‌  ‌of‌‌ 
administrative‌‌agencies.‌  ‌
government‌‌ by‌‌ deftly‌‌ allocating‌‌ their‌‌ exercise‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ three‌‌ branches‌‌ of‌‌  Congress‌  ‌checks‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌branches‌  ‌of‌  ‌government‌  ‌primarily‌‌ 
government.‌  ‌ through‌  ‌its‌  ‌law‌  ‌making‌  ‌powers.‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌can‌‌   create‌‌
  administrative‌‌  ⭐‌Kilusang‌‌Mayo‌‌Uno‌‌v.‌‌Aquino‌‌III‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
It‌‌is‌‌now‌‌beyond‌‌debate‌‌that‌‌the‌‌principle‌‌of‌‌separation‌‌of‌‌powers‌‌   ‌ agencies,‌‌   define‌‌   their‌‌  powers‌‌   and‌‌
  duties,‌‌ fix‌‌ the‌‌ terms‌‌ of‌‌ officers‌‌ and‌‌ 
their‌‌  compensation.‌‌   It‌‌
  can‌‌ also‌‌ create‌‌ courts,‌‌ define‌‌ their‌‌ jurisdiction‌‌  All‌‌
  that‌‌
  is‌‌
  required‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ valid‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ this‌‌ power‌‌ of‌‌ subordinate‌‌ 
1) allows‌‌   “‌blending‌” ‌‌of‌‌
  the‌‌   some‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ executive,‌‌ legislative,‌‌  and‌  ‌reorganize‌  ‌the‌  ‌judiciary‌  ‌so‌  ‌long‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌undermine‌  ‌the‌‌  legislation‌‌is‌‌that‌‌   ‌
or‌‌judicial‌‌powers‌‌in‌‌one‌‌body;‌‌   ‌ security‌  ‌of‌  ‌tenure‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌members.‌  ‌Concomitant‌  ‌with‌  ‌its‌  ‌principal‌‌  1) the‌‌  regulation‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  germane‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  objects‌‌
  and‌‌ purposes‌‌ 
2) does‌  ‌not‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌one‌  ‌branch‌‌   of‌‌
  government‌‌  from‌‌  inquiring‌‌  power‌  ‌to‌  ‌legislate‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌auxiliary‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌ensure‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌laws‌  ‌it‌‌  of‌‌the‌‌law;‌‌and‌‌   ‌
into‌‌
  the‌‌
  affairs‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ other‌‌ branches‌‌ to‌‌ maintain‌‌ the‌‌ balance‌‌  enacts‌‌are‌‌faithfully‌‌executed.‌‌   ‌
2) that‌  ‌the‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌be‌  ‌not‌  ‌in‌  ‌contradiction‌  ‌to,‌  ‌but‌  ‌in‌‌ 
of‌‌power;‌‌   ‌ conformity‌‌with,‌‌the‌‌standards‌‌prescribed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌law.‌‌   ‌
3) but‌‌
  ensures‌‌
  that‌‌
  there‌‌ is‌‌ no‌‌ encroachment‌‌ on‌‌ matters‌‌ within‌‌  F.‌‌Delegation‌‌of‌‌Powers‌  ‌
The‌  ‌Social‌  ‌Security‌  ‌Act‌  ‌has‌  ‌validly‌  ‌delegated‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌fix‌  ‌the‌‌ 
the‌‌exclusive‌‌jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌the‌‌other‌‌branches.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌rule‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌what‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌delegated,‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌delegated‌  ‌or‌  ‌as‌‌  contribution‌  ‌rate‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌minimum‌  ‌and‌  ‌maximum‌  ‌amounts‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌ 
expressed‌‌   in‌‌  a ‌‌Latin‌‌
  maxim—‌potestas‌‌   delegata‌‌   non‌‌  delegari‌‌ potest‌. ‌‌ monthly‌  ‌salary‌  ‌credits.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌scope‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Social‌‌
  Security‌‌ 
In‌‌Re‌‌Production‌‌of‌‌Court‌‌Records‌‌‌re‌‌Independence‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Judiciary‌‌   ‌ The‌‌recognized‌e ‌ xceptions‌t‌ o‌‌the‌‌rule‌‌are‌‌delegation:‌  ‌ Commission's‌‌power‌‌to‌‌fix‌‌them,‌‌as‌‌clearly‌‌laid‌‌out‌‌in‌‌the‌‌law.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌separation‌  ‌of‌  ‌powers‌  ‌inures‌  ‌not‌  ‌by‌  ‌express‌‌  1) Of‌‌tariff‌‌powers‌‌‌to‌‌the‌‌President‌‌under‌‌Sec‌‌28(2)‌‌Art‌‌VI;‌  ‌
provision‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution,‌  ‌but‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌underlying‌  ‌principle‌  ‌that‌‌ 
G.‌‌Fundamental‌‌Powers‌‌of‌‌the‌‌State‌  ‌
2) Of‌‌emergency‌‌powers‌t‌ o‌‌the‌‌President‌‌under‌‌Sec‌‌23(2)‌‌Art‌‌VI;‌  ‌
constitutes‌  ‌the‌  ‌bedrock‌  ‌of‌  ‌our‌  ‌system‌  ‌of‌  ‌checks‌  ‌and‌  ‌balances‌  ‌in‌‌  Briefly‌  ‌
government.‌‌   It‌‌
  divides‌‌ the‌‌ government‌‌ into‌‌ three‌‌ branches,‌‌ each‌‌ with‌‌  3) To‌‌the‌‌people‌‌at‌‌large;‌  ‌
1) Police‌‌   Power‌  ‌regulates‌‌ liberty‌‌ and‌‌ property‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ promotion‌‌ 
well-defined‌‌   powers.‌‌   In‌‌
  its‌‌
  most‌‌  basic‌‌ concept,‌‌ the‌‌ doctrine‌‌ declares‌‌  4) To‌‌local‌‌governments;‌‌and‌  ‌
that‌  ‌the‌  ‌legislature‌  ‌enacts‌  ‌the‌  ‌law,‌  ‌the‌  ‌executive‌‌
  implements‌‌   it,‌‌
  and‌‌  of‌‌the‌‌general‌‌welfare.‌  ‌
the‌‌judiciary‌‌interprets‌‌it.‌  ‌ 5) To‌‌administrative‌‌bodies.‌  ‌ 2) Eminent‌  ‌Domain‌  ‌enables‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌to‌  ‌forcibly‌  ‌acquire‌‌ 
Each‌  ‌branch‌  ‌is‌  ‌considered‌  ‌separate,‌  ‌co-equal,‌  ‌coordinate‌  ‌and‌‌  In‌  ‌every‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌permissible‌  ‌delegation,‌  ‌there‌  ‌must‌‌
  be‌‌
  a ‌‌showing‌‌
  that‌‌  property,‌  ‌upon‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌just‌  ‌compensation,‌  ‌for‌  ‌some‌‌ 
supreme‌  ‌within‌  ‌its‌  ‌own‌  ‌sphere,‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌legal‌  ‌and‌  ‌political‌‌  the‌‌delegation‌‌itself‌‌is‌‌valid.‌‌It‌‌is‌‌valid‌‌only‌‌if‌‌the‌‌law‌‌   ‌ intended‌‌public‌‌use.‌  ‌
a) is‌  ‌complete‌  ‌in‌  ‌itself,‌  ‌setting‌  ‌forth‌  ‌therein‌  ‌the‌‌
  policy‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 7‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

3) Taxation‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌ ability‌‌ to‌‌ demand‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ members‌‌ of‌‌ society‌‌  2. In‌‌
  a ‌‌‌positive‌‌
  sense,‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  power‌‌
  to‌‌  prescribe‌‌
  regulations‌‌   to‌‌  4. Municipal‌  ‌governments‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌quasi-legislative‌  ‌powers‌‌ 
their‌‌
  proportionate‌‌   share‌‌  or‌‌ contribution‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ maintenance‌‌ of‌‌  promote‌  ‌the‌  ‌health,‌  ‌morals,‌  ‌peace,‌  ‌education,‌  ‌good‌  ‌order‌  ‌or‌‌  under‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌welfare‌  ‌clause‌, ‌ ‌Sec‌  ‌16,‌  ‌Local‌  ‌Government‌‌ 
the‌‌government.‌  ‌ safety,‌‌and‌‌general‌‌welfare‌‌of‌‌the‌‌people.‌  ‌ Code.‌  ‌
In‌‌
  ‌negative‌‌ terms,‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ that‌‌ inherent‌‌ and‌‌ plenary‌‌ power‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ State‌‌  5. No‌  ‌mandamus‌  ‌is‌  ‌available‌  ‌to‌  ‌coerce‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌police‌‌ 
Similarities‌  ‌
which‌‌   enables‌‌
  it‌‌
  to‌‌
  prohibit‌‌   all‌‌
  things‌‌ hurtful‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ comfort,‌‌ safety‌‌  power.‌  ‌
1) Inherent‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌and‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌exercised‌  ‌without‌  ‌express‌‌  and‌‌welfare‌‌of‌‌society.‌‌(A ‌ gustin‌‌v.‌‌Edu‌) ‌ ‌ 6. The‌  ‌question‌  ‌of‌  ‌validity‌  ‌of‌  ‌legislation‌  ‌as‌  ‌determined‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
constitutional‌‌grant.‌  ‌ 3. The‌  ‌most‌  ‌essential,‌  ‌insistent‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌least‌  ‌limitable‌  ‌of‌‌  criterion‌‌of‌‌their‌‌conformity‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌‌is‌j‌ usticiable‌. ‌ ‌
2) Not‌  ‌only‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌but‌  ‌indispensable.‌  ‌The‌  ‌State‌  ‌cannot‌‌  powers,‌‌extending‌‌as‌‌it‌‌does‌‌“to‌‌all‌‌the‌‌great‌‌public‌‌needs.”‌  ‌
Evasco,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌Montañez‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌
continue‌‌or‌‌be‌‌effective‌‌unless‌‌it‌‌is‌‌able‌‌to‌‌exercise‌‌them.‌  ‌ 4. May‌‌
  not‌‌   be‌‌
  bargained‌‌ away‌‌ through‌‌ the‌‌ medium‌‌ of‌‌ ‌contract‌‌ or‌‌ 
even‌‌
  a ‌‌‌treaty‌. ‌‌The‌‌  impairment‌‌   clause‌‌
  must‌‌   yield‌‌
  to‌‌ the‌‌ police‌‌  Ordinance‌  ‌No.‌  ‌092-2000,‌  ‌which‌  ‌regulates‌  ‌the‌  ‌construction‌  ‌and‌‌ 
3) Methods‌‌by‌‌which‌‌the‌‌State‌‌interferes‌‌with‌‌private‌‌rights.‌  ‌
power‌‌   whenever‌‌   the‌‌  contract‌‌
  deals‌‌
  with‌‌
  a ‌‌subject‌‌
  affecting‌‌   the‌‌  installation‌‌   of‌‌
  building‌‌   and‌‌
  other‌‌   structures‌‌ such‌‌ as‌‌ billboards‌‌ 
4) Presuppose‌  ‌an‌  ‌equivalent‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌
  private‌‌
  rights‌‌  public‌‌welfare.‌  ‌ within‌  ‌Davao‌  ‌City,‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌exercise‌‌
  of‌‌
  ‌police‌‌   power‌. ‌‌This‌‌
  ‌direct‌‌
  and‌‌ 
interfered‌‌with.‌  ‌ 5. May‌  ‌sometimes‌‌  ‌use‌‌  the‌‌
  taxing‌‌
  power‌‌  as‌‌
  an‌‌
  implement‌‌
  for‌‌  specific‌  ‌grant‌  ‌takes‌  ‌precedence‌  ‌over‌  ‌requirements‌  ‌set‌  ‌forth‌  ‌in‌‌ 
the‌‌attainment‌‌of‌‌a‌‌legitimate‌‌police‌‌objective.‌  ‌ another‌‌   law‌‌
  of‌‌
  general‌‌   application,‌‌   in‌‌  this‌‌
  case‌‌ the‌‌ National‌‌ Building‌‌ 
5) Exercised‌‌primarily‌‌by‌‌the‌‌legislature.‌  ‌
Code.‌  ‌
a. In‌‌
  ‌Lutz‌‌  v.‌‌
  Araneta‌, ‌‌the‌‌ SC‌‌ sustained‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌legitimate‌‌ exercise‌‌ 
of‌‌
  the‌‌ police‌‌ power‌‌ the‌‌ imposition‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌special‌‌ tax‌‌ on‌‌ sugar‌‌  Even‌  ‌if‌‌
  the‌‌
  National‌‌   Building‌‌
  Code‌‌
  imposes‌‌   minimum‌‌   requirements‌‌ 
 ‌ Police‌‌Power‌  ‌ Eminent‌‌Domain‌  ‌ Taxation‌  ‌
producers‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌
  purpose‌‌   of‌‌
  creating‌‌
  a ‌‌special‌‌
  fund‌‌  to‌‌
  be‌‌  as‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌construction‌  ‌and‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌of‌  ‌billboards,‌  ‌the‌  ‌city‌‌ 
used‌‌for‌‌the‌‌rehabilitation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌sugar‌‌industry.‌  ‌ government‌‌   may‌‌  impose‌‌   stricter‌‌  limitations‌‌
  because‌‌   its‌‌
  police‌‌ 
Regulates‌  ‌ Both‌‌liberty‌‌  Only‌‌property‌‌rights‌  ‌ power‌  ‌to‌  ‌do‌  ‌so‌  ‌originates‌  ‌from‌  ‌its‌  ‌charter‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
and‌‌property‌  ‌ b. In‌‌
  ‌Gerochi‌‌
  v.‌‌
  DOE‌, ‌‌the‌‌  Universal‌‌   Charge‌‌   was‌‌  considered‌‌ as‌‌ 
an‌  ‌exaction‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌State’s‌  ‌police‌  ‌power,‌‌  National‌‌Building‌‌Code‌. ‌ ‌
Exercised‌‌by‌  ‌ Government‌  ‌ Government‌‌and‌‌  Government‌  ‌ imposed‌  ‌to‌  ‌ensure‌  ‌the‌  ‌viability‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌country’s‌  ‌electric‌‌ 
private‌‌entities‌  ‌ power‌‌industry.‌  ‌ City‌‌of‌‌Cagayan‌‌De‌‌Oro‌‌v.‌‌Cagayan‌‌Electric‌‌Power‌‌&‌‌Light‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌
6. Power‌‌of‌‌eminent‌‌domain‌‌could‌‌also‌‌be‌‌used‌‌as‌‌an‌‌implement.‌  ‌
The‌‌   purpose‌‌   of‌‌ an‌‌ imposition‌‌ will‌‌ determine‌‌ its‌‌ nature‌‌ as‌‌ either‌‌ a ‌‌tax‌‌ 
Property‌‌taken‌  ‌ Destroyed‌‌  Intended‌‌for‌‌public‌‌use‌‌or‌‌  7. When‌  ‌the‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌so‌  ‌demand‌  ‌as‌  ‌determined‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  or‌‌
  a ‌‌fee.‌‌
  If‌‌
  the‌‌   purpose‌‌   is‌‌  primarily‌‌   ‌revenue‌, ‌‌or‌‌ if‌‌ revenue‌‌ is‌‌ at‌‌ least‌‌ 
because‌‌it‌‌is‌‌  purpose‌‌and‌‌is‌‌therefore‌‌  legislature,‌  ‌property‌  ‌rights‌  ‌must‌  ‌bow‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌primacy‌  ‌of‌‌  one‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ real‌‌ and‌‌ substantial‌‌ purposes,‌‌ then‌‌ the‌‌ exaction‌‌ is‌‌ properly‌‌ 
noxious‌  ‌ wholesome‌  ‌ police‌‌
  power‌‌   because‌‌ property‌‌ rights,‌‌ though‌‌ sheltered‌‌ by‌‌ due‌‌  classified‌‌   as‌‌  an‌‌   exercise‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌ ‌tax‌. ‌‌On‌‌ the‌‌ other‌‌ hand,‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ 
process,‌  ‌must‌  ‌yield‌  ‌to‌  ‌general‌  ‌welfare.‌  ‌(‌Carlos‌  ‌Superdrug‌  ‌v.‌‌  purpose‌  ‌is‌  ‌primarily‌  ‌to‌  ‌regulate‌, ‌ ‌then‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌an‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Compensation‌  ‌ Intangible‌‌  A‌‌full‌‌and‌‌fair‌‌equivalent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌ 
DSWD‌)‌  ‌ police‌  ‌power‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌form‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fee‌, ‌ ‌even‌  ‌though‌  ‌revenue‌  ‌is‌‌ 
altruistic‌‌  property‌‌expropriated‌‌or‌‌ 
Exercise‌  ‌ incidentally‌  ‌generated.‌  ‌In‌‌   other‌‌   words,‌‌
  ‌if‌‌
  generation‌‌   of‌‌
  revenue‌‌   is‌‌ 
feeling‌‌that‌‌he‌‌  protection‌‌and‌‌public‌‌ 
the‌‌ primary‌‌ purpose,‌‌ the‌‌ imposition‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌tax‌‌ but,‌‌ if‌‌ regulation‌‌ is‌‌ 
has‌‌  improvements‌‌for‌‌the‌‌taxes‌‌paid‌  ‌ 1. Lodged‌‌primarily‌‌in‌‌the‌‌national‌l‌ egislature‌. ‌ ‌ the‌‌   primary‌‌   purpose,‌‌   the‌‌   imposition‌‌ is‌‌ properly‌‌ categorized‌‌ as‌‌ 
contributed‌‌to‌‌ 
2. By‌‌virtue‌‌of‌v‌ alid‌‌delegation‌,‌‌may‌‌be‌‌exercised‌‌by:‌  ‌ a‌‌regulatory‌‌fee.‌  ‌
the‌‌general‌‌ 
welfare‌  ‌ a. The‌‌President;‌  ‌
Tests‌  ‌
 ‌ b. Administrative‌‌boards;‌  ‌
1) Rational‌‌Basis‌‌Test.‌‌— ‌ ‌
Police‌‌Power‌  ‌ c. Lawmaking‌  ‌bodies‌  ‌on‌  ‌all‌  ‌municipal‌  ‌levels,‌  ‌including‌  ‌the‌‌ 
barangay.‌  ‌ a) Applied‌  ‌mainly‌  ‌in‌  ‌analysis‌  ‌of‌  ‌equal‌  ‌protection‌‌ 
1. Power‌  ‌of‌  ‌promoting‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌welfare‌  ‌by‌  ‌restraining‌  ‌and‌‌  challenges‌; ‌ ‌
3. Quasi-legislative‌  ‌power‌  ‌— ‌ ‌authority‌  ‌delegated‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
regulating‌‌the‌‌use‌‌of‌‌liberty‌‌and‌‌property.‌  ‌ lawmaking‌‌  body‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌  administrative‌‌   body‌‌
  to‌‌
  adopt‌‌ rules‌‌ and‌‌  b) Laws‌‌  and‌‌
  ordinances‌‌ are‌‌ upheld‌‌ if‌‌ they‌‌ ‌rationally‌‌ further‌‌ 
regulations‌‌
  intended‌‌   to‌‌
  carry‌‌
  out‌‌
  the‌‌
  provisions‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ and‌‌  a‌‌
  legitimate‌‌   governmental‌‌   interest‌. ‌‌Under‌‌ intermediate‌‌ 
implement‌‌legislative‌‌policy.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 8‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

review,‌‌
  governmental‌‌   interest‌‌
  is‌‌
  extensively‌‌
  examined‌‌ and‌‌  7. In‌  ‌Department‌  ‌of‌  ‌Education‌  ‌v.‌  ‌San‌  ‌Diego‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌regulation‌‌  indiscriminate‌  ‌slaughter‌‌
  was‌‌
  not‌‌
  satisfactorily‌‌
  met‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌ 
the‌‌availability‌‌of‌‌less‌‌restrictive‌‌measures‌‌is‌‌considered.‌  ‌ disqualifying‌‌   any‌‌   person‌‌
  who‌‌   has‌‌
  failed‌‌   the‌‌ NMAT‌‌ three‌‌ times‌‌  means‌‌employed.‌  ‌
from‌  ‌taking‌  ‌it‌  ‌again‌  ‌was‌  ‌reinstated‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌SC‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌measure‌‌  b. A‌  ‌law‌  ‌limiting‌  ‌the‌  ‌capacity‌  ‌of‌  ‌common‌  ‌carriers,‌  ‌or‌  ‌of‌‌ 
c) Two‌‌requisites‌‌must‌‌concur:‌  ‌
was‌‌intended‌‌to‌p ‌ rotect‌‌the‌‌patients‌. ‌ ‌ theaters‌  ‌as‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Chan‌, ‌ ‌is‌  ‌valid‌  ‌as‌‌
  this‌‌ 
i) The‌  ‌interests‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌generally‌, ‌ ‌as‌‌  would‌‌   be‌‌
  a ‌‌reasonable‌‌   method‌‌   for‌‌  promoting‌‌   the‌‌ comfort,‌‌ 
8. In‌  ‌Sangalang‌  ‌v.‌  ‌IAC‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌SC‌  ‌sustained‌  ‌the‌  ‌opening‌  ‌of‌  ‌two‌‌ 
distinguished‌‌   from‌‌
  those‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌particular‌‌
  class,‌‌ require‌  convenience‌‌and‌‌safety‌‌of‌‌the‌‌customers.‌  ‌
erstwhile‌  ‌private‌  ‌roads‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌demands‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌common‌‌ 
its‌‌exercise;‌‌and‌  ‌
good,‌‌namely,‌t‌ raffic‌‌decongestion‌‌and‌‌public‌‌convenience‌. ‌ ‌ c. In‌  ‌City‌  ‌Government‌  ‌of‌  ‌QC‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Ericta,‌  ‌in‌  ‌invalidating‌  ‌an‌‌ 
ii) The‌  ‌means‌  ‌employed‌  ‌are‌  ‌reasonably‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌for‌‌  ordinance,‌  ‌the‌  ‌SC‌  ‌said‌  ‌“there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌relation‌‌ 
9. In‌  ‌Del‌  ‌Rosario‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Bengzon‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Generics‌  ‌Act‌  ‌was‌  ‌sustained‌  ‌to‌‌ 
the‌  ‌accomplishment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌unduly‌‌  between‌‌   the‌‌
  setting‌‌
  aside‌‌
  of‌‌
  at‌‌
  least‌‌  6%‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ total‌‌ area‌‌ of‌‌ 
“‌promote‌  ‌and‌  ‌require‌  ‌the‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌generic‌  ‌drug‌  ‌products‌‌ 
oppressive‌‌upon‌‌individuals.‌  ‌ private‌  ‌cemeteries‌  ‌for‌  ‌charity‌  ‌burial‌  ‌grounds‌‌   of‌‌  deceased‌‌ 
that‌  ‌are‌  ‌therapeutically‌  ‌equivalent‌  ‌to‌  ‌their‌  ‌brand-name‌‌ 
2) Strict‌  ‌Scrutiny‌  ‌Test‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌Focus‌  ‌is‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌presence‌  ‌of‌‌  counterparts.”‌  ‌ paupers‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌promotion‌  ‌of‌‌   health,‌‌   morals,‌‌   good‌‌   order,‌‌ 
compelling‌, ‌ ‌rather‌  ‌than‌  ‌substantial,‌  ‌government‌  ‌interest‌  ‌and‌‌  safety,‌  ‌or‌‌  the‌‌
  general‌‌
  welfare‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌
  people.‌‌   The‌‌  ordinance‌‌ 
10. In‌  ‌Telecommunications‌  ‌and‌  ‌Broadcast‌  ‌Attorneys‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  is‌‌actually‌‌a‌‌taking‌‌without‌‌just‌‌compensation.”‌  ‌
on‌  ‌the‌  ‌absence‌  ‌of‌  ‌less‌  ‌restrictive‌  ‌means‌  ‌for‌  ‌achieving‌  ‌that‌‌ 
Philippines‌  ‌v.‌  ‌COMELEC‌, ‌ ‌Sec‌  ‌92‌  ‌of‌‌
  BP‌‌   Blg‌‌
  881‌‌  requiring‌‌   radio‌‌ 
interest.‌  ‌ d. In‌  ‌OSG‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Ayala‌  ‌Land,‌  ‌Inc.‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌SC‌  ‌rejected‌  ‌petitioner’s‌‌ 
and‌  ‌television‌  ‌stations‌  ‌to‌  ‌give‌  ‌free‌  ‌airtime‌  ‌to‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌for‌‌ 
contention‌  ‌that‌  ‌malls,‌  ‌inasmuch‌  ‌as‌  ‌they‌  ‌are‌  ‌required‌  ‌by‌‌ 
Lawful‌‌Subject‌  ‌ broadcasting‌‌   information‌‌   regarding‌‌   the‌‌   candidates‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  1998‌‌ 
the‌  ‌National‌  ‌Building‌  ‌Code‌  ‌to‌  ‌provide‌  ‌parking‌‌   spaces‌‌
  for‌‌ 
elections‌‌was‌‌validated.‌‌   ‌
1. Subject‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  measure‌‌  is‌‌
  within‌‌
  the‌‌  scope‌‌   of‌‌
  police‌‌ power,‌‌ i.e.‌‌  their‌‌customers,‌‌should‌‌provide‌‌such‌‌for‌‌free.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌activity‌  ‌or‌  ‌property‌  ‌sought‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌regulated‌  ‌affects‌  ‌the‌‌  11. In‌  ‌Social‌  ‌Justice‌  ‌Society‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Atienza‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌zoning‌  ‌ordinance‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  3. The‌  ‌SC‌  ‌has‌  ‌invariably‌  ‌applied‌  ‌certain‌  ‌standards‌  ‌for‌  ‌judicial‌‌ 
public‌‌welfare‌. ‌ ‌ City‌  ‌of‌  ‌Manila‌  ‌reclassifying‌  ‌“certain‌  ‌areas‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌city‌  ‌from‌‌  review:‌  ‌
industrial‌  ‌to‌  ‌commercial”‌  ‌was‌  ‌upheld‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌SC‌  ‌citing‌  ‌its‌‌ 
2. In‌  ‌Taxicab‌  ‌Operators‌  ‌of‌  ‌Metro‌  ‌Manila‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Board‌  ‌of‌‌ 
implementation‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌protection‌  ‌and‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Laws‌‌dealing‌‌with‌‌the‌‌freedom‌‌of‌‌the‌‌mind‌‌ 
Transportation‌, ‌ ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌phasing‌  ‌out‌‌  Strict‌‌scrutiny‌  ‌
residents‌. ‌ ‌ or‌‌restricting‌‌the‌‌political‌‌process.‌  ‌
taxicabs‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌six‌  ‌years‌  ‌old‌  ‌was‌  ‌held‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌  ‌police‌‌ 
measure‌  ‌to‌  ‌protect‌  ‌the‌  ‌riding‌  ‌public‌  ‌and‌  ‌promote‌  ‌their‌‌  12. In‌  ‌Ople‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Torres‌, ‌ ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌order‌  ‌establishing‌  ‌the‌‌ 
comfort‌‌and‌‌convenience.‌  ‌ National‌  ‌Computerized‌‌   Identification‌‌
  Reference‌‌   System‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌  Rational‌‌basis‌‌ 
Review‌‌of‌‌economic‌‌legislation‌  ‌
expressed‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌facilitating‌  ‌transactions‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌  standard‌  ‌
3. In‌  ‌Velasco‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Villegas‌, ‌ ‌an‌  ‌ordinance‌  ‌prohibiting‌  ‌barber‌  ‌shop‌‌ 
government‌, ‌ ‌particularly‌  ‌those‌  ‌providing‌  ‌basic‌  ‌services‌  ‌and‌‌ 
operators‌‌   from‌‌   rendering‌‌   massage‌‌   services‌‌
  in‌‌
  a ‌‌separate‌‌ room‌‌ 
social‌  ‌security‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌was‌  ‌struck‌  ‌down‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌invasion‌  ‌of‌‌  Heightened‌‌or‌‌  Evaluating‌‌classifications‌‌based‌‌on‌‌gender‌‌ 
was‌‌   likewise‌‌ sustained,‌‌ to‌‌ ‌prevent‌‌ immorality‌‌ and‌‌ enable‌‌ the‌‌ 
people’s‌‌privacy‌. ‌ ‌ immediate‌‌scrutiny‌  ‌ and‌‌legitimacy‌  ‌
authorities‌‌to‌‌properly‌‌assess‌‌license‌‌fees.‌  ‌
13. However,‌‌   in‌‌
  ‌Kilusang‌‌  Mayo‌‌   Uno‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Director‌‌ General,‌‌ NEDA‌, ‌‌the‌‌ 
4. In‌‌
  ‌Bautista‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Junio‌, ‌‌to‌‌
  ‌conserve‌‌
  energy‌, ‌‌prohibition‌‌
  of‌‌ heavy‌‌ 
Court‌  ‌upheld‌  ‌EO‌  ‌420‌  ‌prescribing‌  ‌for‌  ‌all‌‌
  government‌‌  agencies‌‌  Overbreadth‌‌  A‌‌statute‌‌needlessly‌‌restrains‌‌even‌‌ 
and‌  ‌extra-heavy‌  ‌vehicles‌  ‌from‌  ‌using‌  ‌public‌  ‌streets‌  ‌on‌‌ 
and‌  ‌GOCCs‌  ‌a ‌ ‌“uniform‌  ‌data‌  ‌collection‌  ‌and‌  ‌format‌  ‌for‌  ‌their‌  doctrine‌  ‌ constitutionally‌‌guaranteed‌‌rights‌  ‌
weekends‌‌and‌‌legal‌‌holidays‌‌was‌‌sustained.‌  ‌
existing‌‌ID‌‌systems”‌‌for‌‌their‌‌respective‌‌employees.‌  ‌
5. In‌‌
  ‌Tio‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Videogram‌‌   Regulatory‌‌   Board‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  creation‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ VRB‌‌  Void-for-vagueness‌‌  A‌‌penal‌‌statute‌‌encroaches‌‌upon‌‌the‌‌freedom‌‌ 
Lawful‌‌Means‌  ‌
was‌  ‌sustained‌  ‌“to‌  ‌answer‌  ‌the‌  ‌need‌  ‌for‌  ‌regulating‌‌   the‌‌   video‌‌ 
doctrine‌  ‌ of‌‌speech.‌  ‌
industry‌, ‌ ‌particularly‌  ‌because‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  rampant‌‌   film‌‌
  piracy,‌‌   the‌‌  1. Both‌  ‌ends‌  ‌and‌  ‌means‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌legitimate‌. ‌ ‌Otherwise,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
flagrant‌  ‌violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌intellectual‌  ‌property‌  ‌rights,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  police‌  ‌measure‌‌  shall‌‌   be‌‌
  struck‌‌
  down‌‌
  as‌‌
  an‌‌
  arbitrary‌‌
  intrusion‌‌  4. In‌  ‌fine,‌  ‌the‌  ‌means‌  ‌employed‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌accomplishment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
proliferation‌‌of‌‌pornographic‌‌video‌‌tapes.”‌  ‌ into‌‌private‌‌rights.‌‌   ‌ police‌  ‌objective‌  ‌must‌  ‌pass‌  ‌the‌  ‌test‌  ‌of‌  ‌reasonableness‌  ‌and,‌‌ 
6. In‌  ‌the‌  ‌landmark‌‌  case‌‌   of‌‌  ‌Lozano‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Martinez‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  SC‌‌
  upheld‌‌
  the‌‌  2. There‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌relation‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌means‌‌  specifically,‌‌   conform‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  safeguards‌‌  embodied‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Bill‌‌ of‌‌ 
validity‌‌ of‌‌ BP‌‌ 22‌‌ as‌‌ it‌‌ ‌preserves‌‌ the‌‌ integrity‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ banking‌‌  and‌‌the‌‌end‌. ‌ ‌ Rights‌‌for‌‌the‌‌protection‌‌of‌‌private‌‌rights.‌  ‌
system‌  ‌by‌  ‌preventing‌  ‌worthless‌  ‌checks‌  ‌from‌  ‌flooding‌  ‌the‌‌  a. In‌‌
  ‌Ynot‌‌
  v.‌‌
  IAC‌, ‌‌an‌‌
  EO‌‌
  prohibiting‌‌
  the‌‌
  transport‌‌
  of‌‌
  carabaos‌‌ 
system.‌  ‌ Eminent‌‌Domain‌  ‌
and‌  ‌carabeef‌  ‌across‌  ‌provincial‌  ‌boundaries‌  ‌without‌‌ 
government‌  ‌clearance,‌  ‌was‌  ‌invalidated‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 9‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Definition,‌‌Nature‌‌and‌‌Function‌  ‌ a. In‌‌ ‌Republic‌‌ v.‌‌ PLDT‌, ‌‌the‌‌ SC‌‌ upheld‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Bureau‌‌ of‌‌ 
Sec‌  ‌19‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌LGC‌  ‌states‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌delegated‌  ‌power‌‌ 
Also‌  ‌called‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌expropriation,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌described‌  ‌as‌  ‌“the‌  Telecommunications‌  ‌to‌  ‌demand‌  ‌the‌  ‌interconnection‌‌ 
should‌  ‌be‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌‌   and‌‌  pertinent‌‌   laws.‌‌
  ‌R.A.‌‌
  No.‌‌ 
highest‌  ‌and‌  ‌most‌  ‌exact‌  ‌idea‌  ‌of‌  ‌property‌  ‌remaining‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  between‌  ‌the‌  ‌Government‌  ‌Telephone‌  ‌System‌‌   and‌‌   PLDT,‌‌
  so‌‌ 
7279‌  ‌is‌  ‌such‌  ‌pertinent‌  ‌law‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌case‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌governs‌  ‌the‌  ‌local‌‌ 
government”‌‌   that‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ acquired‌‌ for‌‌ some‌‌ public‌‌ purpose‌‌ through‌‌  that‌‌   the‌‌
  former‌‌ could‌‌ make‌‌ use‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ lines‌‌ and‌‌ facilities‌‌ of‌‌ 
expropriation‌  ‌of‌  ‌properties‌  ‌for‌  ‌purposes‌‌   of‌‌
  urban‌‌   land‌‌  reform‌‌ 
a‌‌method‌‌“in‌‌the‌‌nature‌‌of‌‌a‌‌compulsory‌‌sale‌‌to‌‌the‌‌State.”‌  ‌ PLDT.‌  ‌
and‌‌housing‌.  ‌‌ ‌
Sec‌  ‌9 ‌ ‌Art‌  ‌III‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution,‌‌   providing‌‌
  that‌‌   “private‌‌
  property‌‌  b. Similarly,‌  ‌in‌  ‌PLDT‌  ‌v.‌  ‌NTC‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌was‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌‌ 
The‌‌
  case‌‌   of‌‌ ‌Estate‌‌ or‌‌ Heirs‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Late‌‌ Ex-Justice‌‌ Jose‌‌ B.L.‌‌ Reyes‌‌ v.‌‌ 
shall‌‌   not‌‌
  be‌‌ taken‌‌ for‌‌ public‌‌ use‌‌ without‌‌ just‌‌ compensation”,‌‌ serves‌‌  interconnect‌‌with‌‌a‌‌private‌‌telecommunications‌‌company.‌  ‌
City‌  ‌of‌  ‌Manila‌  ‌emphatically‌  ‌ruled‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌are‌  strict‌ 
as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌limitation,‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌grant,‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌power.‌  ‌It‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌strictly‌‌  limitations‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  power‌‌ of‌‌ eminent‌‌ domain‌‌ by‌‌ local‌‌  PNOC‌‌Alternative‌‌Fuels‌‌v.‌‌NGCP‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
interpreted‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌expropriator‌  ‌and‌  ‌liberally‌  ‌in‌  ‌favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  government‌‌units,‌‌especially‌‌with‌‌respect‌‌to:‌‌   ‌ Republic‌  ‌v.‌  ‌East‌  ‌Silverlane‌  ‌Realty‌  ‌Development‌  ‌Corp‌. ‌ ‌held‌  ‌that‌‌ 
property‌‌owner.‌  ‌
1) the‌  ‌order‌  ‌of‌  ‌priority‌  ‌in‌  ‌acquiring‌  ‌land‌  ‌for‌  ‌socialized‌‌  when‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌  ‌property‌  ‌is‌  ‌classified‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌‌ 
Essential‌‌requisites‌‌for‌‌the‌‌exercise‌‌by‌‌an‌‌LGU‌  ‌ housing;‌‌and‌  ‌ industrial‌  ‌zone‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌subject‌  ‌property‌  ‌therein‌  ‌had‌  ‌been‌  ‌declared‌‌ 
1) Enactment‌‌of‌‌an‌o
‌ rdinance‌,‌‌not‌‌just‌‌a‌‌resolution;‌  ‌ 2) the‌  ‌resort‌  ‌to‌  ‌expropriation‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌means‌  ‌of‌‌  patrimonial‌. ‌‌Further,‌‌   it‌‌
  is‌‌
  apparent‌‌  from‌‌
  R.A.‌‌
  No.‌‌
  10516‌‌ and‌‌ its‌‌ IRR‌‌ 
acquiring‌‌it.‌‌   ‌ that‌  ‌the‌  ‌industrial‌  ‌estate‌  ‌is‌‌   being‌‌
  owned,‌‌   managed,‌‌   and‌‌
  operated‌‌   by‌‌ 
2) Must‌‌   be‌‌
  for‌‌
  a ‌‌‌public‌‌ use‌, ‌‌purpose‌‌ or‌‌ welfare,‌‌ or‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ benefit‌‌ 
the‌  ‌State,‌  ‌not‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌sovereign‌  ‌capacity,‌  ‌but‌  ‌rather‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌private‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌poor‌‌and‌‌the‌‌landless;‌  ‌ Compliance‌‌with‌‌these‌‌conditions‌‌is‌‌mandatory.‌‌   ‌ capacity.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌apparent‌  ‌from‌  ‌P.D.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌949,‌  ‌as‌‌
  amended‌‌   by‌‌
  R.A.‌‌  No.‌‌ 
3) Payment‌‌of‌j‌ ust‌‌compensation‌;‌‌and‌  ‌ 10516,‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌Petrochemical‌  ‌Industrial‌  ‌Park‌  ‌is‌  ‌intended‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Necessity‌‌of‌‌Exercise‌  ‌
4) Exercise‌‌  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  preceded‌‌  by‌‌
  a ‌‌‌valid‌‌ and‌‌ definite‌‌ offer‌‌ made‌‌  accordingly‌‌devoted‌‌by‌‌law‌‌as‌‌a‌‌commercial‌‌and‌‌business‌‌venture.‌  ‌
to‌‌the‌‌owner,‌‌who‌‌rejects‌‌the‌‌same.‌  ‌ 1. Essentially‌  ‌political‌  ‌in‌  ‌nature‌  ‌when‌  ‌exercised‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Thus,‌  ‌NGCP‌  ‌has‌  ‌the‌‌
  authority‌‌
  under‌‌
  Section‌‌
  4 ‌‌of‌‌
  R.A.‌‌
  No.‌‌
  9511‌‌ 
legislature.‌  ‌
Conditions‌‌precedent‌‌to‌‌the‌‌issuance‌‌of‌‌a‌‌writ‌‌of‌‌possession‌  ‌ to‌‌expropriate‌‌the‌‌subject‌‌property‌. ‌ ‌
1) Complaint‌‌   for‌‌
  expropriation‌‌ sufficient‌‌ in‌‌ form‌‌ and‌‌ substance‌‌ is‌‌  2. In‌  ‌cases‌  ‌of‌  ‌delegated‌  ‌authority,‌  ‌the‌‌
  judiciary‌‌
  has‌‌  assumed‌‌   the‌‌ 
filed‌‌in‌‌the‌‌proper‌‌court;‌‌and‌  ‌ power‌  ‌to‌  ‌inquire‌  ‌whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌authority‌  ‌conferred‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌‌  Taking‌  ‌
correctly‌  ‌or‌‌   properly‌‌
  exercised.‌‌  This‌‌   involves‌‌
  looking‌‌  into‌‌
  the‌‌  1. May‌  ‌include‌  ‌trespass‌  ‌without‌  ‌actual‌  ‌eviction‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌owner,‌‌ 
2) Deposit‌  ‌with‌  ‌said‌  ‌court‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌15%‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌property’s‌  ‌fair‌‌ 
necessity‌‌of‌‌the‌‌expropriation.‌  ‌ material‌‌   impairment‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  value‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ property‌‌ or‌‌ prevention‌‌ 
market‌‌value‌b ‌ ased‌‌on‌‌its‌‌current‌‌tax‌‌declaration.‌  ‌
Stages‌  ‌ of‌‌the‌‌ordinary‌‌uses‌‌for‌‌which‌‌the‌‌property‌‌was‌‌intended.‌  ‌
City‌‌of‌‌Manila‌‌v.‌‌Prieto‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
1) Determination‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ ‌validity‌‌ ‌of‌‌ the‌‌ expropriation.‌‌ Necessity‌‌ of‌‌  a. In‌  ‌Ayala‌  ‌de‌  ‌Roxas‌  ‌v.‌  ‌City‌  ‌of‌  ‌Manila‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌imposition‌‌  of‌‌
  an‌‌ 
The‌  ‌SC‌  ‌adopted‌  ‌the‌  ‌ruling‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌CA‌  ‌wherein‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter‌  ‌found‌  ‌the‌‌ 
an‌‌expropriation‌‌is‌‌a‌‌justiciable‌‌question.‌  ‌ easement‌  ‌over‌  ‌a ‌ ‌3-meter‌  ‌strip‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  plaintiff’s‌‌
  property‌‌ 
following‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌to‌  ‌invalidate‌  ‌the‌  ‌expropriation‌  ‌done‌  ‌by‌‌ 
could‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌legally‌  ‌done‌  ‌without‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌just‌‌ 
petitioner:‌  ‌ 2) Determination‌‌of‌j‌ ust‌‌compensation.‌  ‌ compensation.‌  ‌
1. The‌‌  records‌‌   lack‌‌  any‌‌
  evidence‌‌   to‌‌
  support‌‌
  petitioner's‌‌ claim‌‌  Private‌‌Property‌  ‌
that‌  ‌an‌  ‌on-site‌  ‌development‌  ‌program‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌most‌‌  b. In‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Fajardo‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌municipal‌  ‌ordinance‌  ‌prohibiting‌‌ 
practicable‌‌   and‌‌  advantageous‌‌   for‌‌  the‌‌
  beneficiaries,‌‌ to‌‌ justify‌‌  1. Anything‌‌   that‌‌
  can‌‌
  come‌‌  under‌‌   the‌‌
  dominion‌‌ of‌‌ man,‌‌ including:‌‌  construction‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌building‌  ‌that‌‌   would‌‌  destroy‌‌  the‌‌  view‌‌ 
the‌  ‌non-applicability‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌list‌  ‌of‌  ‌priorities‌  ‌in‌  ‌land‌‌  (1)‌  ‌real‌  ‌and‌  ‌personal,‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌tangible‌  ‌and‌  ‌intangible‌  ‌properties.‌‌  of‌  ‌the‌  ‌plaza‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌highway‌  ‌was‌  ‌considered‌  ‌a ‌ ‌taking‌‌ 
acquisition‌‌under‌S ‌ ection‌‌9‌‌of‌‌R.A.‌‌No.‌‌7279‌.  ‌‌ ‌ Except‌m ‌ oney‌a‌ nd‌‌choses‌‌in‌‌action.‌  ‌ under‌‌the‌‌power‌‌of‌‌eminent‌‌domain.‌  ‌
2. Petitioner‌  ‌failed‌  ‌to‌  ‌exhaust‌  ‌other‌  ‌modes‌  ‌of‌  ‌acquisition‌‌  2. Property‌  ‌already‌  ‌devoted‌  ‌to‌  ‌public‌  ‌use‌  ‌is‌  ‌still‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌‌  c. The‌  ‌right-of-way‌  ‌easement,‌  ‌resulting‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌restriction‌‌   or‌‌ 
before‌‌ it‌‌ resorted‌‌ to‌‌ expropriation‌‌ in‌‌ violation‌‌ of‌‌ ‌Section‌‌ 10‌‌  expropriation,‌  ‌provided‌  ‌this‌  ‌is‌  ‌done‌  ‌(1)‌  ‌directly‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  limitation‌  ‌on‌  ‌property‌  ‌rights‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌land‌  ‌traversed‌  ‌by‌‌ 
of‌  ‌R.A.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌7279‌. ‌ ‌Failure‌  ‌to‌  ‌renegotiate‌  ‌the‌  ‌offer‌  ‌to‌‌  legislature‌, ‌‌or‌‌
  (2)‌‌
  ‌under‌‌
  a ‌‌specific‌‌ grant‌‌ of‌‌ authority‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  transmission‌‌   lines‌‌
  is‌‌ also‌‌ an‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ expropriation,‌‌ as‌‌ 
purchase‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌before‌  ‌filing‌  ‌the‌  ‌expropriation‌  ‌case‌  ‌ delegate.‌  ‌ in‌‌NPC‌‌v.‌‌Aguirre-Paderanga‌. ‌ ‌
warrants‌‌the‌‌dismissal‌‌of‌‌the‌‌complaint‌‌for‌‌expropriation.‌  ‌ 3. In‌  ‌NHA‌  ‌v.‌  ‌DARAB‌, ‌ ‌land,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌tenanted‌  ‌or‌‌
  not,‌‌
  acquired‌‌
  by‌‌  d. In‌  ‌NPC‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Ileto‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
3. The‌‌
  intended‌‌  beneficiaries‌‌ of‌‌ petitioner's‌‌ socialized‌‌ housing‌‌  the‌‌   NHA‌‌  for‌‌  its‌‌
  housing‌‌
  and‌‌  resettlement‌‌  programs‌‌ are‌‌ exempt‌‌  transmission‌  ‌lines,‌‌   i.e.‌‌
  construction‌‌   of‌‌  any‌‌
  improvements‌‌ 
program‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌"‌underprivileged‌  ‌and‌  ‌homeless,‌" ‌ ‌in‌‌  from‌‌land‌‌reform‌‌under‌‌PD‌‌1472.‌  ‌ or‌  ‌planting‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌trees‌  ‌that‌  ‌exceed‌  ‌3 ‌ ‌meters‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌ 
violation‌‌of‌S
‌ ection‌‌8.‌ ‌ ‌ 4. Services‌a‌ re‌‌considered‌‌embraced‌‌in‌‌the‌‌concept‌‌of‌‌property.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 10‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

aerial‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌way‌, ‌ ‌clearly‌  ‌interferes‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌ 


property,‌‌they‌‌are‌‌entitled‌‌to‌‌the‌‌payment‌‌of‌‌a‌‌just‌‌compensation.‌  ‌ ⭐‌LBP‌‌v.‌‌Manzano‌‌‌2018‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
landowners’‌‌right‌‌to‌‌possess‌‌and‌‌enjoy‌‌their‌‌properties.‌  ‌
2. Not‌  ‌every‌  ‌taking‌  ‌is‌  ‌compensable,‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌justified‌‌  Public‌‌use‌  ‌ The‌  ‌Special‌‌   Agrarian‌‌  Court‌‌  must‌‌   ensure‌‌   that‌‌  the‌‌
  amount‌‌   determined‌‌ 
under‌‌the‌‌police‌‌power.‌‌   ‌ 1. Any‌  ‌use‌  ‌directly‌  ‌available‌  ‌to‌‌
  the‌‌
  general‌‌
  public‌‌
  as‌‌
  a ‌‌matter‌‌
  of‌‌  at‌‌
  the‌‌
  end‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  proceedings‌‌   is‌‌
  equivalent‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  fair‌‌ market‌‌ value‌‌ 
right‌‌and‌‌not‌‌merely‌‌of‌‌forbearance‌‌or‌‌accommodation.‌  ‌ of‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌taking‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌‌
a. Thus,‌  ‌losses‌  ‌sustained‌  ‌are‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌nature‌  ‌of‌  ‌damnum‌‌ 
strict‌  ‌adherence‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌particular‌  ‌set‌‌   or‌‌  series‌‌   of‌‌
  rules‌‌   imposed‌‌ 
absque‌‌injuria‌. ‌ ‌ 2. There‌‌
  will‌‌
  also‌‌
  be‌‌  public‌‌
  use‌‌
  involved‌‌   even‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ expropriated‌‌  by‌  ‌agricultural‌  ‌reform‌  ‌laws‌  ‌or‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌orders‌. ‌ ‌While‌‌ 
b. This‌‌   rule‌‌
  is‌‌
  only‌‌   valid‌‌
  as‌‌
  long‌‌
  as‌‌
  the‌‌ prejudice‌‌ suffered‌‌ by‌‌  property‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌actually‌  ‌acquired‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌but‌  ‌is‌‌  Section‌  ‌17‌  ‌requires‌  ‌due‌  ‌consideration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌   formula‌‌   prescribed‌‌
  by‌‌ 
an‌  ‌individual‌  ‌is‌‌  ‌shared‌‌   in‌‌
  common‌‌   with‌‌  the‌‌
  rest‌‌
  as‌‌
  was‌‌  merely‌  ‌devoted‌  ‌to‌  ‌public‌  ‌services‌  ‌administered‌  ‌by‌‌  DAR,‌  ‌the‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌just‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌is‌  ‌still‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
illustrated‌‌in‌R ‌ ichards‌‌v.‌‌Washington‌‌Terminal‌. ‌ ‌ privately-owned‌  ‌public‌  ‌utilities‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌telephone‌  ‌or‌  ‌light‌‌  final‌‌decision‌‌of‌‌the‌‌proper‌‌court.‌  ‌
companies.‌  ‌
3. Compensable‌  ‌taking‌  ‌includes‌  ‌destruction,‌  ‌restriction,‌‌  How‌‌determined‌  ‌
diminution,‌‌  or‌‌
  interruption‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ rights‌‌ of‌‌ ownership‌‌ or‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  3. Important‌  ‌thing‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌any‌  ‌member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌   general‌‌   public‌‌
  can‌‌ 
common‌‌   and‌‌  necessary‌‌
  use‌‌
  and‌‌  enjoyment‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ property‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌ demand,‌  ‌for‌  ‌free‌  ‌or‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fee,‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌use‌  ‌the‌  ‌converted‌‌  1. To‌  ‌ascertain‌  ‌just‌  ‌compensation,‌  ‌the‌  ‌court‌  ‌should‌  ‌determine‌‌ 
lawful‌‌manner,‌‌lessening‌‌or‌‌destroying‌‌its‌‌value.‌‌   ‌ property‌‌for‌‌his‌‌direct‌‌and‌‌personal‌‌convenience.‌  ‌ first‌‌the‌‌actual‌‌or‌‌basic‌‌value‌‌of‌‌the‌‌property.‌ 
4. Requisites‌  ‌of‌  ‌Taking‌  ‌in‌  ‌Eminent‌  ‌Domain‌  ‌(according‌  ‌to‌‌  4. Broadened‌  ‌to‌  ‌include‌  ‌those‌  ‌that‌  ‌will‌  ‌redound‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌indirect‌‌  If‌‌Consequential‌‌Damages‌‌>‌‌Consequential‌‌Benefits‌  ‌
Republic‌‌v.‌‌Castellvi‌)‌  ‌ advantage‌‌or‌‌benefit‌‌of‌‌the‌‌public.‌  ‌
J .C.  = Actual V alue  + (Damages  − B enef its )   ‌
a. The‌‌expropriator‌‌must‌e
‌ nter‌‌a‌‌private‌‌property‌; ‌ ‌ MCIAA‌‌v.‌‌Lozada,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
b. The‌‌entry‌‌must‌‌be‌f‌ or‌‌more‌‌than‌‌a‌‌momentary‌‌period‌; ‌ ‌ We‌  ‌now‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌hold‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌taking‌  ‌of‌  ‌private‌  ‌property,‌‌  Otherwise:‌ ‌J ust Compensation  = Actual V alue   ‌
c. The‌  ‌entry‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌under‌  ‌warrant‌  ‌or‌  ‌color‌  ‌of‌  ‌legal‌‌  consequent‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Government's‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌eminent‌‌  2. The‌  ‌basic‌  ‌or‌  ‌market‌  ‌value‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌price‌  ‌that‌‌ 
authority‌; ‌ ‌ domain,‌‌   is‌‌
  ‌always‌‌   subject‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  condition‌‌   that‌‌   the‌‌  property‌‌   be‌‌  may‌  ‌be‌  ‌agreed‌  ‌upon‌  ‌by‌  ‌parties‌  ‌willing‌  ‌but‌  ‌not‌  ‌compelled‌  ‌to‌‌ 
devoted‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌specific‌  ‌public‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌for‌  ‌which‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌taken.‌‌  enter‌‌into‌‌a‌‌contract‌‌of‌‌sale.‌  ‌
d. The‌‌
  property‌‌
  must‌‌ be‌‌ ‌devoted‌‌ to‌‌ public‌‌ use‌‌ or‌‌ otherwise‌‌  Corollarily,‌‌   if‌‌
  this‌‌
  particular‌‌   purpose‌‌   or‌‌
  intent‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ initiated‌‌ or‌‌ 
informally‌‌appropriated‌‌or‌‌injuriously‌‌affected;‌  ‌ not‌  ‌at‌  ‌all‌  ‌pursued,‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌peremptorily‌  ‌abandoned,‌  ‌then‌  ‌the‌‌  3. Among‌  ‌the‌  ‌factors‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌in‌  ‌arriving‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌fair‌‌ 
former‌  ‌owners,‌  ‌if‌  ‌they‌  ‌so‌‌   desire,‌‌  may‌‌   seek‌‌   the‌‌  reversion‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  market‌‌value:‌ 
e. The‌  ‌utilization‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌for‌  ‌public‌  ‌use‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌‌
  in‌‌ 
such‌  ‌a ‌ ‌way‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌oust‌  ‌the‌  ‌owner‌  ‌and‌  ‌deprive‌  ‌him‌  ‌of‌‌  property‌, ‌ ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌return‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌   amount‌‌   of‌‌
  just‌‌
  compensation‌‌  a. Cost‌‌of‌‌acquisition;‌  ‌
beneficial‌‌enjoyment‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌property.‌  ‌ received.‌‌   In‌‌  such‌‌  a ‌‌case,‌‌ the‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ of‌‌ eminent‌‌ domain‌‌ 
has‌  ‌become‌  ‌improper‌  ‌for‌  ‌lack‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌required‌  ‌factual‌‌  b. Current‌‌value‌‌of‌‌like‌‌properties‌‌at‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌taking;‌  ‌
National‌‌Transmission‌‌Corp.‌‌v.‌‌Sps‌‌Taglao‌‌2
‌ 020‌  ‌ justification‌. ‌ ‌ c. Actual‌‌or‌‌potential‌‌uses;‌  ‌
True,‌‌   an‌‌
  ‌easement‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌right‌‌
  of‌‌
  way‌‌   transmits‌‌   no‌‌
  rights‌‌   except‌‌
  the‌‌  Just‌‌compensation‌  ‌ d. In‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌land,‌  ‌their‌  ‌size,‌  ‌shape‌  ‌or‌  ‌location‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌tax‌‌ 
easement‌  ‌itself,‌  ‌and‌‌   the‌‌
  respondents‌‌   would‌‌   retain‌‌  full‌‌
  ownership‌‌   of‌‌  declarations‌‌thereon.‌  ‌
the‌‌
  property‌‌   taken.‌‌
  Nonetheless,‌‌   the‌‌
  acquisition‌‌   of‌‌
  such‌‌   easement‌‌ is‌‌  1. The‌‌  determination‌‌   of‌‌
  just‌‌
  compensation‌‌   is‌‌
  a ‌‌‌judicial‌‌ function‌‌ 
which‌‌   cannot‌‌
  be‌‌
  curtailed‌‌   or‌‌
  limited‌‌
  by‌‌
  legislation,‌‌   much‌‌   less‌‌  4. The‌‌measure‌‌is‌‌not‌‌the‌‌taker's‌‌gain,‌‌but‌‌the‌‌owner's‌‌loss.‌  ‌
not‌  ‌gratis.‌  ‌The‌  ‌limitations‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌taken‌  ‌for‌  ‌an‌‌ 
indefinite‌‌period‌‌would‌‌deprive‌‌its‌‌owner‌‌of‌‌the‌‌normal‌‌use‌‌thereof.‌‌   ‌ by‌‌an‌‌administrative‌‌rule.‌‌‌(‌LBP‌‌v.‌‌Manzano‌‌‌2018‌‌Leonen,‌‌J‌) ‌ ‌
City‌‌Government‌‌of‌‌Valenzuela‌‌v.‌‌Sps‌‌Abacan‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
2. According‌  ‌to‌  ‌De‌  ‌Knecht‌  ‌v.‌  ‌CA‌, ‌ ‌owner‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌all‌  ‌those‌  ‌who‌‌ 
NPC‌‌
  v.‌‌ Sps‌‌ Aoque‌‌ ‌citing‌‌ ‌NPC‌‌ v.‌‌ Tiangco‌‌ held‌‌ that‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ ‌easement‌‌ ‌is‌‌ 
have‌‌  lawful‌‌ interest‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ property‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ condemned,‌‌ including‌‌  In‌  ‌Meralco‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Pineda,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌issue‌  ‌is‌‌ 
intended‌  ‌to‌  ‌perpetually‌  ‌or‌  ‌indefinitely‌  ‌deprive‌  ‌the‌  ‌owner‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌ 
a‌  ‌mortgagee,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌lessee,‌  ‌and‌  ‌a ‌ ‌vendee‌  ‌in‌  ‌possession‌  ‌under‌  ‌an‌‌  determining‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌just‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌expropriation‌‌ 
proprietary‌‌   rights,‌‌ then‌‌ ‌the‌‌ owner‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌ compensated‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ 
executory‌‌contract.‌  ‌ suit,‌‌  a ‌‌‌trial‌‌ before‌‌ the‌‌ commissioners‌‌ is‌‌ indispensable‌. ‌‌However,‌‌ 
monetary‌‌equivalent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌land.‌  ‌
3. However,‌  ‌in‌  ‌LBP‌  ‌v.‌  ‌AMS‌  ‌Farming‌  ‌Corporation‌, ‌ ‌SC‌  ‌rejected‌‌  while‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointment‌‌   of‌‌
  commissioners‌‌   is‌‌
  mandatory‌‌   in‌‌
  resolving‌‌ 
In‌  ‌this‌  ‌case,‌  ‌considering‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌installation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌lines‌‌  respondent’s‌  ‌claim‌  ‌for‌  ‌just‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mere‌‌  the‌  ‌issue‌  ‌of‌  ‌just‌  ‌compensation,‌  ‌courts‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌bound‌  ‌by‌  ‌their‌‌ 
would‌  ‌definitely‌  ‌deprive‌  ‌Spouses‌  ‌Taglao‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌normal‌  ‌use‌‌   of‌‌
  their‌‌  lessee.‌‌   ‌ findings‌. ‌ ‌Courts‌  ‌may‌‌   substitute‌‌
  their‌‌
  estimate‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  value,‌‌  ‌as‌‌
  long‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 11‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

time‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌the‌  ‌land‌  ‌is‌  ‌taken‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌owner.‌  ‌(‌Apo‌  property.‌  ‌His‌  ‌only‌  ‌remedy‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌action‌  ‌for‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌‌
  just‌‌ 
as‌‌it‌‌is‌‌supported‌‌by‌‌the‌‌evidence‌‌‌on‌‌record.‌  ‌
Fruits‌‌v.‌‌LBP‌‌‌2010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌) ‌ ‌ compensation‌‌‌and‌‌may‌‌not‌‌sue‌‌for‌‌ejectment.‌  ‌
Damages‌‌and‌‌interest‌‌as‌‌part‌‌of‌‌just‌‌compensation‌  ‌ 10. Neither‌  ‌laches‌  ‌nor‌  ‌prescription‌  ‌may‌  ‌bar‌  ‌a ‌ ‌claim‌  ‌for‌  ‌just‌‌  2. Amount‌‌to‌‌be‌‌Deposited‌  ‌
1. Consequential‌  ‌Damages‌  ‌consist‌  ‌of‌  ‌injuries‌  ‌directly‌  ‌caused‌‌  compensation‌‌for‌‌property‌‌taken‌‌for‌‌public‌‌use.‌  ‌ a. Rule‌  ‌67‌  ‌— ‌ ‌an‌  ‌amount‌  ‌equivalent‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌full‌  ‌assessed‌‌ 
on‌  ‌the‌  ‌residue‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌private‌  ‌property‌  ‌taken‌  ‌through‌‌  11. Title‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌transferred‌  ‌until‌  ‌after‌‌  value‌‌   ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  property‌‌
  in‌‌
  order‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  court‌‌ to‌‌ issue‌‌ a ‌‌writ‌‌ 
expropriation.‌  ‌ actual‌‌payment‌‌‌of‌‌just‌‌compensation.‌  ‌ of‌‌possession;‌  ‌
b. If‌‌
  the‌‌ expropriator‌‌ is‌‌ an‌‌ ‌LGU‌, ‌‌the‌‌ amount‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ deposited‌‌ is‌‌ 
2. In‌  ‌Republic‌  ‌v.‌  ‌BPI‌,‌  ‌SC‌  ‌clarified‌  ‌that‌  ‌no‌  ‌actual‌  ‌taking‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  LBP‌‌v.‌‌Rivera‌‌2
‌ 010‌  ‌
only‌1 ‌ 5%‌‌of‌‌the‌‌assessed‌‌value‌o ‌ f‌‌the‌‌property.‌‌   ‌
building‌‌is‌‌necessary‌‌to‌‌grant‌‌consequential‌‌damages.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌formula‌  ‌outlined‌  ‌in‌  ‌DAR‌  ‌Administrative‌  ‌Order‌  ‌No.‌  ‌5,‌‌
  series‌‌
  of‌‌  c. In‌  ‌RA‌  ‌8974,‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌expropriation‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌‌ 
3. In‌  ‌Heirs‌  ‌of‌  ‌Banaag‌  ‌v.‌  ‌AMS‌  ‌Farming‌  ‌Corporation‌, ‌ ‌it‌  ‌was‌‌  1998‌‌should‌‌be‌‌applied‌‌in‌‌computing‌‌just‌‌compensation,‌‌thus:‌  ‌ implement‌  ‌a ‌ ‌national‌  ‌government‌  ‌infrastructure‌  ‌project,‌‌ 
stressed‌  ‌that‌  ‌just‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌crops‌  ‌and‌‌  what‌  ‌needs‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌done‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌deposit‌  ‌but‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌‌ 
improvements‌  ‌is‌  ‌inseparable‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌valuation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌raw‌‌  LV‌‌=‌‌(CNI‌‌x‌‌0.6)‌‌+‌‌(CS‌‌x‌‌0.3)‌‌+‌‌(MV‌‌x‌‌0.1)‌  ‌
BIR‌  ‌Zonal‌  ‌valuation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌property.‌  ‌This‌  ‌amount‌‌ 
lands‌‌  as‌‌
  the‌‌
  former‌‌ are‌‌ part‌‌ and‌‌ parcel‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ latter.‌‌ These‌‌ must‌‌  Where:‌‌   ‌ deposited‌‌or‌‌paid‌‌is‌‌NOT‌‌the‌‌just‌‌compensation.‌  ‌
be‌  ‌awarded‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌landowner‌  ‌irrespective‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌nature‌  ‌of‌‌  LV‌‌=‌‌Land‌‌Value‌  ‌
ownership‌‌of‌‌said‌‌crops.‌  ‌ 3. In‌‌
  ‌NPC‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Pobre‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  expropriator‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  allowed‌‌
  to‌‌ unilaterally‌‌ 
CNI‌‌=‌‌Capitalized‌‌Net‌‌Income‌  ‌
withdraw‌  ‌because‌  ‌damages‌  ‌may‌  ‌have‌  ‌already‌  ‌been‌  ‌caused‌‌  to‌‌ 
4. Where‌  ‌entry‌  ‌preceded‌  ‌the‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌for‌‌  CS‌‌=‌‌Comparable‌‌Sales‌  ‌
the‌‌property.‌  ‌
expropriation,‌  ‌the‌  ‌assessment‌‌
  should‌‌   be‌‌
  made‌‌   at‌‌
  the‌‌
  time‌‌  MV‌‌=‌‌Market‌‌Value‌‌per‌‌Tax‌‌Declaration‌  ‌
of‌‌the‌‌entry‌. ‌ ‌ NTC‌‌v.‌‌Bermuda‌‌Development‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
Republic‌‌v.‌‌Dela‌‌Cruz‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
5. As‌  ‌a ‌ ‌general‌  ‌rule,‌  ‌Rule‌  ‌67‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌4 ‌ ‌provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌just‌‌  A‌  ‌case‌  ‌filed‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌landowner‌  ‌for‌  ‌recovery‌  ‌of‌  ‌possession‌  ‌or‌‌ 
compensation‌  ‌is‌  ‌computed‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌taking‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Interest‌  ‌in‌  ‌eminent‌  ‌domain‌  ‌cases‌  ‌"runs‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌matter‌  ‌of‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌‌  ejectment‌  ‌against‌  ‌a ‌ ‌public‌  ‌utility‌‌   corporation,‌‌  which‌‌  has‌‌
  occupied‌‌ 
property‌  ‌or‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌the‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌is‌  ‌filed‌, ‌ ‌whichever‌‌  follows‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌matter‌‌
  of‌‌
  course‌‌
  from‌‌   the‌‌
  right‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌ ‌landowner‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌  the‌  ‌land‌  ‌belonging‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌former‌  ‌without‌  ‌prior‌  ‌acquisition‌  ‌of‌  ‌title‌‌ 
comes‌‌first.‌  ‌ placed‌‌   in‌‌
  as‌‌   good‌‌
  a ‌‌position‌‌   as‌‌
  money‌‌   can‌‌  accomplish‌, ‌‌as‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  thereto‌‌ by‌‌ negotiated‌‌ purchase‌‌ or‌‌ expropriation‌‌ proceedings,‌‌ ‌will‌‌ not‌‌ 
6. In‌‌
  ‌Republic‌‌   v.‌‌  Castellvi‌, ‌‌property‌‌  was‌‌
  deemed‌‌  taken‌‌
  only‌‌ when‌‌  date‌‌of‌‌taking."‌‌   ‌ prosper‌.  ‌‌ ‌
expropriation‌‌   proceedings‌‌   were‌‌
  commenced‌‌   in‌‌
  1959,‌‌  not‌‌ as‌‌ of‌‌  The‌‌proper‌‌recourse‌‌‌is‌‌for‌‌the‌‌ejectment‌‌court:‌‌   ‌
the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌commencement‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌lease‌  ‌in‌  ‌1947.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌just‌‌  Rental‌  ‌
1) to‌‌
  dismiss‌‌ the‌‌ case‌‌ without‌‌ prejudice‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ landowner‌‌ filing‌‌ 
compensation‌‌was‌‌ascertained‌‌in‌‌1959.‌  ‌ Export‌‌Processing‌‌Zone‌‌Authority‌‌v.‌‌Estate‌‌of‌‌Jimenez‌‌2
‌ 011‌  ‌ the‌  ‌proper‌  ‌action‌  ‌for‌  ‌recovery‌  ‌of‌‌
  just‌‌
  compensation‌‌   and‌‌ 
7. In‌‌
  ‌City‌‌  of‌‌
  Cebu‌‌   v.‌‌  Dedamo‌, ‌‌the‌‌   filing‌‌  of‌‌ the‌‌ complaint‌‌ preceded‌‌  consequential‌‌damages‌;‌‌or‌  ‌
The‌‌   Court‌‌  has‌‌
  held‌‌   that‌‌
  ‌compensation‌‌   cannot‌‌   be‌‌ just‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ owner‌‌ 
the‌‌  taking‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   property‌‌   but‌‌
  SC‌‌   said‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ valuation‌‌ should‌‌  2) to‌‌
  dismiss‌‌   the‌‌
  case‌‌  and‌‌
  direct‌‌
  the‌‌
  public‌‌
  utility‌‌ corporation‌‌ 
in‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌property‌  ‌that‌  ‌is‌  ‌immediately‌  ‌taken‌  ‌unless‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌‌ 
be‌‌
  computed‌‌   at‌‌
  the‌‌   time‌‌ of‌‌ taking‌‌ not‌‌ necessarily‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌ of‌‌  to‌  ‌institute‌  ‌the‌  ‌proper‌  ‌expropriation‌  ‌or‌  ‌condemnation‌‌ 
prompt‌  ‌payment‌, ‌ ‌considering‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  owner‌‌  thereby‌‌   immediately‌‌ 
the‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌which‌  ‌was‌  ‌done‌  ‌earlier‌‌   the‌‌
  reason‌‌   for‌‌  proceedings‌  ‌and‌  ‌to‌  ‌pay‌  ‌the‌  ‌just‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌and‌‌ 
suffers‌‌   not‌‌  only‌‌   the‌‌
  loss‌‌  of‌‌
  his‌‌
  property‌‌ but‌‌ also‌‌ the‌‌ loss‌‌ of‌‌ its‌‌ fruits‌‌ 
that‌  ‌is‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌provision‌  ‌under‌  Section‌  ‌19‌  ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌7160‌‌  consequential‌‌damages‌‌assessed‌‌therein;‌‌or‌  ‌
or‌‌ income.‌‌ Thus,‌‌ in‌‌ addition,‌‌ the‌‌ ‌owner‌‌ is‌‌ entitled‌‌ to‌‌ legal‌‌ interest‌‌ 
which‌‌   provides‌‌   in‌‌  essence‌‌   that‌‌  the‌‌
  valuation‌‌   taken‌‌
  by‌‌  the‌‌ LGU‌‌ 
from‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌taking‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌until‌  ‌the‌  ‌actual‌‌  3) to‌‌
  ‌continue‌‌  with‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌  as‌‌
  if‌‌
  it‌‌
  were‌‌
  an‌‌
  expropriation‌‌ 
should‌‌be‌‌reckoned‌‌as‌‌of‌‌the‌‌date‌‌of‌‌actual‌‌possession.‌  ‌
payment‌‌ ‌in‌‌ order‌‌ to‌‌ place‌‌ the‌‌ owner‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌position‌‌ as‌‌ good‌‌ as,‌‌ but‌‌ not‌‌  case‌  ‌and‌  ‌determine‌  ‌the‌  ‌just‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌and‌‌ 
8. Value‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌land‌  ‌and‌  ‌its‌  ‌character‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌‌  better‌‌than,‌‌the‌‌position‌‌he‌‌was‌‌in‌‌before‌‌the‌‌taking‌‌occurred.‌  ‌ consequential‌‌   damages‌‌   pursuant‌‌   to‌‌
  Rule‌‌
  67,‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ ejectment‌‌ 
taken‌‌  by‌‌  the‌‌ government‌‌ are‌‌ the‌‌ criteria‌‌ for‌‌ determining‌‌ just‌‌  court‌‌has‌‌jurisdiction‌‌over‌‌the‌‌value‌‌of‌‌the‌‌subject‌‌land.‌  ‌
compensation.‌  ‌ Remedy‌‌of‌‌Dispossessed‌‌Owner‌  ‌
1. Owner’s‌  ‌failure‌  ‌to‌  ‌question‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌long‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌time‌  ‌the‌‌  Distinguished‌‌f rom‌‌police‌‌power‌  ‌
9. The‌  ‌owner‌  ‌is‌‌   entitled‌‌   to‌‌
  ‌payment‌‌   of‌‌
  interest‌‌   ‌from‌‌   the‌‌  time‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌‌
  taking‌‌   ‌until‌‌
  just‌‌
  compensation‌‌   is‌‌
  actually‌‌  paid‌‌   to‌‌
  him.‌‌  government’s‌  ‌failure‌  ‌to‌  ‌institute‌  ‌expropriation‌  ‌proceedings‌‌  Agan,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌PIATCO‌  ‌
To‌  ‌be‌  ‌just,‌  ‌the‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌must‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌  ‌correct‌‌  constitutes‌  ‌a ‌ ‌waiver‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌regain‌  ‌possession‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌ 
amount‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌paid;‌  ‌it‌  ‌must‌  ‌also‌  ‌be‌  ‌paid‌  ‌within‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reasonable‌‌  Sec‌  ‌17‌  ‌Art‌  ‌XII‌  ‌pertains‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌in‌‌
  times‌‌
  of‌‌
  national‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 12‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

emergency,‌‌ and‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ its‌‌ police‌‌ power,‌‌ to‌‌ temporarily‌‌ take‌‌  deprivation‌. ‌ ‌ Purposes‌  ‌


over‌‌the‌‌operation‌‌of‌a ‌ ny‌‌business‌‌affected‌‌with‌‌public‌‌interest‌. ‌  ‌ ‌ 1) Revenue‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌taxation‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌provide‌  ‌funds‌  ‌or‌‌ 
The‌  ‌term‌  ‌"‌national‌  ‌emergency‌" ‌ ‌was‌  ‌defined‌  ‌to‌  ‌include‌  ‌threat‌‌  Drugstore‌‌Association‌‌v.‌‌National‌‌Council‌‌on‌‌Disability‌‌Affairs‌‌  property‌‌  with‌‌   which‌‌ the‌‌ State‌‌ promotes‌‌ the‌‌ general‌‌ welfare‌‌ and‌‌ 
from‌  ‌external‌  ‌aggression‌, ‌ ‌calamities‌  ‌or‌  ‌national‌‌   disasters‌, ‌‌but‌‌  2016‌  ‌ protection‌‌   of‌‌
  its‌‌
  citizens.‌‌  Raising‌‌  the‌‌
  revenues‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌
  principal‌‌ 
not‌  ‌strikes‌  ‌"‌unless‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌proportion‌  ‌that‌  ‌would‌  ‌paralyze‌‌  object‌‌of‌‌taxation.‌  ‌
government‌  ‌service.‌" ‌ ‌The‌  ‌temporary‌  ‌takeover‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌‌  The‌  ‌PWD‌  ‌mandatory‌  ‌discount‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌purchase‌  ‌of‌  ‌medicine‌  ‌is‌‌ 
2) Non-Revenue.‌‌— ‌ ‌
extends‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌operation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌business‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  supported‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌  ‌objective‌  ‌or‌  ‌purpose.‌  ‌It‌  ‌has‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌  ‌subject‌‌ 
considering‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ concept‌‌ of‌‌ public‌‌ use‌‌ is‌‌ no‌‌ longer‌‌ confined‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  a) Regulation;‌  ‌
ownership‌  ‌thereof.‌  ‌As‌  ‌such‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌‌ 
compensate‌‌   the‌‌
  private‌‌   entity-owner‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ said‌‌ business‌‌ as‌‌ there‌‌  traditional‌  ‌notion‌  ‌of‌  ‌use‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌public,‌  ‌but‌  ‌held‌  ‌synonymous‌  ‌with‌‌  b) Promotion‌‌of‌‌General‌‌Welfare;‌  ‌
is‌  ‌no‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌of‌  ‌ownership.‌  ‌The‌  ‌private‌  ‌entity-owner‌  ‌affected‌‌  public‌  ‌interest,‌  ‌public‌  ‌benefit,‌  ‌public‌  ‌welfare,‌  ‌and‌  ‌public‌‌ 
c) Reduction‌‌of‌‌Social‌‌Inequality;‌  ‌
cannot,‌‌   likewise,‌‌
  claim‌‌   just‌‌  compensation‌‌   as‌‌ the‌‌ temporary‌‌ takeover‌‌  convenience‌. ‌‌As‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌ case‌‌ of‌‌ senior‌‌ citizens,‌‌ the‌‌ discount‌‌ privilege‌‌ 
to‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌PWDs‌  ‌are‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌is‌  ‌actually‌  ‌a ‌‌benefit‌‌   enjoyed‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌  d) Promote‌‌Economic‌‌Growth;‌  ‌
by‌‌  the‌‌
  government‌‌   is‌‌
  ‌in‌‌
  exercise‌‌   of‌‌  its‌‌
  police‌‌   power‌‌   ‌and‌‌ ‌not‌‌ of‌‌ its‌‌ 
power‌‌of‌‌eminent‌‌domain‌. ‌ ‌ general‌  ‌public‌  ‌to‌‌   which‌‌   these‌‌
  citizens‌‌   belong.‌‌  The‌‌   means‌‌   employed‌‌  e) Protectionism.‌  ‌
in‌  ‌invoking‌  ‌the‌  ‌active‌  ‌participation‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  private‌‌   sector,‌‌   in‌‌
  order‌‌   to‌‌  Characteristics‌  ‌
Thus,‌  ‌requiring‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌to‌  ‌pay‌  ‌reasonable‌‌  achieve‌‌ the‌‌ purpose‌‌ or‌‌ objective‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ law,‌‌ is‌‌ reasonably‌‌ and‌‌ directly‌‌ 
compensation‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌
  reasonable‌‌   use‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  property‌‌ pursuant‌‌  related.‌  ‌Also,‌  ‌the‌‌  means‌‌   employed‌‌   to‌‌
  provide‌‌   a ‌‌fair,‌‌   just‌‌
  and‌‌   quality‌‌  1) Inherent‌‌ ‌— ‌‌the‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌ tax,‌‌ an‌‌ inherent‌‌ prerogative,‌‌ has‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ 
to‌‌the‌‌operation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌business‌c‌ ontravenes‌t‌ he‌‌Constitution.‌  ‌ health‌  ‌care‌  ‌to‌  ‌PWDs‌  ‌are‌  ‌reasonably‌  ‌related‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌  ‌accomplishment,‌‌  availed‌‌of‌‌to‌‌assure‌‌the‌‌performance‌‌of‌‌vital‌‌state‌‌functions.‌  ‌
 ‌ and‌‌   are‌‌
  not‌‌
  oppressive,‌‌   considering‌‌ that‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌form‌‌ of‌‌ reimbursement,‌‌  2) Legislative‌  ‌— ‌ ‌taxing‌  ‌power‌  ‌is‌  ‌peculiarly‌  ‌and‌  ‌exclusively‌‌ 
Manila‌‌Memorial‌‌Park‌‌v.‌‌Secretary‌‌of‌‌the‌‌DSWD‌‌‌2013‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ the‌  ‌discount‌  ‌extended‌  ‌to‌  ‌PWDs‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌purchase‌‌   of‌‌  medicine‌‌   can‌‌  be‌‌  legislative‌  ‌in‌  ‌character‌  ‌and‌  ‌remains‌  ‌undiminished‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
claimed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌establishments‌‌as‌‌allowable‌‌tax‌‌deductions.‌  ‌ legislative‌‌in‌‌character.‌  ‌
In‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌police‌‌
  power‌, ‌‌xxxx‌‌
  examples‌‌
  of‌‌
  these‌‌
  regulations‌‌  See‌‌also‌‌‌Eminent‌‌domain‌‌‌under‌‌Local‌‌Governments‌  ‌ 3) Constitutionally‌‌   limited‌‌   — ‌‌the‌‌
  power‌‌   to‌‌
  tax‌‌
  is‌‌ an‌‌ attribute‌‌ of‌‌ 
are‌  ‌ sovereignty.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌strongest‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌the‌  ‌powers‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
1) property‌  ‌condemned‌  ‌for‌  ‌being‌  ‌noxious‌  ‌or‌  ‌intended‌  ‌for‌‌  government.‌‌The‌‌Constitution‌‌sets‌‌forth‌‌such‌‌limits.‌  ‌
Taxation‌  ‌
noxious‌‌purposes;‌  ‌
Exercise‌  ‌
2) zoning‌  ‌ordinances‌  p ‌ rohibiting‌  ‌the‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌property‌  ‌for‌‌  1. Taxes‌  ‌are‌  ‌the‌  ‌enforced‌  ‌proportional‌  ‌contributions‌  ‌from‌‌ 
purposes‌  ‌injurious‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌health,‌  ‌morals‌  ‌or‌  ‌safety‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  persons‌  ‌and‌  ‌property,‌  ‌levied‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌by‌  ‌virtue‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌  1. Inherent‌‌in‌‌the‌‌State,‌‌primarily‌‌vested‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Legislature.‌  ‌
community.‌‌   ‌ sovereignty,‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌support‌  ‌of‌  ‌government‌  ‌and‌  ‌for‌  ‌all‌  ‌public‌‌  2. May‌‌   be‌‌ delegated‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ pursuant‌‌ to‌‌ ‌Sec‌‌ 28(2)‌‌ Art‌‌ VI‌‌ 
needs.‌‌Obligation‌‌to‌‌pay‌‌taxes‌‌is‌n ‌ ot‌‌based‌‌on‌‌contract‌. ‌ ‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Constitution‌‌ — ‌‌‌tariff‌‌ rates,‌‌ import‌‌ and‌‌ export‌‌ quotas,‌‌ 
On‌‌   the‌‌   other‌‌
  hand,‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌  exercise‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ of‌‌ ‌eminent‌‌ domain‌, ‌‌
it‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌settled‌‌  rule‌‌
  that‌‌  the‌‌  acquisition‌‌   of‌‌
  title‌‌
  or‌‌
  total‌‌
  destruction‌‌
  of‌‌  2. Except‌‌  only‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌
  of‌‌
  poll‌‌
  taxes,‌‌
  nonpayment‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌tax‌‌ may‌‌  tonnage‌‌and‌‌wharfage‌‌dues,‌‌and‌‌other‌‌duties‌‌or‌‌imposts‌. ‌ ‌
the‌‌   property‌‌   is‌‌  not‌‌
  essential‌‌   for‌‌
  “taking”‌‌   under‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ of‌‌ eminent‌‌  be‌‌the‌‌subject‌‌of‌‌criminal‌‌prosecution‌‌and‌‌punishment.‌  ‌
3. Pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌direct‌  ‌authority‌  ‌conferred‌  ‌by‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌5 ‌ ‌Art‌  ‌X ‌ ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
domain‌‌to‌‌be‌‌present.‌‌Examples‌‌of‌‌these‌‌include‌  ‌ 3. Taxes‌  ‌are‌  ‌the‌  ‌nation’s‌  ‌lifeblood‌  ‌through‌  ‌which‌  ‌government‌‌  Constitution,‌  ‌local‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌bodies‌  ‌may‌  ‌also‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌the‌‌ 
1) establishment‌‌   of‌‌
  easements‌‌   such‌‌
  as‌‌
  where‌‌ the‌‌ landowner‌‌ is‌‌  agencies‌  ‌continue‌  ‌to‌  ‌operate‌  ‌and‌  ‌with‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌‌  power‌‌of‌‌taxation.‌  ‌
perpetually‌‌  deprived‌‌   of‌‌
  his‌‌
  proprietary‌‌ rights‌‌ because‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  discharges‌‌its‌‌functions‌‌for‌‌the‌‌welfare‌‌of‌‌its‌‌constituents.‌  ‌
4. There‌‌must‌‌be‌‌a‌‌law‌‌granting‌‌an‌‌LGU‌‌to‌‌lawfully‌‌impose‌‌a‌‌tax.‌‌   ‌
hazards‌  ‌posed‌  ‌by‌  ‌electric‌  ‌transmission‌  ‌lines‌  ‌constructed‌‌  4. Taxes‌  ‌= ‌ ‌levied‌  ‌to‌  ‌raise‌  ‌revenues;‌‌
  Licenses‌‌
  = ‌‌imposed‌‌
  for‌‌ 
above‌‌his‌‌property‌‌or‌‌   ‌ regulatory‌‌purpose.‌  ‌ Public‌‌Purpose‌  ‌
2) the‌  ‌compelled‌  ‌interconnection‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌telephone‌  ‌system‌‌  5. In‌‌
  ‌Angeles‌‌ University‌‌ Foundation‌‌ v.‌‌ City‌‌ of‌‌ Angeles‌, ‌‌SC‌‌ held‌‌ that‌‌  1. Revenues‌  ‌received‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌imposition‌  ‌of‌  ‌taxes‌  ‌or‌  ‌levies‌‌ 
between‌‌the‌‌government‌‌and‌‌a‌‌private‌‌company.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌payment‌‌   of‌‌
  building‌‌
  permit‌‌  fee‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌regulatory‌‌
  imposition,‌‌  cannot‌‌
  be‌‌
  used‌‌
  for‌‌
  purely‌‌
  private‌‌
  purposes‌‌ or‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ exclusive‌‌ 
and‌‌ not‌‌ a ‌‌charge‌‌ on‌‌ property,‌‌ and‌‌ is‌‌ therefore‌‌ not‌‌ an‌‌ imposition‌‌  benefit‌‌of‌‌private‌‌persons.‌  ‌
People‌‌v.‌‌Fajardo‌  ‌ from‌‌which‌‌petitioner‌‌is‌‌exempt.‌ 
2. In‌  ‌Planters‌  ‌Products‌  ‌Inc‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Fertiphil‌  ‌Corporation‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌‌ 
A‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌which‌  ‌substantially‌  d ‌ eprives‌  ‌an‌  ‌owner‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌‌  declared‌‌   that‌‌
  a ‌‌tax‌‌ levy‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ sale‌‌ of‌‌ fertilizers‌‌ for‌‌ purposes‌‌ of‌‌ 
beneficial‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌property‌  ‌is‌  ‌confiscation‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌ benefiting‌  ‌a ‌ ‌private‌  ‌corporation,‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌Planters‌  ‌Inc.,‌  ‌is‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 13‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

invalid.‌‌
  It‌‌
  may‌‌
  not‌‌ be‌‌ justified‌‌ even‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌valid‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ police‌‌ 
3. cession‌‌and‌‌   ‌ transfer.‌‌   ‌
power.‌  ‌
4. prescription,‌‌   ‌
B.‌‌Who‌‌are‌‌citizens‌  ‌
 ‌

III.‌‌NATIONAL‌‌TERRITORY‌  ‌ NOT‌  ‌by‌  ‌executing‌  ‌multilateral‌  ‌treaties‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌regulations‌  ‌of‌‌ 
The‌‌following‌‌are‌‌citizens‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines:‌  ‌
sea-use‌‌  rights‌‌
  or‌‌
  enacting‌‌
  statutes‌‌
  to‌‌
  comply‌‌
  with‌‌
  the‌‌
  treaty's‌‌
  terms‌‌ 
Article‌‌I.‌‌‌The‌‌national‌‌territory‌‌   ‌ to‌‌delimit‌‌maritime‌‌zones‌‌and‌‌continental‌‌shelves.‌  ‌ 1. Those‌  ‌who‌  ‌are‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
 ‌
adoption‌‌of‌‌the‌‌1987‌‌Constitution;‌  ‌
1) comprises‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippine‌‌  archipelago,‌‌   with‌‌
  all‌‌
  the‌‌
  islands‌‌ 
and‌‌
  waters‌‌  embraced‌‌   therein,‌‌
  and‌‌
  all‌‌ other‌‌ territories‌‌ over‌‌ 
IV.‌‌CITIZENSHIP‌  ‌ 2. Those‌‌whose‌‌fathers‌‌or‌‌mothers‌‌are‌‌citizens‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines;‌  ‌
which‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌has‌‌sovereignty‌‌or‌‌jurisdiction,‌‌   ‌ 3. Those‌‌   born‌‌
  before‌‌
  January‌‌
  17,‌‌
  1973,‌‌  of‌‌
  Filipino‌‌   mothers,‌‌  who‌‌ 
A.‌‌Kinds‌‌of‌‌Citizenship‌  ‌
2) consisting‌‌of‌‌its‌‌terrestrial,‌‌fluvial‌‌and‌‌aerial‌‌domains,‌   elect‌  ‌Philippine‌‌
  Citizenship‌‌  upon‌‌  reaching‌‌   the‌‌
  age‌‌
  of‌‌
  majority;‌‌ 
B.‌‌Who‌‌are‌‌citizens‌  ‌ and‌  ‌
3) including‌  ‌its‌  ‌territorial‌  ‌sea,‌  ‌the‌  ‌seabed,‌  ‌the‌  ‌subsoil,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
insular‌‌shelves,‌‌and‌‌other‌‌submarine‌‌areas.‌‌   ‌ C.‌‌Who‌‌can‌‌be‌‌citizens‌  ‌ 4. Those‌‌who‌‌are‌n
‌ aturalized‌i‌ n‌‌accordance‌‌with‌‌law.‌  ‌
D.‌‌Modes‌‌of‌‌acquiring‌‌citizenship‌  ‌ Children‌‌of‌‌Filipino‌‌Parents‌  ‌
The‌  ‌waters‌  ‌around,‌  ‌between,‌  ‌and‌  ‌connecting‌  ‌the‌  ‌islands‌  ‌of‌‌ 
the‌  ‌archipelago,‌  ‌regardless‌‌
  of‌‌
  their‌‌
  breadth‌‌
  and‌‌  dimensions,‌‌  E.‌‌Modes‌‌of‌‌losing‌‌and‌‌reacquiring‌‌citizenship‌  ‌ Republic‌‌v.‌‌Sagun‌‌2
‌ 012‌  ‌
form‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌internal‌  ‌waters‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines.‌‌  F.‌‌Dual‌‌citizenship‌‌and‌‌dual‌‌allegiance‌  ‌ It‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌settled‌‌   rule‌‌
  that‌‌ only‌‌ legitimate‌‌ children‌‌ follow‌‌ the‌‌ citizenship‌‌ 
(‌archipelagic‌‌doctrine‌‌of‌‌territoriality‌) ‌ ‌ of‌  ‌the‌  ‌father‌  ‌and‌  ‌that‌  ‌illegitimate‌  ‌children‌  ‌are‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌parental‌‌ 
 ‌
authority‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌mother‌  ‌and‌  ‌follow‌  ‌her‌‌   nationality.‌‌   An‌‌
  illegitimate‌‌ 
RA‌‌9522‌‌‌as‌‌discussed‌‌in‌M
‌ agallona‌‌v.‌‌Ermita‌‌2
‌ 011‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ A.‌‌Kinds‌‌of‌‌Citizenship‌  ‌ child‌  ‌of‌‌   a ‌‌Filipina‌‌   need‌‌
  not‌‌  perform‌‌
  any‌‌   act‌‌
  to‌‌
  confer‌‌
  upon‌‌  him‌‌
  all‌‌ 
1. Natural-born.‌‌‌—‌‌Natural-born‌‌citizens‌‌are‌‌those‌‌who‌‌are‌‌   ‌ the‌  ‌rights‌  ‌and‌  ‌privileges‌  ‌attached‌  ‌to‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines;‌  ‌he‌‌ 
RA‌  ‌9522‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Statutory‌  ‌Tool‌  ‌to‌  ‌Demarcate‌  ‌the‌  ‌Country's‌‌ 
automatically‌b ‌ ecomes‌‌a‌‌citizen‌‌himself.‌  ‌
Maritime‌  ‌Zones‌‌   and‌‌
  Continental‌‌   Shelf‌‌  Under‌‌
  UNCLOS‌‌  III,‌‌
  ‌not‌‌
  to‌‌  a. citizens‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌from‌‌birth‌  ‌
Delineate‌‌‌Philippine‌‌Territory.‌  ‌ Vilando‌‌v.‌‌HRET‌‌2
‌ 011‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
b. without‌  ‌having‌  ‌to‌  ‌perform‌  ‌any‌  ‌act‌  ‌to‌  ‌acquire‌  ‌or‌‌ 
UNCLOS‌  ‌III‌  ‌has‌  ‌nothing‌  ‌to‌  ‌do‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌acquisition‌  ‌(or‌  ‌loss)‌  ‌of‌‌ 
territory‌. ‌‌It‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌multilateral‌‌
  treaty‌‌ regulating,‌‌ among‌‌ others,‌‌ sea-use‌‌  perfect‌‌‌their‌‌Philippine‌‌citizenship.‌‌   ‌ One‌‌  born‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌father‌‌ who‌‌ has‌‌ been‌‌ naturalized‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌Filipino‌‌ himself‌‌ is‌‌ 
rights‌‌over‌‌maritime‌‌zones,‌‌i.e.,‌‌   ‌ to‌‌be‌‌considered‌‌“a‌‌Filipino‌‌citizen‌‌born‌‌to‌‌a‌‌Filipino‌‌father.”‌  ‌
Those‌‌   born‌‌
  before‌‌   January‌‌   17,‌‌
  1973,‌‌   of‌‌
  Filipino‌‌   mothers,‌‌   who‌‌ 
1. the‌  ‌territorial‌  ‌waters‌  ‌[12‌  ‌nautical‌  ‌miles‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌  elect‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌Citizenship‌  ‌upon‌  ‌reaching‌‌   the‌‌
  age‌‌
  of‌‌
  majority‌‌  Election‌  ‌
baselines],‌‌   ‌ shall‌‌be‌‌deemed‌n ‌ atural-born‌‌citizens.‌  ‌
Re‌‌Application‌‌of‌‌Ching‌‌   ‌
2. contiguous‌‌zone‌‌‌[24‌‌nautical‌‌miles‌‌from‌‌the‌‌baselines],‌‌   ‌ 2. Naturalized‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌those‌  ‌who‌  ‌have‌  ‌become‌  ‌Filipino‌  ‌citizens‌‌ 
3. exclusive‌  ‌economic‌  ‌zone‌  ‌[200‌  ‌nautical‌  ‌miles‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌  through‌‌naturalization,‌‌under‌C ‌ A‌‌473‌,‌‌and‌‌by‌R ‌ A‌‌530‌. ‌ ‌ Can‌‌  a ‌‌legitimate‌‌
  child‌‌  born‌‌ under‌‌ the‌‌ 1935‌‌ Constitution‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌Filipino‌‌ 
baselines]),‌‌and‌‌   ‌ mother‌  ‌and‌  ‌an‌  ‌alien‌  ‌father‌  ‌validly‌  ‌elect‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌citizenship‌  ‌14‌‌ 
Lee‌‌v.‌‌Director‌‌of‌‌Lands‌‌   ‌ years‌‌‌after‌‌he‌‌has‌‌reached‌‌the‌‌age‌‌of‌‌majority?‌‌‌NO‌  ‌
4. continental‌‌shelves‌‌   ‌
that‌‌
  UNCLOS‌‌   III‌‌  delimits.‌‌
  UNCLOS‌‌   III‌‌ and‌‌ its‌‌ ancillary‌‌ baselines‌‌ laws‌‌  C.A.‌‌ No.‌‌ 625‌‌ which‌‌ was‌‌ enacted‌‌ pursuant‌‌ to‌‌ Section‌‌ 1(3),‌‌ Article‌‌ IV‌‌ of‌‌ 
The‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌proscription‌  ‌on‌  ‌alien‌  ‌ownership‌  ‌of‌  ‌lands‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
play‌  ‌no‌‌
  role‌‌
  in‌‌   the‌‌
  acquisition,‌‌  enlargement‌‌   or,‌‌
  as‌‌
  petitioners‌‌   claim,‌‌  the‌  ‌1935‌  ‌Constitution,‌  ‌prescribes‌  ‌the‌  ‌procedure‌  ‌that‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌ 
public‌  ‌or‌  ‌private‌  ‌domain‌  ‌was‌  ‌intended‌  ‌to‌  ‌protect‌  ‌lands‌  ‌from‌‌ 
diminution‌‌   of‌‌  territory.‌‌
  Under‌‌
  traditional‌‌   international‌‌   law‌‌ typology,‌‌  followed‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌‌
  to‌‌
  make‌‌  a ‌‌valid‌‌
  election‌‌   of‌‌
  Philippine‌‌   citizenship.‌‌ 
falling‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌   hands‌‌  of‌‌
  non-Filipinos‌. ‌ ‌In‌‌   this‌‌  case,‌‌
  however,‌‌   there‌‌ 
States‌‌acquire‌‌(or‌‌conversely,‌‌lose)‌‌territory‌‌through‌‌   ‌ Legitimate‌  ‌children‌  ‌born‌  ‌of‌  ‌Filipino‌  ‌mothers‌  ‌may‌  ‌elect‌  ‌Philippine‌ 
would‌  ‌be‌  ‌no‌  ‌more‌  ‌public‌  ‌policy‌  ‌violated‌  ‌since‌  ‌the‌  ‌land‌  ‌is‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
citizenship‌‌by‌‌   ‌
1. occupation,‌‌   ‌ hands‌‌   of‌‌
  Filipinos‌‌   qualified‌‌   to‌‌
  acquire‌‌   and‌‌
  own‌‌   such‌‌  land.‌‌ Thus,‌‌ the‌‌ 
subsequent‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌to‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌Filipinos‌  ‌may‌  ‌no‌‌  a) expressing‌  ‌such‌  ‌intention‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌statement‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌signed‌  ‌and‌‌ 
2. accretion,‌‌   ‌ sworn‌‌to‌‌by‌‌the‌‌party‌‌concerned‌‌   ‌
longer‌  ‌be‌  ‌impugned‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌basis‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌invalidity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌initial‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 14‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

citizenship‌‌  is‌‌
  a‌‌
  qualification,‌‌ voting‌‌ during‌‌ election‌‌ time,‌‌ running‌‌ for‌‌  6. He‌‌  must‌‌   have‌‌
  enrolled‌‌
  his‌‌
  minor‌‌ children‌‌ of‌‌ school‌‌ age,‌‌ in‌‌ any‌‌ 
b) before‌‌any‌‌officer‌‌authorized‌‌to‌‌administer‌‌oaths‌,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
public‌  ‌office,‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌categorical‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌  ‌similar‌  ‌nature‌  ‌are‌‌  of‌  ‌the‌  ‌where‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌history,‌  ‌government‌  ‌and‌  ‌civics‌  ‌are‌‌ 
c) shall‌‌be‌‌filed‌‌with‌‌the‌‌nearest‌‌civil‌‌registry‌.  ‌‌ ‌ themselves‌‌formal‌‌manifestations‌‌for‌‌these‌‌persons.‌  ‌ taught‌‌or‌‌prescribed‌‌as‌‌part‌‌of‌‌the‌‌school‌‌curriculum.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌said‌  ‌party‌  ‌shall‌  ‌accompany‌  ‌the‌  ‌aforesaid‌  ‌statement‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌  An‌  ‌election‌  ‌of‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌citizenship‌  ‌presupposes‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌‌ 
oath‌  ‌of‌  ‌allegiance‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌Government‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  D.‌‌Modes‌‌of‌‌acquiring‌‌citizenship‌  ‌
electing‌‌   is‌‌
  an‌‌
  alien;‌‌
  or‌‌
  his‌‌
  status‌‌
  is‌‌
  doubtful‌‌  because‌‌   he‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌national‌‌ 
Philippines.‌  ‌ of‌  ‌two‌  ‌countries.‌  ‌In‌  ‌our‌  ‌jurisdiction,‌  ‌an‌  ‌attack‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person's‌‌  1. ⭐‌Jus‌  ‌sanguinis.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌conferred‌  ‌by‌  ‌virtue‌  ‌of‌  ‌blood‌‌ 
However,‌‌   the‌‌
  1935‌‌
  Charter‌‌   only‌‌
  provides‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  election‌‌  should‌‌ be‌‌  citizenship‌‌may‌‌only‌‌be‌‌done‌‌through‌‌a‌d ‌ irect‌a‌ ction.‌  ‌ relationship.‌  ‌
made‌  ‌"‌upon‌  ‌reaching‌  ‌the‌  ‌age‌  ‌of‌  ‌majority‌."‌  ‌Ching's‌  ‌election‌  ‌was‌‌ 
2. Jus‌‌soli.‌‌‌—‌‌conferred‌‌by‌‌place‌‌of‌‌birth.‌  ‌
clearly‌  ‌beyond,‌  ‌by‌  ‌any‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌yardstick,‌  ‌the‌  ‌allowable‌  ‌period‌‌  C.‌‌Who‌‌can‌‌be‌‌citizens‌  ‌
within‌‌which‌‌to‌‌exercise‌‌the‌‌privilege.‌  ‌ 3. Naturalization‌. ‌ ‌
Any‌‌  person‌‌
  having‌‌
  the‌‌ following‌‌ qualifications‌‌ may‌‌ become‌‌ a ‌‌citizen‌‌ of‌‌ 
Ma,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌v.‌‌Fernandez,‌‌Jr‌2
‌ 010‌  ‌ the‌‌Philippines‌‌by‌‌naturalization‌  ‌ 4. Res‌‌judicata‌. ‌ ‌
1. He‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌not‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌  ‌18‌‌
  years‌‌
  of‌‌
  age‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  day‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  ⭐‌Go,‌‌Sr.‌‌v.‌‌Go‌  ‌
The‌‌‌statutory‌‌formalities‌‌of‌‌electing‌‌Philippine‌‌citizenship‌‌‌are:‌‌   ‌
hearing‌‌of‌‌the‌‌petition;‌  ‌ Cases‌  ‌involving‌  ‌issues‌  ‌on‌  ‌citizenship‌  ‌are‌  ‌sui‌  ‌generis‌. ‌ ‌Once‌  ‌the‌‌ 
1) a‌‌statement‌‌of‌‌election‌‌‌under‌‌oath;‌  ‌
2. He‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌resided‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌continuous‌‌  citizenship‌‌  of‌‌
  an‌‌
  individual‌‌   is‌‌
  put‌‌ into‌‌ question,‌‌ it‌‌ necessarily‌‌ has‌‌ to‌‌ 
2) an‌‌ ‌oath‌‌ of‌‌ allegiance‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ Constitution‌‌ and‌‌ Government‌‌ of‌‌  be‌  ‌threshed‌  ‌out‌  ‌and‌  ‌decided‌  ‌upon.‌  ‌In‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌Frivaldo‌  ‌v.‌‌ 
period‌‌of‌‌not‌‌less‌‌than‌‌ten‌‌years‌; ‌ ‌
the‌‌Philippines;‌‌and‌  ‌ Comelec‌, ‌‌we‌‌ said‌‌ that‌‌ decisions‌‌ declaring‌‌ the‌‌ acquisition‌‌ or‌‌ denial‌‌ of‌‌ 
This‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌understood‌  ‌as‌  ‌reduced‌  ‌to‌  ‌five‌  ‌years‌  ‌for‌  ‌any‌‌  citizenship‌‌cannot‌‌govern‌‌a‌‌person's‌‌future‌‌status‌w ‌ ith‌‌finality‌.  ‌‌ ‌
3) registration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌statement‌  ‌of‌  ‌election‌  ‌and‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌oath‌‌ 
petitioner‌‌having‌‌any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following‌‌qualifications:‌  ‌
with‌‌the‌‌nearest‌‌civil‌‌registry.‌  ‌ Citizenship‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌are‌  ‌a ‌ ‌class‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌own,‌‌
  in‌‌
  that,‌‌
  unlike‌‌
  other‌‌ 
a) Having‌‌   honorably‌‌   held‌‌ office‌‌ under‌‌ the‌‌ Government‌‌ of‌‌  cases,‌  ‌res‌  ‌judicata‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌obtain‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌matter‌  ‌of‌  ‌course‌. ‌ ‌Res‌‌ 
Where,‌  ‌as‌  ‌in‌  ‌petitioners'‌‌   case,‌‌
  the‌‌
  election‌‌
  of‌‌
  citizenship‌‌  has‌‌
  in‌‌
  fact‌‌ 
been‌  ‌done‌  ‌and‌  ‌documented‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌and‌  ‌statutory‌‌  the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌or‌  ‌under‌  ‌that‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌political‌‌  judicata‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌applied‌  ‌in‌  ‌cases‌  ‌of‌  ‌citizenship‌  ‌only‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌‌ 
timeframe,‌‌   ‌the‌‌   registration‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  documents‌‌ of‌‌ election‌‌ beyond‌‌  subdivisions‌‌thereof;‌  ‌ following‌‌concur‌: ‌ ‌
the‌‌
  frame‌‌   should‌‌ be‌‌ allowed‌‌ if‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ meanwhile‌‌ positive‌‌ acts‌‌ of‌‌  b) Having‌  ‌established‌  ‌a ‌ ‌new‌  ‌industry‌  ‌or‌  ‌introduced‌  ‌a ‌‌ 1. a‌‌
  person's‌‌
  citizenship‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ raised‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌material‌‌ issue‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌
citizenship‌  ‌have‌  ‌publicly,‌  ‌consistently,‌  ‌and‌  ‌continuously‌  ‌been‌‌  controversy‌‌where‌‌said‌‌person‌‌is‌‌a‌‌party;‌  ‌
useful‌‌invention‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Philippines;‌  ‌
done‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌actual‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌citizenship,‌‌   for‌‌
  over‌‌   half‌‌
  a ‌‌ 2. the‌  ‌Solicitor‌  ‌General‌  ‌or‌  ‌his‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌representative‌  ‌took‌‌ 
century‌‌  by‌‌  the‌‌   herein‌‌ petitioners,‌‌ is‌ ‌actual‌‌ notice‌ ‌to‌‌ the‌‌ Philippine‌‌  c) Being‌‌married‌‌to‌‌a‌‌Filipino‌‌woman;‌  ‌
active‌‌part‌‌in‌‌the‌‌resolution‌‌thereof;‌‌and‌  ‌
public‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  e ‌ quivalent‌  ‌to‌  ‌formal‌  ‌registration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  d) Having‌‌ been‌‌ engaged‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌teacher‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines‌‌ for‌‌  3. the‌‌finding‌‌of‌‌citizenship‌‌is‌‌affirmed‌‌by‌‌this‌‌Court.‌  ‌
election‌‌of‌‌Philippine‌‌citizenship.‌  ‌ a‌‌period‌‌of‌‌not‌‌less‌‌than‌‌two‌‌years;‌  ‌
Registration‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌confirmation‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌  existence‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌fact.‌‌
  It‌‌  is‌‌  e) Having‌‌been‌‌born‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌  ‌ E.‌‌Modes‌‌of‌‌losing‌‌and‌‌reacquiring‌‌citizenship‌  ‌
not‌  ‌the‌  ‌registration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌election‌, ‌ ‌although‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌‌ 
requirement‌‌   under‌‌
  CA.‌‌ 625,‌‌ ‌that‌‌ will‌‌ confer‌‌ Philippine‌‌ citizenship‌‌  3. He‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌of‌  ‌good‌  ‌moral‌  ‌character‌  ‌and‌  ‌believes‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  Valles‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌
on‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioners.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌only‌  ‌a ‌ ‌means‌  ‌of‌  ‌confirming‌  ‌the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌‌  principles‌‌underlying‌‌the‌‌Philippine‌‌Constitution;‌  ‌
Under‌  ‌Commonwealth‌  ‌Act‌  ‌No.‌  ‌63‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌Filipino‌‌
  citizen‌‌
  may‌‌
  ‌lose‌‌
  his‌‌ 
citizenship‌‌has‌‌been‌‌claimed.‌  ‌ 4. He‌  ‌must‌  ‌own‌  ‌real‌  ‌estate‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌worth‌  ‌not‌  ‌less‌‌  citizenship‌: ‌ ‌
Co‌‌v.‌‌HRET‌  ‌ than‌‌ five‌‌ thousand‌‌ pesos,‌‌ OR‌‌ must‌‌ have‌‌ some‌‌ known‌‌ ‌lucrative‌‌  1) By‌n
‌ aturalization‌i‌ n‌‌a‌‌foreign‌‌country;‌  ‌
trade,‌‌profession,‌‌or‌‌lawful‌‌occupation‌; ‌ ‌
The‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌sworn‌  ‌statement‌  ‌or‌  ‌formal‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌ 2) By‌e
‌ xpress‌r‌ enunciation‌‌‌of‌‌citizenship;‌  ‌
requirement‌  ‌for‌  ‌those‌  ‌who‌‌   still‌‌
  have‌‌
  to‌‌
  elect‌‌
  citizenship.‌‌  ‌For‌‌
  those‌‌  5. He‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌‌
  able‌‌
  to‌‌
  ‌speak‌‌
  and‌‌
  write‌‌
  English‌‌
  or‌‌
  Spanish‌‌
  AND‌‌ 
3) By‌  ‌subscribing‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌oath‌  ‌of‌  ‌allegiance‌  ‌to‌  ‌support‌  ‌the‌‌ 
already‌‌   Filipinos‌‌   when‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌ to‌‌ elect‌‌ came‌‌ up,‌‌ there‌‌ are‌‌ acts‌‌  any‌‌one‌‌of‌‌the‌‌principal‌‌Philippine‌‌languages;‌  ‌ constitution‌  ‌or‌  ‌laws‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌foreign‌‌
  country‌‌
  upon‌‌   attaining‌‌
  21‌‌ 
of‌  ‌deliberate‌  ‌choice‌  ‌which‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌less‌  ‌binding‌. ‌ ‌Entering‌  ‌a ‌‌ years‌‌of‌‌age‌‌or‌‌more;‌  ‌
profession‌  ‌open‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌  ‌Filipinos,‌  ‌serving‌  ‌in‌  ‌public‌  ‌office‌  ‌where‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 15‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

c. By‌‌
  collective‌‌
  change‌‌
  of‌‌
  nationality,‌‌
  ‌en‌‌
  masse‌‌
  as‌‌ a ‌‌result‌‌ of‌‌ 
4) By‌  ‌accepting‌  ‌commission‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌military,‌  ‌naval‌  ‌or‌  ‌air‌‌  1) by‌n
‌ aturalization‌, ‌ ‌
service‌‌of‌‌a‌‌foreign‌‌country;‌  ‌ cession‌‌or‌‌subjugation;‌  ‌
2) by‌r‌ epatriation‌,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
5) By‌c‌ ancellation‌o
‌ f‌‌the‌‌certificate‌‌of‌‌naturalization;‌  d. By‌  ‌adoption‌  ‌of‌  ‌orphan‌  ‌minors‌  ‌as‌  ‌nationals‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌‌ 
3) by‌d
‌ irect‌‌act‌‌‌of‌‌Congress.‌  ‌
6) By‌‌  having‌‌   been‌‌  declared‌‌ by‌‌ competent‌‌ authority,‌‌ a ‌‌‌deserter‌‌  where‌‌they‌‌are‌‌born.‌  ‌
Naturalization‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mode‌  ‌for‌  ‌BOTH‌  ‌acquisition‌  ‌and‌‌ 
in‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌war,‌  ‌unless‌  ‌subsequently,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌plenary‌  ‌pardon‌  ‌or‌‌  3. Derivative‌n
‌ aturalization‌‌is‌‌conferred:‌  ‌
reacquisition‌o
‌ f‌‌Philippine‌‌citizenship.‌  ‌
amnesty‌‌has‌‌been‌‌granted:‌‌and‌  ‌
Repatriation‌, ‌‌on‌‌ the‌‌ other‌‌ hand,‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ had‌‌ under‌‌ various‌‌ statutes‌‌  a. On‌‌the‌‌wife‌‌of‌‌the‌‌naturalized‌‌husband;‌  ‌
7) In‌‌
  case‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌woman,‌‌   upon‌‌   her‌‌ ‌marriage‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌foreigner,‌‌ if,‌‌ by‌‌ 
by‌‌those‌‌who‌‌lost‌‌their‌‌citizenship‌‌due‌‌to:‌‌   ‌ b. On‌‌the‌‌minor‌‌children‌‌of‌‌the‌‌naturalized‌‌parent;‌‌and‌  ‌
virtue‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌laws‌  ‌in‌  ‌force‌  ‌in‌  ‌her‌  ‌husband’s‌  ‌country,‌  ‌she‌‌ 
acquires‌‌his‌‌nationality.‌  ‌ 1) desertion‌‌of‌‌the‌‌armed‌‌forces;‌  ‌
c. On‌‌the‌‌alien‌‌woman‌‌upon‌‌marriage‌‌to‌‌a‌‌national.‌  ‌
In‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌Aznar‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Comelec‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌‌
  ruled‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  mere‌‌
  fact‌‌  2) service‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  armed‌‌
  forces‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ allied‌‌ forces‌‌ in‌‌ World‌‌ War‌‌ 
II;‌  ‌ 4. Under‌  ‌existing‌  ‌laws,‌  ‌an‌  ‌alien‌  ‌may‌  ‌acquire‌  ‌Philippine‌‌ 
that‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌was‌  ‌a ‌ ‌holder‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌certificate‌  ‌stating‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌‌ 
citizenship‌‌through‌‌either‌‌   ‌
American‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌mean‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌longer‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Filipino,‌  ‌and‌‌
  that‌‌
  an‌‌  3) service‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Armed‌‌
  Forces‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ United‌‌ States‌‌ at‌‌ any‌‌ other‌‌ 
application‌‌   for‌‌  an‌‌
  alien‌‌
  certificate‌‌ of‌‌ registration‌‌ was‌‌ not‌‌ tantamount‌‌  time;‌  ‌ a. Judicial‌n
‌ aturalization‌‌under‌C
‌ A‌‌No‌‌473‌‌‌aab‌R
‌ A‌‌No‌‌530‌‌‌or‌‌   ‌
to‌‌renunciation‌‌of‌‌his‌‌Philippine‌‌citizenship.‌  ‌ 4) marriage‌‌of‌‌a‌‌Filipino‌‌woman‌‌to‌‌an‌‌alien;‌‌and‌  ‌ b. Administrative‌n
‌ aturalization‌‌under‌R
‌ A‌‌No‌‌9139‌. ‌ ‌
And,‌  ‌in‌  ‌Mercado‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Manzano‌, ‌ ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌‌  5) political‌‌and‌‌economic‌‌necessity‌. ‌ ‌ 5. In‌‌
  our‌‌
  jurisdiction,‌‌   an‌‌
  alien‌‌
  woman‌‌   married‌‌   to‌‌
  a ‌‌Filipino‌‌ shall‌‌ 
respondent‌‌   was‌‌
  registered‌‌
  as‌‌
  an‌‌
  American‌‌ citizen‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ BID‌‌ and‌‌ was‌‌ 
As‌  ‌distinguished‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌lengthy‌  ‌process‌  ‌of‌  ‌naturalization,‌‌  acquire‌  ‌his‌  ‌citizenship‌  ‌only‌  ‌if‌  ‌she‌  ‌herself‌  ‌might‌  ‌be‌  ‌lawfully‌‌ 
holding‌‌   an‌‌ American‌‌ passport‌‌ were‌‌ just‌‌ a
‌ ssertions‌ ‌of‌‌ his‌‌ American‌‌  repatriation‌‌simply‌‌consists‌‌of‌‌   ‌
nationality‌‌before‌‌the‌‌termination‌‌of‌‌his‌‌American‌‌citizenship.‌  ‌ naturalized.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌derivative‌  ‌naturalization‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌always‌‌ 
1) the‌  ‌taking‌‌
  of‌‌
  an‌‌
  oath‌‌
  of‌‌
  allegiance‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  Republic‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  follow‌‌as‌‌a‌‌matter‌‌of‌‌course‌. ‌ ‌
Thus,‌‌   the‌‌
  mere‌‌  fact‌‌
  that‌‌
  herein‌‌  private‌‌ respondent‌‌ was‌‌ a ‌‌holder‌‌ of‌‌ an‌‌  Philippines‌‌and‌‌   ‌
Australian‌‌   passport‌‌  and‌‌
  had‌‌ an‌‌ alien‌‌ certificate‌‌ of‌‌ registration‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌  RA‌‌No‌‌8171‌  ‌
2) registering‌  ‌said‌  ‌oath‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Local‌  ‌Civil‌  ‌Registry‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
acts‌  ‌constituting‌  ‌an‌  ‌effective‌  ‌renunciation‌‌   of‌‌
  citizenship‌‌   and‌‌
  do‌‌
  not‌‌ 
place‌‌where‌‌the‌‌person‌‌concerned‌‌resides‌‌or‌‌last‌‌resided.‌‌   ‌ Coquilla‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌   ‌
militate‌‌against‌‌her‌‌claim‌‌of‌‌Filipino‌‌citizenship.‌  ‌
Moreover,‌  ‌repatriation‌  ‌results‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌recovery‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
In‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌at‌  ‌bar,‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌lost‌  ‌his‌  ‌domicile‌  ‌of‌  ‌origin‌  ‌in‌  ‌Oras‌‌  by‌‌ 
Bengson‌‌III‌‌v.‌‌HRET‌‌   ‌ original‌‌nationality‌.  ‌‌ ‌
becoming‌‌   a ‌‌U.S.‌‌  citizen‌‌  after‌‌
  enlisting‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌  U.S.‌‌ Navy‌‌ in‌‌ 1965.‌‌ From‌‌ 
Having‌‌   thus‌‌
  taken‌‌
  the‌‌
  required‌‌   oath‌‌   of‌‌ allegiance‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ Republic‌‌ and‌‌  then‌  ‌on‌  ‌and‌  ‌until‌  ‌2000,‌  ‌when‌  ‌he‌  ‌reacquired‌  ‌Philippine‌‌   citizenship,‌‌ 
To‌‌  be‌‌ naturalized,‌‌ an‌‌ applicant‌‌ has‌‌ to‌‌ prove‌‌ that‌‌ he‌‌ ‌possesses‌‌ all‌‌ the‌‌  having‌  ‌registered‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Civil‌  ‌Registry,‌  ‌Cruz‌  ‌is‌  ‌deemed‌‌  to‌‌  petitioner‌‌   was‌‌   an‌‌  alien‌‌
  without‌‌   any‌‌  right‌‌   to‌‌
  reside‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines‌‌ 
qualifications‌‌   and‌‌
  none‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   disqualifications‌‌   provided‌‌  by‌‌
  law‌‌  have‌  ‌recovered‌  ‌his‌  ‌original‌  ‌status‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌natural-born‌  ‌citizen‌, ‌ ‌a ‌‌ save‌  ‌as‌  ‌our‌  ‌immigration‌  ‌laws‌  ‌may‌  ‌have‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌him‌  ‌to‌  ‌stay‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌‌
to‌  ‌become‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Filipino‌  ‌citizen.‌  ‌The‌  ‌decision‌  ‌granting‌  ‌Philippine‌‌  status‌‌which‌‌he‌‌acquired‌‌at‌‌birth‌‌as‌‌the‌‌son‌‌of‌‌a‌‌Filipino‌‌father.‌  ‌ visitor‌‌or‌‌as‌‌a‌‌resident‌‌alien.‌  ‌
citizenship‌  ‌becomes‌  ‌executory‌  ‌only‌  ‌after‌  ‌two‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌years‌  ‌from‌  ‌its‌‌ 
promulgation‌‌   when‌‌  the‌‌
  court‌‌ is‌‌ satisfied‌‌ that‌‌ during‌‌ the‌‌ ‌intervening‌  In‌‌
  Caasi‌‌   v.‌‌
  CA‌, ‌‌this‌‌
  Court‌‌
  ruled‌‌
  that‌‌
  immigration‌‌   to‌‌ the‌‌ United‌‌ States‌‌ 
period‌,‌‌the‌‌applicant‌‌has‌‌   ‌ Naturalization‌  ‌ by‌‌  virtue‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌“‌greencard‌,”‌‌
  which‌‌ entitles‌‌ one‌‌ to‌‌ reside‌‌ permanently‌‌ 
1) not‌‌left‌‌the‌‌Philippines;‌  ‌ 1. It‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌process‌‌  by‌‌
  which‌‌   a ‌‌foreigner‌‌
  acquires,‌‌ voluntarily‌‌ or‌‌ by‌‌  in‌  ‌that‌  ‌country,‌  ‌constitutes‌  ‌abandonment‌  ‌of‌  ‌domicile‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Philippines.‌  ‌With‌  ‌more‌  ‌reason‌  ‌then‌  ‌does‌  ‌naturalization‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌‌
2) has‌‌dedicated‌‌himself‌‌to‌‌a‌‌lawful‌‌calling‌‌or‌‌profession;‌‌   ‌ operation‌  ‌of‌  ‌law,‌  ‌the‌  ‌citizenship‌  ‌of‌  ‌another‌  ‌state.‌  ‌It‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 
foreign‌  ‌country‌  ‌result‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌abandonment‌  ‌of‌  ‌domicile‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
3) has‌  ‌not‌  ‌been‌  ‌convicted‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌offense‌  ‌or‌  ‌violation‌  ‌of‌‌  direct‌o ‌ r‌‌derivative‌. ‌ ‌
Philippines.‌  ‌
Government‌‌promulgated‌‌rules;‌‌or‌  ‌ 2. Direct‌n
‌ aturalization‌‌is‌‌effected:‌  ‌
Here,‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌was‌  ‌repatriated‌  ‌not‌  ‌under‌‌   R.A.‌‌
  No.‌‌  2630,‌‌
  but‌‌  under‌‌ 
4) committed‌‌   any‌‌
  act‌‌
  prejudicial‌‌
  to‌‌ the‌‌ interest‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ nation‌‌ or‌‌  a. By‌‌individual‌‌proceedings,‌‌usually‌‌judicial;‌  ‌ R.A.‌‌
  No.‌‌  8171‌, ‌‌which‌‌   provides‌‌  for‌‌ the‌‌ repatriation‌‌ of,‌‌ among‌‌ others,‌‌ 
contrary‌‌to‌‌any‌‌Government‌‌announced‌‌policies.‌  ‌ natural-born‌  ‌Filipinos‌  ‌who‌  ‌lost‌  ‌their‌  ‌citizenship‌  ‌on‌  ‌account‌  ‌of‌‌ 
b. By‌‌special‌‌act‌‌of‌‌legislature;‌  ‌
Filipino‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌who‌  ‌have‌  ‌lost‌  ‌their‌  ‌citizenship‌  ‌may‌  ‌however‌‌  political‌  ‌or‌  ‌economic‌  ‌necessity‌. ‌ ‌Until‌  ‌his‌  ‌reacquisition‌  ‌of‌‌ 
reacquire‌t‌ he‌‌same:‌‌   ‌ Philippine‌  ‌citizenship‌‌   in‌‌
  2000,‌‌
  petitioner‌‌   did‌‌  not‌‌
  reacquire‌‌   his‌‌
  legal‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 16‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

residence‌‌in‌‌this‌‌country.‌  ‌ House‌‌of‌‌Representatives‌  ‌
Unlike‌‌   those‌‌  with‌‌  dual‌‌
  allegiance,‌‌   who‌‌   must,‌‌
  therefore,‌‌  be‌‌ subject‌‌ to‌‌ 
strict‌  ‌process‌  ‌with‌  ‌respect‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌termination‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  ‌status,‌  ‌for‌‌  District‌‌representatives‌  ‌
Tabasa‌‌v.‌‌CA‌‌   ‌ candidates‌  ‌with‌  ‌dual‌  ‌citizenship,‌  ‌it‌  ‌should‌  ‌suffice‌  ‌if,‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Party-list‌‌system‌  ‌
filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  ‌certificates‌  ‌of‌  ‌candidacy,‌  ‌they‌  ‌elect‌  ‌Philippine‌‌ 
The‌  ‌only‌  ‌persons‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌repatriation‌  ‌under‌  ‌RA‌  ‌8171‌  ‌are‌  ‌the‌‌ 
citizenship‌  ‌to‌  ‌terminate‌  ‌their‌  ‌status‌  ‌as‌  ‌persons‌  ‌with‌  ‌dual‌‌  C.‌‌Legislative‌‌privileges,‌‌inhibitions,‌‌and‌‌disqualifications‌  ‌
following:‌  ‌
citizenship‌. ‌ ‌
D.‌‌Quorum‌‌and‌‌voting‌‌majorities‌  ‌
1. Filipino‌  ‌women‌  ‌who‌  ‌lost‌  ‌their‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌citizenship‌  ‌by‌‌ 
By‌  ‌electing‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌citizenship,‌  ‌such‌  ‌candidates‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌‌ 
marriage‌‌to‌‌aliens;‌‌and‌  ‌ E.‌‌Discipline‌‌of‌‌members‌  ‌
time‌  ‌forswear‌  ‌allegiance‌  ‌to‌‌  the‌‌
  other‌‌
  country‌‌   of‌‌
  which‌‌   they‌‌
  are‌‌ 
2. Natural-born‌  ‌Filipinos‌  ‌including‌  ‌their‌  ‌minor‌‌  ‌children‌‌  who‌‌  also‌‌citizens‌‌and‌‌thereby‌‌terminate‌‌their‌‌status‌‌as‌‌dual‌‌citizens.‌  ‌ F.‌‌Process‌‌of‌‌law-making‌  ‌
lost‌  ‌their‌‌
  Philippine‌‌
  citizenship‌‌
  ‌on‌‌
  account‌‌  of‌‌   political‌‌
  or‌‌ 
economic‌‌necessity‌. ‌ ‌ G.‌‌Electoral‌‌Tribunals‌‌and‌‌the‌‌Commission‌‌on‌‌Appointments‌  ‌
RA‌‌No‌‌9225‌‌or‌‌the‌‌Citizenship‌‌Retention‌‌ 
Petitioner‌‌   was‌‌
  no‌‌
  longer‌‌ a ‌‌minor‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ "repatriation".‌‌ The‌‌  and‌‌Re-acquisition‌‌Act‌‌of‌‌2003‌  ‌ H.‌‌Powers‌‌of‌‌Congress‌  ‌
privilege‌‌  under‌‌  RA‌‌  8171‌‌
  belongs‌‌  to‌‌ ‌children‌‌ who‌‌ are‌‌ of‌‌ minor‌‌ age‌‌  I.‌‌Initiative‌‌and‌‌Referendum‌  ‌
at‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌the‌‌filing‌‌of‌‌the‌‌petition‌‌for‌‌repatriation‌. ‌ ‌ Nicolas-Lewis‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌
 ‌
Neither‌‌   can‌‌
  petitioner‌‌  be‌‌
  a ‌‌natural-born‌‌ Filipino‌‌ who‌‌ left‌‌ the‌‌ country‌‌  There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌provision‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌dual‌  ‌citizenship‌  ‌law‌  ‌— ‌ ‌R.A.‌  ‌9225‌  ‌— ‌‌
due‌  ‌to‌  ‌political‌  ‌or‌  ‌economic‌  ‌necessity.‌  ‌Clearly,‌  ‌he‌  ‌lost‌  ‌his‌‌  requiring‌  ‌"duals"‌‌   to‌‌
  actually‌‌   establish‌‌   residence‌‌  and‌‌
  physically‌‌   stay‌‌  A.‌‌Legislative‌‌power‌  ‌
Philippine‌‌   citizenship‌‌   by‌‌   operation‌‌ of‌‌ law‌‌ and‌‌ not‌‌ due‌‌ to‌‌ political‌‌  in‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌first‌‌before‌‌they‌‌can‌‌exercise‌‌their‌‌right‌‌to‌‌vote.‌  ‌ Legislative‌  ‌power‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌defined‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌‌ 
or‌  ‌economic‌  ‌exigencies.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌to‌  ‌avail‌‌  pass‌‌   laws‌‌
  but‌‌
  also‌‌
  the‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌ alter‌‌ or‌‌ modify‌‌ them.‌‌ It‌‌ also‌‌ covers‌‌ 
himself‌  ‌of‌  ‌repatriation‌  ‌under‌  ‌RA‌  ‌8171.‌  ‌However,‌  ‌he‌  ‌can‌  ‌possibly‌‌  Calilung‌‌v.‌‌Datumanong‌  ‌ the‌  ‌amendment‌  ‌of‌  ‌existing‌  ‌legislations‌  ‌and‌  ‌that‌  ‌would‌  ‌still‌  ‌be‌‌ 
reacquire‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌citizenship‌  ‌by‌  ‌availing‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Citizenship‌‌  encompassed‌‌as‌‌legislative‌‌power.‌  ‌
Retention‌  ‌and‌  ‌Re-acquisition‌  ‌Act‌  ‌of‌  ‌2003‌  ‌by‌  ‌simply‌  ‌taking‌  ‌an‌‌  What‌‌  RA‌‌
  No.‌‌
  9225‌‌
  does‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌allow‌‌  dual‌‌
  citizenship‌‌   to‌‌ natural-born‌‌ 
oath‌‌of‌‌allegiance‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Republic‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌  ‌ Filipino‌‌  citizens‌‌
  who‌‌
  have‌‌   lost‌‌
  Philippine‌‌   citizenship‌‌ by‌‌ reason‌‌  General‌‌Plenary‌‌Powers.‌‌—‌T ‌ he‌‌legislative‌‌power‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌vested‌‌ 
of‌‌their‌‌naturalization‌‌as‌‌citizens‌‌of‌‌a‌‌foreign‌‌country‌. ‌  ‌ ‌ in‌‌the‌‌Congress‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌which‌‌shall‌‌consist‌‌of‌‌a‌‌Senate‌‌ 
and‌‌a‌‌House‌‌of‌‌Representatives,‌e‌ xcept‌t‌ o‌‌the‌‌extent‌‌reserved‌‌to‌‌the‌‌ 
F.‌‌Dual‌‌Citizenship‌‌and‌‌Dual‌‌Allegiance‌  ‌ On‌‌
  its‌‌
  face,‌‌
  it‌‌
  does‌‌   not‌‌
  recognize‌‌   dual‌‌  allegiance.‌‌   By‌‌  swearing‌‌   to‌‌ the‌‌  people‌‌by‌‌the‌‌provision‌‌on‌‌‌initiative‌‌and‌‌referendum‌.‌‌(‌Sec‌‌1‌‌Art‌‌ 
Section‌‌
  5.‌ ‌‌Dual‌‌
  allegiance‌‌  of‌‌ citizens‌‌ is‌‌ inimical‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ national‌‌ interest‌‌  supreme‌‌   authority‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  Republic,‌‌   the‌‌  person‌‌ ‌implicitly‌‌ renounces‌‌  VI‌) ‌ ‌
and‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌dealt‌‌with‌‌by‌‌law.‌  ‌ his‌‌
  foreign‌‌   citizenship‌. ‌‌Plainly,‌‌   from‌‌   Section‌‌   3,‌‌
  RA‌‌ No.‌‌ 9225‌‌ stayed‌‌ 
clear‌‌  out‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  problem‌‌   of‌‌
  dual‌‌
  allegiance‌‌   and‌‌   shifted‌‌   the‌‌
  burden‌‌ of‌‌  Express‌‌Limitations‌  ‌
Mercado‌‌v.‌‌Manzano‌  ‌ confronting‌‌   the‌‌  issue‌‌  of‌‌
  whether‌‌   or‌‌ not‌‌ there‌‌ is‌‌ dual‌‌ allegiance‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ 
1. Sec‌  ‌26.‌  ‌Every‌‌
  bill‌‌
  passed‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  Congress‌‌
  shall‌‌
  embrace‌‌   only‌‌ 
concerned‌‌foreign‌‌country.‌  ‌
Dual‌  ‌citizenship‌  ‌is‌  ‌different‌  ‌from‌  ‌dual‌  ‌allegiance.‌  ‌The‌  ‌former‌‌  one‌‌subject‌‌which‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌expressed‌‌in‌‌the‌‌title‌‌thereof.‌  ‌
arises‌‌  when,‌‌  as‌‌
  a ‌‌result‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌   concurrent‌‌   application‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ different‌‌  Section‌  ‌5,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌IV‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌declaration‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌policy‌‌ 
laws‌‌
  of‌‌
  two‌‌
  or‌‌
  more‌‌   states,‌‌   a ‌‌person‌‌
  is‌‌
  simultaneously‌‌ considered‌‌ a ‌‌ and‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌not‌‌
  a ‌‌self-executing‌‌   provision‌. ‌‌‌The‌‌
  legislature‌‌   still‌‌  has‌‌
  to‌‌  2. Sec‌‌
  28(4)‌. ‌‌No‌‌
  law‌‌
  granting‌‌  any‌‌
  tax‌‌
  exemption‌‌   shall‌‌
  be‌‌ passed‌‌ 
national‌‌by‌‌the‌‌said‌‌states.‌  ‌ enact‌‌a‌‌law‌‌on‌‌dual‌‌allegiance.‌  ‌ without‌‌
  the‌‌
  concurrence‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌majority‌‌ of‌‌ all‌‌ the‌‌ Members‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
Congress.‌  ‌
Dual‌‌   allegiance,‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  other‌‌ hand,‌‌ refers‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ situation‌‌ in‌‌ which‌‌ a ‌‌  ‌
 ‌

person‌  ‌simultaneously‌  ‌owes,‌  ‌by‌  ‌some‌  ‌positive‌‌   act‌, ‌‌loyalty‌‌


  to‌‌
  two‌‌  3. Sec‌  ‌30.‌  ‌No‌  ‌law‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌passed‌  ‌increasing‌  ‌the‌  ‌appellate‌‌ 
or‌‌
  more‌‌  states.‌‌
  While‌‌   dual‌‌
  citizenship‌‌ is‌‌ involuntary,‌‌ dual‌‌ allegiance‌‌ 
V.‌‌LEGISLATIVE‌‌DEPARTMENT‌‌   ‌ jurisdiction‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Supreme‌  ‌Court‌  ‌as‌  ‌provided‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌‌ 
is‌‌the‌‌result‌‌of‌‌an‌‌individual's‌‌volition.‌  ‌ Constitution‌‌without‌‌its‌‌advice‌‌and‌‌concurrence.‌  ‌
A.‌‌Legislative‌‌power‌  ‌
With‌  ‌respect‌  ‌to‌  ‌dual‌  ‌allegiance,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌IV,‌  ‌§5‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌‌  4. Sec‌  ‌31.‌  ‌No‌  ‌law‌  ‌granting‌  ‌a ‌ ‌title‌‌
  of‌‌
  royalty‌‌
  or‌‌
  nobility‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌ 
provides:‌  ‌"‌Dual‌‌   allegiance‌‌   of‌‌
  citizens‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌inimical‌‌   ‌to‌‌
  the‌‌  national‌‌  B.‌‌Chambers‌‌of‌‌Congress‌  ‌ enacted.‌  ‌
interest‌‌and‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌dealt‌‌with‌‌by‌‌law‌."‌  ‌
Senate‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 17‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Fabian‌‌v.‌‌Desierto‌  ‌
Senate‌  ‌
The‌  ‌title‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  bill‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  required‌‌   to‌‌  be‌‌
  an‌‌  index‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  body‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
act,‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌‌
  be‌‌  as‌‌
  comprehensive‌‌   as‌‌  to‌‌  cover‌‌   every‌‌   single‌‌  detail‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  1) The‌  ‌Senate‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌composed‌  ‌of‌  ‌24‌  ‌Senators‌  ‌who‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌27‌  ‌of‌  ‌Republic‌  ‌Act‌  ‌No.‌  ‌6770‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌validly‌  ‌authorize‌  ‌an‌‌ 
measure.‌  ‌It‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌‌   held‌‌   that‌‌
  if‌‌
  the‌‌   title‌‌  fairly‌‌  indicates‌‌   the‌‌
  general‌‌  elected‌a‌ t‌‌large‌‌‌by‌‌the‌‌qualified‌‌voters.‌  ‌
appeal‌‌  to‌‌
  this‌‌  Court‌‌  from‌‌
  decisions‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Office‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Ombudsman‌‌ 
subject,‌‌ and‌‌ reasonably‌‌ covers‌‌ all‌‌ the‌‌ provisions‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ act,‌‌ and‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ 
in‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌disciplinary‌  ‌cases.‌  ‌It‌  ‌consequently‌  ‌violates‌  ‌the‌‌  2) The‌‌
  term‌‌
  of‌‌
  office‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Senators‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌ ‌6 ‌‌years‌. ‌‌No‌‌ Senator‌‌ 
calculated‌‌   to‌‌
  mislead‌‌   the‌‌
  legislature‌‌   or‌‌  the‌‌  people,‌‌ there‌‌ is‌‌ sufficient‌‌ 
proscription‌‌   in‌‌  Section‌‌ 30,‌‌ Article‌‌ VI‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Constitution‌‌ against‌‌ a ‌‌law‌‌  shall‌‌serve‌‌for‌‌more‌‌than‌t‌ wo‌‌consecutive‌‌terms‌. ‌ ‌
compliance‌‌with‌‌the‌‌constitutional‌‌requirement.‌‌   ‌
which‌‌increases‌‌the‌‌Appellate‌‌jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌this‌‌Court.‌  ‌
House‌‌of‌‌Representatives‌  ‌
Prohibition‌‌on‌‌passage‌‌of‌‌irrepealable‌‌laws‌‌
   ‌ Principle‌‌of‌‌non-delegability‌  ‌ 3) The‌‌  Members‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  House‌‌  of‌‌
  Representatives‌‌   shall‌‌  be‌‌
  elected‌‌ 
City‌‌of‌‌Davao‌‌v.‌‌RTC‌‌Br‌‌XII‌‌-‌‌Davao‌‌City‌  ‌ ⭐Two‌‌tests‌‌of‌‌valid‌‌delegation‌‌in‌‌  for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌3 ‌ ‌years‌  ‌xxx.‌  ‌No‌  ‌Member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌House‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Acosta‌‌v.‌‌Ochoa‌‌‌2019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ Representatives‌  ‌shall‌  ‌serve‌  ‌for‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌3 ‌ ‌consecutive‌‌ 
It‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌basic‌  ‌precept‌  ‌that‌‌
  among‌‌
  the‌‌
  implied‌‌
  substantive‌‌   limitations‌‌ 
on‌  ‌the‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌powers‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌passage‌  ‌of‌‌  terms‌.‌‌xxxx‌  ‌
As‌  ‌an‌  ‌exception‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌non-delegation‌  ‌of‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌power‌, ‌‌
irrepealable‌  ‌laws.‌  ‌Irrepealable‌  ‌laws‌  ‌deprive‌  ‌succeeding‌‌   legislatures‌‌  Congress‌‌   has‌‌
  historically‌‌   delegated‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ chief‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ police‌‌ force‌‌ the‌‌  District‌‌representatives‌‌and‌‌questions‌‌of‌‌apportionment‌  ‌
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌fundamental‌  ‌best‌  ‌senses‌  ‌carte‌  ‌blanche‌  ‌in‌  ‌crafting‌  ‌laws‌‌  power‌  ‌to‌  ‌approve‌  ‌or‌  ‌disapprove‌‌  applications‌‌   for‌‌
  license‌‌   to‌‌
  possess‌‌ 
appropriate‌‌to‌‌the‌‌operative‌‌milieu.‌  ‌ or‌‌deal‌‌with‌‌firearms.‌  ‌ Aquino‌‌III‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌

The‌  ‌completeness‌  ‌test‌‌   requires‌‌  that‌‌


  the‌‌  law‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  implemented‌‌   be‌‌  There‌‌   is‌‌
  ‌no‌‌ specific‌‌ provision‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Constitution‌‌ ‌that‌‌ fixes‌‌ a ‌‌250,000‌‌ 
Kida‌‌v.‌‌Senate‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌‌2011‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ complete‌  ‌and‌  ‌should‌  ‌set‌  ‌forth‌  ‌therein‌  ‌the‌  ‌policy‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌executed,‌‌  minimum‌‌   population‌‌   that‌‌
  must‌‌   compose‌‌   a ‌‌legislative‌‌ district.‌‌ While‌‌ 
Does‌  ‌the‌  ‌requirement‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌supermajority‌  ‌vote‌  ‌for‌  ‌amendments‌  ‌or‌‌  carried‌  ‌out‌  ‌or‌  ‌implemented‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌delegate.‌  ‌On‌  ‌the‌‌  other‌‌
  hand,‌‌
  the‌‌  a‌  ‌province‌  ‌is‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌a ‌ ‌representative,‌  ‌with‌  ‌nothing‌‌ 
revisions‌  ‌to‌  ‌RA‌  ‌No.‌  ‌9054‌  ‌violate‌  ‌Secs‌  ‌1 ‌ ‌and‌  ‌16(2),‌  ‌Art‌  ‌VI‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  sufficient‌  ‌standard‌  ‌test‌  ‌requires‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌implemented‌‌  mentioned‌  ‌about‌  ‌population,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌city‌  ‌must‌  ‌first‌  ‌meet‌  ‌a ‌ ‌population‌‌ 
corollary‌‌doctrine‌‌on‌‌irrepealable‌‌laws?‌  ‌ contain‌  ‌adequate‌  ‌guidelines‌  ‌to‌  ‌map‌  ‌out‌  ‌the‌  ‌boundaries‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  minimum‌‌of‌‌250,000‌‌in‌‌order‌‌to‌‌be‌‌similarly‌‌entitled.‌  ‌
delegate's‌  ‌authority.‌  ‌To‌  ‌be‌  ‌sufficient,‌  ‌the‌  ‌standard‌  ‌must‌‌   specify‌‌
  the‌‌ 
YES‌. ‌‌‌While‌‌
  a ‌‌supermajority‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌
  a ‌‌total‌‌
  ban‌‌
  against‌‌
  a ‌‌repeal,‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌ limits‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  delegate's‌‌
  authority,‌‌ announce‌‌ the‌‌ legislative‌‌ policy,‌‌ and‌‌  Plainly‌‌  read,‌‌   Section‌‌  5(3)‌‌
  requires‌‌ a ‌‌‌250,000‌‌ minimum‌‌ population‌‌ 
limitation‌  ‌in‌  ‌excess‌  ‌of‌  ‌what‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌requires‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌  identify‌‌the‌‌conditions‌‌under‌‌which‌‌it‌‌is‌‌to‌‌be‌‌implemented.‌‌   ‌ only‌‌
  for‌‌  a ‌‌city‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  entitled‌‌
  to‌‌ a ‌‌representative,‌‌ but‌‌ not‌‌ so‌‌ for‌‌ a ‌‌
passage‌  ‌of‌  ‌bills‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌constitutionally‌  ‌obnoxious‌  ‌because‌  ‌it‌‌  province‌. ‌ ‌
significantly‌  ‌constricts‌  ‌the‌  ‌future‌  ‌legislators'‌  ‌room‌  ‌for‌  ‌action‌  ‌and‌‌  RA‌‌
  No.‌‌
  10591‌‌   sets‌‌
  forth‌‌   a ‌‌sufficient‌‌
  standard‌‌   found‌‌  in‌‌ Section‌‌ 2.‌‌ It‌‌ 
flexibility.‌  ‌ lays‌  ‌down‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌policy‌  ‌to‌  ‌"‌maintain‌  ‌peace‌  ‌and‌  ‌order‌  ‌and‌‌  Population‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌
  the‌‌
  only‌‌
  factor‌‌
  but‌‌ is‌‌ just‌‌ one‌‌ of‌‌ several‌‌ other‌‌ 
protect‌  ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌against‌  ‌violence‌" ‌ ‌by‌  ‌providing‌  ‌"a‌‌  factors‌‌in‌‌the‌‌composition‌‌of‌‌the‌‌additional‌‌district.‌  ‌
Procedural‌‌Limitations‌  ‌ comprehensive‌  ‌law‌  ‌regulating‌  ‌the‌  ‌ownership,‌  ‌possession,‌  ‌carrying,‌‌ 
manufacture,‌‌   dealing‌‌   in‌‌
  and‌‌   importation‌‌  of‌‌ firearms,‌‌ ammunition,‌‌ or‌‌ 
Phil‌‌Judges‌‌Association‌‌v.‌‌Prado‌  ‌ Aldaba‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Resolution‌  ‌
parts‌‌thereof."‌  ‌
The‌‌purposes‌‌of‌‌the‌o
‌ ne‌‌subject‌‌–‌‌one‌‌title‌r‌ ule‌‌are:‌‌   ‌ The‌  ‌constitutionality‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌legislative‌‌
  apportionment‌‌
  act‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌judicial‌‌ 
B.‌‌Chambers‌‌of‌‌Congress‌  ‌ question,‌‌and‌‌not‌‌a‌‌political‌‌one.‌  ‌
1) to‌‌prevent‌‌hodge-podge‌‌or‌‌"l‌ og-rolling‌"‌‌legislation;‌  ‌
2) to‌‌
  prevent‌‌
  surprise‌‌   or‌‌
  fraud‌‌   upon‌‌ the‌‌ legislature‌‌ by‌‌ means‌‌  Sema‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌ Aside‌  ‌from‌  ‌failing‌  ‌to‌  ‌comply‌  ‌with‌  ‌Section‌  ‌5(3),‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VI‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌ 
of‌‌
  provisions‌‌  in‌‌
  bills‌‌
  of‌‌
  which‌‌   the‌‌
  title‌‌
  gives‌‌
  no‌‌
  intimation,‌‌  population‌  ‌requirement,‌  ‌the‌‌   creation‌‌   by‌‌
  RA‌‌
  9591‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌legislative‌‌ 
The‌‌   office‌‌   of‌‌ a ‌‌legislative‌‌ district‌‌ representative‌‌ to‌‌ Congress‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌
and‌‌  which‌‌
  might‌‌  therefore‌‌ be‌‌ overlooked‌‌ and‌‌ carelessly‌‌ and‌‌  district‌  ‌for‌  ‌Malolos‌  ‌City,‌  ‌carving‌  ‌the‌  ‌city‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌former‌  ‌1st‌‌ 
unintentionally‌‌adopted;‌‌and‌  ‌ national‌  ‌office‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌its‌  ‌occupant,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌House‌  ‌of‌‌ 
District,‌‌  leaves‌‌  the‌‌   town‌‌ of‌‌ Bulacan‌‌ isolated‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ rest‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
Representatives,‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ n ‌ ational‌  ‌official‌. ‌ ‌It‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌incongruous‌‌ 
3) to‌  ‌fairly‌  ‌apprise‌  ‌the‌  ‌people‌, ‌ ‌through‌  ‌such‌‌   publication‌‌   of‌‌  geographic‌‌   mass‌‌ of‌‌ that‌‌ district‌. ‌‌This‌‌ contravenes‌‌ the‌‌ requirement‌‌ 
for‌  ‌a ‌‌regional‌‌   legislative‌‌   body‌‌  like‌‌  the‌‌
  ARMM‌‌  Regional‌‌
  Assembly‌‌   to‌‌ 
legislative‌‌   proceedings‌‌   as‌‌  is‌‌
  usually‌‌
  made,‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  subject‌‌
  of‌‌  in‌  ‌Section‌  ‌5(3),‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VI‌  ‌that‌  ‌each‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌district‌  ‌shall‌‌ 
create‌‌   a ‌‌national‌‌   office‌‌
  when‌‌  its‌‌  legislative‌‌
  powers‌‌ extend‌‌ only‌‌ to‌‌ its‌‌ 
legislation‌  ‌that‌  ‌is‌  ‌being‌  ‌considered,‌  ‌in‌‌   order‌‌  that‌‌  they‌‌
  may‌‌  "‌comprise,‌  ‌as‌  ‌far‌  ‌as‌  ‌practicable,‌  ‌contiguous,‌  ‌compact,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
regional‌‌territory.‌  ‌
have‌  ‌the‌  ‌opportunity‌  ‌of‌  ‌being‌‌   heard‌‌
  thereon,‌‌   by‌‌
  petition‌‌  or‌‌ 
adjacent‌‌territory‌."‌ 
otherwise,‌‌if‌‌they‌‌shall‌‌so‌‌desire.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 18‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Bagabuyo‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌ minimum‌  ‌population‌  ‌requirement‌  ‌of‌  ‌250K‌. ‌ ‌Section‌  ‌3 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  The‌  ‌formula,‌  ‌therefore,‌  ‌for‌‌
  computing‌‌   the‌‌
  number‌‌
  of‌‌
  seats‌‌
  to‌‌
  which‌‌ 
Ordinance‌  ‌appended‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌‌city‌‌  whose‌‌  the‌‌first‌‌party‌‌is‌‌entitled‌‌is‌‌as‌‌follows:‌  ‌
Legislative‌  ‌apportionment‌  ‌is‌  ‌defined‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  population‌  ‌has‌  ‌increased‌  ‌to‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌250K‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌
  entitled‌‌  to‌‌
  ‌at‌‌ 
number‌‌  of‌‌
  representatives‌‌   which‌‌ a ‌‌State,‌‌ county‌‌ or‌‌ other‌‌ subdivision‌‌  least‌‌one‌‌congressional‌‌representative‌. ‌ ‌ N umber of  votes of  f irst party
may‌‌send‌‌to‌‌a‌‌legislative‌‌body.‌‌   ‌ T otal votes f or party −list system = P roportion of  votes of  1st party  
 ‌
Reapportionment‌, ‌‌on‌‌ the‌‌ other‌‌ hand,‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ ‌realignment‌‌ ‌or‌‌ change‌‌  Aldaba‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Decision‌  ‌
The‌  ‌next‌  ‌step‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌‌
  solve‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  number‌‌
  of‌‌
  additional‌‌
  seats‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌ 
in‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌districts‌  ‌brought‌  ‌about‌  ‌by‌  ‌changes‌  ‌in‌‌
  population‌‌
  and‌‌ 
Intercensal‌  ‌demographic‌  ‌projections‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌made‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌entire‌‌  other‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌parties‌  ‌are‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to,‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌proportional‌‌ 
mandated‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌requirement‌  ‌of‌  ‌equality‌  ‌of‌‌ 
year.‌‌  In‌‌
  any‌‌  event,‌‌
  a ‌‌city‌‌   whose‌‌
  population‌‌   has‌‌  increased‌‌ to‌‌ 250,000‌‌  representation.‌  ‌
representation‌. ‌ ‌
is‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌have‌  ‌a ‌ ‌legislative‌  ‌district‌  ‌only‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌"immediately‌‌ 
N o. of  votes of  party
A‌‌
  pronounced‌‌   distinction‌‌   between‌‌ Article‌‌ VI,‌‌ Section‌‌ 5 ‌‌and,‌‌ Article‌‌ X,‌‌  following‌‌election"‌‌‌after‌‌the‌‌attainment.‌  ‌ Addt′l seat  = N o. of  votes of  f irst party × N o. of  additional seats of  1st party  
Section‌‌   10‌‌   is‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  requirement‌‌   a ‌‌‌plebiscite‌. ‌ ‌The‌‌
  of‌‌   Constitution‌‌ 
First‌, ‌ ‌certifications‌  ‌on‌  ‌demographic‌  ‌projections‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌issued‌‌ 
and‌  ‌the‌‌
  LGC‌‌   expressly‌‌   require‌‌
  a ‌‌plebiscite‌‌   to‌‌
  carry‌‌
  out‌‌
  any‌‌
  creation,‌‌  only‌  ‌if‌  ‌such‌  ‌projections‌  ‌are‌  ‌declared‌  ‌official‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌National‌‌  Bantay‌‌RA‌‌7941‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 007‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
division,‌  ‌merger,‌  ‌abolition‌  ‌or‌  ‌alteration‌  ‌of‌  ‌boundary‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌   ‌LGU‌. ‌ ‌In‌‌  Statistics‌‌Coordination‌‌Board‌‌‌(NSCB).‌‌   ‌
contrast,‌‌   ‌no‌‌ plebiscite‌‌ requirement‌‌ exists‌‌ under‌‌ the‌‌ apportionment‌‌  Comelec‌‌   has‌‌
  a ‌‌constitutional‌‌
  duty‌‌
  to‌‌
  disclose‌‌
  and‌‌
  release‌‌   the‌‌ names‌‌ 
or‌‌reapportionment‌‌provision‌. ‌  ‌ ‌ Second‌, ‌ ‌certifications‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌demographic‌  ‌projections‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌‌  of‌  ‌the‌  ‌nominees‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌party-list‌  ‌groups‌  ‌named‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌herein‌‌ 
issued‌  ‌only‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌NSO‌  ‌Administrator‌  ‌or‌  ‌his‌  ‌designated‌‌  petitions.‌  ‌
A‌‌
  legislative‌‌  apportionment‌‌   does‌‌  not‌‌ mean,‌‌ and‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ even‌‌ imply,‌‌  certifying‌‌officer‌.  ‌‌ ‌
a‌‌
  division‌‌   of‌‌
  an‌‌
  LGU‌‌
  where‌‌ the‌‌ apportionment‌‌ takes‌‌ place.‌  ‌Thus,‌‌ the‌‌  CIBAC‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 007‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
plebiscite‌‌   requirement‌‌   that‌‌
  applies‌‌   to‌‌ the‌‌ division‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌province,‌‌ city,‌‌  Third‌, ‌‌intercensal‌‌
  population‌‌
  projections‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  ‌as‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ middle‌‌ 
municipality‌‌   or‌‌
  barangay‌‌   under‌‌   the‌‌  LGC‌‌   should‌‌ not‌‌ apply‌‌ to‌‌ and‌‌ be‌‌ a ‌‌ of‌‌every‌‌year‌. ‌ ‌ In‌‌
  determining‌‌   the‌‌
  number‌‌
  of‌‌  additional‌‌
  seats‌‌ for‌‌ each‌‌ party-list‌‌ that‌‌ 
requisite‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌validity‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌legislative‌  ‌apportionment‌  ‌or‌‌  has‌  ‌met‌  ‌the‌  ‌2%‌  ‌threshold,‌  ‌"‌proportional‌  ‌representation‌" ‌ ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌ 
reapportionment.‌  ‌ Party-list‌‌system‌  ‌ touchstone‌‌to‌‌ascertain‌‌entitlement‌‌to‌‌extra‌‌seats.‌S ‌ ee‌‌BANAT‌  ‌

Equality‌‌of‌‌representation.‌  ‌ Shall‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌20%‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌total‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌  ‌representatives‌‌  Ang‌‌Bagong‌‌Bayani‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 001‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
The‌  ‌law‌  ‌clearly‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌basis‌  ‌for‌  ‌districting‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌‌  including‌‌those‌‌under‌‌the‌‌party‌‌list.‌  ‌
1. The‌  ‌political‌  ‌party,‌  ‌sector,‌  ‌organization‌  ‌or‌  ‌coalition‌  ‌must‌‌ 
number‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌inhabitants‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌city‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌province,‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌‌  Veterans‌‌Federation‌‌Party‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌‌2
‌ 000‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
represent‌  ‌the‌  ‌marginalized‌  ‌and‌  ‌underrepresented‌  ‌groups‌‌ 
number‌  ‌of‌  ‌registered‌  ‌voters‌  ‌therein‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌ 
RA‌  ‌No.‌  ‌7941‌  ‌mandates‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌four‌  ‌inviolable‌  ‌parameters‌. ‌‌ identified‌  ‌in‌  ‌Section‌  ‌5 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌7941.‌  ‌Verily,‌  ‌majority‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌ 
require‌‌   mathematical‌‌   exactitude‌‌   or‌‌
  rigid‌‌   equality‌‌  as‌‌  a ‌‌standard‌‌  membership‌  ‌should‌  ‌belong‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌marginalized‌  ‌and‌‌ 
These‌‌are:‌  ‌
in‌‌gauging‌‌equality‌‌of‌‌representation.‌  ‌ underrepresented‌. ‌ ‌
1. First‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌twenty‌  ‌percent‌  ‌allocation‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Section‌  ‌5 ‌ ‌(2),‌‌ 
Article‌‌   VI‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  mandatory.‌‌
  It‌‌
  merely‌‌
  provides‌‌  a ‌‌‌ceiling‌‌ ‌for‌‌  2. Disqualifications‌‌under‌‌Sec‌‌6‌‌of‌‌RA‌‌7941:‌  ‌
Mariano,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌
party-list‌‌seats‌‌in‌‌Congress.‌  ‌ a. It‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌religious‌  ‌sect‌  ‌or‌  ‌denomination,‌  ‌organization‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Petitioners‌  ‌have‌  ‌not‌  ‌demonstrated‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌delineation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌land‌‌  association‌‌organized‌‌for‌‌religious‌‌purposes;‌  ‌
2. Second,‌  ‌the‌  ‌two‌  ‌percent‌  ‌threshold‌  ‌— ‌ ‌as‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌by‌‌ 
area‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌proposed‌  ‌City‌  ‌of‌  ‌Makati‌  ‌will‌  ‌cause‌  ‌confusion‌  ‌as‌‌
  to‌‌
  its‌‌ 
BANAT‌  ‌ b. It‌‌advocates‌‌violence‌‌‌or‌‌unlawful‌‌means‌‌to‌‌seek‌‌its‌‌goal;‌  ‌
boundaries.‌‌   Section‌‌
  2 ‌‌stated‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  city's‌‌
  land‌‌
  area‌‌ “shall‌‌ comprise‌‌ 
the‌‌present‌‌‌territory‌‌of‌‌the‌‌municipality.”‌   3. Third,‌t‌ he‌‌three-seat‌‌limit‌; ‌ ‌ c. It‌‌is‌‌a‌‌foreign‌p
‌ arty‌‌or‌‌organization;‌  ‌
Even‌  ‌granting‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  p
‌ opulation‌  ‌of‌  ‌Makati‌  ‌stood‌  ‌at‌  ‌450K,‌  ‌its‌‌  4. Fourth,‌p
‌ roportional‌‌representation‌. ‌ ‌ d. It‌  ‌is‌  ‌receiving‌  ‌support‌  ‌from‌  ‌any‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌government,‌‌ 
legislative‌  ‌district‌  ‌may‌  ‌still‌  ‌be‌  ‌increased‌  ‌since‌  ‌it‌  ‌has‌  ‌met‌  ‌the‌‌  political‌‌party,‌‌foundation,‌‌organization;‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 19‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

e. It‌‌ ‌violates‌‌ or‌‌ fails‌‌ to‌‌ comply‌‌ ‌with‌‌ laws,‌‌ rules‌‌ or‌‌ regulations‌‌  one‌  ‌party-list‌  ‌seat‌  ‌for‌  ‌every‌  ‌four‌  ‌existing‌  ‌legislative‌‌  A‌  ‌political‌  ‌party‌  ‌that‌  ‌fields‌  ‌candidates‌  ‌in‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌district‌‌ 
relating‌‌to‌‌elections;‌  ‌ districts.‌  ‌ elections‌‌   can‌‌  participate‌‌   in‌‌
  party-list‌‌
  elections‌‌ ‌only‌‌ through‌‌ its‌‌ 
f. It‌‌declares‌u
‌ ntruthful‌‌statements‌‌in‌‌its‌‌petition;‌  ‌ 2. Garnering‌  ‌two‌  ‌percent‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌total‌  ‌votes‌  ‌cast‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  sectoral‌  ‌wing‌  ‌that‌  ‌can‌  ‌separately‌  ‌register‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌party-list‌‌ 
party-list‌  ‌elections‌  ‌guarantees‌  ‌a ‌ ‌party-list‌  ‌organization‌‌  system.‌  ‌The‌  ‌sectoral‌  ‌wing‌  ‌is‌  ‌by‌  ‌itself‌  ‌an‌  ‌independent‌‌ 
g. It‌‌has‌‌ceased‌‌to‌‌exist‌‌for‌‌at‌‌least‌‌one‌‌(1)‌‌year‌;‌‌or‌  ‌
one‌‌seat.‌‌   ‌ sectoral‌  ‌party‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌linked‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌political‌  ‌party‌  ‌through‌  ‌a ‌‌
h. It‌  ‌fails‌  ‌to‌‌
  participate‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌  last‌‌  two‌‌
  (2)‌‌
  preceding‌‌  elections‌‌  3. The‌  ‌additional‌  ‌seats‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌distributed‌  ‌to‌‌
  the‌‌
  party-list‌‌  coalition.‌  ‌
or‌  ‌fails‌  ‌to‌  ‌obtain‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌‌  two‌‌  ‌percentum‌‌   (2%)‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  votes‌‌  organizations‌  ‌including‌  ‌those‌  ‌that‌  ‌received‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌  ‌two‌‌  3. Sectoral‌‌parties‌‌‌or‌‌organizations‌‌may‌‌either‌‌be‌‌   ‌
cast‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌party-list‌  ‌system‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌two‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌preceding‌‌  percent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌total‌‌votes.‌‌   ‌ a. “‌marginalized‌  ‌and‌  ‌underrepresented‌” ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌labor,‌‌ 
elections‌‌for‌‌the‌‌constituency‌‌in‌‌which‌‌it‌‌has‌‌registered.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌continued‌  ‌operation‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌  two‌‌  percent‌‌
  threshold‌‌   as‌‌
  it‌‌  peasants,‌  ‌fisherfolk,‌  ‌urban‌  ‌poor,‌  ‌indigenous‌  ‌cultural‌‌ 
3. The‌  ‌party‌  ‌or‌  ‌organization‌  ‌must‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌be‌  ‌an‌  ‌adjunct‌  ‌of,‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌‌
applies‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌allocation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌additional‌  ‌seats‌  ‌is‌  ‌now‌‌  communities,‌  ‌handicapped,‌  ‌veterans,‌  ‌and‌  ‌overseas‌‌ 
project‌  ‌organized‌  ‌or‌  ‌an‌  ‌entity‌  ‌funded‌  ‌or‌  ‌assisted‌  by,‌  ‌the‌‌  unconstitutional.‌  ‌ workers;‌‌or‌‌   ‌
government.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌additional‌  ‌seats‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌distributed‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  parties‌‌
  in‌‌
  a ‌‌ b. lacking‌‌
  in‌‌
  “‌well-defined‌‌
  political‌‌
  constituencies.‌” ‌ ‌— ‌‌
4. The‌  ‌party‌  ‌must‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌comply‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌requirements‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
second‌  ‌round‌  ‌of‌  ‌seat‌  ‌allocation‌  ‌until‌  ‌all‌  ‌available‌‌  professionals,‌‌the‌‌elderly,‌‌women,‌‌and‌‌the‌‌youth.‌  ‌
law;‌‌its‌n
‌ ominees‌‌must‌‌likewise‌‌do‌‌so.‌‌   ‌
seats‌‌are‌‌completely‌‌distributed.‌  ‌ 4. A‌‌
  ‌majority‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  members‌‌   of‌‌  sectoral‌‌   parties‌‌   ‌must‌‌ belong‌‌ 
5. Not‌  ‌only‌  ‌the‌  ‌candidate‌  ‌party‌  ‌or‌  ‌organization‌  ‌must‌  ‌represent‌‌ 
4. The‌‌‌three-seat‌‌cap‌‌‌is‌‌constitutional.‌  ‌ to‌  ‌the‌  ‌“marginalized‌  ‌and‌  ‌underrepresented”‌  ‌sector‌  ‌they‌‌ 
marginalized‌  ‌and‌  ‌underrepresented‌  ‌sectors;‌  ‌so‌  ‌also‌  ‌must‌  ‌its‌‌  represent.‌  ‌Same‌  ‌rule‌  ‌applies‌  ‌to‌  ‌sectors‌  ‌that‌  ‌lack‌  ‌“well-defined‌‌ 
nominees.‌  ‌ political‌‌constituencies.”‌  ‌
Phil‌‌Guardians‌‌Brotherhood‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
6. While‌‌   lacking‌‌   a ‌‌well-defined‌‌  political‌‌
  constituency,‌‌ the‌‌ nominee‌‌  The‌‌nominees‌‌of‌‌sectoral‌‌parties‌‌or‌‌organizations‌‌either‌‌   ‌
must‌  ‌likewise‌  ‌be‌  ‌able‌  ‌to‌  ‌contribute‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌formulation‌  ‌and‌‌  The‌  ‌COMELEC‌‌   may‌‌   ‌motu‌‌
  proprio‌‌
  ‌or‌‌
  upon‌‌  verified‌‌
  complaint‌‌   of‌‌
  any‌‌ 
interested‌‌  party,‌‌   ‌remove‌‌   or‌‌
  cancel‌, ‌‌after‌‌
  due‌‌
  notice‌‌ and‌‌ hearing,‌‌ the‌‌  a. must‌‌belong‌‌to‌‌their‌‌respective‌‌sectors,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
enactment‌  ‌of‌  ‌appropriate‌  ‌legislation‌‌   that‌‌
  will‌‌
  benefit‌‌
  the‌‌
  nation‌‌ 
as‌‌a‌‌whole.‌‌   ‌ registration‌‌ of‌‌ any‌‌ national,‌‌ regional‌‌ or‌‌ sectoral‌‌ party,‌‌ organization‌‌ or‌‌  b. must‌  ‌have‌  ‌a ‌ ‌track‌  ‌record‌  ‌of‌  ‌advocacy‌  ‌for‌  ‌their‌‌ 
coalition‌‌if‌‌it:‌‌   ‌ respective‌‌sectors.‌‌   ‌
BANAT‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 009‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Decision‌‌and‌‌Resolution‌  ‌ a) fails‌‌to‌‌participate‌‌in‌‌the‌‌last‌‌two‌‌(2)‌‌preceding‌‌elections‌;‌‌or‌‌   The‌  ‌nominees‌  ‌of‌  ‌national‌  ‌and‌  ‌regional‌‌
  parties‌‌
  or‌‌
  organizations‌‌ 
There‌‌
  is‌‌
  no‌‌
  need‌‌  for‌‌
  legislation‌‌   to‌‌
  create‌‌ an‌‌ additional‌‌ party-list‌‌ seat‌‌  b) fails‌  ‌to‌‌
  ‌qualify‌‌
  for‌‌
  a ‌‌seat‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  two‌‌
  preceding‌‌
  elections‌‌  must‌‌be‌‌bona-fide‌m ‌ embers‌‌of‌‌such‌‌parties‌‌or‌‌organizations.‌ 
whenever‌  ‌four‌  ‌additional‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌districts‌  ‌are‌  ‌created‌  ‌by‌  ‌law.‌‌  for‌‌the‌‌constituency‌‌in‌‌which‌‌it‌‌registered‌. ‌ ‌
Section‌  ‌5(2),‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VI‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌1987‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌automatically‌‌  C.‌‌Legislative‌‌privileges,‌‌inhibitions,‌‌ 
creates‌‌such‌‌additional‌‌party-list‌‌seats‌. ‌ ‌
Atong‌‌Paglaum‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 013‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ and‌‌disqualifications‌  ‌
The‌  ‌filling-up‌  ‌of‌‌
  all‌‌
  available‌‌   party-list‌‌   seats‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌not‌‌
  mandatory.‌‌ 
Actual‌  ‌occupancy‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌party-list‌  ‌seats‌  ‌depends‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌‌  1. National‌  ‌parties‌  ‌or‌  ‌organizations‌  ‌and‌  ‌regional‌  ‌parties‌  ‌or‌‌  Privileges‌‌   ‌
participants‌‌in‌‌the‌‌party-list‌‌election.‌  ‌ organizations‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌need‌‌
  to‌‌
  organize‌‌
  along‌‌
  sectoral‌‌
  lines‌‌
  and‌‌  Freedom‌‌f rom‌‌Arrest‌  ‌
do‌  ‌not‌  ‌need‌  ‌to‌  ‌represent‌  ‌any‌  ‌“marginalized‌  ‌and‌‌ 
There‌  ‌are‌  ‌four‌  ‌parameters‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Philippine-style‌  ‌party-list‌  ‌election‌‌  Sect‌  ‌11.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌Senator‌  ‌or‌  ‌Member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌House‌  ‌of‌  ‌Representatives‌‌ 
underrepresented”‌‌sector.‌  ‌
system:‌  ‌ shall,‌  ‌in‌  ‌all‌  ‌offenses‌  ‌punishable‌  ‌by‌  ‌not‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌six‌  ‌years‌‌ 
1. Twenty‌  ‌percent‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌
  total‌‌
  number‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  membership‌‌   of‌‌  2. Political‌‌  parties‌‌  can‌‌
  participate‌‌  in‌‌
  party-list‌‌
  elections‌‌ provided‌‌ 
imprisonment,‌‌   be‌‌ privileged‌‌ from‌‌ arrest‌‌ ‌while‌‌ the‌‌ Congress‌‌ is‌‌ in‌‌ 
the‌  ‌House‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌maximum‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌  ‌seats‌  ‌available‌  ‌to‌‌  they‌  ‌register‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌party-list‌  ‌system‌  ‌and‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌field‌‌  session.‌‌   ‌
party-list‌  ‌organizations,‌  ‌such‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌automatically‌‌  candidates‌‌in‌‌legislative‌‌district‌‌elections‌.  ‌‌ ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 20‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

No‌  ‌Member‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌questioned‌  ‌nor‌  ‌be‌  ‌held‌  ‌liable‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌‌  unable‌  ‌to‌  ‌discharge‌  ‌the‌  ‌powers‌  ‌and‌  ‌duties‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌office,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Restrictions‌‌and‌‌Prohibitions‌  ‌ Vice-President‌  ‌shall‌  ‌act‌  ‌as‌  ‌President;‌‌
  otherwise,‌‌   the‌‌  President‌‌ 
place‌‌  for‌‌
  any‌‌
  speech‌‌  or‌‌
  debate‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌ Congress‌‌ or‌‌ in‌‌ any‌‌ committee‌‌ 
thereof.‌  ‌ 1) No‌  ‌Senator‌  ‌or‌  ‌Member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌House‌  ‌of‌  ‌Representatives‌  ‌may‌‌  shall‌‌continue‌‌exercising‌‌the‌‌powers‌‌and‌‌duties‌‌of‌‌his‌‌office.‌  ‌
hold‌‌  any‌‌ other‌‌ office‌‌ or‌‌ employment‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Government,‌‌ or‌‌ any‌‌  2. Sec‌  ‌9.‌  ‌Whenever‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌vacancy‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Trillanes‌‌IV‌‌v.‌‌Castillo-Marigomen‌‌2 ‌ 018‌  ‌ subdivision,‌  ‌agency,‌  ‌or‌  ‌instrumentality‌  ‌thereof,‌  ‌including‌  Vice-President‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌term‌  ‌for‌  ‌which‌  ‌he‌  ‌was‌  ‌elected,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌  ‌questioned‌  ‌statements‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌case‌  ‌were‌  ‌admittedly‌  ‌made‌  ‌in‌‌  GOCCs‌‌   or‌‌
  their‌‌
  subsidiaries,‌‌  during‌‌
  his‌‌
  term‌‌ without‌‌ forfeiting‌‌  President‌  ‌shall‌  ‌nominate‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Vice-President‌  ‌from‌  ‌among‌  ‌the‌‌ 
response‌  ‌to‌  ‌queries‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌media‌  ‌during‌  ‌gaps‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Senate's‌‌  his‌‌seat.‌‌(I‌ ncompatible‌‌office‌) ‌ ‌ Members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Senate‌  ‌and‌‌
  the‌‌
  House‌‌  of‌‌
  Representatives‌‌   who‌‌ 
plenary‌  ‌and‌  ‌committee‌  ‌hearings‌, ‌ ‌thus,‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌the‌  ‌purview‌  ‌of‌‌  2) Neither‌  ‌shall‌  ‌he‌  ‌be‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌office‌  ‌which‌‌
  may‌‌
  have‌‌  shall‌  ‌assume‌  ‌office‌  ‌upon‌  ‌confirmation‌‌   by‌‌  a ‌‌‌majority‌‌
  vote‌‌   of‌‌ 
privileged‌‌speech‌‌or‌‌debate‌‌‌under‌‌Section‌‌11,‌‌Article‌‌VI.‌  ‌ been‌  ‌created‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌emoluments‌  ‌thereof‌  ‌increased‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌‌  ALL‌  ‌the‌  ‌Members‌  ‌of‌  ‌both‌  ‌Houses‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Congress,‌  ‌voting‌‌ 
Petitioner‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌successfully‌  ‌invoke‌  ‌parliamentary‌‌  term‌‌for‌‌which‌‌he‌‌was‌‌elected.‌‌(F ‌ orbidden‌‌office‌) ‌ ‌ separately.‌  ‌
non­accountability‌  ‌to‌  ‌insulate‌  ‌his‌  ‌statements,‌  ‌uttered‌  ‌outside‌  ‌the‌‌  Voting‌‌jointly‌  ‌
"sphere‌‌of‌‌legislative‌‌activity,"‌‌‌from‌‌judicial‌‌review.‌  ‌ Liban‌‌v.‌‌Gordon‌  ‌
1. Art‌‌   VII‌‌
  Sec‌‌   18.‌‌
  xxxx‌‌
  The‌‌ Congress,‌‌ ‌voting‌‌ jointly‌, ‌‌by‌‌ a ‌‌vote‌‌ of‌‌ 
Privilege‌‌of‌‌Speech‌‌and‌‌Debate‌‌
   ‌ Not‌‌  being‌‌   a ‌‌government‌‌   official‌‌
  or‌‌
  employee,‌‌   the‌‌ PNRC‌‌ Chairman,‌‌ as‌‌  at‌  ‌least‌  ‌a ‌ ‌majority‌  ‌of‌  ‌ALL‌  ‌its‌  ‌Members‌  ‌in‌  ‌regular‌  ‌or‌‌
  special‌‌ 
such,‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ hold‌‌ a ‌‌government‌‌ office‌‌ or‌‌ employment.‌‌ We‌‌ hold‌‌ that‌‌ 
session,‌  ‌may‌  ‌revoke‌  ‌such‌‌   proclamation‌‌   or‌‌  suspension,‌‌   which‌‌ 
Trillanes‌‌IV‌‌v.‌‌Pimentel,‌‌Sr.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌PNRC‌  ‌Chairman‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌government‌  ‌office‌  ‌or‌  ‌an‌‌ 
office‌‌  in‌‌
  a ‌‌GOCC‌‌   for‌‌ purposes‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ prohibition‌‌ in‌‌ Section‌‌ 13,‌‌ Article‌‌  revocation‌‌shall‌‌not‌‌be‌‌set‌‌aside‌‌by‌‌the‌‌President.‌‌‌xxxx‌  ‌
The‌  ‌performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌legitimate‌  ‌and‌  ‌even‌  ‌essential‌  ‌duties‌  ‌by‌  ‌public‌‌  VI‌‌of‌‌the‌‌1987‌‌Constitution.‌  ‌ E.‌‌Discipline‌‌of‌‌members‌  ‌
officers‌  ‌has‌  ‌never‌‌
  been‌‌   an‌‌   excuse‌‌
  to‌‌
  free‌‌  a ‌‌person‌‌  validly‌‌
  in‌‌
  prison.‌  ‌
The‌‌
  duties‌‌  imposed‌‌   by‌‌  the‌‌   "mandate‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌   people"‌‌ are‌‌ multifarious.‌  ‌ 1. Sec‌  ‌16(3).‌  ‌Each‌  ‌House‌  ‌may‌  ‌xxxx‌  ‌punish‌  ‌its‌  ‌Members‌  ‌for‌‌ 
Appearance‌‌as‌‌counsel‌   ‌
Never‌  ‌has‌  ‌the‌  ‌call‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌particular‌  ‌duty‌‌   lifted‌‌
  a ‌‌prisoner‌‌   into‌‌
  a ‌‌
different‌  ‌classification‌  ‌from‌  ‌those‌  ‌others‌  ‌who‌  ‌are‌  ‌validly‌‌  disorderly‌‌   behavior,‌‌
  and,‌‌
  with‌‌   concurrence‌‌ of‌ ‌two-thirds‌‌ 
  the‌‌
Puyat‌‌v.‌‌de‌‌Guzman‌  ‌ of‌  ‌ALL‌  ‌its‌‌
  Members,‌‌   suspend‌‌  or‌‌
  expel‌‌
  a ‌‌Member.‌‌  A ‌‌penalty‌‌
  of‌‌ 
restrained‌‌by‌‌law‌. ‌ ‌
Ordinarily,‌  ‌by‌  ‌virtue‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Motion‌  ‌for‌  ‌Inter­vention,‌  ‌Assemblyman‌‌  suspension‌,‌‌when‌‌imposed,‌‌shall‌‌not‌‌exceed‌s‌ ixty‌‌days.‌  ‌
Pobre‌‌v.‌‌Santiago‌  ‌ Fernandez‌‌   cannot‌‌   be‌‌
  said‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌
  appearing‌‌   as‌‌
  counsel.‌  ‌Ostensibly,‌‌ he‌‌ 
is‌‌
  not‌‌
  appearing‌‌   on‌‌
  behalf‌‌ of‌‌ another,‌‌ although‌‌ he‌‌ is‌‌ joining‌‌ the‌‌ cause‌‌  Santiago‌‌v.‌‌Sandiganbayan‌ 
Courts‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌interfere‌  ‌with‌‌   the‌‌  legislature‌‌   or‌‌  its‌‌
  members‌‌   in‌‌  of‌‌the‌‌private‌‌respondents.‌   ‌ ‌
The‌  ‌authority‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Sandiganbayan‌  ‌to‌  ‌order‌  ‌the‌  ‌preventive‌‌ 
the‌‌   manner‌‌   they‌‌ perform‌‌ their‌‌ functions‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ legislative‌‌ floor‌‌ 
We‌‌ are‌‌ constrained‌‌ to‌‌ find‌‌ that‌‌ there‌‌ has‌‌ been‌‌ an‌‌ indirect‌‌ "appearance‌‌  suspension‌‌   of‌‌
  an‌‌
  incumbent‌‌   public‌‌
  official‌‌
  charged‌‌ with‌‌ violation‌‌ of‌‌ 
or‌‌ in‌‌ committee‌‌ rooms‌. ‌‌Any‌‌ claim‌‌ of‌‌ an‌‌ unworthy‌‌ purpose‌‌ or‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
as‌  ‌counsel‌‌   before‌‌
  x ‌‌x ‌‌x ‌‌an‌‌
  administrative‌‌
  body"‌‌
  and,‌‌  in‌‌
  our‌‌
  opinion,‌‌  the‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌No.‌  ‌3019‌  ‌has‌  ‌both‌  ‌legal‌  ‌and‌  ‌jurisprudential‌‌ 
falsity‌‌   and‌‌
  mala‌‌  fides‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  statement‌‌   uttered‌‌
  by‌‌  the‌‌  member‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ 
that‌‌   is‌‌
  a ‌‌circumvention‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Constitutional‌‌ prohibition.‌‌ ‌That‌‌ which‌‌  support.‌  ‌
Congress‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ destroy‌‌ the‌‌ privilege.‌‌ The‌‌ disciplinary‌‌ authority‌‌ of‌‌ 
the‌‌  assembly‌‌   and‌‌  the‌‌
  voters,‌‌   not‌‌
  the‌‌
  courts,‌‌
  can‌‌ properly‌‌ discourage‌‌  the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌direct­ly‌  ‌prohibits‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌done‌  ‌by‌‌ 
RA‌  ‌No.‌  ‌3019‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌exclude‌  ‌from‌  ‌its‌  ‌coverage‌  ‌the‌  ‌members‌  ‌of‌‌ 
or‌  ‌correct‌  ‌such‌  ‌abuses‌  ‌committed‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌name‌  ‌of‌  ‌parliamentary‌‌  indirection‌  ‌or‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌general‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌act‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌intended‌  ‌to‌‌ 
Congress‌  ‌and‌  ‌that,‌  ‌therefore,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Sandiganbayan‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌err‌  ‌in‌  ‌thus‌‌ 
immunity.‌  ‌ accomplish‌‌the‌‌objects‌‌specifically‌‌or‌‌impliedly‌‌prohibited.‌  ‌
decreeing‌‌the‌‌assailed‌‌preventive‌‌suspension‌‌order.‌  ‌
For‌‌  the‌‌  above‌‌
  reasons,‌‌   the‌‌
  plea‌‌
  of‌‌
  Senator‌‌
  Santiago‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌ dismissal‌‌  D.‌‌Quorum‌‌and‌‌voting‌‌majorities‌  ‌ F.‌‌Process‌‌of‌‌law-making‌  ‌
of‌‌
  the‌‌  complaint‌‌   for‌‌
  disbarment‌‌   or‌‌
  disciplinary‌‌
  action‌‌
  is‌‌
  well‌‌ taken.‌‌ 
Indeed,‌  ‌her‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌speech‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌actionable‌  ‌criminally‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌‌ Voting‌‌separately‌‌   ‌
disciplinary‌‌proceeding‌‌under‌‌the‌‌Rules‌‌of‌‌Court.‌  ‌ Subject‌‌and‌‌Title‌  ‌
1. Sec‌‌
  11(4).‌‌   If‌‌
  the‌‌
  Congress,‌‌
  within‌‌
  ten‌‌
  days‌‌
  after‌‌
  receipt‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
last‌‌ written‌‌ declaration,‌‌ or,‌‌ if‌‌ not‌‌ in‌‌ session,‌‌ within‌‌ twelve‌‌ days‌‌  De‌‌la‌‌Cruz‌‌v.‌‌Paras‌  ‌
after‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌  ‌assemble,‌‌
  determines‌‌   a ‌‌‌two-thirds‌‌ 
  by‌‌ The‌‌
  title‌‌ was‌‌ not‌‌ in‌‌ any‌‌ way‌‌ altered.‌‌ It‌‌ was‌‌ not‌‌ changed‌‌ one‌‌ whit.‌‌ The‌‌ 
vote‌  ‌of‌‌  both‌‌  Houses,‌‌  ‌voting‌‌  separately‌, ‌‌that‌‌  the‌‌  President‌‌  is‌‌  exact‌  ‌wording‌  ‌was‌  ‌followed.‌  ‌The‌  ‌power‌  ‌granted‌  ‌remains‌  ‌that‌  ‌of‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 21‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

regulation,‌  ‌not‌  ‌prohibition.‌  ‌There‌  ‌is‌  ‌thus‌  ‌support‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌view‌‌  It‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌– ‌ ‌but‌  ‌the‌  ‌revenue‌  ‌bill‌  ‌– ‌ ‌which‌‌
  is‌‌
  required‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌  general‌‌appropriations‌‌law‌‌for‌‌their‌‌respective‌‌offices.‌  ‌
advanced‌  ‌by‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌that‌  ‌to‌  ‌construe‌  ‌Republic‌  ‌Act‌  ‌No.‌  ‌938‌  ‌as‌‌  Constitution‌  ‌to‌  ‌"originate‌  ‌exclusively"‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌House‌  ‌of‌‌ 
To‌  ‌comply‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌requisite,‌  ‌the‌  ‌GAAs‌  ‌should‌  ‌expressly‌‌ 
allowing‌  ‌the‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌operation‌  ‌of‌  ‌night‌‌   clubs‌‌
  would‌‌   give‌‌  Representatives.‌  ‌
authorize‌‌the‌‌transfer‌‌of‌‌funds‌.‌‌Savings‌‌should‌‌be‌a ‌ ctual‌. ‌ ‌
rise‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌constitutional‌‌   question.‌‌   The‌‌
  Constitution‌‌   mandates:‌‌   "Every‌‌ 
Nor‌  ‌does‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌prohibit‌  ‌the‌  ‌filing‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Senate‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌
bill‌  ‌shall‌  ‌embrace‌  ‌only‌  ‌one‌‌   subject‌‌   which‌‌   shall‌‌  be‌‌   expressed‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌  The‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌augment‌‌  was‌‌  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  used‌‌
  only‌‌  when‌‌   the‌‌  purpose‌‌   for‌‌ 
substitute‌  ‌bill‌  ‌in‌  ‌anticipation‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌receipt‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌bill‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
title‌‌  thereof."‌‌   Since‌‌
  there‌‌  is‌‌
  no‌‌   dispute‌‌ as‌‌ the‌‌ title‌‌ limits‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌  which‌  ‌the‌  ‌funds‌  ‌had‌  ‌been‌  ‌allocated‌  ‌were‌‌   already‌‌   satisfied,‌‌   or‌‌ 
House,‌‌  so‌‌
  long‌‌
  as‌‌
  action‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  Senate‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌body‌‌ is‌‌ withheld‌‌ pending‌‌ 
regulating,‌‌   not‌‌
  prohibiting,‌‌   it‌‌ would‌‌ result‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ statute‌‌ being‌‌ invalid‌‌  the‌  ‌need‌‌
  for‌‌  such‌‌  funds‌‌  had‌‌   ceased‌‌  to‌‌
  exist‌, ‌‌for‌‌  only‌‌
  then‌‌
  could‌‌ 
receipt‌‌of‌‌the‌‌House‌‌bill.‌  ‌
if,‌‌ as‌‌ was‌‌ done‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ Municipality‌‌ of‌‌ Bocaue,‌‌ the‌‌ operation‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌night‌‌  savings‌‌be‌‌properly‌‌realized.‌  ‌
club‌‌was‌‌prohibited.‌  ‌
Demetria‌‌v.‌‌Alba‌  ‌ According‌  ‌to‌  ‌Philconsa‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Enriquez‌, ‌ ‌impoundment‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌
As‌‌to‌‌specific‌‌laws‌  ‌ refusal‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌President,‌  ‌for‌  ‌whatever‌  ‌reason,‌  ‌to‌‌   spend‌‌   funds‌‌  made‌‌ 
The‌‌
  purpose‌‌   and‌‌ conditions‌‌ for‌‌ which‌‌ funds‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ transferred‌‌ were‌‌  available‌  ‌by‌  ‌Congress.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌failure‌  ‌to‌  ‌spend‌  ‌or‌  ‌obligate‌  ‌budget‌‌ 
1. Art‌  ‌VII‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌22.‌  ‌The‌  ‌President‌  ‌shall‌  ‌submit‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Congress,‌‌  specified,‌‌i.e.‌‌   ‌ authority‌‌of‌‌any‌‌type.‌  ‌
within‌‌   thirty‌‌  days‌‌   from‌‌  the‌‌ opening‌‌ of‌‌ every‌‌ regular‌‌ session‌‌ as‌‌  1. transfer‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌‌
  augmenting‌‌  It‌‌
  is‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ who‌‌ proposes‌‌ the‌‌ budget‌‌ but‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ Congress‌‌ that‌‌ has‌‌ 
the‌  ‌basis‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌appropriations‌  ‌bill‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌budget‌  ‌of‌‌  an‌‌item‌‌and‌‌   ‌ the‌  ‌final‌  ‌say‌  ‌on‌  ‌matters‌  ‌of‌  ‌appropriations.‌  ‌For‌  ‌this‌  ‌purpose,‌‌ 
expenditures‌  ‌and‌  ‌sources‌  ‌of‌  ‌financing‌, ‌ ‌including‌  ‌receipts‌‌  appropriation‌i‌ nvolves‌‌two‌‌governing‌‌principles,‌‌namely:‌‌   ‌
2. such‌  ‌transfer‌‌
  may‌‌  be‌‌
  made‌‌
  only‌‌
  ‌if‌‌
  there‌‌   are‌‌
  savings‌‌
  from‌‌ 
from‌‌existing‌‌and‌‌proposed‌‌revenue‌‌measures.‌  ‌
another‌‌   item‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  appropriation‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  government‌‌ branch‌‌  1) a‌  ‌Principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Public‌  ‌Fisc‌, ‌ ‌asserting‌  ‌that‌  ‌all‌  ‌monies‌‌ 
2. Art‌  ‌VI‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌24.‌  ‌All‌  ‌appropriation,‌  ‌revenue‌  ‌or‌‌
  tariff‌‌
  bills,‌‌
  bills‌‌  or‌‌constitutional‌‌body.‌  ‌ received‌  ‌from‌  ‌whatever‌  ‌source‌  ‌by‌  ‌any‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
authorizing‌  ‌increase‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌debt,‌  ‌bills‌  ‌of‌  ‌local‌‌  government‌‌are‌‌public‌‌funds;‌‌and‌  ‌
application,‌  ‌and‌  ‌private‌  ‌bills,‌  ‌shall‌  ‌originate‌  ‌exclusively‌  ‌in‌‌  Abakada‌‌Guro‌‌v.‌‌Ermita‌  ‌ 2) a‌  ‌Principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌Appropriations‌  ‌Control‌, ‌ ‌prohibiting‌‌ 
the‌‌
  House‌‌   of‌‌ Representatives‌, ‌‌but‌‌ the‌‌ Senate‌‌ may‌‌ propose‌‌ or‌‌  expenditure‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌public‌  ‌money‌  ‌without‌  ‌legislative‌‌ 
Since‌‌   there‌‌   is‌‌
  no‌‌  question‌‌   that‌‌ the‌‌ revenue‌‌ bill‌‌ exclusively‌‌ originated‌‌ 
concur‌‌with‌‌amendments.‌  ‌ authorization.‌  ‌
in‌‌
  the‌‌  House,‌‌   the‌‌ Senate‌‌ was‌‌ acting‌‌ within‌‌ its‌‌ constitutional‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌ 
3. Sec‌  ‌25.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌increase‌  ‌the‌  ‌appropriations‌‌  introduce‌‌   amendments‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌ House‌‌ bill‌‌ when‌‌ it‌‌ included‌‌ provisions‌‌  On‌‌Cross-border‌‌augmentations‌  ‌
recommended‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌operation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  in‌‌
  Senate‌‌ Bill‌‌ No.‌‌ 1950‌‌ amending‌‌ corporate‌‌ income‌‌ taxes,‌‌ percentage,‌‌ 
Section‌‌   25(5)‌‌   has‌‌
  delineated‌‌   borders‌‌   between‌‌   their‌‌ offices,‌‌ such‌‌ that‌‌ 
Government‌‌as‌‌specified‌‌in‌‌the‌‌budget.‌‌   ‌ excise‌‌   and‌‌  franchise‌‌   taxes.‌‌   The‌‌   sections‌‌
  introduced‌‌   by‌‌ the‌‌ Senate‌‌ are‌‌ 
funds‌  ‌appropriated‌  ‌for‌  ‌one‌  ‌office‌‌   are‌‌   prohibited‌‌   from‌‌   crossing‌‌
  over‌‌ 
germane‌‌   to‌‌  the‌‌  subject‌‌   matter‌‌   and‌‌ purposes‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ house‌‌ bills,‌‌ which‌‌ 
4. No‌  ‌provision‌  ‌or‌  ‌enactment‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌embraced‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌‌  to‌‌
  another‌‌   office‌‌
  even‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ guise‌‌ of‌‌ augmentation‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌deficient‌‌ item‌‌ 
is‌‌
  to‌‌
  supplement‌‌   our‌‌ country’s‌‌ fiscal‌‌ deficit,‌‌ among‌‌ others.‌‌ Thus,‌‌ the‌‌ 
appropriations‌  ‌bill‌  ‌unless‌  ‌it‌  ‌relates‌  ‌specifically‌  ‌to‌  ‌some‌‌  or‌‌
  items.‌‌   Cross-border‌‌   transfers,‌‌   whether‌‌   as‌‌
  augmentation,‌‌ or‌‌ as‌‌ aid,‌‌ 
Senate‌‌acted‌‌within‌‌its‌‌power‌‌to‌‌propose‌‌those‌‌amendments.‌  ‌
were‌p ‌ rohibited‌u ‌ nder‌‌Section‌‌25(5).‌  ‌
particular‌  ‌appropriation‌  ‌therein.‌  ‌Any‌  ‌such‌  ‌provision‌  ‌or‌‌ 
enactment‌‌   shall‌‌  be‌‌
  limited‌‌ in‌‌ its‌‌ operation‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ appropriation‌‌  Araullo‌‌v.‌‌Aquino‌‌III‌‌2 ‌ 014‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ Pork‌‌barrel‌‌system‌‌
   ‌
to‌‌which‌‌it‌‌relates.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌of‌  ‌appropriated‌  ‌funds‌, ‌ ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌valid‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌‌  Belgica‌‌v.‌‌Ochoa‌‌2
‌ 013‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
5. No‌  ‌law‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌passed‌  ‌authorizing‌  ‌any‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌of‌‌  25(5)‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌made‌  ‌upon‌  ‌a ‌ ‌concurrence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌‌ 
appropriations‌; ‌ ‌however‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌President,‌  ‌the‌‌   President‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌  The‌  ‌Legislative‌  ‌branch‌  ‌of‌  ‌government,‌  ‌much‌  ‌more‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌ 
requisites‌,‌‌namely:‌  ‌
members,‌  ‌should‌  ‌not‌  ‌cross‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌field‌  ‌of‌  ‌implementing‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Senate,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Speaker‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌House‌  ‌of‌‌  Representatives,‌‌   the‌‌
  Chief‌‌ 
1) There‌‌   is‌‌
  a ‌‌‌law‌‌ ‌authorizing‌‌ the‌‌ President,‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  national‌  ‌budget‌  ‌since,‌  ‌as‌  ‌earlier‌  ‌stated,‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌is‌  ‌properly‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Justice‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Supreme‌  ‌Court,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌heads‌  ‌of‌‌   Constitutional‌‌  Senate,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Speaker,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Chief‌  ‌Justice,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌heads‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  domain‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Executive.‌  ‌Upon‌  ‌approval‌  ‌and‌  ‌passage‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌GAA,‌‌ 
Commissions‌‌ may,‌‌ ‌by‌‌ law‌, ‌‌be‌‌ authorized‌‌ to‌‌ ‌augment‌‌ ‌any‌‌ item‌  Constitutional‌  ‌Commissions‌  ‌to‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌funds‌  ‌within‌  ‌their‌‌  Congress‘‌  ‌law-making‌  ‌role‌  ‌necessarily‌  ‌comes‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌end‌  ‌and‌  ‌from‌‌ 
in‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌appropriations‌  ‌law‌  ‌for‌  ‌their‌  ‌respective‌  ‌offices‌‌  respective‌‌offices;‌  ‌ there‌  ‌the‌  ‌Executive‘s‌  ‌role‌  ‌of‌  ‌implementing‌  ‌the‌  ‌national‌  ‌budget‌‌ 
from‌s‌ avings‌i‌ n‌‌other‌‌items‌‌of‌‌their‌‌respective‌‌appropriations.‌  ‌ 2) The‌  ‌funds‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌   transferred‌‌
  are‌‌  ‌savings‌‌  ‌generated‌‌   from‌‌   the‌‌  begins.‌  ‌
appropriations‌‌for‌‌their‌‌respective‌‌offices;‌‌and‌  ‌ The‌  ‌foregoing‌  ‌cardinal‌  ‌postulates‌  ‌were‌  ‌definitively‌  ‌enunciated‌  ‌in‌‌ 
Tolentino‌‌v.‌‌SOF‌  ‌
3) The‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌augment‌  ‌an‌  ‌item‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  Abakada‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌moment‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 22‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

becomes‌‌   effective,‌‌ any‌‌ provision‌‌ of‌‌ law‌‌ that‌‌ empowers‌‌ Congress‌‌  1. The‌‌  Senate‌‌ may‌‌ not‌‌ elect,‌‌ as‌‌ members‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Senate‌‌ Electoral‌‌  Once‌  ‌a ‌ ‌winning‌  ‌candidate‌‌   has‌‌


  been‌‌
  ‌proclaimed‌, ‌‌‌taken‌‌   his‌‌
  oath‌, ‌‌
or‌‌
  any‌‌
  of‌‌
  its‌‌
  members‌‌ to‌‌ play‌‌ ‌any‌‌ role‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ implementation‌‌ or‌‌  Tribunal,‌  ‌those‌  ‌Senators‌  ‌who‌  ‌have‌  ‌not‌  ‌been‌  ‌nominated‌  ‌by‌  and‌  ‌assumed‌  ‌office‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌House‌‌   of‌‌
  Representatives,‌‌ 
enforcement‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌violates‌  ‌the‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌separation‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌‌political‌‌parties‌‌specified‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Constitution;‌‌   ‌ the‌‌   ‌jurisdiction‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  HRET‌‌   begins‌‌
  over‌‌ election‌‌ contests‌‌ relating‌‌ 
powers‌‌and‌‌is‌‌thus‌‌unconstitutional.‌  ‌ to‌  ‌his‌  ‌election,‌  ‌returns,‌  ‌and‌‌
  qualifications,‌‌   and‌‌
  ‌mere‌‌   allegation‌‌   as‌‌ 
2. The‌  ‌party‌  ‌having‌  ‌the‌  ‌largest‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌‌
  votes‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Senate‌‌  to‌  ‌the‌  ‌invalidity‌  ‌of‌  ‌her‌  ‌proclamation‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌divest‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌‌ Court‌‌ must‌‌ therefore‌‌ ‌abandon‌‌ its‌‌ ruling‌‌ in‌‌ Philconsa‌‌ which‌‌  may‌‌nominate‌‌not‌‌more‌‌than‌‌three‌‌(3)‌‌members;‌‌   ‌ Electoral‌‌Tribunal‌‌of‌‌its‌‌jurisdiction‌. ‌ ‌
sanctioned‌‌   the‌‌
  conduct‌‌
  of‌‌
  legislator‌‌
  identification‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  guise‌‌ 
3. The‌  ‌party‌  ‌having‌‌   the‌‌
  second‌‌
  largest‌‌  number‌‌   of‌‌
  votes‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌ 
that‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌is‌  ‌merely‌  ‌recommendatory‌  ‌and,‌  ‌as‌  ‌such,‌‌ 
Senate‌‌  has‌‌
  the‌‌ exclusive‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ nominate‌‌ the‌‌ other‌‌ three‌‌ (3)‌‌  Reyes‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 013‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
respondents‘‌‌reliance‌‌on‌‌the‌‌same‌‌falters‌‌altogether.‌  ‌
members;‌‌   ‌
Procedure‌‌for‌‌passage‌‌of‌‌bills‌‌   ‌ 4. Neither‌  ‌these‌  ‌three‌  ‌(3)‌  ‌Senators,‌  ‌nor‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌them,‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌  Contrary‌  ‌to‌  ‌petitioner’s‌  ‌claim‌  ‌the‌  ‌COMELEC‌  ‌retains‌  ‌jurisdiction‌‌
  for‌‌ 
nominated‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌or‌  ‌party‌  ‌other‌  ‌than‌  ‌the‌  ‌one‌‌  having‌  the‌‌following‌‌reasons:‌  ‌
Tolentino‌‌v.‌‌SOF‌  ‌ the‌  ‌second‌  ‌largest‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌  ‌votes‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Senate‌  ‌or‌  ‌its‌‌  First‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌HRET‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌acquire‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌issue‌  ‌of‌‌ 
The‌  ‌presidential‌  ‌certification‌‌   ‌dispensed‌‌   with‌‌  the‌‌
  requirement‌‌   not‌‌  representative‌‌therein;‌‌   ‌ petitioner’s‌  ‌qualifications,‌  ‌as‌  ‌well‌  ‌as‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌assailed‌  ‌COMELEC‌‌ 
only‌‌
  of‌‌
  printing‌‌
  but‌‌
  also‌‌ that‌‌ of‌‌ reading‌‌ the‌‌ bill‌‌ on‌‌ separate‌‌ days.‌‌ The‌‌  5. The‌  ‌Committee‌  ‌on‌  ‌Rules‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌Senate‌  ‌has‌  ‌no‌  ‌standing‌‌
  to‌‌  Resolutions,‌‌unless‌‌a‌‌petition‌‌is‌‌duly‌‌filed‌‌with‌‌said‌‌tribunal.‌   ‌ ‌
phrase‌  ‌"except‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌certifies‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌necessity‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌  validly‌‌make‌‌such‌‌nomination.‌  ‌
Second‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  jurisdiction‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  HRET‌‌
  begins‌‌
  only‌‌
  after‌‌
  the‌‌
  candidate‌‌ 
immediate‌‌   enactment,‌‌   etc."‌‌
  in‌‌
  Art‌‌   VI,‌‌
  §26(2)‌‌
  qualifies‌‌   the‌‌
  two‌‌
  stated‌‌  is‌‌considered‌‌a‌‌Member‌‌of‌‌the‌‌House.‌  ‌
conditions‌‌before‌‌a‌‌bill‌‌can‌‌become‌‌a‌‌law:‌‌   ‌ Powers‌ 
In‌  ‌Vinzons-Chato‌  ‌v.‌  ‌COMELEC‌, ‌ ‌citing‌  ‌Aggabao‌  ‌v.‌  ‌COMELEC‌  ‌and‌ 
1) the‌‌bill‌‌has‌‌passed‌‌‌three‌‌readings‌‌on‌‌separate‌‌days‌‌‌and‌‌   ‌ Dueñas,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌HRET‌  ‌
Guerrero‌‌   v.‌‌  COMELEC‌, ‌‌the‌‌ Court‌‌ ruled‌‌ that‌‌ once‌‌ a ‌‌winning‌‌ candidate‌‌ 
2) it‌‌
  has‌‌
  been‌‌
  ‌printed‌‌   ‌in‌‌
  its‌‌
  final‌‌
  form‌‌
  ‌and‌‌ distributed‌‌ three‌‌  So‌‌  long‌‌  as‌‌
  the‌‌  Constitution‌‌   grants‌‌   the‌‌
  HRET‌‌   the‌‌
  power‌‌
  to‌‌ be‌‌ the‌‌ sole‌  has‌  ‌been‌  ‌proclaimed‌, ‌ ‌taken‌  ‌his‌  ‌oath‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌assumed‌  ‌office‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌‌
days‌‌before‌‌it‌‌is‌‌finally‌‌approved.‌  ‌ judge‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌contests‌  ‌relating‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌election,‌  ‌returns‌  ‌and‌‌  Member‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌
  House‌‌ of‌‌ Representatives,‌‌ the‌‌ COMELEC’s‌‌ jurisdiction‌‌ 
qualifications‌‌   of‌‌  members‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌  House‌‌   of‌‌
  Representatives,‌‌ any‌‌ final‌‌  over‌  ‌election‌  ‌contests‌  ‌relating‌  ‌to‌  ‌his‌  ‌election,‌  ‌returns,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Art‌‌ VI‌‌ §26(2)‌‌ must,‌‌ therefore,‌‌ be‌‌ construed‌‌ as‌‌ ‌referring‌‌ only‌‌ to‌‌ bills‌‌  qualifications‌‌ends,‌‌and‌‌the‌‌HRET’s‌‌own‌‌jurisdiction‌‌begins.‌  ‌
action‌‌   taken‌‌   by‌‌   the‌‌
  HRET‌‌
  on‌‌  a ‌‌matter‌‌ within‌‌ its‌‌ jurisdiction‌‌ shall,‌‌ as‌‌ 
introduced‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌ first‌‌ time‌‌ in‌‌ either‌‌ house‌‌ of‌‌ Congress‌, ‌‌NOT‌‌ to‌‌ 
a‌‌rule,‌‌not‌‌be‌‌reviewed‌‌by‌‌this‌‌Court.‌  ‌ To‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌House,‌  ‌there‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌‌
the‌‌conference‌‌committee‌‌report.‌  ‌
It‌‌
  is‌‌
  hornbook‌‌   doctrine‌‌   that‌‌
  jurisdiction,‌‌   once‌‌   acquired,‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ lost‌‌ at‌‌  concurrence‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following‌‌requisites:‌‌   ‌
G.‌‌Electoral‌‌Tribunals‌‌and‌‌the‌‌Commission‌‌on‌‌  the‌‌  instance‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  parties‌‌  but‌‌  continues‌‌   until‌‌  the‌‌ case‌‌ is‌‌ terminated.‌‌  1) a‌‌valid‌‌proclamation,‌  ‌
Appointments‌  ‌ Thus,‌  ‌in‌  ‌Robles‌  ‌v.‌  ‌HRET‌, ‌‌the‌‌   Court‌‌   ruled‌‌  that‌‌  the‌‌
  mere‌‌  filing‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
2) a‌‌proper‌‌oath,‌‌and‌  ‌
motion‌‌   to‌‌
  withdraw‌‌   protest‌‌  on‌‌  the‌‌
  remaining‌‌   uncontested‌‌   precincts,‌‌ 
Nature‌‌of‌‌Electoral‌‌Tribunals‌  ‌ without‌  ‌any‌  ‌action‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌tribunal,‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌   by‌‌  3) assumption‌‌of‌‌office.‌  ‌
1. Sole‌‌  Judge.‌‌  Not‌‌
  subject‌‌   to‌‌
  appeal.‌‌   May‌‌
  only‌‌   be‌‌ questioned‌‌ via‌‌  itself‌‌divest‌‌the‌‌tribunal‌‌of‌‌its‌‌jurisdiction‌‌over‌‌the‌‌case.‌  ‌ Here,‌  ‌the‌‌
  petitioner‌‌
  cannot‌‌
  be‌‌
  considered‌‌
  a ‌‌Member‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  House‌‌
  of‌‌ 
Certiorari‌‌  ‌petition‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ SC‌. ‌‌Its‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ power‌‌ is‌‌ intended‌‌ to‌‌  Representatives‌‌because,‌‌primarily,‌‌she‌‌has‌‌not‌‌yet‌‌assumed‌‌office.‌  ‌
be‌‌its‌‌own‌‌—‌‌full,‌‌complete‌‌and‌‌unimpaired‌. ‌ ‌ Barbers‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌
Before‌‌there‌‌is‌‌a‌‌valid‌‌or‌‌official‌t‌ aking‌‌of‌‌the‌‌oath‌‌it‌‌must‌‌be‌‌made‌‌   ‌
2. Contests‌. ‌ ‌May‌  ‌only‌  ‌be‌  ‌filed‌  ‌by‌  ‌one‌  ‌who‌  ‌seeks‌‌   to‌‌
  replace‌‌
  the‌‌  In‌  ‌Pangilinan‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Comelec‌, ‌ ‌we‌  ‌ruled‌  ‌that‌  ‌“where‌  ‌the‌  ‌candidate‌  ‌has‌‌  1) before‌‌the‌‌Speaker‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌House‌‌of‌‌Representatives,‌‌and‌  ‌
protestee.‌  ‌ already‌  ‌been‌  ‌proclaimed‌  ‌winner‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌congressional‌‌   elections,‌‌
  the‌‌ 
2) in‌‌open‌‌session.‌   ‌ ‌
3. Members.‌‌   Electoral‌‌
  tribunal‌‌   acquires‌‌   jurisdiction‌‌   upon‌‌ taking‌‌  remedy‌‌   of‌‌
  petitioner‌‌   is‌‌
  to‌‌
  file‌‌
  an‌‌
  electoral‌‌  protest‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ ‌Electoral‌‌ 
Tribunal‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌House‌‌of‌‌Representatives.”‌  ‌ Here,‌  ‌although‌  ‌she‌  ‌made‌  ‌the‌‌   oath‌‌
  before‌‌
  Speaker‌‌   Belmonte,‌‌   there‌‌
  is‌‌ 
of‌  ‌oath‌  ‌and‌  ‌assumption‌  ‌of‌  ‌office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌proclaimed‌  ‌winner.‌‌ 
no‌‌
  indication‌‌   that‌‌ it‌‌ was‌‌ made‌‌ during‌‌ plenary‌‌ or‌‌ in‌‌ open‌‌ session‌‌ and,‌‌ 
Prior‌‌to‌‌assumption,‌‌COMELEC‌‌has‌‌jurisdiction.‌  ‌ Certiorari‌  ‌and‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌will‌  ‌not‌  ‌lie‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌case‌  ‌considering‌  ‌that‌‌ 
thus,‌  ‌it‌  ‌remains‌  ‌unclear‌  ‌whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌required‌  ‌oath‌  ‌of‌  ‌office‌  ‌was‌‌ 
there‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌available‌‌
  and‌‌
  adequate‌‌
  remedy‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  ordinary‌‌  course‌‌  of‌‌ 
Composition‌‌
   ‌ indeed‌‌complied‌‌with.‌  ‌
law‌‌to‌‌annul‌‌the‌‌COMELEC’s‌‌assailed‌‌proceedings.‌  ‌
Tanada‌‌v.‌‌Cuenco‌‌   ‌
Limkaichong‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 23‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Commission‌‌on‌‌Appointments‌  ‌ discretion.‌  ‌ other‌  ‌public‌  ‌ministers‌  ‌and‌  ‌consuls,‌  ‌officers‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌armed‌‌ 
forces‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌rank‌  ‌of‌  ‌colonel‌  ‌or‌‌
  naval‌‌
  captain,‌‌
  and‌‌  other‌‌ 
Guingona,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌Gonzales‌  ‌ Pimentel‌‌v.‌‌HRET‌  ‌ officers‌  ‌whose‌  ‌appointments‌  ‌are‌  ‌vested‌  ‌in‌  ‌him‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌‌ 
Constitution;‌  ‌
It‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌established‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌legality‌  ‌of‌  ‌filling‌  ‌up‌  ‌the‌‌  Under‌  ‌Section‌‌   17,‌‌
  Article‌‌  VI‌‌
  each‌‌  chamber‌‌   of‌‌
  Congress‌‌   exercises‌‌
  the‌‌ 
membership‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌on‌  ‌Appointments‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌ 2. Second‌, ‌ ‌all‌  ‌other‌  ‌officers‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Government‌  ‌whose‌‌ 
power‌‌   to‌‌
  choose,‌‌   within‌‌  constitutionally‌‌   defined‌‌   limits,‌‌   who‌‌
  among‌‌  appointments‌‌are‌‌not‌‌otherwise‌‌provided‌‌for‌‌by‌‌law;‌  ‌
justiciable‌‌issue‌‌and‌‌not‌‌a‌‌political‌‌question.‌  ‌ their‌‌
  members‌‌   would‌‌  occupy‌‌   the‌‌
  allotted‌‌
  ‌6 ‌‌seats‌‌   of‌‌ each‌‌ chamber’s‌‌ 
respective‌e ‌ lectoral‌‌tribunal‌. ‌ ‌ 3. Third‌, ‌‌those‌‌  whom‌‌
  the‌‌
  President‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  authorized‌‌ by‌‌ law‌‌ 
We‌‌  do‌‌
  not‌‌
  agree‌‌   with‌‌
  respondents'‌‌ claim‌‌ that‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ mandatory‌‌ to‌‌ elect‌‌ 
to‌‌appoint;‌  ‌
12‌  ‌Senators‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌on‌  ‌Appointments.‌  ‌The‌‌   Constitution‌‌  Thus,‌  ‌even‌  ‌assuming‌  ‌that‌  ‌party-list‌  ‌representatives‌  ‌comprise‌  ‌a ‌‌
does‌  ‌not‌  ‌contemplate‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌on‌  ‌Appointments‌  ‌must‌‌  4. Fourth‌, ‌ ‌officers‌  ‌lower‌  ‌in‌  ‌rank‌  ‌whose‌  ‌appointments‌  ‌the‌‌ 
sufficient‌‌   number‌‌   and‌‌ have‌‌ agreed‌‌ to‌‌ designate‌‌ common‌‌ nominees‌‌ to‌‌ 
necessarily‌‌ include‌‌ twelve‌‌ (12)‌‌ senators‌‌ and‌‌ twelve‌‌ (12)‌‌ members‌‌ of‌‌  Congress‌‌may‌‌by‌‌law‌‌vest‌‌in‌‌the‌‌President‌‌alone.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌HRET‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌CA,‌  ‌their‌  ‌primary‌  ‌recourse‌  ‌clearly‌‌  rests‌‌   with‌‌
  the‌‌ 
the‌  ‌House‌  ‌of‌‌
  Representatives.‌‌   What‌‌   the‌‌
  Constitution‌‌   requires‌‌
  is‌‌
  that‌‌  House‌  ‌of‌‌   Representatives‌‌   and‌‌   not‌‌
  with‌‌
  this‌‌
  Court.‌‌
  Only‌‌  if‌‌
  the‌‌
  House‌‌  The‌‌  first‌‌
  group‌‌   of‌‌
  officers‌‌
  is‌‌
  clearly‌‌ appointed‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ consent‌‌ 
there‌‌be‌a ‌ t‌‌least‌‌a‌‌majority‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌entire‌‌membership.‌  ‌ of‌‌
  the‌‌  CA‌. ‌ ‌Appointments‌‌ of‌‌ such‌‌ officers‌‌ are‌‌ initiated‌‌ by‌‌ nomination‌‌ 
fails‌  ‌to‌  ‌comply‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌directive‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌on‌ ‌
proportional‌  ‌representation‌  ‌of‌  ‌political‌  ‌parties‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌HRET‌‌  and,‌‌if‌‌the‌‌nomination‌‌is‌‌confirmed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌CA,‌‌the‌‌President‌‌appoints.‌  ‌
Coseteng‌‌v.‌‌Mitra‌  ‌ and‌  ‌the‌  ‌CA‌  ‌can‌  ‌the‌  ‌party-list‌  ‌representatives‌  ‌seek‌  ‌recourse‌  ‌to‌  ‌this‌‌  The‌  ‌second,‌‌
  third‌‌   and‌‌
  fourth‌‌
  groups‌‌  of‌‌
  officers‌‌   are‌‌  the‌‌
  present‌‌
  bone‌‌ 
A‌  ‌political‌  ‌party‌  ‌must‌‌   have‌‌
  at‌‌
  least‌‌   two‌‌
  senators‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Senate‌‌   to‌‌  Court‌  ‌under‌  ‌its‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌review.‌  ‌Under‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌‌  of‌  ‌contention.‌  ‌By‌  ‌following‌  ‌the‌  ‌accepted‌  ‌rule‌  ‌in‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌and‌‌ 
be‌‌   able‌‌
  to‌‌ have‌‌ a ‌‌representative‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Commission‌‌ on‌‌ Appointments,‌‌  primary‌‌jurisdiction‌,‌‌prior‌‌recourse‌‌to‌‌the‌‌House‌‌is‌‌necessary.‌  ‌ statutory‌  ‌construction‌  ‌that‌  ‌an‌  ‌express‌  ‌enumeration‌  ‌of‌  ‌subjects‌‌ 
so‌  ‌that‌  ‌any‌  ‌number‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌  ‌2 ‌ ‌will‌  ‌not‌  ‌entitle‌  ‌such‌  ‌a ‌ ‌party‌  ‌a ‌‌ The‌‌  discretion‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  House‌‌
  to‌‌
  choose‌‌
  its‌‌
  members‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌ HRET‌‌ and‌‌  excludes‌  ‌others‌  ‌not‌  ‌enumerated,‌  ‌it‌  ‌would‌  ‌follow‌  ‌that‌  ‌only‌  ‌those‌‌ 
membership‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Commission‌‌on‌‌Appointments.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌CA‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌absolute‌, ‌ ‌being‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌mandatory‌‌  appointments‌‌   to‌‌
  positions‌‌   expressly‌‌ stated‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ ‌first‌‌ group‌‌ require‌‌ 
constitutional‌‌rule‌‌on‌‌proportional‌‌representation‌. ‌ ‌ the‌‌consent‌‌(confirmation)‌‌of‌‌the‌‌CA.‌  ‌
Daza‌‌v.‌‌Singson‌  ‌ Here,‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌  evident‌‌
  that‌‌ the‌‌ position‌‌ of‌‌ Commissioner‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Bureau‌‌ of‌‌ 
Martinez‌‌III‌‌v.‌‌HRET‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ Customs‌‌   (a‌‌  bureau‌‌
  head)‌‌  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  one‌‌
  of‌‌ those‌‌ within‌‌ the‌‌ first‌‌ group‌‌ of‌‌ 
We‌  ‌resolve‌  ‌the‌  ‌issue‌  ‌in‌  ‌favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌authority‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌House‌  ‌of‌‌  appointments‌‌where‌‌the‌‌consent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌CA‌‌is‌‌required.‌  ‌
Representatives‌  ‌to‌  ‌change‌  ‌its‌  ‌representation‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌on‌‌  What‌‌   needs‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌
  stressed‌‌   at‌‌
  this‌‌
  point‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  apparent‌‌   failure‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
Appointments‌‌   to‌‌
  reflect‌‌
  at‌‌
  any‌‌ time‌‌ the‌‌ changes‌‌ that‌‌ may‌‌ transpire‌‌ in‌‌  HRET‌‌   to‌‌
  give‌‌  weight‌‌   to‌‌
  relevant‌‌   circumstances‌‌   that‌‌
  make‌‌   the‌‌
  will‌‌   of‌‌  H.‌‌Powers‌‌of‌‌Congress‌  ‌
the‌‌
  political‌‌  alignments‌‌ of‌‌ its‌‌ membership.‌‌ It‌‌ is‌‌ understood‌‌ that‌‌ such‌‌  the‌  ‌electorate‌  ‌determinable,‌  ‌following‌  ‌the‌  ‌precedent‌  ‌in‌  ‌Bautista‌. ‌‌
changes‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌permanent‌  ‌and‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌include‌  ‌the‌  ‌temporary‌‌  Respondent‌  ‌HRET‌  ‌gravely‌  ‌abused‌  ‌its‌  ‌discretion‌‌   in‌‌  affirming‌‌   the‌‌  Legislative‌‌inquiries‌‌and‌‌oversight‌‌functions‌  ‌
alliances‌  ‌or‌  ‌factional‌  ‌divisions‌  ‌not‌  ‌involving‌  ‌severance‌  ‌of‌‌   political‌‌  proclamation‌  ‌of‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌Salimbangon‌  ‌despite‌  ‌the‌  ‌final‌‌   outcome‌‌  Question‌‌Hour‌  ‌
loyalties‌  ‌or‌  ‌formal‌  ‌disaffiliation‌  ‌and‌  ‌permanent‌  ‌shifts‌‌   of‌‌
  allegiance‌‌  of‌  ‌revision‌  ‌showing‌  ‌5,401‌  ‌ballots‌  ‌with‌  ‌only‌  ‌"MARTINEZ"‌  ‌or‌  ‌"C.‌‌ 
from‌‌one‌‌political‌‌party‌‌to‌‌another.‌  ‌ "MARTINEZ"‌  ‌written‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌line‌  ‌for‌  ‌Representative,‌  ‌votes‌  ‌which‌‌  Sec‌  ‌22.‌  ‌The‌  ‌heads‌  ‌of‌‌
  departments‌‌   may,‌‌   upon‌‌
  their‌‌  own‌‌
  initiative,‌‌ 
should‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌properly‌  ‌counted‌  ‌in‌  ‌favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌‌ 
Judicial‌‌Review‌‌   ‌ with‌  ‌the‌  ‌consent‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President,‌  ‌or‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌request‌  ‌of‌  ‌either‌‌ 
nullified‌  ‌as‌  ‌stray‌‌   votes,‌‌   after‌‌
  considering‌‌   all‌‌
  relevant‌‌   circumstances‌‌ 
clearly‌‌   establishing‌‌   that‌‌  such‌‌   votes‌‌  could‌‌  not‌‌ have‌‌ been‌‌ intended‌‌ for‌‌  House,‌‌   as‌‌  the‌‌
  rules‌‌
  of‌‌
  each‌‌  House‌‌
  shall‌‌   provide,‌‌   appear‌‌ before‌‌ and‌‌ 
Co‌‌v.‌‌HRET‌  ‌
"Edilito‌‌ C.‌‌ Martinez"‌‌ who‌‌ was‌‌ declared‌‌ a ‌‌nuisance‌‌ candidate‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌final‌‌  be‌  ‌heard‌  ‌by‌  ‌such‌  ‌House‌  ‌on‌  ‌any‌  ‌matter‌  ‌pertaining‌  ‌to‌  ‌their‌‌ 
In‌  ‌the‌  ‌leading‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌Morrero‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Bocar‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌ruled‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌  judgment.‌  ‌ departments.‌‌xxxx‌  ‌
power‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Electoral‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌"is‌  ‌beyond‌‌   judicial‌‌  interference‌‌ 
except‌, ‌ ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌event,‌  ‌upon‌  ‌a ‌ ‌clear‌  ‌showing‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌arbitrary‌  ‌and‌‌  ⭐‌Senate‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌v.‌‌Ermita‌  ‌
Sarmiento‌‌v.‌‌Mison‌  ‌
improvident‌‌use‌‌of‌‌power‌‌as‌‌will‌‌constitute‌‌a‌‌denial‌‌of‌‌due‌‌process.‌‌   ‌
Section‌‌
  22‌‌  which‌‌   provides‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌
  question‌‌   hour‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ interpreted‌‌ 
It‌  ‌is‌  ‌readily‌  ‌apparent‌  ‌that‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌1987‌‌ 
The‌‌  degree‌‌   of‌‌
  judicial‌‌  intervention‌‌   should‌‌  not‌‌
  be‌‌
  made‌‌ to‌‌ depend‌‌ on‌‌  vis-á-vis‌‌  Section‌‌  21‌‌  which‌‌  provides‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌
  power‌‌ of‌‌ either‌‌ House‌‌ of‌‌ 
Constitution,‌  ‌there‌  ‌are‌  ‌four‌  ‌(4)‌  ‌groups‌  ‌of‌  ‌officers‌  ‌whom‌  ‌the‌‌ 
how‌  ‌many‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌members‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌
  HRET‌‌  belong‌‌  to‌‌
  this‌‌  party‌‌
  or‌‌  Congress‌  ‌to‌‌  "conduct‌‌   ‌inquiries‌‌   in‌‌
  aid‌‌
  of‌‌
  legislation‌."‌‌   A ‌‌distinction‌‌ 
President‌‌shall‌‌appoint‌.‌ ‌These‌‌four‌‌(4)‌‌groups‌‌are:‌  ‌
that‌  ‌party.‌  ‌The‌  ‌test‌‌
  remains‌‌   the‌‌
  same‌‌   — ‌‌‌manifest‌‌  grave‌‌   abuse‌‌   of‌‌  was‌  ‌made‌  ‌between‌  ‌inquiries‌  ‌in‌  ‌aid‌  ‌of‌  ‌legislation‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌question‌‌ 
1. First‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  heads‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  executive‌‌ departments,‌‌ ambassadors,‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 24‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

hour.‌  ‌While‌  ‌attendance‌  ‌was‌  ‌meant‌  ‌to‌  b


‌ e‌  ‌discretionary‌  i‌ n‌  ‌the‌‌  Practices‌‌
  Act",‌‌
  a ‌‌matter‌‌
  that‌‌
  appears‌‌   more‌‌
  within‌‌
  the‌‌ province‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  The‌‌  1987‌‌  Constitution‌‌   recognizes‌‌   the‌‌ power‌‌ of‌‌ investigation,‌‌ not‌‌ just‌‌ 
question‌  ‌hour‌, ‌ ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌compulsory‌  ‌in‌  ‌inquiries‌  ‌in‌  ‌aid‌  ‌of‌‌  courts‌‌rather‌‌than‌‌of‌‌the‌‌legislature.‌‌   ‌ of‌‌
  Congress,‌‌   but‌‌
  also‌‌
  of‌‌  "‌any‌‌
  of‌‌ its‌‌ committees‌."‌  ‌This‌‌ is‌‌ significant‌‌ 
legislation‌. ‌ ‌ because‌  ‌it‌  ‌constitutes‌  ‌a ‌ ‌direct‌  ‌conferral‌  ‌of‌  ‌investigatory‌  ‌power‌‌ 
Negros‌‌Oriental‌‌II‌‌Electric‌‌Coop‌‌v.‌‌SP‌‌of‌‌Dumaguete‌  ‌ upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌committees‌  ‌and‌  ‌it‌  ‌means‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌mechanisms‌  ‌which‌‌   the‌‌ 
In‌  ‌fine,‌  ‌the‌  ‌oversight‌  ‌function‌  ‌of‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌facilitated‌  ‌by‌‌ 
Houses‌  ‌can‌  ‌take‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌effectively‌  ‌perform‌  ‌its‌  ‌investigative‌‌ 
compulsory‌  ‌process‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌extent‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌performed‌  ‌in‌‌ 
The‌‌  exercise‌‌
  by‌‌  the‌‌   legislature‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ contempt‌‌ power‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌matter‌‌ of‌‌  function‌‌are‌‌also‌‌available‌‌to‌‌the‌‌committees.‌  ‌
pursuit‌‌of‌‌legislation‌. ‌ ‌
self-preservation‌  ‌as‌  ‌that‌  ‌branch‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌vested‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Senate‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Ermita‌  ‌categorically‌  ‌ruled‌  ‌that ‌‌   "‌the‌‌   power‌‌   of‌‌
  inquiry‌‌
  is‌‌ 
When‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌exercises‌  ‌its‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌inquiry,‌  ‌the‌  ‌only‌  ‌way‌  ‌for‌‌  legislative‌  ‌power,‌  ‌independently‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌branch,‌  ‌asserts‌  ‌its‌ 
broad‌‌   enough‌‌   to‌‌
  cover‌‌  officials‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌   executive‌‌   branch.‌" ‌‌ Verily,‌‌ 
department‌  ‌heads‌  ‌to‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌themselves‌  ‌therefrom‌  ‌is‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌‌  authority‌  ‌and‌  ‌punishes‌  ‌contempts‌  ‌thereof.‌  ‌The‌‌   contempt‌‌  power‌‌   of‌‌ 
the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌reinforced‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌in‌  ‌Arnault‌‌   that‌‌  "‌the‌‌
  operation‌‌   of‌‌ 
claim‌  ‌of‌  ‌privilege‌. ‌ ‌They‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌by‌‌
  the‌‌
  mere‌‌
  fact‌‌
  that‌‌
  they‌‌  the‌‌
  legislature‌‌   is,‌‌
  therefore,‌‌   ‌sui‌‌
  generis‌, ‌‌and‌‌ ‌local‌‌ legislative‌‌ bodies‌‌ 
government,‌  ‌being‌  ‌a ‌ ‌legitimate‌  ‌subject‌  ‌for‌  ‌legislation,‌  ‌ is‌  ‌a ‌‌
are‌  ‌department‌  ‌heads.‌  ‌Only‌  ‌one‌  ‌executive‌‌   official‌‌  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  exempted‌‌  cannot‌  ‌correctly‌‌   claim‌‌   to‌‌
  possess‌‌   it‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌  reasons‌‌  that‌‌
  the‌‌ 
proper‌‌   subject‌‌   for‌‌
  investigation‌" ‌‌and‌‌    that‌‌  "‌the‌‌ power‌‌ of‌‌ inquiry‌‌ 
from‌‌   this‌‌ power‌‌ — ‌‌the‌‌ President‌‌ on‌‌ whom‌‌ executive‌‌ power‌‌ is‌‌ vested,‌‌  national‌‌legislature‌‌does.‌  ‌
is‌‌co-extensive‌‌with‌‌the‌‌power‌‌to‌‌legislate‌."‌  ‌
hence,‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌the‌  ‌reach‌  ‌of‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌except‌  through‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌‌ 
impeachment.‌  ‌ Arnault‌‌v.‌‌Nazareno‌  ‌ Thus,‌‌
  Section‌‌  4(b)‌‌ is‌‌ ‌directly‌‌ repugnant‌‌ ‌with‌‌ Article‌‌ VI,‌‌ Section‌‌ 21.‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌4(b)‌  ‌exempts‌  ‌the‌  ‌PCGG‌  ‌members‌  ‌and‌  ‌staff‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌1 ‌ ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌applied‌  ‌to‌  ‌appearances‌  ‌of‌  ‌department‌‌ 
Once‌  ‌an‌  ‌inquiry‌  ‌is‌  ‌admitted‌  ‌or‌  ‌established‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌  Congress'‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌inquiry‌. ‌ ‌ This‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌countenanced.‌‌ 
heads‌  ‌in‌  ‌inquiries‌  ‌in‌‌
  aid‌‌   of‌‌
  legislation‌. ‌‌Congress‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌
  bound‌‌
  in‌‌ 
jurisdiction‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌legislative‌‌
  body‌‌
  to‌‌
  make,‌‌   we‌‌  think‌‌   the‌‌
  investigating‌‌   Nowhere‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌is‌  ‌any‌  ‌provision‌  ‌granting‌  ‌such‌‌ 
such‌‌ instances‌‌ to‌‌ respect‌‌ the‌‌ refusal‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ department‌‌ head‌‌ to‌‌ appear‌‌ 
committee‌‌   has‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌ require‌‌ a ‌‌witness‌‌ to‌‌ answer‌‌ any‌‌ question‌‌  exemption. ‌  ‌
in‌  ‌such‌  ‌inquiry,‌  ‌unless‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌  ‌claim‌  ‌of‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌is‌  ‌subsequently‌‌ 
pertinent‌‌  to‌‌
  that‌‌  inquiry,‌‌
  subject‌‌
  of‌‌
  course‌‌   to‌‌
  his‌‌  constitutional‌‌ right‌‌ 
made,‌‌either‌‌by‌‌the‌‌President‌‌herself‌‌or‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Executive‌‌Secretary.‌  ‌
against‌‌self-incrimination.‌‌   ‌ Gudani‌‌v.‌‌Senga‌  ‌
Legislative‌‌Investigations‌  ‌ If‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌  ‌of‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌committee‌  ‌is‌  ‌within‌‌ 
If‌‌
  the‌‌
  President‌‌   or‌‌  the‌‌   Chief‌‌  of‌‌
  Staff‌‌  refuses‌‌   to‌‌ allow‌‌ a ‌‌member‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
the‌  ‌range‌  ‌of‌  ‌legitimate‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌inquiry‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌proposed‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌21.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Senate‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌‌
  House‌‌  of‌‌
  Representatives‌‌   or‌‌
  any‌‌  of‌‌  AFP‌  ‌to‌  ‌appear‌  ‌before‌  ‌Congress,‌  ‌the‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌body‌  ‌seeking‌  ‌such‌‌ 
testimony‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌witness‌  ‌called‌  ‌relates‌  ‌to‌  ‌that‌  ‌subject,‌‌ 
testimony‌  ‌may‌  ‌seek‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌relief‌  ‌to‌  ‌compel‌  ‌the‌  ‌attendance.‌‌ 
its‌  ‌respective‌  ‌committees‌  ‌may‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌inquiries‌  ‌in‌  ‌aid‌  ‌of‌‌  obedience‌‌   to‌‌
  its‌‌
  process‌‌   may‌‌
  be‌‌  enforced‌‌  by‌‌  the‌‌
  committee‌‌   by‌‌ 
Such‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌action‌  ‌should‌‌   be‌‌  directed‌‌   at‌‌
  the‌‌  heads‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  executive‌‌ 
legislation‌  ‌in‌  ‌accordance‌  ‌with‌  ‌its‌  ‌duly‌  ‌published‌  ‌rules‌  ‌of‌‌  imprisonment‌. ‌ ‌
branch‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌armed‌  ‌forces,‌  ‌the‌  ‌persons‌  ‌who‌  ‌wield‌  ‌authority‌  ‌and‌‌ 
procedure.‌  ‌The‌  ‌rights‌‌  of‌‌
  persons‌‌   appearing‌‌   in,‌‌
  or‌‌
  affected‌‌
  by,‌‌
  such‌‌  control‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌actions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌officers‌  ‌concerned.‌  ‌The‌  ‌legislative‌‌ 
inquiries‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌respected.‌  ‌ Senate‌‌Blue‌‌Ribbon‌‌Committee‌‌v.‌‌Majaducon‌  purpose‌‌   of‌‌
  such‌‌   testimony,‌‌   as‌‌
  well‌‌  as‌‌  any‌‌  defenses‌‌   against‌‌ the‌‌ same‌‌ 
—‌  ‌whether‌  ‌grounded‌  ‌on‌  ‌executive‌  ‌privilege,‌  ‌national‌  ‌security‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Bengzon‌‌v.‌‌Senate‌‌Blue‌‌Ribbon‌‌Committee‌  ‌ When‌  ‌the‌  ‌Senate‌  ‌Blue‌  ‌Ribbon‌  ‌Committee‌  ‌served‌  ‌subpoena‌  ‌on‌‌ 
similar‌  ‌concerns‌  ‌— ‌ ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌accorded‌  ‌due‌  ‌judicial‌‌   evaluation.‌‌   All‌‌ 
respondent‌‌ Flaviano‌‌ to‌‌ appear‌‌ and‌‌ testify‌‌ before‌‌ it‌‌ in‌‌ connection‌‌ with‌‌ 
the‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌considerations‌  ‌pertinent‌  ‌to‌  ‌either‌  ‌branch‌  ‌of‌ 
The‌‌
  power‌‌   of‌‌
  both‌‌  houses‌‌
  of‌‌
  Congress‌‌
  to‌‌
  conduct‌‌
  inquiries‌‌   in‌‌ aid‌‌ of‌‌  its‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌alleged‌  ‌misuse‌  ‌and‌  ‌mismanagement‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
government‌‌   may‌‌   be‌‌  raised,‌‌   assessed,‌‌   and‌‌ ultimately‌‌ weighed‌‌ against‌‌ 
legislation‌‌   is‌‌
  not,‌‌
  therefore,‌‌
  absolute‌‌
  or‌‌ unlimited.‌  ‌The‌‌ investigation‌‌  AFP-RSBS‌  ‌funds,‌  ‌it‌  ‌did‌  ‌so‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌conduct‌‌ 
each‌‌  other.‌‌  And‌‌  once‌‌   the‌‌  courts‌‌   speak‌‌   with‌‌   finality,‌‌ both‌‌ branches‌‌ of‌‌ 
must‌‌be‌‌   ‌ inquiries‌‌in‌‌aid‌‌of‌‌legislation.‌‌   ‌
government‌  ‌have‌  ‌no‌  ‌option‌  ‌but‌  ‌to‌  ‌comply‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌decision‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
a) in‌  ‌aid‌‌
  of‌‌
  legislation‌‌
  ‌in‌‌
  accordance‌‌
  with‌‌
  its‌‌
  duly‌‌
  published‌‌  In‌  ‌the‌  ‌instant‌  ‌case,‌  ‌no‌  ‌court‌  ‌had‌  ‌acquired‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌‌   the‌‌  courts,‌‌whether‌‌the‌‌effect‌‌of‌‌the‌‌decision‌‌is‌‌to‌‌their‌‌liking‌‌or‌‌disfavor.‌  ‌
rules‌‌of‌‌procedure‌‌and‌‌   ‌ matter‌. ‌ ‌Thus,‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌as‌  ‌yet‌  ‌no‌  ‌encroachment‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  legislature‌‌ 
b) that‌  ‌the‌  ‌rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌persons‌  ‌appearing‌‌
  in‌‌
  or‌‌
  affected‌‌
  by‌‌
  such‌‌  into‌  ‌the‌  ‌exclusive‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌of‌‌   another‌‌  branch‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  government.‌‌  Neri‌‌v.‌‌Senate‌‌Committee‌‌on‌‌Accountability‌‌of‌‌Public‌‌Officers‌‌and‌‌ 
inquiries‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌respected.‌  ‌ Clearly,‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌no‌  ‌basis‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌Judge‌  ‌to‌  ‌apply‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Investigation‌  ‌
ruling‌‌ in‌‌ ‌Bengzon‌. ‌‌Hence,‌‌ the‌‌ denial‌‌ of‌‌ petitioner's‌‌ motion‌‌ to‌‌ dismiss‌‌ 
The‌‌   contemplated‌‌   inquiry‌‌   by‌‌
  respondent‌‌   Committee‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌ really‌‌ "in‌‌  the‌‌petition‌‌for‌‌prohibition‌‌amounted‌‌to‌‌grave‌‌abuse‌‌of‌‌discretion.‌  ‌ Nixon,‌  ‌In‌  ‌Re‌  ‌Sealed‌  ‌Case‌  ‌and‌  ‌Judicial‌‌
  Watch‌, ‌‌somehow‌‌
  provide‌‌
  the‌‌ 
aid‌  ‌of‌  ‌legislation"‌  ‌because‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌related‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌purpose‌‌   within‌‌   the‌‌ 
elements‌‌of‌‌presidential‌‌communications‌‌privilege‌,‌‌to‌‌wit:‌  ‌
juris­diction‌‌   of‌‌
  Congress,‌‌   since‌‌  the‌‌
  aim‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  investigation‌‌   is‌‌
  to‌‌
  find‌‌ 
out‌‌
  whether‌‌   or‌‌
  not‌‌
  the‌‌
  relatives‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  President‌‌   or‌‌ Mr.‌‌ Ricardo‌‌ Lopa‌  In‌‌re‌‌Sabio‌  ‌ 1) The‌  ‌protected‌  ‌communication‌  ‌must‌  ‌relate‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌
had‌  ‌violated‌  ‌Section‌  ‌5 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌No.‌  ‌3019,‌  ‌the‌  ‌"Anti-Graft‌  ‌and‌  ‌Corrupt‌‌  "‌quintessential‌‌and‌‌non-delegable‌‌presidential‌‌power.‌" ‌ ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 25‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

concerns‌  ‌suffused‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌broad‌  ‌daylight‌  ‌of‌  ‌discussion.”‌  ‌(‌Separate‌‌ 


2) The‌  ‌communication‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌authored‌  ‌or‌  ‌"solicited‌  ‌and‌‌  implementation‌  ‌of‌  ‌legislation‌  ‌it‌  ‌has‌  ‌enacted.‌  ‌Clearly,‌  ‌oversight‌‌ 
concerns‌‌post-enactment‌‌measures‌‌undertaken‌‌by‌‌Congress.‌  ‌ Opinion,‌‌Justice‌‌Puno‌,‌‌Macalintal‌‌v.‌‌Comelec,‌‌et‌‌al‌.)‌  ‌ ‌
received"‌‌  by‌‌ a ‌‌close‌‌ advisor‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ or‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ 
himself.‌  ‌The‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌test‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌an‌  ‌advisor‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌in‌‌  The‌  ‌power‌‌
  of‌‌
  oversight‌‌
  has‌‌  been‌‌  held‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌  ‌intrinsic‌‌
  ‌in‌‌
  the‌‌
  grant‌‌
  of‌‌  Power‌‌of‌‌impeachment‌ 
"‌operational‌‌proximity‌"‌‌with‌‌the‌‌President.‌  ‌ legislative‌  ‌power‌  ‌itself‌  ‌and‌  ‌integral‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌checks‌  ‌and‌  ‌balances‌‌  Who‌‌may‌‌be‌‌impeached‌  ‌
3) The‌  ‌presidential‌  ‌communications‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌remains‌  ‌a ‌‌ inherent‌‌in‌‌a‌‌democratic‌‌system‌‌of‌‌government.‌  ‌
1. The‌‌President,‌‌   ‌
qualified‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌that‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌overcome‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌showing‌  ‌of‌‌  Categories‌‌of‌‌congressional‌‌oversight‌‌functions‌  ‌
adequate‌  ‌need,‌  ‌such‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌information‌  ‌sought‌  ‌"likely‌‌  a. Scrutiny.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Its‌  ‌primary‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌  ‌economy‌‌  2. the‌‌Vice-President,‌‌   ‌
contains‌  ‌important‌  ‌evidence"‌  ‌and‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌
  unavailability‌‌   of‌‌ 
and‌‌
  efficiency‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ operation‌‌ of‌‌ government‌‌ activities‌. ‌‌It‌‌ is‌‌  3. the‌‌Members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Supreme‌‌Court,‌‌   ‌
the‌‌
  information‌‌ elsewhere‌‌ by‌‌ an‌‌ appropriate‌‌ investigating‌‌ 
based‌  ‌primarily‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌appropriation‌  ‌of‌  ‌Congress.‌‌ 
authority.‌  ‌ 4. the‌‌Members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitutional‌‌Commissions,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
Under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution,‌  ‌the‌  ‌“‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌purse‌” ‌ ‌belongs‌  ‌to‌‌ 
United‌  ‌States‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Nixon‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌claim‌  ‌of‌  ‌executive‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌is‌‌  Congress.‌  ‌ 5. the‌‌Ombudsman.‌  ‌
subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌balancing‌  ‌against‌  ‌other‌  ‌interest‌. ‌ ‌In‌  ‌other‌  ‌words,‌‌  Likewise,‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌exercises‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌scrutiny‌  ‌thru‌  ‌its‌‌ 
confidentiality‌‌   in‌‌
  executive‌‌  privilege‌‌   is‌‌
  ‌not‌‌
  absolutely‌‌   protected‌‌  by‌‌  power‌  ‌of‌  ‌confirmation.‌  ‌Through‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌confirmation,‌‌  In‌‌re‌‌Gonzales‌  ‌
the‌‌Constitution.‌  ‌ Congress‌‌shares‌‌in‌‌the‌‌appointing‌‌power‌‌of‌‌the‌‌executive.‌  ‌
A‌  ‌public‌  ‌officer‌  ‌who‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌is‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌‌
b. Investigation.‌‌
  — ‌‌‌Congressional‌‌ investigation‌‌ involves‌‌ a ‌‌more‌‌  Member‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌
  Philippine‌‌   Bar‌‌
  as‌‌
  a ‌‌qualification‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ office‌‌ held‌‌ by‌‌ 
Standard‌‌Chartered‌‌Bank‌‌v.‌‌Senate‌‌Committee‌‌on‌‌Banks‌  ‌ intense‌  ‌digging‌  ‌of‌  ‌facts.‌  ‌As‌  ‌now‌  ‌contained‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌1987‌‌  him‌  ‌and‌  ‌who‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌removed‌  ‌from‌  ‌office‌  ‌only‌  ‌by‌  ‌impeachment,‌‌ 
Central‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court’s‌  ‌ruling‌  ‌in‌  ‌Bengzon‌  ‌was‌  ‌the‌  C
‌ ourt’s‌‌  Constitution,‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌to‌  ‌investigate‌  ‌is‌‌  cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌charged‌  ‌with‌  ‌disbarment‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌‌   incumbency‌‌   of‌‌ 
determination‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌intended‌  ‌inquiry‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌in‌  ‌aid‌  ‌of‌‌  circumscribed‌‌by‌‌three‌‌limitations,‌‌namely:‌‌   ‌ such‌‌public‌‌officer.‌‌   ‌
legislation‌. ‌ ‌ a) it‌‌must‌‌be‌‌in‌‌aid‌‌of‌‌its‌‌legislative‌‌functions,‌  ‌ A‌  ‌Member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Supreme‌  ‌Court‌  ‌must‌  ‌first‌  ‌be‌‌  removed‌‌
  from‌‌  office‌‌ 
Indeed,‌‌  ‌the‌‌
  mere‌‌  filing‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌criminal‌‌
  or‌‌
  an‌‌
  administrative‌‌ complaint‌‌  b) it‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌conducted‌  ‌in‌  ‌accordance‌  ‌with‌  ‌duly‌  ‌published‌‌  via‌‌  the‌‌
  constitutional‌‌   route‌‌
  of‌‌
  impeachment.‌‌ Should‌‌ the‌‌ tenure‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
before‌‌
  a ‌‌court‌‌
  or‌‌
  a ‌‌quasi-judicial‌‌   body‌‌  should‌‌ not‌‌ automatically‌‌ bar‌‌  rules‌‌of‌‌procedure,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ Supreme‌  ‌Court‌  ‌Justice‌  ‌be‌  ‌thus‌  ‌terminated‌‌   by‌‌   impeachment,‌‌   he‌‌
  may‌‌ 
the‌‌conduct‌‌of‌‌legislative‌‌investigation‌. ‌ ‌ then‌‌be‌‌held‌‌to‌‌answer‌‌either‌‌criminally‌‌or‌‌administratively.‌  ‌
c) the‌  ‌persons‌  ‌appearing‌  ‌therein‌  ‌are‌  ‌afforded‌  ‌their‌‌ 
constitutional‌‌rights.‌  ‌ Grounds‌‌
   ‌
Romero‌‌II‌‌v.‌‌Estrada‌  ‌ c. Supervision.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌This‌  ‌connotes‌  ‌a ‌ ‌continuing‌  ‌and‌  ‌informed‌‌  for,‌‌and‌c
‌ onviction‌o
‌ f,‌‌   ‌
awareness‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌congressional‌  ‌committee‌  ‌regarding‌‌ 
Suffice‌  ‌it‌  ‌to‌  ‌state‌  ‌that‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌Committee‌  ‌issued‌  ‌invitations‌  ‌and‌‌  1. culpable‌‌violation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitution,‌‌   ‌
executive‌  ‌operations‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌given‌  ‌administrative‌‌   area.‌‌  While‌‌  both‌‌ 
subpoenas‌  ‌to‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌to‌  ‌appear‌  ‌before‌  ‌it‌  ‌in‌  ‌connection‌  ‌with‌  ‌its‌‌ 
congressional‌  ‌scrutiny‌  ‌and‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌involve‌  ‌inquiry‌  ‌into‌‌  2. treason,‌‌   ‌
investigation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌aforementioned‌  ‌investments,‌  ‌it‌‌   did‌‌
  so‌‌
  pursuant‌‌ 
past‌  ‌executive‌  ‌branch‌  ‌actions‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌influence‌  ‌future‌‌ 
to‌  ‌its‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌inquiries‌  ‌in‌  ‌aid‌  ‌of‌  ‌legislation.‌  ‌And‌  ‌the‌‌  3. bribery,‌‌   ‌
executive‌‌  branch‌‌ performance,‌‌ congressional‌‌ supervision‌‌ allows‌‌ 
Court‌‌   has‌‌   no‌‌
  authority‌‌  to‌‌ prohibit‌‌ a ‌‌Senate‌‌ committee‌‌ from‌‌ requiring‌‌ 
Congress‌  ‌to‌  ‌scrutinize‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌delegated‌  ‌law-making‌  4. graft‌‌and‌‌corruption,‌‌   ‌
persons‌‌   to‌‌  appear‌‌
  and‌‌
  testify‌‌  before‌‌   it‌‌
  in‌‌
  connection‌‌ with‌‌ an‌‌ inquiry‌‌ 
authority,‌  ‌and‌  ‌permits‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌to‌  ‌retain‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌‌
  that‌‌
  delegated‌‌ 
in‌  ‌aid‌  ‌of‌  ‌legislation‌  ‌in‌  ‌accordance‌  ‌with‌  ‌its‌  ‌duly‌  ‌published‌  ‌rules‌‌   of‌‌  5. other‌‌high‌‌crimes,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
authority.‌  ‌
procedure.‌  ‌
6. betrayal‌‌of‌‌public‌‌trust.‌ 
Oversight‌  ‌ Non-legislative‌  ‌
Procedure‌  ‌
Separate‌‌Opinion,‌‌Justice‌‌Puno‌,‌‌Macalintal‌‌v.‌‌Comelec,‌‌et‌‌al‌.  ‌‌ ‌ Informing‌‌function‌  ‌
Gutierrez‌‌v.‌‌The‌‌House‌‌of‌‌Representatives‌‌Committee‌‌on‌‌Justice‌‌ 
The‌‌
  legislature’s‌‌   informing‌‌   function‌‌   should‌‌ be‌‌ preferred‌‌ to‌‌ its‌‌ 
Concept‌‌and‌‌bases‌‌of‌‌congressional‌‌oversight‌  ‌ 2011‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Decision‌  ‌
legislative‌  ‌function‌. ‌ ‌He‌  ‌emphasized‌  ‌that‌  ‌“even‌  ‌more‌  ‌important‌‌ 
The‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌oversight‌  ‌embraces‌  ‌all‌  ‌activities‌  ‌undertaken‌  ‌by‌‌  The‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌sufficiency‌  ‌of‌  ‌form‌  ‌and‌  ‌substance‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌ 
than‌  ‌legislation‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌instruction‌  ‌and‌  ‌guidance‌‌  in‌‌
  political‌‌
  affairs‌‌ 
Congress‌  ‌to‌  ‌enhance‌  ‌its‌  ‌understanding‌  ‌of‌  ‌and‌  ‌influence‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌‌  impeachment‌‌   complaint‌‌  is‌‌
  an‌‌
  exponent‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  express‌‌ constitutional‌‌ 
which‌‌   the‌‌
  people‌‌  might‌‌ receive‌‌ from‌‌ a ‌‌body‌‌ which‌‌ kept‌‌ all‌‌ national‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 26‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

grant‌  ‌of‌  ‌rule-making‌  ‌powers‌  ‌of‌‌


  the‌‌
  House‌‌
  of‌‌
  Representatives‌‌
  which‌‌  Ombudsman‌  ‌in‌  ‌carrying‌  ‌out‌  ‌her‌  ‌mandate.‌  ‌What‌  ‌is‌  ‌true‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌  2. "‌Indirect‌‌   initiative‌" ‌‌is‌‌
  the‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  of‌‌
  initiative‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  people‌‌ 
committed‌‌such‌‌determinative‌‌function‌‌to‌‌public‌‌respondent.‌  ‌ Ombudsman‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌equally‌  ‌and‌  ‌necessarily‌  ‌true‌  ‌for‌  ‌her‌‌  through‌  ‌a ‌ ‌proposition‌  ‌sent‌‌  to‌‌
  Congress‌‌   or‌‌
  the‌‌
  local‌‌  legislative‌‌ 
Deputies‌  ‌who‌  ‌act‌  ‌as‌  ‌agents‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  body‌‌for‌‌action.‌  ‌
A‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌what‌  ‌constitutes‌  ‌an‌  ‌impeachable‌  ‌offense‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌
performance‌‌of‌‌their‌‌duties.‌  ‌
purely‌  ‌political‌  ‌question‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌has‌  ‌left‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  3. "‌Referendum‌" ‌ ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌electorate‌  ‌to‌  ‌approve‌‌
  or‌‌ 
sound‌‌discretion‌‌of‌‌the‌‌legislature.‌  ‌ Effect‌‌
   ‌ reject‌‌
  a ‌‌legislation‌‌
  through‌‌ an‌‌ election‌‌ called‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ purpose.‌‌ It‌‌ 
It‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  for‌‌
  this‌‌
  Court‌‌   to‌‌ tell‌‌ a ‌‌co-equal‌‌ branch‌‌ of‌‌ government‌‌ ‌how‌‌ to‌‌  Art‌  ‌XI‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌3[7].‌  ‌Judgment‌  ‌in‌  ‌cases‌  ‌of‌  ‌impeachment‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌‌  may‌‌be‌‌of‌‌two‌‌classes,‌‌namely:‌  ‌
promulgate‌‌   ‌when‌‌  the‌‌
  Constitution‌‌   itself‌‌
  has‌‌
  not‌‌ prescribed‌‌ a ‌‌specific‌‌  extend‌  ‌further‌‌   than‌‌  ‌removal‌‌  from‌‌  office‌‌  and‌‌
  ‌disqualification‌‌   to‌‌  a. Referendum‌  ‌on‌  ‌statutes‌  ‌which‌‌   refers‌‌
  to‌‌
  a ‌‌petition‌‌
  to‌‌ 
method‌‌   of‌‌
  promulgation‌. ‌‌   ‌The‌‌   Court‌‌  is‌‌
  in‌‌
  no‌‌
  position‌‌  to‌‌
  dictate‌‌   a ‌‌ hold‌  ‌any‌  ‌office‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Republic‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines,‌  ‌but‌  ‌the‌‌ 
mode‌‌of‌‌promulgation‌‌beyond‌‌the‌‌dictates‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitution.‌  approve‌‌
  or‌‌
  reject‌‌
  an‌‌
  act‌‌
  or‌‌
  law,‌‌
  or‌‌
  part‌‌ thereof,‌‌ passed‌‌ 
party‌  ‌convicted‌  ‌shall‌  ‌nevertheless‌  ‌be‌  ‌liable‌  ‌and‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌‌  by‌‌Congress;‌‌and‌  ‌
It‌  ‌bears‌  ‌stressing‌  ‌that,‌  ‌unlike‌  ‌the‌  ‌process‌  ‌of‌  ‌inquiry‌  ‌in‌  ‌aid‌  ‌of‌‌  prosecution,‌‌trial,‌‌and‌‌punishment,‌‌according‌‌to‌‌law.‌‌   ‌
legislation‌‌   where‌‌ the‌‌ rights‌‌ of‌‌ witnesses‌‌ are‌‌ involved,‌‌ ‌impeachment‌‌  b. Referendum‌‌   on‌‌
  ‌local‌‌
  law‌‌
  ‌which‌‌
  refers‌‌
  to‌‌
  a ‌‌petition‌‌ to‌‌ 
is‌  ‌primarily‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌protection‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌body‌  ‌politic‌, ‌‌ Barcenas‌‌v.‌‌House‌‌of‌‌Representatives‌  ‌ approve‌  ‌or‌  ‌reject‌  ‌a ‌ ‌law,‌  ‌resolution‌  ‌or‌  ‌ordinance‌‌ 
and‌‌not‌‌for‌‌the‌‌punishment‌‌of‌‌the‌‌offender.‌  ‌ enacted‌  ‌by‌  ‌regional‌  ‌assemblies‌  ‌and‌  ‌local‌  ‌legislative‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌3 ‌ ‌(1)‌  ‌of‌  ‌Art‌  ‌XI‌  ‌speaks‌  ‌of‌  ‌initiating‌‌
  "‌cases‌‌
  of‌‌
  impeachment"‌‌ 
The‌‌one-year‌‌bar‌‌rule‌  ‌ bodies.‌  ‌
while‌  ‌Section‌  ‌3 ‌ ‌(5)‌  ‌pertains‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌initiation‌  ‌of‌  ‌"impeachment‌‌ 
proceedings‌."‌  ‌"Cases,"‌  ‌no‌  ‌doubt,‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌those‌  ‌filed‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌‌  4. "‌Proposition‌"‌‌is‌‌the‌‌measure‌‌proposed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌voters.‌  ‌
Article‌  ‌XI,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌3,‌  ‌paragraph‌  ‌(5)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌reads:‌  ‌"No‌‌ 
impeachment‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌initiated‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  Senate.‌  ‌Its‌  ‌use‌  ‌and‌  ‌its‌  ‌sense‌  ‌are‌  ‌consistent‌  ‌throughout‌  ‌Section‌  ‌3.‌‌  5. "‌Plebiscite‌" ‌ ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌
  electoral‌‌
  process‌‌
  by‌‌
  which‌‌
  an‌‌
  initiative‌‌
  on‌‌ 
official‌‌more‌‌than‌‌once‌‌within‌‌a‌‌period‌‌of‌‌one‌‌year."‌  ‌ Thus,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌3(6)‌  ‌states,‌  ‌“The‌  ‌Senate‌  ‌shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌sole‌‌   power‌‌  to‌‌ 
the‌‌Constitution‌‌is‌‌approved‌‌or‌‌rejected‌‌by‌‌the‌‌people.‌  ‌
decide‌  ‌all‌  ‌cases‌  ‌[not‌  ‌"proceedings"]‌  ‌of‌‌   impeachment."‌‌   Section‌‌
  3(7)‌‌ 
Francisco‌  states‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌term‌  ‌"‌initiate‌" ‌ ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  provides,‌  ‌"Judgment‌  ‌in‌  ‌cases‌  ‌[not‌  ‌"proceedings"]‌  ‌of‌  ‌impeachment‌  6. To‌‌exercise‌‌the‌‌power‌‌of‌‌initiative‌‌or‌‌referendum,‌‌   ‌
impeachment‌‌   complaint‌‌   coupled‌‌   with‌‌
  Congress'‌‌  taking‌‌   initial‌‌  action‌‌  shall‌‌
  not‌‌
  extend‌‌ further‌‌ than‌‌ removal‌‌ from‌‌ office‌‌ and‌‌ disqualification‌‌ 
of‌  ‌said‌  ‌complaint.‌  ‌The‌  ‌initial‌  ‌action‌  ‌taken‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌House‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌  a. at‌‌
  least‌‌
  ‌ten‌‌ per‌‌ centum‌‌ (10%)‌‌ ‌of‌‌ the‌‌ total‌‌ number‌‌ of‌‌ 
to‌‌hold‌‌any‌‌office...."‌  ‌
complaint‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌referral‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌to‌‌
  the‌‌   Committee‌‌   on‌‌  the‌‌registered‌‌voters,‌‌   ‌
Justice‌. ‌ ‌ I.‌‌Initiative‌‌and‌‌Referendum‌  ‌ b. of‌‌
  which‌‌   every‌‌
  legislative‌‌
  district‌‌  is‌‌
  represented‌‌ by‌‌ at‌‌ 
Referring‌  ‌the‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌proper‌  ‌committee‌  ‌ignites‌  ‌the‌‌  least‌‌
  ‌three‌‌   per‌‌
  centum‌‌ (3%)‌‌ ‌of‌‌ the‌‌ registered‌‌ voters‌‌ 
impeachment‌‌ proceeding‌. ‌‌ With‌‌ a ‌‌‌simultaneous‌‌ referral‌‌ of‌‌ multiple‌‌  RA‌‌No.‌‌6735‌‌‌or‌‌the‌‌The‌‌Initiative‌‌and‌‌Referendum‌‌Act.‌  ‌
thereof,‌‌   ‌
complaints‌‌   filed,‌‌
  more‌‌  than‌‌   one‌‌
  lighted‌‌
  matchsticks‌‌   light‌‌
  the‌‌
  candle‌‌  1. "‌Initiative‌" ‌ ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌to‌  ‌propose‌‌  c. shall‌  ‌sign‌  ‌a ‌ ‌petition‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌and‌  ‌register‌  ‌the‌‌ 
at‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌  time. ‌‌
  ‌What‌‌  is‌‌ important‌‌ is‌‌ that‌‌ there‌‌ should‌‌ only‌‌ be‌‌ 
amendments‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌  ‌propose‌  ‌and‌  ‌enact‌‌  same‌‌with‌‌the‌‌Comelec.‌  ‌
ONE‌‌   CANDLE‌‌ that‌‌ is‌‌ kindled‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌year,‌‌ such‌‌ that‌‌ once‌‌ the‌‌ candle‌‌ 
starts‌‌   burning,‌‌  subsequent‌‌   matchsticks‌‌ can‌‌ no‌‌ longer‌‌ rekindle‌‌  legislations‌‌through‌‌an‌‌election‌‌called‌‌for‌‌the‌‌purpose.‌  ‌
7. A‌‌petition‌‌for‌‌an‌‌initiative‌‌on‌‌the‌‌1987‌‌Constitution‌‌must‌‌have‌‌   ‌
the‌‌candle‌. ‌ ‌ There‌‌are‌‌three‌‌(3)‌‌systems‌‌of‌‌initiative,‌‌namely:‌  ‌
a. at‌  ‌least‌  ‌twelve‌  ‌per‌  ‌centum‌  ‌(12%)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌total‌‌ 
Indubitably,‌‌
  an‌‌
  impeachment‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ a ‌‌judicial‌‌ proceeding,‌‌ but‌‌ rather‌‌ a ‌‌ a. Initiative‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌which‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌ number‌‌of‌‌registered‌‌voters‌‌as‌‌signatories,‌‌   ‌
political‌‌exercise‌.‌‌(‌Resolution‌) ‌ ‌ petition‌‌proposing‌‌amendments‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Constitution;‌  ‌
b. of‌‌
  which‌‌   every‌‌ legislative‌‌ district‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ represented‌‌ 
b. Initiative‌  ‌on‌  ‌statutes‌  ‌which‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌petition‌‌  by‌  ‌at‌‌
  least‌‌
  ‌three‌‌
  per‌‌
  centum‌‌   (3%)‌‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  registered‌‌ 
Gonzales‌‌III‌‌v.‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President‌‌2
‌ 014‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
proposing‌‌to‌‌enact‌‌a‌‌national‌‌legislation;‌‌and‌  ‌ voters‌‌therein.‌  ‌
Section‌  ‌8(2)‌  ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌No.‌  ‌6770‌  ‌vesting‌  ‌disciplinary‌  ‌authority‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  c. Initiative‌  ‌on‌  ‌local‌  ‌legislation‌  ‌which‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌
President‌‌   over‌‌  the‌‌
  Deputy‌‌   Ombudsman‌‌   violates‌‌ the‌‌ independence‌‌ of‌‌  Garcia‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌
petition‌‌
  proposing‌‌   to‌‌
  enact‌‌
  a ‌‌regional,‌‌ provincial,‌‌ city,‌‌ 
the‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Ombudsman‌‌and‌‌is‌‌thus‌u ‌ nconstitutional‌. ‌ ‌
municipal,‌‌or‌‌barangay‌‌law,‌r‌ esolution‌‌or‌‌ordinance‌. ‌ ‌ The‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌clearly‌  ‌includes‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌ordinances‌  ‌but‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Ombudsman,‌  ‌by‌  ‌express‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌mandate,‌‌  resolutions‌a‌ s‌‌appropriate‌‌subjects‌‌of‌‌a‌‌local‌‌initiative.‌  ‌
includes‌  ‌its‌  ‌key‌  ‌officials,‌  ‌all‌  ‌of‌  ‌them‌  ‌tasked‌  ‌to‌  ‌support‌  ‌the‌‌   ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 27‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Sec‌  ‌4.‌  ‌The‌  ‌President‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌Vice-President‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌elected‌  ‌by‌‌ 
VI.‌‌EXECUTIVE‌‌DEPARTMENT‌  ‌ objectives.‌   ‌ ‌
direct‌  ‌vote‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌term‌‌
  of‌‌
  ‌6 ‌‌years‌‌
  xxx.‌‌
  The‌‌
  President‌‌  2. Another‌‌   variety‌‌
  is‌‌ the‌‌ ‌informer's‌‌ privilege‌, ‌‌or‌‌ the‌‌ privilege‌‌ 
A.‌‌Qualifications,‌‌election,‌‌and‌‌term‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President‌‌and‌‌  shall‌n‌ ot‌‌be‌‌eligible‌‌for‌‌any‌‌re-election‌.  ‌‌ ‌ of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Government‌  ‌not‌  ‌to‌  ‌disclose‌  ‌the‌  ‌identity‌  ‌of‌  ‌persons‌ 
No‌‌  person‌‌   who‌‌
  has‌‌  succeeded‌‌   as‌‌
  President‌‌  and‌‌
  has‌‌ served‌‌ as‌‌ such‌‌  who‌  ‌furnish‌  ‌information‌  ‌of‌  ‌violations‌  ‌of‌  ‌law‌  ‌to‌  ‌officers‌‌ 
Vice-President‌  ‌
charged‌‌with‌‌the‌‌enforcement‌‌of‌‌that‌‌law.‌‌   ‌
for‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌‌
  4 ‌‌years‌‌
  ‌shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  qualified‌‌
  for‌‌
  election‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌ 
B.‌‌Privileges,‌‌inhibitions,‌‌and‌‌disqualifications‌  ‌ 3. Finally,‌‌a‌g
‌ eneric‌‌privilege‌‌‌for‌‌internal‌‌deliberations.‌  ‌
office‌‌at‌‌any‌‌time.‌  ‌
C.‌‌Powers‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President‌  ‌ Executive‌  ‌privilege‌, ‌ ‌whether‌  ‌asserted‌  ‌against‌  ‌Congress,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
No‌‌Vice-President‌‌shall‌‌serve‌‌for‌‌more‌‌than‌2
‌ ‌‌successive‌‌terms‌.  ‌‌ ‌
General‌‌executive‌‌and‌‌administrative‌‌powers‌  ‌ courts,‌‌ or‌‌ the‌‌ public‌, ‌‌is‌‌ recognized‌‌ only‌‌ in‌‌ relation‌‌ to‌‌ ‌certain‌‌ types‌‌ 
B.‌‌Privileges,‌‌inhibitions,‌‌and‌‌disqualifications‌  ‌ of‌  ‌information‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌sensitive‌‌   character.‌‌   While‌‌  executive‌‌   privilege‌‌ 
Power‌‌of‌‌appointment‌  ‌ is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌constitutional‌  ‌concept,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌claim‌  ‌thereof‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌valid‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌‌ 
Presidential‌‌immunity‌  ‌
Power‌‌of‌‌control‌‌and‌‌supervision‌  ‌ depending‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌ground‌  ‌invoked‌  ‌to‌  ‌justify‌  ‌it‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌context‌  ‌in‌‌ 
⭐‌De‌‌Lima‌‌v.‌‌Duterte‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ which‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌made.‌  ‌Indeed,‌  ‌the‌  ‌extraordinary‌  ‌character‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Emergency‌‌powers‌  ‌ exemptions‌  ‌indicates‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌presumption‌  ‌inclines‌  ‌heavily‌‌ 
The‌  ‌concept‌  ‌of‌  ‌presidential‌  ‌immunity‌  ‌under‌  ‌our‌  ‌governmental‌‌   and‌‌  against‌‌executive‌‌secrecy‌‌‌and‌‌‌in‌‌favor‌‌of‌‌disclosure‌. ‌ ‌
Commander-in-chief‌‌powers‌  ‌ constitutional‌  ‌system‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌distinguish‌  ‌whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌suit‌‌ 
pertains‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌official‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President.‌  ‌Neither‌  ‌does‌  ‌immunity‌‌  Section‌  ‌2(b)‌  ‌of‌  ‌E.O.‌  ‌464‌  ‌virtually‌  ‌states‌  ‌that‌  ‌executive‌  ‌privilege‌‌ 
Executive‌‌clemency‌  ‌
hinge‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌nature‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  suit.‌‌   The‌‌  lack‌‌
  of‌‌
  distinctions‌‌  prevents‌‌  us‌‌  actually‌  ‌covers‌  ‌persons‌. ‌ ‌Such‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌misuse‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌. ‌‌
Diplomatic‌‌power‌  ‌ from‌‌making‌‌any‌‌distinctions.‌  ‌ Executive‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌is‌  ‌properly‌  ‌invoked‌  ‌in‌  ‌relation‌  ‌to‌  ‌specific‌‌ 
categories‌‌of‌‌information‌‌‌and‌‌‌not‌‌to‌‌categories‌‌of‌‌persons‌. ‌ ‌
Powers‌‌relative‌‌to‌‌appropriation‌‌measures‌  ‌ Separate‌‌concurring‌‌of‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
A‌  ‌claim‌  ‌of‌  ‌privilege,‌  ‌being‌  ‌a ‌ ‌claim‌  ‌of‌  ‌exemption‌  ‌from‌  ‌an‌‌ 
Delegated‌‌powers‌  ‌ Presidential‌  ‌immunity‌  ‌from‌‌   suit‌‌
  only‌‌
  extends‌‌  to‌‌  civil,‌‌
  criminal,‌‌   and‌‌  obligation‌  ‌to‌  ‌disclose‌  ‌information,‌  ‌must,‌  ‌therefore,‌  ‌be‌  ‌clearly‌‌ 
administrative‌  ‌liability.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌proceeding‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌writ‌  ‌of‌‌  asserted.‌  ‌
Residual‌‌powers‌  ‌
habeas‌‌data,‌‌as‌‌in‌‌this‌‌case,‌‌does‌‌not‌‌determine‌‌any‌‌such‌‌liability.‌  ‌
Veto‌‌powers‌  ‌ In‌  ‌light‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌highly‌  ‌exceptional‌  ‌nature‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌privilege,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌‌ 
However,‌  ‌the‌  ‌proper‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌habeas‌  ‌data‌  ‌case‌  ‌for‌‌  finds‌‌   it‌‌
  essential‌‌   ‌to‌‌
  limit‌‌
  to‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌ invoke‌‌ the‌‌ 
D.‌‌Rules‌‌of‌‌Succession‌  ‌ pronouncements‌‌   made‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  President‌‌
  in‌‌  his‌‌ official‌‌ capacity‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌  privilege‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌being‌  ‌an‌  ‌extraordinary‌  ‌power,‌  ‌it‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌‌ 
Executive‌  ‌Secretary‌, ‌ ‌following‌  ‌the‌  ‌ruling‌‌   in‌‌
  ‌Aguinaldo‌‌   v.‌‌
  Aquino‌  wielded‌‌only‌‌by‌‌the‌‌highest‌‌official‌‌in‌‌the‌‌executive‌‌hierarchy.‌  ‌
 ‌ III‌. ‌ ‌This‌  ‌is‌  ‌in‌  ‌accord‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌   president‌‌   should‌‌ 
not‌‌   be‌‌
  impleaded‌‌   in‌‌
  any‌‌  suit‌‌  during‌‌
  his‌‌   or‌‌  her‌‌
  incumbency‌, ‌‌as‌‌ 
A.‌‌Qualifications,‌‌election,‌‌and‌‌term‌‌of‌‌the‌‌  recently‌‌reiterated‌‌in‌K ‌ ilusang‌‌Mayo‌‌Uno‌‌v.‌‌Aquino‌‌III‌. ‌ ‌ ⭐‌Neri‌‌v.‌‌Executive‌‌Secretary‌  ‌
President‌‌and‌‌Vice-President‌  ‌ There‌‌are‌‌two‌‌(2)‌‌kinds‌‌of‌‌executive‌‌privilege‌  ‌
Presidential‌‌privilege‌  ‌
Sec‌‌2.‌N
‌ o‌‌person‌‌may‌‌be‌‌elected‌‌President‌‌unless‌‌he‌‌is‌‌   ‌ a) presidential‌  ‌communications‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌— ‌ ‌pertains‌  ‌to‌‌ 
⭐‌Senate‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌v.‌‌Ermita‌  ‌ communications,‌  ‌documents‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌materials‌‌
  that‌‌
  reflect‌‌ 
1. a‌‌natural-born‌c‌ itizen‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines,‌‌   ‌
presidential‌  ‌decision-making‌‌
  and‌‌
  deliberations‌‌  and‌‌
  that‌‌  the‌‌ 
Executive‌‌ privilege‌ ‌is‌‌ defined‌‌ as‌‌ "‌the‌‌ power‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Government‌‌  President‌‌believes‌‌should‌‌remain‌‌confidential.‌  ‌
2. a‌‌registered‌‌voter,‌‌   ‌
to‌  ‌withhold‌  ‌information‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌public,‌  ‌the‌  ‌courts,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌ 
3. able‌‌to‌‌read‌‌and‌‌write,‌‌   ‌ Congress‌."‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌"‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌and‌  ‌high-level‌‌  b) deliberative‌  ‌process‌  ‌privilege.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌includes‌  ‌advisory‌‌ 
executive‌  ‌branch‌  ‌officers‌  ‌to‌  ‌withhold‌  ‌information‌  ‌from‌‌  opinions,‌  ‌recommendations‌  ‌and‌  ‌deliberations‌  ‌comprising‌‌ 
4. at‌‌least‌‌40‌‌years‌‌of‌‌age‌o
‌ n‌‌the‌‌day‌‌of‌‌the‌‌election,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ part‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌process‌  ‌by‌  ‌which‌  ‌governmental‌  ‌decisions‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Congress,‌‌the‌‌courts,‌‌and‌‌ultimately‌‌the‌‌public‌."‌‌   ‌
5. a‌  ‌resident‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌for‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌10‌  ‌years‌‌  policies‌‌are‌‌formulated.‌  ‌
1. One‌  ‌variety‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌‌  secrets‌‌
  privilege‌‌ 
immediately‌‌preceding‌‌such‌‌election.‌  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  ground‌‌   that‌‌  the‌‌  information‌‌   is‌‌
  of‌‌
  such‌‌
  nature‌‌
  that‌‌ its‌‌  Congressional‌  ‌or‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌negation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌presidential‌‌ 
disclosure‌  ‌would‌  ‌subvert‌  ‌crucial‌  ‌military‌  ‌or‌  ‌diplomatic‌‌  communications‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌is‌  ‌always‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌greater‌  ‌scrutiny‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 28‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

than‌‌denial‌‌of‌‌the‌‌deliberative‌‌process‌‌privilege.‌  ‌ family‌  ‌is‌  ‌all-embracing‌  ‌and‌  ‌covers‌  ‌both‌  ‌public‌  ‌and‌  ‌private‌‌  agency‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Executive‌  ‌Department.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌the‌  ‌actions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
office‌‌or‌‌employment.‌  ‌ PCGG‌‌Chairman‌‌are‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌the‌‌review‌‌of‌‌the‌‌CPLC.‌  ‌
The‌‌   right‌‌  of‌‌  Congress‌‌
  or‌‌
  any‌‌
  of‌‌ its‌‌ Committees‌‌ to‌‌ obtain‌‌ information‌‌ 
in‌  ‌aid‌  ‌of‌  ‌legislation‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌equated‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌people's‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌‌  Section‌  ‌7,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌IX-B‌  ‌is‌  ‌meant‌  ‌to‌  ‌lay‌  ‌down‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌rule‌‌  The‌  ‌strict‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌13,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VII‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌1987‌‌ 
public‌  ‌information.‌  ‌The‌  ‌former‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌claim‌  ‌that‌  ‌every‌  ‌legislative‌‌  applicable‌  ‌to‌  ‌all‌  ‌elective‌  ‌and‌  ‌appointive‌  ‌public‌  ‌officials‌  ‌and‌‌  Constitution‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌PCGG‌‌
  Chairman‌‌   nor‌‌  to‌‌  the‌‌ 
inquiry‌‌is‌‌an‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌the‌‌people's‌‌right‌‌to‌‌information.‌  ‌ employees,‌‌   while‌‌   Section‌‌   13,‌‌ Article‌‌ VII‌‌ is‌‌ meant‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ the‌‌ ‌exception‌‌  CPLC‌. ‌ ‌However,‌  ‌Elma‌  ‌remains‌  ‌covered‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌prohibition‌‌ 
ap­plicable‌  ‌only‌‌   to‌‌  the‌‌
  President,‌‌   the‌‌
  Vice-President,‌‌   Members‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  under‌‌‌Section‌‌7,‌‌Article‌‌IX-B‌. ‌ ‌
The‌‌Claim‌‌of‌‌Executive‌‌Privilege‌‌is‌‌Properly‌‌Invoked‌  ‌
Cabinet,‌  ‌their‌‌   deputies‌‌   and‌‌  assistants.‌‌   The‌‌   phrase‌‌
  "unless‌‌   otherwise‌‌ 
Elma's‌  ‌concurrent‌  ‌appointments‌  ‌as‌  ‌PCGG‌  ‌Chairman‌  ‌and‌  ‌CPLC‌  ‌are‌‌ 
Jurisprudence‌  ‌teaches‌  ‌that‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌claim‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌properly‌  ‌invoked,‌‌  provided‌‌   in‌‌
  this‌‌ Constitution"‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ given‌‌ a ‌‌literal‌‌ interpre­tation‌‌ to‌‌ 
unconstitutional,‌‌   for‌‌
  being‌‌
  incompatible‌‌ offices.‌‌ This‌‌ ruling‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ 
there‌‌  must‌‌  be‌‌ a ‌‌formal‌‌ claim‌‌ of‌‌ privilege,‌‌ lodged‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ head‌‌ of‌‌  refer‌‌ only‌‌ to‌‌ those‌‌ particular‌‌ instances‌‌ cited‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Constitution‌‌ itself,‌‌ 
render‌  ‌both‌  ‌appointments‌  ‌void.‌  ‌Following‌‌   the‌‌
  common-law‌‌   rule‌‌  on‌‌ 
the‌‌
  department‌‌   which‌‌
  has‌‌  control‌‌ over‌‌ the‌‌ matter.‌‌ A ‌‌formal‌‌ and‌‌  to‌‌wit:‌   ‌ ‌
incompatibility‌  ‌of‌  ‌offices,‌  ‌Elma‌  ‌had,‌  ‌in‌  ‌effect,‌  ‌vacated‌  ‌his‌  ‌first‌‌ 
proper‌  ‌claim‌  ‌of‌  ‌executive‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌requires‌  ‌a ‌ ‌"precise‌  ‌and‌  ‌certain‌‌  1. the‌  ‌Vice-President‌  ‌being‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  office‌  ‌as‌  ‌PCGG‌  ‌Chairman‌  ‌when‌  ‌he‌  ‌accepted‌  ‌the‌  ‌second‌  ‌office‌  ‌as‌‌ 
reason"‌‌for‌‌preserving‌‌their‌‌confidentiality.‌  ‌ Cabinet‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌3,‌  ‌par(2),‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VII;‌  ‌or‌  ‌acting‌  ‌as‌‌  CPLC.‌  ‌
President‌‌   in‌‌
  those‌‌
  instances‌‌   provided‌‌
  under‌‌   Section‌‌ 7,‌‌ pars.‌ 
Prohibitions‌  ‌ (2)‌‌and‌‌(3),‌‌Article‌‌VII;‌‌and,‌‌   ‌
Funa‌‌v.‌‌Executive‌‌Secretary‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
Sec‌‌
  13.‌‌
  ‌The‌‌
  President,‌‌
  Vice-President,‌‌   the‌‌
  Members‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Cabinet,‌‌  2. the‌  ‌Secretary‌  ‌of‌  ‌Justice‌‌
  ‌being‌‌   an‌‌
  ex-officio‌‌   member‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
Judicial‌  ‌and‌  ‌Bar‌  ‌Council‌  ‌by‌  ‌virtue‌  ‌of‌  ‌Section‌  ‌8(1),‌  ‌Article‌‌  Respondent‌  ‌Bautista‌  ‌being‌  ‌then‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌Undersecretary‌  ‌of‌‌ 
and‌  ‌their‌  ‌deputies‌  ‌or‌  ‌assistants‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌, ‌ ‌unless‌  ‌otherwise‌‌  DOTC,‌‌   she‌‌
  was‌‌ thus‌‌ covered‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ stricter‌‌ prohibition‌‌ under‌‌ Section‌‌ 
VIII.‌  ‌
provided‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌Constitution‌, ‌ ‌hold‌  ‌ANY‌  ‌other‌  ‌office‌  ‌or‌‌  13,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VII‌  ‌and‌  ‌consequently‌  ‌she‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌invoke‌  ‌the‌  ‌exception‌‌ 
employment‌‌‌during‌‌their‌‌tenure‌.  ‌‌ ‌ If‌  ‌the‌  ‌functions‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌performed‌  ‌are‌  ‌merely‌  ‌inci­dental,‌‌  provided‌  ‌in‌  ‌Section‌  ‌7,‌  ‌paragraph‌  ‌2,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌IX-B‌  ‌where‌  ‌holding‌‌ 
remotely‌‌ related,‌‌ inconsistent,‌‌ incompatible,‌‌ or‌‌ other­wise‌‌ alien‌‌  another‌  ‌office‌  ‌is‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌primary‌  ‌functions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
They‌s‌ hall‌‌not‌,‌‌during‌‌said‌‌tenure,‌‌directly‌‌or‌‌indirectly,‌‌   ‌ to‌  ‌the‌  ‌primary‌  ‌function‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌cabinet‌  ‌official,‌  ‌such‌  ‌additional‌‌  position.‌‌   Neither‌‌   was‌‌  she‌‌
  designated‌‌   OIC‌‌  of‌‌
  MARINA‌‌   in‌‌ an‌‌ ex-officio‌‌ 
a) practice‌‌any‌‌other‌‌profession,‌  ‌ functions‌  ‌would‌  ‌fall‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌purview‌  ‌of‌  ‌"‌any‌  ‌other‌  ‌office‌" ‌‌ capacity,‌‌which‌‌is‌‌the‌‌exception‌‌recognized‌‌in‌C ‌ ivil‌‌Liberties‌‌Union‌. ‌ ‌
prohibited‌b ‌ y‌‌the‌‌Constitution.‌ 
b) participate‌‌in‌‌any‌‌business,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
In‌  ‌order‌‌
  that‌‌
  such‌‌
  additional‌‌
  duties‌‌  or‌‌
  functions‌‌   may‌‌  not‌‌  transgress‌‌  C.‌‌Powers‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President‌  ‌
c) be‌  ‌financially‌  ‌interested‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌contract‌  ‌with,‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌‌  the‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌embodied‌  ‌in‌  ‌Section‌  ‌13,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VII‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌1987‌‌ 
franchise,‌  ‌or‌  ‌special‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌granted‌‌  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  Government‌‌ 
General‌‌executive‌‌and‌‌administrative‌‌powers‌  ‌
Constitution,‌‌   ‌
or‌  ‌any‌  ‌subdivision,‌  ‌agency,‌  ‌or‌  ‌instrumentality‌  ‌thereof,‌‌  Section‌‌   1.‌‌
  ‌THE‌‌
  executive‌‌
  power‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  vested‌‌
  in‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ of‌‌ 
1. such‌‌
  additional‌‌
  duties‌‌
  or‌‌
  functions‌‌  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  required‌‌
  by‌‌ the‌ 
including‌‌GOCCs‌‌or‌‌their‌‌subsidiaries.‌  ‌ primary‌‌functions‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌official‌‌concerned,‌‌   ‌ the‌‌Philippines.‌  ‌
2. who‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌perform‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌ex-officio‌  ‌capacity‌  ‌as‌‌  Marcos‌‌v.‌‌Manglapus‌D
‌ ecision‌‌‌and‌R
‌ esolution‌  ‌
The‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌and‌  ‌relatives‌  ‌by‌  ‌consanguinity‌  ‌or‌  ‌affinity‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌ 
provided‌‌by‌‌law,‌‌   ‌
fourth‌‌   civil‌‌
  degree‌‌   ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌ President‌‌ shall‌‌ not,‌‌ during‌‌ his‌‌ tenure,‌‌ be‌‌  The‌‌
  powers‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  President‌‌
  cannot‌‌   be‌‌
  said‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  limited‌‌
  only‌‌
  to‌‌ the‌‌ 
appointed‌‌as‌‌   ‌ 3. without‌‌receiving‌‌any‌‌additional‌‌compensation‌‌‌therefor.‌  ‌ specific‌  ‌powers‌  ‌enumerated‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution.‌  ‌In‌  ‌other‌  ‌words,‌‌ 
executive‌  ‌power‌  ‌is‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌the‌  ‌sum‌  ‌of‌  ‌specific‌  ‌powers‌  ‌so‌‌ 
a) Members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitutional‌‌Commissions,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
Public‌‌Interest‌‌Center‌‌v.‌‌Elma‌D
‌ ecision‌‌‌and‌R
‌ esolution‌  ‌ enumerated‌. ‌ ‌
b) the‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Ombudsman,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
The‌  ‌crucial‌  ‌test‌  ‌in‌  ‌determining‌  ‌whether‌  ‌incompatibility‌  ‌exists‌‌  This‌‌
  is‌‌
  so,‌‌
  notwithstanding‌‌   the‌‌   avowed‌‌   intent‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ members‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
c) as‌  ‌Secretaries,‌  ‌Undersecretaries,‌  ‌chairmen‌  ‌or‌  ‌heads‌  ‌of‌‌  between‌‌   two‌‌
  offices‌‌
  was‌‌  laid‌‌
  out‌‌
  in‌People‌‌
    v.‌‌ Green‌‌ — ‌‌whether‌‌ one‌‌  Constitutional‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌of‌  ‌1986—to‌  ‌limit‌  ‌the‌  ‌powers‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
bureaus‌‌or‌‌offices,‌‌including‌‌GOCCs‌‌and‌‌their‌‌subsidiaries.‌  ‌ office‌‌  is‌‌
  ‌subordinate‌‌ ‌to‌‌ the‌‌ other,‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ sense‌‌ that‌‌ one‌‌ office‌‌ has‌‌ the‌‌  President,‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌result‌  ‌was‌  ‌a ‌ ‌limitation‌  ‌of‌  ‌specific‌  ‌powers‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
right‌‌to‌‌interfere‌‌with‌‌the‌‌other.‌  ‌ President,‌  ‌particularly‌  ‌those‌  ‌relating‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌commander-in-chief‌‌ 
Civil‌‌Liberties‌‌Union‌‌v.‌‌Executive‌‌Secretary‌  ‌ clause,‌  ‌but‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌diminution‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌grant‌  ‌of‌  ‌executive‌‌ 
In‌‌
  this‌‌
  case,‌‌
  ‌an‌‌
  incompatibility‌‌   exists‌‌
  between‌‌   the‌‌ positions‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  power.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌and‌  ‌his‌  ‌official‌‌  PCGG‌  ‌Chairman‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌CPLC.‌  ‌The‌  ‌PCGG‌  ‌is,‌  ‌without‌  ‌question,‌  ‌an‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 29‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

a) Members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitutional‌‌Commissions,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
Vinuya‌‌v.‌‌Romulo‌‌‌2010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ Rufino‌‌v.‌‌Endriga‌  ‌
b) the‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Ombudsman,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
The‌‌  Executive‌‌   Department‌‌   has‌‌
  determined‌‌   that‌‌ taking‌‌ up‌‌ petitioners'‌‌  The‌‌   President‌‌   appoints‌‌   the‌‌
  first‌‌ group‌‌ of‌‌ officers‌‌ ‌with‌‌ ‌the‌‌ consent‌ 
cause‌‌ would‌‌ be‌‌ inimical‌‌ to‌‌ our‌‌ country's‌‌ foreign‌‌ policy‌‌ interests,‌‌ and‌‌  of‌  ‌the‌  ‌CA.‌  ‌The‌  ‌President‌  ‌appoints‌‌   the‌‌  ‌second‌‌   and‌‌
  third‌‌   groups‌‌
  of‌‌  c) as‌  ‌Secretaries,‌  ‌Undersecretaries,‌  ‌chairmen‌  ‌or‌  ‌heads‌  ‌of‌‌ 
could‌  ‌disrupt‌  ‌our‌  ‌relations‌  ‌with‌  ‌Japan,‌  ‌thereby‌  ‌creating‌  ‌serious‌‌  officers‌‌   ‌without‌‌   ‌the‌‌
  consent‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   CA.‌‌  The‌‌  President‌‌   appoints‌‌
  the‌‌  bureaus‌‌or‌‌offices,‌‌including‌‌GOCCs‌‌and‌‌their‌‌subsidiaries.‌  ‌
implications‌  ‌for‌  ‌stability‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌region.‌  ‌For‌  ‌us‌  ‌to‌  ‌overturn‌  ‌the‌‌  third‌  ‌group‌  ‌of‌  ‌officers‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌is‌  ‌silent‌‌   on‌‌
  who‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  appointing‌‌ 
Executive‌‌   Department's‌‌   determination‌‌   would‌‌   mean‌‌ an‌‌ assessment‌‌ of‌‌  power,‌  ‌or‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌authorizing‌  ‌the‌  ‌head‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌department,‌  ‌agency,‌‌  Sec‌  ‌15.‌‌
  ‌Two‌‌
  months‌‌   immediately‌‌   before‌‌  the‌‌   next‌‌
  presidential‌‌ 
the‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌policy‌  ‌judgments‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌coordinate‌  ‌political‌  ‌branch‌  ‌to‌‌  commission,‌‌   or‌‌  board‌‌   to‌‌
  appoint‌‌   is‌‌  declared‌‌   unconstitutional.‌‌ Thus,‌‌  elections‌  ‌and‌  ‌up‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌end‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌term‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌President‌  ‌or‌  ‌Acting‌‌ 
which‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌  ‌that‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌constitutionally‌‌  if‌  ‌Section‌  ‌6(b)‌  ‌and‌  ‌(c)‌  ‌of‌  ‌PD‌  ‌15‌  ‌is‌  ‌found‌  ‌unconstitutional,‌  ‌the‌‌  President‌s‌ hall‌‌not‌‌make‌‌appointments‌,‌‌except‌‌   ‌
committed.‌  ‌ President‌  ‌shall‌  ‌appoint‌  ‌the‌  ‌trustees‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌CCP‌  ‌Board‌  ‌because‌  ‌the‌‌ 
trustees‌‌fall‌‌under‌‌the‌‌third‌‌group‌‌of‌‌officers.‌  ‌ a) temporary‌‌appointments‌‌   ‌
Power‌‌of‌‌appointment‌  ‌ b) to‌‌executive‌‌positions‌‌   ‌
The‌  ‌CCP‌  ‌must‌  ‌fall‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Executive‌  ‌branch.‌  ‌Under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Revised‌‌ 
In‌‌general‌  ‌ Administrative‌‌   Code‌‌   of‌‌
  1987,‌‌  any‌‌
  agency‌‌ "not‌‌ placed‌‌ by‌‌ law‌‌ or‌‌ order‌‌  c) when‌  ‌continued‌  ‌vacancies‌  ‌therein‌  ‌will‌  ‌prejudice‌  ‌public‌‌ 
creating‌‌   them‌‌
  under‌‌   any‌‌  specific‌‌
  department"‌‌   falls‌‌
  "under‌‌   the‌‌
  Office‌‌  service‌‌or‌‌endanger‌‌public‌‌safety.‌  ‌
Gov‌‌of‌‌Phil‌‌Islands‌‌v.‌‌Springer‌  ‌
of‌‌the‌‌President."‌  ‌
Appointment‌‌   to‌  ‌office‌‌
  is‌‌ intrinsically‌‌ an‌‌ executive‌‌ act‌‌ involving‌‌  Section‌  ‌6(b)‌  ‌and‌  ‌(c)‌  ‌of‌  ‌PD‌  ‌15‌  ‌makes‌  ‌the‌  ‌CCP‌  ‌a ‌ ‌self-perpetuating‌‌  De‌‌Castro‌‌v.‌‌JBC‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
the‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌discretion.‌‌   ‌ entity,‌  ‌virtually‌  ‌outside‌  ‌the‌  ‌control‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌  President.‌‌   ‌Such‌‌
  a ‌‌public‌‌ 
Prohibition‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌15,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VII‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌apply‌  ‌to‌‌ 
office‌  ‌or‌  ‌board‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌legally‌  ‌exist‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌1987‌‌ 
With‌‌Concurrence‌‌of‌‌CA‌‌
   ‌ appointments‌‌   to‌‌
  fill‌‌
  a ‌‌vacancy‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Supreme‌‌ Court‌‌ or‌‌ to‌‌ other‌‌ 
Constitution‌. ‌ ‌
appointments‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Judiciary.‌  ‌
Art‌  ‌VII‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌16.‌  ‌The‌  ‌President‌  ‌shall‌  ‌nominate‌  ‌and,‌  ‌WITH‌  ‌the‌‌ 
consent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Commission‌‌on‌‌Appointments‌,‌‌appoint‌‌   ‌ Upon‌‌recommendation‌‌of‌‌JBC‌‌
   ‌ Given‌‌
  the‌‌
  background‌‌   and‌‌   rationale‌‌
  for‌‌  the‌‌ prohibition‌‌ in‌‌ Section‌‌ 15,‌‌ 
a) Members‌‌   of‌‌
  SC‌‌  and‌‌
  all‌‌
  other‌‌
  courts.‌‌
  — ‌‌Art‌‌   VIII‌‌   Sec‌‌
  9.‌‌ ‌The‌‌  Article‌  ‌VII,‌  ‌we‌  ‌have‌  ‌no‌  ‌doubt‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitutional‌  ‌Commission‌‌ 
a) the‌‌heads‌‌of‌‌the‌‌executive‌‌departments,‌‌   ‌ confined‌  ‌the‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌to‌  ‌appointments‌  ‌made‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Members‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ Supreme‌‌ Court‌‌ and‌‌ judges‌‌ of‌‌ lower‌‌ courts‌‌ shall‌‌ 
b) ambassadors,‌‌other‌‌public‌‌ministers‌‌and‌‌consuls,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ Executive‌  ‌Department.‌  ‌The‌  ‌framers‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌need‌  ‌to‌  ‌extend‌  ‌the‌‌ 
be‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌list‌  ‌of‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌three‌‌  prohibition‌  ‌to‌  ‌appointments‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Judiciary,‌  ‌because‌  ‌their‌‌ 
c) officers‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌armed‌  ‌forces‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌rank‌  ‌of‌  ‌colonel‌  ‌or‌‌  nominees‌  ‌preferred‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Judicial‌  ‌and‌  ‌Bar‌  ‌Council‌  ‌for‌‌   every‌‌  establishment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌JBC‌  ‌ensured‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌  ‌would‌  ‌no‌  ‌longer‌  ‌be‌‌ 
naval‌‌captain,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ vacancy.‌S‌ uch‌‌appointments‌‌need‌‌no‌‌confirmation.‌  ‌ midnight‌‌appointments‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Judiciary.‌‌   ‌
d) other‌  ‌officers‌  ‌whose‌  ‌appointments‌  ‌are‌  ‌vested‌  ‌in‌  ‌him‌  ‌in‌‌  b) Ombudsman‌  ‌and‌  ‌deputies.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Art‌  ‌XI‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌9.‌  ‌The‌‌ 
Types‌‌of‌‌appointment‌  ‌
this‌‌Constitution.‌‌   ‌ Ombudsman‌  ‌and‌  ‌his‌  ‌Deputies‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
President‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌list‌  ‌of‌  ‌at‌‌
  least‌‌
  six‌‌
  nominees‌‌
  prepared‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌  Interim‌‌or‌‌recess‌‌appointments‌‌    ‌
i) The‌‌   regular‌‌
  members‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  JBC‌‌
  shall‌‌ be‌‌ appointed‌‌ by‌‌ 
the‌‌  President‌‌   for‌‌
  a ‌‌term‌‌  of‌‌ four‌‌ years‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ consent‌‌  JBC,‌  ‌and‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌list‌  ‌of‌  ‌three‌  ‌nominees‌  ‌for‌  ‌every‌  ‌vacancy‌‌  Art‌  V
‌ II‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌16(2).‌  ‌The‌  ‌President‌  ‌shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌CA.‌‌(A
‌ rt‌‌VIII‌‌Sec‌‌8[2]‌) ‌ ‌ thereafter.‌  ‌Such‌  ‌appointments‌  ‌shall‌  ‌require‌  ‌no‌‌  appointments‌‌   during‌‌   the‌‌
  recess‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ Congress,‌‌ whether‌‌ voluntary‌‌ 
confirmation.‌  ‌All‌  ‌vacancies‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌filled‌  ‌within‌  ‌three‌‌  or‌‌
  compulsory,‌‌   but‌‌
  such‌‌  appointments‌‌   shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  effective‌‌   only‌‌ until‌‌ 
He‌‌shall‌‌also‌‌appoint‌‌   ‌
months‌‌after‌‌they‌‌occur.‌  ‌ disapproved‌‌   by‌‌   the‌‌
  Commission‌‌   on‌‌  Appointments‌‌   or‌‌ until‌‌ the‌‌ next‌‌ 
a) all‌  ‌other‌  ‌officers‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  Government‌‌
  whose‌‌
  appointments‌‌  adjournment‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Congress.‌  ‌
Limitations‌‌    ‌
are‌‌not‌‌otherwise‌‌provided‌‌for‌‌by‌‌law,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
Prohibition‌‌against‌‌Nepotism‌‌and‌‌Midnight‌‌Appointments‌  ‌ Guevara‌‌v.‌‌Inocentes‌  ‌
b) those‌‌whom‌‌he‌‌may‌‌be‌‌authorized‌‌by‌‌law‌‌to‌‌appoint.‌‌   ‌
Sec‌  ‌13[2].‌  ‌The‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌and‌  ‌relatives‌  ‌by‌  ‌consanguinity‌  ‌or‌‌  It‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌clear‌  ‌intent‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌framers‌  ‌of‌  ‌our‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌  ‌a ‌‌
The‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌may,‌  ‌by‌‌   law,‌‌
  vest‌‌
  the‌‌
  appointment‌‌   of‌‌  ‌other‌‌   officers‌‌  recess‌‌appointment‌‌‌effective‌‌only‌‌   ‌
affinity‌‌
  within‌‌
  the‌‌  fourth‌‌
  civil‌‌
  degree‌‌
  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌ President‌‌ shall‌‌ not,‌‌ 
lower‌‌   in‌‌ rank‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ alone,‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ courts,‌‌ or‌‌ ‌in‌‌ the‌‌ heads‌‌ 
during‌‌his‌‌tenure,‌‌be‌‌appointed‌‌as‌‌   ‌ a) until‌‌disapproval‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Commission‌‌on‌‌Appointments,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
of‌‌departments,‌‌agencies,‌‌commissions,‌‌or‌‌boards.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 30‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

b) until‌  ‌the‌  ‌next‌  ‌adjournment‌  ‌of‌  ‌Congress,‌  ‌and‌  ‌never‌  ‌a ‌ ‌day‌‌  President‌  ‌is‌  ‌free‌  ‌to‌  ‌renew‌  ‌the‌  ‌ad‌  ‌interim‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌
a. However,‌  ‌Members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Supreme‌  ‌Court‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 
longer‌‌regardless‌‌of‌‌the‌‌nature‌‌of‌‌the‌‌session‌‌adjourned.‌  ‌ by-passed‌‌appointee.‌  ‌
removed‌‌  after‌‌
  ‌impeachment‌‌   ‌proceedings‌‌
  initiated‌‌ 
It‌  ‌is‌  ‌well‌  ‌settled‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌can‌‌  by‌‌Congress‌‌(Sec‌‌2‌‌Art‌‌XI),‌‌   ‌
De‌‌Rama‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ renew‌‌the‌‌ad‌‌interim‌‌appointments‌‌of‌‌by-passed‌‌appointees.‌‌   ‌
b. while‌‌
  judges‌‌
  of‌‌
  lower‌‌
  courts‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  removed‌‌ only‌‌ 
There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌law‌  ‌that‌  ‌prohibits‌  ‌local‌  ‌elective‌  ‌officials‌  ‌from‌  ‌making‌‌  The‌‌phrase‌‌“w
‌ ithout‌‌reappointment‌”‌‌applies‌‌only‌‌to‌‌one‌‌who‌‌   ‌ by‌‌the‌‌Supreme‌‌Court‌‌‌(Secs‌‌6‌‌and‌‌11,‌‌Art‌‌VIII).‌‌   ‌
appointments‌‌during‌‌the‌‌last‌‌days‌‌of‌‌his‌‌or‌‌her‌‌tenure.‌  ‌ 1. has‌‌been‌‌appointed‌b
‌ y‌‌the‌‌President‌‌and‌‌   ‌ 2. The‌  ‌Chairpersons‌  ‌and‌  ‌Commissioners‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Constitutional‌‌ 
The‌‌
  constitutional‌‌ prohibition‌‌ on‌‌ so-called‌‌ "midnight‌‌ appointments,"‌‌  2. confirmed‌‌   ‌by‌‌ the‌‌ CA,‌‌ ‌whether‌‌ or‌‌ not‌‌ such‌‌ person‌‌ completes‌‌  Commissions‌  ‌shall‌  ‌likewise‌‌   be‌‌
  appointed‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  President,‌‌ 
applies‌‌only‌‌to‌‌the‌‌President‌‌or‌‌Acting‌‌President.‌  ‌ his‌‌term‌‌of‌‌office.‌   ‌ ‌ but‌‌
  they‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  removed‌‌   only‌‌
  by‌‌
  ‌impeachment‌‌ ‌(Sec‌‌ 2 ‌‌Art‌‌ 
XI).‌‌   ‌
There‌‌
  must‌‌  be‌‌
  a ‌‌confirmation‌‌
  by‌‌ the‌‌ CA‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ previous‌‌ appointment‌‌ 
Matibag‌‌v.‌‌Benipayo‌  ‌ before‌‌the‌‌prohibition‌‌on‌‌reappointment‌‌can‌‌apply.‌  ‌ 3. The‌  ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌himself‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
President‌  ‌(Sec‌  ‌9 ‌ ‌Art‌  ‌XI)‌  ‌but‌  ‌may‌  ‌also‌  ‌be‌  ‌removed‌  ‌only‌‌
  by‌‌ 
An‌‌   ‌ad‌‌
  interim‌‌   appointment‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌‌permanent‌‌ ‌appointment‌‌ because‌‌ it‌‌  Temporary‌‌designations‌‌
   ‌ impeachment‌‌(Sec‌‌2‌‌Art‌‌XI).‌  ‌
takes‌  ‌effect‌  ‌immediately‌  ‌and‌  ‌can‌  ‌no‌  ‌longer‌  ‌be‌  ‌withdrawn‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
President‌‌   once‌‌   the‌‌
  appointee‌‌
  has‌‌   qualified‌‌  into‌‌ office.‌‌ The‌‌ fact‌‌ that‌‌ it‌‌  Administrative‌‌
  Code‌‌ of‌‌ 1987,‌‌ Book‌‌ III,‌‌ ‌SECTION‌‌ 17.‌‌ ‌Power‌‌ to‌‌ Issue‌‌  In‌  ‌giving‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌remove‌‌   a ‌‌Deputy‌‌  Ombudsman‌‌ 
is‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌confirmation‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌CA‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌alter‌  ‌its‌  ‌permanent‌‌  Temporary‌‌Designation‌.‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌ and‌‌   Special‌‌  Prosecutor,‌‌
  Congress‌‌   simply‌‌   laid‌‌
  down‌‌   in‌‌
  express‌‌
  terms‌‌ 
character.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Constitution‌‌   itself‌‌   makes‌‌
  an‌‌  ad‌‌
  interim‌‌   appointment‌‌  an‌  ‌authority‌  ‌that‌  ‌is‌  ‌already‌  ‌implied‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌President's‌‌ 
permanent‌  ‌in‌  ‌character‌  ‌by‌  ‌making‌  ‌it‌  ‌effective‌  ‌until‌  ‌disapproved‌‌   by‌‌  1) The‌  ‌President‌  ‌may‌‌
  temporarily‌‌   designate‌‌   an‌‌
  officer‌‌
  already‌‌
  in‌‌  constitutional‌‌ authority‌‌ to‌‌ appoint‌‌ the‌‌ aforesaid‌‌ officials‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Office‌‌ 
the‌‌CA‌‌or‌‌until‌‌the‌‌next‌‌adjournment‌‌of‌‌Congress.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌government‌  ‌service‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌  ‌competent‌  ‌person‌  ‌to‌‌  of‌‌the‌‌Ombudsman.‌  ‌
perform‌  ‌the‌  ‌functions‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌office‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌executive‌  ‌branch,‌‌ 
A‌‌
  distinction‌‌  is‌‌
  thus‌‌
  made‌‌   between‌‌   the‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  of‌‌
  such‌‌ presidential‌‌  Power‌‌of‌‌control‌‌and‌‌supervision‌  ‌
appointment‌‌to‌‌which‌‌is‌‌vested‌‌in‌‌him‌‌by‌‌law,‌‌when:‌‌   ‌
prerogative‌  ‌requiring‌  ‌confirmation‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌CA‌  ‌when‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌is‌  ‌in‌‌ 
session‌‌‌and‌‌when‌‌it‌‌is‌‌‌in‌‌recess‌.  ‌‌ ‌ Section‌  ‌17.‌  ‌The‌‌
  President‌‌
  shall‌‌   ‌control‌‌
  have‌‌   ‌of‌‌  all‌‌  the‌‌  executive‌‌ 
a) the‌  ‌officer‌  ‌regularly‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌
  office‌‌  is‌‌
  unable‌‌ 
to‌‌
  perform‌‌   his‌‌
  duties‌‌  by‌‌
  reason‌‌
  of‌‌  illness,‌‌  absence‌‌   or‌‌  departments,‌‌ bureaus,‌‌ and‌‌ offices.‌‌ He‌‌ shall‌‌ ensure‌‌ that‌‌ the‌ ‌laws‌‌ be‌‌ 
In‌‌
  the‌‌
  former,‌‌   the‌‌  President‌‌
  nominates,‌‌   and‌‌   only‌‌
  upon‌‌ the‌‌ consent‌‌ of‌‌ 
the‌  ‌CA‌  ‌may‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌thus‌  ‌named‌  ‌assume‌  ‌office.‌‌   It‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  so‌‌
  with‌‌  any‌‌other‌‌cause;‌‌or‌  ‌ faithfully‌‌executed‌. ‌ ‌
reference‌  ‌to‌  ‌ad‌  ‌interim‌  ‌appointments.‌‌   It‌‌
  takes‌‌
  effect‌‌  at‌‌
  once.‌‌
  Thus,‌‌ 
b) there‌‌exists‌‌a‌‌vacancy;‌  ‌ ⭐‌PIDS‌‌v.‌‌COA‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
the‌  ‌term‌  ‌“‌ad‌  ‌interim‌  ‌appointment‌”,‌  ‌as‌  ‌used‌  ‌in‌  ‌letters‌  ‌of‌‌ 
appointment‌  ‌signed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌President,‌  ‌means‌  ‌a ‌ ‌permanent‌‌  2) In‌  ‌no‌  ‌case‌  ‌shall‌  ‌a ‌ ‌temporary‌  ‌designation‌‌
  exceed‌‌
  one‌‌
  (1)‌‌  There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌‌
  absolute‌‌
  or‌‌
  categorical‌‌   rule‌‌
  stating‌‌  that‌‌
  a ‌‌Senior‌‌  Deputy‌‌ 
appointment‌  ‌made‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌meantime‌  ‌that‌‌  year.‌  ‌ Executive‌  ‌Secretary‌  ‌has‌  ‌no‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌‌
  act‌‌
  on‌‌
  his‌‌
  own‌‌  or‌‌
  in‌‌
  default‌‌
  of‌‌ 
Congress‌‌is‌i‌ n‌‌recess‌. ‌ ‌
Power‌‌to‌‌remove‌‌
   ‌ the‌  ‌Executive‌  ‌Secretary‌  ‌by‌  ‌authority‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌generally‌  ‌or‌‌ 
The‌‌Constitutionality‌‌of‌‌Renewals‌‌of‌‌Appointments‌  ‌ specifically.‌  ‌
Gonzales‌‌III‌‌v.‌‌OP‌‌2
‌ 012‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
There‌‌   is‌‌  no‌‌
  dispute‌‌   that‌‌  an‌‌
  ad‌‌
  interim‌‌  appointee‌‌
  disapproved‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌  While‌‌
  this‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌ true,‌‌ ‌the‌‌ authority‌‌ to‌‌ issue‌‌ the‌‌ exemption‌‌ must‌‌ 
CA‌‌  can‌‌  no‌‌ longer‌‌ be‌‌ extended‌‌ a ‌‌new‌‌ appointment.‌  ‌The‌‌ disapproval‌‌ is‌‌  Under‌‌ the‌‌ ‌doctrine‌‌ of‌‌ implication‌, ‌‌the‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌ appoint‌‌ carries‌‌ with‌‌  nonetheless‌  ‌be‌  ‌done‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌express‌  ‌designation‌  ‌and‌‌ 
a‌‌
  final‌‌
  decision‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ merits‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ CA‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ its‌‌ checking‌‌  it‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌remove.‌  ‌As‌  ‌a ‌ ‌general‌  ‌rule‌, ‌ ‌therefore,‌  ‌all‌  ‌officers‌‌  delegation‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌president‌  ‌through‌  ‌a ‌ ‌presidential‌  ‌or‌  ‌executive‌‌ 
power‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointing‌  ‌authority‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President.‌  ‌Since‌  ‌the‌‌  appointed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌President‌‌are‌‌also‌‌removable‌‌by‌‌him.‌‌   ‌ issuance.‌  ‌
Constitution‌‌   does‌‌   not‌‌  provide‌‌ for‌‌ any‌‌ appeal‌‌ from‌‌ such‌‌ decision,‌‌ the‌‌ 
The‌‌
  ‌exception‌‌
  ‌to‌‌
  this‌‌
  is‌‌
  when‌‌
  the‌‌ law‌‌ expressly‌‌ provides‌‌ otherwise.‌‌  Furthermore,‌  ‌it‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌stressed‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌Administrative‌  ‌Code‌‌ 
disapproval‌‌   is‌‌
  final‌‌   and‌‌   binding‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  appointee‌‌   as‌‌
  well‌‌  as‌‌ on‌ 
The‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌separates‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌‌
  to‌‌
  remove‌‌  from‌‌
  the‌‌  explicitly‌  ‌grants‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌sign‌  ‌papers‌  ‌by‌  ‌authority‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
the‌‌appointing‌‌power‌. ‌ ‌
President's‌‌power‌‌to‌‌appoint.‌‌   ‌ president‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌executive‌‌
  secretary‌. ‌‌‌It‌‌  grants‌‌
  no‌‌
  similar‌‌ authority‌‌ 
A‌  ‌by-passed‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌is‌  ‌one‌  ‌that‌  ‌has‌  ‌not‌  ‌been‌  ‌finally‌  ‌acted‌  to‌‌a‌‌senior‌‌deputy‌‌executive‌‌secretary‌. ‌ ‌
1. Under‌‌
  Sec‌‌  9 ‌‌Art‌‌
  VIII,‌‌
  the‌‌
  Members‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ Supreme‌‌ Court‌‌ and‌‌ 
upon‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  merits‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  CA‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌
  close‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ session‌‌ of‌‌ Congress.‌  ‌
judges‌‌of‌‌lower‌‌courts‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌appointed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌President.‌‌   ‌ There‌  ‌are‌  ‌powers‌  ‌vested‌  ‌in‌‌
  the‌‌
  President‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  Constitution‌‌
  which‌‌ 
There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌final‌  ‌decision‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌CA.‌  ‌Absent‌  ‌such‌  ‌decision,‌  ‌the‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 31‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

may‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌‌


  delegated‌‌
  to‌‌
  or‌‌
  exercised‌‌
  by‌‌
  an‌‌
  agent‌‌
  or‌‌
  alter‌‌
  ego‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  was‌‌about‌‌to‌‌be‌‌or‌‌had‌‌been‌‌committed;‌‌and‌  ‌ Code?‌  ‌NO.‌  ‌Section‌  ‌31‌  ‌contemplates‌‌
  "‌reorganization‌" ‌‌as‌‌
  limited‌‌
  by‌‌ 
President.‌  ‌ c) the‌‌
  superior‌‌
  ‌failed‌‌
  to‌‌ take‌‌ the‌‌ necessary‌‌ and‌‌ reasonable‌‌  the‌‌following‌‌functional‌‌and‌‌structural‌‌lines:‌‌   ‌
1. The‌‌declaration‌‌of‌‌martial‌‌law,‌‌   ‌ measures‌  ‌to‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌the‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌acts‌  ‌or‌  ‌punish‌  ‌the‌‌  1) restructuring‌  ‌the‌  ‌internal‌‌   organization‌‌
  of‌‌  the‌‌
  Office‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
2. the‌‌suspension‌‌of‌‌the‌‌writ‌‌of‌‌habeas‌‌corpus,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ perpetrators‌‌thereof.‌  ‌ President‌  ‌Proper‌  ‌by‌  ‌abolishing,‌  ‌consolidating‌  ‌or‌  ‌merging‌‌ 
In‌‌
  this‌‌
  case,‌‌
  since‌‌   Aquino‌‌  is‌‌ considered‌‌ a ‌‌superior‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ AFP‌‌ but‌‌ not‌‌  units‌  ‌thereof‌  ‌or‌  ‌transferring‌  ‌functions‌  ‌from‌  ‌one‌  ‌unit‌  ‌to‌‌ 
3. the‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌the‌‌pardoning‌‌power,‌‌   ‌
the‌‌  PNP‌‌  which‌‌  is‌‌ the‌‌ agency‌‌ involved‌‌ in‌‌ this‌‌ case,‌‌ the‌‌ first‌‌ element‌‌ is‌‌  another;‌  ‌
The‌  ‌list‌  ‌is‌‌
  by‌‌
  no‌‌
  means‌‌   exclusive,‌‌   but‌‌  there‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌  a ‌‌showing‌‌
  that‌‌  not‌‌satisfied.‌  ‌ 2) transferring‌‌any‌‌function;‌‌or‌‌   ‌
the‌‌
  executive‌‌   power‌‌  in‌‌ question‌‌ is‌‌ of‌‌ similar‌‌ gravitas‌‌ and‌‌ exceptional‌‌ 
import.‌  ‌ 3) transferring‌‌   any‌‌
  agency‌, ‌‌under‌‌
  the‌‌
  Office‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ President‌‌ 
Doctrine‌‌of‌‌qualified‌‌political‌‌agency‌  ‌
to‌‌any‌‌other‌‌Department‌‌or‌‌Agency‌‌or‌‌vice‌‌versa;‌  ‌
In‌  ‌this‌‌
  case,‌‌
  then‌‌  Executive‌‌   Secretary‌‌   Ermita,‌‌
  as‌‌
  the‌‌
  President's‌‌  alter‌‌  DENR‌‌v.‌‌DENR‌‌Employees‌  ‌
ego,‌  ‌had‌  ‌the‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌let‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌continue‌  ‌implementing‌  ‌its‌‌  The‌  ‌creation‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌office‌  ‌is‌  ‌nowhere‌  ‌mentioned‌, ‌ ‌much‌  ‌less‌‌ 
annual‌  ‌medical‌  ‌checkup‌  ‌program‌  ‌through‌  ‌enrollment‌  ‌with‌  ‌health‌‌  It‌  ‌is‌  ‌apropos‌  ‌to‌  ‌reiterate‌  ‌the‌  ‌elementary‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌qualified‌‌  envisioned‌‌in‌‌said‌‌provision.‌  ‌
maintenance‌  ‌organizations.‌  ‌Consequently,‌  ‌the‌  ‌exemption‌‌   granted‌‌  by‌‌  political‌  ‌agency‌. ‌ This‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌is‌  ‌corollary‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌control‌‌  While‌‌   the‌‌
  power‌‌   to‌‌ create‌‌ a ‌‌truth‌‌ commission‌‌ cannot‌‌ pass‌‌ muster‌‌ on‌‌ 
 v
Executive‌  ‌Secretary‌  ‌Ermita,‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌President's‌  ‌alter‌  ‌ego,‌  ‌is‌‌‌ alid‌. ‌‌It‌‌  power‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President‌‌‌as‌‌provided‌‌for‌‌under‌‌Article‌‌VII,‌‌Section‌‌17.‌  ‌ the‌‌   basis‌‌
  of‌‌
  P.D.‌‌ No.‌‌ 1416‌‌ as‌‌ amended‌‌ by‌‌ P.D.‌‌ No.‌‌ 1772,‌‌ ‌the‌‌ creation‌‌ 
will‌‌remain‌‌so,‌u ‌ nless‌‌disapproved‌‌or‌‌reprobated‌‌by‌‌the‌‌President‌. ‌ ‌ of‌  ‌the‌  ‌PTC‌‌   finds‌‌   justification‌‌   under‌‌  S
‌ ection‌‌   17,‌‌
  Article‌‌   VII‌‌  ‌of‌‌ 
In‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌at‌  ‌bar,‌  ‌the‌  ‌DENR‌  ‌Secretary‌  ‌can‌  ‌validly‌  ‌reorganize‌  ‌the‌‌ 
DENR‌‌   by‌‌  ordering‌‌   the‌‌  transfer‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌ DENR‌‌ XII‌‌ Regional‌‌ Offices‌‌ from‌‌  the‌‌   Constitution,‌‌   imposing‌‌   upon‌‌   the‌‌ President‌‌ the‌‌ duty‌‌ to‌‌ ensure‌‌ that‌‌ 
Nacino‌‌v.‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Ombudsman‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ Cotabato‌  ‌City‌  ‌to‌  ‌Koronadal,‌  ‌South‌  ‌Cotabato.‌  ‌The‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌‌  the‌‌laws‌‌are‌‌faithfully‌‌executed.‌‌(F ‌ aithful‌‌Execution‌‌Clause‌) ‌ ‌
authority‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌DENR‌  ‌Secretary,‌  ‌as‌‌   an‌‌  alter‌‌
  ego,‌‌
  is‌‌
  presumed‌‌  to‌‌
  be‌‌  One‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌powers‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌granted‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌‌ 
Aquino’s‌‌  actuations‌‌  do‌‌
  not‌‌
  constitute‌‌
  a ‌‌participation‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  planning‌‌ 
the‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter‌  ‌had‌‌  not‌‌
  expressly‌‌   repudiated‌‌  this‌  ‌constitutionally-mandated‌  ‌duty‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌create‌  ‌ad‌  ‌hoc‌‌ 
and‌  ‌implementation‌  ‌of‌  ‌Oplan‌  ‌Exodus‌  ‌since,‌  ‌as‌  ‌President‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
the‌‌same.‌  ‌ committees‌. ‌‌This‌‌   flows‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ obvious‌‌ need‌‌ to‌‌ ascertain‌‌ facts‌‌ and‌‌ 
Republic,‌‌  he‌‌
  does‌‌
  not‌‌  exercise‌‌  direct‌‌
  control‌‌  over‌‌ the‌‌ PNP‌‌ ‌under‌‌ 
the‌‌doctrine‌‌of‌‌qualified‌‌political‌‌agency.‌  ‌ In‌  ‌Chiongbian‌  ‌v.‌‌  Orbos‌, ‌‌this‌‌
  Court‌‌  stressed‌‌
  the‌‌
  rule‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  power‌‌  determine‌  ‌if‌  ‌laws‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌faithfully‌  ‌executed.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌in‌  ‌DOH‌  ‌v.‌‌ 
of‌‌  the‌‌
  President‌‌
  to‌‌
  reorganize‌‌  the‌‌ administrative‌‌ regions‌‌ carries‌‌ with‌‌  Camposano‌, ‌‌the‌‌   authority‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  President‌‌
  to‌‌
  create‌‌
  an‌‌ investigative‌‌ 
The‌‌  President‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  Republic‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Philippines‌‌   is‌‌
  NOT‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌  committee‌  ‌to‌  ‌look‌  ‌into‌  ‌the‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌charges‌  ‌filed‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌‌ 
it‌‌the‌‌power‌‌to‌‌determine‌‌the‌‌regional‌‌centers.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌chain‌  ‌of‌  ‌command‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌PNP.‌  ‌Under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌26‌  ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌No.‌‌  employees‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌
  DOH‌‌   for‌‌ the‌‌ anomalous‌‌ purchase‌‌ of‌‌ medicines‌‌ was‌‌ 
6975,‌‌   the‌‌
  command‌‌   and‌‌  direction‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ PNP‌‌ is‌‌ vested‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Chief‌‌ of‌  upheld.‌  ‌
the‌‌PNP.‌  ‌ ⭐‌PIDS‌‌v.‌‌COA‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
Local‌‌government‌‌units‌  ‌
The‌  ‌President's‌  ‌power‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌PNP‌  ‌is‌  ‌subsumed‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌general‌‌  The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌in‌  ‌Berdin‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Mascariñas‌  ‌expanded‌‌   the‌‌
  application‌‌   of‌‌ 
power‌‌   of‌‌
  control‌‌  and‌‌ supervision‌‌ ‌over‌‌ the‌‌ executive‌‌ department‌‌ of‌‌  the‌‌ doctrine‌‌ of‌‌ qualified‌‌ political‌‌ agency‌. ‌‌In‌‌ that‌‌ case,‌‌ the‌‌ doctrine‌‌  Art‌  ‌X ‌ ‌Sec‌  ‌4.‌  ‌The‌  ‌President‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌shall‌  ‌exercise‌ ‌
the‌‌
  government.‌‌   In‌‌ fact,‌‌ ‌Carpio‌‌ v.‌‌ Executive‌‌ Secretary‌‌ held‌‌ that‌‌ "‌the‌‌  was‌‌   extended‌‌   to‌‌
  cover‌‌
  the‌‌  Assistant‌‌
  Regional‌‌ Director‌‌ as‌‌ an‌‌ alter‌‌ ego‌‌  general‌‌supervision‌‌‌over‌‌local‌‌governments.‌‌xxx.‌  ‌
national‌  ‌police‌  ‌force‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌fall‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commander-in-Chief‌‌  of‌‌the‌‌Finance‌‌Secretary.‌  ‌
power‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌‌
  President.‌‌   As‌‌  a ‌‌civilian‌‌
  agency‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  government,‌‌
  it‌‌  is‌‌  Section‌  ‌16.‌  ‌The‌  ‌President‌  ‌shall‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌general‌‌
  supervision‌ ‌
While‌‌ this‌‌ Court‌‌ has‌‌ at‌‌ times‌‌ expanded‌‌ the‌‌ application‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ doctrine‌‌ 
only‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌‌  over‌  ‌autonomous‌  ‌regions‌  ‌to‌  ‌ensure‌  ‌that‌  ‌laws‌  ‌are‌  ‌faithfully‌‌ 
of‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌political‌  ‌agency,‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌remains‌  ‌limited‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
executive‌‌control‌."‌  ‌ executed.‌  ‌
President's‌‌   executive‌‌   secretary‌‌ and‌‌ other‌‌ Cabinet‌‌ secretaries.‌‌ It‌‌ ‌does‌‌ 
Command‌  ‌responsibility‌  ‌has‌  ‌a ‌ ‌technical‌  ‌meaning.‌  ‌In‌  ‌Saez‌, ‌ ‌We‌‌  not‌‌   extend‌‌   to‌‌
  deputy‌‌   executive‌‌
  secretaries‌‌   or‌‌
  assistant‌‌   deputy‌‌  Ganzon‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
ruled‌  ‌that‌  ‌to‌  ‌hold‌  ‌someone‌  ‌liable‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌command‌‌  secretaries.‌  ‌
responsibility,‌‌the‌‌following‌‌elements‌‌must‌‌obtain:‌‌   ‌ 1. Local‌  ‌autonomy,‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution,‌  ‌involves‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mere‌‌ 
Executive‌‌departments‌‌and‌‌offices‌  ‌ decentralization‌  ‌of‌  ‌administration‌, ‌ ‌not‌  ‌of‌  ‌power,‌  ‌in‌‌ 
a) the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌superior-subordinate‌  ‌relationship‌‌ 
between‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌as‌  ‌superior‌  ‌and‌‌
  the‌‌
  perpetrator‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  Biraogo‌‌v.‌‌Philippine‌‌Truth‌‌Commission‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ which‌  ‌local‌  ‌officials‌  ‌remain‌  ‌accountable‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌central‌‌ 
crime‌‌as‌‌his‌‌subordinate;‌  ‌ government‌‌in‌‌the‌‌manner‌‌the‌‌law‌‌may‌‌provide;‌  ‌
Does‌  ‌the‌  ‌creation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌PTC‌  ‌fall‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌ambit‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  power‌‌
  to‌‌  2. The‌‌new‌‌Constitution‌‌does‌‌not‌‌prescribe‌‌federalism;‌ 
b) the‌  ‌superior‌  ‌knew‌  ‌or‌  ‌had‌  ‌reason‌  ‌to‌  ‌know‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌‌  reorganize‌  ‌as‌  ‌expressed‌  ‌in‌‌   Section‌‌   31‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Revised‌‌   Administrative‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 32‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

a‌  ‌limited‌  ‌period‌  ‌and‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌such‌  ‌restrictions‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌may‌‌ 
3. The‌  ‌change‌  ‌in‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌language‌  ‌with‌  ‌respect‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  in‌‌Congress‌‌even‌‌in‌‌times‌‌of‌‌crisis.‌ 
prescribe,‌  ‌to‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌powers‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌and‌  ‌proper‌‌   to‌‌
  carry‌‌
  out‌‌
  a ‌‌
supervision‌‌   clause‌‌ was‌‌ meant‌‌ but‌‌ to‌‌ deny‌‌ legislative‌‌ control‌‌  declared‌‌   national‌‌  policy‌. ‌‌Unless‌‌
  sooner‌‌ withdrawn‌‌ by‌‌ resolution‌‌  Here,‌  ‌PP‌  ‌1017‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌authorize‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌‌ 
over‌  ‌local‌  ‌governments;‌  ‌it‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter‌  ‌from‌‌  of‌‌ the‌‌ Congress,‌‌ such‌‌ powers‌‌ shall‌‌ cease‌‌ upon‌‌ the‌‌ next‌‌ adjournment‌  emergency‌  ‌to‌  ‌temporarily‌  ‌take‌‌   over‌‌  or‌‌
  direct‌‌
  the‌‌
  operation‌‌   of‌‌ 
legislative‌‌  regulation‌‌   provided‌‌   regulation‌‌   is‌‌
  consistent‌‌   with‌‌  thereof.‌  ‌ any‌  ‌privately‌  ‌owned‌  ‌public‌  ‌utility‌  ‌or‌  ‌business‌  ‌affected‌  ‌with‌‌ 
the‌‌fundamental‌‌premise‌‌of‌‌autonomy;‌  ‌ public‌‌interest‌‌without‌‌authority‌‌from‌‌Congress‌. ‌ ‌
4. Since‌‌
  local‌‌  governments‌‌   remain‌‌
  accountable‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  national‌‌  Ampatuan‌‌v.‌‌Puno‌‌2
‌ 011‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌re‌‌Maguindanao‌‌Massacre‌  ‌
authority,‌‌
  the‌‌  latter‌‌
  may,‌‌
  by‌‌
  law,‌‌
  and‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌ manner‌‌ set‌‌ forth‌‌  The‌  ‌President‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌proclaim‌  ‌a ‌ ‌national‌  ‌emergency‌  ‌invoking‌  ‌Sec‌‌  Agan‌‌v.‌‌PIATCO‌  ‌
therein,‌‌impose‌‌disciplinary‌‌action‌‌against‌‌local‌‌officials;‌  ‌ 23(2)‌  ‌of‌  ‌Art‌  ‌VI,‌  ‌only‌  ‌a ‌ ‌state‌  ‌of‌  ‌emergency‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌three‌  ‌places‌‌ 
The‌  ‌temporary‌  ‌takeover‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌extends‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
5. "‌Supervision‌" ‌ ‌and‌  ‌"‌investigation‌" ‌ ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌inconsistent‌‌  mentioned.‌  ‌The‌  ‌calling‌  ‌out‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌armed‌  ‌forces‌  ‌to‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌or‌‌ 
operation‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  business‌‌  and‌‌
  not‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  ownership‌‌   thereof.‌‌  As‌‌
  such‌‌ 
terms:‌  ‌"investigation"‌‌  does‌‌
  not‌‌
  signify‌‌
  "‌control‌" ‌‌‌which‌‌
  the‌  suppress‌  ‌lawless‌  ‌violence‌  ‌in‌  ‌such‌  ‌places‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌power‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌ 
the‌  ‌government‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌  ‌compensate‌  ‌the‌  ‌private‌‌ 
President‌‌does‌‌not‌‌have.‌  ‌ Constitution‌  ‌directly‌  ‌vests‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌President.‌  ‌She‌‌   ‌did‌‌
  not‌‌
  need‌‌   a ‌‌
entity-owner‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌said‌  ‌business‌  ‌as‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌of‌‌ 
congressional‌‌authority‌t‌ o‌‌exercise‌‌the‌‌same.‌  ‌
ownership,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌permanent‌  ‌or‌  ‌temporary.‌  ‌The‌  ‌State‌  ‌in‌‌  effecting‌‌ 
Dadole‌‌v.‌‌COA‌  ‌ the‌‌temporary‌‌takeover‌‌is‌‌exercising‌‌its‌p ‌ olice‌‌power.‌  ‌
On‌‌declaring‌‌a‌‌state‌‌of‌‌national‌‌emergency‌‌in‌D
‌ avid‌‌v.‌‌Arroyo‌  ‌
Whether‌‌LBC‌‌55‌‌of‌‌the‌‌DBM‌‌is‌‌void‌‌for‌‌going‌‌beyond‌‌the‌‌ 
A‌  ‌distinction‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌drawn‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌President's‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌‌  Commander-in-chief‌‌powers‌  ‌
supervisory‌‌powers‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President‌  ‌
declare‌  ‌"‌a ‌ ‌state‌  ‌of‌  ‌national‌  ‌emergency‌" ‌ ‌and‌  ‌to‌  ‌exercise‌‌ 
In‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌law,‌  ‌supervision‌  ‌means‌  ‌overseeing‌  ‌or‌‌   the‌‌
  power‌‌  Graduated‌‌powers‌  ‌
emergency‌‌   powers‌. ‌‌To‌‌   the‌‌
  first,‌‌
  ‌Section‌‌
  18,‌‌
  Article‌‌
  VII‌‌
  grants‌‌ the‌‌ 
or‌  ‌authority‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌officer‌  ‌to‌  ‌see‌  ‌that‌  ‌subordinate‌  ‌officers‌  ‌perform‌‌  President‌  ‌such‌  ‌power,‌  ‌hence,‌  ‌no‌  ‌legitimate‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌objection‌‌  Sec‌  ‌18‌  ‌grants‌  ‌the‌  ‌President,‌  ‌as‌  ‌Commander-in-Chief,‌‌
  a ‌‌“‌sequence‌” ‌‌of‌‌ 
their‌  ‌duties.‌  ‌Control‌, ‌ ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand,‌  ‌means‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌  can‌‌be‌‌raised.‌‌But‌‌to‌‌the‌‌second,‌‌manifold‌‌constitutional‌‌issues‌‌arise.‌  ‌ “‌graduated‌‌powers.‌”‌‌From‌‌the‌‌most‌‌to‌‌the‌‌least‌‌benign,‌‌these‌‌are:‌‌   ‌
officer‌  ‌to‌  ‌alter‌  ‌or‌  ‌modify‌  ‌or‌‌
  nullify‌‌   or‌‌
  set‌‌
  aside‌‌
  what‌‌
  a ‌‌subordinate‌‌ 
President‌‌
  Arroyo‌‌
  ‌could‌‌
  validly‌‌
  declare‌‌   the‌‌
  existence‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌state‌‌ of‌‌  1. The‌  ‌calling‌  ‌out‌  ‌power.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌only‌  ‌criterion‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌‌ 
officer‌‌  has‌‌ done‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ performance‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ duties‌‌ and‌‌ to‌‌ substitute‌‌ the‌‌ 
judgment‌‌of‌‌the‌‌former‌‌for‌‌that‌‌of‌‌the‌‌latter.‌  ‌ national‌  ‌emergency‌  ‌even‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌absence‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Congressional‌‌  ‘‌whenever‌  ‌it‌‌
  becomes‌‌   necessary‌,’‌‌   the‌‌
  President‌‌
  may‌‌  call‌‌
  the‌‌ 
enactment‌. ‌ ‌ armed‌‌ forces‌‌ ‘to‌‌ prevent‌‌ or‌‌ suppress‌‌ lawless‌‌ violence,‌‌ invasion‌‌ 
By‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌fiat,‌  ‌heads‌  ‌of‌  ‌political‌‌
  subdivisions‌‌   are‌‌  subject‌‌  to‌‌  or‌‌rebellion.’‌  ‌
the‌  ‌President’s‌  ‌supervision‌  ‌only,‌‌   not‌‌
  control‌, ‌‌so‌‌
  long‌‌  as‌‌
  their‌‌
  acts‌‌  But‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌emergency‌  ‌powers,‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌taking‌  ‌over‌  ‌of‌‌ 
privately‌  ‌owned‌  ‌public‌  ‌utility‌  ‌or‌  ‌business‌  ‌affected‌  ‌with‌  ‌public‌‌  2. The‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌ ‌suspend‌‌ the‌‌ privilege‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ writ‌ ‌of‌‌ habeas‌‌ 
are‌‌exercised‌‌within‌‌the‌‌sphere‌‌of‌‌their‌‌legitimate‌‌powers.‌‌   ‌
interest‌r‌ equires‌‌a‌‌delegation‌‌from‌‌Congress.‌  ‌ corpus.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌only‌  ‌the‌‌
  privilege‌‌   that‌‌
  is‌‌
  suspended,‌‌   not‌‌
  the‌‌ 
Any‌‌
  directive‌‌ therefore‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ or‌‌ any‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ or‌‌ her‌‌ alter‌‌ egos‌‌  writ‌  ‌itself.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌when‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌is‌  ‌detained‌  ‌for‌  ‌an‌  ‌offense‌‌ 
seeking‌  ‌to‌  ‌alter‌  ‌the‌  ‌wisdom‌  ‌of‌‌
  a ‌‌law-conforming‌‌   judgment‌‌   on‌‌
  local‌‌  Generally,‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌repository‌  ‌of‌  ‌emergency‌  ‌powers.‌‌  related‌‌   to‌‌
  rebellion‌‌   or‌‌
  invasion,‌‌
  the‌‌ Judge‌‌ need‌‌ not‌‌ inquire‌‌ into‌‌ 
affairs‌‌of‌‌an‌‌LGU‌‌is‌‌a‌‌patent‌n ‌ ullity‌. ‌ ‌ Certainly,‌‌
  a ‌‌body‌‌   cannot‌‌   delegate‌‌  a ‌‌power‌‌  not‌‌  reposed‌‌   upon‌‌ it.‌‌  the‌‌legality‌‌of‌‌his‌‌detention.‌  ‌
The‌‌
  Framers‌‌   of‌‌
  our‌‌  Constitution‌‌ deemed‌‌ it‌‌ wise‌‌ to‌‌ allow‌‌ Congress‌‌ to‌‌ 
Does‌‌LBC‌‌55‌‌go‌‌beyond‌‌the‌‌law‌‌it‌‌seeks‌‌to‌‌implement?‌‌‌YES‌. ‌ ‌ grant‌  ‌emergency‌  ‌powers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌President,‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌certain‌‌  3. The‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌declare‌  ‌martial‌  ‌law‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌For‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter‌  ‌two‌‌ 
conditions,‌‌thus:‌  ‌ powers,‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌‌requires‌‌2‌‌requisites‌‌to‌‌concur:‌  ‌
LBC‌  ‌55‌‌   provides‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌  additional‌‌   monthly‌‌   allowances‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌
  given‌‌ 
by‌‌  an‌‌  LGU‌‌  ‌should‌‌   not‌‌  exceed‌‌   ‌P1K‌‌
  in‌‌
  provinces‌‌   and‌‌  cities‌‌
  and‌‌ P700‌‌  1) An‌‌actual‌‌invasion‌‌or‌‌rebellion‌;‌‌AND‌  ‌
1) There‌‌must‌‌be‌‌a‌w
‌ ar‌‌‌or‌‌other‌‌emergency‌. ‌ ‌
in‌  ‌municipalities.‌  ‌Section‌  ‌458,‌  ‌par.‌  ‌(a)(1)(xi),‌  ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌7160,‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌‌  2) That‌‌‌public‌‌safety‌‌‌requires‌‌it.‌  ‌
2) The‌‌delegation‌‌must‌‌be‌‌for‌‌a‌l‌ imited‌‌period‌‌only‌. ‌ ‌
that‌‌   supposedly‌‌   serves‌‌   as‌‌
  the‌‌
  legal‌‌
  basis‌‌  of‌‌
  LBC‌‌   55,‌‌
  allows‌‌ the‌‌ grant‌‌ 
On‌‌declaring‌‌a‌‌state‌‌of‌‌rebellion‌  ‌
of‌  ‌additional‌  ‌allowances‌  ‌to‌  ‌judges‌  ‌“when‌  ‌the‌  ‌finances‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌city‌‌  3) The‌‌
  delegation‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ ‌subject‌‌ to‌‌ such‌‌ restrictions‌‌ as‌‌ the‌‌ 
government‌  ‌allow.”‌  ‌The‌  ‌said‌  ‌provision‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌   authorize‌‌   setting‌‌
  a ‌‌ Congress‌‌may‌‌prescribe‌. ‌ ‌ Section‌  ‌18,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VII‌‌
  ‌does‌‌   not‌‌
  expressly‌‌   prohibit‌‌   ‌the‌‌
  President‌‌ 
definite‌‌maximum‌‌limit.‌  ‌ from‌  ‌declaring‌  ‌a ‌ ‌state‌  ‌of‌  ‌rebellion.‌  ‌The‌  ‌President’s‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌‌ 
4) The‌  ‌emergency‌  ‌powers‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌exercised‌  ‌to‌  ‌carry‌  ‌out‌  ‌a ‌‌
declare‌‌   a ‌‌state‌‌
  of‌‌
  rebellion‌‌   springs‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  main‌‌ from‌‌ her‌‌ powers‌‌ ‌as‌‌ 
national‌‌policy‌‌‌declared‌‌by‌‌Congress.‌ 
Emergency‌‌powers‌  ‌ chief‌  ‌executive‌  ‌and,‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌time,‌  ‌draws‌  ‌strength‌  ‌from‌  ‌her‌‌ 
In‌  ‌Araneta‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Dinglasan‌, ‌ ‌this‌  ‌Court‌  ‌emphasized‌  ‌that‌  ‌legislative‌‌  Commander-in-Chief‌‌powers.‌  ‌
Sec‌  ‌23(2)‌  ‌Art‌  ‌VI‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌in‌‌
  times‌‌
  of‌‌
  ‌war‌‌
  ‌or‌‌
  ‌other‌‌
  national‌‌  power,‌‌   through‌‌  which‌‌
  extraordinary‌‌   measures‌‌ are‌‌ exercised,‌‌ remains‌‌  In‌  ‌calling‌  ‌out‌  ‌the‌  ‌armed‌  ‌forces,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌state‌  ‌of‌‌ 
emergency‌, ‌‌the‌‌ Congress‌‌ may,‌‌ ‌by‌‌ law‌, ‌‌authorize‌‌ the‌‌ President,‌‌ for‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 33‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

rebellion‌‌   is‌‌
  an‌‌
  utter‌‌   ‌superfluity‌. ‌‌At‌‌   most,‌‌
  it‌‌
  only‌‌
  gives‌‌
  notice‌‌   to‌‌  and‌  ‌ the‌‌process‌‌of‌‌his‌‌decision-making.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌nation‌  ‌that‌  ‌such‌  ‌a ‌ ‌state‌  ‌exists.‌  ‌Sanlakas‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Reyes‌  ‌finds‌  ‌that‌‌  d. The‌  ‌Congress,‌  ‌voting‌  ‌jointly,‌  ‌may‌  ‌revoke‌  ‌or‌  ‌affirm‌‌  7. The‌  ‌parameters‌  ‌for‌  ‌determining‌  ‌the‌  ‌sufficiency‌  ‌of‌  ‌factual‌‌ 
such‌‌   a ‌‌declaration‌‌   is‌‌
  devoid‌‌   of‌‌  any‌‌
  legal‌‌  significance.‌  ‌For‌‌   all‌‌ legal‌‌  the‌  ‌President’s‌  ‌proclamation‌  ‌or‌  ‌suspension,‌  ‌allow‌‌  basis‌‌are‌‌as‌‌follows:‌‌   ‌
intents,‌t‌ he‌‌declaration‌‌is‌‌deemed‌‌not‌‌written.‌  ‌ their‌‌   limited‌‌ effectivity‌‌ to‌‌ lapse,‌‌ or‌‌ ‌extend‌‌ ‌the‌‌ same‌‌ 
a. actual‌‌rebellion‌‌or‌‌invasion‌; ‌ ‌
During‌‌  a ‌‌state‌‌
  of‌‌
  rebellion,‌‌ ‌Lacson‌‌ v.‌‌ Perez‌‌ tells‌‌ us‌‌ that‌‌ authorities‌‌  if‌‌Congress‌‌deems‌‌warranted.‌  ‌
may‌  ‌only‌  ‌resort‌  ‌to‌  ‌warrantless‌  ‌arrests‌  ‌of‌  ‌persons‌  ‌suspected‌  ‌of‌‌  b. public‌  ‌safety‌  ‌requires‌  ‌it;‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌two‌  ‌requirements‌‌ 
2. The‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌validity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President’s‌  ‌proclamation‌‌   of‌‌ 
rebellion.‌‌   They‌‌
  should‌‌   not‌‌ be‌‌ based‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ declaration‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌"state‌‌ of‌‌  must‌‌concur;‌‌and‌  ‌
martial‌‌  law‌‌
  or‌‌
  suspension‌‌
  of‌‌  the‌‌  writ‌‌  of‌‌
  habeas‌‌ corpus‌‌ is‌‌ ‌first‌‌ 
rebellion."‌  ‌ a‌  ‌political‌  ‌question‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌hands‌  ‌of‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌before‌  ‌it‌‌  c. there‌  ‌is‌  ‌probable‌  ‌cause‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌to‌‌
  believe‌‌ 
Calling‌‌out‌‌powers‌  ‌ becomes‌‌a‌‌justiciable‌‌one‌‌‌in‌‌the‌‌hands‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Court.‌  ‌ that‌‌there‌‌is‌‌actual‌‌rebellion‌‌or‌‌invasion.‌  ‌
3. Lansang‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌factual‌  ‌basis‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌of‌‌  8. Public‌‌  safety‌‌  ‌"involves‌‌
  the‌‌
  prevention‌‌   of‌‌
  and‌‌   protection‌‌  from‌‌ 
IBP‌‌v.‌‌Zamora‌  ‌
martial‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  privilege‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌
  writ‌‌
  of‌‌  events‌‌
  that‌‌ could‌‌ endanger‌‌ the‌‌ safety‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ general‌‌ public‌‌ from‌‌ 
When‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌calls‌  ‌the‌  ‌armed‌  ‌forces‌  ‌to‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌or‌  ‌suppress‌‌  habeas‌  ‌corpus‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌political‌  ‌question‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌  significant‌  ‌danger,‌  ‌injury/harm,‌  ‌or‌  ‌damage,‌‌   such‌‌
  as‌‌
  crimes‌‌  or‌‌ 
lawless‌  ‌violence,‌  ‌invasion‌  ‌or‌  ‌rebellion,‌  ‌he‌  ‌necessarily‌  ‌exercises‌  ‌a ‌‌ ambit‌‌of‌‌judicial‌‌review.‌‌   ‌ disasters."‌  ‌
discretionary‌  ‌power‌‌   ‌solely‌‌
  vested‌‌
  in‌‌
  his‌‌
  wisdom.‌‌   The‌‌
  Court,‌‌   thus,‌‌  On‌‌extending‌‌martial‌‌law‌  ‌
4. The‌‌
  phrase‌‌  "‌in‌‌  an‌‌
  appropriate‌‌ proceeding‌" ‌‌appearing‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ 
cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌called‌  ‌upon‌  ‌to‌  ‌overrule‌  ‌the‌  ‌President’s‌  ‌wisdom‌  ‌or‌‌ 
third‌  ‌paragraph‌  ‌of‌  ‌Section‌  ‌18,‌  ‌Article‌‌   VII‌‌
  refers‌‌
  to‌‌
  ‌any‌‌  action‌  9. The‌‌  only‌‌
  limitations‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  of‌‌
  congressional‌‌ authority‌‌ 
substitute‌‌its‌‌own.‌‌   ‌
initiated‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌citizen‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌questioning‌  ‌the‌‌  to‌e
‌ xtend‌s‌ uch‌‌proclamation‌‌or‌‌suspension‌‌are‌‌that:‌‌   ‌
However‌, ‌ ‌this‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌an‌  ‌examination‌  ‌of‌  ‌whether‌  ‌such‌‌  sufficiency‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  factual‌‌   basis‌‌   of‌‌   the‌‌  exercise‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌
  Chief‌‌ 
a. the‌  ‌extension‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌President's‌‌ 
power‌  ‌was‌  ‌exercised‌  ‌within‌  ‌permissible‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌limits‌  ‌or‌‌  Executive's‌‌   emergency‌‌   powers.‌‌   ‌It‌‌ could‌‌ be‌‌ denominated‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌
initiative‌; ‌ ‌
whether‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌exercised‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌manner‌  ‌constituting‌  ‌grave‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌of‌‌  complaint,‌‌a‌‌petition,‌‌or‌‌a‌‌matter‌‌to‌‌be‌‌resolved‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Court.‌  ‌
discretion.‌‌  It‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌incumbent‌‌   upon‌‌   the‌‌
  petitioner‌‌  to‌‌
  show‌‌  that‌‌ the‌‌  b. it‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌grounded‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌persistence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
5. In‌  ‌Lagman‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Medialdea‌  ‌2017‌  ‌En‌  ‌Banc‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌had‌  ‌the‌‌ 
President’s‌‌decision‌‌is‌‌totally‌‌bereft‌‌of‌‌factual‌‌basis.‌‌   ‌ invasion‌  ‌or‌  ‌rebellion‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌demands‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌‌ 
occasion‌  ‌to‌  ‌reexamine‌  ‌Fortun‌  ‌and‌  ‌clarify‌‌   that‌‌  ‌the‌‌
  Court‌‌  can‌‌ 
safety;‌‌and‌  ‌
Congress‌‌   may‌‌
  revoke‌‌   the‌‌
  proclamation‌‌   of‌‌
  martial‌‌  law‌‌ or‌‌ suspension‌‌  simultaneously‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌its‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌review‌  ‌with,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
independently‌‌   from,‌‌  the‌‌
  power‌‌  to‌‌
  revoke‌‌
  by‌‌ Congress.‌‌ In‌‌ other‌‌  c. it‌‌
  is‌‌
  subject‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  Court's‌‌
  ‌review‌‌ ‌of‌‌ the‌‌ sufficiency‌‌ of‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌writ‌  ‌of‌  ‌habeas‌  ‌corpus‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌may‌‌ 
words,‌  ‌the‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌review‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌dependent‌  ‌on‌‌  its‌  ‌factual‌  ‌basis‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌petition‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌citizen.‌‌ 
review‌‌   the‌‌
  sufficiency‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  factual‌‌  basis‌‌ thereof.‌‌ However,‌‌ ‌there‌‌ is‌‌ 
whether‌‌   Congress‌‌   exercised‌‌  its‌‌
  own‌‌   power‌‌  to‌‌
  review‌‌ the‌‌ act‌‌ of‌‌  (‌Lagman‌‌v.‌‌Medialdea‌‌2 ‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌) ‌ ‌
no‌  ‌such‌  ‌equivalent‌  ‌provision‌  ‌dealing‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌revocation‌  ‌or‌‌ 
review‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President’s‌‌action‌‌to‌‌call‌‌out‌‌the‌‌armed‌‌forces‌.  ‌‌ ‌ the‌‌President.‌‌   ‌ 10. The‌‌   Court‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌not‌‌  barred‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌  doctrine‌‌  of‌  ‌conclusiveness‌‌ 
6. Lagman‌  ‌established‌  ‌the‌  ‌sufficiency‌  ‌of‌  ‌factual‌  ‌basis‌‌   test‌‌
  as‌‌  of‌‌
  judgment‌‌   from‌‌  examining‌  ‌the‌‌ persistence‌‌ of‌‌ rebellion.‌‌ The‌‌ 
Declaration‌‌of‌‌martial‌‌law‌‌and‌‌suspension‌‌of‌‌the‌‌   being‌‌
  the‌‌
  only‌‌
  test‌‌
  for‌‌
  judicial‌‌
  review‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  President's‌‌ power‌‌  manner‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌deliberated‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌President's‌‌ 
privilege‌‌of‌‌the‌‌writ‌‌of‌‌habeas‌‌corpus;‌‌extension‌  ‌ to‌‌
  declare‌‌  martial‌‌
  law‌‌  and‌‌
  suspend‌‌  the‌‌
  privilege‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  writ‌‌
  of‌‌  request‌  ‌for‌  ‌extension‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌review‌. ‌‌
habeas‌‌corpus‌‌under‌‌Section‌‌18,‌‌Article‌‌VII.‌‌   ‌ (‌Lagman‌‌v.‌‌Pimentel‌‌III‌‌‌2018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌) ‌ ‌
1. Fortun‌‌   v.‌‌
  Arroyo‌‌   ‌2012‌‌   En‌‌
  Banc‌‌  ‌affirms‌‌ that‌‌ although‌‌ ‌Sec‌‌ 18‌‌ 
a. It‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌based‌  ‌only‌  ‌on‌  ‌facts‌  ‌or‌  ‌information‌‌  11. Checks‌  ‌and‌  ‌balances‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌martial‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Art‌  ‌VII‌  ‌vests‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌proclaim‌  ‌martial‌‌ 
known‌‌   by‌‌  or‌‌
  available‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌  President‌‌   at‌‌
  the‌‌ time‌‌  suspension‌‌powers.‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌
law‌  ‌or‌  ‌suspend‌  ‌the‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌writ‌‌
  of‌‌
  habeas‌‌   corpus,‌‌   he‌‌ 
shares‌‌such‌‌power‌‌with‌‌Congress‌.‌ ‌Thus:‌  ‌ he‌‌made‌‌the‌‌declaration‌‌or‌‌suspension;‌  ‌ a. The‌  ‌President‌  ‌may‌  ‌declare‌‌   martial‌‌   law‌‌
  or‌‌
  suspend‌‌   of‌‌ 
b. The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌should‌  ‌look‌  ‌into‌  ‌the‌  ‌full‌  ‌complement‌‌   or‌‌  the‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌writ‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌of‌  ‌habeas‌‌ 
a. The‌  ‌President’s‌  ‌proclamation‌  ‌or‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌is‌‌ 
totality‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌factual‌  ‌basis‌, ‌‌and‌‌  ‌not‌‌  piecemeal‌‌
  or‌‌  corpus‌‌   ‌only‌‌
  when‌‌   there‌‌  is‌‌ an‌‌ invasion‌‌ or‌‌ rebellion‌‌ 
temporary,‌g‌ ood‌‌for‌‌only‌‌60‌‌days‌; ‌ ‌
individually‌.  ‌‌ ‌ and‌  ‌public‌  ‌safety‌  ‌requires‌  ‌such‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌or‌‌ 
b. He‌  ‌must,‌  ‌within‌  ‌48‌  ‌hours‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌proclamation‌  ‌or‌‌  suspension.‌  ‌
suspension,‌‌   ‌report‌‌
  his‌‌
  action‌‌  in‌‌
  person‌‌ or‌‌ in‌‌ writing‌‌  c. Neither‌  ‌should‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌expect‌  ‌absolute‌‌ 
correctness‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌facts‌  ‌stated‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌proclamation‌‌  b. The‌  ‌President's‌  ‌proclamation‌  ‌or‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌ 
to‌‌Congress;‌  ‌
and‌‌in‌‌the‌‌written‌‌Report.‌‌   ‌ for‌‌a‌‌period‌‌‌not‌‌exceeding‌‌60‌‌days‌. ‌ ‌
c. Both‌‌
  houses‌‌   of‌‌ Congress,‌‌ if‌‌ not‌‌ in‌‌ session‌‌ must‌‌ jointly‌‌ 
d. To‌‌
  require‌‌
  precision‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  President's‌‌  appreciation‌‌ of‌‌  c. Within‌  ‌48‌  ‌hours‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌proclamation‌  ‌or‌‌ 
convene‌  ‌within‌  ‌24‌  ‌hours‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌proclamation‌  ‌or‌‌ 
facts‌  ‌would‌  ‌unduly‌‌
  burden‌‌   him‌‌
  and‌‌
  therefore‌‌
  impede‌‌  suspension,‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌must‌  ‌submit‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Report‌  ‌in‌‌ 
suspension‌‌  for‌‌  the‌‌
  purpose‌‌   of‌‌ ‌reviewing‌‌ its‌‌ validity‌; ‌‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 34‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

person‌‌or‌‌in‌‌writing‌‌to‌‌Congress.‌  ‌ Executive‌‌clemency‌  ‌ 1. Pardon‌‌   ‌is‌‌


  a ‌‌‌private‌‌
  ‌act‌‌
  which‌‌   must‌‌
  be‌‌
  pleaded‌‌
  and‌‌ proved‌‌ 
d. The‌  ‌Congress‌, ‌ ‌voting‌  ‌jointly‌  ‌and‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌vote‌  ‌of‌  ‌at‌‌  by‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌pardoned,‌  ‌because‌  ‌the‌  ‌courts‌  ‌take‌‌   no‌‌
  notice‌‌ 
Nature‌‌and‌‌limitations‌  ‌
least‌  ‌a ‌ ‌majority‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌its‌  ‌Members,‌  ‌can‌  ‌revoke‌  ‌the‌‌  thereof;‌  ‌while‌  ‌amnesty‌‌   ‌is‌‌
  a ‌‌‌public‌‌
  ‌act‌‌
  of‌‌
  which‌‌
  the‌‌
  courts‌‌ 
proclamation‌‌or‌‌suspension.‌  ‌ Sec‌‌  19.‌‌
  ‌Except‌‌
  in‌‌ cases‌‌ of‌‌ ‌impeachment‌, ‌‌or‌‌ as‌‌ otherwise‌‌ provided‌‌  should‌‌take‌‌judicial‌‌notice.‌‌   ‌
e. The‌  ‌President‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌set‌  ‌aside‌  ‌the‌  ‌Congress'‌‌  in‌  ‌this‌  ‌Constitution,‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌may‌  ‌grant‌  ‌reprieves,‌‌  2. Pardon‌  ‌is‌  ‌granted‌  ‌to‌‌  one‌‌
  ‌after‌‌
  ‌conviction;‌‌
  while‌‌
  ‌amnesty‌‌ 
revocation‌‌‌of‌‌his‌‌proclamation‌‌or‌‌suspension.‌  ‌ commutations,‌  ‌and‌  ‌pardons,‌  ‌and‌  ‌remit‌  ‌fines‌  ‌and‌  ‌forfeitures,‌  ‌after‌‌  is‌‌
  granted‌‌ to‌‌ classes‌‌ of‌‌ persons‌‌ or‌‌ communities‌‌ who‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ 
f. The‌  ‌President‌  ‌cannot,‌  ‌by‌  h
‌ imself,‌  ‌extend‌  ‌his‌‌  conviction‌‌by‌‌final‌‌judgment.‌  ‌ guilty‌  ‌of‌  ‌political‌  ‌offenses,‌  ‌generally‌  ‌before‌  ‌or‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌‌ 
proclamation‌  ‌or‌  ‌suspension.‌  ‌He‌  ‌should‌  ‌ask‌  ‌the‌‌  institution‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌‌
  criminal‌‌   prosecution‌‌   and‌‌
  sometimes‌‌   after‌‌ 
He‌  ‌shall‌  ‌also‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌grant‌  ‌amnesty‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Congress'‌‌approval‌. ‌ ‌ conviction.‌‌   ‌
concurrence‌o ‌ f‌‌a‌‌majority‌‌of‌‌ALL‌‌the‌‌Members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Congress.‌  ‌
g. Upon‌‌
  such‌‌
  initiative‌‌  or‌‌ request‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ President,‌‌ the‌‌  3. Pardon‌  ‌looks‌  ‌forward‌; ‌ ‌while‌  ‌amnesty‌  ‌looks‌  ‌backward‌‌ 
Art‌  ‌IX-C‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌5.‌  ‌No‌  ‌pardon,‌  ‌amnesty,‌  ‌parole,‌  ‌or‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌of‌‌  and‌‌   abolishes‌‌  and‌‌  puts‌‌   into‌‌
  oblivion‌‌ the‌‌ offense‌‌ with‌‌ which‌‌ 
Congress‌, ‌ ‌voting‌  ‌jointly‌  ‌and‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌vote‌  ‌of‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌a ‌‌
majority‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌its‌  ‌Members,‌  ‌can‌  ‌extend‌  ‌the‌‌  sentence‌‌   for‌‌  ‌violation‌‌  of‌‌
  ‌election‌‌
  ‌laws,‌‌  rules,‌‌ and‌‌ regulations‌‌ shall‌‌  he‌  ‌is‌  ‌charged‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌released‌  ‌by‌  ‌amnesty‌  ‌stands‌‌ 
proclamation‌‌or‌‌suspension.‌  ‌ be‌‌
  granted‌‌   by‌‌   the‌‌
  President‌‌   without‌‌   the‌‌
  favorable‌‌ recommendation‌‌  before‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌precisely‌  ‌as‌  ‌though‌  ‌he‌  ‌had‌  ‌committed‌  ‌no‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌Comelec.‌  ‌ offense.‌  ‌
h. The‌  ‌extension‌  ‌shall‌  ‌only‌  ‌be‌  ‌approved‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌‌ 
invasion‌  ‌or‌  ‌rebellion‌  ‌persists‌  ‌and‌  ‌public‌  ‌safety‌‌  Forms‌‌of‌‌executive‌‌clemency‌  ‌
requires‌‌it.‌  ‌ Vera‌‌v.‌‌People‌  ‌
Pardon‌‌distinguished‌‌from‌‌probation‌‌
   ‌
i. The‌  ‌SC‌  ‌may‌  ‌review‌  ‌the‌  ‌sufficiency‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌factual‌‌  Whether‌‌   or‌‌
  not‌‌ a ‌‌person‌‌ invoking‌‌ the‌‌ benefit‌‌ of‌‌ amnesty‌‌ should‌‌ 
basis‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌proclamation‌  ‌or‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Vera‌  ‌ first‌  ‌admit‌  ‌having‌  ‌committed‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌they‌  ‌were‌‌ 
extension‌  ‌thereof,‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌appropriate‌  ‌proceeding‌  ‌filed‌‌  accused.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌suspend‌  ‌sentence‌  ‌was‌  ‌always‌  ‌a ‌ ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌judicial‌‌ 
by‌‌any‌‌citizen‌. ‌ ‌
power;‌‌   the‌‌
  power‌‌ to‌‌ grant‌‌ reprieves‌‌ and‌‌ pardons‌‌ was‌‌ always‌‌ a ‌‌part‌‌ of‌‌  It‌  ‌is‌  ‌rank‌  ‌inconsistency‌  ‌for‌  ‌appellant‌  ‌to‌  ‌justify‌  ‌an‌  ‌act,‌  ‌or‌  ‌seek‌‌ 
j. The‌  ‌SC‌‌
  must‌‌   promulgate‌‌   its‌‌
  decision‌‌  ‌within‌‌
  30‌‌   days‌‌  the‌  ‌executive‌  ‌power.‌  ‌The‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌sentence‌  ‌simply‌‌  forgiveness‌‌   for‌‌ an‌‌ act‌‌ which,‌‌ according‌‌ to‌‌ him,‌‌ he‌‌ has‌‌ not‌‌ committed.‌‌ 
from‌‌the‌‌filing‌o ‌ f‌‌the‌‌appropriate‌‌proceeding.‌  ‌ postpones‌  ‌the‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌   court‌‌  temporarily‌‌   or‌‌  indefinitely,‌‌  but‌‌  (‌superseding‌‌‌Barrioquinto‌) ‌ ‌
k. Martial‌‌  law‌‌  ‌does‌‌  not‌‌
  suspend‌‌   the‌‌
  operation‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  the‌  c
‌ onviction‌   a
‌ nd‌
  l
‌ iability‌   f
‌ ollowing‌   i
‌ t,‌
  a
‌ nd‌   a
‌ ll‌  c
‌ ivil‌  d
‌ isabilities,‌
 
Constitution‌. ‌ ‌ remain‌ a
‌ nd‌ b
‌ ecome‌ o
‌ perative‌ w
‌ hen‌ j
‌ udgment‌ i
‌ s‌ r
‌ endered.‌‌    ‌ Effect‌‌of‌‌Pardon‌‌
   ‌
l. Martial‌‌   law‌‌
  ‌does‌‌   not‌‌
  supplant‌‌   the‌‌
  functioning‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌  A‌  ‌pardon‌  ‌reaches‌  ‌both‌  ‌the‌  ‌punishment‌  ‌prescribed‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌offense‌‌  Monsanto‌‌v.‌‌Factoran‌  ‌
civil‌  ‌courts‌  ‌or‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌assemblies,‌  ‌nor‌  ‌authorize‌‌  and‌‌   the‌‌
  guilt‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ offender.‌‌ It‌‌ releases‌‌ the‌‌ punishment,‌‌ and‌‌ blots‌‌ out‌‌ 
the‌  ‌conferment‌  ‌of‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌on‌‌  military‌‌
  courts‌‌   and‌‌  of‌‌
  existence‌‌   the‌‌   guilt,‌‌
  so‌‌
  that‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  eye‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  law,‌‌
  the‌‌   offender‌‌  is‌‌ as‌‌  The‌  ‌pardon‌  ‌granted‌  ‌to‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌has‌  ‌resulted‌  ‌in‌  ‌removing‌  ‌her‌‌ 
agencies‌  ‌over‌  ‌civilians‌  ‌where‌  ‌civil‌  ‌courts‌‌
  are‌‌
  able‌‌   to‌‌  innocent‌  ‌as‌  ‌if‌  ‌he‌  ‌had‌  ‌never‌  ‌committed‌  ‌the‌  ‌offense.‌  ‌It‌  ‌removes‌  ‌the‌‌  disqualification‌  ‌from‌  ‌holding‌  ‌public‌  ‌employment‌  ‌but‌  ‌it‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌go‌‌ 
function.‌  ‌ penalties‌  ‌and‌  ‌disabilities,‌  ‌and‌  ‌restores‌  ‌him‌  ‌to‌  ‌his‌  ‌civil‌  ‌rights.‌  ‌It‌‌  beyond‌‌   that.‌  ‌To‌‌ regain‌‌ her‌‌ former‌‌ post‌‌ as‌‌ assistant‌‌ city‌‌ treasurer,‌‌ she‌‌ 
makes‌  ‌him,‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌were,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌new‌  ‌man,‌  ‌and‌‌  gives‌‌  him‌‌  a ‌‌new‌‌   credit‌‌
  and‌‌  must‌  ‌reapply‌  ‌and‌  ‌undergo‌  ‌the‌  ‌usual‌  ‌procedure‌  ‌required‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌‌new‌‌ 
m. The‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌writ‌  ‌applies‌‌ 
capacity.‌  ‌ appointment.‌  ‌
only‌  ‌to‌  ‌persons‌  ‌judicially‌  ‌charged‌‌   for‌‌
  rebellion‌‌   ‌or‌‌ 
offenses‌  ‌inherent‌  ‌in‌  ‌or‌  ‌directly‌  ‌connected‌  ‌with‌‌ 
invasion.‌  ‌ Pardon‌‌distinguished‌‌from‌‌parole‌‌
   ‌ Risos-Vidal‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌‌2
‌ 015‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
n.   the‌‌  Torres‌‌v.‌‌Gonzales‌  ‌
Finally,‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌of‌‌ Former‌‌   President‌‌   Estrada‌‌   was‌‌
  granted‌‌ an‌‌ ‌absolute‌‌ pardon‌‌ that‌‌ fully‌‌ 
writ,‌  ‌any‌  ‌person‌  ‌thus‌  ‌arrested‌  ‌or‌  ‌detained‌‌
  should‌‌   be‌‌  restored‌‌   all‌‌
  his‌‌ civil‌‌ and‌‌ political‌‌ rights,‌‌ which‌‌ naturally‌‌ includes‌‌ the‌‌ 
The‌  ‌grant‌  ‌of‌  ‌pardon‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌terms‌  ‌and‌‌ 
judicially‌  ‌charged‌  ‌within‌  ‌three‌  ‌days‌, ‌ ‌otherwise‌  ‌he‌‌  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  seek‌‌ public‌‌ elective‌‌ office,‌‌ the‌‌ focal‌‌ point‌‌ of‌‌ this‌‌ controversy.‌‌ 
conditions‌‌   of‌‌
  a‌‌
  conditional‌‌
  pardon‌‌   are‌‌
  purely‌‌ executive‌‌ acts‌‌ which‌‌ 
should‌‌be‌‌released.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌only‌  ‌instances‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌extend‌  ‌pardon‌‌ 
are‌n
‌ ot‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌judicial‌‌scrutiny.‌  ‌
remain‌‌to‌‌be‌‌in:‌‌   ‌
Pardon‌‌distinguished‌‌from‌‌amnesty‌‌
   ‌ 1) impeachment‌‌cases;‌  ‌
Barrioquinto‌‌v.‌‌Fernandez‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 35‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

2) cases‌‌that‌‌have‌‌not‌‌yet‌‌resulted‌‌in‌‌a‌‌final‌‌conviction;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ c) recognized‌‌as‌‌a‌‌treaty‌‌‌by‌‌the‌‌other‌‌contracting‌‌state.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌Constitution.‌  ‌The‌  ‌LGC‌  ‌specifies‌  ‌further‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌   release‌‌   shall‌‌
  be‌‌ 
made‌  ‌directly‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌   LGU‌‌   concerned‌‌   within‌‌   five‌‌  (5)‌‌
  days‌‌   after‌‌  every‌‌ 
3) cases‌  ‌involving‌  ‌violations‌  ‌of‌  ‌election‌  ‌laws,‌  r‌ ules‌  ‌and‌‌  The‌  ‌phrase‌  ‌"recognized‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌treaty"‌  ‌means‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌‌  quarter‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  year‌‌   and‌‌  “‌shall‌‌
  not‌‌
  be‌‌
  subject‌‌   to‌‌
  any‌‌  lien‌‌
  or‌‌  holdback‌‌ 
regulations‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌no‌  f‌ avorable‌‌  contracting‌‌   party‌‌
  accepts‌‌
  or‌‌
  acknowledges‌‌   the‌‌
  agreement‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌ that‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌national‌  ‌government‌  ‌for‌  ‌whatever‌‌ 
recommendation‌‌coming‌‌from‌‌the‌‌COMELEC.‌‌   ‌ treaty‌.  ‌‌ ‌ purpose.‌” ‌ ‌As‌  ‌a ‌ ‌rule,‌  ‌the‌  ‌term‌  ‌“‌SHALL‌” ‌ ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌word‌  ‌of‌  ‌command‌  ‌that‌‌ 
Therefore,‌‌   it‌‌
  can‌‌   be‌‌
  argued‌‌   that‌‌
  any‌‌
  act‌‌ of‌‌ Congress‌‌ by‌‌ way‌‌ of‌‌ statute‌‌  Moreover,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌inconsequential‌  ‌whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌United‌  ‌States‌‌   treats‌‌
  the‌‌  must‌  ‌be‌  ‌given‌  ‌a ‌ ‌compulsory‌  ‌meaning.‌  ‌The‌  ‌provision‌  ‌is,‌  ‌therefore,‌‌ 
cannot‌  ‌operate‌‌   to‌‌
  delimit‌‌   the‌‌  pardoning‌‌   power‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  President.‌‌   The‌‌  VFA‌  ‌only‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌executive‌  ‌agreement‌‌   ‌because,‌‌   under‌‌
  international‌‌  IMPERATIVE.‌  ‌
foregoing‌  ‌pronouncements‌  ‌solidify‌  ‌the‌  ‌thesis‌  ‌that‌  ‌Articles‌‌   36‌‌
  and‌‌  law,‌  ‌an‌  ‌executive‌  ‌agreement‌  ‌is‌  ‌as‌‌
  binding‌‌  as‌‌
  a ‌‌treaty.‌‌
  To‌‌
  be‌‌  sure,‌‌
  as‌‌ 
41‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  RPC‌‌   cannot,‌‌   in‌‌  any‌‌  way,‌‌
  serve‌‌   to‌‌
  abridge‌‌   or‌‌
  diminish‌‌  long‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌VFA‌  ‌possesses‌  ‌the‌  ‌elements‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌agreement‌  ‌under‌‌ 
Delegated‌‌powers‌  ‌
the‌‌  exclusive‌‌   power‌‌   and‌‌   prerogative‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ to‌‌ pardon‌‌  international‌‌law,‌‌the‌‌said‌‌agreement‌‌is‌‌to‌‌be‌‌taken‌‌equally‌‌as‌‌a‌‌treaty.‌  1) Tariff‌‌powers‌‌‌under‌‌Section‌‌28(2)‌‌of‌‌Article‌‌VI;‌  ‌
persons‌‌convicted‌‌of‌‌violating‌‌penal‌‌statutes.‌  ‌
In‌  ‌our‌  ‌jurisdiction,‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌ratify‌  ‌is‌  ‌vested‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  2) Emergency‌‌powers‌‌‌under‌‌Section‌‌23(2)‌‌of‌‌Article‌‌VI;‌  ‌
Who‌‌may‌‌avail‌‌of‌‌amnesty‌‌
   ‌ President‌  ‌and‌  ‌not,‌  ‌as‌  ‌commonly‌  ‌believed,‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌legislature.‌‌  Residual‌‌powers‌  ‌
The‌  ‌role‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Senate‌  ‌is‌‌
  limited‌‌
  only‌‌
  to‌‌
  giving‌‌
  or‌‌
  withholding‌‌ 
Macaga-an‌‌v.‌‌People‌  ‌ its‌‌consent,‌‌or‌‌concurrence,‌‌to‌‌the‌‌ratification.‌  ‌ Marcos‌‌v.‌‌Manglapus‌D
‌ ecision‌‌‌and‌R
‌ esolution‌  ‌
The‌  ‌crimes‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌amnestied‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌for‌  ‌violations‌  ‌of‌‌  The‌‌  power‌‌
  involved‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌  President's‌  ‌residual‌‌   power‌  ‌to‌‌  protect‌‌ 
subversion‌  ‌laws‌  ‌or‌  ‌those‌  ‌defined‌  ‌and‌  ‌proscribed‌  ‌under‌  ‌crimes‌‌  Pimentel‌‌v.‌‌Executive‌‌Secretary‌  ‌ the‌‌  general‌‌   welfare‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  people‌. ‌ ‌It‌‌ is‌‌ founded‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ duty‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
against‌‌public‌‌order‌‌‌under‌‌the‌‌RPC.‌  ‌ President,‌  ‌as‌  ‌steward‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌people.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌power‌  ‌borne‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌  ‌usual‌  ‌steps‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌treaty-making‌  ‌process‌  ‌are:‌  ‌negotiation‌, ‌‌
signature‌, ‌ ‌ratification‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌exchange‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌instruments‌  ‌of‌‌  President's‌‌   duty‌‌   to‌‌
  preserve‌‌   and‌‌
  defend‌‌ the‌‌ Constitution.‌  ‌It‌‌ also‌‌ may‌‌ 
Diplomatic‌‌power‌  ‌ be‌‌
  viewed‌‌  as‌‌ a ‌‌power‌‌ implicit‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ President's‌‌ duty‌‌ to‌‌ take‌‌ care‌‌ that‌‌ 
ratification.‌  ‌The‌‌   treaty‌‌  may‌‌   then‌‌
  be‌‌
  submitted‌‌  for‌‌
  ‌registration‌‌   ‌and‌‌ 
Sec‌  ‌21.‌  ‌No‌  ‌treaty‌  ‌or‌  ‌international‌  ‌agreement‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌valid‌  ‌and‌‌  publication‌‌   ‌under‌‌ the‌‌ U.N.‌‌ Charter,‌‌ although‌‌ this‌‌ step‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ essential‌‌  the‌‌laws‌‌are‌‌faithfully‌‌executed.‌  ‌
effective‌‌ unless‌‌ concurred‌‌ in‌‌ by‌‌ at‌‌ least‌‌ ‌2/3‌‌ of‌‌ all‌‌ the‌‌ Members‌‌  to‌‌the‌‌validity‌‌of‌‌the‌‌agreement‌‌as‌‌between‌‌the‌‌parties.‌  ‌
Veto‌‌powers‌‌   ‌
of‌‌the‌‌Senate.‌  ‌ The‌‌   ‌signature‌‌   ‌is‌‌ primarily‌‌ intended‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌means‌‌ of‌‌ authenticating‌‌ the‌‌ 
instrument‌  ‌and‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌symbol‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌good‌  ‌faith‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌‌  1) General‌‌veto‌‌power.‌‌‌‌—‌‌veto‌‌of‌‌entire‌‌bill.‌  ‌
Bayan‌‌v.‌‌Zamora‌‌‌re‌‌VFA‌  ‌
usually‌  ‌performed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌state's‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌representative‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  2) Item-veto.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌President‌  ‌shall‌‌   have‌‌  the‌‌  power‌‌   to‌‌
  veto‌‌
  any‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌21,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VII‌  ‌deals‌  ‌with‌  ‌treatise‌  ‌or‌  ‌international‌‌  diplomatic‌  ‌mission.‌  ‌Ratification‌, ‌ ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand,‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌
  formal‌‌  particular‌  ‌item‌  ‌or‌  ‌items‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌Appropriation,‌  ‌Revenue,‌  ‌or‌‌ 
agreements‌  ‌in‌‌   general.‌‌   This‌‌
  provision‌‌   lays‌‌  down‌‌   ‌general‌‌
  the‌‌   rule‌ ‌ act‌  ‌by‌‌   which‌‌
  a ‌‌state‌‌   confirms‌‌  and‌‌
  accepts‌‌   the‌‌
  provisions‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌treaty‌‌ 
Tariff‌  ‌bill,‌  ‌but‌  ‌the‌  ‌veto‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌affect‌  ‌the‌  ‌item‌  ‌or‌  ‌items‌  ‌to‌‌ 
on‌  ‌treatise‌  ‌or‌  ‌international‌  ‌agreements‌. ‌ ‌All‌  ‌treaties‌  ‌or‌‌  concluded‌  ‌by‌  ‌its‌  ‌representative.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌generally‌  ‌held‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌an‌‌ 
which‌‌he‌‌does‌‌not‌‌object.‌  ‌
international‌  ‌agreements‌  ‌entered‌  ‌into‌  ‌by‌‌   the‌‌
  Philippines,‌‌   regardless‌‌  executive‌  ‌act‌, ‌ ‌undertaken‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌head‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌  ‌or‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
of‌  ‌subject‌  ‌matter,‌  ‌coverage,‌  ‌or‌‌
  particular‌‌
  designation‌‌   or‌‌
  appellation,‌‌  government.‌  ‌ Bolinao‌‌Electronics‌‌v.‌‌Valencia‌  ‌
requires‌‌the‌‌concurrence‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Senate‌‌to‌‌be‌‌valid‌‌and‌‌effective.‌  ‌
Although‌‌   the‌‌
  refusal‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌state‌‌ to‌‌ ratify‌‌ a ‌‌treaty‌‌ which‌‌ has‌‌ been‌‌ signed‌‌ 
When‌‌   a ‌‌provision‌‌   of‌‌
  an‌‌
  appropriation‌‌   bill‌‌
  affects‌‌
  one‌‌
  or‌‌
  more‌‌
  items‌‌ 
In‌  ‌contrast,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌25,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌XVIII‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌special‌  ‌provision‌  ‌that‌‌  in‌  ‌its‌  ‌behalf‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌serious‌  ‌step‌  ‌that‌‌
  should‌‌   not‌‌
  be‌‌
  taken‌‌
  lightly,‌‌
  such‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌same,‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌veto‌  ‌the‌‌
  provision‌‌
  without‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌ 
applies‌  ‌to‌  ‌treaties‌  ‌which‌  ‌involve‌  ‌the‌  ‌presence‌  ‌of‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌military‌‌  decision‌  ‌is‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌competence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌alone,‌  ‌which‌‌ 
same‌‌time‌‌vetoing‌‌the‌‌particular‌‌item‌‌or‌‌items‌‌to‌‌which‌‌it‌‌relates.‌  ‌
bases,‌  ‌troops‌  ‌or‌  ‌facilities‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines.‌  ‌It‌  ‌disallows‌  ‌foreign‌‌  cannot‌‌be‌‌encroached‌‌by‌‌this‌‌Court‌‌via‌‌a‌‌writ‌‌of‌‌mandamus‌. ‌ ‌
military‌  ‌bases,‌  ‌troops,‌  ‌or‌  ‌facilities‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌country,‌  ‌unless‌  ‌the‌‌  Whether‌‌  the‌‌
  President‌‌
  may‌‌  legally‌‌
  veto‌‌
  a ‌‌condition‌‌ attached‌‌ to‌‌ 
following‌‌conditions‌‌are‌‌sufficiently‌‌met,‌v‌ iz‌:  ‌‌ ‌ Powers‌‌relative‌‌to‌‌appropriation‌‌measures‌  ‌ an‌‌appropriation‌‌or‌‌item‌‌‌in‌‌the‌‌appropriation‌‌bill.‌N‌ O‌.  ‌‌ ‌
a) it‌‌must‌‌be‌‌under‌‌a‌t‌ reaty‌; ‌ ‌ Pimentel,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌Aguirre‌  ‌ If‌  ‌the‌  ‌veto‌‌
  is‌‌
  unconstitutional,‌‌
  it‌‌
  follows‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌
  produced‌‌
  no‌‌ 
b) the‌  ‌treaty‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌duly‌  ‌concurred‌‌   in‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌  Senate‌‌  and,‌‌  effect‌  ‌whatsoever,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌restriction‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌4 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌AO‌  ‌372‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌‌
  upheld.‌‌  ‌A ‌‌basic‌‌
  feature‌‌
  of‌‌
  local‌‌ 
when‌  ‌so‌  ‌required‌  ‌by‌  ‌congress,‌‌   ratified‌‌
  by‌‌
  a ‌‌majority‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  appropriation‌‌bill,‌‌therefore,‌‌remains‌.  ‌‌ ‌
fiscal‌  ‌autonomy‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌   ‌automatic‌‌  release‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  shares‌‌
  of‌‌
  LGUs‌‌ 
votes‌‌cast‌‌by‌‌the‌‌people‌‌in‌‌a‌‌national‌‌referendum;‌‌and‌  ‌ in‌‌
  the‌‌  National‌‌ internal‌‌ revenue.‌‌ This‌‌ is‌‌ mandated‌‌ by‌‌ no‌‌ less‌‌ than‌‌ 
Gonzales‌‌v.‌‌Macaraig‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 36‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

The‌‌
  power‌‌  given‌‌
  the‌‌
  executive‌‌  to‌‌
  disapprove‌‌   any‌‌
  item‌‌ or‌‌ items‌‌ in‌‌ an‌‌  b) During‌‌the‌‌term‌‌   ‌
Any‌  ‌provision‌  ‌blocking‌  ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌action‌‌  in‌‌
  implementing‌‌   a ‌‌
Appropriations‌  ‌Bill‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌
  grant‌‌  the‌‌
  authority‌‌
  to‌‌
  veto‌‌
  a ‌‌part‌‌
  of‌‌
  an‌‌ 
law‌  ‌or‌  ‌requiring‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌approval‌  ‌of‌  ‌executive‌  ‌acts‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  4. In‌‌
  case‌‌
  of‌‌ ‌death‌, ‌‌‌permanent‌‌ disability‌, ‌‌‌removal‌‌ ‌from‌‌ office,‌‌ 
item‌‌and‌‌to‌‌approve‌‌the‌‌remaining‌‌portion‌‌of‌‌the‌‌same‌‌item.‌  ‌
incorporated‌‌in‌‌a‌‌separate‌‌and‌‌substantive‌‌bill.‌‌   ‌ or‌  ‌resignation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President,‌  ‌the‌  ‌VP‌  ‌shall‌  ‌BECOME‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌‌   terms‌‌
  ‌item‌‌   ‌and‌‌
  ‌provision‌‌   ‌in‌‌
  budgetary‌‌   legislation‌‌   and‌‌  practice‌‌  President‌‌to‌‌serve‌‌the‌‌unexpired‌‌term.‌‌   ‌
Furthermore,‌  ‌Special‌  ‌Provision‌  ‌No.‌  ‌3,‌  ‌prohibiting‌  ‌the‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
are‌  ‌concededly‌  ‌different.‌  ‌An‌‌   ‌item‌‌   ‌in‌‌
  a ‌‌bill‌‌
  refers‌‌   to‌‌  the‌‌
  particulars,‌‌ 
Modernization‌  ‌Fund‌  ‌for‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌trainer‌‌  planes‌‌
  and‌‌   armored‌‌  5. In‌  ‌case‌  ‌these‌‌
  happen‌‌
  to‌‌
  both‌‌
  the‌‌
  President‌‌
  and‌‌
  VP,‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌Senate‌‌ 
the‌  ‌details,‌  ‌the‌‌
  distinct‌‌   and‌‌
  severable‌‌   parts‌‌   x ‌‌x ‌‌x ‌‌of‌‌
  the‌‌  bill.‌  ‌It‌‌
  is‌‌
  an‌‌ 
personnel‌  ‌carriers,‌  ‌which‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌contracted‌  ‌for‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌AFP,‌  ‌is‌‌ 
indivisible‌‌sum‌‌of‌‌money‌‌dedicated‌‌to‌‌a‌‌stated‌‌purpose.‌  ‌ President‌  ‌or,‌  ‌in‌  ‌case‌‌
  of‌‌
  his‌‌
  inability,‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌Speaker‌, ‌‌shall‌‌   then‌‌ 
violative‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ Constitutional‌‌ prohibition‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ passage‌‌ of‌‌ laws‌‌ that‌‌ 
Explicit‌  ‌is‌‌
  the‌‌
  requirement‌‌  that‌‌
  a ‌‌provision‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌  Appropriations‌‌  impair‌‌
  the‌‌
  obligation‌‌   of‌‌
  contracts‌‌
  (Art‌‌
  III‌‌
  Sec‌‌ 10),‌‌ more‌‌ so,‌‌ contracts‌‌  ACT‌  ‌as‌  ‌President‌  ‌until‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌or‌  ‌VP‌  ‌shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌‌ 
Bill‌  ‌should‌  ‌relate‌  ‌specifically‌  ‌to‌  ‌some‌  ‌"particular‌‌  entered‌‌into‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Government‌‌itself.‌  ‌ elected‌‌and‌‌qualified.‌  ‌
appropriation"‌  ‌therein.‌  ‌The‌  ‌challenged‌  ‌"provisions"‌  ‌fall‌  ‌short‌  ‌of‌‌ 
this‌  ‌requirement.‌  ‌Consequently,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌55‌  ‌(FY‌  ‌'89)‌  ‌and‌  ‌Section‌‌   16‌‌ 
Veto‌  ‌of‌  ‌provision‌  ‌on‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌savings‌  ‌to‌  ‌augment‌  ‌AFP‌  ‌pension‌‌  c) Temporary‌‌Disability‌‌   ‌
funds.‌‌—‌V ‌ ALID‌  ‌
(FY‌  ‌‘90),‌  ‌although‌  ‌labelled‌  ‌as‌  ‌"provisions,"‌  ‌are‌  ‌actually‌‌  6. Whenever‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌President‌transmits‌‌
    to‌‌
  the‌‌
  Senate‌‌ President‌‌ and‌‌ 
inappropriate‌‌   provisions‌‌
  that‌‌  should‌‌
  be‌‌
  treated‌‌   as‌‌ items‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌  The‌‌   Special‌‌
  Provision,‌‌   which‌‌
  allows‌‌   the‌‌
  Chief‌‌
  of‌‌
  Staff‌‌
  to‌‌
  use‌‌ savings‌‌  the‌  ‌Speaker‌  ‌his‌  ‌written‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  unable‌  ‌to‌‌ 
purpose‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President's‌‌veto‌‌power.‌  ‌ to‌  ‌augment‌  ‌the‌  ‌pension‌  ‌fund‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌AFP‌  ‌being‌  ‌managed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
discharge‌  ‌the‌  ‌powers‌  ‌and‌  ‌duties‌‌   of‌‌
  his‌‌
  office‌, ‌‌and‌‌  until‌‌
  he‌‌ 
AFP-RSBS‌‌is‌v ‌ iolative‌‌‌of‌‌Secs‌‌25(5)‌‌and‌‌29(1)‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Art‌‌VI.‌  ‌
transmits‌  ‌to‌  ‌them‌  ‌a ‌ ‌written‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌contrary,‌  ‌such‌‌ 
PHILCONSA‌‌v.‌‌Enriquez‌  ‌ Condition‌‌on‌‌the‌‌deactivation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌CAFGU‌‌—‌V
‌ OID‌  ‌
powers‌  ‌and‌  ‌duties‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌discharged‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌VP‌  ‌as‌  ‌Acting‌‌ 
Veto‌‌of‌‌Provision‌‌on‌‌Debt‌‌Ceiling‌‌—‌V
‌ OID‌  ‌ Such‌  ‌intention‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌embodied‌  ‌and‌  ‌manifested‌  ‌in‌  ‌another‌  ‌law‌  President.‌  ‌
considering‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌abrades‌  ‌the‌  ‌powers‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commander-in-Chief‌‌ 
Also‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌included‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌category‌  ‌of‌  ‌"‌inappropriate‌‌  7. The‌  ‌above‌  ‌also‌  ‌applies‌  ‌whenever‌  ‌a ‌ ‌majority‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌the‌‌ 
and‌  ‌there‌  ‌are‌  ‌existing‌  ‌laws‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌creation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌CAFGU‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌ 
provisions‌" ‌ ‌are‌‌  unconstitutional‌‌  provisions‌‌  and‌‌  provisions‌‌  which‌‌  amended.‌  ‌Again‌  ‌we‌  ‌state:‌  ‌a ‌ ‌provision‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌appropriations‌  ‌act‌‌  Members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Cabinet‌‌‌transmit‌‌the‌‌same.‌  ‌
are‌‌ intended‌‌ to‌‌ amend‌‌ other‌‌ laws,‌‌ because‌‌ clearly‌‌ these‌‌ kinds‌‌ of‌‌ laws‌‌  cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌used‌  ‌to‌  ‌repeal‌‌  or‌‌
  amend‌‌   other‌‌
  laws‌, ‌‌in‌‌  this‌‌
  case,‌‌
  P.D.‌‌ 
have‌‌no‌‌place‌‌in‌‌an‌‌appropriations‌‌bill.‌  ‌ 8. Thereafter,‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌transmits‌  ‌his‌  ‌written‌‌ 
No.‌‌1597‌‌and‌‌R.A.‌‌No.‌‌6758.‌  ‌
declaration‌  ‌that‌  ‌no‌  ‌inability‌  ‌exists,‌  ‌he‌  ‌shall‌  ‌reassume‌  ‌the‌ 
These‌‌   provisos‌‌   are‌‌
  germane‌‌  to‌‌
  and‌‌
  have‌‌ a ‌‌direct‌‌ connection‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ 
D.‌‌Rules‌‌of‌‌Succession‌  ‌ powers‌‌and‌‌duties‌‌of‌‌his‌‌office.‌‌   ‌
item‌  ‌on‌  ‌debt‌  ‌service.‌  ‌Inherent‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌‌  of‌‌
  appropriation‌‌   is‌‌ 
the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌specify‌  ‌how‌  ‌the‌  ‌money‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌spent.‌  ‌The‌  ‌said‌‌  a) At‌‌the‌‌beginning‌‌of‌‌the‌‌term‌‌   ‌ 9. Meanwhile,‌‌
  should‌‌ a ‌‌majority‌‌ of‌‌ all‌‌ the‌‌ Members‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Cabinet‌‌ 
provisos,‌  ‌being‌  ‌appropriate‌  ‌provisions,‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌vetoed‌‌  transmit‌  ‌within‌  ‌five‌  ‌days‌  ‌their‌  ‌written‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌ 
separately‌.‌‌Hence,‌‌the‌‌item‌‌veto‌‌of‌‌said‌‌provisions‌‌is‌v ‌ oid‌. ‌ ‌ 1. If‌  ‌the‌  ‌President-elect‌  ‌fails‌  ‌to‌  ‌qualify‌  ‌or‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌‌ 
President‌  ‌is‌  ‌unable‌  ‌to‌  ‌discharge‌  ‌the‌  ‌powers‌‌   and‌‌  duties‌‌
  of‌‌
  his‌‌ 
Veto‌‌of‌‌provision‌‌on‌‌ratio‌‌for‌‌road‌‌maintenance‌‌—‌V
‌ OID‌  ‌ chosen,‌  ‌the‌  ‌VP-elect‌  ‌shall‌  ‌ACT‌  ‌as‌  ‌President‌  ‌until‌  ‌the‌‌ 
office,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Congress‌‌   shall‌‌  decide‌‌   the‌‌  issue.‌‌  For‌‌  that‌‌
  purpose,‌‌ 
President-elect‌‌shall‌‌have‌‌been‌‌chosen‌‌and‌‌qualified.‌  ‌
It‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌
  alien‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  appropriation‌‌   for‌‌
  road‌‌  maintenance,‌‌
  and‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌  the‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌shall‌  ‌convene,‌  ‌if‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌in‌  ‌session,‌  ‌within‌‌ 
other‌‌   hand,‌‌  it‌‌
  specifies‌‌   how‌‌
  the‌‌
  said‌‌
  item‌‌  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  expended‌‌ — ‌‌70%‌‌  2. If‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌beginning‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President,‌  ‌the‌‌  forty-eight‌‌ hours,‌‌ in‌‌ accordance‌‌ with‌‌ its‌‌ rules‌‌ and‌‌ without‌‌ need‌‌ 
by‌‌administrative‌‌and‌‌30%‌‌by‌‌contract.‌  ‌ President-elect‌  ‌shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌died‌  ‌or‌  ‌shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌become‌‌  of‌‌call.‌  ‌
Veto‌‌of‌‌provision‌‌on‌‌purchase‌‌of‌‌medicines‌‌by‌‌AFP‌‌—‌V
‌ OID‌  ‌ permanently‌‌disabled,‌‌the‌‌VP-elect‌‌shall‌B ‌ ECOME‌P ‌ resident.‌  ‌
10. If‌‌
  the‌‌
  Congress,‌‌
  within‌‌
  ten‌‌
  days‌‌
  after‌‌
  receipt‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ last‌‌ written‌‌ 
Being‌‌  directly‌‌  related‌‌
  to‌‌
  and‌‌ inseparable‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ appropriation‌‌ item‌‌  3. Where‌  ‌no‌  ‌President‌  ‌and‌  ‌VP‌  ‌shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌chosen‌  ‌or‌  ‌shall‌‌  declaration,‌  ‌or,‌  ‌if‌  ‌not‌‌
  in‌‌
  session,‌‌
  within‌‌
  twelve‌‌
  days‌‌
  after‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌ 
on‌‌
  purchases‌‌   of‌‌
  medicines‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  AFP,‌‌
  the‌‌
  special‌‌
  provision‌‌ ‌cannot‌‌  have‌  ‌qualified,‌  ‌or‌  ‌where‌  ‌both‌  ‌shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌died‌  ‌or‌  ‌become‌‌  required‌  ‌to‌  ‌assemble,‌  ‌determines‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌two-thirds‌  ‌vote‌  ‌of‌‌ 
be‌  ‌vetoed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌without‌  ‌also‌  ‌vetoing‌  ‌the‌  ‌said‌  ‌item‌‌  permanently‌‌   disabled,‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌Senate‌‌   President‌‌  or,‌‌
  in‌‌
  case‌‌   of‌‌ his‌‌ 
following‌B ‌ olinao‌‌Electronics‌. ‌ ‌
both‌  ‌Houses,‌  ‌voting‌  ‌separately‌, ‌ ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌is‌‌ 
inability,‌‌  the‌‌
  ‌Speaker‌, ‌‌shall‌‌
  ‌ACT‌‌
  ‌as‌‌ President‌‌ until‌‌ a ‌‌President‌‌ 
unable‌‌   to‌‌
  discharge‌‌   the‌‌
  powers‌‌
  and‌‌  duties‌‌
  of‌‌
  his‌‌
  office,‌‌ the‌‌ VP‌‌ 
Veto‌‌
  of‌‌
  provision‌‌
  on‌‌
  prior‌‌
  approval‌‌
  of‌‌
  Congress‌‌
  for‌‌
  purchase‌‌ of‌‌  or‌‌a‌‌VP‌‌shall‌‌have‌‌been‌‌chosen‌‌and‌‌qualified.‌  ‌
shall‌‌
  ‌ACT‌‌   ‌as‌‌
  President;‌‌
  otherwise,‌‌
  the‌‌
  President‌‌ shall‌‌ continue‌‌ 
military‌‌equipment‌‌—‌V ‌ ALID‌  ‌
exercising‌‌the‌‌powers‌‌and‌‌duties‌‌of‌‌his‌‌office.‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 37‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

accomplished‌  ‌or‌  ‌performed‌  ‌by‌  ‌either‌  ‌branch‌  ‌before‌  ‌a ‌ ‌court‌  ‌may‌‌ 
VII.‌‌JUDICIAL‌‌DEPARTMENT‌  ‌ come‌‌into‌‌the‌‌picture."‌  ‌
paramount‌  ‌public‌  ‌interest‌  ‌that‌  ‌is‌  ‌capable‌  ‌of‌  ‌repetition‌  ‌yet‌‌ 
evading‌‌review‌. ‌ ‌
A.‌‌Concepts‌  ‌ Kilusang‌‌Mayo‌‌Uno‌‌v.‌‌Aquino‌‌III‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
Most‌  ‌important‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌list‌  ‌of‌  ‌requisites‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌  Locus‌‌Standi‌  ‌
Judicial‌‌power‌  ‌
⭐‌actual‌  ‌case‌  ‌or‌  ‌controversy‌. ‌ ‌In‌  ‌every‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌judicial‌‌  or‌‌
  legal‌‌
  standing‌‌  has‌‌
  been‌‌   defined‌‌  as‌‌  ‌a ‌‌personal‌‌   and‌‌ substantial‌‌ 
Judicial‌‌review‌  ‌ power,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌traditional‌  ‌or‌  ‌expanded‌  ‌sense,‌  ‌this‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌‌  interest‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌
  case‌‌  such‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌   party‌‌   has‌‌
  sustained‌‌   or‌‌
  will‌‌ 
B.‌‌Judicial‌‌independence‌‌and‌‌autonomy‌  ‌ absolute‌‌necessity.‌  ‌ sustain‌  ‌direct‌  ‌injury‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌result‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌   governmental‌‌   act‌‌  that‌‌ 
is‌‌being‌‌challenged‌. ‌ ‌
C.‌‌Appointments‌‌to‌‌the‌‌judiciary‌  ‌ There‌‌
  is‌‌
  an‌‌
  actual‌‌
  case‌‌
  or‌‌  controversy‌‌   if‌‌
  there‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌"‌conflict‌‌
  of‌‌ legal‌‌ 
right,‌  ‌an‌  ‌opposite‌  ‌legal‌  ‌claims‌  ‌susceptible‌  ‌to‌  ‌judicial‌‌  Taxpayers,‌  ‌voters,‌  ‌concerned‌  ‌citizens,‌  ‌and‌  ‌legislators‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 
Judicial‌‌and‌‌Bar‌‌Council‌  ‌ resolution‌."‌  ‌A ‌ ‌petitioner‌  ‌bringing‌  ‌a ‌ ‌case‌  ‌before‌  ‌this‌  ‌Court‌  ‌must‌‌  accorded‌‌   standing‌‌
  to‌‌
  sue,‌‌
  provided‌‌
  that‌‌ the‌‌ following‌‌ requirements‌‌ 
establish‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌legally‌  ‌demandable‌  ‌and‌  ‌enforceable‌‌  are‌‌met:‌  ‌
D.‌‌The‌‌Supreme‌‌Court‌  ‌
right‌‌under‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌.‌‌There‌‌must‌‌be‌‌   ‌
 ‌ 1) cases‌‌involve‌‌constitutional‌‌issues;‌  ‌
1. a‌‌real‌‌and‌‌substantial‌‌controversy,‌‌   ‌
2) for‌  ‌taxpayers‌, ‌ ‌there‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌claim‌  ‌of‌  ‌illegal‌‌ 
A.‌‌Concepts‌  ‌ 2. with‌  ‌definite‌  ‌and‌  ‌concrete‌  ‌issues‌  ‌involving‌  ‌the‌  ‌legal‌‌  disbursement‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌  ‌funds‌  ‌or‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌tax‌  ‌measure‌  ‌is‌‌ 
Judicial‌‌power‌  ‌ relations‌‌of‌‌the‌‌parties,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ unconstitutional;‌  ‌
3. admitting‌‌of‌‌specific‌‌relief‌‌that‌‌courts‌‌can‌‌grant.‌  ‌   ‌voters‌, ‌‌there‌‌
3) for‌‌   must‌‌ be‌‌ a ‌‌showing‌‌ of‌‌ obvious‌‌ interest‌‌ in‌‌ 
The‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌power‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌vested‌  ‌in‌  ‌one‌  ‌Supreme‌  ‌Court‌  ‌and‌  ‌in‌‌ 
such‌‌lower‌‌courts‌‌as‌‌may‌‌be‌‌established‌‌by‌‌law.‌  ‌ Moreover,‌‌   an‌‌ actual‌‌ case‌‌ or‌‌ controversy‌‌ requires‌‌ that‌‌ ‌the‌‌ right‌‌ must‌‌  the‌‌validity‌‌of‌‌the‌‌election‌‌law‌‌in‌‌question;‌  ‌
be‌  ‌enforceable‌  ‌and‌  ‌legally‌  ‌demandable‌. ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌case‌  ‌is‌  ‌ripe‌  ‌for‌‌  4) for‌  ‌concerned‌  ‌citizens,‌  ‌there‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌showing‌  ‌that‌‌ 
Judicial‌  ‌power‌  ‌includes‌  ‌the‌  ‌duty‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌courts‌  ‌of‌‌
  justice‌‌
  to‌‌
  settle‌‌ 
adjudication‌‌   ‌when‌‌ the‌‌ challenged‌‌ governmental‌‌ act‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌completed‌‌  the‌  ‌issues‌  ‌raised‌  ‌are‌  ‌of‌  ‌transcendental‌  ‌importance‌‌ 
actual‌  ‌controversies‌  ‌involving‌  ‌rights‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌legally‌‌ 
action‌  ‌such‌‌   that‌‌  there‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌direct,‌‌
  concrete,‌‌
  and‌‌  adverse‌‌   effect‌‌  on‌‌  the‌‌  which‌‌must‌‌be‌‌settled‌‌early;‌‌and‌  ‌
demandable‌‌and‌‌enforceable‌‌‌xxx.‌  ‌ petitioner.‌  ‌In‌  ‌connection‌  ‌with‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌agencies,‌‌  5) for‌  ‌legislators‌, ‌ ‌there‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌claim‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌official‌‌ 
Judicial‌‌review‌  ‌ ripeness‌  ‌is‌  ‌ensured‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌exhaustion‌  ‌of‌‌ 
action‌  ‌complained‌  ‌of‌  ‌infringes‌  ‌upon‌‌   their‌‌
  prerogatives‌‌   as‌‌ 
administrative‌  ‌remedies‌. ‌ ‌One‌  ‌other‌  ‌concept‌  ‌pertaining‌  ‌to‌  ‌judicial‌‌ 
and‌‌  to‌‌ ‌determine‌‌ whether‌‌ or‌‌ not‌‌ there‌‌ has‌‌ been‌‌ a ‌‌grave‌‌ abuse‌‌  legislators.‌  ‌
review‌  ‌is‌  ‌intrinsically‌  ‌connected‌  ‌to‌  ‌it:‌  ‌the‌  ‌concept‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌case‌  ‌being‌‌ 
of‌‌
  discretion‌‌ amounting‌‌ to‌‌ lack‌‌ or‌‌ excess‌‌ of‌‌ jurisdiction‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌  moot‌‌and‌‌academic‌. ‌ ‌ ⭐‌Provincial‌‌Bus‌‌Operators‌‌Association‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌v.‌‌DOLE‌‌ 
part‌‌of‌‌any‌‌branch‌‌or‌‌instrumentality‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Government‌. ‌ ‌
As‌‌   ‌mootness‌, ‌‌Courts‌‌
  for‌‌   cannot‌‌ render‌‌ judgment‌‌ after‌‌ the‌‌ issue‌‌ has‌‌  2018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
Requisites‌  ‌ already‌  ‌been‌  ‌resolved‌  ‌by‌  ‌or‌  ‌through‌  ‌external‌  ‌developments.‌‌ 
Another‌  ‌exception‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌
  concept‌‌   ‌third-party‌‌
  of‌‌   standing.‌  ‌Under‌‌ 
However‌,‌‌Courts‌‌will‌‌decide‌‌cases,‌‌otherwise‌‌moot‌‌and‌‌academic,‌‌if:‌‌  
1. Ripeness‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌An‌  ‌actual‌  ‌case‌  ‌or‌  ‌controversy‌  ‌calling‌  ‌for‌‌  this‌  ‌concept,‌  ‌actions‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌brought‌  ‌on‌  ‌behalf‌  ‌of‌  ‌third‌  ‌parties‌‌ 
the‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌judicial‌‌power;‌  ‌ 1. there‌‌is‌‌a‌g
‌ rave‌‌violation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌;  ‌‌ ‌ provided‌‌the‌‌following‌‌criteria‌‌are‌‌met:‌‌   ‌
2. Locus‌  ‌standi.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌person‌  ‌challenging‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌‌  2. the‌  ‌exceptional‌  ‌character‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌situation‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  1. first‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌party‌  ‌bringing‌  ‌suit‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌suffered‌  ‌an‌‌ 
"‌standing‌"‌‌to‌‌challenge;‌  ‌ paramount‌‌public‌‌interest‌‌‌is‌‌involved;‌‌   ‌ '‌injury-in-fact‌,'‌  ‌thus‌  ‌giving‌  ‌him‌  ‌or‌  ‌her‌  ‌a ‌ ‌sufficiently‌‌ 
3. when‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌issue‌  ‌raised‌  ‌requires‌  ‌formulation‌‌   of‌‌  concrete‌‌interest'‌‌in‌‌the‌‌outcome‌‌of‌‌the‌‌issue‌‌in‌‌dispute;‌  ‌
3. The‌‌
  question‌‌
  of‌‌ constitutionality‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ raised‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ ‌earliest‌‌ 
possible‌‌opportunity‌;‌‌and‌  ‌ controlling‌  ‌principles‌  ‌to‌  ‌guide‌‌
  the‌‌
  bench,‌‌
  the‌‌
  bar,‌‌
  and‌‌
  the‌‌  2. second‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌party‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌a ‌ ‌close‌  ‌relation‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌third‌‌ 
public;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ party;‌‌and‌‌   ‌
4. The‌‌   of‌‌ constitutionality‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ the‌‌ very‌‌ ‌lis‌‌ mota‌ ‌of‌‌ the‌‌ 
  issue‌‌
case.‌  ‌ 4. the‌‌case‌‌is‌‌capable‌‌of‌‌repetition‌‌yet‌‌evading‌‌review‌. ‌ ‌ 3. third‌, ‌‌there‌‌
  must‌‌
  exist‌‌
  some‌‌  ‌hindrance‌‌
  ‌to‌‌
  the‌‌ third‌‌ party's‌‌ 
ability‌‌to‌‌protect‌‌his‌‌or‌‌her‌‌own‌‌interests.‌  ‌
Ripeness‌  ‌ Three‌‌   (3)‌‌
  circumstances‌‌   must‌‌
  be‌‌
  present‌‌  before‌‌
  this‌‌   Court‌‌
  may‌‌
  rule‌‌ 
on‌  ‌a ‌‌moot‌‌   issue.‌‌
  There‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  an‌‌
  ‌issue‌‌
  raising‌‌  a ‌‌grave‌‌
  violation‌‌  In‌  ‌some‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌similar‌  ‌to‌  ‌those‌  ‌in‌  ‌White‌  ‌Light,‌  ‌the‌  ‌third‌‌ 
Tan‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Macapagal‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌case‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌ripe‌  ‌for‌‌  of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌, ‌ ‌involving‌  ‌an‌  ‌exceptional‌  ‌situation‌  ‌of‌‌  parties‌  ‌represented‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌would‌  ‌have‌  ‌special‌  ‌and‌‌ 
adjudication,‌  ‌"it‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌prerequisite‌‌
  that‌‌   something‌‌   had‌‌
  by‌‌
  then‌‌
  been‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 38‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

legitimate‌  ‌reasons‌  ‌why‌  ‌they‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌bring‌  ‌the‌  ‌action‌  ‌themselves.‌‌  The‌  ‌term‌  ‌“‌political‌  ‌question‌” ‌ ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌"those‌  ‌questions‌  ‌which,‌‌  certain‌‌   provisions‌‌   in‌‌  the‌‌
  1987‌‌   Constitution.‌‌   The‌‌
  issues‌‌ likewise‌‌ call‌‌ 
Understandably,‌  ‌the‌  ‌cost‌  ‌to‌  ‌patrons‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌White‌  ‌Light‌  ‌case‌  ‌to‌‌  under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution,‌  ‌are‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌decided‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌in‌  ‌their‌‌  for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌ruling‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌scope‌  ‌of‌  ‌presidential‌  ‌immunity‌  ‌from‌‌   suit.‌‌
  They‌‌ 
bring‌  ‌the‌  ‌action‌  ‌themselves—i.e.,‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌they‌‌   would‌‌
  pay‌‌  sovereign‌‌   capacity,‌‌
  or‌‌
  in‌‌
  regard‌‌
  to‌‌
  which‌‌  full‌‌ discretionary‌‌ authority‌‌  also‌  ‌involve‌  ‌the‌  ‌correct‌  ‌calibration‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  right‌‌
  of‌‌
  petitioner‌‌  against‌‌ 
for‌  ‌the‌  ‌lease‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌motels—will‌  ‌be‌  ‌too‌  ‌small‌  ‌compared‌  ‌with‌‌  has‌  ‌been‌  ‌delegated‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Legislature‌  ‌or‌  ‌executive‌  ‌branch‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  prejudicial‌‌publicity.‌  ‌
the‌‌  cost‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ suit‌. ‌‌This‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ ‌free‌‌ rider‌‌ problem‌‌ in‌‌ economics.‌‌ It‌‌  Government."‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌concerned‌  ‌with‌  ‌issues‌  ‌dependent‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌‌ 
is‌‌
  a‌‌
  negative‌‌   externality‌‌ which‌‌ operates‌‌ as‌‌ a‌‌ ‌disincentive‌‌ to‌‌ sue‌‌ and‌  wisdom‌,‌‌not‌‌legality,‌‌of‌‌a‌‌particular‌‌measure.‌  ‌ B.‌‌Judicial‌‌independence‌‌and‌‌autonomy‌  ‌
assert‌‌a‌‌transcendental‌‌right‌. ‌ ‌
Judicial‌  ‌power‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌a ‌ ‌power;‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌also‌  ‌a ‌ ‌DUTY‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌duty‌‌  To‌‌
  maintain‌‌
  the‌‌
  independence‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  judiciary,‌‌ the‌‌ following‌‌ safeguards‌‌ 
As‌‌to‌‌actual‌‌controversy‌. ‌ ‌ have‌‌been‌‌embodied‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Constitution:‌  ‌
which‌‌  cannot‌‌  be‌‌
  abdicated‌‌   by‌‌ the‌‌ mere‌‌ specter‌‌ of‌‌ this‌‌ creature‌‌ called‌‌ 
Only‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌rights‌  ‌shared‌  ‌by‌  ‌many‌  ‌and‌  ‌requiring‌  ‌a ‌‌ the‌‌political‌‌question‌‌doctrine.‌‌   ‌ 1) The‌  ‌Supreme‌  ‌Court‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌constitutional‌  ‌body.‌  ‌It‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌‌ 
grounded‌‌   level‌‌
  of‌‌
  urgency‌‌  can‌‌
  be‌‌
  ‌transcendent‌. ‌‌‌This‌‌
  Court‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  a ‌‌
forum‌  ‌to‌  ‌appeal‌‌  political‌‌
  and‌‌
  policy‌‌   choices‌‌
  made‌‌  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  Executive,‌‌  There‌‌are‌‌two‌‌species‌‌of‌‌political‌‌questions:‌‌   ‌ abolished‌  ‌nor‌  ‌may‌  ‌its‌  ‌membership‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌manner‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌ 
Legislative,‌‌and‌‌other‌‌constitutional‌‌agencies‌‌and‌‌organs.‌  ‌ 1) "truly‌‌political‌‌questions"‌‌and‌  ‌ meetings‌‌be‌‌changed‌‌by‌‌mere‌‌legislation.‌  ‌
2) those‌‌which‌‌"are‌‌not‌‌truly‌‌political‌‌questions."‌  ‌ 2) The‌  ‌members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌SC‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌removed‌  ‌except‌  ‌by‌‌ 
Lis‌‌Mota‌  ‌
Truly‌  ‌political‌  ‌questions‌  ‌are‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌review‌, ‌ ‌the‌‌   reason‌‌  impeachment.‌  ‌
It‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌well-settled‌‌  maxim‌‌   of‌‌ adjudication‌‌ that‌‌ an‌‌ issue‌‌ assailing‌‌ the‌‌  for‌‌
  respect‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  doctrine‌‌   of‌‌
  separation‌‌   of‌‌
  powers‌‌   to‌‌ be‌‌ maintained.‌‌  3) The‌  ‌SC‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌deprived‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌minimum‌  ‌original‌  ‌and‌‌ 
constitutionality‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌governmental‌‌ act‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌ avoided‌‌ whenever‌‌  On‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand,‌  ‌by‌  ‌virtue‌  ‌of‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌1 ‌ ‌Art‌  ‌VIII,‌  ‌courts‌  ‌can‌  ‌review‌‌ 
possible.‌‌   Courts‌‌
  will‌‌ not‌‌ touch‌‌ the‌‌ issue‌‌ of‌‌ constitutionality‌‌ ‌unless‌‌  appellate‌‌jurisdiction.‌  ‌
questions‌‌which‌‌are‌‌not‌‌truly‌‌political‌‌in‌‌nature.‌  ‌
it‌  ‌is‌  ‌truly‌  ‌unavoidable‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌very‌  ‌lis‌  ‌mota‌  ‌or‌  c
‌ rux‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  4) The‌  ‌appellate‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌SC‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌increased‌  ‌by‌‌ 
controversy.‌  ‌ In‌  ‌our‌  ‌jurisdiction,‌  ‌the‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌truly‌  ‌political‌  ‌question‌‌ 
law‌‌without‌‌its‌‌advice‌‌and‌‌concurrence.‌  ‌
from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌non-justiciable‌  ‌political‌  ‌question‌  ‌lies‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌answer‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Operative‌‌fact‌‌doctrine‌  ‌ 5) Appointees‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  judiciary‌‌
  are‌‌
  now‌‌
  nominated‌‌  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  JBC‌‌
  and‌‌ 
question‌‌   of‌‌
  ‌whether‌‌
  there‌‌ are‌‌ constitutionally‌‌ imposed‌‌ limits‌‌ on‌‌ 
League‌‌of‌‌Cities‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Resolution‌  ‌ powers‌‌   or‌‌
  functions‌‌  conferred‌‌   upon‌‌
  political‌‌   bodies‌. ‌‌If‌‌ there‌‌ are,‌‌  no‌‌longer‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌confirmation‌‌by‌‌the‌‌CA.‌  ‌
then‌  ‌our‌  ‌courts‌  ‌are‌  ‌duty-bound‌  ‌to‌  ‌examine‌  ‌whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌branch‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Under‌  ‌the‌  ‌operative‌  ‌fact‌  ‌doctrine‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌is‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌as‌‌  6) The‌  ‌SC‌  ‌now‌  ‌has‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌supervision‌  ‌over‌  ‌all‌  ‌lower‌‌ 
instrumentality‌‌of‌‌the‌‌government‌‌properly‌‌acted‌‌within‌‌such‌‌limits.‌  ‌
unconstitutional‌  ‌but‌  ‌the‌  ‌effects‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌
  unconstitutional‌‌   law,‌‌
  prior‌‌
  to‌‌  courts‌‌and‌‌their‌‌personnel.‌  ‌
its‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌nullity,‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌left‌  ‌undisturbed‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌matter‌  ‌of‌‌  7) The‌  ‌SC‌  ‌has‌  ‌exclusive‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌discipline‌  ‌judges‌  ‌of‌  ‌lower‌‌ 
Estrada‌‌v.‌‌Arroyo‌  ‌
equity‌  ‌and‌  ‌fair‌  ‌play.‌  ‌In‌  ‌fact,‌  ‌the‌  ‌invocation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌operative‌  ‌fact‌‌ 
courts.‌  ‌
doctrine‌‌is‌‌an‌‌admission‌‌that‌‌the‌‌law‌‌is‌‌unconstitutional.‌  ‌ EDSA‌  ‌I ‌ ‌involves‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌revolution‌‌ 
which‌‌
  ‌overthrew‌‌   the‌‌  whole‌‌ government‌. ‌‌‌EDSA‌‌ II‌‌ is‌‌ an‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌  8) The‌  ‌members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌SC‌  ‌and‌  ‌all‌  ‌lower‌  ‌courts‌‌   have‌‌
  security‌‌
  of‌‌ 
In‌  ‌Planters‌  ‌Products,‌  ‌Inc.‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Fertiphil‌  ‌Corporation‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌‌ 
people‌‌   power‌‌   of‌‌
  freedom‌‌   of‌‌
  speech‌‌ and‌‌ freedom‌‌ of‌‌ assembly‌‌ to‌‌  tenure,‌‌
  which‌‌
  cannot‌‌   be‌‌
  undermined‌‌   by‌‌  a ‌‌law‌‌
  reorganizing‌‌ the‌‌ 
stated:‌  ‌
petition‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌for‌  ‌redress‌  ‌of‌  ‌grievances‌  ‌which‌  ‌only‌‌  judiciary.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌general‌  ‌rule‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌an‌  ‌unconstitutional‌  ‌law‌  ‌is‌  ‌void.‌  ‌It‌‌  affected‌‌the‌‌office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President‌.  ‌‌ ‌
produces‌  ‌no‌  ‌rights,‌  ‌imposes‌  ‌no‌  ‌duties‌  ‌and‌‌   affords‌‌  no‌‌
  protection.‌‌   It‌‌  9) They‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌designated‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌agency‌  ‌performing‌‌ 
EDSA‌  ‌I ‌ ‌is‌  ‌extra‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌legitimacy‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌new‌‌  quasi-judicial‌‌or‌‌administrative‌‌functions.‌  ‌
has‌‌
  no‌‌ legal‌‌ effect.‌‌ It‌‌ is,‌‌ in‌‌ legal‌‌ contemplation,‌‌ inoperative‌‌ as‌‌ if‌‌ it‌‌ has‌‌ 
government‌  ‌that‌  ‌resulted‌  ‌from‌  ‌it‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌  ‌of‌  ‌judicial‌‌ 
not‌  ‌been‌  ‌passed.‌  ‌The‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌operative‌  ‌fact,‌‌   as‌‌
  an‌‌
  ‌exception‌‌   ‌to‌‌  10) The‌  ‌salaries‌  ‌of‌  ‌judges‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌reduced‌  ‌during‌  ‌their‌‌ 
review,‌  ‌but‌  ‌EDSA‌  ‌II‌  ‌is‌  ‌intra‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  resignation‌‌   of‌‌ 
the‌‌general‌‌rule,‌‌only‌‌applies‌‌as‌‌a‌‌matter‌‌of‌‌equity‌‌and‌‌fair‌‌play.‌‌   ‌
the‌  ‌sitting‌  ‌President‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌caused‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌succession‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Vice‌‌  continuance‌‌in‌‌office.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌doctrine‌‌
  is‌‌
  applicable‌‌
  when‌‌
  a ‌‌declaration‌‌
  of‌‌
  unconstitutionality‌‌  President‌‌as‌‌President‌‌are‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌judicial‌‌review.‌‌   ‌
11) The‌‌
  judiciary‌‌
  shall‌‌
  enjoy‌‌ ‌fiscal‌‌ autonomy.‌‌ ‌— ‌‌Fiscal‌‌ autonomy‌‌ 
will‌  ‌impose‌‌  an‌‌  undue‌‌
  burden‌‌
  on‌‌   those‌‌
  who‌‌  have‌‌
  relied‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌  EDSA‌  ‌I ‌ ‌presented‌  ‌political‌  ‌question;‌  ‌EDSA‌  ‌II‌  ‌involves‌  ‌legal‌‌  means‌‌freedom‌‌from‌‌outside‌‌control.‌‌(B ‌ engzon‌‌v.‌‌Drilon‌)‌ 
invalid‌‌law‌. ‌ ‌ questions.‌‌   ‌
Any‌‌  law‌‌
  which‌‌ provides‌‌ for‌‌ an‌‌ exemption‌‌ from‌‌ said‌‌ fees‌‌ would‌‌ 
Political‌‌question‌‌doctrine‌  ‌ The‌  ‌cases‌  ‌at‌  ‌bar‌  ‌pose‌  ‌LEGAL‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌political‌  ‌questions‌. ‌ ‌The‌‌  be‌‌
  constitutionally‌‌   infirm‌‌
  for‌‌
  it‌‌
  impairs‌‌
  the‌‌ Court’s‌‌ guaranteed‌‌ 
principal‌  ‌issues‌  ‌for‌  ‌resolution‌  ‌require‌  ‌the‌  ‌proper‌  ‌interpretation‌  ‌of‌‌ 
⭐‌Francisco‌‌v.‌‌House‌‌of‌‌Representatives‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 39‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

fiscal‌  ‌autonomy‌  ‌and‌  ‌erodes‌  ‌its‌  ‌independence.‌  ‌(‌AM‌  ‌12-2-03-0‌‌  1. the‌‌‌Chief‌‌Justice‌a‌ s‌‌‌ex‌‌officio‌‌Chairman‌,  ‌‌ ‌ newly‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌members‌  ‌by‌  ‌controlling‌  ‌the‌  ‌date‌  ‌and‌  ‌order‌  ‌of‌‌ 
2012‌‌En‌‌Banc‌) ‌ ‌ issuance‌  ‌of‌  ‌said‌  ‌members'‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌or‌  ‌commission‌  ‌papers.‌‌   By‌‌ 
2. the‌‌Secretary‌‌of‌‌Justice‌,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
12) The‌‌SC‌‌alone‌‌may‌‌initiate‌‌rules‌‌of‌‌court.‌  ‌ already‌  ‌designating‌  ‌the‌  ‌numerical‌  ‌order‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌vacancies,‌  ‌the‌  ‌JBC‌‌ 
3. a‌‌representative‌‌of‌‌the‌C
‌ ongress‌a‌ s‌‌ex‌‌officio‌‌Members‌,  ‌‌ ‌ would‌‌   be‌‌
  establishing‌‌   the‌‌  seniority‌‌
  or‌‌ order‌‌ of‌‌ preference‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ new‌‌ 
13) Only‌‌the‌‌SC‌‌may‌‌order‌‌the‌‌temporary‌‌detail‌‌of‌‌judges.‌  ‌
4. a‌‌representative‌‌of‌‌the‌I‌ ntegrated‌‌Bar‌,  ‌‌ ‌ Sandiganbayan‌  ‌Associate‌  ‌Justices‌  ‌even‌  ‌before‌  ‌their‌  ‌appointment‌‌   by‌‌ 
14) The‌‌SC‌‌can‌‌appoint‌‌all‌‌officials‌‌and‌‌employees‌‌of‌‌the‌‌judiciary.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌President‌  ‌and,‌  ‌thus,‌  ‌unduly‌  ‌arrogating‌  ‌unto‌  ‌itself‌‌  a ‌‌vital‌‌
  part‌‌
  of‌‌ 
5. a‌‌professor‌‌of‌‌law‌,  ‌‌ ‌ the‌‌President's‌‌power‌‌of‌‌appointment.‌  ‌
In‌‌re‌‌NPC‌‌‌and‌R
‌ e‌‌GSIS‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
6. a‌‌retired‌M
‌ ember‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Supreme‌‌Court,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
Since‌  ‌the‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌legal‌  ‌fees‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌vital‌  ‌component‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  rules‌‌  D.‌‌The‌‌Supreme‌‌Court‌  ‌
7. a‌‌representative‌‌of‌‌the‌p
‌ rivate‌‌sector‌. ‌ ‌
promulgated‌  ‌by‌  ‌this‌  ‌Court‌  ‌concerning‌  ‌pleading,‌  ‌practice‌  ‌and‌‌  Composition‌  ‌
procedure,‌  ‌it‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌validly‌  ‌annulled,‌  ‌changed‌  ‌or‌  ‌modified‌  ‌by‌‌  The‌  ‌regular‌  ‌members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Council‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Congress.‌  ‌ President‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌4 ‌ ‌years‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌consent‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Sec‌‌   4.‌‌
  The‌‌   Supreme‌‌   Court‌‌  shall‌‌   be‌‌
  composed‌‌   of‌‌ a ‌‌Chief‌‌ Justice‌‌ and‌‌ 
Commission‌‌on‌‌Appointments‌.  ‌‌ ‌ fourteen‌‌   ‌Associate‌‌   Justices.‌‌   It‌‌
  may‌‌   sit‌‌
  en‌‌
  banc‌‌   or‌‌ in‌‌ its‌‌ discretion,‌‌ 
C.‌‌Appointments‌‌to‌‌the‌‌judiciary‌  ‌ in‌  ‌division‌‌   of‌‌
  three,‌‌
  five,‌‌
  or‌‌
  seven‌‌   Members.‌‌   Any‌‌   vacancy‌‌   shall‌‌
  be‌‌ 
Powers‌  ‌
Sec‌  ‌9.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Supreme‌  ‌Court‌  ‌and‌  ‌judges‌  ‌of‌  ‌lower‌‌  filled‌‌within‌‌90‌‌days‌‌‌from‌‌the‌‌occurrence‌‌thereof.‌‌xxxx‌  ‌
courts‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌list‌‌
  of‌‌
  at‌‌
  least‌‌  De‌‌Castro‌‌v.‌‌JBC‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
Powers‌‌and‌‌functions‌  ‌
three‌‌ nominees‌‌ preferred‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ Judicial‌‌ and‌‌ Bar‌‌ Council‌‌ for‌‌ every‌‌  Does‌  ‌mandamus‌  ‌lie‌  ‌to‌  ‌compel‌  ‌the‌  ‌submission‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌shortlist‌  ‌of‌‌ 
1. Exercise‌‌ ‌original‌‌ jurisdiction‌ ‌over‌‌ cases‌‌ affecting‌‌ ambassadors,‌‌ 
vacancy.‌‌Such‌‌appointments‌n ‌ eed‌‌no‌‌confirmation‌. ‌ ‌ nominees‌‌by‌‌the‌‌JBC?‌  ‌
other‌  ‌public‌  ‌ministers‌  ‌and‌  ‌consuls,‌  ‌and‌  ‌over‌  ‌petitions‌  ‌for‌‌ 
For‌  ‌the‌  ‌lower‌  ‌courts,‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌shall‌  ‌issue‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointment‌‌  NO‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌90-day‌  ‌period‌  ‌is‌  ‌directed‌‌   at‌‌
  the‌‌  President,‌‌   ‌not‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌  certiorari,‌  ‌prohibition,‌  ‌mandamus,‌  ‌quo‌  ‌warranto,‌  ‌and‌  ‌habeas‌‌ 
within‌‌90‌‌days‌‌‌from‌‌the‌‌submission‌‌of‌‌the‌‌list.‌  ‌ JBC‌. ‌‌Thus,‌‌ the‌‌ JBC‌‌ should‌‌ start‌‌ the‌‌ process‌‌ of‌‌ selecting‌‌ the‌‌ candidates‌‌ 
corpus.‌  ‌
to‌‌
  fill‌‌
  the‌‌
  vacancy‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Supreme‌‌  Court‌‌ ‌before‌‌ ‌the‌‌ occurrence‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
Qualifications‌‌of‌‌members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌judiciary‌  ‌ vacancy.‌  ‌ 2. Review,‌  ‌revise,‌  ‌reverse,‌  ‌modify,‌  ‌or‌  ‌affirm‌  ‌on‌  ‌appeal‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Sec‌  ‌7.‌  ‌No‌  ‌person‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌Member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Supreme‌‌  certiorari‌, ‌ ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌Rules‌  ‌of‌  ‌Court‌  ‌may‌  ‌provide,‌  ‌final‌‌ 
The‌‌ duty‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ JBC‌‌ to‌‌ submit‌‌ a ‌‌list‌‌ of‌‌ nominees‌‌ before‌‌ the‌‌ start‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
Court‌‌   or‌‌  any‌‌
  lower‌‌
  ‌collegiate‌‌   ‌court‌‌
  unless‌‌
  he‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌‌natural-born‌‌  President's‌  ‌mandatory‌  ‌90-day‌  ‌period‌  ‌to‌‌   appoint‌‌   is‌‌
  ‌ministerial‌, ‌‌but‌‌  judgments‌‌and‌‌orders‌‌of‌‌lower‌‌courts‌‌in:‌  ‌
citizen‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌‌A‌‌Member‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Supreme‌‌Court‌‌must‌‌be‌‌   ‌ its‌  ‌selection‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌‌  candidates‌‌  whose‌‌   names‌‌   will‌‌
  be‌‌  in‌‌  the‌‌
  list‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌  a. All‌  ‌cases‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitutionality‌  ‌or‌  ‌validity‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌‌ 
1. at‌‌least‌‌‌40‌‌years‌‌of‌‌age‌,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ submitted‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌   President‌‌
  lies‌‌  within‌‌   the‌‌  ‌discretion‌‌   ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  JBC.‌‌
  For‌‌  treaty,‌  ‌international‌  ‌or‌  ‌executive‌  ‌agreement,‌  ‌law,‌  ‌presidential‌‌ 
mandamus‌  ‌to‌  ‌lie‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌JBC,‌  ‌therefore,‌  ‌there‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌an‌‌ 
decree,‌  ‌proclamation,‌  ‌order,‌  ‌instruction,‌  ‌ordinance,‌  ‌or‌‌ 
2. must‌  ‌have‌‌
  been‌‌
  for‌‌
  ‌15‌‌
  years‌‌
  or‌‌
  more‌, ‌‌a ‌‌judge‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌lower‌‌  unexplained‌  ‌delay‌  ‌on‌  ‌its‌  ‌part‌  ‌in‌  ‌recommending‌  ‌nominees‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
regulation‌‌is‌‌in‌‌question.‌  ‌
court‌‌or‌‌engaged‌‌in‌‌the‌‌practice‌‌of‌‌law‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌  ‌ Judiciary,‌‌that‌‌is,‌‌in‌‌submitting‌‌the‌‌list‌‌to‌‌the‌‌President.‌  ‌
b. All‌‌
  cases‌‌  involving‌‌
  the‌‌
  legality‌‌
  of‌‌
  any‌‌ tax,‌‌ impost,‌‌ assessment,‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌shall‌  ‌prescribe‌  ‌the‌  ‌qualifications‌‌  of‌‌
  judges‌‌
  of‌‌
  lower‌‌ 
Aguinaldo‌‌v.‌‌Aquino‌‌III‌‌2
‌ 017‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌‌re‌‌  or‌‌toll,‌‌or‌‌any‌‌penalty‌‌imposed‌‌in‌‌relation‌‌thereto.‌  ‌
courts,‌‌  but‌‌
  no‌‌
  person‌‌   may‌‌ be‌‌ appointed‌‌ judge‌‌ thereof‌‌ unless‌‌ he‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌
citizen‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌and‌‌a‌m ‌ ember‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippine‌‌Bar‌. ‌ ‌ clustering‌‌of‌‌nominees‌‌by‌‌the‌‌JBC‌  ‌ c. All‌  ‌cases‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌lower‌  ‌court‌  ‌is‌  ‌in‌‌ 
The‌  ‌clustering‌  ‌of‌  ‌nominees‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌six‌  ‌vacancies‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  issue.‌  ‌
A‌  ‌Member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Judiciary‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌of‌  ‌proven‌‌ 
competence‌,‌‌integrity‌,‌‌probity‌,‌‌and‌‌independence‌. ‌ ‌ Sandiganbayan‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌JBC‌  ‌impaired‌  ‌the‌  ‌President's‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌‌  d. All‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌cases‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌imposed‌‌
  is‌‌
  reclusion‌‌ 
appoint‌‌  members‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Judiciary‌‌
  and‌‌
  to‌‌
  determine‌‌
  the‌‌
  seniority‌‌
  of‌‌  perpetua‌‌or‌‌higher.‌  ‌
Judicial‌‌and‌‌Bar‌‌Council‌  ‌ the‌‌newly-appointed‌‌Sandiganbayan‌‌Associate‌‌Justices.‌  ‌
e. All‌‌cases‌‌in‌‌which‌‌only‌‌an‌‌error‌‌or‌‌question‌‌of‌‌law‌‌is‌‌involved.‌  ‌
Composition‌  ‌ It‌‌
  also‌‌
  bears‌‌
  to‌‌
  point‌‌ out‌‌ that‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ President's‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌ appoint‌‌ 
members‌  ‌of‌  ‌a‌  ‌collegiate‌  ‌court,‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌Sandiganbayan,‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌  3. Assign‌  ‌temporarily‌  ‌judges‌  ‌of‌  ‌lower‌  ‌courts‌  ‌to‌  ‌other‌  ‌stations‌  ‌as‌‌ 
Sec‌  ‌8.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌Judicial‌  ‌and‌  ‌Bar‌  ‌Council‌  ‌is‌  ‌hereby‌  ‌created‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌‌ 
power‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌‌   the‌‌  seniority‌‌   or‌‌
  order‌‌
  ‌of‌‌
  preference‌‌
  of‌‌
  such‌‌  public‌  ‌interest‌  ‌may‌  ‌require.‌  ‌Such‌  ‌temporary‌  ‌assignment‌‌   shall‌‌
  not‌‌ 
supervision‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Supreme‌‌Court‌‌composed‌‌of‌‌   ‌
exceed‌‌six‌‌months‌‌without‌‌the‌‌consent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌judge‌‌concerned.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 40‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

4. Order‌‌  a ‌‌change‌‌ of‌‌ venue‌or‌‌
   place‌‌ of‌‌ trial‌‌ to‌‌ avoid‌‌ a ‌‌miscarriage‌‌ of‌‌  D.‌‌Composition‌‌and‌‌qualifications‌‌of‌‌members‌  ‌
In‌  ‌determining‌  ‌whether‌  ‌a ‌ ‌rule‌‌   prescribed‌‌   by‌‌  the‌‌  Supreme‌‌   Court,‌‌
  for‌‌ 
justice.‌  ‌ E.‌‌Prohibited‌‌offices‌‌and‌‌interests‌  ‌
the‌‌   practice‌‌   and‌‌
  procedure‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   lower‌‌ courts,‌‌ abridges,‌‌ enlarges,‌‌ or‌‌ 
5. Promulgate‌  ‌rules‌  ‌concerning‌  ‌the‌  ‌protection‌  ‌and‌  ‌enforcement‌  ‌of‌‌  modifies‌  ‌any‌  ‌substantive‌  ‌right,‌  ‌the‌  ‌test‌‌   is‌‌
  ‌whether‌‌   the‌‌
  rule‌‌
  really‌‌ 
 ‌
constitutional‌‌   rights,‌‌ pleading,‌‌ practice,‌‌ and‌‌ procedure‌‌ in‌‌ all‌‌ courts,‌‌  regulates‌  ‌procedure‌, ‌ ‌that‌  ‌is,‌  ‌the‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌process‌  ‌for‌  ‌enforcing‌‌ 
the‌  ‌admission‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌practice‌  ‌of‌  ‌law,‌  ‌the‌  ‌integrated‌  ‌bar,‌  ‌and‌  ‌legal‌‌  rights‌  ‌and‌  ‌duties‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌by‌  ‌substantive‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌  ‌for‌  ‌justly‌‌  A.‌‌Common‌‌provisions‌  ‌
assistance‌‌to‌‌the‌‌under-privileged.‌  ‌ administering‌  ‌remedy‌  ‌and‌  ‌redress‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌disregard‌  ‌or‌  ‌infraction‌  ‌of‌‌ 
them.‌‌   ‌If‌‌
  the‌‌
  rule‌‌  takes‌‌  away‌‌   a ‌‌vested‌‌   right,‌‌   it‌‌
  is‌‌ not‌‌ procedural‌. ‌‌ Sec‌  ‌1.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Constitutional‌  ‌Commissions,‌  ‌which‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌ 
6. Appoint‌  ‌all‌  ‌officials‌  ‌and‌  ‌employees‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Judiciary‌  ‌in‌‌  If‌  ‌the‌  ‌rule‌  ‌creates‌  ‌a ‌ ‌right‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌appeal,‌  ‌it‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌  independent‌,‌‌are‌  ‌
accordance‌‌with‌‌the‌‌Civil‌‌Service‌‌Law.‌  ‌ classified‌  ‌as‌  ‌a‌  ‌substantive‌  ‌matter;‌  ‌but‌  ‌if‌  ‌it‌  ‌operates‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌means‌  ‌of‌‌ 
a) the‌‌Civil‌‌Service‌‌Commission‌,  ‌‌ ‌
implementing‌  ‌an‌  ‌existing‌  ‌right‌  ‌then‌  ‌the‌  ‌rule‌  ‌deals‌  ‌merely‌  ‌with‌‌ 
People‌‌ v.‌‌ Mateo‌‌ ‌re‌‌ intermediate‌‌ review‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ CA‌‌ of‌‌ cases‌‌ requiring‌‌  procedure.‌  ‌ b) the‌‌Commission‌‌on‌‌Elections‌,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
automatic‌‌review‌‌by‌‌the‌‌SC‌  ‌ Section‌‌ 23‌‌ of‌‌ Republic‌‌ Act‌‌ No.‌‌ 9165‌‌ is‌‌ declared‌‌ ‌unconstitutional‌‌ ‌for‌‌  c) the‌‌Commission‌‌on‌‌Audit‌. ‌ ‌
While‌  ‌the‌  ‌Fundamental‌  ‌Law‌  ‌requires‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mandatory‌  ‌review‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  being‌  ‌contrary‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌
  ‌rule-making‌‌   authority‌‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Supreme‌‌
  Court‌‌ 
Sec‌  ‌5.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌shall‌  ‌enjoy‌  ‌fiscal‌  ‌autonomy‌. ‌ ‌Their‌‌ 
Supreme‌  ‌Court‌  ‌of‌  ‌cases‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌is‌  ‌reclusion‌‌  under‌‌Section‌‌5(5),‌‌Article‌‌VIII.‌  ‌
approved‌  ‌annual‌  ‌appropriations‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌automatically‌  ‌and‌‌ 
perpetua,‌  ‌life‌  ‌imprisonment,‌  ‌or‌  ‌death,‌  ‌nowhere,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌has‌  ‌it‌‌ 
regularly‌‌released.‌  ‌
proscribed‌  ‌an‌  ‌intermediate‌  ‌review.‌  ‌If‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌  ‌ensure‌  ‌utmost‌‌  Maceda‌‌v.‌‌Vasquez‌‌‌re‌‌supervision‌‌of‌‌lower‌‌courts‌‌and‌‌personnel‌  ‌
circumspection‌‌   before‌‌
  the‌‌ penalty‌‌ of‌‌ death,‌‌ reclusion‌‌ perpetua‌‌ or‌‌ life‌‌  Sec‌‌  7.‌‌
  Each‌‌
  Commission‌‌   shall‌‌
  decide‌‌
  by‌‌
  a ‌‌‌majority‌‌  vote‌‌   of‌‌ all‌‌ its‌‌ 
imprisonment‌  ‌is‌  ‌imposed,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌now‌  ‌deems‌  ‌it‌  ‌wise‌  ‌and‌‌  Article‌  ‌VIII,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌6 ‌ ‌exclusively‌  vests‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Supreme‌  ‌Court‌‌  Members,‌‌   any‌‌  case‌‌
  or‌‌
  matter‌‌
  brought‌‌ before‌‌ it‌‌ within‌‌ 60‌‌ days‌‌ from‌‌ 
compelling‌‌ to‌‌ provide‌‌ in‌‌ these‌‌ cases‌‌ a ‌‌review‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ Court‌‌ of‌‌ Appeals‌‌  administrative‌  ‌supervision‌  ‌over‌  ‌all‌  ‌courts‌  ‌and‌  ‌court‌  ‌personnel.‌  ‌By‌‌ 
the‌‌date‌‌of‌‌its‌‌submission‌‌for‌‌decision‌‌or‌‌resolution.‌  ‌
before‌‌the‌‌case‌‌is‌‌elevated‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Supreme‌‌Court.‌‌   ‌ virtue‌‌
  of‌‌
  this‌‌
  power,‌‌
  it‌‌ is‌‌ only‌‌ the‌‌ Supreme‌‌ Court‌‌ that‌‌ can‌‌ oversee‌‌ the‌‌ 
judges'‌‌
  and‌‌  court‌‌
  personnel's‌‌   compliance‌‌   with‌‌
  all‌‌
  laws,‌‌
  and‌‌
  take‌‌ the‌‌  Additional‌‌Commonalities‌  ‌
proper‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌action‌  ‌against‌  ‌them‌  ‌if‌  ‌they‌  ‌commit‌  ‌any‌‌ 
Estipona,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌Lobrigo‌‌2
‌ 017‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌‌re‌‌Plea-bargaining‌  ‌ 1) How‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌and‌  ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌office.‌‌
  — ‌‌‌All‌‌
  chairpersons‌‌   and‌‌ 
violation‌‌thereof.‌  ‌
commissioners‌  ‌are‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌‌   SC‌‌
  has‌‌
  rejected‌‌   previous‌‌
  attempts‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Congress,‌‌ in‌‌  Thus,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌should‌  ‌first‌  ‌refer‌  ‌the‌  ‌matter‌  ‌of‌‌  consent‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌on‌  ‌Appointments‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌term‌  ‌of‌‌
  ‌7 ‌‌
the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌
  legislative‌‌
  power,‌‌
  to‌‌
  amend‌‌   the‌‌  Rules‌‌   of‌‌
  Court,‌‌
  to‌‌  petitioner's‌‌   certificates‌‌   of‌‌
  service‌‌   to‌‌
  this‌‌ Court‌‌ ‌for‌‌ determination‌‌ 
wit:‌  ‌ years‌w ‌ ithout‌‌reappointment‌. ‌ ‌
of‌  ‌whether‌  ‌said‌  ‌certificates‌  ‌reflected‌  ‌the‌  ‌true‌  ‌status‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌pending‌‌ 
1. Fabian‌‌ v.‌‌ Desierto‌‌ ‌— ‌‌Appeal‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ decision‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Office‌‌  case‌  ‌load,‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌has‌  ‌the‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌records‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌  ‌such‌  ‌a ‌‌ 2) Staggering‌  ‌of‌  ‌terms.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Of‌  ‌those‌  ‌first‌  ‌appointed,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌disciplinary‌  ‌case‌‌  determination.‌‌   ‌ Chairman‌‌   shall‌‌  hold‌‌ office‌‌ for‌‌ seven‌‌ years,‌‌ a ‌‌Commissioner‌‌ for‌‌ 
should‌‌   be‌‌
  taken‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌ CA‌‌ under‌‌ the‌‌ provisions‌‌ of‌‌ Rule‌‌ 43‌‌ of‌‌  five‌‌
  years‌‌
  (2‌‌ for‌‌ Comelec),‌‌ and‌‌ another‌‌ Commissioner‌‌ for‌‌ three‌‌ 
Where‌  ‌a ‌ ‌criminal‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌against‌  ‌a ‌ ‌judge‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌court‌‌ 
the‌  ‌Rules‌  ‌instead‌  ‌of‌  ‌appeal‌  ‌by‌  ‌certiorari‌  ‌under‌  ‌Rule‌  ‌45‌  ‌as‌‌  years‌‌(the‌‌remaining‌‌4‌‌for‌‌Comelec),‌‌without‌‌reappointment.‌  ‌
employee‌  ‌arises‌  ‌from‌  ‌their‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌duties,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
provided‌‌in‌‌Section‌‌27‌‌of‌‌R.A.‌‌No.‌‌6770.‌  ‌
Ombudsman‌‌   must‌‌  defer‌‌   action‌‌ on‌‌ said‌‌ complaint‌‌ and‌‌ refer‌‌ the‌‌  3) Appointment‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌vacancy‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌only‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌unexpired‌‌ 
2. Cathay‌  ‌Metal‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Laguna‌  ‌West‌  ‌Multi-Purpose‌‌  same‌  ‌to‌  ‌this‌  ‌Court‌  ‌for‌  ‌determination‌  ‌whether‌  ‌said‌  ‌judge‌  ‌or‌‌  term‌‌of‌‌the‌‌predecessor.‌‌   ‌
Cooperative,‌  ‌Inc.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌Cooperative‌  ‌Code‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌on‌‌  court‌  ‌employee‌  ‌had‌  ‌acted‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌scope‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌‌ 
notices‌‌   cannot‌‌  replace‌‌
  the‌‌
  rules‌‌
  on‌‌ summons‌‌ under‌‌ Rule‌‌ 14‌‌  administrative‌‌duties.‌  ‌ 4) In‌  ‌no‌  ‌case‌  ‌shall‌  ‌any‌  ‌Member‌  ‌be‌  ‌appointed‌‌
  or‌‌
  designated‌‌
  in‌‌
  a ‌‌
of‌‌the‌‌Rules.‌  ‌  ‌
temporary‌‌or‌‌acting‌‌capacity.‌  ‌
3. Carpio-Morales‌‌   v.‌‌ CA‌‌ ‌2015‌‌ En‌‌ Banc‌‌ — ‌‌The‌‌ first‌‌ paragraph‌‌  VIII.‌‌CONSTITUTIONAL‌‌COMMISSIONS‌  ‌ 5) Common‌‌qualifications.‌‌‌—‌‌All‌‌members‌‌must‌‌be‌‌   ‌
of‌‌
  Section‌‌ 14‌‌ of‌‌ R.A.‌‌ No.‌‌ 6770,‌‌ which‌‌ prohibits‌‌ courts‌‌ except‌‌ 
the‌‌
  Supreme‌‌   Court‌‌   from‌‌   issuing‌‌ temporary‌‌ restraining‌‌ order‌‌  A.‌‌Common‌‌provisions‌  ‌ a) Natural-born‌‌citizens;‌  ‌
and/or‌  ‌writ‌  ‌of‌  ‌preliminary‌  ‌injunction‌  ‌to‌  ‌enjoin‌  ‌an‌‌  b) at‌‌least‌‌35‌‌years‌‌old‌a‌ t‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌appointment‌‌and‌‌   ‌
investigation‌  ‌conducted‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Ombudsman,‌  ‌Is‌‌  B.‌‌Institutional‌‌independence‌‌safeguards‌  ‌
unconstitutional‌‌as‌‌it‌‌contravenes‌‌Rule‌‌58‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Rules.‌  ‌ C.‌‌Powers‌‌and‌‌functions‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 41‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

c) must‌  ‌not‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌candidates‌  ‌for‌  ‌any‌  ‌elective‌‌  public‌‌accountability.‌  ‌ D.‌‌Composition‌‌and‌‌qualifications‌‌of‌‌members‌  ‌
position‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌elections‌‌
  immediately‌‌
  preceding‌‌   their‌ 
appointment.‌  ‌ Comelec‌  1. Enforce‌‌and‌‌administer‌‌all‌‌laws‌‌and‌‌regulations‌‌   ‌ CSC‌  ‌ Comelec‌  ‌ COA‌  ‌
relative‌‌to‌‌the‌‌conduct‌‌of‌‌an‌‌election,‌‌plebiscite,‌‌ 
B.‌‌Institutional‌‌independence‌‌safeguards‌  ‌ initiative,‌‌referendum,‌‌and‌‌recall.‌  ‌
Composition‌  ‌
1‌‌Chair‌‌+‌‌2‌‌  1‌‌Chair‌‌+‌‌6‌‌ 
1‌‌Chair‌‌+‌‌2‌‌Comms‌  ‌
2. Exercise‌‌exclusive‌‌original‌‌jurisdiction‌‌over‌‌all‌‌  Comms‌  ‌ Comms‌  ‌
1) These‌‌bodies‌‌may‌‌not‌‌be‌‌abolished‌‌by‌‌statute.‌  ‌
contests‌‌relating‌‌to‌‌the‌‌elections,‌‌returns,‌‌and‌‌ 
2) Each‌‌of‌‌them‌‌is‌‌expressly‌‌described‌‌as‌‌independent.‌  ‌ Term‌  ‌ 7‌‌years‌‌‌without‌‌reappointment‌ 
qualifications‌‌of‌‌all‌‌elective‌‌regional,‌‌provincial,‌‌ 
3) Each‌‌
  of‌‌
  them‌‌
  is‌‌
  conferred‌‌
  certain‌‌
  powers‌‌
  and‌‌
  functions‌‌
  which‌‌  and‌‌city‌‌officials,‌‌and‌‌appellate‌‌jurisdiction‌‌over‌‌all‌‌ 
CPAs‌‌with‌‌not‌‌less‌‌ 
cannot‌‌be‌‌withdrawn‌‌or‌‌reduced‌‌by‌‌statute.‌  ‌ contests‌‌involving‌‌elective‌‌municipal‌‌officials‌‌ 
a‌‌majority‌‌  than‌‌‌10‌‌years‌‌‌of‌‌ 
decided‌‌by‌‌trial‌‌courts‌‌of‌‌general‌‌jurisdiction,‌‌or‌‌ 
4) The‌  ‌chairmen‌  ‌and‌  ‌members‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌removed‌‌
  from‌‌
  office‌‌  thereof,‌‌  auditing‌‌ 
involving‌‌elective‌‌barangay‌‌officials‌‌decided‌‌by‌‌ 
except‌‌by‌‌impeachment.‌  ‌ including‌‌the‌‌  experience,‌‌OR‌‌ 
trial‌‌courts‌‌of‌‌limited‌‌jurisdiction.‌  ‌
Chair,‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌  members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌ 
5) The‌  ‌chairmen‌  ‌and‌  ‌members‌  ‌are‌  ‌given‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fairly‌  ‌long‌  ‌term‌  ‌of‌‌  3. Decisions,‌‌final‌‌orders,‌‌or‌‌rulings‌‌on‌‌election‌‌  with‌‌proven‌‌  members‌‌of‌‌  Philippine‌‌Bar‌‌who‌‌ 
seven‌‌years.‌  ‌ contests‌‌involving‌‌elective‌‌municipal‌‌and‌‌barangay‌‌  Special‌‌  capacity‌‌for‌‌  the‌‌Philippine‌‌  have‌‌been‌‌engaged‌‌ 
offices‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌final,‌‌executory,‌‌and‌‌not‌‌appealable.‌  ‌ qualification‌  ‌ public‌‌  Bar‌‌who‌‌have‌‌  in‌‌the‌‌practice‌‌of‌‌ 
6) The‌‌  terms‌‌
  of‌‌
  office‌‌
  are‌‌
  staggered‌‌
  in‌‌ such‌‌ a ‌‌manner‌‌ as‌‌ to‌‌ lessen‌‌ 
4. Decide,‌‌except‌‌those‌‌involving‌‌the‌‌right‌‌to‌‌vote,‌‌all‌‌  administration‌  ‌ been‌‌engaged‌‌  law‌‌for‌‌at‌‌least‌1
‌ 0‌‌ 
the‌‌
  opportunity‌‌   for‌‌
  appointment‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ majority‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ body‌‌ by‌‌  years.‌  ‌
questions‌‌affecting‌‌elections,‌‌including‌‌  in‌‌the‌‌practice‌‌ 
the‌‌same‌‌President.‌  ‌ determination‌‌of‌‌the‌‌number‌‌and‌‌location‌‌of‌‌  of‌‌law‌‌for‌‌at‌‌  At‌‌no‌‌time‌‌shall‌‌all‌‌ 
7) The‌  ‌chairmen‌  ‌and‌  ‌members‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌reappointed‌  ‌or‌‌  polling‌‌places,‌‌appointment‌‌of‌‌election‌‌officials‌‌  least‌‌10‌‌  Members‌‌belong‌‌to‌‌ 
appointed‌‌in‌‌an‌‌acting‌‌capacity.‌  ‌ and‌‌inspectors,‌‌and‌‌registration‌‌of‌‌voters.‌  ‌ years‌. ‌ ‌ the‌s‌ ame‌‌ 
among‌‌others‌  ‌ profession.‌  ‌
8) The‌‌
  salaries‌‌
  may‌‌
  not‌‌
  be‌‌
  decreased‌‌
  during‌‌
  their‌‌
  continuance‌‌ in‌‌ 
office.‌  ‌
COA‌  ‌ Shall‌‌have‌‌the‌‌power,‌‌authority,‌‌and‌‌duty‌‌to‌‌examine,‌‌  Funa‌‌v.‌‌Villar‌‌2
‌ 012‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
9) The‌‌Commissions‌‌enjoy‌‌fiscal‌‌autonomy.‌  ‌ audit,‌‌and‌‌settle‌‌all‌‌accounts‌‌pertaining‌‌to‌‌the‌‌revenue‌‌ 
and‌‌receipts‌‌of,‌‌and‌‌expenditures‌‌or‌‌uses‌‌of‌‌funds‌‌and‌‌  The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌restates‌  ‌its‌  ‌ruling‌  ‌on‌  ‌Sec.‌  ‌1(2),‌  ‌Art.‌  ‌IX(D)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
10) Each‌‌Commission‌‌may‌‌promulgate‌‌its‌‌own‌‌rules.‌  ‌ Constitution,‌‌viz‌: ‌ ‌
property,‌‌owned‌‌or‌‌held‌‌in‌‌trust‌‌by,‌‌or‌‌pertaining‌‌to,‌‌the‌‌ 
11) The‌  ‌chairmen‌  ‌and‌  ‌members‌  ‌are‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌certain‌‌  Government,‌‌or‌‌any‌‌of‌‌its‌‌subdivisions,‌‌agencies,‌‌or‌‌  1. The‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌of‌  ‌members‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌three‌‌ 
disqualifications‌‌
  and‌‌
  inhibitions‌‌
  calculated‌‌
  to‌‌
  strengthen‌‌
  their‌‌  instrumentalities,‌‌including‌‌GOCCs‌‌with‌‌original‌‌  constitutional‌  ‌commissions,‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌  ‌expiration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
integrity.‌  ‌ charters,‌‌and‌‌on‌‌a‌p‌ ost-audit‌‌basis‌: ‌ ‌ uneven‌  ‌terms‌  ‌of‌  ‌office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌set‌  ‌of‌  ‌commissioners,‌‌ 
1. constitutional‌‌bodies,‌‌commissions‌‌and‌‌offices‌‌  shall‌  ‌always‌  ‌be‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fixed‌  ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌seven‌  ‌(7)‌  ‌years‌; ‌ ‌an‌‌ 
12) They‌‌are‌‌allowed‌‌to‌‌appoint‌‌their‌‌own‌‌officials‌‌and‌‌employees.‌  ‌
that‌‌have‌‌been‌‌granted‌‌fiscal‌‌autonomy‌‌under‌‌this‌‌  appointment‌‌for‌‌a‌‌lesser‌‌period‌‌is‌‌void‌‌and‌‌unconstitutional‌. ‌ ‌
C.‌‌Powers‌‌and‌‌functions‌  ‌ Constitution;‌  ‌ 2. Appointments‌  ‌to‌  ‌vacancies‌  ‌resulting‌‌   from‌‌   certain‌‌
  causes‌‌ 
2. autonomous‌‌state‌‌colleges‌‌and‌‌universities;‌  ‌ shall‌  ‌only‌  ‌be‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌unexpired‌  ‌portion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
CSC‌  ‌ As‌‌the‌‌central‌‌personnel‌‌agency‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Government,‌‌  3. other‌‌GOCCs‌‌and‌‌their‌‌subsidiaries;‌‌and‌  ‌ predecessor,‌  ‌but‌  ‌such‌  ‌appointments‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌‌ 
shall‌‌establish‌‌a‌‌career‌‌service.‌‌It‌‌shall‌‌   ‌ the‌  ‌unexpired‌  ‌portion‌  ‌as‌  ‌this‌  ‌will‌  ‌likewise‌  ‌disrupt‌  ‌the‌‌ 
4. such‌‌non-governmental‌‌entities‌‌receiving‌‌subsidy‌‌ 
staggering‌‌of‌‌terms.‌  ‌
1. strengthen‌‌the‌‌merit‌‌and‌‌rewards‌‌system,‌‌   ‌ or‌‌equity,‌‌directly‌‌or‌‌indirectly,‌‌from‌‌or‌‌through‌‌the‌‌ 
Government,‌‌which‌‌are‌‌required‌‌by‌‌law‌‌or‌‌the‌‌  3. Members‌‌   who‌‌  were‌‌
  appointed‌‌   for‌‌
  a ‌‌full‌‌
  term‌‌ of‌‌ seven‌‌ years‌ 
2. integrate‌‌all‌‌human‌‌resources‌‌development‌‌  and‌  ‌who‌  ‌served‌  ‌the‌  ‌entire‌  ‌period,‌  ‌are‌  ‌barred‌  ‌from‌‌ 
programs‌‌for‌‌all‌‌levels‌‌and‌‌ranks,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ granting‌‌institution‌‌to‌‌submit‌‌to‌‌such‌‌audit‌‌as‌‌a ‌‌
condition‌‌of‌‌subsidy‌‌or‌‌equity.‌  ‌ reappointment‌t‌ o‌‌any‌‌position‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Commission.‌  
3. institutionalize‌‌a‌‌management‌‌climate‌‌conducive‌‌to‌‌  4. A‌  ‌commissioner‌  ‌who‌  ‌resigns‌  ‌after‌  ‌serving‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 42‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Commission‌  ‌for‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌  ‌seven‌  ‌years‌  ‌is‌  ‌eligible‌  ‌for‌  ‌an‌‌  K.‌‌Adequate‌‌Legal‌‌Assistance‌‌and‌‌Free‌‌Access‌‌to‌‌Courts‌  ‌ Privacy‌‌and‌‌autonomy‌  ‌
appointment‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌position‌  ‌of‌  ‌Chairman‌‌
  for‌‌  the‌‌
  unexpired‌‌ 
L.‌‌Right‌‌Against‌‌Self-incrimination‌  ‌ Ople‌‌v.‌‌Torres‌  ‌
portion‌‌of‌‌the‌‌term‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌departing‌‌chairman.‌‌   ‌
Such‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌covered‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌ban‌  ‌on‌‌  M.‌‌Rights‌‌of‌‌Persons‌‌Under‌‌Custodial‌‌Investigation‌  ‌ The‌‌essence‌‌of‌‌privacy‌‌is‌‌the‌‌"r‌ ight‌‌to‌‌be‌‌let‌‌alone‌."‌  ‌
reappointment,‌  ‌provided‌‌  ‌that‌‌
  the‌‌
  vacancy‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  position‌‌
  of‌‌  Specific‌‌ guarantees‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Bill‌‌ of‌‌ Rights‌‌ have‌‌ ‌penumbras‌‌ ‌formed‌‌ by‌‌ 
Chairman‌  ‌resulted‌  ‌from‌  ‌death,‌  ‌resignation,‌  ‌disability‌  ‌or‌‌  N.‌‌Rights‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Accused‌  ‌
emanations‌  ‌from‌  ‌these‌  ‌guarantees‌  ‌that‌  ‌help‌  ‌give‌  ‌them‌  ‌life‌  ‌and‌‌ 
removal‌‌by‌‌impeachment.‌‌   ‌
O.‌‌Right‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Speedy‌‌Disposition‌‌of‌‌Cases‌  ‌ substance.‌‌Various‌‌guarantees‌‌create‌‌‌zones‌‌of‌‌privacy‌. ‌ ‌
5. Any‌  ‌member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌or‌‌ 
designated‌‌in‌‌a‌t‌ emporary‌o ‌ r‌‌acting‌‌capacity.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌privacy‌  ‌as‌  ‌such‌  ‌is‌  ‌accorded‌  ‌recognition‌‌ 
P.‌‌Right‌‌Against‌‌Excessive‌‌Fines‌‌and‌‌Cruel,‌‌Degrading,‌‌and‌‌ 
independently‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌identification‌  ‌with‌  ‌liberty;‌  ‌in‌  ‌itself,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌fully‌‌ 
E.‌‌Prohibited‌‌offices‌‌and‌‌interests‌  ‌ Inhuman‌‌Punishments‌  ‌ deserving‌‌of‌‌constitutional‌‌protection.‌  ‌

Sec‌‌2.‌‌‌No‌‌member‌‌shall,‌‌during‌‌his‌‌tenure,‌‌   ‌ Q.‌‌Non-imprisonment‌‌for‌‌Debts‌  ‌ The‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌privacy‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fundamental‌  ‌right‌  ‌guaranteed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Constitution,‌‌   hence,‌‌   it‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  burden‌‌  of‌‌
  government‌‌   to‌‌ show‌‌ that‌‌ A.O.‌‌ 
a) hold‌‌any‌‌other‌‌office‌‌or‌‌employment;‌  ‌ R.‌‌Right‌‌Against‌‌Double‌‌Jeopardy‌  ‌ No.‌‌  308‌‌
  is‌‌
  justified‌‌   by‌‌  some‌‌   ‌compelling‌‌ state‌‌ interest‌‌ and‌‌ that‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ 
b) engage‌‌in‌‌the‌‌practice‌‌of‌‌any‌‌profession‌‌or‌‌   ‌ narrowly‌  ‌drawn.‌  ‌The‌  ‌possibilities‌  ‌of‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌and‌‌   misuse‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   PRN,‌‌ 
S.‌‌Right‌‌Against‌‌Involuntary‌‌Servitude‌  ‌ biometrics‌  ‌and‌  ‌computer‌  ‌technology‌  ‌are‌  ‌accentuated‌  ‌when‌  ‌we‌‌ 
c) in‌‌the‌‌active‌‌management‌‌or‌‌control‌‌of‌‌any‌‌business,‌‌   ‌ consider‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌individual‌  ‌lacks‌  ‌control‌  ‌over‌  ‌what‌‌   can‌‌  be‌‌  read‌‌  or‌‌ 
T.‌‌Ex‌‌post‌‌facto‌‌laws‌‌and‌‌Bills‌‌of‌‌Attainder‌  ‌ placed‌  ‌on‌  ‌his‌  ‌ID,‌  ‌much‌  ‌less‌  ‌verify‌  ‌the‌  ‌correctness‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌data‌‌ 
d) be‌  ‌financially‌  ‌interested,‌  ‌directly‌  ‌or‌  ‌indirectly,‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌‌ 
 ‌ encoded.‌  ‌They‌‌   threaten‌‌   the‌‌
  very‌‌  abuses‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  Bill‌‌
  of‌‌
  Rights‌‌   seeks‌‌ 
contract‌  ‌with,‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌franchise‌  ‌or‌  ‌privilege‌‌
  granted‌‌
  by‌‌ 
to‌‌prevent.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌Government,‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌subdivisions,‌  ‌agencies,‌  ‌or‌‌ 
A.‌‌Concept‌‌of‌‌Bill‌‌of‌‌Rights‌  ‌
instrumentalities,‌‌including‌‌GOCCs‌‌or‌‌their‌‌subsidiaries.‌  ‌

Vivares‌‌v.‌‌STC‌‌2
‌ 014‌  ‌
Nature‌‌of‌‌provisions‌‌   ‌
The‌‌three‌‌strands‌‌of‌‌the‌‌right‌‌to‌‌privacy,‌v‌ iz‌:  ‌‌ ‌
IX.‌‌BILL‌‌OF‌‌RIGHTS‌  ‌ Manila‌‌Prince‌‌Hotel‌‌v‌‌GSIS‌  ‌
1) locational‌  ‌or‌  ‌situational‌  ‌privacy‌  ‌— ‌‌refers‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  privacy‌‌ 
A.‌‌Concept‌‌of‌‌Bill‌‌of‌‌Rights‌  ‌ Thus,‌‌
  we‌‌  have‌‌   treated‌‌
  as‌‌  ‌self-executing‌‌   the‌‌  provisions‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ ‌Bill‌‌ of‌‌  that‌  ‌is‌  ‌felt‌  ‌in‌  ‌physical‌  ‌space,‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌that‌  ‌which‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 
Rights‌‌  on‌‌
  arrests,‌‌ searches‌‌ and‌‌ seizures,‌‌ the‌‌ rights‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌person‌‌ under‌‌  violated‌‌by‌‌trespass‌‌and‌‌unwarranted‌‌search‌‌and‌‌seizure;‌  ‌
B.‌‌Due‌‌Process‌‌of‌‌Law‌  ‌ custodial‌  ‌investigation,‌  ‌the‌  ‌rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌accused,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌privilege‌‌  2) informational‌  ‌privacy‌  ‌— ‌ ‌usually‌  ‌defined‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌‌ 
against‌  ‌self-incrimination.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌that‌  ‌legislation‌  ‌is‌‌  individuals‌‌to‌‌control‌‌information‌‌about‌‌themselves;‌‌and‌  ‌
C.‌‌Equal‌‌Protection‌‌of‌‌Laws‌  ‌ unnecessary‌‌   to‌‌  enable‌‌ courts‌‌ to‌‌ effectuate‌‌ constitutional‌‌ provisions‌‌ 
guaranteeing‌  ‌the‌  ‌fundamental‌  ‌rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌life,‌  ‌liberty‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  3) decisional‌  ‌privacy‌  ‌—‌  ‌usually‌  ‌defined‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌‌ 
D.‌‌Right‌‌Against‌‌Unreasonable‌‌Searches‌‌and‌‌Seizures‌  ‌ individuals‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌  ‌certain‌  ‌kinds‌  ‌of‌  ‌fundamental‌  ‌choices‌‌ 
protection‌  ‌of‌  ‌property.‌  ‌The‌  ‌same‌  ‌treatment‌  ‌is‌  ‌accorded‌  ‌to‌‌ 
constitutional‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌forbidding‌  ‌the‌  ‌taking‌  ‌or‌  ‌damaging‌  ‌of‌‌  with‌‌respect‌‌to‌‌their‌‌personal‌‌and‌‌reproductive‌‌autonomy.‌  ‌
E.‌‌Privacy‌‌of‌‌Communications‌‌and‌‌Correspondence‌  ‌
property‌‌for‌‌public‌‌use‌‌without‌‌just‌‌compensation.‌  ‌
Relation‌‌to‌‌human‌‌rights‌  ‌
F.‌‌Freedom‌‌of‌‌Speech‌‌and‌‌Expression‌  ‌
Against‌‌whom‌‌enforceable‌‌   ‌ Republic‌‌v.‌‌Sandiganbayan‌  ‌
G.‌‌Freedom‌‌of‌‌Religion‌  ‌
People‌‌v.‌‌Domasian‌  ‌ The‌  ‌Bill‌  ‌of‌  ‌Rights‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌1973‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌operative‌‌ 
H.‌‌Liberty‌‌of‌‌Abode‌‌and‌‌Freedom‌‌of‌‌Movement‌  ‌ during‌  ‌the‌  ‌interregnum‌. ‌ ‌However,‌  ‌the‌  ‌protection‌  ‌accorded‌  ‌to‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Bill‌  ‌of‌  ‌Rights‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌invoked‌  ‌against‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌  ‌private‌‌ 
individuals‌, ‌ ‌being‌  ‌directed‌  ‌only‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌and‌  ‌its‌‌  individuals‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌‌   Covenant‌‌   and‌‌  the‌‌
  Declaration‌‌   remained‌‌ 
I.‌‌Eminent‌‌Domain‌  ‌ in‌‌effect‌‌during‌‌the‌‌interregnum‌. ‌ ‌
law-enforcement‌‌agencies‌‌as‌‌a‌‌limitation‌‌on‌‌official‌‌action.‌  ‌
J.‌‌Non-impairment‌‌of‌‌Contracts‌  ‌ During‌  ‌the‌  ‌interregnum‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌could‌  ‌not‌  ‌invoke‌  ‌any‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 43‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

exclusionary‌  ‌right‌  ‌under‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Bill‌  ‌of‌  ‌Rights‌  ‌because‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌‌  c) to‌‌widen‌‌the‌‌reach‌‌of‌‌one’s‌‌capabilities,‌  ‌ right‌  ‌to‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌  ‌in‌  ‌requiring‌  ‌a ‌ ‌license‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌possession‌  ‌of‌‌ 
neither‌‌a‌‌constitution‌‌nor‌‌a‌‌Bill‌‌of‌‌Rights‌‌during‌‌the‌‌interregnum.‌  ‌ d) to‌‌
  enhance‌‌
  those‌‌
  moral‌‌
  and‌‌
  spiritual‌‌
  values‌‌ that‌‌ can‌‌ make‌‌  firearms‌. ‌ ‌Article‌  ‌III,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌1 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌is‌  ‌clear‌‌
  that‌‌
  ‌only‌‌ 
Under‌‌   Article‌‌   17(1)‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌ICCPR‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  revolutionary‌‌   government‌‌   had‌‌ 
life,‌  ‌liberty,‌  ‌or‌  ‌property‌  ‌is‌  ‌protected‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌‌ 
one’s‌‌life‌‌more‌‌meaningful‌‌and‌‌rewarding.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌duty‌  ‌to‌  ‌insure‌  ‌that‌  ‌"no‌  ‌one‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌subjected‌  ‌to‌  ‌arbitrary‌  ‌or‌‌  clause‌. ‌ ‌True‌  ‌property‌  ‌rights‌  ‌arise‌  ‌from‌  ‌legitimate‌  ‌claims‌  ‌of‌‌ 
unlawful‌  ‌interference‌  ‌with‌  ‌his‌  ‌privacy,‌  ‌family,‌  ‌home‌  ‌or‌‌  3. According‌  ‌to‌  ‌Imbong‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Ochoa‌, ‌ ‌life‌  ‌commences‌  ‌upon‌‌  entitlement‌‌ defined‌‌ by‌‌ existing‌‌ rules‌‌ or‌‌ understanding‌‌ that‌‌ stem‌‌ from‌‌ 
correspondence."‌‌   Although‌‌   the‌‌
  signatories‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌  Declaration‌‌   did‌‌ not‌‌  “conception,‌‌that‌‌is,‌‌upon‌‌fertilization.”‌  ‌ an‌‌independent‌‌source,‌‌such‌‌as‌‌law.‌  ‌
intend‌‌   it‌‌
  as‌‌
  a ‌‌legally‌‌   binding‌‌   document,‌‌   being‌‌   only‌‌ a ‌‌declaration,‌‌ the‌‌  4. Liberty‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌freedom‌‌
  to‌‌
  do‌‌
  right‌‌
  and‌‌
  never‌‌
  wrong;‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  ever‌‌  Assuming,‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌sake‌  ‌of‌  ‌argument,‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌possess‌  ‌a ‌‌
Court‌  ‌has‌  ‌interpreted‌  ‌the‌  ‌Declaration‌  ‌as‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌generally‌‌  firearm‌  ‌was‌  ‌considered‌  ‌a ‌ ‌property‌  ‌right,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌that‌‌ 
accepted‌  ‌principles‌  ‌of‌  ‌international‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌  ‌binding‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌  guided‌  ‌by‌  ‌reason‌  ‌and‌‌
  the‌‌
  upright‌‌
  honorable‌‌
  conscience‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
property‌‌rights‌‌are‌‌always‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌the‌‌State's‌‌police‌‌power.‌  ‌
State‌. ‌‌Thus,‌‌   the‌‌  revolutionary‌‌ government‌‌ was‌‌ also‌‌ obligated‌‌ ‌under‌‌  individual.‌  ‌
international‌  ‌law‌  ‌to‌  ‌observe‌  ‌the‌  ‌rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌individuals‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌‌  Kinds‌‌of‌‌due‌‌process‌  ‌
Declaration.‌  ‌ Agcaoili,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌Fariñas‌‌2
‌ 018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
Palacios‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
In‌‌
  ‌Secretary‌‌
  of‌‌
  National‌‌  Defense‌‌  et‌‌
  al.‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Manalo‌‌   et‌‌
  al.,‌‌
  the‌‌ Court‌‌ 
Due‌‌process‌i‌ s‌‌comprised‌‌of‌‌two‌‌(2)‌‌components‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌
 ‌

explained‌‌the‌‌concept‌‌of‌r
‌ ight‌‌to‌‌life‌‌‌in‌‌this‌‌wise:‌  ‌
B.‌‌Due‌‌Process‌‌of‌‌Law‌  ‌
While‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌life‌  ‌under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌III,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌1 ‌ ‌guarantees‌‌  a) substantive‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌  ‌which‌  ‌requires‌  ‌the‌  ‌intrinsic‌‌ 
essentially‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ alive—upon‌‌ which‌‌ the‌‌ enjoyment‌‌ of‌‌ all‌‌  validity‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ in‌‌ interfering‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ rights‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ person‌‌ 
Section‌‌
  1.‌‌
  No‌‌
  person‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  deprived‌‌
  of‌‌
  life,‌‌
  liberty,‌‌
  or‌‌
  property‌‌  to‌‌his‌‌life,‌‌liberty,‌‌or‌‌property,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
other‌  ‌rights‌  ‌is‌  ‌preconditioned—the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌security‌  ‌of‌‌ 
without‌‌due‌‌process‌‌of‌‌law,‌‌xxxx.‌  ‌
person‌‌   is‌‌
  a ‌‌guarantee‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   secure‌‌   quality‌‌ of‌‌ this‌‌ life.‌‌ In‌‌ a ‌‌broad‌‌  b) procedural‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌  ‌which‌  ‌consists‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌two‌  ‌basic‌‌ 
sense,‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌security‌  ‌of‌  ‌person‌  ‌"‌emanates‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person's‌‌  rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌notice‌  ‌and‌  ‌hearing‌, ‌ ‌as‌  ‌well‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌guarantee‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Notes‌  ‌
legal‌‌   and‌‌   uninterrupted‌‌   enjoyment‌‌   of‌‌
  his‌‌ life,‌‌ his‌‌ limbs,‌‌ his‌‌ body,‌‌  being‌‌heard‌‌by‌‌an‌‌impartial‌‌and‌‌competent‌‌tribunal.‌  ‌
1. Due‌‌
  process‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌guaranty‌‌ against‌‌ any‌‌ arbitrariness‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ part‌‌  his‌  ‌health,‌‌   and‌‌   his‌‌
  reputation.‌‌   It‌‌
  includes‌‌   the‌‌  right‌‌   to‌‌
  exist,‌‌
  and‌‌ 
the‌‌  right‌‌   to‌‌  enjoyment‌‌   of‌‌ life‌‌ while‌‌ existing‌, ‌‌and‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ invaded‌‌ not‌‌  Substantive‌  ‌
of‌‌the‌‌government.‌  ‌
only‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌deprivation‌  ‌of‌  ‌life‌  ‌but‌‌   also‌‌  of‌‌
  those‌‌   things‌‌   which‌‌   are‌‌  1. Requires‌  ‌the‌  ‌intrinsic‌  ‌validity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌in‌  ‌interfering‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌ 
2. Protects‌  ‌all‌  ‌persons,‌  ‌natural‌  ‌as‌  ‌well‌  ‌as‌  ‌juridical‌, ‌ ‌citizen‌‌
  or‌‌ 
necessary‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌enjoyment‌  ‌of‌  ‌life‌  ‌according‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌nature,‌‌  rights‌‌of‌‌the‌‌person‌‌to‌‌his‌‌life,‌‌liberty‌‌or‌‌property.‌  ‌
alien‌. ‌ ‌ temperament,‌‌and‌‌lawful‌‌desires‌‌of‌‌the‌‌individual."‌  ‌
2. Inquiry‌‌is‌‌whether‌‌it‌‌is‌‌a‌‌proper‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌legislative‌‌power.‌  ‌
3. Juridical‌  ‌persons‌  ‌are‌  ‌also‌  ‌covered‌  ‌but‌  ‌only‌  ‌insofar‌  ‌as‌  ‌their‌‌    ‌right‌‌
The‌‌   to‌‌
  liberty,‌  ‌on‌‌  the‌‌  other‌‌  hand,‌‌  was‌‌  defined‌‌  in‌‌  the‌‌  ‌City‌‌ of‌‌ 
property‌‌‌is‌‌concerned.‌  ‌ Manila,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌v.‌‌Hon.‌‌Laguio,‌‌Jr‌.,‌‌in‌‌this‌‌manner:‌  ‌ 3. The‌‌law‌‌must‌‌have‌‌a‌‌valid‌‌governmental‌‌objective.‌  ‌

4. To‌  ‌deprive‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌“take‌  ‌away‌  ‌forcibly,‌  ‌to‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌from‌  Liberty‌‌   ‌as‌‌ guaranteed‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ Constitution‌‌ was‌‌ defined‌‌ to‌‌ include‌‌  4. This‌‌
  objective‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  pursued‌‌
  in‌‌
  a ‌‌lawful‌‌ manner.‌‌ In‌‌ other‌‌ words,‌‌ 
possessing,‌‌enjoying‌‌or‌‌using‌‌something.”‌  ‌ "the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌exist‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌free‌  ‌from‌  ‌arbitrary‌‌  the‌  ‌means‌  ‌employed‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌reasonably‌  ‌related‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
restraint‌‌or‌‌servitude‌. ‌ ‌ accomplishment‌‌of‌‌the‌‌purpose‌‌and‌‌not‌‌unduly‌‌oppressive.‌  ‌
5. Deprivation‌‌
  is‌‌
  denial‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  life,‌‌
  liberty‌‌ or‌‌ property.‌‌ It‌‌ 
is‌‌ ‌per‌‌ se‌‌ not‌‌ unconstitutional.‌‌ What‌‌ is‌‌ prohibited‌‌ is‌‌ deprivation‌‌  ⭐‌Acosta‌‌v.‌‌Ochoa‌‌‌2019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ 5. In‌‌
  ‌Kwong‌‌
  Sing‌‌
  v.‌‌
  City‌‌
  of‌‌
  Manila‌, ‌‌an‌‌
  ordinance‌‌
  requiring‌‌ all‌‌ laundry‌‌ 
without‌‌due‌‌process‌‌of‌‌law.‌  ‌ establishments‌  ‌to‌  ‌issue‌  ‌their‌  ‌receipts‌  ‌in‌  ‌English‌  ‌or‌  ‌Spanish‌  ‌was‌‌ 
There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌bear‌  ‌arms.‌  ‌Neither‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌ 
ownership‌  ‌or‌  ‌possession‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌firearm‌  ‌a ‌ ‌property‌  ‌right.‌  ‌Persons‌‌  sustained‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌to‌‌
  protect‌‌
  the‌‌
  public‌‌   from‌‌
  deceptions‌‌   and‌‌ 
Concept‌‌of‌‌right‌‌to‌‌life,‌‌liberty‌‌and‌‌property‌  ‌
intending‌  ‌to‌  ‌use‌  ‌a ‌ ‌firearm‌  ‌can‌  ‌only‌  ‌either‌  ‌accept‌  ‌or‌  ‌decline‌  ‌the‌‌  misunderstandings‌  ‌that‌  ‌might‌  ‌arise‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌receipts‌  ‌in‌  ‌Chinese‌‌ 
1. Life‌‌is‌‌the‌‌integrity‌‌of‌‌the‌‌physical‌‌person.‌  ‌ government's‌  ‌terms‌  ‌for‌  ‌its‌  ‌use.‌  ‌The‌  ‌grant‌  ‌of‌  ‌license,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌is‌‌  characters‌‌that‌‌most‌‌don’t‌‌understand.‌  ‌
2. Included‌‌therein‌‌is‌‌the‌‌   ‌ without‌‌prejudice‌‌to‌‌the‌‌inviolability‌‌of‌‌the‌‌home.‌  ‌
6. However,‌‌
  in‌‌
  ‌Yu‌‌
  Cong‌‌
  Eng‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Trinidad‌, ‌‌a ‌‌law‌‌ prohibiting‌‌ the‌‌ keeping‌‌ 
a) right‌‌to‌‌give‌‌full‌‌rein‌‌to‌‌one’s‌‌all‌‌natural‌‌attributes,‌‌   ‌ With‌  ‌the‌  ‌bearing‌  ‌of‌  ‌arms‌  ‌being‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mere‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌granted‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  of‌  ‌account‌  ‌books‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌language‌  ‌other‌  ‌than‌  ‌English,‌  ‌Spanish,‌  ‌or‌‌ 
State,‌  ‌there‌  ‌could‌  ‌not‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌a ‌ ‌deprivation‌  ‌of‌  ‌petitioners'‌‌ 
any‌‌other‌‌local‌‌dialect‌‌was‌i‌ nvalidated‌. ‌ ‌
b) to‌‌expand‌‌the‌‌horizons‌‌of‌‌one’s‌‌mind,‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 44‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

The‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌preliminary‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌is‌  ‌substantive‌, ‌ ‌not‌‌  Administrative‌  ‌ speech,‌‌gender,‌‌or‌‌race,‌‌  interest‌‌and‌‌on‌‌the‌‌absence‌‌ 
merely‌  ‌formal‌  ‌or‌‌   technical.‌‌
  As‌‌   such,‌‌  to‌‌
  deny‌‌
  petitioner's‌‌   motion‌‌   for‌‌  Requisites‌  ‌ other‌‌fundamental‌‌  of‌‌less‌‌restrictive‌‌means‌‌for‌‌ 
reinvestigation‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  basis‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  provisions‌‌   of‌‌ A.M.‌‌ No.‌‌ 11-6-10-SC‌‌  rights‌‌such‌‌as‌‌suffrage,‌‌  achieving‌t‌ hat‌‌interest.‌  ‌
would‌  ‌be‌  ‌to‌  ‌deprive‌  ‌him‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌full‌  ‌measure‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌due‌‌  1) The‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌hearing‌, ‌ ‌which‌  ‌includes‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌present‌‌  judicial‌‌access,‌‌ 
process‌‌on‌‌purely‌‌procedural‌‌grounds.‌  ‌ one’s‌‌case‌‌and‌‌submit‌‌evidence‌‌in‌‌support‌‌thereof.‌  ‌ interstate‌‌travel‌  ‌

Procedural‌‌    ‌ 2) The‌‌tribunal‌‌must‌‌consider‌‌the‌‌evidence‌‌‌presented.‌  ‌ In‌‌terms‌‌of‌‌judicial‌‌  Determines‌‌the‌‌quality‌‌and‌‌ 


Our‌‌
  SC‌‌
  has‌‌ held‌‌ that‌‌ “‌the‌‌ twin‌‌ requirements‌‌ of‌notice‌‌
   and‌‌ hearing‌‌  3) The‌‌decision‌‌must‌‌have‌‌something‌‌to‌‌support‌‌itself.‌  ‌ review‌‌of‌‌statutes‌‌or‌‌  the‌‌amount‌‌of‌‌governmental‌‌ 
constitute‌‌ the‌‌ essential‌‌ elements‌‌ of‌‌ due‌‌ process‌‌ and‌‌ neither‌‌ of‌‌ these‌‌  ordinances:‌  ‌ interest‌‌brought‌‌to‌‌justify‌‌ 
4) The‌‌evidence‌‌must‌‌be‌s‌ ubstantial.‌  ‌ the‌‌regulation‌‌of‌‌ 
elements‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌eliminated‌  ‌without‌  ‌running‌  ‌afoul‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
fundamental‌‌freedoms.‌  ‌
constitutional‌‌guaranty.”‌  ‌ 5) The‌  ‌decision‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  ‌rendered‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  evidence‌‌
  presented‌‌ 
at‌‌the‌‌hearing‌. ‌ ‌ Rational‌‌  Review‌‌for‌‌economic‌‌  Rationally‌‌further‌‌a ‌‌
Judicial‌  ‌
6) The‌‌
  tribunal‌‌
  or‌‌
  body‌‌ or‌‌ any‌‌ of‌‌ its‌‌ judges‌‌ must‌‌ ‌act‌‌ on‌‌ its‌‌ or‌‌ his‌‌  Basis‌‌  legislation;‌‌equal‌‌  legitimate‌‌governmental‌‌ 
Requirements‌‌are‌‌as‌‌follows‌  ‌
Standard‌  ‌ protection‌‌challenges‌  ‌ interest‌  ‌
1) There‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌an‌  ‌impartial‌  ‌court‌  ‌or‌  ‌tribunal‌  ‌clothed‌  ‌with‌‌  own‌  ‌independent‌  ‌consideration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌‌  and‌‌   facts‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
judicial‌‌power‌‌to‌‌hear‌‌and‌‌determine‌‌the‌‌matter‌‌before‌‌it.‌  ‌ controversy‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌‌  simply‌‌
  accept‌‌
  the‌‌
  views‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌subordinate‌‌  Heightened‌‌  Classification‌‌based‌‌on‌‌  Governmental‌‌interest‌‌is‌‌ 
in‌‌arriving‌‌at‌‌a‌‌decision.‌  ‌ or‌‌  gender‌‌and‌‌legitimacy‌  ‌ extensively‌‌examined‌‌and‌‌ 
2) Jurisdiction‌  ‌must‌‌
  be‌‌
  lawfully‌‌
  acquired‌‌
  over‌‌
  the‌‌
  person‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
Immediate‌‌  the‌‌availability‌‌of‌‌less‌‌ 
defendant‌‌  and‌‌
  over‌‌
  the‌‌
  property‌‌
  which‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  subject‌‌
  matter‌‌ of‌‌  7) The‌  ‌board‌  ‌or‌  ‌body‌  ‌should,‌  ‌in‌  ‌all‌  ‌controversial‌  ‌questions,‌‌ 
Scrutiny‌  ‌ restrictive‌‌measures‌‌ 
the‌‌proceeding.‌  ‌ render‌  ‌its‌  ‌decision‌  ‌in‌  ‌such‌  ‌a ‌ ‌manner‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  considered.‌  ‌
proceeding‌  ‌can‌  ‌know‌  ‌the‌  ‌various‌  ‌issues‌  ‌involved,‌‌   and‌‌   the‌‌   ‌

3) The‌‌defendant‌‌must‌‌be‌‌given‌‌an‌o
‌ pportunity‌‌to‌‌be‌‌heard‌. ‌ ‌
reason‌‌for‌‌the‌‌decision‌‌rendered‌.‌  C.‌‌Equal‌‌Protection‌‌of‌‌Laws‌  ‌
4) Judgment‌‌must‌‌be‌‌rendered‌‌upon‌l‌ awful‌‌hearing.‌  ‌
Ang‌‌v.‌‌Belaro,‌‌Jr.‌‌‌2019‌  ‌
In‌‌re‌‌Abellana‌‌v.‌‌Paredes‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌ Section‌‌   1.‌‌
  xxx‌‌
  nor‌‌
  shall‌‌
  any‌‌
  person‌‌
  be‌‌
  denied‌‌
  the‌‌ equal‌‌ protection‌‌ 
The‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌heard‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌most‌  ‌basic‌  ‌principle‌‌   of‌‌
  due‌‌  process.‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌laws.‌  ‌
Jurisprudence‌‌   has‌‌ recognized‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ ‌writ‌‌ of‌‌ habeas‌‌ corpus‌‌ ‌may‌‌ also‌‌  There‌  ‌is‌  ‌only‌  ‌denial‌  ‌of‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌  ‌when‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌total‌  ‌absence‌‌  or‌‌ 
be‌‌
  availed‌‌
  of‌‌
  as‌‌  a ‌‌‌post-conviction‌‌   remedy‌‌   when,‌‌
  as‌‌  a ‌‌consequence‌‌  lack‌‌of‌‌opportunity‌‌to‌‌be‌‌heard‌‌or‌‌to‌‌have‌‌one's‌‌day‌‌in‌‌court.‌  ‌ Concept‌  ‌
sentence‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌judicial‌  ‌proceeding,‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Technical‌‌ rules‌‌ of‌‌ procedure‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌ strictly‌‌ applied‌‌ in‌‌ administrative‌‌  1. Requires‌‌
  that‌‌
  all‌‌ persons‌‌ or‌‌ things‌‌ similarly‌‌ situated‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌ 
following‌‌exceptional‌‌circumstances‌‌is‌‌attendant:‌‌   ‌
proceedings‌  ‌and‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌fully‌‌  treated‌  ‌alike,‌  ‌both‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌rights‌  ‌conferred‌  ‌and‌  ‌responsibilities‌‌ 
1) there‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌a ‌ ‌deprivation‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌constitutional‌  ‌right‌‌  equated‌  ‌with‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌‌   in‌‌
  its‌‌
  strict‌‌
  judicial‌‌   sense.‌‌  The‌‌  essence‌‌
  of‌‌ 
imposed.‌  ‌
resulting‌‌in‌‌the‌‌restraint‌‌of‌‌a‌‌person‌; ‌ ‌ due‌  ‌process‌  ‌is‌  ‌simply‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌heard,‌  ‌or‌  ‌as‌  ‌applied‌  ‌to‌  ‌administrative‌‌ 
2) the‌‌court‌‌had‌n
‌ o‌‌jurisdiction‌‌‌to‌‌impose‌‌the‌‌sentence;‌‌or‌  ‌ proceedings,‌  ‌an‌  ‌opportunity‌  ‌to‌  ‌explai‌n ‌ ‌one's‌  ‌side,‌  ‌or‌  ‌an‌‌  2. Substantive‌  ‌equality‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌enough.‌  ‌The‌  ‌law‌  ‌must‌  ‌also‌  ‌be‌‌ 
opportunity‌  ‌to‌  ‌seek‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reconsideration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌action‌  ‌or‌  ‌ruling‌‌  enforced‌a‌ nd‌‌applied‌‌equally.‌  ‌
3) the‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌excessive‌, ‌ ‌thus‌  ‌voiding‌  ‌the‌‌  complained‌‌of.‌  ‌
sentence‌‌as‌‌such‌ ‌excess.‌  ‌ 3. In‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Vera‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌old‌  ‌Probation‌  ‌Law‌  ‌provided‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Even‌‌   if‌‌
  it‌‌
  were‌‌
  true‌‌
  that‌‌
  petitioner‌‌ or‌‌ his‌‌ counsel‌‌ were‌‌ not‌‌ notified‌‌ of‌‌  Levels‌‌of‌‌Scrutiny‌  ‌ probation‌  ‌system‌‌   shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  applicable‌‌   “only‌‌  in‌‌
  those‌‌   provinces‌‌ 
the‌  ‌scheduled‌  ‌hearing,‌  ‌it‌‌   is‌‌
  still‌‌
  ‌not‌‌
  enough‌‌
  to‌‌
  warrant‌‌   a ‌‌finding‌‌   of‌‌  in‌‌
  which‌‌ the‌‌ respective‌‌ provincial‌‌ boards‌‌ have‌‌ provided‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ 
denial‌  ‌of‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌. ‌ ‌For‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌application‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  principle‌‌   of‌‌
  due‌‌  Test‌  ‌ Deals‌‌with‌  ‌ How?‌  ‌
salary‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌probation‌‌  officer.”‌‌  On‌‌   its‌‌
  face,‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌ a ‌‌sound‌‌ law.‌‌ But‌‌ 
process,‌  ‌what‌  ‌is‌  ‌sought‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌safeguarded‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌lack‌  ‌of‌‌  previous‌‌ 
Strict‌‌  Freedom‌‌of‌‌the‌‌mind;‌‌  Focus‌‌is‌‌on‌‌the‌‌presence‌‌of‌‌  when‌  ‌applied‌, ‌ ‌it‌  ‌discriminates‌  ‌against‌  ‌persons‌  ‌in‌  ‌one‌‌ 
notice‌‌but‌‌the‌‌denial‌‌of‌‌the‌‌‌opportunity‌‌to‌‌be‌‌heard‌. ‌ ‌
Scrutiny‌  ‌ restricting‌‌the‌‌political‌‌  compelling,‌‌rather‌‌than‌‌  province‌  ‌that‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌able‌  ‌to‌  ‌provide‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌salary‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌
process;‌‌regulation‌‌of‌‌  substantial‌‌governmental‌‌  probation‌‌officer.‌‌Thus,‌‌they‌‌are‌‌denied‌‌probation.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 45‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

4. Significantly,‌  ‌in‌  ‌Yrasuegui‌  ‌v.‌  ‌PAL‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌dismissal‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌  local-hire‌  ‌and‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌teachers,‌  ‌in‌  ‌light‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌long‌  ‌honored‌‌  convicted‌‌   in‌‌
  regular‌‌  courts‌‌
  in‌‌
  terms‌‌
  of‌‌
  their‌‌
  rights‌‌
  as‌‌ accused,‌‌ 
overweight‌‌   flight‌‌
  attendant‌‌  was‌‌   upheld‌‌
  as‌‌
  the‌‌
  equal‌‌
  protection‌‌  legal‌‌truism,‌‌“e
‌ qual‌‌pay‌‌for‌‌equal‌‌work‌.”‌  ‌ as‌‌held‌‌in‌‌Garcia‌‌v.‌‌Executive‌‌Secretary‌. ‌ ‌
clause‌  ‌erects‌  ‌no‌  ‌shield‌  ‌against‌  ‌private‌  ‌conduct,‌  ‌however‌‌  6. In‌‌
  ‌DECS‌‌
  v.‌‌
  San‌‌
  Diego‌, ‌‌the‌‌ three-flunk‌‌ rule‌‌ in‌‌ NMAT‌‌ was‌‌ upheld‌‌  13. EO‌  ‌No‌  ‌1 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌President‌  ‌Benigno‌  ‌Aquino‌  ‌III‌  ‌on‌  ‌his‌  ‌“Truth‌‌ 
discriminatory‌  ‌or‌  ‌wrongful.‌  ‌In‌  ‌another‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌International‌‌  and‌‌  not‌‌
  violative‌‌
  of‌‌
  equal‌‌
  protection‌‌
  as‌‌ there‌‌ was‌‌ a ‌‌substantial‌‌  Commission”‌  ‌was‌  ‌invalidated‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌zeroed-in‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌past‌‌ 
School‌‌
  Alliance‌‌  of‌‌
  Educators‌‌   v.‌‌ Quisumbing‌, ‌‌however,‌‌ the‌‌ equal‌‌  distinction‌  ‌between‌  ‌medical‌  ‌students‌  ‌and‌‌
  other‌‌
  students‌‌   who‌‌  administration‌‌of‌‌Arroyo.‌  ‌
protection‌‌clause‌‌was‌‌applied‌‌on‌‌a‌‌private‌‌entity.‌  ‌ are‌‌not‌‌subjected‌‌to‌‌the‌‌NMAT‌‌and‌‌the‌‌three-flunk‌‌rule.‌  ‌ 14. Also‌  ‌considered‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌SC‌‌
  as‌‌
  discriminatory‌‌
  was‌‌
  ‌Sec‌‌
  5.24‌‌
  of‌‌ 
Requisites‌‌for‌‌valid‌‌classification‌  ‌ 7. There‌  ‌also‌  ‌exists‌  ‌between‌  ‌presidential‌  ‌appointees‌  ‌occupying‌‌  the‌  ‌IRR‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Reproductive‌  ‌Health‌  ‌Law‌. ‌ ‌It‌  ‌nullified‌  ‌said‌‌ 
The‌  ‌grouping‌  ‌of‌  ‌persons‌  ‌or‌  ‌things‌  ‌similar‌  ‌to‌  ‌each‌  ‌other‌  ‌in‌  ‌certain‌‌  upper-level‌  ‌positions‌  ‌in‌  ‌government‌  ‌from‌  ‌non-presidential‌‌  law‌  ‌in‌  ‌Imbong‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Ochoa‌, ‌ ‌saying‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌conscientious‌‌ 
particulars‌‌and‌‌different‌‌from‌‌all‌‌others‌‌in‌‌these‌‌same‌‌particulars.‌  ‌ appointees‌  ‌and‌  ‌those‌  ‌that‌  ‌occupy‌  ‌the‌  ‌lower‌  ‌positions‌  ‌in‌‌  objection‌‌   clause‌‌   should‌‌
  be‌‌
  equally‌‌   protective‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ religious‌‌ 
1) Based‌‌upon‌‌substantial‌‌distinctions.‌  ‌ government.‌  ‌ belief‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌  ‌health‌  ‌officers.‌  ‌There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌perceptible‌‌ 
8. Goldenway‌  ‌Merchandising‌  ‌Corporation‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Equitable‌  ‌PCI‌‌
  Bank‌‌  distinction‌‌   why‌‌ they‌‌ should‌‌ not‌‌ be‌‌ considered‌‌ exempt‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ 
2) Germane‌‌to‌‌the‌‌purpose‌‌of‌‌the‌‌law.‌  ‌
upheld‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌47‌  ‌RA‌  ‌8791‌  ‌that‌  ‌shortens‌  ‌the‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌‌  mandates‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌law.‌  ‌The‌  ‌protection‌  ‌accorded‌  ‌to‌  ‌other‌‌ 
3) Not‌‌be‌‌limited‌‌to‌‌existing‌‌conditions‌‌‌only.‌  ‌ conscientious‌  ‌objectors‌  ‌should‌  ‌equally‌  ‌apply‌  ‌to‌  ‌all‌  ‌medical‌‌ 
redemption‌  ‌for‌  ‌juridical‌  ‌persons‌  ‌whose‌  ‌properties‌  ‌were‌‌ 
4) Apply‌‌equally‌‌to‌‌all‌‌members‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌same‌‌class.‌  ‌ foreclosed‌  ‌and‌  ‌sold‌‌   in‌‌  accordance‌‌   with‌‌   Act‌‌   No‌‌  3135.‌‌   There‌‌   is‌‌  practitioners‌  ‌without‌  ‌distinction‌  ‌whether‌  ‌they‌  ‌belong‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
substantial‌  ‌difference‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌nature‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌properties‌‌  private‌‌or‌‌public‌‌sector‌. ‌ ‌
Substantial‌‌Distinctions‌  ‌
foreclosed,‌  ‌residence‌  ‌for‌  ‌natural‌  ‌persons,‌  ‌as‌  ‌compared‌  ‌to‌‌  15. In‌‌   granting‌‌   the‌‌  petition‌‌   in‌‌
  ‌Ang‌‌ Ladlad‌‌ LGBT‌‌ Party‌‌ v.‌‌ COMELEC‌, ‌‌
1. Certain‌‌
  physical‌‌ differences‌‌ of‌‌ persons‌‌ can‌‌ in‌‌ some‌‌ instance‌‌ be‌‌ 
industrial‌‌   or‌‌
  commercial‌‌   purposes‌‌   for‌‌  juridical‌‌ persons‌‌ which‌‌  the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌further‌  ‌invoked‌‌   the‌‌
  principle‌‌  of‌‌
  non-discrimination,‌‌ 
the‌  ‌basis‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌  ‌classification,‌  ‌i.e.‌  ‌strength,‌  ‌height‌  ‌and‌ 
necessitates‌  ‌a ‌ ‌shorter‌  ‌redemption‌‌   period‌‌   to‌‌  reduce‌‌   the‌‌   period‌‌  as‌‌provided‌‌for‌‌also‌‌under‌‌the‌‌ICCPR‌‌and‌‌the‌‌UDHR.‌  ‌
weight,‌‌health‌‌condition,‌‌age.‌  ‌
of‌  ‌uncertainty‌  ‌in‌‌   the‌‌  ownership‌‌   of‌‌
  said‌‌   properties‌‌   and‌‌   enable‌‌  Philippine‌‌Plastics‌‌Industry‌‌Association‌‌v.‌‌San‌‌Pedro‌‌2 ‌ 018‌‌ 
2. In‌  ‌Ceniza‌  ‌v.‌  ‌COMELEC‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌law‌  ‌classifying‌  ‌cities‌  ‌as‌  ‌highly‌‌  mortgagee-banks‌‌to‌‌dispose‌‌sooner‌‌of‌‌their‌‌acquired‌‌assets.‌  ‌ Resolution‌  ‌
urbanized‌‌   if‌‌
  they‌‌
  had‌‌
  an‌‌
  annual‌‌   revenue‌‌ of‌‌ at‌‌ least‌‌ P40‌‌ million‌‌ 
9. Garcia‌‌   v.‌‌
  Drilon‌‌   validated‌‌   ‌RA‌‌
  9262‌‌   ‌or‌‌
  the‌‌   ‌VAWC‌‌   Law‌‌   as‌‌  there‌‌ 
and‌  ‌all‌  ‌others‌  ‌as‌  ‌component‌‌   cities‌‌  was‌‌
  upheld‌‌   since‌‌   it‌‌
  would‌‌  The‌‌   subject‌‌   Ordinance‌‌ ‌did‌‌ not‌‌ violate‌‌ the‌‌ equal‌‌ protection‌‌ clause‌‌ 
is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌need‌  ‌to‌‌  employ‌‌   protection‌‌   upon‌‌   women‌‌   as‌‌
  they‌‌   are‌‌   more‌‌  of‌  ‌the‌‌
  Constitution,‌‌   as‌‌
  there‌‌  is‌‌
  ‌substantial‌‌   distinction‌‌   between‌‌
  the‌‌ 
show‌  ‌whether‌  ‌a ‌ ‌city‌  ‌is‌  ‌capable‌‌   of‌‌
  existence‌‌  and‌‌   development‌‌ 
likely‌‌to‌‌be‌‌victims‌‌of‌‌abuses.‌  ‌ primary‌‌   and‌‌   secondary‌‌   plastic‌‌  packaging‌‌   materials,‌‌ or‌‌ even‌‌ between‌‌ 
independent‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌province‌  ‌where‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌geographically‌‌  plastic‌‌packaging‌‌materials‌‌and‌‌plastic‌‌cutlery.‌‌   ‌
located.‌  ‌Being‌  ‌so,‌  ‌they‌  ‌are‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌from‌  ‌voting‌  ‌for‌‌   provincial‌‌  10. In‌  ‌Tatad‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Secretary‌  ‌of‌  ‌Energy‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌deregulating‌  ‌the‌  ‌oil‌‌ 
officials.‌  ‌ industry‌‌ was‌‌ declared‌‌ unconstitutional‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ ground‌‌ ‌inter‌‌ alia‌‌  Relevance‌‌to‌‌Purpose‌‌of‌‌Law‌  ‌
that‌  ‌it‌  ‌discriminated‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌new‌  ‌players,‌  ‌insofar‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌‌  16. Classification‌‌
  will‌‌
  still‌‌
  be‌‌
  invalid‌‌
  if‌‌
  not‌‌
  relevant‌‌
  or‌‌ germane‌‌ to‌‌ 
3. There‌  ‌is‌  ‌also‌  ‌a ‌ ‌substantial‌  ‌distinction‌  ‌between‌  ‌barangay‌‌ 
placed‌  ‌them‌  ‌at‌  ‌a ‌ ‌competitive‌  ‌disadvantage‌  ‌vis-a-vis‌  ‌the‌‌ 
officials‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌elected‌  ‌public‌  ‌officials,‌  ‌in‌  ‌terms‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌‌purpose‌‌of‌‌the‌‌law.‌  ‌
established‌  ‌oil‌  ‌companies‌  ‌by‌  ‌requiring‌  ‌them‌  ‌to‌  ‌meet‌  ‌certain‌‌ 
term-limit‌‌and‌‌length‌‌of‌‌term.‌  ‌ Duration‌  ‌
conditions‌‌already‌‌being‌‌observed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌latter.‌  ‌
4. RA‌  ‌6770‌  ‌which‌  ‌authorizes‌  ‌the‌  ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌to‌  ‌impose‌  ‌a ‌‌ 17. Classification‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  enforced‌‌
  not‌‌
  only‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  present‌‌ but‌‌ as‌‌ 
11. Serrano‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Gallant‌  ‌Maritime‌  ‌Services,‌  ‌Inc.‌  ‌declared‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌‌ 
six-month‌  ‌preventive‌  ‌suspension,‌  ‌instead‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌
  civil‌‌
  service‌‌  long‌‌as‌‌the‌‌problem‌‌sought‌‌to‌‌be‌‌corrected‌‌continues‌‌to‌‌exist.‌  ‌
was‌  ‌suspect‌  ‌classification‌  ‌against‌  ‌overseas‌  ‌workers‌  ‌with‌  ‌an‌‌ 
provisions‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Admin‌‌ Code,‌‌ which‌‌ limits‌‌ such‌‌ suspension‌‌ to‌‌  18. In‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Cayat‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌prohibited‌  ‌members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
unexpired‌‌  portion‌‌  of‌‌
  one‌‌
  year‌‌
  or‌‌
  more‌‌ in‌‌ their‌‌ contracts‌‌ which‌‌ 
not‌‌exceeding‌‌90‌‌days,‌‌does‌‌not‌‌violate‌‌equal‌‌protection.‌  ‌
burdens‌‌them‌‌with‌‌a‌‌peculiar‌‌disadvantage.‌  ‌ non-Christian‌  ‌tribes‌  ‌from‌‌
  drinking‌‌
  foreign‌‌
  liquor‌‌
  as‌‌
  they‌‌
  have‌‌ 
5. In‌‌
  ‌International‌‌
  School‌‌
  Alliance‌‌
  of‌‌
  Educators‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Quisumbing,‌‌ ‌it‌‌  low‌‌tolerance‌‌of‌‌such‌‌drink.‌  ‌
12. There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌substantial‌  ‌distinction‌  ‌between‌  ‌those‌  ‌tried‌  ‌and‌‌ 
was‌  ‌ruled‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌  ‌exists‌‌
  no‌‌
  substantial‌‌
  distinction‌‌
  between‌‌ 
convicted‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌military‌  ‌court‌  vis-a-vis‌  ‌those‌  ‌tried‌  ‌and‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 46‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

19. In‌  ‌Ormoc‌  ‌Sugar‌  ‌Co.,‌  ‌Inc.‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Treasurer‌  ‌of‌  ‌Ormoc‌  ‌City‌, ‌ ‌an‌‌  DPWH‌‌Region‌‌IV-A‌‌v.‌‌COA‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌‌on‌‌Selective‌‌Prosecution‌  ‌ mortgaged‌‌   properties‌‌   are‌‌
  more‌‌
  often‌‌ used‌‌ for‌‌ residential‌‌ purposes.‌‌ A ‌‌
ordinance‌  ‌imposing‌  ‌1%‌  ‌tax‌  ‌per‌  ‌export‌  ‌sale‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌US‌  ‌of‌  ‌said‌‌  shorter‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌redemption‌  ‌is‌  ‌given‌  ‌to‌  ‌juridical‌  ‌persons‌  ‌whose‌‌ 
In‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Dela‌  ‌Piedra‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌declared‌  ‌that‌  ‌an‌  ‌erroneous‌‌ 
company‌  ‌was‌  ‌invalidated‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌restricted‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌current‌‌  properties‌‌  are‌‌
  more‌‌ often‌‌ used‌‌ for‌‌ commercial‌‌ purposes.‌  ‌Goldenway‌‌ 
performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌statutory‌  ‌duty‌  ‌— ‌ ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌apparent‌  ‌selective‌‌ 
Merchandising‌    ‌explains‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌shorter‌  ‌period‌  ‌is‌  ‌aimed‌‌  to‌‌
  ensure‌‌ 
condition‌  ‌that‌  ‌only‌  ‌one‌  ‌sugar‌  ‌mill‌  ‌exists‌  ‌in‌  ‌Ormoc.‌  ‌Should‌‌  enforcement‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌statute‌  ‌— ‌ ‌could‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌a ‌‌
the‌‌solvency‌‌and‌‌liquidity‌‌of‌‌banks.‌  ‌
there‌  ‌be‌  ‌another‌  ‌sugar‌  ‌mill,‌  ‌it‌  ‌will‌‌
  not‌‌
  be‌‌
  imposed‌‌   with‌‌   such‌‌  violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌equal‌  ‌protection‌  ‌clause,‌  ‌unless‌  the‌  ‌element‌  ‌of‌ 
tax‌‌as‌‌the‌‌ordinance‌‌specifically‌‌mentioned‌‌the‌‌petitioner.‌  ‌ intentional‌‌or‌‌purposeful‌‌discrimination‌‌‌is‌‌shown.‌‌   ‌  ‌

Theory‌‌of‌‌Relative‌‌Constitutionality‌  ‌ Levels‌‌of‌‌scrutiny‌  ‌ D.‌‌Right‌‌Against‌‌Unreasonable‌‌Searches‌‌and‌‌ 


Seizures‌  ‌
20. The‌  ‌constitutionality‌  ‌of‌‌
  a ‌‌statute‌‌
  cannot,‌‌
  in‌‌
  every‌‌
  instance,‌‌
  be‌‌  ⭐‌Zomer‌‌Development‌‌v.‌‌CA‌‌‌2020‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
determined‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mere‌  ‌comparison‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌with‌‌ 
In‌‌
  ‌Samahan‌‌ ng‌‌ Progresibong‌‌ Kabataan‌‌ v.‌‌ Quezon‌‌ City‌, ‌‌this‌‌ Court‌‌  Sec‌‌
  2.‌‌
  ‌The‌‌
  right‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌ people‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ secure‌‌ in‌‌ their‌‌ persons,‌‌ houses,‌‌ 
applicable‌‌   provisions‌‌  of‌‌ the‌‌ Constitution,‌‌ since‌‌ the‌‌ statute‌‌ may‌‌  summarized‌‌   the‌‌
  ‌three‌‌ (3)‌‌ tests‌‌ to‌‌ determine‌‌ the‌‌ reasonableness‌‌  papers,‌  ‌and‌  ‌effects‌  ‌against‌  ‌unreasonable‌  ‌searches‌  ‌and‌  ‌seizures‌‌   of‌‌ 
be‌  ‌constitutionally‌  ‌valid‌  ‌as‌  ‌applied‌  ‌to‌  ‌one‌  ‌set‌  ‌of‌  ‌facts‌  ‌and‌‌  of‌‌a‌‌classification‌: ‌ ‌ whatever‌  ‌nature‌  ‌and‌  ‌for‌  ‌any‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌inviolable,‌  ‌and‌  ‌no‌‌ 
invalid‌‌in‌‌its‌‌application‌‌to‌‌another.‌  ‌
The‌‌strict‌‌scrutiny‌‌test‌a‌ pplies‌‌when‌‌a‌‌classification‌‌either‌‌   ‌ search‌‌warrant‌‌or‌‌warrant‌‌of‌‌arrest‌‌shall‌‌issue‌e‌ xcept‌‌   ‌
21. A‌  ‌statute‌  ‌valid‌  ‌at‌  ‌one‌  ‌time‌  ‌may‌  ‌become‌  ‌void‌‌
  at‌‌
  another‌‌
  time‌‌  1. upon‌‌probable‌‌cause‌‌   ‌
1. interferes‌  ‌with‌  t‌ he‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌fundamental‌  ‌rights‌, ‌‌
because‌‌of‌‌altered‌‌circumstances.‌  ‌ including‌  ‌the‌  ‌basic‌  ‌liberties‌  ‌guaranteed‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌‌  2. to‌‌be‌d
‌ etermined‌‌personally‌‌‌by‌‌the‌‌judge‌‌   ‌
22. Thus,‌‌
  if‌‌ a ‌‌statute‌‌ in‌‌ its‌‌ practical‌‌ operation‌‌ becomes‌‌ arbitrary‌‌ or‌‌  Constitution,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
3. after‌  ‌examination‌  ‌under‌  ‌oath‌  ‌or‌  ‌affirmation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
confiscatory,‌  ‌its‌  ‌validity,‌  ‌even‌  ‌though‌  ‌affirmed‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌former‌‌  2. burdens‌s‌ uspect‌‌classes‌.  ‌‌ ‌
complainant‌‌and‌‌the‌‌witnesses‌‌he‌‌may‌‌produce,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
adjudication,‌  ‌is‌  ‌open‌  ‌to‌  ‌inquiry‌  ‌and‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌  ‌intermediate‌  ‌scrutiny‌  ‌test‌  ‌applies‌  ‌when‌  ‌a ‌ ‌classification‌‌  4. particularly‌  ‌describing‌‌   ‌the‌‌
  place‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  searched‌‌
  and‌‌
  the‌‌ 
light‌‌of‌‌changed‌‌conditions‌. ‌ ‌ does‌‌  not‌‌
  involve‌‌  suspect‌‌
  classes‌‌   or‌‌
  fundamental‌‌
  rights,‌‌
  but‌‌ requires‌‌ 
persons‌‌or‌‌things‌‌to‌‌be‌‌seized.‌  ‌
Applicability‌‌to‌‌All‌  ‌ heightened‌‌   scrutiny,‌‌
  such‌‌
  as‌‌
  in‌‌
  classifications‌‌
  based‌‌ on‌‌ gender‌‌ and‌ 
legitimacy.‌‌   ‌ Concept‌‌of‌‌privacy‌  ‌
23. Substantive‌  ‌similarity‌  ‌will‌  ‌suffice;‌  ‌and‌  ‌as‌  ‌long‌  ‌as‌  ‌this‌  ‌is‌‌ 
achieved,‌  ‌all‌  ‌those‌  ‌covered‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌classification‌  ‌are‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌  Lastly,‌  ‌the‌  ‌rational‌  ‌basis‌  ‌test‌  ‌applies‌  ‌to‌  ‌all‌  ‌other‌  ‌subjects‌  ‌not‌‌  1. The‌  ‌rights‌  ‌against‌  ‌unreasonable‌  ‌searches‌  ‌and‌  ‌seizures‌‌
  and‌‌
  to‌‌ 
covered‌‌by‌‌the‌‌first‌‌two‌‌tests.‌‌   ‌ the‌  ‌privacy‌  ‌of‌  ‌communication‌  ‌and‌  ‌correspondence‌  ‌are‌‌ 
treated‌‌equally.‌  ‌
A‌  ‌"‌suspect‌  ‌class‌" ‌ ‌is‌  ‌"a‌  ‌class‌  ‌saddled‌  ‌with‌  ‌such‌  ‌disabilities,‌  ‌or‌‌  available‌‌to‌a
‌ ll‌‌persons.‌  ‌
24. In‌‌
  ‌Villegas‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Hiu‌‌
  Chong‌‌
  Tsai‌‌
  Pao‌‌
  Ho‌, ‌‌an‌‌
  ordinance‌‌
  imposing‌‌ a ‌‌
subjected‌  ‌to‌  ‌such‌  ‌a ‌ ‌history‌  ‌of‌  ‌purposeful‌  ‌unequal‌  ‌treatment,‌  ‌or‌‌  2. Such‌‌
  right‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌personal‌‌
  and‌‌
  may‌‌
  only‌‌ be‌‌ invoked‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ person‌ 
work‌‌
  permit‌‌   fee‌‌ of‌‌ P50.00‌‌ upon‌‌ all‌‌ aliens‌‌ desirous‌‌ of‌‌ obtaining‌‌  relegated‌  ‌to‌  ‌such‌  ‌a ‌ ‌position‌  ‌of‌  ‌political‌  ‌powerlessness‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌‌ 
employment‌  ‌in‌  ‌Manila‌  ‌was‌  ‌struck‌‌   down‌‌   noting‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌   same‌‌  command‌  ‌extraordinary‌  ‌protection‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌majoritarian‌  ‌political‌‌  entitled‌‌to‌‌it.‌  ‌
amount‌  ‌is‌  ‌being‌  ‌collected‌  ‌whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌alien‌  ‌is‌  ‌casual‌  ‌or‌‌  process.‌‌"  ‌‌ ‌ 3. The‌  ‌“right‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌left‌  ‌alone”‌  ‌extends‌  ‌not‌‌
  only‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  privacy‌‌
  of‌‌ 
permanent,‌  ‌part‌  ‌time‌  ‌or‌  ‌full-time,‌  ‌or‌  ‌whether‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌lowly‌‌  Juridical‌‌entities‌‌cannot‌‌be‌‌considered‌‌a‌‌"suspect‌‌class."‌  ‌ one’s‌  ‌home‌  ‌but‌  ‌also‌  ‌to‌  ‌his‌  ‌office,‌  ‌including‌  ‌the‌  ‌papers‌  ‌and‌‌ 
employee‌‌or‌‌a‌‌highly‌‌paid‌‌executive.‌  ‌ effects‌‌that‌‌may‌‌be‌‌found‌‌there.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌rational‌  ‌basis‌  ‌test‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌applied‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌  ‌the‌‌ 
25. In‌  ‌Tatad‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Secretary‌  ‌of‌  ‌Energy‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌SC‌  ‌struck‌  ‌down‌  ‌a ‌ ‌law‌‌  constitutionality‌  ‌of‌  ‌Republic‌  ‌Act‌  ‌No.‌  ‌8971,‌‌
  Section‌‌
  47.‌‌
  The‌‌
  rational‌  4. The‌  ‌right‌  ‌applies‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌distraint‌  ‌directed‌  ‌only‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌‌ 
deregulating‌  ‌the‌  ‌downstream‌  ‌oil‌  ‌industry‌  ‌for‌  ‌violation‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌  basis‌‌test‌‌requires‌‌only‌‌that‌‌   ‌ government‌  ‌and‌  ‌its‌  ‌agencies‌  ‌tasked‌  ‌with‌‌
  the‌‌
  enforcement‌‌
  of‌‌ 
equal‌‌  protection‌‌   clause‌‌
  as‌‌
  it‌‌
  favored‌‌  the‌‌  oligopoly‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌  3 ‌‌big‌‌  a) there‌‌be‌‌a‌l‌ egitimate‌‌government‌‌interest‌‌‌and‌‌that‌‌   ‌ the‌‌law.‌  ‌
players‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  prejudice‌‌
  of‌‌
  prospective‌‌   investors‌‌  that‌‌ would‌‌ be‌‌  b) there‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌reasonable‌‌
  connection‌‌ ‌between‌‌ it‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ means‌‌  Concept‌‌of‌‌a‌‌search‌  ‌
saddled‌‌   with‌‌
  requirements‌‌   already‌‌  complied‌‌   with‌‌
  by‌‌  the‌‌ three‌‌  employed‌‌to‌‌achieve‌‌it.‌‌   ‌
oil‌‌giants.‌  ‌ 1. What‌  ‌constitutes‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reasonable‌  ‌or‌  ‌unreasonable‌  ‌search‌  ‌and‌‌ 
A‌  ‌longer‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌redemption‌  ‌is‌  ‌given‌  ‌to‌  ‌natural‌  ‌persons‌‌
  whose‌‌ 
seizure‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌particular‌  ‌case‌  ‌is‌  ‌purely‌  ‌a ‌ ‌judicial‌  ‌question,‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 47‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

determinable‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌consideration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌circumstances‌‌  2. Thus,‌‌in‌‌Soliven‌‌v.‌‌Makasiar,‌t‌ he‌‌judge‌‌shall:‌  ‌ the‌  ‌search‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌office‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌seizure‌  ‌of‌  ‌documents,‌‌ 
involved.‌  ‌ paraphernalia,‌  ‌properties‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌implements‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌‌ 
a. Personally‌  ‌evaluate‌  ‌the‌  ‌report‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌supporting‌‌ 
Requisites‌‌of‌‌a‌‌valid‌‌warrant‌  ‌ unlicensed‌  ‌recruiter‌  ‌for‌  ‌overseas‌  ‌employment,‌  ‌was‌  ‌declared‌‌ 
documents‌  ‌submitted‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌fiscal‌  ‌regarding‌  ‌the‌‌ 
unconstitutional‌. ‌ ‌
1) Existence‌‌of‌‌Probable‌‌Cause‌  ‌ existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌probable‌  ‌cause‌  ‌and‌  ‌on‌‌
  the‌‌
  basis‌‌
  thereof,‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Gabiosa,‌‌Sr.‌‌2
‌ 020‌  ‌
1. Probable‌  ‌cause‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌defined‌  ‌as‌  ‌referring‌  ‌to‌  ‌“such‌  ‌facts‌‌  issue‌‌a‌‌warrant‌‌of‌‌arrest,‌‌or‌  ‌
and‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌antecedent‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌warrant‌‌  b. If‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌basis‌‌
  thereof‌‌
  he‌‌
  finds‌‌
  no‌‌
  probable‌‌
  cause,‌‌
  he‌‌  There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌‌
  need‌‌
  to‌‌
  examine‌‌
  both‌‌  the‌‌
  applicant‌‌
  and‌‌
  the‌‌
  witnesses‌‌
  if‌‌ 
either‌‌one‌‌of‌‌them‌‌is‌‌sufficient‌‌to‌‌establish‌‌probable‌‌cause.‌  ‌
that‌  ‌in‌  ‌themselves‌  ‌are‌  ‌sufficient‌  ‌to‌  ‌induce‌  ‌a ‌ ‌cautious‌  ‌man‌‌
  to‌‌  may‌  ‌disregard‌  ‌the‌  ‌fiscal’s‌  ‌report‌  ‌and‌  ‌require‌  ‌the‌‌ 
rely‌‌on‌‌them‌‌and‌‌act‌‌in‌‌pursuance‌‌thereof.”‌  ‌ submission‌‌   of‌‌
  supporting‌‌   affidavits‌‌ of‌‌ witnesses‌‌ to‌‌  The‌  ‌searching‌  ‌questions‌  ‌propounded‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌applicant‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌ 
aid‌‌
  him‌‌
  in‌‌
  arriving‌‌
  at‌‌
  a ‌‌conclusion‌‌  as‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌ existence‌‌  witnesses‌  ‌depend‌  ‌largely‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌discretion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌judge.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌‌ 
2. A‌  ‌finding‌  ‌of‌  ‌probable‌  ‌cause‌‌
  need‌‌
  not‌‌
  be‌‌
  based‌‌
  on‌‌
  clear‌‌
  and‌‌  axiomatic‌‌that‌‌   ‌
of‌‌probable‌‌cause.‌  ‌
convincing‌‌   evidence,‌‌  or‌‌
  on‌‌
  evidence‌‌ beyond‌‌ reasonable‌‌ doubt.‌‌ 
1) the‌  ‌examination‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌probing‌  ‌and‌  ‌exhaustive‌, ‌ ‌not‌‌ 
But,‌‌it‌‌must‌‌be‌‌more‌‌than‌‌mere‌‌suspicion.‌  ‌ 4. In‌  ‌other‌  ‌words,‌  ‌as‌  ‌was‌  ‌held‌  ‌in‌  ‌Enrile‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Salazar‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌judge‌‌ 
merely‌  ‌routinary,‌  ‌general,‌  ‌peripheral,‌  ‌perfunctory‌  ‌or‌‌ 
3. The‌‌
  warrant‌‌
  must‌‌
  refer‌‌
  to‌‌
  ‌only‌‌ one‌‌ specific‌‌ offense‌, ‌‌provided‌‌  need‌‌   not‌‌ personally‌‌ determine‌‌ the‌‌ existence‌‌ of‌‌ probable‌‌ cause‌‌  pro-forma;‌  ‌
by‌  ‌examining‌  ‌under‌  ‌oath‌  ‌or‌  ‌affirmation‌  ‌the‌  ‌complainant‌  ‌and‌‌  2) the‌  ‌judge‌  ‌must‌  ‌not‌  ‌simply‌  ‌rehash‌  ‌the‌  ‌contents‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
in‌‌Sec‌‌3‌‌Rule‌‌126‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Rules‌‌of‌‌Court.‌  ‌
his‌  ‌witnesses,‌  ‌it‌  ‌being‌  ‌sufficient‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌follows‌  ‌established‌‌  affidavit‌  ‌but‌  ‌must‌  ‌make‌  ‌his‌  ‌own‌  ‌inquiry‌  ‌on‌‌
  the‌‌
  intent‌‌
  and‌‌ 
Estrada‌‌v.‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Ombudsman‌‌2
‌ 015‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ justification‌‌of‌‌the‌‌application;‌  ‌
procedure‌  ‌by‌  personally‌  ‌evaluating‌  ‌the‌  ‌report‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Probable‌  ‌cause‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌established‌  ‌with‌  ‌hearsay‌  ‌evidence‌, ‌ ‌as‌‌  supporting‌‌documents‌‌submitted‌‌by‌‌the‌‌prosecutor‌. ‌ ‌ 3) the‌  ‌questions‌  ‌should‌  ‌not‌  ‌merely‌  ‌be‌  ‌repetitious‌  ‌of‌  t‌ he‌‌ 
long‌  ‌as‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌substantial‌  ‌basis‌  ‌for‌  ‌crediting‌  ‌the‌  ‌hearsay.‌‌  averments‌  ‌stated‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌affidavits‌  ‌or‌  ‌depositions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
5. In‌‌
  ‌People‌‌
  v.‌‌ Desmond‌, ‌‌MeTC‌‌ or‌‌ MTC,‌‌ and‌‌ MTCC‌  ‌judges‌‌ are‌‌ ‌no‌‌ 
Hearsay‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌is‌  ‌admissible‌  ‌in‌  ‌determining‌  ‌probable‌‌   cause‌‌
  in‌‌
  a ‌‌ applicant‌‌and‌‌the‌‌witnesses.‌‌   ‌
preliminary‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌because‌  ‌such‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌is‌  ‌merely‌‌  longer‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌to‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌preliminary‌  ‌investigations‌  ‌as‌‌ 
preliminary,‌‌   and‌‌
  does‌‌   not‌‌
  finally‌‌
  adjudicate‌‌
  rights‌‌ and‌‌ obligations‌‌ of‌‌  per‌‌AM‌‌No.‌‌05-8-26-SC,‌‌30‌‌August‌‌2005.‌  ‌
Fenix‌‌v.‌‌CA‌‌2
‌ 016‌  ‌
parties.‌‌   ‌ 6. In‌‌
  ‌Ho‌‌
  v.‌‌
  People‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  objectives‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  prosecutor‌‌
  and‌‌
  the‌‌ judge‌‌ 
We‌  ‌uphold‌‌
  the‌‌  power‌‌  of‌‌
  judges‌‌  to‌‌  dismiss‌‌   a ‌‌criminal‌‌
  case‌‌
  when‌‌  the‌‌ 
in‌‌determining‌‌probable‌‌cause‌‌were‌‌distinguished:‌  ‌ evidence‌  ‌on‌  ‌record‌  ‌clearly‌  ‌fails‌  ‌to‌  ‌establish‌  ‌probable‌  ‌cause‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Ramon‌‌‌2019‌  ‌
Prosecutor‌  ‌ Judge‌  ‌ issuance‌‌of‌‌a‌‌warrant‌‌of‌‌arrest.‌  ‌
The‌‌
  quantum‌‌   of‌‌
  proof‌‌
  to‌‌
  establish‌‌
  probable‌‌   cause‌‌ and‌‌ a ‌‌prima‌‌ 
First‌, ‌ ‌judges‌  ‌have‌  ‌no‌  ‌capacity‌  ‌to‌  ‌review‌  ‌the‌  ‌prosecutor's‌‌ 
facie‌‌
  case‌‌
  for‌‌
  purposes‌‌   of‌‌
  issuance‌‌
  of‌‌
  an‌‌ arrest‌‌ warrant‌‌ and‌‌ for‌‌  Whether‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌reasonable‌‌  If‌  ‌a ‌ ‌warrant‌  ‌of‌  ‌arrest‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌‌  determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌probable‌  ‌cause.‌  ‌That‌  ‌falls‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
preliminary‌‌investigation‌‌are‌‌one‌‌and‌‌the‌‌same.‌  ‌ ground‌  ‌to‌  ‌believe‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌  issued‌  ‌to‌  ‌place‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌in‌‌  DOJ‌‌Secretary.‌‌   ‌
If‌  ‌the‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌on‌  ‌record‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌clearly‌‌  establish‌‌  probable‌‌   cause‌‌  accused‌  ‌is‌  ‌guilty‌  ‌and‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌‌  immediate‌  ‌custody‌  ‌so‌  ‌as‌  ‌not‌  ‌to‌‌ 
held‌‌for‌‌trial.‌  ‌ frustrate‌‌the‌‌ends‌‌of‌‌justice.‌  ‌ Second‌, ‌ ‌once‌  ‌a ‌ ‌complaint‌  ‌or‌  ‌an‌  ‌Information‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌filed,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
then‌  ‌the‌  ‌imperative‌  ‌is‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌prosecutor‌  ‌or‌‌   the‌‌
  judge‌‌
  to‌‌
  relieve‌‌   the‌‌ 
disposition‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌is‌  ‌addressed‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌sound‌  ‌discretion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
accused‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ pain‌‌ of‌‌ going‌‌ through‌‌ trial.‌‌ Conversely,‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ finding‌‌ 
Conducts‌‌preliminary‌‌  Conducts‌  ‌preliminary‌  ‌inquiry/‌‌  court,‌‌
  subject‌‌
  only‌‌   to‌‌ the‌‌ qualification‌‌ that‌‌ its‌‌ action‌‌ must‌‌ not‌‌ impair‌‌ 
by‌  ‌the‌  ‌prosecutor‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌judge‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌on‌  ‌record‌‌ 
investigation‌‌proper‌  ‌ examination‌  ‌ the‌‌
  substantial‌‌   rights‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   accused‌‌
  or‌‌
  the‌‌  right‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ People‌‌ to‌‌ due‌‌ 
sufficiently‌‌   establishes‌‌   a ‌‌‌prima‌‌  facie‌‌
  case‌‌
  or‌‌
  probable‌‌   cause‌‌  against‌‌ 
process‌‌of‌‌law.‌‌   ‌
the‌‌accused,‌‌the‌‌accused‌‌should‌‌be‌‌indicted‌‌and‌‌held‌‌for‌‌trial.‌  ‌
Executive‌: ‌ ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌‌  Judicial‌: ‌ ‌to‌  ‌ascertain‌  ‌whether‌  ‌a ‌‌ Third‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌judge's‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌probable‌  ‌cause‌  ‌has‌  ‌a ‌ ‌different‌‌ 
filing‌  ‌a ‌ ‌criminal‌  ‌information‌  ‌in‌  ‌ warrant‌  o ‌ f‌  ‌arrest‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌‌  objective‌‌than‌‌that‌‌of‌‌the‌‌prosecutor.‌‌   ‌
2) Personal‌‌Determination‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Judge‌  ‌ court‌  ‌ issued.‌  ‌
1. Such‌‌ issuance‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ a ‌‌ministerial‌‌ function‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ judge‌‌ who‌‌ had‌‌  The‌‌   judge‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  compelled‌‌   to‌‌ follow‌‌ the‌‌ prosecutor's‌‌ certification‌‌ of‌‌ 
 ‌
the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌probable‌‌   cause.‌‌   As‌‌
  stated‌‌  in‌‌
  ‌People‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Inting‌, ‌‌"it‌‌
  is‌‌ 
the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌  ‌for‌  ‌himself‌  ‌the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌probable‌‌  7. In‌  ‌Salazar‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Achacoso‌, ‌ ‌Art‌‌   38(c)‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Labor‌‌   Code‌‌
  ‌which‌‌  the‌‌ report,‌‌ the‌‌ affidavits,‌‌ the‌‌ transcripts‌‌ of‌‌ stenographic‌‌ notes,‌‌ and‌‌ all‌‌ 
cause.‌‌He‌‌is‌‌not‌‌bound‌‌by‌‌the‌‌findings‌‌of‌‌the‌‌prosecutor.‌  ‌ empowers‌‌   the‌‌   SOLE‌‌ to‌‌ cause‌‌ the‌‌ arrest‌‌ and‌‌ detention‌‌ and‌‌ order‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 48‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

other‌  ‌supporting‌  ‌documents‌  ‌behind‌  ‌the‌  ‌prosecutor's‌  ‌certification‌‌  9. A‌  ‌search‌  ‌warrant‌  ‌is‌  ‌severable‌. ‌ ‌Those‌  ‌items‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌‌ 
4) Particularity‌‌of‌‌Description‌  ‌
which‌‌are‌‌material‌‌in‌‌assisting‌‌the‌‌judge‌‌to‌‌make‌‌his‌‌determination."‌  ‌ particularly‌  ‌described‌  ‌may‌  ‌simply‌  ‌be‌  ‌cut‌  ‌off‌  ‌without‌‌ 
1. The‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌requires‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌place‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  searched‌‌
  or‌‌
  the‌‌  destroying‌  ‌the‌  ‌whole‌  ‌warrant.‌  ‌(‌Microsoft‌  ‌Corporation‌  ‌v.‌‌ 
The‌  ‌panel's‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌resolving‌  ‌the‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌against‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌and‌ 
Ong‌  ‌primarily‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌basis‌  ‌of‌  ‌Doble's‌  ‌evidence,‌  ‌and‌‌
  in‌‌
  spite‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  persons‌  ‌or‌  ‌things‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌seized‌  ‌be‌  ‌described‌  ‌with‌  ‌such‌‌  Maxicorp,‌‌Inc‌.)‌  ‌
timely‌  ‌submission‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌counter-affidavits,‌  ‌was‌‌   clearly‌‌   committed‌‌  particularity‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌enable‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌serving‌  ‌the‌  ‌warrant‌  ‌to‌‌ 
10. The‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌officers,‌  ‌after‌  ‌making‌  ‌a ‌ ‌legal‌  ‌search‌  ‌and‌‌ 
with‌‌grave‌‌abuse‌‌of‌‌discretion.‌  ‌ identify‌  ‌them.‌  ‌Otherwise,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌general‌‌ 
seizure‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌‌
  warrant,‌‌
  illegally‌‌  made‌‌   a ‌‌search‌‌  and‌‌
  seizure‌‌ 
warrant‌‌‌which‌‌is‌‌proscribed.‌  ‌
of‌‌
  other‌‌ property‌‌ not‌‌ within‌‌ the‌‌ warrant‌‌ ‌does‌‌ not‌‌ invalidate‌‌ the‌‌ 
3) Examination‌‌of‌‌Applicant‌  ‌ 2. Tests‌‌for‌‌specificity:‌  ‌ first‌‌search‌‌and‌‌seizure.‌  ‌
1. Evidence‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ ‌based‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ personal‌‌ knowledge‌‌ of‌‌ those‌‌  a) When‌  ‌the‌  ‌description‌  ‌therein‌  ‌is‌  ‌as‌  ‌specific‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌‌  11. The‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌requires‌  ‌search‌  ‌warrants‌  ‌to‌  ‌particularly‌‌ 
who‌  ‌offered‌  ‌same‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌on‌  ‌mere‌  ‌information‌  ‌or‌  ‌belief.‌‌  circumstances‌‌will‌‌ordinarily‌‌allow;‌  ‌ describe‌‌   not‌‌
  only‌‌ the‌‌ place‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ searched,‌‌ but‌‌ also‌‌ the‌‌ persons‌‌ 
Hearsay‌‌is‌‌not‌‌allowed.‌  ‌
b) When‌  ‌the‌  ‌description‌  ‌expresses‌  ‌a ‌‌‌conclusion‌‌
  of‌‌
  fact‌‌  to‌‌be‌‌searched.‌‌   ‌
2. In‌  ‌Alvarez‌  ‌v.‌  ‌CFI‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌search‌  ‌warrant‌  ‌was‌  ‌annulled‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌‌ 
—‌  ‌not‌  ‌of‌‌
  law‌‌
  — ‌‌by‌‌
  which‌‌
  the‌‌
  warrant‌‌
  officer‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌  12. In‌‌
  ‌People‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Tiu‌‌
  Won‌‌
  Chua‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  validity‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  search‌‌ warrant‌‌ 
issued‌‌of‌‌an‌‌affidavit‌‌based‌‌on‌‌“reliable‌‌information”‌‌only.‌  ‌ guided;‌  ‌ was‌  ‌upheld‌  ‌despite‌  ‌the‌‌
  mistake‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  name‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  persons‌‌
  to‌‌ 
3. In‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌Burgos‌‌
  ‌case,‌‌ the‌‌ application‌‌ for‌‌ search‌‌ warrants‌‌ filed‌‌ by‌‌  c) When‌‌
  the‌‌
  things‌‌
  described‌‌
  are‌‌
  limited‌‌
  to‌‌
  those‌‌
  which‌  be‌  ‌searched,‌  ‌because‌  ‌the‌  ‌authorities‌  ‌conducted‌  ‌surveillance‌ 
two‌‌
  military‌‌
  officers‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ basis‌‌ of‌‌ “the‌‌ evidence‌‌ gathered‌‌ and‌‌  bear‌  ‌direct‌  ‌relation‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌offense‌  ‌for‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌‌  and‌  ‌a ‌ ‌test-buy‌  ‌operation‌  ‌before‌  ‌obtaining‌  ‌the‌  ‌search‌  ‌warrant‌‌ 
collected‌‌by‌‌our‌‌unit”‌‌was‌r‌ ejected‌.‌  ‌ warrant‌‌is‌‌being‌‌issued.‌  ‌ and‌‌subsequently‌‌implementing‌‌it.‌  ‌
4. By‌‌ contrast,‌‌ the‌‌ search‌‌ warrant‌‌ was‌‌ sustained‌‌ in‌‌ ‌Yee‌‌ Sue‌‌ Koy‌‌ v.‌‌  4. A‌  ‌search‌  ‌warrant‌  ‌need‌  ‌not‌  ‌identify‌  ‌with‌  ‌particularity‌  ‌the‌‌  Dimal‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌
Almeda‌, ‌ ‌where‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌shown‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌complainant‌  ‌and‌  ‌his‌‌  person‌‌  against‌‌
  whom‌‌  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  directed;‌‌
  ‌it‌‌
  suffices‌‌
  that‌‌ the‌‌ place‌‌ to‌‌  A‌‌
  description‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌place‌‌
  to‌‌ be‌‌ searched‌‌ is‌‌ sufficient‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ officer‌‌ with‌‌ 
witnesses,‌‌   of‌‌
  their‌‌
  own‌‌  personal‌‌   knowledge‌‌   obtained‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌  be‌‌searched‌‌and‌‌the‌‌things‌‌to‌‌be‌‌seized‌‌are‌‌described.‌  ‌ the‌‌  warrant‌‌ ‌can‌‌ ascertain‌‌ and‌‌ identify‌‌ with‌‌ reasonable‌‌ effort‌‌ the‌‌ 
personal‌  ‌investigations‌  ‌conducted‌  ‌by‌  ‌them,‌  ‌both‌  ‌declared‌‌  place‌  ‌intended,‌  ‌and‌  ‌distinguish‌  ‌it‌  ‌from‌  ‌other‌  ‌places‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
5. While‌‌
  a‌‌
  ‌John‌‌
  Doe‌‌
  warrant‌‌ is‌‌ generally‌‌ held‌‌ invalid,‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ enough‌‌ 
under‌  ‌oath‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌was‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌in‌  ‌usurious‌‌  community‌. ‌‌A ‌‌designation‌‌ that‌‌ points‌‌ out‌‌ the‌‌ place‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ searched‌‌ to‌‌ 
if‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌some‌  ‌descriptio‌  ‌personae‌  ‌that‌  ‌will‌  ‌enable‌  ‌the‌‌ 
activities.‌  ‌ the‌‌  exclusion‌‌   of‌‌
  all‌‌  others,‌‌
  and‌‌   on‌‌ inquiry‌‌ unerringly‌‌ leads‌‌ the‌‌ peace‌‌ 
officer‌‌to‌‌identify‌‌the‌‌accused.‌  ‌ officers‌‌to‌‌it,‌‌satisfies‌‌the‌‌constitutional‌‌requirement‌‌of‌‌definiteness.‌‌   ‌
5. The‌  ‌cases‌  ‌of‌  ‌Mata‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Bayona‌  ‌and‌    ‌Tabujara‌  ‌v.‌  ‌People‌‌ 
6. A‌‌warrant‌‌would‌‌be‌v
‌ alid‌: ‌ ‌ In‌  ‌Vallejo‌  ‌v.‌  ‌CA,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌clarified‌  ‌that‌  ‌technical‌  ‌precision‌  ‌of‌‌ 
invalidated‌  ‌the‌  ‌search‌  ‌warrant‌  ‌and‌  ‌warrant‌  ‌of‌  ‌arrest,‌‌ 
a) When‌  ‌it‌‌
  enables‌‌
  the‌‌
  police‌‌
  officers‌‌
  to‌‌
  readily‌‌
  identify‌  description‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌required.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌only‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌  ‌be‌‌ 
respectively,‌  ‌as‌  ‌they‌  ‌were‌  ‌based‌  ‌solely‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌statement‌  ‌of‌‌ 
reasonable‌  ‌particularity‌  ‌and‌  ‌certainty‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌identity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
witnesses‌  ‌whom‌  ‌the‌  ‌judge‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌personally‌  ‌examine‌  ‌in‌‌  the‌‌properties‌‌to‌‌be‌‌seized;‌  ‌
property‌  ‌to‌‌
  be‌‌  searched‌‌   for‌‌
  and‌‌
  seized,‌‌
  so‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  warrant‌‌
  shall‌‌
  not‌‌ 
writing‌‌and‌‌under‌‌oath.‌  ‌ b) It‌  ‌leaves‌  ‌them‌  ‌with‌  ‌no‌  ‌discretion‌  ‌regarding‌  ‌the‌‌  be‌‌a‌‌mere‌r‌ oving‌‌commission‌. ‌ ‌
6. A‌  ‌challenge‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌participation‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌private‌  ‌person‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌‌ articles‌‌to‌‌be‌‌seized;‌  ‌ An‌  ‌otherwise‌  ‌overbroad‌  ‌warrant‌  ‌will‌  ‌comply‌  ‌with‌‌   the‌‌
  particularity‌‌ 
search‌  ‌warrant‌  ‌proceeding‌  ‌was‌  ‌rejected‌  ‌in‌  ‌PLDT‌  ‌v.‌  ‌HPS‌‌  c) When‌  ‌the‌  ‌things‌  ‌described‌  ‌are‌  ‌limited‌  ‌to‌  ‌those‌  ‌that‌‌  requirement‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌affidavit‌  ‌filed‌  ‌in‌  ‌support‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌warrant‌  ‌is‌‌ 
Software‌  ‌and‌  ‌Communication‌  ‌Corporation‌, ‌ ‌for‌  ‌as‌  ‌long‌  ‌as‌  physically‌  ‌attached‌  ‌to‌  ‌it,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌warrant‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
bear‌‌a‌‌direct‌‌relation‌‌to‌‌the‌‌offense‌‌charged.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌private‌  ‌party‌  ‌is‌  ‌in‌  ‌collaboration‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌NBI‌  ‌or‌  ‌such‌‌  affidavit‌‌and‌‌incorporates‌‌it‌‌with‌‌suitable‌‌words‌‌of‌‌reference.‌  ‌
8. Only‌  ‌the‌  ‌articles‌  ‌particularly‌  ‌described‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌warrant‌‌
  can‌‌
  be‌‌ 
government‌  ‌agency.‌  ‌The‌  ‌party‌  ‌may‌  ‌file‌  ‌an‌  ‌opposition‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌ Warrantless‌‌searches‌  ‌
seized,‌‌  and‌‌
  no‌‌
  other‌‌  property‌‌
  can‌‌
  be‌‌ taken‌‌ thereunder‌‌ ‌unless‌‌ ‌it‌‌ 
motion‌‌   to‌‌
  quash‌‌   the‌‌   search‌‌   warrant‌‌  issued‌‌  by‌‌ the‌‌ court,‌‌ or‌‌ 
is‌‌‌prohibited‌‌by‌‌law‌. ‌ ‌ 1) Consented‌‌searches‌  ‌
a‌‌
  ‌motion‌‌   for‌‌ reconsideration‌‌ ‌of‌‌ the‌‌ court‌‌ order‌‌ granting‌‌ such‌‌ 
motion‌‌to‌‌quash.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 49‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

1. It‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  lightly‌‌
  inferred‌‌
  and‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  shown‌‌
  by‌‌
  clear‌‌ and‌‌  implied‌  ‌acquiescence,‌  ‌which‌  ‌amounts‌  ‌to‌  ‌no‌  ‌consent‌  ‌at‌  ‌all‌. ‌ ‌The‌‌  8. Antiquera‌‌
  v.‌‌
  People‌, ‌‌in‌‌ acquitting‌‌ the‌‌ accused,‌‌ declared,‌‌ citing‌‌ 
convincing‌‌evidence.‌  ‌ validity‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌supposedly‌‌
  consented‌‌
  warrantless‌‌   search‌‌
  is‌‌
  contingent‌‌  People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Martinez,‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌waiver‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌illegal‌  ‌warrantless‌‌ 
on‌‌the‌‌totality‌‌of‌‌the‌‌attendant‌‌circumstances.‌  ‌ arrest‌‌
  does‌‌   not‌‌
  carry‌‌
  with‌‌
  it‌‌
  a ‌‌waiver‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  inadmissibility‌‌
  of‌‌ 
2. It‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌voluntary‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌validate‌  ‌an‌  ‌otherwise‌‌
  illegal‌‌ 
search;‌‌that‌‌is,‌‌the‌‌consent‌‌must‌‌be‌‌   ‌ Here,‌  ‌Sison,‌  ‌who‌  ‌was‌  ‌then‌  ‌unarmed,‌  ‌was‌  ‌prodded‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌arresting‌‌  evidence‌‌seized‌‌during‌‌the‌‌illegal‌‌warrantless‌‌arrest.‌  ‌
officers‌‌   to‌‌
  open‌‌
  the‌‌ pickup's‌‌ hood.‌‌ His‌‌ beguiling‌‌ conformity‌‌ is‌‌ easily‌‌ 
a) unequivocal‌,  ‌‌ ‌ 9. May‌‌
  only‌‌
  be‌‌
  made‌‌ within‌‌ the‌‌ permissible‌‌ area‌‌ of‌‌ search,‌‌ or‌‌ the‌‌ 
accounted‌  ‌by‌  ‌how‌  ‌he‌  ‌was‌  ‌then‌  ‌surrounded‌  ‌by‌  ‌police‌  ‌officers‌  ‌who‌‌ 
had‌  ‌specifically‌  ‌flagged‌  ‌him‌  ‌and‌  ‌his‌  ‌companions‌  ‌down.‌  ‌He‌  ‌was‌‌  place‌‌ within‌‌ the‌‌ immediate‌‌ control‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ person‌‌ being‌‌ arrested‌‌ 
b) specific‌,  ‌‌ ‌
under‌  ‌the‌‌   coercive‌‌   force‌‌
  of‌‌
  armed‌‌  law‌‌
  enforcers.‌‌   His‌‌  consent,‌‌  if‌‌  as‌‌per‌‌Espano‌‌v.‌‌CA‌. ‌ ‌
c) intelligently‌‌given‌‌‌and‌  ‌ at‌‌all,‌‌was‌‌clearly‌‌vitiated.‌  ‌ 10. It‌  ‌has‌  ‌later‌  ‌been‌  ‌ruled‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌search‌  ‌substantially‌‌ 
d) uncontaminated‌‌by‌‌any‌‌duress‌‌or‌‌coercion‌. ‌ ‌ contemporaneous‌‌   with‌‌
  an‌‌ arrest‌‌ can‌‌ precede‌‌ the‌‌ arrest‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ 
2) Incident‌‌to‌‌a‌‌lawful‌‌arrest‌  ‌
3. It‌‌must‌‌be‌‌shown‌‌that‌  ‌ police‌‌
  have‌‌
  probable‌‌
  cause‌‌
  to‌‌
  make‌‌   the‌‌
  arrest‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌
  outset‌‌ of‌‌ 
1. The‌  ‌individual‌  ‌being‌  ‌arrested‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌frisked‌  ‌for‌  ‌concealed‌‌  the‌‌search.‌  ‌
a) The‌‌right‌‌exists;‌  ‌
weapons‌  ‌that‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  used‌‌
  against‌‌
  the‌‌
  arresting‌‌
  officer‌‌
  and‌‌
  all‌‌  ⭐‌Manibog‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌Leonen,‌‌J‌  ‌
b) That‌‌
  the‌‌
  person‌‌
  involved‌‌ had‌‌ knowledge.‌‌ Either‌‌ actual‌‌  unlawful‌  ‌articles‌  ‌found‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌person‌  ‌or‌  ‌within‌  ‌his‌‌ 
or‌‌constructive,‌‌of‌‌the‌‌existence‌‌of‌‌such‌‌right;‌‌and‌  ‌ immediate‌‌control‌m ‌ ay‌‌be‌‌seized.‌  ‌ For‌‌
  a ‌‌"‌stop‌‌   and‌‌
  frisk‌" ‌‌search‌‌  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  valid,‌‌  the‌‌ totality‌‌ of‌‌ suspicious‌‌ 
circumstances‌, ‌‌as‌‌ personally‌‌ observed‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ arresting‌‌ officer,‌‌ must‌‌ 
c) The‌‌
  said‌‌
  person‌‌
  had‌‌
  an‌‌
  actual‌  ‌intention‌‌
  to‌‌ relinquish‌‌  2. People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Figueroa‌  ‌stressed‌  ‌that‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌obtained‌  ‌during‌  ‌a ‌‌ lead‌‌  to‌‌  a ‌‌‌genuine‌‌   reason‌‌   to‌‌
  suspect‌‌   that‌‌
  a ‌‌person‌‌  is‌‌
  committing‌‌ an‌‌ 
the‌‌right.‌  ‌ warrantless‌  ‌search‌‌
  made‌‌
  ‌before‌, ‌‌and‌‌
  not‌‌
  after,‌‌
  ‌a ‌‌warrantless‌‌  illicit‌‌act.‌  ‌
4. The‌‌
  following‌‌
  characteristics‌‌
  of‌‌
  person‌‌
  giving‌‌
  consent‌‌
  and‌‌ the‌‌  arrest‌‌would‌‌be‌‌inadmissible.‌  ‌ Two‌‌   (2)‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  exceptions‌‌   to‌‌  a ‌‌search‌‌  warrant—a‌‌   warrantless‌‌ search‌‌ 
environment‌‌in‌‌which‌‌consent‌‌is‌‌given‌‌may‌‌be‌‌of‌‌help:‌  ‌ 3. While‌  ‌buy-bust‌  ‌operations‌  ‌have‌‌
  been‌‌
  recognized‌‌
  as‌‌
  valid,‌‌
  it‌‌  incidental‌‌   to‌‌
  a ‌‌lawful‌‌
  arrest‌‌   and‌‌ "stop‌‌ and‌‌ frisk"—are‌‌ often‌‌ confused‌‌ 
with‌‌   each‌‌  other.‌‌   ‌Malacat‌‌  v.‌‌
  CA‌‌ explained‌‌ that‌‌ they‌‌ "differ‌‌ in‌‌ terms‌‌ of‌‌ 
1) Age‌‌of‌‌defendant;‌  ‌ must‌‌
  be‌‌
  distinguished‌‌   from‌‌
  ‌instigation‌, ‌‌when‌‌   a ‌‌person‌‌  who‌‌ is‌‌ 
the‌  ‌requisite‌‌   ‌quantum‌‌   of‌‌
  proof‌‌   ‌before‌‌
  they‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  validly‌‌   effected‌‌ 
otherwise‌  ‌not‌  ‌predisposed‌  ‌to‌  ‌commit‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌is‌‌
  enticed‌‌
  or‌‌  and‌‌in‌‌their‌‌allowable‌s‌ cope‌."‌  ‌
2) Public‌‌or‌‌secluded‌‌place;‌  ‌
lured‌‌or‌‌talked‌‌into‌‌committing‌‌the‌‌crime.‌  ‌
3) Objected‌‌or‌‌passively‌‌looked‌‌on;‌  ‌ The‌  ‌lawful‌  ‌arrest‌  ‌generally‌  ‌precedes,‌  ‌or‌  ‌is‌  ‌substantially‌‌ 
4. Decoy‌  ‌solicitation‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌soliciting‌  ‌drugs‌  ‌during‌  ‌a ‌‌ contemporaneous,‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌search‌. ‌ ‌In‌  ‌direct‌  ‌contrast‌  ‌with‌‌ 
4) Education‌‌and‌‌intelligence;‌  ‌ buy-bust‌‌operation‌‌has‌‌been‌‌ruled‌‌as‌v
‌ alid‌. ‌ ‌ warrantless‌  ‌searches‌  ‌incidental‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌lawful‌  ‌arrest,‌  ‌stop‌  ‌and‌  ‌frisk‌‌ 
searches‌‌are‌‌conducted‌‌to‌‌deter‌‌crime.‌‌   ‌
5) Presence‌‌of‌‌coercive‌‌police‌‌procedures;‌  ‌ 5. Prior‌  ‌surveillance‌  ‌is‌‌
  not‌‌
  necessary‌‌
  for‌‌
  as‌‌
  long‌‌
  as‌‌
  the‌‌
  buy-bust‌‌ 
team‌‌is‌‌accompanied‌‌to‌‌the‌‌target‌‌area‌‌by‌t‌ he‌‌informant‌. ‌ ‌ For‌‌
  a ‌‌valid‌‌
  stop‌‌
  and‌‌
  frisk‌‌
  search,‌‌
  the‌‌   arresting‌‌
  officer‌‌ must‌‌ have‌‌ had‌‌ 
6) Belief‌‌that‌‌no‌‌incriminating‌‌evidence‌‌will‌‌be‌‌found;‌  ‌
personal‌  ‌knowledge‌  ‌of‌  ‌facts,‌  ‌which‌  ‌would‌  ‌engender‌  ‌a ‌‌reasonable‌‌ 
7) Nature‌‌of‌‌police‌‌questioning;‌  ‌ 6. Warrantless‌  ‌arrests‌  ‌made‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌basis‌  ‌alone‌  ‌of‌  ‌“tips”‌  ‌or‌‌  degree‌‌of‌‌suspicion‌‌of‌‌an‌‌illicit‌‌act.‌‌   ‌
“reliable‌  ‌information”‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌sufficient.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌further‌  ‌required‌‌  To‌  ‌sustain‌  ‌the‌  ‌validity‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌stop‌  ‌and‌  ‌frisk‌  ‌search,‌  ‌the‌  ‌arresting‌‌ 
8) Environment‌‌where‌‌questioning‌‌took‌‌place;‌‌and‌  ‌
that‌‌
  the‌‌
  accused‌‌
  performed‌‌ some‌‌ ‌overt‌‌ act‌‌ ‌that‌‌ would‌‌ indicate‌‌  officer‌  ‌should‌  ‌have‌  ‌personally‌  ‌observed‌  ‌two‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌or‌  ‌more‌‌ 
9) Possibly‌  ‌vulnerable‌  ‌subjective‌  ‌state‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌‌  that‌‌
  he‌‌
  has‌‌
  committed,‌‌
  is‌‌ actually‌‌ committing,‌‌ or‌‌ is‌‌ attempting‌‌  suspicious‌‌   circumstances‌, ‌‌the‌‌ totality‌‌ of‌‌ which‌‌ would‌‌ then‌‌ create‌‌ a ‌‌
consenting.‌  ‌ to‌‌commit‌‌an‌‌offense.‌  ‌ reasonable‌  ‌inference‌  ‌of‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌activity‌  ‌to‌  ‌compel‌  ‌the‌  ‌arresting‌‌ 
officer‌‌to‌‌investigate‌‌further.‌  ‌
⭐‌People‌‌v.‌‌Yanson‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌Leonen,‌‌J‌  ‌ 7. The‌‌ warrantless‌‌ arrests‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ accused‌‌ which‌‌ were‌‌ based‌‌ solely‌‌ 
It‌  ‌cannot‌‌   be‌‌
  said‌‌
  that‌‌  Sison‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  driver,‌‌
  consented‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌   search‌‌  on‌‌
  a ‌‌“report‌‌
  from‌‌
  a ‌‌civilian‌‌
  asset”‌‌
  or‌‌
  mere‌‌
  “information”‌‌
  were‌‌  3) Of‌  ‌vessels‌  ‌and‌  ‌aircraft‌‌
  for‌‌
  violation‌‌
  of‌‌
  immigration,‌‌
  customs,‌‌ 
made‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌arresting‌  ‌officers.‌  ‌Jurisprudence‌  ‌has‌  ‌settled‌  ‌that‌  ‌mere‌‌  likewise‌  ‌invalidated‌  ‌in‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Tudtud‌  ‌and‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌‌  and‌‌drug‌‌laws‌  ‌
passive‌  ‌conformity‌  ‌or‌  ‌silence‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌warrantless‌  ‌search‌  ‌is‌  ‌only‌  ‌an‌‌  Nuevas‌. ‌ ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 50‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

1. In‌‌
  ‌People‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Aminnudin‌, ‌‌where‌‌
  the‌‌
  accused‌‌
  was‌‌ searched‌‌ and‌‌  intrusive‌‌to‌‌motorists.‌R
‌ outine‌‌inspections‌m
‌ ay‌‌be‌‌had:‌  ‌
minimal‌‌   intrusiveness‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  gravity‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  safety‌‌
  interests‌‌ involved,‌‌ 
arrested‌  ‌upon‌  ‌disembarkation‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌passenger‌  ‌vessel,‌  ‌the‌‌  a) where‌  ‌the‌  ‌officer‌  ‌merely‌  ‌draws‌‌
  aside‌‌
  the‌‌
  curtain‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌ and‌  ‌the‌  ‌reduced‌  ‌privacy‌  ‌expectations‌  ‌associated‌  ‌with‌‌   airline‌‌ 
Court‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌no‌  ‌urgency‌  ‌to‌  ‌effect‌  ‌a ‌ ‌warrantless‌‌  vacant‌  ‌vehicle‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌parked‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌‌  travel.‌  ‌
search.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌Constabulary‌  ‌had‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌two‌  ‌days‌‌  fairgrounds;‌‌   ‌
within‌‌   which‌‌   they‌‌  could‌‌   have‌‌
  obtained‌‌ a ‌‌warrant‌‌ to‌‌ search‌‌ and‌‌  b) simply‌‌looks‌‌into‌‌a‌‌vehicle;‌  ‌ Dela‌‌Cruz‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 016‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
arrest‌‌
  the‌‌
  accused.‌‌   Yet,‌‌
  they‌‌
  did‌‌
  nothing;‌‌  no‌‌ effort‌‌ was‌‌ made‌‌ to‌‌  Here,‌‌
  petitioner‌‌   presented‌‌   his‌‌  bag‌‌  for‌‌
  scanning‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  x-ray‌‌ machine.‌‌ 
c) flashes‌‌a‌‌light‌‌therein‌‌without‌‌opening‌‌the‌‌car's‌‌doors;‌  ‌
comply‌‌with‌‌the‌‌law.‌  ‌ When‌‌  his‌‌
  bag‌‌   went‌‌  through‌‌   the‌‌  x-ray‌‌  machine‌‌   and‌‌   the‌‌ firearms‌‌ were‌‌ 
d) where‌‌
  the‌‌
  occupants‌‌
  are‌‌
  not‌‌
  subjected‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌physical‌‌ or‌‌  detected,‌  ‌he‌  ‌voluntarily‌‌   submitted‌‌   his‌‌
  bag‌‌
  for‌‌
  inspection‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  port‌‌ 
2. Search‌  ‌made‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌routine‌  ‌airport‌  ‌security‌  ‌procedure‌‌ 
body‌‌search;‌  ‌ authorities.‌  ‌
which‌  ‌is‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌under‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌9 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌6235‌  ‌was‌  ‌applied‌  ‌in‌‌ 
e) where‌  ‌the‌  ‌inspection‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌vehicles‌  ‌is‌  ‌limited‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌ Customs‌  ‌searches‌  ‌are‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌when‌  ‌persons‌  ‌exercising‌  ‌police‌‌ 
People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Johnson‌  ‌and‌    ‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Canton‌, ‌ ‌such‌  ‌that‌‌ 
visual‌‌search‌‌or‌‌visual‌‌inspection;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ authority‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌customs‌  ‌law‌  ‌effect‌  ‌search‌  ‌and‌  ‌seizure‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
announcements‌  ‌place‌  ‌passengers‌  ‌on‌  ‌notice‌  ‌that‌  ‌ordinary‌‌ 
f) where‌‌the‌‌routine‌‌check‌‌is‌‌conducted‌‌in‌‌a‌‌fixed‌‌area.‌  ‌ enforcement‌‌of‌‌customs‌‌laws.‌  ‌
constitutional‌  ‌protections‌  ‌against‌  ‌warrantless‌  ‌searches‌  ‌and‌‌ 
seizures‌‌do‌‌not‌‌apply‌‌to‌‌routine‌‌airport‌‌procedures.‌  ‌ 2. In‌  ‌the‌  ‌cases‌  ‌of‌  ‌Caballes‌  ‌v.‌  ‌CA‌  ‌and‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Libnao‌, ‌ ‌a ‌‌ Hence,‌‌to‌‌be‌‌a‌‌valid‌‌‌customs‌‌search,‌‌‌the‌‌requirements‌‌are:‌‌   ‌
checkpoint‌‌   search‌‌
  may‌‌
  either‌‌
  be‌‌ a ‌‌mere‌‌ ‌routine‌‌ inspection‌, ‌‌ 1) the‌  ‌person/s‌  ‌conducting‌  ‌the‌  ‌search‌  ‌was/were‌  ‌exercising‌‌ 
3. The‌  ‌scope‌  ‌of‌‌
  a ‌‌search‌‌
  pursuant‌‌
  to‌‌
  airport‌‌
  security‌‌
  procedures‌‌ 
police‌‌authority‌‌under‌‌customs‌‌law;‌  ‌
is‌‌not‌‌confined‌‌only‌‌to‌‌search‌‌for‌‌weapons.‌  ‌ or‌‌it‌‌may‌‌involve‌‌an‌e
‌ xtensive‌‌search‌.  ‌‌ ‌
2) the‌‌search‌‌was‌‌for‌‌the‌‌enforcement‌‌of‌‌customs‌‌law;‌‌and‌  ‌
4) Of‌‌moving‌‌vehicles‌  ‌ 3. For‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mere‌  ‌routine‌  ‌inspection‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌search‌  ‌is‌  ‌normally‌‌ 
3) the‌‌place‌‌searched‌‌is‌‌not‌‌a‌‌dwelling‌‌place‌‌or‌‌house.‌  
permissible‌‌when‌‌it‌‌is:‌  ‌
1. In‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Dequina‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌SC‌  ‌considered‌  ‌dried‌  ‌marijuana‌‌  Here,‌‌
  the‌‌  facts‌‌
  reveal‌‌
  that‌‌ the‌‌ search‌‌ was‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌ routine‌‌ port‌‌ security‌‌ 
leaves‌  ‌in‌  ‌traveling‌  ‌bags‌  ‌being‌  ‌carried‌  ‌or‌  ‌transported‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  a. limited‌‌to‌‌a‌‌mere‌v
‌ isual‌‌search‌,  ‌‌ ‌ measures.‌  ‌The‌  ‌search‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌conducted‌  ‌by‌  ‌persons‌  ‌authorized‌‌ 
accused‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌taxi‌  ‌cab‌  ‌as‌  ‌admissible‌‌
  in‌‌
  evidence‌‌   against‌‌
  them.‌‌  b. where‌‌
  the‌‌
  occupants‌‌
  are‌‌
  not‌‌
  subjected‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌physical‌‌ or‌‌  under‌‌ customs‌‌ law.‌‌ It‌‌ was‌‌ also‌‌ not‌‌ motivated‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ provisions‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
Since‌  ‌a ‌ ‌crime‌  ‌was‌  ‌actually‌  ‌then‌  ‌being‌  ‌committed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  Tariff‌  ‌and‌  ‌Customs‌  ‌Code‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌customs‌  ‌laws.‌‌   Although‌‌   customs‌‌ 
body‌‌search.‌  ‌
searches‌‌   usually‌‌   occur‌‌
  within‌‌   ports‌‌
  or‌‌ terminals,‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ important‌‌ that‌‌ 
accused,‌  ‌their‌  ‌warrantless‌  ‌arrest‌  ‌was‌  ‌legally‌‌   justified,‌‌
  as‌‌  well‌‌  4. On‌‌ the‌‌ other‌‌ hand,‌‌ when‌‌ the‌‌ vehicle‌‌ is‌‌ stopped‌‌ and‌‌ subjected‌‌ to‌‌  the‌‌search‌‌must‌‌be‌‌for‌‌the‌‌enforcement‌‌of‌‌customs‌‌laws.‌  ‌
as‌‌the‌‌ensuing‌‌search.‌  ‌
an‌‌
  ‌extensive‌‌
  search‌, ‌‌it‌‌
  would‌‌
  be‌‌ constitutionally‌‌ permissible‌‌ 
2. A‌  ‌warrantless‌  ‌search‌  ‌and‌  ‌seizure‌  ‌involving‌‌
  an‌‌
  accused‌‌
  which‌‌  only‌‌if‌‌   ‌ 6) Where‌‌the‌‌prohibited‌‌articles‌‌are‌‌in‌‌‘plain‌‌view’‌  ‌
was‌  ‌caught‌‌
  ‌in‌‌
  flagrante‌‌
  delicto‌‌
  transporting‌‌
  marijuana‌‌
  using‌‌
  a ‌‌ a. the‌  ‌officers‌  ‌conducting‌  ‌the‌  ‌search‌  ‌had‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌or‌‌  1. The‌‌following‌‌requisites‌‌must‌‌concur:‌  ‌
bicycle‌‌was‌‌upheld‌‌in‌P ‌ eople‌‌v.‌‌Penaflorida.‌  ‌
probable‌‌ cause‌‌ to‌‌ believe,‌‌ before‌‌ the‌‌ search,‌‌ that‌‌ either‌‌  a) Prior‌‌
  justification‌‌
  for‌‌
  an‌‌
  intrusion‌‌
  or‌‌
  is‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌position‌‌ 
3. It‌‌
  has‌‌
  been‌‌
  clarified‌‌
  though‌‌
  that‌  ‌the‌‌
  exception‌‌ from‌‌ securing‌‌ a ‌‌ the‌‌motorist‌‌is‌‌a‌‌law‌‌offender‌‌or‌‌   ‌ from‌‌which‌‌he‌‌can‌‌view‌‌a‌‌particular‌‌area;‌  ‌
search‌‌   warrant‌‌ when‌‌ it‌‌ comes‌‌ to‌‌ moving‌‌ vehicles‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ give‌‌  b. they‌  ‌will‌  ‌find‌  ‌the‌  ‌instrumentality‌  ‌or‌  ‌evidence‌‌ 
b) Inadvertent‌d
‌ iscovery;‌  ‌
the‌  ‌police‌  ‌authorities‌  ‌unbridled‌  ‌discretion‌  ‌to‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌a ‌‌ pertaining‌‌to‌‌a‌‌crime‌‌in‌‌the‌‌vehicle‌‌to‌‌be‌‌searched.‌  ‌
warrantless‌  ‌search‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌automobile.‌  ‌Probable‌  ‌cause‌  ‌must‌‌  c) Immediately‌‌
  apparent‌‌
  ‌to‌‌
  the‌‌ officer‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ item‌‌ he‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Johnson‌  ‌
exist.‌  ‌ observes‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌crime,‌  ‌contraband‌‌
  or‌‌ 
Persons‌  ‌may‌‌   lose‌‌
  the‌‌
  protection‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  search‌‌
  and‌‌   seizure‌‌  clause‌‌  by‌‌  otherwise‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌seizure;‌  ‌
5) Of‌‌automobiles‌‌at‌‌borders‌‌or‌‌constructive‌‌borders‌  ‌ exposure‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  ‌persons‌  ‌or‌  ‌property‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌manner‌‌ 
1. One‌  ‌such‌  ‌form‌  ‌of‌  ‌search‌  ‌of‌  ‌moving‌  ‌vehicles‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌  reflecting‌  ‌a ‌ l‌ ack‌  ‌of‌‌
  subjective‌‌   expectation‌‌   of‌‌
  privacy‌, ‌‌which‌‌  d) Justified‌  ‌mere‌  ‌seizure‌  ‌of‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌without‌  ‌further‌‌ 
"‌stop-and-search‌" ‌ ‌for‌  ‌as‌  ‌long‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌warranted‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  expectation‌  ‌society‌  ‌is‌  ‌prepared‌  ‌to‌  ‌recognize‌  ‌as‌  ‌reasonable.‌  ‌Such‌‌  search‌. ‌ ‌
recognition‌  ‌is‌  ‌implicit‌  ‌in‌  ‌airport‌  ‌security‌  ‌procedures‌. ‌ ‌There‌  ‌is‌‌ 
exigencies‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌  ‌order‌  ‌and‌  ‌conducted‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌way‌  ‌least‌‌ 
little‌  ‌question‌  ‌that‌  ‌such‌  ‌searches‌  ‌are‌  ‌reasonable‌, ‌ ‌given‌  ‌their‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 51‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

2. If‌  ‌the‌  ‌package‌  ‌proclaims‌  ‌its‌  ‌contents,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌by‌  ‌its‌  ‌(a)‌‌  eyes‌  ‌were‌  ‌moving‌  ‌fast.‌  ‌There‌  ‌was‌  ‌no‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌ground‌  ‌to‌‌ 
searches‌  ‌and‌  ‌indiscriminate‌  ‌seizures‌  ‌nor‌  ‌to‌  ‌extend‌  ‌a ‌ ‌general‌‌ 
distinctive‌  ‌configuration,‌  ‌its‌  ‌(b)‌  ‌transparency,‌  ‌or‌  ‌its‌  ‌(c)‌‌  exploratory‌‌search‌‌made‌‌solely‌‌to‌‌find‌‌evidence‌‌of‌‌defendant's‌‌guilt.‌  ‌ believe‌‌that‌‌the‌‌petitioner‌‌was‌‌armed‌‌with‌‌a‌‌deadly‌‌weapon.‌  ‌
contents‌  ‌are‌  ‌obvious‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌observer,‌  ‌then‌‌
  the‌‌
  contents‌‌
  are‌‌
  in‌‌  In‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌ at‌‌ hand,‌‌ while‌‌ it‌‌ can‌‌ be‌‌ said‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ presence‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ police‌‌  4. There‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌confluence‌  ‌of‌  ‌several‌  ‌suspicious‌‌ 
plain‌‌view.‌  ‌ officers‌  ‌was‌  ‌legitimate‌  ‌as‌  ‌they‌  ‌were‌  ‌patrolling‌  ‌the‌  ‌area‌  ‌and‌  ‌that‌‌  circumstances‌. ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌solitary‌  ‌tip‌  ‌hardly‌  ‌suffices‌  ‌as‌  ‌probable‌‌ 
discovery‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌plastic‌  ‌sachet‌  ‌was‌  ‌inadvertent,‌  ‌it‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌‌  cause;‌  ‌items‌  ‌seized‌  ‌during‌  ‌warrantless‌  ‌searches‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌‌ 
3. The‌  ‌element‌  ‌of‌  ‌inadvertence‌  ‌would‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌present‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌‌ 
emphasized‌  ‌that,‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌third‌  ‌requisite,‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌clearly‌  ‌not‌‌  solitary‌‌tips‌‌are‌‌inadmissible‌‌as‌‌evidence.‌‌(P ‌ eople‌‌v.‌‌Yanson‌) ‌ ‌
police‌  ‌officers‌  ‌intentionally‌  ‌entered‌  ‌the‌  ‌house‌  ‌with‌  ‌no‌  ‌prior‌‌  apparent‌  ‌that‌  ‌such‌  ‌plastic‌  ‌sachet‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌of‌‌   a ‌‌crime,‌‌  a ‌‌
surveillance‌  ‌or‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌before‌  ‌they‌  ‌discovered‌  ‌the‌‌  contraband,‌‌or‌‌otherwise‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌seizure.‌  ‌ People‌‌v.‌‌Cristobal‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
accused‌‌with‌‌the‌‌subject‌‌items.‌  ‌
7) Of‌  ‌buildings‌  ‌and‌  ‌premises‌  ‌to‌  ‌enforce‌  ‌fire,‌  ‌sanitary,‌  ‌and‌  The‌  ‌CA‌  ‌overlooked‌  ‌the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌seized‌  ‌items‌  ‌were‌  ‌confiscated‌‌ 
4. The‌‌
  “‌immediately‌‌
  apparent‌” ‌‌test‌‌
  does‌‌
  not‌‌
  require‌‌
  an‌‌
  unduly‌‌ 
from‌‌Cristobal‌‌as‌‌he‌‌was‌‌being‌‌issued‌‌a‌‌traffic‌‌violation‌‌ticket.‌  ‌
high‌  ‌degree‌  ‌of‌  ‌certainty‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌incriminating‌  ‌character‌  ‌of‌‌  building‌‌   regulations.‌‌   — ‌‌‌This‌‌ is‌‌ basically‌‌ an‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ police‌‌ 
power‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌State,‌  ‌and‌‌
  would‌‌  not‌‌   require‌‌
  a ‌‌search‌‌   warrant.‌‌
  These‌‌  The‌  ‌police‌  ‌officers'‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌proceeding‌  ‌to‌  ‌search‌  ‌Cristobal's‌  ‌body,‌‌ 
evidence;‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌nexus‌  ‌exists‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌viewed‌  ‌object‌  ‌and‌‌ 
despite‌  ‌their‌  ‌own‌  ‌admission‌  ‌that‌  ‌they‌  ‌were‌  ‌unable‌  ‌to‌  ‌find‌  ‌any‌‌ 
criminal‌‌activity.‌  ‌ are‌‌
  routine‌‌   inspections‌‌   which,‌‌
  however,‌‌   must‌‌   be‌‌
  conducted‌‌   during‌‌ 
weapon‌‌on‌‌him,‌‌constitutes‌‌an‌‌invalid‌‌and‌‌unconstitutional‌‌search.‌  ‌
reasonable‌‌hours.‌  ‌
5. In‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Bolasa‌, ‌ ‌acting‌  ‌on‌  ‌an‌  ‌anonymous‌  ‌tip,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
warrantless‌‌   arrest‌‌
  and‌‌  search‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌   suspects‌‌   were‌‌   invalidated‌‌  8) Stop‌‌and‌‌frisk‌‌or‌‌“Terry‌‌searches”‌  ‌ 9) Under‌‌exigent‌‌and‌‌emergency‌‌circumstances‌  ‌
as‌  ‌the‌  ‌objects‌  ‌seized‌  ‌were‌  ‌not‌  ‌in‌  ‌plain‌  ‌view‌‌   as‌‌
  it‌‌
  was‌‌  shown‌‌  1. In‌‌
  ‌People‌‌
  v.‌‌
  de‌‌
  Gracia‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  raid‌‌ of,‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ consequent‌‌ seizure‌‌ 
  ‌In‌‌
  ‌Manalili‌‌  v.‌‌
  CA‌, ‌‌the‌‌ policemen‌‌ chanced‌‌ upon‌‌ the‌‌ accused‌‌ who‌‌ had‌‌ 
that‌‌   the‌‌
  police‌‌
  officers‌‌   had‌‌
  to‌‌
  peep‌‌   to‌‌
  see‌‌
  them.‌‌   They‌‌   ought‌‌
  to‌‌  of‌  ‌firearms‌  ‌and‌  ‌ammunition‌  ‌in,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Eurocar‌  ‌Sales‌  ‌Office‌  ‌was‌‌ 
reddish‌  ‌eyes,‌‌   walking‌‌   in‌‌
  a ‌‌swaying‌‌
  manner,‌‌
  and‌‌
  who‌‌  appeared‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌ 
have‌  ‌conducted‌  ‌prior‌  ‌surveillance‌  ‌and‌  ‌obtained‌  ‌a ‌ ‌search‌‌  held‌  ‌valid,‌  ‌considering‌  ‌the‌  ‌exigent‌  ‌and‌  ‌emergency‌  ‌situation‌‌ 
high‌o ‌ n‌‌drugs;‌‌thus,‌‌the‌‌search.‌  ‌
warrant.‌  ‌ obtaining.‌  ‌The‌  ‌military‌  ‌operatives‌  ‌had‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌grounds‌  ‌to‌‌ 
6. In‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Figueroa‌, ‌ ‌where,‌  ‌while‌  ‌serving‌  ‌a ‌ ‌warrant‌  ‌of‌‌  1. The‌‌
  apprehending‌‌
  police‌‌
  officer‌‌
  must‌‌
  have‌‌
  a ‌‌‌genuine‌‌ reason‌, ‌‌ believe‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌crime‌  ‌was‌  ‌being‌  ‌committed,‌  ‌and‌  ‌they‌  ‌had‌  ‌no‌‌ 
arrest‌, ‌‌police‌‌  officers‌‌
  searched‌‌   the‌‌
  house‌‌ and‌‌ found‌‌ a ‌‌pistol,‌‌ a ‌‌ in‌  ‌accordance‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌police‌  ‌officer’s‌  ‌experience‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  opportunity‌  ‌to‌  ‌apply‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌search‌  ‌warrant‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌courts‌‌ 
magazine‌  ‌and‌  ‌seven‌  ‌rounds‌‌   of‌‌
  ammunition,‌‌   the‌‌
  seizure‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  surrounding‌‌   conditions,‌‌   to‌‌
  warrant‌‌ the‌‌ belief‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ person‌‌ to‌‌  because‌‌the‌‌latter‌‌were‌‌closed.‌  ‌
firearm‌  ‌and‌  ‌ammunition‌  ‌was‌  ‌held‌‌   lawful,‌‌  because‌‌   the‌‌
  objects‌‌  be‌  ‌held‌  ‌has‌  ‌weapons‌  ‌or‌  ‌contraband‌  ‌concealed‌  ‌about‌  ‌him.‌  ‌It‌‌ 
10) At‌‌military‌‌checkpoints‌  ‌
seized‌‌   were‌‌
  in‌‌
  plain‌‌
  view‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌  officer‌‌ who‌‌ had‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌  should,‌  ‌therefore,‌  ‌be‌  ‌emphasized‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌search‌  ‌and‌  ‌seizure‌‌ 
in‌‌the‌‌place‌‌where‌‌he‌‌was.‌  ‌ should‌‌precede‌‌the‌‌arrest‌‌for‌‌the‌‌principle‌‌to‌‌apply‌.  ‌‌ ‌ In‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Malmstedt‌, ‌‌a ‌‌passenger‌‌   bus‌‌
  was‌‌   stopped‌‌   at‌‌
  a ‌‌military‌‌ 
7. In‌‌
  ‌People‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Salanguit‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  peace‌‌ officers‌‌ entered‌‌ the‌‌ dwelling‌‌  2. In‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Solayao‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Supreme‌  ‌Court‌  ‌found‌  ‌justifiable‌‌  checkpoint‌‌   for‌‌  inspection.‌‌
  One‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  soldiers‌‌   noticed‌‌   a ‌‌bulge‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ 
armed‌‌   with‌‌  a ‌‌search‌‌   warrant‌‌  for‌‌  the‌‌
  seizure‌‌
  of‌‌
  shabu‌‌
  and‌‌ drug‌‌  reason‌  ‌to‌  ‌apply‌  ‌the‌  ‌“stop-and-frisk”‌  ‌rule,‌  ‌because‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  waist‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌which‌  ‌turned‌  ‌out‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌pouch‌  ‌containing‌‌ 
paraphernalia.‌‌   In‌‌
  the‌‌ course‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ search,‌‌ they‌‌ found‌‌ the‌‌ shabu‌‌  drunken‌  ‌actuations‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌and‌  ‌his‌  ‌companions,‌  ‌and‌‌  hashish.‌  ‌Further‌  ‌search‌  ‌revealed‌‌   more‌‌   hashish‌‌   concealed‌‌   in‌‌  several‌‌ 
first,‌  ‌and‌  ‌then‌  ‌came‌  ‌upon‌  ‌an‌  ‌article‌  ‌wrapped‌  ‌in‌  ‌newspaper‌‌  because‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  fact‌‌
  that‌‌ his‌‌ companions‌‌ fled‌‌ when‌‌ they‌‌ saw‌‌ the‌‌  teddy‌‌bears‌‌he‌‌was‌‌carrying‌‌in‌‌his‌‌bag.‌  ‌
which‌‌   turned‌‌   out‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌ marijuana.‌‌ Once‌‌ the‌‌ valid‌‌ portion‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  policemen,‌  ‌and‌  ‌finally,‌  ‌because‌  ‌the‌  ‌peace‌  ‌officers‌  ‌were‌‌ 
search‌‌   warrant‌‌ has‌‌ been‌‌ executed,‌‌ the‌‌ “plain‌‌ view”‌‌ doctrine‌‌ can‌‌  precisely‌  ‌on‌  ‌an‌  ‌intelligence‌  ‌mission‌  ‌to‌  ‌verify‌  ‌reports‌  ‌that‌‌  Saluday‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2 ‌ 018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌‌on‌‌Bus‌‌Searches‌‌and‌‌Inspections‌  ‌
no‌  ‌longer‌  ‌provide‌  ‌any‌  ‌basis‌  ‌for‌  ‌admitting‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌items‌‌  armed‌‌persons‌‌were‌‌roaming‌‌the‌‌vicinity.‌  ‌ In‌‌
  the‌‌
  conduct‌‌
  of‌‌
  bus‌‌
  searches,‌‌  ‌the‌‌
  Court‌‌
  lays‌‌ down‌‌ the‌‌ following‌‌ 
subsequently‌‌found.‌  ‌ 3. The‌‌
  rule‌‌
  was‌‌  not‌‌
  applied‌‌   in‌‌
  ‌Malacat‌‌ v.‌‌ CA‌, ‌‌where‌‌ the‌‌ Supreme‌‌  guidelines.‌‌
   ‌

Dominguez‌‌y‌‌Argana‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌ Court‌  ‌said‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌no‌  ‌valid‌  ‌search‌  ‌because‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌‌  Prior‌  ‌to‌  ‌entry‌, ‌ ‌passengers‌  ‌and‌  ‌their‌  ‌bags‌  ‌and‌  ‌luggages‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌‌ 
nothing‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌behavior‌  ‌or‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌which‌‌  subjected‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌routine‌  ‌inspection‌  ‌akin‌  ‌to‌  ‌airport‌  ‌and‌  ‌seaport‌‌ 
The‌  ‌"plain‌  ‌view"‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌used‌  ‌to‌  ‌launch‌  ‌unbridled‌‌  could‌  ‌have‌  ‌elicited‌  ‌even‌  ‌mere‌  ‌suspicion‌  ‌other‌  ‌than‌  ‌that‌  ‌his‌‌  security‌‌protocol.‌‌In‌‌this‌‌regard,‌‌   ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 52‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

1. metal‌  ‌detectors‌  ‌and‌  ‌x-ray‌  ‌scanning‌  ‌machines‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌‌  search,‌  ‌courts‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌convinced‌  ‌that‌  ‌precautionary‌‌  committed‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌peace‌  ‌officer‌  ‌or‌  ‌private‌  ‌person's‌  ‌perception‌  ‌or‌‌ 
installed‌‌at‌‌bus‌‌terminals;‌  ‌ measures‌  ‌were‌  ‌in‌  ‌place‌  ‌to‌  ‌ensure‌  ‌that‌  ‌no‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌was‌‌  observation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused's‌  ‌presence‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌incident‌‌
  or‌‌
  immediate‌‌ 
planted‌‌against‌‌the‌‌accused.‌  ‌ vicinity.‌‌   ‌
2. passengers‌‌can‌‌also‌‌be‌‌frisked;‌  ‌
Aside‌  ‌from‌  ‌public‌  ‌transport‌  ‌buses,‌  ‌any‌  ‌moving‌  ‌vehicle‌  ‌that‌‌  The‌  ‌rule‌  ‌only‌‌
  requires‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  accused‌‌   perform‌‌   some‌‌   overt‌‌
  act‌‌
  that‌‌ 
3. in‌  ‌lieu‌  ‌of‌  ‌electronic‌  ‌scanners,‌  ‌passengers‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌required‌ 
similarly‌‌   accepts‌‌ passengers‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ terminal‌‌ and‌‌ along‌‌ its‌‌ route‌‌  would‌  ‌indicate‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌has‌‌
  committed,‌‌   is‌‌
  actually‌‌  committing,‌‌   or‌‌
  is‌‌ 
instead‌‌ to‌‌ open‌‌ their‌‌ bags‌‌ and‌‌ luggages‌‌ for‌‌ inspection,‌‌ which‌‌ 
is‌  ‌likewise‌  ‌covered‌  ‌by‌  ‌these‌  ‌guidelines‌. ‌ ‌However,‌  ‌the‌  ‌guidelines‌‌  attempting‌  ‌to‌  ‌commit‌  ‌an‌  ‌offense.‌  ‌Therefore,‌  ‌it‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌
  matter‌‌  that‌‌ 
inspection‌‌must‌‌be‌‌made‌‌in‌‌the‌‌passenger's‌‌presence;‌  ‌
do‌‌not‌‌apply‌‌to‌  ‌ accused-appellant‌  ‌was‌  ‌previously‌  ‌identified‌  ‌only‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌CCTV‌‌ 
4. should‌‌  the‌‌
  passenger‌‌ object,‌‌ he‌‌ or‌‌ she‌‌ can‌‌ validly‌‌ be‌‌ refused‌‌  footage‌  ‌supposedly‌  ‌covering‌‌   his‌‌
  previous‌‌   criminal‌‌   conduct‌‌
  because‌‌ 
a) privately-owned‌‌cars‌;‌‌and‌  ‌
entry‌‌into‌‌the‌‌terminal.‌  ‌ he‌‌ was‌‌ seen‌‌ by‌‌ PO2‌‌ Intud‌‌ and‌‌ PO2‌‌ Monilar‌‌ performing‌‌ an‌‌ overt‌‌ act‌‌ of‌‌ 
b) moving‌  ‌vehicles‌  ‌dedicated‌‌   for‌‌
  private‌‌
  or‌‌
  personal‌‌
  use,‌‌  drawing‌‌a‌‌gun‌‌as‌‌he‌‌was‌‌about‌‌to‌‌enter‌‌LBC.‌  ‌
While‌‌ in‌‌ transit‌, ‌‌a ‌‌bus‌‌ can‌‌ still‌‌ be‌‌ searched‌‌ by‌‌ government‌‌ agents‌‌ or‌‌  as‌‌in‌‌the‌‌case‌‌of‌‌taxis.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌security‌  ‌personnel‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌bus‌  ‌owner‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌  ‌three‌‌ 
instances.‌‌   ‌ People‌‌v.‌‌Gardon-Mentoy‌‌‌2019‌  ‌
⭐‌Vaporoso‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
1. First‌, ‌ ‌upon‌  ‌receipt‌  ‌of‌  ‌information‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌passenger‌  ‌carries‌‌ 
Inspections‌  ‌at‌  ‌checkpoints‌  ‌are‌  ‌confined‌  ‌to‌  ‌visual‌  ‌searches‌. ‌ ‌An‌‌ 
contraband‌‌   or‌‌
  illegal‌‌ articles,‌‌ the‌‌ bus‌‌ where‌‌ the‌‌ passenger‌‌ is‌‌  The‌  ‌first‌  ‌search‌  ‌made‌  ‌on‌  ‌petitioners,‌  ‌i.e.,‌  ‌the‌  ‌cursory‌  ‌body‌  ‌search‌‌  extensive‌‌   search‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  vehicle‌‌  is‌‌ permissible‌‌ only‌‌ ‌when‌‌ the‌‌ officer‌‌ 
aboard‌‌   can‌‌
  be‌‌
  stopped‌‌   en‌‌
  route‌‌ to‌‌ allow‌‌ for‌‌ an‌‌ inspection‌‌ of‌‌  which,‌‌ however,‌‌ did‌‌ not‌‌ yield‌‌ any‌‌ drugs‌‌ but‌‌ only‌‌ personal‌‌ belongings‌‌  conducting‌  ‌the‌  ‌search‌  ‌had‌  ‌probable‌  ‌cause‌  ‌to‌  ‌believe‌  ‌prior‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
the‌‌person‌‌and‌‌his‌‌or‌‌her‌‌effects.‌‌   ‌ of‌  ‌petitioners,‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌as‌‌   a ‌‌search‌‌   incidental‌‌
  to‌‌
  a ‌‌lawful‌‌  search‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌will‌  ‌find‌  ‌inside‌  ‌the‌  ‌vehicle‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌searched‌  ‌the‌‌ 
2. Second‌, ‌ ‌whenever‌  ‌a ‌ ‌bus‌  ‌picks‌  ‌passengers‌  ‌en‌  ‌route,‌  ‌the‌‌  arrest‌‌   as‌‌
  it‌‌ was‌‌ done‌‌ contemporaneous‌‌ to‌‌ their‌‌ arrest‌‌ and‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ place‌‌  instrumentality‌‌or‌‌evidence‌‌pertaining‌‌to‌‌the‌‌commission‌‌of‌‌a‌‌crime.‌ 
prospective‌  ‌passenger‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌frisked‌  ‌and‌‌
  his‌‌
  or‌‌
  her‌‌  bag‌‌
  or‌‌  of‌  ‌apprehension.‌  ‌On‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand,‌  ‌the‌‌   same‌‌   cannot‌‌
  be‌‌
  said‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
luggage‌  ‌be‌  ‌subjected‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌routine‌  ‌inspection‌  ‌by‌‌  second‌  ‌search‌  ‌which‌  ‌yielded‌  ‌the‌  ‌drugs‌  ‌subject‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌case,‌‌  Under‌‌  Section‌‌  5(a),‌‌
  the‌‌
  officer‌‌
  himself‌‌   witnesses‌‌  the‌‌
  commission‌‌   of‌‌ 
government‌  ‌agents‌  ‌or‌  ‌private‌  ‌security‌  ‌personnel‌‌   as‌‌
  though‌‌  considering‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌substantial‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌time‌  ‌had‌  ‌already‌  ‌elapsed‌‌  the‌‌
  crime;‌‌  under‌‌  Section‌‌   5(b),‌‌
  the‌‌ officer‌‌ actually‌‌ knows‌‌ that‌‌ a ‌‌crime‌‌ 
the‌‌person‌‌boarded‌‌the‌‌bus‌‌at‌‌the‌‌terminal.‌‌   ‌ from‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌arrest‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌‌
  second‌‌
  search,‌‌   not‌‌  to‌‌  has‌‌just‌‌been‌‌committed.‌  ‌
mention‌  ‌the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌second‌  ‌search‌  ‌was‌  ‌conducted‌  ‌at‌  ‌a ‌ ‌venue‌‌  The‌‌
  arrest‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ accused‌‌ did‌‌ not‌‌ justify‌‌ the‌‌ search‌‌ because‌‌ the‌‌ 
3. Third‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌bus‌  ‌can‌‌
  be‌‌
  flagged‌‌   down‌‌  at‌‌
  designated‌‌   military‌‌  or‌‌ 
other‌‌than‌‌the‌‌place‌‌of‌‌actual‌‌arrest,‌‌i.e.,‌‌the‌‌Panabo‌‌Police‌‌Station.‌  ‌ arrest‌‌did‌‌not‌‌precede‌‌the‌‌search.‌  ‌
police‌‌   checkpoints‌‌   where‌‌   State‌‌  agents‌‌  can‌‌
  board‌‌ the‌‌ vehicle‌‌ 
for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌routine‌‌
  inspection‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  passengers‌‌   and‌‌
  their‌‌
  bags‌‌
  or‌‌  Warrantless‌‌arrests‌‌and‌‌detention‌  ‌
luggages.‌  ‌ Porteria‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
There‌‌
  are‌‌
  three‌‌
  (3)‌‌
  instances‌‌
  when‌‌
  warrantless‌‌
  arrests‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ lawfully‌‌ 
In‌‌
  both‌‌ situations,‌‌ the‌‌ inspection‌‌ of‌‌ passengers‌‌ and‌‌ their‌‌ effects‌‌ prior‌‌  effected.‌‌These‌‌are:‌‌   ‌ The‌‌  prosecution‌‌   failed‌‌  to‌‌
  establish‌‌   any‌‌  overt‌‌  act‌‌ which‌‌ could‌‌ lead‌‌ to‌‌ 
to‌‌
  entry‌‌  at‌‌
  the‌‌
  bus‌‌
  terminal‌‌   and‌‌
  the‌‌ search‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ bus‌‌ while‌‌ in‌‌ transit‌‌  Marvin's‌  ‌in‌‌  flagrante‌‌  delicto‌‌   arrest.‌‌
  There‌‌   was‌‌  also‌‌
  no‌‌  evidence‌‌
  that‌‌ 
must‌  ‌also‌  ‌satisfy‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌to‌  ‌qualify‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌‌  a) an‌‌arrest‌‌of‌‌a‌‌suspect‌‌‌in‌‌flagrante‌‌delicto‌; ‌ ‌
the‌  ‌arresting‌  ‌officers,‌  ‌or‌  ‌SPO4‌  ‌Pequiras‌  ‌in‌  ‌particular,‌  ‌knew‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌ 
reasonable‌‌search.‌‌   ‌ b) Hot‌  ‌pursuit.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌an‌  ‌arrest‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌suspect‌  ‌where,‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌‌  offense‌‌   that‌‌
  was‌‌
  just‌‌
  committed‌‌   and‌‌  that‌‌
  Marvin‌‌   was‌‌ the‌‌ perpetrator‌‌ 
1. First‌, ‌ ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌manner‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌search,‌  ‌it‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌  ‌least‌‌  personal‌  ‌knowledge‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌arresting‌  ‌officer,‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌probable‌‌  of‌‌the‌‌offense.‌  ‌
intrusive‌  ‌and‌  ‌must‌  ‌uphold‌  ‌the‌  ‌dignity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌or‌‌  cause‌  ‌that‌  ‌said‌  ‌suspect‌  ‌was‌  ‌the‌  ‌perpetrator‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌crime‌‌
  which‌‌ 
had‌‌just‌‌been‌‌committed;‌‌and‌  ‌ In‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌manner,‌  ‌the‌  ‌present‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌suffice‌  ‌to‌‌ 
persons‌  ‌being‌  ‌searched,‌  ‌minimizing,‌  ‌if‌  ‌not‌  ‌altogether‌‌ 
fulfill‌‌   the‌‌
  requirements‌‌   for‌‌
  a ‌‌hot‌‌
  pursuit‌‌  arrest.‌‌  The‌‌   prosecution‌‌   did‌‌ 
eradicating,‌  ‌any‌  ‌cause‌  ‌for‌  ‌public‌  ‌embarrassment,‌‌  c) an‌‌arrest‌‌of‌‌a‌‌prisoner‌‌who‌‌has‌‌escaped.‌  ‌
not‌‌   allege‌‌  and‌‌ prove‌‌ that‌‌ SPO4‌‌ Pequiras‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ arresting‌‌ officers‌‌ had‌‌ 
humiliation‌‌or‌‌ridicule.‌‌   ‌
People‌‌v.‌‌Olarte‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌ personal‌  ‌knowledge‌  ‌of‌  ‌facts‌  ‌that‌  ‌Marvin‌  ‌had‌  ‌just‌  ‌committed‌  ‌an‌‌ 
2. Second‌, ‌ ‌neither‌  ‌can‌  ‌the‌  ‌search‌  ‌result‌  ‌from‌  ‌any‌‌  offense.‌  ‌Neither‌  ‌does‌  ‌the‌  ‌anonymous‌  ‌report‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌suspicious‌‌   person‌‌ 
discriminatory‌  ‌motive‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌insidious‌  ‌profiling,‌‌  Here,‌  ‌the‌  ‌offense‌  ‌had‌  ‌already‌  ‌been‌  ‌consummated‌  ‌but‌  ‌not‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  operate‌  ‌to‌  ‌vest‌  ‌personal‌  ‌knowledge‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  police‌‌   officers‌‌
  about‌‌  the‌‌ 
stereotyping‌‌and‌‌other‌‌similar‌‌motives.‌‌   ‌ presence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌peace‌  ‌officer‌  ‌or‌  ‌private‌  ‌person‌  ‌who,‌  ‌nevertheless,‌‌  commission‌‌of‌‌an‌‌offense.‌  ‌
3. Third‌, ‌‌as‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  purpose‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  search,‌‌
  it‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ continued‌‌  should‌  ‌have‌  ‌personal‌  ‌knowledge‌  ‌of‌  ‌facts‌  ‌or‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌that‌‌   the‌‌ 
to‌‌ensure‌‌public‌‌safety.‌   person‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌arrested‌  ‌had‌  ‌committed‌  ‌it.‌  ‌More‌  ‌importantly,‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌ ‌
4. Fourth‌, ‌ ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌seized‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌reasonable‌‌  durational‌  ‌immediacy‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌offense‌  ‌that‌  ‌had‌  ‌just‌  ‌been‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 53‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Exclusionary‌‌rule‌  ‌ 1) File‌  ‌a ‌ ‌motion‌  ‌to‌  ‌quash‌  ‌the‌  ‌search‌  ‌warrant‌  ‌and‌  ‌motion‌  ‌to‌‌ 
determine‌‌   ‌
suppress‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌illegally‌  ‌obtained‌  ‌if‌‌   a ‌‌search‌‌
  warrant‌‌
  is‌‌ 
1. “Fruit‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌poisonous‌  ‌tree”‌  ‌doctrine,‌  ‌non-exclusionary‌‌  1. whether‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌has‌‌   exhibited‌‌
  a ‌‌‌reasonable‌‌
  expectation‌‌ 
issued‌‌and‌‌the‌‌same‌‌is‌‌invalid.‌  ‌
rule‌  ‌originally‌  ‌enunciated‌  ‌in‌  ‌Stonehill‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Diokno‌  ‌and‌  ‌later‌‌  of‌‌privacy‌‌‌and,‌‌if‌‌so,‌‌   ‌
2) File‌  ‌a ‌ ‌petition‌‌
  for‌‌
  certiorari‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  ground‌‌
  of‌‌
  grave‌‌
  abuse‌‌
  of‌‌ 
constitutionally‌‌affirmed‌‌in‌S‌ ec‌‌3(2)‌‌Art‌‌III‌. ‌ ‌ 2. whether‌‌
  that‌‌
  expectation‌‌
  has‌‌
  been‌‌
  violated‌‌
  by‌‌ unreasonable‌‌ 
discretion‌  ‌amounting‌  ‌to‌  ‌lack‌  ‌or‌  ‌excess‌  ‌of‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌  government‌‌intrusion.‌  ‌
2. Evidence‌  ‌illegally‌  ‌obtained‌‌
  however‌‌
  may‌‌
  nonetheless‌‌
  be‌‌
  used‌‌ 
part‌‌of‌‌the‌‌judge‌‌who‌‌issued‌‌the‌‌search‌‌warrant.‌  ‌
in‌‌
  the‌‌
  judicial‌‌ or‌‌ administrative‌‌ action‌‌ that‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ filed‌‌ against‌‌  Petitioners‌  ‌were‌  ‌invited‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Senate's‌  ‌public‌  ‌hearing‌‌  to‌‌
  deliberate‌‌ 
3) Interpose‌  ‌a ‌ ‌timely‌  ‌objection‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌prosecution‌  ‌is‌‌  on‌  ‌Senate‌  ‌Res.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌455.‌  ‌The‌  ‌inquiry‌  ‌focused‌  ‌on‌  ‌petitioners'‌  ‌acts‌‌ 
the‌‌officer‌‌responsible‌‌for‌‌its‌‌illegal‌‌seizure.‌  ‌
formally‌  ‌offered‌  ‌the‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌trial‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌  committed‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌ discharge‌‌ of‌‌ their‌‌ duties‌‌ as‌‌ officers‌‌ and‌‌ directors‌‌ of‌‌ 
3. Such‌  ‌objection‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌made‌  ‌before‌  ‌arraignment‌  ‌as‌  ‌per‌‌  the‌  ‌said‌  ‌corporations.‌  ‌Consequently,‌  ‌they‌  ‌have‌  ‌no‌  ‌reasonable‌‌ 
inadmissibility‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌evidence.‌  ‌The‌  ‌failure‌  ‌to‌  ‌object‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Zaspa.‌‌‌Otherwise,‌‌waiver‌‌sets‌‌in.‌  ‌ expectation‌  ‌of‌  ‌privacy‌  ‌over‌  ‌matters‌  ‌involving‌  ‌their‌  ‌offices‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌‌
illegality‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  arrest‌‌
  does‌‌
  not‌‌
  include‌‌  the‌‌
  waiver‌‌   to‌‌
  object‌‌   to‌‌  corporation‌‌where‌‌the‌‌government‌‌has‌‌interest.‌  ‌
4. The‌‌
  constitutional‌‌
  guaranty‌‌
  against‌‌
  unreasonable‌‌ searches‌‌ and‌‌  the‌‌inadmissibility‌‌of‌‌the‌‌objects‌‌confiscated.‌‌   ‌
This‌  ‌goes‌  ‌to‌  ‌show‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌privacy‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌absolute‌  ‌where‌‌ 
seizure‌  ‌is‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌only‌  ‌against‌  ‌government‌‌
  authorities‌‌
  and‌‌  4) File‌  ‌a ‌ ‌criminal‌  ‌case‌  ‌for‌  ‌violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌domicile‌  ‌or‌  ‌illegal‌‌  there‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌overriding‌  ‌compelling‌  ‌state‌  ‌interest‌. ‌ ‌In‌‌   ‌Valmonte‌‌   v.‌‌ 
NOT‌‌to‌‌private‌‌individuals‌‌such‌‌as‌‌the‌b ‌ arangay‌‌tanod‌.‌  procurement‌‌of‌‌search‌‌warrant‌.  ‌‌ ‌ Belmonte‌, ‌‌the‌‌   Court‌‌
  remarked‌‌ that‌‌ as‌‌ public‌‌ figures,‌‌ the‌‌ Members‌‌ of‌‌ 
5. In‌  ‌Del‌  ‌Castillo‌  ‌v.‌  ‌People‌, ‌ ‌however,‌  ‌having‌  ‌been‌  ‌established‌‌  the‌  ‌former‌  ‌Batasang‌  ‌Pambansa‌  ‌enjoy‌  ‌a ‌ ‌more‌  ‌limited‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌‌ 
5) Ask‌  ‌for‌‌
  the‌‌
  return‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  objects‌‌
  confiscated‌‌
  when‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌
  is‌‌ 
privacy‌  ‌as‌  ‌compared‌  ‌to‌  ‌ordinary‌  ‌individuals,‌  ‌and‌  ‌their‌‌   actions‌‌
  are‌‌ 
that‌  ‌the‌  ‌assistance‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌barangay‌‌
  tanods‌‌
  were‌‌
  sought‌‌   by‌‌  the‌‌  not‌  ‌illegal.‌  ‌However,‌  ‌this‌  ‌can‌  ‌only‌  ‌be‌  ‌asked‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌‌  subject‌‌to‌‌closer‌‌scrutiny.‌  ‌
police‌  ‌authorities‌  ‌who‌  ‌effected‌  ‌the‌  ‌search‌  ‌warrant,‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌‌  termination‌‌of‌‌the‌‌case.‌  ‌
barangay‌  ‌tanods‌  ‌therefore‌  ‌acted‌  ‌as‌  ‌agents‌  ‌of‌  ‌persons‌  ‌in‌‌ 
Effects‌‌of‌‌illegal‌‌detention‌  ‌ Vivares‌‌v.‌‌STC‌‌2
‌ 014‌  ‌
authority‌. ‌ ‌Thus,‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌proscription‌  ‌applied‌  ‌to‌‌ 
them.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌conspicuous‌  ‌illegality‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌arrest‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌affect‌  ‌the‌‌  Without‌  ‌an‌  ‌actionable‌  ‌entitlement‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌place‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌‌ 
jurisdiction‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ trial‌‌ court,‌‌ because‌‌ even‌‌ in‌‌ instances‌‌ not‌‌ allowed‌‌  informational‌  ‌privacy,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌habeas‌  ‌data‌  ‌petition‌  ‌will‌  ‌not‌  ‌prosper.‌  ‌Is‌‌ 
6. The‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌for‌  ‌warrantless‌  ‌searches‌  ‌charges‌  ‌no‌  ‌criminal‌‌  there‌  ‌a ‌ ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌informational‌  ‌privacy‌  ‌in‌  ‌OSN‌  ‌activities‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌ 
offense‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌remedy‌  ‌is‌  ‌civil‌  ‌under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌32,‌  ‌in‌  ‌relation‌  ‌to‌‌  by‌  ‌law,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌warrantless‌  ‌arrest‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌‌jurisdictional‌‌   defect,‌‌
  and‌‌  any‌‌ 
users‌? ‌ ‌
Article‌‌2219(6)‌‌and‌‌(10)‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Civil‌‌Code.‌  ‌ objection‌  ‌thereto‌  ‌is‌  ‌waived‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌arrested‌  ‌submits‌  ‌to‌‌ 
The‌‌right‌‌to‌‌informational‌‌privacy‌‌on‌‌Facebook‌  ‌
arraignment‌‌without‌‌any‌‌objection.‌  ‌
Polangcos‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌ Before‌  ‌one‌  ‌can‌  ‌have‌  ‌an‌  ‌expectation‌  ‌of‌  ‌privacy‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌or‌  ‌her‌  ‌OSN‌‌ 
activity,‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ first‌‌ necessary‌‌ that‌‌ said‌‌ user,‌‌ in‌‌ this‌‌ case‌‌ the‌‌ children‌‌ 
Polangcos'‌  ‌violations‌  ‌were‌‌   punishable‌‌  only‌‌   by‌‌
  a ‌‌city‌‌
  ordinance‌‌
  that‌‌  E.‌‌Privacy‌‌of‌‌Communications‌‌and‌‌Correspondence‌  of‌  ‌petitioners,‌  ‌manifest‌  ‌the‌  ‌intention‌  ‌to‌  ‌keep‌  ‌certain‌  ‌posts‌‌ 
prescribes‌‌ as‌‌ penalty‌‌ certain‌‌ fines.‌‌ SPO2‌‌ Juntanilla‌‌ thus‌‌ conducted‌‌ an‌‌  private,‌  ‌through‌  ‌the‌  ‌employment‌  ‌of‌  ‌measures‌  ‌to‌  ‌prevent‌‌ 
illegal‌‌
  search‌‌
  when‌‌
  he‌‌  frisked‌‌  Polangcos‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌ foregoing‌‌ violations‌‌  Section‌  ‌3.‌  ‌The‌  ‌privacy‌  ‌of‌  ‌communication‌  ‌and‌  ‌correspondence‌‌  access‌  ‌thereto‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌  ‌limit‌  ‌its‌  ‌visibility.‌  ‌And‌  ‌this‌  ‌intention‌  ‌can‌‌ 
which‌‌were‌‌punishable‌‌only‌‌by‌‌fine.‌  ‌ shall‌‌be‌‌inviolable‌e‌ xcept‌‌   ‌ materialize‌‌   in‌‌ cyberspace‌‌ through‌‌ the‌‌ utilization‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ OSN’s‌‌ privacy‌‌ 
Ultimately,‌  ‌Polangcos‌‌   must‌‌
  be‌‌  acquitted,‌‌
  as‌‌
  the‌‌
  corpus‌‌   delicti‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  tools.‌  ‌In‌  ‌other‌  ‌words,‌  ‌utilization‌  ‌of‌  ‌these‌  ‌privacy‌  ‌tools‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌ 
a) upon‌‌lawful‌‌order‌‌of‌‌the‌‌court,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
crime,‌‌
  i.e.‌‌
  the‌‌
  seized‌‌
  drug,‌‌
  is‌‌
  excluded‌‌  evidence,‌‌ inadmissible‌‌ in‌‌ any‌‌  manifestation,‌  ‌in‌  ‌cyber‌  ‌world,‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  user’s‌‌  invocation‌‌   of‌‌
  his‌‌
  or‌‌  her‌‌ 
proceeding,‌  ‌including‌  ‌this‌  ‌one,‌  ‌against‌  ‌him.‌  ‌This‌  ‌is‌  ‌in‌  ‌accordance‌‌  b) when‌  ‌public‌  ‌safety‌  ‌or‌  ‌order‌  ‌requires‌  ‌otherwise,‌  ‌as‌‌  right‌‌to‌‌informational‌‌privacy.‌  ‌
with‌‌the‌‌exclusionary‌‌rule‌i‌ n‌‌Section‌‌3(2),‌‌Article‌‌III.‌  ‌ prescribed‌‌by‌‌law.‌  ‌
Intrusion,‌‌when‌‌and‌‌how‌‌allowed‌  ‌
Concept‌‌of‌‌communications,‌‌correspondence‌  ‌
Effects‌‌of‌‌unreasonable‌‌searches‌‌and‌‌seizures‌  ‌ Pollo‌‌v.‌‌David‌‌2
‌ 011‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
In‌‌re‌‌Sabio‌  ‌
Remedies‌‌against‌‌unlawful‌‌searches‌  ‌ The‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌privacy‌  ‌right‌  ‌under‌  ‌prior‌  ‌decisions‌  ‌involved‌  ‌a ‌‌
In‌‌
  evaluating‌‌ a ‌‌claim‌‌ for‌‌ violation‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ privacy,‌‌ a ‌‌court‌‌ must‌‌  two-fold‌‌requirement:‌‌   ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 54‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

may‌‌ monitor‌‌ the‌‌ use‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ computer‌‌ resources‌‌ using‌‌ both‌‌ automated‌‌ 
first‌, ‌ ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌has‌  ‌exhibited‌  ‌an‌  ‌actual‌  ‌(‌subjective‌) ‌‌ The‌  ‌form‌  ‌of‌  ‌expression‌  ‌is‌  ‌just‌  ‌as‌  ‌important‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌information‌‌ 
or‌  ‌human‌  ‌means.‌  ‌This‌  ‌implies‌  ‌that‌‌
  on-the-spot‌‌
  inspections‌‌   may‌‌  be‌‌ 
expectation‌‌of‌‌privacy;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ conveyed‌‌   that‌‌
  it‌‌
  forms‌‌
  part‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  expression.‌‌   The‌‌
  present‌‌   case‌‌
  is‌‌
  in‌‌ 
done‌‌   to‌‌
  ensure‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  computer‌‌   resources‌‌  were‌‌
  used‌‌
  only‌‌
  for‌‌ such‌‌ 
point.‌  ‌Large‌  ‌tarpaulins,‌  ‌therefore,‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌analogous‌  ‌to‌  ‌time‌  ‌and‌‌ 
second‌, ‌ ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌expectation‌  ‌be‌  ‌one‌  ‌that‌  ‌society‌  ‌is‌  ‌prepared‌‌
  to‌‌  legitimate‌‌business‌‌purposes.‌  ‌
place.‌  ‌They‌  ‌are‌  ‌fundamentally‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌expression‌  ‌protected‌  ‌under‌‌ 
recognize‌‌as‌‌reasonable‌‌(o ‌ bjective‌).‌  ‌
Exclusionary‌‌rule‌  ‌ Art‌‌III,‌‌Section‌‌4.‌  ‌
In‌  ‌Mancusi‌  ‌v.‌  ‌DeForte‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌US‌  ‌Supreme‌  ‌Court‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌union‌‌ 
Any‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌obtained‌  ‌in‌  ‌violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌xxxx‌  ‌section‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌    speech‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ protected‌‌ under‌‌ the‌‌ ‌safety‌‌ valve‌‌ theory.‌ ‌This‌‌ 
Free‌‌
employee‌  ‌had‌  ‌Fourth‌  ‌Amendment‌  ‌rights‌  ‌with‌  ‌regard‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌‌   office‌‌   at‌‌ 
union‌‌headquarters‌‌that‌‌he‌‌shared‌‌with‌‌other‌‌union‌‌officials.‌  ‌ provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌“nonviolent‌  ‌manifestations‌  ‌of‌  ‌dissent‌  ‌reduce‌  ‌the‌‌ 
inadmissible‌‌for‌‌any‌‌purpose‌‌in‌‌any‌‌proceeding.‌  ‌
likelihood‌  ‌of‌  ‌violence.”‌  ‌This‌  ‌court‌  ‌has‌  ‌held‌  ‌free‌  ‌speech‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌‌ 
In‌  ‌O'Connor‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌that‌  ‌"‌special‌  ‌needs‌" ‌ ‌authorize‌‌  intellectual‌  ‌freedoms‌  ‌as‌  ‌“highly‌  ‌ranked‌  ‌in‌  ‌our‌  ‌scheme‌  ‌of‌‌ 
warrantless‌  ‌searches‌  ‌involving‌  ‌public‌  ‌employees‌  ‌for‌  ‌work-related‌‌  F.‌‌Freedom‌‌of‌‌Speech‌‌and‌‌Expression‌  ‌ constitutional‌  ‌values.”‌  ‌These‌  ‌rights‌  ‌enjoy‌  ‌precedence‌  ‌and‌‌ 
reasons.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌thus‌  ‌laid‌  ‌down‌  ‌a ‌ ‌balancing‌  ‌test‌  ‌under‌  ‌which‌‌  primacy.‌  ‌
government‌‌   interests‌‌   are‌‌
  weighed‌‌   against‌‌   the‌‌
  employee's‌‌   reasonable‌‌ 
Sec‌  ‌4.‌  ‌No‌‌
  law‌‌
  shall‌‌  be‌‌
  passed‌‌
  abridging‌‌   the‌‌  freedom‌‌  of‌‌
  speech,‌‌
  of‌‌  This‌  ‌primordial‌  ‌right‌  ‌calls‌  ‌for‌  ‌utmost‌  ‌respect,‌  ‌more‌  ‌so‌  ‌“when‌‌ 
expectation‌‌of‌‌privacy.‌  ‌
expression,‌  ‌or‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  press,‌‌
  or‌‌
  the‌‌
  right‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  people‌‌
  peaceably‌‌  to‌‌  what‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌curtailed‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌
  dissemination‌‌
  of‌‌
  information‌‌   to‌‌
  make‌‌ 
This‌  ‌Court,‌  ‌in‌  ‌Social‌  ‌Justice‌  ‌Society‌  ‌(SJS)‌  ‌v.‌  ‌DDB‌  ‌has‌  ‌also‌‌  assemble‌‌and‌‌petition‌‌the‌‌government‌‌for‌‌redress‌‌of‌‌grievances.‌  ‌ more‌‌meaningful‌‌the‌‌equally‌‌vital‌‌right‌‌of‌‌suffrage.”‌  ‌
recognized‌  ‌the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  such‌‌
  ‌legitimate‌‌  intrusion‌‌   of‌‌ 
privacy‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌workplace.‌  ‌The‌  ‌employees'‌  ‌privacy‌  ‌interest‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌‌  Sec‌  ‌18.‌  ‌No‌  ‌person‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌detained‌  ‌solely‌  ‌by‌  ‌reason‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  Balance‌‌between‌‌unbridled‌‌expression‌‌and‌‌liberty‌  ‌
office‌‌is‌‌to‌‌a‌‌large‌‌extent‌‌circumscribed‌‌by‌‌   ‌
political‌‌beliefs‌‌and‌‌aspirations.‌‌xxxx‌  ‌ Restrictions‌  ‌on‌‌  speech‌‌
  may‌‌   be‌‌
  resorted‌‌
  to‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  state‌‌
  for‌‌
  reasons‌‌ 
1) the‌‌company's‌‌work‌‌policies,‌‌   ‌
of‌  ‌public‌‌
  order,‌‌
  national‌‌
  security,and‌‌  other‌‌  situations‌‌   which‌‌   impel‌‌ 
2) the‌  ‌CBA,‌  ‌if‌  ‌any,‌  ‌entered‌  ‌into‌  ‌by‌  ‌management‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  Sec‌  ‌8.‌  ‌The‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌people,‌  ‌including‌  ‌those‌  ‌employed‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
the‌‌government‌‌to‌‌repress‌‌the‌‌freedom‌‌of‌‌speech.‌  ‌
bargaining‌‌unit,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ public‌  ‌and‌  ‌private‌  ‌sectors,‌  ‌to‌  ‌form‌  ‌unions,‌  ‌associations,‌  ‌or‌‌ 
societies‌‌for‌‌purposes‌‌not‌‌contrary‌‌to‌‌law‌‌shall‌‌not‌‌be‌‌abridged.‌  ‌ Types‌‌of‌‌regulation‌  ‌
3) the‌‌
  inherent‌‌
  right‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ employer‌‌ to‌‌ maintain‌‌ discipline‌‌ and‌‌ 
efficiency‌‌in‌‌the‌‌workplace.‌‌   ‌ Concept‌  ‌ Prior‌‌restraint‌‌and‌‌subsequent‌‌punishment‌  ‌
Their‌‌ privacy‌‌ expectation‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌regulated‌‌ office‌‌ environment‌‌ is,‌‌ in‌‌ fine,‌‌  ⭐‌The‌‌Diocese‌‌of‌‌Bacolod‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 015‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ Tordesillas‌‌v.‌‌Puno‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌
reduced;‌  ‌and‌  ‌a ‌ ‌degree‌  ‌of‌  ‌impingement‌  ‌upon‌  ‌such‌  ‌privacy‌‌
  has‌‌
  been‌‌ 
upheld.‌  ‌ COMELEC‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌regulate‌  ‌the‌  ‌enjoyment‌‌
  of‌‌  WON‌  ‌the‌  ‌Advisory‌  ‌issued‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌
  respondents‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌
  content-neutral‌‌ 
the‌  ‌preferred‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌of‌  ‌expression‌  ‌exercised‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌‌ and‌  ‌thus‌  ‌constitutes‌  ‌prior‌  ‌restraint,‌  ‌censorship,‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌‌ 
Here,‌‌the‌‌relevant‌‌surrounding‌‌circumstances‌‌to‌‌consider‌‌include‌‌   ‌ content-restrictive,‌‌   which‌‌  resulted‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌"chilling‌‌ effect"‌‌ in‌‌ violation‌‌ of‌‌ 
non-candidate‌‌in‌‌this‌‌case.‌  ‌
1) the‌‌employee's‌‌relationship‌‌to‌‌the‌‌item‌‌seized;‌  ‌ the‌‌freedom‌‌of‌‌the‌‌press.‌  ‌
Continuum‌‌of‌‌thought,‌‌speech,‌‌expression,‌‌and‌‌speech‌‌acts‌  ‌
2) whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌item‌  ‌was‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌immediate‌  ‌control‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Our‌  ‌jurisprudence‌  ‌has‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌four‌  ‌aspects‌  ‌of‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌of‌‌ 
employee‌‌when‌‌it‌‌was‌‌seized;‌‌and‌  ‌ The‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌of‌  ‌expression‌  ‌applies‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌entire‌‌  the‌‌press‌,‌‌to‌‌wit:‌‌   ‌
3) whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌took‌‌
  actions‌‌
  to‌‌
  maintain‌‌
  his‌‌
  privacy‌‌  continuum‌  ‌of‌  ‌speech‌  ‌from‌  ‌utterances‌  ‌made‌‌   to‌‌
  conduct‌‌   enacted,‌‌
  and‌‌ 
even‌  ‌to‌  ‌inaction‌  ‌itself‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌symbolic‌  ‌manner‌  ‌of‌  ‌communication.‌‌  1) freedom‌‌from‌‌prior‌‌restraint;‌  ‌
in‌‌the‌‌item.‌‌   ‌
Ebralinag‌  ‌v.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Division‌  ‌Superintendent‌  ‌of‌  ‌Schools‌  ‌of‌  ‌Cebu‌‌  2) freedom‌‌from‌‌punishment‌‌subsequent‌‌to‌‌publication;‌  ‌
Thus,‌‌
  where‌‌   the‌‌
  employee‌‌   used‌‌
  a ‌‌password‌‌ on‌‌ his‌‌ computer,‌‌ did‌‌ not‌‌  declares‌‌that:‌  ‌
share‌‌
  his‌‌
  office‌‌
  with‌‌
  co-workers‌‌   and‌‌
  kept‌‌
  the‌‌  same‌‌  locked,‌‌   he‌‌
  had‌‌
  a ‌‌ 3) freedom‌‌of‌‌access‌‌to‌‌information;‌‌and‌  ‌
legitimate‌  ‌expectation‌  ‌of‌  ‌privacy‌  ‌and‌  ‌any‌  ‌search‌  ‌of‌  ‌that‌  ‌space‌  ‌and‌‌  Freedom‌‌   of‌‌
  speech‌‌ includes‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ silent.‌‌ The‌‌ salute‌‌  4) freedom‌‌of‌‌circulation.‌  ‌
items‌‌located‌‌therein‌‌must‌‌comply‌‌with‌‌the‌‌Fourth‌‌Amendment.‌  ‌ is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌symbolic‌  ‌manner‌  ‌of‌  ‌communication‌  ‌that‌  ‌conveys‌  ‌its‌‌ 
message‌  ‌as‌  ‌clearly‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌written‌  ‌or‌  ‌spoken‌  ‌word.‌  ‌As‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌‌  Prior‌  ‌restraint‌  ‌refers‌‌  to‌‌  official‌‌  governmental‌‌  restrictions‌‌  on‌‌  the‌‌ 
The‌‌   CSC‌‌
  in‌‌ this‌‌ case‌‌ had‌‌ implemented‌‌ a ‌‌policy‌‌ that‌‌ put‌‌ its‌‌ employees‌‌  form‌‌   of‌‌
  expression,‌‌   it‌‌
  cannot‌‌   be‌‌
  compelled‌‌   any‌‌
  more‌‌ than‌‌ it‌‌ can‌‌  press‌‌ or‌‌ other‌‌ forms‌‌ of‌‌ expression‌‌ in‌‌ advance‌‌ of‌‌ actual‌‌ publication‌‌ or‌‌ 
on‌  ‌notice‌  ‌that‌  ‌they‌  ‌have‌  ‌no‌  ‌expectation‌  ‌of‌‌
  privacy‌‌
  in‌‌
  anything‌‌   they‌‌  be‌  ‌prohibited‌  ‌in‌‌   the‌‌
  face‌‌
  of‌‌
  valid‌‌  religious‌‌
  objections‌‌   like‌‌
  those‌‌  dissemination.‌  ‌Freedom‌  ‌from‌  ‌prior‌  ‌restraint‌  ‌precludes‌‌ 
create,‌‌ store,‌‌ send‌‌ or‌‌ receive‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ office‌‌ computers,‌‌ and‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ CSC‌‌  raised‌‌in‌‌this‌‌petition.‌  ‌ governmental‌‌acts‌‌that‌‌required‌‌   ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 55‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

can‌  ‌be‌  ‌had‌  ‌of‌  ‌respondents'‌  ‌pronouncements‌  ‌except‌  ‌that‌‌  for‌‌


  being‌‌
  a ‌‌ freedom‌  ‌of‌  ‌expression.‌  ‌The‌  ‌restriction‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌
  present‌‌   case‌‌
  does‌‌
  not‌‌ 
a) approval‌‌of‌‌a‌‌proposal‌‌to‌‌publish;‌‌   ‌
reminder‌  ‌of‌  ‌prevailing‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌  ‌jurisprudence,‌‌  pass‌‌
  even‌‌
  the‌‌
  lower‌‌
  test‌‌
  of‌‌
  intermediate‌‌   scrutiny‌‌   for‌‌
  content-neutral‌‌ 
b) licensing‌  ‌or‌  ‌permits‌  ‌as‌  ‌prerequisites‌  ‌to‌  ‌publication‌‌  applicable‌‌   to‌‌  all‌‌
  and‌‌
  not‌‌
  only‌‌
  to‌‌
  media‌‌
  personalities,‌‌
  that‌‌  resistance‌‌  regulations.‌  ‌
including‌  ‌the‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌license‌  ‌taxes‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌to‌‌  or‌  ‌disobedience‌  ‌to‌  ‌lawful‌  ‌orders‌  ‌of‌  ‌authorities‌  ‌may‌  ‌result‌  ‌to‌‌ 
publish;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ criminal,‌‌and‌‌even‌‌administrative,‌‌liabilities.‌  ‌ Incitement‌‌and‌‌advocacy‌ 
c) even‌‌injunctions‌‌against‌‌publication.‌‌   ‌ There‌  ‌are‌  ‌two‌  ‌categories‌  ‌of‌  ‌speech,‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌more‌‌ 
Content‌‌based‌‌and‌‌content‌‌neutral‌  ‌
Any‌‌
  law‌‌  or‌‌
  official‌‌
  that‌‌
  requires‌‌
  some‌‌  form‌‌
  of‌‌
  permission‌‌  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  had‌‌  specific‌  ‌type‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  former‌‌  which‌‌  is‌‌
  directed‌‌   to‌‌
  produce‌‌   imminent‌‌ 
before‌  ‌publication‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌made,‌  ‌commits‌  ‌an‌  ‌infringement‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  ⭐‌The‌‌Diocese‌‌of‌‌Bacolod‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 015‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ lawless‌‌action‌‌and‌‌which‌‌is‌‌likely‌‌to‌‌incite‌‌or‌‌produce‌‌such‌‌action.‌  ‌
constitutional‌‌right,‌‌and‌‌remedy‌‌can‌‌be‌‌had‌‌at‌‌the‌‌courts.‌  ‌ Content-based‌‌   regulations‌‌   can‌‌  either‌‌
  be‌‌
  based‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ viewpoint‌‌ of‌‌  Specificity‌‌of‌‌regulation‌‌and‌‌overbreadth‌‌doctrine‌  ‌
1. In‌  ‌Chavez‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌struck‌  ‌down‌  ‌the‌  ‌statements‌  ‌made‌‌   by‌‌  the‌‌   speaker‌‌
  or‌‌
  the‌‌ subject‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ expression.‌Content-based‌‌
   restraint‌‌ 
Under‌  ‌this‌  ‌doctrine,‌  ‌the‌  ‌statute‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌carefully‌  ‌drawn‌  ‌or‌  ‌be‌‌ 
then‌‌   SOJ‌‌
  Gonzales‌‌   and‌‌  the‌‌
  NTC‌‌  warning‌‌   the‌‌
  media‌‌ on‌‌ airing‌‌  or‌  ‌censorship‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌restrictions‌  ‌“based‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌‌   matter‌‌
  of‌‌ 
the‌  ‌alleged‌  ‌wiretapped‌  ‌telephone‌  ‌conversations‌  ‌of‌  ‌then‌‌  the‌  ‌utterance‌  ‌or‌  ‌speech.”‌  ‌In‌  ‌contrast,‌  ‌content-neutral‌  ‌regulation‌‌  authoritatively‌  ‌construed‌  ‌to‌  ‌punish‌  ‌only‌  ‌unprotected‌  ‌speech‌  ‌and‌‌ 
President‌  ‌Arroyo,‌  ‌as‌  ‌constituting‌  ‌unconstitutional‌  ‌prior‌‌  includes‌‌   controls‌‌   merely‌‌   on‌‌ the‌‌ incidents‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ speech‌‌ such‌‌ as‌‌ time,‌‌  not‌‌be‌‌susceptible‌‌to‌‌application‌‌to‌‌protected‌‌expression.‌  ‌
restraint‌‌on‌‌the‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌free‌‌speech‌‌and‌‌of‌‌the‌‌press.‌  ‌ place,‌‌or‌‌manner‌‌of‌‌the‌‌speech.‌  ‌
Southern‌‌Hemisphere‌‌Engagement‌‌Network‌‌v.‌‌Anti-Terrorism‌‌ 
2. In‌  ‌Primicias‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌City‌  ‌Mayor‌  ‌of‌  ‌Manila's‌  ‌refusal‌  ‌to‌  ‌issue‌‌  Content-based‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌bears‌  ‌a ‌ ‌heavy‌  ‌presumption‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Council‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌‌on‌‌Facial‌‌Challenge‌  ‌
permit‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌public‌‌
  assembly‌‌  was‌‌   held‌‌
  to‌‌
  have‌‌
  violated‌‌   the‌‌    and‌‌ this‌‌ court‌‌ has‌‌ used‌‌ the‌‌ ‌clear‌‌ and‌‌ present‌‌ danger‌‌ 
invalidity,‌‌
freedom‌‌of‌‌expression.‌  ‌ rule‌‌‌as‌‌measure.‌‌   ‌ A‌  ‌facial‌  ‌invalidation‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌statute‌  ‌is‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌only‌  ‌in‌  ‌free‌  ‌speech‌‌ 
3. In‌  ‌ABS-CBN‌  ‌v.‌‌
  COMELEC‌, ‌‌the‌‌  Court‌‌
  held‌‌
  that‌‌  the‌‌
  COMELEC‌‌  cases‌, ‌ ‌wherein‌  ‌certain‌  ‌rules‌  ‌of‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌litigation‌  ‌are‌  ‌rightly‌‌ 
Even‌‌  with‌‌   the‌‌
  clear‌‌
  and‌‌
  present‌‌ danger‌‌ test,‌‌ there‌‌ is‌‌ no‌‌ reason‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌  excepted.‌  ‌
resolution‌‌   totally‌‌
  prohibiting‌‌
  the‌‌
  conduct‌‌  of‌‌
  ‌exit‌‌ polls‌‌ is‌‌ an‌‌ 
state‌  ‌to‌  ‌minimize‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌non-candidate‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌to‌‌   post‌‌  the‌ 
absolute‌  ‌infringement‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitutionally­ ‌ ‌guaranteed‌‌  The‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌vagueness‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌overbreadth‌  ‌do‌‌ 
tarpaulin‌‌   in‌‌
  their‌‌
  private‌‌
  property.‌‌  The‌‌
  size‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ tarpaulin‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ 
rights‌‌of‌‌the‌‌media‌‌and‌‌the‌‌electorate.‌  ‌ NOT‌  ‌operate‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌plane.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌A ‌‌statute‌‌
  or‌‌
  act‌‌
  suffers‌‌
  from‌‌ 
affect‌‌anyone‌‌else’s‌‌constitutional‌‌rights.‌  ‌
4. In‌  ‌Sanidad‌  ‌v.‌  ‌COMELEC‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌provision‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌COMELEC‌‌  the‌‌ defect‌‌ of‌‌ v
‌ agueness‌‌ ‌when‌‌ it‌‌ lacks‌‌ comprehensible‌‌ standards.‌  ‌It‌‌ 
resolution‌  ‌prohibiting‌  ‌the‌  ‌media‌  ‌to‌  ‌allow‌  ‌the‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌ If‌  ‌we‌  ‌apply‌  ‌the‌  ‌test‌  ‌for‌  ‌content-neutral‌  ‌regulation,‌‌   the‌‌
  questioned‌‌ 
is‌‌repugnant‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌‌in‌‌two‌‌respects:‌‌   ‌
column‌  ‌or‌  ‌radio‌  ‌or‌  ‌television‌  ‌time‌  ‌to‌  ‌campaign‌  ‌for‌  ‌or‌‌  acts‌‌   of‌‌  COMELEC‌‌   will‌‌  not‌‌  pass‌‌
  the‌‌
  three‌‌   requirements‌‌ for‌‌ evaluating‌‌ 
against‌‌   the‌‌
  plebiscite‌‌   issues‌‌ as‌‌ regards‌‌ the‌‌ ratification‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  such‌  ‌restraints‌  ‌on‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌of‌  ‌speech.‌  ‌“When‌  ‌the‌  ‌speech‌  ‌restraints‌‌  1) it‌‌violates‌‌due‌‌process‌;‌‌and‌  ‌
act‌  ‌establishing‌  ‌the‌  ‌CAR,‌  ‌was‌  ‌declared‌  ‌null‌  ‌and‌  ‌void‌  ‌and‌‌  take‌  ‌the‌  ‌form‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌content-neutral‌  ‌regulation,‌  ‌only‌  ‌a ‌ ‌substantial‌‌  2) it‌  ‌leaves‌  ‌law‌  ‌enforcers‌‌
  unbridled‌‌
  discretion‌‌
  in‌‌
  carrying‌‌  out‌‌ 
unconstitutional‌‌   by‌‌  the‌‌  Court‌‌
  as‌‌  the‌‌  same‌‌
  restricts,‌‌   without‌‌  governmental‌‌   interest‌‌   is‌‌
  required‌‌   ‌for‌‌ its‌‌ validity,”‌‌ and‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ subject‌‌  its‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌and‌  ‌becomes‌  ‌an‌  ‌arbitrary‌  ‌flexing‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
justifiable‌  ‌reason,‌  ‌the‌  ‌choice‌  ‌of‌  ‌forum‌  ‌where‌  ‌one‌  ‌may‌‌  only‌‌to‌‌the‌‌‌intermediate‌‌approach‌. ‌ ‌ Government‌‌muscle.‌  ‌
express‌‌   his‌‌
  view,‌‌
  tantamount‌‌   to‌‌  a ‌‌restriction‌‌  of‌‌ the‌‌ freedom‌‌  A‌  ‌content-neutral‌  ‌government‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌is‌  ‌sufficiently‌‌  The‌  ‌overbreadth‌  ‌doctrine‌, ‌ ‌meanwhile,‌  ‌decrees‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌‌
of‌‌expression.‌  ‌ justified‌: ‌ ‌ governmental‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌to‌  ‌control‌  ‌or‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌activities‌‌ 
5. In‌  ‌David‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌declared‌  ‌as‌  ‌unconstitutional‌  ‌the‌‌  constitutionally‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌state‌‌
  regulations‌‌
  may‌‌   not‌‌
  be‌‌
  achieved‌‌
  by‌ 
1. if‌‌it‌‌is‌‌within‌‌the‌‌constitutional‌‌power‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Government;‌‌   ‌
warrantless‌  ‌search‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  Daily‌‌
  Tribune‌‌   offices,‌‌   the‌‌   seizure‌‌  means‌  ‌which‌  ‌sweep‌  ‌unnecessarily‌  ‌broadly‌  ‌and‌  ‌thereby‌  ‌invade‌  ‌the‌‌ 
of‌  ‌materials‌  ‌for‌  ‌publication‌  ‌therein,‌  ‌the‌  ‌stationing‌  ‌of‌‌  2. if‌  ‌it‌  ‌furthers‌  ‌an‌  ‌important‌  ‌or‌  ‌substantial‌  ‌governmental‌‌ 
area‌  ‌of‌  ‌protected‌  ‌freedoms.‌  ‌As‌  ‌distinguished‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌vagueness‌‌ 
policemen‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌vicinity,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌arrogant‌  ‌warning‌  ‌of‌‌  interest;‌  ‌
doctrine,‌  ‌the‌  ‌overbreadth‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌assumes‌  ‌that‌  ‌individuals‌  ‌will‌‌ 
government‌  ‌officials‌  ‌to‌  ‌media,‌  ‌among‌  ‌others,‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌‌  3. if‌  ‌the‌  ‌governmental‌‌
  interest‌‌
  is‌‌
  unrelated‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  suppression‌‌  understand‌  ‌what‌  ‌a ‌ ‌statute‌  ‌prohibits‌  ‌and‌  ‌will‌  ‌accordingly‌  ‌refrain‌‌ 
President‌  ‌Arroyo's‌  ‌PP‌  ‌No.‌  ‌1017‌  ‌and‌  ‌GO‌  ‌No.‌  ‌5,‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌said‌‌  of‌‌free‌‌expression;‌‌and‌  ‌ from‌‌that‌‌behavior‌,‌‌even‌‌though‌‌some‌‌of‌‌it‌‌is‌‌protected.‌  ‌
acts‌‌constitute‌‌plain‌‌censorship.‌  ‌
4. if‌‌ the‌‌ incident‌‌ restriction‌‌ is‌‌ no‌‌ greater‌‌ than‌‌ is‌‌ essential‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  A‌  ‌"facial"‌  ‌challenge‌  ‌is‌  ‌likewise‌  ‌different‌  ‌from‌  ‌an‌  ‌"as-applied"‌‌ 
There‌‌
  is‌‌ prior‌‌ restraint‌‌ when‌‌ the‌‌ government‌‌ totally‌‌ prohibits‌‌ and/or‌‌  furtherance‌‌of‌‌that‌‌interest.‌  ‌
challenge.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Distinguished‌  ‌from‌  ‌an‌  ‌as-applied‌  ‌challenge‌‌   which‌‌ 
in‌‌
  some‌‌  way,‌‌   ‌restricts‌‌  ‌the‌‌ expression‌‌ of‌‌ one's‌‌ view‌‌ or‌‌ the‌‌ manner‌‌ of‌‌ 
In‌‌
  this‌‌
  case,‌‌ limiting‌‌ the‌‌ maximum‌‌ size‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ tarpaulin‌‌ would‌‌ render‌‌  considers‌  ‌only‌  ‌extant‌  ‌facts‌  ‌affecting‌  ‌real‌  ‌litigants‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌facial‌‌ 
expressing‌‌   oneself.‌‌  ‌There‌‌   is‌‌
  none‌‌ in‌‌ this‌‌ case.‌‌ ‌No‌‌ other‌‌ interpretation‌‌ 
ineffective‌  ‌petitioners’‌  ‌message‌  ‌and‌  ‌violate‌  ‌their‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌exercise‌‌  invalidation‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌examination‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌entire‌  ‌law‌, ‌‌pinpointing‌‌  its‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 56‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

flaws‌‌
  and‌‌  defects,‌‌  not‌‌
  only‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  basis‌‌
  of‌‌
  its‌‌
  actual‌‌ operation‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  one's‌‌opinion‌‌of‌‌his‌‌or‌‌her‌‌qualifications,‌‌   ‌ activities‌‌abroad‌‌during‌‌the‌‌30-day‌‌overseas‌‌voting‌‌period‌. ‌ ‌
parties,‌  ‌but‌  ‌also‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌assumption‌  ‌or‌  ‌prediction‌  ‌that‌  ‌its‌  ‌very‌‌  3) if‌‌it‌‌cuts‌‌off‌‌‌the‌‌flow‌‌of‌‌media‌‌reporting,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ The‌‌ allowance‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌review‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌law‌‌ or‌‌ statute‌‌ on‌‌ its‌‌ face‌‌ in‌‌ free‌‌ speech‌‌ 
existence‌  ‌may‌  ‌cause‌  ‌others‌  ‌not‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌court‌  ‌to‌  ‌refrain‌  ‌from‌‌ 
4) if‌  ‌the‌  ‌regulatory‌  ‌measure‌  ‌bears‌‌
  no‌‌
  clear‌‌
  and‌‌
  reasonable‌‌  cases‌‌ is‌‌ justified‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ aim‌‌ to‌‌ avert‌‌ the‌‌ "‌chilling‌‌ effect"‌‌ on‌‌ protected‌‌ 
constitutionally‌‌protected‌‌speech‌‌or‌‌activities‌. ‌ ‌
nexus‌‌‌with‌‌the‌‌constitutionally‌‌sanctioned‌‌objective.‌  ‌ speech,‌‌the‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌which‌‌should‌‌not‌‌at‌‌all‌‌times‌‌be‌‌abridged.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌vagueness‌  ‌and‌  ‌overbreadth‌  ‌doctrines,‌  ‌as‌  ‌grounds‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌facial‌‌ 
Here,‌‌ the‌‌ posting‌‌ of‌‌ decals‌‌ and‌‌ stickers‌‌ in‌‌ mobile‌‌ places‌‌ like‌‌ cars‌‌ and‌‌  Restraints‌‌
  on‌‌
  freedom‌‌  of‌‌
  expression‌‌
  are‌‌
  also‌‌ evaluated‌‌ by‌‌ either‌‌ or‌‌ a ‌‌
challenge,‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌to‌  ‌penal‌  ‌laws.‌  ‌The‌  ‌allowance‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌
other‌‌  moving‌‌ vehicles‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ endanger‌‌ any‌‌ substantial‌‌ government‌‌  combination‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following‌‌theoretical‌‌tests,‌‌to‌‌wit:‌‌   ‌
facial‌  ‌challenge‌  ‌in‌  ‌free‌‌
  speech‌‌  cases‌  ‌is‌‌
  justified‌‌   by‌‌  the‌‌
  aim‌‌
  to‌‌
  avert‌‌ 
the‌  ‌"‌chilling‌  ‌effect‌" ‌ ‌on‌  ‌protected‌  ‌speech,‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌‌  interest.‌‌  There‌‌  is‌‌
  no‌‌  clear‌‌
  public‌‌
  interest‌‌  threatened‌‌  by‌‌ such‌‌ activity‌‌  a) the‌‌dangerous‌‌tendency‌‌‌doctrine;‌  ‌
should‌‌   not‌‌
  at‌‌
  all‌‌
  times‌‌
  be‌‌
  abridged.‌‌
  This‌‌   rationale‌‌   is‌‌
  inapplicable‌‌   to‌‌  so‌‌
  as‌‌
  to‌‌
  justify‌‌
  the‌‌  curtailment‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  cherished‌‌ citizen's‌‌ right‌‌ of‌‌ free‌‌ 
speech‌‌and‌‌expression.‌  ‌ b) the‌‌clear‌‌and‌‌present‌‌danger‌r‌ ule;‌‌and‌‌   ‌
plain‌  ‌penal‌  ‌statutes‌  ‌that‌  ‌generally‌  ‌bear‌  ‌an‌  ‌"‌in‌  ‌terrorem‌  ‌effect‌" ‌ ‌in‌‌ 
deterring‌‌socially‌‌harmful‌‌conduct.‌  ‌ c) the‌‌balancing‌‌of‌‌interests‌t‌ est.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌property‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌greater‌  ‌degree‌  ‌of‌‌ 
By‌‌
  its‌‌ nature,‌‌ the‌‌ ‌overbreadth‌‌ doctrine‌‌ has‌‌ to‌‌ necessarily‌‌ apply‌‌ a ‌‌ regulation‌‌   but‌‌   when‌‌
  this‌‌
  right‌‌   is‌‌
  joined‌‌   by‌‌  a ‌‌"liberty"‌‌
  interest,‌‌  When‌  ‌the‌  ‌speech‌  ‌restraints‌  ‌take‌  ‌the‌  ‌form‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌content-neutral‌‌ 
facial‌  ‌type‌  ‌of‌  ‌invalidation‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌most‌  ‌distinctive‌  ‌feature‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  the‌‌  burden‌‌   of‌‌
  justification‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌   part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Government‌‌ must‌‌  regulation,‌  ‌only‌  ‌a ‌ ‌substantial‌  ‌governmental‌  ‌interest‌  ‌is‌  ‌required‌‌ 
overbreadth‌‌   technique‌‌   is‌‌
  that‌‌
  it‌‌
  marks‌‌
  an‌‌
  ‌exception‌‌
  to‌‌ some‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  be‌  ‌exceptionally‌  ‌convincing‌  ‌and‌  ‌irrefutable.‌  ‌The‌  ‌burden‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌  for‌  ‌its‌  ‌validity.‌  ‌They‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌subject‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  strictest‌‌
  form‌‌
  of‌‌
  judicial‌‌ 
usual‌‌rules‌‌of‌‌constitutional‌‌litigation.‌‌   ‌ met‌‌in‌‌this‌‌case.‌  ‌ scrutiny‌  ‌but‌  ‌an‌  ‌intermediate‌‌   approach‌‌   ‌— ‌‌somewhere‌‌  between‌‌ 
the‌  ‌mere‌  ‌rationality‌  ‌that‌  ‌is‌  ‌required‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Ordinarily‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌particular‌  ‌litigant‌  ‌claims‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌statute‌  ‌is‌‌  Speech‌‌regulation‌‌in‌‌relation‌‌to‌‌media‌  ‌ compelling‌‌interest‌‌standard‌‌‌applied‌‌to‌‌content-based‌‌restrictions.‌  ‌
unconstitutional‌‌   as‌‌
  applied‌‌   to‌‌
  him‌‌   or‌‌
  her;‌‌
  if‌‌
  the‌‌
  litigant‌‌
  prevails,‌‌ the‌‌ 
David‌‌v.‌‌Arroyo‌  ‌ As‌‌explained‌‌in‌C
‌ havez‌,  ‌‌ ‌
courts‌  ‌carve‌  ‌away‌  ‌the‌  ‌unconstitutional‌  ‌aspects‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌by‌‌ 
invalidating‌  ‌its‌  ‌improper‌  ‌applications‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌ ‌case‌  ‌to‌  ‌case‌  ‌basis.‌  ‌ The‌‌   search‌‌   and‌‌  seizure‌‌   of‌‌
  materials‌‌   for‌‌
  publication,‌‌ the‌‌ stationing‌‌ of‌‌  1) a‌  ‌content-based‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌is‌  ‌evaluated‌  ‌using‌  ‌the‌  ‌clear‌‌ 
Moreover,‌‌   challengers‌‌   to‌‌
  a ‌‌law‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌ permitted‌‌ to‌‌ raise‌‌ the‌‌ rights‌‌ of‌‌  policemen‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌vicinity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌The‌  ‌Daily‌  ‌Tribune‌  ‌offices,‌‌   and‌‌  the‌‌  and‌‌present‌‌danger‌‌rule‌,  ‌‌ ‌
third‌‌ parties‌‌ and‌‌ can‌‌ only‌‌ assert‌‌ their‌‌ own‌‌ interests.‌  ‌In‌‌ overbreadth‌‌  arrogant‌  ‌warning‌  ‌of‌  ‌government‌  ‌officials‌  ‌to‌  ‌media,‌  ‌are‌  ‌plain‌‌ 
2) while‌  ‌courts‌  ‌will‌  ‌subject‌  ‌content-neutral‌  ‌restraints‌  ‌to‌‌ 
analysis‌,‌‌those‌‌rules‌‌give‌‌way.‌  ‌ censorship.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌officious‌  ‌functionary‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌repressive‌‌ 
intermediate‌‌scrutiny‌. ‌ ‌
In‌‌
  this‌‌
  jurisdiction,‌‌ the‌‌ void-for-vagueness‌‌ doctrine‌‌ asserted‌‌ under‌‌  government‌‌   who‌‌ tells‌‌ the‌‌ citizen‌‌ that‌‌ he‌‌ may‌‌ speak‌‌ only‌‌ if‌‌ allowed‌‌ to‌‌ 
do‌  ‌so,‌‌
  and‌‌  no‌‌  more‌‌  and‌‌   no‌‌
  less‌‌
  than‌‌   what‌‌  he‌‌  is‌‌
  permitted‌‌   to‌‌  say‌‌
  on‌‌  By‌  ‌banning‌  ‌partisan‌  ‌political‌  ‌activities‌  ‌or‌‌
  campaigning‌‌   even‌‌
  during‌‌ 
the‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌  ‌clause‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌utilized‌  ‌in‌  ‌examining‌  ‌the‌‌ 
pain‌‌   of‌‌
  punishment‌‌   should‌‌   he‌‌
  be‌‌  so‌‌
  rash‌‌  as‌‌
  to‌‌ disobey.‌‌ It‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ duty‌‌  the‌‌
  campaign‌‌   period‌‌
  within‌‌   embassies,‌‌   consulates,‌‌ and‌‌ other‌‌ foreign‌‌ 
constitutionality‌‌of‌‌criminal‌‌statutes‌. ‌ ‌
of‌‌
  the‌‌ courts‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ watchful‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ constitutional‌‌ rights‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ citizen,‌‌  service‌  ‌establishments,‌  ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌whether‌  ‌it‌  ‌applies‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌‌ 
Speech‌‌regulation‌‌in‌‌relation‌‌to‌‌election‌  ‌ and‌  ‌against‌  ‌any‌  ‌stealthy‌  ‌encroachments‌  ‌thereon.‌  ‌The‌  ‌motto‌‌   should‌‌  candidates‌  ‌or‌  ‌whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌prohibition‌‌  extends‌‌   to‌‌
  private‌‌
  persons,‌‌  it‌‌ 
always‌‌be‌o ‌ bsta‌‌principiis‌. ‌ ‌ goes‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌the‌  ‌objective‌  ‌of‌  ‌maintaining‌  ‌order‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌voting‌‌ 
Adiong‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌ period‌‌and‌‌ensuring‌‌a‌‌credible‌‌election.‌‌   ‌
Judicial‌‌analysis,‌‌presumptions‌‌and‌‌levels‌‌and‌‌types‌‌of‌‌ 
The‌  ‌COMELEC's‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌on‌  ‌posting‌  ‌of‌  ‌decals‌  ‌and‌  ‌stickers‌  ‌on‌‌  Section‌  ‌36.8‌  ‌of‌  ‌R.A.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌9189‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌struck‌  ‌down‌  ‌for‌  ‌being‌‌ 
"mobile"‌‌
  places‌‌  whether‌‌   public‌‌
  or‌‌
  private‌‌   except‌‌   in‌‌ designated‌‌ areas‌‌  scrutiny‌  ‌ overbroad‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌provide‌  ‌for‌  ‌well-defined‌  ‌standards,‌‌ 
provided‌‌  for‌‌
  by‌‌ the‌‌ COMELEC‌‌ itself‌‌ is‌‌ null‌‌ and‌‌ void‌‌ on‌‌ constitutional‌‌  Gonzales‌‌v.‌‌Katigbak‌  ‌ resulting‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌ambiguity‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌application,‌  ‌which‌  ‌produces‌  ‌a ‌‌
grounds.‌  ‌ chilling‌  ‌effect‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌free‌  ‌speech‌  ‌and‌  ‌expression,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
The‌‌
  power‌‌
  to‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  ‌prior‌‌
  restraint‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  presumed,‌‌
  rather‌‌  ultimately,‌  ‌resulting‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌unnecessary‌  ‌invasion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌area‌  ‌of‌‌ 
National‌  ‌Press‌  ‌Club‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Comelec‌  ‌ruled‌  ‌that‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌of‌  ‌election‌‌ 
the‌‌presumption‌‌is‌‌against‌‌its‌‌validity.‌  ‌ protected‌‌freedoms.‌  ‌
activity‌‌ has‌‌ its‌‌ limits.‌‌ We‌‌ examine‌‌ the‌‌ limits‌‌ of‌‌ regulation‌‌ and‌‌ not‌‌ the‌‌ 
limits‌  ‌of‌  ‌free‌  ‌speech.‌  ‌Regulation‌  ‌of‌  ‌election‌  ‌campaign‌  ‌activity‌‌  may‌‌ 
Nicolas-Lewis‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
Special‌‌topics‌‌in‌‌free‌‌expression‌‌cases‌ 
NOT‌‌pass‌‌the‌‌test‌‌of‌‌validity‌‌   ‌
Hate‌‌speech‌  ‌
1) if‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌too‌  ‌general‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌terms‌  ‌or‌‌
  not‌‌
  limited‌‌
  in‌‌
  time‌‌
  and‌‌  At‌‌
  issue‌‌
  are‌‌
  Section‌‌  36.8‌‌ of‌‌ R.A.‌‌ 9189,‌‌ as‌‌ amended‌‌ by‌‌ R.A.‌‌ 10590‌‌ and‌‌ 
scope‌‌in‌‌its‌‌application,‌‌   ‌ Section‌  ‌74(II)(8)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌COMELEC‌  ‌Resolution‌  ‌No.‌  ‌10035,‌  ‌which‌‌  Defined‌  ‌as‌  ‌speech‌  ‌intended‌  ‌to‌  ‌degrade,‌  ‌intimidate,‌  ‌or‌  ‌incite‌‌ 
2) if‌  ‌it‌  ‌restricts‌  ‌one's‌  ‌expression‌  ‌of‌  ‌belief‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌candidate‌  ‌or‌‌  prohibit‌  ‌the‌  ‌engagement‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌person‌  ‌in‌  ‌partisan‌  ‌political‌‌  violence‌‌or‌‌prejudicial‌‌action‌‌against‌‌certain‌‌social‌‌groupings.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 57‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Laws‌‌against‌‌hate‌‌speech‌‌can‌‌be‌‌divided‌‌into‌  ‌ warrant‌‌‌from‌‌a‌‌judge,‌‌if‌‌an‌‌obscenity‌‌rap‌‌is‌‌in‌‌order;‌  ‌
The‌‌
  law,‌‌
  however,‌‌
  frowns‌‌
  on‌‌
  obscenity.‌‌
  In‌‌ the‌‌ applicable‌‌ law,‌‌ EO‌‌ No.‌‌ 
1) Those‌‌intended‌‌to‌‌preserve‌‌public‌‌order;‌‌and‌  ‌ 876,‌  ‌reference‌  ‌was‌  ‌made‌  ‌to‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌Board‌  ‌"‌applying‌‌  2. The‌  ‌authorities‌  ‌must‌  ‌convince‌  ‌the‌  ‌court‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌   materials‌‌ 
contemporary‌  ‌Filipino‌  ‌cultural‌  ‌values‌  ‌as‌  ‌standard‌,"‌  ‌words‌‌  sought‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌seized‌  ‌are‌  ‌"obscene”,‌  ‌and‌  ‌pose‌  ‌a ‌ ‌clear‌  ‌and‌‌ 
2) Those‌‌intended‌‌to‌‌protect‌‌human‌‌dignity.‌  ‌
which‌‌can‌‌be‌‌construed‌‌in‌‌an‌‌analogous‌‌manner.‌‌   ‌ present‌  ‌danger‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌evil‌  ‌substantive‌  ‌enough‌  ‌to‌  ‌warrant‌‌ 
Defamation‌‌and‌‌libel‌  ‌ State‌‌interference‌‌and‌‌action;‌ 
The‌  ‌ruling‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌limited‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌concept‌  ‌of‌  ‌obscenity‌‌ 
⭐‌Belo-Henares‌‌v.‌‌Guevarra‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌ applicable‌  ‌to‌  ‌motion‌  ‌pictures‌. ‌ ‌Where‌  ‌television‌  ‌is‌  ‌concerned,‌  ‌a ‌‌ 3. The‌  ‌judge‌  ‌must‌  ‌determine‌  ‌whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌are‌‌ 
less‌‌
  liberal‌‌   approach‌‌   calls‌‌
  for‌‌
  observance.‌  ‌This‌‌ is‌‌ so‌‌ because‌‌ unlike‌‌  indeed‌‌"obscene"‌‌upon‌‌His‌‌Honor's‌‌sound‌‌discretion.‌ 
The‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌of‌  ‌speech‌  ‌and‌  ‌of‌  ‌expression,‌  ‌like‌  ‌all‌  ‌constitutional‌‌ 
motion‌  ‌pictures‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌‌   patrons‌‌   have‌‌   to‌‌
  pay‌‌
  their‌‌
  way,‌‌  television‌‌  4. If,‌  ‌in‌‌
  the‌‌
  opinion‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  court,‌‌
  probable‌‌
  cause‌‌
  exists,‌‌
  it‌‌
  may‌‌ 
freedoms,‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌absolute‌. ‌ ‌As‌  ‌such,‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌‌ 
reaches‌‌   every‌‌   home‌‌  where‌‌   there‌‌  is‌‌ a ‌‌set.‌  ‌Children‌‌ then‌‌ will‌‌ likely‌‌ be‌‌  issue‌‌the‌‌search‌‌warrant‌‌prayed‌‌for;‌ 
freedom‌  ‌of‌‌
  expression‌‌   may‌‌   not‌‌
  be‌‌   availed‌‌
  of‌‌
  to‌‌
  broadcast‌‌   lies‌‌
  or‌‌ 
among‌‌   the‌‌
  avid‌‌   viewers‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  programs‌‌   therein‌‌  shown.‌‌  It‌‌
  cannot‌‌ be‌‌  5. The‌  ‌proper‌  ‌suit‌  ‌is‌  ‌then‌  ‌brought‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌court‌  ‌under‌‌
  ‌Article‌‌ 
half-truths,‌  ‌insult‌  ‌others,‌  ‌destroy‌  ‌their‌‌   name‌‌   or‌‌
  reputation‌‌   or‌‌ 
denied‌  ‌though‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌as‌  ‌parens‌  ‌patriae‌  ‌is‌  ‌called‌  ‌upon‌  ‌to‌‌  201‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌RPC;‌  ‌
bring‌‌them‌‌into‌‌disrepute‌. ‌ ‌
manifest‌‌an‌‌attitude‌‌of‌‌caring‌‌for‌‌the‌‌welfare‌‌of‌‌the‌‌young.‌  ‌
6. Any‌‌
  conviction‌‌
  is‌‌
  subject‌‌ to‌‌ appeal.‌‌ The‌‌ appellate‌‌ court‌‌ may‌‌ 
Sedition‌‌and‌‌speech‌‌in‌‌relation‌‌to‌‌rebellion‌  ‌ assess‌  ‌whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌properties‌  ‌seized‌  ‌are‌  ‌indeed‌‌ 
⭐‌Pita‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ "obscene".‌  ‌
When‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fictitious‌  ‌suicide‌  ‌photo‌  ‌and‌  ‌letter‌  ‌were‌  ‌published‌  ‌in‌‌ 
newspapers‌‌   of‌‌ general‌‌ circulation‌‌ expressing‌‌ disappointment‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌  When‌‌   does‌‌  a ‌‌publication‌‌
  have‌‌
  a ‌‌corrupting‌‌
  tendency,‌‌ or‌‌ when‌‌ can‌‌ it‌‌ 
Roxas‌‌  administration‌‌   and‌‌  instructing‌‌   a ‌‌fictitious‌‌  wife‌‌ to‌‌ teach‌‌ their‌‌  be‌‌said‌‌to‌‌be‌‌offensive‌‌to‌‌human‌‌sensibilities?‌  ‌ ⭐‌Madrilejos‌‌v.‌‌Gatdula‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
children‌  ‌to‌  ‌burn‌  ‌photos‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President,‌  ‌the‌‌  Court‌‌
  held‌‌   that‌‌
  such‌‌  It‌  ‌was‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Padan‌  ‌y ‌ ‌Alova‌  ‌that‌  ‌introduced‌  ‌to‌  ‌Philippine‌‌  SC‌‌
  dismissed‌‌
  the‌‌  petition‌‌
  on‌‌  the‌‌  ground‌‌
  that‌‌
  Ordinance‌‌ No.‌‌ 7780,‌‌ an‌‌ 
act‌‌constitutes‌‌inciting‌‌to‌‌sedition.‌  ‌ jurisprudence‌  ‌the‌  ‌"redeeming"‌‌   element‌  ‌that‌‌  should‌‌  accompany‌‌  anti-obscenity‌  ‌law,‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌facially‌  ‌attacked‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌ground‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Such‌  ‌utterance‌  ‌suggests‌  ‌or‌  ‌incites‌‌   rebellious‌‌  conspiracies‌‌   or‌‌
  riots‌‌  the‌‌work,‌‌to‌‌save‌‌it‌‌from‌‌a‌‌valid‌‌prosecution.‌  ‌ overbreadth‌b ‌ ecause‌‌obscenity‌‌is‌‌unprotected‌‌speech‌.‌ 
and‌  ‌tends‌  ‌to‌‌
  turn‌‌
  the‌‌
  people‌‌   against‌‌   the‌‌
  constituted‌‌
  authorities,‌‌   or‌‌  Kalaw-Katigbak‌  ‌represented‌‌   a ‌‌marked‌‌
  departure‌‌   from‌‌  ‌Kottinger‌‌
  ‌in‌‌  The‌‌
  ‌overbreadth‌‌   ‌and‌‌  ‌vagueness‌‌ ‌doctrines‌‌ have‌‌ special‌‌ application‌‌ 
to‌  ‌provoke‌  ‌violence‌  ‌from‌  ‌opposition‌  ‌groups‌  ‌who‌  ‌may‌  ‌seek‌  ‌to‌‌  the‌  ‌sense‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌measured‌  ‌obscenity‌  ‌in‌  ‌terms‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌"‌dominant‌‌  only‌‌   to‌‌
  free‌‌  speech‌‌   cases‌. ‌‌They‌‌   are‌‌
  ‌inapt‌‌   for‌‌  testing‌‌ the‌‌ validity‌‌ of‌‌ 
silence‌  ‌the‌  ‌writer,‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌sum‌  ‌and‌  ‌substance‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  offense‌‌  theme‌" ‌ ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌work,‌  ‌rather‌  ‌than‌  ‌isolated‌  ‌passages,‌  ‌which‌  ‌were‌‌  penal‌  ‌statutes‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌doctrines‌‌   of‌‌
  ‌strict‌‌   scrutiny,‌‌   overbreadth,‌‌   and‌‌ 
under‌‌consideration.‌‌(E ‌ spuelas‌‌v.‌‌People‌) ‌ ‌ central‌  ‌to‌  ‌Kottinger‌. ‌ ‌Kalaw-Katigbak‌  ‌undertook‌  ‌moreover‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌‌  vagueness‌‌   ‌are‌‌
  analytical‌‌   tools‌‌
  developed‌‌   for‌‌  testing‌‌ "on‌‌ their‌‌ faces"‌‌ 
the‌‌   determination‌‌   of‌‌
  obscenity‌‌  essentially‌‌
  a ‌‌judicial‌‌  question‌‌  and‌‌ as‌‌  statutes‌‌in‌‌free‌‌speech‌‌cases.‌  ‌
Obscenity/pornography‌  ‌ a‌  ‌consequence,‌  ‌to‌  ‌temper‌  ‌the‌  ‌wide‌  ‌discretion‌  ‌Kottinger‌  ‌had‌  ‌given‌‌ 
It‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌established‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌that‌  ‌unprotected‌‌ 
Gonzales‌‌v.‌‌Katigbak‌  ‌ unto‌‌law‌‌enforcers.‌  ‌
speech‌‌‌or‌‌low-value‌‌expression‌‌‌refers‌‌to‌‌   ‌
The‌  ‌test‌  ‌is‌  ‌whether‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌average‌  ‌person,‌  ‌applying‌‌  Miller‌  ‌v.‌  ‌California‌, ‌ ‌which‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌abandoned‌  ‌Massachusetts‌, ‌‌
1) libelous‌‌statements,‌‌   ‌
contemporary‌  ‌community‌  ‌standards,‌  ‌the‌  ‌dominant‌  ‌theme‌  ‌of‌‌  established‌‌"basic‌‌guidelines,"‌‌to‌‌wit:‌‌   ‌
2) obscenity‌‌or‌‌pornography,‌‌   ‌
the‌‌
  material‌‌   taken‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌whole‌‌   appeals‌‌   to‌‌
  prurient‌‌   interest‌. ‌ ‌To‌‌  a) whether‌  ‌'the‌  ‌average‌  ‌person,‌  ‌applying‌  ‌contemporary‌‌ 
avoid‌  ‌an‌  ‌unconstitutional‌  ‌taint‌  ‌on‌  ‌its‌  ‌creation,‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌‌  standards'‌‌
  would‌‌  find‌‌
  the‌‌
  work,‌‌ taken‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌whole,‌‌ appeals‌‌ to‌‌  3) false‌‌or‌‌misleading‌‌advertisement,‌‌   ‌
respondent‌  ‌Board‌  ‌is‌  ‌limited‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌  classification‌‌   of‌‌
  films.‌  ‌It‌‌
  can,‌‌
  to‌‌  the‌‌prurient‌i‌ nterest;‌  ‌ 4) insulting‌‌  or‌‌
  "fighting‌‌  words,"‌‌   i.e.,‌‌  those‌‌  which‌‌
  by‌‌
  their‌‌
  very‌‌ 
safeguard‌  ‌other‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌objections,‌  ‌determine‌  ‌what‌  ‌motion‌‌  b) whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌work‌  ‌depicts‌  ‌or‌  ‌describes,‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌patently‌‌  utterance‌‌   inflict‌‌
  injury‌‌
  or‌‌ tend‌‌ to‌‌ incite‌‌ an‌‌ immediate‌‌ breach‌‌ 
pictures‌  ‌are‌  ‌for‌  ‌general‌  ‌patronage‌  ‌and‌  ‌what‌  ‌may‌  ‌require‌  ‌either‌‌  offensive‌  ‌way,‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌specifically‌  ‌defined‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  of‌‌peace‌‌and‌‌   ‌
parental‌‌  guidance‌‌   or‌‌
  be‌‌ limited‌‌ to‌‌ adults‌‌ only.‌  ‌That‌‌ is‌‌ to‌‌ abide‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌  applicable‌‌state‌‌law;‌‌and‌  ‌ 5) expression‌‌endangering‌‌national‌‌security.‌  ‌
principle‌  ‌that‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌of‌  ‌expression‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌   rule‌‌  and‌‌   restrictions‌‌ 
c) whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌work,‌  ‌taken‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌whole,‌  ‌lacks‌‌
  serious‌‌
  literary,‌‌  A‌‌
  litigant‌‌   who‌‌
  stands‌‌   charged‌‌   under‌‌   a ‌‌law‌‌   that‌‌ regulates‌‌ unprotected‌‌ 
the‌‌exemption‌. ‌  ‌ ‌
artistic,‌‌political,‌‌or‌‌scientific‌‌value.‌  ‌ speech‌  ‌can‌  ‌still‌  ‌mount‌  ‌a ‌‌challenge‌‌   that‌‌   a ‌‌statute‌‌   is‌‌
  unconstitutional‌‌ 
The‌‌   test,‌‌
  to‌‌
  repeat,‌‌  to‌‌
  determine‌‌
  whether‌‌
  freedom‌‌
  of‌‌ expression‌‌ may‌‌  as‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  applied‌‌   to‌‌
  him‌‌ or‌‌ her.‌‌ If‌‌ the‌‌ litigant‌‌ prevails,‌‌ the‌‌ courts‌‌ carve‌‌ 
We‌‌make‌‌this‌‌resume.‌  ‌
be‌  ‌limited‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌clear‌  ‌and‌  ‌present‌  ‌danger‌  of‌  ‌an‌  ‌evil‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌ away‌  ‌the‌  ‌unconstitutional‌  ‌aspects‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌by‌  ‌invalidating‌  ‌its‌‌ 
substantive‌‌character‌‌that‌‌the‌‌State‌‌has‌‌a‌‌right‌‌to‌‌prevent.‌   1. The‌  ‌authorities‌  ‌must‌  ‌apply‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌search‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 58‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

improper‌‌applications‌‌on‌‌a‌‌case‌‌to‌‌case‌‌basis.‌  ‌ Although‌‌ the‌‌ Constitution‌‌ vests‌‌ in‌‌ public‌‌ school‌‌ teachers‌‌ the‌‌ ‌right‌‌ to‌‌  substantive‌‌   evil‌‌  that‌‌ Congress‌‌ has‌‌ a ‌‌right‌‌ to‌‌ prevent.‌‌ In‌‌ other‌‌ words,‌‌ 


organize,‌  ‌to‌  ‌assemble‌  ‌peaceably‌  ‌and‌  ‌to‌  ‌petition‌  ‌the‌‌  like‌‌
  other‌‌   rights‌‌   embraced‌‌   in‌‌ the‌‌ freedom‌‌ of‌‌ expression,‌‌ ‌the‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ 
Commercial‌‌speech‌  ‌ government‌‌   for‌‌
  a ‌‌redress‌‌   of‌‌
  grievances,‌‌   there‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌no‌‌ like‌‌ express‌‌  assemble‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌previous‌  ‌restraint‌  ‌or‌  ‌censorship‌. ‌ ‌It‌‌ 
⭐‌The‌‌Diocese‌‌of‌‌Bacolod‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 015‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ provision‌  ‌granting‌  ‌them‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌strike‌. ‌ ‌Rather,‌  ‌the‌‌  may‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌conditioned‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌prior‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌permit‌  ‌or‌‌ 
constitutional‌‌   grant‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  right‌‌  to‌‌
  strike‌‌
  is‌‌
  restrained‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ proviso‌‌  authorization‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌authorities‌  ‌except‌, ‌ ‌of‌  ‌course,‌  ‌if‌‌ 
Not‌  ‌all‌  ‌speech‌  ‌is‌  ‌treated‌  ‌the‌  ‌same.‌  ‌In‌  ‌Chavez‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Gonzales‌, ‌‌this‌‌  that‌‌its‌‌exercise‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌done‌i‌ n‌‌accordance‌‌with‌‌law.‌  ‌ the‌‌
  assembly‌‌   is‌‌
  intended‌‌   to‌‌ be‌‌ held‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌public‌‌ place,‌‌ a ‌‌permit‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ 
court‌  ‌discussed‌  ‌that‌  ‌some‌  ‌types‌  ‌of‌  ‌speech‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌‌  use‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌place,‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌assembly‌  ‌itself,‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌validly‌‌ 
EO‌  ‌180‌  ‌“enjoins‌  ‌under‌  ‌pain‌  ‌of‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌sanctions,‌  ‌all‌‌ 
regulation:‌  ‌ required.‌  ‌
government‌  ‌officers‌  ‌and‌  ‌employees‌  ‌from‌  ‌staging‌  ‌strikes,‌‌ 
In‌  ‌the‌‌
  United‌‌
  States,‌‌
  false‌‌
  or‌‌
  deceptive‌‌
  commercial‌‌   speech‌‌  ‌is‌‌  demonstrations,‌  ‌mass‌  ‌leaves,‌  ‌walkouts‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌forms‌  ‌of‌  ‌mass‌‌  The‌‌   Court‌‌  considers‌‌  the‌‌
  dispersal‌‌   and‌‌
  arrest‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ members‌‌ of‌‌ KMU‌‌ 
categorized‌  ‌as‌  ‌unprotected‌  ‌expression‌‌   that‌‌
  ‌may‌‌
  be‌‌
  subject‌‌
  to‌‌  action‌  ‌which‌  ‌will‌‌
  ‌result‌‌   in‌‌
  temporary‌‌   stoppage‌‌
  or‌‌  disruption‌‌   of‌‌  et‌  ‌al.‌  ‌unwarranted.‌  ‌Their‌‌   dispersal‌‌   was‌‌  done‌‌   merely‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  basis‌‌
  of‌‌ 
prior‌‌restraint.‌  ‌ public‌  ‌service‌.”‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌also‌  ‌settled‌  ‌in‌  ‌jurisprudence‌  ‌that,‌  ‌in‌  ‌general,‌‌  Malacañ ang's‌  ‌directive‌  ‌canceling‌  ‌all‌  ‌permits‌  ‌previously‌  ‌issued‌  ‌by‌‌ 
workers‌‌in‌‌the‌‌public‌‌sector‌‌do‌‌not‌‌enjoy‌‌the‌‌right‌‌to‌‌strike.‌  ‌ local‌‌   government‌‌   units.‌‌  This‌‌  is‌‌
  arbitrary.‌‌   ‌Tolerance‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ rule‌‌ and‌‌ 
We‌  ‌distinguish‌  ‌between‌  ‌political‌  ‌and‌  ‌commercial‌  ‌speech.‌  ‌Political‌‌ 
limitation‌‌is‌‌the‌‌exception‌. ‌ ‌
speech‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌speech‌  ‌“both‌  ‌intended‌  ‌and‌  ‌received‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌‌
contribution‌  ‌to‌  ‌public‌  ‌deliberation‌  ‌about‌  ‌some‌  ‌issue,”‌  ‌“fostering‌‌  BM‌‌Employees‌‌v.‌‌PBM‌  ‌ Moreover,‌  ‌under‌  ‌BP‌  ‌880,‌  ‌the‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌regulate‌  ‌assemblies‌‌ 
informed‌  ‌and‌  ‌civic-minded‌  ‌deliberation.”‌  ‌On‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand,‌‌  and‌‌rallies‌‌is‌‌lodged‌‌with‌‌the‌‌LGUs.‌  ‌
Property‌  ‌and‌  ‌property‌  ‌rights‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌lost‌  ‌thru‌  ‌prescription;‌  ‌but‌‌ 
commercial‌‌   speech‌‌  has‌‌   been‌‌
  defined‌‌  as‌‌
  speech‌‌
  that‌‌
  does‌‌ “no‌‌ more‌‌ 
human‌‌rights‌‌are‌‌imprescriptible.‌  ‌
than‌‌propose‌‌a‌‌commercial‌‌transaction.”‌  ‌ Bayan‌‌v.‌‌Ermita‌‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Public‌‌Assembly‌‌Act‌‌or‌‌BP‌‌880‌  ‌
In‌‌
  the‌‌
  hierarchy‌‌
  of‌‌
  civil‌‌
  liberties,‌‌
  the‌‌
  rights‌‌  of‌‌
  free‌‌ expression‌‌ and‌‌ of‌‌ 
The‌  ‌expression‌  ‌resulting‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌content‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌tarpaulin‌  ‌is,‌‌ 
however,‌‌definitely‌p ‌ olitical‌‌speech.‌  ‌
assembly‌  ‌occupy‌  ‌a ‌ ‌preferred‌  ‌position‌  ‌as‌  ‌they‌  ‌are‌  ‌essential‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  Freedom‌  ‌of‌  ‌assembly‌  ‌connotes‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌to‌‌  meet‌‌ 
preservation‌‌and‌‌vitality‌‌of‌‌our‌‌civil‌‌and‌‌political‌‌institutions.‌  ‌ peaceably‌  ‌for‌  ‌consultation‌  ‌and‌  ‌discussion‌  ‌of‌  ‌matters‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌‌ 
National‌‌emergencies‌  ‌ The‌  ‌superiority‌  ‌of‌  ‌these‌  ‌freedoms‌  ‌over‌  ‌property‌  ‌rights‌  ‌is‌‌  concern.‌‌   ‌

The‌  ‌government‌  ‌may‌  ‌impose‌  ‌certain‌  ‌restrictions‌  ‌to‌  ‌protect‌  ‌itself‌‌  underscored‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mere‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌or‌  ‌rational‌‌  B.P.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌880‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌an‌  ‌absolute‌  ‌ban‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌  ‌assemblies‌  ‌but‌  ‌a ‌‌
relation‌‌   between‌‌   the‌‌ means‌‌ employed‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ and‌‌ its‌‌ object‌‌  restriction‌  ‌that‌  ‌simply‌  ‌regulates‌  ‌the‌  ‌time,‌  ‌place‌  ‌and‌  ‌manner‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌ 
against‌‌utterances‌‌intended‌‌to‌‌weaken‌‌its‌‌power‌‌of‌‌self‌‌defense.‌  ‌
or‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌—‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌is‌  ‌neither‌  ‌arbitrary‌‌   nor‌‌
  discriminatory‌‌  assemblies‌. ‌ ‌This‌  ‌was‌  ‌adverted‌‌   to‌‌
  in‌‌
  ‌Osmeña‌‌   v.‌‌
  Comelec‌, ‌‌where‌‌   the‌‌ 
Speech‌‌of‌‌public‌‌officers‌  ‌ nor‌  ‌oppressive‌‌  — ‌‌would‌‌   suffice‌‌   to‌‌
  validate‌‌
  a ‌‌law‌‌
  which‌‌
  restricts‌‌  or‌‌    a ‌‌"c
Court‌  ‌referred‌  ‌to‌  ‌it‌  ‌as‌‌ ‌ ontent-neutral‌" ‌‌regulation‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  time,‌‌ 
impairs‌  ‌property‌‌   rights.‌‌  On‌‌   the‌‌  other‌‌  hand,‌‌
  a ‌‌constitutional‌‌   or‌‌
  valid‌  place,‌‌and‌‌manner‌‌of‌‌holding‌‌public‌‌assemblies.‌  ‌
Vasquez‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
infringement‌  ‌of‌  ‌human‌  ‌rights‌  ‌requires‌  ‌a ‌ ‌more‌  ‌stringent‌  ‌criterion,‌‌ 
Even‌  ‌if‌‌
  the‌‌
  defamatory‌‌   statement‌‌   is‌‌
  false,‌‌
  no‌‌
  liability‌‌
  can‌‌
  attach‌‌   if‌‌
  it‌‌  namely‌  ‌the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌grave‌  ‌and‌  ‌immediate‌  ‌danger‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌
IBP‌‌v.‌‌Atienza‌‌2
‌ 010‌  ‌
relates‌  ‌to‌  ‌official‌  ‌conduct,‌  ‌unless‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌official‌  ‌concerned‌‌  substantive‌‌evil‌w ‌ hich‌‌the‌‌State‌‌has‌‌the‌‌right‌‌to‌‌prevent.‌  ‌
proves‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌statement‌  ‌was‌  ‌made‌  ‌with‌‌   actual‌‌  malice‌‌  ‌— ‌‌that‌‌  is,‌‌  The‌‌   demonstration‌‌   held‌‌
  by‌‌ petitioners‌‌ was‌‌ purely‌‌ and‌‌ completely‌‌ an‌‌  In‌  ‌modifying‌  ‌the‌  ‌permit‌  ‌outright,‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌gravely‌  ‌abused‌  ‌his‌‌ 
with‌  ‌knowledge‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌false‌  ‌or‌  ‌with‌  ‌reckless‌  ‌disregard‌  ‌of‌‌  exercise‌‌   of‌‌
  their‌‌ ‌freedom‌‌ of‌‌ expression‌‌ in‌‌ general‌‌ and‌‌ of‌‌ their‌‌ right‌‌  discretion‌  ‌when‌‌   he‌‌   did‌‌
  not‌‌
  immediately‌‌   inform‌‌   the‌‌
  IBP‌‌   who‌‌   should‌‌ 
whether‌‌it‌‌was‌‌false‌‌or‌‌not.‌‌   ‌ of‌  ‌assembly‌  ‌and‌  ‌of‌  ‌petition‌  ‌for‌  ‌redress‌  ‌of‌  ‌grievances‌  ‌in‌‌  have‌  ‌been‌  ‌heard‌  ‌first‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌matter‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌perceived‌  ‌imminent‌‌   and‌ 
This‌‌  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  gist‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  ruling‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌ landmark‌‌ case‌‌ of‌‌ ‌New‌‌ York‌‌ Times‌‌  particular‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌appropriate‌  ‌governmental‌  ‌agency,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Chief‌‌  grave‌  ‌danger‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌substantive‌  ‌evil‌  ‌that‌‌   may‌‌   warrant‌‌  the‌‌  changing‌‌   of‌‌ 
v.‌‌
  Sullivan‌, ‌‌which‌‌   this‌‌
  Court‌‌
  has‌‌  cited‌‌
  with‌‌
  approval‌‌   in‌‌
  several‌‌
  of‌‌ its‌‌  Executive,‌‌against‌‌the‌‌police‌‌officers‌‌of‌‌the‌‌municipality‌‌of‌‌Pasig.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌venue.‌  ‌The‌  ‌opportunity‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌
  heard‌‌   precedes‌‌   the‌‌   action‌‌  on‌‌ 
own‌‌decisions.‌‌This‌‌is‌‌the‌r‌ ule‌‌of‌‌“actual‌‌malice.”‌‌   ‌ the‌  ‌permit‌, ‌ ‌since‌  ‌the‌  ‌applicant‌  ‌may‌  ‌directly‌  ‌go‌  ‌to‌  ‌court‌  ‌after‌  ‌an‌‌ 
unfavorable‌‌action‌‌on‌‌the‌‌permit.‌  ‌
David‌‌v.‌‌Arroyo‌  ‌
Cognate‌‌rights‌  ‌ While‌‌ prudence‌‌ requires‌‌ that‌‌ there‌‌ be‌‌ a ‌‌realistic‌‌ appraisal‌‌ not‌‌ of‌‌ what‌‌ 
"‌Assembly‌" ‌ ‌means‌  ‌a ‌ ‌right‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌to‌  ‌meet‌‌  may‌  ‌possibly‌  ‌occur‌  ‌but‌  ‌of‌  ‌what‌  ‌may‌  ‌probably‌  ‌occur,‌  ‌given‌  ‌all‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Freedom‌‌of‌‌assembly‌  ‌
peaceably‌‌   for‌‌
  consultation‌‌   in‌‌
  respect‌‌   to‌‌
  public‌‌   affairs.‌‌
  As‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ case‌‌  relevant‌‌ circumstances,‌‌ still‌‌ the‌‌ assumption‌‌ - ‌‌especially‌‌ so‌‌ where‌‌ the‌‌ 
Jacinto‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ of‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌of‌  ‌expression,‌  ‌this‌  ‌right‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌to‌‌
  be‌‌  limited,‌‌
  much‌‌   less‌‌  assembly‌‌   is‌‌
  scheduled‌‌  for‌‌  a ‌‌specific‌‌
  public‌‌  place‌‌
  - ‌‌is‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ permit‌‌ 
denied,‌  ‌except‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌ ‌showing‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌clear‌  ‌and‌  ‌present‌  ‌danger‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌ must‌‌be‌‌for‌‌the‌‌assembly‌‌being‌‌held‌‌there.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 59‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

documents,‌  ‌and‌  ‌papers‌  ‌pertaining‌  ‌to‌  ‌official‌  ‌acts,‌‌   transactions,‌‌   or‌‌ 


Freedom‌‌of‌‌association‌  ‌ peace‌‌
  agenda,‌‌
  as‌‌
  a ‌‌corollary‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ constitutional‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ information‌‌ 
decisions,‌‌  as‌‌
  well‌‌
  as‌‌
  to‌‌
  government‌‌   research‌‌   data‌‌ used‌‌ as‌‌ basis‌‌ for‌‌  and‌‌disclosure.‌  ‌
Art‌  ‌IX-B‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌2(5).‌  ‌The‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌self-organization‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌‌  policy‌  ‌development,‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌afforded‌  ‌the‌  ‌citizen,‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌‌
  such‌‌ 
denied‌‌to‌‌government‌‌employees.‌  ‌ limitations‌‌as‌‌may‌‌be‌‌provided‌‌by‌‌law.‌  ‌ Initiatives‌  ‌for‌  ‌Dialogue‌  ‌and‌  ‌Empowerment‌  ‌through‌  ‌Alternative‌‌ 
The‌‌right‌‌to‌‌information‌‌is‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌certain‌‌recognized‌‌  Legal‌‌Services‌‌v.‌‌PSALM‌‌2 ‌ 012‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
Art‌‌
  XIII‌‌
  Sec‌‌
  3 ‌‌par‌‌
  2.‌‌
  ‌It‌‌
  shall‌‌
  guarantee‌‌
  the‌‌
  rights‌‌ of‌‌ all‌‌ workers‌‌ to‌‌ 
self-organization,‌  ‌collective‌  ‌bargaining‌  ‌and‌  ‌negotiations,‌  ‌and‌‌  restrictions:‌  ‌ Unlike‌‌   the‌‌
  ‌disclosure‌‌   of‌‌
  information‌‌ ‌which‌‌ is‌‌ mandatory‌‌ under‌‌ the‌‌ 
peaceful‌  ‌concerted‌  ‌activities,‌  ‌including‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌strike‌  ‌in‌‌  1) National‌‌security‌‌matters‌‌and‌‌intelligence‌‌information;‌  ‌ Constitution,‌‌   the‌‌
  other‌‌   aspect‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ people’s‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ know‌‌ requires‌‌ a ‌‌
accordance‌‌with‌‌law.‌‌xxxx‌  ‌ demand‌‌   or‌‌
  request‌‌   for‌‌  one‌‌
  to‌‌
  gain‌‌
  access‌‌
  to‌‌
  documents‌‌ and‌‌ paper‌‌ of‌‌ 
2) Trade‌‌secrets‌‌and‌‌banking‌‌transactions;‌  ‌ the‌  ‌particular‌  ‌agency.‌  ‌Moreover,‌  ‌the‌  ‌duty‌  ‌to‌  ‌disclose‌  ‌covers‌‌   only‌‌ 
Ang‌‌Ladlad‌‌LGBT‌‌Party‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌ 3) Criminal‌‌matters;‌‌and‌  ‌ transactions‌  ‌involving‌  ‌public‌  ‌interest‌, ‌ ‌while‌  ‌the‌  ‌duty‌  ‌to‌  ‌allow‌‌ 
access‌‌   has‌‌   a ‌‌broader‌‌   scope‌‌   of‌‌
  information‌‌   which‌‌
  embraces‌‌ not‌‌ only‌‌ 
Under‌  ‌our‌  ‌system‌  ‌of‌  ‌laws,‌  ‌every‌  ‌group‌‌   has‌‌   the‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  promote‌‌   its‌‌  4) Other‌‌confidential‌‌information.‌  ‌ transactions‌  ‌involving‌  ‌public‌  ‌interest,‌  ‌but‌  ‌any‌  ‌matter‌  ‌contained‌  ‌in‌‌ 
agenda‌‌   and‌‌
  attempt‌‌   to‌‌
  persuade‌‌   society‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ validity‌‌ of‌‌ its‌‌ position‌‌  official‌  ‌communications‌  ‌and‌  ‌public‌  ‌documents‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌‌ 
Adiong‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌
through‌  ‌normal‌  ‌democratic‌  ‌means.‌  ‌Absent‌  ‌any‌  ‌compelling‌  ‌state‌‌  agency.‌  ‌
interest‌, ‌‌it‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  COMELEC‌‌   or‌‌ this‌‌ Court‌‌ to‌‌ impose‌‌ its‌‌ views‌‌  Freedom‌  ‌to‌  ‌distribute‌  ‌information‌  ‌to‌  ‌every‌  ‌citizen‌  ‌wherever‌  ‌he‌‌ 
on‌‌  the‌‌
  populace.‌‌   Otherwise‌‌   stated,‌‌
  the‌‌ COMELEC‌‌ is‌‌ certainly‌‌ not‌‌ free‌‌  desires‌  ‌to‌  ‌receive‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌so‌  ‌clearly‌  ‌vital‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌preservation‌  ‌of‌‌  a ‌‌free‌‌  Belgica‌‌v.‌‌Executive‌‌Secretary‌‌2
‌ 013‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
to‌  ‌interfere‌  ‌with‌  ‌speech‌  ‌for‌  ‌no‌  ‌better‌  ‌reason‌  ‌than‌  ‌promoting‌  ‌an‌‌  society‌‌   that,‌‌   putting‌‌ aside‌‌ reasonable‌‌ police‌‌ and‌‌ health‌‌ regulations‌‌ of‌‌ 
approved‌‌message‌‌or‌‌discouraging‌‌a‌‌disfavored‌‌one.‌  ‌ Case‌  ‌law‌  ‌instructs‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌proper‌  ‌remedy‌  ‌to‌  ‌invoke‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌‌ 
time‌  ‌and‌  ‌manner‌  ‌of‌  ‌distribution,‌  ‌it‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌fully‌  ‌preserved.‌  ‌The‌‌ 
information‌‌is‌‌to‌‌file‌‌a‌‌petition‌‌for‌m ‌ andamus‌. ‌ ‌
To‌  ‌the‌  ‌extent,‌  ‌therefore,‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌precluded,‌‌  danger‌‌   of‌‌   distribution‌‌   can‌‌   so‌‌
  easily‌‌ be‌‌ controlled‌‌ by‌‌ traditional‌‌ legal‌‌ 
because‌‌   of‌‌
  COMELEC's‌‌   action,‌‌
  from‌‌
  publicly‌‌   expressing‌‌   its‌‌
  views‌‌ as‌‌  methods‌‌   leaving‌‌  to‌‌
  each‌‌   householder‌‌   the‌‌ full‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ decide‌‌ whether‌‌  Privatization‌‌and‌‌Management‌‌Office‌‌v.‌‌Strategic‌‌Development‌‌ 
a‌  ‌political‌  ‌party‌  ‌and‌  ‌participating‌  ‌on‌  ‌an‌  ‌equal‌‌
  basis‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  political‌‌  he‌  ‌will‌  ‌receive‌  ‌strangers‌  ‌as‌  ‌visitors,‌  ‌that‌  ‌stringent‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌can‌‌ 
2013‌  ‌
process‌  ‌with‌  ‌other‌  ‌equally-qualified‌  ‌party-list‌  ‌candidates,‌  ‌we‌  ‌find‌‌  serve‌  ‌no‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌but‌  ‌that‌  ‌forbidden‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitution,‌  ‌the‌‌   naked‌‌ 
that‌  ‌there‌  ‌has,‌  ‌indeed,‌  ‌been‌  ‌a ‌ ‌transgression‌  ‌of‌  ‌petitioner's‌‌  restriction‌‌of‌‌the‌‌dissemination‌‌of‌‌ideas.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌information‌  ‌allows‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌to‌  ‌hold‌  ‌public‌  ‌officials‌‌ 
fundamental‌‌rights.‌  ‌ accountable‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌and‌  ‌aids‌  ‌them‌  ‌in‌  ‌engaging‌  ‌in‌  ‌public‌‌ 
The‌‌Province‌‌of‌‌North‌‌Cotabato‌‌v.‌‌GRP‌  ‌ discussions‌  ‌leading‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌formulation‌  ‌of‌  ‌government‌  ‌policies‌  ‌and‌‌ 
their‌‌  effective‌‌   implementation.‌‌ By‌‌ itself,‌‌ it‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ extend‌‌ to‌‌ causing‌‌ 
In‌‌Re‌‌Marcial‌‌Edillon‌  ‌ Matters‌‌  of‌‌
  public‌‌ concern‌‌ covered‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ information‌‌ include‌‌  the‌‌
  award‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   sale‌‌
  of‌‌
  government‌‌  assets‌‌   in‌‌
  failed‌‌
  public‌‌ biddings.‌‌ 
To‌‌
  compel‌‌   a ‌‌lawyer‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌ a ‌‌member‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Integrated‌‌ Bar‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌  steps‌‌and‌‌negotiations‌‌leading‌‌to‌‌the‌‌consummation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌contract.‌  ‌ Thus,‌  ‌assuming‌‌   that‌‌
  Dong-A‌‌   Consortium‌‌  may‌‌   access‌‌  the‌‌
  records‌‌  for‌‌ 
violative‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌to‌  ‌associate‌. ‌ ‌Integration‌‌  The‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌information‌  ‌"‌contemplates‌  ‌inclusion‌  ‌of‌  ‌negotiations‌‌  the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌validating‌  ‌the‌  ‌indicative‌  ‌price‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌‌ 
does‌  ‌not‌  ‌make‌  ‌a ‌ ‌lawyer‌  ‌a ‌ ‌member‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌‌
  group‌‌   of‌‌
  which‌‌
  he‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌  leading‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌consummation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌transaction‌."‌  ‌Certainly,‌  ‌a ‌‌ information,‌  ‌it‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌follow‌  ‌that‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌is‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
already‌  ‌a ‌ ‌member.‌‌   He‌‌
  became‌‌   a ‌‌member‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Bar‌‌
  when‌‌
  he‌‌
  passed‌‌  consummated‌  ‌contract‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌requirement‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  award.‌  ‌
the‌‌Bar‌‌examinations.‌  ‌ right‌‌to‌‌information.‌  ‌
Sereno‌‌v.‌‌Committee‌‌on‌‌Trade‌‌and‌‌Related‌‌Matters‌‌of‌‌NEDA‌‌2
‌ 016‌  ‌
Bar‌  ‌integration‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌compel‌  ‌the‌  ‌lawyer‌  ‌to‌  ‌associate‌  ‌with‌‌  Intended‌‌   as‌‌   a ‌‌"splendid‌‌   symmetry"‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌ information‌‌ under‌‌ 
anyone‌. ‌ ‌He‌  ‌is‌  ‌free‌  ‌to‌  ‌attend‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌attend‌  ‌the‌  ‌meetings‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌  the‌‌
  Bill‌‌  of‌‌ Rights‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ ‌policy‌‌ of‌‌ public‌‌ disclosure‌‌ ‌under‌‌ Section‌‌ 28,‌‌  The‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌guarantee‌  ‌to‌  ‌information‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌open‌  ‌every‌‌ 
Integrated‌‌  Bar‌‌
  Chapter‌‌   or‌‌
  vote‌‌
  or‌‌
  refuse‌‌   to‌‌
  vote‌‌
  in‌‌
  its‌‌
  elections‌‌ as‌‌ he‌‌  Article‌‌  II‌‌
  of‌‌  the‌‌  Constitution.‌‌   The‌‌   right‌‌  to‌‌
  information‌‌ guarantees‌‌ the‌‌  door‌  ‌to‌‌
  any‌‌
  and‌‌   all‌‌
  information,‌‌   but‌‌
  is‌‌
  rather‌‌  confined‌‌  to‌‌
  matters‌‌
  of‌‌ 
chooses.‌  ‌The‌  ‌only‌  ‌compulsion‌  ‌to‌  ‌which‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌subjected‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌  right‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌to‌  ‌demand‌  ‌information,‌  ‌while‌  ‌Section‌  ‌28‌‌  public‌  ‌concern.‌  ‌It‌‌   is‌‌  subject‌‌
  to‌‌
  such‌‌   limitations‌‌   as‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  provided‌‌ 
payment‌‌of‌‌annual‌‌dues.‌  ‌ recognizes‌‌   the‌‌ duty‌‌ of‌‌ officialdom‌‌ to‌‌ give‌‌ information‌‌ even‌‌ if‌‌ nobody‌‌  by‌  ‌law.‌  ‌The‌  ‌State's‌  ‌policy‌  ‌of‌  ‌full‌  ‌public‌  ‌disclosure‌  ‌is‌  ‌restricted‌  ‌to‌‌ 
demands.‌  ‌Respondents‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌thus‌  ‌point‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌absence‌‌   of‌‌
  an‌‌  transactions‌‌   involving‌‌   public‌‌ interest,‌‌ and‌‌ is‌‌ tempered‌‌ by‌‌ reasonable‌‌ 
Freedom‌‌of‌‌information‌  ‌ implementing‌  ‌legislation‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌excuse‌  ‌in‌  ‌not‌  ‌effecting‌  ‌such‌‌  conditions‌‌prescribed‌‌by‌‌law.‌  ‌
policy‌. ‌ ‌
Sec‌  ‌7.‌  ‌The‌  ‌right‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  people‌‌
  to‌‌
  information‌‌  on‌‌
  matters‌‌
  of‌‌
  public‌‌  Two‌‌
  requisites‌‌  must‌‌   concur‌‌
  before‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ information‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ 
concern‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌recognized.‌  ‌Access‌  ‌to‌  ‌official‌  ‌records,‌  ‌and‌  ‌to‌‌  In‌‌
  fine,‌‌
  E.O.‌‌
  No.‌‌ 3 ‌‌establishes‌‌ petitioners'‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ consulted‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌  compelled‌‌by‌‌writ‌‌of‌‌mandamus.‌‌   ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 60‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

of‌  ‌agency‌  ‌opinions‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌agency‌  ‌establishes‌  ‌final‌  ‌policy;‌‌  that‌  ‌it‌  ‌covers‌  ‌the‌  ‌mere‌  ‌existence‌  ‌or‌  ‌pendency‌  ‌of‌  ‌disciplinary‌‌ 
Firstly‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  information‌‌
  sought‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  in‌‌
  relation‌‌
  to‌‌ matters‌‌ of‌‌ 
and‌‌   ‌ actions.‌  ‌
public‌‌concern‌‌or‌‌public‌‌interest‌.  ‌‌ ‌
third‌, ‌‌it‌‌
  protects‌‌
  the‌‌
  integrity‌‌
  of‌‌ an‌‌ agency's‌‌ decision;‌‌ the‌‌ public‌‌ 
And,‌‌  ‌secondly‌, ‌‌it‌‌
  must‌‌
  not‌‌
  be‌‌
  exempt‌‌
  by‌‌
  law‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ operation‌‌  should‌‌   not‌‌
  judge‌‌
  officials‌‌
  based‌‌
  on‌‌  information‌‌   they‌‌ considered‌‌  Vitangcol‌‌III‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 016‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Separate‌‌Opinion‌‌of‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
of‌‌the‌‌constitutional‌‌guarantee.‌  ‌ prior‌‌to‌‌issuing‌‌their‌‌final‌‌decisions.‌  ‌
When‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌petition‌  ‌for‌  ‌mandamus‌‌   ‌relates‌‌
  to‌‌
  a ‌‌public‌‌ 
The‌‌ constitutional‌‌ guarantee‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ people's‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ information‌‌ ‌does‌‌  Rights‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌‌
  waived‌‌   if‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  contrary‌‌
  to‌‌  law,‌‌
  public‌‌
  order,‌‌
  public‌‌  right‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌‌
  information‌‌   on‌‌  matters‌‌
  of‌‌
  public‌‌
  concern,‌‌ 
NOT‌  ‌cover‌  ‌national‌  ‌security‌  ‌matters‌  ‌and‌  ‌intelligence‌‌  policy,‌‌  morals,‌‌  or‌‌
  good‌‌ customs,‌‌ or‌‌ prejudicial‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌third‌‌ person‌‌ with‌‌  and‌‌
  when‌‌   the‌‌  object‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  petition‌‌ is‌‌ to‌‌ compel‌‌ the‌‌ performance‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌
information,‌  ‌trade‌  ‌secrets‌  ‌and‌  ‌banking‌  ‌transactions‌  ‌and‌‌  a‌‌
  right‌‌ recognized‌‌ by‌‌ law.‌‌ There‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌public‌‌ policy‌‌ involved‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌claim‌‌  public‌  ‌duty,‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌need‌  ‌not‌  ‌show‌  ‌that‌  ‌its‌  ‌interest‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌ 
criminal‌  ‌matters.‌  ‌Equally‌  ‌excluded‌  ‌from‌  ‌coverage‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  of‌  ‌deliberative‌  ‌process‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌— ‌ ‌"the‌  ‌policy‌  ‌of‌  ‌open,‌  ‌frank‌‌  result‌‌is‌‌exclusive‌.‌‌It‌‌may‌‌be‌‌shared‌‌by‌‌the‌‌public‌‌in‌‌general.‌  ‌
constitutional‌  ‌guarantee‌  ‌are‌  ‌diplomatic‌  ‌correspondence,‌‌  discussion‌‌   between‌‌   subordinate‌‌   and‌‌
  chief‌‌ concerning‌‌ administrative‌‌ 
closed-door‌  ‌Cabinet‌  ‌meeting‌  ‌and‌  ‌executive‌  ‌sessions‌  ‌of‌  ‌either‌‌  Without‌‌   a ‌‌doubt,‌‌   information‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  conduct‌‌   of‌‌
  elections‌‌   is‌‌ a ‌‌matter‌‌ 
action."‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌the‌  ‌deliberative‌  ‌process‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌‌ 
house‌  ‌of‌  ‌Congress,‌  ‌as‌  ‌well‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌‌
  internal‌‌
  deliberations‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  of‌  ‌public‌  ‌concern‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌directly‌  ‌affects‌  ‌the‌  ‌lives‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌People.‌  ‌The‌‌ 
waived‌. ‌ ‌
Supreme‌‌Court‌.  ‌‌ ‌ Commission‌‌   on‌‌
  Elections‌‌   may‌‌   be‌‌
  compelled,‌‌   through‌‌   mandamus,‌‌ to‌‌ 
As‌  ‌a ‌ ‌qualified‌  ‌privilege,‌  ‌the‌  ‌burden‌  ‌falls‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌‌  make‌  ‌an‌  ‌inventory‌  ‌of‌  ‌and‌  ‌disclose‌  ‌the‌  ‌MAC‌  ‌and‌  ‌IP‌  ‌addresses‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Every‌  ‌claim‌  ‌of‌  ‌exemption,‌  ‌being‌  ‌a ‌ ‌limitation‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌ ‌right‌‌  agency‌‌   asserting‌‌  the‌‌
  deliberative‌‌   process‌‌
  privilege‌‌   to‌‌
  prove‌‌
  that‌‌ the‌‌  IMSI‌  ‌and‌  ‌IMEI‌  ‌numbers‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌electronic‌  ‌devices‌  ‌used‌  ‌during‌‌ 
constitutionally‌‌   granted‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  people,‌‌   is‌‌
  liberally‌‌   construed‌‌ in‌‌ favor‌‌  information‌‌   in‌‌
  question‌‌   satisfies‌‌ both‌‌ requirements‌‌ — ‌‌predecisional‌‌  elections‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌public.‌  ‌It‌‌
  is‌‌
  mandated‌‌   to‌‌
  enforce‌‌   and‌‌  administer‌‌   all‌‌ 
of‌  ‌disclosure‌  ‌and‌  ‌strictly‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌claim‌  ‌of‌  ‌confidentiality.‌‌  and‌‌deliberative.‌  ‌ laws‌‌and‌‌regulations‌‌relative‌‌to‌‌the‌‌conduct‌‌of‌‌an‌‌election.‌  ‌
However,‌  ‌the‌  ‌claim‌  ‌of‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌cause‌  ‌for‌  ‌exemption‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
obligation‌  ‌to‌  ‌disclose‌  ‌information‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌clearly‌  ‌asserted‌  ‌by‌‌ 
specifying‌‌the‌‌grounds‌‌for‌‌the‌‌exemption.‌  ‌ Records‌‌of‌‌Police‌‌Drug‌‌Operations‌‌‌Almora‌‌v.‌‌Dela‌‌Rosa‌‌2
‌ 018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ I-Popefrancis‌‌v.‌‌DBM‌‌‌2016‌  ‌

The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌is‌  ‌mandated‌  ‌to‌  ‌protect‌  ‌and‌  ‌enforce‌  ‌the‌‌


  people's‌‌
  ‌right‌‌
  to‌  It‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  disputed‌‌   that‌‌
  PDAF‌‌   disbursements‌‌   and‌‌  the‌‌
  recipients‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌ 
DFA‌‌v.‌‌BCA‌‌International‌‌2
‌ 016‌  ‌ information‌. ‌‌The‌‌ undeniable‌‌ fact‌‌ that‌‌ thousands‌‌ of‌‌ ordinary‌‌ citizens‌‌  same‌‌   constitute‌‌   a ‌‌matter‌‌   of‌‌
  public‌‌
  concern‌‌   or‌‌
  public‌‌   interest,‌‌
  which‌‌ 
have‌  ‌been‌  ‌killed,‌  ‌and‌  ‌continue‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌killed,‌  ‌during‌  ‌police‌  ‌drug‌‌  are‌  ‌not‌  ‌exempt‌‌   from‌‌   the‌‌
  operation‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌   constitutional‌‌   guarantee‌‌   of‌‌ 
This‌  ‌case‌  ‌is‌  ‌one‌  ‌of‌  ‌first‌  ‌impression‌  ‌involving‌  ‌the‌  ‌production‌  ‌of‌‌  operations‌‌certainly‌‌is‌‌a‌‌matter‌‌of‌‌grave‌‌public‌‌concern.‌  ‌ the‌‌  right‌‌  to‌‌
  information.‌‌   Nevertheless,‌‌   it‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌ proper‌‌ to‌‌ issue‌‌ a ‌‌writ‌‌ 
evidence‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌arbitration‌  ‌case‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌deliberative‌  ‌process‌‌  of‌‌mandamus‌‌in‌‌the‌‌present‌‌case.‌  ‌
privilege‌‌is‌‌invoked.‌  ‌ Contrary‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌claim‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Solicitor‌  ‌General,‌  ‌the‌  ‌requested‌‌ 
information‌‌   and‌‌
  documents‌‌   do‌‌ not‌‌ obviously‌‌ involve‌‌ state‌‌ secrets‌‌  Here,‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌fail‌  ‌to‌  ‌establish‌‌   that‌‌
  respondent‌‌   actually‌‌   neglected‌‌ 
Deliberative‌  ‌process‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌is‌  ‌one‌  ‌kind‌  ‌of‌  ‌privileged‌‌  affecting‌‌national‌‌security.‌  ‌ or‌  ‌refused‌  ‌to‌  ‌provide‌  ‌the‌  ‌information‌  ‌they‌  ‌requested.‌  ‌While‌‌ 
information,‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌exceptions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitutional‌‌  respondent‌‌   has‌‌
  the‌‌
  duty‌‌   to‌‌
  give‌‌
  the‌‌
  public‌‌
  access‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ information,‌‌ 
right‌  ‌to‌‌
  information.‌‌
  U.S.‌‌
  courts‌‌  have‌‌  established‌‌
  ‌two‌‌   fundamental‌‌  it‌‌ has‌‌ the‌‌ discretion‌‌ to‌‌ ascertain‌‌ the‌‌ best‌‌ way‌‌ to‌‌ disseminate,‌‌ publish,‌‌ 
requirements‌f‌ or‌‌the‌‌deliberative‌‌process‌‌privilege‌‌to‌‌be‌‌invoked.‌‌   ‌ Right‌‌to‌‌Information‌‌and‌‌Confidentiality‌‌of‌‌Disbarment‌‌Proceedings‌‌‌in‌‌ 
or‌‌otherwise‌‌make‌‌available‌‌the‌‌said‌‌information.‌‌   ‌
Roque,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌AFP‌‌Chief‌‌of‌‌Staff‌‌2
‌ 017‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
1. First‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌communication‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌predecisional‌, ‌ ‌i.e.,‌‌  The‌  ‌information‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌seek‌  ‌are‌  ‌already‌  ‌posted‌‌   on‌‌
  its‌‌
  website.‌‌ 
"antecedent‌‌to‌‌the‌‌adoption‌‌of‌‌an‌‌agency‌‌policy."‌‌   ‌ Disbarment‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌are‌  ‌covered‌  ‌by‌  ‌what‌  ‌is‌  ‌known‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌‌  There‌‌   is‌‌
  also‌‌   no‌‌   clear‌‌  legal‌‌  mandate‌‌   for‌‌ respondents‌‌ to‌‌ identify‌‌ 
2. Second‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌communication‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌deliberative‌, ‌ ‌i.e.,‌  ‌"a‌‌  confidentiality‌‌   rule.‌‌   The‌‌
  confidentiality‌‌
  rule‌‌
  is‌‌
  intended,‌‌   in‌‌ part,‌‌ to‌‌  familial‌  ‌relations‌  ‌and/or‌  ‌determine‌  ‌nepotism‌  ‌or‌  ‌political‌‌ 
direct‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌deliberative‌  ‌process‌  ‌in‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌makes‌‌  prevent‌  ‌the‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌disbarment‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌tool‌  ‌to‌  ‌damage‌  ‌a ‌‌ dynasties‌  ‌among‌  ‌the‌  ‌recipients‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  PDAF‌‌  disbursements‌. ‌‌In‌‌ 
recommendations‌  ‌or‌  ‌expresses‌  ‌opinions‌  ‌on‌‌   legal‌‌  or‌‌  policy‌‌  lawyer's‌‌reputation‌‌in‌‌the‌‌public‌‌sphere.‌  ‌ fact,‌  ‌as‌  ‌of‌  ‌yet,‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌even‌  ‌no‌  ‌law‌  ‌that‌  ‌particularly‌  ‌defines‌  ‌and‌‌ 
matters."‌  ‌ As‌‌
  a ‌‌general‌‌   rule,‌‌  disciplinary‌‌
  proceedings‌‌   are‌‌
  confidential‌‌ in‌‌ nature‌‌  governs‌‌political‌‌dynasty.‌  ‌
The‌‌ deliberative‌‌ process‌‌ privilege‌‌ can‌‌ also‌‌ be‌‌ invoked‌‌ in‌‌ ‌arbitration‌‌  until‌  ‌their‌  ‌final‌  ‌resolution‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌final‌  ‌decision‌  ‌of‌‌
  this‌‌
  Court.‌‌
  The‌‌   ‌

proceedings‌‌‌under‌‌RA‌‌9285.‌‌It‌‌contains‌‌three‌‌policy‌‌bases:‌‌   ‌ confidentiality‌  ‌rule‌  ‌requires‌  ‌only‌  ‌that‌  ‌"proceedings‌  ‌against‌‌  G.‌‌Freedom‌‌of‌‌Religion‌  ‌


attorneys"‌  ‌be‌  ‌kept‌  ‌private‌  ‌and‌  ‌confidential.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌proceedings‌‌ 
first‌,‌‌the‌‌privilege‌‌protects‌‌candid‌‌discussions‌‌within‌‌an‌‌agency;‌‌   against‌  ‌attorneys‌  ‌that‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌kept‌  ‌private‌  ‌and‌  ‌confidential.‌  ‌This‌‌  Sec‌  ‌5.‌  ‌No‌  ‌law‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌made‌  ‌respecting‌  ‌an‌  ‌establishment‌  ‌of‌‌ 
second‌, ‌‌it‌‌
  prevents‌‌
  public‌‌
  confusion‌‌
  from‌‌
  premature‌‌ disclosure‌‌  would‌  ‌necessarily‌  ‌prohibit‌  ‌the‌  ‌distribution‌  ‌of‌  ‌actual‌  ‌disbarment‌‌  religion,‌  ‌or‌  ‌prohibiting‌  ‌the‌  ‌free‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌thereof.‌  ‌The‌‌
  free‌‌
  exercise‌‌ 
complaints‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌   press.‌‌
  However,‌‌   ‌the‌‌  rule‌‌   does‌‌  not‌‌
  extend‌‌  so‌‌
  far‌‌ 
and‌  ‌enjoyment‌  ‌of‌  ‌religious‌  ‌profession‌  ‌and‌  ‌worship,‌  ‌without‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 61‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

discrimination‌‌   or‌‌
  preference,‌‌  shall‌‌ forever‌‌ be‌‌ allowed.‌‌ No‌‌ religious‌‌ 
morality.‌  ‌
test‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌required‌‌for‌‌the‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌civil‌‌or‌‌political‌‌rights.‌  ‌ Sherbert‌  ‌and‌  ‌Yoder‌  ‌adopted‌  ‌a ‌ ‌balancing‌  ‌test‌  ‌for‌  ‌free‌  ‌exercise‌‌ 
jurisprudence‌  ‌which‌  ‌would‌  ‌impose‌  ‌a ‌ ‌discipline‌  ‌to‌  ‌prevent‌‌  ⭐Thus,‌  ‌we‌  ‌find‌  ‌that‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌particular‌  ‌case‌  ‌and‌  ‌under‌‌   these‌‌ 
Basic‌‌principles‌  ‌ manipulation‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌balancing‌  ‌of‌  ‌interests.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌free‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌claim‌‌  distinct‌  ‌circumstances,‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌Escritor's‌  ‌conjugal‌‌ 
Purpose‌  ‌ could‌‌result‌‌to‌t‌ hree‌‌kinds‌‌of‌‌accommodation‌:  ‌‌ ‌ arrangement‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌penalized‌  ‌as‌  ‌she‌‌   has‌‌
  made‌‌   out‌‌  a ‌‌case‌‌ 
for‌‌
  ‌exemption‌‌   from‌‌  the‌‌  law‌‌  based‌‌   on‌‌
  her‌‌
  fundamental‌‌   right‌‌ to‌‌ 
⭐‌Estrada‌‌v.‌‌Escritor‌  ‌ a) Mandatory‌‌   — ‌‌‌those‌‌
  which‌‌   are‌‌
  found‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌ constitutionally‌‌ 
freedom‌‌of‌‌religion‌. ‌ ‌
compelled,‌‌i.e.,‌‌required‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Free‌‌Exercise‌‌Clause;‌  ‌
In‌‌resolving‌‌claims‌‌involving‌‌religious‌‌freedom‌‌   ‌
b) Permissive‌  ‌— ‌‌‌those‌‌
  which‌‌
  are‌‌
  discretionary‌‌
  or‌‌
  legislative;‌‌ 
Concept‌‌of‌‌Religion‌  ‌
1) benevolent‌  ‌neutrality‌  ‌or‌  ‌accommodation‌, ‌‌whether‌‌  and‌  ‌
mandatory‌‌ or‌‌ permissive,‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ spirit,‌‌ intent‌‌ and‌‌ framework‌‌  c) Prohibited‌‌—‌t‌ hose‌‌which‌‌the‌‌religion‌‌clauses‌‌prohibit.‌  ‌ Austria‌‌v.‌‌NLRC‌  ‌
underlying‌‌the‌‌religion‌‌clauses‌‌in‌‌our‌‌Constitution;‌‌and‌‌   ‌
It‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌strict‌  ‌scrutiny-‌  ‌compelling‌  ‌state‌  ‌interest‌  ‌test‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌‌  The‌‌
  case‌‌   at‌‌
  bar‌‌
  does‌‌ not‌‌ concern‌‌ an‌‌ ecclesiastical‌‌ or‌‌ purely‌‌ religious‌‌ 
2) in‌  ‌deciding‌  ‌respondent's‌  ‌plea‌  ‌of‌  ‌exemption‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌  most‌  ‌in‌  ‌line‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌benevolent‌  ‌neutrality-accommodation‌‌  affair‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌bar‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌from‌  ‌taking‌  ‌cognizance‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌same.‌  ‌An‌‌ 
Free‌  ‌Exercise‌  ‌Clause‌, ‌ ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌
  ‌compelling‌‌
  state‌‌
  interest‌‌  approach‌. ‌ ‌We‌  ‌explained‌  ‌this‌  ‌process‌  ‌in‌  ‌detail,‌  ‌by‌  ‌showing‌  ‌the‌‌  ecclesiastical‌‌   affair‌  ‌involves‌‌  the‌‌ relationship‌‌ between‌‌ the‌‌ church‌‌ 
test,‌‌the‌‌strictest‌‌test‌,‌‌which‌‌must‌‌be‌‌applied.‌  ‌ questions‌‌which‌‌must‌‌be‌‌answered‌‌in‌‌each‌‌step,‌v‌ iz‌: ‌ ‌ and‌  ‌its‌  ‌members‌  ‌and‌  ‌relate‌  ‌to‌  ‌matters‌  ‌of‌  ‌faith,‌  ‌religious‌‌  doctrines,‌‌ 
The‌  ‌benevolent‌  ‌neutrality‌  ‌theory‌  ‌believes‌  ‌that‌  ‌with‌  ‌respect‌  ‌to‌‌  worship‌‌and‌‌governance‌‌of‌‌the‌‌congregation.‌‌   ‌
First‌, ‌ ‌Has‌  ‌the‌‌
  statute‌‌
  or‌‌
  government‌‌
  action‌‌
  created‌‌
  a ‌‌burden‌‌
  on‌‌ 
governmental‌  ‌actions,‌  ‌accommodation‌‌   ‌of‌‌
  religion‌‌  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  allowed,‌‌  the‌‌free‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌religion?‌  ‌ To‌  ‌be‌  ‌concrete,‌  ‌examples‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌so-called‌  ‌ecclesiastical‌  ‌affairs‌  ‌to‌‌ 
not‌  ‌to‌  ‌promote‌  ‌the‌  ‌government's‌  ‌favored‌  ‌form‌  ‌of‌  ‌religion,‌  ‌but‌  ‌to‌‌  which‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌meddle‌  ‌are‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌for‌‌ 
allow‌  ‌individuals‌  ‌and‌  ‌groups‌  ‌to‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌their‌  ‌religion‌  ‌without‌‌  Second‌, ‌‌Is‌‌
  there‌‌
  a ‌‌sufficiently‌‌ compelling‌‌ state‌‌ interest‌‌ to‌‌ justify‌‌ 
excommunication‌, ‌ ‌ordinations‌  ‌of‌  ‌religious‌  ‌ministers,‌‌ 
hindrance.‌  ‌The‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌accommodations‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌remove‌  ‌a ‌ ‌burden‌‌  this‌‌infringement‌‌of‌‌religious‌‌liberty?‌  ‌
administration‌‌of‌‌sacraments.‌  ‌
on,‌  ‌or‌  ‌facilitate‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person's‌  ‌or‌  ‌institution's‌  ‌religion.‌‌  Third‌, ‌‌Has‌‌ the‌‌ state‌‌ in‌‌ achieving‌‌ its‌‌ legitimate‌‌ purposes‌‌ used‌‌ the‌‌ 
Thus,‌‌   what‌‌   is‌‌
  ‌sought‌‌   ‌under‌‌
  the‌‌
  theory‌‌   of‌‌
  accommodation‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ a ‌‌ What‌  ‌is‌  ‌involved‌  ‌here‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌relationship‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌church‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌‌ 
least‌  ‌intrusive‌  ‌means‌  ‌possible‌‌   so‌‌  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  free‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌ 
declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌unconstitutionality‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌facially‌  ‌neutral‌  ‌law,‌  ‌but‌  ‌an‌‌  employer‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌minister‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌employee‌. ‌‌It‌‌
  is‌‌
  purely‌‌  secular‌‌
  and‌‌ 
infringed‌‌   any‌‌
  more‌‌  than‌‌   necessary‌‌   to‌‌  achieve‌‌ the‌‌ legitimate‌‌ goal‌‌ 
exemption‌‌   from‌‌ its‌‌ application‌‌ or‌‌ its‌‌ "burdensome‌‌ effect,"‌‌ whether‌‌  has‌  ‌no‌  ‌relation‌  ‌whatsoever‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌practice‌  ‌of‌  ‌faith,‌  ‌worship‌  ‌or‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌state?‌  ‌
by‌‌the‌‌legislature‌‌or‌‌the‌‌courts.‌  ‌ doctrines‌‌of‌‌the‌‌church.‌  ‌
The‌‌  free‌‌   exercise‌‌   of‌‌  religion‌‌   is‌‌
  specifically‌‌
  articulated‌‌   as‌‌ one‌‌ of‌‌ 
The‌‌cases‌‌of‌‌Sherbert‌a‌ nd‌‌Yoder‌l‌ aid‌‌out‌‌the‌‌following‌‌doctrines:‌‌   ‌   f‌ undamental‌‌
the‌‌   ‌rights‌‌  in‌‌  our‌‌  Constitution‌. ‌‌It‌‌  is‌‌  a ‌‌fundamental‌‌  Principle‌‌of‌‌separation‌‌of‌‌church‌‌and‌‌state‌  ‌
a) free‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌clause‌  ‌claims‌  ‌were‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌heightened‌‌  right‌‌   that‌‌
  enjoys‌‌ a ‌‌preferred‌‌ position‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ hierarchy‌‌ of‌‌ rights‌‌ — ‌‌"the‌‌  Operation‌‌of‌‌sectarian‌‌schools‌‌
   ‌
scrutiny‌  ‌or‌  ‌compelling‌  ‌interest‌  ‌test‌  ‌if‌  ‌government‌‌  most‌‌inalienable‌‌and‌‌sacred‌‌of‌‌human‌‌rights."‌  ‌
substantially‌‌burdened‌‌the‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌religion;‌  ‌ Art‌  ‌XIV‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌4(2).‌  ‌Educational‌  ‌institutions,‌  ‌other‌  ‌than‌  ‌those‌‌ 
Thus,‌‌   it‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  the‌‌ State's‌‌ broad‌‌ interest‌‌ in‌‌ "protecting‌‌ the‌‌ institutions‌‌ 
b) heightened‌‌ scrutiny‌‌ ‌or‌‌ ‌compelling‌‌ interest‌‌ test‌‌ governed‌‌  established‌  ‌by‌  ‌religious‌  ‌groups‌  ‌and‌  ‌mission‌  ‌boards,‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌ 
of‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌and‌‌   the‌‌
  family,"‌‌   or‌‌
  even‌‌
  "in‌‌
  the‌‌
  sound‌‌
  administration‌‌   of‌‌ 
cases‌‌   ‌ justice"‌  ‌that‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌weighed‌  ‌against‌  ‌respondent's‌  ‌claim,‌  ‌but‌  ‌the‌‌  owned‌  ‌solely‌  ‌by‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌or‌  ‌corporations‌  ‌or‌‌ 
State's‌‌   narrow‌‌   interest‌‌   in‌‌ refusing‌‌ to‌‌ make‌‌ an‌‌ exception‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌  associations‌‌   at‌‌
  least‌‌
  60%‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  capital‌‌
  of‌‌
  which‌‌
  is‌‌ owned‌‌ by‌‌ such‌‌ 
i) where‌  ‌the‌  ‌burden‌  ‌was‌  ‌direct‌, ‌ ‌i.e.,‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌‌ 
religion‌‌  triggered‌‌ a ‌‌criminal‌‌ or‌‌ civil‌‌ penalty,‌‌ as‌‌ well‌‌  cohabitation‌  ‌which‌  ‌respondent's‌  ‌faith‌  ‌finds‌  ‌moral‌. ‌ ‌This,‌  ‌the‌‌  citizens.‌  ‌xxx‌  ‌The‌  ‌control‌  ‌and‌  ‌administration‌  ‌of‌  ‌educational‌‌ 
as‌‌cases‌‌   ‌ Solicitor‌‌General‌‌failed‌‌to‌‌do‌. ‌ ‌ institutions‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌vested‌‌in‌‌citizens‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌  ‌
ii) where‌‌  the‌‌
  burden‌‌  was‌‌   ‌indirect‌, ‌‌i.e.,‌‌
  the‌‌   exercise‌‌
  of‌‌  The‌‌ ‌public‌‌ morality‌‌ expressed‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ is‌‌ necessarily‌‌ ‌secular‌‌ ‌for‌‌  Religious‌‌instructions‌‌in‌‌public‌‌schools‌‌
   ‌
religion‌  ‌resulted‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌forfeiture‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌government‌‌  in‌  ‌our‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌order,‌  ‌the‌  ‌religion‌  ‌clauses‌  ‌prohibit‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌‌  Art‌‌  XIV‌‌  Sec‌‌   3(3).‌‌   At‌‌
  the‌‌ option‌‌ expressed‌‌ in‌‌ writing‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ parents‌‌ 
benefit;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ from‌  ‌establishing‌  ‌a ‌ ‌religion,‌  ‌including‌  ‌the‌  ‌morality‌  ‌it‌  ‌sanctions‌. ‌‌
or‌‌
  guardians,‌‌   religion‌‌   shall‌‌   be‌‌ allowed‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ taught‌‌ to‌‌ their‌‌ children‌‌ 
c) the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌could‌‌  carve‌‌
  out‌‌  ‌accommodations‌‌   ‌or‌‌
  exemptions‌‌  Although‌  ‌the‌  ‌morality‌  ‌contemplated‌  ‌by‌  ‌laws‌  ‌is‌  ‌secular,‌  ‌benevolent‌‌ 
neutrality‌  ‌could‌  ‌allow‌  ‌for‌  ‌accommodation‌  ‌of‌  ‌morality‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌‌  or‌‌
  wards‌‌   in‌‌
  public‌‌   elementary‌‌   and‌‌
  high‌‌
  schools‌‌   within‌‌   the‌‌
  regular‌‌ 
from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌facially‌  ‌neutral‌  ‌law‌  ‌of‌  ‌general‌  ‌application,‌  ‌whether‌‌ 
religion,‌  ‌provided‌  ‌it‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌
  offend‌‌  compelling‌‌   state‌‌
  interests.‌‌   The‌‌  class‌‌   hours‌‌   by‌‌   instructors‌‌   designated‌‌   or‌‌
  approved‌‌   by‌‌   the‌‌
  religious‌‌ 
general‌‌or‌‌criminal.‌  ‌
jurisdiction‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌extends‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌  ‌public‌  ‌and‌  ‌secular‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 62‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

authorities‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌religion‌  ‌to‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌children‌  ‌or‌  ‌wards‌‌
  belong,‌‌ 
benefit‌‌one‌‌religion.‌  ‌ neutrality‌  ‌in‌  ‌religious‌  ‌matters‌. ‌ ‌Such‌  ‌government‌  ‌neutrality‌  ‌may‌ 
without‌‌additional‌‌cost‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Government.‌  ‌ be‌‌summarized‌‌in‌‌four‌‌general‌‌propositions:‌  
Tax‌‌Exemption‌‌
   ‌ Celdran‌‌y‌‌Pamintuan‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌ 1) Government‌  ‌must‌  ‌not‌  ‌prefer‌  ‌one‌  ‌religion‌  ‌over‌  ‌another‌‌
  or‌‌ 
Art‌‌   VI‌‌
  Sec‌‌  28(3).‌‌  Charitable‌‌  institutions,‌‌ churches‌‌ and‌‌ personages‌‌  religion‌‌over‌‌irreligion;‌‌   ‌
The‌  ‌non-establishment‌  ‌clause‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reinforcement‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
or‌  ‌convents‌  ‌appurtenant‌  ‌thereto,‌  ‌mosques,‌  ‌non-profit‌  ‌cemeteries,‌‌  principle‌‌  of‌‌
  separation‌‌   of‌‌  church‌‌   and‌‌   state‌. ‌‌It‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ equivalent‌‌ to‌‌  2) Government‌  ‌funds‌  ‌must‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌applied‌  ‌to‌  ‌religious‌‌ 
and‌  ‌all‌  ‌lands,‌  ‌buildings,‌  ‌and‌  ‌improvements,‌‌   actually,‌‌
  directly,‌‌
  and‌‌  separation‌‌   of‌‌
  religion‌‌ and‌‌ state.‌‌ It‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ indifference‌‌ nor‌‌ denial‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  purposes;‌  ‌
exclusively‌  ‌used‌  ‌for‌  ‌religious,‌  ‌charitable,‌‌
  or‌‌
  educational‌‌   purposes‌‌  religious‌‌nature‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Filipino‌‌society.‌  ‌ 3) Government‌‌action‌‌must‌n
‌ ot‌‌aid‌‌‌religion;‌‌and‌  ‌
shall‌‌be‌‌exempt‌‌from‌‌taxation.‌  ‌ In‌‌
  determining‌‌
  ‌whether‌‌
  there‌‌   was‌‌
  excessive‌‌
  entanglement‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  4) Government‌  ‌action‌  ‌must‌  ‌not‌  ‌result‌  ‌in‌  ‌excessive‌‌ 
Public‌‌Aid‌‌to‌‌Religion‌‌
   ‌ State‌‌in‌‌church‌‌matters‌,‌‌the‌‌following‌‌factors‌‌are‌‌considered:‌‌   ‌ entanglement‌‌with‌‌religion.‌  ‌
Art‌  ‌VI‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌29(2).‌  ‌No‌  ‌public‌  ‌money‌  ‌or‌  ‌property‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  1) the‌  ‌character‌  ‌and‌  ‌purposes‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌institutions‌  ‌that‌  ‌are‌‌ 
benefited;‌  ‌ Ang‌‌Ladlad‌‌LGBT‌‌Party‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌‌supra‌‌   ‌
appropriated,‌‌   applied,‌‌   paid,‌‌
  or‌‌
  employed,‌‌   directly‌‌
  or‌‌
  indirectly,‌‌
  for‌‌ 
the‌  ‌use,‌  ‌benefit,‌  ‌or‌  ‌support‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌sect,‌  ‌church,‌  ‌denomination,‌‌  2) the‌‌nature‌‌of‌‌the‌‌aid‌‌that‌‌the‌‌State‌‌provides;‌‌and‌  ‌ At‌  ‌bottom,‌  ‌what‌  ‌our‌  ‌non-establishment‌  ‌clause‌  ‌calls‌  ‌for‌  ‌is‌‌ 
sectarian‌  ‌institution,‌  ‌or‌  ‌system‌  ‌of‌  ‌religion,‌  ‌or‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌priest,‌‌  3) the‌  ‌resulting‌  ‌relationship‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  "‌government‌  ‌neutrality‌  ‌in‌  ‌religious‌  ‌matters‌."‌  ‌Clearly,‌‌ 
preacher,‌  ‌minister,‌  ‌other‌  ‌religious‌  ‌teacher,‌  ‌or‌  ‌dignitary‌  ‌as‌  ‌such,‌‌  religious‌‌authority.‌  ‌ "governmental‌‌   reliance‌‌
  on‌‌
  religious‌‌  justification‌‌ is‌‌ inconsistent‌‌ with‌‌ 
except‌‌   when‌‌  such‌‌ priest,‌‌ preacher,‌‌ minister,‌‌ or‌‌ dignitary‌‌ is‌‌ assigned‌‌  this‌  ‌policy‌  ‌of‌‌
  neutrality."‌‌
  We‌‌  thus‌‌
  find‌‌
  that‌‌
  it‌‌
  was‌‌
  grave‌‌
  violation‌‌
  of‌‌ 
In‌‌
  this‌‌
  case,‌‌
  petitioner‌‌
  and‌‌
  the‌‌
  OSG‌‌
  have‌‌
  not‌‌ endeavored‌‌ to‌‌ establish‌‌ 
to‌  ‌the‌  ‌armed‌  ‌forces,‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌penal‌  ‌institution,‌  ‌or‌  ‌government‌‌  the‌  ‌non-establishment‌  ‌clause‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌COMELEC‌  ‌to‌  ‌utilize‌  ‌the‌  ‌Bible‌‌ 
how‌‌the‌‌State‌‌can‌‌be‌‌unduly‌‌involved‌‌with‌‌church‌‌matters.‌‌   ‌
and‌‌the‌‌Koran‌‌to‌‌justify‌‌the‌‌exclusion‌‌of‌‌‌Ang‌‌Ladlad‌. ‌ ‌
orphanage‌‌or‌‌leprosarium.‌  ‌
⭐‌Re‌‌Valenciano‌‌‌2017‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ The‌  ‌denial‌  ‌of‌  ‌Ang‌  ‌Ladlad's‌  ‌registration‌  ‌on‌  ‌purely‌  ‌moral‌‌ 
Non-establishment‌‌clause‌  ‌
grounds‌  ‌amounts‌  ‌more‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌statement‌  ‌of‌  ‌dislike‌  ‌and‌‌ 
⭐‌Peralta‌‌v.‌‌Philippine‌‌Postal‌‌Corp‌‌2
‌ 018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ What‌‌ is‌‌ prohibited‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ use‌‌ of‌‌ public‌‌ money‌‌ or‌‌ property‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ sole‌‌  disapproval‌  ‌of‌  ‌homosexuals‌, ‌ ‌rather‌  ‌than‌  ‌a ‌ ‌tool‌  ‌to‌  ‌further‌‌
  any‌‌ 
purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌benefiting‌  ‌or‌  ‌supporting‌  ‌any‌  ‌church.‌  ‌The‌  ‌prohibition‌‌  substantial‌‌public‌‌interest.‌‌   ‌
Religious‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌‌constitutional‌‌   mandate‌‌   is‌‌  not‌‌  inhibition‌‌   of‌‌  contemplates‌  ‌a ‌ ‌scenario‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌appropriation‌  ‌is‌  ‌primarily‌‌ 
profound‌  ‌reverence‌  ‌for‌  ‌religion‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌   denial‌‌   of‌‌  its‌‌
  influence‌‌   in‌‌  intended‌‌for‌‌the‌‌furtherance‌‌of‌‌a‌‌particular‌‌church.‌  ‌ Free‌‌exercise‌‌clause‌  ‌
human‌‌   affairs.‌‌ The‌‌ ‌right‌‌ to‌‌ religious‌‌ profession‌‌ and‌‌ worship‌‌ has‌‌ a ‌‌
two­fold‌  ‌aspect,‌  ‌viz.,‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌to‌  ‌believe‌  ‌and‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌to‌  ‌act‌  ‌on‌‌  The‌  ‌non-establishment‌  ‌clause‌  ‌reinforces‌  ‌the‌  ‌wall‌  ‌of‌  ‌separation‌‌  ⭐‌Valmores‌‌v.‌‌Achacoso‌‌2
‌ 017‌  ‌
one's‌  ‌beliefs.‌  ‌The‌  ‌first‌  ‌is‌  ‌absolute‌‌   as‌‌
  long‌‌  as‌‌
  the‌‌   belief‌‌   is‌‌  confined‌‌  between‌‌Church‌‌and‌‌State.‌‌It‌‌simply‌‌means‌‌   ‌
The‌  ‌Bill‌  ‌of‌  ‌Rights‌  ‌guarantees‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌the‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌to‌  ‌act‌  ‌on‌  ‌their‌‌ 
within‌  ‌the‌  ‌realm‌  ‌of‌  ‌thought.‌  ‌The‌  ‌second‌  ‌is‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌regulation‌‌  1) that‌‌  the‌‌  State‌‌  ‌cannot‌‌   set‌‌   up‌‌ a ‌‌Church‌; ‌‌nor‌‌ pass‌‌ laws‌‌ which‌‌  individual‌  ‌beliefs‌  ‌and‌  ‌proscribes‌  ‌government‌  ‌intervention‌  ‌unless‌‌ 
where‌  ‌the‌‌  belief‌‌
  is‌‌
  translated‌‌   into‌‌
  external‌‌  acts‌‌  that‌‌   affect‌‌   the‌‌
  public‌‌  aid‌  ‌one‌  ‌religion,‌‌   aid‌‌
  all‌‌
  religion,‌‌   or‌‌  prefer‌‌   one‌‌   religion‌‌   over‌‌  necessary‌  ‌to‌  ‌protect‌  ‌its‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌from‌  ‌injury‌  ‌or‌  ‌when‌‌
  public‌‌   safety,‌‌ 
welfare.‌  ‌ another‌  ‌nor‌‌   force‌‌  nor‌‌  influence‌‌   a ‌‌person‌‌   to‌‌   go‌‌
  to‌‌
  or‌‌
  remain‌‌  peace,‌‌   comfort,‌‌   or‌‌
  convenience‌‌ requires‌‌ it.‌‌ Thus,‌‌ as‌‌ faculty‌‌ members‌‌ 
The‌‌  "‌Lemon‌‌   test‌" ‌‌uses‌‌  a ‌‌three-pronged‌‌  test‌‌  to‌‌ adjudge‌‌ whether‌‌ the‌‌  away‌‌   from‌‌   church‌‌   against‌‌   his‌‌
  will‌‌   or‌‌
  force‌‌   him‌‌   to‌‌
  profess‌‌ a ‌‌ of‌‌
  the‌‌
  MSU-College‌‌ of‌‌ Medicine,‌‌ respondents‌‌ herein‌‌ were‌‌ duty-bound‌‌ 
assailed‌  ‌governmental‌  ‌act‌  ‌violated‌  ‌the‌non-establishment‌‌
    clause‌, ‌ belief‌‌or‌‌disbelief‌‌in‌‌any‌‌religion;‌‌   ‌ to‌‌protect‌‌and‌‌preserve‌‌petitioner‌‌Valmores'‌‌religious‌‌freedom.‌  ‌
as‌‌follows:‌  ‌ 2) that‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌punish‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌for‌  ‌entertaining‌  ‌or‌‌ 
professing‌  ‌religious‌  ‌beliefs‌  ‌or‌  ‌disbeliefs,‌  ‌for‌  ‌church‌‌  Freedom‌‌to‌‌propagate‌‌religious‌‌doctrine‌‌
   ‌
1. The‌‌statute‌‌must‌‌have‌‌a‌s‌ ecular‌‌legislative‌‌purpose‌; ‌ ‌
attendance‌‌or‌‌nonattendance;‌‌   ‌
2. Its‌  ‌principal‌  ‌or‌  ‌primary‌  ‌effect‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌one‌  ‌that‌  ‌neither‌‌  American‌‌Bible‌‌Society‌‌v.‌‌City‌‌of‌‌Manila‌  ‌
3) that‌  ‌no‌  ‌tax‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌amount,‌‌
  large‌‌
  or‌‌
  small,‌‌
  can‌‌
  be‌‌
  levied‌‌
  to‌‌ 
advances‌‌nor‌‌inhibits‌‌religion;‌‌and,‌  ‌ support‌‌any‌‌religious‌‌activity‌‌or;‌‌   ‌ The‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌guaranty‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌free‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌and‌  ‌enjoyment‌  ‌of‌‌ 
3. The‌  ‌statute‌  ‌must‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌foster‌  ‌"an‌  excessive‌  ‌government‌‌  4) that‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌openly‌  ‌or‌‌
  secretly‌‌
  ‌participate‌‌
  ‌in‌‌
  the‌‌  religious‌  ‌profession‌  ‌and‌  ‌worship‌  ‌carries‌  ‌with‌  ‌it‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌‌ 
entanglement‌w ‌ ith‌‌religion.”‌  ‌ affairs‌‌of‌‌any‌‌religious‌‌organization‌‌or‌‌group‌‌and‌‌vice‌‌versa.‌‌   ‌ disseminate‌‌   religious‌‌   information.‌  ‌Any‌‌ restraint‌‌ of‌‌ such‌‌ right‌‌ can‌‌ 
only‌‌
  be‌‌
  justified‌‌
  like‌‌
  other‌‌   restraints‌‌ of‌‌ freedom‌‌ of‌‌ expression‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ 
Indeed,‌  ‌what‌  ‌is‌  ‌prohibited‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌using‌  ‌its‌‌
  resources‌‌
  to‌‌
  solely‌‌  In‌  ‌effect,‌  ‌what‌  ‌non-establishment‌  ‌calls‌  ‌for‌  ‌is‌  ‌government‌‌  grounds‌‌   that‌‌
  there‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌‌clear‌‌ and‌‌ present‌‌ danger‌‌ of‌‌ any‌‌ substantive‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 63‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

evil‌‌which‌‌the‌‌State‌‌has‌‌the‌‌right‌‌to‌‌prevent.‌  ‌   concerns‌‌ of‌‌ ‌public‌‌ and‌‌ secular‌‌ morality‌. ‌‌It‌‌ cannot‌‌ be‌‌ judged‌‌ 
the‌‌ and‌‌
  separate‌‌  from‌‌
  the‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  travel‌‌ and‌‌ enjoys‌‌ a ‌‌different‌‌ protection‌‌ 
based‌  ‌on‌  ‌personal‌  ‌bias,‌  ‌specifically‌  ‌those‌  ‌colored‌  ‌by‌  ‌particular‌‌  under‌‌the‌‌ICCPR,‌‌i.e.,‌‌against‌‌being‌‌"arbitrarily‌‌deprived"‌‌thereof.‌  ‌
Concurring‌‌Opinion‌‌of‌‌J.‌‌Mendoza‌‌in‌C
‌ enteno‌‌v.‌‌Villalon-Pornillos‌‌   ‌ mores.‌‌  Two‌‌   things‌‌
  may‌‌ be‌‌ concluded‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ fact‌‌ that‌‌ an‌‌ unmarried‌‌ 
woman‌‌gives‌‌birth‌‌out‌‌of‌‌wedlock:‌  ‌ Watch-list‌‌and‌‌hold‌‌departure‌‌orders‌  ‌
The‌‌   solicitation‌‌   of‌‌
  donations‌‌  for‌‌
  the‌‌ repair‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌chapel‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ covered‌‌ 
1) if‌‌
  the‌‌
  father‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  child‌‌
  is‌‌
  himself‌‌ unmarried,‌‌ the‌‌ woman‌‌ is‌‌  Genuino‌‌v.‌‌De‌‌Lima‌‌2
‌ 018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
by‌  ‌P.D.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌1564‌  ‌which‌  ‌requires‌  ‌a ‌ ‌permit‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌solicitation‌  ‌of‌‌ 
not‌  ‌ordinarily‌  ‌administratively‌  ‌liable‌  ‌for‌  ‌disgraceful‌  ‌and‌‌ 
contributions‌‌for‌‌"charitable‌‌or‌‌public‌‌welfare‌‌purposes."‌‌   ‌ The‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌travel‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌absolute‌. ‌ ‌There‌  ‌are‌  ‌constitutional,‌‌ 
immoral‌‌conduct.‌  ‌
A‌‌
  religious‌‌
  purpose‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌
  necessarily‌‌   a ‌‌charitable‌‌   or‌‌
  public‌‌
  welfare‌‌  statutory‌‌and‌‌inherent‌‌limitations‌‌regulating‌‌the‌‌right‌‌to‌‌travel.‌‌   ‌
2) if‌  ‌the‌  ‌father‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌child‌  ‌born‌  ‌out‌  ‌of‌  ‌wedlock‌  ‌is‌  ‌himself‌‌ 
purpose.‌  ‌To‌  ‌require‌  ‌a ‌ ‌government‌  ‌permit‌  ‌before‌  ‌solicitation‌  ‌for‌‌  married‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌woman‌  ‌other‌  ‌than‌  ‌the‌  ‌mother,‌  ‌then‌‌   there‌‌  is‌‌
  a ‌‌ The‌‌ ‌liberty‌‌ of‌‌ abode‌‌ may‌‌ only‌‌ be‌‌ impaired‌‌ by‌‌ a ‌‌‌lawful‌‌ order‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
religious‌‌  purpose‌‌   may‌‌   be‌‌
  allowed‌‌  is‌‌
  to‌‌
  lay‌‌
  a ‌‌prior‌‌ restraint‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌  cause‌‌   for‌‌  administrative‌‌   sanction‌‌   against‌‌ either‌‌ the‌‌ father‌‌ or‌‌  court‌‌   and,‌‌
  on‌‌ the‌‌ one‌‌ hand,‌‌ the‌‌ ‌right‌‌ to‌‌ travel‌‌ ‌may‌‌ only‌‌ be‌‌ impaired‌‌ 
free‌‌  exercise‌‌   of‌‌
  religion‌. ‌‌Such‌‌  restraint,‌‌ if‌‌ allowed,‌‌ may‌‌ well‌‌ justify‌‌  the‌‌mother.‌‌   ‌ by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌law‌  ‌that‌  ‌concerns‌  ‌national‌  ‌security,‌  ‌public‌  ‌safety‌  ‌or‌  ‌public‌‌ 
requiring‌  ‌a ‌ ‌permit‌  ‌before‌  ‌a ‌ ‌church‌  ‌can‌  ‌make‌  ‌Sunday‌‌   collections‌‌  or‌‌  health.‌  ‌
enforce‌‌tithing.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌sanctity‌  ‌of‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌is‌  ‌constitutionally‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌and‌‌ 
likewise‌‌   affirmed‌‌  by‌‌
  our‌‌
  statutes‌‌
  as‌‌
  a ‌‌special‌‌
  contract‌‌
  of‌‌
  permanent‌‌  In‌‌
  ‌Leave‌‌ Division,‌‌ OAS‌‌ - ‌‌OCA‌‌ v.‌‌ Heusdens‌, ‌‌the‌‌ Court‌‌ enumerated‌‌ the‌ 
union.‌  ‌ statutes‌‌  which‌‌  specifically‌‌   provide‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌
  impairment‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ 
Iglesia‌‌ni‌‌Cristo‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ travel,‌‌viz.:‌  ‌
 ‌

We‌  ‌reject‌  ‌petitioner’s‌  ‌postulate‌  ‌that‌  ‌its‌  ‌religious‌  ‌program‌  ‌is‌  ‌per‌  ‌se‌‌  H.‌‌Liberty‌‌of‌‌Abode‌‌and‌‌Freedom‌‌of‌‌Movement‌  ‌ 1. The‌  ‌Human‌‌   Security‌‌  Act‌‌  of‌‌
  2010‌‌  or‌‌
  R.A.‌‌
  No.‌‌
  9372‌‌   for‌‌
  an‌‌ 
beyond‌  ‌review‌  ‌by‌‌   the‌‌
  respondent‌‌   Board.‌‌   Its‌‌
  public‌‌   broadcast‌‌   on‌‌
  TV‌‌  individual‌‌
  ‌charged‌‌  with‌‌  the‌‌
  crime‌‌
  of‌‌
  terrorism‌‌  ‌even‌‌ though‌‌ 
of‌‌
  its‌‌  religious‌‌
  program‌‌   brings‌‌   it‌‌
  out‌‌  of‌‌   the‌‌  bosom‌‌   of‌‌ internal‌‌ belief.‌‌  Scope‌‌and‌‌limitations‌  ‌ such‌‌person‌‌is‌‌out‌‌on‌‌bail.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌iterates‌  ‌the‌‌
  rule‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌ e
‌ xercise‌‌   ‌of‌‌  religious‌‌  freedom‌‌  2. The‌‌Philippine‌‌Passport‌‌Act‌‌of‌‌1996‌‌‌or‌‌R.A.‌‌No.‌‌8239.‌  ‌
can‌‌   be‌‌  regulated‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌  State‌‌
  when‌‌   it‌‌ will‌‌ bring‌‌ about‌‌ the‌‌ clear‌‌ and‌‌  Sec‌  ‌6.‌  ‌The‌  ‌liberty‌  ‌of‌‌
  abode‌‌  and‌‌
  of‌‌
  changing‌‌
  the‌‌  same‌‌
  within‌‌
  the‌‌ 
present‌  ‌danger‌  ‌of‌  ‌some‌  ‌substantive‌  ‌evil‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌is‌  ‌duty‌‌  limits‌  ‌prescribed‌‌   by‌‌  law‌‌
  shall‌‌
  not‌‌
  be‌‌
  impaired‌‌
  ‌except‌upon‌‌
    lawful‌‌  3. The‌‌   "Anti-Trafficking‌‌   in‌‌
  Persons‌‌   Act‌‌
  of‌‌
  2003"‌‌
  ‌or‌‌
  R.A.‌‌ No.‌‌ 
bound‌  ‌to‌  ‌prevent,‌  ‌i.e.,‌  ‌serious‌  ‌detriment‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌more‌  ‌overriding‌‌  order‌‌of‌‌the‌‌court.‌‌   ‌ 9208‌‌   allowing‌‌
  the‌‌ Travel‌‌ Control‌‌ and‌‌ Enforcement‌‌ Unit‌‌ of‌‌ BI‌‌ 
interest‌‌of‌‌public‌‌health,‌‌public‌‌morals,‌‌or‌‌public‌‌welfare.‌  ‌ to‌  ‌"offload‌  ‌passengers‌  ‌with‌  ‌fraudulent‌  ‌travel‌  ‌documents,‌‌ 
Neither‌‌  shall‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌right‌‌
  to‌‌
  travel‌‌
  be‌‌
  impaired‌‌
  ‌except‌‌
  ‌in‌‌
  the‌‌ interest‌‌  doubtful‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌travel,‌  ‌including‌  ‌possible‌  ‌victims‌  ‌of‌‌ 
of‌‌   ‌ human‌‌trafficking"‌‌from‌‌our‌‌ports.‌  ‌
Religious‌‌belief‌‌and‌‌private‌‌employment‌‌
   ‌
1) national‌‌security,‌‌   ‌ 4. The‌  ‌Migrant‌  ‌Workers‌  ‌and‌  ‌Overseas‌  ‌Filipinos‌  ‌Act‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Victoriano‌‌v.‌‌Elizalde‌‌Rope‌‌Workers’‌‌Union‌  ‌ 1995‌‌   or‌‌
  R.‌‌
  A.‌‌
  No.‌‌
  8042‌‌ where‌‌ the‌‌ POEA‌‌ may‌‌ refuse‌‌ to‌‌ issue‌‌ 
2) public‌‌safety,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ deployment‌  ‌permit‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌specific‌  ‌country‌  ‌that‌  ‌effectively‌‌ 
The‌  ‌constitutionality‌‌   of‌‌
  Republic‌‌
  Act‌‌
  No.‌‌
  3350‌‌   was‌‌   questioned.‌‌   The‌‌ 
3) public‌‌health,‌‌   ‌ prevents‌‌our‌‌migrant‌‌workers‌‌to‌‌enter‌‌such‌‌country.‌  ‌
said‌  ‌R.A.‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌employees‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌application‌‌   and‌‌   coverage‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌
closed‌  ‌shop‌  ‌agreement-mandated‌  ‌in‌  ‌another‌‌   law-based‌‌   on‌‌
  religious‌‌  as‌‌may‌‌be‌‌provided‌‌by‌‌law.‌  ‌ 5. The‌‌  Act‌‌ on‌‌ Violence‌‌ against‌‌ Women‌‌ and‌‌ Children‌‌ or‌‌ R.A.‌‌ 
objections.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌unanimous‌  ‌Court‌  ‌upheld‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitutionality‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  No.‌  ‌9262‌  ‌that‌  ‌restricts‌  ‌movement‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌individual‌  ‌against‌‌ 
Marcos‌‌v.‌‌Manglapus‌  ‌ whom‌‌the‌‌protection‌‌order‌‌is‌‌intended.‌  ‌
law,‌  ‌holding‌  ‌that‌  ‌"government‌  ‌is‌‌   not‌‌
  precluded‌‌   from‌‌   pursuing‌‌   valid‌‌ 
objectives‌‌   secular‌‌
  in‌‌
  character‌‌  even‌‌
  if‌‌
  the‌‌
  incidental‌‌   result‌‌  would‌‌ be‌‌  It‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌emphasized‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌individual‌  ‌right‌  ‌involved‌  ‌is‌‌   not‌‌
  the‌‌  6. Inter-Country‌‌Adoption‌‌Act‌‌of‌‌1995‌‌‌or‌‌R.A.‌‌No.‌‌8043.‌  ‌
favorable‌‌to‌‌a‌‌religion‌‌or‌‌sect."‌  ‌ right‌  ‌to‌  ‌travel‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌to‌‌   other‌‌   countries‌‌   or‌‌  within‌‌
  the‌‌  The‌‌  exceptions‌‌  to‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ travel‌‌ are‌‌ LIMITED‌‌ to‌‌ those‌‌ stated‌‌ 
Philippines.‌  ‌These‌  ‌are‌  ‌what‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌travel‌  ‌would‌  ‌normally‌‌  in‌‌Section‌‌6,‌‌Article‌‌III‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌  ‌
Religious‌‌belief‌‌and‌‌public‌‌employment‌‌
   ‌ connote.‌  ‌Essentially,‌‌   the‌‌
  right‌‌
  involved‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌
  right‌‌ to‌‌ return‌‌ to‌‌ one's‌ 
country,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌totally‌‌   distinct‌‌   right‌‌
  under‌‌
  international‌‌   law,‌‌   independent‌‌  The‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌issue‌  ‌HDO‌  ‌is‌  ‌inherent‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌courts.‌‌  The‌‌
  courts‌‌   may‌‌ 
Anonymous‌‌v.‌‌Radam‌  ‌ issue‌‌  a ‌‌HDO‌‌  against‌‌  an‌‌
  accused‌‌   in‌‌
  a ‌‌criminal‌‌   case‌‌
  so‌‌ that‌‌ he‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ 
from,‌‌although‌‌related‌‌to,‌‌the‌‌right‌‌to‌‌travel.‌  ‌
dealt‌  ‌with‌  ‌in‌  ‌accordance‌  ‌with‌  ‌law.‌  ‌It‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌require‌  ‌legislative‌‌ 
For‌  ‌a ‌ ‌particular‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌to‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌"‌disgraceful‌  ‌and‌  ‌immoral‌" ‌‌ The‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌return‌  ‌to‌  ‌one's‌  ‌country‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌among‌  ‌the‌  ‌rights‌‌  conferment‌  ‌or‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌recognition;‌  ‌it‌  ‌co-exists‌‌   with‌‌  the‌‌
  grant‌‌ 
behavior‌‌   under‌‌
  civil‌‌
  service‌‌   laws,‌‌
  it‌‌
  must‌‌   be‌‌ regulated‌‌ on‌‌ account‌‌ of‌‌  specifically‌‌ guaranteed‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Bill‌‌ of‌‌ Rights‌. ‌‌However,‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ distinct‌‌  of‌‌judicial‌‌power.‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 64‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

I.‌‌Eminent‌‌Domain‌  ‌ contracts.‌  ‌
An‌  ‌inspection‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌bodily‌‌   features‌‌  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  court‌‌   or‌‌
  by‌‌
  witnesses,‌  ‌
For‌  ‌an‌  ‌extensive‌  ‌discussion‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌  ‌topics,‌  ‌please‌  ‌refer‌  ‌to‌‌ 
 ‌
can‌  ‌not‌  ‌violate‌  ‌the‌  ‌privilege,‌  ‌because‌  ‌it‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌call‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Basic‌‌Concepts‌‌>‌‌Fundamental‌‌Powers‌‌>‌‌Eminent‌‌Domain‌. ‌ ‌ K.‌‌Adequate‌‌Legal‌‌Assistance‌‌and‌‌Free‌‌Access‌‌to‌‌  accused‌‌   as‌  ‌a ‌‌witness‌‌
  — ‌‌it‌‌
  does‌‌  not‌‌
  call‌‌
  upon‌‌   the‌  ‌defendant‌‌ for‌  ‌his‌‌ 
Courts‌  ‌ testimonial‌ ‌responsibility.‌‌   ‌
J.‌‌Non-impairment‌‌of‌‌Contracts‌  ‌
Sec‌  ‌11.‌  ‌Free‌  ‌access‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌courts‌  ‌and‌  ‌quasi-judicial‌  ‌bodies‌  ‌and‌‌  Villaflor‌‌v.‌‌Summers‌  ‌
Sec‌  ‌10.‌  ‌No‌  ‌law‌  ‌impairing‌  ‌the‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌of‌  ‌contracts‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  adequate‌  ‌legal‌  ‌assistance‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌denied‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌person‌  ‌by‌‌  The‌‌  constitutional‌‌   guaranty‌‌   that‌‌
  no‌‌ person‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ compelled‌‌ in‌‌ any‌‌ 
passed.‌  ‌ reason‌‌of‌‌poverty.‌  ‌ criminal‌  ‌case‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌witness‌  ‌against‌  ‌himself‌  ‌is‌  ‌limited‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌
prohibition‌  ‌against‌  ‌compulsory‌‌   testimonial‌‌   self-incrimination.‌  ‌
PADPAO‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌‌2017‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ People‌‌v.‌‌Rio‌  ‌
The‌  ‌corollary‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌proposition‌  ‌is‌  ‌that,‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌ ‌proper‌  ‌showing‌  ‌and‌‌ 
WON‌‌   a ‌‌motion‌‌ to‌‌ withdraw‌‌ appeal‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ denied‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ sole‌‌ reason‌‌  under‌‌   an‌‌
  order‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  trial‌‌
  court,‌‌  an‌‌  ocular‌‌  inspection‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  body‌‌ of‌‌ 
The‌  ‌non-impairment‌  ‌clause‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌10,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌III‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
of‌‌inability‌‌to‌‌retain‌‌the‌‌services‌‌of‌‌counsel.‌  ‌ the‌‌accused‌‌is‌‌permissible.‌  ‌
Constitution‌‌   is‌‌
  limited‌‌ in‌‌ application‌‌ to‌‌ laws‌‌ that‌‌ derogate‌‌ from‌‌ prior‌‌ 
acts‌  ‌or‌  ‌contracts‌  ‌by‌‌  enlarging,‌‌
  abridging‌‌   or‌‌
  in‌‌
  any‌‌  manner‌‌   changing‌‌ 
YES‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌can‌  ‌appoint‌  ‌a ‌ ‌counsel‌  ‌de‌  ‌oficio‌  ‌to‌  ‌prosecute‌  ‌his‌  Beltran‌‌v.‌‌Samson‌  ‌
the‌‌
  intention‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  parties.‌‌
  There‌‌   is‌‌
  impairment‌‌   if‌‌
  a ‌‌subsequent‌‌ law‌‌ 
appeal‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌Section‌‌
  13‌‌
  of‌‌
  Rule‌‌
  122‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Rules‌‌   of‌‌
  Court‌‌   and‌‌ 
changes‌  ‌the‌  ‌terms‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contract‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties,‌  ‌imposes‌  ‌new‌‌ 
the‌‌
  constitutional‌‌   mandate‌‌   provided‌‌   in‌‌
  Section‌‌ 11‌‌ of‌‌ Article‌‌ III‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  The‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌inhibition‌  ‌against‌  ‌self-incrimination‌  ‌is‌  ‌directed‌‌ 
conditions,‌‌ dispenses‌‌ with‌‌ those‌‌ agreed‌‌ upon‌‌ or‌‌ withdraws‌‌ remedies‌‌ 
1987‌‌Constitution.‌  ‌ not‌  ‌merely‌  ‌to‌  ‌giving‌  ‌of‌  ‌oral‌  ‌testimony,‌  ‌but‌  ‌embraces‌  ‌as‌  ‌well‌  ‌the‌‌ 
for‌‌the‌‌enforcement‌‌of‌‌the‌‌rights‌‌of‌‌the‌‌parties.‌  ‌
furnishing‌  ‌of‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌by‌  ‌other‌  ‌means‌  ‌than‌  ‌by‌  ‌word‌‌   of‌‌
  mouth,‌‌   the‌‌ 
In‌‌
  this‌‌
  case,‌‌
  PSAs'‌‌   contracts‌‌   with‌‌
  their‌‌  clients‌‌
  are‌‌
  not‌‌
  affected‌‌ in‌‌ any‌‌  This‌‌   ‌right‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌counsel‌‌ de‌‌ oficio‌‌ ‌does‌‌ not‌‌ cease‌‌ upon‌‌ the‌‌ conviction‌‌  divulging,‌  ‌in‌  ‌short,‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌fact‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌has‌  ‌a ‌ ‌right‌  ‌to‌‌ 
manner‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌requirement‌  ‌of‌  ‌having‌  ‌to‌  ‌obtain‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌
  COMELEC‌‌  of‌  ‌an‌  ‌accused‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌trial‌  ‌court.‌  ‌It‌  ‌continues,‌  ‌even‌‌   during‌‌   appeal.‌‌  hold‌‌secret.‌  ‌
written‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌bear,‌  ‌carry,‌  ‌and‌  ‌transport‌  ‌firearms‌  ‌outside‌  ‌of‌‌  Even‌‌   in‌‌
  a ‌‌case,‌‌ such‌‌ as‌‌ the‌‌ one‌‌ at‌‌ bar,‌‌ where‌‌ the‌‌ accused‌‌ had‌‌ signified‌‌ 
Writing‌‌  is‌‌
  something‌‌   more‌‌  than‌‌
  moving‌‌
  the‌‌
  body,‌‌ or‌‌ the‌‌ hand,‌‌ or‌‌ the‌‌ 
their‌‌
  residence‌‌   or‌‌
  place‌‌
  of‌‌
  work‌‌ and‌‌ in‌‌ public‌‌ places,‌‌ during‌‌ election‌‌  his‌‌   intent‌‌   to‌‌ withdraw‌‌ his‌‌ appeal,‌‌ the‌‌ court‌‌ is‌‌ required‌‌ to‌‌ inquire‌‌ into‌‌ 
fingers;‌  ‌writing‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌purely‌  ‌mechanical‌  ‌act,‌  ‌because‌  ‌it‌‌ 
period.‌‌All‌‌that‌‌PSAs‌‌must‌‌do‌‌is‌‌to‌‌secure‌‌such‌‌authority.‌  ‌ the‌‌reason‌‌for‌‌the‌‌withdrawal.‌  ‌
requires‌‌the‌‌application‌‌of‌‌intelligence‌‌and‌‌attention‌. ‌ ‌
 ‌

SWS‌‌and‌‌Pulse‌‌Asia‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 015‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ Here‌  ‌the‌  ‌witness‌  ‌is‌‌
  compelled‌‌   to‌‌
  write‌‌
  and‌‌
  create,‌‌  by‌‌   means‌‌  of‌‌ 
L.‌‌Right‌‌Against‌‌Self-incrimination‌  ‌ the‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌writing,‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌which‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌exist‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌which‌‌ 
The‌  ‌relation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌state's‌  ‌police‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌‌  may‌‌identify‌‌him‌‌as‌‌the‌‌falsifier.‌  ‌
non-impairment‌  ‌of‌  ‌contracts‌  ‌was‌  ‌thoroughly‌  ‌explained‌  ‌in‌  ‌Ortigas‌‌  Sec‌  ‌17.‌  ‌No‌  ‌person‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌compelled‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌witness‌  ‌against‌‌ 
In‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌ of‌‌ ‌Villaflor‌‌ v.‌‌ Summers‌, ‌‌it‌‌ was‌‌ sought‌‌ to‌‌ exhibit‌‌ something‌‌ 
and‌‌Co.‌‌v.‌‌Feati‌‌Bank‌: ‌ ‌ himself.‌  ‌ already‌‌   in‌‌
  existence,‌‌   while‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌
  at‌‌
  bar,‌‌
  the‌‌ question‌‌ deals‌‌ with‌‌ 
While‌  ‌non-impairment‌  ‌of‌  ‌contracts‌  ‌is‌  ‌constitutionally‌‌  something‌‌ not‌‌ yet‌‌ in‌‌ existence;‌‌ in‌‌ short,‌‌ to‌‌ create‌‌ this‌‌ evidence‌‌ which‌‌ 
guaranteed,‌‌   the‌‌
  rule‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  absolute,‌‌
  since‌‌
  it‌‌ has‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ reconciled‌‌  Sec‌  ‌12(3).‌  ‌Any‌  ‌confession‌  ‌or‌  ‌admission‌  ‌obtained‌  ‌in‌  ‌violation‌‌
  of‌‌  may‌‌seriously‌‌incriminate‌‌him.‌  ‌
with‌‌the‌‌legitimate‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌police‌‌power.‌  ‌ this‌‌
  or‌‌
  Section‌‌
  17‌‌  hereof‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌  inadmissible‌‌
  in‌‌
  evidence‌‌   against‌‌ 
him.‌  ‌ People‌‌v.‌‌Olvis‌  ‌
We‌‌  have‌‌
  demonstrated‌‌   that‌‌ not‌‌ only‌‌ an‌‌ important‌‌ or‌‌ substantial‌‌ state‌‌ 
interest,‌  ‌but‌  ‌even‌  ‌a ‌ ‌compelling‌  ‌one‌  ‌anchors‌  ‌Resolution‌  ‌No.‌  ‌9674's‌‌  Scope‌‌and‌‌coverage‌  ‌
The‌  ‌accused-appellants‌  ‌were‌  ‌denied‌‌   their‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  counsel‌‌
  not‌‌
  once,‌ 
requirement‌  ‌of‌  ‌disclosing‌  ‌subscribers‌  ‌to‌  ‌election‌  ‌surveys‌. ‌ ‌It‌  ‌effects‌‌ 
US‌‌v.‌‌Tan‌‌Teng‌  ‌ but‌  ‌twice.‌  ‌We‌  ‌refer‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌forced‌  ‌re-enactment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌the‌‌ 
the‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌policy‌  ‌of‌  ‌guaranteeing‌  ‌equal‌  ‌access‌  ‌to‌‌ 
three‌‌accused‌‌were‌‌made‌‌to‌‌perform‌‌shortly‌‌after‌‌their‌‌apprehension.‌  ‌
opportunities‌‌   for‌‌
  public‌‌   service‌‌   and‌‌  is‌‌
  impelled‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ imperative‌‌ of‌‌  The‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌of‌  ‌compelling‌  ‌a ‌ ‌man‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌criminal‌  ‌court‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌‌ Forced‌  ‌re-enactments,‌  ‌like‌  ‌uncounselled‌  ‌and‌  ‌coerced‌‌ 
"fair"‌‌elections.‌  ‌ witness‌  ‌against‌  ‌himself,‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌prohibition‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  use‌‌
  of‌‌
  physical‌‌   or‌‌  confessions‌‌come‌‌within‌‌the‌‌ban‌‌against‌‌self-incrimination.‌  ‌
As‌‌
  a ‌‌valid‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  of‌‌
  COMELEC's‌‌
  regulatory‌‌
  powers,‌‌   Resolution‌‌ No.‌‌  moral‌  ‌compulsion,‌  ‌to‌  ‌extort‌  ‌communications‌  ‌from‌  ‌him,‌  ‌not‌  ‌an‌  ‌
exclusion‌‌of‌‌his‌‌body‌‌as‌‌evidence,‌‌when‌‌it‌‌may‌‌be‌‌material.‌‌   ‌ Thus,‌  ‌an‌‌
  act,‌‌
  whether‌‌
  testimonial‌‌   or‌‌   passive,‌‌
  that‌‌  would‌‌   amount‌‌   to‌‌ 
9674‌  ‌is‌  ‌correctly‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌written‌  ‌into‌  ‌petitioners'‌  ‌existing‌‌  disclosure‌  ‌of‌  ‌incriminatory‌  ‌facts‌  ‌is‌  ‌covered‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌inhibition‌‌
  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 65‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Constitution.‌  ‌This‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌distinguished,‌  ‌parenthetically,‌  ‌from‌‌  cross-examination‌‌by‌‌the‌‌prosecution;‌  ‌ with‌‌  a ‌‌crime‌‌
  before‌‌   the‌‌
  prosecutor's‌‌   office,‌‌ a ‌‌mandatory‌‌ drug‌‌ testing‌‌ 
mechanical‌‌acts‌‌‌which‌‌include‌  ‌ 3) WHILE‌‌   TESTIFYING,‌‌   to‌‌
  refuse‌‌
  to‌‌
  answer‌‌   a ‌‌specific‌‌ question‌‌  can‌  ‌never‌  ‌be‌  ‌random‌  ‌or‌  ‌suspicionless.‌  ‌Drug‌  ‌testing‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌case‌‌ 
1. requiring‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌to‌  ‌submit‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌test‌  ‌to‌  ‌extract‌  ‌virus‌‌  which‌  ‌tends‌  ‌to‌  ‌incriminate‌  ‌him‌  ‌for‌  ‌some‌‌   crime‌‌
  other‌‌
  than‌‌  would‌  ‌violate‌  ‌a ‌ ‌persons'‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌privacy.‌  ‌Worse‌‌   still,‌‌
  ‌the‌‌
  accused‌‌ 
from‌‌his‌‌body,‌  ‌ that‌‌for‌‌which‌‌he‌‌is‌‌then‌‌prosecuted.‌  ‌ persons‌‌are‌‌veritably‌‌forced‌‌to‌‌incriminate‌‌themselves‌. ‌ ‌
2. or‌‌compelling‌‌him‌‌to‌‌expectorate‌‌morphine‌‌from‌‌his‌‌mouth,‌  ‌ Application‌  ‌
3. or‌‌making‌‌her‌‌submit‌‌to‌‌a‌‌pregnancy‌‌test‌  ‌ SJS‌‌v.‌‌DDB‌‌‌re‌‌Mandatory‌‌Drug‌‌Testing‌  ‌
People‌‌v.‌‌Yatar‌  ‌
4. or‌‌a‌‌footprinting‌‌test,‌  ‌ The‌‌
  drug‌‌
  test‌‌
  prescribed‌‌
  under‌‌  Sec.‌‌
  36(c),‌‌ (d),‌‌ and‌‌ (f)‌‌ of‌‌ RA‌‌ 9165‌‌ for‌‌ 
secondary‌  ‌and‌  ‌tertiary‌  ‌level‌  ‌students‌  ‌and‌  ‌public‌  ‌and‌  ‌private‌‌  A‌  ‌person‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌compelled‌  ‌to‌  ‌submit‌  ‌to‌  ‌fingerprinting,‌‌ 
5. or‌  ‌requiring‌  ‌him‌  ‌to‌  ‌take‌  ‌part‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌police‌  ‌lineup‌  ‌in‌  ‌certain‌‌ 
employees,‌  ‌while‌  ‌mandatory,‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌random‌  ‌and‌  ‌suspicionless‌‌  photographing,‌  ‌paraffin,‌  ‌blood‌  ‌and‌  ‌DNA,‌  ‌as‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌testimonial‌‌ 
cases.‌  ‌
arrangement‌.  ‌‌ ‌ compulsion‌‌   involved.‌‌
  The‌‌   accused‌‌
  may‌‌   be‌‌
  compelled‌‌   to‌‌
  submit‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌
physical‌  ‌examination‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌  ‌his‌‌
  involvement‌‌   in‌‌   an‌‌  offense‌‌
  of‌‌ 
Chavez‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ What‌‌
  can‌‌
  reasonably‌‌
  be‌‌
  deduced‌‌
  from‌‌  the‌‌
  US‌‌
  cases‌‌ of‌‌ ‌Vernonia‌‌ ‌and‌‌  which‌‌he‌‌is‌‌accused.‌  ‌
Board‌‌of‌‌Education‌‌‌and‌‌applied‌‌to‌‌this‌‌jurisdiction‌‌are:‌‌   ‌
Compulsion‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌understood‌  ‌here‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌   necessarily‌‌   connote‌‌ 
1) schools‌‌  and‌‌
  their‌‌
  administrators‌‌
  stand‌‌
  ‌in‌‌ loco‌‌ parentis‌‌ with‌‌  Cabal‌‌v.‌‌Kapunan,‌‌Jr.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌violence;‌  ‌it‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌  ‌product‌  ‌of‌  ‌unintentional‌ 
respect‌‌to‌‌their‌‌students;‌  ‌
statements.‌‌ Pressure‌‌ which‌‌ operates‌‌ to‌‌ overbear‌‌ his‌‌ will,‌‌ disable‌‌ him‌‌ 
2) minor‌‌   students‌‌  have‌‌   contextually‌‌   fewer‌‌   rights‌‌ than‌‌ an‌‌ adult,‌‌  Proceedings‌  ‌for‌  ‌forfeiture‌  ‌of‌  ‌property‌  ‌are‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌or‌‌ 
from‌  ‌making‌  ‌a ‌ ‌free‌  ‌and‌  ‌rational‌  ‌choice,‌  ‌or‌  ‌impair‌  ‌his‌  ‌capacity‌  ‌for‌‌ 
and‌  ‌are‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌custody‌  ‌and‌  ‌supervision‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌‌  penal,‌‌ and,‌‌ hence,‌‌ the‌‌ exemption‌‌ of‌‌ defendants‌‌ in‌‌ criminal‌‌ cases‌‌ from‌‌ 
rational‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌would‌  ‌in‌  ‌our‌  ‌opinion‌  ‌be‌  ‌sufficient.‌  ‌So‌  ‌is‌  ‌moral‌‌ 
parents,‌‌guardians,‌‌and‌‌schools;‌  ‌ the‌‌obligation‌‌to‌‌be‌‌witnesses‌‌against‌‌themselves‌‌are‌‌applicable.‌  ‌
coercion‌  ‌"tending‌  ‌to‌  ‌force‌  ‌testimony‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌unwilling‌  ‌lips‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌ 
defendant."‌  ‌ 3) schools,‌‌   acting‌‌  ‌in‌‌
  loco‌‌  parentis‌, ‌‌have‌‌ a ‌‌duty‌‌ to‌‌ safeguard‌‌ the‌‌ 
health‌  ‌and‌‌  well-being‌‌   of‌‌
  their‌‌
  students‌‌   and‌‌
  may‌‌   adopt‌‌
  such‌‌  ⭐‌Calida‌‌v.‌‌Trillanes‌‌IV‌‌‌2019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J‌  ‌
People‌‌v.‌‌Ayson‌  ‌ measures‌‌   as‌‌
  may‌‌   reasonably‌‌ be‌‌ necessary‌‌ to‌‌ discharge‌‌ such‌‌  The‌‌  power‌‌
  of‌‌
  legislative‌‌
  inquiry‌‌  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  carefully‌‌ balanced‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ 
duty;‌‌and‌  ‌ private‌  ‌rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌those‌  ‌affected.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌person's‌  ‌right‌  ‌against‌‌ 
The‌  ‌right‌  ‌against‌  ‌self-incrimination‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌self-executing‌  ‌or‌‌ 
4) schools‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌impose‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌on‌  ‌applicants‌‌  self-incrimination‌‌   and‌‌
  to‌‌
  due‌‌
  process‌‌
  cannot‌‌  be‌‌
  swept‌‌ aside‌‌ in‌‌ favor‌‌ 
automatically‌‌   operational.‌  ‌It‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ claimed.‌‌ A ‌‌person‌‌ suspected‌‌ of‌‌ 
for‌‌admission‌‌that‌‌are‌‌fair,‌‌just,‌‌and‌‌non-discriminatory.‌  ‌ of‌‌the‌‌purported‌‌public‌‌need‌‌of‌‌a‌‌legislative‌‌inquiry.‌  ‌
having‌  ‌committed‌  ‌a ‌ ‌crime‌  ‌and‌  ‌subsequently‌  ‌charged‌  ‌with‌  ‌its‌‌ 
commission‌  ‌in‌  ‌court,‌  ‌has‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌  ‌rights‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌matter‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌  Guided‌  ‌by‌  ‌Vernonia‌  ‌and‌  ‌Board‌  ‌of‌  ‌Education,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌is‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  It‌‌
  must‌‌  be‌‌
  stressed‌‌   that‌‌
  persons‌‌ invited‌‌ to‌‌ appear‌‌ before‌‌ a ‌‌legislative‌‌ 
testifying‌‌or‌‌producing‌‌evidence,‌‌to‌‌wit:‌  ‌ view‌  ‌and‌  ‌so‌  ‌holds‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌9165‌  ‌requiring‌  inquiry‌  ‌do‌  ‌so‌  ‌as‌  ‌resource‌‌   persons‌‌
  and‌‌
  not‌‌   as‌‌
  accused‌‌
  in‌‌
  a ‌‌criminal‌‌ 
1) BEFORE‌‌   THE‌‌   CASE‌‌ IS‌‌ FILED‌‌ IN‌‌ COURT,‌‌ but‌‌ after‌‌ having‌‌ been‌‌  mandatory,‌  ‌random,‌  ‌and‌  ‌suspicionless‌  ‌drug‌  ‌testing‌  ‌of‌  ‌students‌  ‌are‌‌  proceeding.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌they‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌accorded‌  ‌respect‌  ‌and‌  ‌courtesy‌‌ 
taken‌  ‌into‌  ‌custody‌  ‌or‌  ‌otherwise‌  ‌deprived‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌liberty‌  ‌in‌‌  constitutional‌. ‌ ‌ since‌  ‌they‌  ‌were‌  ‌under‌  ‌no‌  ‌compulsion‌  ‌to‌  ‌accept‌  ‌the‌  ‌invitation‌‌ 
some‌  ‌significant‌  ‌way,‌  ‌and‌  ‌on‌  ‌being‌  ‌interrogated‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  extended‌‌before‌‌them,‌‌yet‌‌they‌‌did‌‌so‌‌anyway.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌reduced‌‌   expectation‌‌   of‌‌
  privacy‌‌   on‌‌   the‌‌
  part‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  employees,‌‌ 
police:‌  ‌the‌‌   continuing‌‌   right‌‌
  to‌‌
  remain‌‌   silent‌‌ and‌‌ to‌‌ counsel,‌‌  the‌  ‌compelling‌  ‌state‌‌   concern‌‌   likely‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌  met‌‌  by‌‌
  the‌‌  search,‌‌  and‌‌
  the‌‌ 
and‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌informed‌  ‌thereof,‌  ‌not‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌subjected‌  ‌to‌  ‌force,‌‌  Immunity‌‌statutes‌  ‌
well-defined‌  ‌limits‌‌   set‌‌  forth‌‌  in‌‌  the‌‌
  law‌‌   to‌‌
  properly‌‌   guide‌‌  authorities‌‌ 
violence,‌  ‌threat,‌  ‌intimidation‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌  ‌means‌  ‌which‌‌  in‌‌ the‌‌ conduct‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ random‌‌ testing,‌‌ we‌‌ hold‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ challenged‌‌ drug‌‌  Galman‌‌v.‌‌Pamaran‌  ‌
vitiates‌  ‌the‌  ‌free‌  ‌will;‌  ‌and‌  ‌to‌  ‌have‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌obtained‌  ‌in‌‌  test‌‌  requirement‌‌   is,‌‌
  under‌‌   the‌‌  limited‌‌   context‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ case,‌‌ reasonable‌‌ 
violation‌‌of‌‌these‌‌rights‌‌rejected;‌  ‌ and,‌‌ergo,‌c‌ onstitutional‌. ‌ ‌ Immunity‌  ‌statutes‌‌   may‌‌
  be‌‌   generally‌‌  classified‌‌
  into‌‌
  two:‌  ‌one,‌‌   which‌‌ 
grants‌  ‌"‌use‌  ‌immunity‌";‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌
  other,‌‌
  which‌‌
  grants‌‌  what‌‌  is‌‌
  known‌‌ 
2) AFTER‌‌THE‌‌CASE‌‌IS‌‌FILED‌‌IN‌‌COURT‌  ‌ Unlike‌  ‌the‌  ‌situation‌  ‌covered‌‌   by‌‌
  Sec.‌‌
  36(c)‌‌
  and‌‌
  (d)‌‌
  of‌‌
  RA‌‌
  9165,‌‌  as‌‌"‌transactional‌‌immunity‌".‌   ‌ ‌
a) to‌‌refuse‌‌to‌‌be‌‌a‌‌witness;‌  ‌ the‌‌ Court‌‌ finds‌‌ ‌no‌‌ valid‌‌ justification‌‌ for‌‌ mandatory‌‌ drug‌‌ testing‌‌ 
for‌‌persons‌‌accused‌‌of‌‌crimes‌. ‌ ‌ The‌  ‌distinction‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌two‌  ‌is‌  ‌as‌  ‌follows:‌  ‌"‌Use‌  ‌immunity‌" ‌‌
b) not‌‌
  to‌‌
  have‌‌
  any‌‌
  prejudice‌‌
  whatsoever‌‌
  result‌‌
  to‌‌
  him‌‌ 
prohibits‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌witness'‌  ‌compelled‌  ‌testimony‌  ‌and‌‌   its‌‌
  fruits‌‌
  in‌‌
  any‌‌ 
by‌‌such‌‌refusal;‌  ‌ The‌  ‌operative‌  ‌concepts‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌mandatory‌  ‌drug‌  ‌testing‌  ‌are‌‌  manner‌  ‌in‌  ‌connection‌  ‌with‌‌   the‌‌
  criminal‌‌   prosecution‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  witness.‌  ‌
c) to‌  ‌testify‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌own‌  ‌behalf,‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌‌  "‌randomness‌" ‌‌and‌‌  "‌suspicionless‌."‌  ‌In‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌
  of‌‌
  persons‌‌ charged‌‌  On‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand,‌  ‌"‌transactional‌  ‌immunity‌" ‌ ‌grants‌  ‌immunity‌  ‌to‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 66‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

the‌‌
  witness‌‌
  from‌‌
  prosecution‌‌
  for‌‌
  an‌‌
  offense‌‌
  to‌‌
  which‌‌
  his‌‌
  compelled‌‌  extra-judicial‌‌confessions‌‌outlawed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌. ‌ ‌ individual's‌‌constitutional‌‌rights‌. ‌  ‌ ‌
testimony‌‌relates.‌  ‌
Requisites‌  ‌ In‌  ‌People‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Basay‌, ‌‌this‌‌  Court‌‌
  stressed‌‌   that‌‌
  an‌‌
  accused's‌‌  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌ 
 ‌
informed‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  remain‌‌   silent‌‌ and‌‌ to‌‌ counsel‌‌ "‌contemplates‌‌ 
M.‌‌Rights‌‌of‌‌Persons‌‌Under‌‌Custodial‌‌Investigation‌  ‌ People‌‌v.‌‌Fernandez‌‌y‌‌Dela‌‌Vega‌‌‌2018‌  ‌ the‌  ‌transmission‌  ‌of‌  ‌meaningful‌  ‌information‌  ‌rather‌  ‌than‌  ‌just‌‌ 
the‌  ‌ceremonial‌  ‌and‌  ‌perfunctory‌  ‌recitation‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌abstract‌‌ 
It‌‌ is‌‌ settled‌‌ that‌‌ for‌‌ an‌‌ ‌extrajudicial‌‌ confession‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ admissible‌‌ in‌‌  constitutional‌‌principle‌."‌  ‌
Sec‌  ‌12.‌  ‌Any‌  ‌person‌  ‌under‌‌
  investigation‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  commission‌‌
  of‌‌
  an‌‌  evidence‌‌against‌‌the‌‌accused,‌‌the‌‌same‌‌must‌‌be‌‌   ‌
offense‌‌shall‌‌have‌‌the‌‌‌right‌‌to‌‌be‌‌informed‌‌‌of‌‌his‌‌right‌  ‌ The‌‌ investigation‌‌ was‌‌ actually‌‌ conducted‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ absence‌‌ of‌‌ counsel‌‌ in‌‌ 
a) voluntary,‌‌   ‌
one‌  ‌place‌  ‌(the‌  ‌QC‌  ‌SID‌  ‌headquarters)‌  ‌and‌  ‌signed‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌presence‌  ‌of‌‌ 
a) to‌r‌ emain‌‌silent‌‌‌and‌‌   ‌ b) made‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌assistance‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌competent‌  ‌and‌  ‌independent‌‌  counsel‌  ‌in‌  ‌another‌  ‌(the‌  ‌QC‌  ‌IBP‌  ‌office).‌  ‌These‌  ‌facts‌  ‌lead‌  ‌us‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
b) to‌‌ ‌have‌‌ competent‌‌ and‌‌ independent‌‌ counsel‌‌ preferably‌‌  counsel,‌  ‌ inevitable‌  ‌conclusion‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌confessions‌  ‌of‌  ‌both‌  ‌defendants‌‌   were‌‌ 
of‌‌his‌‌own‌‌choice.‌  ‌ c) express,‌‌and‌  ‌ obtained‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌absence‌  ‌of‌  ‌independent‌  ‌and‌  ‌competent‌  ‌counsel‌  ‌as‌‌ 
d) in‌‌writing.‌  ‌ mandated‌‌by‌‌the‌‌1987‌‌Constitution.‌  ‌
Availability‌  ‌
In‌‌
  ‌People‌‌   v.‌‌
  Cachuela,‌‌ the‌‌ Court‌‌ held‌‌ that‌‌ a ‌‌‌custodial‌‌ investigation‌‌ 
"‌Custodial‌  ‌investigation‌" ‌ ‌shall‌  ‌include‌  ‌the‌‌
  practice‌‌
  of‌‌
  issuing‌‌  is‌  ‌any‌  ‌questioning‌  ‌initiated‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌enforcement‌  ‌authorities‌  ‌after‌  ‌a ‌‌ People‌‌v.‌‌Culala‌  ‌
  "‌invitation‌" ‌‌to‌‌ a ‌‌person‌‌ who‌‌ is‌‌ investigated‌‌ in‌‌ connection‌‌ with‌‌ 
an‌‌ person‌‌   is‌‌
  taken‌‌  into‌‌
  custody‌‌  or‌‌ otherwise‌‌ deprived‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ freedom‌‌ of‌‌  In‌‌ People‌‌ v.‌‌ Bandula‌, ‌‌it‌‌ was‌‌ held‌‌ that‌‌ ‌a ‌‌Municipal‌‌ Attorney‌‌ cannot‌‌ 
an‌‌
  offense‌‌  he‌‌
  is‌‌
  suspected‌‌  to‌‌
  have‌‌
  committed,‌‌   without‌‌ prejudice‌‌ to‌‌  action‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌significant‌  ‌manner.‌  ‌x ‌ ‌x ‌ ‌x ‌ ‌It‌  ‌begins‌  ‌when‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌‌  be‌‌an‌‌independent‌‌counsel‌a‌ s‌‌required‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Constitution.‌  ‌
the‌‌liability‌‌of‌‌the‌‌"inviting"‌‌officer‌‌for‌‌any‌‌violation‌‌of‌‌law.‌  ‌ longer‌  ‌a ‌ ‌general‌  ‌inquiry‌  ‌into‌  ‌an‌  ‌unsolved‌  ‌crime‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌ 
investigation‌  ‌has‌  ‌started‌  ‌to‌  ‌focus‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌ ‌particular‌  ‌person‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌‌
suspect‌. ‌ ‌ People‌‌v.‌‌Rodriguez‌‌and‌‌Artellero‌  ‌
People‌‌v.‌‌Moreno‌‌y‌‌Tazon‌‌‌2020‌  ‌
Here,‌  ‌Fernandez‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌assisted‌  ‌by‌  ‌counsel‌  ‌at‌  ‌all‌‌
  times‌‌
  during‌‌  In‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌   of‌‌
  ‌People‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Bolanos‌, ‌‌we‌‌   held‌‌   that‌‌
  an‌‌
  accused‌‌ who‌‌ is‌‌ on‌‌ 
Even‌  ‌assuming‌  ‌that‌  ‌appellant's‌  ‌arrest‌  ‌was‌  ‌irregular,‌  ‌still,‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  a ‌‌ board‌  ‌the‌  ‌police‌  ‌vehicle‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌way‌  ‌to‌‌
  the‌‌  police‌‌  station‌‌
  is‌‌
  already‌‌ 
his‌  ‌custodial‌  ‌investigation.‌  ‌He‌  ‌was‌  ‌assisted‌‌
  by‌‌
  Atty.‌‌  Francisco‌‌  only‌‌ 
jurisdictional‌  ‌defect,‌  ‌and‌  ‌objection‌  ‌thereto‌  ‌is‌  ‌waived‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌‌  under‌‌custodial‌‌investigation.‌  ‌
during‌‌the‌‌time‌‌he‌‌executed‌‌his‌‌extrajudicial‌‌confession.‌  ‌
person‌‌arrested‌‌submits‌‌to‌‌arraignment‌‌without‌‌objection.‌  ‌
Moreover,‌  ‌Atty.‌  ‌Francisco‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌an‌  ‌independent‌  ‌counsel.‌  ‌Atty.‌‌  Jurisprudence‌  ‌is‌  ‌clear‌  ‌that‌‌
  an‌‌
  accused‌‌
  under‌‌
  custodial‌‌
  investigation‌‌ 
There‌  ‌was‌  ‌no‌  ‌violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌appellant's‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌counsel‌  ‌during‌‌ 
Francisco‌‌   testified‌‌  that‌‌
  he‌‌
  was‌‌  a ‌‌‌legal‌‌
  consultant‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Office‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  must‌  c ‌ ontinuously‌  ‌have‌  ‌a ‌ ‌counsel‌  ‌assisting‌  ‌him‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌very‌‌ 
custodial‌  ‌investigation.‌  ‌The‌  ‌records‌  ‌show‌  ‌that‌  ‌appellant‌  ‌was‌‌ 
Municipal‌  ‌Mayor‌  ‌of‌  ‌Binmaley.‌  ‌He‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌‌  start‌‌
  thereof.‌‌
  In‌‌
  this‌‌
  case,‌‌
  Rodriguez‌‌   and‌‌
  appellant‌‌
  were‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ hands‌‌ 
informed‌‌   of‌‌
  his‌‌
  constitutional‌‌   rights‌‌  when‌‌
  he‌‌
  was‌‌  arrested.‌‌  Since‌‌ he‌‌ 
independent‌  ‌counsel‌  ‌since‌  ‌protecting‌  ‌the‌  ‌rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌Fernandez‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌‌ of‌‌the‌‌police‌‌for‌‌about‌‌four‌‌days‌‌without‌‌the‌‌assistance‌‌of‌‌counsel.‌  ‌
chose‌  ‌to‌  ‌remain‌‌   silent,‌‌
  he‌‌
  was‌‌   not‌‌
  interrogated‌‌  and‌‌  no‌‌
  statement‌‌  or‌‌ 
suspect‌‌  is‌‌
  in‌‌ direct‌‌ conflict‌‌ with‌‌ his‌‌ duty‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ Municipal‌‌ Mayor‌‌ and‌‌ 
evidence‌  ‌was‌  ‌extracted‌  ‌from‌  ‌him;‌  ‌neither‌  ‌was‌  ‌any‌  ‌evidence‌‌ 
the‌‌local‌‌government‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Municipality.‌  ‌ People‌‌v.‌‌Andan‌  ‌
presented‌  ‌in‌  ‌court‌  ‌that‌  ‌was‌  ‌supposedly‌  ‌obtained‌  ‌from‌  ‌him‌  ‌during‌‌ 
custodial‌‌investigation.‌  ‌ Given‌  ‌these‌  ‌circumstances,‌  ‌Fernandez's‌  ‌extrajudicial‌  ‌confession‌  ‌is‌‌ 
It‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌successfully‌‌   claimed‌‌   that‌‌
  appellant's‌‌  confession‌‌   before‌‌ 
inadmissible‌‌in‌‌evidence.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌mayor‌  ‌is‌  ‌inadmissible.‌  ‌However,‌  ‌appellant's‌  ‌confession‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Turla‌  ‌ mayor‌‌   was‌‌
  not‌‌
  made‌‌
  in‌‌
  response‌‌ to‌‌ any‌‌ interrogation‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ latter.‌‌ In‌‌ 
Right‌‌to‌‌have‌‌independent‌‌and‌‌competent‌‌counsel,‌‌
 
The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌agrees‌  ‌with‌  ‌counsel‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused-appellant‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌  fact,‌  ‌the‌  ‌mayor‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌question‌  ‌appellant‌  ‌at‌  ‌all.‌  ‌No‌  ‌police‌‌ 
preferably‌‌of‌‌own‌‌choice‌‌
   ‌
Receipt‌‌   for‌‌
  Custody‌‌   is‌‌
  inadmissible‌‌   in‌‌  evidence,‌‌   as‌‌
  it‌‌
  was‌‌   signed‌‌   by‌‌  authority‌  ‌ordered‌  ‌appellant‌  ‌to‌  ‌talk‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌mayor.‌  ‌It‌  ‌was‌  ‌appellant‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Deniega‌  ‌ himself‌‌   who‌‌  spontaneously,‌‌   freely‌‌  and‌‌
  voluntarily‌‌   sought‌‌   the‌‌ mayor‌‌ 
the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌during‌‌   custodial‌‌  investigation‌‌   without‌‌   the‌‌   assistance‌‌   of‌‌ 
counsel‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌choice‌‌  and‌‌
  without‌‌  having‌‌   been‌‌  first‌‌   informed‌‌   of‌‌
  his‌‌  for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌private‌  ‌meeting.‌  ‌The‌  ‌mayor‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌know‌  ‌that‌  ‌appellant‌  ‌was‌‌ 
If‌  ‌the‌  ‌lawyer‌  ‌were‌  ‌one‌  ‌furnished‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused's‌  ‌behalf,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌‌ 
constitutional‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌silence‌  ‌and‌  ‌to‌  ‌counsel.‌  ‌The‌‌   said‌‌   Receipt‌‌  is‌‌  a ‌ going‌  ‌to‌  ‌confess‌  ‌his‌  ‌guilt‌  ‌to‌  ‌him.‌  ‌Hence‌  ‌we‌  ‌hold‌  ‌that‌  ‌appellant's‌ 
important‌‌   that‌‌
  he‌‌
  should‌‌  be‌‌
  ‌competent‌‌   and‌‌ independent‌, ‌‌i.e.,‌‌ that‌‌ 
declaration‌  ‌against‌  ‌interest‌  ‌and‌  ‌a ‌ ‌tacit‌  ‌admission‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌‌  confession‌‌to‌‌the‌‌mayor‌‌was‌‌correctly‌‌admitted‌‌by‌‌the‌‌trial‌‌court.‌  ‌
he‌‌  w
‌ illing‌‌
  is‌‌   to‌‌
  fully‌‌ safeguard‌‌ the‌‌ constitutional‌‌ rights‌‌ of‌ 
charged,‌  ‌since‌  ‌mere‌  ‌unexplained‌  ‌possession‌  ‌of‌  ‌prohibited‌  ‌drugs‌  ‌is‌‌  the‌  ‌accused‌, ‌ ‌as‌  ‌distinguished‌  ‌from‌  ‌one‌  ‌who‌  ‌would‌  ‌merely‌  ‌be‌‌  Appellant's‌  ‌confessions‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌media‌  ‌were‌  ‌likewise‌  ‌properly‌‌ 
punished‌  ‌by‌  ‌law.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Receipt‌  ‌is‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌category‌  ‌as‌‌  admitted.‌  ‌We‌  ‌have‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌statements‌  ‌spontaneously‌  ‌made‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌‌
giving‌  ‌a ‌ ‌routine,‌  ‌peremptory‌  ‌and‌  ‌meaningless‌  ‌recital‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 67‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

suspect‌  ‌to‌  ‌news‌  ‌reporters‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌ ‌televised‌  ‌interview‌  ‌are‌  ‌deemed‌‌  There‌‌  are‌‌
  ‌two‌‌
  kinds‌‌
  of‌‌ involuntary‌‌ or‌‌ coerced‌‌ confessions‌‌ treated‌‌ 
This‌  ‌notwithstanding,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌should‌  ‌still‌  ‌inquire‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌‌ 
voluntary‌a‌ nd‌‌are‌‌admissible‌‌in‌‌evidence.‌  ‌ in‌‌this‌‌constitutional‌‌provision:‌‌   ‌
voluntariness‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌confession.‌  ‌The‌  ‌prosecution‌  ‌must‌  ‌establish‌‌ 
Right‌‌to‌‌be‌‌informed‌‌
   ‌ 1) those‌‌  which‌‌  are‌‌  the‌‌ product‌‌ of‌‌ third‌‌ degree‌‌ methods‌‌ such‌‌ as‌‌  that‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌spoke‌  ‌freely,‌  ‌without‌  ‌inducement‌  ‌of‌‌   any‌‌  kind,‌‌
  and‌‌ 
torture,‌‌  force,‌‌
  violence,‌‌   threat,‌‌
  intimidation,‌‌   which‌‌
  are‌‌ dealt‌‌  fully‌  ‌aware‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌consequences‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌confession.‌  ‌This‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Canoy‌  ‌ with‌‌in‌‌paragraph‌‌2‌‌of‌‌§12,‌‌and‌  ‌ inferred‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌language‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌confession,‌  ‌as‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌‌ 
2) those‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌given‌  ‌without‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌of‌  ‌Miranda‌‌  provided‌‌details‌‌known‌‌only‌‌to‌‌him‌‌or‌‌her.‌  ‌
No‌  ‌meaningful‌  ‌information‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌his‌  ‌rights‌  ‌under‌  ‌custodial‌‌ 
interrogation‌  ‌was‌  ‌conveyed‌  ‌to‌  ‌GREGORIO.‌  ‌He‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌asked‌  ‌if‌  ‌he‌‌  warnings,‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌‌
  of‌‌
  paragraph‌‌
  1 ‌‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌ 
Out‌‌of‌‌Court‌‌Identifications/Police‌‌Line-ups‌‌
   ‌
wanted‌‌   to‌‌
  avail‌‌
  of‌‌
  his‌‌ rights‌‌ and‌‌ was‌‌ not‌‌ told‌‌ that‌‌ if‌‌ he‌‌ had‌‌ no‌‌ lawyer‌‌  §12.‌  ‌
of‌  ‌his‌  ‌own‌  ‌choice‌  ‌he‌  ‌could‌  ‌avail‌  ‌of‌  ‌one‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌for‌  ‌him.‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Moreno‌‌y‌‌Tazón‌‌2
‌ 020‌‌supra‌  ‌
What‌‌   renders‌‌ the‌‌ confession‌‌ of‌‌ accused-appellant‌‌ inadmissible‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ 
Furthermore,‌‌ the‌‌ waiver‌‌ states‌‌ that‌‌ he‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ want‌‌ the‌‌ assistance‌‌ of‌‌  fact‌‌
  that‌‌ he‌‌ was‌‌ ‌not‌‌ given‌‌ the‌‌ Miranda‌‌ warnings‌‌ effectively‌. ‌‌There‌‌  Out-of-court‌  ‌identification‌  ‌is‌  ‌conducted‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌police‌  ‌in‌  ‌various‌‌ 
counsel‌  ‌and‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌shown‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌agreed‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌assisted‌  ‌by‌  ‌Atty.‌‌  was‌‌  thus‌‌ ‌only‌‌ a ‌‌perfunctory‌‌ reading‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Miranda‌‌ rights‌‌ to‌‌ him‌‌  ways.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌done‌  ‌thru‌  ‌show-ups‌  ‌where‌‌   the‌‌
  suspect‌‌   alone‌‌   is‌‌
  brought‌‌ 
Tanjili.‌  ‌ without‌  ‌any‌  ‌effort‌  ‌to‌  ‌find‌  ‌out‌  ‌from‌  ‌him‌‌
  whether‌‌
  he‌‌
  wanted‌‌   to‌‌
  have‌‌  face‌  ‌to‌  ‌face‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌witness‌  ‌for‌  ‌identification.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌‌
  done‌‌   thru‌‌
  mug‌‌ 
counsel‌‌   and,‌‌
  if‌‌
  so,‌‌
  whether‌‌   he‌‌
  had‌‌
  his‌‌
  own‌‌
  counsel‌‌ or‌‌ he‌‌ wanted‌‌ the‌  shots‌  ‌where‌  ‌photographs‌  ‌are‌  ‌shown‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌witness‌  ‌to‌  ‌identify‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Waiver‌  ‌ police‌‌to‌‌appoint‌‌one‌‌for‌‌him.‌  ‌ suspect.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌also‌  ‌done‌  ‌thru‌‌
  ‌lineups‌‌   ‌where‌‌   a ‌‌witness‌‌   identifies‌‌   the‌‌ 
‌ hese‌‌rights‌c
Sec‌‌12‌‌(1).‌T ‌ annot‌‌be‌‌waived‌‌‌except‌‌   ‌ Here,‌  ‌accused-appellant‌  ‌was‌  ‌assisted‌  ‌by‌  ‌Atty.‌  ‌De‌  ‌los‌  ‌Reyes,‌  ‌who,‌‌  suspect‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌group‌  ‌of‌  ‌persons‌  ‌lined‌  ‌up‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌x ‌ ‌x ‌‌x.‌‌  In‌‌ 
though‌  ‌presumably‌  ‌competent,‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌an‌‌  resolving‌  ‌the‌  ‌admissibility‌  ‌of‌  ‌and‌  ‌relying‌  ‌on‌  ‌out-of-court‌‌ 
1. in‌‌writing‌‌and‌‌   ‌
"independent‌  ‌counsel"‌  ‌as‌  ‌contemplated‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌   law‌‌  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  reason‌‌  identification‌  ‌of‌  ‌suspects,‌  ‌courts‌  ‌have‌  ‌adopted‌  ‌the‌  ‌totality‌  ‌of‌‌ 
2. in‌‌the‌‌presence‌‌of‌‌counsel.‌  ‌ that‌‌
  he‌‌  was‌‌
  ‌station‌‌
  commander‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ WPD‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌ he‌‌ assisted‌‌  circumstances‌  ‌test‌  ‌where‌  ‌they‌  ‌consider‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌  ‌factors,‌‌ 
accused-appellant.‌  ‌ viz[.]:‌‌   ‌
People‌‌v.‌‌Bacor‌  ‌
1) the‌‌
  witness'‌‌   opportunity‌‌
  to‌‌
  view‌‌
  the‌‌
  criminal‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌
  time‌‌
  of‌‌ 
As‌‌
  observed‌‌   in‌‌ People‌‌ v.‌‌ Bandula‌, ‌‌the‌‌ independent‌‌ counsel‌‌ required‌‌ 
All‌  ‌throughout‌‌   the‌‌
  custodial‌‌   investigation,‌‌  Atty.‌‌
  Miriam‌‌   Angot‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  the‌‌crime;‌  ‌
by‌  ‌Art.‌  ‌III,‌‌
  §12(1)‌‌   ‌cannot‌‌   be‌‌
  a ‌‌special‌‌
  counsel,‌‌
  public‌‌
  or‌‌
  private‌‌ 
PAO‌‌ took‌‌ pains‌‌ to‌‌ explain‌‌ meaningfully‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ accused‌‌ each‌‌ and‌‌ every‌‌  2) the‌‌witness'‌‌degree‌‌of‌‌attention‌‌at‌‌that‌‌time;‌  ‌
prosecutor,‌  ‌municipal‌  ‌attorney,‌  ‌or‌  ‌counsel‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌   police‌‌  whose‌‌ 
query‌‌ posed‌‌ by‌‌ SPO3‌‌ Ydulzura.‌‌ Accused‌‌ then‌‌ stamped‌‌ his‌‌ approval‌‌ to‌‌ 
interest‌‌is‌‌admittedly‌‌adverse‌‌to‌‌the‌‌accused.‌  ‌ 3) the‌‌accuracy‌‌of‌‌any‌‌prior‌‌description‌‌given‌‌by‌‌the‌‌witness;‌‌   ‌
the‌  ‌extrajudicial‌  ‌confession‌  ‌by‌  ‌affixing‌  ‌his‌  ‌signature‌  ‌on‌  ‌each‌  ‌and‌‌ 
every‌  ‌page‌  ‌thereof‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  presence‌‌  of‌‌
  counsel‌‌  Angot.‌‌
  ‌Consequently,‌‌  Effect‌‌of‌‌non-compliance‌‌
   ‌ 4) the‌  ‌level‌  ‌of‌  ‌certainty‌  ‌demonstrated‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌witness‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌‌ 
there‌‌was‌‌an‌‌effective‌‌waiver‌‌of‌‌the‌‌right‌‌to‌‌remain‌‌silent.‌  ‌ identification;‌  ‌
Sec‌  ‌12(3).‌  ‌Any‌  ‌confession‌  ‌or‌  ‌admission‌  ‌obtained‌  ‌in‌  ‌violation‌‌
  of‌‌ 
5) the‌  ‌length‌  ‌of‌‌
  time‌‌
  between‌‌
  the‌‌
  crime‌‌
  and‌‌
  the‌‌
  identification;‌‌ 
Lumanog‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ this‌  ‌or‌  ‌Section‌  ‌17‌  ‌hereof‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌inadmissible‌  ‌in‌  ‌evidence‌‌  and‌  ‌
against‌‌him.‌  ‌ 6) the‌‌suggestiveness‌‌of‌‌the‌‌identification‌‌procedure.‌  ‌
Police‌‌   officers‌‌   claimed‌‌ that‌‌ upon‌‌ arresting‌‌ Joel,‌‌ they‌‌ informed‌‌ him‌‌ of‌‌ 
his‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌rights‌  ‌to‌  ‌remain‌  ‌silent,‌  ‌that‌  ‌any‌  ‌information‌  ‌he‌‌  Porteria‌‌y‌‌Manebali‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2019‌‌supra‌  ‌  ‌

would‌‌   give‌‌   could‌‌   be‌‌


  used‌‌   against‌‌   him,‌‌  and‌‌  that‌‌  he‌‌  had‌‌  the‌‌
  right‌‌  to‌‌
  a ‌‌
When‌‌   the‌‌  police‌‌
  officers‌‌  asked‌‌ Marvin‌‌ regarding‌‌ the‌‌ discovery‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  N.‌‌Rights‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Accused‌  ‌
competent‌  ‌and‌  ‌independent‌  ‌counsel,‌  ‌preferably,‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌own‌  ‌choice,‌‌ 
motorcycle's‌  ‌registration‌  ‌documents‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌possession,‌  ‌Marvin's‌‌ 
and‌  ‌if‌  ‌he‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌afford‌  ‌the‌  ‌services‌  ‌of‌  ‌counsel‌‌   he‌‌  will‌‌
  be‌‌
  provided‌‌  Criminal‌‌due‌‌process‌  ‌
right‌  ‌to‌  ‌counsel‌  ‌automatically‌  ‌attached.‌  ‌Without‌‌   the‌‌
  assistance‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌
with‌‌   one.‌  ‌However,‌‌   since‌‌   these‌‌   rights‌‌  can‌‌  only‌‌   be‌‌   waived‌‌ in‌‌ writing‌‌ 
counsel,‌  ‌and‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌absence‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌valid‌‌
  waiver‌‌
  of‌‌
  this‌‌
  right,‌‌
  Marvin's‌‌  Sec‌  ‌14.‌  ‌No‌  ‌person‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌held‌  ‌to‌  ‌answer‌‌
  for‌‌
  a ‌‌criminal‌‌
  offense‌‌ 
and‌‌  with‌‌   the‌‌   assistance‌‌   of‌‌  counsel,‌‌   there‌‌
  could‌‌   not‌‌   have‌‌ been‌‌ such‌‌ a ‌‌
"voluntary"‌‌answer‌‌is‌i‌ nadmissible‌‌as‌‌evidence‌‌of‌‌his‌‌guilt.‌  ‌
valid‌  ‌waiver‌‌   by‌‌  Joel,‌‌  who‌  ‌was‌‌   presented‌‌   to‌‌  Atty.‌‌  Sansano‌‌   at‌‌
  the‌‌
  IBP‌‌  without‌‌due‌‌process‌‌of‌‌law.‌  ‌
Office,‌‌   Quezon‌‌   City‌‌  Hall‌‌  only‌‌  the‌‌   following‌‌ day‌‌ and‌‌ stayed‌‌ overnight‌‌  Another‌  ‌circumstantial‌  ‌evidence‌‌   considered‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  trial‌‌   court‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌ 
at‌‌the‌‌police‌‌station‌‌before‌‌he‌‌was‌‌brought‌‌to‌‌said‌‌counsel.‌  ‌ alleged‌  ‌confession‌  ‌of‌  ‌Marvin‌  ‌to‌  ‌Virgie,‌  ‌the‌  ‌mother‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Nunez‌‌v.‌‌Sandiganbayan‌  ‌
complainant.‌  ‌Unlike‌  ‌Marvin's‌  ‌admission‌  ‌to‌  ‌P/Insp.‌  ‌Villamer,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
What‌  ‌is‌  ‌required‌  ‌for‌  ‌compliance‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌  ‌mandate‌  ‌in‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Obrero‌  ‌ confession‌  ‌to‌  ‌Virgie,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌private‌  ‌party,‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌scope‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
criminal‌  ‌proceedings?‌  ‌In‌  ‌Arnault‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Pecson‌  ‌this‌  ‌Court‌  ‌succinctly‌‌ 
constitutional‌‌and‌‌statutory‌‌limitations‌‌on‌‌extrajudicial‌‌confessions.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 68‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

identified‌  ‌it‌  ‌with‌  ‌"a


‌  ‌ ‌fair‌  ‌and‌  ‌impartial‌  ‌trial‌  ‌and‌  ‌reasonable‌‌  a) That‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌recidivist,‌  ‌quasi-recidivist,‌  ‌or‌  ‌habitual‌‌ 
1. In‌  ‌all‌  ‌cases,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌bail‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌matter‌  ‌of‌  ‌right‌  ‌or‌  ‌discretion,‌‌ 
opportunity‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌  preparation‌‌   of‌‌ defense‌."‌‌ It‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ said‌‌ that‌‌ if‌‌  delinquent‌, ‌ ‌or‌  ‌has‌  ‌committed‌‌   the‌‌
  crime‌‌
  aggravated‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌ 
notify‌  ‌the‌  ‌prosecutor‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌hearing‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌application‌  ‌for‌‌ 
an‌‌accused‌‌   ‌ circumstance‌‌of‌r‌ eiteration‌; ‌ ‌
bail‌‌or‌‌require‌‌him‌‌to‌‌submit‌‌his‌‌recommendation;‌  ‌
1. has‌‌been‌‌heard‌‌in‌‌a‌‌court‌‌of‌‌competent‌‌jurisdiction,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ b) That‌  ‌he‌  ‌has‌  ‌previously‌  ‌escaped‌  ‌from‌  ‌legal‌  ‌confinement,‌‌ 
2. Where‌‌ bail‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌matter‌‌ of‌‌ discretion,‌‌ ‌conduct‌‌ a ‌‌hearing‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
2. proceeded‌‌against‌‌under‌‌the‌‌orderly‌‌processes‌‌of‌‌law,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ application‌  ‌for‌  ‌bail‌  ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌‌  evaded‌  ‌sentence,‌  ‌or‌  ‌violated‌  ‌the‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌bail‌‌ 
3. only‌‌punished‌‌after‌‌inquiry‌‌and‌‌investigation,‌‌   ‌ prosecution‌  ‌refuses‌  ‌to‌  ‌present‌‌   evidence‌‌  to‌‌
  show‌‌  that‌‌
  the‌‌  without‌‌valid‌‌justification;‌  ‌
4. upon‌‌notice‌‌to‌‌him,‌‌   ‌ guilt‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌‌
  is‌‌
  strong‌‌  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  purpose‌‌  of‌‌
  enabling‌‌
  the‌‌  c) That‌  ‌he‌  ‌committed‌  ‌the‌  ‌offense‌  ‌while‌  ‌under‌  ‌probation,‌‌ 
court‌‌to‌‌exercise‌‌its‌‌sound‌‌discretion;‌  ‌ parole,‌‌or‌‌conditional‌‌pardon‌; ‌ ‌
5. with‌‌an‌‌opportunity‌‌to‌‌be‌‌heard,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
3. Decide‌‌
  whether‌‌
  the‌‌
  guilt‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ accused‌‌ is‌‌ strong‌‌ based‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌  d) That‌‌   the‌‌
  circumstances‌‌   of‌‌
  his‌‌
  case‌‌
  indicate‌‌
  the‌‌ ‌probability‌‌ 
6. a‌‌
  judgment‌‌
  awarded‌‌
  within‌‌
  the‌‌
  authority‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌constitutional‌‌  of‌‌flight‌‌‌if‌‌released‌‌on‌‌bail;‌‌or‌  ‌
law,‌‌   ‌ summary‌‌of‌‌evidence‌‌of‌‌the‌‌prosecution;‌‌and‌  ‌
e) That‌‌
  there‌‌
  is‌‌
  undue‌‌ risk‌‌ ‌that‌‌ he‌‌ may‌‌ commit‌‌ another‌‌ crime‌‌ 
then‌‌he‌‌has‌‌had‌‌due‌‌process‌‌of‌‌law.‌  ‌ 4. If‌‌
  the‌‌
  guilt‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  accused‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌ strong,‌‌ discharge‌‌ the‌‌ accused‌‌ 
during‌‌the‌‌pendency‌‌of‌‌the‌‌appeal.‌  ‌
upon‌‌   the‌‌
  approval‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  bail‌‌  bond.‌‌ ‌Otherwise‌the‌‌
   bail‌‌ should‌ 
Bail‌  ‌ be‌‌denied.‌  ‌ In‌  ‌Leviste‌  ‌v.‌  ‌CA‌, ‌ ‌We‌  ‌explained‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌foregoing‌  ‌provisions‌‌ 
contemplate‌‌two‌‌scenarios.‌‌   ‌
Sec‌‌  13.‌‌
  All‌‌
  persons,‌‌   except‌‌ those‌‌ charged‌‌ with‌‌ offenses‌‌ punishable‌‌ 
Villanueva‌‌v.‌‌Buaya‌‌2 ‌ 010‌  ‌ First‌, ‌ ‌where‌  ‌none‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌listed‌  ‌bail-negating‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌is‌‌ 
by‌‌
  reclusion‌‌   perpetua‌‌ when‌‌ evidence‌‌ of‌‌ guilt‌‌ is‌‌ strong,‌‌ shall,‌‌ before‌‌ 
present,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌may‌  ‌grant‌  ‌or‌  ‌deny‌  ‌bail‌‌
  based‌‌   on‌‌
  its‌‌
  sound‌‌ 
conviction,‌  ‌be‌  ‌bailable‌  ‌by‌  ‌sufficient‌  ‌sureties,‌  ‌or‌  ‌be‌  ‌released‌  ‌on‌‌  In‌  ‌any‌  ‌event,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌bail‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌matter‌  ‌of‌  ‌right‌  ‌or‌  ‌discretion,‌  ‌a ‌‌
judicial‌‌discretion.‌‌   ‌
recognizance‌‌   as‌‌
  may‌‌  be‌‌
  provided‌‌   by‌‌
  law.‌‌   The‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ bail‌‌ shall‌‌ not‌‌  hearing‌‌   for‌‌  a ‌‌petition‌‌
  for‌‌  bail‌‌
  is‌‌ required‌‌ in‌‌ order‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ court‌‌ to‌‌ 
be‌‌
  impaired‌‌   even‌‌   when‌‌  the‌‌ privilege‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ writ‌‌ of‌‌ habeas‌‌ corpus‌‌ is‌‌  consider‌   t
‌ he‌  ‌
g uidelines‌
  s
‌ et‌‌
  forth‌‌
  in‌‌
  Section‌‌
  9,‌‌  Rule‌‌
  114‌‌   in‌‌
  fixing‌‌
  the‌‌  Second‌, ‌ ‌if‌  ‌a ‌‌bail-negating‌‌
  circumstance‌‌
  exists,‌‌
  the‌‌
  Court‌‌
  has‌‌
  ‌no‌‌ 
amount‌‌of‌‌bail.‌  ‌ other‌‌option‌‌but‌‌to‌‌deny‌‌or‌‌cancel‌‌‌the‌‌bail.‌‌   ‌
suspended.‌‌Excessive‌‌bail‌‌shall‌‌not‌‌be‌‌required.‌  ‌
However,‌‌the‌‌enumeration‌‌in‌‌Section‌‌5‌‌is‌n
‌ ot‌‌exclusive‌. ‌ ‌
People‌‌v.‌‌Escobar‌‌2
‌ 017‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ Balanay‌‌v.‌‌Adalim-White‌‌2
‌ 016‌  ‌
We‌‌   clarify‌‌   that‌‌
  ‌conviction‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌   accused‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  crime‌‌ charged‌‌ is‌‌ 
Bail‌‌
  ‌is‌‌  the‌‌  security‌‌  given‌‌  for‌‌  the‌‌  temporary‌‌  release‌‌  of‌‌ a ‌‌person‌‌ who‌‌  It‌  ‌is‌  ‌basic,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌that‌  ‌bail‌  ‌hearing‌  ‌is‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌even‌  ‌if‌  t‌ he‌‌  irrelevant‌  ‌only‌  ‌in‌  ‌bail‌  ‌application‌  ‌pending‌  ‌appeal‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌‌ 
has‌  ‌been‌  ‌arrested‌  ‌and‌  ‌detained‌  ‌but‌  ‌"whose‌  ‌guilt‌  ‌has‌  ‌not‌  ‌yet‌  ‌been‌‌  prosecution‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌interpose‌  ‌any‌  ‌objection‌  ‌or‌  ‌leaves‌  ‌the‌‌  penalty‌‌   imposed‌‌   is‌‌
  NOT‌‌ reclusion‌‌ perpetua,‌‌ life‌‌ imprisonment,‌‌ 
proven"‌  ‌in‌  ‌court‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌doubt.‌  ‌The‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌bail‌  ‌is‌‌  application‌‌for‌‌bail‌‌to‌‌the‌‌sound‌‌discretion‌‌of‌‌the‌‌court.‌  ‌ or‌  ‌death.‌  ‌The‌‌   Revised‌‌   Rules‌‌   is‌‌
  clear‌‌
  that‌‌  when‌‌   a ‌‌person‌‌
  is‌‌
  charged‌‌ 
cognate‌‌to‌‌the‌‌fundamental‌r‌ ight‌‌to‌‌be‌‌presumed‌‌innocent‌. ‌ ‌ with‌‌   a ‌‌capital‌‌   offense‌‌   or‌‌ an‌‌ offense‌‌ punishable‌‌ by‌‌ reclusion‌‌ perpetua‌‌ 
In‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Hon.‌  ‌Maceda‌  ‌reiterated‌  ‌in‌  ‌Trillanes‌  ‌IV‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Judge‌‌ 
or‌‌
  death,‌‌   he/she‌‌   shall‌‌   not‌‌  be‌‌   admitted‌‌   to‌‌
  bail,‌‌ regardless‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ stage‌‌ 
In‌  ‌this‌  ‌case,‌  ‌the‌  ‌imposable‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌for‌  ‌kidnapping‌  ‌for‌  ‌ransom‌  ‌is‌‌  Pimentel‌  ‌Sr.‌, ‌ ‌this‌  ‌Court‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌"all‌  ‌prisoners‌  ‌whether‌  ‌under‌‌ 
of‌‌
  the‌‌   criminal‌‌   prosecution,‌‌   when‌‌ evidence‌‌ of‌‌ his/her‌‌ guilt‌‌ is‌‌ strong.‌‌ 
death,‌  ‌reduced‌  ‌to‌  ‌reclusion‌  ‌perpetua.‌  ‌Escobar's‌  ‌bail‌  ‌is,‌  ‌thus,‌  ‌a ‌‌ preventive‌  ‌detention‌  ‌or‌  ‌serving‌  ‌final‌  ‌sentence‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌practice‌‌   their‌‌ 
Conviction‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌capital‌  ‌offense‌  ‌imports‌  ‌that‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌against‌‌ 
matter‌‌ of‌‌ judicial‌‌ discretion‌, ‌‌provided‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ evidence‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ guilt‌‌  profession‌  ‌nor‌  ‌engage‌  ‌in‌‌
  any‌‌
  business‌‌   or‌‌
  occupation‌‌   or‌‌
  hold‌‌
  office,‌‌ 
the‌‌accused‌‌is‌‌strong‌‌so‌‌bail‌‌pending‌‌appeal‌‌is‌‌foreclosed.‌  ‌
is‌‌not‌‌strong.‌  ‌ elective‌‌or‌‌appointive,‌‌while‌‌in‌‌detention."‌  ‌

Escobar's‌‌
  Second‌‌ Bail‌‌ Petition‌‌ is‌‌ ‌not‌‌ barred‌‌ by‌‌ res‌‌ judicata‌‌ as‌‌ this‌‌  ⭐‌Reyes‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
⭐‌People‌‌v.‌‌Sales‌‌‌2019‌‌Resolution‌  ‌
doctrine‌‌is‌‌not‌‌recognized‌‌in‌‌criminal‌‌proceedings‌. ‌ ‌
The‌  ‌factual‌  ‌findings‌  ‌show‌  ‌the‌  ‌presence‌  ‌of‌  ‌two‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌circumstances‌‌ 
In‌  ‌non-capital‌  ‌offenses‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌‌   trial‌‌
  court‌‌  imposes‌‌   the‌‌
  penalty‌‌
  of‌‌ 
stated‌‌in‌‌Rule‌‌114,‌‌Section‌‌5:‌‌   ‌
Te‌‌v.‌‌Perez‌  ‌ imprisonment‌  ‌exceeding‌  ‌six‌  ‌years,‌  ‌the‌  ‌conviction‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  accused‌‌  of‌‌ 
the‌‌   crime‌‌
  charged‌‌ ‌does‌‌ not‌‌ ‌ipso‌‌ facto‌‌ ‌negate‌‌ bail‌‌ pending‌‌ appeal‌. ‌‌The‌‌  1) petitioner‌  ‌had‌  ‌previously‌  ‌escaped‌  ‌from‌  ‌legal‌  ‌confinement,‌‌ 
The‌‌   law‌‌
  and‌‌   settled‌‌   jurisprudence‌‌   demands‌‌ that‌‌ a ‌‌‌hearing‌‌ ‌be‌‌  accused‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌denied‌  ‌bail,‌  ‌or‌  ‌his‌  ‌bail‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌cancelled‌  ‌upon‌  ‌a ‌‌ evaded‌  ‌sentence,‌  ‌or‌  ‌violated‌  ‌the‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌bail‌‌ 
conducted‌‌   before‌‌   bail‌‌   could‌‌   be‌‌
  fixed‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌
  temporary‌‌   release‌‌ of‌‌  showing‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌prosecution,‌  ‌with‌  ‌notice‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused,‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  without‌‌a‌‌valid‌‌justification;‌‌and‌  ‌
the‌‌  accused,‌‌   if‌‌
  bail‌‌
  is‌‌ at‌‌ all‌‌ justified.‌‌ We‌‌ reiterate‌‌ the‌‌ following‌‌ duties‌‌  following‌‌or‌‌other‌‌similar‌‌circumstances:‌  ‌ 2) he‌‌poses‌‌a‌‌flight‌‌risk‌‌if‌‌admitted‌‌to‌‌bail.‌‌   ‌
of‌‌judges‌‌in‌‌case‌‌an‌‌application‌‌for‌‌bail‌‌is‌‌filed:‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 69‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

cf‌‌Presumption‌‌of‌‌Regularity‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Performance‌‌of‌‌Official‌‌  Ibañez‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2016‌  ‌
There‌  ‌was‌  ‌thus‌  ‌no‌  ‌error‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Sandiganbayan's‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌ 
discretion‌‌to‌‌cancel‌‌petitioner's‌‌bail.‌  ‌ Functions‌‌in‌‌‌⭐P
‌ eople‌‌v.‌‌Ordiz‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌ Here,‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌were‌  ‌duly‌  ‌represented‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌counsel‌  ‌de‌  ‌oficio‌  ‌all‌‌ 
throughout‌‌the‌‌proceedings‌e‌ xcept‌‌for‌‌one‌‌hearing‌.  ‌‌ ‌
Standards‌‌for‌‌fixing‌‌bail‌‌
   ‌ The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌stresses‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌presumption‌  ‌of‌  ‌regularity‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌duty‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌overcome‌  ‌the‌  ‌stronger‌‌  The‌‌   Court‌‌  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  persuaded‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  absence‌‌
  of‌‌  the‌‌   counsel‌‌   de‌‌  oficio‌‌ 
Padua‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌ presumption‌‌   of‌‌
  innocence‌‌   in‌‌
  favor‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ accused.‌‌ Where‌‌ there‌‌ is‌‌  in‌  ‌one‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌hearings‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌case‌  ‌amounts‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌denial‌  ‌of‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌‌ 
any‌‌  hint‌‌
  of‌‌
  irregularity‌‌   committed‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌  police‌‌
  officers‌‌
  in‌‌ arresting‌‌  counsel.‌‌   Nor‌‌ does‌‌ such‌‌ absence‌‌ warrant‌‌ the‌‌ nullification‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ entire‌‌ 
The‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌high‌  ‌degree‌  ‌of‌  ‌probability‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌will‌‌ 
the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌and‌  ‌thereafter,‌  ‌several‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌we‌  ‌have‌  ‌earlier‌  ‌noted,‌‌  trial‌‌court‌‌proceedings‌‌and‌‌the‌‌eventual‌‌invalidation‌‌of‌‌its‌‌ruling.‌  ‌
abscond‌  ‌confers‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌court‌  ‌no‌  ‌greater‌  ‌discretion‌  ‌than‌  ‌to‌‌ 
increase‌‌   the‌‌ bond‌‌ ‌subject,‌‌ of‌‌ course,‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ constitutional‌‌ provision‌‌  there‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌no‌  ‌presumption‌  ‌of‌  ‌regularity‌  ‌of‌  ‌performance‌  ‌in‌  ‌their‌‌ 
favor.‌  ‌ Right‌‌to‌‌be‌‌informed‌‌of‌‌the‌‌nature‌‌and‌‌cause‌‌of‌‌accusation‌  ‌
that‌  ‌"excessive‌‌   bail‌‌
  shall‌‌   not‌‌
  be‌‌
  required."‌‌   The‌‌
  recourse‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  judge‌‌ 
is‌‌to‌‌fix‌‌a‌‌higher‌‌amount‌‌of‌‌bail‌‌and‌n ‌ ot‌‌to‌‌deny‌‌the‌‌fixing‌‌of‌‌bail.‌  ‌ Enrile‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 015‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
Right‌‌to‌‌be‌‌heard‌  ‌
Right‌‌to‌‌bail‌‌and‌‌right‌‌to‌‌travel‌‌
   ‌ The‌‌   procedural‌‌   due‌‌ process‌‌ mandate‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Constitution‌‌ requires‌‌ that‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Tulin‌  ‌
the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌be‌  ‌arraigned‌  ‌so‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌fully‌  ‌informed‌‌   as‌‌
  to‌‌ 
Manotoc,‌‌Jr.‌‌v‌‌CA‌  ‌ why‌  ‌he‌  ‌was‌  ‌charged‌  ‌and‌  ‌what‌  ‌penal‌  ‌offense‌  ‌he‌  ‌has‌  ‌to‌  ‌face,‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌ 
Does‌  ‌it‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌a ‌ ‌violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌Hiong's‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌ 
informed‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌nature‌  ‌and‌  ‌cause‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  accusation‌‌  against‌‌
  him‌‌  on‌‌  convicted‌‌   only‌‌  on‌‌ showing‌‌ that‌‌ his‌‌ guilt‌‌ is‌‌ shown‌‌ beyond‌‌ reasonable‌‌ 
Does‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌facing‌  ‌a ‌ ‌criminal‌  ‌indictment‌  ‌and‌  ‌provisionally‌‌ 
the‌  ‌ground‌‌   that‌‌
  he‌‌
  was‌‌  convicted‌‌   as‌‌
  an‌‌
  accomplice‌‌  under‌‌  Section‌‌   4 ‌‌ doubt‌  ‌with‌  ‌full‌  ‌opportunity‌  ‌to‌  ‌disprove‌  ‌the‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌against‌  ‌him.‌‌ 
released‌‌on‌‌bail‌‌have‌‌an‌‌unrestricted‌‌right‌‌to‌‌travel?‌‌‌NO‌. ‌ ‌
of‌  ‌PD‌  ‌532‌  ‌even‌  ‌though‌  ‌he‌  ‌was‌  ‌charged‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌principal‌  ‌by‌  ‌direct‌‌  During‌‌   arraignment‌, ‌‌the‌‌ accused‌‌ is‌‌ granted‌‌ the‌‌ opportunity‌‌ to‌‌ fully‌‌ 
The‌  ‌condition‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌upon‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌  ‌himself‌‌  participation‌‌under‌‌Section‌‌2‌‌of‌‌said‌‌law?‌  ‌ know‌‌   the‌‌  precise‌‌   charge‌‌
  that‌‌
  confronts‌‌   him‌‌  and‌‌
  made‌‌
  fully‌‌   aware‌‌ of‌‌ 
available‌‌
  at‌‌
  all‌‌
  times‌‌
  whenever‌‌ the‌‌ court‌‌ requires‌‌ his‌‌ presence‌‌  possible‌‌   loss‌‌  of‌‌  freedom,‌‌   even‌‌
  of‌‌
  his‌‌
  life,‌‌ depending‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ nature‌‌ of‌‌ 
operates‌‌as‌‌a‌‌valid‌‌restriction‌‌on‌‌his‌‌right‌‌to‌‌travel.‌  ‌ The‌‌   ruling‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  trial‌‌
  court‌‌
  is‌‌ within‌‌ well-settle‌‌ jurisprudence‌‌ that‌‌ if‌‌  the‌‌crime‌‌imputed‌‌to‌‌him.‌  ‌
there‌‌   is‌‌
  lack‌‌
  of‌‌
  complete‌‌   evidence‌‌   of‌‌
  conspiracy,‌‌   the‌‌
  liability‌‌
  is‌‌
  that‌‌ 
Presumption‌‌of‌‌innocence‌  ‌ of‌  ‌an‌  ‌accomplice‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌as‌  ‌principal‌  ‌(‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Tolentino‌).‌  ‌Any‌‌  The‌  ‌Information‌  ‌must‌  ‌permit‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌to‌  ‌prepare‌  ‌his‌  ‌defense,‌‌ 
doubt‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌participation‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌   individual‌‌
  in‌‌  the‌‌
  commission‌‌   of‌‌  ensure‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌prosecuted‌  ‌only‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌basis‌  ‌of‌  ‌facts‌  ‌presented,‌‌ 
⭐‌De‌‌Guzman‌‌y‌‌Aguilar‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ the‌‌crime‌‌is‌‌always‌‌resolved‌‌in‌‌favor‌‌of‌‌lesser‌‌responsibility.‌  enable‌‌   him‌‌   to‌‌
  plead‌‌   jeopardy‌‌   against‌‌   a ‌‌later‌‌  prosecution,‌‌   and‌‌ inform‌‌ 
the‌‌   court‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  facts‌‌  alleged‌‌  so‌‌   that‌‌
  it‌‌
  can‌‌  determine‌‌   the‌‌
  sufficiency‌‌ 
The‌‌   requisite‌‌   quantum‌‌  of‌‌
  ‌proof‌‌ beyond‌‌ reasonable‌‌ doubt‌‌ ‌is‌‌ borne‌‌ 
Assistance‌‌of‌‌counsel‌  ‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ charge.‌‌ An‌‌ Information‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ sufficient‌‌ to‌‌ withstand‌‌ a ‌‌motion‌‌ 
by‌‌  the‌‌   constitutional‌‌  imperative‌‌   of‌‌
  due‌‌
  process.‌‌
  It‌‌
  is‌‌
  also‌‌
  in‌‌ keeping‌‌ 
to‌  ‌quash,‌  ‌and‌  ‌yet‌  ‌insufficiently‌  ‌inform‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌specific‌‌ 
with‌‌   the‌‌ ‌presumption‌‌ of‌‌ innocence‌‌ of‌‌ an‌‌ accused‌‌ until‌‌ the‌‌ contrary‌‌  This‌  ‌right‌  ‌is‌  ‌available‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌during‌  ‌trial.‌  ‌Every‌  ‌person‌  ‌under‌‌  details‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌alleged‌  ‌offenses.‌‌   In‌‌
  such‌‌   instances,‌‌   the‌‌
  Rules‌‌
  of‌‌
  Court‌‌ 
is‌‌proved.‌  ‌ custody‌‌of‌‌the‌‌law‌‌enjoys‌‌the‌‌right.‌  ‌ allow‌‌   the‌‌  accused‌‌   to‌‌
  move‌‌  for‌‌  a ‌‌b
‌ ill‌‌
  of‌‌   particulars‌  ‌to‌‌  enable‌‌ him‌‌ 
Any‌‌  person‌‌ arrested,‌‌ detained‌‌ or‌‌ under‌‌ custodial‌‌ investigation‌‌ shall‌‌  properly‌‌to‌‌plead‌‌and‌‌to‌‌prepare‌‌for‌‌trial.‌  ‌
Disputable‌‌Presumptions‌‌in‌⭐ ‌ F
‌ uertes‌‌v.‌‌Senate‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌ 
at‌‌
  all‌‌
  times‌‌ be‌‌ assisted‌‌ by‌‌ counsel.‌‌ Included‌‌ in‌‌ this‌‌ right‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌  In‌‌
  general,‌‌
  a ‌‌bill‌‌ of‌‌ particulars‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ further‌‌ specification‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
2020‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
to‌‌be‌‌informed‌‌of‌‌his‌‌right‌‌to‌‌counsel.‌  ‌ charges‌  ‌or‌‌
  claims‌‌   in‌‌
  an‌‌
  action‌, ‌‌which‌‌   an‌‌
  accused‌‌
  may‌‌
  avail‌‌
  of‌‌
  by‌‌ 
This‌  ‌Court‌  ‌has‌  ‌upheld‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitutionality‌  ‌of‌  ‌disputable‌‌  motion‌  ‌before‌  ‌arraignment,‌  ‌to‌  ‌enable‌  ‌him‌  ‌to‌  ‌properly‌  ‌plead‌  ‌and‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Pepino‌‌y‌‌Rueras‌‌‌2016‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
presumptions‌ ‌in‌‌ criminal‌‌ laws.‌‌ The‌‌ constitutional‌‌ presumption‌‌ of‌‌  prepare‌‌for‌‌trial‌. ‌ ‌
innocence‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌violated‌  ‌when‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌logical‌  ‌connection‌‌  The‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌counsel‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fundamental‌  ‌right‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌intended‌  ‌to‌‌  The‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌bill‌  ‌of‌  ‌particulars‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌supply‌  ‌vague‌  ‌facts‌  ‌or‌‌ 
between‌‌the‌‌fact‌‌proved‌‌and‌‌the‌‌ultimate‌‌fact‌‌presumed‌.  ‌‌ ‌ preclude‌‌   the‌‌
  slightest‌‌
  coercion‌‌   that‌‌
  would‌‌   lead‌‌
  the‌‌
  accused‌‌   to‌‌ admit‌‌  allegations‌‌   ‌in‌‌
  the‌‌  complaint‌‌   or‌‌
  information‌‌ to‌‌ enable‌‌ the‌‌ accused‌‌ to‌‌ 
something‌  ‌false.‌  ‌The‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌counsel‌  ‌attaches‌  ‌upon‌‌   the‌‌
  start‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌  properly‌  ‌plead‌  ‌and‌  ‌prepare‌  ‌for‌  ‌trial.‌  ‌It‌  ‌presupposes‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌ 
Section‌  ‌14,‌  ‌paragraph‌‌  4 ‌‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Anti-Hazing‌‌   Law,‌‌
  which‌‌   provides‌‌
  that‌‌ 
investigation.‌  ‌Custodial‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌commences‌  ‌when‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌‌   is‌‌  Information‌, ‌‌one‌‌ that‌‌ presents‌‌ all‌‌ the‌‌ elements‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ crime‌‌ charged,‌‌ 
an‌‌  accused's‌‌   presence‌‌
  during‌‌ a ‌‌hazing‌‌ is‌  ‌prima‌‌ facie‌  ‌evidence‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ 
taken‌‌   into‌‌   custody‌‌  and‌‌  is‌‌
  singled‌‌ out‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌suspect‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ commission‌‌  albeit‌‌under‌‌vague‌‌terms.‌  ‌
or‌‌
  her‌‌
  participation,‌‌
  does‌‌   not‌‌
  violate‌‌
  the‌‌
  constitutional‌‌ presumption‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌under‌  ‌investigation.‌  ‌As‌  ‌a ‌ ‌rule,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌police‌  ‌lineup‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌ 
of‌  ‌innocence.‌  ‌This‌  ‌disputable‌  ‌presumption‌  ‌is‌  ‌also‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌bill‌  ‌of‌‌ 
part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌custodial‌  ‌investigation‌; ‌ ‌hence,‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌counsel‌‌ 
attainder.‌  ‌ ⭐‌People‌‌v.‌‌Solar‌‌y‌‌Dumbrique‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
guaranteed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌‌cannot‌‌yet‌‌be‌‌invoked‌‌at‌‌this‌‌stage.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 70‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

The‌‌  Court‌‌ hereby‌‌ lays‌‌ down‌‌ the‌‌ following‌‌ guidelines‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ guidance‌‌  however,‌‌   is‌‌


  correct‌‌  only‌‌ insofar‌‌ as‌‌ formal‌‌ objections‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ pleadings‌‌  Far‌  ‌from‌  ‌being‌  ‌vexatious,‌  ‌capricious‌  ‌and‌  ‌oppressive,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌Bench‌‌and‌‌the‌‌Bar:‌  ‌ are‌  ‌concerned.‌  ‌By‌  ‌express‌  ‌provision‌  ‌of‌  ‌Section‌  ‌9,‌  ‌Rule‌  ‌117‌  ‌and‌‌
  by‌‌  delays‌‌   entailed‌‌   by‌‌   the‌‌  postponements‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ aforesaid‌‌ hearings‌‌ were,‌‌ 
established‌‌ jurisprudence,‌‌ ‌the‌‌ validity‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Information‌‌ vis-a-vis‌‌  to‌‌
  a ‌‌great‌‌
  extent,‌‌   attributable‌‌   to‌‌
  petitioner‌‌ Francisco's‌‌ own‌‌ pursuit‌‌ of‌‌ 
1. Any‌  ‌Information‌  ‌which‌  a‌ lleges‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌qualifying‌  ‌or‌‌ 
the‌  ‌essential‌  ‌issue‌  ‌of‌  ‌whether‌‌   or‌‌  not‌‌
  it‌‌
  sufficiently‌‌   charges‌‌   an‌  extraordinary‌‌   remedies‌‌ against‌‌ the‌‌ interlocutory‌‌ orders‌‌ issued‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ 
aggravating‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌is‌  ‌present,‌  ‌must‌  ‌state‌  ‌the‌‌ 
offense‌‌   goes‌‌   into‌‌
  the‌‌  very‌‌
  foundation‌‌ of‌‌ jurisdiction‌, ‌‌hence,‌‌ may‌‌  Sariaya‌  ‌MTC‌‌   and‌‌   the‌‌  assignment‌‌   of‌‌
  at‌‌
  least‌‌
  three‌‌
  public‌‌
  prosecutors‌‌ 
ultimate‌  ‌facts‌  ‌relative‌  ‌to‌  ‌such‌  ‌circumstance‌. ‌‌ be‌‌raised‌‌and‌‌addressed‌‌at‌‌any‌‌stage‌‌of‌‌the‌‌proceedings.‌  ‌ to‌‌the‌‌case.‌  ‌
Otherwise,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Information‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌‌motion‌‌
  to‌‌ 
quash‌,‌‌or‌‌a‌‌motion‌‌for‌‌a‌b
‌ ill‌‌of‌‌particulars‌. ‌ ‌ Right‌‌to‌‌speedy,‌‌impartial,‌‌and‌‌public‌‌trial‌  ‌ Right‌‌of‌‌confrontation‌  ‌
Failure‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌to‌  ‌avail‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌said‌  ‌remedies‌‌  Martinez‌‌III‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌ ⭐‌People‌‌v.‌‌Sergio‌‌and‌‌Lacanilao‌‌‌2019‌  ‌
constitutes‌  ‌a ‌ ‌waiver‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌question‌  ‌the‌  ‌defective‌‌ 
statement‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌aggravating‌  ‌or‌  ‌qualifying‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌in‌‌  The‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌guarantees‌‌   under‌‌   Section‌‌  16,‌‌
  Article‌‌
  III‌‌
  the‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌  May‌‌   a ‌‌prosecution‌‌
  witness,‌‌
  like‌‌ Mary‌‌ Jane‌‌ Veloso,‌‌ who‌‌ was‌‌ convicted‌‌ 
the‌  ‌Information,‌  ‌and‌  ‌consequently,‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌  the‌  ‌speedy‌  ‌disposition‌  ‌of‌  ‌cases.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌has‌  ‌adopted‌  ‌the‌‌  of‌  ‌drug‌  ‌trafficking‌  ‌and‌  ‌sentenced‌  ‌to‌  ‌death‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Indonesian‌‌ 
appreciated‌‌against‌‌him‌‌if‌‌proven‌‌during‌‌trial.‌  ‌ "‌balancing‌  ‌test‌" ‌ ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌effect‌  ‌that‌‌
  in‌‌
  determining‌‌   the‌‌  existence‌‌   of‌‌  Government‌  ‌and‌  ‌who‌  ‌is‌  ‌presently‌  ‌confined‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌prison‌  ‌facility‌  ‌in‌‌ 
inordinate‌  ‌delay‌  ‌the‌  ‌courts‌  ‌should‌  ‌consider‌  ‌the‌  ‌presence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Indonesia,‌  ‌testify‌  ‌by‌  ‌way‌  ‌of‌  ‌deposition‌  ‌without‌  ‌violating‌  ‌the‌‌ 
2. Prosecutors‌  ‌must‌  ‌ensure‌  ‌compliance‌  ‌with‌  ‌Section‌  ‌8 ‌ ‌(a),‌‌  constitutional‌‌right‌‌to‌‌confrontation‌‌of‌‌a‌‌witness‌‌by‌‌the‌‌accused?‌‌   ‌
following‌‌factors,‌‌namely;‌‌   ‌
Rule‌  ‌112‌  ‌that‌  ‌mandates‌  ‌the‌  ‌attachment‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Information‌‌ 
the‌‌resolution‌‌finding‌‌probable‌‌cause‌‌against‌‌the‌‌accused.‌  ‌ 1) the‌‌length‌‌of‌‌delay;‌  ‌ YES‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌right‌‌
  to‌‌
  confrontation‌  ‌is‌‌  part‌‌  of‌‌  due‌‌  process‌‌  not‌‌  only‌‌ 
2) the‌‌reason‌f‌ or‌‌delay;‌  ‌ in‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌but‌  ‌also‌  ‌in‌  ‌civil‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌as‌  ‌well‌  ‌as‌‌
  in‌‌ 
3. Cases‌‌  which‌‌  have‌‌  attained‌‌
  finality‌‌   prior‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ promulgation‌‌ 
proceedings‌‌in‌‌administrative‌‌tribunals‌‌with‌‌quasi-judicial‌‌powers.‌  ‌
of‌‌
  this‌‌
  Decision‌‌  will‌‌  remain‌‌  final‌‌
  by‌‌  virtue‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ ‌principle‌‌  3) the‌‌defendant's‌a
‌ ssertion‌‌of‌‌his‌‌or‌‌her‌‌right;‌‌and‌  ‌
of‌‌conclusiveness‌‌of‌‌judgment‌. ‌ ‌ 4) the‌‌prejudice‌t‌ o‌‌the‌‌defendant‌‌as‌‌a‌‌result‌‌of‌‌the‌‌delay.‌  ‌ Indubitably,‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌Cristina‌  ‌and‌  ‌Julius‌  ‌are‌‌ 
equally‌‌   safeguarded.‌‌   The‌‌
  parameters‌‌   laid‌‌  down‌‌  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  trial‌‌ court‌‌ are‌‌ 
4. For‌  ‌cases‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌still‌‌
  pending‌‌   before‌‌   the‌‌
  trial‌‌
  court,‌‌
  the‌‌  In‌  ‌Corpuz‌  ‌v.‌‌
  Sandiganbayan:‌‌   ‌Delay‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌two-edged‌‌   sword‌. ‌‌It‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌ 
sufficient‌  ‌in‌  ‌detail‌  ‌ensuring‌  ‌that‌  ‌Mary‌  ‌Jane‌  ‌will‌  ‌give‌‌  her‌‌   testimony‌‌ 
prosecution,‌‌   when‌‌   still‌‌
  able,‌‌
  may‌‌ file‌‌ a ‌‌motion‌‌ to‌‌ amend‌‌ the‌‌  government‌  ‌that‌  ‌bears‌  ‌the‌  ‌burden‌  ‌of‌  ‌proving‌  ‌its‌  ‌case‌  ‌beyond‌‌ 
under‌  ‌oath‌  ‌to‌  ‌deter‌‌  lying‌‌  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  threat‌‌  of‌‌
  perjury‌‌
  charge.‌‌   She‌‌  is‌‌
  still‌‌ 
Information‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌properly‌  ‌allege‌  ‌the‌  ‌aggravating‌  ‌or‌‌  reasonable‌  ‌doubt.‌  ‌The‌  ‌passage‌  ‌of‌  ‌time‌  ‌may‌  ‌make‌  ‌it‌  ‌difficult‌  ‌or‌‌ 
subjected‌  ‌to‌  ‌cross-examination‌  ‌so‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌  ‌the‌  ‌presence‌  ‌of‌‌ 
qualifying‌‌circumstance‌‌pursuant‌‌to‌‌this‌‌Decision.‌  ‌ impossible‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌to‌  ‌carry‌  ‌its‌  ‌burden.‌  ‌As‌  ‌held‌  ‌in‌‌ 
any‌‌
  falsehood‌‌   in‌‌
  her‌‌  testimony.‌‌   Lastly,‌‌   the‌‌ guidelines‌‌ enable‌‌ the‌‌ trial‌‌ 
Williams‌  ‌v.‌  ‌US‌, ‌ ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌to‌  ‌sustain‌  ‌its‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌try‌  ‌the‌‌ 
5. For‌‌  cases‌‌
  in‌‌  which‌‌  a ‌‌judgment‌‌   or‌‌
  decision‌‌   has‌‌
  already‌‌ been‌‌  court‌  ‌judge‌  ‌to‌  ‌observe‌  ‌her‌  ‌demeanor‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌witness‌  ‌and‌  ‌assess‌  ‌her‌‌ 
accused‌‌despite‌‌a‌‌delay,‌‌it‌‌must‌‌show‌‌two‌‌things:‌‌   ‌
rendered‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌trial‌  ‌court‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌still‌  ‌pending‌  ‌appeal,‌  ‌the‌  credibility.‌  ‌
case‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌judged‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌appellate‌  ‌court‌  ‌depending‌  ‌on‌‌  a) that‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌suffered‌  ‌no‌  ‌serious‌  ‌prejudice‌  ‌beyond‌‌
  that‌‌ 
whether‌‌ the‌‌ accused‌‌ has‌‌ already‌‌ waived‌‌ his‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ question‌‌  which‌‌ensued‌‌from‌‌the‌‌ordinary‌‌and‌‌inevitable‌‌delay;‌‌and‌‌   ‌
People‌‌v.‌‌Matibag‌  ‌
the‌  ‌defective‌  ‌statement‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌aggravating‌  ‌or‌  ‌qualifying‌‌  b) that‌‌
  there‌‌
  was‌‌
  no‌‌
  more‌‌
  delay‌‌ than‌‌ is‌‌ reasonably‌‌ attributable‌‌ 
circumstance‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Information.‌  ‌ to‌‌the‌‌ordinary‌‌processes‌‌of‌‌justice.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌testimony‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌single‌  ‌witness,‌  ‌if‌  ‌found‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌credible,‌‌ 
trustworthy‌‌   and‌‌   straightforward‌‌ would‌‌ suffice‌‌ to‌‌ convict‌‌ the‌‌ accused‌‌ 
Here,‌  ‌the‌‌
  delay‌‌   incurred‌‌   in‌‌
  conducting‌‌  the‌‌
  preliminary‌‌   investigation‌‌  of‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌‌   he‌‌
  was‌‌
  charged.‌‌   The‌‌
  discretion‌‌
  still‌‌
  lies‌‌
  with‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Cubay‌‌y‌‌Ugsalan‌‌‌2019‌  ‌ surely‌‌   prejudiced‌‌   the‌‌
  petitioners.‌‌
  With‌‌  the‌‌
  lapse‌‌
  of‌‌
  nearly‌‌   five‌‌
  years‌‌  the‌‌   prosecution‌‌   as‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  number‌‌   of‌‌
  witnesses‌‌  and‌‌
  whom‌‌   to‌‌ present‌‌ 
The‌‌   Informations‌‌   conspicuously‌‌   lack‌‌
  the‌‌ second‌‌ element‌‌ of‌‌ rape,‌‌ i.e.‌‌  from‌  ‌the‌  ‌submission‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  ‌counter‌  ‌affidavits,‌  ‌they‌  ‌were‌  ‌thus‌  ‌no‌‌  on‌‌  the‌‌  witness‌‌   stand.‌‌   For‌‌  sure,‌‌
  the‌‌  prosecution‌‌ could‌‌ not‌‌ be‌‌ accused‌‌ 
the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌employed‌  ‌force‌  ‌or‌  ‌intimidation,‌  ‌or‌  ‌that‌‌   the‌‌
  victim‌‌   was‌‌  longer‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌position‌  ‌to‌  ‌adequately‌  ‌prepare‌  ‌themselves‌  ‌for‌  ‌their‌‌  of‌‌
  suppressing‌‌   vital‌‌ evidence.‌‌ The‌‌ defense‌‌ could‌‌ have‌‌ presented‌‌ Mrs.‌‌ 
deprived‌  ‌of‌  ‌reason,‌  ‌unconscious,‌‌   under‌‌   twelve‌‌  (12)‌‌
  years‌‌   of‌‌
  age,‌‌
  or‌‌  defense‌  ‌should‌  ‌further‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌and‌  ‌trial‌  ‌be‌  ‌held,‌  ‌including‌  ‌the‌‌  Mercado‌‌as‌‌an‌‌adverse‌‌witness‌‌if‌‌it‌‌so‌‌desired.‌  ‌
was‌  ‌demented.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Informations‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌validly‌  ‌charge‌  ‌the‌‌  gathering‌  ‌of‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌new‌  ‌allegation‌  ‌that‌  ‌had‌  ‌meanwhile‌‌ 
contributed‌  ‌another‌  ‌ground‌  ‌for‌  ‌their‌  ‌indictment‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌  violation‌‌  of‌‌  On‌‌  the‌‌
  other‌‌  hand,‌‌   this‌‌  Court‌‌  agrees‌‌ with‌‌ accused-appellants‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ 
crime‌‌   of‌‌
  rape‌‌
  or‌‌
  any‌‌
  offense‌‌
  at‌‌
  all.‌‌
  The‌‌
  same,‌‌  for‌‌
  sure,‌‌ cannot‌‌ be‌‌ the‌‌ 
Section‌‌3(e)‌‌of‌‌R.A.‌‌No.‌‌3019.‌  ‌ trial‌  ‌court‌  ‌should‌‌   not‌‌   have‌‌  considered‌‌   the‌‌
  extrajudicial‌‌  statement‌‌   of‌‌ 
basis‌‌of‌‌a‌‌valid‌‌judgment‌‌of‌‌conviction.‌‌   ‌
Edna‌‌   Crisologo‌‌   Jacob‌‌   who‌‌   was‌‌   not‌‌ placed‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ witness‌‌ stand,‌‌ thus,‌‌ 
We‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌unmindful‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌rule‌  ‌that‌  ‌by‌  ‌his‌  ‌plea,‌  ‌an‌  ‌accused‌  ‌is‌‌  depriving‌  ‌the‌  ‌defense‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌cross-examination.‌  ‌The‌‌ 
Imperial,‌‌et‌‌al‌‌v.‌‌Joson,‌‌et‌‌al‌‌‌2010‌ 
deemed‌  ‌to‌  ‌have‌  ‌waived‌  ‌all‌  ‌objections‌‌   to‌‌  the‌‌
  information.‌‌   This‌‌
  rule,‌‌  veracity‌  ‌of‌  ‌her‌  ‌statement‌‌   not‌‌
  having‌‌   been‌‌  ascertained,‌‌  it‌‌
  should‌‌  not‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 71‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

have‌  ‌been‌  ‌given‌  ‌any‌  ‌probative‌  ‌value‌  ‌at‌  ‌all.‌  ‌Be‌  ‌that‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌may,‌  ‌her‌‌  Sec‌‌
  16.‌‌  ‌All‌‌
  persons‌‌
  shall‌‌   have‌‌
  the‌‌  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  a ‌‌speedy‌‌
  disposition‌‌
  of‌‌  The‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌found‌  ‌in‌  ‌Section‌  ‌23‌  ‌is‌  ‌unconstitutional‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌‌ 
testimony‌  ‌is‌  ‌merely‌  ‌corroborative,‌  ‌and‌  ‌its‌  ‌exclusion‌  ‌will‌‌   not‌‌
  affect‌‌ 
their‌  ‌cases‌  ‌before‌  ‌all‌  ‌judicial,‌  ‌quasi-judicial,‌  ‌or‌  ‌administrative‌‌  because‌  ‌it‌  ‌contravenes‌  ‌the‌  ‌rule-making‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌‌
  Court,‌‌
  it‌‌
  ‌also‌‌ 
the‌‌finding‌‌of‌‌guilt‌‌of‌‌accused-appellants.‌  ‌
bodies.‌  ‌ constitutes‌‌ "cruel,‌‌ degrading,‌‌ and‌‌ inhuman"‌‌ punishment‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ 
accused.‌‌The‌‌aim‌‌is‌‌to‌‌rehabilitate,‌‌not‌‌punish,‌‌those‌‌drug‌‌offenders.‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Givera‌  ‌ Olbes‌‌v.‌‌Buemio‌  ‌
 ‌

Oral‌‌
  testimony‌‌   may‌‌   be‌‌
  taken‌‌
  into‌‌
  account‌‌   only‌‌  when‌‌   it‌‌
  is‌‌
  complete,‌‌  In‌  ‌Solar‌  ‌Team‌  ‌Entertainment,‌  ‌Inc.‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Judge‌  ‌How,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌‌ 
that‌‌
  is,‌‌
  if‌‌   the‌‌ witness‌‌ has‌‌ been‌‌ wholly‌‌ cross-examined‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ adverse‌‌  Q.‌‌Non-imprisonment‌‌for‌‌Debts‌  ‌
stressed‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌exceptions‌  ‌consisting‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌exclusions‌‌ 
party‌  ‌or‌‌   the‌‌  right‌‌   to‌‌  cross-examine‌‌   is‌‌
  lost‌‌
  wholly‌‌   or‌‌
  in‌‌  part‌‌   thru‌‌  the‌‌  provided‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Speedy‌  ‌Trial‌  ‌Act‌  ‌of‌  ‌1998‌  ‌reflect‌  ‌the‌  ‌fundamentally‌‌ 
fault‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌adverse‌  ‌party.‌  ‌But‌  ‌when‌  ‌cross-examination‌  ‌is‌‌   not‌‌
  and‌‌  recognized‌  ‌principle‌  ‌that‌  ‌"speedy‌  ‌trial"‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌relative‌  ‌term‌  ‌and‌‌  Sec‌‌  20.‌‌
  No‌‌  person‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  imprisoned‌‌
  for‌‌ debt‌‌ or‌‌ non-payment‌‌ of‌‌ 
cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌done‌‌   or‌‌  completed‌‌   due‌‌
  to‌‌  causes‌‌   attributable‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌  party‌‌  necessarily‌  ‌involves‌  ‌a ‌ ‌degree‌  ‌of‌  ‌flexibility.‌‌   ‌Such‌‌
  right‌‌   to‌‌
  a ‌‌speedy‌‌  a‌‌poll‌‌tax.‌  ‌
offering‌‌   the‌‌   witness,‌‌   the‌‌  uncompleted‌‌   testimony‌‌   is‌‌
  thereby‌‌ rendered‌‌  trial‌‌  and‌‌ a ‌‌speedy‌‌ disposition‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌case‌‌ is‌‌ violated‌‌ only‌‌ when‌‌ the‌‌ 
incompetent.‌  ‌ proceeding‌‌   is‌‌
  attended‌‌  by‌‌
  vexatious,‌‌   capricious‌‌   and‌‌   oppressive‌‌  Lozano‌‌v.‌‌Martinez‌‌‌on‌‌BP‌‌22‌  ‌
delays.‌  ‌
Compulsory‌‌process‌  ‌ Has‌  ‌BP‌  ‌22‌  ‌transgressed‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌inhibition‌  ‌against‌‌ 
imprisonment‌  ‌for‌‌   debt?‌   ‌To‌‌
  answer‌‌   the‌‌  question‌, ‌‌it‌‌
  is‌‌
  necessary‌‌   to‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Chua‌  ‌ Lumanog‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ examine‌‌   what‌‌   the‌‌ statute‌‌ prohibits‌‌ and‌‌ punishes‌‌ as‌‌ an‌‌ offense‌. ‌‌
The‌‌
  1973‌‌  and‌‌ 1987‌‌ Constitutions‌‌ expanded‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ compulsory‌‌  The‌‌
  ‌gravamen‌‌   ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  offense‌‌   punished‌‌ by‌‌ BP‌‌ 22‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ act‌‌ of‌‌ making‌‌ 
What‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌prohibits‌  ‌are‌  ‌unreasonable,‌  ‌arbitrary‌‌ 
process‌‌
  ‌which‌‌   now‌‌
  includes‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌right‌‌ to‌‌ secure‌‌ the‌‌ production‌‌ of‌‌  and‌‌
  issuing‌‌   a ‌‌worthless‌‌   check‌‌   or‌‌
  a ‌‌check‌‌ that‌‌ is‌‌ dishonored‌‌ upon‌‌ its‌‌ 
and‌‌oppressive‌‌delays‌,‌‌which‌‌render‌‌rights‌‌nugatory.‌  ‌ presentation‌‌   for‌‌  payment.‌  ‌It‌‌   is‌‌  not‌‌  the‌‌ non-payment‌‌ of‌‌ an‌‌ obligation‌‌ 
evidence‌‌‌on‌‌one's‌‌behalf.‌‌The‌‌movant‌‌must‌‌show:‌‌   ‌
A‌  ‌mere‌  ‌mathematical‌  ‌reckoning‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌involved‌  ‌would‌  ‌not‌‌   be‌‌  which‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌punishes.‌‌   The‌‌   law‌‌   punishes‌‌   the‌‌
  act‌‌
  not‌‌  as‌‌
  an‌‌
  offense‌‌ 
a) that‌‌the‌‌evidence‌‌is‌‌really‌m
‌ aterial‌; ‌ ‌ against‌‌property,‌‌but‌‌an‌‌offense‌‌against‌‌public‌‌order.‌  ‌
sufficient.‌  ‌Under‌  ‌the‌  ‌circumstances,‌  ‌we‌  ‌hold‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌delay‌  ‌of‌  ‌(4)‌‌ 
b) that‌‌
  he‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  guilty‌‌
  of‌‌
  neglect‌‌
  in‌‌
  previously‌‌
  obtaining‌‌
  the‌‌  four‌  ‌years‌‌
  during‌‌
  which‌‌   the‌‌
  case‌‌
  remained‌‌   pending‌‌  with‌‌   the‌‌
  CA‌‌
  and‌‌   ‌

production‌‌of‌‌such‌‌evidence;‌  ‌ this‌‌Court‌‌was‌‌not‌‌unreasonable,‌‌arbitrary‌‌or‌‌oppressive.‌  ‌ R.‌‌Right‌‌Against‌‌Double‌‌Jeopardy‌  ‌


c) that‌‌the‌‌evidence‌‌will‌‌be‌‌available‌‌at‌‌the‌‌time‌‌desired;‌‌and‌‌   ‌  ‌

d) that‌‌no‌‌similar‌‌evidence‌‌could‌‌be‌‌obtained.‌  ‌ P.‌‌Right‌‌Against‌‌Excessive‌‌Fines‌‌and‌‌Cruel,‌‌  Mallari‌‌v.‌‌People‌  ‌


In‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌
  at‌‌
  bar,‌‌
  the‌‌  trial‌‌
  court‌‌
  correctly‌‌   denied‌‌   appellant's‌‌   motion‌‌  Degrading,‌‌and‌‌Inhuman‌‌Punishments‌  ‌
for‌‌  the‌‌
  production‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  records‌‌   which‌‌   were‌‌  the‌‌ basis‌‌ in‌‌ issuing‌‌ the‌‌  A‌  ‌comparison‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Informations‌  ‌filed‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌two‌  ‌cases‌  ‌under‌‌ 
POEA‌‌   Certification‌‌   dated‌‌   February‌‌   3,‌‌
  1994,‌‌  as‌‌
  the‌‌ same‌‌ would‌‌ not‌‌ in‌‌  consideration‌  ‌as‌  ‌well‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌findings‌  ‌of‌  ‌facts‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  appellate‌‌
  court‌‌ 
Sec‌‌   19.‌‌
  Excessive‌‌   fines‌‌
  shall‌‌
  not‌‌
  be‌‌
  imposed,‌‌   nor‌‌
  cruel,‌‌
  degrading‌‌  tells‌‌
  us‌‌
  that‌‌
  they‌‌
  refer‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌ series‌‌ of‌‌ acts.‌‌ These‌‌ series‌‌ of‌‌ acts‌‌ 
any‌  ‌way‌  ‌alter‌  ‌the‌  ‌undisputed‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌appellant‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌issued‌  ‌a ‌‌
license‌‌until‌‌then.‌  ‌ or‌  ‌inhuman‌  ‌punishment‌  ‌inflicted.‌  ‌Neither‌  ‌shall‌  ‌death‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌be‌‌  amount‌  ‌to‌  ‌what‌  ‌is‌  ‌known‌  ‌in‌  ‌law‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌continued,‌  ‌continuous‌  ‌or‌‌ 
imposed,‌‌   unless,‌‌
  for‌‌  compelling‌‌   reasons‌‌ involving‌‌ heinous‌‌ crimes,‌‌  continuing‌‌offense‌. ‌ ‌
Trials‌‌in‌‌absentia‌  ‌ the‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌hereafter‌  ‌provides‌  ‌for‌  ‌it.‌  ‌Any‌  ‌death‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌already‌‌  It‌  ‌has‌  ‌also‌‌
  been‌‌
  ruled‌‌
  that‌‌   when‌‌
  two‌‌   informations‌‌   refer‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌ 
imposed‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌reduced‌‌to‌‌reclusion‌‌perpetua.‌  ‌ transaction,‌  ‌the‌  ‌second‌  ‌charge‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌prosper‌  ‌because‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌‌ 
When‌‌presence‌‌of‌‌accused‌‌is‌‌a‌‌duty‌‌
   ‌
The‌  ‌employment‌  ‌of‌  ‌physical,‌  ‌psychological,‌  ‌or‌  ‌degrading‌‌  will‌  ‌thereby‌  ‌be‌  ‌placed‌  ‌in‌‌
  jeopardy‌‌  for‌‌  the‌‌
  second‌‌
  time‌‌  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌ 
1. Arraignment‌‌and‌‌plea;‌  ‌ offense.‌  ‌
punishment‌  ‌against‌  ‌any‌  ‌prisoner‌  ‌or‌  ‌detainee‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌‌ 
2. During‌‌trial,‌‌for‌‌identification;‌  ‌ substandard‌  ‌or‌  ‌inadequate‌  ‌penal‌  ‌facilities‌  ‌under‌  ‌subhuman‌‌  Petitioner,‌  ‌having‌  ‌already‌  ‌been‌  ‌convicted‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌complex‌  ‌crime‌  ‌of‌‌ 
3. Promulgation‌‌of‌‌sentence,‌‌unless‌‌for‌‌light‌‌offense.‌  ‌ conditions‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌dealt‌‌with‌‌by‌‌law.‌  ‌ estafa‌  ‌thru‌  ‌falsification‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌  ‌documents‌  ‌in‌  ‌CA-G.R.‌  ‌No.‌‌ 
20817-CR,‌‌   it‌‌
  stands‌‌ to‌‌ reason‌‌ that‌‌ she‌‌ can‌‌ no‌‌ longer‌‌ be‌‌ held‌‌ liable‌‌ for‌‌ 
Estipona,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌Lobrigo‌‌2
‌ 017‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌re‌‌Plea-bargaining‌  ‌ the‌  ‌same‌  ‌crime‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌case.‌  ‌The‌  ‌rule‌  ‌against‌  ‌double‌  ‌jeopardy‌‌ 
O.‌‌Right‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Speedy‌‌Disposition‌‌of‌‌Cases‌  ‌ protects‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌not‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌peril‌  ‌of‌  ‌second‌‌ 
Leonen,‌‌J‌‌concurring‌  ‌ punishment‌‌‌but‌‌against‌‌being‌‌tried‌‌for‌‌the‌‌same‌‌offense‌.  ‌‌ ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 72‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

People‌‌v.‌‌Sandiganbayan‌‌(Second‌‌Division)‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌ question‌  ‌of‌  ‌whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌for‌  ‌acquittal‌  ‌is‌  ‌per‌  ‌se‌  ‌void‌  ‌on‌‌  individuals‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌group‌  ‌of‌  ‌individuals,‌  ‌the‌  ‌imposition‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌
jurisdictional‌  ‌grounds.‌  ‌The‌  ‌court‌  ‌will‌  ‌look‌  ‌into‌  ‌the‌  ‌decision's‌‌  punishment,‌  ‌penal‌  ‌or‌  ‌otherwise,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌lack‌  ‌of‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌trial.‌‌   This‌‌ 
We‌  ‌adhere‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌
  ‌finality-of-acquittal‌‌
  doctrine‌, ‌‌that‌‌
  is,‌‌
  a ‌‌judgment‌‌  validity‌‌  — ‌‌if‌‌
  it‌‌
  was‌‌
  rendered‌‌  by‌‌
  a ‌‌court‌‌ without‌‌ jurisdiction‌‌ or‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌  last‌‌
  element,‌‌   the‌‌  total‌‌ lack‌‌ of‌‌ court‌‌ intervention‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ finding‌‌ of‌‌ guilt‌‌ 
of‌‌acquittal‌‌is‌‌final‌‌and‌‌unappealable.‌  ‌ court‌  ‌acted‌  ‌with‌  ‌grave‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌of‌  ‌discretion‌  ‌amounting‌  ‌to‌  ‌lack‌  ‌or‌‌  and‌  ‌the‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌actual‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌imposed,‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌ 
excess‌‌of‌‌jurisdiction‌‌—‌‌not‌‌on‌‌its‌‌legal‌‌correctness.‌  ‌ most‌‌   essential.‌‌  P.D.‌‌
  No.‌‌  1866‌‌   does‌‌
  not‌‌
  possess‌‌
  the‌‌ elements‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌bill‌‌ 
The‌‌elements‌‌of‌‌double‌‌jeopardy‌‌‌are‌‌   ‌
of‌‌attainder.‌  ‌
1) the‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌or‌  ‌information‌  ‌was‌  ‌sufficient‌  ‌in‌  ‌form‌  ‌and‌  As‌  ‌long‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌court‌  ‌acts‌  ‌within‌  ‌its‌  ‌jurisdiction,‌  ‌any‌  ‌alleged‌  ‌errors‌‌ 
substance‌‌to‌‌sustain‌‌a‌‌conviction;‌  ‌ committed‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌discretion‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌reviewable‌  ‌via‌‌ 
certiorari‌  ‌for‌  ‌being‌‌   nothing‌‌   more‌‌   than‌‌   errors‌‌
  of‌‌
  judgment.‌‌   Thus,‌‌  the‌‌  Inmates‌‌of‌‌the‌‌New‌‌Bilibid‌‌Prison‌‌v.‌‌De‌‌Lima‌‌‌2019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
2) the‌‌court‌‌had‌‌jurisdiction;‌  ‌ CA‌‌committed‌‌reversible‌‌error‌‌when‌‌it‌‌annulled‌‌the‌‌RTC‌‌Decision.‌  ‌
While‌  ‌R.A.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌10592‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌define‌  ‌a ‌ ‌crime/offense‌  ‌or‌‌ 
3) the‌‌accused‌‌had‌‌been‌‌arraigned‌‌and‌‌had‌‌pleaded;‌‌and‌  ‌  ‌
provide/prescribe/establish‌  ‌a ‌ ‌penalty‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌addresses‌  ‌the‌‌ 
4) the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌was‌  ‌convicted‌  ‌or‌  ‌acquitted‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌was‌‌  S.‌‌Right‌‌Against‌‌Involuntary‌‌Servitude‌  ‌ rehabilitation‌  ‌component‌  ‌of‌  ‌our‌  ‌correctional‌‌   system,‌‌   its‌‌
  provisions‌‌ 
dismissed‌‌without‌‌his‌‌express‌‌consent.‌  ‌ have‌  ‌the‌‌   purpose‌‌   and‌‌  effect‌‌
  of‌‌
  diminishing‌‌   the‌‌  punishment‌‌   attached‌‌ 
The‌‌ ‌only‌‌ instance‌‌ when‌‌ the‌‌ accused‌‌ can‌‌ be‌‌ barred‌‌ from‌‌ invoking‌‌ his‌‌  Sec‌‌  18.‌‌
  xxx‌‌ No‌‌ involuntary‌‌ servitude‌‌ in‌‌ any‌‌ form‌‌ shall‌‌ exist‌‌ ‌except‌‌  to‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime.‌  ‌The‌  ‌further‌  ‌reduction‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌length‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌of‌‌ 
right‌‌  against‌‌
  double‌‌ jeopardy‌‌ is‌‌ when‌‌ it‌‌ can‌‌ be‌‌ demonstrated‌‌ that‌‌ ‌the‌‌  as‌‌
  a ‌‌punishment‌‌   for‌‌
  a ‌‌crime‌‌ whereof‌‌ the‌‌ party‌‌ shall‌‌ have‌‌ been‌‌ duly‌‌  imprisonment‌‌   is,‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  ultimate‌‌   analysis,‌‌
  beneficial‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ detention‌‌ 
trial‌‌ court‌‌ acted‌‌ with‌‌ grave‌‌ abuse‌‌ of‌‌ discretion‌‌ amounting‌‌ to‌‌ lack‌‌  convicted.‌  ‌ and‌  ‌convicted‌  ‌prisoners‌  ‌alike;‌  ‌hence,‌  ‌calls‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌application‌  ‌of‌‌ 
or‌  ‌excess‌  ‌of‌  ‌jurisdiction,‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌prosecution‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌‌  Article‌‌22‌‌of‌‌the‌‌RPC.‌  ‌
allowed‌  ‌the‌  ‌opportunity‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌  ‌its‌  ‌case‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌or‌‌  T.‌‌Ex‌‌post‌‌facto‌‌laws‌‌and‌‌Bills‌‌of‌‌Attainder‌  ‌ Section‌  ‌4,‌  ‌Rule‌  ‌1 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Implementing‌  ‌Rules‌  ‌and‌  ‌Regulations‌  ‌of‌‌ 
where‌‌the‌‌trial‌‌was‌‌sham.‌  ‌
Republic‌‌   Act‌‌
  No.‌‌
  10592‌‌   is‌‌
  DECLARED‌‌
  ‌invalid‌‌  ‌insofar‌‌  as‌‌
  it‌‌
  provides‌‌ 
⭐‌Fuertes‌‌v.‌‌Senate‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌2
‌ 020‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ for‌  ‌the‌  ‌prospective‌  ‌application‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌grant‌  ‌of‌  ‌good‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌time‌‌ 
Remedy‌‌of‌‌State‌‌from‌‌Judgment‌‌of‌‌Acquittal:‌‌  allowance,‌  ‌time‌  ‌allowance‌  ‌for‌  ‌study,‌  ‌teaching‌  ‌and‌  ‌mentoring,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Bowden‌‌v.‌‌Bowden‌‌‌2019‌  ‌ Contrary‌‌   to‌‌  petitioner's‌‌  assertion,‌‌   the‌‌ Anti-Hazing‌‌ Law‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ a ‌‌bill‌‌ of‌‌  special‌‌time‌‌allowance‌‌for‌‌loyalty.‌  ‌
attainder.‌‌  A ‌‌‌bill‌‌
  of‌‌
  attainder‌‌   is‌‌
  generally‌‌   understood‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌legislative‌‌ 
If‌  ‌the‌  ‌court‌  ‌finds‌  ‌the‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌insufficient‌  ‌to‌  ‌support‌  ‌a ‌ ‌verdict‌  ‌of‌‌  act‌  ‌which‌  ‌inflicts‌  ‌punishment‌  ‌on‌  ‌individuals‌  ‌or‌  ‌members‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌  ‌
 ‌

guilt,‌‌   the‌‌
  court‌‌   shall‌‌   grant‌‌  the‌‌
  ‌demurrer‌‌   ‌and‌‌
  the‌‌ criminal‌‌ case‌‌ shall‌‌  particular‌‌   group‌‌   without‌‌   a ‌‌judicial‌‌   trial.‌‌
  For‌‌
  a ‌‌law‌‌
  to‌‌ be‌‌ considered‌‌ a ‌‌
be‌  ‌dismissed.‌  ‌Such‌  ‌dismissal‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌resolution‌‌   on‌‌  the‌‌
  merits‌‌   and‌‌  bill‌‌of‌‌attainder‌,‌‌it‌‌must‌‌be‌‌shown‌‌to‌c‌ ontain‌‌all‌o‌ f‌‌the‌‌following:‌‌   X.‌‌LAW‌‌ON‌‌PUBLIC‌‌OFFICERS‌  ‌
tantamount‌‌   to‌‌ an‌‌ acquittal.‌‌ ‌Any‌‌ further‌‌ prosecution‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ accused‌‌ 
after‌  ‌an‌  ‌acquittal‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌right‌  ‌against‌‌  1. a‌  ‌specification‌  ‌of‌  ‌certain‌  ‌individuals‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌group‌  ‌of‌‌  A.‌‌General‌‌principles‌  ‌
double‌  ‌jeopardy.‌  ‌Accordingly,‌  ‌an‌  ‌order‌  ‌granting‌  ‌the‌  ‌demurrer‌  ‌to‌‌  individuals,‌‌   ‌
evidence‌‌   and‌‌  acquitting‌‌   the‌‌ accused‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ ground‌‌ of‌‌ insufficiency‌‌ of‌‌  2. the‌‌imposition‌‌of‌‌a‌‌punishment,‌‌penal‌‌or‌‌otherwise,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ B.‌‌Modes‌‌of‌‌acquiring‌‌title‌‌to‌‌public‌‌office‌  ‌
evidence‌‌cannot‌‌be‌‌the‌‌subject‌‌of‌‌an‌‌appeal.‌  ‌ 3. the‌‌lack‌‌of‌‌judicial‌‌trial.‌  ‌ C.‌‌Modes‌‌and‌‌kinds‌‌of‌‌appointment‌  ‌
The‌  ‌rule‌‌
  barring‌‌
  an‌‌
  appeal‌‌
  from‌‌
  a ‌‌judgment‌‌
  of‌‌
  acquittal‌‌
  is,‌‌
  however,‌‌  Here,‌  ‌the‌  ‌mere‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌Information‌  ‌against‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌and‌  ‌her‌‌ 
not‌‌absolute.‌‌The‌‌following‌‌are‌‌the‌‌recognized‌e‌ xceptions‌t‌ hereto:‌‌   ‌ fellow‌  ‌sorority‌  ‌members‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌finding‌  ‌of‌‌   their‌‌
  guilt‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  crime‌‌  D.‌‌Eligibility‌‌and‌‌qualification‌‌requirements‌  ‌
1. when‌‌the‌‌prosecution‌‌is‌‌denied‌‌due‌‌process‌‌of‌‌law;‌‌and‌  ‌ charged.‌‌   Contrary‌‌ to‌‌ her‌‌ claim,‌‌ petitioner‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ being‌‌ charged‌‌ merely‌‌ 
E.‌‌Disabilities‌‌and‌‌inhibitions‌‌of‌‌public‌‌officers‌  ‌
2. when‌  ‌the‌  ‌trial‌  ‌court‌  ‌commits‌  ‌grave‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌of‌  ‌discretion‌‌  because‌  ‌she‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Tau‌  ‌Gamma‌  ‌Sigma‌  ‌Sorority,‌  ‌but‌‌ 
amounting‌  ‌to‌  ‌lack‌  ‌or‌  ‌excess‌‌
  of‌‌
  jurisdiction‌‌
  in‌‌
  dismissing‌‌   a ‌‌ because‌  ‌she‌  ‌is‌  ‌allegedly‌  ‌a ‌ ‌principal‌  ‌by‌  ‌direct‌  ‌participation‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  F.‌‌Powers‌‌and‌‌duties‌‌of‌‌public‌‌officers‌  ‌
criminal‌  ‌case‌  ‌by‌  ‌granting‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused's‌  ‌demurrer‌  ‌to‌‌  hazing‌‌   that‌‌
  led‌‌
  to‌‌
  Abracia's‌‌   death.‌‌  As‌‌
  stated,‌‌ these‌‌ are‌‌ matters‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ 
evidence.‌  ‌ trial‌‌court‌‌to‌‌decide.‌‌   ‌ G.‌‌Rights‌‌of‌‌public‌‌officers‌  ‌

Misolas‌‌v.‌‌Panga‌  ‌ H.‌‌Liabilities‌‌of‌‌public‌‌officers‌  ‌
Mandagan‌‌v.‌‌Jose‌‌M.‌‌Valero‌‌Corp‌‌‌2019‌  ‌
Essential‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌bill‌  ‌of‌  ‌attainder‌  ‌are‌  ‌a ‌ ‌specification‌  ‌of‌  ‌certain‌‌  I.‌‌Immunity‌‌of‌‌public‌‌officers‌  ‌
Judicial‌  ‌review‌  ‌in‌  ‌certiorari‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌confined‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 73‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

J.‌‌Distinguish:‌‌de‌‌facto‌‌and‌‌de‌‌jure‌‌officers‌  ‌ E.O.‌‌
  issued‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  President‌‌  or‌‌
  an‌‌
  order‌‌
  of‌‌
  an‌‌
  administrative‌‌  agency‌‌  A‌  ‌corporation‌  ‌is‌  ‌considered‌  ‌a ‌ ‌GOCC‌  ‌only‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌Government‌‌ 
such‌‌as‌‌the‌‌CSC‌‌pursuant‌‌to‌‌Section‌‌17,‌‌Book‌‌V‌‌of‌‌E.O.‌‌292.‌  ‌ directly‌  ‌or‌  ‌indirectly‌  ‌owns‌  ‌or‌  ‌controls‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌a ‌ ‌majority‌  ‌or‌  ‌51%‌‌ 
K.‌‌Termination‌‌of‌‌official‌‌relation‌  ‌
As‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌issue‌  ‌regarding‌  ‌Sections‌  ‌7 ‌ ‌and‌  ‌8,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌IX-B‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  share‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌capital‌  ‌stock.‌  ‌Consequently,‌  ‌RPN‌  ‌was‌  ‌neither‌  ‌a ‌ ‌GOCC‌‌ 
L.‌‌Civil‌‌service‌  ‌ Constitution,‌‌   we‌‌
  hold‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  assailed‌‌
  Orders‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ DOTC‌‌ Secretary‌‌  because‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌  Government's‌‌   total‌‌
  share‌‌
  in‌‌
  RPN's‌‌ capital‌‌ stock‌‌ being‌‌ 
do‌  ‌not‌  ‌violate‌  ‌the‌  ‌aforementioned‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌provisions‌‌  only‌‌32.4%.‌  ‌
M.‌‌Accountability‌‌of‌‌public‌‌officers‌  ‌
considering‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌organic‌  ‌personnel‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌DOTC-CAR‌  ‌were,‌  ‌in‌‌ 
N.‌‌Term‌‌limits‌  ‌ effect,‌  ‌merely‌  ‌designated‌  ‌to‌  ‌perform‌  ‌the‌  ‌additional‌  ‌duties‌‌   and‌‌  Abeja‌‌v.‌‌Tanada‌  ‌
 ‌ functions‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌LTFRB‌  ‌Regional‌  ‌Office‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌direct‌‌  "‌Public‌  ‌office‌  ‌is‌  ‌personal‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌incumbent‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌a ‌‌
supervision‌‌ and‌‌ control‌‌ of‌‌ LTFRB‌‌ Central‌‌ Office,‌‌ pending‌‌ the‌‌ creation‌‌  property‌  ‌which‌  ‌passes‌  ‌to‌  ‌his‌  ‌heirs‌" ‌ ‌The‌  ‌heirs‌  ‌may‌  ‌no‌  ‌longer‌‌ 
A.‌‌General‌‌principles‌  ‌ of‌‌a‌‌regular‌‌RO.‌  ‌ prosecute‌‌   the‌‌
  deceased‌‌   protestee's‌‌
  counterclaim‌‌   for‌‌ damages‌‌ against‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌1.‌‌
  Art‌‌
  XI.‌‌
  ‌Public‌‌
  office‌‌   a ‌‌‌public‌‌
  is‌‌   trust‌. ‌‌Public‌‌  officers‌‌  To‌  ‌designate‌‌   ‌a ‌‌public‌‌
  officer‌‌
  to‌‌
  another‌‌  position‌‌  may‌‌  mean‌‌
  to‌‌  vest‌‌  the‌  ‌protestant‌  ‌for‌  ‌that‌  ‌was‌  ‌extinguished‌  ‌when‌  ‌death‌  ‌terminated‌‌  his‌‌ 
him‌  ‌with‌  ‌additional‌  ‌duties‌‌   while‌‌   he‌‌
  performs‌‌  the‌‌
  functions‌‌  of‌‌
  his‌‌  right‌‌to‌‌occupy‌‌the‌‌contested‌‌office.‌  ‌
and‌  ‌employees‌  ‌must,‌  ‌at‌  ‌all‌  ‌times,‌  ‌be‌  ‌accountable‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌people,‌‌ 
permanent‌  ‌office.‌  ‌Or‌  ‌in‌  ‌some‌  ‌cases,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌public‌  ‌officer‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 
serve‌  ‌them‌  ‌with‌  ‌utmost‌  ‌responsibility,‌  ‌integrity,‌  ‌loyalty,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
designated‌‌to‌‌a‌‌position‌‌in‌‌an‌a ‌ cting‌‌capacity‌. ‌ ‌ De‌‌la‌‌Victoria‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌
efficiency;‌‌act‌‌with‌‌patriotism‌‌and‌‌justice,‌‌and‌‌lead‌‌modest‌‌lives.‌  ‌
Whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌heirs‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌deceased‌  ‌protestee‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌election‌  ‌protest‌‌ 
Sec‌  ‌2(b)‌  ‌RA‌  ‌3019‌. ‌ ‌"‌Public‌  ‌officer‌" ‌ ‌includes‌  ‌elective‌  ‌and‌‌  NLTDRA‌‌v.‌‌CSC‌  ‌
may‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌real‌  ‌party-in-interest‌  ‌even‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌vice-mayor‌‌ 
appointive‌  ‌officials‌  ‌and‌  ‌employees,‌  ‌permanent‌  ‌or‌  ‌temporary,‌‌ 
The‌  ‌position‌  ‌which‌  ‌private‌‌
  respondent‌‌   Garcia‌‌  would‌‌   like‌‌
  to‌‌
  occupy‌‌  has‌  ‌been‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌to‌  ‌intervene‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌protestant‌  ‌had‌  ‌waived‌  ‌his‌‌ 
whether‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌classified‌  ‌or‌  ‌unclassified‌  ‌or‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌service‌ 
anew‌  ‌was‌  ‌abolished‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌EO‌‌
  No.‌‌
  649,‌‌
  a ‌‌valid‌‌  reorganization‌‌  claim‌‌for‌‌damages‌‌and‌‌costs‌‌in‌‌the‌‌proceedings.‌  ‌
receiving‌‌compensation,‌‌even‌‌nominal,‌‌from‌‌the‌‌government.‌  ‌
measure.‌‌   There‌‌  is‌‌
  ‌no‌‌
  vested‌‌  property‌‌  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌ re-employed‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌ NO‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌late‌  ‌Mesina's‌  ‌claim‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌contested‌  ‌office‌‌  was‌‌  not‌‌  in‌‌  any‌‌ 
reorganized‌‌office.‌  ‌
Sec‌  ‌3 ‌ ‌(b)‌  ‌RA‌  ‌6713‌. ‌ ‌"‌Public‌  ‌Officials‌" ‌ ‌includes‌  ‌elective‌  ‌and‌‌  sense‌‌   a ‌‌transmissible‌‌   right‌‌   that‌‌
  devolved‌‌   upon‌‌  her‌‌ surviving‌‌ spouse‌‌ 
appointive‌  ‌officials‌  ‌and‌  ‌employees,‌  ‌permanent‌  ‌or‌  ‌temporary,‌‌  and‌  ‌her‌  ‌children‌  ‌after‌  ‌her‌  ‌death.‌  ‌Public‌  ‌office‌  ‌is‌  ‌personal‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
whether‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  career‌‌
  or‌‌
  non-career‌‌
  service,‌‌  including‌‌  military‌‌ and‌‌  Laurel‌‌v.‌‌Desierto‌  ‌ incumbent‌‌and‌‌is‌‌not‌‌a‌‌property‌‌which‌‌passes‌‌to‌‌his‌‌heirs.‌  ‌
police‌  ‌personnel,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌they‌  ‌receive‌  ‌compensation‌, ‌‌ The‌‌characteristics‌o
‌ f‌‌a‌‌public‌‌office‌ ‌include‌‌   ‌ Private‌  ‌respondents’‌  ‌only‌  ‌interest‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌outcome‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌is‌ 
regardless‌‌of‌‌amount.‌  ‌ limited‌  ‌to‌  ‌no‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌their‌  ‌interest‌  ‌in‌  ‌defending‌  ‌her‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌‌ 
1) the‌‌delegation‌‌of‌‌sovereign‌‌functions‌,  ‌‌ ‌
protestant's‌  ‌claim‌  ‌for‌  ‌damages‌  ‌and‌  ‌costs.‌  ‌They‌  ‌may‌  ‌no‌  ‌longer‌‌ 
Sec‌‌of‌‌DOTC‌‌v.‌‌Mabalot‌  ‌ 2) its‌‌creation‌‌by‌‌law‌‌and‌‌not‌‌by‌‌contract,‌‌   ‌
prosecute‌  ‌her‌  ‌own‌‌   counter-claim‌‌   for‌‌
  damages‌‌   against‌‌   the‌‌
  protestant‌‌ 
A‌‌
  public‌‌ office‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ created‌‌ through‌‌ any‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ following‌‌ modes,‌‌ to‌‌  3) an‌‌oath,‌‌   ‌ for‌‌
  that‌‌
  was‌‌   extinguished‌‌   when‌‌   death‌‌   terminated‌‌   her‌‌
  right‌‌  to‌‌ occupy‌‌ 
wit,‌‌either‌‌   ‌ 4) salary,‌‌   ‌ the‌‌contested‌‌office‌‌of‌‌mayor‌‌of‌‌Albuera,‌‌Leyte.‌  ‌
1) by‌‌the‌C
‌ onstitution‌, ‌ ‌
5) continuance‌‌of‌‌the‌‌position,‌‌   ‌
Libanan‌‌v.‌‌Sandiganbayan‌  ‌
2) by‌l‌ aw‌,‌‌or‌  ‌
6) scope‌‌of‌‌duties,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
3) by‌a
‌ uthority‌‌of‌‌law.‌  ‌ The‌‌ term‌‌ "‌office‌" ‌‌used‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ could‌‌ apply‌‌ to‌‌ any‌‌ office‌‌ which‌‌ the‌‌ 
7) the‌‌designation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌position‌‌as‌‌an‌‌office.‌‌   ‌
officer‌  ‌charged‌  ‌might‌  ‌currently‌  ‌be‌  ‌holding‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌necessarily‌  ‌the‌‌ 
In‌  ‌the‌  ‌instant‌  ‌case,‌  ‌the‌  ‌creation‌  ‌and‌  ‌establishment‌  ‌of‌  ‌LTFRB-CAR‌‌ 
Unless‌‌
  the‌‌
  powers‌‌
  conferred‌‌
  are‌‌ of‌‌ this‌‌ nature,‌‌ the‌‌ individual‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ a ‌‌ particular‌‌office‌‌under‌‌which‌‌he‌‌was‌‌charged.‌  ‌
Regional‌  ‌Office‌  ‌was‌  ‌made‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌third‌  ‌mode‌  ‌— ‌ ‌by‌‌ 
public‌‌officer.‌  ‌
authority‌  ‌of‌  ‌law‌, ‌ ‌which‌  ‌could‌  ‌be‌  ‌decreed‌  ‌for‌  ‌instance,‌  ‌through‌‌
  an‌‌  The‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌order‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌amount‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌deprivation‌  ‌of‌‌ 
property‌  ‌without‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌  ‌of‌  ‌law‌. ‌ ‌Public‌‌
  office‌‌   "‌a ‌‌public‌‌ 
  is‌‌
Carandang‌‌v.‌‌Ombudsman‌‌2
‌ 011‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 74‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

There‌‌  is‌‌
  no‌‌
  power‌‌  in‌‌
  this‌‌
  country‌‌
  which‌‌ can‌‌ compel‌‌ a ‌‌man‌‌ 
agency‌  ‌or‌  ‌trust‌,"‌  ‌and‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌envisioned‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  The‌  ‌general‌  ‌rule‌  ‌is‌‌
  that‌‌
  appointments‌‌   shall‌‌
  take‌‌  effect‌‌
  immediately;‌‌ 
Constitutional‌‌provision‌‌which‌‌petitioner‌‌invokes.‌  ‌ and‌  ‌should‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointees‌  ‌already‌  ‌assume‌  ‌the‌  ‌duties‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  to‌‌accept‌‌an‌‌office.‌  ‌
positions,‌  ‌they‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌receive‌  ‌their‌  ‌salary‌  ‌at‌  ‌once‌. ‌‌
The‌‌General‌‌Manager,‌‌PPA‌‌v.‌‌Monserate‌  ‌ Permanent‌v‌ s‌T
‌ emporary‌‌Appointments‌  ‌
There‌‌   is‌‌
  no‌‌
  need‌‌
  to‌‌
  wait‌‌  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  approval‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ appointments‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ 
Whether‌‌   or‌‌
  not‌‌
  there‌‌  was‌‌ due‌‌ process‌‌ when‌‌ respondent‌‌ was‌‌ replaced‌‌  CSC.‌  ‌The‌  ‌appointments‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌effective‌  ‌until‌  ‌disapproved‌‌   by‌‌  Appointment‌‌in‌‌the‌‌career‌‌service‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌permanent‌‌or‌‌temporary.‌  ‌
by‌  ‌petitioner‌‌   Anino‌‌
  from‌‌  her‌‌
  position‌‌
  as‌‌
  Manager‌‌  II‌‌
  and‌‌
  demoted‌‌  to‌‌  the‌‌CSC‌. ‌ ‌ 1. Permanent‌‌   status.‌‌
  ‌A ‌‌permanent‌‌   appointment‌‌
  shall‌‌   be‌‌
  issued‌‌ 
Administrative‌‌Officer.‌  ‌ Nevertheless,‌  ‌the‌  ‌aforementioned‌  ‌general‌  ‌rules‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌‌  to‌‌
  a ‌‌person‌‌
  who‌‌  meets‌‌   all‌‌
  the‌‌
  requirements‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌ position‌‌ to‌‌ 
simply‌  ‌applied‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌at‌  ‌bar‌  ‌given‌  ‌its‌  ‌peculiar‌‌  which‌‌he‌‌is‌‌being‌‌appointed.‌  ‌
NO‌. ‌‌In‌‌  ‌Aquino‌‌  v.‌‌ Civil‌‌ Service‌‌ Commission‌, ‌‌this‌‌ Court‌‌ emphasized‌‌ that‌‌ 
circumstances.‌S‌ imply‌‌stated,‌‌during‌‌the‌‌pendency‌‌of‌‌the‌‌appeal:‌  ‌ 2. Temporary‌  ‌appointment.‌  ‌In‌  ‌the‌  ‌absence‌  ‌of‌  ‌appropriate‌‌ 
“once‌  ‌an‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌is‌  ‌issued‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌moment‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointee‌‌ 
assumes‌  ‌a ‌ ‌position‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌civil‌  ‌service‌  ‌under‌  ‌a ‌ ‌completed‌‌  1. The‌  ‌appointee‌  ‌has‌  ‌a ‌ ‌right‌‌   to‌‌  payment‌‌   of‌‌
  salaries‌‌   from‌‌  eligibles‌‌   and‌‌  it‌‌
  becomes‌‌   necessary‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌  public‌‌
  interest‌‌ to‌‌ fill‌‌ 
appointment,‌  ‌he‌  ‌acquires‌  ‌a‌  ‌legal,‌  ‌not‌  ‌merely‌  ‌equitable,‌  ‌right‌‌  (to‌‌
  the‌‌  the‌‌
  government.‌‌ — ‌‌if‌‌ the‌‌ appointment‌‌ was‌‌ disapproved‌‌ ‌on‌‌  a‌‌
  vacancy,‌‌ a ‌‌temporary‌‌ appointment‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ issued‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌person‌‌ 
position)‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌protected‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌by‌  ‌statute,‌  ‌but‌  ‌also‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  grounds‌  ‌which‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌a ‌ ‌violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌civil‌‌  who‌‌   meets‌‌   all‌‌
  the‌‌   requirements‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌  position‌‌ to‌‌ which‌‌ he‌‌ is‌‌ 
constitution,‌‌   and‌‌
  cannot‌‌
  be‌‌
  taken‌‌ away‌‌ from‌‌ him‌‌ either‌‌ by‌‌ revocation‌‌  service‌  ‌law‌, ‌ ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌failure‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointee‌  ‌to‌  ‌meet‌  ‌the‌‌  being‌‌   appointed‌‌   ‌except‌‌
  the‌‌
  appropriate‌‌   civil‌‌
  service‌‌
  eligibility‌. ‌‌
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointment,‌  ‌or‌  ‌by‌  ‌removal,‌  ‌except‌  ‌for‌  ‌cause,‌  ‌and‌  ‌with‌‌  Qualification‌‌Standards‌‌(QS)‌‌prescribed‌‌for‌‌the‌‌position.‌  ‌ Such‌  ‌temporary‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌exceed‌  ‌12‌  ‌months‌, ‌‌
previous‌‌notice‌‌and‌‌hearing.”‌  ‌ but‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointee‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌replaced‌  ‌sooner‌  ‌if‌  ‌a ‌ ‌qualified‌  ‌civil‌‌ 
2. The‌  ‌appointing‌  ‌authority‌‌   shall‌‌  be‌‌  personally‌‌   liable‌‌
  for‌‌ 
service‌‌eligible‌‌becomes‌‌available.‌  ‌
To‌  ‌be‌  ‌sure,‌  ‌her‌  ‌position‌  ‌as‌‌
  Manager‌‌
  II‌‌
  ‌never‌‌
  became‌‌   vacant‌‌  since‌‌  the‌  ‌salary‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointee.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌was‌‌ 
her‌  ‌demotion‌  ‌was‌  ‌void.‌  ‌In‌  ‌this‌  ‌jurisdiction,‌‌   "an‌‌
  appointment‌‌   to‌‌
  a ‌‌ disapproved‌‌for‌‌violation‌‌of‌‌civil‌‌service‌‌law‌. ‌ ‌ Pangilinan‌‌v.‌‌Maglaya‌  ‌
non-vacant‌‌position‌‌in‌‌the‌‌civil‌‌service‌‌is‌‌null‌‌and‌‌void‌a ‌ b‌‌initio‌.”‌  ‌ Only‌‌
  if‌‌
  this‌‌
  Court‌‌   finally‌‌
  rules‌‌
  that‌‌ petitioners'‌‌ appointments‌‌ did‌‌ not‌‌ 
Pangilinan‌‌   was‌‌  only‌‌
  an‌‌
  ‌acting‌‌  ‌appointee‌‌ because‌‌ he‌‌ did‌‌ not‌‌ have‌‌ the‌‌ 
While‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌Anino’s‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌contested‌  ‌position‌  ‌is‌‌  violate‌‌  any‌‌
  civil‌‌
  service‌‌   law,‌‌
  is‌‌
  petitioners'‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  payment‌‌
  of‌‌ their‌‌  requisite‌  ‌qualifications;‌  ‌as‌  ‌such,‌  ‌he‌  ‌could‌  ‌not‌  ‌claim‌  ‌security‌  ‌of‌‌ 
void,‌‌ he‌‌ is‌‌ nonetheless‌‌ considered‌‌ a ‌‌‌de‌‌ facto‌‌ ‌officer‌‌ during‌‌ the‌‌ period‌‌  salaries‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌City‌  ‌Government‌  ‌of‌  ‌Dumaguete,‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌given‌‌  tenure.‌  ‌The‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌Pangilinan‌  ‌was‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌for‌  ‌his‌  ‌initial‌‌ 
of‌‌his‌‌incumbency.‌‌   ‌ period,‌‌indisputably‌‌established.‌  ‌ appointment‌‌   as‌‌
  agent‌‌
  in‌‌  the‌‌
  NBI‌‌  does‌‌
  not‌‌
  mean‌‌
  he‌‌
  was‌‌  qualified‌‌  for‌‌ 
In‌  ‌the‌  ‌later‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌Civil‌  ‌Liberties‌  ‌Union‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Executive‌  ‌Secretary,‌  ‌this‌‌  all‌‌other‌‌positions‌‌he‌‌might‌‌later‌‌occupy‌‌in‌‌the‌‌civil‌‌service.‌‌   ‌
Court‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌a ‌ ‌de‌  ‌facto‌  ‌officer‌  ‌to‌  ‌receive‌  ‌emoluments‌  ‌for‌  ‌actual‌‌  B.‌‌Modes‌‌of‌‌acquiring‌‌title‌‌to‌‌public‌‌office‌  ‌
Where‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌holds‌  ‌his‌  ‌position‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌pleasure‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌superior‌‌   or‌‌ 
services‌‌rendered‌b ‌ ut‌‌only‌‌when‌‌there‌‌is‌‌no‌d ‌ e‌‌jure‌‌‌officer.‌  ‌ 1. By‌e
‌ lection‌; ‌ ‌
subject‌‌
  to‌‌  some‌‌   supervening‌‌   event,‌‌  his‌‌
  separation‌‌   from‌‌
  office‌‌ is‌‌ ‌not‌‌ 
In‌‌
  fine,‌‌
  the‌‌  rule‌‌  is‌‌
  that‌‌ where‌‌ there‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌‌de‌‌ jure‌‌ officer,‌‌ a ‌‌‌de‌‌ facto‌‌  2. By‌‌direct‌‌provision‌‌of‌‌law;‌  ‌ a‌  ‌removal‌. ‌ ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌effected‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌will‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌superior‌  ‌or‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
officer,‌  ‌during‌  ‌his‌  ‌wrongful‌  ‌incumbency,‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  3. By‌a
‌ ppointment‌. ‌ ‌ happening‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ contingency,‌‌ resulting‌‌ in‌‌ another‌‌ and‌‌ different‌‌ mode‌‌ 
emoluments‌‌   attached‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌ office,‌‌ even‌‌ if‌‌ he‌‌ occupied‌‌ the‌‌ office‌‌  of‌‌terminating‌‌official‌‌relations‌‌known‌‌as‌e ‌ xpiration‌‌of‌‌the‌‌term‌. ‌ ‌
in‌‌
  good‌‌   faith.‌  ‌This‌‌   rule,‌‌
  however,‌‌   cannot‌‌
  be‌‌  applied‌‌ squarely‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌  C.‌‌Modes‌‌and‌‌kinds‌‌of‌‌appointment‌  ‌
Strictly‌  ‌speaking,‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner's‌  ‌temporary‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌as‌‌ 
present‌‌case.‌  ‌
The‌‌
  appointment‌‌
  to‌‌
  a ‌‌government‌‌
  post‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  complete‌‌ involves‌‌ several‌‌  Executive‌‌   Director‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ LTO‌‌ should‌‌ have‌‌ ended‌‌ twelve‌‌ months‌‌ after‌‌ 
Monserate‌  ‌is‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌  ‌backpay‌  ‌differentials‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌period‌‌  steps.‌‌   ‌ he‌  ‌assumed‌  ‌office,‌  ‌or‌  ‌on‌  ‌July‌  ‌16,‌  ‌1988.‌  ‌From‌  ‌that‌  ‌date,‌  ‌his‌‌ 
starting‌‌   from‌‌
  her‌‌  assumption‌‌   as‌‌
  Administrative‌‌ Officer‌‌ up‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌  appointment‌  ‌had‌  ‌ceased‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌valid‌  ‌even‌‌
  if‌‌
  a ‌‌qualified‌‌
  replacement‌‌ 
First‌,‌‌comes‌‌the‌‌nomination‌‌by‌‌the‌‌President.‌‌   ‌
of‌  ‌her‌  ‌actual‌  ‌reinstatement‌  ‌to‌  ‌her‌  ‌rightful‌  ‌position‌  ‌as‌  ‌Division‌‌  was‌‌not‌‌yet‌‌available‌‌and‌‌consequently‌‌had‌‌to‌‌be‌‌discontinued.‌  ‌
Manager.‌  ‌ Second,‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌  ‌that‌  ‌nomination‌  ‌valid‌  ‌and‌  ‌permanent,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Commission‌‌on‌‌Appointments‌‌has‌‌to‌‌confirm‌‌said‌‌nomination.‌‌   ‌
Prov‌‌of‌‌Camarines‌‌Sur‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
Nazareno‌‌v.‌‌City‌‌of‌‌Dumaguete‌  ‌ Third‌‌
  and‌‌
  last‌‌
  is‌‌   ‌acceptance‌‌
  the‌‌   ‌thereof‌‌  by‌‌  the‌‌  appointee‌‌ by‌‌ his‌‌ 
assumption‌‌of‌‌office.‌‌   ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 75‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

otherwise‌  ‌provided‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌Constitution,‌‌


  hold‌‌
  any‌‌  other‌‌  office‌‌ 
WON‌  ‌Dato‌  ‌was‌  ‌a ‌ ‌permanent‌  ‌employee‌  ‌of‌  ‌petitioner‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌
  time‌‌
  he‌‌  Subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌on‌  ‌nuisance‌  ‌candidates,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌candidate‌  ‌for‌‌ 
or‌‌
  employment‌‌   during‌‌  their‌‌   tenure.‌‌
  They‌‌ shall‌‌ not,‌‌ during‌‌ said‌‌ 
was‌‌suspended‌‌on‌‌March‌‌16,‌‌1976.‌  ‌ senator‌‌   needs‌‌   only‌‌
  to‌‌
  meet‌‌
  the‌‌  qualifications‌‌
  laid‌‌
  down‌‌   in‌‌
  Sec‌‌
  3 ‌‌Art‌‌ 
tenure,‌‌directly‌‌or‌‌indirectly,‌‌   ‌
NO‌. ‌‌The‌‌  fact‌‌  that‌‌  Dato‌‌  obtained‌‌  civil‌‌  service‌‌  eligibility‌‌ later‌‌ on‌‌ is‌‌ of‌‌  VI‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitution,‌‌to‌‌wit:‌‌   ‌
a. practice‌‌any‌‌other‌‌profession,‌‌   ‌
no‌  ‌moment‌  ‌as‌  ‌his‌  ‌having‌  ‌passed‌  ‌the‌  ‌supervising‌  ‌security‌  ‌guard‌‌  1) citizenship,‌‌   ‌
examination,‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌ipso‌  ‌facto‌  ‌convert‌  ‌his‌  ‌temporary‌‌  b. participate‌‌in‌‌any‌‌business,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
2) voter‌‌registration,‌‌   ‌
appointment‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌permanent‌  ‌one‌. ‌ ‌In‌  ‌cases‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌‌
  one‌‌
  at‌‌  c. be‌‌
  financially‌‌ interested‌‌ in‌‌ any‌‌ contract‌‌ with,‌‌ or‌‌ in‌‌ any‌‌ 
3) literacy,‌‌   ‌
bench,‌  ‌what‌  ‌is‌  ‌required‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ n ‌ ew‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌since‌  ‌a ‌‌ franchise,‌  ‌or‌  ‌special‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌granted‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
permanent‌‌   appointment‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌
  a ‌‌continuation‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ temporary‌‌  4) age,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ Government.‌‌   ‌
appointment‌  ‌— ‌ ‌these‌  ‌are‌  ‌two‌  ‌distinct‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointing‌‌  5) residency.‌   ‌ ‌ They‌  ‌shall‌  ‌strictly‌  ‌avoid‌  ‌conflict‌  ‌of‌  ‌interest‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  conduct‌‌
  of‌‌ 
authority.‌  ‌ their‌‌office.‌‌(‌Sec‌‌13‌‌Art‌‌VII‌) ‌ ‌
Beyond‌  ‌these‌  ‌stated‌  ‌qualification‌  ‌requirements,‌  ‌candidates‌  ‌for‌‌ 
In‌  ‌Luego‌  ‌v.‌‌
  Civil‌‌
  Service‌‌   Commission‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  Court‌‌
  ruled‌‌  that‌‌
  CSC‌‌  has‌‌  senator‌  ‌need‌  ‌not‌  ‌possess‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌  ‌qualification.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Congress‌  3. No‌  ‌Senator‌  ‌or‌  ‌Member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌House‌  ‌of‌  ‌Representatives‌‌ 
the‌‌   power‌‌
  to‌‌  approve‌‌
  or‌‌
  disapprove‌‌
  an‌‌
  appointment‌‌   set‌‌
  before‌‌  it.‌  ‌It‌‌  cannot‌  ‌validly‌  ‌amend‌  ‌or‌  ‌otherwise‌  ‌modify‌  ‌these‌  ‌qualification‌‌  may‌‌   hold‌‌
  any‌‌
  other‌‌
  office‌‌ or‌‌ employment‌‌ ‌in‌‌ the‌‌ Government‌, ‌‌
does‌‌not‌‌have‌‌the‌‌power‌‌   ‌ standards,‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌disregard,‌  ‌evade,‌  ‌or‌  ‌weaken‌  ‌the‌  ‌force‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌ during‌‌his‌‌term‌‌‌without‌‌forfeiting‌‌his‌‌seat‌.‌‌(‌Sec‌‌13‌‌Art‌‌VI‌) ‌ ‌
1. to‌m
‌ ake‌‌the‌‌appointment‌‌‌itself‌‌or‌‌   ‌ constitutional‌‌mandate,‌‌or‌‌alter‌‌or‌‌enlarge‌‌the‌‌Constitution.‌  ‌
4. No‌  ‌Senator‌  ‌or‌  ‌Member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌House‌  ‌of‌  ‌Representatives‌‌ 
2. to‌  ‌direct‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointing‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌change‌  ‌the‌‌  may‌‌   personally‌‌  appear‌‌ as‌‌ counsel‌‌ before‌‌ any‌‌ court‌‌ of‌‌ justice‌‌ or‌‌ 
Maquera‌‌v.‌‌Borra‌  ‌
employment‌‌status‌‌‌of‌‌an‌‌employee.‌   ‌ ‌ before‌  ‌the‌  ‌Electoral‌  ‌Tribunals,‌  ‌or‌  ‌quasi-judicial‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌‌ 
The‌  ‌CSC‌‌   can‌‌  only‌‌
  inquire‌‌   into‌‌   the‌‌  eligibility‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  person‌‌   chosen‌‌  The‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  vote‌‌
  and‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  voted‌‌  for‌‌ shall‌‌ not‌‌ be‌‌ dependent‌‌ upon‌‌ the‌‌  administrative‌‌bodies.‌‌   ‌
to‌‌  fill‌‌
  a ‌‌position‌‌   and‌‌  if‌‌
  it‌‌
  finds‌‌   the‌‌  person‌‌  qualified‌‌   it‌‌ must‌‌ so‌‌ attest.‌  ‌ wealth‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌individual‌  ‌concerned,‌  ‌whereas‌  ‌social‌  ‌justice‌‌  Neither‌‌   shall‌‌
  he,‌‌
  directly‌‌   or‌‌ indirectly,‌‌ be‌‌ interested‌‌ financially‌‌ 
If‌  ‌not,‌‌
  the‌‌   appointment‌‌   must‌‌   be‌‌  disapproved.‌‌   The‌‌  duty‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  CSC‌‌
  is‌‌  presupposes‌  ‌equal‌‌   opportunity‌‌   for‌‌  all,‌‌
  rich‌‌
  and‌‌
  poor‌‌
  alike,‌‌
  and‌‌
  that,‌‌  in‌  ‌any‌  ‌contract‌  ‌with,‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌franchise‌  ‌or‌  ‌special‌  ‌privilege‌‌ 
to‌a ‌ ttest‌a‌ ppointments.‌‌   ‌ accordingly,‌  ‌no‌  ‌person‌  ‌shall,‌  ‌by‌  ‌reason‌  ‌of‌  ‌poverty,‌  ‌be‌  ‌denied‌  ‌the‌‌  granted‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Government,‌‌during‌‌his‌‌term‌‌of‌‌office.‌‌   ‌
chance‌‌to‌‌be‌‌elected‌‌to‌‌public‌‌office.‌  ‌
Dato,‌‌
  being‌‌
  merely‌‌ a ‌‌temporary‌‌ employee,‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ entitled‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  He‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌intervene‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌matter‌  ‌before‌  ‌any‌  ‌office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
relief‌‌
  he‌‌
  seeks,‌‌
  including‌‌ his‌‌ claim‌‌ for‌‌ backwages‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ entire‌‌  Government‌  ‌for‌  ‌his‌  ‌pecuniary‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌or‌  ‌where‌  ‌he‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 
Frivaldo‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌
period‌‌of‌‌his‌‌suspension.‌  ‌ called‌‌upon‌‌to‌‌act‌‌on‌‌account‌‌of‌‌his‌‌office.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌14‌‌Art‌‌VI‌) ‌ ‌
Literally,‌  ‌such‌  ‌qualifications‌  ‌— ‌ ‌unless‌  ‌otherwise‌  ‌expressly‌‌  5. No‌  ‌member‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Constitutional‌  ‌Commission,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Sevilla‌‌v.‌‌Santos‌  ‌ conditioned,‌  ‌as‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌age‌  ‌and‌  ‌residence‌  ‌— ‌ ‌should‌  ‌thus‌‌
  be‌‌  Ombudsman‌‌   and‌‌  his‌‌
  deputies,‌‌
  shall,‌‌ during‌‌ his‌‌ tenure,‌‌ hold‌‌ 
possessed‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌‌   "elective‌‌   [or‌‌  elected]‌‌   official"‌‌
  begins‌‌
  to‌‌
  govern,‌‌  any‌‌other‌‌office‌‌or‌‌employment.‌‌   ‌
May‌‌
  an‌‌ officer‌‌ who‌‌ was‌‌ appointed‌‌ to‌‌ an‌‌ office‌‌ in‌‌ an‌‌ "acting"‌‌ capacity,‌‌ 
i.e.,‌‌at‌‌the‌‌time‌‌he‌‌is‌‌proclaimed‌‌and‌‌at‌‌the‌‌start‌‌of‌‌his‌‌term.‌  ‌
bring‌‌
  a ‌‌quo‌‌
  warranto‌‌   action‌‌
  against‌‌   the‌‌ permanent‌‌ appointee‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  Neither‌  ‌shall‌  ‌he‌‌
  engage‌‌
  in‌‌  the‌‌
  practice‌‌  of‌‌
  any‌‌
  profession‌‌   or‌‌
  in‌‌ 
position?‌  ‌ the‌‌ active‌‌ management‌‌ or‌‌ control‌‌ of‌‌ any‌‌ business‌‌ which,‌‌ in‌‌ any‌‌ 
E.‌‌Disabilities‌‌and‌‌inhibitions‌‌of‌‌public‌‌officers‌  ‌
way,‌‌   may‌‌
  be‌‌
  affected‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌ functions‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ office,‌‌ nor‌‌ shall‌‌ he‌‌ 
NO‌. ‌‌An‌‌  "acting"‌‌  appointment‌‌  is‌‌  merely‌‌ temporary,‌‌ one‌‌ which‌‌ is‌‌ good‌‌  Constitutional‌‌Inhibitions‌  ‌ be‌  ‌financially‌  ‌interested,‌‌   directly‌‌  or‌‌
  indirectly,‌‌   in‌‌
  any‌‌
  contract‌‌ 
only‌‌until‌‌another‌‌appointment‌‌is‌‌made‌‌to‌‌take‌‌its‌‌place.‌‌   ‌ with,‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌franchise‌  ‌or‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌granted‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
1. The‌  ‌President‌  ‌and‌  ‌VP‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌receive‌  ‌during‌  ‌their‌  ‌tenure‌‌ 
any‌  ‌other‌  ‌emolument‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌Government‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌‌  Government.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌2‌‌Art‌‌IX-A,‌‌Sec‌‌8‌‌Art‌‌XI‌) ‌ ‌
D.‌‌Eligibility‌‌and‌‌qualification‌‌requirements‌  ‌
source‌.‌‌(‌Sec‌‌6‌‌Art‌‌VII‌) ‌ ‌ 6. No‌  ‌officer‌  ‌or‌  ‌employee‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌civil‌  ‌service‌  ‌shall‌  ‌engage,‌‌ 
Social‌‌Justice‌‌Society‌‌v.‌‌PDEA‌  ‌
2. The‌  ‌President,‌  ‌Vice-President,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  directly‌‌  or‌‌
  indirectly,‌‌
  in‌‌ any‌‌ electioneering‌‌ or‌‌ partisan‌‌ political‌‌ 
Cabinet,‌  ‌and‌  ‌their‌  ‌deputies‌  ‌or‌‌
  assistants‌‌
  shall‌‌
  not,‌‌
  unless‌‌  campaign.‌‌(‌Sec‌‌2[4]‌‌Art‌‌IX-B‌) ‌ ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 76‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Partisan‌  ‌political‌  ‌activity‌  ‌means‌  ‌active‌  ‌support‌  ‌for‌  ‌or‌‌  2. No‌  ‌Senator‌  ‌or‌  ‌Member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌House‌  ‌of‌  ‌Representatives‌‌  In‌‌
  no‌‌ case‌‌ shall‌‌ any‌‌ official‌‌ hold‌‌ more‌‌ than‌‌ two‌‌ positions‌‌ other‌‌ 
affiliation‌‌
  with‌‌  the‌‌
  cause‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌political‌‌  party‌‌ or‌‌ candidate.‌‌ This‌‌  may‌‌   be‌‌ appointed‌‌ to‌‌ any‌‌ office‌‌ which‌‌ may‌‌ have‌‌ been‌‌ created‌‌ or‌‌  than‌‌his‌‌primary‌‌position.‌‌(‌Sec‌‌49‌‌Book‌‌IV‌‌EO‌‌292‌) ‌ ‌
generally‌  ‌includes‌  ‌becoming‌  ‌actively‌  ‌identified‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌  the‌‌
  emoluments‌‌   thereof‌‌ increased‌‌ during‌‌ the‌‌ term‌‌ for‌‌ which‌‌ he‌‌  3. Disqualification‌  ‌of‌  ‌judges‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌No‌  ‌judge‌  ‌or‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌officer‌‌ 
success‌‌  or‌‌
  failure‌‌
  of‌‌
  any‌‌
  candidate‌‌   or‌‌
  candidate‌‌   for‌‌
  election‌‌ to‌‌  was‌‌elected.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌13‌‌Art‌‌VI‌) ‌ ‌ shall‌‌sit‌‌in‌‌any‌‌case‌‌   ‌
public‌‌office.‌  ‌ 3. The‌  ‌Members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Supreme‌  ‌Court‌  ‌and‌  ‌of‌  ‌other‌  ‌courts‌‌  a. in‌  ‌which‌  ‌he,‌  ‌or‌  ‌his‌  ‌wife‌  ‌or‌  ‌child,‌  ‌is‌  ‌pecuniarily‌ 
7. No‌  ‌elective‌  ‌official‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌eligible‌  ‌for‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌or‌‌  established‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌designated‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌agency‌‌  interested‌‌as‌‌heir,‌‌legatee,‌‌creditor‌‌or‌‌otherwise,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
designation‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌capacity‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌public‌  ‌office‌  ‌or‌  ‌position‌‌  performing‌  ‌quasi-judicial‌  ‌or‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌function.‌  ‌(‌Sec‌  ‌12‌‌ 
b. in‌  ‌which‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌related‌  ‌to‌  ‌either‌  ‌party‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌ 
during‌‌his‌‌tenure.‌  ‌ Art‌‌VIII‌) ‌ ‌
sixth‌‌degree‌‌‌of‌‌consanguinity‌‌or‌‌affinity,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
Unless‌  ‌otherwise‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌by‌‌   law‌‌  or‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  primary‌‌   functions‌‌  4. Appointees‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitutional‌  ‌Commissions‌  ‌must‌‌   not‌‌
  have‌‌ 
c. to‌  ‌counsel‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌fourth‌  ‌degree‌, ‌ ‌computed‌‌ 
of‌  ‌his‌  ‌position,‌  ‌no‌  ‌appointive‌  ‌official‌  ‌shall‌  ‌hold‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌‌  been‌  ‌candidates‌  ‌for‌  ‌any‌  ‌elective‌  ‌position‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌elections‌‌ 
office‌‌or‌‌employment‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Government.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌7‌‌Art‌‌IX-B‌) ‌ ‌ immediately‌‌preceding‌‌their‌‌appointment.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌1[1]‌‌Art‌‌IX-B‌) ‌ ‌ according‌‌to‌‌the‌‌rules‌‌of‌‌the‌‌civil‌‌law,‌‌or‌‌   ‌

8. No‌  ‌elective‌  ‌or‌  ‌appointive‌‌   public‌‌   officer‌‌  or‌‌


  employee‌‌   ‌shall‌‌  5. The‌‌   Ombudsman‌‌   and‌‌  his‌‌
  Deputies‌‌ shall‌‌ not‌‌ be‌‌ qualified‌‌ to‌‌ run‌‌  d. in‌‌ which‌‌ he‌‌ has‌‌ been‌‌ executor,‌‌ administrator,‌‌ guardian,‌‌ 
receive‌  ‌additional,‌  ‌double,‌  ‌or‌  ‌indirect‌  ‌compensation,‌  ‌unless‌‌  for‌  ‌any‌  ‌office‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌election‌  ‌immediately‌  ‌succeeding‌  ‌their‌‌  trustee‌‌or‌‌counsel,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
specifically‌  ‌authorized‌‌   by‌‌
  law,‌‌  nor‌‌
  accept‌‌  without‌‌   the‌‌  consent‌‌  cessation‌‌from‌‌office.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌11‌‌Art‌‌XI‌) ‌ ‌ e. in‌  ‌which‌  ‌he‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌presided‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌inferior‌  ‌court‌‌ 
of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Congress,‌‌   any‌‌
  present,‌‌   emolument,‌‌   office,‌‌
  or‌‌
  title‌‌
  of‌‌ any‌‌  6. No‌  ‌candidate‌  ‌who‌  ‌has‌  ‌lost‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌election,‌  ‌shall‌  ‌within‌  ‌one‌‌  when‌‌his‌‌ruling‌‌or‌‌decision‌‌is‌‌the‌‌subject‌‌of‌‌review,‌‌   ‌
kind‌‌from‌‌any‌‌foreign‌‌government.‌  ‌ year‌  ‌after‌  ‌such‌  ‌election,‌  ‌be‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌office‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  without‌‌
  the‌‌
  written‌‌
  consent‌‌
  of‌‌
  all‌‌
  parties‌‌
  in‌‌ interest,‌‌ signed‌‌ by‌‌ 
Pensions‌  ‌or‌  ‌gratuities‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌additional,‌‌  Government‌‌   or‌‌
  any‌‌
  GOCCs‌‌  or‌‌
  in‌‌  any‌‌
  of‌‌
  their‌‌ subsidiaries.‌‌ (‌Sec‌‌  them‌‌and‌‌entered‌‌upon‌‌the‌‌record.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌1‌‌R137‌) ‌ ‌
double,‌‌or‌‌indirect‌‌compensation.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌8‌‌Art‌‌IX-B‌) ‌ ‌ 6‌‌Art‌‌IX-B‌) ‌ ‌ 4. Certain‌‌  attorneys‌‌   not‌‌   to‌‌
  practice.‌‌  ‌— ‌‌No‌‌   judge‌‌   or‌‌
  other‌‌
  official‌‌ 
No‌  ‌loan,‌  ‌guaranty,‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌form‌  ‌of‌  ‌financial‌  ‌accommodation‌‌  Other‌‌Inhibitions‌  ‌
9. or‌‌
  employee‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   superior‌‌   courts‌‌   or‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  OSG,‌‌   shall‌‌ engage‌ 
for‌‌  any‌‌  business‌‌ purpose‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ granted,‌‌ directly‌‌ or‌‌ indirectly,‌‌  in‌‌
  private‌‌
  practice‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌member‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌
  bar‌‌  or‌‌ give‌‌ professional‌‌ 
1. Inhibition‌  ‌Against‌  ‌Purchase‌  ‌of‌  ‌Property‌  ‌at‌  ‌Tax‌  ‌Sale.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌No‌‌ 
by‌  ‌any‌  ‌government-owned‌  ‌or‌  ‌controlled‌  ‌bank‌  ‌or‌  ‌financial‌‌  advice‌‌to‌‌clients.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌35‌‌R138‌) ‌ ‌
officer‌  ‌or‌  e‌ mployee‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  government‌‌   shall‌‌
  purchase‌‌   directly‌‌ 
institution‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌President,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Vice-President,‌  ‌the‌‌  5. Inhibitions‌  ‌Against‌  ‌Commissioners.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌Chairman‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌ 
or‌  ‌indirectly‌  ‌any‌  ‌property‌  ‌sold‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Members‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Cabinet,‌‌ the‌‌ Congress,‌‌ the‌‌ Supreme‌‌ Court,‌‌  Members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌CHR‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not,‌  ‌during‌  ‌their‌  ‌tenure,‌  ‌hold‌  ‌any‌‌ 
non-payment‌  o ‌ f‌  ‌any‌  ‌tax,‌  ‌fee‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌public‌‌   charge.‌‌
  Any‌‌   such‌‌ 
and‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitutional‌‌   Commissions,‌‌   the‌‌   Ombudsman‌, ‌‌or‌‌  other‌‌office‌‌or‌‌employment.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌3‌‌Title‌‌II-A‌‌Book‌‌V‌‌EO‌‌292‌) ‌ ‌
purchase‌‌   by‌‌
  an‌‌  officer‌‌ or‌‌ employee‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ ‌void‌. ‌‌(‌Sec‌‌ 36‌‌ Book‌‌ 
to‌  ‌any‌  ‌firm‌  ‌or‌  ‌entity‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌they‌  ‌have‌  ‌controlling‌  ‌interest,‌‌ 
I‌‌EO‌‌292‌) ‌ ‌ 6. Prohibited‌  ‌Business‌  ‌and‌  ‌Pecuniary‌  ‌Interest.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌It‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌ 
during‌‌their‌‌tenure.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌16‌‌Art‌‌XI‌) ‌ ‌
2. Inhibitions‌  ‌Against‌‌   Holding‌‌   More‌‌   than‌‌
  Two‌‌  Positions.‌‌   — ‌‌Even‌‌  unlawful‌  ‌for‌  ‌any‌  ‌local‌  ‌government‌  ‌official‌  ‌or‌  ‌employee‌, ‌‌
Constitutional‌‌Disqualifications‌  ‌ directly‌‌or‌‌indirectly,‌‌to:‌  ‌
if‌‌
  allowed‌‌   by‌‌
  law‌‌   or‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ primary‌‌ functions‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ position,‌‌ a ‌‌
1. The‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌and‌  ‌relatives‌  ‌by‌  ‌consanguinity‌  ‌or‌  ‌affinity‌  ‌within‌‌  member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Cabinet,‌  ‌undersecretary,‌  ‌assistant‌‌  a. Engage‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌business‌  ‌transaction‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌LGU‌  ‌in‌‌ 
the‌‌   ‌fourth‌‌
  civil‌‌   degree‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌President‌‌   ‌shall‌‌
  not,‌‌
  during‌‌
  his‌  secretary‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌appointive‌  ‌official‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Executive‌‌  which‌‌he‌‌is‌‌an‌‌official‌‌or‌‌employee;‌ 
tenure,‌‌be‌‌appointed‌‌as‌‌   ‌ Department‌‌ may,‌‌ in‌‌ addition‌‌ to‌‌ his‌‌ primary‌‌ position,‌‌ hold‌‌ not‌‌ 
b. Hold‌  ‌such‌  ‌interests‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌cockpit‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌games‌‌ 
a. Members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitutional‌‌Commissions,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ more‌  ‌than‌  ‌two‌  ‌positions‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌and‌  ‌GOCCs‌  ‌and‌‌ 
licensed‌‌by‌‌an‌‌LGU;‌  ‌
receive‌‌the‌‌corresponding‌‌compensation‌‌therefor.‌  ‌
b. the‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Ombudsman,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ c. Purchase‌‌   any‌‌  real‌‌
  estate‌‌  or‌‌
  other‌‌   property‌‌   forfeited‌‌  in‌‌ 
This‌‌   limitation‌‌   shall‌‌ not‌‌ apply‌‌ to‌‌ ad‌‌ hoc‌‌ ‌bodies‌‌ or‌‌ committees,‌‌ 
c. as‌‌Secretaries,‌‌Undersecretaries,‌‌   ‌ favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌LGU‌  ‌for‌‌  unpaid‌‌   taxes‌‌   or‌‌
  assessment,‌‌   or‌‌ 
or‌  ‌to‌  ‌boards,‌  ‌councils‌  ‌or‌‌   bodies‌‌   of‌‌
  which‌‌
  the‌‌   President‌‌  is‌‌
  the‌‌ 
by‌‌
  virtue‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌legal‌‌
  process‌‌   at‌‌
  the‌‌  instance‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  said‌‌ 
d. chairmen‌  ‌or‌  ‌heads‌  ‌of‌  ‌bureaus‌  ‌or‌  ‌offices,‌  ‌including‌‌  Chairman.‌  ‌
LGU;‌  ‌
GOCCs‌‌and‌‌their‌‌subsidiaries.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌13‌‌Art‌‌VII‌) ‌ ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 77‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

d. Be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌surety‌  ‌for‌  ‌any‌  ‌person‌  ‌contracting‌  ‌or‌  ‌doing‌‌  2. Alter‌  ‌ego‌  ‌principle.‌  ‌Under‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌qualified‌‌  obligation‌  ‌but‌  ‌in‌  ‌appreciation‌  ‌for‌  ‌services‌  ‌rendered,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌voluntary‌‌ 
business‌‌   with‌‌
  the‌‌
  LGU‌‌  for‌‌
  which‌‌  a ‌‌surety‌‌
  is‌‌
  required;‌‌  political‌  ‌agency‌, ‌ ‌which‌  ‌recognizes‌  ‌the‌  ‌establishment‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌ donation‌  ‌in‌  ‌consideration‌  ‌of‌  ‌services‌  ‌which‌  ‌admit‌  ‌of‌  ‌no‌‌ 
and‌  ‌ single‌‌
  executive,‌‌  all‌‌
  executive‌‌ and‌‌ administrative‌‌ organizations‌‌  compensation‌  ‌in‌  ‌money.‌  ‌The‌  ‌additional‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌given‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
e. Possess‌  ‌or‌  ‌use‌  ‌any‌  ‌public‌  ‌property‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌LGU‌  ‌for‌‌  are‌‌adjuncts‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Executive‌‌Department.‌  ‌ petitioner‌‌   was‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ nature‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌salary‌‌ because‌‌ it‌‌ was‌‌ received‌‌ by‌‌ him‌‌ 
as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌matter‌  ‌of‌  ‌right‌  ‌in‌  ‌recompense‌  ‌for‌  ‌services‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌by‌  ‌him‌‌   as‌‌ 
private‌‌purposes.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌89‌‌LGC‌) ‌ ‌ 3. This‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌is‌  ‌corollary‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌control‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Acting‌‌   Assistant‌‌   General‌‌   Manager‌‌ for‌‌ Finance‌‌ and‌‌ Administration.‌‌ For‌‌ 
7. Practice‌‌of‌‌Profession.‌—
‌  ‌ ‌ President.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌additional‌  ‌services‌  ‌he‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌   MIAA,‌‌   he‌‌
  was‌‌
  entitled‌‌  to‌‌ 
a. All‌  ‌governors‌, ‌ ‌city‌  ‌and‌  ‌municipal‌  ‌mayors‌  ‌are‌‌  4. Discretionary‌  ‌Function.‌  ‌Ordinarily,‌  ‌mandamus‌  ‌will‌  ‌not‌‌  additional‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌which‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌included‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌highest‌‌ 
prohibited‌  ‌from‌  ‌practicing‌  ‌their‌  ‌profession‌  ‌or‌‌  prosper‌  ‌to‌  ‌compel‌  ‌a ‌ ‌discretionary‌  ‌act.‌  ‌But‌  ‌where‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌‌  basic‌‌salary‌‌rate.‌  ‌
engaging‌‌   in‌‌
  any‌‌
  occupation‌‌   other‌‌
  than‌‌
  the‌‌
  exercise‌‌ of‌‌  "gross‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌of‌  ‌discretion,‌  ‌manifest‌  ‌injustice‌  ‌or‌  ‌palpable‌‌ 
their‌‌functions‌‌as‌‌local‌‌chief‌‌executives.‌  ‌ excess‌  ‌of‌  ‌authority"‌  ‌equivalent‌  ‌to‌  ‌denial‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌settled‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌‌  H.‌‌Liabilities‌‌of‌‌public‌‌officers‌  ‌
which‌‌  petitioner‌‌  is‌‌
  entitled,‌‌
  and‌‌
  there‌‌ is‌‌ no‌‌ other‌‌ plain,‌‌ speedy‌‌ 
b. Sanggunian‌  ‌members‌  ‌may‌  ‌practice‌  ‌their‌‌  Doing‌‌of‌‌an‌‌act‌‌which‌‌a‌‌public‌‌officer‌‌should‌‌not‌‌ 
and‌‌adequate‌‌remedy,‌‌the‌‌writ‌‌shall‌‌issue.‌  ‌ Malfeasance‌  ‌
professions,‌  ‌engage‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌occupation,‌  ‌or‌  ‌teach‌  ‌in‌‌  have‌‌done.‌  ‌
schools‌e‌ xcept‌‌during‌‌session‌‌hours‌.  ‌‌ ‌ 5. Ministerial‌  ‌Function‌. ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌mechanical‌  ‌act‌  ‌that‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌‌ 
Improper‌‌doing‌‌of‌‌an‌‌act‌‌which‌‌a‌‌person‌‌might‌‌ 
performed‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌case,‌  ‌and‌  ‌if‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌not,‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌ordered‌‌  Misfeasance‌  ‌
c. Doctors‌  ‌of‌  ‌medicine‌  ‌may‌  ‌practice‌  ‌their‌  ‌profession‌‌  lawfully‌‌do.‌  ‌
performed‌‌by‌‌a‌‌court‌‌of‌‌justice.‌  ‌
even‌  ‌during‌  ‌official‌‌
  hours‌‌
  of‌‌
  work‌‌
  only‌‌  on‌‌
  occasions‌‌ 
Failure‌‌of‌‌an‌‌agent‌‌to‌‌perform‌‌his‌‌undertaking‌‌for‌‌ 
of‌‌emergency.‌  ‌ G.‌‌Rights‌‌of‌‌public‌‌officers‌  ‌ Nonfeasance‌  ‌
the‌‌principal.‌  ‌
Provided‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌officials‌  ‌concerned‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌derive‌‌  1. Right‌‌   to‌‌ Office‌. ‌‌‌If‌‌ the‌‌ appointment‌‌ only‌‌ stated‌‌ the‌‌ position‌‌ and‌‌ 
1. A‌  ‌public‌  ‌officer‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌‌
  be‌‌
  civilly‌‌
  liable‌‌
  for‌‌
  acts‌‌
  done‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌ 
monetary‌‌compensation‌‌therefrom.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌90‌‌LGC‌) ‌ ‌ not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌particular‌  ‌station,‌  ‌then‌  ‌the‌  ‌officer‌  ‌may‌  ‌validly‌  ‌be‌‌ 
performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌official‌  ‌duties,‌  ‌unless‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌clear‌‌ 
8. Civil‌  ‌servants‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌strike‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌Government‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌‌ reassigned‌  ‌or‌  ‌transferred‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌station‌  ‌without‌  ‌violating‌  ‌the‌‌ 
showing‌‌of‌‌bad‌‌faith,‌‌malice‌‌or‌‌gross‌‌negligence.‌  ‌
means‌  ‌of‌  ‌securing‌  ‌changes‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌terms‌  ‌and‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌of‌‌  right‌‌to‌‌security‌‌of‌‌tenure.‌  ‌
2. Any‌‌   public‌‌
  officer‌‌   who,‌‌
  without‌‌ just‌‌ cause,‌‌ neglects‌‌ to‌‌ perform‌‌ 
employment.‌‌   (‌Sec‌‌
  4 ‌‌R3‌‌
  RR‌‌  to‌‌
  Govern‌‌
  the‌‌
  Exercise‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ Right‌‌  2. Preference‌  ‌in‌  ‌Promotion.‌  ‌There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌mandatory‌  ‌nor‌‌ 
a‌  ‌duty‌  ‌within‌  ‌a ‌ ‌period‌  ‌fixed‌  ‌by‌‌
  law‌‌  or‌‌
  regulation,‌‌   or‌‌
  within‌‌
  a ‌‌
of‌‌Government‌‌Employees‌‌to‌‌Self-Organization‌) ‌ ‌ peremptory‌  ‌requirement‌  ‌that‌‌   persons‌‌   next-in-rank‌‌   are‌‌
  entitled‌‌ 
reasonable‌  ‌period‌  ‌if‌  ‌none‌‌   is‌‌
  fixed,‌‌
  shall‌‌  be‌‌
  liable‌‌
  for‌‌
  damages‌‌ 
9. There‌  ‌are‌  ‌prohibited‌  ‌acts‌  ‌and‌  ‌transactions‌  ‌as‌  ‌well‌  ‌under‌‌  to‌  ‌preference‌  ‌in‌  ‌appointment.‌  ‌What‌  ‌is‌  ‌provided‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌they‌‌ 
to‌‌the‌‌private‌‌party‌‌concerned.‌  ‌
Section‌‌7‌‌of‌‌RA‌‌No‌‌6713‌. ‌ ‌ would‌  ‌be‌  ‌among‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌   va­cancy‌‌  if‌‌ 
qualified,‌  ‌and‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌vacancy‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌filled‌  ‌by‌  ‌promotion,‌  ‌the‌‌  3. A‌‌
  head‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌department‌‌ or‌‌ a ‌‌superior‌‌ officer‌‌ shall‌‌ not‌‌ be‌‌ civilly‌‌ 
F.‌‌Powers‌‌and‌‌duties‌‌of‌‌public‌‌officers‌  ‌ same‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌filled‌‌by‌‌transfer‌‌or‌‌other‌‌modes‌‌of‌‌appointment.‌  ‌ liable‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌wrongful‌  ‌acts,‌  ‌omissions‌‌   of‌‌
  duty,‌‌
  negligence,‌‌   or‌‌ 
misfeasance‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌subordinates,‌  ‌unless‌  ‌he‌  ‌has‌  ‌actually‌‌ 
Source‌‌of‌‌Power‌  ‌ 3. Leave‌‌ of‌‌ Absence.‌  ‌15‌‌ days‌‌ VL‌‌ of‌‌ absence‌‌ and‌‌ 15‌‌ days‌‌ of‌‌ SL‌‌ for‌‌ 
authorized‌  ‌by‌  ‌written‌  ‌order‌  ‌the‌  ‌specific‌  ‌act‌  ‌or‌  ‌misconduct‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌1.‌  ‌Art‌  ‌II.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Philippines‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌democratic‌‌
  and‌‌
  republican‌‌  each‌  ‌year‌  ‌of‌  ‌service‌  ‌with‌  ‌full‌  ‌pay,‌  ‌exclusive‌  ‌of‌  ‌Saturdays,‌‌ 
complained‌‌of.‌  ‌
State.‌  ‌Sovereignty‌  ‌resides‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌and‌  ‌all‌  ‌government‌‌  Sundays‌‌and‌‌holidays.‌  ‌
4. No‌  ‌subordinate‌  ‌officer‌  ‌or‌  ‌employee‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌civilly‌‌   liable‌‌
  for‌‌ 
authority‌‌emanates‌‌from‌‌them.‌  ‌ 4. Retirement‌‌Pay‌. ‌ ‌
acts‌‌  done‌‌
  by‌‌ him‌‌ in‌‌ good‌‌ faith‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ performance‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ duties.‌‌ 
Notes‌  ‌ However‌, ‌‌he‌‌   shall‌‌ be‌‌ liable‌‌ for‌‌ willful‌‌ or‌‌ negligent‌‌ acts‌‌ done‌‌ by‌‌ 
Santiago‌‌v.‌‌COA‌  ‌
1. The‌‌  express‌‌
  grant‌‌
  of‌‌
  power‌‌
  carries‌‌  with‌‌
  it‌‌ the‌‌ grant‌‌ of‌‌ all‌‌ other‌‌  him‌‌   which‌‌
  are‌‌
  contrary‌‌   to‌‌
  law,‌‌  morals,‌‌  public‌‌  policy‌‌ and‌‌ good‌‌ 
WON‌  ‌the‌  ‌additional‌  ‌compensation‌‌
  Santiago‌‌
  received‌‌
  in‌‌
  his‌‌
  capacity‌‌  customs‌  ‌even‌  ‌if‌  ‌he‌  ‌acted‌  ‌under‌  ‌orders‌  ‌or‌  ‌instructions‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌ 
powers‌  ‌necessary,‌  ‌proper,‌  ‌or‌  ‌incidental‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌effective‌  ‌and‌‌ 
as‌‌MIAA‌‌AGM‌‌redounds‌‌to‌‌the‌‌computation‌‌of‌‌his‌‌retirement‌‌pay.‌  ‌ superiors.‌  ‌
efficient‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌the‌‌expressly‌‌granted‌‌power.‌‌   ‌
YES‌. ‌‌An‌‌ ‌honorarium‌‌ ‌is‌‌ defined‌‌ as‌‌ something‌‌ given‌‌ not‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌matter‌‌ of‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 78‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

5. A‌  ‌public‌  ‌officer‌  ‌commits‌‌   an‌‌


  offense‌‌  in‌‌  relation‌‌
  to‌‌
  his‌‌
  office‌‌
  ‌if‌‌  Gentallan‌  ‌by‌  ‌her‌  ‌superior‌  ‌officers.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌they‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌held‌‌  Petitioners‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌hide‌  ‌behind‌  ‌our‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌in‌  ‌Arias‌  ‌v.‌‌ 
he‌‌   perpetrates‌‌   the‌‌   offense‌‌   while‌‌ performing,‌‌ though‌‌ in‌‌ an‌‌  personally‌  ‌accountable‌  ‌for‌  ‌her‌  ‌back‌  ‌salaries.‌  ‌The‌  ‌municipal‌‌  Sandiganbayan‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌explained‌  ‌in‌  ‌that‌  ‌case‌‌   that‌‌  conspiracy‌‌ 
improper‌  ‌or‌  ‌irregular‌  ‌manner,‌  ‌his‌  ‌official‌  ‌functions‌  ‌and‌‌  government,‌  ‌therefore,‌  ‌should‌  ‌disburse‌  ‌funds‌  ‌to‌  ‌answer‌  ‌for‌  ‌her‌‌  was‌  ‌not‌  ‌adequately‌  ‌proven,‌  ‌contrary‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌at‌  ‌bar‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌‌ 
he‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌commit‌  ‌the‌  ‌offense‌  ‌without‌  ‌holding‌  ‌his‌‌   public‌‌  claims‌‌resulting‌‌from‌‌dismissal.‌  ‌ petitioners’‌  ‌unity‌  ‌of‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌and‌  ‌unity‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  execution‌‌   of‌‌
  an‌‌ 
office.‌  ‌In‌  ‌such‌  ‌a ‌ ‌case,‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  i‌ ntimate‌  ‌connection‌ ‌ unlawful‌‌objective‌‌were‌‌sufficiently‌‌established‌. ‌  ‌ ‌
between‌‌the‌‌offense‌‌and‌‌the‌‌office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌accused.‌  ‌ Liability‌‌of‌‌Superior‌‌Officers‌‌for‌‌Acts‌‌of‌‌Subordinates‌‌   ‌
Also,‌  ‌unlike‌  ‌in‌  ‌Arias‌, ‌ ‌where‌  ‌there‌  ‌were‌  ‌no‌‌
  reasons‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌
  heads‌‌   of‌‌ 
Preventive‌‌suspension‌‌and‌‌back‌‌salaries‌  ‌ Arias‌‌v.‌‌Sandiganbayan‌  ‌ offices‌  ‌to‌  ‌further‌  ‌examine‌  ‌each‌  ‌voucher‌  ‌in‌  ‌detail,‌  ‌petitioners‌‌ 
We‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌setting‌  ‌a ‌ ‌bad‌‌
  precedent‌‌   if‌‌
  a ‌‌head‌‌
  of‌‌
  office‌‌
  is‌‌  suddenly‌‌  herein,‌‌   by‌‌
  virtue‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  duty‌‌   given‌‌
  to‌‌
  them‌‌   by‌‌ law‌‌ as‌‌ well‌‌ as‌‌ by‌‌ 
Right‌‌to‌‌Compensation.‌  ‌
swept‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌conspiracy‌  ‌conviction‌  ‌simply‌  ‌because‌  ‌he‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌‌  rules‌  ‌and‌  ‌regulations,‌  ‌had‌  ‌the‌  ‌responsibility‌‌   to‌‌  examine‌‌   each‌‌ 
GR‌:‌‌  ‌No‌‌work,‌‌no‌‌pay;‌  ‌ voucher‌  ‌to‌  ‌ascertain‌  ‌whether‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌proper‌  ‌to‌  ‌sign‌  ‌it‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌‌ 
personally‌‌   examine‌‌ every‌‌ single‌‌ detail,‌‌ painstakingly‌‌ trace‌‌ every‌‌ step‌‌ 
EXC‌:‌‌  ‌ he‌‌
T   Court‌‌
  crafted‌‌
  two‌‌
  conditions‌‌
  before‌‌
  an‌‌
  employee‌‌ may‌‌  from‌‌   inception,‌‌
  and‌‌  investigate‌‌   the‌‌ motives‌‌ of‌‌ every‌‌ person‌‌ involved‌‌  approve‌‌and‌‌disburse‌‌the‌‌cash‌‌advance.‌  ‌
be‌‌entitled‌‌to‌‌back‌‌salaries:‌‌   ‌ in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌transaction‌  ‌before‌  ‌affixing‌  ‌his‌  ‌signature‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌final‌  ‌approving‌‌ 
1. the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌found‌  ‌innocent‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  authority.‌  ‌ Miralles‌‌v.‌‌COA‌‌‌2017‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
charges‌a‌ nd‌  ‌ All‌  ‌heads‌  ‌of‌  ‌offices‌  ‌have‌  ‌to‌  ‌rely‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reasonable‌  ‌extent‌  ‌on‌  ‌their‌‌  The‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌should‌  ‌have‌  ‌instead‌‌   been‌‌
  presumed‌‌   to‌‌  have‌‌
  acted‌‌  in‌‌ 
2. his‌‌suspension‌‌must‌‌be‌u
‌ njustified.‌  ‌ subordinates‌  ‌and‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌good‌  ‌faith‌  ‌of‌  ‌those‌  ‌who‌  ‌prepare‌  ‌bids,‌‌  the‌‌  regular‌‌  performance‌‌   of‌‌
  his‌‌
  official‌‌ duty‌‌ because‌‌ no‌‌ evidence‌‌ had‌‌ 
purchase‌‌supplies,‌‌or‌‌enter‌‌into‌‌negotiations.‌  ‌ been‌‌   presented‌‌  to‌‌
  show‌‌  his‌‌
  having‌‌   acted‌‌
  in‌‌
  bad‌‌
  faith‌‌  and‌‌  with‌‌
  gross‌‌ 
NB:‌‌  ‌  ‌‌strict‌‌
A   observance‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ ‌second‌‌ condition‌‌ for‌‌ an‌‌ award‌‌ 
negligence.‌‌   We‌‌
  should‌‌  remind‌‌ the‌‌ COA‌‌ that‌‌ it‌‌ could‌‌ not‌‌ justly‌‌ execute‌‌ 
of‌  ‌back‌  ‌salaries‌  ‌becomes‌  ‌important‌  ‌only‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌‌ 
its‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌function‌  ‌of‌  ‌disallowing‌  ‌expenditures‌  ‌unless‌  ‌it‌‌ 
employee‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌   innocent‌‌ of‌‌ any‌‌ administrative‌‌  Alfonso‌‌v.‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President‌‌2
  totally‌‌ ‌ 007‌  ‌
accurately‌  ‌but‌  ‌fairly‌  ‌identified‌  ‌the‌  ‌persons‌  ‌liable‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
infraction‌.  ‌‌ ‌ Petitioner's‌  ‌foreknowledge‌  ‌of‌  ‌facts‌  ‌and‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌that‌‌  disallowances.‌  ‌
There‌  ‌are‌  ‌two‌  ‌kinds‌  ‌of‌  ‌preventive‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌of‌  ‌civil‌  ‌service‌‌  suggested‌  ‌an‌  ‌irregularity‌  ‌constituted‌  ‌added‌  ‌reason‌  ‌for‌  ‌her‌  ‌to‌‌ 
In‌  ‌our‌  ‌view,‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner's‌  ‌invocation‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌Arias‌‌
  ‌doctrine‌‌
  in‌‌
  his‌‌ 
employees‌  ‌who‌  ‌are‌  ‌charged‌  ‌with‌  ‌offenses‌  ‌punishable‌‌   by‌‌
  removal‌‌  exercise‌‌
  a ‌‌greater‌‌  degree‌‌
  of‌‌
  circumspection‌‌   before‌‌
  signing‌‌ and‌‌ 
issuing‌‌the‌‌titles.‌  ‌ favor‌‌was‌‌appropriate.‌  ‌
or‌‌suspension:‌‌   ‌
1) Preventive‌‌suspension‌p
‌ ending‌‌investigation‌‌‌and‌  ‌
Field‌‌Investigation‌‌Office‌‌v.‌‌Piano‌‌‌2017‌  ‌
Exception‌‌i‌ n‌‌C
‌ esa‌‌v.‌‌Ombudsman‌‌2
‌ 008‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
2) preventive‌‌suspension‌‌‌pending‌‌appeal‌; ‌ ‌
Arias‌  ‌finds‌  ‌no‌  ‌application‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌case‌  ‌since‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌signed‌‌ 
compensation‌  ‌is‌  ‌due‌  ‌only‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  period‌‌
  of‌‌
  preventive‌‌
  suspension‌‌  By‌‌
  failing‌‌
  to‌‌
  prevent‌‌   the‌‌
  irregularity‌‌
  that‌‌
  Cesa‌‌
  had‌‌
  reason‌‌   to‌‌
  suspect‌‌ 
Resolution‌  ‌No.‌  ‌IAC-09-045‌  ‌not‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌head‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌agency‌  ‌but‌  ‌as‌‌ 
pending‌‌ appeal‌‌ should‌‌ the‌‌ employee‌‌ be‌‌ ultimately‌‌ exonerated.‌‌ (‌CSC‌‌  all‌‌
  along‌‌
  or‌‌
  to‌‌
  take‌‌
  immediate‌‌   steps‌‌
  to‌‌
  rectify,‌‌
  Cesa‌‌ had‌‌ tolerated‌‌ the‌‌ 
Chairman‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌  IAC‌‌  which‌‌   has‌‌   the‌‌
  duty‌‌ to‌‌ inspect‌‌ delivered‌‌ items‌‌ to‌‌ 
v.‌‌Richard‌‌Cruz‌‌2
‌ 011‌‌En‌‌Banc‌) ‌ ‌ same‌‌and‌‌allowed‌‌it‌‌to‌‌wreak‌‌havoc‌‌on‌‌the‌‌coffers‌‌of‌‌the‌‌city.‌  ‌
be‌  ‌conforming‌‌   to‌‌  the‌‌
  NAPOLCOM‌‌   approved‌‌   technical‌‌
  specifications,‌‌ 
Illegal‌‌dismissal,‌‌reinstatement,‌‌and‌‌back‌‌salaries‌  ‌ and‌  ‌rejects‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌if‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌shown‌  ‌otherwise.‌  ‌Moreover,‌  ‌even‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Santillano‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2010‌  ‌
application‌  ‌of‌  ‌Arias‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌barred‌  ‌in‌  ‌certain‌  ‌cases‌  ‌in‌  ‌view‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Muni‌‌of‌‌Jasaan‌‌v.‌‌Gentallan‌  ‌
The‌‌   doctrine‌‌ in‌‌ ‌Arias‌‌ v.‌‌ Sandiganbayan‌‌ ‌could‌‌ not‌‌ be‌‌ used‌‌ by‌‌ Ecleo,‌‌  exceptional‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌which‌  ‌should‌  ‌have‌  ‌prodded‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌to‌‌ 
An‌  ‌illegally‌  ‌dismissed‌  ‌government‌  ‌employee‌  ‌who‌  ‌is‌  ‌later‌  ‌ordered‌‌  Jr.‌‌ to‌‌ escape‌‌ liability,‌‌ as‌‌ the‌‌ documents‌‌ he‌‌ had‌‌ to‌‌ approve‌‌ were‌‌ ‌not‌‌ so‌‌  exercise‌‌a‌‌higher‌‌degree‌‌of‌‌circumspection.‌  ‌
reinstated‌‌   is‌‌
  entitled‌‌
  to‌‌
  backwages‌‌ and‌‌ other‌‌ monetary‌‌ benefits‌‌ from‌‌  voluminous‌‌‌so‌‌as‌‌to‌‌preclude‌‌him‌‌from‌‌studying‌‌each‌‌one‌‌carefully.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌WTCD‌  ‌Report‌  ‌already‌  ‌showed‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌LPOHs‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌fully‌‌ 
the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌her‌‌illegal‌‌dismissal‌‌up‌‌to‌‌her‌‌reinstatement.‌  ‌ conform‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌NAPOLCOM‌  ‌standard‌‌
  specifications.‌‌   Yet,‌‌
  respondent‌‌ 
In‌  ‌the‌  ‌instant‌‌
  case,‌‌
  we‌‌
  note‌‌
  that‌‌
  there‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌no‌‌
  finding‌‌
  that‌‌   malice‌‌   or‌  Bacasmas‌‌v.‌‌Sandiganbayan‌‌‌2013‌  ‌ still‌  ‌issued‌‌
  the‌‌
  Resolution,‌‌
  concealing‌‌
  the‌‌
  truth‌‌  by‌‌
  stating‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  2 ‌‌
bad‌  ‌faith‌  ‌attended‌  ‌the‌  ‌illegal‌  ‌dismissal‌  ‌and‌  ‌refusal‌  ‌to‌  ‌reinstate‌‌  LPOHs‌‌conformed‌‌to‌‌all‌‌the‌‌specifications‌‌and‌‌accepted‌‌them.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 79‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Castillo-Co‌‌v.‌‌Sandiganbayan‌‌‌2018‌  ‌ The‌  ‌private‌  ‌life‌  ‌of‌‌


  an‌‌
  employee‌‌   cannot‌‌   be‌‌
  segregated‌‌   from‌‌   his‌‌  De‌‌Lima‌‌v.‌‌Duterte‌‌‌2019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
public‌‌ life.‌‌ Dishonesty‌‌ inevitably‌‌ reflects‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ fitness‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ officer‌‌ 
When‌  ‌a ‌ ‌local‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌board‌  ‌gives‌  ‌the‌  ‌local‌  ‌chief‌  ‌executive‌‌  May‌  ‌the‌  ‌incumbent‌  ‌Chief‌  ‌Executive‌  ‌be‌  ‌haled‌  ‌to‌  ‌court‌  ‌even‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
or‌‌ employee‌‌ to‌‌ continue‌‌ in‌‌ office‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ discipline‌‌ and‌‌ morale‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌perform‌  ‌a ‌ ‌certain‌  ‌act‌  ‌or‌  ‌enter‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌specific‌‌  limited‌‌purpose‌‌under‌‌the‌‌Rules‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Writ‌‌of‌‌Habeas‌‌Data?‌  ‌
service.‌  ‌
transaction,‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter‌  ‌ought‌  ‌to‌  ‌strictly‌  ‌abide‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌express‌‌ 
terms‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌authority.‌  ‌Any‌  ‌deviation‌  ‌therefrom,‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  NO‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌concept‌  ‌of‌  ‌presidential‌  ‌immunity‌  ‌under‌‌   our‌‌
  governmental‌‌ 
detriment‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  LGU,‌‌
  constitutes‌‌   an‌‌
  offense‌‌   punishable‌‌   under‌‌ 
I.‌‌Immunity‌‌of‌‌public‌‌officers‌‌   ‌ and‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌system‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌distinguish‌  ‌whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌‌ 
RA‌‌3019‌‌for‌‌which‌‌the‌‌LCE‌‌must‌‌be‌‌held‌‌accountable.‌  ‌ Doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌Official‌  ‌Immunity.‌  ‌Mistakes‌  ‌concededly‌  ‌committed‌‌  suit‌  ‌pertains‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌official‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President.‌  ‌Neither‌  ‌does‌‌ 
by‌‌
  public‌‌  officers‌‌   are‌‌
  not‌‌
  actionable‌‌   absent‌‌
  any‌‌
  clear‌‌  showing‌‌ that‌‌  immunity‌‌hinge‌‌on‌‌the‌‌nature‌‌of‌‌the‌‌suit.‌‌   ‌
In‌  ‌this‌  ‌case,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌finds‌  ‌that‌  ‌Resolution‌  ‌No.‌  ‌120‌  ‌should‌  ‌have‌‌ 
they‌  ‌were‌  ‌motivated‌  ‌by‌  ‌malice‌  ‌or‌  ‌gross‌  ‌negligence‌  ‌amounting‌  ‌to‌‌  Accordingly,‌  ‌the‌  ‌concept‌  ‌is‌  ‌clear‌  ‌and‌  ‌allows‌  ‌no‌  ‌qualifications‌  ‌or‌‌ 
prompted‌  ‌Gov.‌  ‌Co‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌more‌  ‌circumspect‌  ‌in‌  ‌transacting‌  ‌with‌‌ 
bad‌  ‌faith.‌  ‌Even‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌  ‌officers,‌  ‌their‌  ‌acts‌  ‌are‌‌  restrictions‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌sued‌  ‌while‌  ‌holding‌‌ 
Nakajima‌  ‌Trading.‌‌   To‌‌
  reiterate,‌‌   the‌‌
  resolution‌‌
  clearly‌‌   directed‌‌
  her‌‌
  to‌‌ 
protected‌‌by‌‌the‌‌presumption‌‌of‌‌good‌‌faith.”‌  ‌ such‌‌office‌. ‌ ‌
procure‌  ‌brand‌  ‌new‌  ‌heavy‌  ‌equipment.‌‌   However,‌‌  she‌‌  contracted‌‌   with‌‌ 
Nakajima‌  ‌Trading‌  ‌for‌  ‌reconditioned‌  ‌equipment‌  ‌and‌  ‌effected‌  ‌the‌‌  As‌  ‌a ‌ ‌rule,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌public‌  ‌officer,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌judicial,‌  ‌quasi-judicial‌  ‌or‌‌ 
consequent‌  ‌expenditure‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌  ‌funds‌  ‌thereon.‌  ‌All‌  ‌this,‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  executive,‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌  personally‌‌  liable‌‌
  to‌‌
  one‌‌  injured‌‌  in‌‌ consequence‌‌ of‌  J.‌‌Distinguish‌d
‌ e‌‌facto‌‌‌and‌d
‌ e‌‌jure‌‌‌officers‌‌   ‌
prejudice‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Province‌‌of‌‌Quirino.‌  an‌  ‌act‌  ‌performed‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌scope‌  ‌of‌‌  his‌‌  official‌‌
  authority,‌‌
  and‌‌
  in‌‌  1) De‌  ‌jure‌  ‌— ‌‌‌One‌‌
  who‌‌
  has‌‌
  lawful‌‌
  title‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  office‌‌
  but‌‌
  has‌‌
  not‌‌
  been‌‌ 
line‌‌of‌‌his‌‌official‌‌duty.‌  ‌ able‌‌to‌‌take‌‌possession‌‌of‌‌it‌‌or‌‌has‌‌been‌‌ousted‌‌therefrom.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌subordinates‌  ‌contemplated‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Arias‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌are‌  ‌those‌‌ 
public‌  ‌officers‌‌
  and‌‌
  employees‌‌   who‌‌   are‌‌
  ‌actually‌‌   under‌‌
  the‌‌   control‌‌  Farolan‌‌v.‌‌Solmac‌‌Marketing‌  ‌ 2) De‌  ‌facto‌  ‌— ‌ ‌One‌  ‌who‌  ‌derives‌  ‌his‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌from‌  ‌one‌  ‌having‌‌ 
or‌  ‌supervision‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌head‌  ‌of‌  ‌office‌  ‌concerned‌, ‌ ‌or‌  ‌those‌  ‌who‌‌  colorable‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌‌
  appoint,‌‌  if‌‌
  the‌‌
  office‌‌
  is‌‌
  an‌‌
  appointive‌‌
  office,‌‌ 
answer‌  ‌directly‌  ‌or‌  ‌indirectly‌  ‌to‌  ‌their‌  ‌superiors,‌  ‌who‌  ‌are‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  Whatever‌‌   damage‌‌   they‌‌  may‌‌
  have‌‌   caused‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌result‌‌
  of‌‌
  such‌‌ an‌‌  and‌‌whose‌‌appointment‌‌is‌‌valid‌‌on‌‌its‌‌face.‌  ‌
employ‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌government‌  ‌agency‌. ‌ ‌Atty.‌  ‌Marcos‌  ‌admitted‌‌  erroneous‌  ‌interpretation,‌  ‌if‌  ‌any‌  ‌at‌  ‌all,‌  ‌is‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌nature‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌
All‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following‌e
‌ lements‌‌must‌‌concur:‌‌   ‌
that‌‌  he‌‌
  was‌‌
  merely‌‌  consulted‌‌
  by‌‌  Gov.‌‌ Co‌‌ in‌‌ his‌‌ capacity‌‌ ‌as‌‌ a ‌‌private‌‌  damnum‌  ‌absque‌  ‌injuria.‌  ‌Mistakes‌  ‌concededly‌  ‌committed‌  ‌by‌‌ 
lawyer‌. ‌ ‌ public‌‌   officers‌‌  are‌‌
  not‌‌  actionable‌‌  absent‌‌   any‌‌
  clear‌‌   showing‌‌ that‌‌ they‌‌  a. there‌‌must‌‌be‌‌a‌‌de‌‌jure‌‌office;‌  ‌
were‌‌
  motivated‌‌ by‌‌ malice‌‌ or‌‌ gross‌‌ negligence‌‌ amounting‌‌ to‌‌ bad‌‌ faith.‌‌  b. there‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌color‌  ‌of‌  ‌right‌  ‌or‌  ‌general‌  ‌acquiescence‌  ‌by‌‌ 
After‌  ‌all,‌  ‌"even‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌  ‌officers,‌  ‌the‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  the‌‌public;‌‌and‌‌   ‌
Liability‌‌for‌‌Acts‌‌Committed‌‌Outside‌‌of‌‌Duty‌‌   ‌
petitioners‌‌are‌‌protected‌‌by‌‌the‌‌presumption‌‌of‌‌good‌‌faith.”‌ 
Remolona‌‌v.‌‌CSC‌  ‌ c. there‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌   ‌actual‌‌
  physical‌‌
  possession‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ office‌‌ ‌in‌‌ 
good‌‌faith‌. ‌ ‌
Whether‌  ‌a ‌ ‌civil‌  ‌service‌  ‌employee‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌dismissed‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌  Lansang‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
government‌‌   service‌‌ for‌‌ an‌‌ offense‌‌ which‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ work-related‌‌ or‌‌ which‌‌  The‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌state‌  ‌immunity‌  ‌from‌  ‌suit‌  ‌applies‌  ‌to‌‌   complaints‌‌  Distinction‌‌between‌‌de‌‌jure‌‌and‌‌de‌‌facto‌‌officers‌  ‌
is‌‌not‌‌connected‌‌with‌‌the‌‌performance‌‌of‌‌his‌‌official‌‌duty.‌   filed‌‌  against‌‌   public‌‌   officials‌‌   for‌‌
  acts‌‌ done‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ performance‌‌ of‌‌ their‌‌  De‌‌jure‌  ‌ De‌‌facto‌  ‌
The‌  ‌rule‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌dishonesty,‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌warrant‌‌  duties.‌‌   The‌‌
  rule‌‌  ‌does‌‌  not‌‌  apply‌‌   where‌‌   the‌‌
  public‌‌   official‌‌ is‌‌ charged‌‌ 
dismissal,‌  ‌need‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌committed‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌course‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  in‌‌
  his‌‌  official‌‌
  capacity‌‌   for‌‌
  acts‌‌
  that‌‌
  are‌‌
  unlawful‌‌   and‌‌  injurious‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  One‌‌who‌‌has‌‌lawful‌‌title‌‌to‌‌the‌‌  One‌‌who‌‌actually‌‌possesses‌‌the‌‌ 
rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌others.‌  ‌Public‌  ‌officials‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌exempt,‌  ‌in‌  ‌their‌  ‌personal‌‌  office‌‌but‌‌has‌‌not‌‌been‌‌able‌‌to‌‌  office‌‌although‌‌he‌‌has‌‌an‌‌ 
performance‌‌   of‌‌
  duty‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  person‌‌
  charged.‌  ‌The‌‌  rationale‌‌ 
capacity,‌‌from‌‌liability‌‌arising‌‌from‌‌acts‌‌committed‌‌in‌‌bad‌‌faith.‌  ‌ take‌‌possession‌‌of‌‌it‌‌or‌‌has‌‌been‌‌  imperfect‌‌or‌‌only‌‌colorable‌‌title‌‌ 
for‌‌ the‌‌ rule‌‌ is‌‌ that‌‌ if‌‌ a ‌‌government‌‌ officer‌‌ or‌‌ employee‌‌ is‌‌ dishonest‌‌ or‌‌  ousted‌‌therefrom‌  ‌ thereto.‌  ‌
is‌  ‌guilty‌  ‌of‌  ‌oppression‌  ‌or‌  ‌grave‌  ‌misconduct,‌  ‌even‌‌   if‌‌
  said‌‌
  defects‌‌
  of‌‌  Neither‌  ‌does‌  ‌it‌  ‌apply‌‌   where‌‌  the‌‌
  public‌‌   official‌‌
  is‌‌
  clearly‌‌  being‌‌
  sued‌‌ 
character‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌connected‌  ‌with‌  ‌his‌  ‌office,‌  ‌they‌  ‌affect‌  ‌his‌  ‌right‌‌
  to‌‌  not‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌official‌  ‌capacity‌  ‌but‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌personal‌  ‌capacity‌, ‌‌although‌‌  Has‌‌title‌  ‌ Only‌‌has‌‌color‌‌of‌‌title‌  ‌
continue‌‌in‌‌office‌. ‌  ‌ ‌ the‌‌
  acts‌‌   complained‌‌   of‌‌
  may‌‌
  have‌‌   been‌‌  committed‌‌   while‌‌ he‌‌ occupied‌‌ 
a‌‌public‌‌position.‌  ‌ A‌‌de‌‌facto‌‌may‌‌grow‌‌into‌‌a‌‌de‌‌  A‌‌usurper‌‌may‌‌grow‌‌into‌‌a‌‌de‌‌ 
jure.‌  ‌ facto‌‌if‌‌the‌‌assumption‌‌is‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 80‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

government‌  ‌officer‌  ‌or‌  ‌employee‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌ Resignation‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌preclude‌  ‌the‌  ‌finding‌  ‌of‌  ‌administrative‌‌ 
acquiesced‌‌in‌  ‌
reorganization‌: ‌ ‌ liability‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌was‌  ‌filed‌  ‌prior‌  ‌to‌‌
  resignation.‌‌   However,‌‌
  if‌‌ 
Validly‌‌appointed‌  ‌ Not‌‌validly‌‌appointed‌  ‌ a. Where‌‌  there‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌‌significant‌‌
  increase‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌ number‌‌ of‌‌  the‌‌
  official‌‌   has‌‌ resigned‌‌ without‌‌ an‌‌ administrative‌‌ case‌‌ having‌‌ 
positions‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌new‌  ‌staffing‌  ‌pattern‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  been‌  ‌filed,‌‌   no‌‌
  administrative‌‌   case‌‌  may‌‌   be‌‌
  filed‌‌  thereafter.‌‌
  The‌‌ 
Entitlement‌‌to‌‌salary‌‌in‌S
‌ ampayan‌‌v.‌‌Daza‌  ‌ department‌‌or‌‌agency‌‌concerned‌; ‌ ‌ only‌  ‌recourse‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌file‌‌
  civil‌‌  or‌‌
  criminal‌‌   cases‌. ‌‌(‌Ombudsman‌‌   v.‌‌ 
As‌‌  a ‌‌‌de‌‌
  facto‌‌   public‌‌   officer,‌‌   respondent‌‌ cannot‌‌ be‌‌ made‌‌ to‌‌ reimburse‌‌  b. Where‌  ‌an‌  ‌office‌  ‌is‌  ‌abolished‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌performing‌‌  Andutan,‌‌Jr‌‌2 ‌ 011‌) ‌ ‌
funds‌‌   disbursed‌‌   during‌‌   his‌‌ term‌‌ of‌‌ office‌‌ because‌‌ his‌‌ acts‌‌ are‌‌ as‌‌ valid‌‌  substantially‌‌the‌‌same‌‌functions‌‌is‌‌created‌; ‌ ‌ 8. Recall‌  ‌
as‌  ‌those‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌de‌  ‌jure‌  ‌officer.‌  ‌Moreover,‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌de‌  ‌facto‌  ‌officer,‌  ‌he‌‌
  is‌‌  c. Where‌‌   ‌incumbents‌‌   are‌‌   replaced‌‌ by‌‌ those‌‌ less‌‌ qualified‌‌  9. Prescription‌. ‌ ‌In‌‌
  view‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  policy‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  State‌‌
  contained‌‌
  in‌‌ 
entitled‌‌to‌‌emoluments‌‌for‌‌actual‌‌services‌‌rendered‌. ‌ ‌
in‌  ‌terms‌  ‌of‌  ‌status‌  ‌of‌  ‌appointment,‌  ‌performance‌  ‌and‌‌  the‌‌
  law‌‌
  fixing‌‌
  the‌‌
  period‌‌
  of‌‌
  ‌one‌‌
  year‌‌
  ‌within‌‌
  which‌‌ actions‌‌ for‌‌ 
merit‌; ‌ ‌ quo‌‌warranto‌‌‌may‌‌be‌‌instituted.‌  ‌
K.‌‌Termination‌‌of‌‌official‌‌relation‌  ‌
d. Where‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reclassification‌  ‌of‌  ‌offices‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  10. Failure‌‌
  to‌‌
  Assume‌‌
  Office‌. ‌ ‌The‌‌  office‌‌ of‌‌ any‌‌ official‌‌ elected‌‌ 
1. End‌  ‌of‌  ‌term‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌Officials‌  ‌and‌  ‌employees‌  ‌holding‌‌
  primarily‌‌ 
department‌  ‌or‌  ‌agency‌‌   concerned‌‌   and‌‌
  the‌‌
  reclassified‌‌  who‌  ‌fails‌  ‌or‌  ‌refuses‌  ‌to‌  ‌take‌  ‌his‌  ‌oath‌  ‌of‌  ‌office‌  ‌within‌  ‌six‌‌ 
confidential‌‌   ‌positions‌‌   continue‌‌   only‌‌ for‌‌ so‌‌ long‌‌ as‌‌ confidence‌‌ 
offices‌‌
  perform‌‌   substantially‌‌   the‌‌
  same‌‌  function‌‌   as‌‌ the‌‌  months‌‌‌from‌‌his‌‌proclamation‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌considered‌‌vacant.‌  ‌
in‌  ‌them‌  ‌endures.‌  ‌The‌‌   termination‌‌   of‌‌
  their‌‌
  official‌‌  relation‌‌
  can‌‌ 
original‌‌offices‌; ‌ ‌
be‌‌  justified‌‌
  on‌‌ the‌‌ ground‌‌ of‌‌ loss‌‌ of‌‌ confidence‌‌ ‌because‌‌ in‌‌ that‌‌  L.‌‌Civil‌‌Service‌  ‌
case‌  ‌their‌  ‌cessation‌  ‌from‌  ‌office‌  ‌involves‌  ‌no‌  ‌removal‌  ‌but‌‌  e. Where‌  ‌the‌  ‌removal‌  ‌violates‌  ‌the‌  ‌order‌  ‌of‌  ‌separation‌‌ 
merely‌‌the‌e‌ xpiration‌o ‌ f‌‌the‌‌term‌‌of‌‌office.‌  ‌ provided‌  ‌in‌  ‌Section‌  ‌3 ‌ ‌hereof.‌  ‌(‌Cotiangco‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Prov‌  ‌of‌‌  Scope‌  ‌
Biliran‌‌2
‌ 011‌‌En‌‌Banc‌) ‌ ‌ Sec‌  ‌2 ‌ ‌Art‌  ‌IX-B‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌civil‌  ‌service‌  ‌embraces‌  ‌all‌  ‌branches,‌‌ 
2. Retirement‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌compulsory‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌of‌  ‌government‌‌ 
officials‌  ‌and‌  ‌employees‌  ‌is‌  ‌upon‌  ‌their‌  ‌reaching‌  ‌the‌  ‌age‌  ‌of‌  ‌65‌‌  5. Abandonment.‌  ‌When‌  ‌a ‌ ‌judge‌  ‌of‌  ‌first‌  ‌instance,‌  ‌presiding‌‌  subdivisions,‌  ‌instrumentalities,‌  ‌and‌  ‌agencies‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Government,‌‌ 
years.‌‌   ‌ over‌  ‌a ‌‌branch‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌CFI‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌judicial‌‌   district‌‌  by‌‌
  virtue‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌legal‌‌  including‌‌GOCCs‌w ‌ ith‌‌original‌‌charters‌. ‌ ‌
and‌‌
  valid‌‌   appointment,‌‌ accepts‌‌ another‌‌ appointment‌‌ to‌‌ preside‌‌ 
3. Abolition‌‌
  of‌‌
  Office‌. ‌‌‌In‌‌  order‌‌  to‌‌  be‌‌  valid,‌‌  the‌‌  abolition‌‌  must‌‌  Khan‌‌v.‌‌Ombudsman‌  ‌
over‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌branch‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌CFI,‌  ‌in‌‌   addition‌‌  to‌‌  another‌‌ 
be‌  ‌made‌  ‌in‌  ‌good‌  ‌faith.‌  ‌Where‌  ‌the‌  ‌abolition‌  ‌is‌  ‌made‌  ‌in‌  ‌bad‌‌  court‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌category,‌  ‌both‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌belong‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌new‌‌  The‌  ‌Office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌exercises‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌public‌‌ 
faith,‌  ‌for‌  ‌political‌  ‌or‌  ‌personal‌  ‌reasons,‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌‌  judicial‌‌   district‌‌ formed‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ addition‌‌ of‌‌ another‌‌ CFI‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ old‌‌  officials‌  ‌and‌  ‌employees‌‌   of‌‌
  GOCCs‌‌   with‌‌
  original‌‌  charters.‌‌  This‌‌
  being‌‌ 
circumvent‌‌   the‌‌
  constitutional‌‌ security‌‌ of‌‌ tenure‌‌ of‌‌ civil‌‌ service‌‌  one,‌‌
  enters‌‌   into‌‌
  the‌‌   discharge‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ functions‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ new‌‌ office‌‌  so,‌  ‌it‌  ‌can‌  ‌only‌  ‌investigate‌  ‌and‌  ‌prosecute‌  ‌acts‌  ‌or‌  ‌omissions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
employees,‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ null‌‌ and‌‌ void.‌‌ There‌‌ is‌‌ an‌‌ invalid‌‌ "abolition"‌‌ as‌‌ 
and‌  ‌receives‌  ‌the‌  ‌corresponding‌  ‌salary,‌‌  a
  he‌‌‌ bandons‌‌   ‌his‌‌  old‌‌  officials‌‌and‌‌employees‌‌of‌‌government‌‌corporations.‌‌   ‌
where‌‌ there‌‌ is‌‌ merely‌‌ a ‌‌change‌‌ of‌‌ nomenclature‌‌ of‌‌ positions,‌‌ or‌‌ 
office‌‌and‌‌cannot‌‌claim‌‌to‌‌be‌‌entitled‌‌to‌‌repossess‌‌it.‌  ‌ Therefore,‌‌   although‌‌   the‌‌  government‌‌   later‌‌
  on‌‌
  acquired‌‌ the‌‌ controlling‌‌ 
where‌  ‌claims‌  ‌of‌  ‌economy‌  ‌are‌  ‌belied‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌‌ 
ample‌‌funds‌. ‌ ‌ 6. Incompatible‌‌
  Office.‌  ‌Exists‌‌  where‌‌  there‌‌  is‌‌  a ‌‌conflict‌‌  in‌‌  the‌  ‌ interest‌  ‌in‌  ‌PAL,‌  ‌the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌remains‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌have‌  ‌an‌‌ 
duties‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ offices,‌‌ so‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ performance‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ duties‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  "original‌  ‌charter"‌  ‌and‌  ‌its‌  ‌officers‌  ‌and‌  ‌employees‌  ‌could‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌ 
To‌  ‌consider‌  ‌an‌  ‌office‌  ‌abolished‌  ‌there‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌an‌‌ 
one‌  ‌interferes‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌   performance‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  duties‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  other,‌‌  investigated‌‌or‌‌prosecuted‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Ombudsman.‌  ‌
intention‌‌to‌‌do‌‌away‌‌with‌‌it‌‌wholly‌‌and‌‌permanently‌. ‌ ‌
or‌  ‌whenever‌  ‌one‌  ‌is‌  ‌subordinate‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌in‌  ‌some‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌ 
4. Reorganization.‌  ‌As‌  ‌a ‌ ‌general‌  ‌rule‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌reorganization‌  ‌is‌‌  important‌  ‌and‌  ‌principal‌  ‌duties,‌  ‌and‌‌   subject‌‌  in‌‌
  some‌‌   degree‌‌  to‌‌  Appointments‌‌to‌‌the‌‌civil‌‌service‌  ‌
carried‌‌  out‌‌
  in‌‌
  "good‌‌
  faith"‌‌
  if‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌purpose‌‌ of‌‌ economy‌‌  its‌  ‌revisory‌  ‌power.‌  ‌One‌  ‌person‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌and‌  ‌should‌  ‌not‌  ‌hold‌‌  Shall‌‌be‌‌made‌o‌ nly‌‌   ‌
or‌‌to‌‌make‌‌bureaucracy‌‌more‌‌efficient‌.  ‌‌ ‌ both‌‌offices,‌‌if‌‌they‌‌are‌‌incompatible,‌‌at‌‌the‌‌same‌‌time.‌  ‌
a) according‌‌   to‌‌  ‌merit‌‌
  and‌‌
  fitness‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ determined,‌‌ as‌‌ far‌‌ as‌‌ 
Section‌‌
  2 ‌‌of‌‌
  RA‌‌
  6656‌‌
  cites‌‌ instances‌‌ that‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ considered‌‌ as‌  7. Resignation,‌  ‌Removal‌. ‌ ‌Not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌bar‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌finding‌  ‌of‌‌  practicable,‌‌and‌  ‌
evidence‌  ‌of‌  ‌bad‌  ‌faith‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌removal‌  ‌from‌  ‌office‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌ administrative‌‌liability.‌‌(O ‌ P‌‌v.‌‌Cataquiz‌‌2
‌ 011‌) ‌ ‌ b) by‌  ‌competitive‌  ‌examination‌, ‌‌‌except‌‌   ‌to‌‌
  positions‌‌
  which‌‌ 
are‌‌   ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 81‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

1) policy-determining,‌‌   ‌ possess‌‌   the‌‌  qualifications‌‌   required‌‌  by‌‌


  law.‌  ‌If‌‌
  he‌‌
  does,‌‌
  then‌‌
  the‌‌ 
For‌  ‌LGUs,‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌assessor‌  ‌is‌  ‌mandatory.‌  ‌In‌‌ 
2) primarily‌‌confidential,‌‌or‌  ‌ appointment‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌faulted‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌ground‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌  ‌are‌‌ 
promotions‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌appointing‌  ‌authority‌  ‌must‌  ‌automatically‌‌ 
others‌‌  better‌‌   qualified‌‌
  who‌‌  should‌‌ have‌‌ been‌‌ preferred.‌  ‌This‌‌ is‌‌ 
3) highly‌‌technical.‌  ‌ a‌‌
  political‌‌  question‌‌   involving‌‌  considerations‌‌  of‌‌
  wisdom‌‌ which‌‌ only‌‌  consider‌  ‌the‌  ‌employees‌  ‌next‌  ‌in‌  ‌rank‌  ‌as‌  ‌candidates‌  ‌for‌‌ 
the‌‌appointing‌‌authority‌‌can‌‌decide.‌  ‌ appointment.‌‌   ‌
Career‌v
‌ s‌N
‌ on-career‌‌Service‌  ‌
The‌  ‌next-in-rank‌  ‌rule‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌rule‌  ‌of‌  ‌preference‌  ‌on‌  ‌who‌  ‌to‌‌ 
1. Entrance‌‌
  in‌‌   ‌career‌‌
  the‌‌   service‌‌
  ‌is‌‌  based‌‌  on‌‌ merit‌‌ and‌‌ fitness‌‌  Lopez‌‌v.‌‌CSC‌  ‌ consider‌‌   for‌‌
  promotion‌. ‌‌The‌‌   rule‌‌
  does‌‌  not‌‌
  give‌‌ employees‌‌ next‌‌ in‌‌ 
to‌  ‌be‌  ‌determined‌  ‌as‌  ‌far‌  ‌as‌  ‌practicable‌  ‌by‌  ‌competitive‌‌  rank‌‌
  ‌a ‌‌vested‌‌   right‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  position‌‌  next‌‌
  higher‌‌  to‌‌
  theirs‌‌
  should‌‌ that‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Commission’s‌  ‌power‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌extend‌  ‌to‌  ‌considerations‌  ‌other‌‌ 
examination,‌‌or‌‌based‌‌on‌‌highly‌‌technical‌‌qualifications.‌‌   ‌ position‌‌become‌‌vacant.‌  ‌
than‌  ‌those‌  ‌enumerated‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌belief‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌  ‌are‌‌ 
2. On‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand,‌  ‌entrance‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌non-career‌  ‌service‌  ‌is‌‌  others‌‌   more‌‌ qualified.‌  ‌The‌‌ law‌‌ limits‌‌ the‌‌ Commission’s‌‌ authority‌‌  To‌  ‌successfully‌  ‌protest‌  ‌the‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌appointment,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
based‌  ‌on‌  ‌criteria‌  ‌other‌  ‌than‌  ‌the‌  ‌"usual‌  ‌tests‌  ‌of‌  ‌merit‌  ‌and‌‌  only‌  ‌to‌  ‌whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointees‌  ‌possess‌  ‌the‌  ‌legal‌‌  employee‌  ‌next‌  ‌in‌  ‌rank‌  ‌must‌  ‌prove‌  ‌his‌  ‌or‌  ‌her‌  ‌status‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌‌
fitness.‌  ‌ qualifications‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌appropriate‌  ‌civil‌  ‌service‌  ‌eligibility‌, ‌‌ qualified‌  ‌next-in-rank;‌  ‌otherwise,‌  ‌the‌  ‌protest‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌ 
nothing‌‌else.‌‌   ‌ dismissed.‌  ‌
Positions‌‌in‌‌the‌c‌ areer‌‌service‌‌‌are‌‌further‌‌grouped‌‌into‌‌three‌‌(3)‌‌levels.‌‌   ‌
The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌emphasizes‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌has‌  ‌no‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌‌  Petitioner‌  ‌further‌  ‌contends‌  ‌that‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌was‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌in‌‌ 
1. The‌  ‌first‌  ‌level‌  ‌includes‌  ‌positions‌‌
  requiring‌‌
  less‌‌
  than‌‌
  four‌‌
  (4)‌‌ 
substitute‌  ‌its‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌for‌  ‌that‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌Ports‌‌  violation‌‌  of‌‌   ‌three-salary-grade‌‌
  the‌‌   rule‌  ‌found‌‌  in‌‌  Item‌‌ 15‌‌ of‌‌ CSC‌‌ 
years‌‌of‌‌collegiate‌‌studies.‌‌   ‌
Authority‌‌   when‌‌
  it‌‌
  comes‌‌
  to‌‌ evaluating‌‌ the‌‌ performance,‌‌ personality,‌‌  MC‌  ‌No.‌  ‌3,‌  ‌Series‌  ‌of‌  ‌2001.‌  ‌It‌  ‌states‌  ‌that‌  ‌an‌  ‌employee‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 
2. The‌  ‌second‌  ‌level‌  ‌includes‌  ‌positions‌  ‌with‌  ‌duties‌  ‌requiring‌  ‌at‌‌  and‌  ‌accomplishments‌  ‌of‌  ‌candidates‌  ‌who‌  ‌all‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌necessary‌‌  promoted‌  ‌or‌  ‌transferred‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌position‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌   more‌‌   than‌‌ 
least‌  ‌four‌  ‌(4)‌  ‌years‌  ‌of‌  ‌college‌  ‌work‌  ‌up‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Division‌  ‌Chief‌‌  eligibility‌‌and‌‌legal‌‌qualifications.‌  ‌ three‌  ‌(3)‌  ‌salary,‌  ‌pay‌  ‌or‌‌
  job‌‌  grades‌‌   higher‌‌   than‌‌  the‌‌   employee's‌‌ 
level.‌‌   ‌ present‌‌position‌. ‌ ‌
3. The‌  ‌third‌  ‌level‌‌
  includes‌‌
  positions‌‌
  in‌‌   ‌Career‌‌
  the‌‌   Executive‌‌  Santiago‌‌v.‌‌CSC‌  ‌   a ‌‌‌meritorious‌‌
Any‌  ‌or‌  ‌all‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌  ‌would‌  ‌constitute‌‌   case‌ ‌
Service‌. ‌ ‌ Whether‌‌the‌‌next-in-rank‌‌rule‌‌is‌‌mandatory.‌  ‌ exempted‌f‌ rom‌‌the‌‌3-salary‌‌grade‌‌limitation‌‌‌on‌‌promotion:‌  ‌

NO‌. ‌‌There‌‌   is‌‌
  "no‌‌
  mandatory‌‌   nor‌‌
  peremptory‌‌   requirement‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌ Civil‌‌  1. The‌‌
  position‌‌
  occupied‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  person‌‌
  is‌‌
  next-in-rank‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ 
Luego‌‌v.‌‌CSC‌  ‌
Service‌  ‌Law‌  ‌that‌  ‌persons‌  ‌next-in-rank‌  ‌are‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌preference‌  ‌in‌‌  vacant‌‌position;‌  ‌
Is‌‌
  the‌‌ Civil‌‌ Service‌‌ Commission‌‌ authorized‌‌ to‌‌ disapprove‌‌ a ‌‌permanent‌‌ 
appointment.‌  ‌What‌‌   it‌‌
  does‌‌
  provide‌‌   is‌‌
  that‌‌
  they‌‌  would‌‌   be‌‌
  among‌‌   the‌‌  2. The‌‌position‌‌is‌‌a‌‌lone‌,‌‌or‌‌entrance‌p
‌ osition;‌  ‌
appointment‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌ground‌  ‌that‌  ‌another‌  ‌person‌  ‌is‌  ‌better‌  ‌qualified‌‌ 
first‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ considered‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ vacancy,‌‌ if‌‌ qualified,‌‌ and‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ vacancy‌‌ is‌‌  3. The‌  ‌position‌  ‌belongs‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌dearth‌  ‌category‌, ‌ ‌such‌  ‌as‌‌ 
than‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointee‌  ‌and,‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌basis‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌finding,‌  ‌order‌  ‌his‌‌ 
not‌  ‌filled‌  ‌by‌‌   promotion,‌‌   the‌‌
  same‌‌   shall‌‌   be‌‌
  filled‌‌  by‌‌
  transfer‌‌   or‌‌
  other‌‌ 
replacement‌‌by‌‌the‌‌latter?‌  ‌ Medical‌‌Officer/Specialist‌‌and‌‌Attorney‌p ‌ ositions;‌  ‌
modes‌‌of‌‌appointment."‌  ‌
4. The‌  ‌position‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌unique‌‌
  ‌and/or‌‌
  ‌highly‌‌
  specialized‌‌
  such‌‌
  as‌‌ 
NO‌. ‌‌The‌‌  CSC‌‌  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  empowered‌‌   to‌‌
  determine‌‌   the‌‌
  kind‌‌ of‌‌ nature‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
appointment‌  ‌extended‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointing‌  ‌officer,‌  ‌its‌  ‌authority‌  ‌being‌‌  Actuarial‌‌positions‌‌and‌‌Airways‌‌Communicator;‌  ‌
Abad‌‌v.‌‌Dela‌‌Cruz‌‌‌2015‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
limited‌‌  to‌‌  approving‌‌   or‌‌
  reviewing‌‌   the‌‌
  appointment‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌  light‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  5. The‌  ‌candidates‌  ‌passed‌  ‌through‌  ‌a ‌ ‌deep‌  ‌selection‌‌
  process,‌‌ 
requirements‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Civil‌  ‌Service‌  ‌Law.‌  ‌When‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointee‌  ‌is‌‌  The‌  ‌appointing‌  ‌authority‌  ‌in‌  ‌LGUs‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌local‌  ‌chief‌  ‌executive‌  ‌who‌‌  taking‌  ‌into‌  ‌consideration‌  ‌the‌  ‌candidates'‌  ‌superior‌‌ 
qualified‌  ‌and‌  ‌all‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌legal‌  ‌require­ments‌  ‌are‌  ‌satisfied,‌  ‌the‌‌  must‌  ‌assess‌  ‌the‌  ‌merits‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Personnel‌  ‌Selection‌  ‌Board's‌‌  qualifications‌‌‌in‌‌regard‌‌to:‌  ‌
Commission‌‌has‌‌no‌‌choice‌‌but‌‌to‌a ‌ ttest‌t‌ o‌‌the‌‌appointment.‌  ‌ recommendation.‌‌   If‌‌
  ‌heads‌‌
  of‌‌
  offices‌‌
  or‌‌
  departments‌‌ ‌in‌‌ an‌‌ LGU‌‌ are‌‌ 
a. Educational‌‌achievements;‌  ‌
appointed,‌  ‌majority‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌sanggunian‌  ‌concerned‌‌ 
Appointment‌‌   is‌‌
  an‌‌
  essentially‌‌   discretionary‌‌   power‌‌ and‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌  b. Highly‌‌specialized‌‌trainings;‌ 
must‌  ‌concur‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointment.‌  ‌Finally,‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointment‌‌   must‌‌   be‌‌ 
performed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌officer‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌vested‌  ‌according‌‌   to‌‌
  his‌‌ 
submitted‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌CSC‌  ‌for‌  ‌attestation‌  ‌within‌  ‌30‌  ‌days‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌  c. Relevant‌‌work‌‌experience;‌  ‌
best‌  ‌lights,‌  ‌the‌  ‌only‌‌
  condition‌‌   being‌‌  that‌‌   the‌‌  appointee‌‌  should‌‌ 
appointment's‌‌issuance‌‌date.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 82‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

imposition‌  ‌of‌  ‌additional‌  ‌duties‌, ‌ ‌usually‌  ‌by‌  ‌law,‌  ‌upon‌  ‌a ‌‌


d. Consistent‌‌high‌‌performance‌‌rating/ranking;‌‌and‌  ‌ person‌  ‌already‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌service‌  ‌by‌  ‌virtue‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌earlier‌‌  Yangson‌‌v.‌‌DepEd‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
6. The‌‌vacant‌‌position‌‌belongs‌‌to‌‌the‌c‌ losed‌‌career‌‌system‌. ‌ ‌ appointment.‌‌   ‌ Reassignments‌  ‌differ‌  ‌from‌  ‌transfers,‌  ‌and‌  ‌public‌  ‌employees‌‌ 
CSC‌  ‌found‌  ‌that‌  ‌respondent's‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌fell‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌fifth‌‌  2. Designation‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌entail‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌additional‌‌  benefits‌‌  with‌  ‌appointments‌  ‌that‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌station-specific‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 
exception.‌‌   Out‌‌
  of‌‌
  nine‌‌
  (9)‌‌  candidates,‌‌
  respondent‌‌   ranked‌‌
  first‌‌   with‌‌ a ‌‌ or‌  ‌grant‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌so‌  ‌designated‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌‌
  to‌‌
  claim‌‌
  the‌‌  reassigned‌‌to‌‌another‌‌station‌‌in‌‌the‌‌exigency‌‌of‌‌public‌‌service.‌  ‌
grade‌  ‌of‌  ‌90.67‌  ‌out‌  ‌of‌  ‌100.‌  ‌Respondent's‌  ‌case,‌  ‌therefore,‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌"‌very‌‌  salary‌‌attached‌‌to‌‌the‌‌position.‌  ‌  
meritorious‌‌case‌."‌  ‌ An‌  ‌appointment‌‌   ‌is‌‌
  ‌station-specific‌‌   ‌if‌‌
  the‌‌
  employee's‌‌  appointment‌‌ 
3. When‌  ‌completed,‌  ‌usually‌  ‌with‌  ‌its‌  ‌confirmation,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
paper‌‌   specifically‌‌   indicates‌‌   on‌‌
  its‌‌
  face‌‌ the‌‌ particular‌‌ office‌‌ or‌‌ station‌‌ 
appointment‌  ‌results‌  ‌in‌  ‌security‌  ‌of‌  ‌tenure‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌‌  the‌  ‌position‌  ‌is‌  ‌located.‌  ‌Moreover,‌  ‌the‌  ‌station‌  ‌should‌  ‌already‌  ‌be‌‌ 
Estrellado‌‌v.‌‌David‌‌‌2016‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ chosen‌  ‌unless‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌replaceable‌  ‌at‌  ‌pleasure‌  ‌because‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  specified‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌position‌‌   title,‌‌
  even‌‌   if‌‌
  the‌‌  place‌‌
  of‌‌
  assignment‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌ 
The‌  ‌next-in-rank‌  ‌status‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌government‌  ‌employee‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌‌ nature‌‌of‌‌his‌‌office.‌  ‌ indicated‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌face‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointment.‌  ‌Here,‌  ‌petitioner's‌‌ 
guarantee‌  ‌to‌  ‌one's‌  ‌fitness‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌position‌  ‌aspired‌  ‌for,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  4. On‌‌
  the‌‌
  other‌‌   a ‌‌‌reassignment‌‌ ‌is‌‌ merely‌‌ a ‌‌movement‌‌ of‌‌ 
  hand,‌‌ appointment‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌solely‌  ‌for‌  ‌Surigao‌  ‌National‌  ‌or‌  ‌for‌  ‌any‌  ‌specific‌‌ 
applicant‌  ‌must‌  ‌go‌  ‌through‌  ‌the‌  ‌rigors‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌screening‌  ‌and‌  ‌selection‌‌  an‌  ‌employee‌  ‌from‌  ‌one‌  ‌organizational‌  ‌unit‌  ‌to‌  ‌another‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  school.‌‌   ‌
process‌  ‌as‌  ‌determined‌  ‌and‌  ‌conducted‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌department‌  ‌or‌  ‌agency,‌‌  same‌‌   department‌‌   or‌‌ agency‌‌ which‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ involve‌‌ a ‌‌reduction‌‌  Petitioner's‌  ‌movement‌  ‌was‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reassignment‌, ‌ ‌not‌‌   a ‌‌transfer‌. ‌‌It‌‌
  did‌‌ 
subject‌‌
  only‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  standards‌‌ and‌‌ guidelines‌‌ set‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ CSC.‌‌ This‌‌ is‌‌ in‌‌  in‌‌
  rank,‌‌
  status‌‌ or‌‌ salary‌‌ and‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ require‌‌ the‌‌ issuance‌‌ of‌‌ an‌‌  not‌‌
  violate‌‌   her‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌   security‌‌ of‌‌ tenure.‌‌ While‌‌ she‌‌ is‌‌ entitled‌‌ to‌‌ her‌‌ 
keeping‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌ideal‌  ‌of‌  ‌promoting‌  ‌through‌  ‌merit‌  ‌rather‌  ‌than‌‌  appointment.‌  ‌ right‌  ‌to‌  ‌security‌  ‌of‌  ‌tenure,‌  ‌she‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌assert‌  ‌her‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌stay‌  ‌at‌‌ 
entitlement,‌  ‌and‌  ‌thus‌  ‌ensuring‌‌   that‌‌
  government‌‌   service‌‌  is‌‌
  rewarded‌‌  Surigao‌  ‌National.‌  ‌Her‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌papers‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌specific‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
5.   legal‌‌ concept‌‌ of‌‌ ‌transfer‌‌ ‌differs‌‌ from‌‌ reassignment.‌‌ Most‌‌ 
The‌‌
with‌‌the‌‌best‌‌fit.‌  ‌ school,‌  ‌which‌  ‌means‌‌   she‌‌   may‌‌
  be‌‌
  assigned‌‌   to‌‌
  any‌‌
  station‌‌   as‌‌
  may‌‌   be‌‌ 
notably,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌transfer‌  ‌involves‌  ‌the‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌of‌  ‌another‌‌ 
appointment,‌‌   while‌‌   a ‌‌reassignment‌‌   does‌‌  not.‌‌
  A ‌‌‌transfer‌‌
  ‌is‌‌
  a ‌‌ necessary‌  ‌for‌  ‌public‌  ‌exigency.‌  ‌Because‌‌   she‌‌   holds‌‌
  no‌‌   vested‌‌
  right‌‌  to‌‌ 
Discretion‌‌of‌‌Appointing‌‌Authority‌‌
   ‌ remain‌‌   as‌‌  Principal‌‌  III‌‌ of‌‌ Surigao‌‌ National,‌‌ her‌‌ security‌‌ of‌‌ tenure‌‌ was‌‌ 
movement‌‌   from‌‌   one‌‌
  position‌‌   to‌‌
  another‌‌ which‌‌ is‌‌ of‌‌ equivalent‌‌ 
Lapinid‌‌v.‌‌CSC‌  ‌ rank,‌  ‌level,‌  ‌or‌  ‌salary‌  ‌without‌  ‌break‌  ‌in‌  ‌service‌  ‌involving‌  ‌the‌‌  not‌‌violated.‌  ‌

Whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌CSC‌  ‌can‌  ‌override‌  ‌the‌  ‌permanent‌  ‌appointment‌‌  issuance‌‌of‌‌an‌‌appointment.‌  ‌ When‌  ‌an‌  ‌employee's‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌is‌  ‌station-specific,‌  ‌his‌  ‌or‌  ‌her‌‌ 
made‌‌by‌‌the‌‌PPA‌‌on‌‌the‌‌ground‌‌that‌‌someone‌‌else‌‌is‌‌better‌‌qualified.‌  ‌ 6. Promotion‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌advancement‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌employee‌  ‌from‌  ‌one‌‌  reassignment‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌exceed‌  ‌a ‌ ‌maximum‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌one‌  ‌(1)‌  ‌year.‌‌ 
This‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ the‌‌ case‌‌ for‌‌ appointments‌‌ that‌‌ are‌‌ ‌not‌‌ station-specific‌. ‌‌In‌‌ 
position‌  ‌to‌  ‌another‌  ‌with‌  ‌an‌  ‌increase‌  ‌in‌  ‌duties‌  ‌and‌‌ 
NO‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌CSC‌  ‌has‌  ‌no‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌except‌  ‌over‌  ‌its‌  ‌own‌‌  such‌  ‌instances,‌  ‌the‌  ‌reassignment‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌indefinite‌  ‌and‌‌   exceed‌‌
  one‌‌ 
responsibilities‌‌ as‌‌ authorized‌‌ by‌‌ law,‌‌ and‌‌ usually‌‌ accompanied‌‌ 
personnel.‌  ‌Neither‌  ‌does‌  ‌it‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌review‌  ‌the‌‌  (1)‌‌year—as‌‌in‌‌petitioner's‌‌case.‌  ‌
by‌‌an‌‌increase‌‌in‌‌salary.‌  ‌
appointments‌  ‌made‌  ‌by‌  ‌other‌  ‌offices‌  ‌except‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌  ‌ascertain‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌‌ 
appointee‌  ‌possesses‌  ‌the‌  ‌required‌  ‌qualifications.‌  ‌The‌‌   determination‌‌  Osea‌‌v.‌‌Malaya‌  ‌ M.‌‌Accountability‌‌of‌‌Public‌‌Officers‌  ‌
of‌  ‌who‌  ‌among‌  ‌aspirants‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌minimum‌  ‌statutory‌  ‌qualifications‌‌ 
The‌‌  designation‌‌   of‌‌
  respondent‌‌ as‌‌ Schools‌‌ Division‌‌ Superintendent‌‌ of‌‌ 
Types‌‌of‌‌accountability‌  ‌
should‌  ‌be‌  ‌preferred‌  ‌belongs‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointing‌  ‌authority‌  ‌and‌‌   not‌‌
  the‌‌ 
CSC.‌  ‌It‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌disallow‌  ‌an‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌because‌‌   it‌‌
  believes‌‌  another‌‌  Camarines‌  ‌Sur‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌appointment.‌  ‌Her‌  ‌designation‌‌  San‌‌Luis‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
person‌‌   is‌‌
  better‌‌
  qualified‌‌  and‌‌  much‌‌ less‌‌ can‌‌ it‌‌ direct‌‌ the‌‌ appointment‌‌  partook‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌nature‌‌   a ‌‌r
  of‌‌ ‌ eassignment‌‌   ‌from‌‌  Iriga‌‌  City,‌‌  where‌‌ 
It‌‌
  is‌‌
  well-settled‌‌   that‌‌
  when‌‌   a ‌‌public‌‌   officer‌‌   goes‌‌
  beyond‌‌ the‌‌ scope‌‌ of‌‌ 
of‌‌its‌‌own‌‌choice.‌  ‌ she‌  ‌previously‌  ‌exercised‌  ‌her‌  ‌functions‌  ‌as‌  ‌OIC-Schools‌  ‌Division‌‌ 
his‌  ‌duty,‌  ‌particularly‌  ‌when‌  ‌acting‌  ‌tortiously,‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌‌ 
Superintendent,‌‌   to‌‌
  Camarines‌‌   Sur.‌  ‌Clearly,‌‌ therefore,‌‌ the‌‌ requirement‌‌ 
Personnel‌‌actions‌  ‌ protection‌  ‌on‌‌   account‌‌   of‌‌
  his‌‌
  office‌, ‌‌but‌‌
  is‌‌
  liable‌‌
  for‌‌
  his‌‌
  acts‌‌
  like‌‌
  any‌‌ 
in‌‌
  Section‌‌  99‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  LGC‌‌  of‌‌
  1991‌‌   of‌‌
  prior‌‌
  consultation‌‌   with‌‌   the‌‌ local‌‌ 
private‌‌individual.‌  ‌
1. While‌  ‌an‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌selection‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌proper‌‌  school‌‌   board,‌‌  does‌‌   not‌‌
  apply.‌  ‌It‌‌  only‌‌   refers‌‌
  to‌‌
  ‌appointments‌‌ ‌made‌‌ 
authority‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌individual‌  ‌who‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌the‌  ‌powers‌  ‌and‌‌  by‌‌DECS.‌  ‌
Threefold‌‌Liability‌‌Rule‌‌in‌D
‌ omingo‌‌v.‌‌Rayala‌  ‌
functions‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌given‌‌   ‌designation‌‌
  office,‌‌   ‌merely‌‌  connotes‌‌  an‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 83‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

agencies‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌government.‌‌  However,‌‌  the‌‌


  Ombudsman,‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌  12. Appeals‌  ‌in‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌disciplinary‌  ‌cases‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Basic‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌  ‌officers‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌three-fold‌  ‌liability‌  ‌rule,‌‌ 
exercise‌‌  of‌‌
  its‌‌
  ‌primary‌‌
  jurisdiction‌‌
  ‌over‌‌   cases‌‌
  cognizable‌‌   by‌‌  Ombudsman‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌filed‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌
  ‌Court‌‌
  of‌‌
  Appeals‌‌
  via‌‌
  a ‌‌
which‌  ‌states‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌wrongful‌‌   acts‌‌
  or‌‌
  omissions‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌public‌‌
  officer‌‌ 
the‌  ‌Sandiganbayan,‌  ‌may‌  ‌take‌  ‌over,‌  ‌at‌  ‌any‌  ‌stage,‌  ‌from‌  ‌any‌‌  verified‌‌Petition‌‌for‌‌Review‌‌under‌R ‌ ule‌‌43‌. ‌ ‌
may‌  ‌give‌  ‌rise‌  ‌to‌  ‌civil,‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌and‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌liability.‌  ‌An‌‌ 
investigating‌  ‌agency‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌government,‌  ‌the‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌of‌‌ 
action‌  ‌for‌  ‌each‌  ‌can‌  ‌proceed‌  ‌independently‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌others.‌  ‌This‌  ‌rule‌‌ 
such‌‌cases.‌  ‌ Real-party-interest‌‌in‌‌Administrative‌‌Appeals‌‌    ‌
applies‌‌with‌‌full‌‌force‌‌to‌‌sexual‌‌harassment.‌  ‌
6. Power‌  ‌to‌‌   Investigate‌‌   Cases‌‌   of‌‌
  Ill-gotten‌‌  Wealth.‌‌   ‌The‌‌
  PCGG,‌‌  Ombudsman‌‌v.‌‌Gutierrez‌‌‌2017‌  ‌
Ombudsman‌‌v.‌‌Regalado‌‌‌2018‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ with‌‌  the‌‌
  assistance‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ Solicitor‌‌ General,‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ agency‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
Samaniego‌  ‌remains‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌
  the‌‌   prevailing‌‌   doctrine.‌‌   The‌‌
  Ombudsman‌‌ 
government‌  ‌empowered‌  ‌to‌  ‌bring‌  ‌these‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌for‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌11(b)‌  ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌No.‌  ‌6713‌  ‌explicitly‌‌  states‌‌   that‌‌
  ‌dismissal‌‌   from‌‌  has‌‌
  legal‌‌
  interest‌‌
  in‌‌
  appeals‌‌   from‌‌   its‌‌
  rulings‌‌   in‌‌ administrative‌‌ cases.‌‌ 
forfeiture‌  ‌of‌‌  property‌‌
  allegedly‌‌   acquired‌‌   unlawfully‌‌   before‌‌  the‌‌ 
the‌  ‌service‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌warranted‌  ‌through‌  ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌‌  Petitioner‌  ‌could‌  ‌not‌  ‌then‌  ‌be‌  ‌faulted‌  ‌for‌  ‌filing‌  ‌its‌  ‌Omnibus‌  ‌Motion‌‌ 
EDSA‌  ‌Revolution.‌  ‌The‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌investigate‌  ‌cases‌  ‌of‌‌ 
proceeding‌, ‌ ‌even‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌erring‌  ‌officer‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌subjected‌  ‌to‌  ‌criminal‌‌  before‌‌the‌‌appellate‌‌court.‌  ‌
ill-gotten‌  ‌or‌  ‌unexplained‌‌   wealth‌‌   acquired‌‌   after‌‌  that‌‌
  date‌‌ 
prosecution.‌‌   This‌‌ is‌‌ in‌‌ keeping‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ three‌‌ (3)-fold‌‌ liability‌‌ rule‌‌ in‌‌  is‌‌now‌‌vested‌‌in‌‌the‌O ‌ mbudsman‌. ‌ ‌
the‌‌law‌‌on‌‌public‌‌officers.‌  ‌ Ombudsman‌‌v.‌‌Bongais‌‌‌2018‌  ‌
7. Ombudsman‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌Military‌. ‌ ‌Has‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌cases‌‌ 
The‌‌Ombudsman‌‌and‌‌the‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Special‌‌Prosecutor‌  ‌ involving‌‌Police‌‌officers.‌  ‌ In‌  ‌the‌  ‌face‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌clarification‌‌
  made‌‌
  in‌‌
  ‌Gutierrez‌, ‌‌it‌‌
  should‌‌  now‌‌   be‌‌ 
8. Preventive‌  ‌Suspension‌. ‌ ‌Preventive‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌under‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌13‌‌  considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌settled‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌has‌  ‌legal‌‌ 
1. The‌‌  power‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ Ombudsman‌‌ to‌‌ investigate‌‌ and‌‌ prosecute‌‌ any‌‌ 
RA‌‌ 3019‌‌ as‌‌ amended‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ limited‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌‌maximum‌‌ period‌‌ of‌‌  standing‌  ‌to‌  ‌intervene‌  ‌in‌  ‌appeals‌  ‌from‌  ‌its‌  ‌rulings‌  ‌in‌  ‌administrative‌‌ 
illegal‌‌
  act‌‌
  or‌‌
  omission‌‌   of‌‌
  any‌‌ public‌‌ official‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ an‌‌ exclusive‌‌ 
ninety‌‌(90)‌‌days,‌‌from‌‌issuances‌‌thereof‌. ‌ ‌ cases,‌  ‌provided,‌  ‌that‌‌   the‌‌
  Ombudsman‌‌   moves‌‌   for‌‌
  intervention‌‌   before‌‌ 
authority‌  ‌but‌  ‌a ‌ ‌shared‌‌  or‌‌  concurrent‌‌   authority‌‌   in‌‌
  respect‌‌
  of‌‌ 
rendition‌‌   of‌‌
  judgment‌, ‌‌pursuant‌‌ to‌‌ Rule‌‌ 19‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Rules‌‌ Court,‌‌ lest‌‌ its‌‌ 
the‌‌offense‌‌charged.‌‌   ‌ Preventive‌‌   suspension‌‌   pursuant‌‌   to‌‌
  §24‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌ Ombudsman‌‌ Act‌‌ 
motion‌‌be‌‌denied‌‌as‌‌the‌‌Court‌‌did‌‌in‌‌Sison‌,‌‌Magno‌,‌‌and‌‌Liggayu‌. ‌ ‌
2. It‌‌
  has‌‌
  the‌‌
  power‌‌   to‌‌
  impose‌‌ the‌‌ penalty‌‌ of‌‌ removal,‌‌ suspension,‌‌  expressly‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌"the‌  ‌preventive‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌shall‌‌ 
continue‌  ‌until‌  ‌the‌‌
  case‌‌
  is‌‌
  terminated‌‌   by‌‌  the‌‌  Office‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  The‌‌   status‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌   Ombudsman‌‌   as‌‌  a ‌‌party‌‌  adversely‌‌   affected‌‌ by‌‌ – ‌‌and‌‌ 
demotion,‌  ‌fine,‌  ‌censure,‌  ‌or‌  ‌prosecution‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌public‌  ‌officer‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Ombudsman‌  ‌but‌  ‌not‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌six‌‌   months‌, ‌‌without‌‌   pay."‌‌  therefore‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌   legal‌‌
  standing‌‌   to‌‌  assail‌‌  – ‌‌the‌‌  CA‌‌   Decision‌‌   did‌‌  not‌‌ 
employee‌  ‌found‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌at‌  ‌fault,‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌ 
Their‌‌  preventive‌‌
  suspension‌‌   for‌‌
  six‌‌
  (6)‌‌
  months‌‌   without‌‌ pay‌‌ is‌‌  automatically‌  ‌warrant‌  ‌the‌‌   grant‌‌  of‌‌  its‌‌
  motion‌‌   to‌‌
  intervene.‌‌   Since‌‌   the‌‌ 
administrative‌‌disciplinary‌‌authority.‌‌   ‌
thus‌‌according‌‌to‌‌law.‌  ‌ Court‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌find‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌excepting‌‌   circumstances‌‌   obtained‌‌   in‌‌ 
3. Power‌  ‌to‌  ‌Investigate‌  ‌Administrative‌  ‌Charges.‌  ‌The‌‌  this‌  ‌case,‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌rule‌  ‌provided‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌2 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌Rule‌  ‌19,‌  ‌as‌‌ 
9. Preventive‌  ‌suspension‌‌   is‌‌
  merely‌‌   a ‌‌preventive‌‌   measure,‌‌   a ‌‌
Philippine‌  ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌is‌‌   armed‌‌  with‌‌  the‌‌
  power‌‌   to‌‌
  prosecute‌‌  reinforced‌  ‌in‌  ‌Gutierrez‌, ‌ ‌squarely‌  ‌applies.‌  ‌Hence,‌  ‌while‌  ‌the‌‌ 
erring‌‌   public‌‌   officers‌‌
  and‌‌
  employees,‌‌   giving‌‌   him‌‌ an‌‌ active‌‌ role‌‌  preliminary‌  ‌step‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌investigation.‌  ‌If‌‌ 
Ombudsman‌  ‌had‌  ‌legal‌  ‌interest‌‌   to‌‌  intervene,‌‌   the‌‌  period‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌
  filing‌‌ 
in‌  ‌the‌  ‌enforcement‌  ‌of‌  ‌laws‌  ‌on‌‌
  anti-graft‌‌   and‌‌   corrupt‌‌   practices‌‌  after‌  ‌such‌  ‌investigation,‌  ‌the‌  ‌charge‌  ‌is‌  ‌established‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌ 
of‌‌
  its‌‌  motion‌‌   to‌‌
  intervene‌‌   had‌‌
  already‌‌   lapsed‌‌   as‌‌
  it‌‌
  was‌‌ filed‌‌ after‌‌ the‌‌ 
and‌  ‌such‌  ‌other‌  ‌offenses‌  ‌that‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌committed‌  ‌by‌  ‌such‌‌  person‌  ‌investigated‌  ‌is‌  ‌found‌  ‌guilty‌  ‌of‌  ‌acts‌  ‌warranting‌  ‌his‌‌ 
CA‌‌had‌‌promulgated‌‌its‌‌Decision.‌  ‌
officers‌‌   and‌‌ employees.‌‌ ‌The‌‌ legislature‌‌ has‌‌ vested‌‌ him‌‌ with‌‌  suspension‌  ‌or‌  ‌removal,‌  ‌then‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌suspended,‌  ‌removed‌  ‌or‌‌ 
broad‌  ‌powers‌  ‌to‌  ‌enable‌  ‌him‌  ‌to‌  ‌implement‌  ‌his‌  ‌own‌‌  dismissed.‌‌This‌‌is‌‌the‌‌penalty.‌  ‌ The‌‌Sandiganbayan‌  ‌
actions.‌  ‌ 10. A‌  ‌decision‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌in‌‌  Sec‌  ‌4.‌  ‌Art‌  ‌XI.‌  ‌The‌  ‌present‌  ‌anti-graft‌  ‌court‌  ‌known‌  ‌as‌  t‌ he‌‌ 
4. Concurrent‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌Office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President.‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌had‌‌  administrative‌  ‌cases‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌executed‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌matter‌  ‌of‌‌  Sandiganbayan‌  ‌shall‌  ‌continue‌  ‌to‌  ‌function‌  ‌and‌  ‌exercise‌  i‌ ts‌‌ 
intended‌  ‌the‌  ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌to‌  ‌exercise‌‌  course‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌Office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌shall‌  ‌ensure‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌  jurisdiction‌‌as‌‌now‌‌or‌‌hereafter‌‌may‌‌be‌‌provided‌‌by‌‌law.‌  ‌
concurrent‌‌  disciplinary‌‌   jurisdiction‌‌   over‌‌ petitioners‌‌ as‌‌ Deputy‌‌  decision‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌strictly‌‌enforced‌‌and‌‌properly‌‌implemented.‌  ‌
11. The‌  ‌remedy‌  ‌of‌  ‌aggrieved‌  ‌parties‌  ‌from‌  ‌resolutions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
N.‌‌Term‌‌limits‌  ‌
Ombudsman‌‌and‌‌Special‌‌Prosecutor,‌‌respectively.‌  ‌
Ombudsman‌  ‌finding‌  ‌probable‌  ‌cause‌  ‌in‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌cases,‌‌   when‌‌  Doctrine‌‌of‌‌Holdover‌‌Capacity‌‌in‌A
‌ bas‌‌Kida‌‌v.‌‌Senate‌‌2
‌ 011‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
5. Concurrent‌‌   with‌‌ the‌‌ DOJ.‌‌ The‌‌ authority‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Ombudsman‌‌ to‌‌ 
investigate‌  ‌offenses‌  ‌involving‌  ‌public‌  ‌officers‌  ‌or‌‌   employees‌‌
  is‌‌  tainted‌  ‌with‌  ‌grave‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌of‌  ‌discretion,‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Rule‌‌
  65‌‌
  ‌Petition‌‌  Whether‌‌
  or‌‌
  not‌‌
  those‌‌ elected‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ 2008-2011‌‌ can‌‌ continue‌‌ to‌‌ serve‌‌ 
not‌‌
  exclusive‌‌   but‌‌
  is‌‌
  concurrent‌‌ with‌‌ other‌‌ similarly‌‌ authorized‌‌  for‌‌Certiorari‌w ‌ ith‌‌the‌‌‌Supreme‌‌Court‌,‌‌not‌‌with‌‌the‌‌CA.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 84‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

office‌‌in‌‌a‌‌holdover‌‌capacity‌‌until‌‌the‌‌rescheduled‌‌2013‌‌elections.‌  ‌  ‌
Eugenio‌‌v.‌‌CSC‌  ‌
NO‌. ‌‌Since‌‌  elective‌‌ ARMM‌‌ officials‌‌ are‌‌ local‌‌ officials,‌‌ they‌‌ are‌‌ covered‌  A.‌‌General‌‌principles‌‌   ‌
CESB‌‌ was‌‌ created‌‌ by‌‌ PD‌‌ No.‌‌ 1.‌‌ It‌‌ cannot‌‌ be‌‌ disputed,‌‌ therefore,‌‌ that‌‌ as‌‌ 
and‌‌ bound‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ three-year‌‌ term‌‌ limit‌‌ prescribed‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ Constitution;‌‌  1. Administrative‌  ‌Law‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌branch‌  ‌of‌  ‌modern‌  ‌law‌  ‌under‌‌  the‌  ‌CESB‌  ‌was‌  ‌created‌  ‌by‌  ‌law,‌  ‌it‌  ‌can‌  ‌only‌  ‌be‌  ‌abolished‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
they‌‌cannot‌‌extend‌‌their‌‌term‌‌through‌‌a‌‌holdover.‌  ‌ which‌  ‌the‌  ‌executive‌  ‌department‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌
  government‌‌   acting‌‌
  in‌‌
  a ‌ legislature.‌  ‌The‌  ‌creation‌  ‌and‌  ‌abolition‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌  ‌offices‌  ‌is‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌8.‌  ‌Art‌  ‌X.‌  ‌The‌  ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌office‌  ‌of‌  ‌elective‌  ‌local‌‌  quasi-legislative‌  ‌or‌  ‌quasi-judicial‌  ‌capacity,‌  ‌interferes‌  ‌with‌‌   the‌‌ 
primarily‌‌a‌‌legislative‌‌function‌. ‌ ‌
officials‌, ‌ ‌except‌  ‌barangay‌  ‌officials,‌  ‌which‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  conduct‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌individual‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌promoting‌  ‌the‌‌ 
well-being‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌community,‌  ‌as‌  ‌under‌‌   laws‌‌
  regulating‌‌   public‌‌  The‌‌
  essential‌‌
  autonomous‌‌
  character‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ CESB‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ negated‌‌ by‌‌ its‌‌ 
determined‌  ‌by‌  ‌law,‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌three‌  ‌years‌  ‌and‌  ‌no‌  ‌such‌‌ 
corporations,‌  ‌business‌  ‌affected‌  ‌with‌  ‌public‌  ‌interest,‌‌  attachment‌  ‌to‌  ‌respondent‌‌  Commission.‌‌  Under‌‌  the‌‌  Administrative‌‌ 
official‌‌shall‌‌serve‌‌for‌‌more‌‌than‌‌three‌‌consecutive‌‌terms.‌  ‌
professions,‌  ‌trades‌  ‌and‌  ‌callings,‌‌   rates‌‌
  and‌‌   prices,‌‌
  laws‌‌  for‌‌
  the‌‌  Code‌‌
  of‌‌
  1987,‌‌
  the‌‌
  purpose‌‌   of‌‌
  attaching‌‌   one‌‌
  functionally‌‌ inter-related‌‌ 
It‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌broadly‌  ‌stated‌  ‌that‌  the‌  ‌legislature‌  ‌cannot,‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌‌  government‌  ‌agency‌  ‌to‌  ‌another‌  ‌is‌  to‌  ‌attain‌  ‌"policy‌  ‌and‌  ‌program‌‌ 
protection‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  public‌‌
  health‌‌
  and‌‌ safety‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ promotion‌‌ of‌‌ 
postponing‌  ‌the‌  ‌election‌  ‌to‌  ‌fill‌  ‌an‌  ‌office‌  ‌the‌  ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌‌  the‌‌public‌‌convenience‌‌and‌‌advantage.‌  ‌ coordination."‌  ‌
limited‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution,‌  ‌extend‌  ‌the‌  ‌term‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  incumbent‌‌ 
2.
A‌  ‌rule‌  ‌in‌  ‌administrative‌‌   law‌‌   enunciated‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌
  of‌‌
  ‌Sison‌‌
  v.‌‌ 
beyond‌‌the‌‌period‌‌as‌‌limited‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Constitution.‌  ‌
Pangramuyen‌‌   provides‌‌   that‌‌   the‌‌ absence‌‌ of‌‌ palpable‌‌ error‌‌ or‌‌  ⭐‌De‌‌la‌‌Llana‌‌v.‌‌Alba‌  ‌
  in‌‌
The‌‌  rule‌‌ of‌‌ holdover‌‌ can‌‌ only‌‌ apply‌‌ as‌‌ an‌‌ available‌‌ option‌‌ where‌‌ 
grave‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌of‌  ‌discretion,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌loathe‌  ‌to‌‌  The‌‌   abolition‌‌   of‌‌  an‌‌
  office‌‌ within‌‌ the‌‌ competence‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌legitimate‌‌ body‌‌ 
no‌‌
  express‌‌   or‌‌
  implied‌‌
  legislative‌‌  intent‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ contrary‌‌ exists;‌‌ ‌it‌‌  substitute‌  ‌its‌  ‌own‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌for‌  ‌that‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌administrative‌‌  if‌‌
  done‌‌   in‌‌ good‌‌ faith‌‌ suffers‌‌ from‌‌ no‌‌ infirmity.‌‌ It‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌well-known‌‌ rule‌‌ 
cannot‌‌apply‌‌where‌‌such‌‌contrary‌‌intent‌‌is‌‌evident.‌  ‌ agency‌  ‌entrusted‌‌   with‌‌
  the‌‌   enforcement‌‌   and‌‌  implementation‌‌   of‌‌  also‌  t‌ hat‌‌   valid‌‌  abolition‌‌   of‌‌
  offices‌‌  is‌‌
  neither‌‌   removal‌‌
  nor‌‌
  separation‌‌ 
In‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌way‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌elective‌‌   ARMM‌‌   officials‌‌
  cannot‌‌
  be‌‌  the‌‌law.‌‌   ‌ of‌‌
  the‌‌  incumbents.‌‌   If‌‌
  the‌‌  abolition‌‌   is‌‌  void,‌‌
  the‌‌
  incumbent‌‌
  is‌‌
  deemed‌‌ 
extended‌  ‌through‌  ‌a ‌ ‌holdover,‌  ‌the‌  ‌term‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌shortened‌  by‌‌  never‌   t
‌ o‌   h
‌ ave‌  c
‌ eased‌   t
‌ o‌‌
  h old‌‌  office.‌‌  T
‌ he‌‌
  t est‌‌  remains‌‌  w hether‌‌ 
putting‌‌   an‌‌   expiration‌‌   date‌‌  earlier‌‌   than‌‌   the‌‌   three‌‌  (3)‌‌
  years‌‌ that‌‌ 
B.‌‌Administrative‌‌agencies‌‌   ‌
the‌‌abolition‌‌is‌‌in‌‌good‌‌faith‌.  ‌‌ ‌
the‌‌   Constitution‌‌   itself‌‌
  commands.‌  ‌This‌‌   is‌‌ what‌‌ will‌‌ happen‌‌ — ‌‌a ‌‌ "‌Agency‌"‌‌includes‌‌   ‌
term‌‌   of‌‌
  less‌‌   than‌‌
  two‌‌
  years‌‌   — ‌‌if‌‌
  a ‌‌call‌‌ for‌‌ special‌‌ elections‌‌ shall‌‌  a) any‌  ‌department,‌  ‌bureau,‌  ‌office,‌  ‌commission,‌  ‌authority‌  ‌or‌‌ 
prevail.‌‌   ‌In‌‌ sum,‌‌ while‌‌ synchronization‌‌ is‌‌ achieved,‌‌ the‌‌ result‌‌ is‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌  Reorganization‌  ‌
officer‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌National‌  ‌Government‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌or‌‌ 
cost‌‌of‌‌a‌‌violation‌‌of‌‌an‌‌express‌‌provision‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitution.‌   ‌ ‌ executive‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌  ‌rules,‌  ‌issue‌  ‌licenses,‌  ‌grant‌  ‌rights‌  ‌or‌‌  As‌‌   a ‌‌general‌‌
  rule‌, ‌‌a ‌‌reorganization‌‌
  is‌‌
  carried‌‌ out‌‌ in‌‌ ‘‌good‌‌ faith‌’ ‌‌if‌‌ 
The‌  ‌above‌  ‌considerations‌  ‌leave‌  ‌only‌  ‌Congress'‌  ‌chosen‌  ‌interim‌‌  privileges,‌‌and‌‌adjudicate‌‌cases;‌‌   ‌ it‌‌is‌‌for‌‌   ‌
measure‌  ‌— ‌ ‌RA‌  ‌No.‌  ‌10153‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌of‌‌  b) research‌‌institutions‌‌with‌‌respect‌‌to‌‌licensing‌‌functions;‌‌   ‌ 1. the‌‌purpose‌‌of‌‌economy‌o
‌ r‌‌   ‌
OICs‌  ‌to‌  ‌govern‌  ‌the‌  ‌ARMM‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌pre-synchronization‌  ‌period‌‌ 
c) government‌  ‌corporations‌  ‌with‌  ‌respect‌  ‌to‌  ‌functions‌  ‌regulating‌‌  2. to‌‌make‌‌bureaucracy‌‌more‌e
‌ fficient‌.  ‌‌ ‌
pursuant‌‌   to‌‌
  Sections‌‌  3,‌‌
  4 ‌‌and‌‌ 5 ‌‌of‌‌ this‌‌ law‌‌ — ‌‌as‌‌ the‌‌ only‌‌ measure‌‌ that‌‌ 
private‌‌right,‌‌privileges,‌‌occupation‌‌or‌‌business;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ On‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand‌, ‌ ‌no‌  ‌valid‌  ‌abolition‌  ‌takes‌  ‌place‌  ‌and‌  ‌whatever‌‌ 
Congress‌‌can‌‌make.‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌
d) officials‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌disciplinary‌  ‌power‌  ‌as‌‌
  provided‌‌
  by‌‌  abolition‌  ‌done‌  ‌is‌  ‌void‌  ‌ab‌  ‌initio‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌abolition‌‌
  which‌‌
  is‌‌
  nothing‌‌ 
law.‌  ‌ else‌‌but‌‌a‌‌separation‌‌or‌‌removal,‌‌is‌‌done‌‌for‌‌   ‌
XI.‌‌ADMINISTRATIVE‌‌LAW‌‌   ‌
1. political‌‌reasons‌‌‌or‌‌   ‌
A‌‌
  public‌‌
  office‌‌
  may‌‌   ‌created‌‌ ‌through‌‌ any‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ following‌‌ modes,‌‌ to‌‌ 
  be‌‌
A.‌‌General‌‌principles‌  ‌ 2. purposely‌‌to‌‌defeat‌‌security‌‌of‌‌tenure‌,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
wit,‌‌either‌‌   ‌
B.‌‌Administrative‌‌agencies‌  ‌ 3. otherwise‌‌not‌‌in‌‌good‌‌faith‌,  ‌‌ ‌
1) by‌‌the‌C
‌ onstitution‌, ‌ ‌
There‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌invalid‌  ‌abolition‌‌  as‌‌
  where‌‌
  there‌‌
  is‌‌
  merely‌‌
  a ‌‌change‌‌  of‌‌ 
C.‌‌Powers‌‌of‌‌administrative‌‌agencies‌  ‌ 2) by‌l‌ aw‌,‌‌or‌ 
nomenclature‌  ‌of‌  ‌positions‌‌   or‌‌
  where‌‌
  claims‌‌  of‌‌
  economy‌‌   are‌‌
  belied‌‌ 
D.‌‌Judicial‌‌Review‌  ‌ 3) by‌a
‌ uthority‌‌of‌‌law.‌  ‌ by‌‌the‌‌existence‌‌of‌‌ample‌‌funds.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 85‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

⭐‌Larin‌‌v.‌‌Executive‌‌Secretary‌  ‌ the‌  ‌interest‌  ‌of‌  ‌simplicity,‌  ‌economy‌  ‌and‌  ‌efficiency.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌  ‌well‌‌  economic‌‌   viability.‌‌ ‌Section‌‌ 16,‌‌ Article‌‌ XII‌‌ should‌‌ not‌‌ be‌‌ construed‌‌ 
within‌‌the‌‌authority‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President.‌  ‌ so‌‌as‌‌to‌‌prohibit‌‌Congress‌‌from‌‌creating‌‌public‌‌corporations.‌  ‌
Does‌‌  the‌‌
  President‌‌
  have‌‌
  the‌‌
  power‌‌
  to‌‌
  reorganize‌‌
  the‌‌
  BIR‌‌
  or‌‌
  to‌‌ issue‌‌ 
The‌‌   test‌‌
  of‌‌ ‌economic‌‌ viability‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ apply‌‌ to‌‌ public‌‌ corporations‌‌ 
the‌‌questioned‌‌E.O.‌‌NO.‌‌132‌?‌ 
⭐‌Kapisanan‌‌ng‌‌mga‌‌Kawani‌‌ng‌‌ERB‌‌v.‌‌Barin‌  ‌ dealing‌  ‌with‌  ‌governmental‌  ‌functions,‌  ‌to‌  ‌which‌  ‌category‌  ‌the‌  ‌BSP‌‌ 
YES‌. ‌‌There‌‌
  should‌‌
  be‌‌
  a ‌‌legal‌‌
  basis‌‌
  and‌‌
  such‌‌
  should‌‌
  be‌‌ in‌‌ good‌‌ faith.‌‌  belongs.‌‌   The‌‌  o‌ wnership‌‌   and‌‌   control‌‌   test‌‌
  ‌is‌‌  likewise‌‌  irrelevant‌‌ 
Abolition‌  ‌and‌  ‌removal‌  ‌are‌  ‌mutually‌  ‌exclusive‌  ‌concepts.‌  ‌From‌  ‌a ‌‌
Section‌‌   20,‌‌
  Book‌‌   III‌‌
  of‌‌
  E.O.‌‌  No.‌‌
  292‌‌  ‌on‌‌   ‌Residual‌‌ Powers‌ ‌of‌‌ 
  the‌‌ for‌‌
  a ‌‌public‌‌   corporation‌‌   like‌‌   the‌‌   BSP.‌  ‌To‌‌ reiterate,‌‌ the‌‌ relationship‌‌ of‌‌ 
legal‌  ‌standpoint,‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌‌  occupant‌‌   in‌‌
  an‌‌
  abolished‌‌   office.‌‌  Where‌‌ 
the‌  ‌President‌  ‌is‌  ‌one‌  ‌such‌  ‌legal‌  ‌basis‌  ‌which‌  ‌speaks‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌other‌‌  the‌  ‌BSP,‌‌
  an‌‌   attached‌‌   agency,‌‌   to‌‌  the‌‌  government,‌‌   through‌‌   the‌‌  DECS,‌‌
  is‌ 
there‌‌   is‌‌ no‌‌ occupant,‌‌ there‌‌ is‌‌ no‌‌ tenure‌‌ to‌‌ speak‌‌ of.‌‌ Thus,‌‌ impairment‌‌ 
powers‌‌vested‌‌in‌‌the‌‌President‌‌under‌‌the‌‌law.‌‌   ‌ defined‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌ Revised‌‌ Administrative‌‌ Code‌‌ of‌‌ 1987.‌  ‌The‌‌ BSP‌‌ meets‌‌ 
of‌‌
  the‌‌   constitutional‌‌   guarantee‌‌   of‌‌
  security‌‌   of‌‌
  tenure‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ arise‌‌ in‌‌ 
What‌  ‌law‌  ‌gives‌  ‌him‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌reorganize?‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌PD‌  ‌No.‌  ‌1772‌‌  the‌  ‌abolition‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌office.‌‌
  On‌‌  the‌‌  other‌‌  hand,‌‌   ‌removal‌‌   ‌implies‌‌
  that‌‌  the‌  ‌minimum‌  ‌statutory‌  ‌requirement‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌attached‌‌ 
which‌  ‌amended‌  ‌PD‌  ‌No.‌  ‌1416.‌  ‌These‌  ‌decrees‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌grant‌  ‌the‌‌  the‌‌  office‌‌   and‌‌
  its‌‌
  related‌‌
  positions‌‌   subsist‌‌ and‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ occupants‌‌ are‌‌  government‌‌   agency‌‌   as‌‌
  the‌‌ DECS‌‌ Secretary‌‌ sits‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ BSP‌‌ Board‌‌ 
President‌  ‌the‌  ‌continuing‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌reorganize‌  ‌the‌  ‌national‌‌  merely‌‌separated‌‌from‌‌their‌‌positions.‌  ‌ ex‌‌
  officio,‌‌   ‌thus‌‌   facilitating‌‌   the‌‌ policy‌‌ and‌‌ program‌‌ coordination‌‌ 
government‌, ‌ ‌which‌  ‌includes‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌group,‌  ‌consolidate‌‌  between‌‌the‌‌BSP‌‌and‌‌the‌‌DECS.‌  ‌
Because‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌
  expansion‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  ERC's‌‌
  functions‌‌   and‌‌  concerns,‌‌  there‌‌ 
bureaus‌  ‌and‌  ‌agencies,‌  ‌to‌  ‌abolish‌  ‌offices,‌  ‌to‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌functions,‌  ‌to‌‌ 
was‌‌
  a ‌‌valid‌‌   abolition‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  ERB.‌‌
  Thus,‌‌  there‌‌
  is‌‌
  no‌‌
  merit‌‌
  to‌‌
  KERB's‌‌ 
create‌  ‌and‌  ‌classify‌  ‌functions,‌  ‌services‌  ‌and‌  ‌activities‌  ‌and‌  ‌to‌‌  Beja,‌‌Sr.‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
allegation‌‌   that‌‌  there‌‌
  is‌‌
  an‌‌
  impairment‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  security‌‌ of‌‌ tenure‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
standardize‌‌salaries‌‌and‌‌materials.‌  ‌
ERB's‌‌employees.‌  ‌ Attachment‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌agency‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Department‌  ‌is‌  ‌one‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌three‌‌ 
Is‌  ‌the‌  ‌reorganization‌  ‌of‌  ‌BIR‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌E.O.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌132‌  ‌tainted‌‌   with‌‌  administrative‌  ‌relationships‌  ‌mentioned‌  ‌in‌‌   Book‌‌  IV,‌‌  Chapter‌‌  7 ‌‌of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
bad‌‌   faith‌? ‌‌‌YES‌. ‌‌A ‌‌reading‌‌ of‌‌ some‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ provisions‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ questioned‌‌  Banda,‌‌et.‌‌al.‌‌v.‌‌Ermita‌‌‌2010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ Administrative‌  ‌Code‌  ‌of‌  ‌1987,‌  ‌the‌‌
  other‌‌
  two‌‌
  being‌‌  ‌supervision‌‌   and‌‌ 
E.O.‌‌   No.‌‌  132‌‌  clearly‌‌   leads‌‌
  us‌‌  to‌‌
  an‌‌
  inescapable‌‌ conclusion‌‌ that‌‌ there‌‌  control‌‌‌and‌‌administrative‌‌supervision‌. ‌ ‌
are‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌of‌  ‌bad‌  ‌faith‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  It‌‌
  is‌‌  undisputed‌‌   that‌‌ the‌‌ NPO,‌‌ as‌‌ an‌‌ agency‌‌ that‌‌ is‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Office‌‌ of‌‌ 
the‌‌   Press‌‌  Secretary,‌‌ is‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Office‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ President.‌‌ In‌‌ the‌‌ case‌‌ at‌‌  Attachment‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌lateral‌  ‌relationship‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌‌ 
reorganization‌‌of‌‌the‌‌BIR.‌  ‌
bar,‌‌   there‌‌
  was‌‌  neither‌‌ an‌‌ abolition‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ NPO‌‌ nor‌‌ a ‌‌removal‌‌ of‌‌ any‌‌ of‌‌  department‌‌ or‌‌ its‌‌ equivalent‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ attached‌‌ agency‌‌ or‌‌ corporation‌‌ 
1. Section‌  ‌1.1.2‌  ‌of‌  ‌said‌  ‌executive‌  ‌order‌  ‌abolishes‌  ‌an‌  ‌office‌‌  for‌  ‌purposes‌  ‌of‌  ‌policy‌  ‌and‌‌
  program‌‌
  coordination‌. ‌‌The‌‌
  coordination‌‌ 
its‌  ‌functions‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌  transferred‌‌   to‌‌
  another‌‌   agency.‌‌   Under‌‌   the‌‌
  assailed‌‌ 
while‌  ‌another‌  ‌one‌  ‌performing‌  ‌substantially‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  shall‌‌be‌‌accomplished‌‌by‌‌   ‌
EO‌  ‌378,‌  ‌the‌  ‌NPO‌  ‌remains‌  ‌the‌  ‌main‌‌   printing‌‌
  arm‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  government‌‌ 
function‌‌is‌‌created.‌  ‌
for‌‌  all‌‌
  kinds‌‌ of‌‌ government‌‌ forms‌‌ and‌‌ publications‌‌ but‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ interest‌‌  a) having‌‌  the‌‌
  department‌‌
  represented‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ governing‌‌ board‌‌ of‌‌ 
2. The‌‌  creation‌‌
  of‌‌
  services‌‌  and‌‌
  divisions‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ BIR‌‌ resulted‌‌ in‌‌  of‌  ‌greater‌  ‌economy‌  ‌and‌  ‌encouraging‌  ‌efficiency‌  ‌and‌  ‌profitability,‌  ‌it‌‌  the‌‌attached‌‌agency‌‌or‌‌corporation;‌‌   ‌
a‌‌
  significant‌‌
  increase‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  number‌‌   of‌‌
  positions‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌ said‌‌  must‌  ‌now‌  ‌compete‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌private‌  ‌sector‌  ‌for‌  ‌certain‌  ‌government‌‌ 
b) having‌  ‌the‌  ‌attached‌  ‌corporation‌  ‌or‌  ‌agency‌  ‌comply‌  ‌with‌  ‌a ‌‌
bureau.‌  ‌ printing‌  ‌jobs.‌  ‌At‌  ‌most,‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mere‌  ‌alteration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌main‌‌ 
system‌‌of‌‌periodic‌‌reporting;‌‌and‌‌   ‌
function‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌NPO‌  ‌by‌  ‌limiting‌  ‌the‌  ‌exclusivity‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌printing‌‌ 
Bagaoisan‌‌v.‌‌National‌‌Tobacco‌‌Authority‌  ‌ responsibility‌‌to‌‌election‌‌forms.‌  ‌ c) having‌  ‌the‌  ‌department‌  ‌or‌  ‌its‌  ‌equivalent‌  ‌provide‌  ‌general‌‌ 
policies‌‌through‌‌its‌‌representative‌‌in‌‌the‌‌board.‌  ‌
It‌  ‌is‌  ‌important‌  ‌to‌  ‌emphasize‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌questioned‌  ‌Executive‌‌ 
Boy‌‌Scouts‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌v.‌‌COA‌‌‌2011‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ With‌‌   respect‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  management‌‌   of‌‌
  personnel‌, ‌‌‌an‌‌
  attached‌‌ agency‌‌ 
Orders‌  ‌No.‌  ‌29‌  ‌and‌  ‌No.‌  ‌36‌  ‌have‌  ‌not‌  ‌abolished‌  ‌the‌  ‌National‌‌ 
is‌, ‌ ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌certain‌  ‌extent,‌  ‌free‌  ‌from‌  ‌Departmental‌‌   interference‌‌  and‌‌ 
Tobacco‌  ‌Administration‌  ‌but‌  ‌merely‌  ‌mandated‌  ‌its‌‌  Sec‌  ‌20,‌  ‌Chapter‌  ‌8,‌  ‌Title‌  ‌VI,‌  ‌Book‌  ‌IV‌  ‌of‌  ‌EO‌  ‌292‌  ‌classifies‌‌
  BSP‌‌
  as‌‌
  an‌‌ 
control‌.‌  ‌
reorganization‌  ‌through‌  ‌the‌  ‌streamlining‌  ‌or‌  ‌reduction‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌  Attached‌‌Agency.‌  ‌
personnel‌.  ‌‌ ‌
The‌  ‌BSP‌  ‌is‌  ‌a‌  ‌public‌  ‌corporation‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌government‌  ‌agency‌  ‌or‌‌  Malaga‌‌v.‌‌Penachos,‌‌Jr.‌  ‌
In‌‌
  the‌‌
  present‌‌   instance,‌‌   involving‌‌   neither‌‌
  an‌‌   abolition‌‌ nor‌‌ transfer‌‌ of‌‌  instrumentality‌  ‌with‌  ‌juridical‌  ‌personality.‌  ‌Public‌  ‌corporations‌  ‌are‌‌ 
offices,‌‌  the‌‌
  assailed‌‌   action‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌mere‌‌ reorganization‌‌ under‌‌ the‌‌ general‌‌  treated‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌as‌  ‌agencies‌  ‌or‌  ‌instrumentalities‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌‌  Instrumentality‌‌refers‌‌to‌‌any‌‌agency‌‌of‌‌the‌‌National‌‌Government,‌‌   ‌
provisions‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  law‌‌  consisting‌‌   mainly‌‌  of‌‌
  ‌streamlining‌‌   ‌the‌‌ NTA‌‌ in‌‌  which‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌tests‌  ‌of‌  ‌ownership‌  ‌or‌‌
  control‌‌  and‌‌  1. not‌‌integrated‌‌within‌‌the‌‌department‌‌framework‌,  ‌‌ ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 86‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

2. vested‌‌with‌‌special‌‌functions‌‌or‌‌jurisdiction‌‌by‌‌law,‌‌   ‌ In‌‌
  the‌‌
  instant‌‌   case,‌‌
  ISA‌‌ instituted‌‌ the‌‌ expropriation‌‌ proceedings‌‌ in‌‌ its‌‌  Community‌‌Rural‌‌Bank‌‌of‌‌Guimba‌‌v.‌‌Talavera‌  ‌
3. endowed‌‌with‌‌some‌‌if‌‌not‌‌all‌‌corporate‌‌powers,‌‌   ‌ capacity‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌agent‌  ‌or‌  ‌delegate‌  ‌or‌  ‌representative‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Republic‌‌ 
In‌‌
  administrative‌‌   ‌supervision‌‌
  law,‌‌   ‌means‌‌  overseeing‌‌ or‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ 
pursuant‌‌   to‌‌
  its‌‌ authority‌‌ under‌‌ P.D.‌‌ No.‌‌ 272.‌  ‌The‌‌ principal‌‌ or‌‌ the‌‌ real‌‌ 
4. administering‌‌special‌‌funds,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ or‌  ‌authority‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌officer‌  ‌to‌  ‌see‌  ‌that‌  ‌subordinate‌  ‌officers‌  ‌perform‌‌ 
party‌  ‌in‌  ‌interest‌  ‌is‌  ‌thus‌  ‌the‌  ‌Republic‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌National‌  ‌Steel‌‌ 
5. enjoying‌‌operational‌‌autonomy,‌‌usually‌‌through‌‌a‌‌charter.‌‌   ‌ their‌  ‌duties.‌  C ‌ ontrol‌, ‌ ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand,‌  ‌means‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌ 
Corporation,‌  ‌even‌  ‌though‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌an‌  ‌ultimate‌  ‌user‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
This‌  ‌term‌  ‌includes‌  ‌regulatory‌  ‌agencies,‌  ‌chartered‌  ‌institutions,‌  ‌and‌‌  properties‌  ‌involved‌  ‌should‌  ‌the‌  ‌condemnation‌  ‌suit‌  ‌be‌  ‌eventually‌‌  officer‌  ‌to‌  ‌alter‌  ‌or‌  ‌modify‌  ‌or‌  ‌nullify‌  ‌or‌‌
  set‌‌
  aside‌‌
  ‌what‌‌
  a ‌‌subordinate‌‌ 
GOCCS.‌  ‌ successful.‌  ‌ officer‌‌ had‌‌ done‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ performance‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ duties‌‌ and‌‌ to‌‌ ‌substitute‌‌ ‌the‌‌ 
judgment‌‌of‌‌the‌‌former‌‌for‌‌that‌‌of‌‌the‌‌latter.‌  ‌
Chartered‌  ‌institution‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌agency‌  ‌organized‌  ‌or‌‌
  operating‌‌ 
Republic‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ Review‌  ‌as‌‌   an‌‌
  act‌‌
  of‌‌
  supervision‌‌
  and‌‌  control‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌  justice‌‌  secretary‌‌ 
under‌  ‌a ‌‌special‌‌
  charter,‌‌
  and‌‌
  vested‌‌  by‌‌  law‌‌
  with‌‌
  functions‌‌
  relating‌‌
  to‌‌ 
specific‌‌constitutional‌‌policies‌‌or‌‌objectives.‌‌This‌‌term‌‌includes‌‌   ‌ over‌  ‌the‌  ‌fiscals‌  ‌and‌  ‌prosecutors‌  ‌finds‌  ‌basis‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Petitioner‌  ‌Sugar‌  ‌Regulatory‌  ‌Administration‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌lawfully‌‌  exhaustion‌‌of‌‌administrative‌‌remedies.‌  ‌
1. the‌‌state‌‌universities‌‌and‌‌colleges,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ bring‌‌
  an‌‌
  action‌‌  on‌‌
  behalf‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Republic‌‌  and‌‌  that‌‌ the‌‌ OGCC‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ 
Here,‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌grossly‌  ‌erroneous‌  ‌for‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌judge‌  ‌to‌  ‌order‌  ‌the‌‌ 
2. the‌‌monetary‌‌authority‌‌of‌‌the‌‌state.‌‌   ‌ have‌  ‌the‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌represent‌  ‌said‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌case.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌‌ 
apparent‌  ‌that‌  ‌its‌  ‌charter‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌grant‌  ‌the‌  ‌SRA‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌‌  reinvestigation‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  prosecutor.‌‌ This‌‌ action‌‌ enabled‌‌ the‌‌ 
represent‌‌the‌‌Republic‌‌in‌‌suits‌‌filed‌‌by‌‌or‌‌against‌‌the‌‌latter.‌  ‌ latter‌‌
  to‌‌
  reprobate‌‌   and‌‌
  reverse‌‌  the‌‌
  secretary's‌‌ Resolution.‌‌ In‌‌ granting‌‌ 
Luzon‌‌Development‌‌Bank‌‌v.‌‌Association‌‌of‌‌Luzon‌‌Dev.‌‌Bank‌‌  the‌  ‌Motion‌  ‌for‌  ‌Reinvestigation,‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌effectively‌  ‌demolished‌‌ 
Employees‌  ‌ The‌‌   OGCC‌‌   can‌‌  represent‌‌   neither‌‌   the‌‌  SRA‌‌  nor‌‌
  the‌‌  Republic‌. ‌ ‌We‌‌ 
the‌‌DOJ's‌‌power‌‌of‌‌control‌‌and‌‌supervision‌‌over‌‌prosecutors.‌  ‌
do‌  ‌not,‌  ‌however,‌‌   share‌‌
  the‌‌
  view‌‌   that‌‌
  only‌‌
  the‌‌
  OSG‌‌  can‌‌
  represent‌‌  the‌‌ 
The‌  ‌voluntary‌  ‌arbitrator‌, ‌ ‌whether‌  ‌acting‌  ‌solely‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌panel,‌‌  SRA.‌‌   When‌‌   confronted‌‌   with‌‌   a ‌‌situation‌‌   where‌‌   one‌‌
  government‌‌ office‌‌ 
enjoys‌‌  in‌‌
  law‌‌
  the‌‌
  status‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌‌quasi-judicial‌‌
  agency‌‌ but‌‌ independent‌‌  ⭐‌Biraogo‌‌v.‌‌The‌‌Philippine‌‌Truth‌‌Commission‌R ‌ e‌‌Power‌‌of‌‌Control,‌‌ 
takes‌  ‌an‌  ‌adverse‌  ‌position‌  ‌against‌  ‌another‌  ‌government‌‌   agency,‌‌
  as‌‌  in‌‌ 
of,‌‌
  and‌‌
  apart‌‌ from,‌‌ the‌‌ NLRC‌‌ since‌‌ his‌‌ decisions‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌ appealable‌‌ to‌‌  Faithful‌‌Execution‌‌Clause,‌‌and‌‌Power‌‌to‌‌Investigate‌  ‌
this‌‌ case,‌‌ the‌‌ Solicitor‌‌ General‌‌ should‌‌ not‌‌ refrain‌‌ from‌‌ performing‌‌ his‌‌ 
the‌‌latter.‌  ‌ duty‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌lawyer‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌government.‌  ‌In‌  ‌such‌  ‌an‌  ‌instance,‌  ‌the‌‌  The‌  ‌creation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌PTC‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌justified‌‌  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  President's‌‌   power‌‌
  of‌‌ 
The‌‌ voluntary‌‌ arbitrator‌‌ no‌‌ less‌‌ performs‌‌ a ‌‌state‌‌ function‌‌ pursuant‌‌ to‌‌  government‌  ‌office‌  ‌adversely‌  ‌affected‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌position‌  ‌taken‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  control.‌‌   The‌‌  power‌‌   of‌‌   control‌‌  is‌‌  entirely‌‌  different‌‌   from‌‌   the‌‌
  power‌‌ to‌‌ 
a‌  ‌governmental‌  ‌power‌  ‌delegated‌  ‌to‌  ‌him‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌provisions‌‌  Solicitor‌  ‌General‌  ‌may‌  ‌appear‌  ‌on‌  ‌its‌  ‌own‌  ‌behalf‌  ‌through‌  ‌its‌  ‌legal‌‌  create‌  ‌public‌  ‌offices.‌  ‌The‌  ‌former‌  ‌is‌‌   inherent‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌  Executive,‌‌  while‌‌ 
therefore‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Labor‌  ‌Code‌  ‌and‌  ‌he‌  ‌falls,‌  ‌therefore,‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌  personnel‌‌or‌‌representative.‌  ‌ the‌‌
  latter‌‌  finds‌‌
  basis‌‌   from‌‌  either‌‌ a ‌‌valid‌‌ delegation‌‌ from‌‌ Congress,‌‌ or‌‌ 
contemplation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌term‌‌"i‌ nstrumentality‌".‌  ‌ Consequently,‌‌‌the‌‌SRA‌‌need‌‌not‌‌be‌‌represented‌‌by‌‌the‌‌OSG.‌‌   ‌ his‌‌inherent‌‌duty‌‌to‌‌faithfully‌‌execute‌‌the‌‌laws.‌  ‌
Indeed,‌‌   the‌‌
  Executive‌‌   is‌‌
  given‌‌
  much‌‌   leeway‌‌ in‌‌ ensuring‌‌ that‌‌ our‌‌ laws‌‌ 
Iron‌‌and‌‌Steel‌‌Authority‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ Leyson‌‌v.‌ ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌ are‌‌
  faithfully‌‌  executed.‌‌   One‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ recognized‌‌ powers‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ 
We‌  ‌consider‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌ISA‌  ‌is‌  ‌properly‌  ‌regarded‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌agent‌  ‌or‌‌  granted‌‌   pursuant‌‌   to‌‌
  this‌‌   constitutionally-mandated‌‌ duty‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ 
To‌‌be‌‌considered‌‌a‌‌GOCC,‌‌three‌‌(3)‌‌requisites‌‌must‌‌concur,‌‌namely,‌‌   ‌
delegate‌‌   ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Republic.‌‌ The‌‌ Republic‌‌ itself‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌body‌‌ corporate‌‌ and‌‌  to‌‌create‌‌‌ad‌‌hoc‌‌committees.‌  ‌
first‌,‌‌any‌‌agency‌‌organized‌‌as‌‌a‌‌stock‌‌or‌‌non-stock‌‌corporation;‌‌   ‌
juridical‌‌
  person‌‌ vested‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ full‌‌ panoply‌‌ of‌‌ powers‌‌ and‌‌ attributes‌‌  On‌  ‌the‌  ‌charge‌  ‌that‌  ‌EO‌  ‌No.‌  ‌1 ‌ ‌transgresses‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌‌   Congress‌‌   to‌‌ 
which‌‌are‌‌compendiously‌‌described‌‌as‌‌"legal‌‌personality."‌  ‌ second‌, ‌ ‌vested‌  ‌with‌  ‌functions‌  ‌relating‌‌
  to‌‌
  public‌‌
  needs‌‌
  whether‌‌  appropriate‌‌   funds‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌
  operation‌‌   of‌‌ a ‌‌public‌‌ office,‌‌ suffice‌‌ it‌‌ to‌‌ say‌‌ 
When‌  ‌the‌  ‌statutory‌  ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌non-incorporated‌  ‌agency‌  ‌expires,‌  ‌the‌‌  governmental‌‌or‌‌proprietary‌‌in‌‌nature;‌‌and,‌‌   ‌ that‌  ‌there‌  ‌will‌  ‌be‌  ‌no‌  ‌appropriation‌  ‌but‌  ‌only‌  ‌an‌  ‌allotment‌  ‌or‌‌ 
powers,‌  ‌duties‌  ‌and‌  ‌functions‌  ‌as‌  ‌well‌‌  as‌‌
  the‌‌
  assets‌‌
  and‌‌
  liabilities‌‌  of‌‌  third‌, ‌ ‌owned‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Government‌  ‌directly‌  ‌or‌  ‌through‌  ‌its‌‌  allocations‌‌   of‌‌ existing‌‌ funds‌‌ already‌‌ appropriated.‌  ‌Accordingly,‌‌ there‌‌ 
that‌  ‌agency‌  ‌revert‌  ‌back‌  ‌to,‌  ‌and‌  ‌are‌  ‌re-assumed‌  ‌by,‌  ‌the‌‌  instrumentalities‌  ‌either‌  ‌wholly,‌  ‌or,‌  ‌where‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌as‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  is‌‌
  no‌‌
  usurpation‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Executive‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ of‌‌ Congress‌‌ 
case‌  ‌of‌  ‌stock‌  ‌corporations,‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌extent‌  ‌of‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌fifty-one‌‌  to‌‌appropriate‌‌funds.‌‌   ‌
Republic‌. ‌ ‌
(51)‌‌percent‌‌of‌‌its‌‌capital‌‌stock‌. ‌ ‌ The‌  ‌President's‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌investigations‌  ‌to‌  ‌ensure‌  ‌that‌‌ 
laws‌  ‌are‌  ‌faithfully‌  ‌executed‌  ‌is‌  ‌well‌  ‌recognized.‌  ‌It‌  ‌flows‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 87‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

faithful-execution‌  ‌clause‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VII,‌‌  Kinds‌‌of‌‌administrative‌‌rules‌‌and‌‌regulations‌  ‌ and‌‌
  the‌‌
  administrative‌‌   inter­pretation‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  law‌‌ is‌‌ at‌‌ best‌‌ advisory.‌‌ It‌‌ 
Section‌‌17‌‌thereof.‌  ‌ Legislative‌‌
   ‌ has‌  ‌also‌  ‌been‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌interpretative‌  ‌regulations‌  ‌need‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌‌ 
published‌. ‌ ‌
designed‌  ‌to‌  ‌implement‌  ‌a ‌ ‌primary‌  ‌legislation‌  ‌by‌  ‌providing‌  ‌the‌‌ 
C.‌‌Powers‌‌of‌‌administrative‌‌agencies‌  ‌
details‌  ‌thereof.‌  ‌Before‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌adopted,‌  ‌there‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌hearing‌, ‌ ‌and‌‌ 
Smart‌‌v.‌‌NTC‌  ‌ Melendres‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌
must‌‌be‌‌published.‌  ‌
Administrative‌  ‌agencies‌  ‌possess‌  ‌quasi-legislative‌  ‌or‌  ‌rule-making‌  Interpretative‌‌
   ‌ A‌  ‌formal‌  ‌trial-type‌  ‌hearing‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌at‌  ‌all‌  ‌times‌  ‌and‌  ‌in‌  ‌all‌  ‌instances‌‌ 
powers‌‌and‌q
‌ uasi-judicial‌‌or‌‌administrative‌‌adjudicatory‌‌powers.‌  ‌ essential‌‌  to‌‌  due‌‌
  process.‌‌  It‌‌
  is‌‌
  enough‌‌   that‌‌   the‌‌
  parties‌‌   are‌‌
  given‌‌   a ‌‌fair‌‌ 
designed‌‌  to‌‌
  provide‌‌  guidelines‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  law‌‌
  which‌‌ the‌‌ administrative‌‌ 
The‌  ‌rules‌  ‌and‌  ‌regulations‌  ‌that‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌agencies‌  ‌promulgate,‌‌  and‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌opportunity‌  ‌to‌  ‌explain‌  ‌their‌  ‌respective‌  ‌sides‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
agency‌‌is‌‌in‌‌charge‌‌of‌‌enforcing.‌‌It‌‌need‌‌NOT‌‌be‌‌published.‌  ‌
controversy‌‌   and‌‌
  to‌‌
  present‌‌  evidence‌‌   on‌‌   which‌‌   a ‌‌fair‌‌
  decision‌‌   can‌‌ be‌‌ 
which‌  ‌are‌  ‌the‌  ‌product‌  ‌of‌  ‌a‌  ‌delegated‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌create‌‌ 
Eslao‌‌v.‌‌COA‌  ‌ based.‌  ‌
new‌‌and‌‌additional‌‌legal‌‌provisions‌‌that‌‌have‌‌the‌‌effect‌‌of‌‌law,‌‌should‌ 
a) be‌‌
  within‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌scope‌‌ ‌of‌‌ the‌‌ statutory‌‌ authority‌‌ granted‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌  Administrative‌  ‌regulations‌  ‌and‌  ‌policies‌  ‌enacted‌  ‌by‌  ‌administrative‌‌ 
Eastern‌‌Telecom‌‌v.‌‌International‌‌Communication‌  ‌
legislature‌‌to‌‌the‌‌administrative‌‌agency.‌‌   ‌ bodies‌  ‌to‌  ‌interpret‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌‌
  force‌‌
  of‌‌
  law‌‌
  and‌‌
  are‌‌
  entitled‌‌
  to‌‌ 
b) be‌  ‌germane‌  ‌to‌‌
  the‌‌
  objects‌‌   and‌‌
  purposes‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  law,‌‌  and‌‌
  be‌‌  great‌‌respect.‌  ‌ In‌  ‌cases‌‌
  where‌‌
  the‌‌
  dispute‌‌
  concerns‌‌
  the‌‌
  interpretation‌‌  by‌‌
  an‌‌
  agency‌‌ 
of‌‌its‌‌own‌‌rules,‌‌we‌‌should‌‌apply‌‌only‌‌these‌‌standards:‌‌   ‌
not‌‌ in‌‌ contradiction‌‌ to,‌‌ but‌‌ in‌‌ conformity‌‌ with,‌‌ the‌‌ standards‌‌ 
prescribed‌‌by‌‌law‌  ‌ CIR‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ 1. Whether‌‌the‌‌‌delegation‌‌of‌‌power‌‌was‌‌valid‌;  ‌‌ ‌
c) conform‌  ‌to‌  ‌and‌  ‌be‌  ‌consistent‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  When‌  ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌rule‌  ‌is‌  ‌merely‌  ‌interpretative‌  ‌in‌  ‌nature,‌  ‌its‌‌  2. whether‌‌   the‌‌
  ‌regulation‌‌
  was‌‌ within‌‌ that‌‌ delegation‌; ‌‌and‌‌ if‌‌ 
enabling‌‌statute.‌  ‌ applicability‌‌   needs‌‌
  nothing‌‌   further‌‌   than‌‌
  its‌‌   bare‌‌   issuance‌‌ for‌‌ it‌‌ gives‌‌  so,‌‌   ‌
In‌‌
  questioning‌‌
  the‌‌
  validity‌‌
  or‌‌
  constitutionality‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌rule‌‌ or‌‌ regulation‌‌  no‌  ‌real‌  ‌consequence‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌what‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌itself‌  ‌has‌  ‌already‌‌  3. whether‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reasonable‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌under‌  ‌a ‌ ‌due‌‌ 
issued‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌agency,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌party‌  ‌need‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌exhaust‌‌  prescribed.‌‌   When,‌‌   upon‌‌   the‌‌   other‌‌  hand,‌‌  the‌‌   administrative‌‌   rule‌‌   goes‌‌  process‌‌test‌.  ‌‌ ‌
beyond‌  ‌merely‌  ‌providing‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌   means‌‌   that‌‌   can‌‌  facilitate‌‌
  or‌‌
  render‌‌ 
administrative‌  ‌remedies‌  ‌before‌  ‌going‌  ‌to‌‌  court.‌‌  ‌This‌‌  principle‌‌ 
least‌  ‌cumbersome‌  ‌the‌‌   implementation‌‌   of‌‌   the‌‌   law‌‌  but‌‌
  ‌substantially‌‌  Requisites‌‌for‌‌validity‌  ‌
applies‌  ‌only‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌agency‌‌ 
adds‌‌   to‌‌
  or‌‌
  increases‌‌   the‌‌ burden‌‌ of‌‌ those‌‌ governed,‌‌ it‌‌ behooves‌‌ the‌‌ 
concerned‌  ‌was‌  ‌performed‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌  ‌quasi-judicial‌‌  1. Completeness‌  ‌Test.‌  ‌it‌  ‌must‌  ‌set‌  ‌forth‌  ‌therein‌‌
  the‌‌
  policy‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌ 
agency‌  ‌to‌  ‌accord‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌to‌  ‌those‌  ‌directly‌  ‌affected‌  ‌a ‌ ‌chance‌  ‌to‌‌   be‌‌ 
function‌, ‌‌and‌‌
  not‌‌
  when‌‌
  the‌‌
  assailed‌‌  act‌‌
  pertained‌‌
  to‌‌
  its‌‌ rule-making‌‌  executed,‌‌carried‌‌out‌‌or‌‌implemented‌‌by‌‌the‌‌delegate.‌  ‌
heard‌, ‌‌and‌‌   thereafter‌‌   to‌‌  be‌‌ ‌duly‌‌ informed‌, ‌‌before‌‌ that‌‌ new‌‌ issuance‌‌ 
or‌‌quasi-legislative‌‌power.‌  ‌
is‌‌given‌‌the‌‌force‌‌and‌‌effect‌‌of‌‌law.‌  ‌
In‌  ‌like‌  ‌manner,‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌primary‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌applies‌‌  2. Sufficient‌  ‌Standard‌  ‌Test.‌  ‌the‌‌
  limits‌‌  of‌‌
  which‌‌
  are‌‌
  sufficiently‌‌ 
RMC‌  ‌37-93‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌viewed‌  ‌simply‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌corrective‌  ‌measure.‌  ‌The‌‌  determinate‌  ‌or‌  ‌determinable‌  ‌— ‌ ‌to‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌delegate‌  ‌must‌‌ 
only‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌agency‌  ‌exercises‌  ‌its‌‌ 
BIR‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌simply‌  ‌interpret‌  ‌the‌  ‌law;‌  ‌it‌  ‌legislated‌  ‌under‌  ‌its‌‌  conform‌‌in‌‌the‌‌performance‌‌of‌‌his‌‌functions.‌  ‌
quasi-judicial‌‌or‌‌adjudicatory‌‌function‌. ‌ ‌
quasi-legislative‌  ‌authority.‌  ‌The‌  ‌due‌  ‌observance‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌
  requirements‌‌ 
of‌‌
  ‌notice‌, ‌‌of‌‌
  ‌hearing‌, ‌‌and‌‌
  of‌‌ ‌publication‌‌ ‌should‌‌ not‌‌ have‌‌ been‌‌ then‌‌  Dagan,‌‌et.‌‌al.‌‌v.‌‌Philippine‌‌Racing‌‌Commission‌  ‌
Rule-making‌‌or‌‌Quasi-legislative‌‌power‌  ‌
ignored.‌‌  The‌‌   hastily‌‌
  promulgated‌‌   ‌RMC‌‌
  37-93‌‌   has‌‌
  fallen‌‌  short‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌
is‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌  ‌rules‌  ‌and‌  ‌regulations‌  ‌which‌  ‌results‌  ‌in‌‌  The‌‌ validity‌‌ of‌‌ an‌‌ administrative‌‌ issuance‌‌ hinges‌‌ on‌‌ compliance‌‌ with‌‌ 
valid‌‌and‌‌effective‌‌administrative‌‌issuance‌. ‌ ‌
delegated‌  ‌legislation‌  ‌that‌  ‌is‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌confines‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌granting‌‌  the‌‌following‌r ‌ equisites‌: ‌ ‌
statute‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌non-delegability‌  ‌and‌  ‌separability‌  ‌of‌‌  Peralta‌‌v.‌‌CSC‌‌   ‌ 1. Its‌‌promulgation‌‌must‌‌be‌a
‌ uthorized‌‌by‌‌the‌‌legislature‌; ‌ ‌
powers.‌  ‌ 2. It‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌promulgated‌  ‌in‌  ‌accordance‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌ 
When‌  ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌or‌  ‌executive‌  ‌agency‌  ‌renders‌  ‌an‌  ‌opinion‌  ‌or‌‌ 
prescribed‌‌procedure‌; ‌ ‌
issues‌  ‌a ‌ ‌statement‌  ‌of‌  ‌policy,‌  ‌it‌‌
  merely‌‌
  interprets‌‌
  a ‌‌pre-existing‌‌
  law;‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 88‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

3. It‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  ‌within‌‌
  the‌‌
  scope‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ authority‌‌ given‌‌ ‌by‌‌ the‌‌  As‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌enactment‌  ‌of‌  ‌laws,‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌rule‌  ‌is‌  ‌that,‌  ‌the‌‌  for‌  ‌the‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌‌  just‌‌
  compensation‌‌   to‌‌
  landowners.‌‌   Only‌‌  the‌‌ 
legislature;‌  ‌ promulgation‌  ‌of‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌issuances‌  ‌DOES‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌require‌‌  legislature‌‌   can‌‌
  recall‌‌
  that‌‌
  power.‌‌ The‌‌ DAR‌‌ has‌‌ no‌‌ authority‌‌ to‌‌ qualify‌‌ 
previous‌  ‌notice‌  ‌and‌  ‌hearing‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌only‌  ‌exception‌  ‌being‌‌   where‌‌  the‌‌  or‌‌undo‌‌that.‌  ‌
4. It‌‌must‌‌be‌‌reasonable‌. ‌ ‌
legislature‌  ‌itself‌  ‌requires‌  ‌it‌  ‌and‌  ‌mandates‌  ‌that‌‌  the‌‌
  regulation‌‌   shall‌‌ 
There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌delegation‌  ‌of‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌speak‌  ‌of‌‌
  between‌‌
  Philracom,‌‌
  as‌‌  2.‌‌W ithin‌‌the‌‌Scope‌‌of‌‌Authority‌‌
   ‌
be‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌certain‌  ‌facts‌  ‌as‌  ‌determined‌  ‌at‌  ‌an‌  ‌appropriate‌‌ 
the‌‌ delegator‌‌ and‌‌ MJCI‌‌ and‌‌ PRCI‌‌ as‌‌ delegates.‌‌ The‌‌ Philracom‌‌ directive‌‌  investigation.‌  ‌This‌  ‌exception‌  ‌pertains‌  ‌to‌‌   the‌‌  issuance‌‌   of‌‌
  ‌legislative‌‌  Boie-Takeda‌‌Chemicals‌‌v.‌‌De‌‌la‌‌Serna‌  ‌
is‌‌merely‌i‌ nstructive‌i‌ n‌‌character.‌  ‌ rules‌‌   as‌‌
  distinguished‌‌  from‌‌ ‌interpretative‌‌ rules‌‌ which‌‌ give‌‌ no‌‌ real‌‌  In‌‌
  including‌‌   commissions‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  computation‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 13th‌‌ month‌‌ pay,‌‌ 
As‌  ‌a ‌ ‌rule,‌‌
  the‌‌
  issuance‌‌   of‌‌
  rules‌‌
  and‌‌   regulations‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  of‌‌
  an‌‌  consequence‌‌more‌‌than‌‌what‌‌the‌‌law‌‌itself‌‌has‌‌already‌‌prescribed.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌second‌  ‌paragraph‌  ‌of‌  ‌Section‌  ‌5 ‌ ‌(a)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  IRR‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  13th‌‌
  Month‌‌ 
administrative‌‌   agency‌‌
  of‌‌  its‌‌
  quasi-legislative‌‌   power‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ require‌‌  In‌‌
  the‌‌  instant‌‌   case,‌‌   EO‌‌  156‌‌   is‌‌ obviously‌‌ a ‌‌‌legislative‌‌ ‌rule‌‌ as‌‌ it‌‌ seeks‌‌  Pay‌‌  Law‌‌
  unduly‌‌  expanded‌‌   the‌‌
  concept‌‌   of‌‌
  "basic‌‌   salary"‌‌ as‌‌ defined‌‌ in‌‌ 
notice‌  ‌and‌  ‌hearing.‌  ‌In‌  ‌Abella,‌  ‌Jr.‌‌  v.‌‌
  Civil‌‌
  Service‌‌   Commission‌, ‌‌this‌‌  to‌  ‌implement‌  ‌or‌  ‌execute‌‌   primary‌‌   legislative‌‌   enactments‌‌   intended‌‌   to‌‌  P.D.‌‌851.‌‌   ‌
Court‌  ‌had‌  ‌the‌  ‌occasion‌  ‌to‌  ‌rule‌  ‌that‌  ‌prior‌  ‌notice‌  ‌and‌  ‌hearing‌‌   are‌‌  protect‌‌   the‌‌  domestic‌‌   industry‌‌   by‌‌
  imposing‌‌   a ‌‌ban‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌ importation‌‌ 
NOT‌  ‌essential‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌validity‌  ‌of‌  ‌rules‌  ‌or‌  ‌regulations‌  ‌issued‌‌   in‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌specified‌‌ product‌‌ not‌‌ previously‌‌ subject‌‌ to‌‌ such‌‌ prohibition.‌‌ The‌‌  Miners‌‌Association‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Phils‌‌v.‌‌Factoran,‌‌Jr‌. ‌ ‌
the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌quasi-legislative‌  ‌powers‌  ‌since‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌‌  importation‌  ‌ban‌  ‌runs‌  ‌afoul‌  ‌the‌  ‌third‌  ‌requisite‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌‌ 
determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌past‌  ‌events‌  ‌or‌  ‌facts‌  ‌that‌  ‌have‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌  Considering‌  t‌ hat‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌rules‌  ‌draw‌  ‌life‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌statute‌‌ 
administrative‌  ‌order.‌  ‌The‌  ‌subject‌  ‌matter‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌  laws‌‌   authorizing‌‌   the‌‌ 
established‌‌or‌‌ascertained‌. ‌ ‌ President‌‌   to‌‌
  regulate‌‌   or‌‌
  forbid‌‌ importation‌‌ of‌‌ used‌‌ motor‌‌ vehicles,‌‌ is‌‌  which‌  ‌they‌  ‌seek‌  ‌to‌  ‌implement,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌obvious‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌spring‌‌ 
the‌‌   ‌domestic‌‌   ‌industry.‌  ‌The‌‌   proscription‌‌   in‌‌  the‌‌  importation‌‌   of‌‌
  used‌‌  cannot‌‌rise‌‌higher‌‌than‌‌its‌‌source‌.  ‌‌ ‌
1.‌‌Authorized‌‌by‌‌Congress‌  ‌ motor‌‌   vehicles‌‌   should‌‌   be‌‌ operative‌‌ only‌‌ outside‌‌ the‌‌ Freeport‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ 
Tayug‌‌Rural‌‌Bank‌‌v.‌‌Central‌‌Bank‌  ‌ inclusion‌  ‌of‌  ‌said‌  ‌zone‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌ambit‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Maceren‌  ‌
invalid‌  ‌modification‌  ‌of‌‌   RA‌‌  7227.‌  ‌Indeed,‌‌   ‌when‌‌   the‌‌
  application‌‌   of‌‌ 
Nowhere‌‌ in‌‌ R.A.‌‌ 720‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ Monetary‌‌ Board‌‌ authorized‌‌ to‌‌ mete‌‌ out‌‌ on‌‌  The‌‌
  regulation‌‌   penalizing‌‌   electro‌‌
  fishing‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ strictly‌‌ in‌‌ accordance‌‌ 
an‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌modifies‌  ‌existing‌  ‌laws‌  ‌or‌  ‌exceeds‌‌ 
rural‌‌
  banks‌‌ an‌‌ additional‌‌ penalty‌‌ rate‌‌ on‌‌ their‌‌ past‌‌ due‌‌ accounts‌‌ with‌‌  with‌  ‌the‌  ‌Fisheries‌  ‌Law,‌  ‌under‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌was‌  ‌issued,‌‌ 
the‌  ‌intended‌  ‌scope,‌  ‌as‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌instant‌  ‌case‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌issuance‌‌ 
Appellant.‌‌   ‌ because‌‌the‌‌law‌‌itself‌‌does‌‌not‌‌expressly‌‌punish‌‌electro‌‌fishing.‌  ‌
becomes‌  ‌void,‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌for‌‌   being‌‌   ultra‌‌  vires‌, ‌‌but‌‌   ‌also‌‌   for‌‌
  being‌‌ 
unreasonable‌. ‌ ‌
Executive‌‌Secretary‌‌v.‌‌Southwing‌‌Heavy‌‌Industries‌  ‌ Romulo,‌‌Mabanta,‌‌Buenaventura,‌‌Sayoc‌‌&‌‌De‌‌Los‌‌Angeles‌‌v.‌‌HDMF‌  ‌
The‌  ‌problem‌  ‌lies‌  ‌with‌  ‌respect‌  ‌to‌‌  the‌‌  application‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌   importation‌‌ 
Delegation‌  ‌of‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌powers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌is‌  ‌permitted‌  ‌in‌‌  ban‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Freeport.‌  ‌There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌logic‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌all‌  ‌encompassing‌  When‌‌   the‌‌   Board‌‌   of‌‌
  Trustees‌‌
  of‌‌  the‌‌  HDMF‌‌   required‌‌   in‌‌ Section‌‌ 1,‌‌ Rule‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌28(2)‌  ‌of‌  ‌Article‌‌
  VI‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Constitution.‌‌
  The‌‌
  relevant‌‌   statutes‌‌  application‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  assailed‌‌   provision‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ Freeport‌‌ which‌‌ is‌‌ outside‌‌  VII‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌1995‌  ‌Amendments‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌IRR‌  ‌of‌  ‌R.A.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌7742‌  ‌that‌‌ 
to‌‌execute‌‌this‌‌provision‌‌are:‌  ‌ the‌‌ customs‌‌ territory.‌‌ As‌‌ long‌‌ as‌‌ the‌‌ used‌‌ motor‌‌ vehicles‌‌ do‌‌ not‌‌ enter‌‌  employers‌  ‌should‌  ‌have‌  ‌both‌  ‌provident/retirement‌  a ‌ nd‌  ‌housing‌‌ 
the‌  ‌customs‌  ‌territory,‌  ‌the‌  ‌injury‌  ‌or‌  ‌harm‌  ‌sought‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌   prevented‌‌  or‌‌  benefits‌‌   for‌‌
  all‌‌
  its‌‌
  employees‌‌   in‌‌  order‌‌   to‌‌
  qualify‌‌  for‌‌  exemption‌‌ from‌‌ 
1) The‌‌Tariff‌‌and‌‌Customs‌‌Code;‌  ‌
remedied‌‌   not‌‌ arise.‌  ‌The‌‌ application‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌ 
  will‌‌ the‌  ‌Fund,‌  ‌it‌  ‌effectively‌  ‌amended‌  ‌Section‌  ‌19‌  ‌of‌  ‌P.D.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌1752.‌  ‌And‌‌ 
2) Executive‌  ‌Order‌  ‌No.‌  ‌226,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Omnibus‌  ‌Investment‌  ‌Code‌‌   of‌‌ 
consistent‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌and‌  ‌reason‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌. ‌ ‌ when‌  ‌the‌  ‌Board‌  ‌subsequently‌  ‌abolished‌‌   that‌‌
  exemption‌‌   through‌‌   the‌‌ 
the‌‌Philippines;‌  ‌
When‌‌  the‌‌ reason‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ ceases,‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ ceases.‌  ‌It‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ the‌‌ letter‌‌  1996‌  ‌Amendments,‌  ‌it‌  ‌repealed‌  ‌Section‌  ‌19‌  ‌of‌  ‌P.D.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌1752.‌  ‌Such‌‌ 
3) Republic‌  ‌Act‌  ‌No.‌  ‌8800,‌  ‌otherwise‌  ‌known‌‌   as‌‌
  the‌‌
  “Safeguard‌‌ 
alone‌‌but‌‌the‌‌spirit‌‌of‌‌the‌‌law‌‌also‌‌that‌‌gives‌‌it‌‌life.‌  ‌ amendment‌‌   and‌‌   subsequent‌‌   repeal‌‌   of‌‌
  Section‌‌   19‌‌
  are‌‌   both‌‌   invalid,‌‌ as‌‌ 
Measures‌‌Act”‌‌(SMA).‌  ‌
they‌‌are‌‌not‌‌within‌‌the‌‌delegated‌‌power‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Board.‌‌   ‌
There‌  ‌are‌  ‌thus‌  ‌explicit‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌and‌  ‌statutory‌  ‌permission‌‌ 
authorizing‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌to‌  ‌ban‌  ‌or‌  ‌regulate‌  ‌importation‌  ‌of‌  ‌articles‌‌  Land‌‌Bank‌‌v.‌‌Dalauta‌‌‌2017‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
DAR‌‌v.‌‌Sutton‌  ‌
and‌‌commodities‌‌into‌‌the‌‌country.‌‌   ‌ In‌  ‌Section‌  ‌57‌  ‌of‌  ‌R.A.‌‌
  No.‌‌
  6657,‌‌
  Congress‌‌  expressly‌‌  granted‌‌   the‌‌
  RTC,‌‌ 
acting‌‌ as‌‌ SAC,‌‌ the‌‌ original‌‌ and‌‌ exclusive‌‌ jurisdiction‌‌ over‌‌ all‌‌ petitions‌‌  In‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌at‌  ‌bar,‌  ‌we‌  ‌find‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌impugned‌  ‌A.O.‌  ‌is‌  ‌invalid‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌‌ 
contravenes‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution.‌  ‌The‌  ‌A.O.‌  ‌sought‌  ‌to‌  ‌regulate‌  ‌livestock‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 89‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

farms‌  ‌by‌  ‌including‌  ‌them‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌coverage‌  ‌of‌  ‌agrarian‌  ‌reform‌  ‌and‌‌  Purisima‌‌v.‌‌Philippine‌‌Tobacco‌‌Institute‌‌‌2017‌  ‌ Philippine‌‌Consumers‌‌Foundation‌‌v.‌‌Sec‌‌of‌‌DECS‌  ‌
prescribing‌  ‌a ‌ ‌maximum‌  ‌retention‌  ‌limit‌  ‌for‌  ‌their‌  ‌ownership.‌  ‌The‌‌ 
Court‌  ‌clarified‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Luz‌  ‌Farms‌  ‌case‌  ‌that‌  ‌livestock,‌  ‌swine‌  ‌and‌‌  A‌‌
  reading‌‌   of‌‌   Section‌‌   11‌‌   of‌‌
  RR‌‌  17-2012‌‌ and‌‌ Annex‌‌ "D-1"‌‌ on‌‌ Cigarettes‌‌  We‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌convinced‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌argument‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌regulate‌‌ 
poultry-raising‌  ‌are‌  ‌industrial‌  ‌activities‌  ‌and‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌fall‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌  Packed‌‌   by‌‌   Machine‌‌   of‌‌   RMC‌‌   90-2012‌‌   reveals‌‌
  that‌‌
  they‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌ simply‌‌  school‌  ‌fees‌  ‌"does‌  ‌not‌  ‌always‌  ‌include‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌increase"‌  ‌such‌‌ 
definition‌  ‌of‌  ‌"agriculture"‌  ‌or‌  ‌"agricultural‌  ‌activity."‌  ‌The‌  ‌raising‌  ‌of‌‌  regulations‌‌   to‌‌ implement‌‌ RA‌‌ 10351.‌‌ They‌‌ are‌‌ amendatory‌‌ provisions‌‌  fees.‌  ‌The‌  ‌function‌  ‌of‌  ‌prescribing‌  ‌rates‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌‌   agency‌‌ 
livestock,‌‌  swine‌‌   and‌‌  poultry‌‌   is‌‌
  different‌‌
  from‌‌ crop‌‌ or‌‌ tree‌‌ farming.‌‌ It‌‌  which‌‌   require‌‌   cigarette‌‌   manufacturers‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ liable‌‌ to‌‌ pay‌‌ for‌‌ more‌‌ tax‌‌  may‌  ‌be‌  ‌either‌  ‌a ‌ ‌legislative‌  ‌or‌  ‌an‌  ‌adjudicative‌  ‌function.‌  ‌If‌  ‌it‌  ‌were‌  ‌a ‌‌
is‌‌an‌‌industrial,‌‌not‌‌an‌‌agricultural,‌‌activity.‌  ‌ than‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌allows.‌  ‌The‌  ‌BIR,‌  ‌in‌  ‌issuing‌  ‌these‌  ‌revenue‌‌   regulations,‌‌  legislative‌‌   function‌, ‌‌the‌‌   grant‌‌   of‌‌ prior‌‌ notice‌‌ and‌‌ hearing‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ 
created‌‌ an‌‌ additional‌‌ tax‌‌ liability‌‌ for‌‌ packaging‌‌ combinations‌‌ smaller‌  affected‌‌   parties‌‌   is‌‌
  NOT‌‌  a ‌‌requirement‌‌   of‌‌
  due‌‌ process‌. ‌‌As‌‌ regards‌‌ 
than‌  ‌20‌  ‌cigarette‌  ‌sticks.‌  ‌Excise‌‌   tax‌‌
  on‌‌  cigarettes‌‌
  packed‌‌   by‌‌
  machine‌‌  rates‌  ‌prescribed‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌agency‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌ 
Holy‌‌Spirit‌‌Homeowners‌‌Association‌‌v.‌‌Defensor‌  ‌
shall‌‌   be‌‌  imposed‌‌   on‌‌ the‌‌ packaging‌‌ combination‌‌ of‌‌ 20‌‌ cigarette‌‌ sticks‌‌  quasi-judicial‌‌   function,‌‌   prior‌‌   notice‌‌   and‌‌ hearing‌‌ are‌‌ essential‌‌ to‌‌ 
In‌‌
  questioning‌‌   the‌‌
  validity‌‌
  or‌‌
  constitutionality‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌rule‌‌ or‌‌ regulation‌‌  as‌‌  a ‌‌whole‌‌   and‌‌   not‌‌
  to‌‌ individual‌‌ packaging‌‌ combinations‌‌ or‌‌ pouches‌‌  the‌‌validity‌‌of‌‌such‌‌rates.‌‌   ‌
issued‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌agency,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌party‌  ‌need‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌exhaust‌‌  of‌‌5's,‌‌10's,‌‌etc.‌  ‌ When‌  ‌the‌  ‌rules‌  ‌and/or‌‌
  rates‌‌
  laid‌‌
  down‌‌
  by‌‌
  an‌‌
  administrative‌‌
  agency‌‌ 
administrative‌  ‌remedies‌  ‌before‌  ‌going‌  ‌to‌  ‌court.‌  ‌This‌  ‌principle,‌‌ 
are‌‌
  meant‌‌
  to‌‌   ‌to‌‌
  apply‌‌   all‌  ‌enterprises‌‌  of‌‌  a ‌‌given‌‌  kind‌‌  throughout‌‌ the‌‌ 
however,‌  ‌applies‌  ‌only‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌administrative‌  3.‌‌Observance‌‌of‌‌Prescribed‌‌Procedure;‌‌Notice‌‌and‌‌Hearing;‌‌
  country,‌‌they‌‌may‌‌partake‌‌of‌‌a‌l‌ egislative‌c‌ haracter.‌‌   ‌
agency‌  ‌concerned‌  ‌was‌  ‌performed‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌‌ 
Publication‌‌
   ‌
QUASI-JUDICIAL‌  ‌function‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌assailed‌  ‌act‌‌  Where‌  ‌the‌  ‌rules‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌rates‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌apply‌  ‌exclusively‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌
pertained‌‌to‌‌its‌‌rule-making‌‌or‌‌quasi-legislative‌‌power.‌  ‌ Republic‌‌v.‌‌Medina‌  ‌ particular‌‌
  party‌, ‌‌‌based‌‌  upon‌‌  a ‌‌finding‌‌  of‌‌ fact‌, ‌‌then‌‌ its‌‌ function‌‌ 
Where‌‌   what‌‌
  is‌‌
  assailed‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌validity‌‌ or‌‌ constitutionality‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌rule‌‌  is‌‌quasi-judicial‌‌‌in‌‌character.‌  ‌
If‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌is‌  ‌empowered‌  ‌to‌‌   approve‌‌   provisional‌‌   rates‌‌   even‌‌ 
or‌‌
  regulation‌‌  issued‌‌  by‌‌
  the‌‌ administrative‌‌ agency‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ performance‌‌  without‌  ‌a ‌ ‌hearing,‌‌   ‌a ‌‌fortiori‌‌  it‌‌  may‌‌   act‌‌   on‌‌
  such‌‌  rates‌‌  upon‌‌   a ‌‌six-day‌‌  Is‌  ‌DO‌  ‌No.‌  ‌37‌  ‌issued‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌DECS‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌legislative‌‌ 
of‌  ‌its‌  ‌quasi-legislative‌  ‌function‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌regular‌  ‌courts‌  ‌have‌‌  notice‌  ‌to‌  ‌persons‌  ‌concerned.‌‌   To‌‌   be‌‌
  sure,‌‌   petitioner‌‌   Gonzalez‌‌   argues‌‌  function?‌  ‌We‌  ‌believe‌  ‌so.‌  ‌This‌  ‌being‌  ‌so,‌  ‌prior‌  ‌notice‌  ‌and‌‌   hearing‌‌ 
jurisdiction‌  ‌to‌  ‌pass‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌same.‌  ‌Hence,‌  ‌the‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌course‌  ‌to‌‌  that‌‌   the‌‌
  proviso‌‌
  applies‌‌   only‌‌
  to‌‌   initial,‌‌   not‌‌  revised,‌‌  rates.‌‌ The‌‌ Public‌‌  are‌‌not‌‌essential‌‌to‌‌the‌‌validity‌‌of‌‌its‌‌issuance.‌  ‌
assail‌‌its‌‌validity‌m ‌ ust‌‌follow‌‌the‌‌doctrine‌‌of‌‌hierarchy‌‌of‌‌courts.‌  ‌ Service‌  ‌Act,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌makes‌  ‌no‌  ‌distinction.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Public‌  ‌Service‌‌ 
Where‌‌
  the‌‌
  principal‌‌
  relief‌‌
  sought‌‌  is‌‌  to‌‌
  invalidate‌‌
  an‌‌
  IRR,‌‌ petitioners'‌‌  Commission‌‌   practice,‌‌   moreover,‌‌   is‌‌
  to‌‌  hear‌‌   and‌‌ approve‌‌ revised‌‌ rates‌‌  Philippine‌‌Communications‌‌Satellite‌‌v.‌‌Alcuaz‌  ‌
remedy‌‌  is‌‌
  an‌‌
  ordinary‌‌  action‌‌
  for‌‌  its‌‌  nullification‌, ‌‌an‌‌ action‌‌ which‌‌  without‌‌   published‌‌  notices‌‌   or‌‌ hearing.‌‌ The‌‌ reason‌‌ is‌‌ easily‌‌ discerned:‌‌ 
The‌‌   order‌‌   in‌‌
  question‌‌ which‌‌ was‌‌ issued‌‌ by‌‌ Alcuaz‌‌ no‌‌ doubt‌‌ contains‌‌ 
properly‌‌falls‌‌under‌‌the‌‌jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌the‌‌RTC.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌provisional‌  ‌rates‌  ‌are‌  ‌by‌  ‌their‌  ‌nature‌  ‌temporary‌  ‌and‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌‌ 
all‌  ‌the‌  ‌attributes‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌quasi-judicial‌  ‌adjudication.‌  ‌Foremost‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌ 
adjustment‌‌in‌‌conformity‌‌with‌‌the‌‌definitive‌‌rates‌‌approved.‌  ‌
Where‌‌   a‌‌
  rule‌‌
  or‌‌
  regulation‌‌ has‌‌ a ‌‌provision‌‌ not‌‌ expressly‌‌ stated‌‌  fact‌‌   that‌‌  said‌‌  order‌‌
  pertains‌‌   exclusively‌‌   to‌‌
  petitioner‌‌  and‌‌ to‌‌ no‌‌ other.‌‌ 
or‌  ‌contained‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  statute‌‌
  being‌‌   implemented,‌‌   that‌‌
  provision‌‌  Thus,‌  ‌an‌  ‌immediate‌‌   reduction‌‌   in‌‌
  its‌‌
  rates‌‌  would‌‌   adversely‌‌   affect‌‌   its‌‌ 
does‌‌not‌‌necessarily‌‌contradict‌‌the‌‌statute‌.  ‌‌ ‌ Maceda‌‌v.‌‌ERB‌  ‌ operations‌‌and‌‌the‌‌quality‌‌of‌‌its‌‌service‌‌to‌‌the‌‌public.‌  ‌
What‌‌   must‌‌  be‌‌
  stressed‌‌ is‌‌ that‌‌ while‌‌ under‌‌ Executive‌‌ Order‌‌ No.‌‌ 172,‌‌ a ‌‌ With‌‌
  regard‌‌ to‌‌ ‌rate-fixing‌, ‌‌respondent‌‌ has‌‌ no‌‌ authority‌‌ to‌‌ make‌‌ such‌‌ 
Orceo‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌‌2010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ hearing‌  ‌is‌  ‌indispensable,‌  ‌it‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌preclude‌  ‌the‌  ‌Board‌  ‌from‌‌  order‌‌
  without‌‌ first‌‌ giving‌‌ petitioner‌‌ a ‌‌hearing,‌‌ whether‌‌ the‌‌ order‌‌ be‌‌ 
ordering,‌‌  ‌ex‌‌
  parte‌, ‌‌a ‌‌provisional‌‌ increase,‌‌ as‌‌ it‌‌ did‌‌ here,‌‌ subject‌‌ to‌‌ its‌‌  temporary‌‌   or‌‌   permanent,‌‌   and‌‌
  it‌‌ is‌‌ immaterial‌‌ whether‌‌ the‌‌ same‌‌ is‌‌ 
The‌  ‌inclusion‌  ‌of‌  ‌airsoft‌  ‌guns‌  ‌and‌  ‌airguns‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌term‌  ‌"firearm"‌  ‌in‌‌ 
final‌‌disposition.‌  ‌ made‌  ‌upon‌  ‌a ‌ ‌complaint,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌summary‌  ‌investigation,‌  ‌or‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Resolution‌‌   No.‌‌
  8714‌‌
  for‌‌
  purposes‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌
  gun‌‌
  ban‌‌   during‌‌  the‌‌ election‌‌ 
period‌‌   is‌‌
  a ‌‌reasonable‌‌   restriction,‌‌
  the‌‌   objective‌‌   of‌‌ which‌‌ is‌‌ to‌‌ ensure‌‌  Section‌‌   3(e)‌‌ outlines‌‌ the‌‌ jurisdiction‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Board‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ grounds‌‌ for‌‌  commission's‌‌own‌‌motion‌‌as‌‌in‌‌the‌‌present‌‌case.‌  ‌
the‌‌holding‌‌of‌‌free,‌‌orderly,‌‌honest,‌‌peaceful‌‌and‌‌credible‌‌elections.‌  ‌ which‌  ‌it‌‌
  may‌‌   decree‌‌
  a ‌‌price‌‌  adjustment,‌‌   subject‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  requirements‌‌ 
of‌  ‌notice‌  ‌and‌  ‌hearing.‌  P ‌ ending‌‌   ‌that,‌‌  however,‌‌  it‌‌  may‌‌  order,‌‌  under‌‌  Rubenecia‌‌v.‌‌CSC‌  ‌
However‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌excludes‌  ‌the‌  ‌replicas‌  ‌and‌  ‌imitations‌  ‌of‌  ‌airsoft‌‌ 
guns‌‌
  and‌‌
  airguns‌‌   from‌‌ the‌‌ term‌‌ "firearm"‌‌ under‌‌ Resolution‌‌ No.‌‌ 8714,‌‌  Section‌‌   8,‌‌
  an‌‌
  authority‌‌   to‌‌
  increase‌‌
  provisionally,‌‌   ‌without‌‌   need‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌ Assuming‌  ‌that‌  ‌Rubenecia‌  ‌had‌  ‌not‌  ‌in‌  ‌fact‌  ‌been‌  ‌sent‌  ‌an‌  ‌individual‌‌ 
because‌‌they‌‌are‌‌not‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌any‌‌regulation,‌‌unlike‌‌airsoft‌‌guns.‌  ‌ hearing‌,‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌the‌‌final‌‌outcome‌‌of‌‌the‌‌proceeding.‌  ‌ notice,‌  ‌the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌remains‌  ‌that‌‌
  Resolution‌‌
  No.‌‌  93­-2387‌‌
  was‌‌   published‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 90‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌newspaper‌  ‌of‌  ‌general‌  ‌circulation;‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌may‌‌  Unlike‌  ‌the‌  ‌restrictive‌‌   aggregate-based‌‌   airtime‌‌   limits,‌‌
  the‌‌
  directive‌‌   to‌‌  review‌  ‌that‌  ‌review‌  ‌schools‌  ‌and‌  ‌centers‌  ‌believe‌  ‌would‌  ‌best‌  ‌enable‌‌ 
accordingly‌  ‌be‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌to‌  ‌have‌  ‌complied‌  ‌substantially‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌  give‌‌
  prior‌‌
  notice‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌
  unduly‌‌
  burdensome‌‌   and‌‌ unreasonable,‌‌ much‌‌  their‌  ‌enrollees‌  ‌to‌  ‌meet‌  ‌the‌  ‌standards‌  ‌required‌  ‌before‌  ‌becoming‌  ‌a ‌‌
requirement‌‌of‌‌written‌‌notice‌‌in‌‌its‌‌own‌‌Resolution.‌‌   ‌ less‌  ‌could‌  ‌it‌  ‌be‌  ‌characterized‌  ‌as‌  ‌prior‌  ‌restraint‌  ‌since‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌‌  full-pledged‌‌public‌‌accountant.‌  ‌
restriction‌‌on‌‌dissemination‌‌of‌‌information‌‌before‌‌broadcast.‌  ‌
 ‌
PITC‌‌v.‌‌COA‌‌‌citing‌‌Tañada‌‌v.‌‌Tuvera‌  ‌ In‌‌
  the‌‌ same‌‌ way‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ Court‌‌ finds‌‌ the‌‌ “prior‌‌ notice”‌‌ requirement‌‌ as‌‌  Pimentel‌‌v.‌‌LEB‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌r‌ e‌‌Reasonableness‌‌of‌‌PhiLSAT‌  ‌
not‌  ‌constitutionally‌  ‌infirm,‌‌   it‌‌
  similarly‌‌   concludes‌‌  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  “‌right‌‌
  to‌  The‌‌   exercise‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌ supervise‌‌ and‌‌ regulate‌‌ legal‌‌ education‌‌ is‌‌ 
DBM-CCC‌‌   No.‌‌  10‌‌
  has‌‌
  been‌‌
  re-issued‌‌   in‌‌
  its‌‌ entirety‌‌ and‌‌ submitted‌‌ for‌‌ 
reply‌” ‌‌provision‌‌   is‌‌ reasonable‌‌ and‌‌ consistent‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ constitutional‌‌  circumscribed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌normative‌  ‌contents‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌itself,‌‌ 
publication‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Official‌‌
  Gazette.‌‌ ‌Would‌‌ the‌‌ subsequent‌‌ publication‌‌ 
mandate.‌  ‌ that‌  ‌is,‌  ‌it‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌reasonably‌  ‌exercised.‌  ‌Reasonable‌  ‌exercise‌‌ 
thereof‌  ‌cure‌  ‌the‌  ‌defect‌  ‌and‌  ‌retroact‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌ 
above-mentioned‌‌items‌‌were‌‌disallowed‌‌in‌‌audit?‌  ‌ means‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌should‌  ‌not‌  ‌amount‌  ‌to‌‌   control‌‌  and‌‌  that‌‌
  it‌‌
  respects‌‌ 
4.‌‌Fair‌‌and‌‌Reasonable‌  ‌ the‌  ‌Constitutionally‌  ‌­guaranteed‌  ‌institutional‌  ‌academic‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌and‌‌ 
NO‌. ‌‌‌From‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌ the‌‌ COA‌‌ disallowed‌‌ the‌‌ expenses‌‌ in‌‌ audit‌‌ up‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ 
Lupangco‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ the‌‌citizen's‌‌right‌‌to‌‌quality‌‌and‌‌accessible‌‌education.‌‌   ‌
filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌herein‌  ‌petition‌‌   the‌‌
  subject‌‌  circular‌‌
  remained‌‌  in‌‌
  legal‌‌  limbo‌‌ 
due‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌  ‌non-publication.‌  ‌As‌  ‌was‌  ‌stated‌  ‌in‌  ‌Tañada‌  ‌vs.‌  ‌Tuvera‌, ‌‌ Here,‌‌  mandating‌‌   law‌‌
  schools‌‌  to‌‌
  reject‌‌
  applicants‌‌  who‌‌  failed‌‌
  to‌‌ reach‌‌ 
Is‌  ‌the‌  ‌RTC‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌category‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌PRC‌  ‌so‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌cannot‌‌
  pass‌‌ 
"prior‌  ‌publication‌  ‌of‌  ‌laws‌  ‌before‌  ‌they‌  ‌become‌  ‌effective‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌‌  the‌‌
  prescribed‌‌   PhiLSAT‌‌   passing‌‌  score‌‌
  or‌‌
  those‌‌
  with‌‌ expired‌‌ PhiLSAT‌‌ 
upon‌‌the‌‌validity‌‌of‌‌the‌‌administrative‌‌acts‌‌of‌‌the‌‌latter‌?  ‌‌ ‌
dispensed‌‌   with,‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  reason‌‌   that‌‌
  such‌‌
  omission‌‌  would‌‌   offend‌‌ due‌‌  eligibility‌  ‌transfers‌  ‌complete‌  ‌control‌  ‌over‌  ‌admission‌  ‌policies‌  ‌from‌‌ 
NO‌. ‌ ‌What‌  ‌is‌  ‌clear‌  ‌from‌  ‌PD‌  ‌No.‌  ‌223‌  ‌creating‌  ‌the‌  ‌PRC‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌‌  the‌‌law‌‌schools‌‌to‌‌the‌‌LEB.‌  ‌
process‌  ‌insofar‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌would‌  ‌deny‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌knowledge‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌  laws‌‌ 
attached‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌for‌  ‌general‌  ‌direction‌  ‌and‌‌ 
that‌‌are‌‌supposed‌‌to‌‌govern‌‌it."‌  ‌ The‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌institutions‌  ‌then‌  ‌are‌  ‌constricted‌  ‌only‌  ‌in‌  ‌providing‌‌ 
coordination.‌‌   Well‌‌
  settled‌‌   in‌‌
  our‌‌
  jurisprudence‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌
  view‌‌   that‌‌ ‌even‌‌ 
"additional"‌‌   admission‌‌   requirements,‌‌   admitting‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  interpretation‌‌ 
acts‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President‌‌may‌‌be‌‌reviewed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌RTC.‌  ‌
GMA‌‌v.‌‌MTRCB‌  ‌ that‌  ‌the‌  ‌preference‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌school‌  ‌itself‌  ‌is‌  ‌merely‌  ‌secondary‌  ‌or‌‌ 
In‌‌
  order‌‌   to‌‌
  invoke‌‌   the‌‌ exclusive‌‌ appellate‌‌ jurisdiction‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ CA,‌‌ there‌‌  supplemental‌  ‌to‌  ‌that‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌antithetical‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌very‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Administrative‌  ‌Code‌  ‌of‌  ‌1987‌‌   expressly‌‌
  requires‌‌   each‌‌
  agency‌‌
  to‌‌  has‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌final‌  ‌order‌  ‌or‌  ‌ruling‌  ‌which‌  ‌resulted‌  ‌from‌  ‌proceedings‌‌  principle‌‌of‌‌reasonable‌‌supervision‌‌and‌‌regulation.‌  ‌
file‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌Office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌National‌  ‌Administrative‌  ‌Register‌‌  wherein‌  ‌the‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌body‌  ‌involved‌  ‌exercised‌  ‌its‌‌ 
(ONAR)‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ UP‌‌ Law‌‌ Center‌‌ three‌‌ certified‌‌ copies‌‌ of‌‌ every‌‌ rule‌‌  It‌  ‌is‌‌
  settled‌‌  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  PhiLSAT,‌‌   when‌‌  administered‌‌   as‌‌
  an‌‌  aptitude‌‌   test,‌‌ 
quasi-judicial‌‌‌functions.‌‌   ‌
adopted‌‌   by‌‌  it‌. ‌‌Administrative‌‌  issuances‌‌  which‌‌
  are‌‌ not‌‌ published‌‌ or‌‌  is‌  ‌reasonably‌  ‌related‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌State's‌  ‌unimpeachable‌  ‌interest‌  ‌in‌‌ 
Can‌‌
  this‌‌
  Commission‌‌   lawfully‌‌
  prohibit‌‌
  the‌‌ examinees‌‌ from‌‌ attending‌‌  improving‌‌   the‌‌  quality‌‌  of‌‌
  legal‌‌
  education.‌‌ This‌‌ aptitude‌‌ test,‌‌ however,‌‌ 
filed‌‌with‌‌the‌‌ONAR‌‌are‌i‌ neffective‌a‌ nd‌‌may‌‌not‌‌be‌‌enforced.‌  ‌
review‌‌  classes,‌‌
  receiving‌‌  handout‌‌
  materials,‌‌  tips‌‌
  or‌‌ the‌‌ like‌‌ three‌‌ (3)‌‌  should‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌exclusionary,‌  ‌restrictive,‌‌   or‌‌
  qualifying‌‌   as‌‌  to‌‌
  encroach‌‌ 
days‌‌before‌‌the‌‌date‌‌of‌‌examination‌? ‌ ‌ upon‌‌institutional‌‌academic‌‌freedom.‌  ‌
GMA‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌‌2
‌ 014‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
NO‌. ‌ ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌axiom‌  ‌in‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌law‌  ‌that‌  ‌administrative‌‌ 
For‌‌ failing‌‌ to‌‌ conduct‌‌ prior‌‌ hearing‌‌ before‌‌ coming‌‌ up‌‌ with‌‌ Resolution‌‌  authorities‌‌   should‌‌ not‌‌ act‌‌ arbitrarily‌‌ and‌‌ capriciously‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ issuance‌‌  Adjudicatory‌‌or‌‌Quasi-judicial‌‌power‌  ‌
No.‌  ‌9615,‌  ‌said‌  ‌Resolution,‌  ‌specifically‌  ‌in‌  ‌regard‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  new‌‌
  rule‌‌
  on‌‌  of‌  ‌rules‌  ‌and‌  ‌regulations.‌  ‌To‌  ‌be‌‌
  valid,‌‌  such‌‌   rules‌‌
  and‌‌   regulations‌‌ 
aggregate‌‌airtime‌‌‌is‌‌declared‌d ‌ efective‌‌and‌‌ineffectual.‌  ‌ This‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌
  power‌‌
  to‌‌
  hear‌‌   and‌‌  determine‌‌   questions‌‌   of‌‌ fact‌‌ to‌‌ which‌‌ 
must‌  ‌be‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌and‌  ‌fairly‌  ‌adapted‌  ‌to‌  ‌secure‌  ‌the‌  ‌end‌  ‌in‌‌ 
the‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌policy‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌‌  apply‌‌
  and‌‌
  to‌‌
  decide‌‌
  in‌‌
  accordance‌‌   with‌‌ 
Resolution‌‌No.‌‌9615‌d
‌ oes‌‌not‌‌impose‌  ‌ view‌. ‌ ‌If‌  ‌shown‌  ‌to‌  ‌bear‌  ‌no‌  ‌reasonable‌‌   relation‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌  purposes‌‌ 
the‌  ‌standards‌  ‌laid‌  ‌down‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌itself‌  ‌in‌  ‌enforcing‌  ‌and‌‌ 
an‌‌unreasonable‌‌burden‌‌‌on‌‌the‌  ‌ for‌  ‌which‌  ‌they‌‌   are‌‌
  authorized‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌  issued,‌‌   then‌‌  they‌‌   must‌‌
  be‌‌ 
administering‌‌the‌‌same‌‌law.‌‌   ‌
broadcast‌‌industry‌  ‌ held‌‌to‌‌be‌‌invalid‌. ‌ ‌
Contrary‌‌   to‌‌
  petitioners’‌‌
  contention,‌‌ the‌‌ ‌Reporting‌‌ Requirement‌‌ ‌for‌‌  Resolution‌  ‌No.‌  ‌105‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌unreasonable‌  ‌and‌  ‌arbitrary,‌  ‌it‌  ‌also‌‌  Meralco‌‌v.‌‌Atilano‌‌‌2012‌  ‌
the‌  ‌Comelec’s‌  ‌monitoring‌  ‌is‌  ‌reasonable.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reasonable‌  ‌means‌‌  infringes‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌examinees'‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌liberty‌  ‌guaranteed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
A‌  ‌preliminary‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌‌quasi-judicial‌‌
  proceeding.‌‌ 
adopted‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌COMELEC‌  ‌to‌  ‌ensure‌  ‌that‌  ‌parties‌  ‌and‌  ‌candidates‌‌
  are‌‌  Constitution.‌‌  Also,‌‌  it‌‌ ‌violates‌‌ the‌‌ academic‌‌ freedom‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ schools‌‌ 
The‌  ‌public‌  ‌prosecutor‌  ‌exercises‌  ‌investigative‌  ‌powers‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
afforded‌‌  equal‌‌  opportunities‌‌ to‌‌ promote‌‌ their‌‌ respective‌‌ candidacies.‌‌  concerned.‌  ‌Respondent‌  ‌PRC‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌interfere‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌of‌‌ 
conduct‌‌   of‌‌
  preliminary‌‌
  investigation‌‌   to‌‌  determine‌‌
  whether,‌‌ based‌‌ on‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 91‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

the‌‌   evidence‌‌  presented‌‌   to‌‌


  him,‌‌ he‌‌ should‌‌ take‌‌ further‌‌ action‌‌ by‌‌ filing‌‌  Administrative‌‌due‌‌process‌  ‌
Utto‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌
a‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌in‌  ‌court.‌  ‌In‌  ‌doing‌  ‌so,‌  ‌he‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌adjudicate‌‌ 
1.‌‌Jurisdiction‌‌
   ‌ In‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌proceedings,‌‌   the‌‌
  essence‌‌
  of‌‌
  due‌‌
  process‌‌   is‌‌
  simply‌‌ 
upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌rights,‌  ‌obligations‌  ‌or‌  ‌liabilities‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties‌  ‌before‌‌  him.‌‌ 
Since‌‌   the‌‌
  power‌‌  exercised‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ public‌‌ prosecutor‌‌ in‌‌ this‌‌ instance‌‌ is‌‌  an‌‌  ‌opportunity‌‌
  to‌‌  be‌‌
  heard‌, ‌‌or‌‌ an‌‌ opportunity‌‌ to‌‌ explain‌‌ one’s‌‌ side‌‌ 
De‌‌Syquia‌‌v.‌‌Board‌‌of‌‌Power‌‌and‌‌Water‌‌Works‌  ‌ or‌  ‌opportunity‌  ‌to‌  ‌seek‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reconsideration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌action‌  ‌or‌  ‌ruling‌‌ 
merely‌  ‌investigative‌  ‌or‌  ‌inquisitorial‌, ‌ ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌different‌‌ 
standard‌  ‌in‌  ‌terms‌  ‌of‌  ‌stating‌  ‌the‌  ‌facts‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌‌  Respondent‌  ‌board‌  ‌acquired‌  ‌no‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌petitioner's‌‌  complained‌‌of.‌  ‌
determinations.‌  ‌ contractual‌  ‌relations‌  ‌with‌‌   respondents-complainants‌‌   as‌‌  her‌‌  tenants,‌‌ 
We‌  ‌rule,‌  ‌therefore,‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌DOJ‌  ‌resolution‌  ‌satisfactorily‌  ‌complied‌‌  since‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌
  engaged‌‌
  in‌‌
  a ‌‌public‌‌
  service‌‌
  nor‌‌
  in‌‌  the‌‌  sale‌‌
  of‌‌  Garcia‌‌v.‌‌Pajaro‌  ‌
electricity‌‌without‌‌permit‌‌or‌‌franchise.‌  ‌
with‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌and‌  ‌legal‌  ‌requirements‌  ‌when‌  ‌it‌  ‌stated‌  ‌its‌  ‌legal‌‌  The‌  ‌city‌  ‌treasurer‌  ‌of‌  ‌Dagupan‌  ‌has‌  ‌the‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌institute‌‌ 
basis‌‌  for‌‌
  denying‌‌   MERALCO’s‌‌   petition‌‌   for‌‌  review‌‌  which‌‌  is‌‌
  Section‌‌  7 ‌‌ disciplinary‌  ‌actions‌  ‌against‌  ‌subordinate‌  ‌officers‌‌   or‌‌
  employees.‌‌   The‌‌ 
of‌‌
  Department‌‌   Circular‌‌  No.‌‌  70,‌‌ which‌‌ authorizes‌‌ the‌‌ SOJ‌‌ to‌‌ dismiss‌‌ a ‌‌ Mariño,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌Gamilla‌‌   ‌ essence‌  ‌of‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌proceeding‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌ 
petition‌  ‌outright‌  ‌if‌  ‌he‌  ‌finds‌  ‌it‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌patently‌  ‌without‌  ‌merit‌  ‌or‌‌  It‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌settled‌‌
  rule‌‌ that‌‌ jurisdiction,‌‌ once‌‌ acquired,‌‌ continues‌‌ until‌‌ the‌‌  opportunity‌  ‌to‌  ‌explain‌  ‌one’s‌  ‌side,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌written‌  ‌or‌  ‌verbal.‌  ‌The‌‌ 
manifestly‌  ‌intended‌  ‌for‌  ‌delay,‌  ‌or‌‌   when‌‌   the‌‌  issues‌‌
  raised‌‌
  therein‌‌  are‌‌  case‌‌ is‌‌ finally‌‌ terminated.‌‌ The‌‌ petition‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ Med-Arbiter‌‌ was‌‌ filed‌‌  constitutional‌  ‌mandate‌  ‌is‌  ‌satisfied‌  ‌when‌  ‌a ‌ ‌petitioner‌  ‌complaining‌‌ 
too‌‌insubstantial‌‌to‌‌require‌‌consideration.‌  ‌ ahead‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ complaint‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ civil‌‌ case‌‌ before‌‌ the‌‌ RTC.‌‌ As‌‌ such,‌‌ when‌‌  about‌  ‌an‌  ‌action‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌ruling‌  ‌is‌  ‌granted‌  ‌an‌  ‌opportunity‌  ‌to‌  ‌seek‌‌ 
the‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌filed‌  ‌their‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌a ‌ ‌quo,‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌‌  reconsideration.‌  ‌
Encinas‌‌v.‌‌Agustin,‌‌Jr.‌‌2
‌ 013‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ injunction‌  ‌and‌  ‌restraining‌  ‌order‌‌   prayed‌‌   for‌‌
  had‌‌  already‌‌  been‌‌  lodged‌‌ 
with‌‌   the‌‌   Med-Arbiter.‌  ‌The‌‌   removal‌‌   of‌‌
  padlocks‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ access‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  Domingo‌‌v.‌‌Rayala‌  ‌
In‌‌administrative‌‌law,‌‌a‌q
‌ uasi-judicial‌‌proceeding‌‌‌involves‌‌   ‌
office‌  ‌premises‌  ‌is‌  ‌necessarily‌  ‌included‌  ‌in‌  ‌petitioners’‌  ‌prayer‌  ‌to‌‌ 
a) taking‌‌and‌‌evaluating‌‌evidence;‌  ‌ The‌  ‌records‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌indicate‌  ‌that‌  ‌Rayala‌  ‌was‌  ‌afforded‌  ‌all‌  ‌these‌‌ 
enjoin‌‌   respondents‌‌   from‌‌  performing‌‌   acts‌‌ pertaining‌‌ to‌‌ union‌‌ officers‌‌ 
procedural‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌  ‌safeguards.‌  ‌Although‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌beginning‌  ‌he‌‌ 
b) determining‌‌facts‌‌based‌‌upon‌‌the‌‌evidence‌‌presented;‌‌and‌  ‌ and‌  ‌on‌  ‌behalf‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌union.‌  ‌In‌  ‌observance‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌‌ 
questioned‌  ‌the‌  ‌authority‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Committee‌  ‌to‌  ‌try‌‌   him,‌‌  he‌‌
  appeared,‌‌ 
c) rendering‌  ‌an‌  ‌order‌  ‌or‌  ‌decision‌  ‌supported‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌facts‌‌  adherence‌  ‌of‌  ‌jurisdiction,‌  ‌it‌‌   is‌‌
  clear‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  RTC‌‌   should‌‌  not‌‌  have‌‌ 
personally‌‌and‌‌with‌‌counsel,‌‌and‌‌participated‌‌in‌‌the‌‌proceedings.‌ 
exercised‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌provisional‌  ‌reliefs‌  ‌prayed‌  ‌for‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
proved.‌  ‌
complaint.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌has‌  ‌laid‌  ‌down‌  ‌the‌  ‌test‌  ‌for‌  ‌determining‌  ‌whether‌  ‌an‌‌  Rivera‌‌v.‌‌CSC‌  ‌
Unlike‌‌  the‌‌
  NLRC‌‌   which‌‌
  is‌‌
  explicitly‌‌
  vested‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ jurisdiction‌‌ over‌‌ 
administrative‌  ‌body‌  ‌is‌‌   exercising‌‌   ‌judicial‌‌
  ‌or‌‌
  ‌merely‌‌   investigatory‌‌ 
claims‌‌   for‌‌
  actual,‌‌  moral,‌‌
  exemplary‌‌   and‌‌
  other‌‌
  forms‌‌   of‌‌ damages,‌‌ the‌‌  In‌‌
  order‌‌  that‌‌   the‌‌ review‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ decision‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌subordinate‌‌ officer‌‌ might‌‌ 
functions‌  ‌— ‌ ‌adjudication‌  ‌signifies‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌and‌‌ 
BLR‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌specifically‌  ‌empowered‌  ‌to‌  ‌adjudicate‌  ‌claims‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌‌  not‌‌  turn‌‌ out‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ a ‌‌farce,‌‌ the‌‌ reviewing‌‌ officer‌‌ must‌‌ perforce‌‌ be‌‌ other‌‌ 
authority‌‌   to‌‌
  adjudicate‌‌  upon‌‌  the‌‌
  rights‌‌  and‌‌ obligations‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ parties.‌‌ 
nature‌‌arising‌‌from‌‌intra-union‌‌or‌‌inter-union‌‌disputes.‌  ‌ than‌‌the‌‌officer‌‌whose‌‌decision‌‌is‌‌under‌‌review.‌  ‌
Hence,‌‌  ‌if‌‌
  the‌‌   only‌‌
  purpose‌‌   of‌‌
  an‌‌  investigation‌‌   is‌‌
  to‌‌
  evaluate‌‌  the‌‌ 
evidence‌  ‌submitted‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌agency‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌facts‌  ‌and‌‌ 
2.‌‌Due‌‌Process‌‌
   ‌ Corona‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
circumstances‌  ‌presented‌  ‌to‌  ‌it,‌  ‌and‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌agency‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌ 
authorized‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌  ‌a ‌ ‌final‌  ‌pronouncement‌  ‌affecting‌  ‌the‌‌  In‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌proceedings,‌  ‌procedural‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌‌  What‌‌
  is‌‌
  prescribed‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ and‌‌ the‌Beja‌‌
   ‌case‌‌ is‌‌ that‌‌ all‌‌ complaints‌‌ 
parties,‌  ‌then‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌absence‌  ‌of‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌discretion‌  ‌and‌‌  recognized‌‌to‌‌include‌‌the‌‌following:‌‌   ‌ against‌  ‌a ‌ ‌PPA‌  ‌official‌  ‌or‌  ‌employee‌  ‌below‌  ‌the‌  ‌rank‌  ‌of‌  ‌Assistant‌‌ 
judgment‌. ‌ ‌ General‌‌  Manager‌‌   shall‌‌ be‌‌ filed‌‌ before‌‌ the‌‌ PPA‌‌ General‌‌ Manager‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ 
1) the‌‌right‌‌to‌‌actual‌‌or‌c‌ onstructive‌n
‌ otice‌; ‌ ‌
Here,‌  ‌the‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌BFP‌  ‌were‌‌
  purely‌‌
  administrative‌‌   in‌‌  proper‌  ‌officials,‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌PPA‌  ‌police‌‌
  or‌‌  any‌‌  aggrieved‌‌   party.‌‌
  The‌‌ 
2) a‌‌real‌‌opportunity‌‌to‌‌be‌‌heard‌;  ‌‌ ‌ aggrieved‌  ‌party‌  ‌should‌  ‌not,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌be‌  ‌one‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌official‌‌ 
nature‌  ‌and‌‌   constituted‌‌
  a ‌‌‌fact-finding‌‌  investigation‌‌   for‌‌
  purposes‌‌
  of‌‌ 
determining‌  ‌whether‌  ‌a ‌ ‌formal‌  ‌charge‌  ‌for‌  ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌offense‌‌  3) a‌‌tribunal‌‌vested‌‌with‌‌competent‌‌jurisdiction;‌‌and‌  ‌ upon‌  ‌whose‌  ‌lap‌  ‌the‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌he‌  ‌has‌  ‌filed‌  ‌may‌  ‌eventually‌  ‌fall‌  ‌on‌‌ 
should‌‌be‌‌filed‌‌against‌‌petitioner.‌  ‌ appeal.‌‌No‌‌man‌‌can‌‌be‌‌at‌‌once‌‌a‌‌litigant‌‌and‌‌judge.‌‌   ‌
4) a‌  ‌finding‌  ‌by‌  ‌said‌  ‌tribunal‌  ‌supported‌  ‌by‌  ‌substantial‌‌ 
evidence‌. ‌ ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 92‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Marcelo‌‌v.‌‌Bungubung‌  ‌ not‌‌ tantamount‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌denial‌‌ of‌‌ her‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ due‌‌ process.‌‌ Petitioner‌‌  The‌  ‌rule‌  ‌of‌  ‌res‌  ‌judicata‌  ‌which‌  ‌forbids‌  ‌the‌  ‌reopening‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌matter‌‌ 
was‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌  ‌file‌  ‌a ‌ ‌counter-affidavit‌‌   and‌‌  position‌‌
  paper‌‌
  and‌‌
  later‌‌  once‌‌  judicially‌‌   determined‌‌   by‌‌
  competent‌‌   authority‌‌   applies‌‌ as‌‌ well‌‌ to‌‌ 
The‌‌  fact‌‌
  that‌‌  no‌‌   formal‌‌
  hearing‌‌   took‌‌
  place‌‌   is‌‌ not‌‌ sufficient‌‌ ground‌‌ to‌‌  on,‌‌
  was‌‌  given‌‌  a ‌‌chance‌‌   to‌‌
  file‌‌
  two‌‌ motions‌‌ for‌‌ reconsideration‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  the‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌and‌  ‌quasi-judicial‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌  ‌public,‌  ‌executive‌  ‌or‌‌ 
say‌‌
  that‌‌  due‌‌ process‌‌ was‌‌ not‌‌ afforded‌‌ to‌‌ Bungubung.‌‌ It‌‌ is‌‌ well-settled‌‌  decision‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌deputy‌  ‌ombudsman. ‌  ‌As‌  ‌long‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties‌  ‌are‌‌  administrative‌‌   officers‌‌
  and‌‌
  boards‌‌  acting‌‌
  within‌‌   their‌‌ jurisdiction‌‌ as‌‌ 
that‌  ‌in‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌proceedings,‌  ‌including‌  ‌those‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌‌  given‌  ‌the‌  ‌opportunity‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌heard‌  ‌before‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌is‌‌  to‌‌the‌‌judgments‌‌of‌‌courts‌‌having‌‌general‌‌judicial‌‌powers.‌  ‌
Ombudsman,‌  ‌cases‌‌   may‌‌  be‌‌  submitted‌‌   for‌‌
  resolution‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  basis‌‌
  of‌‌  rendered,‌‌the‌‌demands‌‌of‌‌due‌‌process‌‌are‌‌sufficiently‌‌met‌. ‌ ‌ Indeed,‌  ‌the‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌‌   conclusiveness‌‌   of‌‌
  prior‌‌   adjudications‌‌   is‌‌ 
affidavits‌‌   and‌‌  pleadings.‌‌   It‌‌
  is,‌‌
  therefore,‌‌   not‌‌   legally‌‌  objectionable‌‌   for‌‌ 
not‌‌
  confined‌‌   in‌‌
  its‌‌
  operation‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  judgments‌‌   of‌‌
  what‌‌  are‌‌ ordinarily‌‌ 
being‌‌   violative‌‌ of‌‌ due‌‌ process‌‌ for‌‌ an‌‌ administrative‌‌ agency‌‌ to‌‌ resolve‌‌ 
Quisumbing‌‌v.‌‌Rosales‌‌‌2015‌  ‌ known‌  ‌as‌  ‌courts,‌  ‌but‌  ‌it‌  ‌extends‌  ‌to‌  ‌all‌  ‌bodies‌  ‌upon‌  ‌whom‌  ‌judicial‌‌ 
a‌  ‌case‌  ‌based‌  ‌solely‌  ‌on‌  ‌position‌  ‌papers,‌  ‌affidavits‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Petitioner‌  ‌was‌  ‌given‌  ‌ample‌  ‌opportunity‌  ‌to‌  ‌air‌  ‌her‌  ‌side‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌  powers‌‌had‌‌been‌‌conferred.‌ 
documentary‌‌   evidence‌‌   submitted‌‌   by‌‌  the‌‌   parties‌‌   as‌‌
  affidavits‌‌   of‌‌ 
witnesses‌‌may‌‌take‌‌the‌‌place‌‌of‌‌their‌‌direct‌‌testimonies‌. ‌ ‌ allegations‌  ‌against‌  ‌her‌  ‌after‌  ‌being‌  ‌sufficiently‌  ‌apprised‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
allegations‌  ‌against‌  ‌her;‌  ‌she‌  ‌was‌  ‌afforded‌  ‌the‌  ‌chance‌  ‌to‌  ‌submit‌  ‌her‌‌  Ocho‌‌v.‌‌Calos‌  ‌
Perez‌‌v.‌‌People‌  ‌ written‌  ‌explanation.‌  ‌Unfortunately,‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌failed‌  ‌to‌  ‌avail‌  ‌of‌‌  Under‌‌   the‌‌   principle‌‌   of‌‌
  ‌conclusiveness‌‌   of‌‌ judgment,‌‌ "the‌‌ identity‌‌ of‌‌ 
that‌‌right,‌‌and‌‌chose‌‌to‌‌directly‌‌seek‌‌the‌‌intervention‌‌of‌‌this‌‌Court.‌  ‌ causes‌‌   of‌‌ action‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ required‌‌ but‌‌ merely‌‌ identity‌‌ of‌‌ issues.”‌‌ Simply‌‌ 
There‌  ‌is‌  ‌nothing‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌that‌  ‌says‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌party‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌‌
put,‌  ‌it‌  ‌bars‌  ‌the‌  ‌relitigation‌  ‌of‌  ‌particular‌  ‌facts‌  ‌or‌  ‌issues‌  ‌in‌  ‌another‌‌ 
non-litigation‌‌   proceeding‌‌   is‌‌ entitled‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ represented‌‌ by‌‌ counsel‌‌ and‌‌ 
Villa-Ignacio‌‌v.‌‌Gutierrez‌‌‌2017‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ litigation‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌parties‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌‌different‌‌   claim‌‌
  or‌‌   cause‌‌
  of‌‌ 
that,‌  ‌without‌  ‌such‌  ‌representation,‌  ‌he‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌bound‌  ‌by‌  ‌such‌‌ 
Changing‌  ‌regulations‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌middle‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌without‌‌  action.‌  ‌
proceedings.‌  ‌The‌  ‌assistance‌  ‌of‌  ‌lawyers,‌  ‌while‌  ‌desirable,‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌ 
indispensable.‌  ‌ reason,‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌  ‌violation‌  ‌has‌  ‌accrued,‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌comply‌  ‌with‌‌  There‌‌   is‌‌  no‌‌  question‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ issue‌‌ of‌‌ whether‌‌ petitioner‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ owner‌‌ 
fundamental‌‌fairness,‌‌or‌‌in‌‌other‌‌words,‌‌due‌‌process‌‌of‌‌law.‌  ‌ of‌  ‌other‌  ‌agricultural‌  ‌lands‌  ‌had‌  ‌already‌  ‌been‌  ‌passed‌  ‌upon‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Atienza,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌‌2010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ proper‌  ‌quasi-judicial‌  ‌authority.‌  ‌Said‌  ‌decision‌  ‌became‌  ‌final‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Exceptions‌t‌ o‌‌requirements‌‌of‌‌notice‌‌and‌‌hearing‌‌
   ‌ executory.‌‌   The‌‌  CA‌‌
  thus‌‌  erred‌‌   in‌‌
  still‌‌
  making‌‌
  a ‌‌finding‌‌
  that‌‌ petitioner‌‌ 
Although‌‌   ‌political‌‌   parties‌‌   play‌‌
  an‌‌
  important‌‌   role‌‌
  in‌‌ our‌‌ democratic‌‌  1) Summary‌‌Abatement‌‌of‌‌Nuisance‌‌per‌‌se;‌  ‌ is‌  ‌not‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌farmer-beneficiary‌  ‌because‌  ‌he‌  ‌owns‌  ‌other‌‌ 
set-up‌‌  as‌‌
  an‌‌  intermediary‌‌   between‌‌   the‌‌
  state‌‌ and‌‌ its‌‌ citizens,‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ still‌‌  agricultural‌‌lands.‌  ‌
a‌  ‌private‌  ‌organization,‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌state‌  ‌instrument.‌  ‌Members‌  ‌whose‌‌  2) Preventive‌‌Suspension;‌  ‌
rights‌  ‌under‌  ‌their‌  ‌charter‌  ‌may‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌violated‌  ‌have‌‌   recourse‌‌   to‌‌  3) Padlocking‌‌of‌‌filthy‌‌restaurants,‌‌theaters,‌‌etc.;‌  ‌
Ligtas‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 015‌  ‌
courts‌  ‌of‌  ‌law‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌enforcement‌  ‌of‌  ‌those‌  ‌rights,‌  ‌but‌  ‌not‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌‌due‌‌  4) Cancellation‌‌of‌‌Passport‌‌of‌‌accused;‌  ‌
process‌‌issue‌‌against‌‌the‌‌government‌‌or‌‌any‌‌of‌‌its‌‌agencies.‌  ‌ The‌‌
  CA‌‌  was‌‌  correct‌‌  in‌‌
  ruling‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  doctrine‌‌ of‌‌ ‌res‌‌ judicata‌‌ ‌applies‌‌ 
5) Summary‌‌distraint‌‌and‌‌levy;‌  ‌ only‌  ‌to‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌or‌  ‌quasi-judicial‌  ‌proceedings,‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Catacutan‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 011‌  ‌ 6) Grant‌‌of‌‌Provisional‌‌Authority.‌  ‌ exercise‌‌of‌‌administrative‌‌powers‌.  ‌‌ ‌

Due‌  ‌process‌  ‌of‌  ‌law‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌denied‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌exclusion‌  ‌of‌  ‌irrelevant,‌‌  Administrative‌‌appeal‌‌and‌‌review‌  ‌
Fact-finding,‌‌investigative,‌‌licensing,‌‌and‌‌rate-fixing‌‌powers‌‌   ‌
immaterial,‌‌ or‌‌ incompetent‌‌ evidence,‌‌ or‌‌ testimony‌‌ of‌‌ an‌‌ incompetent‌‌  Unless‌  ‌otherwise‌  ‌provided‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌or‌  ‌executive‌  ‌order,‌  ‌an‌  ‌appeal‌‌ 
witness.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌an‌  ‌error‌  ‌to‌  ‌refuse‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌which‌  ‌although‌‌  from‌‌  a ‌‌final‌‌
  decision‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  administrative‌‌   agency‌‌  may‌‌
  be‌‌   taken‌‌
  to‌  Subido‌‌Law‌‌Offices‌‌v.‌‌CA‌‌‌2016‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
admissible‌  ‌for‌  ‌certain‌  ‌purposes,‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌admissible‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌‌  the‌‌
  Department‌‌ Head,‌‌ whose‌‌ decision‌‌ may‌‌ further‌‌ be‌‌ brought‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  The‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌consists‌  ‌in‌  ‌gathering,‌  ‌organizing,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
which‌‌counsel‌‌states‌‌as‌‌the‌‌ground‌‌for‌‌offering‌‌it.‌  ‌ regular‌‌courts.‌  ‌ analyzing‌‌   evidence,‌‌   which‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌useful‌‌ aid‌‌ or‌‌ tool‌‌ in‌‌ an‌‌ administrative‌‌ 
Administrative‌r‌ es‌‌judicata‌  ‌ agency's‌  ‌performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌
  rule-making‌‌   or‌‌
  quasi-judicial‌‌   functions.‌‌ 
Melendres‌‌v.‌‌PAGC‌‌‌2012‌  Notably,‌‌investigation‌‌is‌‌indispensable‌‌to‌‌prosecution.‌  ‌
San‌‌Luis‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
The‌  ‌denial‌  ‌of‌  ‌petitioner’s‌  ‌request‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌‌formal‌‌
  investigation‌‌
  is‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 93‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

The‌  ‌confusion‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌scope‌  ‌and‌  ‌parameters‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌AMLC's‌‌  D.‌‌Judicial‌‌Review‌  ‌ 3. when‌‌there‌‌is‌‌grave‌‌abuse‌‌of‌‌discretion;‌‌   ‌
investigatory‌‌   powers‌‌   and‌‌
  whether‌‌
  such‌‌  seeps‌‌
  into‌‌ and‌‌ approximates‌‌  4. when‌‌the‌‌judgment‌‌is‌‌based‌‌on‌‌a‌‌misapprehension‌‌of‌‌facts;‌  ‌
Teng‌‌v.‌‌Pahagac‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌   ‌
a‌  ‌quasi­-judicial‌  ‌agency's‌  ‌inquisitorial‌  ‌powers‌  ‌lies‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌AMLC's‌‌ 
By‌  ‌disallowing‌  ‌reconsideration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌   VA's‌‌  decision,‌‌  Section‌‌
  7,‌‌
  Rule‌‌  5. when‌‌the‌‌findings‌‌of‌‌facts‌‌are‌‌conflicting;‌‌   ‌
investigation‌‌   and‌‌ consequent‌‌ initial‌‌ determination‌‌ of‌‌ whether‌‌ certain‌‌ 
activities‌‌are‌‌constitutive‌‌of‌‌anti-money‌‌laundering‌‌offenses.‌  ‌ XIX‌  ‌of‌  ‌DO‌  ‌40-03‌  ‌and‌  ‌Section‌  ‌7 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌2005‌  ‌Procedural‌  ‌Guidelines‌‌  6. when‌‌   in‌‌
  making‌‌   its‌‌  findings,‌‌
  the‌‌
  CA‌‌
  went‌‌
  beyond‌‌ the‌‌ issues‌‌ 
Nowhere‌‌   from‌‌
  the‌‌
  text‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  AMLA‌‌   nor‌‌
  its‌‌  IRR‌‌   can‌‌ we‌‌ glean‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌  went‌‌   directly‌‌   against‌‌ the‌‌ legislative‌‌ intent‌‌ behind‌‌ Article‌‌ 262-A‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  case,‌‌ or‌‌ its‌  ‌findings‌‌ are‌‌ contrary‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ admissions‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Labor‌  ‌Code.‌  ‌These‌  ‌rules‌  ‌deny‌  ‌the‌  ‌VA‌  ‌the‌  ‌chance‌  ‌to‌‌   correct‌‌
  himself‌‌  both‌‌the‌‌appellant‌‌and‌‌the‌‌appellee;‌‌   ‌
AMLC‌  ‌exercises‌  ‌quasi-judicial‌  ‌functions‌  ‌whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌actual‌‌ 
and‌  ‌compel‌  ‌the‌  ‌courts‌  ‌of‌  ‌justice‌  ‌to‌  ‌prematurely‌  ‌intervene‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌  7. ‌when‌‌the‌‌findings‌‌are‌‌contrary‌‌to‌‌the‌‌trial‌‌court;‌  ‌
preliminary‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌is‌  ‌done‌  ‌simply‌‌   at‌‌  its‌‌
  behest‌‌  or‌‌
  conducted‌‌ 
action‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌agency..‌  ‌In‌‌   ‌Industrial‌‌
  Enterprises,‌‌   Inc.‌‌
  v.‌‌ 
by‌‌the‌‌Department‌‌of‌‌Justice‌‌and‌‌the‌‌Ombudsman.‌  ‌ 8. when‌  ‌the‌  ‌findings‌  ‌are‌  ‌conclusions‌  ‌without‌  ‌citation‌  ‌of‌‌ 
CA‌, ‌ ‌we‌  ‌ruled‌  ‌that‌  ‌relief‌  ‌must‌  ‌first‌  ‌be‌  ‌obtained‌  ‌in‌‌
  an‌‌
  administrative‌‌ 
Plainly,‌  ‌the‌  ‌AMLC's‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌of‌  ‌money‌‌   laundering‌‌  offenses‌‌   and‌‌  proceeding‌  ‌before‌  ‌a ‌ ‌remedy‌  ‌will‌  ‌be‌  ‌supplied‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌courts‌  ‌even‌‌  specific‌‌evidence‌‌on‌‌which‌‌they‌‌are‌‌based;‌ 
its‌‌
  determination‌‌ of‌‌ possible‌‌ money‌‌ laundering‌‌ offenses,‌‌ specifically‌‌  though‌‌the‌‌matter‌‌is‌‌within‌‌the‌‌proper‌‌jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌a‌‌court.‌  ‌ 9. when‌  ‌the‌  ‌facts‌  ‌set‌  ‌forth‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌petition‌  ‌as‌  ‌well‌  ‌as‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
its‌  ‌inquiry‌  ‌into‌  ‌certain‌  ‌bank‌  ‌accounts‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌by‌‌
  court‌‌  order,‌‌
  does‌‌  petitioner's‌  ‌main‌  ‌and‌  ‌reply‌  ‌briefs‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌disputed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
not‌  ‌transform‌  ‌it‌  ‌into‌  ‌an‌  ‌investigative‌  ‌body‌‌
  exercising‌‌
  quasi-judicial‌‌  respondent;‌‌   ‌
LRTA‌‌v.‌‌Salvaña‌‌‌2014‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
powers.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌present‌  ‌rule‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌government‌  ‌party‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌“party‌‌  10. when‌  ‌the‌  ‌findings‌  ‌of‌  ‌fact‌  ‌are‌  ‌premised‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌supposed‌‌ 
adversely‌  ‌affected”‌  ‌for‌  ‌purposes‌  ‌of‌  ‌appeal‌  ‌provided‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌  absence‌  ‌of‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌and‌  ‌contradicted‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌on‌‌ 
Philippine‌‌Interisland‌‌Shipping‌‌Association‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
government‌‌   party‌‌
  that‌‌   has‌‌
  a ‌‌right‌‌
  to‌‌
  appeal‌‌
  must‌‌ be‌‌ the‌‌ office‌‌  record;‌‌and‌‌   ‌
We‌‌
  conclude‌‌   that‌‌
  E.O.‌‌
  No.‌‌
  1088‌‌   is‌‌
  a ‌‌valid‌‌
  statute‌‌
  and‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  PPA‌‌ is‌‌  or‌‌agency‌‌prosecuting‌‌the‌‌case.‌  ‌ 11. when‌‌
  the‌‌ CA‌‌ manifestly‌‌ overlooked‌‌ certain‌‌ relevant‌‌ facts‌‌ not‌‌ 
duty‌‌  bound‌‌   to‌‌  comply‌‌   with‌‌  its‌‌
  provisions.‌‌ The‌‌ PPA‌‌ may‌‌ increase‌‌ the‌‌  disputed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties,‌  ‌which,‌  ‌if‌  ‌properly‌  ‌considered,‌‌ 
Dacoycoy,‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌National‌  ‌Bank‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌URACCS‌  ‌failed‌  ‌to‌‌ 
rates‌‌  but‌‌
  it‌‌
  may‌‌ not‌‌ decrease‌‌ them‌‌ below‌‌ those‌‌ mandated‌‌ by‌‌ E.O.‌‌ No.‌‌  would‌‌justify‌‌a‌‌different‌‌conclusion.‌  ‌
contemplate‌  ‌a ‌ ‌situation‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌CSC‌  ‌modified‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌from‌‌ 
1088.‌‌   ‌
dismissal‌‌   to‌‌
  suspension.‌‌ The‌‌ erring‌‌ civil‌‌ servant‌‌ was‌‌ not‌‌ exonerated,‌‌ 
and‌  ‌the‌  ‌finding‌  ‌of‌  ‌guilt‌  ‌still‌  ‌stood.‌  ‌In‌  ‌these‌  ‌situations,‌  ‌the‌‌  Ombudsman‌‌v.‌‌Capulong‌‌2
‌ 014‌  ‌
Holy‌‌Spirit‌‌Homeowners‌‌Association‌‌v.‌‌Defensor‌  ‌
disciplinary‌  ‌authority‌  ‌should‌‌   be‌‌
  allowed‌‌   to‌‌
  appeal‌‌
  the‌‌
  modification‌‌ 
WON‌  ‌the‌  ‌CA‌  ‌has‌‌
  jurisdiction‌‌
  over‌‌
  the‌‌
  subject‌‌
  matter‌‌   and‌‌
  can‌‌
  grant‌‌ 
The‌‌   Committee's‌‌   authority‌‌  to‌‌
  fix‌‌
  the‌‌
  selling‌‌
  price‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  lots‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌  of‌‌the‌‌decision.‌  ‌
reliefs,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌primary‌  ‌or‌  ‌incidental,‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌  ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌has‌‌ 
likened‌‌   to‌‌ the‌‌ rate-fixing‌‌ power‌‌ of‌‌ administrative‌‌ agencies.‌‌ In‌‌ case‌‌ of‌‌  lifted‌‌the‌‌subject‌‌order‌‌of‌‌preventive‌‌suspension.‌  ‌
a‌  ‌delegation‌  ‌of‌  ‌rate-fixing‌  ‌power,‌  ‌the‌  ‌only‌‌   standard‌‌   which‌‌
  the‌‌  Wooden‌‌v.‌‌CSC‌  ‌
As‌  ‌a ‌ ‌rule,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌consistent‌  ‌and‌‌
  general‌‌
  policy‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Court‌‌
  not‌‌
  to‌‌ 
legislature‌  ‌is‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌  ‌prescribe‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌guidance‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
As‌  ‌a ‌ ‌general‌  ‌rule,‌  ‌factual‌  ‌findings‌  ‌of‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌agencies,‌‌  interfere‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌Ombudsman’s‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌investigatory‌  ‌and‌‌ 
administrative‌  ‌authority‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌rate‌  ‌be‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌and‌ 
such‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌CSC,‌  ‌that‌  ‌are‌  ‌affirmed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌CA,‌  ‌are‌  ‌conclusive‌‌  prosecutory‌‌powers.‌  ‌
just‌.  ‌‌ ‌
upon‌‌and‌‌generally‌‌not‌‌reviewable‌‌by‌‌this‌‌Court.‌  ‌ In‌  ‌the‌  ‌instant‌  ‌case,‌  ‌the‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌lifting‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌preventive‌‌ 
RCPI‌‌v.‌‌NTC‌  ‌ However,‌‌   this‌‌ Court‌‌ has‌‌ recognized‌‌ several‌‌ ‌exceptions‌‌ ‌to‌‌ this‌‌ rule,‌‌ to‌‌  suspension‌‌   order‌‌   against‌‌   Capulong‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ render‌‌ the‌‌ petition‌‌ moot‌‌ 
wit:‌‌   ‌ and‌‌  academic.‌‌   It‌‌
  does‌‌  not‌‌  preclude‌‌
  the‌‌
  courts‌‌   from‌‌ passing‌‌ upon‌‌ the‌‌ 
Well-settled‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌rule‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌Public‌  ‌Service‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌now‌‌
  is‌‌  validity‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌preventive‌‌   suspension‌‌ order.‌‌ Such‌‌ order‌‌ is‌‌ interlocutory‌‌ 
1. when‌  ‌the‌  ‌findings‌  ‌are‌  ‌grounded‌  ‌entirely‌  ‌on‌  ‌speculation,‌‌ 
empowered‌  ‌to‌  ‌approve‌  ‌provisionally‌  ‌rates‌  ‌of‌  ‌utilities‌  ‌without‌  ‌the‌‌  in‌‌character‌‌and‌‌not‌‌a‌‌final‌‌order‌‌on‌‌the‌‌merits‌‌of‌‌the‌‌case.‌‌   ‌
surmises,‌‌or‌‌conjectures;‌  ‌
necessity‌‌of‌‌a‌‌prior‌‌hearing.‌  ‌
2. when‌‌
  the‌‌
  inference‌‌
  made‌‌
  is‌‌
  manifestly‌‌
  mistaken,‌‌
  absurd,‌‌ or‌‌  Here,‌  ‌the‌  ‌CA‌  ‌aptly‌  ‌ruled‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌  Ombudsman‌‌   abused‌‌   its‌‌
  discretion‌‌ 
impossible;‌‌   ‌ because‌‌   it‌‌
  failed‌‌
  to‌‌
  sufficiently‌‌   establish‌‌
  any‌‌
  basis‌‌ to‌‌ issue‌‌ the‌‌ order‌‌ 
of‌  ‌preventive‌  ‌suspension.‌  ‌Capulong’s‌  ‌non-disclosure‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌wife’s‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 94‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

business‌  ‌interest‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌serious‌  ‌dishonesty‌  ‌or‌  ‌grave‌‌  Euro-Med‌‌Laboratories‌‌v.‌‌Prov‌‌of‌‌Batangas‌‌   ‌ substantial‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌reasonably‌  ‌believe‌  ‌it‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌true,‌‌  a ‌‌respondent‌‌  in‌‌
  a ‌‌
misconduct.‌  ‌Nothing‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌records‌  ‌reveals‌  ‌that‌  ‌Capulong‌‌  deportation‌  ‌proceeding‌  ‌can‌  ‌seek‌  ‌judicial‌‌   relief‌‌   to‌‌
  enjoin‌‌   respondent‌‌ 
deliberately‌  ‌placed‌  ‌“N/A”‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌SALN‌  ‌despite‌  ‌knowledge‌‌   about‌‌  his‌‌  The‌‌   doctrine‌‌
  of‌‌
  primary‌‌  jurisdiction‌‌   holds‌‌  that‌‌  if‌‌
  a ‌‌case‌‌
  is‌‌
  such‌‌
  that‌‌  BOC‌‌from‌‌proceeding‌‌with‌‌the‌‌deportation‌‌case.‌  ‌
wife’s‌  ‌business‌  ‌interest.‌  ‌As‌  ‌explained‌  ‌by‌  ‌Capulong,‌  ‌the‌‌  SEC‌‌
  already‌‌  its‌  ‌determination‌  ‌requires‌  ‌the‌  ‌expertise,‌  ‌specialized‌  ‌training‌  ‌and‌‌ 
The‌‌
  present‌‌
  case‌‌
  falls‌‌
  within‌‌
  the‌‌
  exception‌‌
  considering‌‌  that‌‌
  proof‌‌ of‌‌ 
revoked‌  ‌the‌  ‌registration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌corporations‌  ‌where‌  ‌his‌  ‌wife‌  ‌was‌‌  an‌‌  knowledge‌‌   of‌‌
  an‌‌
  administrative‌‌   body,‌‌   relief‌‌
  must‌‌ first‌‌ be‌‌ obtained‌‌ in‌‌ 
their‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌citizenship‌  ‌had‌  ‌been‌  ‌adduced,‌  ‌such‌  ‌as,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
incorporator;‌‌hence,‌‌he‌‌deemed‌‌it‌‌not‌‌necessary‌‌to‌‌indicate‌‌it.‌  ‌ an‌‌ administrative‌‌ proceeding‌‌ before‌‌ resort‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ courts‌‌ is‌‌ had‌‌ even‌‌ if‌‌ 
identification‌  ‌numbers‌  ‌issued‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Bureau‌  ‌of‌  ‌Immigration‌‌ 
the‌  ‌matter‌  ‌may‌  ‌well‌  ‌be‌  ‌within‌  ‌their‌  ‌proper‌  ‌jurisdiction.‌  ‌In‌  ‌such‌  ‌a ‌‌
confirming‌‌their‌‌Philippine‌‌citizenship.‌  ‌
case,‌‌the‌‌court‌‌in‌‌which‌‌the‌‌claim‌‌is‌‌sought‌‌to‌‌be‌‌enforced‌‌may‌‌   ‌
F.F.‌‌Cruz‌‌&‌‌Co‌‌v.‌‌Philippine‌‌Iron‌‌Construction‌‌and‌‌Marine‌‌Works‌‌ 
In‌‌ ‌BOC‌‌ v.‌‌ Dela‌‌ Rosa,‌  ‌it‌‌ is‌‌ required‌‌ that‌‌ before‌‌ judicial‌‌ intervention‌‌ is‌‌ 
2017‌  ‌ 1. suspend‌  ‌the‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌process‌  ‌pending‌  ‌referral‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌‌ 
sought,‌  ‌the‌  ‌claim‌  ‌of‌  ‌citizenship‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌respondent‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌deportation‌‌ 
issues‌‌to‌‌the‌‌administrative‌‌body‌‌for‌‌its‌‌view‌‌or,‌‌   ‌
The‌‌
  rule‌‌
  is‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌Board‌‌   of‌‌
  Marine‌‌   Inquiry‌’s‌‌   findings‌‌ are‌‌ binding‌‌  proceeding‌‌   must‌‌
  be‌‌
  so‌‌
  substantial‌‌   that‌‌
  there‌‌
  are‌‌
  reasonable‌‌ grounds‌‌ 
and‌  ‌conclusive‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌courts‌  ‌when‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌supported‌  ‌by‌  ‌substantial‌‌  2. if‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties‌  ‌would‌‌
  not‌‌
  be‌‌
  unfairly‌‌
  disadvantaged,‌‌
  ‌dismiss‌‌  to‌‌believe‌‌that‌‌such‌‌claim‌‌is‌‌correct.‌  ‌
evidence‌.  ‌‌ ‌ the‌‌case‌‌without‌‌prejudice.‌  ‌

In‌  ‌finding‌  ‌that‌‌


  F.F.‌‌
  Cruz‌‌
  was‌‌  negligent,‌‌   the‌‌
  BMI‌‌
  clearly‌‌   identified‌‌   the‌‌  This‌  ‌case‌  ‌is‌  ‌one‌  ‌over‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌primary‌  ‌jurisdiction‌‌  Samar‌‌II‌‌Electric‌‌Coop‌‌v.‌‌Seludo,‌‌Jr.‌‌2
‌ 012‌‌   ‌
evidentiary‌‌   basis‌‌
  in‌‌  support‌‌  of‌‌ its‌‌ conclusion.‌‌ The‌‌ CA‌‌ cannot‌‌ thus‌‌ be‌‌  clearly‌‌held‌‌sway.‌  ‌
Pursuant‌‌   to‌‌
  its‌‌
  power‌‌  of‌‌
  supervision‌‌   and‌‌   control,‌‌  the‌‌ NEA‌‌ is‌‌ granted‌  ‌
faulted‌  ‌for‌  ‌relying‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌BMI's‌  ‌factual‌  ‌findings‌  ‌to‌  ‌support‌‌  its‌‌
  own‌‌  First‌, ‌‌petitioner‌‌
  was‌‌  seeking‌‌  the‌‌
  enforcement‌‌   of‌‌ a ‌‌claim‌‌ for‌‌ a ‌‌certain‌‌  the‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌investigations‌‌   and‌‌  other‌‌  similar‌‌
  actions‌‌   as‌‌ 
conclusion‌  ‌that‌  ‌F.F.‌  ‌Cruz‌  ‌was‌  ‌guilty‌  ‌of‌  ‌contributory‌  ‌negligence‌‌  amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌money‌  ‌against‌  ‌an‌  ‌LGU.‌  ‌This‌  ‌brought‌‌   the‌‌
  case‌‌
  within‌‌   the‌‌  well‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌issue‌  ‌orders,‌  ‌rules‌  ‌and‌  ‌regulations‌  ‌with‌  ‌respect‌  ‌to‌  ‌all‌‌ 
because‌‌such‌‌findings‌‌are‌‌supported‌‌by‌‌substantial‌‌evidence.‌  ‌ COA's‌  ‌domain‌  ‌to‌  ‌pass‌  ‌upon‌  ‌money‌  ‌claims‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌‌  matters‌‌   affecting‌‌   electric‌‌
  cooperatives.‌‌   Certainly,‌‌   the‌‌  matter‌‌  as‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ 
With‌  ‌regard‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌exoneration‌  ‌of‌  ‌AMC,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌the‌  ‌CA‌  ‌correctly‌‌  under‌‌Section‌‌26‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Government‌‌Auditing‌‌Code‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌  ‌ validity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌resolution‌  ‌issued‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Board‌  ‌of‌  ‌Directors‌  ‌of‌‌ 
disregarded‌  ‌certain‌  ‌portions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌BMI‌  ‌report‌  ‌because‌  ‌they‌  ‌were‌‌  Second‌, ‌ ‌petitioner's‌  ‌claim‌  ‌involved‌  ‌compliance‌  ‌with‌  ‌applicable‌‌  SAMELCO‌  ‌II‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌matter‌  ‌which‌  ‌affects‌  ‌the‌  ‌said‌  ‌electric‌  ‌cooperative‌‌ 
based‌‌  entirely‌‌ on‌‌ conjecture‌‌ instead‌‌ of‌‌ being‌‌ grounded‌‌ on‌‌ substantial‌‌  auditing‌‌   laws‌‌   and‌‌   rules‌‌  on‌‌
  procurement.‌‌   Such‌‌ matters‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌ within‌‌  and,‌  ‌thus,‌  ‌comes‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌ambit‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌powers‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌NEA‌  ‌as‌‌ 
evidence.‌  ‌ the‌‌
  usual‌‌   area‌‌  of‌‌
  knowledge,‌‌   experience‌‌ and‌‌ expertise‌‌ of‌‌ most‌‌ judges‌‌  expressed‌‌in‌‌Sections‌‌5‌‌and‌‌7‌‌of‌‌P.D.‌‌No.‌‌1645.‌  ‌
but‌‌
  within‌‌   the‌‌
  special‌‌   competence‌‌   of‌‌
  COA‌‌  auditors‌‌
  and‌‌  accountants.‌‌  While‌‌   the‌‌
  RTC‌‌
  has‌‌  jurisdiction‌‌   over‌‌  the‌‌
  petition‌‌   for‌‌ prohibition‌‌ filed‌‌ 
Doctrine‌‌of‌‌primary‌‌administration‌‌jurisdiction‌  ‌ Thus,‌‌it‌‌was‌‌proper‌‌for‌‌the‌‌RTC‌‌to‌‌dismiss‌‌petitioner's‌‌complaint.‌  ‌ by‌  ‌respondent,‌  ‌the‌  ‌NEA,‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌‌   of‌‌
  its‌‌
  power‌‌   of‌‌
  supervision‌‌ 
Sps‌‌Abejo‌‌v.‌‌De‌‌la‌‌Cruz‌  ‌ and‌‌   control,‌‌
  has‌‌
  ‌primary‌‌   jurisdiction‌‌   ‌to‌‌  determine‌‌   the‌‌  issue‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ 
Heirs‌‌of‌‌Vidad‌‌v.‌‌LBP‌‌2
‌ 010‌  ‌ validity‌‌of‌‌the‌‌subject‌‌resolution.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌dispute‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌contending‌  ‌parties‌  ‌for‌  ‌control‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
corporation‌  ‌manifestly‌  ‌falls‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌primary‌  ‌and‌  ‌exclusive‌‌  In‌  ‌accordance‌‌   with‌‌  settled‌‌
  principles‌‌   of‌‌
  administrative‌‌   law,‌‌
  primary‌‌  Doctrine‌‌of‌‌exhaustion‌‌of‌‌administrative‌‌remedies‌  ‌
jurisdiction‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌SEC‌  ‌in‌  ‌whom‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌has‌  ‌reserved‌  ‌such‌‌  jurisdiction‌  ‌is‌  ‌vested‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌DAR‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌preliminary‌‌ 
jurisdiction‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌agency‌  ‌of‌  ‌special‌  ‌competence‌  ‌to‌‌  manner‌‌   the‌‌
  just‌‌
  compensation‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ lands‌‌ taken‌‌ under‌‌ the‌‌ agrarian‌‌  Garcia‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
deal‌‌promptly‌‌and‌‌expeditiously‌‌therewith.‌  ‌ reform‌  ‌program,‌  ‌but‌  ‌such‌  ‌determination‌  ‌is‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌challenge‌‌  Under‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌exhaustion‌  ‌of‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌remedies,‌‌ 
before‌  ‌the‌  ‌courts.‌‌   The‌‌
  resolution‌‌  of‌‌
  just‌‌   compensation‌‌   cases‌‌  for‌‌
  the‌‌  recourse‌  ‌through‌  ‌court‌  ‌action,‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌prosper‌  ‌until‌  ‌after‌  ‌all‌  ‌such‌‌ 
Prov‌‌of‌‌Zamboanga‌‌del‌‌Norte‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ taking‌  ‌of‌  ‌lands‌  ‌under‌  ‌agrarian‌  ‌reform‌  ‌is,‌  ‌after‌  ‌all,‌  ‌essentially‌  ‌a ‌‌ administrative‌  ‌remedies‌  ‌would‌  ‌have‌  ‌first‌  ‌been‌  ‌exhausted.‌  ‌The‌‌ 
judicial‌‌function.‌  ‌ doctrine‌‌   does‌‌  not‌‌
  warrant‌‌   a ‌‌court‌‌ to‌‌ arrogate‌‌ unto‌‌ itself‌‌ the‌‌ authority‌‌ 
The‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌primary‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌warrant‌  ‌a ‌ ‌court‌  ‌to‌‌ 
arrogate‌  ‌unto‌  ‌itself‌  ‌the‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌resolve‌  ‌a ‌ ‌controversy‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌‌  to‌‌ resolve,‌‌ or‌‌ interfere‌‌ in,‌‌ a ‌‌controversy‌‌ the‌‌ jurisdiction‌‌ over‌‌ which‌‌ is‌‌ 
Gaw‌‌Guy‌‌v.‌‌Ignacio‌‌2
‌ 010‌  ‌ lodged‌‌   initially‌‌   with‌‌
  an‌‌
  administrative‌‌   body,‌‌
  like‌‌
  the‌‌
  PCA‌‌   Board‌‌
  and‌‌ 
jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌initially‌  ‌lodged‌  ‌with‌  ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌‌ 
body‌‌of‌‌special‌‌competence.‌  ‌ its‌  ‌Investigation‌  ‌Committee,‌  ‌of‌  ‌special‌  ‌competence.‌  ‌The‌  ‌rule‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌‌ 
Petitioners‌  ‌rely‌  ‌on‌  ‌Board‌  ‌of‌  ‌Commissioners‌  ‌(CID)‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Dela‌  ‌Rosa‌, ‌‌
wherein‌  ‌this‌  ‌Court‌  ‌ruled‌  ‌that‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌claim‌  ‌of‌  ‌citizenship‌  ‌is‌  ‌so‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 95‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

element‌  ‌of‌  ‌petitioner's‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌action,‌  ‌and‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌too‌  ‌significant‌  ‌a ‌‌ available‌‌   remedies‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ administrative‌‌ level‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌precondition‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  Paat‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
mandate‌‌to‌‌be‌‌just‌‌waylaid‌‌by‌‌the‌‌courts.‌  ‌ filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌certiorari‌  ‌petition.‌  ‌Only‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌final‌  ‌resolution‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
protest‌  ‌can‌  ‌the‌  ‌aggrieved‌  ‌party‌  ‌be‌  ‌said‌  ‌to‌  ‌have‌  ‌exhausted‌  ‌the‌‌  It‌‌
  was‌‌
  easy‌‌   to‌‌ perceive‌‌ then‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ private‌‌ respondents‌‌ looked‌‌ up‌‌ to‌‌ 
available‌  ‌remedies‌  ‌at‌‌   the‌‌  administrative‌‌  level.‌  ‌In‌‌
  other‌‌  words,‌‌   only‌‌  the‌  ‌Secretary‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌review‌  ‌and‌  ‌disposition‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  ‌case.‌  ‌By‌‌ 
Regino‌‌v.‌‌Pangasinan‌‌Colleges‌‌of‌‌Science‌‌and‌‌Technology‌  ‌
then‌‌  can‌‌  he‌‌   viably‌‌   avail‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  remedy‌‌
  of‌‌ certiorari‌‌ before‌‌ the‌‌ proper‌‌  appealing‌  ‌to‌  ‌him,‌  ‌they‌  ‌acknowledged‌  ‌the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌adequate‌‌ 
First‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌exhaustion‌  ‌of‌  ‌administrative‌‌   remedies‌‌   has‌‌   no‌‌  courts.‌  ‌Non-compliance‌  ‌with‌  ‌this‌  ‌statutory‌  ‌requirement,‌  ‌under‌‌  and‌  ‌plain‌  ‌remedy‌  ‌still‌  ‌available‌  ‌and‌  ‌open‌  ‌to‌  ‌them‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌ordinary‌‌ 
bearing‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ present‌‌ case.‌‌ Petitioner‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ asking‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ reversal‌‌ of‌‌  Section‌‌   58‌‌   of‌‌  R.A.‌‌
  No.‌‌  9184,‌‌ constitutes‌‌ a ‌‌ground‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ dismissal‌‌ of‌‌  course‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌law.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌they‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌now,‌  ‌without‌  ‌violating‌  ‌the‌‌ 
the‌‌
  policies‌‌   of‌‌
  PCST.‌  ‌Neither‌‌
  is‌‌ she‌‌ demanding‌‌ it‌‌ to‌‌ allow‌‌ her‌‌ to‌‌ take‌‌  the‌‌action‌‌for‌‌lack‌‌of‌‌jurisdiction.‌  ‌ principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌exhaustion‌  ‌of‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌remedies,‌  ‌seek‌  ‌court’s‌‌ 
her‌‌final‌‌examinations.‌  ‌ intervention‌‌ by‌‌ filing‌‌ an‌‌ action‌‌ for‌‌ replevin‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ grant‌‌ of‌‌ their‌‌ relief‌‌ 
 ‌
Second‌, ‌ ‌exhaustion‌  ‌of‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌remedies‌  ‌is‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌when‌‌  during‌‌the‌‌pendency‌‌of‌‌an‌‌administrative‌‌proceedings.‌  ‌
there‌  ‌is‌  ‌competence‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌body‌  ‌to‌  ‌act‌‌ 
Exceptions‌t‌ o‌‌the‌‌doctrine‌‌of‌‌exhaustion‌‌of‌‌administrative‌‌
 
upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌matter‌  ‌complained‌  ‌of.‌  ‌Administrative‌  ‌agencies‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌‌  IT‌‌Foundation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌   ‌
remedies‌‌
   ‌
courts.‌  ‌Specifically,‌  ‌the‌  ‌CHED‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌award‌‌ 
The‌  ‌peculiar‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌surrounding‌  ‌the‌  ‌unconventional‌‌ 
damages.‌  ‌ 1) when‌‌there‌‌is‌‌a‌‌violation‌‌of‌‌due‌‌process‌, ‌ ‌
rendition‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌BAC‌  ‌Report‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌precipitate‌  ‌awarding‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Third‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌exhaustion‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌admits‌  ‌of‌  ‌exceptions,‌  ‌one‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌‌  2) when‌‌the‌‌issue‌‌involved‌‌is‌p
‌ urely‌a‌ ‌‌legal‌q
‌ uestion,‌  ‌ Contract‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  Comelec‌‌   en‌‌  banc‌‌
  — ‌‌plus‌‌  the‌‌ fact‌‌ that‌‌ it‌‌ was‌‌ racing‌‌ to‌‌ 
arises‌‌ when‌‌ the‌‌ issue‌‌ is‌‌ purely‌‌ legal‌‌ and‌‌ well‌‌ within‌‌ the‌‌ jurisdiction‌‌  3) when‌  ‌the‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌action‌‌  is‌‌
  ‌patently‌‌
  illegal‌‌
  amounting‌‌  have‌‌
  its‌‌
  Contract‌‌   with‌‌  MPC‌‌   implemented‌‌   in‌‌
  time‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌   elections‌‌   in‌‌ 
of‌‌
  the‌‌
  trial‌‌
  court.‌‌
  Petitioner’s‌‌  action‌‌
  for‌‌
  damages‌‌   inevitably‌‌   calls‌‌
  for‌‌  to‌‌lack‌‌or‌‌excess‌‌of‌‌jurisdiction,‌  ‌ May‌  ‌2004—‌  ‌have‌  ‌combined‌  ‌to‌  ‌bring‌  ‌about‌  ‌the‌  ‌urgent‌  ‌need‌  ‌for‌‌ 
the‌‌ application‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ interpretation‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Civil‌‌ Code,‌‌ a ‌‌function‌‌ that‌  judicial‌‌  intervention,‌‌   thus‌‌   prompting‌‌   this‌‌
  Court‌‌  to‌‌  dispense‌‌   with‌‌ the‌‌ 
4) when‌‌ there‌‌ is‌‌ ‌estoppel‌‌ ‌on‌‌ the‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ administrative‌‌ agency‌‌ 
falls‌‌within‌‌the‌‌jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌the‌‌courts.‌  ‌ procedural‌‌exhaustion‌‌of‌‌administrative‌‌remedies‌‌in‌‌this‌‌case.‌  ‌
concerned,‌  ‌

Batelec‌‌II‌‌Electric‌‌Coop‌‌v.‌‌Energy‌‌Industry‌‌Administration‌‌Bureau‌  ‌ 5) when‌‌there‌‌is‌‌‌irreparable‌‌injury,‌  ‌ Doctrine‌‌of‌‌finality‌‌of‌‌administrative‌‌action‌  ‌


6) when‌‌  the‌‌
  ‌respondent‌‌   is‌‌ a ‌‌department‌‌ secretary‌‌ whose‌‌ acts‌‌  GR‌:‌‌  Decision‌  ‌of‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌agencies‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌final‌‌ 
In‌  ‌light‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌exhaustion‌  ‌of‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌remedies,‌  ‌a ‌‌
motion‌  ‌for‌  ‌reconsideration‌  ‌must‌  ‌first‌  ‌be‌  ‌filed‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌special‌‌  as‌‌
  an‌‌
  alter‌‌   ego‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  President‌‌   bears‌‌
  the‌‌ implied‌‌ and‌‌ assumed‌‌  before‌‌Judicial‌‌Review;‌‌   ‌
civil‌‌action‌‌for‌‌certiorari‌‌may‌‌be‌‌availed‌‌of.‌‌   ‌ approval‌‌of‌‌the‌‌latter,‌  ‌ EXC‌:  ‌‌ ‌
The‌  ‌pivotal‌  ‌issue‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌whether‌  ‌petitioner,‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌NPC,‌‌  7) when‌  ‌to‌  ‌require‌  ‌exhaustion‌‌
  of‌‌
  administrative‌‌
  remedies‌‌
  would‌‌  1) Interlocutory‌‌orders;‌  ‌
should‌  ‌supply‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌needs‌  ‌of‌  ‌PSC‌  ‌requires‌  ‌a ‌ ‌probe‌  ‌into‌  ‌the‌‌  be‌‌unreasonable‌, ‌ ‌
2) To‌‌protect‌‌rights;‌  ‌
technical‌  ‌and‌  ‌financial‌  ‌capability‌  ‌of‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌to‌  ‌meet‌  ‌the‌‌  8) when‌‌it‌‌would‌a
‌ mount‌‌to‌‌a‌‌nullification‌‌of‌‌a‌‌claim,‌  ‌
3) There‌‌is‌‌a‌‌violation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitution;‌  ‌
requirements‌  ‌of‌  ‌bulk‌‌   power‌‌   supply‌‌   of‌‌
  PSC‌‌
  — ‌‌a ‌‌question‌‌  of‌‌
  fact,‌‌
  the‌‌  9) when‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌  ‌matter‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌private‌  ‌land‌  ‌in‌  ‌land‌  ‌case‌‌ 
determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌expertise‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Bureau.‌  ‌The‌‌  4) There‌‌is‌‌excessive‌‌use‌‌of‌‌power.‌  ‌
proceedings,‌  ‌
contention‌  ‌of‌  ‌petitioner‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  issue‌‌   is‌‌
  on‌‌
  pure‌‌   question‌‌  of‌‌
  law‌‌  is,‌‌ 
10) when‌  ‌the‌  ‌rule‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌provide‌  ‌a ‌ ‌plain,‌  ‌speedy‌  ‌and‌‌ 
 ‌

therefore,‌‌hollow.‌  ‌
adequate‌‌remedy‌,  ‌‌ ‌ XII.‌‌ELECTION‌‌LAW‌  ‌
Dimson‌‌(Manila)‌‌v.‌‌LWUA‌‌‌2010‌  ‌ 11) when‌  ‌there‌  ‌are‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌indicating‌  ‌the‌  ‌urgency‌  ‌of‌‌ 
A.‌‌Suffrage‌  ‌
judicial‌‌intervention.‌  ‌
Moreover,‌  ‌it‌  ‌appears‌  ‌that‌  ‌compliance‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌mandatory‌  ‌protest‌‌ 
12) in‌‌quo‌‌warranto‌p
‌ roceedings;‌  ‌ B.‌‌Political‌‌parties‌  ‌
mechanisms‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌is‌  ‌jurisdictional‌  ‌in‌  ‌character.‌  ‌Section‌‌   58‌‌
  of‌‌ 
R.A.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌9184‌  ‌requires‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌  ‌be‌  ‌exhaustion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌statutorily‌‌  13) when‌‌the‌c‌ laim‌‌involved‌‌is‌s‌ mall‌; ‌ ‌ C.‌‌Candidacy‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 96‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

D.‌‌Campaign‌  ‌ and‌  ‌firearms‌  ‌laws‌, ‌ ‌or‌  ‌any‌  ‌crime‌  ‌against‌  ‌national‌‌  Inclusion‌‌and‌‌exclusion‌‌proceedings‌  ‌
security‌; ‌ ‌
E.‌‌Board‌‌of‌‌Election‌‌Inspectors‌‌and‌‌Board‌‌of‌‌Canvassers‌  ‌ 1. The‌‌  ‌MTC‌‌  ‌shall‌‌
  have‌‌
  original‌‌
  and‌‌
  exclusive‌‌ jurisdiction‌‌ over‌‌ all‌‌ 
c) Insane‌‌or‌‌incompetent‌‌persons.‌  ‌
cases‌‌of‌‌inclusion‌‌and‌‌exclusion‌‌of‌‌voters.‌‌   ‌
F.‌‌Remedies‌  ‌ Registration‌‌and‌‌deactivation‌‌of‌‌voters‌  ‌ 2. Decisions‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  MTC‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  ‌appealed‌‌ ‌to‌‌ the‌‌ RTC‌‌ within‌‌ five‌‌ 
Petition‌‌to‌‌deny‌‌due‌‌course‌‌to‌‌or‌‌cancel‌‌certificate‌‌of‌‌  1. Registration‌‌   shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  daily‌‌
  ‌except‌‌
  during‌‌ the‌‌ period‌‌ starting‌‌  (5)‌‌days‌‌‌from‌‌receipt‌‌of‌‌notice‌‌thereof.‌‌   ‌
candidacy‌  ‌ 120‌  ‌days‌  ‌before‌  ‌a ‌ ‌regular‌  ‌election‌  ‌and‌  ‌90‌  ‌days‌‌
  before‌‌
  a ‌‌ 3. The‌‌
  RTC‌‌   shall‌‌
  decide‌‌ the‌‌ appeal‌‌ within‌‌ ten‌‌ (10)‌‌ days‌‌ ‌from‌‌ the‌‌ 
special‌‌election.‌  ‌ time‌‌  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  received‌‌
  and‌‌  the‌‌
  decision‌‌
  shall‌‌
  immediately‌‌   become‌‌ 
Petition‌‌for‌‌disqualification‌  ‌ 2. Grounds‌‌for‌d
‌ eactivation‌: ‌ ‌ final‌  ‌and‌  ‌executory.‌  ‌No‌  ‌motion‌  ‌for‌  ‌reconsideration‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌ 
Failure‌‌of‌‌election;‌‌call‌‌for‌‌special‌‌election‌  ‌ a) Any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌grounds‌‌for‌‌disqualification;‌  ‌ entertained.‌  ‌

b) Did‌  ‌not‌  ‌vote‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌two‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌successive‌  ‌preceding‌‌  4. Petition‌‌ for‌‌ ‌Inclusion‌‌ ‌may‌‌ be‌‌ filed‌‌ at‌‌ any‌‌ time‌‌ ‌except‌‌ ‌105‌‌ days‌‌ 
Pre-proclamation‌‌controversy‌  ‌
regular‌‌   elections‌‌ as‌‌ shown‌‌ by‌‌ their‌‌ voting‌‌ records.‌‌ For‌‌  prior‌‌  to‌‌
  a ‌‌regular‌‌ election‌‌ or‌‌ 75‌‌ days‌‌ prior‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌special‌‌ election.‌‌ 
Election‌‌protest‌  ‌ this‌  ‌purpose,‌  ‌regular‌  ‌elections‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌include‌  ‌the‌‌
  SK‌‌  It‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌decided‌‌within‌‌15‌‌days‌‌‌after‌‌its‌‌filing.‌  ‌
elections;‌  ‌ 5. Petition‌  ‌for‌  ‌Exclusion‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌filed‌  ‌at‌  ‌any‌  ‌time‌  ‌except‌  ‌100‌‌ 
Quo‌‌warranto‌  ‌
c) Registration‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌ordered‌  ‌excluded‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌
  Court;‌‌  days‌  ‌prior‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌regular‌  ‌election‌  ‌or‌  ‌65‌  ‌days‌  ‌before‌  ‌a ‌ ‌special‌‌ 
 ‌ election.‌‌It‌ ‌shall‌‌be‌‌decided‌‌within‌‌10‌‌days‌f‌ rom‌‌its‌‌filing.‌  ‌
and‌  ‌
A.‌‌Suffrage‌  ‌ d) Lost‌‌his‌‌Filipino‌‌citizenship.‌  ‌ 6. The‌  ‌challenge‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌register‌  ‌is‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Sec‌‌1‌‌Art‌‌V.‌‌‌Suffrage‌‌may‌‌be‌‌exercised‌‌by‌‌   ‌ filed‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌ERB‌, ‌ ‌whereas‌  ‌petitions‌  ‌for‌  ‌inclusion‌  ‌or‌‌ 
e) Fails‌‌  to‌‌
  submit‌‌  for‌‌
  validation‌‌   on‌‌ or‌‌ before‌‌ the‌‌ last‌‌ day‌‌ 
exclusion‌‌   pertains‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  right‌‌  to‌‌
  vote,‌‌ is‌‌ judicial‌‌ in‌‌ nature‌‌ and‌‌ 
1) all‌‌citizens‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines,‌‌   ‌ of‌‌
  filing‌‌  of‌‌
  application‌‌  for‌‌
  registration‌‌   for‌‌ purposes‌‌ of‌‌  lodged‌‌with‌‌the‌‌MTC.‌  ‌
2) not‌‌otherwise‌‌disqualified‌‌by‌‌law,‌  ‌ the‌‌May‌‌2016‌‌elections.‌  ‌
7. A‌  ‌decision‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌exclusion‌  ‌proceeding‌  ‌would‌  ‌neither‌  ‌be‌‌ 
3) who‌‌are‌‌at‌‌least‌‌‌18‌‌years‌‌‌of‌‌age,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ Kabataan‌‌Party-List‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌‌2015‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ conclusive‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌voter's‌  ‌political‌  ‌status,‌  ‌nor‌‌   bar‌‌
  subsequent‌‌ 
4) who‌  ‌shall‌  ‌have‌‌  resided‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Philippines‌‌
  for‌‌
  at‌‌
  least‌‌
  ‌one‌‌  proceedings‌‌   on‌‌
  his‌‌  right‌‌
  to‌‌ be‌‌ registered‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌voter‌‌ in‌‌ any‌‌ other‌ 
1. The‌‌
  right‌‌  to‌‌
  vote‌‌  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  a ‌‌natural‌‌
  right‌‌
  but‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌‌right‌‌ created‌‌ by‌‌ 
year‌‌  ‌and‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  place‌‌
  wherein‌‌   they‌‌
  propose‌‌
  to‌‌
  vote,‌‌
  for‌‌  at‌‌  election.‌‌It‌‌is‌‌not‌‌res‌‌judicata‌‌‌as‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Comelec.‌  ‌
law‌. ‌ ‌Suffrage‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌privilege‌  ‌granted‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌to‌  ‌such‌‌ 
least‌‌‌six‌‌months‌‌‌immediately‌‌preceding‌‌the‌‌election.‌   persons‌  ‌or‌  ‌classes‌  ‌as‌  ‌are‌  ‌most‌  ‌likely‌  ‌to‌‌   exercise‌‌   it‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌  8. The‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌lower‌  ‌court‌  ‌over‌  ‌exclusion‌  ‌cases‌  ‌is‌‌ 
No‌  ‌literacy,‌  ‌property,‌  ‌or‌‌
  other‌‌
  substantive‌‌
  requirement‌‌
  shall‌‌  public‌‌good‌.  ‌‌ ‌ limited‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌‌   determining‌‌   the‌‌  right‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  voter‌‌
  to‌‌
  remain‌‌   in‌‌ 
be‌‌imposed‌‌on‌‌the‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌suffrage.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌list‌  ‌of‌  ‌voters‌  ‌or‌‌
  to‌‌
  declare‌‌
  that‌‌  the‌‌
  challenged‌‌   voter‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌ 
2. Registration‌  ‌regulates‌  ‌the‌‌   exercise‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  right‌‌  of‌‌  suffrage.‌‌ 
qualified‌  ‌to‌  ‌vote‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌precinct‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌registered,‌‌ 
Qualification‌‌and‌‌disqualification‌‌of‌‌voters‌  ‌ It‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  a‌‌
  qualification‌‌ for‌‌ such‌‌ right.‌‌ As‌‌ a ‌‌form‌‌ of‌‌ regulation,‌‌ 
specifying‌‌the‌‌ground‌‌of‌‌the‌‌voter's‌‌disqualification.‌  ‌
compliance‌‌with‌‌the‌‌registration‌‌procedure‌‌is‌‌dutifully‌‌enjoined.‌‌   ‌
1. The‌‌following‌‌are‌d
‌ isqualified‌‌‌from‌‌voting:‌  ‌ 9. Inclusion/exclusion‌  ‌proceedings,‌  ‌while‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌in‌  ‌character,‌‌ 
3. The‌  ‌process‌  ‌of‌  ‌registration‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌procedural‌  ‌limitation‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌ 
a) Sentenced‌  ‌by‌  ‌final‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌to‌  ‌suffer‌  ‌imprisonment‌‌  are‌  ‌summary‌  ‌proceedings.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌decision‌  ‌therein‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌ 
right‌‌to‌‌vote.‌  
for‌‌not‌‌less‌‌than‌o
‌ ne‌‌year‌; ‌ ‌ operate‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌bar‌‌
  to‌‌
  any‌‌ future‌‌ action‌‌ in‌‌ any‌‌ other‌‌ election‌‌ that‌‌ a ‌‌
4. Thus,‌  ‌the‌  ‌biometrics‌  ‌validation‌  ‌requirement‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌‌ party‌‌   may‌‌  take‌‌  concerning‌‌   his‌‌  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  registered‌‌   as‌‌ a ‌‌voter.‌‌ 
b) Adjudged‌  ‌by‌  ‌final‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌by‌  ‌competent‌  ‌court‌  ‌or‌‌ 
"qualification"‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  right‌‌
  of‌‌
  suffrage,‌‌   but‌‌ a ‌‌mere‌‌  (‌Domino‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌) ‌ ‌
tribunal‌  ‌of‌  ‌having‌  ‌committed‌  ‌any‌  ‌crime‌  ‌involving‌‌ 
aspect‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌registration‌  ‌procedure,‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌has‌‌   the‌‌ 
disloyalty‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  duly‌‌
  constituted‌‌
  government‌‌   such‌‌ as‌‌ 
right‌‌to‌‌reasonably‌‌regulate.‌  ‌
rebellion,‌  ‌sedition‌, ‌ ‌violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌anti-subversion‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 97‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Local‌‌and‌‌overseas‌‌absentee‌‌voting‌  ‌ 2. Members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌board‌  ‌of‌  ‌election‌  ‌inspectors‌  ‌and‌  ‌their‌‌  the‌  ‌general‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌of‌  ‌government.‌  ‌(‌Atong‌  ‌Paglaum‌  ‌v.‌‌ 
substitutes:‌‌
  ‌Provided‌, ‌‌That‌‌ they‌‌ are‌‌ registered‌‌ voters‌‌ within‌‌ the‌‌  Comelec‌‌‌2013‌‌En‌‌Banc‌) ‌ ‌
Overseas‌‌Absentee‌‌Voters‌  ‌
province,‌‌city‌‌or‌‌municipality.‌  ‌ Jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Comelec‌‌over‌‌political‌‌parties‌  ‌
1. All‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌abroad,‌  ‌who‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌‌   otherwise‌‌ 
3.Members‌  ‌of‌  ‌media‌, ‌ ‌media‌  ‌practitioners,‌  ‌including‌  ‌the‌‌ 
disqualified‌  ‌by‌  ‌law,‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌18‌  ‌years‌  ‌of‌  ‌age‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌day‌  ‌of‌‌  Atienza,‌‌Jr‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌‌2010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
technical‌‌and‌‌support‌‌staff.‌  ‌
elections,‌  ‌may‌  ‌vote‌  ‌for‌  ‌President,‌  ‌VP,‌  ‌Senators‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Additional‌‌Notes‌  ‌ 1. The‌‌   validity‌‌ or‌‌ invalidity‌‌ of‌‌ Atienza,‌‌ et‌‌ al.'s‌‌ expulsion‌‌ was‌‌ purely‌‌ 
Party-List‌  ‌Representatives‌, ‌ ‌as‌  ‌well‌  ‌as‌  ‌in‌  ‌all‌  ‌national‌‌ 
a‌‌
  ‌membership‌‌   ‌issue‌‌   that‌‌  had‌‌  to‌‌ be‌‌ settled‌‌ within‌‌ the‌‌ party.‌‌ It‌‌ is‌‌ 
referenda‌‌and‌‌plebiscites.‌  ‌ 1. Absentee‌‌voters‌‌may‌‌only‌‌vote‌‌for‌‌National‌‌Positions.‌  ‌
an‌  ‌internal‌  ‌party‌  ‌matter‌  ‌over‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌COMELEC‌  ‌has‌  ‌no‌‌ 
2. Disqualifications‌: ‌ ‌ 2. An‌  ‌Illiterate‌  ‌or‌  ‌PWD‌  ‌may‌  ‌vote‌  ‌through‌  ‌an‌  ‌assistor‌  ‌who‌‌
  may‌‌  jurisdiction.‌  ‌
a) Those‌‌who‌‌have‌l‌ ost‌‌their‌‌Filipino‌‌citizenship‌; ‌ ‌ either‌‌be‌‌   ‌
2. COMELEC's‌‌   powers‌‌   and‌‌ functions‌‌ under‌‌ Section‌‌ 2,‌‌ Article‌‌ IX-C‌‌ of‌‌ 
b) Those‌  ‌who‌  ‌have‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌renounced‌  ‌their‌‌  a) A‌‌relative‌‌within‌‌the‌‌4th‌‌civil‌‌degree;‌  ‌ the‌‌  Constitution,‌‌   "include‌‌   the‌‌ ascertainment‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ identity‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
Philippine‌  ‌citizenship‌  ‌and‌  ‌who‌  ‌have‌  ‌pledged‌‌  b) A‌‌confidant‌‌who‌‌belongs‌‌to‌‌the‌‌same‌‌household;‌‌OR‌  ‌ political‌‌party‌‌and‌‌its‌‌legitimate‌‌officers‌‌responsible‌‌for‌‌its‌‌acts."‌  ‌
allegiance‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌foreign‌  ‌country‌, ‌ ‌except‌  ‌those‌  ‌who‌‌  3. COMELEC's‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌register‌  ‌political‌  ‌parties‌  ‌necessarily‌‌ 
c) A‌‌BEI‌‌member.‌  ‌
have‌  ‌reacquired‌  ‌or‌  ‌retained‌  ‌their‌  ‌Philippine‌‌  involved‌  ‌the‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌persons‌  ‌who‌  ‌must‌‌
  act‌‌   on‌‌   its‌‌ 
citizenship‌‌under‌‌RA‌‌9225;‌  ‌ 3. An‌‌
  assistor,‌‌
  ‌except‌‌
  for‌‌
  a ‌‌BEI‌‌
  member‌, ‌‌may‌‌
  only‌‌
  assist‌‌
  up‌‌
  to‌‌
  ‌3 ‌‌
behalf.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌the‌  ‌COMELEC‌  ‌may‌  ‌resolve‌  ‌an‌  ‌intra-party‌‌ 
times‌. ‌ ‌
c) Those‌  ‌who‌  ‌have‌  ‌committed‌  ‌and‌  ‌are‌  ‌convicted‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌‌ leadership‌  ‌dispute‌, ‌ ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌proper‌  ‌case‌  ‌brought‌  ‌before‌  ‌it,‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌‌ 
final‌‌
  judgment‌‌   by‌‌ a ‌‌Philippine‌‌ court‌‌ or‌‌ tribunal‌‌ of‌‌ an‌‌  Detainee‌‌voting‌  ‌ incident‌‌of‌‌its‌‌power‌‌to‌‌register‌‌political‌‌parties.‌  ‌
offense‌  ‌punishable‌  ‌by‌  ‌imprisonment‌  ‌of‌‌   not‌‌  less‌‌
  than‌‌  Under‌‌
  Section‌‌  2,‌‌
  Rule‌‌
  1 ‌‌of‌‌
  ‌COMELEC‌‌  Resolution‌‌   No.‌‌ 9371‌, ‌‌Persons‌‌ 
one‌‌(1)‌‌year‌;‌‌and‌  ‌ Registration‌‌of‌‌political‌‌parties‌  ‌
Deprived‌‌of‌‌Liberty‌‌(PDLs)‌‌who‌‌may‌‌vote‌‌are‌‌those:‌‌   ‌
d) Previously‌‌declared‌‌insane‌‌or‌‌incompetent.‌  ‌ Art‌‌IX-C‌‌Sec‌‌2(5)‌.‌‌The‌‌following‌s‌ hall‌‌be‌‌refused‌‌registration‌: ‌ ‌
1) confined‌  ‌in‌  ‌jail,‌  ‌formally‌  ‌charged‌  ‌for‌  ‌any‌  ‌crime/s‌  ‌and‌‌ 
awaiting/undergoing‌‌trial;‌‌or‌  ‌ 1. Religious‌‌denominations‌‌and‌‌sects;‌  ‌
Local‌‌Absentee‌‌Voters‌  ‌
2) serving‌  ‌sentence‌  ‌of‌  ‌imprisonment‌  ‌for‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌  ‌one‌‌
  (1)‌‌  2. Those‌  ‌which‌  ‌seek‌‌
  to‌‌
  achieve‌‌
  their‌‌
  goals‌‌
  through‌‌
  violence‌‌ 
1. Members‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌AFP‌‌  and‌‌ PNP‌‌ and‌‌ other‌‌ ‌government‌‌ officers‌‌ 
year‌,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ or‌‌unlawful‌‌means;‌  ‌
and‌  ‌employees‌  ‌who‌  ‌are‌  ‌duly‌  ‌registered‌  ‌voters‌  ‌and‌  ‌who,‌  ‌on‌‌ 
election‌  ‌day,‌  ‌may‌  ‌temporarily‌  ‌be‌‌
  assigned‌‌   in‌‌
  connection‌‌  with‌‌  3) whose‌‌conviction‌‌is‌‌on‌‌appeal.‌  ‌ 3. Those‌  ‌who‌  ‌refuse‌  ‌to‌  ‌uphold‌  ‌and‌  ‌adhere‌  ‌to‌  ‌this‌‌ 
the‌‌
  performance‌‌ of‌‌ election‌‌ duties‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌place‌‌ where‌‌ they‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌  Constitution,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
See‌‌COMELEC‌‌Resolution‌‌No.‌‌10482‌. ‌ ‌
registered‌‌voters.‌  ‌ 4. Those‌‌which‌‌are‌‌supported‌‌by‌‌any‌‌foreign‌‌government.‌  ‌
B.‌‌Political‌‌Parties‌  ‌
A‌  ‌political‌  ‌party‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌organized‌  ‌group‌  ‌of‌  ‌citizens‌‌ 
advocating‌‌   an‌‌
  ideology‌‌ or‌‌ platform,‌‌ principles‌‌ and‌‌ policies‌‌ for‌‌ 

C.‌‌Candidacy‌  ‌
who‌‌served‌‌ 
at‌‌least‌‌4‌‌ 
Position‌  ‌ Allocation‌  ‌ Citizenship‌  ‌ Age‌  ‌ Res‌  ‌ Reg‌  ‌ Literacy‌  ‌ Term‌  ‌ Limit‌  ‌ years.‌  ‌

Ineligible‌‌  2‌‌ 
for‌‌any‌‌  VP‌  ‌ 1,‌‌National‌  ‌ Natural-Born‌  ‌ 40‌  ‌ 10‌  ‌ PH‌  ‌ ATRW‌  ‌ 6‌  ‌
President‌  ‌ 1,‌‌National‌  ‌ Natural-Born‌  ‌ 40‌  ‌ 10‌  ‌ PH‌  ‌ ATRW‌  ‌ 6‌  ‌ consecutive‌  ‌
election;‌‌ 
Successor‌‌  Senator‌  ‌ 24,‌‌National‌  ‌ Natural-Born‌  ‌ 35‌  ‌ 2‌  ‌ PH‌  ‌ ATRW‌  ‌ 6‌  ‌ 2‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 98‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

consecutive‌  ‌ HUC,‌‌ICC,‌‌  City‌‌or‌‌  ATRW‌‌+ ‌‌ 3‌‌ 


Mayor‌  ‌ Filipino‌  ‌ 21‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌ 3‌  ‌
Municipality‌  ‌ Muni‌  ‌ Filipino‌  ‌ consecutive‌  ‌
20%‌‌of‌‌HR;‌‌ 
Party-List‌‌  3‌‌ 
Max‌‌of‌‌3‌‌per‌‌  Natural-Born‌  ‌ 25‌1‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌ PH‌  ‌ ATRW‌  ‌ 3‌  ‌ HUC,‌‌ICC,‌‌  City‌‌or‌‌  ATRW‌‌+ ‌‌ 3‌‌ 
Representative‌  ‌ consecutive‌  ‌ Vice‌‌Mayor‌  ‌ Filipino‌  ‌ 21‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌ 3‌  ‌
PL‌  ‌ Municipality‌  ‌ Muni‌  ‌ Filipino‌  ‌ consecutive‌  ‌

District‌‌  1,‌‌Legislative‌‌  3‌‌  Member,‌‌ 


Natural-Born‌  ‌ 25‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌ District‌  ‌ ATRW‌  ‌ 3‌  ‌ 8,‌‌10‌‌or‌‌12,‌‌  City‌‌or‌‌  ATRW‌‌+ ‌‌ 3‌‌ 
Representative‌  ‌ District‌  ‌ consecutive‌  ‌ Sangguniang‌‌  Filipino‌  ‌ 18‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌ 3‌  ‌
HUC,‌‌ICC‌  ‌ Muni‌  ‌ Filipino‌  ‌ consecutive‌  ‌
Panlungsod‌  ‌
ARMM‌‌  2‌‌ 
1,‌‌Regional‌  ‌ Natural-Born‌  ‌ 35‌  ‌ 5‌  ‌ ARMM‌  ‌ ATRW‌  ‌ 3‌  ‌
Governor‌  ‌ consecutive‌  ‌ Member,‌‌ 
8,‌‌  ATRW‌‌+ ‌‌ 3‌‌ 
Sangguniang‌‌  Filipino‌  ‌ 18‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌ Muni‌  ‌ 3‌  ‌
Municipality‌  ‌ Filipino‌  ‌ consecutive‌  ‌
ARMM‌‌Vice‌‌  2‌‌  Bayan‌  ‌
1,‌‌Regional‌  ‌ Natural-Born‌  ‌ 35‌  ‌ 5‌  ‌ ARMM‌  ‌ ATRW‌  ‌ 3‌  ‌
Governor‌  ‌ consecutive‌  ‌
Punong‌‌  ATRW‌‌+ ‌‌ 3‌‌ 
1,‌‌Barangay‌  ‌ Filipino‌  ‌ 18‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌ Brgy‌  ‌ 3‌  ‌
ARMM‌‌  24,‌‌Regional;‌‌  2‌‌  Barangay‌  ‌ Filipino‌  ‌ consecutive‌  ‌
Natural-Born‌  ‌ 21‌  ‌ 5‌  ‌ District‌  ‌ ATRW‌  ‌ 3‌  ‌
Assemblyman‌  ‌ 3‌‌per‌‌District‌  ‌ consecutive‌  ‌
ATRW‌‌+ ‌‌ 3‌‌ 
Kagawad‌  ‌ 7,‌‌Barangay‌  ‌ Filipino‌  ‌ 18‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌ Brgy‌  ‌ 3‌  ‌
ATRW‌‌+ ‌‌ 3‌‌  Filipino‌  ‌ consecutive‌  ‌
Governor‌  ‌ 1,‌‌Provincial‌  ‌ Filipino‌  ‌ 21‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌ Province‌  ‌ 3‌  ‌
Filipino‌  ‌ consecutive‌  ‌
Sangguniang‌‌  18-‌‌  ATRW‌‌+ ‌‌
ATRW‌‌+ ‌‌ 3‌‌  Kabataan‌‌  1,‌‌Barangay‌  ‌ Filipino‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌ Brgy‌  ‌ 3‌  ‌ Silent‌  ‌
Vice‌‌Governor‌  ‌ 1,‌‌Provincial‌  ‌ Filipino‌  ‌ 21‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌ Province‌  ‌ 3‌  ‌ Chairperson‌  ‌ 24‌  ‌ Filipino‌  ‌
Filipino‌  ‌ consecutive‌  ‌

Member,‌‌  Sangguniang‌‌  18-‌‌ 


ATRW‌‌+ ‌‌ 3‌‌  ATRW‌‌+ ‌‌
Sangguniang‌‌  2‌‌per‌‌District‌  ‌ Filipino‌  ‌ 21‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌ District‌  ‌ 3‌  ‌ Kabataan‌‌  7,‌‌Barangay‌  ‌ Filipino‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌ Brgy‌  ‌ 3‌  ‌ Silent‌  ‌
Filipino‌  ‌ consecutive‌  ‌ Members‌  ‌ 24‌  ‌ Filipino‌  ‌
Panlalawigan‌  ‌
 ‌
Legends:‌  ‌ ICC‌:‌‌Independent‌‌Component‌‌City‌  ‌
1‌‌
‌But‌‌not‌‌more‌‌than‌‌30‌‌for‌‌Youth‌‌sector‌  ‌ ATRW‌:‌‌Able‌‌to‌‌Read‌‌and‌‌Write‌  ‌
HUC‌:‌‌Highly‌‌Urbanized‌‌City‌  ‌ Filipino‌‌‌or‌‌any‌‌other‌‌Local‌‌Dialect‌  ‌
Qualifications‌‌and‌‌disqualifications‌‌of‌‌candidates‌  ‌ b. Age.‌‌—‌‌Must‌‌be‌‌possessed‌‌on‌‌the‌‌day‌‌of‌‌election.‌  ‌ 1) Actual‌‌removal‌‌or‌‌change‌‌of‌‌domicile;‌  ‌
Qualifications‌   ‌
c. Residence‌  ‌ 2) Animus‌  ‌non‌  ‌revertendi‌  ‌with‌  ‌definite‌  ‌corresponding‌‌ 
acts;‌‌AND‌  ‌
a. Citizenship‌  ‌ 1. For‌‌purposes‌‌of‌‌election‌‌law,‌‌it‌‌is‌‌synonymous‌‌with‌‌domicile.‌  ‌
3) Purpose‌  ‌to‌  ‌remain‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌for‌  ‌an‌  ‌indefinite‌  ‌time,‌‌ 
1. Must‌‌   be‌‌
  possessed‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌
  time‌‌ he‌‌ is‌‌ proclaimed‌‌ and‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ start‌‌  2. To‌‌
  abandon‌‌
  or‌‌
  reacquire‌‌ domicile‌‌ of‌‌ origin,‌‌ the‌‌ following‌‌ must‌‌ 
voluntary‌‌and‌‌actual.‌  ‌
of‌‌term.‌  ‌ concur:‌  ‌
4. To‌‌establish‌‌NEW‌‌domicile:‌  ‌
2. Repatriation‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌former‌‌
  Filipino‌‌
  under‌‌
  RA‌‌ 9225‌‌ allows‌‌ him‌‌ to‌‌  1) Bodily‌‌presence‌‌in‌‌new‌‌locality;‌  ‌
recover‌  ‌his‌  ‌natural-born‌  ‌citizenship‌  ‌upon‌  ‌taking‌  ‌an‌  ‌oath‌  ‌of‌‌  1) Actual‌‌removal‌‌or‌‌change‌‌of‌‌domicile;‌  ‌
2) Animus‌‌manendi;‌A
‌ ND‌  ‌
allegiance‌. ‌ ‌ 2) Animus‌‌non‌‌revertendi‌‌‌AND‌‌animus‌‌manendi‌;‌‌AND‌  ‌
3) Animus‌‌non‌‌revertendi‌. ‌ ‌
3. Those‌  ‌who‌  ‌seek‌  ‌public‌  ‌office‌  ‌must‌  ‌ALSO‌  ‌make‌  ‌a ‌ ‌personal‌‌  3) Acts‌‌which‌‌correspond‌‌with‌‌the‌‌purpose.‌  ‌
and‌‌sworn‌‌renunciation‌‌‌of‌‌other‌‌foreign‌‌citizenship.‌  ‌ 3. To‌‌abandon‌‌an‌‌OLD‌‌domicile:‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 99‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

5. Evidence‌  ‌must‌  ‌engender‌  ‌the‌  ‌kind‌  ‌of‌  ‌permanency‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌‌  5) Fugitives‌‌from‌‌justice;‌  ‌ But‌‌   while‌‌   the‌‌   totality‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  evidence‌‌ may‌‌ not‌‌ establish‌‌ conclusively‌‌ 
prove‌‌abandonment‌‌of‌‌one's‌‌original‌‌domicile‌. ‌ ‌ 6) Permanent‌‌residents‌‌in‌‌a‌‌foreign‌‌country;‌  ‌ that‌  ‌FPJ‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌natural-born‌  ‌citizen,‌  ‌the‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌on‌  ‌hand‌  ‌still‌‌   would‌‌ 
d. Registration‌‌as‌‌Voter.‌‌—‌A
‌ ‌‌candidate‌‌should‌‌be‌‌a‌‌registered‌‌  preponderate‌‌   in‌‌ his‌‌ favor‌‌ enough‌‌ to‌‌ hold‌‌ that‌‌ he‌‌ cannot‌‌ be‌‌ held‌‌ guilty‌‌ 
7) Insane‌‌or‌‌feeble-minded.‌  ‌
of‌  ‌having‌  ‌made‌  ‌a ‌ ‌material‌  ‌misrepresentation‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌certificate‌  ‌of‌‌ 
voter‌‌at‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌filing‌‌of‌‌COC.‌  ‌
Vacancy‌‌and‌‌Succession‌   ‌
candidacy‌‌in‌‌violation‌‌of‌‌Section‌‌78‌‌of‌‌the‌‌OEC.‌  ‌
e. Literacy.‌‌—‌S‌ imply‌‌means‌‌ability‌‌to‌‌read‌‌and‌‌write.‌  ‌
 ‌

Position‌  ‌ Remedy‌ 
Disqualifications‌  ‌ Quinto‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌Resolution‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
Under‌‌the‌‌OEC‌  ‌ VP‌‌succeeds,‌‌either‌‌permanently‌‌or‌‌in‌‌an‌‌acting‌‌ 
President‌  The‌‌
  ‌deemed-resigned‌‌
  provisions‌‌
  substantially‌‌ serve‌‌ governmental‌‌ 
capacity.‌  ‌
1) Insanity‌‌or‌‌incompetence;‌‌   ‌ interests‌‌i.e.,‌‌   ‌

2) Sentenced‌  ‌by‌  ‌final‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌for‌  ‌subversion,‌  ‌insurrection,‌‌  President‌‌nominates‌‌from‌‌Congress;‌  ‌ 1. efficient‌  ‌civil‌  ‌service‌  ‌faithful‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌ 
VP‌  Congress‌‌confirms‌‌by‌‌majority‌‌vote‌‌voting‌‌  people‌‌rather‌‌than‌‌to‌‌party;‌‌   ‌
rebellion;‌‌   ‌
separately.‌  ‌
3) Sentenced‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌penalty‌  ‌of‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌‌
  eighteen‌‌
  months‌‌
  or‌‌
  for‌‌
  a ‌‌ 2. avoidance‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌appearance‌  ‌of‌  ‌"political‌  ‌justice"‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌‌ 
crime‌‌involving‌‌moral‌‌turpitude.‌  ‌ Senator‌  Special‌‌election‌‌held‌‌at‌‌the‌‌next‌‌regular‌‌election.‌  ‌ policy;‌  ‌

4) Conviction‌‌by‌‌final‌‌judgment‌‌for:‌  ‌ 3. avoidance‌‌of‌‌the‌‌danger‌‌of‌‌a‌‌powerful‌‌political‌‌machine;‌‌and‌‌   ‌
Party-List‌‌  Next‌‌nominee‌‌succeeds.‌‌If‌‌the‌‌5-man‌‌list‌‌is‌‌ 
a) Bribery;‌  ‌ Representative‌  exhausted,‌‌nominate‌‌more.‌  4. ensuring‌  ‌that‌  ‌employees‌  ‌achieve‌  ‌advancement‌  ‌on‌  ‌their‌‌ 
merits‌  ‌and‌  ‌that‌  ‌they‌  ‌be‌  ‌free‌  ‌from‌  ‌both‌  ‌coercion‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌ 
b) Acts‌‌of‌‌terrorism‌‌to‌‌enhance‌‌candidacy;‌  ‌ Special‌‌Election‌‌provided‌t‌ he‌‌vacancy‌‌occurred‌‌at‌‌ 
District‌‌  prospect‌‌of‌‌favor‌‌from‌‌political‌‌activity.‌‌   ‌
c) Excess‌‌in‌‌campaign‌‌expenditure;‌  ‌ least‌‌1‌‌year‌‌before‌‌term‌‌expiration‌‌and‌‌it‌‌be‌‌held‌‌ 
Representative‌  These‌  ‌are‌  ‌interests‌  ‌that‌  ‌are‌  ‌important‌  ‌enough‌  ‌to‌  ‌outweigh‌  ‌the‌‌ 
60-90‌‌days‌‌after‌‌occurrence.‌  ‌
d) Solicited,‌‌received‌‌or‌‌made‌‌any‌‌prohibited‌‌contributions;‌  ‌ non-fundamental‌‌   right‌‌
  of‌‌
  appointive‌‌  officials‌‌
  and‌‌
  employees‌‌   to‌‌
  seek‌‌ 
e) Violation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌OEC.‌  ‌
Filing‌‌of‌‌certificates‌‌of‌‌candidacy‌  ‌ elective‌‌office.‌  ‌

5) Permanent‌  ‌resident‌  ‌of‌  ‌or‌  ‌an‌  ‌immigrant‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌foreign‌  ‌country‌‌  Effect‌‌of‌‌filing‌  ‌ Substitution‌‌and‌‌withdrawal‌‌of‌‌candidates‌  ‌
unless‌‌‌he‌‌has‌‌waived‌‌such‌‌status.‌  ‌ Salcedo‌v‌ .‌‌Comelec‌  ‌
A‌‌
  person‌‌   can‌‌ file‌‌ multiple‌‌ CoCs.‌‌ However,‌‌ before‌‌ the‌‌ deadline‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
6) Nuisance‌‌candidates;‌‌and‌  ‌ In‌  ‌case‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌‌material‌‌
  misrepresentation‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  certificate‌‌
  of‌‌  filing‌‌   of‌‌
  CoC,‌‌
  he‌‌ must‌‌ ensure‌‌ that‌‌ he‌‌ retains‌‌ one‌‌ CoC‌‌ and‌‌ withdraws‌‌ 
7) False‌‌material‌‌representation‌‌in‌‌the‌‌COC.‌  ‌ candidacy,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Comelec‌  ‌is‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌to‌  ‌deny‌  ‌due‌  ‌course‌  ‌to‌  ‌or‌‌  all‌  ‌the‌  ‌other.‌  ‌Otherwise,‌  ‌he‌‌   will‌‌
  be‌‌
  disqualified‌‌   from‌‌
  all‌‌
  positions‌‌ 
cancel‌  ‌such‌  ‌certificate‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌petition‌  ‌by‌  ‌any‌‌
  person.‌‌  filed.‌‌(‌Go‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌) ‌ ‌
Under‌‌the‌‌LGC‌  ‌
The‌  ‌material‌  ‌misrepresentation‌  ‌contemplated‌  ‌by‌  ‌Section‌  ‌78‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Sinaca‌‌v.‌‌Mula‌  ‌
1) Sentenced‌  ‌by‌  ‌final‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌for‌  ‌an‌  ‌offense‌  ‌involving‌  ‌moral‌‌  Code‌‌refers‌‌to‌‌qualifications‌f‌ or‌‌elective‌‌office.‌‌   ‌
turpitude‌‌
  or‌‌
  for‌‌
  an‌‌
  offense‌‌
  punishable‌‌   by‌‌
  one‌‌ (1)‌‌ year‌‌ or‌‌ more‌‌  It‌‌is‌‌necessary,‌‌among‌‌others,‌‌that‌‌the‌s‌ ubstitute‌c‌ andidate‌‌   ‌
Aside‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌requirement‌  ‌of‌  ‌materiality,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌false‌  ‌representation‌‌ 
of‌‌imprisonment,‌‌within‌‌two‌‌(2)‌‌years‌‌after‌‌serving‌‌sentence;‌  ‌ 1. must‌  ‌be‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌political‌  ‌party‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌original‌‌ 
must‌  ‌consist‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌"‌deliberate‌  ‌attempt‌  ‌to‌‌
  mislead,‌‌  misinform,‌‌   or‌‌ 
2) Removed‌‌from‌‌office‌‌as‌‌a‌‌result‌‌of‌‌an‌‌administrative‌‌case;‌  ‌ hide‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fact‌  ‌which‌  ‌would‌  ‌otherwise‌  ‌render‌  ‌a ‌ ‌candidate‌  ‌ineligible‌."‌‌  candidate‌‌and‌‌   ‌
3) Convicted‌‌   by‌‌
  final‌‌
  judgment‌‌
  for‌‌
  violating‌‌ the‌‌ oath‌‌ of‌‌ allegiance‌‌  The‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌surname,‌‌  when‌‌
  not‌‌
  intended‌‌
  to‌‌
  mislead‌‌   or‌‌
  deceive‌‌
  the‌‌  2. must‌‌be‌‌duly‌‌nominated‌a‌ s‌‌such‌‌by‌‌the‌‌political‌‌party.‌  ‌
to‌‌the‌‌Republic;‌  ‌ public‌‌as‌‌to‌‌one's‌‌identity,‌‌is‌‌not‌‌within‌‌the‌‌scope‌‌of‌‌the‌‌provision.‌  ‌
Even‌  ‌the‌  ‌fact‌‌
  that‌‌
  EMMANUEL‌‌   only‌‌  became‌‌
  a ‌‌member‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  LAKAS‌‌ 
4) Dual‌  ‌citizenship.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Continued‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌passport‌  ‌after‌‌  party‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌  ‌disqualification‌  ‌of‌  ‌TEODORO,‌  ‌will‌  ‌not‌  ‌affect‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Tecson‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌‌Re‌‌Material‌‌Misrepresentation‌  ‌ validity‌‌of‌‌the‌‌substitution.‌  ‌
renunciation‌  ‌negates‌  ‌the‌  ‌oath‌  ‌and‌  ‌renounces‌  ‌the‌‌ 
renunciation.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 100‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

The‌  ‌decision‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌which‌  ‌member‌  ‌a ‌ ‌party‌  ‌shall‌  ‌nominate‌  ‌as‌  ‌its‌‌  All‌  ‌told,‌  ‌a ‌‌disqualified‌‌
  candidate‌‌
  may‌‌
  only‌‌
  be‌‌
  substituted‌‌
  if‌‌
  he‌‌  been‌  ‌denied‌  ‌due‌‌
  course‌‌
  to‌‌
  and/or‌‌
  cancelled‌‌   under‌‌
  Section‌‌
  78‌‌ 
candidate‌‌is‌‌a‌‌party‌‌concern‌‌which‌‌is‌‌not‌‌cognizable‌‌by‌‌the‌‌courts.‌  ‌ had‌‌a‌‌valid‌‌certificate‌‌of‌‌candidacy‌‌in‌‌the‌‌first‌‌place.‌  ‌ is‌‌deemed‌‌to‌‌have‌‌not‌‌been‌‌a‌‌candidate‌‌at‌‌all.‌  ‌
Section‌  ‌77‌  ‌requires‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌  ‌be‌  ‌an‌  ‌"official‌  ‌candidate"‌  ‌before‌‌ 
Vivero‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌  ‌ Federico‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌‌2013‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ candidate‌  ‌substitution‌  ‌proceeds.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌ground‌  ‌for‌‌ 
substitution‌  ‌is‌  ‌death,‌  ‌withdrawal‌  ‌or‌  ‌disqualification‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌
Form‌‌   – ‌‌‌written‌‌  declaration‌‌   under‌‌   oath.‌‌  There‌‌   was‌‌  no‌‌ withdrawal‌‌  Federico’s‌‌substitution‌‌of‌‌Edna‌‌Sanchez‌  ‌ candidate‌, ‌‌the‌‌  said‌‌
  section‌‌   unequivocally‌‌ states‌‌ that‌‌ only‌‌ an‌‌ official‌‌ 
of‌  ‌candidacy‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌position‌  ‌of‌  ‌mayor‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌‌   candidate,‌‌   before‌‌  as‌‌mayoralty‌‌candidate‌‌was‌‌not‌‌valid‌  ‌ candidate‌‌of‌‌a‌‌registered‌‌or‌‌accredited‌‌party‌‌may‌‌be‌‌substituted.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌deadline‌  ‌for‌‌   filing‌‌
  certificates‌‌   of‌‌
  candidacy,‌‌   personally‌‌   appeared‌‌  When‌  ‌Batangas‌  ‌Governor‌  ‌Armando‌  ‌Sanchez‌‌   died‌‌   on‌‌
  April‌‌   27,‌‌  2010,‌ 
in‌  ‌the‌  ‌COMELEC‌  ‌office,‌  ‌asked‌  ‌for‌  ‌his‌  ‌certificate‌  ‌of‌  ‌candidacy‌  ‌and‌‌  Edna‌  ‌withdrew‌  ‌her‌  ‌candidacy‌  ‌as‌  ‌mayor‌  ‌and‌  ‌substituted‌  ‌her‌  ‌late‌‌  Nuisance‌‌candidates‌  ‌
intercalated‌‌   the‌‌
  word‌‌   “vice”‌‌ before‌‌ the‌‌ word‌‌ mayor‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ following‌‌  husband‌‌   as‌‌  gubernatorial‌‌   candidate‌‌   for‌‌  the‌‌  province‌‌   on‌‌  April‌‌   29.‌‌   By‌‌  A‌‌nuisance‌‌candidate‌‌‌is‌‌one‌‌who‌‌files‌‌a‌‌COC‌‌   ‌
day‌  ‌wrote‌  ‌the‌  ‌election‌‌   registrar‌‌
  saying‌‌   that‌‌
  his‌‌
  name‌‌   be‌‌
  included‌‌   in‌‌  fielding‌  ‌Edna‌  ‌as‌  ‌their‌  ‌substitute‌  ‌candidate‌  ‌for‌  ‌Governor,‌  ‌the‌  ‌party‌‌ 
the‌‌list‌‌of‌‌official‌‌candidates‌‌for‌‌mayor.‌  ‌ 1) to‌‌put‌‌the‌‌election‌‌process‌‌in‌‌mockery‌‌or‌‌disrepute‌‌or‌‌   ‌
knew‌‌   that‌‌  she‌‌  had‌‌
  to‌‌
  withdraw‌‌ her‌‌ candidacy‌‌ for‌‌ Mayor.‌‌ Considering‌‌ 
that‌  ‌the‌  ‌deadline‌  ‌for‌  ‌substitution‌  ‌in‌‌   case‌‌  of‌‌  withdrawal‌‌   had‌‌
  already‌‌  2) to‌‌cause‌‌confusion‌‌among‌‌the‌‌voters‌‌   ‌
Ramirez‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌  ‌ lapsed,‌  ‌no‌  ‌person‌  ‌could‌  ‌substitute‌  ‌her‌‌   as‌‌
  mayoralty‌‌   candidate.‌‌   The‌‌  a) by‌‌   the‌‌
  similarity‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  names‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ registered‌‌ candidates‌‌ 
Since‌‌   his‌‌  certificate‌‌   of‌‌
  candidacy‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌ office‌‌ of‌‌ board‌‌ member‌‌ was‌‌  sudden‌  ‌death‌  ‌of‌  ‌then‌  ‌Governor‌  ‌Sanchez‌  ‌and‌‌   the‌‌
  substitution‌‌   by‌‌   his‌‌  or‌‌   ‌
filed‌  ‌by‌‌   his‌‌
  party,‌‌
  and‌‌  the‌‌  said‌‌
  party‌‌
  had‌‌   withdrawn‌‌   the‌‌
  nomination‌‌  widow‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌gubernatorial‌  ‌race‌  ‌could‌  ‌not‌  ‌justify‌  ‌a ‌ ‌belated‌‌ 
b) by‌‌
  other‌‌   circumstances‌‌   or‌‌
  acts‌‌
  which‌‌  clearly‌‌
  demonstrate‌‌ 
which‌‌   withdrawal‌‌   was‌‌   confirmed‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  candidate‌‌   under‌‌   oath,‌‌
  there‌‌  substitution‌‌in‌‌the‌‌mayoralty‌‌race.‌  ‌
that‌‌
  the‌‌
  candidate‌‌ has‌‌ no‌‌ bona‌‌ fide‌‌ intention‌‌ to‌‌ run‌. ‌‌(‌Sec‌‌ 
was‌‌   substantial‌‌   compliance‌‌ with‌‌ Sec.‌‌ 73.‌‌ His‌‌ filing‌‌ under‌‌ oath‌‌ within‌‌  Without‌‌ question,‌‌ the‌‌ votes‌‌ garnered‌‌ by‌‌ Edna‌‌ could‌‌ not‌‌ be‌‌ credited‌‌ to‌‌  69‌‌OEC‌) ‌ ‌
the‌‌
  statutory‌‌   period‌‌   of‌‌
  his‌‌ individual‌‌ certificate‌‌ for‌‌ candidacy‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌  Federico‌  ‌as‌  ‌he‌  ‌was‌  ‌never‌  ‌a ‌ ‌legitimate‌  ‌candidate.‌  ‌As‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌an‌‌ 
Pamatong‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌
separate‌  ‌office‌  ‌of‌  ‌mayor‌  ‌was,‌  ‌in‌  ‌effect,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌rejection‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌party‌‌  invalid‌  ‌substitution,‌  ‌there‌  ‌could‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌  ‌proclamation.‌  ‌In‌‌ 
nomination‌‌on‌‌his‌‌behalf‌‌for‌‌the‌‌office‌‌of‌‌board‌‌member.‌  ‌ effect,‌‌the‌‌second‌‌COCVP‌‌in‌‌his‌‌name‌‌had‌‌no‌‌legal‌‌basis.‌  ‌ The‌‌
  question‌‌
  of‌‌
  whether‌‌  a ‌‌candidate‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌nuisance‌‌ candidate‌‌ or‌‌ not‌‌ is‌‌ 
both‌‌legal‌‌and‌‌factual.‌‌   ‌
Tagolino‌‌v.‌‌HRET‌‌2
‌ 013‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
Villanueva‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌  ‌
A‌‌disqualification‌‌case‌‌under‌‌Section‌‌68‌‌of‌‌OEC‌‌is‌‌hinged‌‌on‌‌either:‌‌   ‌ Martinez‌‌v.‌‌HRET‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
The‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌Mendoza's‌  ‌withdrawal‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌sworn‌  ‌is‌  ‌but‌  ‌a ‌‌
technicality‌‌   which‌‌
  should‌‌
  not‌‌
  be‌‌
  used‌‌
  to‌‌
  frustrate‌‌  the‌‌ people's‌‌  a) a‌‌
  candidate's‌‌
  possession‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌permanent‌‌
  resident‌‌ status‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌ The‌‌
  declaration‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌duly‌‌
  registered‌‌
  candidate‌‌
  as‌‌
  nuisance‌‌
  candidate‌‌ 
will‌‌in‌‌favor‌‌of‌‌petitioner‌‌as‌‌the‌‌substitute‌‌candidate.‌‌   ‌ foreign‌‌country,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ results‌‌in‌‌the‌‌cancellation‌‌of‌‌his‌‌certificate‌‌of‌‌candidacy.‌‌   ‌
b) his‌‌or‌‌her‌‌commission‌‌of‌‌certain‌‌acts‌‌of‌‌disqualification.‌‌   ‌ A‌  ‌nuisance‌  ‌candidate‌  ‌is‌  ‌thus‌  ‌defined‌  ‌as‌  ‌one‌  ‌who,‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Miranda‌‌v.‌‌Abaya‌  ‌ Anent‌‌   the‌‌
  latter,‌‌
  the‌‌
  prohibited‌‌
  acts‌‌
  under‌‌ Section‌‌ 68‌‌ refer‌‌ to‌‌ election‌‌  attendant‌  ‌circumstances,‌  ‌has‌  ‌no‌  ‌bona‌  ‌fide‌  ‌intention‌  ‌to‌  ‌run‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
offenses‌‌   under‌‌  the‌‌
  OEC.‌‌
  One‌‌
  who‌‌  is‌‌
  disqualified‌‌
  under‌‌   Section‌‌   68‌‌ is‌‌  office‌  ‌for‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌certificate‌  ‌of‌‌  candidacy‌‌   has‌‌
  been‌‌   filed,‌‌
  his‌‌
  sole‌‌ 
Under‌‌  the‌‌  express‌‌   provisions‌‌   of‌‌
  Section‌‌  77‌‌
  of‌‌  the‌‌
  Code,‌‌
  not‌‌
  just‌‌
  any‌‌ 
still‌‌technically‌‌considered‌‌to‌‌have‌‌been‌‌a‌‌candidate.‌  ‌ purpose‌‌   being‌‌
  the‌‌  reduction‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   votes‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌strong‌‌   candidate,‌‌ upon‌‌ 
person,‌‌   but‌‌  only‌‌
  "‌an‌‌
  official‌‌  candidate‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌registered‌‌ or‌‌ accredited‌‌ 
the‌‌  expectation‌‌   that‌‌  ballots‌‌
  with‌‌   only‌‌   the‌‌
  surname‌‌   of‌‌ such‌‌ candidate‌‌ 
political‌  ‌party"‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌substituted.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌person‌  ‌without‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌‌  A‌‌
  ‌denial‌‌ of‌‌ due‌‌ course‌‌ to‌‌ and/or‌‌ cancellation‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌CoC‌‌ proceeding‌‌ 
will‌‌be‌‌considered‌‌stray‌‌and‌‌not‌‌counted‌‌for‌‌either‌‌of‌‌them.‌  ‌
certificate‌  ‌of‌  ‌candidacy‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌a ‌ ‌candidate‌  ‌in‌‌  under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌78‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌OEC‌  ‌is‌  ‌premised‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person's‌ 
much‌‌  the‌‌ same‌‌ way‌‌ as‌‌ any‌‌ person‌‌ who‌‌ has‌‌ not‌‌ filed‌‌ any‌‌ certificate‌‌ of‌‌  Ballots‌‌  indicating‌‌  only‌‌
  the‌‌  similar‌‌ surname‌‌ of‌‌ two‌‌ (2)‌‌ candidates‌‌ for‌‌ 
misrepresentation‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌material‌  ‌qualifications‌‌   required‌‌
  for‌‌ 
candidacy‌  ‌at‌  ‌all‌  ‌can‌  ‌not,‌  ‌by‌  ‌any‌  ‌stretch‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌imagination,‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ the‌‌   elective‌‌
  office‌‌  aspired‌‌
  for.‌‌
  It‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌ enough‌‌ that‌‌ a ‌‌person‌‌ lacks‌‌ the‌‌  the‌  ‌same‌  ‌position‌  ‌may,‌  ‌in‌  ‌appropriate‌‌   cases,‌‌
  be‌‌
  counted‌‌   in‌‌  favor‌‌
  of‌‌ 
candidate‌‌at‌‌all.‌  ‌ relevant‌  ‌qualification;‌  ‌he‌  ‌or‌  ‌she‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌also‌  ‌made‌  ‌a ‌ ‌false‌‌  the‌‌
  bona‌‌  fide‌‌
  candidate‌‌  and‌‌   ‌not‌‌
  considered‌‌   stray‌, ‌‌even‌‌
  if‌‌
  the‌‌  other‌‌ 
representation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌CoC.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌person‌  ‌whose‌  ‌CoC‌  ‌had‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 101‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

candidate‌  ‌was‌‌  declared‌‌


  a ‌‌nuisance‌‌
  candidate‌‌
  by‌‌
  final‌‌
  judgment‌‌
  after‌‌  Effect‌‌of‌‌disqualification‌  ‌ 7. A‌  ‌person‌  ‌can‌  ‌file‌  ‌multiple‌  ‌CoCs‌. ‌ ‌However,‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌‌ 
the‌‌elections.‌  ‌ 1. Aside‌  ‌from‌  ‌CARRL,‌  ‌other‌‌   substantial‌‌   qualification‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌person‌‌  deadline‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  filing‌‌
  of‌‌ CoC,‌‌ he‌‌ must‌‌ ensure‌‌ that‌‌ he‌‌ retains‌‌ one‌‌ 
in‌  ‌filing‌  ‌his‌  ‌CoC‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌‌
  he‌‌  certifies‌‌
  that‌‌
  he‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  ineligible‌‌   to‌‌  CoC‌  ‌and‌  ‌withdraws‌  ‌all‌  ‌the‌  ‌other.‌  ‌Otherwise,‌  ‌he‌  ‌will‌  ‌be‌‌ 
Zapanta‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌‌2019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ run‌‌due‌‌to‌‌causes‌‌such‌‌as:‌  ‌ disqualified‌‌from‌‌all‌‌positions.‌  ‌

a) Perpetual‌‌disqualification;‌  ‌ 8. The‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌duly‌  ‌registered‌  ‌candidate‌  ‌as‌  ‌nuisance‌‌ 
The‌  ‌2018‌  ‌En‌  ‌Banc‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌Santos‌  ‌clarified‌  ‌that‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌multi-slot‌‌ 
office‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌COMELEC‌  ‌must‌  ‌not‌‌   merely‌‌   apply‌‌  a ‌‌simple‌‌   mathematical‌‌  candidate‌‌‌results‌‌in‌‌the‌‌cancellation‌‌of‌‌his‌‌COC.‌  ‌
b) Barred‌‌by‌‌3-term‌‌Limit‌‌Rule;‌  ‌
formula‌  ‌of‌  ‌adding‌  ‌the‌  ‌votes‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌nuisance‌  ‌candidate‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  9. In‌  ‌a ‌ ‌special‌  ‌election,‌  ‌should‌  ‌there‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌lone‌  ‌candidate‌, ‌ ‌he‌‌ 
c) Sentenced‌  ‌by‌  ‌final‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌crime‌  ‌involving‌‌ 
legitimate‌  ‌candidate‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌similar‌  ‌name.‌  ‌To‌  ‌apply‌  ‌such‌  ‌simple‌‌  shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌proclaimed‌  ‌without‌  ‌the‌  ‌need‌  ‌to‌  ‌proceed‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌ 
moral‌‌turpitude;‌  ‌
arithmetic‌  ‌might‌  ‌lead‌  ‌to‌‌   the‌‌   double‌‌   counting‌‌   of‌‌  votes‌‌  because‌‌  there‌‌  election.‌  ‌
may‌  ‌be‌  ‌ballots‌  ‌containing‌  ‌votes‌  ‌for‌  ‌both‌  ‌nuisance‌  ‌and‌  ‌legitimate‌‌  2. It‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌ministerial‌‌
  ‌duty‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Comelec‌‌
  to‌‌
  receive‌‌
  COCs‌‌
  that‌‌ 
10. In‌  ‌regular‌  ‌elections,‌  ‌the‌  ‌lone‌  ‌candidate‌  ‌only‌  ‌needs‌  ‌1 ‌ ‌vote‌  ‌to‌‌ 
candidates.‌‌   In‌‌
  those‌‌
  ballots‌‌   that‌‌  contain‌‌   both‌‌
  votes‌‌   for‌‌  nuisance‌‌ and‌‌  on‌‌their‌‌face‌‌appears‌‌to‌‌be‌‌duly‌‌accomplished.‌  ‌
win.‌  ‌
legitimate‌‌   candidate,‌‌   ‌only‌‌  one‌‌   count‌‌   of‌‌
  vote‌‌ ‌must‌‌ be‌‌ credited‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  3. Appointive‌‌  officials‌‌
  are‌‌
  ‌deemed-resigned‌‌   upon‌‌
  filing‌‌
  of‌‌
  CoC.‌‌ 
legitimate‌‌candidate.‌  ‌ Does‌‌not‌‌apply‌‌to‌‌elective‌‌officials‌‌(Q
‌ uinto‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌) ‌ ‌ D.‌‌Campaign‌  ‌
The‌‌
  legal‌‌
  standing‌‌
  of‌‌ unaffected‌‌ candidates‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌nuisance‌‌ petition‌‌ has‌‌  4. In‌  ‌case‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌material‌‌
  misrepresentation‌‌   in‌‌  the‌‌
  certificate‌‌  "‌Election‌‌   campaign‌" ‌‌or‌‌  ‌“partisan‌‌   political‌‌   activity"‌  ‌refers‌‌ 
already‌‌been‌‌settled‌‌in‌S ‌ antos‌: ‌ ‌ of‌  ‌candidacy,‌‌   the‌‌   Comelec‌‌  is‌‌
  authorized‌‌   to‌‌
  deny‌‌   due‌‌
  course‌‌   to‌‌  to‌  ‌an‌‌
  act‌‌
  designed‌‌
  to‌‌
  promote‌‌   the‌‌
  election‌‌
  or‌‌
  defeat‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌particular‌‌ 
In‌‌
  a ‌‌petition‌‌ for‌‌ disqualification‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌nuisance‌‌ candidate,‌‌ the‌‌ only‌‌  or‌  ‌cancel‌  ‌such‌  ‌certificate‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌petition‌‌   by‌‌
  any‌  candidate‌‌or‌‌candidates‌‌to‌‌a‌‌public‌‌office.‌  ‌
real‌  ‌parties‌  ‌in‌  ‌interest‌  ‌are‌  ‌the‌  ‌alleged‌  ‌nuisance‌  ‌candidate,‌  ‌the‌‌  person.‌  ‌
Premature‌‌campaigning‌  ‌
affected‌  ‌legitimate‌  ‌candidate,‌  ‌whose‌  ‌names‌  ‌are‌  ‌similarly‌‌  Deny‌‌Due‌‌Course/‌‌ 
confusing.‌  ‌ As‌‌to‌  ‌ Disqualification‌  ‌ Elements‌‌of‌‌Premature‌‌Campaigning:‌  ‌
Cancel‌‌CoC‌  ‌
1) a‌  ‌person‌  ‌engages‌‌
  in‌‌
  an‌‌
  election‌‌
  campaign‌‌
  or‌‌
  partisan‌‌
  political‌‌ 
Marquez‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌‌2019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ Reason‌  ‌ Ineligibility‌‌of‌‌candidate‌‌  Material‌‌  activity;‌‌   ‌
due‌‌to‌‌commission‌‌of‌‌  misrepresentation‌‌of‌‌ 
We‌  ‌find‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌COMELEC‌  ‌committed‌  ‌grave‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌of‌  ‌discretion‌  ‌in‌‌  prohibited‌‌acts.‌  ‌ qualifications‌‌intended‌‌  2) the‌  ‌act‌  ‌is‌  ‌designed‌  ‌to‌  ‌promote‌  ‌the‌  ‌election‌  ‌or‌  ‌defeat‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌
declaring‌  ‌Marquez‌  ‌a ‌‌nuisance‌‌   candidate‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  ground‌‌   of‌‌
  ‌failure‌‌
  to‌‌  to‌‌defraud‌  ‌ particular‌‌candidate‌‌‌or‌‌candidates;‌‌   ‌
prove‌‌   financial‌‌   capacity‌‌
  to‌‌  sustain‌‌
  the‌‌
  financial‌‌   rigors‌‌  of‌‌  waging‌‌ a ‌‌ 3) the‌‌act‌‌is‌‌done‌‌outside‌‌‌the‌‌campaign‌‌period.‌  ‌
nationwide‌‌campaign.‌‌   ‌ Attacks‌  ‌ The‌‌Candidate‌  ‌ The‌‌CoC‌  ‌
Penera‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌‌‌Resolution‌  ‌
Maquera‌‌   v.‌‌
  Borra‌, ‌‌already‌‌   declared‌  ‌that‌‌
  the‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  vote‌‌
  and‌‌  to‌‌ be‌‌  Effect‌  ‌ Votes‌‌for‌‌DQed‌‌candidate‌‌  Not‌‌candidate‌‌to‌‌begin‌‌ 
voted‌  ‌for‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌made‌  ‌to‌  ‌depend‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌wealth‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  considered‌S ‌ TRAY‌‌‌votes‌  ‌ with‌  ‌ Reversal‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌previous‌  ‌Decision‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌A ‌‌candidate‌‌
  is‌‌
  liable‌‌
  for‌‌
  an‌‌ 
candidate.‌  ‌The‌  ‌COMELEC's‌  ‌burden‌  ‌is‌  ‌thus‌  ‌to‌  ‌show‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reasonable‌‌  election‌  ‌offense‌  ‌only‌  ‌for‌  ‌acts‌  ‌done‌‌
  during‌‌
  the‌‌
  campaign‌‌   period,‌‌
  not‌‌ 
correlation‌‌‌between‌‌   ‌ Substitution‌  ‌ ALLOWED‌  ‌ NOT‌‌ALLOWED‌  ‌
before.‌  ‌
1. proof‌‌of‌‌a‌‌bona‌‌fide‌‌intention‌‌to‌‌run‌,‌‌on‌‌the‌‌one‌‌hand,‌‌and‌‌   2nd‌‌Placer‌  ‌ Does‌‌not‌‌win.‌‌Succession‌‌  WINS‌  ‌
Prohibited‌‌contributions‌  ‌
2. proof‌  ‌of‌  ‌financial‌  ‌capacity‌  ‌to‌  ‌wage‌  ‌a ‌ ‌nationwide‌‌  or‌‌appointment‌‌applies.‌  ‌
No‌‌
  contribution‌‌ for‌‌ purposes‌‌ of‌‌ partisan‌‌ political‌‌ activity‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ made‌‌ 
campaign‌‌‌on‌‌the‌‌other.‌  ‌ 5. Grounds‌  ‌for‌  ‌substitution‌  ‌are‌  ‌death,‌  ‌withdrawal‌  ‌or‌‌ 
directly‌‌or‌‌indirectly‌‌by‌‌any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following:‌  ‌
disqualification‌‌of‌‌a‌‌candidate.‌  ‌
1. Public‌‌or‌‌private‌‌financial‌‌institutions‌E
‌ XC‌L
‌ oans;‌  ‌
6. A‌‌
  candidate‌‌
  must‌‌
  personally‌‌
  appear‌‌ before‌‌ the‌‌ proper‌‌ Comelec‌‌ 
2. Natural‌  ‌and‌  ‌juridical‌  ‌persons‌  ‌operating‌  ‌a ‌ ‌public‌  ‌utility‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌‌ 
Office‌‌to‌w
‌ ithdraw‌h
‌ is‌‌candidacy.‌  ‌
possession‌‌of‌‌or‌‌exploiting‌‌any‌‌natural‌‌resources‌‌of‌‌the‌‌nation‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 102‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

3. Natural‌  ‌and‌  ‌juridical‌  ‌persons‌  ‌who‌  ‌hold‌  ‌contracts‌  ‌or‌‌ 


5. A‌  ‌content-based‌  ‌regulation,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌bears‌  ‌a ‌ ‌heavy‌‌  d. The‌‌  incidental‌‌ restriction‌‌ on‌‌ freedom‌‌ of‌‌ expression‌‌ 
subcontracts‌‌  to‌‌
  supply‌‌
  the‌‌
  government‌‌  or‌‌
  any‌‌
  of‌‌
  its‌‌ divisions,‌‌ 
presumption‌‌   of‌‌
  invalidity‌‌   and‌‌ is‌‌ measured‌‌ against‌‌ the‌‌ ‌clear‌‌ and‌‌  is‌‌
  no‌‌  greater‌‌
  than‌‌
  is‌‌
  essential‌‌  to‌‌ the‌‌ furtherance‌‌ of‌‌ 
subdivisions‌‌  or‌‌
  instrumentalities,‌‌
  with‌‌
  goods‌‌ or‌‌ services‌‌ or‌‌ to‌‌ 
present‌‌   danger‌‌   rule.‌‌  The‌‌ latter‌‌ will‌‌ pass‌‌ constitutional‌‌ muster‌  that‌‌interest.‌  ‌
perform‌‌construction‌‌or‌‌other‌‌works;‌  ‌
only‌  ‌if‌  ‌justified‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌compelling‌  ‌reason,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌restrictions‌‌  3. The‌  ‌COMELEC's‌  ‌constitutionally‌  ‌delegated‌  ‌powers‌  ‌of‌‌ 
4. Natural‌  ‌and‌  ‌juridical‌  ‌persons‌  ‌who‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  g‌ ranted‌‌  imposed‌‌are‌‌neither‌‌overbroad‌‌nor‌‌vague.‌  ‌ supervision‌  ‌and‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌extend‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌ownership‌‌ 
franchises,‌  ‌incentives,‌  ‌exemptions,‌  ‌allocations‌  ‌or‌  ‌similar‌‌ 
6. There‌‌   is‌‌
  no‌‌
  compelling‌‌   and‌‌ substantial‌‌ state‌‌ interest‌‌ endangered‌‌  per‌‌  se‌‌
  of‌‌
  PUVs‌‌
  and‌‌ transport‌‌ terminals,‌‌ but‌‌ only‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ franchise‌‌ 
privileges‌‌or‌‌concessions‌‌by‌‌the‌‌government;‌  ‌
by‌  ‌the‌  ‌posting‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌tarpaulin‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌justify‌  ‌curtailment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  or‌‌permit‌‌to‌‌operate‌‌the‌‌same.‌  ‌
5. Natural‌‌  and‌‌  juridical‌‌
  persons‌‌
  who,‌‌
  within‌‌ one‌‌ year‌‌ prior‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  right‌‌  of‌‌
  freedom‌‌   of‌‌ expression.‌‌ The‌‌ size‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ tarpaulin‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌  4. The‌  ‌posting‌  ‌of‌  ‌election‌  ‌campaign‌‌  material‌‌   on‌‌
  vehicles‌‌  used‌‌  for‌‌ 
date‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌election,‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌granted‌  ‌loans‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌‌  affect‌‌anyone‌‌else’s‌‌constitutional‌‌rights.‌  ‌ public‌  ‌transport‌‌   or‌‌
  on‌‌
  transport‌‌
  terminals‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌
  only‌‌
  a ‌‌form‌‌  of‌‌ 
accommodations‌‌in‌‌excess‌‌of‌‌P100K‌‌by‌‌the‌‌government;‌  ‌
7. Content-based‌  ‌restraint‌  ‌or‌  ‌censorship‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌restrictions‌‌  political‌  ‌expression,‌  ‌but‌  ‌also‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌ownership‌  ‌- ‌ ‌it‌  ‌has‌‌ 
6. Educational‌  ‌institutions‌  ‌which‌  ‌have‌  ‌received‌  ‌grants‌  ‌of‌‌
  public‌‌  “based‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌  ‌matter‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌utterance‌  ‌or‌  ‌speech.”‌  ‌In‌‌  nothing‌‌to‌‌do‌‌with‌‌the‌‌franchise‌‌or‌‌permit‌‌to‌‌operate‌‌the‌‌PUV.‌  ‌
funds‌‌amounting‌‌to‌‌no‌‌less‌‌than‌‌P100K;‌  ‌ contrast,‌  ‌content-neutral‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌includes‌  ‌controls‌  ‌merely‌‌  5. A‌  ‌government‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌captive-audience‌‌ 
7. Officials‌  ‌or‌‌
  employees‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Civil‌‌
  Service,‌‌
  or‌‌
  members‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  on‌‌
  the‌‌   incidents‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  speech‌‌   such‌‌
  as‌‌  time,‌‌
  place,‌‌  or‌‌
  manner‌‌ of‌‌  doctrine‌‌   may‌‌  not‌‌
  be‌‌
  justified‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ supposed‌‌ "captive‌‌ audience"‌‌ 
AFP;‌‌and‌  ‌ the‌  ‌speech.‌‌   ‌The‌‌
  regulation‌‌   involved‌‌   at‌‌
  bar‌‌
  is‌‌
  content-based.‌‌  may‌‌   avoid‌‌
  exposure‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  otherwise‌‌   intrusive‌‌
  speech.‌‌ Here,‌‌ the‌‌ 
The‌‌   tarpaulin‌‌   content‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌  easily‌‌ divorced‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ size‌‌ of‌‌  commuters‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌forced‌  ‌or‌  ‌compelled‌  ‌to‌  ‌read‌  ‌the‌  ‌election‌‌ 
8. Foreigners‌‌and‌‌foreign‌‌corporations.‌  ‌
its‌‌medium.‌  ‌ campaign‌‌materials‌‌posted‌‌on‌‌PUVs‌‌and‌‌transport‌‌terminals.‌‌   ‌
Lawful‌‌and‌‌prohibited‌‌election‌‌propaganda‌  ‌
6. In‌‌
  sum,‌‌   Section‌‌
  7(g)‌‌ items‌‌ (5)‌‌ and‌‌ (6),‌‌ in‌‌ relation‌‌ to‌‌ Section‌‌ 7(f),‌‌ 
Adiong‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌  ‌ 1-UTAK‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 015‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
of‌‌ Resolution‌‌ No.‌‌ 9615‌‌ ‌violate‌‌ the‌‌ free‌‌ speech‌‌ clause;‌‌ they‌‌ are‌‌ 
The‌  ‌COMELEC's‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌on‌  ‌posting‌  ‌of‌  ‌decals‌  ‌and‌  ‌stickers‌  ‌on‌‌  1. Section‌  ‌7(g)‌  ‌items‌  ‌(5)‌  ‌and‌  ‌(6),‌  ‌in‌  ‌relation‌  ‌to‌  ‌Section‌  ‌7(f),‌  ‌of‌‌  content-neutral‌  ‌regulations‌, ‌ ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌ 
"mobile"‌‌  places‌‌
  whether‌‌   public‌‌
  or‌‌
  private‌‌   except‌‌   in‌‌ designated‌‌ areas‌‌  Resolution‌‌   No.‌‌  9615‌‌  unduly‌‌   infringe‌‌   on‌‌ the‌‌ fundamental‌‌ right‌‌ of‌‌  constitutional‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌COMELEC‌  ‌to‌  ‌issue‌  ‌and‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌‌ 
provided‌‌  for‌‌
  by‌‌ the‌‌ COMELEC‌‌ itself‌‌ is‌‌ null‌‌ and‌‌ void‌‌ on‌‌ constitutional‌‌  the‌‌
  people‌‌  to‌‌
  freedom‌‌   of‌‌
  speech.‌‌ Central‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ prohibition‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌  necessary‌  ‌to‌  ‌further‌  ‌the‌‌   objective‌‌
  of‌‌  ensuring‌‌   equal‌‌  time,‌‌
  space‌‌ 
grounds.‌  ‌ freedom‌  ‌of‌  ‌individuals,‌  ‌i.e‌.,‌  ‌the‌  ‌owners‌  ‌of‌  ‌PUVs‌  ‌and‌  ‌private‌‌  and‌  ‌opportunity‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌   candidates.‌‌   They‌‌   are‌‌
  not‌‌
  only‌‌   repugnant‌‌ 
transport‌  ‌terminals,‌  ‌to‌  ‌express‌  ‌their‌  ‌preference,‌  ‌through‌  ‌the‌‌  to‌  ‌the‌  ‌free‌  ‌speech‌  ‌clause,‌  ‌but‌  ‌are‌  ‌also‌  ‌violative‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌equal‌‌ 
D
‌ iocese‌‌of‌‌Bacolod‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌2
‌ 015‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ posting‌  ‌of‌  ‌election‌  ‌campaign‌  ‌material‌  ‌in‌  ‌their‌  ‌property,‌  ‌and‌‌  protection‌  ‌clause‌, ‌ ‌as‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌substantial‌  ‌distinction‌ 
convince‌‌others‌‌to‌‌agree‌‌with‌‌them.‌  ‌ between‌‌   owners‌‌  of‌‌
  PUVs‌‌   and‌‌
  transport‌‌   terminals‌‌   and‌‌  owners‌‌  of‌‌ 
1. This‌  ‌case‌  ‌concerns‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌petitioners,‌  ‌who‌  ‌are‌‌  private‌‌vehicles‌‌and‌‌other‌‌properties.‌  ‌
non-candidates,‌‌   to‌‌
  post‌‌
  the‌‌
  tarpaulin‌‌
  in‌‌ their‌‌ private‌‌ property,‌‌ as‌‌  2. A‌‌ ‌content-neutral‌‌ regulation‌‌ ‌is‌‌ constitutionally‌‌ permissible‌, ‌‌
an‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌their‌‌right‌‌of‌‌free‌‌expression.‌‌   ‌ even‌  ‌if‌  ‌it‌  ‌restricts‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌free‌  ‌speech,‌  ‌provided‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌ 
GMA‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌‌‌2014‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
following‌r‌ equisites‌c‌ oncur:‌  ‌
2. COMELEC‌‌   does‌‌
  not‌‌
  have‌‌   the‌‌  authority‌‌   to‌‌
  regulate‌‌
  the‌‌
  enjoyment‌‌ 
a. The‌  ‌government‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌is‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌  The‌  ‌assailed‌  ‌rule‌  ‌on‌  ‌“‌aggregate-based‌” ‌ ‌airtime‌  ‌limits‌  ‌is‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌preferred‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌of‌  ‌expression‌  ‌exercised‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌‌
constitutional‌‌power‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Government;‌‌   ‌ unreasonable‌  ‌and‌  ‌arbitrary‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌‌
  unduly‌‌
  restricts‌‌
  and‌‌
  constrains‌‌  the‌‌ 
non-candidate.‌  ‌
ability‌  ‌of‌  ‌candidates‌  ‌and‌  ‌political‌  ‌parties‌  ‌to‌  ‌reach‌  ‌out‌  ‌and‌‌ 
3. Election‌‌   propaganda‌‌  refers‌‌
  to‌‌
  matters‌‌
  done‌‌
  by‌‌
  or‌‌
  on‌‌
  behalf‌‌
  of‌‌  b. It‌  ‌furthers‌  ‌an‌  ‌important‌  ‌or‌  ‌substantial‌  ‌governmental‌‌ 
communicate‌‌with‌‌the‌‌people.‌‌   ‌
and‌‌in‌‌coordination‌‌with‌‌candidates‌‌and‌‌political‌‌parties.‌  ‌ interest;‌  ‌
4. Every‌  ‌citizen’s‌  ‌expression‌  ‌with‌‌
  political‌‌
  consequences‌‌
  enjoys‌‌
  a ‌‌ c. The‌  ‌governmental‌  ‌interest‌  ‌is‌  ‌unrelated‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  NPC‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌  ‌
high‌‌degree‌‌of‌‌protection.‌  ‌ suppression‌‌of‌‌free‌‌expression;‌‌and‌‌   ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 103‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Section‌‌ 11‌‌ (b)‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ purport‌‌ in‌‌ any‌‌ way‌‌ to‌‌ restrict‌‌ the‌‌ reporting‌‌ by‌‌  R.A.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌9006‌  ‌explicitly‌  ‌directs‌  ‌that‌  ‌broadcast‌  ‌advertisements‌‌  c. Members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commission-accredited‌  ‌citizen‌  ‌arms‌‌ 
newspapers‌  ‌or‌  ‌radio‌  ‌or‌  ‌television‌‌   stations‌‌
  of‌‌
  news‌‌
  or‌‌
  news-worthy‌‌  donated‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌ candidate‌‌ shall‌‌ not‌‌ be‌‌ broadcasted‌‌ without‌‌ the‌‌ written‌‌  or‌  ‌other‌  ‌civil‌  ‌society‌  ‌organizations‌  ‌and‌  ‌NGOs‌  ‌duly‌‌ 
events‌  ‌relating‌  ‌to‌  ‌candidates,‌  ‌their‌  ‌qualifications,‌  ‌political‌  ‌parties‌‌  acceptance‌‌of‌‌the‌‌candidate.‌  ‌ accredited‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Commission;‌‌and‌  ‌
and‌  ‌programs‌  ‌of‌  ‌government.‌  ‌Moreover,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌11‌  ‌(b)‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌  The‌‌ phrase‌‌ “those‌‌ incurred‌‌ or‌‌ caused‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ incurred‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ candidate”‌‌  d. Any‌  ‌registered‌  ‌voter‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌city‌  ‌or‌  ‌municipality‌  ‌of‌‌ 
reach‌  ‌commentaries‌  ‌and‌  ‌expressions‌  ‌of‌  ‌belief‌  ‌or‌  ‌opinion‌  ‌by‌‌  is‌  ‌sufficiently‌  ‌adequate‌  ‌to‌  ‌cover‌  ‌those‌  ‌expenses‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌‌  known‌‌ integrity‌‌ and‌‌ competence‌‌ who‌‌ is‌‌ ‌not‌‌ connected‌‌ 
reporters‌‌   or‌‌
  broadcasters‌‌   or‌‌
  editors‌‌
  or‌‌
  commentators‌‌   or‌‌ columnists‌‌  contributed‌  ‌or‌  ‌donated‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌candidate’s‌  ‌behalf.‌  ‌By‌  ‌virtue‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  with‌‌any‌‌candidate‌‌or‌‌political‌‌party‌. ‌ ‌
in‌  ‌respect‌  ‌of‌  ‌candidates,‌  ‌their‌  ‌qualifications,‌  ‌and‌  ‌programs‌  ‌and‌  ‌so‌‌  legal‌  ‌requirement‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contribution‌  ‌or‌  ‌donation‌  ‌should‌  ‌bear‌  ‌the‌‌  Powers‌ 
forth,‌‌  so‌‌
  long‌‌   at‌‌ least‌‌ as‌‌ such‌‌ comments,‌‌ opinions‌‌ and‌‌ beliefs‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌  written‌‌   conformity‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  candidate,‌‌ a ‌‌contributor/‌‌ supporter/‌‌ donor‌‌ 
in‌‌fact‌‌advertisements‌‌for‌‌particular‌‌candidates‌‌covertly‌‌paid‌‌for.‌  ‌ Section‌‌
  168.‌‌  ‌Powers‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌ board‌‌ of‌‌ election‌‌ inspectors.‌‌ ‌— ‌‌The‌‌ 
certainly‌  ‌qualifies‌  ‌as‌  ‌“any‌  ‌person‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌by‌  ‌such‌  ‌candidate‌  ‌or‌‌ 
treasurer.”‌U ‌ bi‌‌lex‌‌non‌‌distinguit,‌‌nec‌‌nos‌‌distinguere‌‌debemus.‌  ‌ board‌‌shall‌‌have‌‌the‌‌following‌‌powers‌‌and‌‌functions:‌  ‌
Limitations‌‌on‌‌expenses‌  ‌
1. Conduct‌  ‌the‌  ‌voting‌  ‌and‌  ‌counting‌  ‌of‌  ‌votes‌  ‌in‌  ‌their‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌13.‌  ‌RA‌  ‌7166.‌  ‌Authorized‌  ‌Expenses‌  ‌of‌  ‌Candidates‌  ‌and‌‌  Pilar‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌  ‌ respective‌‌polling‌‌places;‌  ‌
Political‌  ‌Parties.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌agreement‌  ‌amount‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌candidate‌  ‌or‌‌ 
2. Act‌‌
  as‌‌
  deputies‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Commission‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  supervision‌‌   and‌‌ 
registered‌‌  political‌‌   party‌‌
  may‌‌
  spend‌‌
  for‌‌
  election‌‌ campaign‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌  Section‌  ‌14‌  ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌7166‌  ‌states‌  ‌that‌  ‌"‌every‌  ‌candidate‌" ‌ ‌has‌  ‌the‌‌ 
obligation‌‌to‌‌file‌‌his‌‌statement‌‌of‌‌contributions‌‌and‌‌expenditures.‌  ‌ control‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌election‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌polling‌‌  places‌‌  wherein‌‌   they‌‌ 
as‌‌follows:‌  ‌
are‌  ‌assigned,‌  ‌to‌  ‌assure‌  ‌the‌  ‌holding‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌in‌‌
  a ‌‌free,‌‌ 
a) For‌‌
  candidates.‌‌   — ‌‌P10.00‌‌   for‌‌  President‌‌   and‌‌
  VP;‌‌
  and‌‌
  for‌‌ other‌‌  The‌  ‌term‌  ‌"every‌  ‌candidate"‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌to‌  ‌refer‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌
orderly‌‌and‌‌honest‌‌manner;‌‌and‌  ‌
candidates‌  ‌P3.00‌  ‌for‌  ‌every‌  ‌voter‌  ‌currently‌  ‌registered‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  candidate‌‌  who‌‌   pursued‌‌  his‌‌
  campaign,‌‌   but‌‌
  also‌‌
  to‌‌
  one‌‌ who‌‌ withdrew‌‌ 
3. Perform‌‌such‌‌other‌‌functions.‌  ‌
constituency‌  ‌where‌  ‌he‌  ‌filed‌  ‌his‌  ‌certificate‌  ‌of‌  ‌candidacy.‌  ‌A ‌‌ his‌‌candidacy.‌  ‌
candidate‌‌   without‌‌ any‌‌ political‌‌ party‌‌ and‌‌ without‌‌ support‌‌ from‌  Pangandaman‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌  ‌
any‌  ‌political‌  ‌party‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌to‌  ‌spend‌  ‌P5.00‌  ‌for‌  ‌every‌‌  E.‌‌Board‌‌of‌‌Election‌‌Inspectors‌‌and‌‌Board‌‌of‌‌ 
such‌‌voter;‌‌and‌  ‌ Canvassers‌  ‌ The‌‌  insistence‌‌   of‌‌
  petitioner‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌ COMELEC‌‌ violated‌‌ Sections‌‌ 166,‌‌ 
170,‌‌   175‌‌   and‌‌ 176‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ OEC‌‌ when‌‌ it‌‌ ordered‌‌ elements‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ AFP‌‌ and‌‌ 
b) For‌  ‌political‌  ‌parties.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌P5.00‌  ‌for‌  ‌every‌  ‌voter‌  ‌currently‌‌  Composition‌  ‌
the‌‌
  PNP‌‌   who‌‌  are‌‌  not‌‌ assigned‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ affected‌‌ areas‌‌ as‌‌ members‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
registered‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌constituency‌  ‌or‌  ‌constituencies‌  ‌where‌  ‌it‌  ‌has‌‌  1. No‌‌
  person‌‌   shall‌‌  serve‌‌
  as‌‌ chairman‌‌ or‌‌ member‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ ‌Electoral‌‌  BEI‌  ‌is‌  ‌likewise‌  ‌unconvincing‌  ‌vis-à-vis‌  ‌the‌‌   underlying‌‌   reason‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
official‌‌candidates.‌  ‌ Board‌‌‌if‌‌he‌‌is‌‌related‌‌within‌‌the‌‌‌fourth‌‌civil‌‌degree‌‌‌to‌‌   ‌ Comelec‌  ‌to‌  ‌have‌  ‌an‌  ‌effective‌  ‌and‌  ‌impartial‌  ‌military‌  ‌presence‌  ‌"to‌‌ 
Statement‌‌of‌‌contributions‌‌and‌‌expenses‌  ‌ a. any‌‌member‌‌of‌‌the‌‌board‌‌of‌‌election‌‌inspectors‌‌or‌‌   ‌ avoid‌‌the‌‌risk‌‌of‌‌another‌‌failure‌‌of‌‌elections."‌  ‌
Section‌‌   14.‌‌ ‌Statement‌‌ of‌‌ Contributions‌‌ and‌‌ Expenditures:‌‌ Effect‌‌  b. to‌‌
  any‌‌
  candidate‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  voted‌‌
  for‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ polling‌‌ place‌‌ or‌‌ 
of‌  ‌Failure‌  ‌to‌  ‌File‌‌  Statement‌. ‌‌— ‌‌Every‌‌   candidate‌‌   and‌‌  treasurer‌‌   of‌‌  Mastura‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌  ‌
his‌‌spouse.‌  ‌
the‌‌   political‌‌   party‌‌
  shall,‌‌
  within‌‌
  thirty‌‌   (30)‌‌  days‌‌   after‌‌ the‌‌ day‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  COMELEC‌  ‌can‌  ‌suspend‌  ‌the‌  ‌canvass‌  ‌of‌  ‌votes‌  ‌pending‌  ‌its‌  ‌inquiry‌‌ 
2. Those‌  ‌convicted‌  ‌with‌  ‌finality‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌offense‌‌ 
election,‌  ‌file‌  ‌in‌  ‌duplicate‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌offices‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌the‌‌  whether‌  ‌there‌  ‌exists‌  ‌a ‌ ‌discrepancy‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌various‌  ‌copies‌  ‌of‌‌ 
punishable‌  ‌by‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌6 ‌ ‌months‌  ‌imprisonment‌  ‌or‌  ‌have‌  ‌a ‌‌
full,‌  ‌true‌  ‌and‌  ‌itemized‌  ‌statement‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌contributions‌  ‌and‌‌  election‌  ‌returns‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌disputed‌  ‌voting‌  ‌centers.‌  ‌Corollarily,‌  ‌once‌‌ 
pending‌‌electoral‌‌offense‌c‌ ase‌‌are‌‌DQed.‌  ‌
expenditures‌‌in‌‌connection‌‌with‌‌the‌‌election.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌election‌‌
  returns‌‌  were‌‌   found‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  falsified‌‌
  or‌‌  tampered‌‌
  with,‌‌   the‌‌ 
3. Should‌  ‌there‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌lack‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌  ‌school‌  ‌teachers‌  ‌willing,‌‌ 
No‌‌   person‌‌   elected‌‌   to‌‌
  any‌‌  public‌‌   offices‌‌  shall‌‌
  enter‌‌  upon‌‌
  the‌‌ duties‌‌  COMELEC‌  ‌can‌  ‌annul‌  ‌the‌  ‌illegal‌  ‌canvass‌  ‌and‌  ‌order‌  ‌the‌  ‌Board‌  ‌of‌‌ 
available‌  ‌or‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌to‌  ‌serve,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌may‌  ‌instead‌‌ 
of‌  ‌his‌  ‌office‌  ‌until‌  ‌he‌  ‌has‌  ‌filed‌  ‌the‌  ‌statement‌  ‌of‌  ‌contributions‌‌   and‌‌  Canvassers‌‌ to‌‌ reconvene‌‌ and‌‌ proclaim‌‌ the‌‌ winners‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ basis‌‌ of‌‌ the‌ 
appoint‌‌the‌‌following‌‌persons‌‌in‌‌this‌‌order‌‌of‌‌preference:‌  ‌
expenditures‌‌herein‌‌required.‌  ‌ genuine‌  ‌returns‌  ‌or,‌  ‌if‌  ‌it‌  ‌should‌  ‌refuse,‌  ‌replace‌  ‌the‌  ‌members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
a. Private‌‌school‌‌teachers;‌  ‌ board‌‌or‌‌proclaim‌‌the‌‌winners‌‌itself.‌  ‌
Ejercito‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌‌2
‌ 014‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ b. National‌‌government‌‌employees;‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 104‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

The‌  ‌function‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌canvassing‌  ‌board‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌canvass‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  returns‌‌   is‌‌  The‌  ‌COMELEC‌  ‌En‌  ‌Banc‌  ‌properly‌  ‌disqualified‌  ‌Barbara‌  ‌Ruby‌  ‌from‌‌  questioning‌  ‌his‌  ‌eligibility,‌  ‌we‌  ‌held‌  ‌in‌  ‌Velasco‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Comelec‌  ‌that‌‌
  the‌‌ 
purely‌  ‌ministerial‌  ‌in‌  ‌nature.‌  ‌Equally‌  ‌ministerial,‌  ‌therefore,‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌  assuming‌  ‌the‌‌   position‌‌
  of‌‌
  Mayor‌‌  of‌‌
  Lucena‌‌   City.‌‌
  To‌‌
  begin‌‌  with,‌‌
  there‌‌  COMELEC's‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌to‌  ‌deny‌  ‌due‌  ‌course‌  ‌to‌  ‌and‌  ‌cancel‌  ‌a ‌ ‌COC‌‌ 
function‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commelec,‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌‌   its‌‌
  supervisory‌‌   power‌‌  was‌  ‌no‌  ‌valid‌  ‌candidate‌  ‌for‌  ‌her‌  ‌to‌  ‌substitute‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌  ‌Ramon’s‌‌  continues.‌  ‌
over‌  ‌said‌  ‌Board.‌  ‌So‌  ‌long‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌election‌  ‌returns‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌‌  ineligibility.‌  ‌Also,‌  ‌Ramon‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌voluntarily‌  ‌withdraw‌  ‌his‌  ‌CoC‌‌  Moreover,‌  ‌we‌  ‌held‌  ‌in‌‌   ‌Fermin‌‌   v.‌‌
  Comelec‌‌   ‌that‌‌
  the‌‌
  Court‌‌
  has‌‌   already‌‌ 
accomplished‌  ‌in‌  ‌due‌  ‌form,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Board,‌  ‌and‌‌   on‌‌   appeal‌‌  therefrom,‌‌   the‌‌  before‌‌the‌‌elections‌‌in‌‌accordance‌‌with‌‌Section‌‌73‌‌of‌‌the‌‌OEC.‌  ‌ likened‌‌   a ‌‌proceeding‌‌   under‌‌   Section‌‌   78‌‌
  to‌‌   a ‌‌quo‌‌ warranto‌‌ ‌proceeding‌‌ 
Comelec‌‌must‌‌include‌‌said‌‌returns‌‌in‌‌the‌‌canvass.‌‌   ‌ A‌  ‌permanent‌  ‌vacancy‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌office‌  ‌of‌  ‌Mayor‌  ‌of‌  ‌Lucena‌  ‌City‌  ‌thus‌‌  under‌‌   Section‌‌   253‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌  OEC‌‌ since‌‌ they‌‌ both‌‌ deal‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ eligibility‌‌ 
resulted,‌  ‌and‌  ‌such‌  ‌vacancy‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌filled‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌‌
  the‌‌
  law‌‌  on‌‌  or‌‌
  qualification‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌candidate,‌‌   with‌‌ the‌‌ distinction‌‌ mainly‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ fact‌‌ 
F.‌‌Remedies‌  ‌ succession‌‌defined‌‌in‌‌Section‌‌44‌‌of‌‌the‌‌LGC.‌  ‌ that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌"Section‌  ‌78"‌  ‌petition‌  ‌is‌  ‌filed‌  ‌before‌  ‌proclamation,‌  ‌while‌  ‌a ‌‌
Petition‌‌to‌‌deny‌‌due‌‌course‌‌to‌‌or‌‌cancel‌‌certificate‌‌of‌‌  petition‌‌   for‌‌
  ‌quo‌‌  warranto‌‌   is‌‌
  filed‌‌  ‌after‌‌   ‌proclamation‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ winning‌‌ 
Maquiling‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌‌‌2013‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ candidate.‌  ‌
candidacy‌  ‌
We‌  ‌held‌  ‌in‌  ‌Francisco‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Comelec‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌COMELEC‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌‌ 
⭐‌Aratea‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌‌2012‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ Arnado‌‌  was‌‌
  a ‌‌‌dual‌‌
  citizen‌‌ disqualified‌‌ to‌‌ run‌‌ for‌‌ public‌‌ office‌‌ based‌‌ 
on‌‌Section‌‌40(d)‌‌of‌‌the‌‌LGC.‌  ‌ proper‌  ‌body‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌  ‌the‌‌   pronouncement‌‌   against‌‌   which‌‌  the‌‌
  truth‌‌
  or‌‌ 
Antipolo,‌  ‌the‌  ‌alleged‌  ‌"second‌  ‌placer,"‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌proclaimed‌  ‌Mayor‌‌  falsity‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌material‌‌  representation‌‌   in‌‌
  a ‌‌COC‌‌   can‌‌
  be‌‌  measured.‌‌ As‌‌ we‌‌ 
With‌‌   Arnado‌‌  being‌‌
  barred‌‌
  from‌‌   even‌‌   becoming‌‌   a ‌‌candidate,‌‌
  his‌‌
  COC‌‌ 
because‌  ‌Lonzanida's‌  ‌certificate‌  ‌of‌  ‌candidacy‌  ‌was‌  ‌void‌  ‌ab‌  ‌initio.‌  ‌In‌‌  held‌  ‌in‌  ‌Aratea‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌three-term‌  ‌limit‌  ‌rule‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌‌ 
short,‌‌
  Lonzanida‌‌   was‌‌
  never‌‌ a ‌‌candidate‌‌ at‌‌ all.‌‌ All‌‌ votes‌‌ for‌‌ Lonzanida‌‌  is‌  ‌thus‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌void‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌beginning.‌  ‌Arnado‌  ‌being‌  ‌a ‌‌ ineligibility‌‌   affecting‌‌ the‌‌ qualification‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌candidate‌‌ to‌‌ elective‌‌ office‌‌ 
were‌  ‌stray‌  ‌votes.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌Antipolo,‌  ‌the‌  ‌only‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌candidate,‌‌  non-candidate,‌  ‌the‌  ‌votes‌  ‌cast‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌favor‌  ‌should‌  ‌not‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌‌  and‌‌  the‌‌ misrepresentation‌‌ of‌‌ such‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌‌ground‌‌ to‌‌ grant‌‌ the‌‌ petition‌‌ 
actually‌  ‌garnered‌  ‌the‌  ‌highest‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌  ‌votes‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌position‌  ‌of‌‌  counted.‌  ‌This‌  ‌leaves‌  ‌Maquiling‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌candidate‌‌   who‌‌  to‌‌deny‌‌due‌‌course‌‌to‌‌or‌‌cancel‌‌a‌‌COC‌.  ‌‌ ‌
Mayor.‌  ‌ obtained‌  ‌the‌  ‌highest‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌  ‌votes.‌  ‌Therefore,‌  ‌the‌  ‌rule‌  ‌on‌‌ 
The‌  ‌rule‌  ‌on‌  ‌succession‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌44‌  ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌7160‌  ‌would‌  ‌not‌‌ 
succession‌‌under‌‌the‌‌LGC‌‌will‌‌not‌‌apply.‌  ‌
All‌  ‌the‌  ‌offenses‌  ‌mentioned‌  ‌in‌  ‌Section‌  ‌68‌  ‌refer‌  ‌to‌  ‌election‌  ‌offenses‌‌  apply‌  ‌if‌‌
  the‌‌
  permanent‌‌  vacancy‌‌   was‌‌
  caused‌‌   by‌‌  one‌‌  whose‌‌  COC‌‌
  was‌‌ 
under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Omnibus‌  ‌Election‌  ‌Code,‌  ‌not‌  ‌to‌  ‌violations‌  ‌of‌  ‌other‌  ‌penal‌‌  void‌‌ab‌‌initio.‌  ‌
Chua‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌‌‌2016‌‌Leonen‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
laws.‌  ‌There‌  ‌is‌  ‌absolutely‌  ‌nothing‌  ‌in‌‌   the‌‌
  language‌‌   of‌‌
  Section‌‌   68‌‌
  that‌‌ 
would‌  ‌justify‌  ‌including‌  ‌violation‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌   three-term‌‌   limit‌‌
  rule‌, ‌‌or‌‌  The‌‌   rule‌‌ on‌‌ succession‌‌ under‌‌ Section‌‌ 45,‌‌ however,‌‌ would‌‌ not‌‌ apply‌‌ if‌‌  Petition‌‌for‌‌disqualification‌ 
conviction‌  ‌by‌  ‌final‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌of‌‌   falsification‌‌  under‌‌   the‌‌  the‌  ‌permanent‌  ‌vacancy‌  ‌was‌  ‌caused‌  ‌by‌‌   one‌‌
  whose‌‌  COC‌‌  was‌‌
  void‌‌
  ab‌‌  ⭐‌Francisco‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
RPC,‌  ‌as‌  ‌one‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌grounds‌  ‌or‌  ‌offenses‌  ‌covered‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌68.‌‌  initio.‌  ‌Specifically‌  ‌with‌  ‌respect‌‌
  to‌‌
  dual‌‌
  citizens,‌‌
  their‌‌
  COCs‌‌
  are‌‌
  void‌‌  Whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌COMELEC‌  ‌acted‌‌   in‌‌
  grave‌‌
  abuse‌‌   of‌‌  discretion‌‌   in‌‌ 
Clearly,‌‌   the‌‌
  violation‌‌   by‌‌ Lonzanida‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ three-term‌‌ limit‌‌ rule,‌‌ or‌‌ his‌‌  ab‌‌initio.‌  ‌ ruling‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌petition‌  ‌for‌  ‌disqualification‌  ‌under‌  ‌Sec.‌  ‌68‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  OEC‌‌ 
conviction‌  ‌by‌  ‌final‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌of‌‌   falsification‌‌  under‌‌   the‌‌  In‌  ‌cases‌  ‌of‌  ‌vacancies‌  ‌caused‌‌   by‌‌
  those‌‌  with‌‌
  void‌‌
  ab‌‌
  initio‌‌  COCs,‌‌
  the‌‌  cannot‌  ‌prosper‌  ‌without‌  ‌a ‌ ‌prior‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌finding‌  ‌the‌  ‌respondent‌‌ 
RPC,‌‌does‌‌not‌‌constitute‌‌a‌‌ground‌‌for‌‌a‌‌petition‌‌under‌‌Section‌‌68.‌  ‌ person‌‌   legally‌‌   entitled‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  vacant‌‌  position‌‌  would‌‌
  be‌‌ the‌‌ candidate‌‌  guilty‌‌of‌‌an‌‌election‌‌offense.‌  ‌
Even‌  ‌without‌  ‌a ‌ ‌petition‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌78‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Omnibus‌  ‌Election‌‌  who‌‌garnered‌‌the‌n ‌ ext‌‌highest‌‌number‌‌of‌‌votes‌a‌ mong‌‌eligibles.‌  ‌ YES‌. ‌ ‌Petitioner‌  ‌is‌  ‌correct‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌contention‌‌
  that‌‌
  a ‌‌prior‌‌
  judgment‌‌   is‌‌ 
Code,‌  ‌the‌  ‌COMELEC‌  ‌is‌  ‌under‌‌   a ‌‌legal‌‌
  duty‌‌   to‌‌
  cancel‌‌
  the‌‌
  certificate‌‌
  of‌‌  not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌precondition‌  ‌to‌  ‌filing‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Petition‌  ‌for‌  ‌Disqualification.‌‌ 
candidacy‌‌ of‌‌ anyone‌‌ suffering‌‌ from‌‌ perpetual‌‌ special‌‌ disqualification‌‌  Halili‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌‌‌2019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ Nevertheless,‌‌ the‌‌ petition‌‌ must‌‌ necessarily‌‌ fail‌‌ for‌‌ lack‌‌ of‌‌ substantial‌‌ 
to‌  ‌run‌  ‌for‌  ‌public‌  ‌office‌  ‌by‌  ‌virtue‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌final‌‌  judgment‌‌   of‌‌
  conviction.‌‌  evidence‌  ‌to‌  ‌establish‌‌   that‌‌
  private‌‌   respondent‌‌  committed‌‌   an‌‌
  election‌‌ 
The‌‌   final‌‌
  judgment‌‌   of‌‌ conviction‌‌ is‌‌ judicial‌‌ notice‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ COMELEC‌‌ of‌‌  It‌‌ has‌‌ already‌‌ been‌‌ ruled‌‌ in‌‌ ‌Latasa‌‌ v.‌‌ Comelec‌, ‌‌that‌‌ the‌‌ conversion‌‌ of‌‌ 
a‌  ‌municipality‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌city‌  ‌does‌‌
  not‌‌
  constitute‌‌
  an‌‌
  interruption‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  offense.‌  ‌
the‌‌disqualification‌‌of‌‌the‌‌convict‌‌from‌‌running‌‌for‌‌public‌‌office.‌  ‌
incumbent‌‌official's‌‌continuity‌‌of‌‌service.‌  ‌ Contrary‌  ‌to‌  ‌Poe‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌categorically‌  ‌rules‌  ‌herein‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Contrary‌‌  to‌‌ Morales'‌‌ argument‌‌ that‌‌ since‌‌ he‌‌ had‌‌ been‌‌ proclaimed‌‌ and‌‌  COMELEC‌‌   can‌‌
  be‌‌ the‌  ‌proper‌  ‌body‌‌ to‌‌ make‌‌ the‌‌ pronouncement‌ 
Talaga‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌‌‌2012‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
had‌‌
  assumed‌‌   office‌‌
  as‌‌
  mayor‌‌ in‌‌ 2016,‌‌ disputes‌‌ as‌‌ to‌‌ his‌‌ COC‌‌ became‌‌  against‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌truth‌‌   or‌‌
  falsity‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌material‌‌
  representation‌‌ 
moot‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌proper‌  ‌remedy‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌file‌  ‌a ‌ ‌quo‌  ‌warranto‌  ‌proceeding‌  in‌‌a‌‌COC‌‌can‌‌be‌‌measured‌. ‌ ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 105‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

b) Election‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌polling‌  ‌place‌  ‌had‌  ‌been‌  ‌suspended‌‌ 


A‌‌predicate‌‌judgment‌‌is‌‌not‌‌required‌‌in‌‌  Soliva‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌  ‌
before‌‌close‌‌of‌‌voting;‌‌and‌  ‌
Petitions‌‌for‌‌Disqualification‌  ‌
We‌‌  agree‌‌  with‌‌
  the‌‌ findings‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ COMELEC‌‌ that‌‌ there‌‌ was‌‌ a ‌‌failure‌‌ of‌‌ 
c) After‌  ‌voting‌  ‌and‌  ‌during‌‌
  preparation‌‌
  and‌‌
  transmission‌‌ 
The‌  ‌quantum‌  ‌of‌  ‌proof‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌in‌  ‌election‌  ‌cases‌  ‌is,‌  ‌as‌  ‌in‌  ‌all‌‌  election‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  municipality‌‌   of‌‌  RTR,‌‌
  as‌‌
  the‌‌
  counting‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌ votes‌‌ and‌‌ 
of‌‌election‌‌returns‌‌or‌‌in‌‌their‌‌custody‌‌or‌‌canvass;‌  ‌
administrative‌  ‌cases,‌  ‌substantial‌  ‌evidence‌. ‌ ‌To‌  ‌impose‌  ‌prior‌‌  the‌‌
  canvassing‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  election‌‌   returns‌‌  was‌‌  clearly‌‌
  attended‌‌   by‌‌
  fraud,‌‌ 
conviction‌‌   of‌‌
  an‌‌
  election‌‌ offense‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌condition‌‌ sine‌‌ qua‌‌ non‌‌ before‌‌ a ‌‌ The‌‌three‌‌instances‌‌were‌‌due‌‌to:‌  ‌ intimidation,‌‌terrorism‌‌and‌‌harassment.‌  ‌
Petition‌‌
  for‌‌
  Disqualification‌‌   can‌‌ be‌‌ launched‌‌ would‌‌ be‌‌ tantamount‌‌ to‌‌  i) Force‌‌Majeure;‌  ‌ It‌  ‌is‌  ‌likewise‌  ‌not‌  ‌denied‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌counting‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
requiring‌  ‌proof‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌doubt,‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌significantly‌‌ 
ii) Violence;‌  ‌ polling‌  ‌places‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌multi-purpose‌  ‌gymnasium‌  ‌was‌  ‌without‌  ‌the‌‌ 
beyond‌‌what‌‌our‌‌laws‌‌require.‌  ‌
authority‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  COMELEC‌‌   as‌‌
  required‌‌ by‌‌ law.‌  ‌The‌‌ irregularity‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
iii) Terrorism;‌  ‌
transfer‌  ‌of‌  ‌venue‌  ‌was‌  ‌highlighted‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌   fact‌‌   that‌‌   the‌‌
  same‌‌
  was‌‌
  not‌‌ 
Diambrang‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌‌‌2016‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ iv) Fraud;‌  ‌ recorded‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Board‌‌of‌‌Election‌‌Inspectors‌‌(BEI).‌‌   ‌
Patad's‌‌
  disqualification‌‌ arose‌‌ from‌‌ his‌‌ being‌‌ a ‌‌fugitive‌‌ from‌‌ justice.‌‌ It‌‌  v) Other‌‌analogous‌‌causes.‌  ‌
does‌‌
  not‌‌
  matter‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌ disqualification‌‌ case‌‌ against‌‌ him‌‌ was‌‌ finally‌‌  5. The‌‌requisites‌‌to‌‌declare‌‌failure‌‌of‌‌elections:‌  ‌ Batabor‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌  ‌
decided‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌COMELEC‌  ‌En‌  ‌Banc‌  ‌only‌  ‌on‌  ‌14‌  ‌November‌  ‌2011.‌‌ 
a) No‌‌
  voting‌‌  took‌‌
  place‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  polling‌‌
  places‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  date‌  ‌ The‌  ‌question‌  ‌of‌  ‌whether‌  ‌there‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌terrorism‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌‌ 
Patad's‌  ‌certificate‌  ‌of‌  ‌candidacy‌  ‌was‌  ‌void‌  ‌ab‌  ‌initio.‌  ‌As‌  ‌such,‌‌ 
fixed‌‌by‌‌law,‌‌or‌‌there‌‌was‌‌failure‌‌to‌‌elect;‌‌AND‌  ‌ irregularities‌  ‌is‌  ‌better‌  ‌ventilated‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌election‌  ‌contest.‌  ‌These‌‌ 
Diambrang,‌  ‌being‌  ‌the‌  ‌first-placer‌  ‌among‌  ‌the‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌candidates,‌‌ 
irregularities‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌rule‌  ‌be‌  ‌invoked‌  ‌to‌  ‌declare‌  ‌a ‌ ‌failure‌  ‌of‌‌ 
should‌‌have‌‌been‌‌proclaimed‌‌as‌‌the‌‌duly‌‌elected‌‌Punong‌‌Barangay.‌  ‌ b) The‌‌votes‌‌that‌‌were‌‌not‌‌cast‌‌affect‌‌election‌‌result.‌  ‌
election‌‌  and‌‌
  to‌‌
  disenfranchise‌‌   the‌‌
  electorate‌‌ through‌‌ the‌‌ misdeeds‌‌ of‌‌ 
6. Again,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Comelec‌  ‌en‌  ‌banc‌  ‌has‌  ‌exclusive‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌to‌‌  a‌‌relative‌‌few.‌  ‌
Failure‌‌of‌‌election;‌‌call‌‌for‌‌special‌‌election‌  ‌
declare‌‌a‌‌failure‌‌of‌‌elections.‌  ‌
Moreover,‌  ‌petitioner’s‌  ‌allegation‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌voting‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌resumed‌‌ 
1. Only‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commission‌‌
  ‌en‌‌
  banc‌, ‌‌‌motu‌‌
  proprio‌‌
  or‌‌
  upon‌‌
  verified‌‌  7. Requisites‌‌for‌‌holding‌‌Special‌‌Elections:‌  ‌ after‌‌
  lunch‌‌  break,‌‌
  preventing‌‌  100‌‌  of‌‌
  his‌‌
  relatives‌‌
  and‌‌ followers‌‌ from‌‌ 
petition‌‌may‌‌ ‌p ostpone‌ ‌election‌. ‌ ‌
a) that‌‌there‌‌is‌‌a‌‌failure‌‌of‌‌election,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ voting,‌‌is‌‌better‌‌ventilated‌‌in‌‌an‌‌election‌‌contest.‌  ‌
2. The‌‌grounds‌‌for‌‌postponement‌‌‌are:‌  ‌
b) that‌  ‌such‌  ‌failure‌  ‌would‌  ‌affect‌  ‌the‌  ‌results‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
a) Violence;‌  ‌ election.‌  ‌ Loong‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌  ‌
b) Terrorism;‌  ‌ In‌  ‌the‌  ‌performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌duties,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌given‌  ‌a ‌‌
Mitmug‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌  ‌
c) Loss‌  ‌or‌  ‌destruction‌  ‌of‌  ‌election‌  ‌paraphernalia‌  ‌or‌‌  considerable‌‌   latitude‌‌ in‌‌ adopting‌‌ means‌‌ and‌‌ methods‌‌ that‌‌ will‌‌ insure‌‌ 
records;‌  ‌ There‌‌   can‌‌   be‌‌
  ‌failure‌‌   of‌‌
  election‌‌   in‌‌ a ‌‌political‌‌ unit‌‌ only‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ will‌‌ of‌‌  the‌‌   accomplishment‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ great‌‌ objective‌‌ for‌‌ which‌‌ it‌‌ was‌‌ created‌‌ — ‌‌
the‌‌   majority‌‌   has‌‌   been‌‌   defiled‌‌   and‌‌   cannot‌‌   be‌‌   ascertained‌. ‌‌But,‌‌ if‌‌  to‌‌
  promote‌‌   free,‌‌
  orderly,‌‌   and‌‌
  honest‌‌  elections.‌‌   ‌The‌‌ choice‌‌ of‌‌ means‌‌ 
d) Force‌‌majeure;‌‌OR‌  ‌
it‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌determined,‌  ‌it‌‌   must‌‌
  be‌‌   accorded‌‌   respect.‌‌   After‌‌
  all,‌‌
  there‌‌   is‌‌  taken‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌on‌  ‌Elections,‌  ‌unless‌  ‌they‌  ‌are‌  ‌clearly‌‌ 
e) Other‌  ‌analogous‌  ‌causes‌  ‌that‌  ‌render‌  ‌the‌  ‌holding‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌ no‌  ‌provision‌  ‌in‌  ‌our‌  ‌election‌  ‌laws‌  ‌which‌‌   requires‌‌   that‌‌
  a ‌‌majority‌‌   of‌‌  illegal‌  ‌or‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌grave‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌of‌  ‌discretion,‌  ‌should‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌‌ 
free,‌‌orderly,‌‌honest‌‌elections‌‌impossible.‌  ‌ registered‌‌   voters‌‌   must‌‌   cast‌‌
  their‌‌   votes.‌‌   All‌‌
  the‌‌   law‌‌   requires‌‌   is‌‌
  that‌‌   a ‌‌ interfered‌‌with.‌  ‌
3. The‌  ‌election‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌reset‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌date‌‌
  reasonably‌‌
  close‌‌  but‌‌
  not‌‌  winning‌  ‌candidate‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌elected‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌plurality‌  ‌of‌  ‌valid‌  ‌votes,‌‌  The‌‌   grounds‌‌  for‌‌  failure‌‌
  of‌‌
  election‌‌  — ‌‌force‌‌ majeure,‌‌ terrorism,‌‌ fraud‌‌ 
later‌  ‌than‌  ‌30‌  ‌days‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌  ‌cause‌  ‌has‌  ‌ceased.‌  ‌This‌  ‌30-day‌‌  regardless‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  actual‌‌   number‌‌   of‌‌ ballots‌‌ cast.‌‌ A ‌‌petition‌‌ to‌‌ annul‌‌ an‌‌  or‌  ‌other‌  ‌analogous‌  ‌causes‌  ‌— ‌ ‌clearly‌  ‌involve‌‌   questions‌‌   of‌‌
  fact.‌‌
  It‌‌
  is‌‌ 
period‌‌is‌‌only‌‌directory.‌  ‌ election‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌pre-proclamation‌  ‌controversy.‌  ‌Consequently,‌  ‌the‌‌  for‌‌
  this‌‌  reason‌‌  that‌‌  they‌‌
  can‌‌  only‌‌
  be‌‌
  determined‌‌   by‌‌ the‌‌ COMELEC‌‌ en‌‌ 
proclamation‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌winning‌  ‌candidate‌  ‌together‌  ‌with‌  ‌his‌  ‌subsequent‌‌  banc‌  ‌after‌  ‌due‌  ‌notice‌  ‌and‌  ‌hearing‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties.‌  ‌In‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌at‌  ‌bar,‌‌ 
4. Failure‌‌of‌‌elections‌‌‌happen‌‌when:‌  ‌ assumption‌  ‌of‌‌   office‌‌  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  an‌‌
  impediment‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌   prosecution‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  petitioner‌  ‌never‌  ‌asked‌  ‌the‌  ‌COMELEC‌  ‌en‌  ‌banc‌  ‌to‌  ‌call‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌special‌‌ 
a) Election‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌polling‌  ‌place‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌held‌  ‌on‌  ‌fixed‌‌  case‌‌to‌‌its‌‌logical‌‌conclusion.‌  ‌ election‌‌in‌‌Sulu.‌  ‌
date;‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 106‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

3. In‌  ‌a ‌ ‌pre-proclamation‌  ‌controversy,‌  ‌the‌  ‌BOC‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌Comelec‌‌  a) The‌‌BOC‌‌was‌‌improperly‌‌constituted;‌‌   ‌
Carlos‌‌v.‌‌Angeles‌  ‌
are‌‌  not‌‌   to‌‌
  look‌‌
  beyond‌‌   or‌‌
  behind‌‌ election‌‌ returns‌‌ which‌‌ are‌‌ on‌‌  b) quo‌‌warranto‌‌‌was‌‌not‌‌the‌‌proper‌‌remedy;‌‌   ‌
The‌‌
  ‌annulment‌‌   of‌‌  an‌‌
  election‌‌  on‌‌ the‌‌ ground‌‌ of‌‌ fraud,‌‌ irregularities‌‌  their‌  ‌face‌  ‌regular‌  ‌and‌  ‌authentic‌  ‌returns.‌  ‌In‌  ‌such‌  ‌summary‌‌ 
and‌  ‌violations‌  ‌of‌  ‌election‌  ‌laws‌  ‌may‌‌  be‌‌  raised‌‌
  as‌‌
  an‌‌
  incident‌‌  to‌‌
  an‌‌  c) what‌‌was‌‌filed‌‌was‌‌a‌‌petition‌‌to‌‌annul‌‌a‌‌proclamation;‌‌   ‌
proceedings,‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌room‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌presentation‌  ‌of‌‌ 
election‌‌   contest‌. ‌‌Such‌‌   grounds‌‌  for‌‌
  annulment‌‌   of‌‌
  an‌‌
  election‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌  evidence‌a ‌ liunde‌. ‌  ‌ ‌ d) the‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌quo‌  ‌warranto‌  ‌petition‌  ‌or‌  ‌an‌  ‌election‌ 
invoked‌‌in‌‌an‌‌election‌‌protest‌‌case.‌‌   ‌ protest‌  ‌was‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌made‌  ‌without‌  ‌prejudice‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
4. Pre-proclamation‌  ‌controversies‌  ‌are‌  ‌mandated‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌ 
The‌  ‌trial‌  ‌court‌  ‌has‌  ‌no‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌to‌  ‌declare‌  ‌a ‌ ‌failure‌  ‌of‌‌  pre-proclamation‌  ‌controversy‌  ‌or‌  ‌was‌  ‌made‌  ‌ad‌‌ 
summarily‌d
‌ isposed‌‌of.‌  ‌
election.‌  ‌In‌  ‌a ‌ ‌petition‌  ‌to‌  ‌annul‌  ‌an‌‌
  election‌‌  under‌‌   Section‌‌  6,‌‌
  BP‌‌
  Blg.‌‌  cautelam;‌‌and,‌‌   ‌
5. While‌  ‌the‌  ‌Comelec‌  ‌has‌  ‌exclusive‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌‌ 
881,‌‌
  two‌‌  conditions‌‌   must‌‌   be‌‌
  averred‌‌   in‌‌
  order‌‌
  to‌‌
  support‌‌  a ‌‌sufficient‌‌  e) ‌the‌‌proclamation‌‌was‌‌null‌‌and‌‌void.‌  ‌
pre-proclamation‌  ‌controversies‌  ‌involving‌  ‌local‌  ‌elective‌‌ 
cause‌‌of‌‌action.‌ ‌These‌‌are:‌‌   ‌
officials,‌‌  nevertheless,‌‌ pre-proclamation‌‌ cases‌‌ are‌‌ ‌not‌‌ allowed‌  10. The‌  ‌filing‌‌
  of‌‌
  an‌‌
  election‌‌
  protest‌‌   or‌‌
  a ‌‌petition‌‌
  for‌‌
  quo‌‌
  warranto‌‌ 
1) the‌  ‌illegality‌  ‌must‌  ‌affect‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌50%‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌votes‌  ‌cast‌‌  in‌  ‌elections‌  ‌for‌  ‌President,‌  ‌VP,‌  ‌Senator‌  ‌and‌  ‌Member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  precludes‌  ‌the‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌pre-proclamation‌ 
and‌‌   ‌ House.‌  ‌What‌  ‌is‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌correction‌  ‌of‌  ‌"‌manifest‌‌  controversy‌  ‌or‌  ‌amounts‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌abandonment‌  ‌of‌  ‌one‌  ‌earlier‌‌ 
2) the‌‌good‌‌votes‌‌can‌‌be‌‌distinguished‌‌from‌‌the‌‌bad‌‌ones.‌   ‌ ‌ errors‌‌‌in‌‌the‌‌certificate‌‌of‌‌canvass‌‌or‌‌election‌‌returns."‌‌   ‌ filed.‌  ‌

It‌  ‌is‌  ‌only‌  ‌when‌  ‌these‌  ‌two‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌are‌  ‌established‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌  6. If‌‌
  the‌‌
  error‌‌
  sought‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ corrected‌‌ is‌‌ truly‌‌ a ‌‌manifest‌‌ error,‌‌ then‌‌  11. All‌  ‌pre-proclamation‌  ‌cases‌  ‌pending‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commission‌‌ 
annulment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌election‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌justified‌  ‌because‌  ‌the‌  ‌remaining‌‌  the‌‌  matter‌‌
  should‌‌ have‌‌ already‌‌ been‌‌ raised‌‌ before‌‌ the‌‌ BOC.‌‌ The‌‌  shall‌‌   be‌‌
  deemed‌‌ ‌terminated‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ beginning‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ term‌‌ of‌‌ 
votes‌‌do‌‌not‌‌constitute‌‌a‌‌valid‌‌constituency.‌  ‌ exception‌  ‌is‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌error‌  ‌is‌  ‌one‌  ‌that‌  ‌“could‌  ‌not‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌‌  the‌‌  Office‌‌   ‌involved‌‌
  and‌‌   the‌‌  rulings‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ BOC‌‌ concerned‌‌ shall‌‌ 
discovered‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌canvassing‌  ‌despite‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌due‌‌  be‌‌
  deemed‌‌   affirmed,‌‌  without‌‌   prejudice‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌ filing‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌regular‌‌ 
Pre-proclamation‌‌controversy‌  ‌ diligence.”‌‌   ‌ election‌  ‌protest‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌aggrieved‌  ‌party.‌  ‌However‌, ‌‌
proceedings‌  ‌may‌  ‌continue‌  ‌when‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌basis‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌
  evidence‌‌ 
1. A‌  ‌pre-proclamation‌  ‌controversy‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌question‌‌  7. The‌‌
  act‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ BEI‌‌ in‌‌ declaring‌‌ some‌‌ votes‌‌ as‌‌ stray‌‌ involves‌‌ the‌‌ 
thus‌  ‌far‌  ‌presented,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Comelec‌  ‌determines‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  petition‌ 
pertaining‌  ‌to‌  ‌or‌  ‌affecting‌  ‌the‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌board‌  ‌of‌‌  appreciation‌  ‌of‌  ‌ballots‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌proper‌  ‌subject‌  ‌for‌  ‌an‌‌  appears‌  ‌meritorious‌‌   ‌and‌‌   accordingly‌‌   issues‌‌   an‌‌
  order‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌ 
canvassers‌  ‌which‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌raised‌  ‌by‌  ‌any‌  ‌candidate‌  ‌or‌  ‌by‌  ‌any‌‌  election‌‌protest‌. ‌ ‌ proceeding‌‌   to‌‌
  continue‌‌   or‌‌  when‌‌   an‌‌
  appropriate‌‌   order‌‌ had‌‌ been‌‌ 
registered‌  ‌political‌  ‌party‌  ‌before‌‌  the‌‌
  board‌‌   or‌‌
  directly‌‌
  with‌‌   the‌‌ 
8. The‌‌ COMELEC‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌‌general‌‌ rule‌‌ need‌‌ not‌‌ go‌‌ beyond‌‌ the‌‌ face‌‌ of‌‌  issued‌‌by‌‌the‌‌SC‌‌in‌‌a‌‌petition‌‌for‌‌certiorari.‌ 
Comelec.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌returns‌  ‌and‌  ‌investigate‌  ‌alleged‌  ‌election‌  ‌irregularities.‌  ‌An‌‌  12. The‌  ‌rule‌  ‌is‌  ‌indeed‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌proclamation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌winning‌‌ 
2. Issues‌‌that‌‌may‌‌be‌‌raised:‌  ‌ exception‌t‌ o‌‌this‌‌is‌‌   ‌ candidate‌  ‌makes‌  ‌the‌  ‌pre-proclamation‌  ‌controversy‌  ‌no‌  ‌longer‌‌ 
a) Illegal‌‌composition‌‌or‌‌proceedings‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌BOC;‌  ‌ a. precipitate‌‌canvassing,‌‌   ‌ viable,‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌issues‌  ‌raised‌  ‌therein‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌more‌  ‌closely‌‌ 
b) The‌  ‌canvassed‌  ‌election‌  ‌returns‌  ‌are‌  ‌incomplete‌, ‌‌ b. terrorism,‌‌   ‌ examined‌  ‌and‌  ‌better‌  ‌resolved‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌election‌  ‌protest.‌  ‌
contain‌‌   material‌‌ ‌defects‌, ‌‌appear‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ ‌tampered‌‌ ‌with‌‌  However‌, ‌‌‌this‌‌ is‌‌ true‌‌ only‌‌ where‌‌ the‌‌ proclamation‌‌ is‌‌ based‌‌ 
c. lack‌‌of‌‌sufficient‌‌notice‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Board,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
or‌  ‌falsified‌, ‌ ‌or‌  ‌contain‌  ‌discrepancies‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌‌  on‌‌a‌‌complete‌‌canvass‌. ‌ ‌
d. disregard‌  ‌of‌  ‌manifest‌  ‌irregularities‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌face‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  13. Where‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌claimed‌  ‌that‌  ‌certain‌  ‌returns‌  ‌should‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌‌ 
returns‌‌or‌‌in‌‌other‌‌authentic‌‌copies‌‌thereof;‌  ‌
questioned‌‌returns‌  ‌ omitted‌  ‌because‌  ‌they‌  ‌were‌  ‌manufactured‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌returns‌‌ 
c) The‌  ‌election‌  ‌returns‌  ‌were‌  ‌prepared‌  ‌under‌  ‌duress,‌‌ 
Coupled‌  ‌with‌  ‌intent‌  ‌to‌  ‌defraud‌  ‌or‌  ‌manipulate‌  ‌election‌‌  cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌included‌  ‌because‌  ‌they‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌‌   irretrievably‌‌
  lost,‌‌ 
threats,‌  ‌coercion,‌  ‌or‌  ‌intimidation,‌  ‌or‌  ‌they‌  ‌are‌‌ 
obviously‌m ‌ anufactured‌o ‌ r‌‌not‌‌authentic;‌‌and‌  ‌ results‌  ‌to‌  ‌justify‌  ‌the‌  ‌summary‌‌
  annulment‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  canvass‌‌
  and‌‌  the‌  ‌pre-proclamation‌  ‌controversy‌  ‌should‌  ‌still‌  ‌be‌‌ 
the‌‌annulment‌‌of‌‌proclamation‌  ‌ continued‌  ‌despite‌  ‌the‌  ‌proclamation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌supposed‌‌ 
d) When‌  ‌substitute‌  ‌or‌  ‌fraudulent‌  ‌returns‌  ‌in‌‌ 
9. After‌  ‌a ‌ ‌proclamation‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌made,‌  ‌a ‌‌pre-proclamation‌‌   case‌‌  winner.‌  ‌Indeed,‌  ‌the‌‌   COMELEC‌‌   may‌‌   in‌‌
  such‌‌
  pre-proclamation‌‌ 
controverted‌  ‌polling‌  ‌places‌  ‌were‌  ‌canvassed‌, ‌ ‌the‌‌  proceedings‌‌determine‌‌if‌‌the‌‌proclamation‌‌should‌‌be‌‌annulled.‌  ‌
results‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌materially‌  ‌affected‌  ‌the‌‌
  standing‌‌
  of‌‌  before‌  ‌the‌  ‌COMELEC‌  ‌is,‌  ‌logically,‌  ‌no‌  ‌longer‌  ‌viable.‌  ‌The‌  ‌rule‌‌ 
the‌‌aggrieved‌‌candidate‌‌or‌‌candidates.‌  ‌ admits‌‌of‌‌exceptions‌,‌‌however,‌‌as‌‌where:‌‌   ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 107‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

14. Where‌‌   only‌‌  an‌‌


  election‌‌
  protest‌‌ ‌ex‌‌ abundanti‌‌ ad‌‌ cautelam‌‌ (as‌‌ a ‌‌ 3. Quo‌  ‌Warranto‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌election‌  ‌contest‌  ‌relating‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌ mayorship‌  ‌was‌  ‌disrupted‌  ‌by‌  ‌his‌  ‌defeat‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌‌ 
precautionary‌  ‌measure)‌  ‌is‌  ‌filed,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌‌
  retains‌‌
  jurisdiction‌‌  qualifications‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌elective‌  ‌official‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌ground‌  ‌of‌‌  1998‌‌elections.‌  ‌
to‌‌hear‌‌the‌‌petition‌‌seeking‌‌to‌‌annul‌‌an‌‌election.‌  ‌ ineligibility‌  ‌or‌  ‌disloyalty‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Republic.‌  ‌The‌  ‌issue‌  ‌is‌‌ 
Socrates‌‌v.‌‌  The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌likewise‌  ‌emphasized‌  ‌in‌  ‌Socrates‌  ‌that‌  ‌“an‌ 
15. Doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌statistical‌  ‌improbability‌. ‌ ‌Standing‌  ‌alone‌  ‌and‌‌  whether‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌possesses‌  ‌all‌  ‌the‌  ‌qualifications‌‌   and‌‌ 
Comelec‌  elective‌  ‌local‌  ‌official‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌seek‌  ‌immediate‌‌ 
without‌  ‌more,‌  ‌the‌  ‌bare‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌candidate‌  ‌for‌  ‌public‌  ‌office‌‌  none‌‌of‌‌the‌‌disqualifications‌‌prescribed‌‌by‌‌law‌. ‌ ‌
reelection‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fourth‌  ‌term.‌  ‌The‌  ‌prohibited‌  ‌election‌‌ 
received‌‌
  zero‌‌  votes‌‌  in‌‌
  one‌‌  or‌‌  two‌‌   precincts‌‌
  can‌‌ not‌‌ adequately‌‌  4. A‌‌
  valid‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ ‌discretion‌‌ to‌‌ allow‌‌ execution‌‌ pending‌‌  refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌next‌  ‌regular‌  ‌election‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌office‌‌ 
support‌  ‌a ‌ ‌finding‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌  ‌election‌  ‌returns‌  ‌are‌‌  appeal‌‌   ‌requires‌‌   that‌‌
  it‌‌
  should‌‌
  be‌‌
  based‌‌ "upon‌‌ good‌‌ reasons‌‌ to‌‌  following‌  ‌the‌  ‌end‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌third‌  ‌consecutive‌  ‌term‌  ‌[and,‌‌ 
statistically‌‌improbable.‌  ‌ be‌  ‌stated‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌special‌  ‌order."‌  ‌The‌  ‌following‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌"good‌‌  hence],‌‌   ‌[a]ny‌‌  subsequent‌‌   election,‌‌   like‌‌ recall‌‌ election,‌‌ is‌‌ 
no‌‌longer‌‌covered‌‌‌x‌‌x‌‌x.”‌  ‌
Election‌‌protest‌  ‌ reasons"‌‌ and‌‌ ‌a ‌‌combination‌‌ of‌‌ two‌‌ or‌‌ more‌‌ of‌‌ them‌‌ will‌‌ suffice‌‌ 
to‌‌grant‌‌execution‌‌pending‌‌appeal:‌‌   ‌ Conversion‌‌of‌‌a‌‌Municipality‌‌into‌‌a‌‌City‌  ‌
Poe‌‌v.‌‌Arroyo,‌‌PET‌‌Case‌‌No‌‌002‌  ‌
a. public‌‌interest‌‌involved‌‌or‌‌will‌‌of‌‌the‌‌electorate;‌‌   ‌
May‌  ‌the‌  ‌widow‌  ‌substitute/intervene‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌protestant‌  ‌who‌  ‌died‌‌  Latasa‌‌v.‌‌  The‌‌conversion‌‌of‌‌a‌‌municipality‌‌into‌‌a‌‌city‌‌does‌‌ 
b. the‌  ‌shortness‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌remaining‌‌
  portion‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  term‌‌
  of‌‌  Comelec‌  not‌‌constitute‌‌an‌‌interruption‌‌of‌‌the‌‌incumbent‌‌ 
during‌‌the‌‌pendency‌‌of‌‌the‌‌latter’s‌‌protest‌‌case?‌  ‌
the‌‌contested‌‌office;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ official’s‌‌continuity‌‌of‌‌service‌. ‌ ‌
NO‌. ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌public‌  ‌office‌  ‌is‌  ‌personal‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌officer‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌‌
c. the‌  ‌length‌  ‌of‌  ‌time‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌election‌  ‌contest‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌‌ 
property‌‌ transmissible‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ heirs‌‌ upon‌‌ death.‌‌ Thus,‌‌ we‌‌ consistently‌‌  Period‌‌of‌‌Preventive‌‌Suspension‌  ‌
pending.‌  ‌
rejected‌  ‌substitution‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌widow‌  ‌or‌‌   the‌‌
  heirs‌‌
  in‌‌
  election‌‌  contests‌‌ 
where‌‌the‌‌protestant‌‌dies‌‌during‌‌the‌‌pendency‌‌of‌‌the‌‌protest.‌  ‌ 5. The‌  ‌mere‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌notice‌  ‌of‌  ‌appeal‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌enough.‌  ‌It‌‌  Aldovino‌‌v.‌‌  A‌  ‌preventive‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌simply‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌term‌‌ 
should‌  ‌be‌‌   accompanied‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  payment‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  correct‌‌   amount‌‌  Comelec‌  interruption‌  ‌because‌  ‌the‌  ‌suspended‌  ‌official‌‌ 
This‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌  to‌‌
  say‌‌
  that‌‌
  death‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  protestant‌‌   necessarily‌‌   abates‌‌   the‌‌  continues‌  ‌to‌  ‌stay‌  ‌in‌  ‌office‌  ‌although‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌barred‌‌ 
of‌  ‌appeal‌  ‌fee.‌  ‌The‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌‌   full‌‌
  amount‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌docket‌‌ 
pending‌  ‌action.‌  ‌We‌  ‌have‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌substitution‌  ‌and‌  ‌intervention‌  ‌but‌‌  from‌  ‌exercising‌  ‌the‌  ‌functions‌  ‌and‌  ‌prerogatives‌  ‌of‌‌ 
fee‌‌‌is‌‌an‌‌indispensable‌‌step‌‌for‌‌the‌‌perfection‌‌of‌‌an‌‌appeal.‌  ‌
only‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌real‌  ‌party‌‌   in‌‌  interest.‌  ‌A ‌‌real‌‌  party‌‌  in‌‌  interest‌‌  is‌‌  the‌‌  the‌  ‌office‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌period‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌best‌‌ 
party‌  ‌who‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌benefited‌  ‌or‌  ‌injured‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌judgment,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  Assumption‌‌of‌‌Office‌‌by‌‌Operation‌‌of‌‌Law‌‌   ‌ indicator‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌
  suspended‌‌   official’s‌‌
  continuity‌‌
  in‌‌
  office‌‌ 
party‌  ‌who‌  ‌is‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌avails‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌suit.‌  ‌Herein‌‌  is‌‌
  the‌‌  ‌absence‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌permanent‌‌   replacement‌‌   and‌‌ the‌‌ 
Borja‌‌v.‌‌  There‌  ‌was,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌ruled,‌  ‌no‌  ‌violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  lack‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌
  authority‌‌ to‌‌ appoint‌‌ one‌‌ since‌‌ no‌‌ vacancy‌‌ 
movant/intervenor,‌‌   Mrs.‌‌ FPJ,‌‌ herself,‌‌ denies‌‌ any‌‌ claim‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ office‌‌ of‌‌ 
Comelec‌‌  three-term‌‌ limit,‌‌ for‌‌ Capco‌‌ “was‌‌ not‌‌ elected‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ office‌‌  exists‌  ‌
President.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌given‌  ‌the‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌case,‌  ‌we‌  ‌can‌‌  and‌‌Capco‌  ‌ of‌  ‌the‌‌
  mayor‌‌   in‌‌  the‌‌  first‌‌
  term‌‌
  but‌‌  simply‌‌
  found‌‌   himself‌‌ 
conclude‌‌   that‌‌  protestant’s‌‌   widow‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ a ‌‌real‌‌ party‌‌ in‌‌ interest‌‌ to‌‌ this‌‌  thrust‌  ‌into‌  ‌it‌  ‌by‌  ‌operation‌  ‌of‌  ‌law‌” ‌ ‌when‌  ‌a ‌ ‌permanent‌‌  Election‌‌Protest‌  ‌
election‌‌protest.‌  ‌ vacancy‌‌occurred‌‌in‌‌that‌‌office.‌  ‌
Lonzanida‌‌  Lonzanida‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌fully‌  ‌serve‌  ‌the‌  ‌1995-1998‌  ‌mayoral‌‌ 
Quo‌‌warranto‌  ‌ Montebon‌‌  The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌emphasized‌  ‌that‌  ‌succession‌  ‌in‌  ‌local‌‌  v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌ term,‌  ‌there‌  ‌being‌  ‌an‌  ‌involuntary‌‌   severance‌‌   from‌‌  office‌‌ 
v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌ government‌  ‌office‌  ‌is‌  ‌by‌  ‌operation‌  ‌of‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌  ‌as‌‌  as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌result‌  ‌of‌  ‌legal‌  ‌processes.‌  ‌In‌  ‌fine,‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌an‌‌ 
1. Election‌  ‌Contests‌  ‌— ‌ ‌refer‌  ‌to‌  ‌election‌‌  protests‌‌  or‌‌  petitions‌‌  such,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌involuntary‌  ‌severance‌  ‌from‌  ‌office.‌‌  effective‌‌interruption‌‌of‌‌the‌‌continuity‌‌of‌‌service.‌  ‌
for‌‌‌quo‌‌warranto‌. ‌ ‌ Since‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌no‌  ‌less‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌Montebon‌  ‌to‌  ‌vacate‌  ‌his‌‌ 
2. Election‌  ‌Protest‌  ‌— ‌ ‌refers‌‌  to‌‌  an‌‌  election‌‌  contest‌‌  relating‌‌  to‌‌  post‌  ‌as‌  ‌councilor‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌assume‌  ‌office‌  ‌as‌  ‌vice-‌‌  Ong‌‌v.‌‌  His‌  ‌proclamation‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌‌   duly‌‌   elected‌‌
  mayor‌‌   in‌‌  the‌‌ 
mayor,‌  ‌his‌  ‌occupation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌higher‌  ‌office‌  ‌cannot,‌‌  Alegre‌  ‌ 1998‌  ‌mayoralty‌  ‌election‌  ‌coupled‌  ‌by‌  ‌his‌‌ 
the‌  ‌election‌  ‌and‌  ‌returns‌  ‌of‌  ‌elective‌  ‌officials,‌  ‌grounded‌  ‌on‌‌  assumption‌‌   of‌‌
  office‌‌
  and‌‌   ‌his‌‌
  continuous‌‌   exercise‌‌   of‌‌ 
without‌‌   more,‌‌ be‌‌ deemed‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌voluntary‌‌ renunciation‌‌ of‌‌ 
frauds‌  ‌or‌  ‌irregularities‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌elections,‌  ‌the‌‌  his‌‌position‌‌as‌‌councilor.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌functions‌  ‌thereof‌  ‌from‌  ‌start‌  ‌to‌  ‌finish‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
casting‌  ‌and‌  ‌counting‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌ballots‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌preparation‌  ‌and‌‌  term,‌  ‌should‌  ‌legally‌  ‌be‌  ‌taken‌  ‌as‌  ‌service‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌full‌‌ 
canvassing‌  ‌of‌  ‌returns.‌  ‌The‌  ‌issue‌  ‌is‌  ‌who‌  ‌obtained‌  ‌the‌‌  Recall‌‌Election‌  ‌ term‌‌in‌‌contemplation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌three-term‌‌rule‌. ‌ ‌
plurality‌‌of‌‌valid‌‌votes‌‌cas‌t.‌  ‌
Adormeo‌‌  The‌  ‌Court‌‌
  emphasized‌‌
  that‌‌
  ‌th
‌ e‌‌
  continuity‌‌
  of‌‌
  Talaga’s‌‌  Rivera‌‌III‌‌  The‌  ‌fact‌  ‌of‌  ‌being‌‌
  belatedly‌‌
  ousted,‌‌
  i.e.,‌‌
  after‌‌
  the‌‌
  expiry‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 108‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌ of‌  ‌the‌  ‌term,‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌an‌  ‌interruption‌  ‌in‌‌  Settlement‌‌of‌‌boundary‌‌disputes‌  ‌ 2. "‌Government-owned‌  ‌or‌  ‌controlled‌  ‌corporation‌" ‌ ‌refers‌  ‌to‌‌ 
Morales’‌‌ service‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ full‌‌ term;‌‌ neither‌‌ can‌‌ Morales,‌‌ as‌  any‌  ‌agency‌  ‌organized‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌stock‌  ‌or‌  ‌non-stock‌  ‌corporation,‌‌ 
he‌  ‌argued,‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌merely‌  ‌a ‌ ‌“caretaker‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Local‌‌officials‌  ‌
vested‌  ‌with‌  ‌functions‌  ‌relating‌  ‌to‌  ‌public‌  ‌needs‌  ‌whether‌‌ 
office”‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mere‌  ‌“de‌  ‌facto‌  ‌officer”‌  ‌for‌  ‌purposes‌  ‌of‌‌  governmental‌  ‌or‌  ‌proprietary‌  ‌in‌  ‌nature‌, ‌ ‌and‌‌   owned‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌ 
Recall‌  ‌
applying‌‌the‌‌three-term‌‌limit‌‌rule.‌  Government‌  ‌directly‌  ‌or‌  ‌through‌  ‌its‌  ‌instrumentalities‌  ‌either‌‌ 
Term‌‌Limits‌  ‌ wholly,‌  ‌or,‌  ‌where‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌as‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌stock‌‌ 
Dizon‌‌v.‌‌  The‌  ‌assumption‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌vice‌  ‌mayor‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌office‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Comelec‌  the‌  ‌mayor,‌  ‌no‌  ‌matter‌  ‌how‌  ‌short‌  ‌it‌  ‌may‌  ‌seem‌  ‌to‌‌   ‌ corporations,‌‌to‌‌the‌‌extent‌‌of‌a ‌ t‌‌least‌‌51%‌‌of‌‌its‌‌capital‌‌stock.‌  ‌
Dizon,‌  ‌interrupted‌  ‌Morales’‌  ‌continuity‌  ‌of‌  ‌service‌. ‌‌ Local‌‌Government‌‌Code‌‌of‌‌1991‌  ‌
Thus,‌  ‌Morales‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌hold‌‌
  office‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  full‌‌
  term‌‌
  of‌‌
  1 ‌‌ Muni‌‌of‌‌Tangkal‌‌v.‌‌Balindong‌‌‌2017‌  ‌
 ‌
July‌‌2004‌‌to‌‌30‌‌June‌‌2007‌  ‌ As‌  ‌a ‌ ‌government‌  ‌instrumentality,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Municipality‌  ‌of‌  ‌Tangkal‌  ‌can‌‌ 
A.‌‌Autonomous‌‌Regions‌‌and‌‌their‌‌relation‌‌to‌‌the‌‌ 
only‌‌   act‌‌
  for‌‌ secular‌‌ purposes‌‌ and‌‌ in‌‌ ways‌‌ that‌‌ have‌‌ primarily‌‌ secular‌‌ 
Abundo‌‌v.‌‌  During‌  ‌the‌  ‌pendency‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌election‌  ‌protest,‌  ‌Abundo‌‌  National‌‌Government‌  ‌ effects‌‌ consistent‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ non-establishment‌‌ clause.‌‌ Hence,‌‌ even‌‌ if‌‌ it‌‌ 
Comelec‌  ceased‌  ‌from‌‌   exercising‌‌   power‌‌   or‌‌
  authority‌‌   over‌‌  the‌‌ 
The‌  ‌creation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌autonomous‌  ‌region‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌effective‌  ‌when‌‌  is‌  ‌assumed‌  ‌that‌  ‌juridical‌  ‌persons‌  ‌are‌‌  capable‌‌   of‌‌
  practicing‌‌
  religion,‌‌ 
good‌  ‌people‌  ‌of‌  ‌Viga,‌  ‌Catanduanes.‌  ‌Consequently,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
period‌‌  during‌‌  which‌‌  Abundo‌‌   was‌‌   not‌‌
  serving‌‌  as‌‌ mayor‌‌  approved‌‌   by‌‌
  majority‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  votes‌‌
  cast‌‌
  by‌‌ the‌‌ constituent‌‌ units‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌ the‌  ‌Municipality‌  ‌of‌  ‌Tangkal‌  ‌is‌  ‌constitutionally‌  ‌proscribed‌  ‌from‌‌ 
should‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌rest‌  ‌period‌  ‌or‌  ‌break‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌‌  plebiscite‌‌called‌‌for‌‌the‌‌purpose,‌‌   ‌ adopting,‌‌much‌‌less‌‌exercising,‌‌any‌‌religion,‌‌including‌‌Islam.‌  ‌
service.‌  ‌ provided‌  ‌that‌  ‌only‌  ‌provinces,‌  ‌cities,‌  ‌and‌  ‌geographic‌  ‌areas‌  ‌voting‌‌ 
 ‌ favorably‌  ‌in‌  ‌such‌  ‌plebiscite‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌included‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌autonomous‌‌ 
Classifications‌  ‌
Quasi-corporations‌  ‌
 ‌

region.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌18‌‌Art‌‌X)‌  ‌ ‌
XIII.‌‌LOCAL‌‌GOVERNMENTS‌  ‌ created‌‌by‌‌the‌‌State‌‌for‌‌a‌‌limited‌‌purpose.‌  ‌
Abbas‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌  ‌
A.‌‌Autonomous‌‌Regions‌‌and‌‌their‌‌relation‌‌to‌‌the‌‌National‌‌  Municipal‌‌corporations‌  ‌
The‌  ‌creation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌autonomous‌  ‌region‌  ‌is‌  ‌made‌  ‌to‌  ‌depend,‌  ‌not‌  ‌on‌‌ 
Government‌  ‌ the‌  ‌total‌  ‌majority‌  ‌vote‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌plebiscite,‌  ‌but‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌will‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌body‌  ‌politic‌  ‌or‌  ‌corporate‌  ‌established‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌to‌  ‌assist‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
majority‌‌in‌‌each‌‌of‌‌the‌‌constituent‌‌units‌. ‌ ‌ civil‌  ‌government‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌state,‌  ‌with‌  ‌delegated‌  ‌authority‌‌   to‌‌
  regulate‌‌ 
B.‌‌Public‌‌Corporations‌  ‌ and‌‌   administer‌‌   the‌‌  local‌‌ or‌‌ internal‌‌ affairs‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌city,‌‌ town‌‌ or‌‌ district‌‌ 
C.‌‌Principles‌‌of‌‌Local‌‌Autonomy‌‌Powers‌‌of‌‌LGUs‌  ‌ Ordillo‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌  ‌ which‌‌is‌‌incorporated.‌  ‌
Elements‌  ‌
General‌‌welfare‌‌clause‌  ‌ The‌  ‌sole‌  ‌province‌‌
  of‌‌
  ‌Ifugao‌‌
  ‌cannot‌‌
  validly‌‌   constitute‌‌
  the‌‌
  Cordillera‌‌ 
Autonomous‌  ‌Region.‌  ‌The‌  ‌term‌  ‌"region"‌  ‌used‌  ‌in‌  ‌it's‌  ‌ordinary‌  ‌sense‌‌  a. Legal‌‌creation/incorporation‌‌‌—‌‌by‌‌legislation;‌  ‌
Eminent‌‌domain‌  ‌ means‌  ‌two‌  ‌or‌  ‌more‌  ‌provinces.‌  ‌Ifugao‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌province‌  ‌by‌  ‌itself.‌  ‌To‌‌  b. Corporate‌  ‌Name‌  ‌— ‌ ‌name‌  ‌by‌  ‌which‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌incorporated‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Taxing‌‌power‌  ‌ become‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌region,‌  ‌it‌  ‌must‌  ‌join‌  ‌other‌  ‌provinces,‌  ‌cities,‌‌  known‌‌in‌‌which‌‌all‌‌corporate‌‌acts‌‌are‌‌done;‌  ‌
municipalities,‌‌and‌‌geographical‌‌areas.‌  ‌
c. Inhabitants‌‌‌—‌‌refers‌‌to‌‌natural‌‌persons,‌‌the‌‌constituents;‌  ‌
Closure‌‌and‌‌opening‌‌of‌‌roads‌  ‌
B.‌‌Public‌‌Corporations‌  ‌ d. Territory‌  ‌— ‌ ‌the‌  ‌land‌  ‌mass‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌inhabitants‌  ‌reside,‌‌ 
Legislative‌‌power‌  ‌ together‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌waters,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌air‌  ‌space.‌  ‌The‌  ‌territorial‌‌ 
Concept;‌‌distinguished‌‌from‌‌GOCCs‌  ‌
Ultra‌‌vires‌‌acts‌  ‌ boundaries‌‌must‌‌be‌‌definite,‌‌fixed‌‌or‌‌certain.‌  ‌
1. A‌‌
  ‌public‌‌   corporation‌‌   is‌‌
  one‌‌
  that‌‌
  is‌‌
  organized‌‌   for‌‌
  government‌‌ 
Nature‌‌and‌‌functions‌‌
   ‌
Corporate‌‌powers‌  ‌ of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌portion‌  ‌of‌‌
  a ‌‌state,‌‌
  such‌‌
  as‌‌
  an‌‌
  LGU.‌‌
  It‌‌
  is‌‌
  created‌‌   for‌‌
  public‌‌ 
use.‌  ‌ a. Governmental‌‌   — ‌‌administration‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  power‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ State‌‌ and‌‌ 
Liability‌‌of‌‌LGUs‌  ‌ promoting‌‌the‌‌public‌‌welfare.‌‌Agents‌‌of‌‌the‌‌State.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 109‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

b. Proprietary‌‌   — ‌‌exercised‌‌  for‌‌  the‌‌  special‌‌ benefit‌‌ and‌‌ advantage‌  a. De‌  ‌jure‌  ‌— ‌ ‌its‌  ‌creation‌  ‌perfectly‌  ‌complies‌  ‌with‌  ‌all‌‌  Section‌‌6,‌‌LGC.‌A
‌ uthority‌‌to‌‌Create‌‌LGUs.‌‌‌—‌‌either‌‌   ‌
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌community‌  ‌and‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌attainment‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  ‌collective‌‌  requirements‌‌of‌‌incorporation.‌  ‌ 1) by‌‌
  ‌law‌‌
  ‌enacted‌‌
  by‌‌
  Congress‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌
  of‌‌ a ‌‌province,‌‌ city,‌‌ 
needs.‌‌Representative‌‌of‌‌the‌‌inhabitants.‌  ‌ b. De‌‌facto‌‌‌—‌‌not‌‌all‌‌requirements‌‌duly‌‌complied‌‌with.‌  ‌ municipality,‌‌or‌‌any‌‌other‌‌political‌‌subdivision,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
Torio‌‌v.‌‌Fontanilla‌  ‌ De‌‌Facto‌‌Municipal‌‌Corporation‌‌Doctrine,‌‌Elements‌  ‌ 2) by‌‌
  ‌ordinance‌‌
  ‌passed‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  sangguniang‌‌   panlalawigan‌‌   or‌‌ 
a. Valid‌‌law‌‌authorizing‌‌incorporation;‌  ‌ sangguniang‌  ‌panlungsod‌  ‌concerned‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌
WON‌  ‌the‌  ‌celebration‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌town‌  ‌fiesta‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌municipal‌‌ 
barangay‌l‌ ocated‌‌within‌‌its‌‌territorial‌‌jurisdiction,‌‌   ‌
council‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌governmental‌‌  or‌‌  a ‌‌corporate‌‌  or‌‌
  proprietary‌‌   function‌‌
  of‌‌  b. Attempt‌‌in‌‌good‌‌faith‌‌to‌‌organize‌‌it;‌  ‌
the‌‌municipality.‌  ‌ As‌‌
  a ‌‌general‌‌  rule,‌‌
  the‌‌
  creation‌‌   of‌‌ an‌‌ LGU‌‌ or‌‌ its‌‌ conversion‌‌ from‌‌ one‌‌ 
c. Colorable‌‌compliance‌‌with‌‌the‌‌law;‌‌and‌  ‌
level‌  ‌to‌  ‌another‌  ‌level‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌verifiable‌  ‌indicators‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Proprietary.‌  ‌The‌  ‌powers‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌municipality‌‌   are‌‌
  twofold‌‌
  in‌‌
  character‌‌ 
d. Assumption‌‌of‌‌corporate‌‌powers‌  ‌ viability‌‌and‌‌projected‌‌capacity‌‌to‌‌provide‌‌services,‌‌‌to‌‌wit‌: ‌ ‌
—‌  ‌public‌, ‌ ‌governmental,‌  ‌or‌  ‌political‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌one‌  ‌hand,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
corporate‌, ‌‌private,‌‌ or‌‌ proprietary‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ other.‌‌ Governmental‌‌ powers‌‌  Sec‌  ‌442(d),‌  ‌LGC‌  ‌of‌  ‌1991‌. ‌‌Municipalities‌‌   existing‌‌   as‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  date‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  a) Income‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌It‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌sufficient,‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌acceptable‌‌ 
are‌‌
  those‌‌ exercised‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ corporation‌‌ in‌‌ administering‌‌ the‌‌ powers‌‌ of‌‌  effectivity‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌Code‌  ‌shall‌  ‌continue‌  ‌to‌  ‌exist‌  ‌and‌  ‌operate‌  ‌as‌  ‌such.‌‌  standards,‌  ‌to‌  ‌provide‌  ‌for‌  ‌all‌  ‌essential‌  ‌government‌‌ 
the‌  ‌state‌  ‌and‌  ‌promoting‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌welfare‌  ‌and‌  ‌they‌  ‌include‌  ‌the‌‌  Existing‌‌municipal‌‌districts‌‌   ‌ facilities‌  ‌and‌  ‌services‌  ‌and‌  ‌special‌  ‌functions‌‌ 
legislative,‌  ‌judicial,‌  ‌public,‌  ‌and‌  ‌political.‌  ‌Municipal‌  ‌powers‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌  1) organized‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌presidential‌  ‌issuances‌  ‌or‌  ‌executive‌‌  commensurate‌‌with‌‌the‌‌size‌‌of‌‌its‌‌population;‌  ‌
other‌  ‌hand‌‌   are‌‌
  exercised‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌  special‌‌
  benefit‌‌   and‌‌
  advantage‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌  orders‌‌AND‌  ‌ b) Population‌. ‌‌— ‌‌It‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  determined‌‌
  as‌‌
  the‌‌
  total‌‌ number‌‌ 
community‌  ‌and‌  ‌include‌  ‌those‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌ministerial,‌  ‌private‌  ‌and‌‌  of‌‌inhabitants‌‌within‌‌the‌‌territorial‌‌jurisdiction;‌‌and‌  ‌
2) which‌  ‌have‌  ‌their‌  ‌respective‌  ‌set‌  ‌of‌  ‌elective‌  ‌municipal‌‌ 
corporate.‌  ‌
officials‌  ‌holding‌  ‌office‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌effectivity‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌‌  c) Land‌‌   Area‌. ‌‌— ‌‌It‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌  contiguous,‌‌   unless‌‌   it‌‌ comprises‌‌ 
Holding‌‌   a ‌‌fiesta‌‌  even‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ purpose‌‌ is‌‌ to‌‌ commemorate‌‌ a ‌‌religious‌‌ or‌‌  Code‌‌   ‌ two‌‌ or‌‌ more‌‌ islands‌‌ or‌‌ is‌‌ separated‌‌ by‌‌ an‌‌ LGU‌‌ independent‌‌ 
historical‌‌   event‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ town‌‌ is‌‌ in‌‌ essence‌‌ an‌‌ act‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ special‌‌ benefit‌‌  of‌  ‌the‌  ‌others;‌  ‌properly‌  ‌identified‌  ‌by‌  ‌metes‌  ‌and‌  ‌bounds‌‌ 
shall‌‌henceforth‌‌be‌‌considered‌‌as‌‌regular‌‌municipalities.‌  ‌
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌community‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌welfare‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌‌  with‌‌   technical‌‌   descriptions;‌‌   and‌‌
  ‌sufficient‌‌  to‌‌ provide‌‌ for‌‌ 
performed‌  ‌in‌‌   pursuance‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌policy‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  state.‌‌  The‌‌  ‌basic‌‌
  element‌‌  Requisites‌‌for‌‌creation,‌‌conversion,‌‌division,‌‌merger‌‌or‌‌
 
such‌  ‌basic‌  ‌services‌  ‌and‌  ‌facilities‌  ‌to‌  ‌meet‌  ‌the‌‌ 
is‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌governmental‌  ‌in‌  ‌essence‌, ‌ ‌otherwise,‌  ‌the‌  ‌function‌‌  dissolution‌  ‌ requirements‌‌of‌‌its‌‌populace‌. ‌ ‌
becomes‌‌   private‌‌   or‌‌
  proprietary‌‌   in‌‌
  character.‌‌   Easily,‌‌
  no‌‌ governmental‌‌  General‌‌Requirements‌  ‌ Plebiscite‌  ‌
or‌  ‌public‌‌   policy‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  state‌‌   is‌‌
  involved‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  celebration‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌town‌‌ 
Section‌‌  10‌‌
  Art‌‌
  X.‌‌
  No‌‌ province,‌‌ city,‌‌ municipality,‌‌ or‌‌ barangay‌‌ may‌‌  1. When‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌‌   states‌‌  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  plebiscite‌‌  shall‌‌
  be‌‌   conducted‌‌   “‌in‌‌ 
fiesta.‌  ‌
be‌‌   ‌ the‌‌   political‌‌  units‌‌   directly‌‌   affected,”‌‌   it‌‌
  means‌‌   that‌‌ residents‌‌ 
Under‌  ‌the‌  ‌LGC,‌‌
  local‌‌
  governments‌‌
  may‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  (4)‌‌
  general‌‌
  kinds‌‌  1) created,‌‌   ‌ of‌  ‌the‌  ‌political‌  ‌entity‌  ‌who‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌economically‌‌   dislocated‌‌ 
of‌‌powers:‌  ‌ by‌  ‌the‌  ‌separation‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌portion‌  ‌thereof‌  ‌have‌  ‌a ‌ ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌vote‌  ‌in‌‌ 
2) divided,‌‌   ‌
a. Those‌‌that‌‌are‌e
‌ xpressly‌g‌ ranted‌‌to‌‌them;‌  ‌ said‌‌plebiscite.‌  ‌
3) merged,‌‌   ‌
b. Those‌‌that‌‌are‌i‌ mplied‌‌from‌‌those‌‌expressly‌‌granted;‌  ‌ 2. The‌  ‌creation,‌  ‌division,‌  ‌merger,‌  ‌abolition‌  ‌or‌  ‌substantial‌‌ 
4) abolished,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ alteration‌  ‌of‌  ‌boundaries‌  ‌of‌  ‌local‌  ‌government‌  ‌units‌  ‌involve‌  ‌a ‌‌
c. Those‌  ‌that‌  ‌are‌  ‌necessary‌, ‌ ‌appropriate,‌  ‌or‌  ‌incidental‌‌
  for‌‌
  their‌‌ 
5) its‌‌boundary‌‌substantially‌‌altered,‌   common‌  ‌denominator‌  ‌— ‌ ‌material‌  ‌change‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌political‌‌ 
efficient‌‌and‌‌effective‌‌governance,‌‌and‌  ‌ and‌‌  economic‌‌   rights‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ local‌‌ government‌‌ units‌‌ ‌directly‌‌ 
except‌‌   ‌
d. Those‌  ‌that‌  ‌are‌  ‌essential‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌promotion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌‌  affected‌‌as‌‌well‌‌as‌‌the‌‌people‌‌therein.‌(‌ M ‌ iranda‌‌v.‌‌Aguirre‌) ‌ ‌
welfare‌‌of‌‌their‌‌inhabitants.‌  ‌ 1) in‌  ‌accordance‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌criteria‌  ‌(on‌  ‌income,‌  ‌land‌  ‌area‌‌ 
3. Conversion‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌HUC‌  ‌is‌  ‌substantial‌  ‌alteration‌  ‌of‌  ‌boundaries‌‌ 
and‌‌population)‌‌established‌‌in‌‌the‌‌LGC‌‌and‌‌   ‌
Types‌  ‌ governed‌  ‌by‌  ‌Sec.‌  ‌10,‌  ‌Art.‌  ‌X ‌ ‌and‌  ‌resultantly,‌  ‌said‌  ‌provision‌‌ 
2) subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌approval‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌majority‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌votes‌  ‌cast‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌‌ applies,‌‌
  governs‌‌   and‌‌ prevails‌‌ over‌‌ Sec.‌‌ 453‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ LGC‌‌ ‌(U
‌ mali‌‌ v.‌‌ 
plebiscite‌i‌ n‌‌the‌‌political‌‌units‌‌directly‌‌affected.‌  ‌ Comelec‌‌2‌ 014‌‌En‌‌Banc‌) ‌ ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 110‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

income‌‌ which‌‌ the‌‌ local‌‌ government‌‌ can‌‌ invariably‌‌ rely‌‌ upon‌‌ as‌‌ 
⭐‌Del‌‌Rosario‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌‌2020‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ Component‌‌ 
the‌‌source‌‌of‌‌much‌‌needed‌‌funds.‌(‌ A
‌ lvarez‌‌v.‌‌Guingona‌) ‌ P100M‌  ‌ AND‌‌150K‌  ‌ OR‌‌100‌‌sq‌‌km‌  ‌
City‌  ‌
Are‌  ‌the‌  ‌voters‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌city‌  ‌which‌  ‌used‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌component‌  ‌city‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌ 2. NB:‌‌
  In‌‌ case‌‌ of‌‌ conversion‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌new‌‌ component‌‌ city,‌‌ IRAs‌‌ are‌‌ ‌no‌‌ 
province‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌vote‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌plebiscite‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌division‌  ‌of‌  ‌said‌‌  longer‌  ‌included‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌computation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌P100M‌  ‌income‌‌  P50M‌‌‌latest‌‌ 
HUC‌  ‌ AND‌‌200K‌  ‌   ‌
province,‌  ‌even‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌  ‌city‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌converted‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌highly‌‌  income‌  ‌
requirement,‌‌as‌‌per‌‌RA‌‌9009‌‌amending‌‌Sec‌‌450‌‌of‌‌the‌‌LGC.‌  ‌
urbanized‌‌city‌‌(HUC)?‌N ‌ O‌. ‌ ‌
Land‌‌Area‌  ‌ Ave‌‌of‌‌‌P20M‌‌ 
OR‌‌2,000‌‌sq‌‌km‌‌‌of‌‌ 
As‌‌
  applied‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  present‌‌
  petition,‌‌
  ‌is‌‌
  the‌‌
  HUC‌‌  of‌‌
  Puerto‌‌ Princesa‌‌ a ‌‌ for‌‌2 ‌‌
1. In‌  ‌Mariano‌‌   v.‌‌
  Comelec,‌‌   petitioners‌‌   have‌‌
  not‌‌
  demonstrated‌‌   that‌‌  Province‌  ‌ AND‌‌250K‌  ‌ contiguous‌‌territory,‌‌ 
"political‌‌
  unit‌‌   directly‌‌
  affected"‌‌  by‌‌   the‌‌
  partition‌‌  of‌‌ the‌‌ province‌‌  consecutive‌‌ 
the‌‌   delineation‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  land‌‌
  area‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  proposed‌‌  City‌‌
  of‌‌  Makati‌‌  except‌‌‌if‌‌an‌‌island‌  ‌
of‌‌Palawan‌‌into‌‌three‌‌separate‌‌provinces‌? ‌ ‌ preceding‌‌yrs‌  ‌
will‌  ‌cause‌  ‌confusion‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌  ‌boundaries.‌  ‌We‌  ‌note‌  ‌that‌  ‌said‌‌ 
  careful‌‌ survey‌‌ of‌‌ cases‌‌ reveals‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ Court‌‌ has‌‌ considered‌‌ ‌three‌‌ 
A‌‌ delineation‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌change‌  ‌even‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌inch‌  ‌the‌  ‌land‌  ‌area‌‌  1. Division‌‌  and‌‌ Merger‌. ‌‌— ‌‌‌Division‌‌ and‌‌ merger‌‌ of‌‌ existing‌‌ LGUs‌‌ 
key‌  ‌factors‌  ‌in‌  ‌determining‌  ‌whether‌  ‌an‌  ‌LGU‌  ‌is‌‌  a ‌‌"political‌‌  unit‌‌  previously‌‌covered‌‌by‌‌Makati‌‌as‌‌a‌‌municipality.‌  ‌ shall‌‌comply‌‌with‌‌the‌‌same‌‌requirements‌‌for‌‌their‌‌creation:‌  ‌
directly‌‌affected"‌‌by‌‌an‌‌LGU‌‌change‌‌or‌‌conversion‌:  ‌‌ ‌ 2. Sec‌‌
  2 ‌‌Art‌‌
  9 ‌‌of‌‌ the‌‌ IRR‌‌ provides‌‌ "the‌‌ land‌‌ area‌‌ requirement‌‌ shall‌‌  a. Such‌  ‌division‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌reduce‌  ‌the‌  ‌income,‌‌ 
1) territorial‌‌alteration,‌‌   ‌ not‌‌
  apply‌‌   where‌‌   the‌‌
  proposed‌‌ province‌‌ is‌‌ composed‌‌ of‌‌ one‌‌ (1)‌‌  population,‌‌
  or‌‌
  land‌‌
  area‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ LGUs‌‌ concerned‌‌ ‌to‌‌ less‌‌ 
or‌‌
  more‌‌   islands"‌‌   (upheld‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌ 2011‌‌ Resolution‌‌ of‌‌ ‌Navarro‌‌ v.‌‌  than‌‌the‌‌minimum‌‌requirements‌‌‌prescribed.‌ 
2) political‌‌effects,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
Ermita‌) ‌ ‌ b. The‌  ‌income‌  ‌classification‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌
  original‌‌
  LGUs‌‌  shall‌‌ 
3) economic‌‌effects.‌  ‌
Population‌  ‌ not‌  ‌fall‌  ‌below‌  ‌its‌  ‌current‌  ‌classification‌  ‌prior‌‌
  to‌‌
  such‌‌ 
First‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌assailed‌  ‌statute‌  ‌will‌  ‌not‌  ‌result‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌alteration‌‌
  of‌‌
  Puerto‌‌  division.‌  ‌
1. Sec‌  ‌5(3)‌  ‌Art‌  ‌VI‌  ‌provides,‌  ‌inter‌  ‌alia‌, ‌ ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌city‌  ‌with‌  ‌a ‌‌
Princesa's‌‌territorial‌‌jurisdiction.‌  ‌
population‌  ‌of‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌250,000‌  ‌shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌one‌‌  2. Conversion‌‌of‌‌a‌‌Component‌‌City‌‌Into‌‌an‌‌HUC.‌‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌
As‌  ‌regards‌  ‌political‌  ‌and‌  ‌economic‌  ‌effects,‌  ‌voters‌  ‌of‌  ‌HUCs‌  ‌cannot‌‌  representative‌. ‌ ‌In‌‌   fact,‌‌
  section‌‌
  3 ‌‌of‌‌  the‌‌  Ordinance‌‌  appended‌‌  a. Requisites‌‌for‌‌conversion‌‌— ‌ ‌
vote‌  ‌for‌‌
  elective‌‌
  provincial‌‌   officials.‌‌
  HUCs,‌‌
  as‌‌
  conceptualized‌‌   in‌‌  our‌‌  to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌‌city‌‌  whose‌‌  population‌‌   has‌‌ 
local‌‌  government‌‌ laws,‌‌ are‌‌ essentially‌‌ cities‌‌ that‌‌ have‌‌ attained‌‌ a ‌‌level‌‌  i. Income‌  ‌— ‌ ‌latest‌  ‌annual‌  ‌income‌  ‌of‌  ‌not‌  ‌less‌‌ 
increased‌  ‌to‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌250,000‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌‌ 
of‌  ‌population‌  ‌growth‌  ‌and‌  ‌economic‌  ‌development‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌‌  one‌‌congressional‌‌representative‌.‌‌(M ‌ ariano‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌) ‌ ‌ than‌  ‌P50M‌  ‌as‌  ‌certified‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  city‌‌
  treasurer;‌ 
legislature‌  ‌has‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌sufficient‌  ‌for‌  ‌devolution‌  ‌of‌  ‌governmental‌‌  and‌  ‌
2. Plainly‌  ‌read,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌5(3)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌requires‌  ‌a ‌‌
powers‌‌as‌‌self-contained‌‌political‌‌units.‌  ‌ ii. Population‌  ‌— ‌ ‌which‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌‌ 
250,000‌  ‌minimum‌  ‌population‌  ‌only‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌city‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌ 
Lastly‌, ‌‌as‌‌   an‌‌
  HUC,‌‌  Puerto‌‌  Princesa,‌‌   in‌‌ its‌‌ own‌‌ right,‌‌ has‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌  entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌representative,‌  ‌but‌  ‌not‌  ‌so‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌province‌. ‌‌ 200,000‌‌inhabitants‌,‌‌as‌‌certified‌‌by‌‌NSO.‌  ‌
impose‌  ‌its‌  ‌own‌  ‌taxes,‌‌   fees‌‌  and‌‌   charges,‌‌   the‌‌
  revenues‌‌   of‌‌
  which‌‌   shall‌‌  (‌Aquino‌‌III‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌‌2010‌‌En‌‌Banc)‌  b. Procedure‌‌for‌‌conversion‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌
accrue‌‌  to‌‌  its‌‌
  own‌‌
  treasury.‌  ‌It‌‌   is‌‌
  likewise‌‌   entitled‌‌
  to‌‌  its‌‌ own‌‌ internal‌‌ 
Specific‌‌Requirements‌  ‌ i. Resolution‌‌   — ‌‌to‌‌
  the‌‌ Office‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ 
revenue‌  ‌allotment‌  ‌and‌  ‌its‌  ‌own‌  ‌share‌  ‌in‌  ‌whatever‌  ‌natural‌‌   resources‌‌ 
by‌  ‌its‌  ‌sanggunian‌  ‌as‌  ‌approved‌‌   and‌‌
  endorsed‌‌ 
may‌  ‌be‌  ‌found‌  ‌within‌  ‌its‌  ‌territory.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌therefore‌  ‌clear‌  ‌that‌  ‌Puerto‌‌  LGU‌  ‌ Income‌  ‌ Population‌  ‌ Land‌‌Area‌  ‌
by‌‌the‌‌city‌‌mayor.‌  ‌
Princesa‌‌   has‌‌   been‌‌
  rendered‌‌   fiscally‌‌   autonomous‌‌   from‌‌   the‌‌  province‌‌ 
2K‌; ‌ ‌5K‌  ‌in‌‌  ii. Declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌conversion‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Within‌  ‌30‌‌ 
of‌‌Palawan‌‌by‌‌virtue‌‌of‌‌the‌‌city's‌‌conversion‌‌into‌‌an‌‌HUC.‌  ‌
Barangay‌  ‌ NA‌  ‌ MM,‌  ‌SMPS‌‌  NA‌  ‌ days‌  ‌from‌  ‌receipt‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌resolution,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Income‌  ‌ and‌‌HUCs‌  ‌
President‌‌  shall‌‌
  declare‌‌  the‌‌
  component‌‌ city‌‌ as‌‌ 
1. The‌  ‌IRAs‌  ‌are‌  ‌items‌  ‌of‌  ‌income‌  ‌because‌  ‌they‌  ‌form‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Ave‌‌of‌P ‌ 2.5M‌‌  highly-urbanized.‌  ‌
gross‌‌   accretion‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  funds‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ LGU.‌‌ The‌‌ IRAs‌‌ regularly‌‌ and‌‌  for‌‌2 ‌‌ AND‌  ‌50‌  ‌sq‌  ‌km‌, ‌‌ iii. Plebiscite‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Within‌  ‌120‌  ‌days‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Municipality‌  ‌ AND‌‌25K‌  ‌
automatically‌‌   accrue‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  local‌‌   treasury‌‌  without‌‌   need‌‌
  of‌‌
  any‌‌  consecutive‌‌  except‌‌if‌‌an‌‌island‌  ‌ declaration.‌‌   ‌
further‌  ‌action‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌LGU.‌  ‌They‌  ‌thus‌  ‌constitute‌‌  preceding‌‌yrs‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 111‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

iv. Effect‌‌   of‌‌ Conversion‌‌ — ‌‌‌The‌‌ conversion‌‌ shall‌‌  of‌  ‌the‌  ‌LGC‌  ‌on‌  ‌organizational‌  ‌structure‌  ‌and‌  ‌staffing‌  ‌pattern,‌  ‌and‌‌  from‌  ‌being‌  ‌"underinclusive"‌  ‌because‌  ‌the‌  ‌classification‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌ 
make‌  ‌it‌  ‌independent‌‌   ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  province‌‌
  where‌‌  Section‌‌16‌‌otherwise‌‌known‌‌as‌‌the‌g ‌ eneral‌‌welfare‌‌clause.‌  ‌ include‌  ‌all‌  ‌individuals‌  ‌tainted‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌mischief‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌
  law‌ 
it‌‌is‌‌geographically‌‌located.‌  ‌ seeks‌‌to‌‌eliminate.‌  ‌
3. Abolition.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌when‌  ‌its‌  ‌income,‌  ‌population,‌  ‌OR‌  ‌land‌  ‌area‌‌
  has‌‌  MMDA‌‌v.‌‌Bel-Air‌‌Village‌‌Association‌  ‌
been‌  ‌irreversibly‌  ‌reduced‌  ‌to‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌  ‌the‌  ‌minimum‌‌  Rimando‌‌v.‌‌Naguilian‌‌Emission‌‌Testing‌‌Center‌‌‌2012‌  ‌
Congress‌  ‌delegated‌  ‌police‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌LGUs‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌LGC.‌  ‌LGUs‌‌ 
standards.‌  ‌
exercise‌  ‌police‌  ‌power‌  ‌through‌  ‌their‌  ‌respective‌  ‌legislative‌‌  A‌  ‌mayor‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌compelled‌  ‌by‌  ‌mandamus‌  ‌to‌  ‌issue‌  ‌a ‌ ‌business‌‌ 
4.
Beginning‌  ‌of‌  ‌Corporate‌  ‌Existence.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌When‌  ‌a ‌ ‌new‌  ‌LGU‌  ‌is‌‌  bodies‌. ‌ ‌ permit‌  ‌since‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌delegated‌  ‌police‌  ‌power‌‌ 
created,‌  ‌its‌  ‌corporate‌  ‌existence‌  ‌shall‌  ‌commence‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌‌  hence,‌  ‌discretionary‌  ‌in‌  ‌nature.‌  ‌As‌  ‌Section‌  ‌444(b)(3)(iv)‌  ‌so‌‌   states,‌‌ 
election‌  ‌and‌  ‌qualification‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌chief‌  ‌executive‌  ‌and‌  ‌a ‌‌ Legaspi‌‌v.‌‌City‌‌of‌‌Cebu‌‌‌2013‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌municipal‌  ‌mayor‌  ‌to‌  ‌issue‌  ‌licenses‌  ‌is‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌‌ 
majority‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌members‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌sanggunian‌, ‌ ‌unless‌  ‌some‌‌  Section‌‌16‌‌of‌‌the‌‌LGC.‌  ‌
other‌‌time‌‌is‌‌fixed‌‌therefor‌‌by‌‌the‌‌law‌‌or‌‌ordinance‌‌creating‌‌it.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌LGC‌  ‌has‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌empowered‌  ‌the‌  ‌LGUs‌  ‌to‌  ‌enact‌  ‌and‌  ‌adopt‌‌ 
ordinances‌‌   to‌‌
  regulate‌‌
  vehicular‌‌ traffic‌‌ and‌‌ to‌‌ prohibit‌‌ illegal‌‌ parking‌‌ 
C.‌‌Principles‌‌of‌‌Local‌‌Autonomy‌‌Powers‌‌of‌‌LGUs‌  ‌ Laygo‌‌v.‌‌Mayor‌‌of‌‌Solano‌‌‌2017‌  ‌
within‌‌their‌‌jurisdictions.‌  ‌
General‌‌welfare‌‌clause‌‌   ‌ The‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌of‌  ‌operating‌  ‌a ‌ ‌market‌  ‌stall‌  ‌under‌  ‌license‌  ‌is‌‌ 
Mosqueda‌‌v.‌‌Pilipino‌‌Banana‌‌Growers‌‌&‌‌Exporters‌2
‌ 016‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ always‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌police‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌   city‌‌
  government‌‌   and‌‌ 
Within‌  ‌their‌  ‌respective‌  ‌territorial‌  ‌jurisdictions,‌  ‌LGUs‌‌
  shall‌‌
  ensure‌‌ 
may‌  ‌be‌  ‌refused‌  ‌or‌  ‌granted‌  ‌for‌  ‌reasons‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌  ‌policy‌  ‌and‌  ‌sound‌‌ 
and‌‌support,‌‌among‌‌other‌‌things,‌‌   ‌ Section‌‌  16‌‌
  comprehends‌‌   two‌‌
  branches‌‌  of‌‌
  delegated‌‌
  powers,‌‌
  namely:‌‌  public‌  ‌administration.‌  ‌Being‌  ‌a ‌ ‌delegated‌  ‌police‌  ‌power,‌  ‌the‌  ‌grant‌  ‌or‌‌ 
1) the‌‌preservation‌‌and‌‌enrichment‌‌of‌‌culture,‌‌   ‌ the‌  ‌general‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌power‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌police‌  ‌power‌  ‌proper.‌‌  revocation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌privilege‌‌is,‌‌therefore,‌d ‌ iscretionary‌i‌ n‌‌nature.‌  ‌
General‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌power‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌delegated‌  ‌by‌‌ 
2) promote‌‌health‌‌and‌‌safety,‌  
Congress‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌
  local‌‌
  legislative‌‌
  body‌‌
  to‌‌
  enact‌‌
  ordinances‌‌
  and‌‌
  make‌‌  Eminent‌‌domain‌  ‌
3) enhance‌‌the‌‌right‌‌of‌‌the‌‌people‌‌to‌‌a‌‌balanced‌‌ecology,‌‌   ‌ regulations.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌courts‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌  ‌whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌‌ 
4) encourage‌‌  and‌‌ support‌‌ the‌‌ development‌‌ of‌‌ appropriate‌‌ and‌‌  The‌  ‌police‌‌   power‌‌
  proper,‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌   other‌‌
  hand,‌‌
  authorizes‌‌   the‌‌
  LGU‌‌
  to‌‌  requisites‌‌have‌‌been‌‌complied‌‌with:‌  ‌
self-reliant‌‌scientific‌‌and‌‌technological‌‌capabilities,‌‌   ‌ enact‌  ‌ordinances‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌and‌  ‌proper‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌health‌  ‌and‌  ‌safety,‌‌ 
1. An‌  ‌ordinance‌  ‌is‌  ‌enacted‌  ‌authorizing‌  ‌the‌  ‌LCE,‌  ‌to‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌the‌‌ 
5) improve‌‌public‌‌morals,‌‌   ‌ prosperity,‌  ‌morals,‌  ‌peace,‌  ‌good‌  ‌order,‌  ‌comfort,‌  ‌and‌  ‌convenience‌  ‌of‌‌ 
power‌‌   of‌‌
  eminent‌‌  domain‌‌ or‌‌ pursue‌‌ expropriation‌‌ proceedings‌‌ 
the‌‌  local‌‌
  government‌‌   unit‌‌
  and‌‌
  its‌‌ constituents,‌‌ and‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ protection‌‌ 
6) enhance‌‌economic‌‌prosperity‌‌and‌‌social‌‌justice,‌‌   ‌ over‌‌a‌‌particular‌‌private‌‌property.‌  ‌
of‌‌their‌‌property.‌  ‌
7) promote‌‌full‌‌employment‌‌among‌‌their‌‌residents,‌‌   ‌ 2. It‌‌
  is‌‌
  exercised‌‌
  ‌for‌‌
  public‌‌
  use,‌‌
  purpose‌‌
  or‌‌ welfare,‌‌ or‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ 
Advancing‌  ‌the‌  ‌interests‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌residents‌  ‌who‌  ‌are‌  ‌vulnerable‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
8) maintain‌‌peace‌‌and‌‌order,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ benefit‌‌of‌‌the‌‌poor‌‌and‌‌the‌‌landless.‌  ‌
alleged‌  ‌health‌  ‌risks‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌  ‌their‌‌
  exposure‌‌
  to‌‌
  pesticide‌‌  drift‌‌
  justifies‌‌ 
9) preserve‌‌   the‌‌
  comfort‌‌
  and‌‌
  convenience‌‌
  of‌‌ their‌‌ inhabitants.‌‌  the‌  ‌motivation‌  ‌behind‌  ‌the‌  ‌enactment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌ordinance.‌  ‌However,‌‌  3. There‌‌is‌p
‌ ayment‌‌of‌‌just‌‌compensation.‌  ‌
(‌Sec‌‌16‌‌LGC‌) ‌ ‌ Ordinance‌‌No.‌‌0309-07‌v‌ iolates‌t‌ he‌‌Due‌‌Process‌‌Clause.‌‌   ‌ 4. A‌  ‌valid‌  ‌and‌  ‌definite‌  ‌offer‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌previously‌  ‌made‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌  ‌impossibility‌  ‌of‌  ‌carrying‌  ‌out‌  ‌a ‌ ‌shift‌  ‌to‌  ‌another‌  ‌mode‌  ‌of‌‌  property‌‌owner,‌‌but‌‌said‌‌offer‌‌was‌‌not‌‌accepted.‌  ‌
City‌‌of‌‌General‌‌Santos‌‌v.‌‌COA‌‌‌2014‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
pesticide‌  ‌application‌  ‌within‌  ‌three‌  ‌months‌  ‌can‌  ‌readily‌  ‌be‌‌  Just‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌determined‌  ‌as‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌‌   ‌actual‌‌ 
  of‌‌
The‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌mandate‌  ‌for‌  ‌local‌  ‌autonomy‌  ‌supports‌  ‌petitioner‌‌  appreciated‌  ‌given‌  ‌the‌  ‌vast‌  ‌area‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌affected‌  ‌plantations‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌ 
taking.‌‌‌(‌The‌‌City‌‌of‌‌Cebu‌‌v.‌‌Sps‌‌Dedamo‌) ‌ ‌
city’s‌‌  issuance‌‌  of‌‌
  EO‌‌
  40‌‌
  s.‌‌
  2008,‌‌
  creating‌‌
  change‌‌ management‌‌ teams‌‌  corresponding‌‌resources‌‌required‌‌therefor.‌  ‌
as‌‌an‌‌initial‌‌step‌‌for‌‌its‌‌organization‌‌development‌‌masterplan.‌  ‌ Genuine‌‌necessity‌‌for‌‌public‌‌use‌‌‌entails:‌  ‌
Ordinance‌  ‌No.‌  ‌0309-07‌  ‌also‌  ‌violates‌  ‌the‌  ‌Equal‌  ‌Protection‌‌ 
Local‌  ‌autonomy‌  ‌also‌  ‌grants‌  ‌local‌  ‌governments‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌‌  Clause.‌‌ A ‌‌ban‌‌ against‌‌ aerial‌‌ spraying‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ weed‌‌ out‌‌ the‌‌ harm‌‌ that‌‌  1. It‌‌should‌‌be‌‌ascertained‌‌to‌‌be‌‌PUBLIC‌‌in‌‌character;‌  ‌
streamline‌‌   and‌‌
  reorganize.‌‌   This‌‌
  power‌‌ is‌‌ inferred‌‌ from‌‌ Section‌‌ 76‌‌  the‌‌
  ordinance‌‌   seeks‌‌
  to‌‌  achieve.‌‌
  In‌‌
  the‌‌
  process,‌‌  the‌‌
  ordinance‌‌   suffers‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 112‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

2. The‌  ‌ascertainment‌  ‌must‌  ‌precede‌  ‌or‌  ‌accompany,‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌‌  c) Unregistered‌‌or‌‌abandoned‌‌and‌‌idle‌‌lands;‌  ‌ properties‌‌   of‌‌
  public‌‌  dominion,‌‌   they‌‌
  indisputably‌‌   belong‌‌  to‌‌ the‌‌ State,‌‌ 
follow,‌‌the‌‌taking‌‌of‌‌the‌‌land;‌‌and‌  ‌ d) Those‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌declared‌  ‌Areas‌  ‌or‌  ‌Priority‌  ‌Development,‌‌  and‌‌   are‌‌
  outside‌‌   the‌‌
  commerce‌‌   of‌‌
  man.‌‌ Thus,‌‌ unless‌‌ petitioner‌‌ leases‌‌ 
3. There‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reasonable‌  ‌or‌  ‌practical‌  ‌necessity,‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌would‌‌  Zonal‌‌
  Improvement‌‌   Program‌‌  sites,‌‌
  and‌‌ Slum‌‌ Improvement‌‌ and‌‌  its‌  ‌real‌  ‌property‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌taxable‌  ‌person,‌  ‌the‌  ‌specific‌  ‌property‌  ‌leased‌‌ 
combine‌  ‌the‌  ‌greatest‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌least‌‌  Resettlement‌‌Program‌‌sites‌‌which‌‌have‌‌not‌‌yet‌‌been‌‌acquired;‌  ‌ becomes‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌real‌  ‌property‌  ‌tax;‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌case,‌  ‌only‌  ‌those‌‌ 
inconvenience‌  ‌and‌  ‌expense‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌condemning‌  ‌party‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  portions‌  ‌of‌  ‌petitioner’s‌  ‌properties‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌leased‌  ‌to‌  ‌taxable‌‌ 
e) BLISS‌‌sites‌‌which‌‌have‌‌not‌‌yet‌‌been‌‌acquired;‌‌and‌  ‌
property‌‌owner.‌‌(d ‌ e‌‌la‌‌Paz‌‌Masikip‌‌v.‌‌City‌‌of‌‌Pasig‌) ‌ ‌ persons‌‌like‌‌private‌‌parties‌‌are‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌real‌‌property‌‌tax.‌  ‌
f) Privately-owned‌‌lands.‌  ‌
Before‌‌an‌‌LGU‌‌may‌‌enter‌‌into‌‌the‌‌possession‌‌of‌‌the‌‌property,‌‌it‌‌must‌‌   ‌
Where‌  ‌[on-site]‌  ‌development‌  ‌is‌  ‌found‌  ‌more‌  ‌practicable‌  ‌and‌‌  ⭐‌L
‌ RTA‌‌v.‌‌Quezon‌‌City‌‌‌2019‌  ‌
1) file‌‌a‌‌complaint‌‌for‌‌expropriation‌‌in‌‌the‌‌proper‌‌court‌‌and‌  ‌
advantageous‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌beneficiaries,‌  ‌the‌  ‌priorities‌  ‌mentioned‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌‌ 
An‌  ‌agency‌  ‌will‌  ‌be‌  ‌classified‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌government‌  ‌instrumentality‌‌ 
2) deposit‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌15%‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌property's‌  ‌fair‌  ‌market‌  ‌value‌‌  section‌‌shall‌‌not‌‌apply‌. ‌ ‌
vested‌‌with‌‌corporate‌‌powers‌‌when‌‌the‌‌following‌e ‌ lements‌‌concur:‌‌   ‌
based‌‌on‌‌its‌‌current‌‌tax‌‌declaration.‌  ‌ SEC.‌  ‌10.‌  ‌Modes‌  ‌of‌‌
  Land‌‌
  Acquisition.‌‌
  — ‌‌xxx‌‌  ‌expropriation‌‌  shall‌‌
  be‌‌ 
a) it‌‌performs‌‌governmental‌‌functions,‌‌and‌  ‌
The‌  ‌law‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌make‌  ‌the‌  ‌determination‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌public‌‌  purpose‌‌
  a ‌‌ resorted‌  ‌to‌  ‌only‌  ‌when‌  ‌other‌  ‌modes‌  ‌of‌  ‌acquisition‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌‌ 
condition‌  ‌precedent‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌writ‌  ‌of‌  ‌possession.‌‌  exhausted‌:‌‌x‌‌x‌‌x.‌  ‌ b) it‌‌enjoys‌‌operational‌‌autonomy.‌‌   ‌
(‌Francia‌‌v.‌‌Municipality‌‌of‌‌Meycauayan‌) ‌ ‌ It‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌matter‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌instrumentality‌  ‌is‌‌
  endowed‌‌ 
City‌‌of‌‌Manila‌‌v.‌‌Prieto‌2
‌ 019‌‌see‌E
‌ minent‌‌Domain‌‌u
‌ nder‌‌Basic‌‌ 
with‌  ‌corporate‌  ‌powers.‌  ‌Its‌  ‌characterization‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌lost‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Republic‌‌v.‌‌Heirs‌‌of‌‌Borbon‌‌and‌‌CA‌‌2
‌ 015‌  ‌ Principles‌‌for‌‌more‌‌discussions‌  ‌ government‌‌entity‌‌possesses‌‌corporate‌‌status.‌  ‌
The‌‌
  expropriator‌‌ who‌‌ has‌‌ taken‌‌ possession‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ property‌‌ subject‌‌ of‌‌  Taxing‌‌power‌  ‌ Here,‌  ‌the‌  ‌LRTA‌  ‌bears‌  ‌the‌  ‌elemental‌  ‌characteristics‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌
expropriation‌  ‌is‌  ‌obliged‌  ‌to‌  ‌pay‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  government‌  ‌instrumentality‌  ‌vested‌  ‌with‌  ‌corporate‌  ‌powers.‌  ‌A ‌‌
landowner‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌possession‌  ‌although‌  ‌the‌‌  Taxes,‌‌Fees,‌‌and‌‌Charges‌  ‌ government‌‌   instrumentality‌‌   though‌‌   vested‌‌  with‌‌
  corporate‌‌   powers‌‌  is‌‌ 
proceedings‌  ‌had‌  ‌been‌  ‌discontinued‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌ground‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌‌  exempt‌‌   from‌‌  real‌‌
  property‌‌
  tax,‌‌
  but‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌exemption‌‌   shall‌‌ not‌‌ extend‌‌ 
purpose‌‌for‌‌the‌‌expropriation‌‌had‌‌meanwhile‌‌ceased.‌  ‌ to‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌private‌  ‌entities‌  ‌to‌  ‌whom‌  ‌the‌  ‌beneficial‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Smart‌‌v.‌‌Municipality‌‌of‌‌Malvar,‌‌Batangas‌‌‌2014‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
government‌‌instrumentality's‌‌properties‌‌has‌‌been‌‌vested‌.  ‌‌ ‌
Henry‌‌Sy‌‌v.‌‌Quezon‌‌City‌‌‌2013‌  ‌ The‌  ‌LGC‌  ‌defines‌  ‌the‌  ‌term‌  ‌“‌charges‌” ‌ ‌as‌  ‌referring‌  ‌to‌  ‌pecuniary‌‌ 
liability,‌‌
  as‌‌
  rents‌‌  or‌‌
  fees‌‌  against‌‌  persons‌‌   or‌‌
  property,‌‌  while‌‌
  the‌‌
  term‌‌   ‌

The‌  ‌correct‌  ‌rate‌  ‌of‌  ‌legal‌  ‌interest‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌applied‌  ‌is‌  ‌twelve‌  ‌percent‌‌  “‌fee‌” ‌‌means‌‌  “a‌‌
  charge‌‌   fixed‌‌
  by‌‌
  law‌‌  or‌‌ ordinance‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ regulation‌‌ or‌‌  Just‌‌share‌‌in‌‌the‌‌national‌‌taxes‌  ‌
(12%)‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌six‌  ‌percent‌  ‌(6%)‌  ‌per‌  ‌annum,‌‌   owing‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  nature‌‌
  of‌‌  inspection‌‌of‌‌a‌‌business‌‌or‌‌activity.”‌‌   ‌
the‌‌
  City’s‌‌  obligation‌‌   as‌‌
  an‌‌
  effective‌‌  forbearance.‌‌ Notwithstanding‌‌ the‌‌  1. Section‌‌   284.‌‌
  Allotment‌‌   of‌‌
  Internal‌‌ Revenue‌‌ Taxes.‌‌ — ‌‌based‌‌ 
Since‌  ‌the‌  ‌main‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌Ordinance‌  ‌No.‌  ‌18‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌regulate‌  ‌certain‌‌ 
lack‌‌
  of‌‌
  proper‌‌ authorization,‌‌ the‌‌ legal‌‌ character‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ City’s‌‌ action‌‌ as‌‌  on‌  ‌the‌  ‌collection‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  third‌‌  fiscal‌‌
  year‌‌
  preceding‌‌
  the‌‌
  current‌‌ 
construction‌  ‌activities‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌identified‌  ‌special‌  ‌projects,‌  ‌which‌‌ 
one‌‌of‌‌"taking"‌‌did‌‌not‌‌change.‌  ‌ fiscal‌‌year‌‌as‌‌follows:‌O ‌ n‌‌the‌‌3rd‌‌year‌‌and‌‌thereafter,‌‌40%.‌  ‌
included‌‌   “cell‌‌ sites”‌‌ or‌‌ telecommunications‌‌ towers,‌‌ the‌‌ fees‌‌ imposed‌‌ 
Exemplary‌  ‌damages‌  ‌and‌‌   attorney’s‌‌
  fees‌‌  should‌‌
  be‌‌
  awarded‌‌
  to‌‌  are‌  ‌primarily‌  ‌regulatory‌  ‌in‌  ‌nature,‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌primarily‌‌  2. Section‌  ‌287.‌  ‌Local‌  ‌Development‌  ‌Projects.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌shall‌‌ 
the‌  ‌landowner‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌takes‌  ‌possession‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  revenue-raising‌. ‌ ‌While‌  ‌the‌  ‌fees‌  ‌may‌  ‌contribute‌  ‌to‌‌   the‌‌
  revenues‌‌   of‌‌  appropriate‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌annual‌  ‌budget‌  ‌no‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌  ‌20%‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌ 
property‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌prolonged‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌time‌  ‌without‌  ‌properly‌‌  the‌  ‌Municipality,‌  ‌this‌  ‌effect‌  ‌is‌  ‌merely‌  ‌incidental.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌the‌  ‌fees‌‌  annual‌‌IRA‌‌for‌‌development‌‌projects.‌‌   ‌
initiating‌‌expropriation‌‌proceedings‌. ‌ ‌ imposed‌‌are‌N ‌ OT‌t‌ axes.‌‌   ‌ 3. The‌  ‌share‌  ‌of‌  ‌each‌  ‌LGU‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌
  released,‌‌   without‌‌
  need‌‌   of‌‌
  any‌‌ 
RA‌  ‌No‌‌
  7279.‌‌
  SEC‌‌
  9.‌‌
  Priorities‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Acquisition‌‌  of‌‌
  Land.‌‌
  — ‌‌‌Lands‌‌  further‌‌   action,‌‌ directly‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ treasurer‌‌ on‌‌ a ‌‌quarterly‌‌ basis,‌‌ and‌‌ 
MCIAA‌‌v.‌‌City‌‌of‌‌Lapu-lapu‌‌and‌‌Pacaldo‌‌2
‌ 015‌  ‌ which‌‌   shall‌‌ not‌‌ be‌‌ subject‌‌ to‌‌ any‌‌ ‌lien‌‌ or‌‌ holdback‌‌ ‌that‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ 
for‌s‌ ocialized‌‌housing‌‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌acquired‌‌in‌‌the‌‌following‌‌order:‌  ‌
imposed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌national‌‌government‌‌for‌‌whatever‌‌purpose.‌  ‌
a) Those‌‌owned‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Government;‌  ‌ Like‌‌   in‌‌ ‌MIAA‌, ‌‌the‌‌ airport‌‌ lands‌‌ and‌‌ buildings‌‌ of‌‌ MCIAA‌‌ are‌‌ properties‌‌ 
of‌  ‌public‌  ‌dominion‌  ‌because‌  ‌they‌  ‌are‌  ‌intended‌  ‌for‌  ‌public‌  ‌use.‌  ‌As‌‌  ⭐‌Mandanas‌‌v.‌‌Ochoa,‌‌Jr‌‌‌2018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
b) Alienable‌‌lands‌‌of‌‌the‌‌public‌‌domain;‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 113‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Section‌  ‌6,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌X ‌ ‌the‌  ‌1987‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌textually‌  ‌commands‌  ‌the‌‌  Whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌national‌  ‌wealth,‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌case‌  ‌the‌  ‌Camago-Malampaya‌‌  2. A‌‌municipal‌‌ordinance‌‌is‌n
‌ ot‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌collateral‌‌attack‌. ‌ ‌
allocation‌‌to‌‌the‌‌LGUs‌‌of‌‌a‌‌just‌‌share‌‌in‌‌the‌‌‌national‌‌taxes.‌  ‌ reservoir,‌  ‌is‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌Province‌  ‌of‌  ‌Palawan's‌  ‌"area"‌  ‌for‌  ‌it‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌  3. The‌  ‌Vice-Governor,‌‌   as‌‌
  the‌‌
  presiding‌‌   officer‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Sangguniang‌‌ 
entitled‌‌to‌‌40%‌‌of‌‌the‌‌government's‌‌share‌.  ‌‌ ‌ Panlalawigan,‌  ‌has‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌control‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌funds‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌‌  phrase‌‌
  national‌‌
  ‌internal‌‌
  revenue‌‌   taxes‌‌ engrafted‌‌ in‌‌ Section‌‌ 284‌‌ 
is‌‌
  undoubtedly‌‌ ‌more‌‌ restrictive‌‌ than‌‌ the‌‌ term‌‌ national‌‌ taxes‌‌ written‌‌  Territorial‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌territorial‌  ‌boundaries‌  ‌as‌‌  said‌  ‌body.‌  ‌Accordingly,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌Vice-Governor‌  ‌who‌  ‌has‌  ‌the‌‌ 
in‌‌
  Section‌‌
  6.‌‌
  As‌‌
  such,‌‌  Congress‌‌
  has‌‌
  actually‌‌  departed‌‌
  from‌‌   the‌‌
  letter‌‌  defined‌‌in‌‌the‌‌LGU's‌‌charter.‌  ‌ authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌approve‌  ‌disbursement‌  ‌vouchers‌  ‌for‌‌   expenditures‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌1987‌‌Constitution.‌  ‌ appropriated‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ operation‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Sangguniang‌‌ Panlalawigan.‌‌ 
An‌  ‌LGU's‌‌  territorial‌‌   jurisdiction‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌
  necessarily‌‌
  co-extensive‌‌   with‌‌ 
(‌Atienza‌‌v.‌‌Villarosa‌) ‌ ‌
Thus,‌‌
  the‌‌
  exclusion‌‌   of‌‌
  other‌‌
  national‌‌
  taxes‌‌  like‌‌
  customs‌‌   duties‌‌  its‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌or‌  ‌assertion‌  ‌of‌  ‌powers.‌  ‌Unless‌  ‌clearly‌  ‌expanded‌  ‌by‌‌ 
from‌  ‌the‌  ‌base‌  ‌for‌  ‌determining‌  ‌the‌  ‌just‌  ‌share‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌LGUs‌‌  Congress,‌  ‌the‌  ‌LGU's‌  ‌territorial‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌refers‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌‌  4. As‌  ‌a ‌ ‌corollary,‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌salary‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌employee‌  ‌or‌  ‌official‌  ‌is‌‌ 
contravened‌‌the‌‌express‌‌constitutional‌‌edict‌‌in‌‌Sec‌‌6‌‌Art‌‌X.‌  ‌ land‌  ‌area‌. ‌ ‌Utilization‌  ‌of‌  ‌natural‌  ‌resources‌  ‌found‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌land‌  charged‌‌   against‌‌   the‌‌  provincial‌‌   funds‌, ‌‌even‌‌
  if‌‌ this‌‌ employee‌‌ 
area‌‌as‌‌delimited‌‌by‌‌law‌‌is‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌the‌4 ‌ 0%‌‌LGU‌‌share.‌  ‌ reports‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Vice-Governor‌  ‌or‌  ‌is‌  ‌assigned‌  ‌to‌  ‌his‌  ‌office,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Villafuerte,‌‌Jr‌‌v.‌‌Robredo‌‌‌2014‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ Governor‌  ‌retains‌  ‌the‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌appoint‌  ‌the‌  ‌said‌  ‌employee‌‌ 
Closure‌‌and‌‌opening‌‌of‌‌roads‌  ‌ pursuant‌‌to‌‌Section‌‌465(b)(v)‌‌of‌‌Rep.‌‌Act‌‌No.‌‌7160.‌‌(i‌ bid.‌) ‌ ‌
A‌‌
  reading‌‌   of‌‌ MC‌‌ No.‌‌ 2010-138‌‌ shows‌‌ that‌‌ ‌it‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌mere‌‌ reiteration‌‌ of‌‌ 
5. It‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  vice‌‌
  mayor‌‌
  who‌‌   exercises‌‌  administrative‌‌   control‌‌   over‌‌ 
an‌‌  existing‌‌   provision‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  LGC.‌‌ It‌‌ was‌‌ plainly‌‌ intended‌‌ to‌‌ remind‌‌  1. As‌  ‌a ‌ ‌general‌  ‌rule,‌  ‌local‌  ‌roads‌  ‌used‌  ‌for‌  ‌public‌  ‌service‌  ‌are‌‌ 
the‌  ‌Sangguniang‌  ‌Bayan's‌  ‌funds‌  ‌as‌  ‌presiding‌  ‌officer‌  ‌thereof.‌‌ 
LGUs‌  ‌to‌  ‌faithfully‌  ‌observe‌  ‌the‌  ‌directive‌‌   stated‌‌   in‌‌
  Section‌‌
  287‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌  considered‌  ‌public‌  ‌property‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌absolute‌  ‌control‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Thus,‌  ‌the‌  ‌approval‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌mayor‌  ‌in‌  ‌relation‌  ‌to‌  ‌travel‌  ‌orders‌‌ 
LGC‌‌   to‌‌ utilize‌‌ the‌‌ 20%‌‌ portion‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ IRA‌‌ for‌‌ development‌‌ projects.‌‌ ‌It‌‌  Congress;‌  ‌hence,‌  ‌local‌  ‌governments‌  ‌have‌  ‌no‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌‌ 
chargeable‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Sangguniang‌  ‌Bayan's‌  ‌funds‌  ‌is‌  ‌only‌‌ 
was,‌  ‌at‌  ‌best,‌  ‌an‌  ‌advisory‌  ‌to‌  ‌LGUs‌  ‌to‌  ‌examine‌  ‌themselves‌  ‌if‌  ‌they‌‌  control‌‌or‌‌regulate‌‌their‌‌use.‌  ‌
ministerial‌  ‌and‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌disregarded‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌mayor's‌‌ 
have‌‌been‌‌complying‌‌with‌‌the‌‌law.‌  ‌ However,‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌10‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌LGC,‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌delegated‌  ‌to‌‌  unjustified‌‌refusal‌‌to‌‌do‌‌so.‌‌(M ‌ aulana‌‌v.‌‌Pangansayan‌‌2 ‌ 019‌) ‌ ‌
political‌‌  subdivisions‌‌
  some‌‌   control‌‌ of‌‌ local‌‌ roads.‌‌ (‌Figuracion‌‌ 
6. Section‌  ‌53‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌   LGC‌‌
  is‌‌
  more‌‌
  exacting‌‌   as‌‌
  it‌‌
  requires‌‌  that‌‌ 
 ‌
v.‌‌Sps‌‌Libi‌) ‌ ‌
Equitable‌  ‌share‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌proceeds‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌utilization‌  ‌and‌‌  the‌  ‌“majority‌  ‌of‌  ‌ALL‌  ‌members‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  sanggunian‌‌   elected‌‌ 
2. To‌  ‌convert‌  ‌a ‌ ‌barrio‌  ‌road‌  ‌into‌  ‌patrimonial‌  ‌property,‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌‌  and‌‌qualified”‌‌shall‌‌constitute‌‌a‌‌quorum.‌  ‌
development‌‌of‌‌the‌‌national‌‌wealth‌‌within‌‌respective‌‌areas‌‌   ‌
requires‌‌  the‌‌
  LGU‌‌   to‌‌  enact‌‌ an‌‌ ‌ordinance,‌‌ approved‌‌ by‌‌ at‌‌ least‌‌ 
7. The‌‌   Vice‌‌   Governor,‌‌ as‌‌ the‌‌ Presiding‌‌ Officer,‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ considered‌‌ 
two-thirds‌‌   (2/3)‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ Sanggunian‌‌ members,‌‌ permanently‌‌ 
★ Section‌‌   290.‌‌
  Amount‌‌   of‌‌   Share‌‌  of‌‌   LGUs.‌‌   — ‌‌In‌‌
  addition‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌  a‌‌
  part‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  SP‌‌  for‌‌
  purposes‌‌ of‌‌ ascertaining‌‌ if‌‌ a ‌‌quorum‌‌ exists.‌‌ 
closing‌‌the‌‌road.‌‌(A ‌ lolino‌‌v.‌‌Flores‌‌2 ‌ 016‌) ‌ ‌
IRA,‌  ‌LGUs‌  ‌shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌a ‌ ‌share‌  ‌of‌  ‌40%‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌gross‌  ‌collection‌‌  In‌  ‌determining‌  ‌the‌  ‌number‌  ‌which‌  ‌constitutes‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌majority‌‌ 
Legislative‌‌power‌  ‌ vote,‌‌   the‌‌  Vice‌‌   Governor‌‌   is‌‌
  excluded.‌‌   The‌‌  Vice‌‌
  Governor's‌‌   right‌‌ 
derived‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌national‌  ‌government‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌   preceding‌‌   fiscal‌‌ 
year‌‌   from‌‌   mining‌‌
  taxes,‌‌  royalties,‌‌   forestry‌‌ and‌‌ fishery‌‌ charges,‌‌  Requisites‌f‌ or‌‌valid‌‌ordinance‌  ‌ to‌‌
  vote‌‌   is‌‌  merely‌‌   contingent‌‌   and‌‌
  arises‌‌ only‌‌ when‌‌ there‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌tie‌‌ 
and‌  ‌such‌  ‌other‌  ‌taxes,‌  ‌fees,‌  ‌or‌  ‌charges,‌  ‌including‌  ‌related‌‌  to‌‌break.‌‌(J‌ avier‌‌v.‌‌Cadiao‌‌2 ‌ 016‌) ‌ ‌
1. It‌  ‌must‌  ‌also‌  ‌conform‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌  ‌substantive‌‌ 
surcharges,‌  ‌interests,‌  ‌or‌  ‌fines,‌  ‌and‌  ‌from‌  ‌its‌  ‌share‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌‌  requirements:‌‌   ‌ Fernando‌‌v.‌‌St‌‌Scholastica’s‌‌College‌‌‌2013‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
co-production,‌  ‌joint‌  ‌venture‌  ‌or‌  ‌production‌  ‌sharing‌  ‌agreement‌‌ 
a) must‌‌not‌‌contravene‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌‌or‌‌any‌‌statute;‌‌   ‌
in‌  ‌the‌  ‌utilization‌‌   and‌‌
  development‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  national‌‌   wealth‌‌  Even‌  ‌without‌  ‌going‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌discussion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌strict‌  ‌scrutiny‌  ‌test,‌‌ 
within‌‌their‌‌territorial‌‌jurisdiction‌. ‌ ‌ b) must‌‌not‌‌be‌‌unfair‌‌or‌‌oppressive;‌‌   ‌ Ordinance‌  ‌No.‌  ‌192,‌  ‌s.‌  ‌1994‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌struck‌  ‌down‌  ‌for‌  ‌not‌  ‌being‌‌ 
c) must‌‌not‌‌be‌‌partial‌‌or‌‌discriminatory;‌‌   ‌ reasonably‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌to‌  ‌accomplish‌  ‌the‌  ‌City’s‌  ‌purpose.‌  ‌More‌‌ 
⭐‌Republic‌‌v.‌‌Prov‌‌of‌‌Palawan‌‌‌2018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌as‌‌upheld‌‌in‌‌the‌‌  importantly,‌‌it‌‌is‌o ‌ ppressive‌‌of‌‌private‌‌rights‌. ‌ ‌
2020‌‌Resolution‌‌‌penned‌‌by‌‌Leonen‌‌J ‌ ‌ d) must‌‌not‌‌prohibit‌‌but‌‌may‌‌regulate‌‌trade;‌‌   ‌
Anent‌  ‌the‌  ‌objectives‌  ‌of‌  ‌prevention‌  ‌of‌  ‌concealment‌  ‌of‌  ‌unlawful‌‌   acts‌‌ 
e) must‌‌be‌‌general‌‌and‌‌consistent‌‌with‌‌public‌‌policy;‌‌and‌‌   ‌
and‌  ‌“un-neighborliness,”‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌obvious‌  ‌that‌  ‌providing‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌parking‌‌ 
f) must‌‌not‌‌be‌‌unreasonable.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 114‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

area‌‌ has‌‌ no‌‌ logical‌‌ connection‌‌ to,‌‌ and‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ reasonably‌‌ necessary‌‌ for,‌‌  3. Local‌‌
  referendum‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌
  legal‌‌
  process‌‌
  whereby‌‌ the‌‌ registered‌‌  3. Municipality‌  ‌of‌  ‌Pililla,‌  ‌Rizal‌  ‌v.‌  ‌CA‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌legality‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
the‌‌accomplishment‌‌of‌‌these‌‌goals.‌  ‌ voters‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ LGUs‌‌ may‌‌ approve,‌‌ amend‌‌ or‌‌ reject‌‌ any‌‌ ordinance‌‌  representation‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌unauthorized‌  ‌counsel‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌   raised‌‌   at‌‌ 
enacted‌‌by‌‌the‌‌sanggunian.‌  ‌ any‌‌stage‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌proceedings.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌have‌  ‌not‌  ‌adequately‌  ‌shown‌  ‌that‌  ‌an‌  ‌80%‌  ‌see-thru‌‌ 
fence‌  ‌would‌‌   provide‌‌   better‌‌
  protection‌‌
  and‌‌  a ‌‌higher‌‌
  level‌‌
  of‌‌  security,‌‌  4. The‌  ‌COMELEC's‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌review‌  ‌the‌  ‌substance‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  4. Although‌‌   a ‌‌municipality‌‌   may‌‌  not‌‌
  hire‌‌  a ‌‌private‌‌
  lawyer‌‌ to‌‌ represent‌‌ 
or‌  ‌serve‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌more‌  ‌satisfactory‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌deterrent,‌  ‌than‌‌  a ‌‌tall‌‌
  solid‌‌  propositions‌‌   in‌‌
  an‌‌ initiative‌‌ petition‌‌ is‌‌ implied‌‌ in‌‌ Section‌‌ 12‌‌ of‌‌  it‌  ‌in‌  ‌litigations,‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌interest‌  ‌of‌  ‌substantial‌  ‌justice‌  ‌however,‌  ‌we‌‌ 
concrete‌‌wall.‌  ‌ RA‌‌
  No.‌‌  6735,‌‌   which‌‌   gives‌‌
  this‌‌  Court‌‌ appellate‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌ review‌‌  hold‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌municipality‌  ‌may‌  ‌adopt‌  ‌the‌  ‌work‌  ‌already‌‌ 
the‌  ‌COMELEC's‌  ‌findings‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌sufficiency‌  ‌or‌  ‌insufficiency‌‌   of‌‌  performed‌‌   in‌‌
  good‌‌   faith‌‌   by‌‌
  such‌‌   private‌‌   lawyer‌, ‌‌which‌‌ work‌‌ is‌‌ 
Samahan‌‌ng‌‌mga‌‌Progresibong‌‌Kabataan‌‌v.‌‌Quezon‌‌City‌‌  the‌  ‌petition‌  ‌for‌  ‌initiative‌‌
  or‌‌  referendum.‌‌   (‌Marmeto‌‌   v.‌‌
  Comelec‌‌  beneficial‌‌to‌‌it‌‌provided‌‌that‌  ‌
2017‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ 2017‌‌En‌‌Banc‌) ‌ ‌ a. no‌‌injustice‌‌is‌‌thereby‌‌heaped‌‌on‌‌the‌‌adverse‌‌party‌‌and‌‌   ‌

The‌  ‌Manila‌  ‌and‌  ‌Navotas‌  ‌Ordinances‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌completely‌‌  Corporate‌‌powers‌  ‌ b. no‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌guise‌  ‌is‌  ‌paid‌  ‌therefor‌  ‌by‌  ‌said‌‌ 
stricken‌  ‌down‌  ‌since‌  ‌their‌  ‌exceptions,‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌essentially‌  municipality‌‌to‌‌the‌‌private‌‌lawyer.‌‌   ‌
To‌‌sue‌‌and‌‌be‌‌sued‌  ‌
determinative‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  scope‌‌
  and‌‌
  breadth‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ curfew‌‌ regulations,‌‌ are‌‌  Unless‌‌
  so‌‌
  expressly‌‌
  adopted,‌‌
  the‌‌ private‌‌ lawyer's‌‌ work‌‌ cannot‌‌ bind‌‌ 
inadequate‌‌   to‌‌
  ensure‌‌   protection‌‌  of‌‌ the‌‌ above-mentioned‌‌ fundamental‌‌  1. Private‌‌  attorneys‌‌ cannot‌‌ represent‌‌ a ‌‌province‌‌ or‌‌ municipality‌‌ 
the‌‌municipality.‌  ‌
rights.‌  ‌While‌  ‌some‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌valid,‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌are‌  ‌merely‌‌  in‌‌
  lawsuits‌. ‌Only‌‌ the‌‌ ‌provincial‌‌ fiscal,‌‌ provincial‌‌ and‌‌ municipal‌‌ 
attorney‌  ‌should‌  ‌represent‌  ‌a ‌ ‌municipality‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌‌
  lawsuits.‌‌  Only‌‌
  in‌‌  5.‌  ‌The‌  ‌LGC‌  ‌requires‌  ‌prior‌  ‌authorization‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌sangguniang‌‌ 
ancillary‌‌thereto;‌‌as‌‌such,‌‌they‌‌cannot‌‌subsist‌‌independently.‌  ‌
exceptional‌  ‌instances‌  ‌may‌  ‌a ‌ ‌private‌  ‌attorney‌  ‌be‌  ‌hired‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌‌ panlungsod,‌  ‌law,‌  ‌or‌  ‌ordinance,‌  ‌before‌  ‌a ‌ ‌city‌  ‌mayor‌  ‌may‌  ‌sign‌  ‌a ‌‌
As‌  ‌compared‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌two‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌ordinances,‌  ‌the‌  ‌list‌  ‌of‌  ‌exceptions‌‌  contract‌  ‌on‌  ‌behalf‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌city.‌  ‌If‌  ‌the‌  ‌city‌  ‌mayor‌  ‌has‌  ‌no‌  ‌authority‌‌ 
municipality‌  ‌to‌  ‌represent‌  ‌it‌  ‌in‌  ‌lawsuits.‌  ‌The‌  ‌municipality's‌‌ 
under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Quezon‌  ‌City‌  ‌Ordinance‌  ‌is‌  ‌more‌  ‌narrowly‌  ‌drawn‌  ‌to‌‌  authority‌  ‌to‌‌
  employ‌‌   a ‌‌private‌‌
  attorney‌‌
  is‌‌
  expressly‌‌   limited‌‌
  only‌‌
  to‌‌  from‌  ‌the‌  ‌sangguniang‌  ‌panlungsod‌  ‌to‌  ‌sign‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contract,‌  ‌members‌  ‌of‌‌ 
sufficiently‌‌   protect‌‌  the‌‌  minors'‌‌   rights‌‌  of‌‌
  association,‌‌   free‌‌   exercise‌‌ of‌‌  situations‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌provincial‌  ‌fiscal‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌disqualified‌  ‌to‌‌  the‌‌
  sangguniang‌‌   panlungsod‌‌ have‌‌ standing‌‌ to‌‌ file‌‌ a ‌‌case‌‌ to‌‌ have‌‌ this‌‌ 
religion,‌‌travel,‌‌to‌‌peaceably‌‌assemble,‌‌and‌‌of‌‌free‌‌expression.‌  ‌ serve‌‌and‌‌represent‌‌it,‌‌to‌‌wit:‌  ‌ contract‌‌declared‌‌null‌‌and‌‌void.‌‌(L ‌ ao,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌LGU‌‌of‌‌Cagayan‌‌De‌‌Oro‌) ‌ ‌
In‌‌
  sum,‌‌   while‌‌   the‌‌
  Court‌‌   finds‌‌   that‌‌
  all‌‌  three‌‌  Curfew‌‌   Ordinances‌‌   have‌‌  a. if‌  ‌and‌  ‌when‌  ‌original‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌of‌  ‌case‌  ‌involving‌  ‌the‌‌  To‌‌acquire‌‌and‌‌convey‌‌property‌  ‌
passed‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌prong‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌strict‌‌   scrutiny‌‌   test‌‌
  — ‌‌that‌‌
  is,‌‌
  that‌‌  the‌‌  municipality‌‌is‌‌vested‌‌in‌‌the‌‌SC,‌‌   ‌ 1. If‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌is‌  ‌owned‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌municipality‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌public‌  ‌and‌‌ 
State‌  ‌has‌  ‌sufficiently‌  ‌shown‌  ‌a ‌ ‌compelling‌  ‌interest‌  ‌to‌  ‌promote‌‌ 
b. when‌  ‌the‌  ‌municipality‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌party‌  ‌adverse‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌provincial‌‌  govern­mental‌  ‌capacity‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌is‌  ‌public‌‌   and‌‌   Congress‌‌   has‌‌ 
juvenile‌  ‌safety‌  ‌and‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌juvenile‌  ‌crime‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌concerned‌‌ 
government‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌  ‌some‌  ‌other‌  ‌municipality‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  absolute‌‌control‌‌over‌‌it.‌   ‌ ‌
localities,‌  ‌only‌  ‌the‌  ‌Quezon‌  ‌City‌  ‌Ordinance‌  ‌has‌  ‌passed‌  ‌the‌  ‌second‌‌ 
prong‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  strict‌‌
  scrutiny‌‌   test,‌‌   as‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  only‌‌  issuance‌‌   out‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  province,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ But‌‌
  if‌‌
  the‌‌ property‌‌ is‌‌ owned‌‌ in‌‌ its‌‌ private‌‌ or‌‌ ‌proprietary‌‌ capacity‌, ‌‌
three‌‌  which‌‌   provides‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌ ‌least‌‌ restrictive‌‌ means‌‌ ‌to‌‌ achieve‌‌ this‌‌  c. when,‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌case‌  ‌involving‌  ‌the‌‌
  municipality,‌‌
  he,‌‌
  or‌‌
  his‌‌
  wife,‌‌
  or‌‌  then‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌patri­monial‌  ‌and‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌has‌  ‌no‌  ‌absolute‌‌
  control.‌  ‌The‌‌ 
interest.‌  ‌ child,‌  ‌is‌  ‌pecuniarily‌  ‌involved,‌  ‌as‌  ‌heir‌  ‌legatee,‌  ‌creditor‌  ‌or‌‌  munici­pality‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌deprived‌  ‌of‌  ‌it‌  ‌without‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌  ‌and‌‌ 
otherwise.‌  ‌ payment‌‌ of‌‌ just‌‌ compensation.‌‌ (‌Province‌‌ of‌‌ Zamboanga‌‌ del‌‌ Norte‌‌ v.‌‌ 
Local‌‌initiative‌‌and‌‌referendum‌  ‌ City‌‌of‌‌Zamboanga‌) ‌ ‌
2. In‌  ‌Ramos‌  ‌v.‌  ‌CA‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌ruled‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌municipality‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌‌ 
1. Local‌  ‌initiative‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌legal‌  ‌process‌  ‌whereby‌  ‌the‌  ‌registered‌‌  represented‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌private‌  ‌law‌  ‌firm‌  ‌which‌  ‌had‌  ‌volunteered‌  ‌its‌‌  2. Regardless‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  source‌‌
  or‌‌
  classification‌‌   of‌‌
  land‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ possession‌‌ 
voters‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌LGU‌  ‌may‌  ‌directly‌  ‌propose,‌  ‌enact,‌  ‌or‌  ‌amend‌  ‌any‌‌  services‌  ‌gratis‌, ‌ ‌in‌  ‌collaboration‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌municipal‌  ‌attorney‌  ‌and‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌municipality,‌‌ excepting‌‌ those‌‌ acquired‌‌ with‌‌ its‌‌ own‌‌ funds‌‌ in‌‌ its‌‌ 
ordinance.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌fiscal,‌  ‌as‌  ‌such‌‌  representation‌‌   was‌‌  violative‌‌   of‌‌
  Sec.‌‌
  1683‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  private‌  ‌or‌  ‌corporate‌  ‌capacity,‌  ‌such‌  ‌property‌  ‌is‌  ‌held‌  ‌in‌  ‌trust‌  ‌for‌‌ 
old‌  ‌Administrative‌  ‌Code.‌  ‌Only‌  ‌accountable‌  ‌public‌  ‌officers‌‌   may‌‌  the‌  ‌State‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌inhabitants,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌it‌  ‌be‌  ‌for‌‌ 
2. If‌‌
  the‌‌
  proposition‌‌   is‌‌
  approved‌‌ by‌‌ a ‌‌majority‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ votes‌‌ cast,‌‌ it‌‌ 
act‌  ‌for‌  ‌and‌  ‌in‌  ‌behalf‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌‌  entities‌‌   and‌‌
  that‌‌  public‌‌
  funds‌‌  governmental‌‌or‌‌proprietary‌‌purposes.‌‌(R ‌ abuco‌‌v.‌‌Villegas‌) ‌ ‌
shall‌  ‌take‌  ‌effect‌  ‌fifteen‌  ‌(15)‌‌
  days‌‌   after‌‌
  certification‌‌   by‌‌  the‌‌ 
COMELEC‌. ‌ ‌ should‌‌not‌‌be‌‌expended‌‌to‌‌hire‌‌private‌‌lawyers.‌  ‌ 3. Property‌  ‌however,‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌patrimonial‌  ‌and‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌held‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌‌
municipality‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌proprietary‌  ‌capacity‌  ‌is‌  ‌treated‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌private‌‌ 
asset‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌town‌  ‌and‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌levied‌  ‌upon‌  ‌and‌  ‌sold‌  ‌under‌  ‌an‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 115‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

ordinary‌  ‌execution.‌  ‌The‌  ‌same‌  ‌rule‌  ‌applies‌  ‌to‌  ‌municipal‌  ‌funds‌‌  1. While‌‌   the‌‌
  authorization‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  municipal‌‌
  mayor‌‌
  need‌‌
  not‌‌
  be‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌  funded‌‌  by‌‌
  lump-sum‌‌
  appropriations.‌‌
  (‌Verceles,‌‌
  Jr.‌‌
  v.‌‌
  COA‌‌
  ‌2016‌‌
  En‌‌ 
derived‌‌from‌‌patrimonial‌‌properties.‌‌(M ‌ uni‌‌of‌‌Paoay‌‌v.‌‌Manaois‌) ‌ ‌ form‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌ordinance,‌  ‌the‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌said‌  ‌local‌‌  Banc‌) ‌ ‌
4. The‌‌   ‌properties‌‌   ‌of‌‌
  a ‌‌municipality,‌‌
  whether‌‌
  real‌‌
  or‌‌
  personal,‌‌ which‌‌  executive‌‌   is‌‌
  authorized‌‌  to‌‌
  enter‌‌
  into‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌  made‌‌ pursuant‌‌ 
7. Under‌‌   ‌Section‌‌  336‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ LGC‌, ‌‌the‌‌ ‌general‌‌ rule‌‌ is‌‌ that‌‌ funds‌‌ shall‌‌ 
are‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌for‌  ‌public‌  ‌use‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌attached‌  ‌and‌  ‌sold‌  ‌at‌‌  to‌‌a‌‌law‌‌or‌‌ordinance‌.‌‌(‌Land‌‌Bank‌‌v.‌‌Cacayuran‌‌‌2013‌) ‌ ‌
be‌  ‌available‌  ‌exclusively‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌specific‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌for‌  ‌which‌  ‌they‌‌ 
execution‌  ‌sale‌  ‌to‌  ‌satisfy‌  ‌a ‌ ‌money‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌‌  2. An‌  ‌act‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌outside‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌municipality’s‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌is‌‌  have‌  ‌been‌  ‌appropriated.‌  ‌The‌  ‌exception‌  ‌is‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌LCE‌  ‌is‌‌ 
municipality.‌  ‌Municipal‌‌ ‌revenues‌‌ ‌derived‌‌ from‌‌ taxes,‌‌ licenses‌‌ and‌‌  considered‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌‌void‌‌
  ultra‌‌  vires‌‌
  act‌, ‌‌while‌‌ an‌‌ act‌‌ attended‌‌ only‌‌ by‌‌  authorized‌  ‌by‌  ‌ordinance‌  ‌to‌  ‌augment‌  ‌any‌‌   item‌‌
  in‌‌  the‌‌
  approved‌‌ 
market‌‌   fees,‌‌
  and‌‌ which‌‌ are‌‌ intended‌‌ ‌primarily‌‌ and‌‌ exclusively‌‌ for‌‌  an‌  ‌irregularity‌  ‌but‌  ‌remains‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌municipality’s‌  ‌power‌  ‌is‌‌  annual‌  ‌budget‌  ‌from‌  ‌savings‌  ‌in‌  ‌other‌  ‌items‌  within‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌‌ 
the‌  ‌purpose‌‌   of‌‌
  financing‌‌   the‌‌
  governmental‌‌  activities‌‌  and‌‌
  functions‌‌  considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌ultra‌  ‌vires‌  ‌act‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌‌
  ratification‌‌   and/or‌‌  expense‌‌class‌.‌‌(‌ibid.‌) ‌ ‌
of‌‌the‌‌municipality,‌‌are‌e‌ xempt‌‌from‌‌execution‌. ‌ ‌ validation‌.‌‌To‌‌the‌‌former‌‌belongs‌‌municipal‌‌contracts‌‌which‌‌   ‌
8. A‌  ‌line-item‌  ‌is‌  ‌"the‌  ‌last‌  ‌and‌  ‌indivisible‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌‌   a ‌‌program‌‌   in‌‌ 
5. Where‌‌   a ‌‌municipality‌‌   fails‌‌
  or‌‌
  refuses,‌‌ without‌‌ justifiable‌‌ reason,‌‌ to‌‌  a) are‌‌entered‌‌into‌b
‌ eyond‌‌the‌‌powers‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌LGU;‌‌and‌  ‌ the‌  ‌appropriation‌‌   law,‌‌  which‌‌   is‌‌
  distinct‌‌
  from‌‌   the‌‌  expense‌‌   category‌‌ 
effect‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌final‌  ‌money‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌against‌‌   it,‌‌
  the‌‌  or‌  ‌allotment‌  ‌class."‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌allocation‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌specified‌  ‌singular‌‌ 
b) do‌‌not‌‌comply‌‌with‌‌the‌s‌ ubstantive‌‌requirements‌‌of‌‌law‌;  ‌‌ ‌
claimant‌  ‌may‌  ‌avail‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌remedy‌  ‌of‌  m ‌ andamus‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌‌  amount‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌specified‌  ‌singular‌  ‌purpose‌. ‌ ‌(‌Germar‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Legaspi‌‌ 
compel‌‌   the‌‌  enactment‌‌   and‌‌
  approval‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌ necessary‌‌ appropriation‌‌  while‌‌to‌‌the‌‌latter‌‌belongs‌‌those‌‌which‌  ‌ 2018‌) ‌ ‌
ordinance,‌‌   and‌‌
  the‌‌
  corresponding‌‌ disbursement‌‌ of‌‌ municipal‌‌ funds‌‌ 
c) are‌  ‌entered‌  ‌into‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  improper‌‌
  department,‌‌
  board,‌‌
  officer‌‌
  of‌‌  9. RA‌  ‌7160‌  ‌explicitly‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that,‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌rule,‌  ‌"‌acquisitions‌  ‌of‌‌ 
therefor.‌‌(M ‌ uni‌‌of‌‌Makati‌‌v.‌‌CA‌) ‌ ‌
agent;‌‌and‌  ‌ supplies‌  ‌by‌  ‌LGUs‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌through‌  ‌competitive‌  ‌bidding.‌" ‌ ‌By‌ 
To‌‌enter‌‌into‌‌contracts‌  ‌ way‌‌of‌e‌ xception‌,‌‌no‌‌bidding‌‌is‌‌required‌‌in‌‌the‌‌following‌‌instances:‌  ‌
d) do‌  ‌not‌  ‌comply‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌formal‌  ‌requirements‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌written‌‌ 
Requisites‌‌of‌‌a‌‌valid‌‌local‌‌government‌‌contract‌  ‌ contract‌‌e.g.,‌‌the‌‌Statute‌‌of‌‌Frauds.‌‌(i‌ bid.‌) ‌ ‌ a) personal‌‌canvass‌‌of‌‌responsible‌‌merchants;‌  ‌
a. The‌  ‌LGU‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌enter‌  ‌into‌  ‌the‌  ‌particular‌‌  3. Public‌‌   officials‌‌   can‌‌
  be‌‌ held‌‌ personally‌‌ accountable‌‌ for‌‌ acts‌‌ claimed‌‌  b) emergency‌‌purchase;‌  ‌
contract;‌  ‌ to‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌performed‌  ‌in‌  ‌connection‌  ‌with‌  ‌official‌  ‌duties‌  ‌where‌‌ 
they‌‌have‌‌acted‌u ‌ ltra‌‌vires‌.‌‌(‌ibid.‌) ‌ ‌ c) negotiated‌‌purchase;‌  ‌
b. Pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌22(c),‌  ‌there‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌prior‌  ‌authorization‌ ‌
by‌‌the‌‌sanggunian‌‌‌concerned;‌  ‌ 4. If‌‌
  the‌‌   project‌‌   is‌‌
  already‌‌  provided‌‌ for‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ appropriation‌‌ ordinance‌‌  d) direct‌  ‌purchase‌  ‌from‌  ‌manufacturers‌  ‌or‌  ‌exclusive‌  ‌distributors‌‌ 
in‌‌
  ‌sufficient‌‌   ‌detail,‌‌
  then‌‌   ‌no‌‌
  separate‌‌   authorization‌‌   is‌‌ necessary.‌‌  and‌  ‌
c. If‌  ‌the‌  ‌contract‌  ‌involves‌  ‌the‌  ‌expenditure‌  ‌of‌‌
  public‌‌
  funds,‌‌
  there‌‌ 
should‌‌be‌  ‌ On‌‌   the‌‌ other‌‌ hand,‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ project‌‌ is‌‌ couched‌‌ in‌‌ ‌general‌‌ ‌terms,‌‌ then‌‌ a ‌‌ e) purchase‌  ‌from‌  ‌other‌  ‌government‌  ‌entities.‌  ‌(‌Sison‌  ‌v.‌  ‌People‌‌ 
separate‌  ‌approval‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Sangguniang‌  ‌Bayan‌  ‌is‌  ‌required.‌‌  2010‌) ‌ ‌
i. An‌‌actual‌‌appropriation;‌‌‌and‌  ‌
(‌Quisumbing‌‌v.‌‌Garcia‌) ‌ ‌
ii. A‌‌certificate‌‌of‌‌availability‌‌of‌‌funds‌b
‌ y‌‌the‌‌treasurer;‌  ‌ 10. A‌  ‌local‌  ‌chief‌  ‌executive‌  ‌could‌  ‌only‌  ‌resort‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ negotiated‌‌ 
5. When‌‌   the‌‌
  local‌‌
  chief‌‌
  executive‌‌ enters‌‌ into‌‌ contracts,‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ speaks‌‌  purchase‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌366‌  ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌No.‌  ‌7160‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌COA‌‌ 
d. Must‌‌  conform‌‌
  with‌‌ the‌‌ ‌formal‌‌ requisites‌‌ of‌‌ written‌‌ contracts;‌‌  of‌  ‌prior‌  ‌authorization‌  ‌or‌  ‌authority‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌Sangguniang‌‌  Resolutions‌‌if‌‌the‌‌following‌‌two‌‌requisites‌‌are‌‌present:‌‌   ‌
and‌  ‌ Panlungsod‌‌and‌n ‌ ot‌‌ratification‌.‌‌(‌Vergara‌‌v.‌‌Ombudsman‌) ‌ ‌
e. If‌  ‌a ‌ ‌province‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌party‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contract‌  ‌conveying‌  ‌title‌  ‌to‌  ‌real‌‌  1) public‌  ‌biddings‌  ‌have‌  ‌failed‌  ‌for‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌two‌  ‌consecutive‌‌ 
6. While‌  ‌a ‌ ‌blanket‌  ‌authority‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌per‌  ‌se‌  ‌ineffective,‌  ‌it‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌  times‌‌‌and;‌  ‌
property,‌‌   it‌‌
  must‌‌  be‌‌   approved‌‌   by‌‌ the‌‌ President;‌‌ If‌‌ municipality,‌‌  suffice‌  ‌for‌  ‌purposes‌  ‌of‌  ‌implementing‌  ‌projects‌  ‌funded‌  ‌by‌‌ 
it‌‌should‌‌be‌‌approved‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Governor.‌  ‌ lump-sum‌‌appropriations.‌‌   ‌ 2) no‌  ‌suppliers‌  ‌have‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌to‌  ‌participate‌  ‌or‌  ‌win‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Ultra‌‌vires‌‌acts‌  ‌ biddings.‌‌(‌Ong‌‌v.‌‌People‌) ‌ ‌
The‌  ‌nature‌  ‌of‌  ‌lump-sum‌  ‌appropriations‌  ‌vis-a-vis‌  ‌the‌‌  power‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
purse‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  SP‌‌   requires‌‌
  the‌‌
  local‌‌
  chief‌‌
  executive‌‌
  to‌‌
  obtain‌‌  definite‌‌  Liability‌‌of‌‌LGUs‌  ‌
Effects‌‌of‌‌Noncompliance‌  ‌
and‌  ‌specific‌  ‌authorizations‌  ‌before‌  ‌he‌  ‌can‌  ‌enter‌  ‌into‌  ‌contracts‌‌  1. It‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  necessary‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌
  liability‌‌
  to‌‌ attach‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ defective‌‌ roads‌‌ 
A‌‌‌and‌‌C‌‌=‌‌Ultra‌‌vires‌;‌‌B‌‌and‌‌D‌‌=‌‌may‌‌be‌‌ratified.‌  ‌
or‌  ‌streets‌  ‌belong‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌
  LGU‌‌   from‌‌
  which‌‌   responsibility‌‌   is‌‌
  exacted.‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 116‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

What‌  ‌is‌  ‌required‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌LGU‌  ‌has‌  ‌either‌  ‌"control‌  ‌or‌‌ 
9. This‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌personal‌  ‌liability‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌applied‌  ‌to‌  ‌cases‌‌  Respondents'‌  ‌resort‌  ‌to‌  ‌filing‌  ‌a‌  ‌case‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌RTC‌  ‌was‌  ‌warranted‌‌ 
supervision"‌  ‌over‌‌   said‌‌   street‌‌   or‌‌
  road‌. ‌‌(‌City‌‌
  of‌‌
  Manila‌‌   v.‌‌
  Teotico‌‌ 
where‌  ‌a ‌ ‌public‌  ‌officer‌  ‌removes‌  ‌another‌  ‌officer‌  ‌or‌  ‌discharges‌  ‌an‌‌  under‌  ‌the‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌case.‌  ‌They‌  ‌took‌  ‌all‌  ‌the‌  ‌necessary‌‌ 
applied‌  ‌in‌  ‌Jimenez‌  ‌v.‌  ‌City‌  ‌of‌  ‌Manila‌, ‌ ‌Guilatco‌  ‌v.‌  ‌City‌  ‌of‌‌
  Dagupan‌, ‌‌
employee‌‌wrongfully.‌‌(C ‌ orrea‌‌v.‌‌CFI‌‌of‌‌Bulacan‌) ‌ ‌ steps‌‌  to‌‌
  settle‌‌ the‌‌ dispute‌‌ within‌‌ the‌‌ procedure‌‌ set‌‌ out‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ law,‌‌ and‌‌ 
and‌‌Muni‌‌of‌‌San‌‌Juan‌‌v.‌‌CA‌) ‌ ‌
Settlement‌‌of‌‌boundary‌‌disputes‌  ‌ by‌‌
  all‌‌
  indication,‌‌   was‌‌
  prepared‌‌  to‌‌
  see‌‌
  the‌‌
  matter‌‌  thru‌‌
  in‌‌
  order‌‌   to‌‌ lay‌‌ 
2. LGUs‌‌and‌‌their‌‌officials‌‌are‌n
‌ ot‌‌exempt‌‌‌from‌‌liability‌‌for‌‌   ‌ the‌‌issue‌‌to‌‌rest.‌  ‌
Jurisdictional‌  ‌Responsibility‌  ‌for‌  ‌Settlement‌  ‌of‌  ‌Boundary‌‌   Dispute.‌‌ 
a. death‌‌or‌‌injury‌‌‌to‌‌persons‌‌or‌‌   ‌ However,‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌failed‌  ‌to‌  ‌perform‌  ‌their‌  ‌concomitant‌‌ 
—‌  ‌Boundary‌  ‌disputes‌  ‌between‌  ‌and‌  ‌among‌  ‌LGUs‌  ‌shall,‌  ‌as‌  ‌much‌  ‌as‌‌ 
responsibility‌‌   under‌‌ the‌‌ same‌‌ law,‌‌ leaving‌‌ respondents‌‌ with‌‌ no‌‌ other‌‌ 
b. damage‌‌to‌‌property‌.‌‌(‌Sec‌‌24,‌‌LGC‌) ‌ ‌ possible,‌‌be‌‌settled‌‌amicably.‌‌To‌‌this‌‌end,‌‌boundary‌‌disputes‌‌involving:‌  ‌
recourse‌  ‌but‌  ‌to‌  ‌bring‌  ‌the‌  ‌matter‌  ‌to‌  ‌court.‌  ‌As‌  ‌such,‌  ‌respondents'‌ 
3. The‌  ‌State‌  ‌is‌  ‌only‌  ‌liable‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌agents,‌  ‌officers‌  ‌and‌‌  a. two‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌or‌  ‌more‌  ‌barangays‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌‌
  city‌‌
  or‌‌
  municipality‌‌  petition‌‌before‌‌the‌‌RTC‌‌must‌‌be‌‌upheld.‌  ‌
employees‌‌   when‌‌   they‌‌   act‌‌
  as‌‌
  special‌‌   agents‌‌ and‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ chauffeur‌‌  shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌referred‌  ‌for‌  ‌settlement‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌sangguniang‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌ambulance‌‌of‌‌the‌‌General‌‌Hospital‌‌was‌‌not‌‌such‌‌an‌‌agent.‌‌   ‌ panlungsod‌‌or‌‌sangguniang‌‌bayan‌‌‌concerned.‌  ‌
City‌‌of‌‌Paranaque‌‌v.‌‌Katipunan‌‌ng‌‌mga‌‌Mamamayan‌‌ng‌‌Bagong‌‌ 
b. two‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌or‌  ‌more‌  ‌municipalities‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌province‌‌  Parañaque,‌‌Inc.‌‌‌2016‌  ‌
A‌  ‌special‌  ‌agent‌  ‌is‌  ‌one‌  ‌who‌‌  receives‌‌  a ‌‌definite‌‌
  and‌‌   fixed‌‌  order‌‌  or‌‌ 
commission,‌‌   foreign‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  duties‌‌
  of‌‌
  his‌‌  office‌‌
  if‌‌
  he‌‌  shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌referred‌  ‌for‌  ‌settlement‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌sangguniang‌‌ 
The‌  ‌ordinance‌  ‌unequivocally‌  ‌transfers‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌Aseana‌‌ 
is‌‌a‌‌special‌‌official.‌‌(M ‌ erritt‌‌v.‌‌Gov‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Phil‌‌Islands‌) ‌ ‌ panlalawigan‌‌‌concerned.‌  ‌
Business‌  ‌Park‌  ‌from‌  ‌Barangay‌  ‌Tambo‌  ‌to‌  ‌Barangay‌  ‌Baclaran.‌  ‌This‌‌ 
c. municipalities‌  ‌or‌  ‌component‌  ‌cities‌  ‌of‌  ‌different‌  ‌provinces‌‌  constitutes‌  ‌a ‌ ‌substantial‌  ‌alteration‌  ‌of‌  ‌boundaries,‌  ‌albeit‌‌ 
4. A‌  ‌municipality‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌from‌  ‌liability‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌negligent‌‌ 
shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌jointly‌‌
  referred‌‌
  for‌‌
  settlement‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  sanggunians‌‌
  of‌‌  worded‌‌to‌‌appear‌‌that‌‌it‌‌is‌‌merely‌‌a‌‌transfer‌‌of‌‌tax‌‌declaration‌.  ‌‌ ‌
performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌
  corporate‌‌  or‌‌
  proprietary‌‌  or‌‌
  business‌‌   functions.‌‌ 
the‌‌province‌‌concerned.‌  ‌
(‌Mendoza‌‌v.‌‌De‌‌Leon‌) ‌ ‌
d. a‌  ‌component‌  ‌city‌  ‌or‌  ‌municipality‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  one‌‌
  hand‌‌  and‌‌   a ‌‌HUC‌‌  Local‌‌officials‌  ‌
5. The‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌implied‌  ‌municipal‌  ‌liability‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌said‌  ‌to‌‌ 
on‌  ‌the‌  ‌other,‌  ‌or‌  ‌two‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌or‌  ‌more‌  ‌HUCs,‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌jointly‌‌  Vacancies‌‌and‌‌succession‌  ‌
apply‌  ‌to‌  ‌all‌  ‌cases‌  ‌where‌  ‌money‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌property‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌party‌  ‌is‌‌ 
referred‌‌‌for‌‌settlement‌‌to‌‌the‌‌respective‌‌sanggunians.‌  ‌
 ‌

received‌  ‌under‌  ‌such‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌law,‌‌  Position‌  ‌ Remedy‌ 
independent‌  ‌of‌  ‌express‌  ‌contract‌  ‌implies‌  ‌an‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌‌  e. In‌  ‌the‌  ‌event‌  ‌the‌  ‌sanggunian‌  ‌fails‌  ‌to‌  ‌effect‌  ‌an‌  ‌amicable‌‌ 
municipality‌‌to‌‌do‌‌justice‌‌with‌‌respect‌‌to‌‌the‌‌same.‌  ‌ settlement‌  ‌within‌  ‌sixty‌  ‌(60)‌  ‌days‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌date‌  ‌the‌  ‌dispute‌‌  Governor‌‌or‌‌  Vice‌‌Governor‌‌or‌‌Vice‌‌Mayor‌‌succeeds‌  ‌
was‌‌   referred‌‌  thereto,‌‌
  it‌‌
  shall‌‌
  issue‌‌   a ‌‌certification‌‌  to‌‌
  that‌‌
  effect.‌‌  Mayor‌  ‌
6. The‌  ‌measure‌  ‌of‌  ‌recovery‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌received‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  Thereafter,‌  ‌the‌  ‌dispute‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌formally‌  ‌tried‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
municipal‌‌corporation.‌‌(P
‌ rov‌‌of‌‌Cebu‌‌v.‌‌IAC‌) ‌ ‌ sanggunian‌  ‌concerned‌  ‌which‌  ‌shall‌  ‌decide‌  ‌the‌  ‌issue‌  ‌within‌‌  Vice‌‌Governor‌‌  No‌‌1‌‌Board‌‌Member‌‌or‌‌Councilor‌‌with‌‌the‌‌highest‌‌ 
sixty‌  ‌(60)‌  ‌days‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌date‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌certification‌  ‌referred‌  ‌to‌‌  or‌‌Vice‌‌Mayor‌  ‌ percentage‌‌of‌‌votes.‌  ‌
7. The‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌estoppel‌  ‌CANNOT‌  ‌be‌  ‌applied‌  ‌as‌  ‌against‌  ‌a ‌‌
municipal‌‌   corporation‌‌
  to‌‌
  validate‌‌   a ‌‌contract‌‌
  which‌‌  it‌‌ has‌‌ no‌‌ power‌‌  above.‌  ‌
Punong‌‌  No‌‌1‌‌Barangay‌‌Kagawad‌  ‌
to‌  ‌make‌  ‌or‌  ‌which‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌to‌  ‌make,‌  ‌although‌  ‌the‌‌  There‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌boundary‌  ‌dispute‌  ‌when‌  ‌a ‌‌portion‌‌
  or‌‌
  the‌‌
  whole‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  Barangay‌‌   ‌
corporation‌  ‌has‌  ‌accepted‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌thereof‌  ‌and‌‌   the‌‌  other‌‌   party‌‌  territorial‌‌area‌‌of‌‌an‌‌LGU‌‌is‌‌claimed‌‌by‌‌two‌‌or‌‌more‌‌LGUs.‌  ‌
has‌‌ fully‌‌ performed‌‌ his‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ agreement,‌‌ or‌‌ has‌‌ expended‌‌ large‌‌  Sanggunian‌‌  Appointment‌‌by:‌  ‌
sums‌  ‌in‌  ‌preparation‌  ‌for‌  ‌performance.‌  ‌(‌San‌  ‌Diego‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Muni‌  ‌of‌‌  Brgy‌‌Mayamot,‌‌Antipolo‌‌City‌‌v.‌‌Antipolo‌‌City‌‌‌2016‌  ‌ Members‌  ‌ a) President,‌‌in‌‌case‌‌of‌‌Province‌‌or‌‌HUC‌‌or‌‌ 
Naujan‌) ‌ ‌ ICC;‌  ‌
The‌  ‌RTC‌  ‌is‌  ‌without‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌to‌  ‌settle‌  ‌a ‌ ‌boundary‌  ‌dispute‌‌ 
involving‌  ‌barangays‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌city‌  ‌or‌  ‌municipality.‌  ‌Said‌  ‌dispute‌‌  b) Governor,‌‌in‌‌case‌‌of‌‌Component‌‌City‌‌of‌‌ 
8. The‌  ‌general‌  ‌rule‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌public‌  ‌officials‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌held‌  ‌personally‌ 
Municipality;‌  ‌
accountable‌  ‌for‌  ‌acts‌  ‌claimed‌  ‌to‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌performed‌  ‌in‌‌  shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌referred‌  ‌for‌  ‌settlement‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌sangguniang‌  ‌panlungsod‌  ‌or‌‌ 
sangguniang‌‌bayan‌‌‌concerned.‌  ‌ c) Mayor,‌‌in‌‌case‌‌of‌‌barangay‌‌upon‌‌ 
connection‌‌  with‌‌   official‌‌   duties‌‌   where‌‌   they‌‌
  have‌‌ acted‌‌ ‌ultra‌‌ vires‌‌ or‌‌ 
recommendation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌sangguniang‌‌ 
where‌‌there‌‌is‌‌a‌‌showing‌‌of‌b ‌ ad‌‌faith.‌‌‌(‌Chavez‌‌v.‌‌SB‌,‌‌Rama‌‌v.‌‌CA‌) ‌ ‌
barangay.‌  ‌
Prov‌‌of‌‌Antique‌‌v.‌‌Calabocal‌‌‌2016‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 117‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

1. leave‌‌of‌‌absence,‌‌   ‌ 3) Dishonesty,‌‌ oppression,‌‌ misconduct‌‌ in‌‌ office,‌‌ gross‌‌ negligence,‌‌ 
Appointee‌‌should‌‌be‌‌a‌‌party-mate‌‌of‌‌the‌‌member‌‌ 
who‌‌caused‌‌the‌‌vacancy‌‌to‌‌maintain‌‌party‌‌  2. travel‌‌abroad,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ or‌‌dereliction‌‌of‌‌duty;‌  ‌
representation.‌  ‌ 4) Commission‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌offense‌  ‌involving‌‌  ‌moral‌‌
  turpitude‌‌
  or‌‌
  an‌‌ 
3. suspension‌‌from‌‌office,‌‌   ‌
If‌‌member‌‌is‌‌independent,‌‌the‌‌sanggunian‌‌  offense‌‌punishable‌‌by‌‌at‌‌least‌p ‌ rision‌‌mayor‌; ‌ ‌
nominates.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌vice-governor,‌  ‌vice-mayor,‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌highest‌  ‌ranking‌‌ 
5) Abuse‌‌of‌‌authority;‌  ‌
sangguniang‌‌   barangay‌‌
  member‌‌   shall‌‌ automatically‌‌ exercise‌‌ the‌‌ 
Chua‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌‌2016‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ powers‌  ‌and‌  ‌perform‌  ‌the‌  ‌duties‌  ‌and‌  ‌functions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌LCE‌‌  6) Unauthorized‌  ‌absence‌  ‌for‌  ‌fifteen‌  ‌(15)‌  ‌consecutive‌  ‌working‌‌ 
concerned,‌‌except‌t‌ he‌‌power‌‌to‌‌   ‌ days‌,‌‌except‌i‌ n‌‌the‌‌case‌‌of‌‌members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌sanggunian;‌  ‌
Dual‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌are‌  ‌disqualified‌  ‌from‌  ‌running‌‌   for‌‌
  any‌‌
  elective‌‌  local‌‌ 
1. appoint‌,  ‌‌ ‌ 7) Application‌  ‌for,‌  ‌or‌  ‌acquisition‌  ‌of,‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌citizenship‌  ‌or‌‌ 
position.‌‌   Their‌‌
  certificates‌‌  of‌‌ candidacy‌‌ are‌‌ ‌void‌‌ ab‌‌ initio‌, ‌‌and‌‌ votes‌‌ 
residence‌‌or‌‌the‌‌status‌‌of‌‌an‌‌immigrant‌‌of‌‌another‌‌country.‌  ‌
cast‌‌
  for‌‌
  them‌‌  will‌‌
  be‌‌ disregarded.‌‌ Consequently,‌‌ whoever‌‌ garners‌‌ the‌‌  2. suspend‌,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
next‌  ‌highest‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌  ‌votes‌  ‌among‌  ‌the‌  ‌eligible‌  ‌candidates‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌  An‌  ‌elective‌  ‌local‌  ‌official‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌
  ‌removed‌‌
  ‌from‌‌
  office‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  grounds‌‌ 
3. dismiss‌‌employees‌‌   ‌
person‌‌legally‌‌entitled‌‌to‌‌the‌‌position.‌  ‌ enumerated‌‌above‌b ‌ y‌‌order‌‌of‌‌the‌‌proper‌‌court‌. ‌ ‌
which‌  ‌can‌  ‌only‌  ‌be‌  ‌exercised‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌temporary‌‌ 
incapacity‌‌exceeds‌‌thirty‌‌(30)‌‌working‌‌days‌. ‌ ‌ Jurisdiction‌  ‌
Victoria‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌
b) Said‌  ‌temporary‌  ‌incapacity‌  ‌shall‌  ‌terminate‌‌   ‌submission‌‌  A‌  ‌verified‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌against‌  ‌any‌  ‌erring‌  ‌local‌  ‌elective‌  ‌official‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌ 
  ‌upon‌‌
The‌  ‌law‌  ‌is‌  ‌clear‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌ranking‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Sanggunian‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌   appropriate‌‌  sanggunian‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌written‌‌ declaration‌‌ by‌‌  prepared‌‌as‌‌follows,‌‌a‌‌complaint‌‌against‌‌any‌‌elective:‌  ‌
determined‌‌   on‌‌ the‌‌ basis‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ ‌proportion‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ votes‌‌ obtained‌‌ by‌‌  the‌‌LCE‌‌that‌‌he‌‌has‌‌reported‌‌back‌‌to‌‌office.‌  ‌ a) official‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌‌province,‌‌
  a ‌‌HUC,‌‌ an‌‌ ICC‌‌ or‌‌ component‌‌ city‌‌ shall‌‌ 
each‌  ‌winning‌  ‌candidate‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌total‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌  r ‌ egistered‌‌  be‌‌filed‌‌before‌‌the‌O ‌ ffice‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President‌; ‌ ‌
c) OIC‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌When‌  ‌the‌  ‌incumbent‌  ‌LCE‌  ‌is‌  ‌traveling‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌ 
voters‌  ‌of‌‌  each‌‌  district.‌‌  It‌‌  does‌‌ not‌‌ mention‌‌ anything‌‌ about‌‌ factoring‌‌ 
country‌‌
  but‌‌
  outside‌‌
  his‌‌
  territorial‌‌
  jurisdiction‌‌   for‌‌
  a ‌‌period‌‌ ‌not‌‌  b) official‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌municipality‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌filed‌  ‌before‌  t‌ he‌‌ 
the‌‌number‌‌of‌‌voters‌‌who‌‌actually‌‌voted.‌  ‌
exceeding‌‌  three‌‌  (3)‌‌
  consecutive‌‌   days‌, ‌‌he‌‌ may‌‌ ‌designate‌‌ in‌‌  sangguniang‌  ‌panlalawigan‌  ‌whose‌  ‌decision‌  ‌may‌  b ‌ e‌‌ 
writing‌‌the‌‌OIC‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌said‌‌office..‌  ‌ appealed‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President;‌‌and‌  ‌
Damasen‌‌v.‌‌Tumamao‌‌‌2010‌‌also‌‌in‌N
‌ avarro‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
d) Mandatory‌  ‌OIC.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌In‌  ‌the‌  ‌event,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌LCE‌‌  c) barangay‌  ‌official‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌filed‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌sangguniang‌‌ 
The‌‌law‌‌provides‌‌for‌‌conditions‌‌for‌‌the‌‌rule‌‌of‌‌succession‌‌to‌‌apply:‌‌   ‌ concerned‌  ‌fails‌  ‌or‌  ‌refuses‌  ‌to‌  ‌issue‌‌   such‌‌   authorization‌, ‌‌the‌‌  panlungsod‌  ‌or‌‌   bayan‌‌
  concerned‌‌   whose‌‌  decision‌‌
  shall‌‌   be‌‌
  ‌final‌‌ 
First‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌appointee‌  ‌shall‌  ‌come‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌political‌  ‌party‌  ‌as‌‌  next‌‌
  ranking‌‌   officer‌‌
  shall‌‌  have‌‌   the‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  assume‌‌   the‌‌ powers,‌‌  and‌ e
‌ xecutory‌ . ‌
  ‌
that‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Sanggunian‌‌member‌‌who‌‌caused‌‌the‌‌vacancy.‌‌   ‌ duties,‌  ‌and‌  ‌functions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌said‌  ‌office‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌fourth‌  ‌(4th)‌‌  The‌  ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌has‌  ‌concurrent‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌administrative‌‌ 
Second‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌appointee‌  ‌must‌‌
  have‌‌
  a ‌‌‌nomination‌‌
  ‌and‌‌
  a ‌‌Certificate‌‌
  of‌‌  day‌  ‌of‌  ‌absence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌said‌  ‌LCE,‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌limitations‌‌  cases.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌has‌  ‌primary‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌to‌  ‌investigate‌  ‌any‌‌ 
Membership‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌highest‌  ‌official‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌political‌  ‌party‌‌  provided.‌  ‌ act‌  ‌or‌  o
‌ mission‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌public‌  ‌officer‌  ‌or‌  ‌employee‌  ‌who‌  ‌is‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌‌ 
concerned.‌  ‌ Discipline‌  ‌ jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Sandiganbayan.‌  ‌
Since‌  ‌the‌  ‌permanent‌‌   vacancy‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Sanggunian‌‌   occurred‌‌   because‌‌   of‌‌  i.‌‌Elective‌‌officials‌  ‌ Preventive‌‌suspension‌‌   ‌
the‌  ‌elevation‌  ‌of‌  ‌LDP‌  ‌member‌  ‌Alonzo‌  ‌to‌  ‌vice-mayor,‌  ‌it‌  ‌follows‌‌   that‌‌  1. Preventive‌‌suspension‌‌may‌‌be‌‌imposed:‌  ‌
Grounds‌  ‌
the‌  ‌person‌  ‌to‌  ‌succeed‌  ‌her‌  ‌should‌  ‌also‌  ‌belong‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌LDP‌  ‌so‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌‌ 
An‌‌
  elective‌‌
  local‌‌
  official‌‌
  may‌‌ be‌‌ ‌disciplined,‌‌ suspended,‌‌ or‌‌ removed‌‌  a) By‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌— ‌‌province,‌‌
  a ‌‌highly‌‌
  urbanized‌‌
  or‌‌
  an‌‌ 
preserve‌‌party‌‌representation.‌  ‌
from‌‌office‌‌on‌‌any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following‌‌grounds:‌  ‌ independent‌‌component‌‌city;‌  ‌

Temporary‌‌Vacancy‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌LCE‌  ‌ 1) Disloyalty‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Republic‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines;‌  ‌ b) By‌‌the‌g


‌ overnor‌‌‌—‌‌component‌‌city‌‌or‌‌municipality;‌‌or‌  ‌

a) When‌  ‌the‌  ‌LCE‌  ‌is‌  ‌temporarily‌  ‌incapacitated‌  ‌to‌  ‌perform‌  ‌his‌‌  2) Culpable‌‌violation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitution;‌  ‌ c) By‌‌the‌m
‌ ayor‌‌‌—‌‌barangay.‌  ‌
duties‌‌for‌‌physical‌‌or‌‌legal‌‌reasons‌‌such‌‌as,‌‌but‌‌not‌‌limited‌‌to,‌‌   ‌ 2. Preventive‌‌suspension‌‌may‌‌be‌‌imposed‌‌at‌‌any‌‌time‌‌   ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 118‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

a) after‌‌the‌‌issues‌‌are‌‌joined,‌‌   ‌ ii.‌‌Appointive‌‌officials‌  ‌
a) The‌  ‌sangguniang‌  ‌panlalawigan‌, ‌ ‌in‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌decisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
b) when‌‌the‌e
‌ vidence‌‌of‌‌guilt‌‌is‌‌strong‌,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ sangguniang‌  ‌panlungsod‌  ‌of‌  ‌component‌  ‌cities‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Dagadag‌‌v.‌‌Tongnawa‌  ‌
c) given‌  ‌the‌  ‌gravity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌offense,‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌great‌  ‌probability‌‌  sangguniang‌‌bayan;‌‌and‌  ‌
that‌  ‌the‌  ‌continuance‌  ‌in‌  ‌office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌could‌‌  b) The‌  ‌Office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌, ‌ ‌in‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌decisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Where‌  ‌a ‌ ‌municipal‌  ‌mayor‌  ‌orders‌  ‌the‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌or‌  ‌dismissal‌  ‌of‌‌   a ‌‌
influence‌  ‌the‌  ‌witnesses‌  ‌or‌  ‌pose‌  ‌a ‌ ‌threat‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌safety‌  municipal‌  ‌employee‌  ‌on‌  ‌grounds‌  ‌he‌  ‌believes‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌proper,‌  ‌but‌  ‌his‌‌ 
sangguniang‌‌ panlalawigan‌‌ and‌‌ that‌‌ of‌‌ HUCs‌‌ and‌‌ ICCs.‌‌ Decisions‌‌ 
and‌‌integrity‌‌of‌‌the‌‌records‌‌and‌‌other‌‌evidence.‌  ‌ order‌‌  is‌‌
  reversed‌‌
  or‌‌
  nullified‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  CSC‌‌ or‌‌ the‌‌ CA,‌‌ he‌‌ has‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President‌‌shall‌‌be‌f‌ inal‌‌and‌‌executory.‌  ‌
contest‌‌such‌‌adverse‌‌ruling.‌‌   ‌
3. Any‌  ‌single‌  ‌preventive‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌of‌  ‌local‌  ‌elective‌  ‌officials‌‌  Doctrine‌‌of‌‌condonation‌‌   ‌
shall‌‌not‌‌extend‌‌beyond‌s‌ ixty‌‌(60)‌‌days‌. ‌ ‌ Recall‌  ‌
Carpio-Morales‌‌v.‌‌CA‌‌‌2015‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
4. In‌  ‌the‌  ‌event‌  ‌that‌  ‌several‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌cases‌  ‌are‌  ‌filed‌  ‌the‌‌ 
1. For‌‌
  the‌‌ 1 ‌‌year‌‌ time‌‌ bar‌‌ to‌‌ apply,‌‌ the‌‌ approaching‌‌ regular‌‌ local‌‌ 
preventive‌  ‌suspension‌‌   can‌‌
  not‌‌
  last‌‌
  for‌‌
  more‌‌  than‌‌
  ninety‌‌   (90)‌‌  1. Election‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mode‌  ‌of‌  ‌condoning‌  ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌‌  election‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌one‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌position‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  official‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌ 
days‌  ‌within‌  ‌a ‌ ‌single‌  ‌year‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌ground‌  ‌or‌  ‌grounds‌‌  offense‌, ‌‌and‌‌   there‌‌  is‌‌
  simply‌‌  no‌‌
  constitutional‌‌ or‌‌ statutory‌‌ basis‌‌  recalled,‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌actually‌  ‌contested‌  ‌and‌  ‌filled‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
existing‌‌and‌‌known‌‌at‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌the‌‌first‌‌suspension.‌  ‌ in‌  ‌our‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌to‌  ‌support‌  ‌the‌‌  notion‌‌
  that‌‌
  an‌‌
  official‌‌
  elected‌‌  electorate‌.‌‌(‌Angobung‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌) ‌ ‌
5. Upon‌  ‌expiration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌preventive‌  ‌suspension,‌  ‌the‌  ‌suspended‌‌  for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌different‌  ‌term‌  ‌is‌  ‌fully‌  ‌absolved‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌administrative‌‌ 
2. Any‌  ‌elective‌  ‌local‌  ‌official‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌recall‌  ‌election‌‌ 
elective‌  ‌official‌  ‌shall‌‌   be‌‌
  deemed‌‌   reinstated‌‌   in‌‌
  office‌‌   without‌‌  liability‌‌   arising‌‌  from‌‌  an‌‌
  offense‌‌  done‌‌ during‌‌ a ‌‌prior‌‌ term.‌‌ In‌‌ this‌‌ 
only‌O‌ NCE‌‌during‌‌his‌‌term‌‌of‌‌office‌‌for‌‌‌loss‌‌of‌‌confidence.‌  ‌
prejudice‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌continuation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌against‌  ‌him.‌‌  jurisdiction,‌  ‌liability‌  ‌arising‌  ‌from‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌offenses‌‌ 
However‌, ‌ ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌delay‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌proceedings‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  case‌‌  is‌‌
  due‌‌  to‌‌  may‌  ‌be‌  ‌condoned‌  ‌bv‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌in‌  ‌light‌  ‌of‌  ‌Section‌  ‌19,‌‌  3. No‌‌
  recall‌‌
  ‌shall‌‌
  take‌‌
  place‌‌
  within‌‌
  one‌‌  (1)‌‌
  year‌‌
  from‌‌  the‌‌
  date‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
his‌  ‌fault,‌  ‌neglect,‌  ‌or‌  ‌request,‌  ‌other‌  ‌than‌  ‌the‌‌  appeal‌‌   duly‌‌   filed,‌‌  Article‌  ‌VII‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌1987‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌which‌  ‌was‌  ‌interpreted‌  ‌in‌‌  official's‌  ‌assumption‌  ‌to‌  ‌office‌  ‌or‌  ‌one‌  ‌(1)‌  ‌year‌  ‌immediately‌‌ 
the‌‌
  duration‌‌   of‌‌
  such‌‌  delay‌‌   shall‌‌
  not‌‌
  be‌‌ counted‌‌ ‌in‌‌ computing‌‌  Llamas‌‌v.‌‌Orbos‌‌‌to‌‌apply‌‌to‌‌administrative‌‌offenses.‌  ‌ preceding‌‌a‌‌regular‌‌local‌‌election.‌  ‌
the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌termination‌‌of‌‌the‌‌case.‌  ‌ 2. This‌‌
  Court's‌‌ abandonment‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ condonation‌‌ doctrine‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌  Term‌‌Limits‌  ‌
6. If‌‌ the‌‌ purpose‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ preventive‌‌ suspension‌‌ is‌‌ already‌‌ achieved,‌‌  prospective‌  ‌in‌  ‌application‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌reason‌  ‌that‌  ‌judicial‌‌  Section‌‌   8.‌‌
  Art‌‌   X.‌‌
  1987‌‌  Constitution.‌‌   The‌‌  term‌‌ of‌‌ office‌‌ of‌‌ elective‌‌ 
the‌  ‌imposition‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌maximum‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌6 ‌ ‌months‌  ‌is‌‌  decisions‌  ‌applying‌  ‌or‌  ‌interpreting‌  ‌the‌  ‌laws‌‌   or‌‌
  the‌‌
  Constitution,‌‌  local‌‌   officials,‌‌   except‌‌
  barangay‌‌   officials,‌‌   which‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ determined‌‌ 
unwarranted.‌(‌ ‌Garcia‌‌v.‌‌Mojica‌) ‌ ‌ until‌  ‌reversed,‌  ‌shall‌  ‌form‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌legal‌  ‌system‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  by‌  ‌law,‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌three‌  ‌years‌  ‌and‌  ‌no‌  ‌such‌  ‌official‌  ‌shall‌  ‌serve‌  ‌for‌‌ 
Removal‌  ‌ Philippines.‌  ‌ more‌‌than‌t‌ hree‌‌consecutive‌‌terms‌.  ‌‌ ‌

The‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌of‌  ‌dismissal‌  ‌from‌  ‌service‌  ‌upon‌  ‌an‌  ‌erring‌  ‌elective‌‌  Voluntary‌  ‌renunciation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌office‌  ‌for‌‌  any‌‌
  length‌‌  of‌‌
  time‌‌  shall‌‌ 
Giron‌‌v.‌‌Ochoa‌‌‌2017‌  ‌
local‌‌  official‌‌
  may‌‌  be‌‌  o
  decreed‌‌‌ nly‌‌
  by‌‌
  a ‌‌court‌‌ of‌‌ law‌. ‌‌(‌Pablico‌‌ v.‌  not‌‌
  be‌‌ considered‌‌ as‌‌ an‌‌ interruption‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ continuity‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ service‌‌ 
Villapando‌) ‌ ‌ The‌  ‌condonation‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌applies‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌public‌  ‌official‌  ‌elected‌  ‌to‌‌  for‌‌the‌‌full‌‌term‌‌for‌‌which‌‌he‌‌was‌‌elected.‌  ‌
another‌‌office.‌  ‌ Sec‌  ‌43‌  ‌LGC.‌  ‌The‌  ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌barangay‌  ‌officials‌  ‌and‌  ‌members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌‌   penalty‌‌  of‌‌
  removal‌‌  from‌‌
  office‌‌
  as‌‌  a ‌‌result‌‌
  of‌‌ an‌‌ administrative‌‌ 
sangguniang‌‌   kabataan‌‌   shall‌‌   be‌‌
  for‌‌
  ‌five‌‌
  (5)‌‌ years‌‌ xxxx‌‌ (‌as‌‌ amended‌‌ 
investigation‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌a ‌ ‌BAR‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌candidacy‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Dimapilis‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌‌2017‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ by‌‌RA‌‌No.‌‌8524‌) ‌ ‌
respondent‌‌for‌‌any‌‌elective‌‌position.‌  ‌
Perpetual‌‌   disqualification‌‌ to‌‌ hold‌‌ public‌‌ office‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌material‌‌ fact‌‌  Notes‌  ‌
Administrative‌‌appeal‌  ‌
involving‌  ‌eligibility‌  ‌which‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌petitioner's‌  ‌CoC‌  ‌void‌  ‌from‌‌  1. For‌  ‌local‌  ‌elective‌  ‌officials,‌  ‌three-term‌  ‌limit‌  ‌rule‌  ‌applies‌‌ 
Decisions‌  ‌in‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌cases‌  ‌may,‌  ‌within‌  ‌thirty‌  ‌(30)‌‌   days‌‌
  from‌‌ 
the‌  ‌start‌  ‌since‌‌
  he‌‌
  was‌‌
  not‌‌
  eligible‌‌
  to‌‌
  run‌‌
  for‌‌
  any‌‌
  public‌‌   office‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌  when‌‌the‌‌following‌‌concurs:‌  ‌
receipt‌‌thereof,‌‌be‌a ‌ ppealed‌‌to‌‌the‌‌following:‌  ‌ time‌‌he‌‌filed‌‌the‌‌same.‌  ‌
a) Election‌‌to‌‌same‌‌position;‌‌AND‌  ‌
b) Full‌‌service,‌‌for‌‌3‌‌consecutive‌‌terms.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 119‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

2. GR‌:‌‌The‌‌limit‌‌does‌‌not‌‌apply‌‌when‌‌there‌‌is‌‌an‌‌interruption.‌  ‌ Punong‌  ‌Barangay.‌  ‌YES‌. ‌ ‌His‌  ‌election‌  ‌as‌  ‌municipal‌‌


  councilor‌‌
  would‌‌  Is‌‌ the‌‌ provincial‌‌ board‌‌ member’s‌‌ election‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ same‌‌ position‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ 
 ‌

entail‌‌abandonment‌‌and‌‌as‌‌with‌‌resignation,‌‌is‌‌voluntary.‌  ‌ third‌  ‌and‌  ‌fourth‌  ‌time,‌  ‌but‌  ‌now‌  ‌in‌  ‌representation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌renamed‌‌ 
 ‌ INTERRUPTS‌  ‌ DOES‌‌NOT‌‌INTERRUPT‌  ‌
district,‌‌a‌‌violation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌three-term‌‌limit‌‌rule?‌  ‌
Involuntary‌‌  Succession;‌  ‌ Suspension;‌  ‌ Aldovino‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌ YES‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌actual‌  ‌difference‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌population‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌old‌  ‌Second‌‌ 
Cause‌  ‌ Recall;‌  ‌ Extended‌‌Illness;‌  ‌ District‌  ‌from‌  ‌that‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  current‌‌  Third‌‌   District‌‌  amounts‌‌   to‌‌
  less‌‌
  than‌‌ 
Temporary‌‌ inability‌‌ or‌‌ disqualification‌‌ to‌‌ exercise‌‌ the‌‌ functions‌‌ of‌‌ an‌‌ 
DQ‌‌before‌‌end‌‌  Force‌‌Majeure;‌  ‌ 10%‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌population‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  latter.‌‌  This‌‌
  numerical‌‌   fact‌‌
  renders‌‌   the‌‌ 
of‌‌term;‌  ‌ Conversion‌‌of‌‌municipality‌‌to‌‌  elective‌  ‌post,‌  ‌even‌  ‌if‌  ‌involuntary,‌  ‌should‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌an‌‌ 
effective‌‌   interruption‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌term‌‌
  because‌‌
  it‌‌
  ‌does‌‌ not‌‌ involve‌‌ the‌‌ loss‌‌  new‌  ‌Third‌  ‌District‌  ‌as‌‌  essentially,‌‌   although‌‌   not‌‌
  literally,‌‌
  the‌‌  same‌‌   as‌‌ 
city;‌  ‌
of‌‌title‌‌to‌‌office‌. ‌ ‌ the‌‌old‌‌Second‌‌District.‌‌   ‌
DQ‌‌after‌‌end‌‌of‌‌term‌  ‌
The‌  ‌best‌  ‌indicator‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌suspended‌  ‌official's‌  ‌continuity‌  ‌in‌  ‌office‌‌
  is‌‌ 
Voluntary‌‌   ‌ Renunciation‌‌(abandonment‌‌or‌‌  Tallado‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌‌2019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
Cause‌  ‌ resignation);‌  ‌ the‌  ‌absence‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌permanent‌  ‌replacement‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌lack‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
authority‌‌to‌‌appoint‌‌one‌‌‌since‌‌no‌‌vacancy‌‌exists‌. ‌ ‌ Once‌‌ the‌‌ order‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Office‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Ombudsman‌‌ to‌‌ dismiss‌‌ an‌‌ elective‌‌ 
local‌‌   official‌‌  is‌‌
  executed,‌‌   the‌‌
  dismissed‌‌   official‌‌
  thereby‌‌   loses‌‌
  title‌‌ to‌‌ 
3. There‌‌is‌‌interruption‌‌if‌‌there‌‌is‌‌involuntary‌‌loss‌‌of‌‌title.‌  ‌
Abundo,‌‌Sr‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 013‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌‌on‌‌effect‌‌of‌‌election‌‌protest‌  ‌ the‌  ‌office‌  ‌even‌  ‌if‌  ‌he‌  ‌or‌  ‌she‌  ‌has‌  ‌filed‌  ‌a ‌ ‌timely‌  ‌appeal‌  ‌assailing‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Adormeo‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌a
‌ s‌‌with‌S‌ ocrates‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌ dismissal‌‌   which‌‌   would‌‌   have‌‌   prevented‌‌ it‌‌ from‌‌ attaining‌‌ finality.‌‌ ‌The‌‌ 
The‌  ‌consecutiveness‌  ‌of‌  ‌what‌  ‌otherwise‌  ‌would‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌‌   Abundo’s‌‌  loss‌‌   of‌‌
  title‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌ office‌‌ constitutes‌‌ an‌‌ involuntary‌‌ interruption‌‌ 
An‌  ‌elective‌‌   official,‌‌  who‌‌   has‌‌
  served‌‌  for‌‌
  three‌‌
  consecutive‌‌   terms‌‌   and‌‌  three‌‌  successive,‌‌ continuous‌‌ mayorship‌‌ was‌‌ effectively‌‌ broken‌‌ when‌‌  of‌‌the‌‌official's‌‌service‌‌of‌‌his‌‌or‌‌her‌‌full‌‌term.‌  ‌
who‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌seek‌  ‌the‌  ‌elective‌  ‌position‌‌  for‌‌
  what‌‌   could‌‌
  be‌‌
  his‌‌
  fourth‌‌  he‌  ‌was‌‌
  initially‌‌
  deprived‌‌   of‌‌
  title‌‌  to,‌‌
  and‌‌
  was‌‌
  veritably‌‌
  disallowed‌‌  to‌‌ 
The‌  ‌DILG's‌  ‌execution‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌OMB‌  ‌decisions‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner's‌‌ 
term,‌‌   but‌‌
  later‌‌  ‌won‌‌  in‌‌
  a ‌‌recall‌‌
  election‌, ‌‌had‌‌ an‌‌ ‌interruption‌‌ ‌in‌‌ the‌‌  serve‌  ‌and‌  ‌occupy,‌  ‌an‌  ‌office‌  ‌to‌  ‌which‌  ‌he‌‌
  was‌‌
  eventually‌‌
  declared‌‌
  to‌‌ 
continuity‌‌of‌‌the‌‌official’s‌‌service.‌‌   ‌ have‌‌been‌‌the‌‌rightful‌‌choice‌‌of‌‌the‌‌electorate.‌  ‌ dismissal‌‌ clearly‌‌ constituted‌‌ loss‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ petitioner's‌‌ title‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ office.‌ 
The‌  ‌dismissals‌  ‌were‌  ‌involuntary‌  ‌interruptions‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner's‌‌ 
The‌  ‌two-year‌  ‌period‌  ‌during‌  ‌which‌  ‌his‌  ‌opponent‌  ‌was‌  ‌serving‌  ‌as‌‌ 
2016-2019‌  ‌term.‌  ‌As‌  ‌such,‌  ‌he‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌to‌  ‌have‌  ‌fully‌‌ 
Rivera‌‌III‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌ mayor‌‌should‌‌be‌‌considered‌‌as‌‌an‌i‌ nterruption‌. ‌ ‌ served‌‌a‌‌third‌‌successive‌‌term‌‌of‌‌office.‌  ‌
Here,‌‌   ‌respondent‌‌   Morales‌‌   was‌‌   elected‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌ term‌‌ July‌‌ 1,‌‌ 1998‌‌ to‌‌   ‌

Albania‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 017‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
 ‌

June‌‌   30,‌‌  2001.‌  ‌He‌‌ assumed‌‌ the‌‌ position.‌  ‌He‌‌ served‌‌ as‌‌ mayor‌‌ until‌‌ 


June‌‌   30,‌‌   2001‌. ‌ ‌He‌‌  was‌‌ mayor‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ entire‌‌ period‌‌ notwithstanding‌‌  A‌  ‌violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  three-term‌‌   limit‌‌
  rule‌‌
  is‌‌
  an‌‌
  ineligibility‌‌   which‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌
XIV.‌‌NATIONAL‌‌ECONOMY‌‌AND‌‌PATRIMONY‌  ‌
the‌‌
  Decision‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ RTC‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ electoral‌‌ protest‌‌ ousting‌‌ him‌‌ as‌‌ mayor.‌  ‌ proper‌  ‌ground‌‌   for‌‌
  a ‌‌‌petition‌‌
  to‌‌
  deny‌‌  due‌‌   course‌‌   to‌‌
  or‌‌
  to‌‌
  cancel‌‌  a ‌‌
To‌  ‌reiterate,‌  ‌as‌  ‌held‌  ‌in‌  ‌Ong‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Alegre‌, ‌ ‌such‌  ‌circumstance‌‌   does‌‌  not‌‌  A.‌‌Exploration,‌‌development,‌‌and‌‌utilization‌‌of‌‌natural‌‌ 
COC‌‌‌under‌‌Section‌‌78‌‌of‌‌the‌‌OEC.‌  ‌
constitute‌‌an‌‌interruption‌‌in‌‌serving‌‌the‌‌full‌‌term.‌  ‌ resources‌  ‌
While‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌ran‌  ‌as‌  ‌Governor‌  ‌of‌  ‌Camarines‌  ‌Norte‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌   2007‌‌ 
elections,‌‌   he‌‌  did‌‌
  not‌‌  win‌‌  as‌‌
  such.‌‌
  It‌‌
  was‌‌  only‌‌ after‌‌ he‌‌ filed‌‌ a ‌‌petition‌‌  B.‌‌Franchises,‌‌authorities,‌‌and‌‌certificates‌‌for‌‌public‌‌utilities‌  ‌
Dizon‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌
for‌  ‌correction‌  ‌of‌  ‌manifest‌  ‌error‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌was‌  ‌proclaimed‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌  ‌assumption‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌vice‌  ‌mayor‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌mayor,‌  ‌no‌‌  duly-elected‌  ‌Governor.‌  ‌He‌  ‌assumed‌  ‌the‌  ‌post‌  ‌and‌  ‌served‌  ‌the‌‌  C.‌‌Acquisition,‌‌ownership,‌‌and‌‌transfer‌‌of‌‌public‌‌and‌‌private‌‌ 
matter‌‌how‌‌short,‌i‌ nterrupted‌M ‌ orales’‌‌continuity‌‌of‌‌service.‌‌   ‌ unexpired‌‌   term‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ opponent.‌‌ ‌Consequently,‌‌ he‌‌ did‌‌ not‌‌ hold‌‌ the‌‌  lands‌  ‌
office‌‌  for‌‌
  the‌‌   full‌‌
  term‌‌   of‌‌
  three‌‌
  years.‌‌   As‌‌ he‌‌ had‌‌ ‌not‌‌ fully‌‌ served‌‌ the‌‌ 
D.‌‌Practice‌‌of‌‌professions‌  ‌
Bolos,‌‌Jr‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌ term,‌  ‌and‌  ‌had‌  ‌not‌  ‌been‌  ‌elected‌  ‌for‌  ‌three‌  ‌consecutive‌  ‌terms‌  ‌as‌‌ 
Governor,‌‌there‌‌was‌n ‌ o‌‌violation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌three-term‌‌limit‌‌rule‌. ‌ ‌ E.‌‌Organization‌‌and‌‌regulation‌‌of‌‌private‌‌and‌‌public‌‌ 
Whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌voluntary‌  ‌renunciation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Office‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Punong‌‌
  Barangay‌‌   by‌‌ petitioner‌‌ when‌‌ he‌‌ assumed‌‌ office‌‌ as‌‌ Municipal‌‌  corporations‌  ‌
⭐‌Naval‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 014‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
Councilor‌‌
  so‌‌
  that‌‌  he‌‌
  is‌‌
  deemed‌‌
  to‌‌
  have‌‌
  fully‌‌
  served‌‌
  his‌‌ third‌‌ term‌‌ as‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 120‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

F.‌‌Monopolies,‌‌restraint‌‌of‌‌trade,‌‌and‌‌unfair‌‌competition‌  ‌ corporations‌‌involving‌t‌ echnical‌‌or‌‌financial‌‌assistance‌. ‌ ‌ persons‌‌and‌‌entities‌‌partake‌‌of‌‌two‌‌natures:‌  


 ‌ Examining‌‌   the‌‌
  IPRA,‌‌
  ‌there‌‌ is‌‌ nothing‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ that‌‌ grants‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  a) a‌‌permit‌;‌‌and‌  ‌
ICCs/IPs‌  ‌ownership‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌natural‌  ‌resources‌  ‌within‌  ‌their‌‌  b) a‌‌contract‌. ‌ ‌
A.‌‌Exploration,‌‌development,‌‌and‌‌utilization‌‌of‌‌  ancestral‌‌   domains‌. ‌ ‌The‌‌ right‌‌ of‌‌ ICCs/IPs‌‌ in‌‌ their‌‌ ancestral‌‌ domains‌‌ 
natural‌‌resources‌  ‌ includes‌‌ ownership,‌‌ but‌‌ this‌‌ "‌ownership‌" ‌‌is‌‌ ‌expressly‌‌ defined‌‌ and‌‌ 
Consistent‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌Regalian‌  ‌Doctrine‌, ‌ ‌all‌  ‌unexplored‌  ‌or‌‌ 
unextracted‌‌ mineral‌‌ resources‌‌ belong‌‌ to‌‌ every.‌‌ ‌Issues‌‌ regarding‌‌ the‌‌ 
limited‌‌‌in‌‌Section‌‌7‌‌(a).‌  ‌
Cruz‌‌v.‌‌SENR‌‌‌re‌‌Constitutionality‌‌of‌‌IPRA‌‌and‌‌its‌‌IRR‌  ‌ exploration,‌‌   extraction‌‌   and‌‌  utilization‌‌  of‌‌ mineral‌‌ resources‌‌ are‌‌ 
The‌‌Small-Scale‌‌Utilization‌‌of‌‌Natural‌‌Resources‌‌Is‌A
‌ llowed‌‌  imbued‌  ‌with‌  ‌public‌  ‌interest‌. ‌ ‌This‌  ‌striking‌  ‌constitutional‌‌ 
Ancestral‌‌Domains‌‌and‌‌Ancestral‌‌Lands‌‌are‌‌the‌‌Private‌‌  realization‌  ‌justifies‌  ‌a ‌ ‌strict‌‌
  interpretation‌‌   in‌‌
  favor‌‌   of‌‌
  preserving‌‌ 
Under‌‌Paragraph‌‌3,‌‌Section‌‌2‌‌of‌‌Article‌‌XII‌  ‌
Property‌‌of‌‌Indigenous‌‌Peoples‌‌and‌‌Do‌‌Not‌‌Constitute‌‌Part‌‌of‌‌  the‌‌
  possession‌‌   of‌‌
  mineral‌‌   resources‌‌   in‌‌
  favor‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  State‌‌
  and‌‌
  in‌‌ 
the‌‌Land‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Public‌‌Domain.‌  ‌ Ownership‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌natural‌  ‌resources‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌ancestral‌  ‌domains‌‌  trust‌  ‌for‌  ‌its‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌pending‌  ‌controversies‌  ‌regarding‌  ‌their‌‌ 
remains‌‌  with‌‌
  the‌‌
  State‌‌
  and‌‌
  the‌‌
  ICCs/IPs‌‌
  are‌‌
  ‌merely‌‌ granted‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌  exploration,‌‌extraction,‌‌transportation‌‌or‌‌exportation.‌  ‌
The‌‌  private‌‌   character‌‌   of‌‌
  ancestral‌‌
  lands‌‌ and‌‌ domains‌‌ as‌‌ laid‌‌ down‌‌ in‌‌ 
to‌‌   ‌ Thus,‌‌ the‌‌ CA‌‌ is‌‌ correct‌‌ in‌‌ declaring‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ RTC‌‌ erred‌‌ in‌‌ enjoining‌‌ the‌‌ 
the‌  ‌IPRA‌  ‌is‌  ‌further‌  ‌strengthened‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌option‌  ‌given‌  ‌to‌  ‌individual‌‌ 
ICCs/IPs‌‌over‌‌their‌‌individually-owned‌‌ancestral‌‌lands.‌  ‌ 1. "manage‌‌and‌‌conserve"‌‌‌them‌‌for‌‌future‌‌generations,‌‌   ‌ DENR-MGB‌  ‌in‌  ‌suspending‌  ‌petitioner's‌‌   mining‌‌   operations‌‌   as‌‌
  well‌‌
  as‌‌ 
withholding‌‌the‌‌issuance‌‌of‌‌its‌‌OTPs‌‌and‌‌MOEPs.‌‌   ‌
Section‌‌   3 ‌‌of‌‌
  Article‌‌  XII‌‌  on‌‌
  National‌‌   Economy‌‌   and‌‌
  Patrimony‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  2. "benefit‌  ‌and‌  ‌share"‌  ‌the‌  ‌profits‌  ‌from‌  ‌their‌  ‌allocation‌  ‌and‌‌ 
1987‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌classifies‌  ‌lands‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌domain‌‌   ‌into‌‌
  four‌‌  utilization,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ B.‌‌Franchises,‌‌authorities,‌‌and‌‌certificates‌‌for‌‌public‌‌ 
categories:‌  ‌(a)‌  ‌agricultural,‌  ‌(b)‌  ‌forest‌  ‌or‌  ‌timber,‌  ‌(c)‌  ‌mineral‌  ‌lands,‌‌  3. "negotiate‌‌
  the‌‌
  terms‌‌ and‌‌ conditions‌‌ for‌‌ their‌‌ exploration"‌‌ for‌‌  utilities‌  ‌
and‌  ‌(d)‌  ‌national‌  ‌parks. ‌  ‌Section‌  ‌5 ‌ ‌mentions‌  ‌ancestral‌  ‌lands‌  ‌and‌‌  the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌"ensuring‌  ‌ecological‌  ‌and‌  ‌environmental‌‌  Section‌  ‌11.‌  ‌No‌  ‌franchise,‌  ‌certificate,‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌  ‌form‌  ‌of‌‌ 
ancestral‌‌   domains‌‌   but‌‌  it‌‌
  does‌‌ not‌‌ classify‌‌ them‌‌ under‌‌ any‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ said‌‌  protection‌‌and‌‌conservation‌‌measures."‌‌   ‌ authorization‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌operation‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌public‌‌
  utility‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  granted‌‌ 
four‌  ‌categories. ‌  ‌To‌‌  classify‌‌   them‌‌   as‌‌
  public‌‌  lands‌‌  under‌‌   any‌‌  one‌‌ 
Simply‌  ‌stated,‌  ‌the‌  ‌ICCs/IPs'‌  ‌rights‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌natural‌  ‌resources‌‌  except‌‌   ‌
of‌‌the‌‌four‌‌classes‌‌will‌‌render‌‌the‌‌entire‌‌IPRA‌‌law‌‌a‌‌nullity.‌   ‌‌ ‌
take‌‌the‌‌form‌‌of‌m ‌ anagement‌‌or‌‌stewardship‌. ‌ ‌ a) to‌c‌ itizens‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌or‌‌   ‌
Sections‌‌7‌‌(a),‌‌7‌‌(b)‌‌and‌‌57‌‌of‌‌the‌‌IPRA‌‌Do‌‌Not‌‌Violate‌‌the‌‌ 
The‌‌Large-Scale‌‌Utilization‌‌of‌‌Natural‌‌Resources‌‌Is‌A ‌ llowed‌‌  b) to‌  ‌corporations‌  ‌or‌  ‌associations‌  ‌organized‌  ‌under‌‌   the‌‌
  laws‌‌ 
Regalian‌‌Doctrine‌‌Enshrined‌‌in‌‌Section‌‌2,‌‌Article‌‌XII‌  ‌
Under‌‌Paragraphs‌‌1‌‌and‌‌4,‌‌Section‌‌2,‌‌Article‌‌XII‌  ‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines,‌‌ ‌at‌‌ least‌‌ 60%‌‌ of‌‌ whose‌‌ capital‌‌ is‌‌ owned‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌exploration,‌  ‌development‌‌  by‌‌such‌‌citizens;‌‌   ‌
and‌  ‌utilization‌  ‌of‌  ‌natural‌  ‌resources,‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌exercises‌  ‌full‌‌  Interpreting‌‌   Section‌‌   2,‌‌
  Article‌‌   XII‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  1987‌‌ Constitution‌‌ in‌‌ relation‌‌ 
to‌‌
  Section‌‌   57‌‌  of‌‌
  IPRA,‌‌   the‌‌
  State,‌‌   as‌‌   owner‌‌   of‌‌
  these‌‌
  natural‌‌ resources,‌‌  nor‌‌
  shall‌‌ such‌‌ franchise,‌‌ certificate,‌‌ or‌‌ authorization‌‌ be‌‌ exclusive‌‌ in‌‌ 
control‌  ‌and‌  ‌supervision‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌may‌  ‌undertake‌  ‌the‌‌
  same‌‌  in‌‌
  four‌‌
  (4)‌‌ 
may‌  ‌directly‌  ‌undertake‌  ‌the‌  ‌development‌  ‌and‌  ‌exploitation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  character‌‌or‌‌for‌‌a‌‌longer‌‌period‌‌than‌‌‌50‌‌years‌.  ‌‌ ‌
modes:‌  ‌
natural‌‌
  resources‌‌   by‌‌   itself,‌‌  ‌or‌‌
  in‌‌ the‌‌ alternative‌, ‌‌it‌‌ may‌‌ recognize‌‌ the‌‌  The‌‌  State‌‌
  shall‌‌
  encourage‌‌  ‌equity‌‌
  participation‌‌
  in‌‌
  public‌‌ utilities‌‌ 
1. The‌‌State‌‌may‌d
‌ irectly‌u
‌ ndertake‌‌such‌‌activities;‌‌or‌  ‌ priority‌‌   rights‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   ICCs/IPs‌‌   as‌‌   owners‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  land‌‌
  on‌‌  which‌‌ the‌‌  by‌‌the‌‌general‌‌public.‌‌   ‌
2. The‌  ‌State‌  ‌may‌  ‌enter‌  ‌into‌  ‌co-production,‌  ‌joint‌‌
  venture‌‌   or‌‌  natural‌  ‌resources‌  ‌are‌  ‌found‌  ‌by‌  ‌entering‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌co-production,‌  ‌joint‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌17.‌  ‌In‌  ‌times‌  ‌of‌  ‌national‌  ‌emergency‌, ‌ ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌‌ 
production-sharing‌  ‌agreements‌‌   with‌‌
  Filipino‌‌  citizens‌‌
  or‌‌  venture,‌‌or‌‌production-sharing‌‌agreement‌‌with‌‌them.‌  ‌
interest‌‌
  so‌‌
  requires,‌‌   the‌‌
  State‌‌
  may,‌‌
  during‌‌ the‌‌ emergency‌‌ and‌‌ under‌‌ 
qualified‌‌corporations;‌  ‌
reasonable‌  ‌terms‌  ‌prescribed‌  ‌by‌  ‌it,‌  ‌temporarily‌  ‌take‌  ‌over‌  ‌or‌‌ 
3. Congress‌  ‌may,‌  ‌by‌  ‌law,‌  ‌allow‌  ‌small-scale‌  ‌utilization‌  ‌of‌‌  Shuley‌‌Mine‌‌v.‌‌DENR‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌ direct‌  ‌the‌  ‌operation‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌privately-owned‌  ‌public‌  ‌utility‌  ‌or‌‌ 
natural‌‌resources‌‌by‌‌Filipino‌‌citizens;‌  ‌ The‌‌
  ‌Regalian‌‌   Doctrine‌‌   espouses‌‌   that‌‌
  all‌‌ lands‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ public‌‌ domain‌‌  business‌‌affected‌‌with‌‌public‌‌interest‌. ‌ ‌
4. For‌  ‌the‌  ‌large-scale‌  ‌exploration,‌  ‌development‌  ‌and‌‌  belong‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌State,‌‌
  and‌‌
  that,‌‌
  as‌‌
  a ‌‌consequence‌‌   thereof,‌‌   any‌‌
  asserted‌‌  Section‌  ‌18.‌  ‌The‌  ‌State‌  ‌may,‌  ‌in‌‌
  the‌‌
  interest‌‌
  of‌‌
  ‌national‌‌   welfare‌‌
  or‌‌ 
utilization‌  ‌of‌  ‌minerals,‌  ‌petroleum‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌mineral‌  ‌oils,‌‌  right‌‌of‌‌ownership‌‌over‌‌land‌‌necessarily‌‌traces‌‌back‌‌to‌‌the‌‌State.‌  ‌
defense‌, ‌‌establish‌‌   and‌‌
  operate‌‌   vital‌‌
  industries‌‌   and,‌‌
  upon‌‌
  payment‌‌ 
the‌‌
  President‌‌  may‌‌  enter‌‌ into‌‌ agreements‌‌ with‌‌ foreign-owned‌‌  The‌  ‌mineral‌  ‌agreements‌  ‌entered‌  ‌into‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌with‌  ‌private‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 121‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

of‌  ‌just‌  ‌compensation,‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌to‌  ‌public‌  ‌ownership‌  ‌utilities‌  ‌and‌ 


be‌‌
  served‌‌
  in‌‌
  allowing‌‌
  plain­tiffs-appellants‌‌
  to‌‌
  recover‌‌ the‌‌ land‌‌ as‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌  AGRIX.‌  ‌
other‌‌private‌‌enterprises‌‌to‌‌be‌‌operated‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Government.‌  ‌ already‌‌in‌‌the‌‌hands‌‌of‌‌qualified‌‌persons.‌  ‌
Also,‌  ‌the‌  ‌means‌  ‌employed‌  ‌to‌‌   rehabilitate‌‌
  AGRIX‌‌   fall‌‌
  far‌‌
  short‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
Albano‌‌v.‌‌Reyes‌  ‌ requirement‌  ‌that‌  ‌they‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌unduly‌‌   oppressive.‌‌   The‌‌  right‌‌   to‌‌ 
Ramírez‌‌v.‌‌Vda‌‌de‌‌Ramirez‌  ‌ property‌  ‌in‌  ‌all‌  ‌mortgages,‌  ‌liens,‌  ‌interests,‌  ‌penalties‌  ‌and‌  ‌charges‌‌ 
Art.‌‌ XII,‌‌ Sec.‌‌ 11‌‌ ‌does‌‌ not‌‌ necessarily‌‌ imply‌‌ ‌that‌‌ only‌‌ Congress‌‌ has‌‌  owing‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌creditors‌  ‌of‌  ‌AGRIX‌  ‌is‌  ‌arbitrarily‌  ‌destroyed.‌  ‌There‌  ‌is‌‌ 
the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌grant‌  ‌such‌  ‌authorization‌. ‌ ‌Our‌  ‌statute‌  ‌books‌  ‌are‌‌  The‌  ‌Constitutional‌  ‌provision‌  ‌which‌  ‌enables‌  ‌aliens‌  ‌to‌  ‌acquire‌‌ 
discrimination‌‌   as‌‌
  well.‌‌ In‌‌ extinguishing‌‌ the‌‌ mortgage‌‌ and‌‌ other‌‌ liens,‌‌ 
replete‌‌   with‌‌   laws‌‌
  granting‌‌   specified‌‌
  agencies‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Executive‌‌ Branch‌‌  private‌‌lands‌‌‌does‌‌not‌‌extend‌‌to‌t‌ estamentary‌s‌ uccession‌. ‌ ‌
the‌‌
  decree‌‌   lumps‌‌   the‌‌
  secured‌‌   creditors‌‌
  with‌‌
  the‌‌
  unsecured‌‌   creditors‌‌ 
the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌issue‌  ‌such‌  ‌authorization‌  ‌for‌  ‌certain‌  ‌classes‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌‌  and‌  ‌places‌  ‌them‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌level‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌prosecution‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌ 
utilities.‌  ‌ Matthews‌‌v.‌‌Taylor‌  ‌ respective‌  ‌claims.‌  ‌In‌  ‌this‌  ‌respect,‌  ‌all‌  ‌of‌  ‌them‌  ‌are‌  ‌considered‌‌ 
In‌‌
  the‌‌  instant‌‌   case,‌‌
  the‌‌   PPA,‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ option‌‌ granted‌‌ it‌‌ by‌‌  unsecured‌‌creditors‌‌violative‌‌of‌‌the‌e ‌ qual‌‌protection‌‌clause‌. ‌ ‌
Benjamin‌  ‌has‌  ‌no‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌nullify‌  ‌the‌  ‌Agreement‌  ‌of‌  ‌Lease‌‌ 
P.D.‌‌  No.‌‌
  857,‌‌  chose‌‌   to‌‌
  contract‌‌   out‌‌  the‌‌
  operation‌‌   and‌‌ management‌‌ of‌‌  between‌  ‌Joselyn‌  ‌and‌  ‌petitioner.‌  ‌Benjamin,‌  ‌being‌  ‌an‌  ‌alien,‌  ‌is‌‌  On‌  ‌top‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌this,‌  ‌New‌  ‌Agrix,‌  ‌Inc.‌  ‌was‌  ‌created‌  ‌by‌  ‌special‌  ‌decree‌‌ 
the‌‌  MICP‌‌   to‌‌
  a ‌‌private‌‌  corporation.‌  ‌This‌‌ is‌‌ clearly‌‌ within‌‌ its‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌  absolutely‌  ‌prohibited‌  ‌from‌‌   acquiring‌‌   private‌‌  and‌‌
  public‌‌
  lands‌‌  notwithstanding‌  ‌the‌  ‌provision‌  ‌of‌  ‌Article‌  ‌XIV,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌4 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌   1973‌‌ 
do.‌  ‌The‌  ‌contract‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌PPA‌  ‌and‌  ‌ICTSI,‌  ‌coupled‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Philippines.‌‌  This‌‌
  is‌‌
  true‌‌  even‌‌ if‌‌ we‌‌ sustain‌‌ Benjamin's‌‌ claim‌‌  Constitution‌‌   proscribing‌‌   the‌‌
  formation,‌‌ organization,‌‌ or‌‌ regulation‌‌ of‌‌ 
President's‌  ‌written‌  ‌approval,‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌the‌  ‌necessary‌‌   authorization‌‌  that‌‌he‌‌provided‌‌the‌‌funds‌‌for‌‌such‌‌acquisition.‌‌   ‌ private‌‌corporations‌‌by‌‌the‌‌government.‌  ‌
for‌‌ICTSI's‌‌operation‌‌and‌‌management‌‌of‌‌the‌‌MICP.‌‌   ‌
The‌  ‌decree‌  ‌also‌  ‌impairs‌  ‌the‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌contract‌  ‌between‌‌ 
D.‌‌Practice‌‌of‌‌professions‌  ‌ AGRIX‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌private‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌without‌  ‌justification.‌  ‌While‌‌   it‌‌
  is‌‌ 
Republic‌‌v.‌‌PLDT‌  ‌
true‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌police‌  ‌power‌‌  is‌‌
  superior‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  impairment‌‌   clause,‌‌   the‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌14.‌  ‌The‌  ‌sustained‌  ‌development‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌reservoir‌‌   of‌‌
  national‌‌ 
There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌reason‌‌   why‌‌  the‌‌
  State‌‌
  may‌‌   not‌‌
  require‌‌
  a ‌‌public‌‌
  utility‌‌  to‌‌  principle‌  ‌will‌  ‌apply‌  ‌only‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌contract‌  ‌is‌  ‌so‌  ‌related‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
talents‌  ‌consisting‌  ‌of‌  ‌Filipino‌  ‌scientists,‌  ‌entrepreneurs,‌‌  public‌  ‌welfare‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌will‌‌
  be‌‌
  considered‌‌  congenitally‌‌   susceptible‌‌   to‌‌ 
render‌‌   services‌‌   in‌‌ the‌‌ general‌‌ interest,‌‌ provided‌‌ just‌‌ compensation‌‌ is‌‌ 
professionals,‌‌ managers,‌‌ high-level‌‌ technical‌‌ manpower‌‌ and‌‌ skilled‌‌  change‌‌by‌‌the‌‌legislature‌‌in‌‌the‌‌interest‌‌of‌‌the‌‌greater‌‌number.‌  ‌
paid‌  ‌therefor.‌  ‌Ultimately,‌  ‌the‌  ‌beneficiary‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌interconnecting‌‌ 
service‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌  ‌users‌  ‌of‌  ‌both‌  ‌telephone‌  ‌systems,‌  ‌so‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌  workers‌‌   and‌‌   craftsmen‌‌   in‌‌
  all‌‌
  fields‌‌
  shall‌‌  be‌‌
  promoted‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌ State.‌‌ 
condemnation‌‌would‌‌be‌‌for‌‌public‌‌use.‌  ‌ The‌‌  State‌‌
  shall‌‌   ‌encourage‌‌ appropriate‌‌ technology‌‌ and‌‌ ‌regulate‌‌  Liban‌‌v.‌‌Gordon‌‌2 ‌ 011‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
its‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌national‌  ‌benefit.‌  ‌The‌  ‌practice‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌‌ 
C.‌‌Acquisition,‌‌ownership,‌‌and‌‌transfer‌‌of‌‌public‌‌and‌‌  professions‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Philippines‌‌   shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  limited‌‌   to‌‌
  Filipino‌‌   citizens,‌‌  The‌‌   structure‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ PNRC‌‌ is‌‌ sui‌‌ generis‌, ‌‌being‌‌ neither‌‌ strictly‌‌ private‌‌ 
nor‌‌  public‌‌
  in‌‌
  nature.‌‌   R.A.‌‌
  No.‌‌  95‌‌
  remains‌‌   valid‌‌
  and‌‌
  constitutional‌‌ in‌‌ 
private‌‌lands‌  save‌‌in‌‌cases‌‌prescribed‌‌by‌‌law.‌  ‌
its‌‌entirety.‌  ‌
Godinez‌‌v.‌‌Pak‌‌Luen‌  ‌ E.‌‌Organization‌‌and‌‌regulation‌‌of‌‌private‌‌and‌‌public‌‌ 
corporations‌  ‌ F.‌‌Monopolies,‌‌restraint‌‌of‌‌trade,‌‌and‌‌unfair‌‌ 
The‌  ‌vendor‌  ‌or‌  ‌his‌  ‌heirs‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌rely‌  ‌on‌  ‌an‌  ‌argument‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌‌  competition‌  ‌
imprescriptibility‌  ‌because‌  ‌the‌  ‌land‌  ‌sold‌  ‌in‌  ‌1941‌  ‌is‌  ‌now‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  Section‌‌   16.‌‌  ‌The‌‌  Congress‌‌
  shall‌‌ not,‌‌ ‌except‌‌ by‌‌ general‌‌ law‌, ‌‌provide‌‌ 
hands‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Filipino‌  ‌citizen‌  ‌against‌  ‌whom‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitutional‌‌  for‌  ‌the‌  ‌formation,‌  ‌organization,‌  ‌or‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌of‌  ‌private‌‌  Section‌  ‌19.‌  ‌The‌  ‌State‌‌
  shall‌‌
  regulate‌‌
  or‌‌
  prohibit‌‌
  monopolies‌‌   when‌‌ 
prescription‌  ‌was‌  ‌never‌  ‌intended‌  ‌to‌  ‌apply.‌  ‌Fong‌  ‌Pak‌  ‌Luen,‌  ‌the‌‌  corporations.‌  ‌GOCCs‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌created‌  ‌or‌  ‌established‌  ‌by‌  ‌special‌‌  the‌  ‌public‌  ‌interest‌  ‌so‌  ‌requires.‌  ‌No‌  ‌combinations‌  ‌in‌  ‌restraint‌  ‌of‌‌ 
disqualified‌‌   alien‌‌
  vendee‌‌  later‌‌
  sold‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌   property‌‌
  to‌‌
  Trinidad‌‌  S.‌‌  charters‌‌   ‌in‌‌
  the‌‌  interest‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  common‌‌   good‌‌ and‌‌ ‌subject‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  trade‌‌or‌‌unfair‌‌competition‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌allowed.‌  ‌
Navata,‌‌a‌‌Filipino‌‌citizen‌‌qualified‌‌to‌‌acquire‌‌real‌‌property.‌  ‌
test‌‌of‌‌economic‌‌viability.‌  ‌
Lagman‌‌v.‌‌Torres‌D
‌ ecision‌‌‌and‌R
‌ esolution‌  ‌
Tejido‌‌v.‌‌Zamacoma‌  ‌ NADECO‌‌v.‌‌PVB‌  ‌ A‌  ‌monopoly‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌privilege‌  ‌or‌  ‌peculiar‌  ‌advantage‌  ‌vested‌  ‌in‌  ‌one‌  ‌or‌ 
The‌  ‌litigated‌  ‌property‌  ‌is‌  ‌now‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌hands‌  ‌of‌  ‌Filipino‌  ‌citizens.‌  ‌ The‌‌   interests‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ public‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌ sufficiently‌‌ involved‌‌ to‌‌ warrant‌‌ the‌‌  more‌  ‌persons‌  ‌or‌  ‌companies,‌  ‌consisting‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌exclusive‌  ‌right‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Zamacoma,‌  ‌who‌  ‌owns‌  ‌the‌  ‌bigger‌  ‌portions‌  ‌of‌  ‌subject‌  ‌properties,‌‌  interference‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  government‌‌   with‌‌
  the‌‌ private‌‌ contracts‌‌ of‌‌ AGRIX.‌‌ It‌‌  power‌  ‌to‌  ‌carry‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌ ‌particular‌  ‌business‌  ‌or‌  ‌trade,‌  ‌manufacture‌  ‌a ‌‌
became‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Filipino‌  ‌citizen‌  ‌as‌  ‌of‌  ‌1936.‌  ‌The‌  ‌other‌  ‌defendants‌  ‌are‌  ‌all‌‌  would‌‌   appear‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ decree‌‌ was‌‌ issued‌‌ only‌‌ to‌‌ favor‌‌ a ‌‌special‌‌ group‌‌  particular‌  ‌article,‌  ‌or‌  ‌control‌  ‌the‌  ‌sale‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌whole‌  ‌supply‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌
Filipino‌‌   citizens.‌  ‌Therefore,‌‌ there‌‌ would‌‌ be‌‌ no‌‌ more‌‌ public‌‌ policy‌‌ to‌‌  of‌  ‌investors‌  ‌who‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌preferred‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌legitimate‌  ‌creditors‌  ‌of‌‌  particular‌‌commodity.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 122‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

and‌  ‌remove‌  ‌cultural‌  ‌inequities‌  ‌by‌  ‌equitably‌  ‌diffusing‌  ‌wealth‌  ‌and‌‌ 


On‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌combination‌  ‌in‌  ‌restraint‌  ‌of‌  ‌trade‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌‌  Time‌‌ and‌‌ again,‌‌ we‌‌ have‌‌ ruled‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ social‌‌ justice‌‌ provisions‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
political‌‌power‌‌for‌‌the‌‌common‌‌good.‌  ‌ Constitution‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌self-executing‌  ‌principles‌  ‌ready‌  ‌for‌‌ 
agreement‌  ‌or‌  ‌understanding‌  ‌between‌  ‌two‌  ‌or‌  ‌more‌  ‌persons,‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
form‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contract,‌  ‌trust,‌  ‌pool,‌  ‌holding‌  ‌company,‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌form‌  ‌of‌‌  Sec‌  ‌2.‌  ‌The‌  ‌promotion‌  ‌of‌  ‌social‌  ‌justice‌  ‌shall‌  ‌include‌  ‌the‌‌  enforcement‌  ‌through‌  ‌the‌  ‌courts.‌  ‌They‌  ‌are‌  ‌merely‌  ‌statements‌  ‌of‌ 
association,‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌unduly‌  ‌restricting‌  ‌competition‌, ‌‌ commitment‌‌   to‌‌
  create‌‌ economic‌‌ opportunities‌‌ based‌‌ on‌‌ freedom‌‌ of‌‌  principles‌‌   and‌‌
  policies.‌  ‌To‌‌  give‌‌
  them‌‌  effect,‌‌   legislative‌‌ enactment‌‌ is‌‌ 
monopolizing‌  ‌trade‌  ‌and‌  ‌commerce‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌certain‌  ‌commodity,‌‌  initiative‌‌and‌‌self-reliance.‌  ‌ required.‌  ‌
controlling‌  ‌its‌  ‌production,‌  ‌distribution‌  ‌and‌  ‌price,‌  ‌or‌  ‌otherwise‌‌ 
Sec‌‌  10‌‌
  Art‌‌
  II.‌  ‌The‌‌
  State‌‌
  shall‌‌
  promote‌‌
  social‌‌
  justice‌‌
  in‌‌
  all‌‌
  phases‌‌  B.‌‌Economic,‌‌Social,‌‌and‌‌Cultural‌‌Rights‌  ‌
interfering‌  ‌with‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌of‌  ‌trade‌  ‌without‌  ‌statutory‌  ‌authority.‌‌ 
Combination‌  ‌in‌  ‌restraint‌  ‌of‌  ‌trade‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌means‌  ‌while‌‌  of‌‌national‌‌development.‌  ‌
Economic,‌‌   social,‌‌   and‌‌   cultural‌‌  rights‌‌   include‌‌   the‌‌
  human‌‌   right‌‌ to‌‌ 
monopoly‌‌refers‌‌to‌‌the‌‌end.‌  ‌ The‌‌aims‌‌of‌‌the‌‌policy‌‌to‌‌promote‌‌social‌‌justice‌‌are:‌  ‌ work,‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌adequate‌  ‌standard‌  ‌of‌  ‌living,‌  ‌including‌  ‌food,‌‌ 
Competition‌‌
  ‌is‌‌  the‌‌  underlying‌‌  principle‌‌  of‌‌  Section‌‌  19,‌‌  Article‌‌  1) To‌  ‌protect‌  ‌and‌  ‌enhance‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌to‌  ‌human‌‌  clothing,‌  ‌and‌  ‌housing,‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌‌   physical‌‌   and‌‌  mental‌‌
  health,‌‌  the‌‌ 
XII‌‌‌of‌‌our‌‌Constitution‌‌which‌‌cannot‌‌be‌‌violated‌‌by‌‌R.A.‌‌No.‌‌8180.‌‌   ‌ dignity;‌  ‌ right‌‌
  to‌‌
  social‌‌
  security,‌‌   the‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  a ‌‌healthy‌‌   environment,‌‌   and‌‌  the‌‌ 
The‌  ‌offending‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌R.A.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌8180‌  ‌so‌  ‌permeate‌‌
  its‌‌
  essence‌‌  right‌‌to‌‌education.‌  ‌
2) To‌‌reduce‌‌social,‌‌economic,‌‌and‌‌political‌‌inequalities;‌‌and‌  ‌
that‌‌
  ‌the‌‌
  entire‌‌ law‌‌ has‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ struck‌‌ down.‌‌ The‌‌ provisions‌‌ on‌‌ tariff‌‌  International‌‌School‌‌Alliance‌‌of‌‌Educators‌‌v.‌‌Quisumbing‌  ‌
differential‌, ‌ ‌inventory‌  ‌and‌  ‌predatory‌  ‌pricing‌  ‌are‌  ‌among‌  ‌the‌‌  3) To‌‌remove‌‌cultural‌‌inequities.‌  ‌
principal‌  ‌props‌  ‌of‌  ‌R.A.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌8180.‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌could‌  ‌not‌  ‌have‌‌  The‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌specifically‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌labor‌  ‌is‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌‌ 
deregulated‌‌the‌‌downstream‌‌oil‌‌industry‌‌without‌‌these‌‌provisions.‌  ‌ Calalang‌‌v.‌‌Williams‌  ‌ "humane‌‌   conditions‌‌   of‌‌
  work."‌‌  These‌‌  conditions‌‌   are‌‌  not‌‌  restricted‌‌   to‌‌ 
the‌  ‌physical‌  ‌workplace‌  ‌- ‌ ‌the‌  ‌factory,‌  ‌the‌  ‌office‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌field‌  ‌- ‌ ‌but‌‌ 
R.A.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌8180‌  ‌is‌  ‌declared‌  ‌unconstitutional‌  ‌and‌  ‌E.O.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌372‌‌  Social‌  ‌justice‌  ‌is‌  ‌"neither‌  ‌communism,‌  ‌nor‌  ‌despotism,‌  ‌nor‌‌  include‌  ‌as‌  ‌well‌  ‌the‌  ‌manner‌  ‌by‌  ‌which‌  ‌employers‌  ‌treat‌  ‌their‌‌ 
void.‌  ‌ atomism,‌  ‌nor‌  ‌anarchy,"‌  ‌but‌  ‌the‌  ‌humanization‌  ‌of‌  ‌laws‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  employees.‌  ‌
equalization‌  ‌of‌  ‌social‌  ‌and‌  ‌economic‌  ‌forces‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌so‌  ‌that‌‌ 
To‌‌
  recapitulate,‌‌
  the‌‌  Decision‌‌ declared‌‌ R.A.‌‌ No.‌‌ 8180‌‌ unconstitutional‌‌  The‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌also‌  ‌directs‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌to‌  ‌promote‌  ‌"equality‌  ‌of‌‌ 
justice‌‌   in‌‌
  its‌‌
  rational‌‌   and‌‌  objectively‌‌  secular‌‌   conception‌‌ may‌‌ at‌‌ least‌‌ 
for‌‌three‌‌reasons:‌‌   ‌ employment‌‌   opportunities‌‌   for‌‌
  all."‌‌
  It‌‌
  would‌‌
  be‌‌  an‌‌
  affront‌‌ to‌‌ both‌‌ the‌‌ 
be‌‌ approximated.‌‌ Social‌‌ justice‌‌ means‌‌ the‌‌ promotion‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ welfare‌‌ of‌‌ 
1) it‌‌gave‌‌more‌‌power‌‌to‌‌an‌‌already‌‌powerful‌‌oil‌‌oligopoly;‌  ‌ all‌  ‌the‌  ‌people,‌  ‌the‌  ‌adoption‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Government‌  ‌of‌  ‌measures‌‌  spirit‌  ‌and‌  ‌letter‌  ‌of‌  ‌these‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌State,‌  ‌in‌  ‌spite‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌ 
2) it‌‌blocked‌‌the‌‌entry‌‌of‌‌effective‌‌competitors;‌‌and‌  ‌ calculated‌‌   to‌‌
  insure‌‌   economic‌‌ stability‌‌ of‌‌ all‌‌ the‌‌ competent‌‌ elements‌‌  primordial‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌to‌  ‌promote‌  ‌and‌  ‌ensure‌  ‌equal‌  ‌employment‌‌ 
of‌‌
  society,‌‌   through‌‌   the‌‌  maintenance‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌proper‌‌
  economic‌‌ and‌‌ social‌‌  opportunities,‌  ‌closes‌  ‌its‌  ‌eyes‌  ‌to‌  ‌unequal‌  ‌and‌  ‌discriminatory‌  ‌terms‌‌ 
3) it‌  ‌will‌  ‌sire‌  ‌an‌  ‌even‌  ‌more‌  ‌powerful‌  ‌oligopoly‌  ‌whose‌‌  and‌‌conditions‌‌of‌‌employment.‌  ‌
equilibrium‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌interrelations‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  members‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  community,‌‌ 
unchecked‌  ‌power‌  ‌will‌  ‌prejudice‌  ‌the‌  ‌interest‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
constitutionally,‌‌   through‌‌   the‌‌
  adoption‌‌   of‌‌ measures‌‌ legally‌‌ justifiable,‌‌  Article‌  ‌7 ‌‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌International‌‌   Covenant‌‌   on‌‌
  Economic,‌‌   Social,‌‌
  and‌‌ 
consumers‌‌and‌‌compromise‌‌the‌‌general‌‌welfare.‌  ‌
 ‌
or‌  ‌extra-constitutionally,‌  ‌through‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌powers‌‌   underlying‌‌  Cultural‌‌ Rights‌‌ impregnably‌‌ institutionalized‌‌ in‌‌ this‌‌ jurisdiction‌‌ the‌‌ 
the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌governments‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌time-honored‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌‌  long‌‌
  honored‌‌ legal‌‌ truism‌‌ of‌‌ "equal‌‌ pay‌‌ for‌‌ equal‌‌ work."‌‌ Persons‌‌ who‌‌ 
XV.‌‌SOCIAL‌‌JUSTICE‌‌AND‌‌HUMAN‌‌RIGHTS‌  ‌ salus‌‌populi‌‌est‌‌suprema‌‌lex.‌  ‌ work‌  ‌with‌  ‌substantially‌  ‌equal‌  ‌qualifications,‌  ‌skill,‌  ‌effort‌  ‌and‌‌ 
responsibility,‌  ‌under‌  ‌similar‌  ‌conditions,‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌paid‌  ‌similar‌‌ 
A.‌‌Concept‌‌of‌‌Social‌‌Justice‌  ‌ Dalton-Reyes‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ salaries.‌  ‌

B.‌‌Economic,‌‌Social,‌‌and‌‌Cultural‌‌Rights‌  ‌ Under‌‌   the‌‌


  policy‌‌   of‌‌
  social‌‌   justice,‌‌ ‌the‌‌ law‌‌ bends‌‌ over‌‌ backward‌‌ to‌‌ 
C.‌‌Commission‌‌on‌‌Human‌‌Rights‌  ‌
accommodate‌  ‌the‌  ‌interests‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌   working‌‌   class‌‌  on‌‌  the‌‌
  humane‌‌ 
C.‌‌Commission‌‌on‌‌Human‌‌Rights‌  ‌ justification‌‌   that‌‌
  those‌‌   with‌‌  less‌‌ privilege‌‌ in‌‌ life‌‌ should‌‌ have‌‌ more‌‌ in‌‌  Powers‌ 
 ‌ law;‌  ‌more‌  ‌so‌  ‌in‌‌
  the‌‌  case‌‌
  of‌‌
  one‌‌
  who‌‌  pursues‌‌   her‌‌  case‌‌
  even‌‌  without‌‌ 
1. Investigate,‌‌
  on‌‌
  its‌‌
  own‌‌
  or‌‌
  on‌‌
  complaint‌‌
  by‌‌
  any‌‌ party,‌‌ all‌‌ forms‌‌ 
the‌‌ assistance‌‌ of‌‌ counsel.‌  ‌Social‌‌ justice‌‌ would‌‌ be‌‌ a ‌‌meaningless‌‌ term‌‌ 
of‌‌human‌‌rights‌‌violations‌‌involving‌c‌ ivil‌‌and‌‌political‌‌rights‌; ‌ ‌
A.‌‌Concept‌‌of‌‌Social‌‌Justice‌  ‌ if‌‌an‌‌element‌‌of‌‌rigidity‌‌would‌‌be‌‌affixed‌‌to‌‌the‌‌procedural‌‌precepts.‌  ‌
2. Adopt‌  ‌its‌  ‌operational‌  ‌guidelines‌  ‌and‌  ‌rules‌  ‌of‌  ‌procedure,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Sec‌‌
  1.‌‌
  The‌‌
  Congress‌‌   shall‌‌
  give‌‌  highest‌‌
  priority‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌ enactment‌‌ of‌‌ 
BFAR‌‌Employees‌‌Union‌‌v.‌‌COA‌  ‌ cite‌  ‌for‌  ‌contempt‌  ‌for‌  ‌violations‌  ‌thereof‌  ‌in‌  ‌accordance‌  ‌with‌‌ 
measures‌  ‌that‌  ‌protect‌  ‌and‌  ‌enhance‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌to‌‌ 
the‌‌Rules‌‌of‌‌Court;‌  ‌
human‌  ‌dignity,‌  ‌reduce‌‌
  social,‌‌  economic,‌‌   and‌‌
  political‌‌   inequalities,‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 123‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

3. Exercise‌  ‌visitorial‌  ‌powers‌  ‌over‌  ‌jails,‌  ‌prisons,‌  ‌or‌  ‌detention‌‌  behalf‌‌


  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  victims‌‌
  of‌‌
  human‌‌  rights‌‌ violations.‌‌ Not‌‌ being‌‌ a ‌‌court‌‌ of‌‌  XVI.‌‌EDUCATION,‌‌SCIENCE,‌‌TECHNOLOGY,‌‌ 
facilities;‌  ‌ justice,‌‌‌the‌‌CHR‌‌itself‌‌has‌‌no‌‌jurisdiction‌‌to‌‌issue‌‌the‌‌writ.‌  ‌
ARTS,‌‌CULTURE‌‌AND‌‌SPORTS‌  ‌
4. Recommend‌‌   to‌‌
  Congress‌‌   effective‌‌ measures‌‌ to‌‌ promote‌‌ human‌‌ 
Simon,‌‌Jr‌‌v.‌‌CHR‌  ‌
rights‌‌
  and‌‌
  to‌‌ provide‌‌ for‌‌ compensation‌‌ to‌‌ victims‌‌ of‌‌ violations‌‌  A.‌‌Academic‌‌Freedom‌  ‌
of‌‌human‌‌rights,‌‌or‌‌their‌‌families;‌  ‌ The‌  ‌term‌  ‌“‌civil‌  ‌rights‌,”‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌defined‌  ‌as‌  ‌referring‌  ‌— ‌ ‌to‌  ‌those‌‌  Pimentel‌‌v.‌‌LEB‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
5. Monitor‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌Government's‌  compliance‌  ‌with‌‌  rights‌  ‌that‌  ‌belong‌  ‌to‌  ‌every‌  ‌citizen‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌  ‌or‌  ‌country,‌  ‌or,‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌‌
wider‌  ‌sense,‌  ‌to‌  ‌all‌  ‌its‌  ‌inhabitants,‌  ‌and‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌connected‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌  Section‌  ‌5(2),‌  ‌Article‌  ‌XIV‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌1987‌  ‌Constitution,‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌‌ 
international‌‌treaty‌‌obligations‌‌on‌‌human‌‌rights‌;‌ 
organization‌‌or‌‌administration‌‌of‌‌government.‌‌   ‌ Academic‌‌   freedom‌‌   shall‌‌   be‌‌  enjoyed‌‌   in‌‌  all‌‌
  institutions‌‌ of‌‌ higher‌‌ 
6. Grant‌  ‌immunity‌  ‌from‌  ‌prosecution‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌person‌  ‌whose‌‌  learning‌. ‌ ‌
testimony‌  ‌or‌  ‌whose‌  ‌possession‌  ‌of‌  ‌documents‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌‌  Political‌‌
  rights‌, ‌‌on‌‌  the‌‌  other‌‌  hand,‌‌  are‌‌  said‌‌  to‌‌  refer‌‌  to‌‌  the‌‌  right‌‌  to‌‌ 
Academic‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌has‌  ‌traditionally‌  ‌been‌  ‌associated‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌narrow‌‌ 
evidence‌  ‌is‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌or‌  ‌convenient‌‌
  to‌‌
  determine‌‌
  the‌‌
  truth‌‌
  in‌‌  participate,‌  ‌directly‌  ‌or‌  ‌indirectly,‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌establishment‌  ‌or‌‌ 
aspect‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌  broader‌‌   area‌‌  of‌‌
  freedom‌‌   of‌‌
  thought,‌‌   speech,‌‌ expression‌‌ 
administration‌‌   of‌‌
  government,‌‌   the‌‌
  right‌‌
  of‌‌
  suffrage,‌‌
  the‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  hold‌‌ 
any‌‌investigation‌‌conducted‌‌by‌‌it‌‌or‌‌under‌‌its‌‌authority;‌  ‌ and‌‌
  the‌‌
  press.‌‌   It‌‌
  has‌‌
  been‌‌   identified‌‌   with‌‌ the‌‌ individual‌‌ autonomy‌‌ of‌‌ 
public‌  ‌office,‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌petition‌  ‌and,‌  ‌in‌  ‌general,‌  ‌the‌  ‌rights‌‌ 
educators‌‌   to‌‌
  "investigate,‌‌   pursue,‌‌   and‌‌  discuss‌‌   free‌‌
  from‌‌
  internal‌‌
  and‌‌ 
appurtenant‌‌to‌‌citizenship‌‌vis-a-vis‌‌the‌‌management‌‌of‌‌government.‌  ‌
Cariño‌‌v.‌‌CHR‌  ‌ external‌‌   interference‌‌   or‌‌
  pressure."‌‌   Thus,‌‌ academic‌‌ freedom‌‌ of‌‌ faculty‌‌ 
The‌‌   ‌power‌‌ to‌‌ cite‌‌ for‌‌ contempt‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌ understood‌‌ to‌‌ apply‌‌ only‌‌  members,‌  ‌professors,‌  ‌researchers,‌  ‌or‌  ‌administrators‌  ‌is‌  ‌defended‌‌ 
The‌‌   CHR‌‌
  was‌‌  not‌‌
  meant‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  fundamental‌‌   law‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌  another‌‌   court‌‌  to‌  ‌violations‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌adopted‌  ‌operational‌  ‌guidelines‌  ‌and‌  ‌rules‌  ‌of‌‌  based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌freedom‌‌of‌‌speech‌‌and‌‌press‌. ‌ ‌
or‌  ‌quasi-judicial‌  ‌agency.‌  ‌The‌  ‌most‌  ‌that‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌conceded‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  procedure‌  ‌essential‌  ‌to‌  ‌carry‌  ‌out‌  ‌its‌  ‌investigatorial‌  ‌powers.‌  ‌The‌‌ 
Commission‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌way‌  ‌of‌  ‌adjudicative‌  ‌power‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌may‌‌  Academic‌‌   freedom‌‌   is‌‌ enjoyed‌‌ not‌‌ only‌‌ by‌‌ members‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ faculty,‌‌ but‌‌ 
"order‌  ‌to‌  ‌desist"‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌instance‌  ‌before‌  ‌us,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌ 
investigate,‌‌  i.e.,‌‌
  receive‌‌
  evidence‌‌   and‌‌ make‌‌ findings‌‌ of‌‌ fact‌‌ as‌‌ regards‌‌  also‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌   students‌‌   themselves,‌‌   as‌‌
  affirmed‌‌   in‌‌ ‌Ateneo‌‌ de‌‌ Manila‌‌ 
investigatorial‌‌   in‌‌
  character‌‌  but‌‌
  prescinds‌‌ from‌‌ an‌‌ adjudicative‌‌ power‌‌ 
claimed‌‌human‌‌rights‌‌violations‌‌involving‌‌civil‌‌and‌‌political‌‌rights.‌‌   ‌ University‌‌   v.‌‌
  Judge‌‌  Capulong.‌‌   Jurisprudence‌‌   has‌‌   so‌‌
  far‌‌ understood‌‌ 
that‌‌it‌‌does‌‌not‌‌possess.‌‌   ‌
academic‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌students‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter's‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌enjoy‌  ‌in‌‌ 
But‌  ‌fact-finding‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌adjudication‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌cannot‌‌   be‌‌
  likened‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌ 
Composition‌‌and‌‌Qualification‌‌of‌‌Members‌  ‌ school‌‌the‌‌guarantees‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Bill‌‌of‌‌Rights‌. ‌ ‌
judicial‌‌  function‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌court‌‌
  of‌‌
  justice,‌‌
  or‌‌
  even‌‌
  a ‌‌quasi-judicial‌‌ agency‌‌ 
or‌  ‌official.‌  ‌The‌  ‌function‌  ‌of‌  ‌receiving‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌and‌  ‌ascertaining‌‌  Art‌‌XIII‌‌Sec‌‌17.‌‌   ‌ Apart‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌academic‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌of‌  ‌teachers‌  ‌and‌  ‌students,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
therefrom‌  ‌the‌  ‌facts‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌controversy‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌judicial‌  ‌function,‌‌  academic‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌institution‌  ‌itself‌  ‌is‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌and‌‌ 
properly‌  ‌speaking.‌  ‌To‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌such,‌  ‌the‌  ‌faculty‌  ‌of‌‌  receiving‌‌  1) There‌  ‌is‌  ‌hereby‌  ‌created‌  ‌an‌  ‌independent‌  ‌office‌  ‌called‌  ‌the‌‌  constitutionally‌  ‌guaranteed.‌  ‌As‌  ‌held‌  ‌in‌  ‌Garcia‌  ‌v.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Faculty‌‌ 
evidence‌  ‌and‌  ‌making‌  ‌factual‌  ‌conclusions‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌controversy‌  ‌must‌‌   be‌‌  Commission‌‌on‌‌Human‌‌Rights.‌  ‌ Admission‌  ‌Committee,‌  ‌Loyola‌  ‌School‌  ‌of‌  ‌Theology,‌  ‌institutions‌‌ 
accompanied‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌authority‌  ‌of‌  ‌applying‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌to‌  ‌those‌  ‌factual‌‌  decide‌  ‌for‌  ‌themselves‌  ‌their‌  ‌aims‌  ‌and‌  ‌objectives‌  ‌and‌  ‌how‌  ‌best‌  ‌to‌‌ 
2) The‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌composed‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌‌Chairman‌‌
  ‌and‌‌
  ‌four‌‌ 
conclusions‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌end‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌controversy‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌decided‌  ‌or‌‌  attain‌  ‌them.‌  ‌Garcia‌  ‌also‌  ‌enumerated‌  ‌the‌  ‌internal‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌for‌‌ 
determined‌  ‌authoritatively,‌  ‌finally‌  ‌and‌  ‌definitively,‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌such‌‌  Members‌‌who‌‌must‌‌be‌‌   ‌ institutional‌  ‌academic‌  ‌freedom,‌  ‌that‌  ‌is,‌  ‌the‌  ‌academic‌  ‌staff‌  ‌should‌‌ 
appeals‌  ‌or‌  ‌modes‌  ‌of‌  ‌review‌  ‌as‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌provided‌  ‌by‌  ‌law.‌  ‌This‌‌  a) natural-born‌‌‌citizens‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌and‌‌   ‌ have‌d‌ e‌‌facto‌‌‌control‌‌over:‌‌   ‌
function,‌‌to‌‌repeat,‌‌the‌‌Commission‌‌does‌‌not‌‌have.‌  ‌
b) a‌‌majority‌‌of‌‌whom‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Bar.‌‌   ‌ a) the‌‌admission‌‌and‌‌examination‌‌of‌‌students;‌  ‌
b) the‌‌curricula‌‌for‌‌courses‌‌of‌‌study;‌  ‌
EPZA‌‌v.‌‌CHR‌  ‌ Bautista‌‌v.‌‌Salonga‌  ‌
c) the‌‌appointment‌‌and‌‌tenure‌‌of‌‌office‌‌of‌‌academic‌‌staff;‌‌and‌‌   ‌
Does‌  ‌the‌  ‌CHR‌  ‌have‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌to‌  ‌issue‌  ‌a ‌ ‌writ‌  ‌of‌  ‌injunction‌  ‌or‌‌  Since‌  ‌the‌  ‌position‌  ‌of‌  ‌CHR‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌among‌‌  the‌‌  positions‌‌   mentioned‌‌   in‌‌  d) the‌  ‌allocation‌  ‌of‌  ‌income‌  ‌among‌  ‌the‌  ‌different‌  ‌categories‌  ‌of‌‌ 
restraining‌  ‌order‌  ‌against‌  ‌supposed‌  ‌violators‌  ‌of‌  ‌human‌  ‌rights,‌  ‌to‌‌  the‌  ‌first‌  ‌sentence‌  ‌of‌  ‌Sec.‌  ‌16,‌  ‌Art.‌  ‌VII‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌1987‌  ‌Constitution,‌‌  expenditure.‌  ‌
compel‌  ‌them‌  ‌to‌  ‌cease‌  ‌and‌  ‌desist‌  ‌from‌  ‌continuing‌  ‌the‌  ‌acts‌‌  appoint­ments‌  ‌to‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌to‌‌   be‌‌
  made‌‌
  with‌‌   the‌‌
  confirma­tion‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌ 
complained‌‌of?‌‌‌NO‌. ‌ ‌ Commission‌‌   on‌‌ Appointments,‌‌ it‌‌ follows‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ appointment‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌  State's‌  ‌supervisory‌  ‌and‌  ‌regulatory‌‌
  power‌‌
  over‌‌
  legal‌‌
  education‌‌ 
President‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Chairman‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌CHR‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌made‌  ‌without‌  ‌the‌‌  in‌‌relation‌‌to‌‌academic‌‌freedom‌  ‌
Evidently,‌  ‌the‌  ‌"preventive‌  ‌measures‌  ‌and‌  ‌legal‌  ‌aid‌  ‌services"‌‌ 
mentioned‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌refer‌  ‌to‌  ‌extrajudicial‌  ‌and‌  ‌judicial‌‌  review‌‌or‌‌participation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Commission‌‌on‌‌Appointments‌. ‌  ‌ ‌ The‌‌  rule‌‌
  is‌‌
  that‌‌ institutions‌‌ of‌‌ higher‌‌ learning‌‌ enjoy‌‌ ample‌‌ discretion‌‌ 
remedies‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌CHR‌  ‌may‌  ‌seek‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌proper‌  ‌courts‌  ‌on‌‌   ‌ to‌‌decide‌‌for‌‌itself‌‌   ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 124‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

G.‌‌Nationality‌‌and‌‌Statelessness‌  ‌
1. who‌‌may‌‌teach;‌‌   ‌ Likewise,‌‌  in‌‌
  imposing‌‌   that‌‌
  only‌‌ those‌‌ with‌‌ a ‌‌basic‌‌ degree‌‌ in‌‌ law‌‌ may‌‌ 
2. what‌‌may‌‌be‌‌taught,‌‌   ‌ be‌  ‌admitted‌  ‌to‌  ‌graduate‌  ‌programs‌  ‌in‌  ‌law‌  ‌encroaches‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌‌  H.‌‌General‌‌Principles‌‌of‌‌Treaty‌‌Law‌  ‌
school's‌‌right‌‌to‌‌determine‌‌who‌‌may‌‌be‌‌admitted.‌  ‌
3. how‌‌it‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌taught‌‌and‌‌   ‌ I.‌‌Doctrine‌‌of‌‌State‌‌Responsibility‌  ‌
3. Minimum‌‌qualifications‌‌of‌‌faculty‌‌members‌  ‌
4. who‌‌to‌‌admit,‌‌   ‌
As‌  ‌worded,‌  ‌the‌  ‌assailed‌  ‌clauses‌  ‌of‌  ‌Section‌  ‌7(c)‌  ‌and‌‌   7(e)‌‌
  insofar‌‌
  as‌‌  J.‌‌Refugees‌  ‌
being‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  ‌academic‌‌
  freedom‌. ‌‌The‌‌   State,‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌  exercise‌‌
  of‌‌ 
they‌‌   give‌‌
  LEB‌‌   the‌‌
  power‌‌   to‌‌
  prescribe‌‌
  the‌‌
  minimum‌‌   qualifications‌‌  of‌‌ 
its‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌supervision‌  ‌and‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌over‌  ‌education,‌  ‌can‌  ‌only‌‌  K.‌‌Treatment‌‌of‌‌aliens‌  ‌
faculty‌‌   members‌‌   are‌‌
  ‌in‌‌ tune‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ reasonable‌‌ supervision‌‌ and‌‌ 
impose‌‌   ‌minimum‌‌   regulations‌. ‌‌The‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ receive‌‌ education‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ 
regulation‌  ‌clause‌  ‌and‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌infringe‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌academic‌‌  L.‌‌International‌‌Human‌‌Rights‌‌Law‌  ‌
and‌  ‌should‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌taken‌  ‌to‌  ‌mean‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌admitted‌  ‌to‌‌ 
freedom‌‌   ‌of‌‌ law‌‌ schools.‌‌ ‌University‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ East‌‌ v.‌‌ Pepanio‌‌ held‌‌ that‌‌ 
educational‌‌institutions.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌requirement‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌masteral‌‌   degree‌, ‌‌albeit‌‌
  for‌‌
  tertiary‌‌  education‌‌  M.‌‌International‌‌Humanitarian‌‌Law‌ 
By‌‌
  case‌‌
  law,‌‌ the‌‌ Court‌‌ already‌‌ upheld‌‌ the‌‌ validity‌‌ of‌‌ administering‌‌ an‌‌  teachers,‌‌is‌n ‌ ot‌‌unreasonable‌. ‌ ‌
aptitude‌  ‌test‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reasonable‌  ‌police‌  ‌power‌  ‌measure‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  Categories‌‌of‌‌armed‌‌conflicts‌  ‌
However,‌‌  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌manner‌‌
  by‌‌
  which‌‌  the‌‌
  LEB‌‌
  had‌‌
  exercised‌‌
  this‌‌ 
context‌  ‌of‌  ‌admission‌  ‌standards‌  ‌into‌  ‌institutions‌  ‌of‌  ‌higher‌‌   learning.‌‌ 
power‌  ‌through‌  ‌its‌  ‌various‌  ‌issuances‌  ‌that‌  ‌prove‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌  Core‌‌international‌‌obligations‌‌of‌‌States‌  ‌
Pursuant‌‌   to‌‌  its‌‌
  power‌‌   under‌‌
  Section‌‌   7(e),‌‌
  the‌‌ Court‌‌ affirms‌‌ the‌‌ LEB's‌‌ 
unreasonable‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌LEB-imposed‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌compliance‌  ‌is‌‌ 
authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌initiate‌  ‌and‌  ‌administer‌  ‌an‌  ‌aptitude‌  ‌test,‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌‌ 
unreasonable‌‌given‌‌the‌‌logistical‌‌and‌‌financial‌‌obstacles.‌  ‌ Principles‌‌of‌‌international‌‌humanitarian‌‌law‌  ‌
PhiLSAT,‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌minimum‌  ‌standard‌  ‌for‌  ‌law‌  ‌admission.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
PhiLSAT,‌  ‌insofar‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌functions‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌aptitude‌  ‌exam‌  ‌that‌‌  4. Legal‌‌apprenticeship‌‌and‌‌legal‌‌internship‌  ‌
Law‌‌on‌‌neutrality‌  ‌
measures‌  ‌the‌  ‌academic‌  ‌potential‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌examinee‌  ‌to‌  ‌pursue‌‌ 
The‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌unduly‌  ‌interfere‌  ‌with‌‌
  the‌‌
  discretion‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌law‌‌
  school‌‌ 
the‌‌
  study‌‌   of‌‌  law‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌ end‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ quality‌‌ of‌‌ legal‌‌ education‌‌ is‌‌  N.‌‌Law‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Sea‌  ‌
regarding‌  ‌its‌  ‌curriculum,‌  ‌particularly‌  ‌its‌  ‌apprenticeship‌  ‌program.‌‌ 
improved,‌‌is‌n ‌ ot‌‌per‌‌se‌‌unconstitutional‌.‌  ‌
Plainly,‌‌these‌‌issuances‌‌are‌‌beyond‌‌mere‌‌supervision‌‌and‌‌regulation.‌  ‌
However‌, ‌‌there‌‌   are‌‌
  certain‌‌
  provisions‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  PhiLSAT‌‌
  that‌‌
  render‌‌ its‌‌   ‌
Baselines‌  ‌
 ‌

operation‌  ‌exclusionary,‌  ‌restrictive,‌‌   and‌‌


  qualifying‌‌  which‌‌
  is‌‌
  contrary‌‌ 
XVII.‌‌PUBLIC‌‌INTERNATIONAL‌‌LAW‌  ‌ Archipelagic‌‌States‌  ‌
to‌‌its‌‌design‌‌as‌‌an‌‌aptitude‌‌exam.‌‌   ‌
LEB's‌  ‌Powers‌‌
  vis-a-vis‌‌
  Institutional‌‌
  Academic‌‌
  Freedom‌‌
  and‌‌
  the‌‌  Internal‌‌waters‌  ‌
A.‌‌Concepts‌  ‌
Right‌‌to‌‌Education‌  ‌
Territorial‌‌sea‌  ‌
1. PhiLSAT‌  ‌ B.‌‌Relationship‌‌between‌‌International‌‌and‌‌Philippine‌‌ 
Contiguous‌‌zone‌  ‌
The‌‌  Court‌‌
  takes‌‌   a ‌‌calibrated‌‌   approach‌‌   and‌‌  partially‌‌   nullifies‌‌
  LEBMO‌‌  domestic‌‌law‌  ‌
No.‌  ‌7-2016‌  ‌insofar‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌absolutely‌  ‌prescribes‌  ‌the‌  ‌passing‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Exclusive‌‌economic‌‌zone‌  ‌
PhiLSAT‌‌   and‌‌   the‌‌
  taking‌‌   thereof‌‌  within‌‌
  two‌‌ years‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌prerequisite‌‌ for‌‌  C.‌‌Sources‌‌of‌‌international‌‌law‌  ‌
admission‌‌   to‌‌
  any‌‌  law‌‌  school‌‌   which,‌‌
  on‌‌  its‌‌
  face,‌‌
  run‌‌   directly‌‌ counter‌‌  Continental‌‌shelf‌  ‌
D.‌‌Subjects‌‌of‌‌international‌‌law‌  ‌
to‌‌institutional‌‌academic‌‌freedom.‌  ‌
International‌‌Tribunal‌‌for‌‌the‌‌Law‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Sea‌  ‌
2. Other‌‌LEB‌‌issuances‌‌on‌‌law‌‌admission‌  ‌ E.‌‌Jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌States‌  ‌

The‌  ‌requirement‌  ‌that‌‌   an‌‌


  applicant‌‌   obtain‌‌   a ‌‌specific‌‌  number‌‌
  of‌‌
  units‌‌  O.‌‌International‌‌Environmental‌‌Law‌  ‌
Basis‌‌of‌‌Jurisdiction‌  ‌
in‌  ‌English,‌  ‌Mathematics,‌  ‌and‌  ‌Social‌  ‌Science‌  ‌subjects‌  ‌affects‌  ‌a ‌ ‌law‌‌ 
Principle‌‌21‌‌of‌‌Stockholm‌‌Declaration‌  ‌
school's‌  ‌admission‌  ‌policies‌  ‌leaving‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter‌  ‌totally‌  ‌without‌‌  Exemptions‌‌from‌‌Jurisdiction‌  ‌
discretion‌‌   to‌‌
  admit‌‌
  applicants‌‌   who‌‌
  are‌‌
  deficient‌‌   in‌‌
  these‌‌
  subjects‌‌   or‌‌  Precautionary‌‌principle‌  ‌
to‌  ‌allow‌  ‌such‌  ‌applicant‌  ‌to‌  ‌complete‌  ‌these‌  ‌requirements‌  ‌at‌  ‌a ‌ ‌later‌‌  Act‌‌of‌‌State‌‌doctrine‌  ‌
time.‌  ‌  ‌
F.‌‌Diplomatic‌‌and‌‌Consular‌‌Law‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 125‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

d. subject‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  provisions‌‌   of‌‌
  Article‌‌
  59,‌‌
  ‌judicial‌‌   decisions‌‌
  ‌and‌‌  The‌‌important‌‌elements‌‌to‌‌consider‌‌in‌‌this‌‌case‌‌are:‌‌   ‌
A.‌‌Concepts‌  ‌ the‌  ‌teachings‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌most‌  ‌highly‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌publicists‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
1. Public‌  ‌International‌  ‌Law‌‌  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  system‌‌  of‌‌
  law‌‌
  that‌‌
  regulates‌‌  a. The‌  ‌objection‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌dissenter‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌done‌‌ 
various‌‌   nations,‌‌  as‌‌
  ‌subsidiary‌‌   ‌means‌‌  for‌‌
  the‌‌ determination‌‌ of‌‌ 
the‌‌
  interrelationship‌‌
  of‌‌
  sovereign‌‌   states‌‌
  and‌‌ duties‌‌ with‌‌ regard‌‌  before‌t‌ he‌‌norm‌‌has‌‌ripened‌‌to‌‌CIL‌‌or‌‌at‌‌the‌‌outset.‌  ‌
rules‌‌of‌‌law.‌  ‌
to‌‌one‌‌another.‌  ‌ b. The‌‌objection‌‌must‌‌be‌‌consistent‌. ‌ ‌
This‌  ‌provision‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌prejudice‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌to‌  ‌decide‌‌
  a ‌‌
2. Comitas‌‌   gentium.‌‌
  —‌‌
  or‌‌
  ‌international‌‌ comity‌, ‌‌refers‌‌ to‌‌ rules‌‌  case‌‌‌ex‌‌aequo‌‌et‌‌bono‌,‌‌if‌‌the‌‌parties‌‌agree‌‌thereto.‌  ‌ c. The‌  ‌objection‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌categorical,‌  ‌clear‌  ‌and‌‌ 
of‌  ‌politeness,‌‌
  convenience‌‌   and‌‌
  goodwill‌‌
  observed‌‌   by‌‌
  States‌‌  in‌‌  equivocal‌d ‌ issent‌‌must‌‌be‌‌shown.‌  ‌
Notes‌  ‌
their‌‌mutual‌‌intercourse‌‌without‌‌being‌‌legally‌‌bound‌‌by‌‌them.‌  ‌ 7. What‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌ value‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ POD?‌‌ ‌Since‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌CIL,‌‌ all‌‌ states‌‌ must‌‌ 
1. There‌‌are‌‌‌2‌‌instances‌‌where‌e
‌ quity‌m
‌ ay‌‌be‌‌applied‌:  ‌‌ ‌
3. Hard‌  ‌law‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌‌
  binding‌‌
  international‌‌
  legal‌‌
  norms‌‌
  or‌‌
  those‌‌  comply‌  ‌because‌  ‌all‌‌   states‌‌
  are‌‌
  bound‌‌
  by‌‌   it.‌‌
  However,‌‌   when‌‌   the‌‌ 
which‌‌have‌‌coercive‌‌character.‌‌   ‌ a. Ex‌  ‌Aequo‌  ‌et‌  ‌Bono‌  ‌— ‌ ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌requirement‌  ‌of‌‌  state‌‌
  qualifies‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌persistent‌‌ objector,‌‌ it‌‌ may‌‌ not‌‌ be‌‌ compelled‌‌ 
agreement‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties‌  ‌by‌  ‌permitting‌  ‌the‌  ‌ICJ‌  ‌to‌‌  to‌‌follow‌‌the‌‌CIL.‌  ‌
Soft‌  ‌law‌  ‌refers‌‌
  to‌‌
  norms‌‌
  that‌‌
  are‌‌
  non-binding‌‌
  in‌‌
  character‌‌
  but‌‌ 
resolve‌‌  the‌‌ case‌‌ ‌on‌‌ the‌‌ basis‌‌ of‌‌ e
‌ quity‌‌ ‌instead‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
still‌‌have‌‌legal‌‌relevance.‌  ‌ 8. There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌stare‌  ‌decisis‌  ‌on‌  ‌ICJ‌  ‌decisions‌  ‌because‌  ‌Art‌  ‌59‌‌ 
applicable‌‌rules‌‌of‌‌international‌‌law.‌  ‌
provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌decisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌ICJ‌  ‌shall‌  ‌apply‌  ‌only‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌‌ 
B.‌‌Relationship‌‌between‌‌International‌‌and‌‌Philippine‌‌  b. Non‌  ‌liquet.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌“it‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌clear,”‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌situation‌‌  parties‌‌and‌‌only‌‌in‌‌a‌‌particular‌‌case.‌  ‌
domestic‌‌law‌  ‌ where‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌‌
  no‌‌
  applicable‌‌   law‌‌  and‌‌
  the‌‌  parties‌‌   have‌‌ 
9. Obligations‌  ‌Erga‌  ‌Omnes.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Obligations‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌state‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
not‌‌agreed‌‌to‌‌have‌‌their‌‌case‌‌decided‌e‌ x‌‌aequo‌‌et‌‌bono‌. ‌ ‌
Government‌‌of‌‌Hong‌‌Kong‌‌SAR‌‌v.‌‌Olalia,‌‌Jr.‌  ‌ international‌‌   community.‌‌   Obligations‌‌   for‌‌
  which‌‌   all‌‌
  states‌‌ have‌‌ 
2. Equity‌‌can‌‌perform‌‌three‌‌functions‌  ‌ a‌‌
  legal‌‌  interest‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ fulfillment‌‌ by‌‌ reason‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ importance‌‌ of‌‌ 
The‌  ‌modern‌  ‌trend‌  ‌in‌  ‌public‌  ‌international‌  ‌law‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌primacy‌‌ 
a. Equity‌  ‌infra‌  ‌legem‌  ‌— ‌ ‌to‌  ‌adapt‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌facts‌  ‌of‌‌  their‌  ‌subject‌  ‌matter‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌international‌  ‌community.‌  ‌Whether‌‌ 
placed‌‌   on‌‌ the‌‌ worth‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ individual‌‌ person‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ sanctity‌‌ of‌‌ 
human‌  ‌rights‌. ‌ ‌Slowly,‌  ‌the‌  ‌recognition‌‌   that‌‌
  ‌the‌‌
  individual‌‌  person‌‌  individual‌‌cases;‌  ‌ such‌  ‌duty‌  ‌addresses‌  ‌a ‌ ‌jus‌  ‌cogens‌  ‌norm‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌protect,‌‌ 
may‌  ‌properly‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌subject‌  ‌of‌  ‌international‌  ‌law‌  ‌is‌  ‌now‌  ‌taking‌‌  b. Equity‌p
‌ raeter‌‌legem‌‌‌—‌‌to‌‌fill‌‌gaps‌‌in‌‌the‌‌law;‌  ‌ promote‌‌and‌‌preserve‌‌a‌‌jus‌‌cogens‌‌norm.‌  ‌
root.‌  ‌The‌  v‌ ulnerable‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌subjects‌  ‌of‌‌   international‌‌  10. Unilateral‌  ‌Declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌State‌  ‌Doctrine.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌unilateral‌‌ 
c. Equity‌  ‌contra‌  ‌legem‌  ‌— ‌ ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reason‌  ‌for‌  ‌refusing‌  ‌to‌‌ 
law‌  ‌are‌  ‌limited‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌  ‌states‌  ‌was‌  ‌dramatically‌‌   eroded‌‌
  towards‌‌
  the‌‌  declaration‌‌binds‌‌the‌‌state‌‌internationally‌‌when:‌‌   ‌
apply‌‌unjust‌‌laws.‌  ‌
second‌‌half‌‌of‌‌the‌‌past‌‌century.‌  ‌
3. How‌‌is‌‌PIL‌‌formed?‌‌   ‌ a. Publicly‌‌made‌‌and‌‌manifesting‌‌will‌‌to‌‌be‌‌bound;‌  ‌
Please‌‌refer‌‌to‌‌‌Adherence‌‌to‌‌International‌‌Law‌‌‌for‌‌more‌‌cases‌. ‌ ‌ b. Made‌‌by‌‌an‌‌authority‌‌vested‌‌with‌‌the‌‌power‌‌to‌‌do‌‌so;‌  ‌
a. Through‌‌state‌‌practice‌‌‌—‌‌2‌‌elements:‌‌   ‌
C.‌‌Sources‌‌of‌‌international‌‌law‌  ‌ i. objective‌‌element‌‌(general‌‌state‌‌practice);‌  ‌ c. Made‌‌orally‌‌or‌‌in‌‌writing;‌  ‌
Article‌‌38,‌I‌ nternational‌‌Court‌‌of‌‌Justice‌‌Statute‌  ‌ ii. subjective‌  ‌element‌  ‌(‌opinio‌  ‌juris‌  ‌sive‌‌  d. Addressed‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌international‌  ‌community‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌‌ 
The‌‌
  Court,‌‌
  whose‌‌
  function‌‌   is‌‌
  to‌‌ decide‌‌ in‌‌ accordance‌‌ with‌‌ international‌‌  necessitatis‌)  ‌‌ ‌ specific‌‌state‌‌or‌‌entity;‌  ‌
law‌‌such‌‌disputes‌‌as‌‌are‌‌submitted‌‌to‌‌it,‌‌shall‌‌apply:‌  ‌ e. Stated‌‌in‌‌clear‌‌and‌‌specific‌‌terms;‌  ‌
b. Through‌  ‌agreement‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌states‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Through‌‌ 
a. international‌  ‌conventions‌, ‌ ‌whether‌  ‌general‌  ‌or‌  p ‌ articular,‌‌  conventions‌‌or‌‌treaties.‌  ‌ f. Consistent‌‌with‌‌jus‌‌cogens;‌  ‌
establishing‌  ‌rules‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌contesting‌‌  g. Will‌‌not‌‌bind‌‌third‌‌states‌‌who‌‌do‌‌not‌‌accept‌‌it;‌  ‌
4. Lotus‌‌ Doctrine.‌‌ ‌— ‌‌A ‌‌state‌‌ is‌‌ barred‌‌ to‌‌ do‌‌ an‌‌ act‌‌ only‌‌ when‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ 
states;‌  ‌
so‌‌
  prohibited‌‌
  under‌‌   a ‌‌treaty‌‌  or‌‌
  CIL‌‌
  because‌‌   restriction‌‌   to‌‌ state‌‌  h. Not‌‌validly‌‌revoked.‌  ‌
b. international‌  ‌custom‌, ‌ ‌as‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌general‌  ‌practice‌‌  sovereignty‌‌is‌‌not‌‌presumed.‌  ‌
accepted‌‌as‌‌law;‌  ‌ Bayan‌‌Muna‌‌v.‌‌Romulo‌‌2
‌ 011‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌re‌‌Executive‌‌Agreements‌  ‌
5. Relevant‌  ‌State‌‌
  Practice‌‌
  Doctrine‌. ‌‌— ‌‌Practice‌‌
  of‌‌
  those‌‌
  states‌‌ 
c. the‌‌general‌‌principles‌‌of‌‌law‌‌‌recognized‌‌by‌‌civilized‌‌nations;‌  ‌ whose‌‌interests‌‌are‌‌specially‌‌affected‌. ‌ ‌ International‌‌agreements‌‌may‌‌be‌‌in‌‌the‌‌form‌‌of‌‌   ‌
6. What‌‌is‌‌the‌‌Persistent‌‌Objector‌‌Doctrine‌‌(POD)?‌‌   ‌ 1) treaties‌  ‌that‌  ‌require‌‌
  legislative‌‌
  concurrence‌‌
  after‌‌
  executive‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 126‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

General‌‌Principles‌‌of‌‌Law‌  ‌ Council‌‌  alone‌‌  has‌‌


  the‌‌
  power‌‌
  to‌‌ make‌‌ decisions‌‌ which‌‌ Member‌‌ 
ratification;‌‌or‌‌   ‌
States‌‌are‌o‌ bligated‌u ‌ nder‌‌the‌‌Charter‌‌to‌‌carry‌‌out.‌  ‌
2) executive‌  ‌agreements‌  ‌that‌  ‌are‌  ‌similar‌  ‌to‌  ‌treaties,‌  ‌except‌‌  13. Are‌  ‌those‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌by‌  ‌civilized‌  ‌nations‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌so‌‌ 
that‌  ‌they‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌require‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌concurrence‌  ‌and‌  ‌are‌‌  fundamental‌‌   that‌‌
  they‌‌   a ‌‌basic‌‌ tenet‌‌ in‌‌ virtually‌‌ every‌‌ major‌‌  Effect‌‌of‌‌actions‌‌of‌‌organs‌‌of‌‌international‌‌organizations‌‌
  are‌‌  
usually‌‌ less‌‌ formal‌‌ and‌‌ deal‌‌ with‌‌ a‌‌ narrower‌‌ range‌‌ of‌‌ subject‌‌  legal‌  ‌system.‌  ‌They‌  ‌are‌  ‌derived‌  ‌from‌  ‌domestic‌  ‌law.‌  ‌They‌‌   find‌‌  created‌‌
b y‌t
‌ reaty‌   ‌
matters‌‌than‌‌treaties.‌  ‌
relevance‌‌in‌f‌ illing‌‌gaps‌‌‌left‌‌by‌‌treaties‌‌and‌‌CIL.‌  ‌ 20. Art‌  ‌2(a)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌2011‌  ‌Draft‌  ‌Articles‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌Responsibility‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Under‌  ‌international‌  ‌law,‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌difference‌  ‌between‌  ‌treaties‌‌  14. In‌  ‌the‌  ‌Corfu‌  ‌Channel‌  ‌Case‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌ICJ‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌of‌‌  International‌  ‌Organizations‌, ‌ ‌an‌  ‌“‌international‌‌   organization‌” ‌‌
and‌‌executive‌‌agreements‌‌in‌‌terms‌‌of‌‌their‌‌binding‌‌effects‌. ‌ ‌
Albania‌  ‌to‌  ‌notify‌  ‌the‌  ‌UK‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌minefield‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌‌  is‌‌
  one‌‌  established‌‌   by‌‌
  a ‌‌treaty‌‌
  or‌‌
  other‌‌
  instrument‌‌ governed‌‌ by‌‌ 
territory‌  ‌is‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌certain‌  ‌general‌  ‌and‌  ‌well-recognized‌‌  international‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌  ‌possessing‌  ‌its‌  ‌own‌  ‌international‌  ‌legal‌‌ 
Saguisag‌‌v.‌‌Executive‌‌Secretary‌‌2
‌ 016‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌re‌‌EDCA‌  ‌
principles‌‌of‌‌IL:‌  ‌ personality.‌  ‌International‌  ‌organizations‌  ‌may‌  ‌include‌  ‌as‌‌ 
Executive‌  ‌agreements‌  ‌may‌  ‌dispense‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌requirement‌‌   of‌‌
  Senate‌‌  a. Elementary‌‌   considerations‌‌ of‌‌ humanity‌, ‌‌even‌‌ more‌‌  members,‌‌in‌‌addition‌‌to‌‌States,‌‌other‌‌entities.‌  ‌
concurrence‌  ‌because‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌legal‌  ‌mandate‌  ‌with‌  ‌which‌  ‌they‌  ‌are‌‌  exacting‌‌in‌‌peace‌‌than‌‌in‌‌war;‌  21. Every‌  ‌internationally‌  ‌wrongful‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌international‌‌ 
concluded.‌  ‌They‌  ‌merely‌  ‌involve‌  ‌arrangements‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌ 
b. Principle‌‌of‌‌freedom‌‌of‌‌maritime‌‌communication;‌‌and‌  ‌ organization‌  ‌entails‌  ‌the‌  ‌international‌  ‌responsibility‌  ‌of‌  ‌that‌‌ 
implementation‌‌   of‌‌
  existing‌‌
  policies,‌‌ rules,‌‌ laws,‌‌ or‌‌ agreements.‌‌ They‌‌ 
are‌‌concluded‌‌   ‌ organization.‌  ‌
c. Every‌  ‌State‌  ‌has‌  ‌an‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌not‌‌  to‌‌
  allow‌‌   knowingly‌‌ 
1) to‌‌adjust‌‌the‌‌details‌‌of‌‌a‌‌treaty;‌  ‌ its‌‌
  territory‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ used‌‌ for‌‌ acts‌‌ contrary‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ rights‌‌ of‌‌  22. There‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌internationally‌  ‌wrongful‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌international‌‌ 
2) pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌or‌  ‌upon‌  ‌confirmation‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  other‌‌States.‌  ‌ organization‌‌when‌‌conduct‌‌consisting‌‌of‌‌an‌‌action‌‌or‌‌omission:‌‌  
Legislature;‌  ‌ 15. The‌‌  ‌Aramco‌‌
  Arbitration‌‌   Case‌‌ declared‌‌ the‌‌ principle‌‌ of‌‌ ‌respect‌‌  a) is‌‌attributable‌‌to‌‌that‌‌organization‌‌under‌‌IL;‌‌and‌  ‌
3) in‌‌
  the‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  President's‌‌
  independent‌‌
  powers‌‌
  under‌‌  for‌  ‌acquired‌  ‌rights‌  ‌as‌  ‌one‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌fundamental‌  ‌principles‌  ‌of‌‌  b) constitutes‌‌a‌‌breach‌‌of‌‌an‌‌international‌‌obligation.‌  ‌
the‌‌Constitution.‌  ‌ both‌‌PIL‌‌and‌‌of‌‌the‌‌municipal‌‌law‌‌of‌‌most‌‌civilized‌‌States.‌  ‌
23. The‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌organ‌  ‌or‌  ‌agent‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌international‌‌ 
The‌  ‌raison‌  ‌d'etre‌  ‌of‌  ‌executive‌  ‌agreements‌  ‌hinges‌  ‌on‌  ‌prior‌‌  16. The‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌estoppel‌  ‌is‌  ‌also‌  ‌considered‌  ‌a ‌ ‌general‌‌ 
constitutional‌‌or‌‌legislative‌‌authorizations.‌  ‌ organization‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌functions‌  ‌of‌  ‌that‌  ‌organ‌‌
  or‌‌ 
principle‌  ‌of‌‌
  law‌‌
  as‌‌
  applied‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌Case‌‌
  Concerning‌‌
  the‌‌  Temple‌‌  agent‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌that‌  ‌organization‌  ‌under‌‌ 
of‌‌Preah‌‌Vihear‌. ‌ ‌ international‌  ‌law,‌  ‌whatever‌  ‌position‌  ‌the‌  ‌organ‌  ‌or‌  ‌agent‌‌ 
Customary‌‌International‌‌Law‌  ‌
17. Our‌  ‌own‌  ‌SC‌‌
  in‌‌
  ‌Kuroda‌‌  v.‌‌
  Jalandoni‌‌
  has‌‌
  declared‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  rules‌‌  holds‌‌‌in‌‌respect‌‌of‌‌the‌‌organization.‌  ‌
11. CIL‌  ‌consists‌  ‌of‌  ‌rules‌  ‌of‌  ‌law‌  ‌derived‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌consistent‌‌  and‌  ‌regulations‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Hague‌  ‌Conventions‌  ‌are‌  ‌generally‌‌  24. The‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌organ‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌State‌  ‌or‌  ‌an‌‌
  organ‌‌
  or‌‌
  agent‌‌
  of‌‌
  an‌‌ 
conduct‌  ‌of‌  ‌States‌  ‌acting‌‌
  out‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  belief‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  law‌‌
  required‌‌  accepted‌  ‌principles‌  ‌of‌  ‌law.‌  ‌Therefore,‌  ‌they‌  ‌form‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌our‌‌  international‌  ‌organization‌  ‌that‌  ‌is‌  ‌placed‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌disposal‌  ‌of‌‌ 
them‌‌to‌‌act‌‌that‌‌way.‌  ‌ laws‌  ‌even‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌signatory‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  another‌  ‌international‌  ‌organization‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌under‌‌ 
12. The‌‌elements‌‌of‌‌customary‌‌norms‌‌‌are:‌  ‌ conventions.‌  ‌ international‌  ‌law‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter‌  ‌organization‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌‌ 
a. Duration‌o
‌ r‌‌long‌‌State‌‌practice;‌  ‌ Effect‌‌of‌‌UN‌‌Declarations,‌‌Security‌‌Council‌‌Resolutions‌  ‌ organization‌‌exercises‌e‌ ffective‌‌control‌o ‌ ver‌‌that‌‌conduct.‌  ‌
b. Consistency‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌practice‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌widespread‌‌  18. Resolutions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌UN‌  ‌General‌  ‌Assembly‌  ‌are‌  ‌mere‌‌  D.‌‌Subjects‌‌of‌‌international‌‌law‌  ‌
repetition‌  ‌by‌  ‌States‌  ‌of‌  ‌similar‌  ‌international‌‌   acts‌‌
  over‌‌  recommendations‌  ‌on‌  ‌questions‌  ‌or‌  ‌matters‌‌
  within‌‌
  the‌‌
  scope‌‌ 
1.   ‌subject‌‌ ‌of‌‌ IL‌‌ is‌‌ one‌‌ to‌‌ whom‌‌ the‌‌ rules‌‌ of‌‌ IL‌‌ are‌‌ immediately‌‌ 
A‌‌
time;‌  ‌ of‌‌the‌‌present‌‌UN‌‌Charter.‌‌   ‌
addressed.‌  ‌
c. Generality‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌practice‌  ‌or‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌acts‌  ‌are‌‌  The‌  ‌resolutions,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌may‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
taken‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌significant‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌  ‌States‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌‌  On‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand,‌  ‌an‌  ‌object‌  ‌is‌‌
  a ‌‌person‌‌
  or‌‌
  entity‌‌
  for‌‌
  which‌‌ 
existence‌‌of‌‌international‌‌customs‌. ‌ ‌
rejected‌‌by‌‌a‌‌significant‌‌number‌‌of‌‌States;‌‌and‌  ‌ the‌  ‌subjects‌  ‌of‌  ‌IL‌  ‌hold‌  ‌rights‌  ‌and‌  ‌obligations‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
19. Under‌‌   Art‌‌ 25‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ UN‌‌ Charter,‌‌ all‌‌ members‌‌ agree‌‌ to‌‌ accept‌‌ and‌‌  international‌‌legal‌‌order.‌  ‌
d. Opinio‌  ‌Juris‌  ‌Sive‌  ‌Necessitatis‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌requirement‌‌  carry‌  ‌out‌  ‌the‌  ‌decisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Security‌  ‌Council.‌  ‌While‌‌   other‌‌ 
that‌‌the‌‌acts‌‌must‌‌occur‌‌out‌‌of‌‌a‌‌sense‌‌of‌‌obligation.‌  ‌ organs‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌   UN‌‌  make‌‌   recommendations‌‌   to‌‌
  Governments,‌‌   the‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 127‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

States‌  ‌ some‌  ‌powerful‌  ‌states‌  ‌used‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌  ‌colonizing‌  ‌states‌  ‌to‌‌  15. Elements‌‌of‌‌"belligerency"‌‌for‌‌purposes‌‌of‌‌recognition‌  ‌
exercise‌  ‌this‌  ‌power‌  ‌for‌  ‌them‌  ‌until‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌that‌  ‌protectorate‌‌ 
2. Doctrine‌‌  of‌‌
  State‌‌
  Continuity.‌‌
  State‌‌
  continues‌‌
  despite‌‌ changes‌‌  a. Occupation‌‌of‌‌substantial‌‌portion‌‌of‌‌territory,‌‌   ‌
will‌‌now‌‌be‌‌able‌‌to‌‌govern‌‌itself‌‌more‌‌effectively.‌  ‌
of‌‌government,‌‌people,‌‌and‌‌territory.‌  ‌ b. Organized‌  ‌civil‌  ‌government‌  ‌supported‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
8. Principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌Uti‌  ‌Possidetis‌  ‌Juris.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌general‌  ‌rule‌  ‌of‌  ‌IL‌‌ 
3. Doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌State‌  ‌Succession.‌  ‌Opposite‌  ‌of‌  ‌Continuity.‌  ‌When‌‌  majority‌‌of‌‌the‌‌inhabitants‌‌in‌‌the‌‌territory,‌  ‌
stating‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌boundaries‌  ‌of‌  ‌colonial‌  ‌territories‌  ‌ought‌  ‌to‌‌ 
one‌  ‌state‌  ‌succeeds‌  ‌another,‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌now‌  ‌a ‌ ‌change‌  ‌of‌‌  become‌  ‌international‌  ‌boundaries‌  ‌when‌  ‌those‌  ‌territories‌‌  c. Conflict‌  ‌between‌  ‌legitimate‌  ‌government‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌ 
sovereignty.‌‌Two‌‌theories‌‌of‌‌recognition:‌‌   ‌ attained‌‌independence‌‌unless‌‌altered‌‌by‌‌agreement.‌  ‌ belligerents‌‌is‌s‌ erious‌‌and‌‌outcome‌‌is‌u
‌ ncertain‌, ‌ ‌
a. ✔‌Declarative‌  ‌Theory‌  ‌— ‌ ‌objective‌  ‌evaluation‌  ‌of‌‌  9. Recognition‌. ‌‌A ‌‌method‌‌ of‌‌ accepting‌‌ certain‌‌ factual‌‌ situations‌‌  d. Belligerents‌  ‌are‌  ‌willing‌  ‌and‌  ‌able‌  ‌to‌‌
  observe‌‌
  laws‌‌
  of‌‌ 
statehood.‌  ‌If‌  ‌the‌  ‌four‌  ‌elements‌  ‌are‌  ‌complete,‌  ‌there‌‌  and‌‌endowing‌‌them‌‌with‌‌legal‌‌significance.‌  ‌ war‌‌and‌‌other‌‌international‌‌obligations.‌  ‌
exists‌  ‌a ‌ ‌State.‌  ‌Recognition‌  ‌is‌  ‌immaterial.‌  ‌This‌  ‌is‌‌ 
10. Co-optation‌. ‌ ‌While‌  ‌recognition‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌state‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌  16. Doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌State‌  ‌Continuity.‌  ‌The‌  ‌moment‌  ‌a ‌ ‌State‌  ‌is‌‌ 
acknowledged‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Montevideo‌‌Convention.‌  ‌
indispensable‌  ‌to‌  ‌statehood,‌  ‌particularly‌  ‌with‌  ‌respect‌  ‌to‌  ‌jus‌‌  established‌‌   as‌‌ an‌‌ international‌‌ person;‌‌ the‌‌ State‌‌ continues‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ 
b. Constitutive‌  ‌Theory‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Recognition‌  ‌of‌  ‌state‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌‌  the‌‌  same‌‌
  corporate‌‌   person‌‌
  whatever‌‌ changes‌‌ may‌‌ take‌‌ place‌‌ in‌‌ 
cogens‌‌
  and‌‌
  ‌erga‌‌
  omnes‌‌  norms,‌‌
  the‌‌ newly‌‌ established‌‌ state‌‌ can‌‌ 
additional‌‌element‌‌of‌‌statehood.‌  ‌ its‌‌internal‌‌organization.‌  ‌
only‌‌
  enjoy‌‌
  such‌‌  other‌‌
  rights‌‌
  and‌‌  privileges‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ international‌‌ 
4. Elements‌‌of‌‌“State”‌‌—‌1
‌ 933‌‌Montevideo‌‌Convention‌  ‌ sphere‌‌through‌‌“co-optation.”‌  ‌ 17. Effects‌‌of‌‌State‌‌Succession‌‌   ‌
a. Permanent‌‌population;‌  ‌ 11. Effects‌‌of‌‌Recognition‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Recognizing‌‌State‌‌   ‌ a. Transfer‌‌of‌‌allegiance‌‌of‌‌inhabitants;‌  ‌
b. Defined‌‌territory;‌  ‌ a. Full‌‌
  diplomatic‌‌ relations,‌‌ except‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ case‌‌ of‌‌ ‌de‌‌ facto‌‌  b. Political‌‌laws‌‌are‌‌automatically‌‌abrogated;‌  ‌
c. Government;‌  ‌ recognition‌; ‌ ‌
c. Public‌  ‌properties‌  ‌are‌  ‌acquired.‌  ‌Torts‌  ‌liability‌‌
  are‌‌
  not‌‌ 
d. Capacity‌‌to‌‌enter‌‌into‌‌relations‌‌with‌‌other‌‌states.‌  ‌ b. Right‌‌to‌‌sue‌‌in‌‌courts‌‌of‌‌recognizing‌‌state;‌  ‌ acquired‌  ‌— ‌ ‌the‌  ‌new‌  ‌sovereign‌  ‌has‌  ‌option‌‌
  to‌‌
  assume‌‌ 
c. Entitlement‌‌to‌‌property‌‌within‌‌recognizing‌‌state;‌  ‌ liability;‌  ‌
5. To‌  ‌effectively‌  ‌comply‌‌
  with‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌territory‌‌
  ‌requisite,‌‌
  there‌‌
  must‌‌ 
be:‌‌   ‌ d. Recognition‌  ‌being‌  ‌retroactive,‌  ‌validates‌  ‌past‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌‌  d. Treaties‌  ‌of‌  ‌predecessor‌  ‌state‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌binding‌  ‌on‌‌
  new‌‌ 
recognized‌‌state‌‌or‌‌government.‌  ‌ sovereign‌  ‌except‌  ‌those‌  ‌dealing‌  ‌with‌  ‌local‌  ‌rights‌  ‌and‌‌ 
a. Sufficient‌  ‌consistency‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌sovereignty‌‌ 
affecting‌‌territory.‌  ‌
over‌‌the‌‌territory‌‌and‌‌that‌‌the;‌  ‌ 12. Recognition‌  ‌of‌  ‌Government‌. ‌ ‌Recognition‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌political‌‌ 
18. Clean‌‌
  Slate‌‌
  Doctrine.‌‌   — ‌‌A ‌‌newly-independent‌‌ State‌‌ begins‌‌ its‌‌ 
b. Authority‌‌must‌‌be‌‌exercised‌‌effectively.‌  ‌ question‌‌   and‌‌
  largely‌‌
  involves‌‌
  the‌‌
  discretion‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Executive.‌‌ It‌‌ 
is‌‌not‌‌mandatory.‌‌   ‌ existence‌‌free‌‌of‌‌the‌‌obligations‌‌of‌‌its‌‌predecessor.‌  ‌
Independence‌  ‌means‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌being‌  ‌free‌  ‌from‌  ‌external‌‌ 
13. Estrada‌‌
  Doctrine‌. ‌‌If‌‌  a ‌‌government‌‌  was‌‌  established‌‌  through‌‌  19. Government‌  ‌Succession‌. ‌ ‌Government‌  ‌succession‌  ‌could‌‌ 
pressure‌  ‌but‌‌
  being‌‌
  able‌‌
  to‌‌
  run‌‌
  the‌‌
  government‌‌  on‌‌
  its‌‌
  own,‌‌
  not‌‌ 
political‌  ‌upheaval,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌state‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌issue‌  ‌a ‌ ‌declaration‌  ‌giving‌‌  take‌‌place‌‌either‌‌through:‌‌   ‌
dependent‌‌on‌‌the‌‌aid‌‌or‌‌assistance‌‌of‌‌outside‌‌forces.‌  ‌
recognition‌  ‌to‌  ‌such‌  ‌government,‌  ‌but‌  ‌may‌  ‌merely‌  ‌accept‌‌  a. Revolution‌; ‌ ‌
6. Principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌association.‌  ‌The‌  ‌associates‌  ‌are‌  ‌former‌‌ 
whatever‌‌   government‌‌   is‌‌
  in‌‌
  effective‌‌ control‌‌ without‌‌ raising‌‌ the‌‌  b. Changing‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌. ‌ ‌
colonies,‌  ‌wanting‌  ‌to‌  ‌have‌  ‌independence‌  ‌but‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌yet‌‌ 
issue‌‌on‌‌recognition.‌‌   ‌
effectively‌  ‌or‌  ‌competently‌  ‌enter‌  ‌into‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌relations.‌  ‌Thus,‌‌  20. Effects‌‌of‌‌Government‌‌Succession‌‌   ‌
they‌  ‌have‌  ‌to‌  ‌enter‌  ‌into‌  ‌an‌  ‌association‌  ‌treaty‌  ‌with‌  ‌other‌‌  Dealing‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌dealing‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌ 
a. All‌  ‌rights‌‌
  of‌‌
  predecessor‌‌
  government‌‌
  are‌‌
  inherited‌‌
  by‌‌ 
powerful‌‌   states‌‌   and‌‌
  the‌‌ latter‌‌ will‌‌ exercise‌‌ the‌‌ foreign‌‌ relations‌‌  judgment‌‌on‌‌the‌‌legitimacy‌‌of‌‌the‌‌said‌‌government‌.  ‌‌ ‌
the‌‌new‌‌government;‌  ‌
with‌‌respect‌‌to‌‌that‌‌territory.‌  ‌ 14. Recognition‌  ‌of‌  ‌Belligerency‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌idea‌  ‌of‌  ‌belligerency‌‌ 
b. If‌  ‌change‌  ‌is‌  ‌by‌  ‌peaceful‌  ‌means,‌  ‌new‌  ‌government‌‌ 
7. Protectorates‌. ‌ ‌Those‌  ‌still‌  ‌unable‌‌  to‌‌  exercise‌‌  its‌‌  capacity‌‌  to‌‌  denotes‌  ‌armed‌  ‌conflict‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌so-called‌  ‌belligerents‌  ‌are‌‌ 
inherits‌‌all‌‌obligations;‌  ‌
enter‌‌ into‌‌ relations‌‌ with‌‌ other‌‌ states‌‌ and‌‌ so‌‌ it‌‌ must‌‌ rely‌‌ first‌‌ on‌‌  considered‌‌   parties‌‌
  to‌‌ the‌‌ ‌armed‌‌ conflict.‌‌ ‌An‌‌ armed‌‌ group‌‌ may‌‌ 
be‌‌classified‌‌as‌‌either‌‌a‌‌belligerent,‌‌insurgent,‌‌or‌‌a‌‌terrorist.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 128‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

c. If‌  ‌change‌  ‌is‌  ‌by‌  ‌violent‌  ‌means,‌  ‌new‌  ‌government‌  ‌has‌‌  26. What‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌difference‌  ‌between‌  ‌unilateral‌  ‌secession‌  ‌and‌‌  b. Insurgent‌  ‌groups‌  ‌and‌  ‌national‌  ‌liberation‌‌ 
the‌‌   option‌‌
  to‌‌
  reject‌‌  political‌‌  and‌‌
  personal‌‌
  obligations,‌‌  unilateral‌‌declaration‌‌of‌‌independence?‌‌   ‌ movements‌  ‌are‌  ‌also‌  ‌endowed‌  ‌with‌  ‌rights‌  ‌and‌‌ 
but‌  ‌not‌  ‌those‌  ‌arising‌  ‌out‌‌  of‌‌
  regular‌‌
  administration‌‌  of‌‌  a. Unilateral‌‌ Declaration‌‌ of‌‌ independence‌—declaring‌‌  obligations‌  ‌in‌  ‌IL,‌  ‌most‌  ‌notably‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌laws‌  ‌of‌‌ 
government.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌territory‌  ‌as‌  ‌now‌  ‌separate‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌mother‌  ‌state,‌‌  armed‌‌conflict.‌  ‌
International‌‌organizations‌  ‌ and‌‌  declaring‌‌   that‌‌  the‌‌
  territory‌‌
  itself‌‌ has‌‌ established‌‌ a ‌‌ E.‌‌Jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌States‌  ‌
new‌‌state;‌  ‌
21. Refer‌‌ to‌‌ public‌‌ intergovernmental‌‌ organizations.‌‌ They‌‌ typically‌‌  1. IL‌‌recognizes‌‌the‌‌following‌‌types‌‌of‌‌jurisdiction:‌  ‌
are‌  ‌ b. Unilateral‌  ‌secession‌—when‌  ‌a ‌ ‌portion‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌territory‌‌ 
a. The‌‌jurisdiction‌‌to‌p
‌ rescribe‌; ‌ ‌
separates‌‌itself‌‌from‌‌an‌‌original‌‌state.‌  ‌
a. Institutions‌‌established‌‌by‌‌a‌‌treaty;‌  ‌
b. To‌e
‌ nforce‌;‌‌and‌  ‌
In‌  ‌summary,‌  ‌IL‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌regulate‌  ‌unilateral‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌of‌‌ 
b. Composed‌‌  of‌‌
  members‌‌
  that‌‌
  are‌‌
  States‌‌
  or‌‌ international‌‌ 
independence‌  ‌but‌  ‌it‌  ‌does‌  ‌recognize‌  ‌the‌  ‌so-called‌  ‌remedial‌‌  c. To‌a
‌ djudicate‌. ‌ ‌
organizations;‌  ‌
right‌‌theory‌‌‌as‌‌a‌‌possible‌‌valid‌‌reason‌‌for‌‌secession.‌  ‌ 2. Jurisdiction‌  ‌to‌‌
  prescribe‌‌  laws.‌‌   — ‌‌‌The‌‌  authority‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌state‌‌
  to‌‌ 
c. Regulated‌‌by‌‌IL;‌‌and‌  ‌
27. “‌Remedial‌  ‌Right‌  ‌Only‌  ‌Theories‌” ‌ ‌assert‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌group‌  ‌has‌  ‌a ‌‌ make‌‌
  its‌‌ policy‌‌ applicable‌‌ to‌‌ persons‌‌ or‌‌ activities‌‌ regardless‌‌ of‌‌ 
d. Endowed‌‌with‌‌a‌‌legal‌‌personality.‌  ‌ general‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌secede‌  ‌if‌  ‌and‌  ‌only‌  ‌if‌  ‌it‌  ‌has‌  ‌suffered‌  ‌certain‌‌  boundaries.‌  ‌
22. Principle‌‌   of‌‌
  Charter‌‌   Supremacy.‌‌   — ‌‌In‌‌
  the‌‌
  event‌‌
  of‌‌ a ‌‌conflict‌‌  injustices‌  ‌for‌  ‌which‌  ‌secession‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌appropriate‌  ‌remedy‌  ‌of‌‌  3. Jurisdiction‌  ‌to‌  ‌enforce.‌‌   — ‌‌‌Concerned‌‌
  with‌‌
  the‌‌
  authority‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌
between‌  ‌the‌  ‌obligations‌  ‌of‌  ‌members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌UN‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌‌  last‌‌resort.‌  ‌ state‌  ‌to‌  ‌use‌  ‌the‌  ‌resources‌  ‌of‌‌
  government‌‌
  to‌‌
  induce‌‌  or‌‌
  compel‌‌ 
Charter‌  ‌and‌  ‌their‌  ‌obligations‌  ‌under‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌  ‌international‌‌  28. Internal‌  ‌Self-determination‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌group‌  ‌of‌  ‌people‌‌  compliance‌‌with‌‌its‌‌law.‌‌This‌‌includes‌‌authority‌‌to‌‌arrest.‌‌   ‌
agreement,‌‌their‌‌obligations‌‌under‌‌the‌‌Charter‌‌shall‌‌prevail.‌  ‌ claiming‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌different‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌majority‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌able‌  ‌to‌‌  Having‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌is‌  ‌one‌  ‌and‌  ‌enforcement‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  decision‌‌
  of‌‌ 
Individuals‌  ‌ pursue‌  ‌political,‌  ‌economic,‌  ‌social‌  ‌and‌  ‌cultural‌  ‌development‌‌  the‌‌court‌‌is‌‌another.‌‌   ‌
without‌‌a‌‌need‌‌of‌‌being‌‌separated‌‌from‌‌the‌‌State.‌  ‌ 4. Jurisdiction‌  ‌to‌  ‌adjudicate‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌authority‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌  ‌to‌‌ 
23. An‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌individual‌  ‌becomes‌  ‌an‌  ‌Act‌  ‌of‌  ‌State‌  ‌if‌  ‌it‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 
imputed‌‌to‌‌the‌‌State.‌  ‌ 29. External‌  ‌Self-determination‌. ‌ ‌If‌  ‌it‌  ‌involves‌  ‌unilateral‌‌  subject‌  ‌particular‌  ‌persons‌‌
  or‌‌
  things‌‌
  to‌‌
  its‌‌
  courts‌‌
  regardless‌‌   of‌‌ 
An‌  ‌act‌  ‌the‌  ‌performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌prescribed‌  ‌or‌‌  secession‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌state.‌  ‌The‌  ‌threshold‌  ‌to‌  ‌invoke‌  ‌such‌  ‌is‌‌  boundaries.‌  ‌
permitted‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌imputed‌  ‌to‌‌
  the‌‌  reflective‌‌of‌l‌ ex‌‌ferenda‌‌‌norm‌‌on‌‌the‌‌matter.‌‌Applies‌‌in‌‌cases‌‌of:‌‌   ‌ Basis‌‌of‌‌Jurisdiction‌  ‌
State.‌‌
  ‌However‌, ‌‌as‌‌   per‌‌
  IL,‌‌
  such‌‌  an‌‌
  act‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  imputable‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌  a. Former‌‌Colonies;‌  ‌
Territoriality‌‌principle‌  ‌
State‌‌
  if‌‌
  the‌‌
  act‌‌
  is‌‌
  performed‌‌   by‌‌
  an‌‌
  individual‌‌
  who,‌‌
  as‌‌
  an‌‌
  organ‌‌  b. Where‌‌a‌‌people‌‌is‌‌oppressed;‌  ‌
of‌‌
  the‌‌  State,‌‌ is‌‌ competent‌‌ under‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ to‌‌ represent‌‌ the‌‌ State‌‌ in‌‌  5. The‌  ‌State‌  ‌has‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌property,‌  ‌persons,‌  ‌acts,‌  ‌or‌‌ 
c. Where‌  ‌a ‌ ‌definable‌  ‌group‌  ‌is‌  ‌denied‌  ‌meaningful‌‌  events‌‌occurring‌‌within‌‌its‌‌territory.‌  ‌
relation‌‌to‌‌other‌‌States,‌‌such‌‌as‌‌the‌‌‌Head‌‌of‌‌State‌. ‌ ‌
access‌  ‌to‌  ‌government‌  ‌to‌  ‌pursue‌  ‌their‌  ‌political,‌‌  Generality‌  ‌principle‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌
  reach‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  application‌‌   of‌‌ 
24. Right‌  ‌to‌  ‌Self-Determination‌. ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌CIL‌, ‌ ‌jus‌  ‌cogens‌  ‌and‌  ‌an‌‌  economic,‌‌social‌‌and‌‌cultural‌‌development.‌‌   ‌
our‌  ‌law.‌  ‌Whereas‌  ‌“‌Territoriality''‌  ‌speaks‌  ‌of‌  ‌whether‌‌ 
erga‌‌omnes‌‌‌obligation.‌I‌ t‌‌consists‌‌of:‌‌   ‌
Others‌  ‌ jurisdiction‌  ‌is‌  ‌made‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person,‌  ‌property,‌  ‌act‌  ‌or‌‌ 
a. The‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌  ‌the‌  ‌political‌  ‌status‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌‌  event‌‌occurring‌‌in‌‌that‌‌territory.‌  ‌
30. Territorial‌  ‌entities‌  ‌other‌  ‌than‌  ‌states.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌States‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌‌ 
applicable‌‌to‌‌colonial‌‌territories;‌  ‌
only‌‌
  territorial‌‌
  entities‌‌ that‌‌ may‌‌ possess‌‌ rights‌‌ and‌‌ obligations‌‌  a. Subjective‌  ‌Territoriality‌  ‌Principle‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Jurisdiction‌  ‌to‌‌ 
b. Freedom‌  ‌to‌  ‌pursue‌  ‌economic,‌  ‌social‌  ‌and‌  ‌cultural‌‌  prosecute‌  ‌or‌  ‌punish‌‌
  crimes‌‌  ‌commenced‌‌   ‌within‌‌
  their‌‌ 
under‌‌IL.‌‌Examples‌‌are‌‌Taiwan,‌‌Hong‌‌Kong,‌‌and‌‌the‌‌Holy‌‌See.‌  ‌
development.‌  ‌ territory‌  ‌but‌  ‌completed‌  ‌or‌  ‌consummated‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
31. Groups‌‌  of‌‌
  individuals.‌‌ — ‌‌‌may‌‌ also‌‌ have‌‌ legal‌‌ personalities‌‌ as‌‌ 
25. Secession‌. ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌situation‌  ‌where‌  ‌a ‌ ‌particular‌  ‌territory‌  ‌is‌‌  collective‌‌entities.‌  ‌
territory‌‌of‌‌another‌‌state.‌  ‌
withdrawn‌‌from‌‌a‌‌mother‌‌state.‌‌   ‌ b. Objective‌T ‌ erritoriality‌‌Principle.‌  ‌
a. Indigenous‌‌groups‌; ‌ ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 129‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Certain‌  ‌states‌  ‌apply‌‌


  their‌‌
  territorial‌‌
  jurisdiction‌‌
  to‌‌
  offenses‌‌
  or‌‌  of‌  ‌specific‌  ‌offenses‌‌
  who‌‌
  is‌‌
  located‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  territory‌‌
  of‌‌ 
the‌‌State.‌  ‌
F.‌D
‌ iplomatic‌‌and‌‌Consular‌‌Law‌  ‌
acts‌‌commenced‌‌in‌‌another‌‌state,‌‌but:‌  ‌
1. Right‌  ‌of‌  ‌Legation‌  ‌or‌  ‌Diplomatic‌  ‌Intercourse‌. ‌ ‌— ‌‌Right‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌
a. Consummated‌‌or‌‌completed‌‌within‌‌their‌‌territory,‌‌or‌  ‌ Passive‌‌personality‌‌principle‌  ‌
State‌‌to‌‌send‌‌and‌‌receive‌‌diplomatic‌‌envoys.‌  ‌
b. Producing‌‌
  gravely‌‌
  harmful‌‌  consequences‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌ social‌‌  11. A‌  ‌State‌  ‌can‌  ‌assert‌  ‌its‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌an‌  ‌offense‌  ‌committed‌‌ 
2. The‌  ‌head‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌mission‌‌  is‌‌
  considered‌‌   as‌‌
  having‌‌   taken‌‌   up‌‌   his‌‌ 
or‌‌economic‌‌order‌‌inside‌‌their‌‌territory.‌  ‌ abroad‌‌   on‌‌  the‌‌
  sole‌‌
  ground‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  victim‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌
  offense‌‌
  was‌‌
  a ‌‌
functions‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌receiving‌  ‌State‌  ‌either‌  ‌when‌  ‌he‌  ‌has‌‌   presented‌‌ 
national‌‌of‌‌the‌‌State.‌  ‌
Nationality‌‌principle‌‌and‌‌statelessness‌  ‌ his‌  ‌credentials‌  ‌or‌  ‌when‌  ‌he‌  ‌has‌  ‌notified‌  ‌his‌  ‌arrival‌‌   and‌‌  a ‌‌true‌‌ 
12. This‌  ‌was‌  ‌applied‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌
  ‌Yunis‌‌
  case‌‌
  where‌‌   the‌‌
  US‌‌
  prosecuted‌‌   a ‌‌ copy‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌
  credentials‌‌   has‌‌  been‌‌  presented‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  Ministry‌‌   for‌‌ 
6. The‌  ‌link‌  ‌of‌  ‌course‌  ‌is‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌nationality‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Lebanese‌  ‌for‌  ‌hijacking‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Jordanian‌  ‌civilian‌  ‌airliner‌  ‌in‌  ‌Beirut‌‌  Foreign‌‌Affairs‌‌of‌‌the‌‌receiving‌‌State.‌‌(A ‌ rt‌‌13‌‌VCDR‌) ‌ ‌
person‌‌(either‌‌offender‌‌or‌‌victim).‌  ‌ even‌  ‌though‌  ‌the‌  ‌only‌  ‌connection‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌US‌  ‌was‌  ‌the‌  ‌presence‌‌ 
3. Persona‌  ‌Non‌  ‌Grata.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌receiving‌  ‌State‌  ‌may‌  ‌at‌  ‌any‌  ‌time‌‌ 
a. Active‌  ‌Nationality‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌link‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌nationality‌  ‌of‌‌  among‌‌the‌‌passengers‌‌of‌‌American‌‌citizens.‌  ‌
and‌‌ ‌without‌‌ having‌‌ to‌‌ explain‌‌ its‌‌ decision,‌‌ notify‌‌ the‌‌ sending‌‌ 
the‌‌offender‌a‌ nd‌‌the‌‌court.‌  ‌ Exemptions‌‌from‌‌Jurisdiction‌  State‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌head‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌mission‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌  ‌member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
b. Passive‌  ‌Nationality‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌‌   link‌‌  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  nationality‌‌   of‌‌  diplomatic‌‌ staff‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ mission‌‌ is‌‌ ‌persona‌‌ non‌‌ grata‌‌ or‌‌ that‌‌ any‌‌ 
Act‌‌of‌‌State‌‌doctrine‌  ‌
the‌‌victim‌a‌ nd‌‌the‌‌court.‌  ‌ other‌‌   member‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  staff‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ mission‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ acceptable.‌‌ (‌Art‌‌ 
13. The‌‌   Act‌‌
  of‌‌  State‌‌   Doctrine.‌  ‌Every‌‌  sovereign‌‌  state‌‌  is‌‌ bound‌‌ 
7. In‌  ‌cases‌  ‌where‌  ‌two‌  ‌nationalities‌  ‌are‌  ‌in‌  ‌conflict‌  ‌with‌  ‌each‌‌  9‌‌VCDR‌) ‌ ‌
to‌‌
  respect‌‌   the‌‌   independence‌‌   of‌‌  every‌‌  other‌‌   sovereign‌‌   state‌‌ and‌‌ 
other,‌  ‌the‌  ‌ICJ‌  ‌subscribes‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌real‌  ‌and‌  ‌effective‌‌  4. The‌  ‌severance‌  ‌of‌  ‌diplomatic‌  ‌relations‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌ipso‌  ‌facto‌‌ 
the‌‌
  courts‌‌   of‌‌
  one‌‌   country‌‌ will‌‌ not‌‌ sit‌‌ in‌‌ judgment‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ acts‌‌ of‌‌ 
nationality‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌individual.‌  ‌ the‌‌
  government‌‌ of‌‌ another‌‌ than‌‌ within‌‌ its‌‌ own‌‌ territory.‌‌ This‌‌ is‌‌ 
involve‌‌the‌‌severance‌‌of‌‌consular‌‌relations.‌‌(A ‌ rt‌‌2[3]‌‌VCCR‌) ‌ ‌
8. Effective‌  ‌nationality‌  ‌theory.‌  ‌Right‌  ‌to‌  ‌diplomatic‌  ‌protection‌‌  corollary‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌state‌  ‌immunity.‌  ‌(‌Underhill‌  ‌v.‌‌  5. Exequatur.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌head‌  ‌of‌‌   a ‌‌consular‌‌
  post‌‌
  is‌‌
  admitted‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌ 
and‌  ‌protection‌  ‌by‌  ‌means‌  ‌of‌‌
  international‌‌   judicial‌‌   proceedings‌‌  Hernandez,‌‌168‌‌US‌‌250‌) ‌ ‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ functions‌‌ by‌‌ an‌‌ ‌authorization‌‌ ‌in‌‌ whatever‌‌ form‌‌ 
only‌  ‌arises‌  ‌when‌  ‌proper‌  ‌nationality‌  ‌link‌  ‌exists‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌‌  14. The‌‌   act‌‌
  of‌‌
  state‌‌   doctrine‌‌
  ‌does‌‌
  not‌‌   appl‌y ‌‌where‌‌   nothing‌‌   in‌‌ the‌‌  from‌‌the‌‌receiving‌‌State‌‌termed‌‌an‌e‌ xequatur‌. ‌ ‌
individual‌‌concerned‌‌and‌‌the‌‌state.‌‌   ‌ present‌‌   suit‌‌ requires‌‌ a ‌‌court‌‌ to‌‌ declare‌‌ invalid‌‌ the‌‌ official‌‌ act‌‌ of‌‌  A‌  ‌State‌  ‌which‌  ‌refused‌  ‌to‌  ‌grant‌  ‌an‌  ‌exequatur‌  ‌is‌‌
  not‌‌
  obliged‌‌
  to‌‌ 
Protective‌‌principle‌  ‌ a‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌sovereign.‌  ‌(‌W.S.‌  ‌Kirkpatrick‌  ‌& ‌ ‌Co.‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Evtl.‌  ‌Tectonics,‌‌  give‌‌to‌‌the‌‌sending‌‌State‌‌reasons‌‌for‌‌such‌‌refusal.‌‌(A ‌ rt‌‌12‌‌VCCR‌) ‌ ‌
9.
A‌‌  state‌‌   can‌‌  legislate‌‌ crimes‌‌ that‌‌ it‌‌ considers‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ a ‌‌threat‌‌ to‌‌ its‌‌  493‌‌US‌‌400‌) ‌ ‌ 6. Right‌  ‌of‌  ‌Consular‌  ‌Notification.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌if‌  ‌a ‌ ‌national‌‌   so‌‌  requests,‌‌ 
security,‌‌   integrity‌‌   or‌‌
  economic‌‌   interests‌‌ regardless‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ place‌‌  International‌‌organizations‌‌and‌‌their‌‌officers‌  ‌ the‌  ‌competent‌  ‌authorities‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌   receiving‌‌   State‌‌   shall,‌‌   without‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌commission‌‌of‌‌the‌‌crime.‌‌   ‌ WHO‌‌v.‌‌Aquino‌  ‌ delay,‌  ‌inform‌  ‌the‌  ‌consular‌  ‌post‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  sending‌‌   State‌‌   if,‌‌
  within‌‌ 
Universality‌‌principle‌  ‌ its‌  ‌consular‌  ‌district,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌national‌  ‌of‌  ‌that‌  ‌State‌  ‌is‌  ‌arrested‌  ‌or‌‌ 
It‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌recognized‌‌ principle‌‌ of‌‌ international‌‌ law‌‌ and‌‌ under‌‌ our‌‌ system‌‌  committed‌‌   to‌‌
  prison‌‌
  or‌‌
  to‌‌
  custody‌‌   pending‌‌   trial‌‌
  or‌‌
  is‌‌ detained‌‌ 
10. It‌  ‌is‌  ‌for‌  ‌violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌erga‌  ‌omnes‌‌   norms‌‌   and‌‌
  is‌‌
  asserted‌‌
  in‌‌
  at‌‌  of‌‌
  separation‌‌   of‌‌
  powers‌‌   that‌‌  diplomatic‌‌   immunity‌‌ is‌‌ essentially‌‌ a ‌‌ in‌‌any‌‌other‌‌manner.‌‌(A ‌ rt‌‌36[1][b]‌‌VCCR‌) ‌ ‌
least‌‌two‌‌situations‌  ‌ political‌  ‌question‌  ‌and‌  ‌courts‌  ‌should‌  ‌refuse‌  ‌to‌  ‌look‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌a ‌‌
determination‌‌by‌‌the‌‌executive‌‌branch‌‌of‌‌the‌‌government.‌  ‌ 7. Diplomatic‌‌   Inviolability.‌‌
  — ‌‌The‌‌  person‌‌   of‌‌ a ‌‌diplomatic‌‌ agent‌‌ 
a. In‌  ‌absentia.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Where‌  ‌a ‌ ‌state‌  ‌asserts‌  ‌universal‌‌  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  inviolable.‌‌
  He‌‌
  shall‌‌
  not‌‌
  be‌‌  liable‌‌
  to‌‌
  any‌‌ form‌‌ of‌‌ arrest‌‌ 
jurisdiction‌‌   despite‌‌
  the‌‌  fact‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ alleged‌‌ offender‌‌ is‌‌  15. Under‌  ‌Art‌  ‌IV‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌11‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Convention‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌Privileges‌  ‌and‌‌  or‌‌detention.‌  ‌
not‌‌  even‌‌ present‌‌ on‌‌ its‌‌ territory‌‌ as‌‌ applied‌‌ by‌‌ Belgium‌‌  Immunities‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌UN‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌personal‌  ‌baggage‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
8. Diplomatic‌  ‌Immunity.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌diplomatic‌  ‌agent‌  ‌shall‌  ‌enjoy‌‌ 
in‌‌the‌A‌ rrest‌‌Warrant‌‌‌case.‌  ‌ representatives‌‌   of‌‌
  States‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌ principal‌‌ and‌‌ subsidiary‌‌ organs‌‌ 
immunity‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌  receiving‌‌ 
b. Aut‌‌   dedere‌‌   aut‌‌
  judicare.‌‌   — ‌‌A ‌‌more‌‌   limited‌‌
  exercise‌‌  of‌  ‌the‌  ‌UN‌  ‌while‌  ‌exercising‌  ‌their‌  ‌functions‌  ‌and‌  ‌during‌  ‌their‌‌ 
State‌. ‌ ‌He‌  ‌shall‌  ‌also‌  ‌enjoy‌  ‌immunity‌  ‌from‌  ‌its‌  ‌civil‌  ‌and‌‌ 
tied‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  obligation‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌State‌‌  in‌‌
  a ‌‌number‌‌ of‌‌ treaties‌‌  journey‌  ‌to‌  ‌and‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌place‌  ‌of‌  ‌meeting‌  ‌or‌  ‌post‌  ‌shall‌  ‌enjoy‌‌ 
administrative‌j‌urisdiction,‌‌except‌i‌ n‌‌the‌‌case‌‌of:‌  ‌
to‌  ‌either‌  ‌prosecute‌  ‌or‌  ‌extradite‌‌   an‌‌
  alleged‌‌
  offender‌‌  immunity‌‌from‌‌seizure‌‌and‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌‌exempt‌‌from‌‌inspection‌. ‌ ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 130‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

a. A‌‌ ‌real‌‌ action‌‌ relating‌‌ to‌‌ ‌private‌‌ immovable‌‌ ‌property‌‌  State‌  ‌granting‌  ‌its‌  ‌nationality.‌  ‌Mr.‌  ‌Nottebohm’s‌  ‌nationality,‌‌ 


G.‌‌Nationality‌‌and‌‌Statelessness‌  ‌ however,‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌any‌  ‌genuine‌  ‌prior‌  ‌link‌  ‌with‌‌ 
situated‌‌in‌‌the‌‌territory‌‌of‌‌the‌‌receiving‌‌State;‌  ‌
1. Nationality‌‌
  ‌is‌‌ the‌‌ bond‌‌ which‌‌ unites‌‌ a ‌‌person‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌given‌‌ State‌‌  Liechtenstein‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌sole‌  ‌object‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌naturalization‌  ‌was‌‌
  to‌‌ 
b. An‌‌action‌‌relating‌‌to‌s‌ uccession‌; ‌ ‌ which‌‌   constitutes‌‌
  his‌‌  membership‌‌   and‌‌ a ‌‌claim‌‌ of‌‌ protection‌‌ of‌‌  enable‌‌   him‌‌
  to‌‌
  acquire‌‌  the‌‌
  status‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌neutral‌‌ national‌‌ in‌‌ time‌‌ of‌‌ 
c. An‌  ‌action‌  ‌relating‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌professional‌‌
  or‌‌
  commercial‌‌  that‌‌
  State,‌‌
  and‌‌
  which‌‌   subjects‌‌ him‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ obligations‌‌ created‌‌ by‌‌  war.‌  ‌
activity‌o ‌ utside‌‌his‌‌official‌‌functions.‌  ‌ the‌‌laws‌‌of‌‌that‌‌State.‌  ‌ 8. Generally,‌‌ a ‌‌State‌‌ may‌‌ NOT‌‌ prohibit‌‌ its‌‌ nationals‌‌ from‌‌ changing‌ 
9. The‌  ‌personal‌  ‌baggage‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌diplomatic‌  ‌agent‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌exempt‌‌  2. Nationality‌  ‌Principle.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌for‌  ‌each‌  ‌State‌  ‌to‌  ‌establish‌  ‌its‌‌  their‌‌nationality.‌‌This‌‌is‌‌provided‌‌under‌‌Art‌‌15‌‌of‌‌the‌‌UDHR.‌  ‌
from‌‌inspection‌,‌‌unless‌‌   ‌ own‌‌standards‌‌for‌‌conferring‌‌nationality.‌  ‌ However‌, ‌ ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Doctrine‌‌  of‌‌
  Indelible‌‌   Allegiance‌, ‌‌a ‌‌State‌ 
a. there‌  ‌are‌  ‌serious‌  ‌grounds‌  ‌for‌  ‌presuming‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌‌  3. Principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌Continuous‌  ‌Nationality.‌  ‌— ‌   ‌This‌  ‌applies‌  ‌to‌‌  may‌‌ prohibit‌‌ under‌‌ certain‌‌ circumstances.‌‌ An‌‌ example‌‌ is‌‌ under‌‌ 
contains‌‌articles‌‌not‌‌covered‌‌by‌‌the‌‌exemptions‌‌or‌‌   ‌ claims‌‌   for‌‌
  diplomatic‌‌   protection.‌‌   It‌‌
  requires‌‌  that‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌  CA‌‌
  63‌‌
  wherein‌‌   a ‌‌Filipino‌‌
  may‌‌
  not‌‌  divest‌‌
  himself‌‌   of‌‌
  Philippine‌‌ 
b. articles‌‌
  the‌‌
  import‌‌
  or‌‌
  export‌‌ of‌‌ which‌‌ is‌‌ prohibited‌‌ by‌‌  of‌  ‌the‌  ‌occurrence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌injury‌  ‌until‌‌   the‌‌
  making‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌
  award,‌‌  citizenship‌‌ in‌‌ any‌‌ manner‌‌ while‌‌ the‌‌ Republic‌‌ is‌‌ at‌‌ war‌‌ with‌‌ any‌‌ 
the‌  ‌claim‌  ‌must‌  ‌continuously‌  ‌and‌  ‌without‌  ‌interruption‌  ‌have‌‌  country.‌  ‌
the‌‌
  law‌‌
  or‌‌
  controlled‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  quarantine‌‌   regulations‌‌   of‌‌ 
belonged‌‌to‌‌a‌‌person‌‌or‌‌to‌‌a‌‌series‌‌of‌‌persons‌  ‌ 9. A‌‌
  ‌stateless‌‌   ‌person‌‌
  is‌‌
  one‌‌
  who‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌  considered‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌national‌‌ 
the‌‌receiving‌‌State.‌  
a. Having‌  ‌the‌  ‌nationality‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌by‌‌
  whom‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  put‌‌  by‌‌  any‌‌
  State‌‌  under‌‌
  the‌‌  operation‌‌  of‌‌ its‌‌ law.‌‌ ‌Statelessness‌‌ ‌may‌‌ 
Liang‌‌v.‌‌People‌  ‌ forward,‌‌and‌  ‌ be‌‌either‌‌   ‌
The‌  ‌privileges‌  ‌and‌  ‌immunities‌  ‌of‌  ‌diplomats‌  ‌and‌  ‌those‌  ‌of‌‌  b. Not‌‌  having‌‌
  the‌‌
  nationality‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ State‌‌ against‌‌ whom‌‌ it‌‌  a. de‌‌
  jure‌, ‌‌which‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌  status‌‌  of‌‌
  individuals‌‌ stripped‌‌ of‌‌ 
international‌  ‌officials‌  ‌rest‌  ‌upon‌  ‌different‌  ‌legal‌  ‌foundations.‌‌  is‌‌put‌‌forward.‌  ‌ their‌  ‌nationality‌  ‌by‌  ‌their‌  ‌former‌‌   government‌‌   without‌‌ 
Whereas‌  ‌those‌  ‌immunities‌  ‌awarded‌‌   to‌‌
  diplomatic‌‌  agents‌‌   are‌‌
  a ‌‌right‌‌  having‌‌an‌‌opportunity‌‌to‌‌acquire‌‌another;‌‌or‌‌   ‌
of‌‌
  the‌‌  sending‌‌   states‌‌
  based‌‌  on‌‌
  ‌customary‌‌   international‌‌   law‌, ‌‌those‌‌  4. Principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌National‌  ‌Treatment.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌An‌  ‌alien‌  ‌cannot‌ 
granted‌‌   to‌‌
  international‌‌   officials‌‌  are‌‌ based‌‌ on‌‌ ‌treaty‌‌ ‌or‌‌ conventional‌‌  complain‌‌provided‌‌he‌‌receives‌‌the‌‌same‌‌treatment‌‌as‌‌nationals.‌  ‌ b. de‌‌
  facto‌, ‌‌referred‌‌
  to‌‌ as‌‌ ‌refugees‌. ‌‌(‌Frivaldo‌‌ v.‌‌ Comelec‌‌ 
law.‌‌   ‌ 5. Doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌Effective‌  ‌Nationality.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Within‌  ‌a ‌ ‌third‌  ‌State,‌  ‌a ‌‌ 1996)‌  ‌

10. Consular‌  ‌Immunity.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌immunity‌  ‌for‌‌  person‌  ‌having‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌‌  one‌‌  nationality‌‌  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  treated‌‌
  as‌‌
  if‌‌  10. Under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Convention‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌Reduction‌  ‌of‌  ‌Statelessness‌, ‌ ‌the‌‌ 
he‌  ‌had‌‌
  only‌‌
  one.‌‌
  The‌‌
  third‌‌
  State‌‌
  shall‌‌
  recognize‌‌   exclusively‌‌   in‌‌  following‌‌measures‌‌have‌‌been‌‌adopted‌‌to‌‌reduce‌‌statelessness:‌  ‌
consular‌‌
  officers.‌‌
  However,‌‌
  they‌‌
  shall‌‌   ‌not‌‌
  be‌‌
  liable‌‌
  to‌‌
  arrest‌‌ 
its‌‌territory‌‌either‌‌the‌‌nationality‌‌of‌‌the‌‌country‌‌in‌‌which‌‌   ‌ a. A‌  ‌contracting‌  ‌State‌  ‌shall‌  ‌grant‌  ‌its‌  ‌nationality‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌
or‌‌detention‌‌pending‌‌trial‌,‌‌except‌‌   ‌
a. he‌‌is‌‌habitually‌‌and‌‌principally‌‌a‌‌resident‌‌‌of‌‌or‌‌   ‌ person‌  ‌born‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌territory‌  ‌who‌  ‌would‌‌
  otherwise‌‌  be‌‌ 
a. in‌‌the‌‌case‌‌of‌‌a‌‌grave‌‌crime‌‌and‌‌   ‌
b. in‌  ‌the‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌he‌  ‌appears‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌in‌  ‌fact‌  ‌most‌‌  stateless;‌‌and‌  ‌
b. pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌decision‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌competent‌  ‌judicial‌‌ 
closely‌‌connected‌. ‌ ‌ b. The‌  ‌same‌  ‌shall‌  ‌grant‌  ‌its‌  ‌nationality‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person,‌  ‌not‌‌ 
authority.‌  ‌
6. Genuine‌  ‌or‌  ‌Effective‌  ‌Link‌  ‌Requirement.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌State‌  ‌has‌  ‌no‌‌  born‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌territory,‌  ‌who‌  ‌would‌  ‌otherwise‌  ‌be‌‌ 
Consular‌  ‌officers‌  ‌shall‌  ‌also‌  ‌enjoy‌  ‌immunity‌  ‌from‌  ‌civil‌‌ 
power‌  ‌to‌  ‌confer‌  ‌its‌‌
  nationality‌‌   on‌‌
  inhabitants‌‌   of‌‌
  another‌‌
  State‌‌  stateless,‌‌  if‌‌
  the‌‌
  nationality‌‌   of‌‌
  one‌‌
  of‌‌
  his‌‌
  parents‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ 
jurisdiction,‌‌except‌‌in‌‌respect‌‌of‌‌a‌‌civil‌‌action‌‌either‌  ‌ time‌‌of‌‌birth‌‌was‌‌that‌‌of‌‌the‌‌State.‌  ‌
or‌  ‌on‌  ‌foreigners‌  ‌entering‌  ‌its‌  ‌territory‌  ‌when‌  ‌such‌  ‌persons‌‌ 
a. arising‌  ‌out‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌private‌  ‌contract‌  ‌concluded‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌‌ concerned‌‌   are‌‌
  not‌‌ attached‌‌ to‌‌ it‌‌ by‌‌ any‌‌ particular‌‌ bond,‌‌ such‌‌ as‌‌  11. Article‌‌
  31‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌Convention‌‌   Relating‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  Status‌‌   of‌‌ Stateless‌‌ 
consular‌‌officer;‌‌or‌  ‌ origin,‌‌domicile,‌‌or‌‌birth.‌  ‌ Persons‌  ‌states‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌stateless‌  ‌person‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌lawfully‌‌ 
b. by‌  ‌a ‌‌third‌‌
  party‌‌
  for‌‌
  ‌damage‌‌
  ‌arising‌‌
  from‌‌
  an‌‌
  accident‌‌  7. In‌  ‌the‌  ‌Nottebohm‌  ‌Case‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌Liechtenstein’s‌‌  expelled‌  ‌save‌  ‌on‌  ‌grounds‌  ‌of‌  ‌national‌  ‌security‌  ‌or‌  ‌public‌‌ 
in‌‌the‌‌receiving‌‌State.‌  claim‌‌ was‌‌ inadmissible‌‌ on‌‌ grounds‌‌ relating‌‌ to‌‌ Mr.‌‌ Nottebohm’s‌‌  order.‌  ‌
nationality.‌  ‌On‌  ‌the‌‌
  international‌‌   plane,‌‌  the‌‌
  grant‌‌   of‌‌
  nationality‌‌  H.‌‌General‌‌Principles‌‌of‌‌Treaty‌‌Law‌  ‌
is‌‌ entitled‌‌ to‌‌ recognition‌‌ by‌‌ other‌‌ States‌‌ ‌only‌‌ if‌‌ it‌‌ represents‌‌ a ‌‌
1. Per‌‌VCLT,‌‌a‌t‌ reaty‌h
‌ as‌‌the‌‌following‌e‌ lements‌:  ‌‌ ‌
genuine‌  ‌connection‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌individual‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 131‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

a. An‌‌international‌‌agreement;‌  ‌ c. Third‌  ‌group‌  ‌— ‌ ‌regards‌  ‌the‌  ‌protection‌  ‌of‌  ‌humanity‌, ‌‌ between‌  ‌the‌‌
  accrediting‌‌
  State‌‌
  and‌‌
  the‌‌
  State‌‌
  to‌‌ 
especially‌‌the‌‌most‌‌essential‌‌human‌‌rights.‌  ‌ which‌‌they‌‌are‌‌accredited;‌  ‌
b. Concluded‌‌between‌‌States;‌  ‌
7. Development‌‌of‌‌a‌‌Treaty‌‌‌(‌How‌‌a‌‌Treaty‌‌is‌‌formed‌)  ‌‌ ‌ iii. Representatives‌a‌ ccredited‌‌by‌‌States.‌  ‌
c. In‌‌written‌f‌ orm;‌  ‌
a. Proposal‌‌to‌‌draft‌‌a‌‌Treaty;‌  ‌ For‌‌these‌‌exceptions,‌f‌ ull‌‌powers‌‌is‌‌still‌‌needed‌. ‌ ‌
d. Governed‌‌by‌‌International‌‌law.‌  ‌
b. Negotiation‌‌and‌‌drafting‌‌of‌‌the‌‌terms;‌  ‌ Bayan‌‌v.‌‌Zamora‌‌‌re‌‌VFA‌  ‌
2. As‌‌
  established‌‌   in‌‌ the‌‌ case‌‌ of‌‌ ‌Qatar‌‌ v.‌‌ Bahrain‌, ‌‌even‌‌ agreements‌‌ 
that‌‌  are‌‌
  not‌‌
  in‌‌
  conformity‌‌   with‌‌  the‌‌
  definition‌‌
  of‌‌  a ‌‌treaty‌‌
  in‌‌ the‌‌  c. Adoption‌‌and‌‌Authentication‌‌of‌‌the‌‌text‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Treaty;‌  ‌ Section‌  ‌25,‌  ‌Article‌‌
  XVIII‌‌
  disallows‌‌
  foreign‌‌   military‌‌
  bases,‌‌
  troops,‌‌
  or‌‌ 
VCLT,‌‌may‌‌actually‌‌be‌‌binding.‌  ‌ d. Signature/expression‌‌of‌‌consent‌‌to‌‌be‌‌bound;‌  ‌ facilities‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌country,‌  ‌unless‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌are‌‌ 
sufficiently‌‌met,‌‌viz:‌‌   ‌
3. There‌‌are‌t‌ wo‌‌types‌o
‌ f‌‌treaties‌  ‌ e. Ratification;‌  ‌
a) it‌‌must‌‌be‌‌under‌‌a‌‌treaty‌; ‌ ‌
a. Law-making‌  ‌treaties‌  ‌are‌  ‌multilateral‌  ‌agreements‌  ‌that‌‌  f. Exchange‌  ‌of‌  ‌Instruments‌  ‌of‌  ‌Ratification‌  ‌and‌  ‌Entry‌  ‌into‌‌ 
b) the‌‌treaty‌‌must‌‌be‌d
‌ uly‌‌concurred‌‌in‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Senate‌;‌‌and‌  ‌
create‌  ‌legal‌  ‌obligations‌  ‌the‌  ‌observance‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌does‌‌  force‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Treaty;‌  ‌
not‌‌dissolve‌‌the‌‌treaty‌‌obligation.‌  ‌ c) recognized‌‌as‌‌a‌‌treaty‌‌‌by‌‌the‌‌other‌‌contracting‌‌state.‌  ‌
g. Accession‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  Treaty‌‌ by‌‌ states‌‌ wishing‌‌ to‌‌ join‌‌ after‌‌ its‌‌ 
b. Contract‌  ‌treaties‌  ‌are‌  ‌agreements‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌mutual‌‌  As‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌3rd‌  ‌element,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌is‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  firm‌‌  view‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  phrase‌‌ 
entry‌‌into‌‌force,‌‌if‌‌any.‌  ‌
"recognized‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌treaty"‌  ‌means‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌contracting‌  ‌party‌‌ 
interchange‌‌   of‌‌
  benefits‌‌ between‌‌ parties‌‌ and‌‌ which‌‌ create‌‌ 
8. When‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌  ‌is‌  ‌still‌  ‌a ‌ ‌signatory‌, ‌ ‌then‌  ‌the‌  ‌substantive‌‌  accepts‌  ‌or‌  ‌acknowledges‌  ‌the‌  ‌agreement‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌treaty‌. ‌‌To‌‌
  require‌‌ 
reciprocal‌  ‌or‌  ‌concessionary‌  ‌obligations‌  ‌between‌  ‌and‌‌ 
content‌‌of‌‌the‌‌treaty‌‌will‌‌not‌‌yet‌‌govern‌‌the‌‌state’s‌‌conduct‌‌.  ‌‌ ‌ the‌  ‌other‌  ‌contracting‌  ‌state,‌‌   the‌‌
  US‌‌  in‌‌
  this‌‌
  case,‌‌  to‌‌  submit‌‌   the‌‌
  VFA‌‌
  to‌‌ 
towards‌  ‌particular‌  ‌parties‌  ‌only‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌towards‌  ‌the‌‌  the‌  ‌US‌  ‌Senate‌  ‌for‌  ‌concurrence‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌  ‌Constitution,‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌‌ 
whole‌‌international‌‌community.‌  ‌ When‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contracting‌  ‌state‌, ‌ ‌then‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌  ‌is‌‌  accord‌‌strict‌‌meaning‌‌to‌‌the‌‌phrase.‌  ‌
4. The‌‌following‌‌are‌‌restrictions‌‌on‌‌the‌‌subject‌‌matter‌‌of‌‌treaties‌  ‌ duty-bound‌‌   not‌‌
  to‌‌
  perform‌‌   acts‌‌
  that‌‌
  will‌‌
  render‌‌
  it‌‌ incapable‌‌ to‌‌ 
perform‌‌the‌‌object‌‌and‌‌purpose‌‌of‌‌the‌‌treaty.‌‌   ‌ Pimentel‌‌v.‌‌Executive‌‌Secretary‌  ‌
a. Jus‌‌  cogens‌‌  ‌restrictions‌‌   — ‌‌a ‌‌treaty‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌void‌‌
  ‌if‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌ time‌‌ 
of‌‌
  its‌‌
  conclusion,‌‌   it‌‌
  conflicts‌‌ with‌‌ a ‌‌peremptory‌‌ norm‌‌ of‌‌  When‌‌
  the‌‌
  state‌‌
  is‌‌   a ‌ party‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  already‌‌   provisions‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ treaty‌‌ 
In‌‌
  the‌‌
  realm‌‌
  of‌‌
  treaty-making,‌‌  the‌‌
  President‌‌
  has‌‌
  the‌‌ sole‌‌ authority‌‌ to‌‌ 
general‌‌IL.‌  ‌ will‌‌already‌‌enter‌‌into‌‌force‌‌in‌‌their‌‌relations.‌  ‌ negotiate‌‌with‌‌other‌‌states.‌  ‌
b. UN‌  ‌Charter‌  ‌restrictions‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌Charter‌‌  9. “‌Full‌  ‌powers‌” ‌ ‌means‌  ‌a ‌ ‌document‌  ‌emanating‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌  In‌‌
  the‌‌   process‌‌   of‌‌
  treaty-making,‌‌   the‌signature‌‌
    ‌is‌‌
  primarily‌‌ intended‌‌ 
Supremacy.‌  ‌ competent‌‌   authority‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌State‌‌
  designating‌‌  a ‌‌person‌‌ or‌‌ persons‌‌  as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌means‌  ‌of‌  ‌authenticating‌  ‌the‌‌   instrument‌‌   and‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌symbol‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
to‌‌
  represent‌‌ the‌‌ State‌‌ for‌‌ negotiating,‌‌ adopting‌‌ or‌‌ authenticating‌‌  good‌  ‌faith‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties.‌  ‌Ratification‌, ‌ ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand,‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌ 
5. Jus‌  ‌cogens‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌peremptory‌  ‌norm‌  ‌of‌  ‌general‌  ‌IL‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌norm‌‌  formal‌‌   act‌‌
  by‌‌
  which‌‌   a ‌‌state‌‌
  confirms‌‌   and‌‌
  accepts‌‌ the‌‌ provisions‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌
the‌‌
  text‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌treaty,‌‌
  for‌‌
  expressing‌‌   the‌‌
  consent‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ State‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ 
accepted‌  ‌and‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌international‌  ‌community‌  ‌of‌‌  treaty‌  ‌concluded‌  ‌by‌  ‌its‌  ‌representative.‌  ‌It‌‌   is‌‌
  generally‌‌   held‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  an‌‌ 
bound‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌treaty,‌  ‌or‌  ‌for‌  ‌accomplishing‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌  ‌act‌  ‌with‌‌ 
States‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌whole‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌norm‌  ‌from‌  ‌which‌  ‌no‌  ‌derogation‌  ‌is‌‌  executive‌‌act‌. ‌ ‌
respect‌‌to‌‌a‌‌treaty.‌E ‌ xceptions‌:  ‌‌ ‌
permitted‌  ‌and‌  ‌which‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌modified‌  ‌only‌  ‌by‌‌   a ‌‌subsequent‌‌ 
a. Apparent‌‌Authority‌—
‌ ‌‌Article‌‌7‌‌(1)‌‌(b),‌‌VCLT.‌‌   ‌ It‌‌
  should‌‌   be‌‌
  emphasized‌‌   under‌‌ our‌‌ Constitution,‌‌ ‌the‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌ 
  that‌‌
norm‌‌of‌‌general‌‌IL‌‌having‌‌the‌‌same‌‌character.‌‌(A ‌ rt‌‌53‌‌VCLT‌) ‌ ‌
ratify‌  ‌is‌‌   vested‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌   President‌, ‌‌‌subject‌‌  to‌‌  the‌‌  concurrence‌‌ 
6. The‌‌three‌‌groups‌‌of‌j‌ us‌‌cogens‌‌‌norms‌  ‌ b. Implied‌‌Authority‌—
‌ ‌‌Article‌‌7‌‌(2),‌‌VCLT‌‌– ‌ ‌ of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Senate‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌role‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Senate,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌is‌  ‌limited‌  ‌only‌‌   to‌‌ 
a. First‌  ‌group‌  ‌— ‌ ‌encompasses‌  ‌the‌  ‌maxims‌  ‌of‌  ‌IL,‌  ‌which‌‌  i. Heads‌  ‌of‌‌
  State,‌‌  Heads‌‌  of‌‌
  Government‌‌   and‌‌  giving‌‌   or‌‌
  withholding‌‌   its‌‌
  consent,‌‌  or‌‌
  concurrence,‌‌   to‌‌ the‌‌ ratification.‌  ‌
Ministers‌  ‌for‌  ‌Foreign‌  ‌Affairs‌, ‌ ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌  Although‌‌   the‌‌  refusal‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌state‌‌ to‌‌ ratify‌‌ a ‌‌treaty‌‌ which‌‌ has‌‌ been‌‌ signed‌‌ 
protect‌‌the‌f‌ oundations‌‌of‌‌law,‌‌peace‌‌and‌‌humanity;‌  ‌
in‌  ‌its‌  ‌behalf‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌serious‌  ‌step‌  ‌that‌‌  should‌‌   not‌‌
  be‌‌
  taken‌‌   lightly,‌‌
  such‌‌ 
purpose‌  ‌of‌‌
  performing‌‌  all‌‌
  acts‌‌
  relating‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌ 
b. Second‌  ‌group‌  ‌— ‌ ‌covers‌  ‌the‌  ‌rules‌  ‌of‌  p ‌ eaceful‌‌  decision‌  ‌is‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌competence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌alone,‌  ‌which‌‌ 
conclusion‌‌of‌‌a‌‌treaty;‌  ‌
cooperation‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌sphere‌  ‌of‌  ‌IL,‌  ‌which‌  ‌protects‌‌  cannot‌‌be‌‌encroached‌‌by‌‌this‌‌Court‌‌via‌‌a‌‌writ‌‌of‌m ‌ andamus‌. ‌ ‌
fundamental‌‌common‌‌interests;‌‌and‌  ‌ ii. Heads‌  ‌of‌  ‌diplomatic‌  ‌missions‌, ‌ ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌adopting‌  ‌the‌  ‌text‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌treaty‌‌  10. The‌  ‌consent‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌State‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  bound‌‌
  by‌‌
  a ‌‌treaty‌‌
  is‌‌
  expressed‌‌
  by‌‌ 
accession‌w ‌ hen:‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 132‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

a. the‌‌treaty‌‌so‌‌provides;‌  d. Fraud;‌  ‌ i. It‌‌


  should‌‌
  radically‌‌
  transform‌‌  the‌‌
  extent‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
b. it‌  ‌is‌‌
  otherwise‌‌
  established‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  negotiating‌‌
  States‌‌
  so‌‌  e. Corruption‌‌of‌‌a‌‌representative‌‌of‌‌a‌‌State;‌  ‌ obligation‌‌that‌‌will‌‌be‌‌performed;‌  ‌
agreed;‌‌or‌  ‌ f. Coercion‌‌of‌‌a‌‌representative‌‌of‌‌a‌‌State;‌  ‌ ii. The‌  ‌party‌  ‌would‌  ‌now‌  ‌be‌  ‌obliged‌  ‌to‌‌
  perform‌‌ 
c. all‌‌the‌‌parties‌‌have‌‌subsequently‌‌so‌‌agreed.‌  ‌ something‌‌   which‌‌
  is‌‌
  different‌‌   from‌‌ that‌‌ which‌‌ 
g. Coercion‌‌of‌‌a‌‌state‌‌by‌‌the‌‌threat‌‌or‌‌use‌‌of‌‌force;‌  ‌
was‌‌originally‌‌agreed‌‌upon;‌  ‌
11. Reservations‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌A‌  ‌unilateral‌  ‌statement,‌  ‌however‌  ‌phrased‌‌   or‌‌  h. Treaties‌‌conflicting‌‌with‌j‌ us‌‌cogens‌‌‌norm.‌  ‌ iii. The‌‌  burden‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  obligation‌‌
  has‌‌ increased‌‌ to‌‌ 
named,‌  ‌made‌  ‌by‌  ‌a‌  ‌State,‌  ‌when‌  ‌signing,‌  ‌ratifying,‌  ‌accepting,‌‌ 
15. Requisites‌‌for‌E
‌ rror‌t‌ o‌‌invalidate‌‌a‌‌treaty:‌‌   ‌ the‌  ‌extent‌  ‌of‌  ‌performing‌  ‌something‌‌ 
approving‌  ‌or‌  ‌acceding‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌treaty,‌  ‌whereby‌  ‌it‌  ‌purports‌  ‌to‌‌ 
exclude‌‌  or‌‌
  to‌‌ modify‌‌ the‌‌ legal‌‌ effect‌‌ of‌‌ certain‌‌ provisions‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  a. Error‌‌
  is‌‌
  about‌‌
  a ‌‌fact‌‌
  or‌‌
  situation‌‌
  which‌‌
  was‌‌
  assumed‌‌
  to‌‌  essentially‌‌different.‌  ‌
treaty‌‌in‌‌their‌‌application‌‌to‌‌that‌‌State.‌‌   ‌ exist‌‌at‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌conclusion;‌  ‌ b. The‌  ‌change‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌resulted‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌radical‌‌ 
When‌‌   is‌‌
  reservation‌‌  ‌not‌‌ allowed‌? ‌‌‌Article‌‌ 19,‌‌ VCLT‌‌ — ‌‌A ‌‌state‌‌  b. That‌  ‌fact‌  ‌or‌  ‌situation‌  ‌forms‌  ‌an‌  ‌essential‌  ‌basis‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  transformation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌extent‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  obligations‌‌
  still‌‌
  to‌‌ 
may,‌  ‌when‌  ‌signing,‌‌
  ratifying,‌‌   accepting,‌‌
  approving‌‌   or‌‌
  acceding‌‌  consent‌‌to‌‌be‌‌bound‌‌by‌‌the‌‌treaty;‌  ‌ be‌‌performed.‌‌   ‌
to‌‌a‌‌treaty,‌‌formulate‌‌a‌‌reservation‌u ‌ nless‌:  ‌‌ ‌ c. The‌  ‌state‌  ‌invoking‌  ‌the‌  ‌error‌  ‌must‌‌
  not‌‌
  have‌‌
  contributed‌‌  c. The‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌refer‌  ‌to‌  ‌those‌  ‌that‌  ‌determined‌  ‌the‌‌ 
a. The‌‌reservation‌‌is‌p
‌ rohibited‌b
‌ y‌‌the‌‌treaty;‌  ‌ to‌‌the‌‌error.‌‌(D‌ octrine‌‌of‌‌Clean‌‌Hands‌);‌  ‌ parties‌‌to‌‌accept‌‌the‌‌treaty.‌  ‌

b. The‌  ‌treaty‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌only‌  ‌specified‌  ‌reservations,‌‌  d. It‌‌had‌‌known‌‌or‌‌would‌‌have‌‌known‌‌of‌‌the‌‌error.‌‌   ‌ d. The‌‌change‌‌must‌‌have‌‌been‌u


‌ nforeseen‌. ‌ ‌
which‌‌ do‌‌ not‌‌ include‌‌ the‌‌ reservation‌‌ in‌‌ question,‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌  16. Grounds‌  ‌for‌  ‌Termination,‌  ‌Denunciation,‌  ‌Withdrawal,‌  ‌or‌‌  e. The‌‌  existence‌‌  at‌‌
  the‌‌
  time‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ treaty’s‌‌ conclusion‌‌ must‌‌ 
made;‌  ‌ Suspension:‌‌   ‌ have‌‌   constituted‌‌   an‌‌  essential‌‌   basis‌‌  of‌‌ the‌‌ consent‌‌ ‌of‌‌ 
c. The‌  ‌reservation‌  ‌is‌  ‌incompatible‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌object‌  ‌and‌‌  the‌‌parties‌‌to‌‌be‌‌bound‌‌   ‌
a. Application‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  treaty‌‌
  and/or‌‌
  Application‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ VCLT‌‌ 
purpose‌‌of‌‌the‌‌treaty.‌  ‌ (Art‌‌42);‌  ‌ I.‌D
‌ octrine‌‌of‌‌State‌‌Responsibility‌  ‌
12. What‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌best‌  ‌source‌  ‌of‌  ‌interpretation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌VCLT‌  ‌— ‌‌ b. Consent‌‌of‌‌all‌‌parties‌‌e.g‌‌Desuetude‌(‌ Art‌‌54);‌  ‌ 1.   ‌internationally‌‌
There‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌‌   wrongful‌‌
  act‌‌
  ‌of‌‌  a ‌‌State‌‌  when‌‌ 
travaux‌‌preparatoires‌. ‌ ‌ conduct‌‌consisting‌‌of‌‌an‌‌action‌‌or‌‌omission:‌  ‌
c. Discharge‌‌through‌‌Material‌‌Breach‌‌(Art‌‌60);‌  ‌
13. Ways‌‌
  by‌‌
  which‌‌   a ‌‌state‌‌
  party‌‌
  to‌‌
  a ‌‌treaty‌‌
  may‌‌
  no‌‌
  longer‌‌ be‌‌  a. is‌‌attributable‌‌to‌‌the‌‌State‌‌under‌‌International‌‌Law;‌‌and‌  ‌
d. Impossibility‌‌of‌‌Performance;‌  ‌
bound‌‌by‌‌the‌‌treaty:‌‌   ‌
b. constitutes‌‌a‌‌breach‌‌of‌‌international‌‌obligation.‌  ‌
e. Rebus‌‌
  Sic‌‌
  Stantibus‌‌
  (Art‌‌
  62)‌‌ or‌‌ Fundamental‌‌ Change‌‌ of‌‌ 
a. Withdrawal‌o
‌ r‌‌renunciation;‌  ‌
Circumstances;‌‌   ‌ 2. The‌‌“‌nexus‌”‌‌requirement.‌‌Two‌‌elements‌‌are‌‌required:‌‌   ‌
b. Invalidity‌‌   ‌of‌‌ treaty‌‌ — ‌‌this‌‌ presupposes‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ treaty‌‌ is‌‌ 
f. Emergence‌‌of‌‌new‌‌‌Jus‌‌Cogens‌‌‌(Art‌‌64);‌  ‌ a. Internationally‌‌wrongful‌‌act;‌ 
defective;‌  ‌
g. Outbreak‌‌of‌‌war.‌  ‌ b. It‌‌is‌‌attributed‌‌to‌‌the‌‌state.‌  ‌
c. Termination‌  ‌of‌  ‌treaty‌  ‌— ‌ ‌treaty‌  ‌is‌  ‌valid‌  ‌but‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 
terminated‌‌based‌‌on‌‌valid‌‌grounds.‌  ‌ 17. A‌‌material‌‌breach‌o
‌ f‌‌a‌‌treaty‌‌consists‌‌in:‌  ‌ 3. Two‌‌Theories‌‌on‌‌State‌‌Responsibility‌‌   ‌

14. Grounds‌‌for‌‌‌Invalidity‌‌of‌‌Treaties‌  ‌ a. A‌‌repudiation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌treaty‌‌not‌‌sanctioned,‌‌or‌  ‌ a. Strict‌  ‌liability‌  ‌theory‌  ‌— ‌ ‌objective‌  ‌or‌  ‌risk‌  ‌theory;‌‌ 
b. The‌  ‌violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌provision‌  ‌essential‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  liability‌‌attaches‌‌irrespective‌‌of‌‌bad‌‌or‌‌good‌‌faith.‌  ‌
a. Provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌municipal‌  ‌law‌  ‌regarding‌  ‌competence‌  ‌to‌‌ 
conclude‌‌treaties;‌  ‌ accomplishment‌‌of‌‌the‌‌object‌‌or‌‌purpose‌‌of‌‌the‌‌treaty.‌  ‌ b. Fault‌  ‌liability‌  ‌theory‌  ‌— ‌ ‌subjective‌  ‌theory;‌  ‌liability‌‌ 
18. Elements‌‌of‌‌Fundamental‌‌Change‌‌of‌‌Circumstances‌‌   ‌ attaches‌‌   only‌‌
  upon‌‌
  proof‌‌
  of‌‌
  ‌dolo‌‌
  ‌or‌‌ fault‌‌ (negligence);‌‌ 
b. Specific‌‌   restrictions‌‌
  on‌‌
  authority‌‌
  to‌‌
  express‌‌
  the‌‌
  consent‌‌ 
obligation‌  ‌of‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌(how‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌  ‌was‌  ‌done;‌  ‌due‌‌ 
of‌‌a‌‌state;‌  ‌ a. The‌  ‌change‌  ‌of‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌ diligence).‌  ‌
c. Error;‌  ‌ “fundamental”‌‌character.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 133‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

4. Doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌Imputability.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌State‌  ‌is‌  ‌liable‌  ‌only‌  ‌for‌  ‌its‌  ‌own‌‌  The‌‌following‌‌requisites‌‌are‌‌present:‌  ‌ Purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌countermeasure‌  ‌— ‌ ‌compel‌  ‌breaching‌  ‌state‌  ‌to‌‌ 
acts‌  ‌and‌  ‌omissions,‌  ‌and‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌‌
  context,‌‌
  the‌‌
  State‌‌
  is‌‌  identified‌‌  a. The‌  ‌State‌  ‌does‌  ‌so‌  ‌with‌  ‌knowledge‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  comply‌‌with‌‌the‌‌terms‌‌of‌‌the‌‌treaty.‌  ‌
with‌  ‌its‌  ‌governmental‌  ‌organs‌  ‌and‌  ‌apparatus,‌  ‌not‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌ 
population.‌  ‌
circumstances‌‌of‌‌the‌‌IWA;‌‌and‌  ‌ J.‌‌Refugees‌  ‌
b. The‌  ‌act‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌internationally‌  ‌wrongful‌  ‌if‌‌  1.   ‌refugee‌‌
A‌‌   ‌is‌‌  a ‌‌person‌‌  who,‌‌  owing‌‌  to‌‌  a ‌‌‌well-founded‌‌  fear‌‌  of‌‌ 
5. What‌‌conducts‌‌are‌‌attributable‌‌to‌‌the‌‌State?‌  ‌
committed‌‌by‌‌that‌‌State.‌  ‌ being‌  ‌persecuted‌  ‌for‌  ‌reasons‌  ‌of‌  ‌race‌, ‌ ‌religion‌, ‌ ‌nationality‌, ‌‌
a. Conduct‌‌of‌o
‌ rgans‌o
‌ f‌‌the‌‌State.‌  ‌ 8. Circumstances‌‌precluding‌‌wrongfulness‌  ‌ membership‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌particular‌  ‌social‌  ‌group‌  ‌or‌  ‌political‌‌ 
b. Conduct‌  ‌of‌  ‌persons‌  ‌or‌  ‌entities‌  ‌exercising‌‌  a. Non-compliance‌  ‌with‌  ‌rules‌  ‌concerning‌  ‌nationality‌  ‌of‌‌  opinion‌, ‌‌is‌‌   outside‌‌   the‌‌
  country‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ nationality‌‌ and‌‌ is‌‌ unable‌‌ 
elements‌  ‌of‌  ‌governmental‌  ‌authority.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌provided‌‌  or,‌  ‌owing‌  ‌to‌  ‌such‌  ‌fear,‌  ‌is‌  ‌unwilling‌  ‌to‌  ‌avail‌  ‌himself‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
claims;‌  ‌
the‌  ‌person‌  ‌or‌  ‌entity‌  ‌is‌  ‌acting‌  ‌in‌  ‌that‌  ‌capacity‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  protection‌‌   of‌‌
  that‌‌
  country;‌‌   or‌‌ who,‌‌ not‌‌ having‌‌ a ‌‌nationality‌‌ and‌‌ 
b. Failure‌‌to‌‌exhaust‌‌local‌‌remedies;‌  ‌ being‌‌   outside‌‌   the‌‌
  country‌‌   of‌‌
  his‌‌
  former‌‌ habitual‌‌ residence‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌
particular‌‌instance.‌  ‌
c. Conduct‌  ‌of‌‌
  organs‌‌
  placed‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌
  disposal‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌State‌‌
  by‌‌  c. Waiver‌‌by‌‌the‌‌state;‌  ‌ result‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌events,‌  ‌is‌  ‌unable‌  ‌or,‌  ‌owing‌  ‌to‌  ‌such‌  ‌fear,‌  ‌is‌‌ 
d. Unreasonable‌  ‌delay‌  ‌and‌‌
  improper‌‌
  behavior‌‌
  of‌‌
  injured‌‌  unwilling‌‌to‌‌return‌‌to‌‌it.‌  ‌
another‌‌State.‌  ‌
alien;‌  ‌ 2. Grounds‌‌   and‌‌
  Criteria‌‌ of‌‌ Persecution.‌‌ For‌‌ the‌‌ purposes‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
d. Conduct‌‌directed‌‌or‌‌controlled‌‌by‌‌a‌‌State.‌  ‌
e. Consent‌‌of‌‌injured‌‌state;‌  ‌ Refugee‌‌  Convention,‌‌   a ‌‌person‌‌ is‌‌ persecuted‌‌ if‌‌ ‌life,‌‌ freedom,‌‌ or‌‌ 
e. Conduct‌  ‌carried‌  ‌out‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌absence‌  ‌or‌  ‌default‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  other‌  ‌substantial‌  ‌rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌are‌  ‌endangered‌  ‌or‌‌ 
official‌‌authorities.‌  ‌ f. Lawful‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌self-defense‌  ‌under‌  ‌UN‌‌
  Charter‌‌
  and‌‌  threatened‌  ‌by‌  ‌measures‌‌   or‌‌
  a ‌‌menacing‌‌
  situation‌‌   which‌‌  can‌‌
  be‌‌ 
f. The‌‌
  ‌conduct‌‌
  of‌‌
  an‌‌
  insurrectional‌‌ movement‌‌ which‌‌  in‌‌conformity‌‌with‌‌IHRL‌‌and‌‌IHL;‌  ‌ ascribed‌‌to‌‌a‌‌State‌‌or‌‌a‌‌State-like‌‌entity.‌  ‌
becomes‌‌the‌‌new‌‌Government‌‌of‌‌a‌‌State.‌  ‌ g. Lawful‌c‌ ountermeasure;‌‌   ‌ 3. The‌‌   CIL‌‌ principle‌‌ of‌‌ ‌non-refoulement‌‌ prescribes,‌‌ broadly,‌‌ that‌‌ 
g. The‌‌  ‌conduct‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌movement‌, ‌‌insurrectional‌‌ or‌‌ other,‌‌  h. Force‌‌majeure‌; ‌ ‌ no‌‌ refugee‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌ returned‌‌ to‌‌ any‌‌ country‌‌ where‌‌ he‌‌ or‌‌ she‌‌ is‌‌ 
which‌  ‌succeeds‌  ‌in‌  ‌establishing‌  ‌a ‌‌new‌‌   State‌‌   in‌‌  part‌‌
  of‌‌  i. Distress‌‌(Article‌‌24);‌  ‌ likely‌‌to‌‌face‌‌persecution,‌‌other‌‌ill-treatment,‌‌or‌‌torture.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌territory‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌pre-existing‌  ‌State‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌territory‌‌  4. Under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌33‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌1951‌  ‌Convention‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌Status‌  ‌of‌‌ 
j. Necessity‌‌(Article‌‌25).‌  ‌
under‌‌its‌‌administration.‌  ‌ Refugees‌,‌‌this‌‌may‌N ‌ OT‌‌‌be‌‌claimed‌‌by‌‌a‌‌refugee‌‌   ‌
h. Conduct‌  ‌acknowledged‌  ‌and‌  ‌adopted‌‌
  by‌‌
  a ‌‌State‌‌
  as‌‌  9. Calvo‌‌   Doctrine.‌‌   ‌— ‌‌which‌‌
  says‌‌
  aliens‌‌
  in‌‌
  a ‌‌foreign‌‌ state‌‌ should‌‌ 
a. whom‌‌  there‌‌
  are‌‌
  reasonable‌‌   grounds‌‌
  for‌‌
  regarding‌‌
  as‌‌ a ‌‌
its‌‌own‌. ‌ ‌ not‌  ‌be‌  ‌given‌  ‌preferential‌  ‌treatment‌  ‌than‌  ‌the‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌of‌  ‌that‌‌ 
danger‌‌to‌‌the‌‌security‌‌of‌‌the‌‌country‌‌in‌‌which‌‌he‌‌is,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
foreign‌‌state;‌‌   ‌
6. The‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌organ‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌State‌  ‌or‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌or‌  ‌entity‌‌  b. who,‌  ‌having‌  ‌been‌  ‌convicted‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌final‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌of‌‌
  a ‌‌
Calvo‌  ‌Clause‌  ‌says‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌foreigner‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌presence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
empowered‌‌   to‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  elements‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ governmental‌‌ authority‌‌  particularly‌‌
  serious‌‌   crime,‌‌
  constitutes‌‌   a ‌‌danger‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌ 
shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌even‌  ‌if‌‌   it‌‌
  exceeds‌‌   its‌‌  foreign‌‌ state‌‌ usually‌‌ for‌‌ business‌‌ will‌‌ provide‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ contract‌‌ to‌‌ 
community‌‌of‌‌that‌‌country.‌  ‌
authority‌‌or‌‌contravenes‌‌instructions‌. ‌ ‌ waive‌‌
  its‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  diplomatic‌‌ protection—in‌‌ effect‌‌ the‌‌ foreigner‌‌ 
should‌‌avail‌‌of‌‌local‌‌remedies‌‌before‌‌diplomatic‌‌protection.‌  ‌ K.‌‌Treatment‌‌of‌‌aliens‌  ‌
7. When‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌State‌  ‌responsible‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌wrongful‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌‌ 
10. Elements‌‌of‌‌a‌‌valid‌‌countermeasure‌:  ‌‌ ‌ Rendition‌. ‌ ‌To‌  ‌deliver‌  ‌an‌  ‌individual‌  ‌from‌  ‌one‌  ‌state‌  ‌to‌  ‌another‌  ‌or‌‌ 
another‌‌State?‌  ‌
a. prior‌‌internationally‌‌wrongful‌‌act,‌‌   ‌ surrender‌  ‌if‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌to‌  ‌persons.‌  ‌Three‌  ‌methods‌  ‌of‌  ‌rendition‌  ‌in‌‌ 
a. It‌‌
  aids‌‌ or‌‌ assists‌‌ another‌‌ State‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ commission‌‌ of‌‌ an‌‌ 
international‌‌law:‌‌   ‌
IWA;‌  ‌ b. invoking‌  ‌state‌  ‌had‌  ‌called‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌to‌‌ 
discontinue‌‌the‌‌wrongful‌‌act‌‌or‌‌make‌‌reparation,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ 1) Extradition;‌  ‌
b. It‌‌ directs‌‌ and‌‌ controls‌‌ another‌‌ State‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ commission‌‌ 
of‌‌an‌‌IWA;‌  ‌ c. proportionality‌‌of‌‌the‌‌measure.‌  ‌ 2) Deportation;‌  ‌
c. It‌‌coerces‌‌another‌‌State‌‌to‌‌commit‌‌an‌‌IWA.‌  ‌ 3) Abduction‌‌of‌‌foreign‌‌nationals‌‌abroad.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 134‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Extradition‌  ‌ b. Because‌  ‌if‌  ‌you‌  ‌question‌  ‌the‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌of‌‌


  the‌‌
  court,‌‌  2) The‌‌  person‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  extradited‌‌
  had‌‌
  been‌‌ charged‌‌ or‌‌ convicted‌‌ 
you‌‌
  should‌‌   question‌‌  the‌‌
  jurisdiction‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  basis‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌ of‌‌extraditable‌‌offense.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌removal‌‌   of‌‌
  an‌‌
  accused‌‌
  from‌‌   the‌‌  Philippines‌‌   with‌‌
  the‌‌
  object‌‌  of‌‌ 
judicial‌‌function‌‌involved.‌  ‌ 3) Extraditable‌‌offense‌‌is‌‌either‌‌   ‌
placing‌  ‌him‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌disposal‌  ‌of‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌authorities‌  ‌to‌  ‌enable‌  ‌the‌‌ 
requesting‌‌   state‌‌
  or‌‌
  government‌‌   to‌‌  hold‌‌  him‌‌
  in‌‌ connection‌‌ with‌‌ any‌‌  6. Ker-Frisbie‌  ‌Doctrine‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌illegality‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌arrest‌  ‌will‌  ‌not‌‌  a) listed‌‌and/or‌‌   ‌
criminal‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌directed‌  ‌against‌  ‌him‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌execution‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌ necessarily‌‌affect‌‌the‌‌jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌the‌‌court.‌  ‌
b) covered‌  ‌by‌  ‌“Double‌  ‌or‌  ‌Dual‌  ‌Criminality‌‌ 
penalty‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌on‌  ‌him‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌penal‌  ‌or‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌law‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Government‌‌of‌‌Hong‌‌Kong‌‌SAR‌‌v.‌‌Muñoz‌‌‌2016‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌re‌‌Double‌‌  Principle/Clause.”‌  ‌
requesting‌‌state‌‌or‌‌government.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌2[a]‌P ‌ D‌‌1069‌)  ‌‌ ‌
Criminality‌‌Rule‌  ‌ Distinguished‌‌f rom‌‌deportation‌  ‌
Fundamental‌‌principles‌  ‌
The‌  ‌five‌  ‌postulates‌‌   of‌‌
  extradition‌‌   as‌‌  espoused‌‌   in‌‌
  ‌Government‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  The‌  ‌HKSAR‌  ‌as‌‌
  the‌‌
  requesting‌‌   state‌‌
  must‌‌  establish‌‌   the‌‌
  following‌‌  ‌six‌‌  Deportation‌. ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌unilateral‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌  ‌because‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌ 
USA‌‌v.‌‌Purganan‌  ‌
elements‌,‌‌namely:‌‌   ‌ dependent‌‌upon‌‌the‌‌request‌‌of‌‌a‌‌state‌‌not‌‌dependent‌‌on‌‌a‌‌treaty.‌  ‌
1) there‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌an‌  ‌extradition‌  ‌treaty‌  ‌in‌  ‌force‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌‌  Extradition‌  ‌ Deportation‌ 
1. Extradition‌‌Is‌‌a‌‌Major‌‌Instrument‌‌for‌‌the‌‌Suppression‌‌of‌‌Crime;‌ 
HKSAR‌‌and‌‌the‌‌Philippines;‌  ‌
2. The‌‌Requesting‌‌State‌‌Will‌‌Accord‌‌Due‌‌Process‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Accused;‌  ‌ 2) the‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌charges‌  ‌that‌  ‌are‌‌
  pending‌‌  in‌‌  the‌‌
  HKSAR‌‌   against‌‌  Means‌‌the‌‌surrender‌‌by‌‌force‌‌of‌‌  The‌‌expulsion‌‌of‌‌an‌‌unwanted‌‌or‌‌ 
3. The‌‌Proceedings‌‌Are‌S‌ ui‌‌Generis‌; ‌ ‌ the‌‌person‌‌to‌‌be‌‌extradited;‌  ‌ a‌‌wanted‌‌person‌‌by‌‌the‌‌  undesirable‌‌alien.‌  ‌
3) the‌  ‌crimes‌  ‌for‌‌
  which‌‌
  the‌‌
  person‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  extradited‌‌   is‌‌
  charged‌‌  requested‌‌State‌‌to‌‌the‌‌requesting‌‌ 
4. Compliance‌‌Shall‌‌Be‌‌in‌‌Good‌‌Faith;‌  ‌ State.‌  ‌
are‌e‌ xtraditable‌w ‌ ithin‌‌the‌‌terms‌‌of‌‌the‌‌treaty;‌  ‌
5. There‌‌Is‌‌an‌‌Underlying‌‌Risk‌‌of‌‌Flight.‌  ‌
4) the‌‌
  individual‌‌ before‌‌ the‌‌ court‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ same‌‌ person‌‌ charged‌‌ in‌‌  May‌‌only‌‌be‌‌made‌‌pursuant‌‌to‌‌a ‌‌ A‌‌pure‌‌unilateral‌‌act‌‌and‌‌exercise‌‌ 
Additional‌‌Notes‌  ‌ the‌‌HKSAR;‌  ‌ treaty‌  ‌ of‌‌sovereignty‌  ‌
1. The‌‌obligation‌‌to‌‌extradite‌‌is‌‌treaty-based‌. ‌ ‌ 5) the‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌submitted‌  e‌ stablishes‌  ‌probable‌  ‌cause‌  ‌to‌ 
believe‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌extradited‌  ‌committed‌  ‌the‌‌  For‌‌the‌‌benefit‌‌of‌‌the‌‌requesting‌‌  In‌‌the‌‌interest‌‌of‌‌the‌‌country‌‌of‌‌ 
2. Could‌‌
  not‌‌
  cover‌‌ “political‌‌ offenses”.‌‌ ‌This‌‌ is‌‌ CIL.‌‌ An‌‌ ‌exception‌‌  offenses‌‌charged;‌  ‌ State‌  ‌ residence‌‌and‌‌is‌‌ordered‌‌without‌ 
to‌  ‌the‌  ‌political‌  ‌offense‌  ‌exception‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌Attentat‌  ‌Clause‌ ‌ a‌‌request‌‌by‌‌a‌‌third‌‌State.‌  ‌
6) the‌  ‌offenses‌  ‌are‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌in‌  ‌both‌  ‌the‌  ‌HKSAR‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌ 
which‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌assasination,‌  ‌murder,‌  ‌attempt‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌  Philippines‌‌(‌double‌‌criminality‌‌rule‌).‌  ‌
life‌‌
  of,‌‌
  or‌‌
  other‌‌
  willful‌‌ crimes‌‌ against‌‌ the‌‌ person‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Head‌‌ of‌‌ 
Under‌‌   the‌‌
  ‌double‌‌  criminality‌‌ rule‌, ‌‌‌the‌‌ extraditable‌‌ offense‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ 
L.‌‌International‌‌Human‌‌Rights‌‌Law‌  ‌
State‌‌   or‌‌ Head‌‌ of‌‌ Government‌‌ of‌‌ either‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ State‌‌ Parties‌‌ or‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌ criminal‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌laws‌  ‌of‌  ‌both‌  ‌the‌  ‌requesting‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌requested‌‌  Universal‌‌Declaration‌‌of‌‌Human‌‌Rights‌  ‌
member‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌family‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌regarded‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌political‌‌  states‌. ‌ ‌Because‌  ‌the‌  ‌offense‌  ‌of‌  ‌accepting‌  ‌an‌  ‌advantage‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌agent‌‌ 
crime‌. ‌ ‌ charged‌  ‌against‌  ‌him‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌HKSAR‌  ‌is‌  ‌one‌  ‌that‌  ‌deals‌  ‌with‌  ‌private‌‌  1. First‌‌Generation‌‌Rights‌‌‌—‌‌civil‌‌and‌‌political‌; ‌ ‌
3. “Rule‌‌   of‌‌
  Specialty”‌‌
  must‌‌ be‌‌ followed‌. ‌‌The‌‌ requesting‌‌ state‌‌ is‌‌  sector‌  ‌bribery,‌  ‌the‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌application‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌double‌‌  2. Second‌‌Generation‌‌Rights‌‌‌—‌‌economic,‌‌social‌‌and‌‌cultural‌; ‌ ‌
criminality‌  ‌rule‌  ‌are‌  ‌obviously‌  ‌not‌  ‌met‌. ‌ ‌Accordingly,‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌of‌‌ 
not‌  ‌permitted‌  ‌to‌  ‌prosecute‌  ‌the‌  ‌extradited‌  ‌individual‌  ‌for‌‌  There‌  ‌are‌  ‌two‌  ‌UN‌  ‌Human‌  ‌Rights‌  ‌Covenants‌  ‌that‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌legally‌‌ 
accepting‌‌   an‌‌
  advantage‌‌   as‌‌
  an‌‌ agent‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ dropped‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ request‌‌ 
offenses‌‌that‌‌are‌‌not‌‌covered‌‌by‌‌the‌‌request.‌  ‌ for‌‌extradition.‌‌   ‌ binding‌‌‌treaties‌‌for‌‌the‌‌protection‌‌of‌‌these‌‌human‌‌rights:‌  ‌
4. Ex‌‌post‌‌facto‌‌‌law‌‌prohibition‌‌does‌‌not‌‌apply.‌  ‌
Procedure‌  ‌ International‌‌Covenant‌‌on‌‌Civil‌‌and‌‌Political‌‌Rights‌  ‌
5. Male‌  ‌captus‌  ‌bene‌  ‌dentus‌. ‌ ‌It‌‌  is‌‌  now‌‌  a ‌‌general‌‌  principle‌‌  of‌‌ 
Extradition‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌requesting‌  ‌state‌  ‌expects‌  ‌under‌  ‌pacta‌  ‌sunt‌‌  Some‌‌rights‌‌recognized‌‌in‌‌the‌‌ICCPR‌‌are‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌certain‌l‌ imitations‌: ‌ ‌
law.‌  ‌This‌  ‌means‌‌
  “wrongfully‌‌
  captured,‌‌  validly‌‌
  detained.”‌‌
  ‌Male‌‌ 
Captus‌‌Bene‌‌Detentus‌‌‌is‌‌justifiable‌‌for‌‌two‌‌reasons:‌‌   ‌ servanda‌  ‌to‌  ‌receive‌  ‌the‌  ‌extradited‌  ‌individual.‌  ‌There‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌‌ 1. The‌‌   exercise‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌  ‌right‌‌   to‌‌
  freedom‌‌   of‌‌
  expression‌‌   in‌‌
  Article‌‌ 
request.‌C
‌ onditions‌:  ‌‌ ‌ 19‌  ‌carries‌  ‌with‌  ‌it‌  ‌special‌  ‌duties‌  ‌and‌  ‌responsibilities.‌  ‌It‌  ‌may‌‌ 
a. Because‌  ‌fundamental‌  ‌individual‌  ‌rights‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌‌ 
1) It‌‌must‌‌be‌‌pursuant‌‌to‌‌a‌‌treaty;‌  ‌ therefore‌‌   be‌‌
  subject‌‌   to‌‌
  certain‌‌  restrictions,‌‌  but‌‌ these‌‌ shall‌‌ only‌‌ 
right‌‌to‌‌due‌‌process‌‌is‌‌still‌‌recognized.‌‌   ‌
be‌‌such‌‌as‌‌are‌‌provided‌‌by‌‌law‌‌and‌‌are‌‌necessary:‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 135‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

a. For‌‌respect‌‌of‌‌the‌‌rights‌‌or‌‌reputations‌‌of‌‌others;‌  ‌ Fundamental‌‌Human‌‌Rights‌  ‌ other‌  ‌public‌  ‌emergency,‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌invoked‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌justification‌  ‌of‌‌ 
torture.‌  ‌(‌Art‌  ‌2[2]‌  ‌UN‌  ‌Convention‌  ‌Against‌  ‌Torture‌  ‌and‌  ‌Other‌‌ 
b. For‌  ‌the‌  ‌protection‌  ‌of‌  ‌national‌  ‌security‌  ‌or‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌‌  1. Right‌  ‌Against‌  ‌Genocide.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Genocide‌  ‌includes‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Cruel,‌‌Inhuman‌‌or‌‌Degrading‌‌Treatment‌) ‌ ‌
order,‌‌or‌‌of‌‌public‌‌health‌‌or‌‌morals.‌  ‌ following‌‌   acts‌‌
  committed‌‌   with‌‌
  intent‌‌
  to‌‌ destroy,‌‌ in‌‌ whole‌‌ or‌‌ in‌‌ 
The‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌of‌  ‌torture‌  ‌has‌  ‌evolved‌  ‌into‌  ‌jus‌  ‌cogens‌  ‌or‌‌ 
2. The‌‌same‌‌right‌‌is‌‌further‌‌limited‌‌by‌‌Article‌‌20‌‌which‌‌prohibits‌  ‌ part,‌‌a‌‌national,‌‌ethnical,‌‌racial‌‌or‌‌religious‌‌group,‌‌such‌‌as:‌  ‌
peremptory‌‌norm.‌‌(P ‌ rosecutor‌‌v.‌‌Furundzija‌) ‌ ‌
a. Any‌‌propaganda‌‌for‌‌war;‌  ‌ a. Killing‌‌members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌group;‌  ‌
3. Right‌  ‌Against‌  ‌Slavery‌  ‌and‌  ‌Forced‌  ‌Labor.‌‌   — ‌‌‌Slavery‌‌   ‌is‌‌
  the‌‌ 
b. Any‌  ‌advocacy‌  ‌of‌  ‌national,‌  ‌racial‌  ‌or‌  ‌religious‌  ‌hatred‌‌  b. Causing‌‌serious‌‌bodily‌‌or‌‌mental‌‌harm‌‌to‌‌members;‌  ‌ status‌  ‌or‌  ‌condition‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌over‌  ‌whom‌  ‌any‌  ‌or‌  ‌all‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
that‌‌
  constitutes‌‌
  incitement‌‌ to‌‌ discrimination,‌‌ hostility‌‌  c. Deliberately‌  ‌inflicting‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌group‌‌  conditions‌‌  of‌‌
  life‌‌  powers‌‌attaching‌‌to‌‌the‌‌right‌‌of‌‌ownership‌‌are‌‌exercised..‌  ‌
or‌‌violence.‌  ‌ calculated‌  ‌to‌  ‌bring‌  ‌about‌  ‌its‌  ‌physical‌  ‌destruction‌  ‌in‌‌  Forced‌‌   Labor‌‌   shall‌‌
  mean‌‌  all‌‌
  work‌‌   or‌‌
  service‌‌ which‌‌ is‌‌ exacted‌‌ 
3. Right‌  ‌of‌  ‌Derogation.‌  ‌Under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌4,‌  ‌in‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌‌  whole‌‌or‌‌in‌‌part;‌  ‌ from‌  ‌any‌  ‌person‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌menace‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌and‌  ‌for‌‌ 
emergency‌  ‌which‌  ‌threatens‌  ‌the‌  ‌life‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌nation‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  d. Imposing‌  ‌measures‌  ‌intended‌‌
  to‌‌
  prevent‌‌
  births‌‌
  within‌‌  which‌  ‌the‌  ‌said‌  ‌person‌  ‌has‌  ‌not‌  ‌offered‌  ‌himself‌  ‌voluntarily.‌  ‌It‌‌ 
existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌officially‌  ‌proclaimed,‌  ‌the‌  ‌States‌  ‌Parties‌‌  the‌‌group;‌‌and‌  ‌ shall‌‌not‌‌include‌: ‌ ‌
may‌‌
  take‌‌
  measures‌‌   derogating‌‌   from‌‌ their‌‌ obligations‌‌ under‌‌ the‌‌  a. Compulsory‌‌military‌‌service;‌  ‌
e. Forcibly‌  ‌transferring‌  ‌children‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  group‌‌
  to‌‌
  another‌‌ 
present‌‌Covenant.‌  ‌
group.‌  ‌ b. Normal‌‌civic‌‌obligations‌‌of‌‌citizens;‌  ‌
The‌‌following‌‌rights‌‌however‌‌are‌‌‌non-derogable‌: ‌ ‌
Under‌‌
  PH‌‌
  Law,‌‌
  ‌RA‌‌ 9851‌‌ has‌‌ added‌‌ “‌social‌‌ or‌‌ any‌‌ other‌‌ similar‌‌  c. Any‌‌work‌‌by‌‌reason‌‌of‌‌conviction‌‌in‌‌a‌‌court‌‌of‌‌law;‌  ‌
1. The‌‌right‌‌to‌‌life;‌  ‌ stable‌‌and‌‌permanent‌‌group‌”‌‌to‌‌the‌‌list‌‌of‌‌protected‌‌groups.‌  ‌
d. Any‌  ‌work‌  ‌or‌  ‌service‌  ‌exacted‌  ‌in‌  ‌cases‌  ‌of‌  ‌emergency,‌‌ 
2. Freedom‌  ‌from‌  ‌torture‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌  ‌cruel,‌  ‌inhuman‌  ‌or‌  ‌degrading‌‌  Genocide‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌crime‌‌   under‌‌  IL‌‌
  and‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌
  considered‌‌  a ‌‌political‌‌  like‌‌war‌‌or‌‌calamity;‌‌and‌  ‌
treatment‌‌
  or‌‌
  punishment,‌‌   and‌‌  freedom‌‌   from‌‌ being‌‌ subjected‌‌ to‌‌  crime‌  ‌for‌  ‌purposes‌  ‌of‌  ‌extradition.‌  ‌The‌  ‌international‌‌   norm‌‌   for‌‌ 
e. Minor‌‌communal‌‌service.‌  ‌
medical‌‌or‌‌scientific‌‌experiment‌‌without‌‌free‌‌consent;‌  ‌ the‌  ‌prevention,‌  ‌prosecution‌  ‌and‌‌   punishment‌‌   of‌‌
  Genocide‌‌ 
3. Freedom‌‌from‌‌slavery‌‌and‌‌servitude;‌  ‌ is‌  ‌jus‌  ‌cogens‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌‌
  therefore‌‌   ‌non-derogable‌. ‌‌(‌Prosecutor‌‌   v.‌‌  4. Right‌  ‌Against‌  ‌Discrimination.‌  ‌— ‌‌‌Racial‌‌   Discrimination‌‌   is‌‌ 
Blagojevic‌‌and‌‌Jokic‌) ‌ ‌ any‌  ‌distinction,‌  ‌exclusion,‌  ‌restriction‌  ‌or‌  ‌preference‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌‌ 
4. Freedom‌  ‌from‌  ‌imprisonment‌  ‌for‌  ‌inability‌  ‌to‌  ‌fulfill‌  ‌a ‌‌
race,‌  ‌color,‌‌
  descent,‌‌  or‌‌  national‌‌
  or‌‌
  ethnic‌‌
  origin‌‌   which‌‌
  has‌‌  the‌‌ 
contractual‌‌obligation;‌  ‌ 2. Right‌‌   Against‌‌   Torture.‌‌  — ‌‌‌Torture‌‌ ‌is‌‌ any‌‌ act‌‌ by‌‌ which‌‌ severe‌‌ 
purpose‌  ‌or‌  ‌effect‌  ‌of‌  ‌nullifying‌  ‌or‌  ‌impairing‌  ‌the‌  ‌recognition,‌‌ 
pain‌  ‌or‌  ‌suffering,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌physical‌‌
  or‌‌  mental,‌‌   is‌‌
  intentionally‌‌ 
5. Right‌‌against‌e‌ x‌‌post‌‌facto‌‌‌laws;‌  ‌ enjoyment‌‌   or‌‌
  exercise,‌‌ on‌‌ an‌‌ equal‌‌ footing,‌‌ of‌‌ human‌‌ rights‌‌ and‌‌ 
inflicted‌‌on‌‌a‌‌person‌‌for‌‌such‌‌purposes‌‌as‌‌   ‌
6. Right‌‌to‌‌recognition‌‌everywhere‌‌as‌‌a‌‌person‌‌before‌‌the‌‌law;‌  ‌ fundamental‌  ‌freedoms‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌political,‌  ‌economic,‌  ‌social,‌‌ 
a. obtaining‌‌
  from‌‌   him‌‌
  or‌‌
  a ‌‌third‌‌
  person‌‌ information‌‌ or‌‌ a ‌‌ cultural‌‌or‌‌any‌‌other‌‌field‌‌of‌‌public‌‌life.‌  ‌
7. Freedom‌‌of‌‌thought,‌‌conscience‌‌and‌‌religion.‌  ‌ confession,‌‌   ‌
Apartheid‌  ‌means‌  ‌inhumane‌  ‌acts‌  ‌committed‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  context‌‌
  of‌‌ 
International‌‌Covenant‌‌on‌‌Economic,‌‌Social‌‌and‌‌Cultural‌‌  b. punishing‌  ‌him‌  ‌for‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌  ‌he‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌third‌  ‌person‌  ‌has‌‌  an‌  ‌institutionalized‌  ‌regime‌  ‌of‌  ‌systematic‌  ‌oppression‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Rights‌  ‌ committed‌‌or‌‌is‌‌suspected‌‌of‌‌having‌‌committed,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ domination‌‌   by‌‌
  one‌‌
  racial‌‌
  group‌‌
  or‌‌
  groups‌‌ and‌‌ committed‌‌ with‌‌ 
1. Principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌Progressive‌  ‌Realization.‌  ‌— ‌‌‌recognizes‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌  c. intimidating‌‌or‌‌coercing‌‌him‌‌or‌‌a‌‌third‌‌person,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ the‌‌intention‌‌of‌‌maintaining‌‌that‌‌regime.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌3[a]‌‌RA‌‌9851‌) ‌ ‌
full‌  ‌realization‌  ‌of‌  ‌some‌  ‌rights‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Covenant‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌  d. for‌‌any‌‌reason‌‌based‌‌on‌‌discrimination‌‌of‌‌any‌‌kind,‌‌   ‌ Distinction‌  ‌made‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌State‌  ‌Party‌  ‌between‌  ‌its‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌and‌‌ 
difficult‌‌to‌‌achieve‌‌in‌‌a‌‌short‌‌period‌‌of‌‌time.‌  ‌ non-citizens‌‌is‌‌not‌‌violative‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Convention‌. ‌ ‌
when‌‌   such‌‌
  pain‌‌  or‌‌
  suffering‌‌  is‌‌
  inflicted‌‌
  by‌‌ or‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ instigation‌‌ 
This‌‌principle‌‌however‌‌is‌‌not‌‌applicable‌‌to‌‌the‌‌ICCPR.‌  ‌ of‌  ‌or‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌
  consent‌‌   or‌‌
  acquiescence‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌public‌‌   official‌‌  5. Rights‌‌of‌‌Stateless‌‌Persons.‌D
‌ iscussed‌‌in‌‌Part‌‌G ‌ ‌
or‌‌other‌‌person‌‌acting‌‌in‌‌an‌‌official‌‌capacity‌. ‌ ‌ 6. Rights‌‌of‌‌Refugees.‌D
‌ iscussed‌‌in‌‌Part‌‌J ‌ ‌
No‌  ‌exceptional‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌whatsoever,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌a ‌‌state‌‌  7. Rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌Indigenous‌  ‌Peoples‌  ‌and‌  ‌Minorities.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Tribal‌‌ 
of‌  ‌war‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌threat‌  ‌of‌  ‌war,‌  ‌internal‌  ‌political‌‌
  in‌‌
  stability‌‌
  or‌‌
  any‌‌  peoples‌  ‌are‌  ‌those‌  ‌whose‌  ‌social,‌  ‌cultural‌  ‌and‌  ‌economic‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 136‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

conditions‌‌
  distinguish‌‌ them‌‌ from‌‌ other‌‌ sections‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ national‌‌  b. The‌  ‌use,‌  ‌procuring‌  ‌or‌  ‌offering‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌child‌  ‌for‌‌  Categories‌‌of‌‌armed‌‌conflicts‌  ‌
community.‌  ‌ prostitution;‌  ‌
Indigenous‌  ‌peoples‌  ‌are‌  ‌those‌  ‌who,‌  ‌on‌  ‌account‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌‌  An‌  ‌armed‌  ‌conflict‌  ‌exists‌  ‌whenever‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌resort‌  ‌to‌  ‌armed‌‌ 
c. The‌  ‌use,‌  ‌procuring‌  ‌or‌  ‌offering‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌child‌  ‌for‌  ‌illicit‌‌ 
descent‌‌   from‌‌
  the‌‌
  populations‌‌   which‌‌ inhabited‌‌ the‌‌ country,‌‌ or‌‌ a ‌‌ force‌  ‌between‌  ‌States‌  ‌or‌  ‌protracted‌  ‌armed‌  ‌violence‌  ‌between‌‌ 
activities;‌  ‌
geographical‌‌ region‌‌ to‌‌ which‌‌ the‌‌ country‌‌ belongs,‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌ of‌‌  governmental‌  ‌authorities‌  ‌and‌  ‌organized‌  ‌armed‌‌   groups‌‌
  or‌‌
  between‌‌ 
d. Work‌  ‌which,‌  ‌by‌  ‌its‌  ‌nature‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌in‌‌  such‌‌groups‌‌within‌‌a‌‌State.‌‌(P
‌ rosecutor‌‌v.‌‌Tadic‌) ‌ ‌
conquest‌  ‌or‌  ‌colonisation‌  ‌and‌  ‌who,‌  ‌irrespective‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  ‌legal‌‌ 
status,‌  ‌retain‌  ‌some‌  ‌or‌  ‌all‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  ‌own‌  ‌social,‌  ‌economic,‌‌  which‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌carried‌  ‌out,‌  ‌is‌  ‌likely‌  ‌to‌  ‌harm‌  ‌the‌  ‌health,‌‌  International‌‌armed‌‌conflicts‌  ‌
cultural‌‌  and‌‌
  political‌‌  institutions.‌‌ (‌1989‌‌ Indigenous‌‌ and‌‌ Tribal‌‌  safety‌  ‌or‌  ‌morals‌  ‌of‌  ‌children.‌  ‌(‌1990‌  ‌Worst‌  ‌Forms‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Child‌‌Labor‌‌Convention‌) ‌ ‌ The‌  ‌Common‌  ‌Article‌  ‌2 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Geneva‌  ‌Conventions‌  ‌defines‌  ‌an‌‌ 
Peoples‌‌Convention‌)‌  ‌
international‌‌armed‌‌conflict‌‌as‌‌   ‌
8. Rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌Migrant‌  ‌Workers.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌migrant‌  ‌worker‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌ M.‌‌International‌‌Humanitarian‌‌Law‌  ‌ 1. all‌  ‌cases‌  ‌of‌  ‌declared‌  ‌war‌  ‌or‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌  ‌armed‌  ‌conflict‌‌ 
person‌‌   who‌‌  is‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌ engaged,‌‌ is‌‌ engaged‌‌ or‌‌ has‌‌ been‌‌ engaged‌‌ in‌‌  1. IHL‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌set‌  ‌of‌  ‌rules‌‌
  which‌‌
  seek,‌‌
  for‌‌
  humanitarian‌‌   reasons,‌‌   to‌‌  which‌  ‌may‌  ‌arise‌  ‌between‌  ‌two‌  ‌or‌  ‌more‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌High‌‌ 
a‌  ‌remunerated‌  ‌activity‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌State‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌he‌  ‌or‌  ‌she‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌‌ limit‌  ‌the‌  ‌effects‌  ‌of‌  ‌armed‌  ‌conflict‌. ‌ ‌It‌  ‌protects‌  ‌persons‌‌   who‌‌  Contracting‌  ‌Parties‌, ‌ ‌even‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌  ‌of‌  ‌war‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌ 
national.‌‌(‌1990‌‌Migrant‌‌Workers‌‌Convention‌) ‌ ‌ are‌  ‌not‌  ‌or‌  ‌are‌  ‌no‌  ‌longer‌  ‌participating‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌hostilities‌  ‌and‌‌  recognized‌‌by‌‌one‌‌of‌‌them‌‌and‌‌   ‌
No‌‌migrant‌‌worker‌‌or‌‌member‌‌of‌‌his‌‌or‌‌her‌‌family‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌   ‌ restricts‌‌the‌‌means‌‌and‌‌methods‌‌of‌‌warfare.‌  ‌
2. all‌‌
  cases‌‌
  of‌‌
  partial‌‌
  or‌‌
  total‌‌
  occupation‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  territory‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌
a. imprisoned‌  ‌merely‌  ‌on‌‌
  the‌‌
  ground‌‌
  of‌‌
  failure‌‌
  to‌‌
  fulfil‌‌
  a ‌‌ 2. IHL‌‌   does‌‌
  not‌‌
  concern‌‌  the‌‌
  legality‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ war‌‌ or‌‌ the‌‌ justification‌‌  High‌  ‌Contracting‌  ‌Party,‌  ‌even‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌said‌‌
  occupation‌‌   meets‌‌ 
contractual‌‌obligation.‌  ‌ for‌‌
  the‌‌
  commencement‌‌   of‌‌
  hostilities.‌‌ It‌‌ deals‌‌ with‌‌ ‌jus‌‌ in‌‌ bello‌, ‌‌ with‌‌no‌‌armed‌‌resistance.‌  ‌
or‌‌justice‌‌in‌‌war,‌‌not‌‌with‌j‌ us‌‌ad‌‌bellum‌,‌‌or‌‌justice‌‌of‌‌war.‌  ‌
b. deprived‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌or‌  ‌her‌  ‌authorization‌  ‌of‌  ‌residence‌  ‌or‌‌  Internal‌‌or‌‌non-international‌‌armed‌‌conflict‌  ‌
work‌  ‌permit‌  ‌or‌  ‌expelled‌  ‌merely‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌ground‌  ‌of‌‌  3. A‌‌person‌‌‌hors‌‌de‌‌combat‌‌‌is:‌  ‌
Are‌  ‌those‌  ‌restricted‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌territory‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌single‌  ‌State‌, ‌ ‌involving‌‌ 
failure‌  ‌to‌  ‌fulfill‌  ‌an‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌unless‌  ‌fulfilment‌‌  a. anyone‌‌who‌‌is‌‌in‌‌the‌‌power‌‌of‌‌an‌‌adverse‌‌party;‌  ‌ either‌‌  regular‌‌  armed‌‌
  forces‌‌   fighting‌‌  groups‌‌   of‌‌
  armed‌‌  dissidents,‌‌ or‌‌ 
obligation‌  ‌constitutes‌  ‌a ‌ ‌condition‌  ‌for‌  ‌such‌‌ 
b. anyone‌‌who‌‌is‌‌defenseless;‌‌or‌  ‌ armed‌‌groups‌‌fighting‌‌each‌‌other.‌ 
authorization‌‌or‌‌permit.‌‌(A ‌ rt‌‌20‌) ‌ ‌
c. anyone‌  ‌who‌  ‌clearly‌  ‌expresses‌  ‌an‌  ‌intention‌  ‌to‌‌  Internationalized‌  ‌Armed‌  ‌Conflict.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Prosecutor‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Tadic‌‌ 
Principle‌‌   of‌‌
  equality‌‌   of‌‌
  treatment.‌‌  — ‌‌‌Migrant‌‌ workers‌‌ shall‌‌ 
surrender;‌‌   ‌ explained‌‌
  that‌‌
  an‌‌
  internal‌‌
  armed‌‌ conflict‌‌ may‌‌ become‌‌ international‌‌ 
enjoy‌  ‌treatment‌  ‌not‌‌  less‌‌   favourable‌‌
  than‌‌  that‌‌
  which‌‌
  applies‌‌
  to‌‌ 
if‌  ‌
nationals‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌of‌  ‌employment‌  ‌in‌  ‌respect‌  ‌of‌‌  provided‌  ‌he‌‌
  or‌‌
  she‌‌
  abstains‌‌
  from‌‌
  any‌‌
  hostile‌‌
  act‌‌
  and‌‌
  does‌‌
  not‌‌ 
remuneration,‌  ‌other‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌of‌  ‌work,‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌terms‌  ‌of‌‌  attempt‌‌to‌‌escape.‌  ‌ 1. Another‌‌
  State‌‌
  intervenes‌‌
  in‌‌ that‌‌ conflict‌‌ through‌‌ its‌‌ troops,‌‌ 
employment.‌‌(A ‌ rt‌‌25‌) ‌ ‌ or‌  ‌
4. Martens‌  ‌Clause.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌implements‌  ‌rules‌  ‌of‌  ‌humanitarian‌  ‌law‌‌ 
9. Rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌Women.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Discrimination‌  ‌against‌‌   women‌‌   shall‌‌  applicable‌  ‌in‌  ‌armed‌  ‌conflict‌  ‌that‌  ‌are‌  ‌so‌  ‌fundamental‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  2. If‌  ‌some‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌participants‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌internal‌  ‌armed‌  ‌conflict‌‌ 
mean‌  ‌any‌  ‌distinction,‌  ‌exclusion‌  ‌or‌  ‌restriction‌  ‌made‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌  respect‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  human‌‌
  person‌‌   and‌‌  ‌elementary‌‌ considerations‌‌ of‌‌  act‌‌on‌‌behalf‌‌of‌‌that‌‌other‌‌State.‌  ‌
basis‌‌  of‌‌
  sex.‌‌
  ‌(1
‌ 979‌‌
  Convention‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌ Elimination‌‌ of‌‌ All‌‌ Forms‌‌  humanity‌  ‌(‌Corfu‌  ‌Channel‌  ‌Case‌) ‌ ‌that‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌observed‌  ‌by‌‌  all‌  Two‌‌criteria‌‌must‌‌be‌‌assessed:‌  ‌
of‌‌Discrimination‌‌Against‌‌Women‌) ‌ ‌ States‌  ‌WON‌  ‌they‌  ‌have‌  ‌ratified‌  ‌the‌  ‌conventions‌  ‌that‌  ‌contain‌‌ 
1. The‌‌intensity‌‌of‌‌the‌‌conflict;‌‌and‌  ‌
them‌  ‌because‌  ‌they‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌intransgressible‌  ‌principles‌  ‌of‌‌ 
10. Rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Child.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌child‌  ‌means‌  ‌every‌  ‌human‌  ‌being‌‌ 
international‌‌   customary‌‌  law.‌‌
  (‌Advisory‌‌ Opinion‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ Legality‌‌  2. The‌‌organization‌‌of‌‌the‌‌parties.‌  ‌
below‌  ‌the‌  ‌age‌  ‌of‌‌
  ‌18‌‌   years‌‌  ‌unless‌‌
  under‌‌   the‌‌
  law‌‌
  applicable‌‌   to‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌Threat‌‌or‌‌Use‌‌of‌‌Nuclear‌‌Weapons‌) ‌ ‌ These‌  ‌criteria‌  ‌are‌  ‌used‌  ‌to‌  ‌distinguish‌  ‌an‌  ‌armed‌  ‌conflict‌  ‌from‌‌ 
the‌‌
  child,‌‌
  majority‌‌   is‌‌
  attained‌‌  earlier.‌‌
  (‌1989‌‌  Convention‌‌   on‌‌ the‌‌ 
Rights‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Child‌) ‌ ‌ This‌‌is‌‌embodied‌‌in‌‌Art‌‌1(2)‌‌of‌‌Additional‌‌Protocol‌‌I‌‌of‌‌1977‌. ‌ ‌ banditry,‌  ‌unorganized‌  ‌insurrections,‌  ‌or‌  ‌terrorist‌  ‌activities‌  ‌which‌‌ 
are‌n
‌ ot‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌IHL‌.‌‌(‌Prosecutor‌‌v.‌‌Limaj‌) ‌ ‌
The‌‌‌worst‌‌forms‌‌of‌‌child‌‌labour‌‌‌comprises:‌  ‌
a. All‌‌forms‌‌of‌‌slavery;‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 137‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

War‌‌of‌‌national‌‌liberation‌  ‌ 4. Mercenary.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌mercenary‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌‌ d. that‌‌
  of‌‌
  conducting‌‌   their‌‌
  operations‌‌ in‌‌ accordance‌‌ with‌‌ 
An‌  ‌armed‌  ‌conflict‌  ‌also‌  ‌treated‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌conflict‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌international‌‌  combatant‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌prisoner‌  ‌of‌  ‌war.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌mercenary‌  ‌is‌  ‌any‌  ‌person‌‌  the‌  ‌laws‌  ‌and‌  ‌customs‌  ‌of‌  ‌war.‌  ‌(‌Art‌  ‌4[A.2]‌  ‌Geneva‌‌ 
character.‌  ‌ who:‌‌   ‌ Convention‌‌III‌) ‌ ‌
a. is‌‌ specially‌‌ recruited‌‌ locally‌‌ or‌‌ abroad‌‌ in‌‌ order‌‌ to‌‌ fight‌‌  3. Persons‌  ‌who‌  ‌accompany‌  ‌the‌  ‌armed‌  ‌forces‌  ‌without‌  ‌actually‌‌ 
Core‌‌international‌‌obligations‌‌of‌‌States‌  ‌
in‌‌an‌‌armed‌‌conflict;‌‌   ‌ being‌‌members‌‌thereof,‌‌such‌‌as‌‌   ‌
The‌‌seven‌‌fundamental‌‌rules‌‌are:‌ 
b. does,‌‌in‌‌fact,‌‌take‌‌a‌‌direct‌‌part‌‌in‌‌the‌‌hostilities;‌‌   ‌ a. civilian‌‌members‌‌of‌‌military‌‌aircraft‌‌crews,‌‌   ‌
a. Persons‌  ‌hors‌  ‌de‌  ‌combat‌  ‌and‌  ‌those‌  ‌who‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌take‌‌   a ‌‌direct‌‌ 
c. is‌  ‌motivated‌  ‌to‌  ‌take‌  ‌part‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  hostilities‌‌
  essentially‌‌  b. war‌‌correspondents,‌‌   ‌
part‌‌
  in‌‌
  hostilities‌‌  are‌‌ entitled‌‌ to‌‌ respect‌‌ for‌‌ their‌‌ lives‌‌ and‌‌ their‌‌ 
by‌‌the‌‌desire‌‌for‌‌private‌‌gain;‌‌   ‌ c. supply‌‌contractors,‌‌   ‌
moral‌‌and‌‌physical‌‌integrity.‌  ‌
d. is‌‌neither‌‌a‌‌national‌‌nor‌‌a‌‌resident;‌‌   ‌ d. members‌‌ of‌‌ labour‌‌ units‌‌ or‌‌ of‌‌ services‌‌ responsible‌‌ for‌‌ 
b. It‌  ‌is‌  ‌forbidden‌  ‌to‌  ‌kill‌  ‌or‌  ‌injure‌  ‌an‌  ‌enemy‌  ‌who‌  ‌surrenders‌  ‌or‌‌ 
who‌‌is‌h ‌ ors‌‌de‌‌combat.‌  ‌ e. is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌‌member‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  armed‌‌
  forces‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌Party‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌  the‌‌welfare‌‌of‌‌the‌‌armed‌‌forces,‌‌   ‌
conflict;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ provided‌  ‌that‌‌
  they‌‌
  have‌‌
  received‌‌
  authorization‌‌
  ‌shall‌‌
  also‌‌
  be‌‌ 
c. The‌  ‌wounded‌  ‌and‌  ‌sick‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  collected‌‌
  and‌‌
  cared‌‌
  for‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌ 
party‌‌to‌‌the‌‌conflict‌‌which‌‌has‌‌them‌‌in‌‌its‌‌power.‌  ‌ f. has‌‌
  not‌‌
  been‌‌   sent‌‌
  by‌‌
  a ‌‌State‌‌ which‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ a ‌‌Party‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  entitled‌‌to‌‌prisoner-of-war‌‌status.‌  ‌
conflict‌  ‌on‌  ‌official‌  ‌duty‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌member‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌armed‌‌  4. Any‌  ‌member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌armed‌  ‌forces‌  ‌who‌  ‌engages‌  ‌in‌  ‌espionage‌‌ 
d. Captured‌  ‌combatants‌  ‌and‌  ‌civilians‌  ‌are‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌respect‌  ‌for‌‌ 
forces.‌‌(A‌ rt‌‌47‌‌Protocol‌‌I)‌  ‌ ‌ shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌status‌  ‌of‌  ‌prisoner‌  ‌of‌  ‌war‌  ‌and‌‌ 
their‌‌lives,‌‌dignity,‌‌personal‌‌rights‌‌and‌‌convictions.‌  ‌
5.
Military‌‌   objectives‌‌   ‌are‌‌  limited‌‌ to‌‌ those‌‌ objects‌‌ which‌‌ by‌‌ their‌‌  may‌  ‌be‌  ‌treated‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌spy,‌  ‌unless‌  ‌that‌  ‌member‌  ‌is‌  ‌in‌  ‌uniform‌‌ 
e. Everyone‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌from‌  ‌fundamental‌‌ 
nature,‌‌   location,‌‌   purpose‌‌   or‌‌   use‌‌   make‌‌ an‌‌ effective‌‌ contribution‌‌  while‌‌gathering‌‌or‌‌attempting‌‌to‌‌gather‌‌information.‌  ‌
judicial‌‌guarantees.‌  ‌
to‌  ‌military‌  ‌action‌  ‌and‌  ‌whose‌  ‌total‌  ‌or‌  ‌partial‌  ‌destruction,‌‌  Law‌‌on‌‌neutrality‌  ‌
f. Parties‌‌
  to‌‌
  a ‌‌conflict‌‌
  and‌‌
  members‌‌
  of‌‌
  their‌‌
  armed‌‌
  forces‌‌ do‌‌ not‌‌  capture‌  ‌or‌  ‌neutralization,‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌ruling‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌‌ 
have‌‌an‌‌unlimited‌‌choice‌‌of‌‌methods‌‌and‌‌means‌‌of‌‌warfare.‌  ‌ time,‌‌offers‌‌a‌‌definite‌‌military‌‌advantage.‌  ‌ 1. Neutrality‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌legal‌  ‌position‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌State‌  ‌which‌  ‌remained‌‌ 
g. Parties‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌conflict‌  ‌shall‌  ‌at‌‌
  all‌‌
  times‌‌
  distinguish‌‌
  between‌‌
  the‌‌  aloof‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌war‌‌
  between‌‌  two‌‌
  other‌‌
  States‌‌   or‌‌
  groups‌‌   of‌‌
  States‌‌ 
Prisoners‌‌of‌‌war‌  ‌
civilian‌  ‌population‌  ‌and‌  ‌combatants.‌  ‌Attacks‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  while‌  ‌maintaining‌  ‌certain‌  ‌rights‌  ‌towards‌  ‌the‌  ‌belligerents‌  ‌and‌‌ 
1. Prisoners‌  ‌of‌  ‌war‌  ‌are‌‌   lawful‌‌   combatants‌‌   who‌‌  have‌‌  fallen‌‌
  into‌  observing‌  ‌certain‌  ‌duties‌  ‌prescribed‌  ‌by‌  ‌customary‌  ‌law‌  ‌or‌  ‌by‌‌ 
directed‌‌solely‌‌against‌‌military‌‌objectives.‌  ‌
the‌‌power‌‌of‌‌the‌‌enemy.‌  ‌ international‌‌conventions‌‌or‌‌treaties.‌  ‌
Principles‌‌of‌‌international‌‌humanitarian‌‌law‌  ‌
2. Members‌  ‌of‌  ‌other‌  ‌militias‌  ‌and‌  ‌members‌  ‌of‌  ‌other‌  ‌volunteer‌‌  2. A‌‌neutralized‌‌State‌‌‌has‌‌the‌‌following‌‌characteristics:‌  ‌
Treatment‌‌of‌‌civilians‌  ‌ corps‌, ‌ ‌including‌  ‌those‌  ‌of‌‌   ‌organized‌‌   resistance‌‌   movements‌, ‌‌
a. Its‌‌neutrality‌‌is‌‌permanent;‌  ‌
1. A‌  ‌civilian‌  ‌is‌  ‌any‌  ‌person‌  ‌who‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌belong‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌armed‌‌  belonging‌‌   to‌‌
  a ‌‌Party‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌   conflict‌‌   and‌‌  operating‌‌   in‌‌
  or‌‌ outside‌‌ 
their‌‌  own‌‌   territory,‌‌   even‌‌   if‌‌  this‌‌   territory‌‌   is‌‌
  occupied,‌‌   provided‌‌  b. Its‌‌neutrality‌‌is‌‌guaranteed‌‌by‌‌a‌‌treaty;‌‌and‌  ‌
force‌  ‌and‌  ‌who‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌combatant.‌  ‌In‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌‌
  doubt‌, ‌‌a ‌‌person‌‌ 
shall‌‌be‌‌treated‌‌as‌‌a‌‌civilian.‌  the‌‌following‌‌conditions‌‌are‌‌met:‌  ‌ c. It‌‌is‌‌obliged‌‌to‌‌maintain‌‌its‌‌status‌‌of‌‌neutrality.‌  ‌
2. The‌  ‌civilian‌  ‌population‌  ‌comprises‌  ‌all‌  ‌persons‌  ‌who‌  ‌are‌‌  a. that‌‌
  of‌‌
  being‌‌
  commanded‌‌
  by‌‌
  a ‌‌person‌‌
  responsible‌‌
  for‌‌  3. A‌‌neutral‌‌cannot‌‌avail‌‌himself‌‌of‌‌his‌‌neutrality:‌  ‌
civilians.‌  ‌The‌  ‌presence‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌civilian‌  ‌population‌  ‌of‌‌  his‌‌subordinates;‌  ‌
a. If‌‌he‌‌commits‌‌hostile‌‌acts‌‌against‌‌a‌‌belligerent;‌‌and‌  ‌
individuals‌‌   who‌‌
  do‌‌
  not‌‌
  come‌‌
  within‌‌   the‌‌
  definition‌‌ of‌‌ civilians‌‌  b. that‌‌
  of‌‌
  having‌‌
  a ‌‌fixed‌‌
  distinctive‌‌ sign‌‌ recognizable‌‌ at‌‌ a ‌‌
b. If‌  ‌he‌  ‌commits‌  ‌acts‌  ‌in‌  ‌favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌belligerent,‌‌ 
does‌‌ not‌‌ deprive‌‌ the‌‌ population‌‌ of‌‌ its‌‌ civilian‌‌ character.‌‌ (‌Art‌‌ 50‌‌  distance;‌  ‌
particularly‌‌   if‌‌
  he‌‌
  voluntarily‌‌ enlists‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ ranks‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
Protocol‌‌I)‌  ‌ ‌ c. that‌‌of‌‌carrying‌‌arms‌‌openly;‌  ‌ armed‌‌forces‌‌of‌‌one‌‌of‌‌the‌‌parties.‌  ‌
3. The‌  ‌civilian‌  ‌population‌  ‌and‌  ‌individual‌  ‌civilians‌  ‌shall‌  ‌enjoy‌‌ 
general‌  ‌protection‌  ‌against‌  ‌dangers‌  ‌arising‌  ‌from‌  ‌military‌‌ 
operations.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 138‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

4.
Goods‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌neutral‌  ‌found‌  ‌on‌  ‌board‌  ‌an‌  ‌enemy’s‌‌   vessel‌‌   are‌‌  not‌‌  Archipelagic‌‌States‌  ‌ 10. All‌  ‌ships‌  ‌and‌  ‌aircraft‌  ‌enjoy‌  ‌the‌‌   right‌‌  of‌‌
  archipelagic‌‌   sea‌‌  lanes‌‌ 
liable‌  ‌to‌  ‌seizure‌  ‌as‌  ‌prize‌  ‌of‌  ‌war‌  ‌except‌  ‌if‌  ‌they‌  ‌constitute‌‌  passage‌‌in‌‌such‌‌sea‌‌lanes‌‌and‌‌air‌‌routes.‌  ‌
4. An‌‌ ‌archipelagic‌‌ State‌‌ means‌‌ a ‌‌State‌‌ constituted‌‌ wholly‌‌ by‌‌ one‌‌ 
contraband‌‌of‌‌war.‌  ‌ Regime‌‌of‌‌islands‌  ‌
or‌‌more‌‌archipelagos‌‌and‌‌may‌‌include‌‌other‌‌islands.‌  ‌
Contraband‌  ‌of‌  ‌war‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌item‌  ‌or‌  ‌goods‌‌   that‌‌
  are‌‌
  ‌of‌‌
  a ‌‌
Straight‌‌archipelagic‌‌baselines‌  ‌ 11. An‌  ‌island‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌naturally‌  ‌formed‌  ‌area‌  ‌of‌  ‌land,‌‌   surrounded‌‌   by‌‌ 
military‌‌character‌. ‌ ‌
5. The‌  ‌Archipelagic‌‌   Theory‌‌   ‌considers‌‌   a ‌‌group‌‌  of‌‌
  islands‌‌  which‌‌  water,‌‌which‌‌is‌‌above‌‌water‌‌at‌‌high‌‌tide.‌  ‌
5. Doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌Continuous‌  ‌Voyage‌  ‌and‌‌   Ultimate‌‌   Destination.‌‌ 
are‌  ‌so‌  ‌closely‌  ‌interrelated‌‌   and‌‌   their‌‌  interconnecting‌‌   waters‌‌
  as‌‌  12. Rocks‌  ‌which‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌sustain‌  ‌human‌  ‌habitation‌  ‌or‌‌ 
—‌‌   ‌Absolute‌‌   contraband‌‌   is‌‌
  liable‌‌
  to‌‌
  capture‌‌   if‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌ shown‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ 
one‌‌geographical‌‌unit.‌  ‌ economic‌‌life‌‌of‌‌their‌‌own‌‌‌shall‌‌have‌N ‌ O‌  ‌
destined‌‌   to‌‌  territory‌‌   belonging‌‌   to‌‌
  or‌‌
  occupied‌‌   by‌‌ the‌‌ enemy‌‌ or‌‌ 
to‌‌the‌‌armed‌‌forces‌‌of‌‌the‌‌enemy.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌theory‌  ‌allows‌  ‌an‌  ‌archipelagic‌  ‌state‌  ‌to‌  ‌draw‌  ‌straight‌‌  a. exclusive‌‌economic‌‌zone‌‌or‌‌   ‌
archipelagic‌  ‌baselines‌  ‌joining‌  ‌the‌  ‌outermost‌  ‌points‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  b. continental‌‌shelf.‌  ‌
6. Right‌‌   of‌‌
  Angary.‌‌   — ‌‌‌Neutral‌‌ vessels‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ port‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌belligerent‌‌ 
outermost‌‌islands‌‌and‌‌drying‌‌reefs‌‌of‌‌the‌‌archipelago.‌  ‌
State‌‌   may‌‌   be‌‌   seized‌‌ and‌‌ made‌‌ to‌‌ transport‌‌ troops‌‌ and‌‌ supplies.‌‌  Internal‌‌waters‌  ‌
It‌  ‌extends‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌requisitioning‌  ‌of‌  ‌vessels,‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌property,‌‌  Archipelagic‌‌waters‌  ‌
13. Article‌  ‌I ‌‌of‌‌   the‌‌
  1987‌‌
  Constitution‌‌   defines‌‌   the‌‌
  ‌internal‌‌   waters‌‌ 
such‌‌as‌‌railroad‌‌material,‌‌‌upon‌‌payment‌‌of‌‌compensation‌. ‌ ‌ 6. The‌  ‌waters‌  ‌enclosed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌archipelagic‌  ‌baselines‌  ‌shall‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌  P ‌ hilippines‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌waters‌  ‌around,‌  ‌between,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
become‌  ‌archipelagic‌  ‌waters‌  ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  ‌depth‌  ‌or‌‌ 
N.‌‌Law‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Sea‌  ‌ connecting‌  ‌the‌  ‌islands‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌archipelago,‌  ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌‌ 
distance‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌coast,‌‌   and‌‌   within‌‌   these‌‌   archipelagic‌‌   waters,‌ 
Baselines‌  ‌ breadth‌‌and‌d ‌ imensions.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌archipelagic‌  ‌State‌  ‌may‌  ‌draw‌  ‌closing‌  ‌lines‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
delimitation‌‌of‌‌its‌‌internal‌‌waters.‌  ‌ 14. Article‌‌   8 ‌‌of‌‌
  UNCLOS‌‌   provides‌‌   that‌‌   waters‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ landward‌‌ side‌‌ 
1. The‌  ‌baseline‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌low-water‌  ‌mark‌  ‌along‌  ‌the‌  ‌coast‌  ‌from‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌baseline‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌territorial‌  ‌sea‌  ‌form‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌internal‌‌ 
which‌  ‌the‌  ‌belt‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌territorial‌  ‌sea‌  ‌is‌  ‌measured.‌  ‌(‌Fisheries‌‌  7. Ships‌‌ of‌‌ all‌‌ States‌‌ enjoy‌‌ the‌‌ ‌right‌‌ of‌‌ innocent‌‌ passage‌‌ through‌‌ 
waters‌‌of‌‌the‌‌State.‌  ‌
Case‌) ‌ ‌ archipelagic‌  ‌waters.‌  ‌This‌  ‌right‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌available‌  ‌inside‌  ‌the‌‌ 
closing‌‌lines‌‌for‌‌the‌‌delimitation‌‌of‌‌internal‌‌waters.‌  ‌ Territorial‌‌sea‌  ‌
2. The‌  ‌normal‌  ‌baseline‌  ‌for‌  ‌measuring‌  ‌the‌  ‌breadth‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
territorial‌  ‌sea‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌low-water‌‌   line‌‌
  along‌‌
  the‌‌
  coast‌‌
  as‌‌
  marked‌‌  8. Innocent‌‌   ‌Passage‌‌ ‌means‌‌ navigation‌‌ through‌‌ the‌‌ territorial‌‌ sea‌‌  15. The‌‌   ‌territorial‌‌   sea‌‌   ‌is‌‌ an‌‌ adjacent‌‌ belt‌‌ of‌‌ sea‌‌ which‌‌ may‌‌ extend‌‌ 
on‌  ‌large-scale‌‌  charts‌‌   officially‌‌
  recognized‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  coastal‌‌  State.‌‌  for‌‌the‌‌purpose‌‌of:‌  ‌ up‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌breadth‌  ‌of‌  ‌12‌  ‌nautical‌  ‌miles‌  ‌from‌‌   the‌‌
  baseline‌‌
  over‌‌ 
(‌Art‌‌5‌U
‌ NCLOS‌) ‌ ‌ which‌‌the‌‌sovereignty‌‌of‌‌a‌‌coastal‌‌State‌‌extends.‌  ‌
a. traversing‌‌   that‌‌   sea‌‌
  without‌‌  entering‌‌  internal‌‌
  waters‌‌ or‌‌ 
3. The‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌straight‌  ‌baseline‌  ‌method‌  ‌has‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌‌  calling‌  ‌at‌  ‌a ‌ ‌roadstead‌  ‌or‌‌
  port‌‌
  facility‌‌
  outside‌‌
  internal‌  16. In‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌Fisheries‌‌   Jurisdiction‌‌   Case‌, ‌‌the‌‌  ‌preferential‌‌   rights‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌
limitations‌: ‌ ‌ waters;‌‌or‌  ‌ coastal‌  ‌State‌  ‌had‌  ‌crystallized‌  ‌as‌  ‌customary‌  ‌law.‌  ‌Such‌‌ 
a. The‌  ‌drawing‌  ‌of‌  ‌straight‌  ‌baselines‌  ‌must‌  ‌not‌‌
  depart‌‌
  to‌‌  preferential‌  ‌rights‌  ‌refer‌  ‌to‌‌   that‌‌   of‌‌
  fishing‌‌   in‌‌  adjacent‌‌  waters‌‌
  in‌‌ 
b. proceeding‌‌  to‌‌
  or‌‌
  from‌‌
  internal‌‌  waters‌‌
  or‌‌ a ‌‌call‌‌ at‌‌ such‌‌ 
favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌coastal‌  ‌State‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌‌situation‌‌   of‌‌  special‌‌  dependence‌‌ 
any‌  ‌appreciable‌  ‌extent‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌direction‌  ‌of‌‌  roadstead‌‌or‌‌port‌‌facility,‌‌and‌  ‌
on‌‌its‌‌coastal‌‌fisheries.‌  ‌
the‌‌coast;‌  ‌ so‌  ‌long‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌prejudicial‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌peace,‌  ‌good‌  ‌order‌  ‌or‌‌ 
b. The‌  ‌areas‌  ‌lying‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌lines‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌‌
  sufficiently‌‌  Contiguous‌‌zone‌  ‌
security‌‌of‌‌the‌‌coastal‌‌State.‌  ‌
closely‌  ‌linked‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  land‌‌
  domain‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌
  subject‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌  Archipelagic‌‌sea‌‌lanes‌‌passage‌  ‌ 17. In‌  ‌a ‌ ‌zone‌  ‌contiguous‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌  ‌territorial‌  ‌sea,‌  ‌described‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌‌ 
regime‌‌of‌‌internal‌‌waters;‌‌and‌  ‌ contiguous‌  ‌zone,‌  ‌the‌  ‌coastal‌  ‌State‌  ‌may‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌the‌  ‌control‌‌ 
9. Archipelagic‌  ‌sea‌  ‌lanes‌  ‌passage‌  ‌means‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
c. Account‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌taken‌‌
  of‌‌
  economic‌‌   interests‌‌  peculiar‌‌  necessary‌‌to:‌  ‌
rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌navigation‌  ‌and‌  ‌overflight‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌
  normal‌‌   mode‌‌   solely‌‌ 
to‌‌
  the‌‌ region‌‌ concerned,‌‌ the‌‌ reality‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ importance‌‌  a. prevent‌  ‌infringement‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌Customs,‌  ‌Fiscal,‌‌ 
for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌continuous,‌  ‌expeditious‌  ‌and‌  ‌unobstructed‌‌ 
of‌‌which‌‌are‌‌clearly‌‌evidenced‌‌by‌‌long‌‌usage.‌  ‌ Immigration‌  ‌or‌  ‌Sanitary‌  ‌laws‌  ‌and‌  ‌regulations‌‌ 
transit‌‌  between‌‌   one‌‌  part‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ high‌‌ seas‌‌ or‌‌ an‌‌ EEZ‌‌ and‌‌ another‌‌ 
part‌‌of‌‌the‌‌high‌‌seas‌‌or‌‌an‌‌EEZ.‌  ‌ within‌‌its‌‌territory‌‌or‌‌territorial‌‌sea;‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 139‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

b. punish‌‌ ‌infringement‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ above‌‌ laws‌‌ and‌‌ regulations‌‌  a. throughout‌  ‌the‌  ‌natural‌  ‌prolongation‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌land‌‌  a. A‌  ‌State‌  ‌must‌  ‌show‌  ‌material‌  ‌damage‌‌
  and‌‌
  causation‌‌
  to‌‌ 
committed‌‌within‌‌its‌‌territory‌‌or‌‌territorial‌‌sea.‌  territory‌‌to‌‌the‌‌outer‌‌edge‌‌of‌‌the‌‌continental‌‌margin,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ be‌‌entitled‌‌to‌‌legal‌‌relief;‌‌and‌  ‌
18. The‌  ‌contiguous‌  ‌zone‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌extend‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌24‌  ‌nautical‌‌  b. to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌distance‌  ‌of‌  ‌200‌  ‌nautical‌  ‌miles‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌  b. A‌  ‌State‌  ‌has‌  ‌a ‌ ‌duty‌  ‌to‌  ‌prevent,‌  ‌and‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌held‌‌ 
miles‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌baselines‌  ‌from‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌breadth‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  baselines‌‌   from‌‌
  which‌‌   the‌‌
  breadth‌‌  of‌‌ the‌‌ territorial‌‌ sea‌‌  responsible‌  ‌for‌‌   pollution‌‌   by‌‌
  private‌‌
  parties‌‌
  within‌‌  its‌‌ 
territorial‌‌sea‌‌is‌‌measured.‌  ‌ is‌  ‌measured‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌outer‌  ‌edge‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌continental‌‌  jurisdiction‌  ‌if‌  ‌such‌  ‌pollution‌‌   results‌‌
  in‌‌
  demonstrable‌‌ 
Exclusive‌‌economic‌‌zone‌  ‌ margin‌‌does‌‌not‌‌extend‌‌up‌‌to‌‌that‌‌distance.‌  ‌ injury‌‌to‌‌another‌‌State.‌  ‌
23. The‌‌   coastal‌‌
  State‌‌
  exercises‌‌ over‌‌ the‌‌ continental‌‌ shelf‌‌ ‌exclusive‌  Precautionary‌‌principle‌  ‌
19. The‌  ‌exclusive‌  ‌economic‌  ‌zone‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌area‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌and‌‌ 
sovereign‌‌   rights‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌
  purpose‌‌ of‌‌ exploring‌‌ it‌‌ and‌‌ exploiting‌‌ 
adjacent‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌territorial‌  ‌sea,‌  ‌over‌  ‌which‌  ‌a ‌ ‌State‌  ‌has‌  ‌special‌‌  3. The‌‌
  ‌precautionary‌‌   principle‌‌   requires‌‌ that,‌‌ if‌‌ there‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌strong‌‌ 
its‌‌natural‌‌resources.‌  ‌
rights‌‌over‌‌the‌‌exploration‌‌and‌‌utilization‌‌of‌‌marine‌‌resources.‌  ‌ suspicion‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌certain‌  ‌activity‌  ‌may‌  ‌have‌  ‌environmentally‌‌ 
International‌‌Tribunal‌‌for‌‌the‌‌Law‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Sea‌  ‌ harmful‌  ‌consequences,‌‌   it‌‌
  is‌‌
  better‌‌
  to‌‌
  control‌‌   that‌‌
  activity‌‌   now‌‌ 
20. It‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌extend‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌200‌  ‌nautical‌  ‌miles‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
24. Contentious‌  ‌Jurisdiction.‌  ‌— ‌   ‌The‌  ‌Tribunal‌  ‌has‌  ‌jurisdiction‌‌  rather‌‌than‌‌to‌‌wait‌‌for‌‌incontrovertible‌‌scientific‌‌evidence.‌‌   ‌
baselines‌  ‌from‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌breadth‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌territorial‌  ‌sea‌  ‌is‌‌ 
measured.‌  ‌ over‌‌ all‌‌ disputes‌‌ concerning‌‌ the‌‌ interpretation‌‌ or‌‌ application‌‌ of‌‌  4. This‌  ‌principle‌  ‌is‌  ‌expressed‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Rio‌  ‌Declaration,‌  ‌which‌‌ 
the‌‌UNCLOS.‌  ‌ stipulates‌  ‌that,‌  ‌where‌  ‌there‌  ‌are‌  ‌“threats‌  ‌of‌  ‌serious‌  ‌or‌‌ 
21. The‌‌coastal‌‌State‌‌has:‌  ‌
25. Advisory‌‌  Jurisdiction.‌‌ — ‌‌The‌‌ Seabed‌‌ Disputes‌‌ Chamber‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  irreversible‌‌   damage,‌‌ lack‌‌ of‌‌ full‌‌ scientific‌‌ certainty‌‌ shall‌‌ not‌‌ be‌ 
a. sovereign‌‌rights‌‌   ‌ used‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reason‌  ‌for‌  ‌postponing‌  ‌cost-effective‌  ‌measures‌  ‌to‌‌ 
Tribunal‌  ‌is‌  ‌competent‌  ‌to‌  ‌give‌  ‌an‌  ‌advisory‌  ‌opinion‌  ‌on‌  ‌legal‌‌ 
i. for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌exploring‌  ‌and‌  ‌exploiting,‌‌  questions‌  ‌arising‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌scope‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌activities‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  prevent‌‌environmental‌‌degradation.”‌  ‌
conserving‌  ‌and‌  ‌managing‌  ‌the‌  ‌natural‌  ‌resources,‌‌  Assembly‌‌or‌‌Council‌‌of‌‌the‌‌International‌‌Seabed‌‌Authority.‌  ‌ International‌‌Service‌‌for‌‌the‌‌Acquisition‌‌of‌‌Agri-Biotech‌‌ 
whether‌  ‌living‌  ‌or‌  ‌nonliving,‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌waters‌‌  Applications‌‌v.‌‌Greenpeace‌‌Southeast‌‌Asia‌‌‌2015‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
superjacent‌‌   to‌‌ the‌‌ seabed‌‌ and‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ seabed‌‌ and‌‌ its‌‌  O.‌‌International‌‌Environmental‌‌Law‌  ‌
subsoil,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ Principle‌‌21‌‌of‌‌Stockholm‌‌Declaration‌  The‌  ‌precautionary‌  ‌principle‌  ‌finds‌  ‌direct‌  ‌application‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
evaluation‌  ‌of‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌in‌  ‌cases‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌courts.‌  ‌For‌  ‌purposes‌  ‌of‌‌ 
ii. with‌  ‌regard‌  ‌to‌  ‌other‌  ‌activities‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌economic‌‌  Principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌Good‌  ‌Neighborliness.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌States‌  ‌have,‌‌   in‌‌
  accordance‌‌  evidence,‌  ‌the‌  ‌precautionary‌  ‌principle‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌treated‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌‌
exploitation‌  ‌and‌  ‌exploration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌zone,‌‌   such‌‌
  as‌‌  with‌  ‌the‌  ‌Charter‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌United‌  ‌Nations‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌principles‌  ‌of‌‌  principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌last‌  ‌resort,‌  ‌where‌  ‌application‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌regular‌  ‌Rules‌  ‌of‌‌ 
the‌  ‌production‌‌   of‌‌
  energy‌‌  from‌‌
  the‌‌  water,‌‌   currents‌‌  international‌‌law,‌‌   ‌ Evidence‌‌   would‌‌   cause‌‌  in‌‌
  an‌‌
  inequitable‌‌  result‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌ environmental‌‌ 
and‌‌winds;‌  ‌ plaintiff‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌
1) the‌‌sovereign‌‌right‌‌to‌‌exploit‌‌their‌‌own‌‌resources‌‌   ‌
b. jurisdiction‌‌with‌‌regard‌‌to:‌  ‌ a) settings‌‌in‌‌which‌‌the‌‌risks‌‌of‌‌harm‌‌are‌‌uncertain;‌  ‌
2) pursuant‌‌to‌‌their‌o
‌ wn‌‌environmental‌‌policies‌,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
i. the‌  ‌establishment‌  ‌and‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌artificial‌  ‌islands,‌‌  b) settings‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌harm‌  ‌might‌  ‌be‌  ‌irreversible‌  ‌and‌  ‌what‌  ‌is‌‌ 
3) the‌  ‌responsibility‌  ‌to‌  ‌ensure‌  ‌that‌  ‌activities‌  ‌within‌  ‌their‌‌  lost‌‌is‌‌irreplaceable;‌‌and‌  ‌
installations‌‌and‌‌structures;‌  ‌
jurisdiction‌  ‌or‌  ‌control‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌cause‌  ‌damage‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  c) settings‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌harm‌  ‌that‌  ‌might‌  ‌result‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌‌ 
ii. marine‌‌scientific‌‌research;‌  ‌ environment‌  ‌of‌  ‌other‌  ‌States‌  ‌or‌‌
  of‌‌
  areas‌‌
  beyond‌‌   the‌‌
  limits‌‌  serious.‌‌   ‌
iii. the‌  ‌protection‌  ‌and‌  ‌preservation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌marine‌‌  of‌‌national‌‌jurisdiction.‌  ‌ When‌‌   these‌‌
  features‌‌   — ‌‌‌uncertainty‌, ‌‌the‌‌ ‌possibility‌‌ of‌‌ irreversible‌‌ 
environment.‌  ‌ Notes‌  ‌ harm‌, ‌‌and‌‌   the‌‌
  ‌possibility‌‌   of‌‌
  serious‌‌ harm‌‌ — ‌‌coincide,‌‌ the‌‌ case‌‌ for‌‌ 
the‌  ‌precautionary‌‌   principle‌‌   is‌‌
  strongest.‌‌
  When‌‌  in‌‌
  doubt,‌‌   cases‌‌
  must‌‌ 
Continental‌‌shelf‌  ‌ 1. The‌  ‌no-harm‌  ‌rule‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌widely‌  ‌recognised‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌CIL‌‌  be‌  ‌resolved‌  ‌in‌  ‌favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌balanced‌  ‌and‌‌ 
22. The‌‌
  ‌continental‌‌   shelf‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌coastal‌‌
  State‌‌
  comprises‌‌  the‌‌ seabed‌‌  whereby‌  ‌a ‌ ‌State‌  ‌is‌  ‌duty-bound‌  ‌to‌  ‌prevent,‌  ‌reduce‌‌
  and‌‌
  control‌‌  healthful‌‌ecology.‌  ‌
and‌  ‌subsoil‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌submarine‌  ‌areas‌  ‌that‌  ‌extend‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌its‌‌  the‌‌risk‌‌of‌‌environmental‌‌harm‌‌to‌‌other‌‌states.‌  ‌
territorial‌‌sea‌‌   ‌ 2. The‌‌   ‌Trail‌‌
  Smelter‌‌
  Case‌‌ established‌‌ two‌‌ fundamental‌‌ principles‌‌  END‌‌OF‌‌POLITICAL‌‌AND‌‌PUBLIC‌‌INTERNATIONAL‌‌LAW‌  ‌
of‌‌liability‌‌for‌‌transboundary‌‌pollution‌‌under‌‌IL:‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 140‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

START‌‌OF‌‌LABOR‌‌LAW‌‌AND‌‌SOCIAL‌‌LEGISLATION‌  ‌ A‌‌
  statute‌‌
  passed‌‌
  to‌‌
  protect‌‌
  labor‌‌  is‌‌
  a ‌‌"‌legitimate‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  of‌‌ police‌‌  Right‌‌
  to‌‌
  Participate.‌‌
  — ‌‌‌They‌‌
  shall‌‌
  also‌‌
  participate‌‌   in‌‌ policy‌‌ and‌‌ 
power‌, ‌ ‌although‌  ‌it‌  ‌incidentally‌  ‌destroys‌  ‌existing‌  ‌contract‌  ‌rights."‌‌ 
decision-making‌  ‌processes‌  ‌affecting‌  ‌their‌  ‌rights‌  ‌and‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌as‌‌ 
I.‌‌FUNDAMENTAL‌‌PRINCIPLES‌  ‌ Contracts‌  ‌regulating‌  ‌relations‌  ‌between‌  ‌capital‌  ‌and‌  ‌labor‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌‌ 
merely‌  ‌contractual,‌  ‌and‌  ‌said‌  ‌labor‌  ‌contracts‌  ‌are‌  ‌impressed‌  ‌with‌‌  may‌‌be‌‌provided‌‌by‌‌law.‌  ‌
public‌‌interest,‌‌and‌‌must‌‌yield‌‌to‌‌the‌‌common‌‌good.‌  ‌ The‌‌State‌‌shall‌‌promote‌‌   ‌
A. Legal‌‌basis‌  ‌
The‌‌
  relations‌‌   between‌‌   capital‌‌ and‌‌ labor‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌ merely‌‌ contractual‌‌ as‌‌  1. the‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌shared‌  ‌responsibility‌  ‌between‌  ‌workers‌‌ 
1. 1987‌‌Constitution‌  ‌
provided‌  ‌in‌  ‌Article‌  ‌1700‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Civil‌‌
  Code.‌‌
  By‌‌   statutory‌‌  declaration,‌‌ 
and‌‌employers‌‌and‌‌   ‌
Constitutional‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌protection‌  ‌of‌  ‌labor‌  ‌are‌  ‌NOT‌‌  labor‌  ‌contracts‌‌   are‌‌  ‌impressed‌‌   with‌‌  public‌‌   interest‌‌   and,‌‌
  therefore,‌ 
SELF-EXECUTING,‌  ‌and‌  ‌are‌  ‌mere‌  ‌guidelines‌  ‌that‌  ‌need‌‌   enabling‌‌  must‌  ‌yield‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌common‌  ‌good.‌  ‌Labor‌  ‌contracts‌  ‌are‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌‌  2. the‌  ‌preferential‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌voluntary‌  ‌modes‌  ‌in‌  ‌settling‌‌ 
laws.‌  ‌They‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌judicially‌  ‌enforceable.‌  ‌(‌see‌  ‌2009‌  ‌Serrano‌‌  special‌  ‌laws‌  ‌on‌  ‌wages,‌  ‌working‌  ‌conditions,‌  ‌hours‌  ‌of‌  ‌labor,‌  ‌and‌‌  disputes‌, ‌ ‌including‌  ‌conciliation,‌  ‌and‌  ‌shall‌  ‌enforce‌  ‌their‌‌ 
similar‌  ‌subjects.‌  ‌In‌  ‌other‌  ‌words,‌  ‌labor‌  ‌contracts‌  ‌are‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  mutual‌‌compliance‌‌therewith‌‌to‌‌foster‌‌industrial‌‌peace.‌ 
Case‌) ‌ ‌
police‌‌   power‌‌  of‌‌ the‌‌ State.‌‌ The‌‌ DO‌‌ was‌‌ issued‌‌ to‌‌ grant‌‌ bus‌‌ drivers‌‌ and‌‌ 
Council‌‌   of‌‌
  Teachers‌‌ & ‌‌Staff‌‌ of‌‌ Colleges‌‌ & ‌‌Universities‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Phils.‌‌ v.‌‌  conductors‌‌minimum‌‌wages‌‌and‌‌social‌‌welfare‌‌benefits.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌State‌  ‌shall‌  ‌regulate‌  ‌the‌  ‌relations‌  ‌between‌  ‌workers‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Sec.‌‌of‌‌Education,‌‌et‌‌al‌‌2 ‌ 018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ employers,‌‌recognizing‌‌   ‌
3. Labor‌‌Code‌  ‌
The‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌mandates‌  ‌of‌  ‌protection‌  ‌to‌  ‌labor‌  ‌and‌  ‌security‌  ‌of‌‌  1. the‌‌
  ‌right‌‌
  of‌‌
  labor‌‌ to‌‌ its‌‌ just‌‌ share‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ fruits‌‌ of‌‌ production‌‌ 
a) PD‌‌442,‌‌as‌‌amended‌; ‌ ‌
tenure‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌as‌  ‌self-executing‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌sense‌  ‌that‌  ‌these‌‌  are‌‌  and‌‌   ‌
automatically‌  ‌acknowledged‌  ‌and‌  ‌observed‌  ‌without‌  ‌need‌  ‌for‌  ‌any‌‌  b) Omnibus‌‌Rules‌‌implementing‌‌the‌‌Labor‌‌Code‌. ‌ ‌
enabling‌  ‌legislation.‌  ‌However,‌‌   subsequent‌‌   legislation‌‌   is‌‌
  still‌‌
  needed‌‌  2. the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌enterprises‌  ‌to‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌returns‌  ‌to‌‌ 
to‌  ‌define‌  ‌the‌  ‌parameters‌  ‌of‌  ‌these‌  ‌guaranteed‌  ‌rights‌  ‌to‌  ‌ensure‌  ‌the‌‌  B. State‌‌policy‌‌towards‌‌labor‌  ‌ investments,‌‌and‌‌to‌‌expansion‌‌and‌‌growth.‌  ‌
protection‌‌   and‌‌   promotion,‌‌  not‌‌  only‌‌
  the‌‌
  rights‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌ labor‌‌ sector,‌‌ but‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌employers'‌‌as‌‌well.‌  ‌ SEC‌‌3‌‌ART‌‌XIII.‌T
‌ he‌‌State‌‌shall‌‌   ‌
1. Security‌‌of‌‌tenure‌  ‌
2. Civil‌‌Code‌  ‌ 1. afford‌  ‌full‌  ‌protection‌  ‌to‌  ‌labor‌, ‌ ‌local‌  ‌and‌  ‌overseas,‌‌  a) Workers‌  ‌can‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌dismissed‌  ‌without‌‌
  just‌‌
  or‌‌
  authorized‌‌ 
organized‌‌and‌‌unorganized,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ causes.‌  ‌
a) Article‌‌   1700‌. ‌‌The‌‌  relations‌‌
  between‌‌   capital‌‌
  and‌‌  labor‌‌ are‌‌ 
not‌‌  merely‌‌   contractual.‌‌  They‌‌  are‌‌ so‌‌ impressed‌‌ with‌‌ public‌‌  2. promote‌‌
  full‌‌
  employment‌‌   and‌‌
  equality‌‌
  of‌‌
  employment‌‌  b) Probationary‌  ‌employees‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌made‌  ‌regular‌  ‌after‌  ‌6 ‌‌
interest‌  ‌that‌  ‌labor‌  ‌contracts‌  ‌must‌  ‌yield‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌common‌‌  opportunities‌‌‌for‌‌all.‌  ‌ months‌‌‌unless‌‌a‌‌different‌‌period‌‌is‌‌agreed.‌  ‌
good.‌  ‌Therefore,‌  ‌such‌  ‌contracts‌  ‌are‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  special‌‌  Collective‌  ‌Rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌Workers.‌‌
  — ‌‌‌It‌‌
  shall‌‌
  guarantee‌‌
  the‌‌
  rights‌‌
  of‌‌
  all‌‌  c) It‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌to‌  ‌continue‌  ‌to‌  ‌work‌  ‌until‌‌ 
laws‌  ‌on‌  ‌labor‌  ‌unions,‌  ‌collective‌  ‌bargaining,‌  ‌strikes‌  ‌and‌‌  workers‌‌to‌   terminated‌‌for‌‌just‌‌or‌‌authorized‌‌cause‌‌as‌‌provided‌‌by‌‌law.‌  ‌
lockouts,‌  ‌closed‌  ‌shop,‌  ‌wages,‌  ‌working‌  ‌conditions,‌  ‌hours‌‌ 
of‌‌labor‌‌and‌‌similar‌‌subjects.‌  ‌ 1. self-organization,‌‌   ‌
ARTICLE‌  ‌294.‌  ‌Security‌  ‌of‌  ‌Tenure.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌In‌  ‌cases‌  ‌of‌  ‌regular‌‌ 
b) Article‌  ‌1701‌. ‌ ‌Neither‌  ‌capital‌  ‌nor‌  ‌labor‌  ‌shall‌  ‌act‌‌  2. collective‌‌bargaining‌‌and‌‌negotiations,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ employment,‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌terminate‌  ‌the‌  ‌services‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌ 
oppressively‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌other,‌  ‌or‌  ‌impair‌  ‌the‌  ‌interest‌  ‌or‌‌  3. peaceful‌‌
  concerted‌‌
  activities,‌‌
  including‌‌
  the‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  strike‌‌ in‌‌  employee‌  ‌except‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ j‌ ust‌  ‌cause‌  ‌or‌  ‌when‌  a
‌ uthorized‌  ‌by‌  ‌this‌‌ 
convenience‌‌of‌‌the‌‌public.‌‌(P ‌ rinciple‌‌of‌‌Non-oppression‌) ‌ ‌ accordance‌‌with‌‌law.‌‌   ‌ Title.‌  ‌An‌  ‌employee‌  ‌who‌  ‌is‌‌
  ‌unjustly‌‌
  dismissed‌‌   from‌‌
  work‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌ 
c) Article‌‌  1702‌. ‌‌In‌‌
  case‌‌ of‌‌ doubt,‌‌ all‌‌ labor‌‌ legislation‌‌ and‌‌ all‌‌  entitled‌‌to‌  ‌
Individual‌‌Rights‌‌of‌‌Workers.‌‌—‌T
‌ hey‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌entitled‌‌to‌‌   ‌
labor‌‌ contracts‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ construed‌‌ in‌‌ favor‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ safety‌‌ and‌‌ 
a) reinstatement‌  ‌without‌  ‌loss‌  ‌of‌  ‌seniority‌  ‌rights‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌‌ 
decent‌‌living‌‌for‌‌the‌‌laborer.‌  ‌ 1. security‌‌of‌‌tenure,‌‌   ‌
privileges‌‌and‌  ‌
The‌‌Provincial‌‌Bus‌‌Operators‌‌Association‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌et‌‌al‌‌v.‌‌  2. humane‌‌conditions‌‌of‌‌work,‌‌and‌‌a  ‌‌ ‌ b) his‌‌full‌‌backwages‌,‌‌inclusive‌‌of‌‌allowances,‌‌and‌  ‌
DOLE,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌2
‌ 018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J‌‌   ‌ 3. living‌‌wage.‌‌   ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 141‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

a) An‌  ‌employee‌  ‌can‌  ‌join‌  ‌a ‌ ‌union‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌day‌  ‌of‌‌  leave,‌  ‌holiday‌  ‌pay‌  ‌and‌‌
  13th‌‌  month‌‌   pay‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  ‌burden‌‌   ‌rests‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌ 
c) his‌  ‌other‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌or‌‌
  their‌‌
  monetary‌‌  equivalent‌‌
  computed‌‌ 
from‌‌   the‌‌
  time‌‌
  his‌‌
  compensation‌‌   was‌‌
  withheld‌‌  from‌‌  him‌‌
  up‌‌ 
employment.‌  ‌ employer‌  ‌to‌  ‌prove‌  ‌payment.‌  ‌This‌  ‌standard‌  ‌follows‌‌  the‌‌  basic‌‌  rule‌‌ 
b) Collective‌‌
  bargaining‌‌   is‌‌
  a ‌‌contract‌‌
  between‌‌  workers‌‌  and‌‌  that‌‌
  in‌‌
  all‌‌
  illegal‌‌ dismissal‌‌ cases‌‌ the‌‌ burden‌‌ rests‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ defendant‌‌ to‌‌ 
to‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌his‌‌actual‌‌reinstatement.‌  ‌
prove‌‌payment‌‌rather‌‌than‌‌on‌‌the‌‌plaintiff‌‌to‌‌prove‌‌non-payment.‌‌   ‌
employers‌  ‌on‌  ‌terms‌  ‌and‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌of‌  ‌employment‌  ‌over‌‌ 
and‌‌above‌‌those‌‌mandated‌‌by‌‌law.‌  ‌ On‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand,‌  ‌for‌‌
  ‌overtime‌‌   pay,‌‌
  premium‌‌   pays‌‌  for‌‌  holidays‌‌ 
2. Social‌‌justice‌  ‌
and‌  ‌rest‌  ‌days‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌burden‌  ‌is‌  ‌shifted‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌, ‌ ‌as‌  ‌these‌‌ 
The‌‌  promotion‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  welfare‌‌
  of‌‌ all‌‌ the‌‌ people,‌‌ the‌‌ adoption‌‌ by‌‌  5. Construction‌‌in‌‌favor‌‌of‌‌labor‌  ‌ monetary‌‌   claims‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌ incurred‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ normal‌‌ course‌‌ of‌‌ business.‌‌ It‌‌ 
the‌  ‌Government‌  ‌of‌  ‌measures‌  ‌calculated‌  ‌to‌  ‌insure‌  ‌economic‌‌  is‌  ‌thus‌  ‌incumbent‌  ‌upon‌‌   the‌‌
  employee‌‌   to‌‌
  first‌‌
  prove‌‌
  that‌‌  he‌‌
  actually‌‌ 
stability‌‌
  of‌‌
  all‌‌
  the‌‌
  component‌‌   elements‌‌   of‌‌
  society,‌‌  through‌‌
  the‌‌  ARTICLE‌  ‌4.‌  ‌Construction‌  ‌in‌  ‌Favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌Labor‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌All‌  ‌doubts‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  rendered‌  ‌service‌  ‌in‌  ‌excess‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  regular‌‌
  eight‌‌
  working‌‌   hours‌‌   a ‌‌day,‌‌ 
maintenance‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌proper‌  ‌economic‌  ‌and‌  ‌social‌  ‌equilibrium‌  ‌in‌‌  implementation‌  ‌and‌  ‌interpretation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌Code,‌‌  and‌‌that‌‌he‌‌in‌‌fact‌‌worked‌‌on‌‌holidays‌‌and‌‌rest‌‌days.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌interrelation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌community,‌‌  including‌  ‌its‌  ‌implementing‌  ‌rules‌  ‌and‌  ‌regulations,‌  ‌shall‌‌   be‌‌
  resolved‌‌ 
Remoticado‌‌v.‌‌Typical‌‌Construction‌‌Trading‌‌‌2018‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌
constitutionally,‌  ‌through‌  ‌the‌  ‌adoption‌  ‌of‌  ‌measures‌  ‌legally‌‌  in‌‌favor‌‌of‌‌labor‌. ‌ ‌ re‌‌Illegal‌‌Dismissal‌  ‌
justifiable,‌  ‌or‌  ‌extra-constitutionally‌  ‌through‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌‌ 
powers‌  ‌underlying‌  ‌the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌Governments‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌  There‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌no‌  ‌case‌  ‌for‌  ‌illegal‌  ‌termination‌  ‌of‌  ‌employment‌  ‌when‌‌ 
a) In‌  ‌Peñaflor‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Outdoor‌  ‌Clothing‌  ‌2010‌, ‌ ‌this‌  ‌principle‌  ‌has‌‌ 
time-honored‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌Salus‌  ‌Populi‌  ‌est‌  ‌suprema‌  ‌lex‌. ‌‌ there‌  ‌was‌  ‌no‌  ‌termination‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer.‌  ‌While,‌  ‌in‌  ‌illegal‌‌ 
been‌‌   extended‌‌   to‌‌
  cover‌‌ ‌doubts‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ evidence‌‌ presented‌‌  termination‌  ‌cases,‌  ‌the‌  ‌burden‌  ‌is‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌to‌  ‌show‌  ‌just‌‌ 
(‌Calalang‌‌v.‌‌Williams‌) ‌ ‌
by‌‌the‌‌employer‌‌and‌‌the‌‌employee.‌  ‌ cause‌  ‌for‌  ‌termination‌  ‌of‌  ‌employment,‌  ‌such‌  ‌a ‌ ‌burden‌  ‌arises‌  ‌only‌‌  if‌‌ 
3. Equal‌‌work‌‌opportunities‌  ‌ the‌‌
  complaining‌‌   ‌employee‌‌   ‌has‌‌
  shown,‌‌  by‌‌ s
‌ ubstantial‌‌ evidence‌, ‌‌
b) If‌  ‌doubt‌  ‌exists‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌presented‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
a) The‌  ‌State‌  ‌shall‌  ‌promote‌  ‌full‌  ‌employment‌  ‌and‌  ‌equality‌‌
  of‌‌  employer‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee,‌‌   the‌‌  scales‌‌
  of‌‌
  justice‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌  the‌‌fact‌‌of‌‌termination‌b ‌ y‌‌the‌‌employer.‌  ‌
employment‌‌opportunities‌‌for‌‌all.‌  ‌ tilted‌  ‌in‌  ‌favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter.‌  ‌(‌Dreamland‌  ‌Hotel‌  ‌Resort‌  ‌v.‌‌  Duty‌‌Free‌‌Philippines‌‌v.‌‌Tria‌‌‌2012‌‌ 
b) A‌  ‌manifestation‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌is‌‌
  the‌‌
  enactment‌‌
  of‌‌
  ‌RA‌‌
  10911‌‌
  or‌‌  Johnson‌‌2 ‌ 014‌) ‌ ‌ re‌‌Clear‌‌and‌‌Convincing‌‌Evidence‌  ‌
the‌  ‌Anti-Age‌  ‌Discrimination‌  ‌in‌  ‌Employment‌  ‌Act‌. ‌ ‌The‌‌  c) The‌  ‌rule‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌speaks‌  ‌in‌  ‌clear‌  ‌and‌‌ 
In‌  ‌illegal‌  ‌dismissal‌  ‌cases,‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌is‌  ‌burdened‌  ‌to‌  ‌prove‌  ‌just‌‌ 
law‌‌however‌‌accepts‌‌of‌e‌ xceptions‌  ‌ categorical‌  ‌language,‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌room‌  ‌for‌  ‌interpretation;‌‌ 
cause‌‌   ‌for‌‌  terminating‌‌  the‌‌  employment‌‌  of‌‌  its‌‌  employee‌‌ w‌ ith‌‌ clear‌‌ 
i) Age‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌bona‌  ‌fide‌  ‌occupational‌  ‌qualification‌‌  there‌  ‌is‌  ‌only‌  ‌room‌  ‌for‌  ‌application.‌  ‌Only‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌‌
  law‌‌
  is‌‌ 
and‌  ‌convincing‌  ‌evidence‌.‌  ‌This‌  ‌principle‌  ‌is‌  ‌designed‌  ‌to‌  ‌give‌‌ 
reasonably‌‌   necessary‌‌   in‌‌ the‌‌ normal‌‌ operation‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌ ambiguous‌‌   or‌‌
  of‌‌
  doubtful‌‌   meaning‌‌
  may‌‌ the‌‌ court‌‌ interpret‌‌ 
flesh‌  ‌and‌  ‌blood‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌guaranty‌  ‌of‌‌
  security‌‌  of‌‌  tenure‌‌
  granted‌‌
  by‌‌  the‌‌ 
particular‌‌   business‌‌  or‌‌   where‌‌   the‌‌ differentiation‌‌ is‌‌  or‌‌
  construe‌‌ its‌‌ true‌‌ intent.‌‌ (‌Leoncio‌‌ v.‌‌ MST‌‌ Marine‌‌ Services‌‌  Constitution‌‌to‌‌employees‌‌under‌‌the‌‌Labor‌‌Code.‌  ‌
based‌‌on‌‌reasonable‌‌factors‌‌other‌‌than‌‌age;‌  ‌ 2017‌) ‌ ‌
 ‌

ii) The‌  ‌intent‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌observe‌  ‌the‌‌  terms‌‌


  of‌‌
  a ‌‌‌bona‌‌
  fide‌‌  6. Burden‌‌of‌‌proof‌‌and‌‌quantum‌‌of‌‌evidence‌  ‌
II.‌‌RECRUITMENT‌‌AND‌‌PLACEMENT‌  ‌
seniority‌‌  system‌‌   that‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  intended‌‌  to‌‌ evade‌‌ the‌‌  Maula‌‌v.‌‌Ximex‌‌Delivery‌‌Express‌‌‌2017‌  ‌
purpose‌‌of‌‌this‌‌Act;‌  ‌ Definition‌‌of‌‌recruitment‌‌and‌‌placement‌  ‌
In‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌and‌  ‌quasi-judicial‌  ‌proceedings,‌  ‌the‌  ‌quantum‌  ‌of‌‌ 
iii) The‌  ‌intent‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌observe‌  ‌the‌‌
  terms‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌bona‌‌
  fide‌‌  evidence‌  ‌required‌  ‌is‌  ‌substantial‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌or‌  ‌"such‌  ‌relevant‌‌ 
Regulation‌‌of‌‌recruitment‌‌and‌‌placement‌‌activities‌  ‌
employee‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌voluntary‌  ‌early‌‌  evidence‌‌  as‌‌
  a ‌‌reasonable‌‌  mind‌‌  might‌‌ accept‌‌ as‌‌ adequate‌‌ to‌‌ support‌‌ a ‌‌
retirement‌  ‌plan‌  ‌consistent‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌‌  conclusion."‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌unsubstantiated‌  ‌suspicions,‌  ‌accusations,‌  ‌and‌‌  Illegal‌‌Recruitment‌  ‌
this‌‌Act;‌‌or‌  ‌ conclusions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌provide‌  ‌legal‌  ‌justification‌  ‌for‌‌ 
dismissing‌‌the‌‌employee.‌  ‌ Liability‌‌of‌‌local‌‌recruitment‌‌agency‌‌and‌‌foreign‌‌employer‌  ‌
iv) The‌‌action‌‌is‌‌duly‌‌certified‌‌by‌‌the‌‌SOLE.‌  ‌
4. Right‌‌to‌‌self-organization‌‌and‌‌collective‌‌bargaining‌  ‌ Minsola‌‌v.‌‌New‌‌City‌‌Builders,‌‌Inc.‌‌‌2018‌‌re‌‌Money‌‌Claims‌  ‌ Termination‌‌of‌‌contract‌‌of‌‌migrant‌‌worker‌  ‌
In‌  ‌claims‌  ‌for‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌salary‌  ‌differential,‌  ‌service‌  ‌incentive‌‌  Employment‌‌of‌‌non-resident‌‌aliens‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 142‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

A. Definition‌‌of‌‌recruitment‌‌and‌‌placement‌  ‌ see‌‌POEA‌‌Memorandum‌‌Circular‌‌No.‌‌08,‌‌S.‌‌2018‌  ‌ g) Sole‌  ‌proprietors,‌  ‌partnerships‌‌


  or‌‌
  corporations‌‌   licensed‌‌   to‌‌ 
No‌  ‌employer‌  ‌may‌  ‌hire‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Filipino‌  ‌worker‌  ‌for‌  ‌overseas‌‌  engage‌  ‌in‌  ‌private‌  ‌recruitment‌  ‌and‌  ‌placement‌  ‌for‌  ‌local‌‌ 
Recruitment‌  ‌and‌  ‌placement‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌act‌‌  of‌‌  canvassing,‌‌  employment‌  ‌are‌  ‌prohibited‌  ‌from‌  ‌engaging‌  ‌in‌  ‌job‌‌ 
employment‌‌   ‌except‌‌ ‌through‌‌ the‌‌ Boards‌‌ and‌‌ entities‌‌ authorized‌‌ 
enlisting,‌  ‌contracting,‌  ‌transporting,‌  ‌utilizing,‌  ‌hiring,‌  ‌or‌  ‌procuring‌‌  contracting‌  ‌or‌  ‌subcontracting‌  ‌activities.‌  ‌(‌Sec‌  ‌5,‌  ‌DO‌  ‌No‌‌ 
by‌‌the‌‌DOLE.‌‌Direct-hiring‌‌by‌  
workers,‌  ‌and‌  ‌includes‌  ‌referrals,‌  ‌contract‌  ‌services,‌  ‌promising‌  ‌or‌‌  141-14‌) ‌ ‌
advertising‌‌   for‌‌ employment,‌‌ locally‌‌ or‌‌ abroad,‌‌ whether‌‌ for‌‌ profit‌‌ or‌‌  a) members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌diplomatic‌‌corps,‌‌   ‌
For‌‌Overseas‌‌Employment‌  ‌
not:‌‌   ‌ b) international‌  ‌organizations‌‌   and‌‌
  such‌‌  other‌‌
  employers‌‌ 
a) Travel‌‌agencies‌‌‌and‌‌sales‌‌agencies‌‌of‌‌airline‌‌companies;‌  ‌
Provided‌,‌‌That‌‌any‌‌person‌‌or‌‌entity‌‌which,‌i‌ n‌‌any‌‌manner‌,  ‌‌ ‌ as‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌DOLE‌  ‌are‌  ‌exempted‌  ‌from‌‌ 
this‌‌provision.‌  ‌ b) Officers‌‌   or‌‌
  Board‌‌
  members‌‌  of‌‌
  any‌‌
  corporation‌‌ or‌‌ partners‌‌ 
1. offers‌‌or‌p
‌ romises‌f‌ or‌‌a‌‌fee‌,  ‌‌ ‌
c) Also‌  ‌exempted‌  ‌are‌  ‌name‌‌   hirees‌‌
  or‌‌
  those‌‌  individuals‌‌  in‌‌a‌‌partnership‌‌engaged‌‌in‌‌the‌‌business‌‌of‌‌a‌‌travel‌‌agency;‌  ‌
2. employment‌‌to‌t‌ wo‌‌or‌‌more‌‌‌persons‌‌   ‌
who‌  ‌are‌  ‌able‌  ‌to‌  ‌secure‌‌
  contracts‌‌
  on‌‌
  their‌‌
  own‌‌
  efforts‌‌  c) Corporations‌  ‌and‌  ‌partnerships,‌  ‌where‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌officers,‌‌ 
shall‌‌be‌‌deemed‌‌engaged‌‌in‌‌recruitment‌‌and‌‌placement.‌  ‌ and‌  ‌representation‌  ‌without‌  ‌the‌  ‌assistance‌  ‌or‌‌  Board‌‌members‌‌or‌‌partners‌‌is‌‌also‌‌(b);‌  ‌
B. Regulation‌‌of‌‌recruitment‌‌and‌‌placement‌‌  participation‌‌of‌‌any‌‌agency.‌  ‌ d) Individuals,‌‌  partners,‌‌   officers‌‌
  or‌‌
  directors‌‌
  of‌‌
  an‌‌
  insurance‌‌ 
activities‌  ‌ Their‌‌hiring‌‌nonetheless‌‌must‌‌be‌‌processed‌‌through‌‌the‌‌POEA‌  company‌  ‌who‌  ‌make,‌  ‌propose‌  ‌or‌  ‌provide‌  ‌an‌  ‌insurance‌‌ 
3. Entities‌‌prohibited‌‌from‌‌recruiting‌  ‌ contract‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌compulsory‌  ‌insurance‌  ‌coverage‌  ‌for‌‌ 
1. Regulatory‌‌authorities‌  ‌
agency-hired‌‌OFWs;‌  ‌
a. Philippine‌‌Overseas‌‌Employment‌‌Administration‌  ‌ The‌  ‌following‌  ‌are‌  ‌disqualified‌  ‌from‌  ‌recruitment‌  ‌and‌‌ 
e) Sole‌  ‌proprietors,‌  ‌partners‌  ‌or‌  ‌officers‌‌
  and‌‌
  board‌‌
  members‌‌ 
placement‌‌for‌‌domestic‌‌employment‌: ‌ ‌
Shall‌  ‌regulate‌  ‌private‌  ‌sector‌  ‌participation‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  with‌‌derogatory‌‌records.‌  ‌
a) Persons‌c‌ onvicted‌o
‌ f‌‌   ‌
recruitment‌‌   and‌‌
  overseas‌‌  placement‌‌   of‌‌
  workers‌‌ by‌‌ setting‌‌  f) Any‌  ‌official‌  ‌or‌  ‌employee‌  ‌of‌  ‌DOLE,‌  ‌POEA,‌  ‌OWWA,‌  ‌DFA,‌‌ 
up‌  ‌a ‌ ‌licensing‌  ‌and‌  ‌registration‌  ‌system‌. ‌ ‌It‌  ‌shall‌  ‌also‌‌  a. illegal‌‌recruitment,‌‌   ‌
DOJ,‌  ‌DOH,‌  ‌BI,‌  ‌IC,‌  ‌NLRC,‌  ‌TESDA,‌  ‌CFO,‌  ‌NBO,‌  ‌PNP,‌  ‌CAAP,‌‌ 
formulate‌  ‌and‌  ‌implement‌  ‌a ‌ ‌system‌  ‌for‌  ‌promoting‌  ‌and‌‌  b. trafficking‌‌in‌‌persons,‌‌   ‌ international‌  ‌airport‌  ‌authorities,‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌GAs‌  ‌directly‌‌ 
monitoring‌‌the‌‌overseas‌‌employment‌‌of‌‌Filipinos.‌  ‌ involved‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  implementation‌‌   of‌‌
  RA‌‌ No‌‌ 8042‌‌ and/or‌‌ any‌‌ 
c. violation‌‌of‌‌child‌‌labor‌‌laws,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
b. Regulatory‌‌and‌‌visitorial‌‌powers‌‌of‌‌the‌‌SOLE‌  ‌ of‌‌his‌‌relatives‌‌within‌‌the‌4 ‌ th‌‌civil‌‌degree‌. ‌ ‌
d. crimes‌‌involving‌‌moral‌‌turpitude;‌  ‌
1) Art‌  ‌36.‌  ‌Regulatory‌  ‌Power.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Secretary‌  ‌of‌  ‌Labor‌‌  4. Suspension‌‌or‌‌cancellation‌‌of‌‌license‌‌or‌‌authority‌  ‌
b) Agencies‌  ‌whose‌  ‌licenses‌  ‌have‌‌
  previously‌‌
  been‌‌
  ‌cancelled‌‌ 
shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌restrict‌  ‌and‌  ‌regulate‌  ‌the‌‌  The‌‌
  DOLE‌‌
  Secretary‌‌
  and‌‌
  POEA‌‌ Administrator‌‌ have‌‌ ‌concurrent‌‌ 
recruitment‌  ‌and‌  ‌placement‌  ‌activities‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌agencies‌‌  or‌‌revoked‌; ‌ ‌
jurisdiction‌‌to‌‌suspend‌‌or‌‌cancel‌‌a‌‌license.‌  ‌
within‌  ‌the‌  ‌coverage‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌Title‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌hereby‌‌  c) Cooperatives;‌  ‌
authorized‌  ‌to‌  ‌issue‌  ‌orders‌  ‌and‌  ‌promulgate‌  ‌rules‌  ‌and‌‌  5. Prohibited‌‌practices‌  ‌
d) Law‌‌enforcers‌‌and‌‌any‌‌official‌‌or‌‌employee‌‌of‌‌the‌‌DOLE.‌  ‌
regulations‌‌   to‌‌
  carry‌‌
  out‌‌
  the‌‌
  objectives‌‌   and‌‌  implement‌‌  It‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌unlawful‌  ‌for‌  ‌any‌  ‌individual,‌  ‌entity,‌  ‌licensee,‌  ‌or‌‌ 
e) Those‌‌   against‌‌   whom‌‌ probable‌‌ cause‌‌ or‌‌ prima‌‌ facie‌‌ finding‌‌ 
the‌‌provisions‌‌of‌‌this‌‌Title.‌  ‌ holder‌‌of‌‌authority:‌  ‌
of‌  ‌guilt‌  ‌for‌  ‌illegal‌‌
  recruitment‌‌   or‌‌
  other‌‌  related‌‌
  cases‌‌  exist‌‌ 
2) Art‌  ‌37.‌  ‌Visitorial‌  ‌Power.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Secretary‌  ‌of‌  ‌Labor‌  ‌or‌‌  a) To‌  ‌charge‌  ‌or‌  ‌accept‌  ‌directly‌  ‌or‌  ‌indirectly‌  ‌any‌‌ 
particularly‌  ‌to‌  ‌owners‌  ‌or‌  ‌directors‌  ‌of‌  ‌agencies‌  ‌who‌‌   have‌‌ 
his‌  ‌duly‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌representatives‌  ‌may,‌‌   at‌‌
  any‌‌  time,‌‌  committed‌‌such‌‌violations.‌  ‌ amount‌  ‌greater‌  ‌than‌  ‌that‌  ‌specified‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
inspect‌  ‌the‌  ‌premises,‌  ‌books‌  ‌of‌  ‌accounts‌  ‌and‌‌   records‌‌  schedule‌‌of‌‌allowable‌‌fees‌p ‌ rescribed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌SOLE;‌  ‌
f) Sole‌  ‌proprietors‌  ‌of‌  ‌duly‌  ‌licensed‌  ‌agencies‌  ‌are‌  ‌prohibited‌‌ 
of‌‌
  any‌‌
  person‌‌   or‌‌ entity‌‌ covered‌‌ by‌‌ this‌‌ Title,‌‌ require‌‌ it‌‌ 
from‌‌  securing‌‌
  another‌‌ license‌‌ to‌‌ engage‌‌ in‌‌ recruitment‌‌ and‌‌  b) To‌  ‌furnish‌  ‌or‌  ‌publish‌  ‌any‌  ‌false‌  ‌notice‌  ‌or‌‌ 
to‌  ‌submit‌  ‌reports‌  ‌regularly‌  ‌on‌  ‌prescribed‌‌   forms,‌‌   and‌‌ 
placement.‌  ‌ information‌  ‌or‌‌
  document‌‌   in‌‌
  relation‌‌
  to‌‌
  recruitment‌‌ 
act‌‌on‌‌violations‌‌of‌‌any‌‌provisions‌‌of‌‌this‌‌Title.‌  ‌
or‌‌employment;‌  ‌
2. Ban‌‌on‌‌direct‌‌hiring‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 143‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

c) To‌‌
  give‌‌
  any‌‌
  false‌‌
  notice,‌‌
  testimony,‌‌ information‌‌ or‌‌  q) Non-renegotiation‌‌of‌‌Loan;‌  ‌ iii) Complainants‌  ‌were‌  ‌convinced‌  ‌to‌  ‌part‌  ‌with‌  ‌their‌‌ 
document‌  ‌or‌  ‌commit‌  ‌any‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌‌  r) Specifying‌‌a‌‌Medical‌‌Entity;‌  ‌ money‌‌by‌‌such‌‌impression;‌1  ‌
misrepresentation‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌securing‌  ‌a ‌‌ iv) There‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌a ‌ ‌promise‌  ‌or‌  ‌offer‌  ‌of‌‌ 
s) Specifying‌‌a‌‌Training;‌  ‌
license‌‌or‌‌authority‌‌‌under‌‌the‌‌Labor‌‌Code;‌‌   ‌ employment.‌2  ‌
t) Violation‌‌of‌‌Suspension;‌‌and‌  ‌
d) To‌  ‌induce‌  ‌or‌  ‌attempt‌‌  to‌‌
  induce‌‌
  a ‌‌worker‌‌  already‌‌  b) Recruitment‌‌   and‌‌   Placement;‌‌
  Presumption.‌‌   Where‌‌   a ‌‌fee‌‌ 
employed‌  ‌to‌  ‌quit‌  ‌his‌  ‌employment‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌offer‌‌  u) Collection‌‌of‌‌Insurance‌‌Premium.‌  ‌
is‌  ‌collected‌  ‌in‌  ‌consideration‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌promise‌  ‌or‌  ‌offer‌  ‌of‌‌ 
him‌‌another;‌  ‌
C. Illegal‌‌Recruitment‌  ‌ employment‌‌to‌t‌ wo‌‌or‌‌more‌‌‌prospective‌‌workers.‌  ‌
e) To‌‌
  ‌influence‌‌ or‌‌ attempt‌‌ to‌‌ influence‌‌ any‌‌ person‌‌ or‌‌  c) Additional‌‌elements‌  ‌
entity‌‌ not‌‌ to‌‌ employ‌‌ any‌‌ worker‌‌ who‌‌ has‌‌ not‌‌ applied‌‌  Any‌‌
  act‌‌
  of‌‌
  canvassing,‌‌  enlisting,‌‌ contracting,‌‌ transporting,‌‌ utilizing,‌‌ 
hiring,‌  ‌or‌  ‌procuring‌  ‌workers‌  ‌and‌  ‌includes‌  ‌referring,‌  ‌contract‌‌  i)   ‌by‌‌
For‌  ‌syndicated.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌committed‌‌   ‌three‌‌  or‌‌  more‌‌ 
for‌‌employment‌‌through‌‌his‌‌agency;‌  ‌
services,‌  ‌promising‌  ‌or‌  ‌advertising‌  ‌for‌  ‌employment‌  ‌abroad,‌‌  persons‌  ‌conspiring‌  ‌and‌  ‌confederating‌  ‌with‌  ‌one‌‌ 
f) To‌‌  engage‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  recruitment‌‌   or‌‌
  placement‌‌  of‌‌ workers‌‌ 
whether‌‌
  for‌‌
  profit‌‌
  or‌‌
  not‌, ‌‌when‌‌  undertaken‌‌  by‌‌  a ‌‌non-l‌icensee‌‌  another.‌‌(P
‌ eople‌‌v.‌‌Hashim‌‌‌2012‌) ‌ ‌
in‌  ‌jobs‌  ‌harmful‌  ‌to‌  ‌public‌  ‌health‌‌   or‌‌
  morality‌‌   or‌‌
  to‌‌ 
the‌‌dignity‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Republic;‌‌   ‌ or‌‌non-holder‌‌of‌‌authority.‌  ‌ ii) For‌  ‌large‌  ‌scale.‌‌
  — ‌‌committed‌‌  ‌against‌‌   ‌three‌‌  or‌‌ 
Authority‌‌ ‌refers‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌document‌‌ issued‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ SOLE‌‌ authorizing‌‌ the‌‌  more‌‌   persons,‌‌
  individually‌‌
  or‌‌
  as‌‌  a ‌‌group.‌‌ (‌People‌‌ 
g) To‌  ‌obstruct‌  ‌or‌  ‌attempt‌  ‌to‌  ‌obstruct‌  ‌inspection‌‌
  by‌‌ 
v.‌‌Tuguinay‌‌‌2012‌) ‌ ‌
the‌‌SOLE;‌  ‌ officers,‌  ‌personnel,‌  ‌agents‌  ‌or‌  ‌representatives‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌licensed‌‌ 
h) To‌f‌ ail‌‌to‌‌submit‌‌reports‌; ‌ ‌ recruitment/manning‌  ‌agency‌  ‌to‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌recruitment‌  ‌and‌  2. Types‌  ‌
placement‌‌   activities‌‌
  in‌‌
  a ‌‌place‌‌ stated‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ license‌‌ or‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌specified‌‌  a) One‌  ‌is‌  ‌simple‌  ‌illegal‌  ‌recruitment‌  ‌committed‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌‌
i) To‌  ‌substitute‌  ‌or‌  ‌alter‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌prejudice‌  ‌of‌  t‌ he‌‌ 
place.‌  ‌ licensee‌‌or‌‌holder‌‌of‌‌authority.‌  ‌
worker,‌  ‌employment‌  ‌contracts‌  ‌approved‌  ‌and‌‌ 
verified‌‌by‌‌the‌‌DOLE;‌  ‌ License‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌document‌  ‌issued‌‌  by‌‌  the‌‌  SOLE‌‌  authorizing‌‌  a ‌‌ b) Any‌  ‌person‌  ‌“who‌  ‌is‌  ‌neither‌  ‌a ‌ ‌licensee‌  ‌nor‌  ‌a ‌ ‌holder‌  ‌of‌‌ 
j) For‌  ‌an‌  ‌officer‌  ‌or‌  ‌agent‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌recruitment‌  ‌or‌‌  person,‌  ‌partnership‌  ‌or‌  ‌corporation‌  ‌to‌  ‌operate‌  a‌  ‌ ‌private‌‌  authority”‌‌commits‌‌the‌‌second‌‌type‌‌of‌‌illegal‌‌recruitment.‌  ‌
placement‌  ‌agency‌  ‌to‌  ‌become‌  ‌an‌  ‌officer‌  ‌or‌‌  recruitment/manning‌‌agency.‌  ‌
c) Large‌  ‌scale‌  ‌or‌  ‌Qualified.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌third‌  ‌type‌  ‌of‌  ‌illegal‌‌ 
member‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  Board‌‌   of‌‌
  any‌‌
  corporation‌‌   engaged‌‌ in‌‌  Any‌‌
  recruitment‌‌   activities,‌‌
  including‌‌
  the‌‌
  prohibited‌‌ practices,‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌  recruitment‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌offenders‌  ‌who‌  ‌either‌  ‌commit‌  ‌the‌‌ 
travel‌‌
  agency‌‌   or‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  engaged‌‌ directly‌‌ or‌‌ indirectly‌‌ in‌‌  undertaken‌  ‌by‌  ‌non-licensees‌  ‌or‌  ‌non-holders‌  ‌of‌  ‌authority‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  offense‌  ‌alone‌  ‌or‌  ‌with‌  ‌another‌  ‌person‌  ‌against‌  ‌three‌  ‌or‌‌ 
the‌‌management‌‌of‌‌a‌‌travel‌‌agency;‌‌   ‌ deemed‌i‌ llegal‌. ‌ ‌ more‌‌‌persons‌‌individually‌‌or‌‌as‌‌a‌‌group.‌‌   ‌
k) To‌w
‌ ithhold‌‌or‌‌deny‌‌travel‌‌documents‌; ‌ ‌ The‌‌characteristics‌‌of‌‌a‌‌recruitment‌‌license‌‌are:‌  ‌ d) Syndicated‌  ‌—A ‌  ‌ ‌syndicate‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌group‌  ‌of‌  ‌three‌‌   or‌‌
  more‌‌ 
l) Failure‌  ‌to‌  ‌actually‌  ‌deploy‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contracted‌  ‌worker‌‌  1) It‌‌is‌‌place-specific‌; ‌ ‌ persons‌  ‌conspiring‌‌   and‌‌
  confederating‌‌   with‌‌   one‌‌
  another‌‌  in‌‌ 
without‌‌valid‌‌reason;‌  ‌ carrying‌‌   out‌‌
  the‌‌   act‌‌
  circumscribed‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ commits‌‌ the‌ 
2) It‌‌is‌‌person-specific‌;‌‌and‌  ‌
m) Failure‌  ‌to‌  ‌reimburse‌  ‌expenses‌  ‌incurred‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  fourth‌  ‌type‌  ‌of‌  ‌illegal‌  ‌recruitment‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌law.‌  ‌(‌People‌  ‌v.‌‌ 
worker;‌‌and‌  ‌ 3) It‌‌is‌‌prospective‌. ‌ ‌ Sadiosa‌) ‌ ‌

n) To‌‌
  allow‌‌ a ‌‌‌non-Filipino‌‌ citizen‌‌ to‌‌ head‌‌ or‌‌ manage‌‌ a ‌‌ 1. Elements‌  ‌ Under‌  ‌RA‌  ‌8042,‌  ‌the‌  ‌third‌  ‌and‌  ‌fourth‌  ‌types‌  ‌herein‌  ‌are‌‌ 
licensed‌‌recruitment/manning‌‌agency.‌  ‌ considered‌‌Illegal‌‌Recruitment‌‌as‌‌‌Economic‌‌Sabotage‌. ‌ ‌
a) Essential‌  ‌Element‌. ‌ ‌Presupposes‌  ‌deceit‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Other‌‌Prohibited‌‌Acts‌  ‌ misrepresentation‌. ‌ ‌ 3. Illegal‌‌recruitment‌‌as‌‌distinguished‌‌from‌‌estafa‌  ‌

o) Excessive‌‌  Interest.‌‌
  To‌‌
  arrange,‌‌ facilitate‌‌ or‌‌ grant‌‌ a ‌‌loan‌‌  i) Without‌‌being‌‌duly‌‌authorized;‌  ‌
to‌‌an‌‌OFW‌‌with‌‌interest‌> ‌ 8%‌‌per‌‌annum‌; ‌ ‌ ii) Gave‌  ‌distinct‌  ‌impression‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌had‌  ‌power‌  ‌or‌‌ 
p) Specifying‌‌a‌‌Loan‌‌Entity;‌  ‌ ability‌‌to‌‌deploy‌‌workers;‌  ‌ 1
‌ eople‌‌v.‌‌Goce‌,‌‌GR‌‌No‌‌113161,‌‌August‌‌29,‌‌1995‌  ‌
P
2
D
‌ arvin‌‌v.‌‌CA‌‌and‌‌People‌,‌‌GR‌‌No‌‌125044,‌‌July‌‌13,‌‌1998‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 144‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

a) Estafa‌‌   by‌‌
  means‌‌   of‌‌ false‌‌ pretense.‌‌ ‌A ‌‌worker‌‌ who‌‌ suffers‌‌  2. Theory‌‌of‌‌imputed‌‌knowledge‌  sanction‌  ‌the‌  ‌violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌PH‌  ‌labor‌  ‌laws‌  ‌requiring‌  ‌aliens‌  ‌to‌‌ 
pecuniary‌  ‌damage‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌result‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌previous‌  ‌or‌‌  Sunace‌‌International‌‌Management‌‌Services,‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌NLRC‌  ‌ secure‌‌work‌‌permits‌‌before‌‌their‌‌employment.‌3  ‌
simultaneous‌  ‌false‌  ‌pretense‌  ‌resorted‌  ‌to‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌nonlicensee‌‌  d) Alien‌  ‌Employment‌‌  Permit.‌‌   — ‌‌‌Revised‌‌
  Rules‌‌
  for‌‌
  Issuance‌‌   of‌‌ 
or‌  ‌nonholder‌  ‌of‌  ‌authority,‌  ‌may‌‌   complain‌‌   for‌‌
  estafa‌‌
  ‌aside‌‌  The‌  ‌theory‌  ‌of‌  ‌imputed‌  ‌knowledge‌  ‌ascribes‌  ‌the‌  ‌knowledge‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Employment‌‌   Permits‌‌ to‌‌ Foreign‌‌ Nationals,‌‌ ‌DOLE‌‌ D.O.‌‌ No.‌‌ 186,‌‌ 
from‌‌‌illegal‌‌recruitment.‌  ‌ agent‌‌ TO‌‌ the‌‌ principal‌, ‌‌not‌‌ the‌‌ other‌‌ way‌‌ around.‌‌ The‌‌ knowledge‌‌ of‌‌  S.‌‌2017‌  ‌
the‌  ‌principal-foreign‌  ‌employer‌  ‌cannot,‌  ‌therefore,‌  ‌be‌  ‌imputed‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌‌ 
b) Illegal‌  ‌recruitment‌  ‌and‌  ‌estafa‌  ‌cases‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌filed‌‌  Coverage.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌All‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌nationals‌  ‌who‌  ‌intend‌  ‌to‌  ‌engage‌  ‌in‌‌ 
agent.‌  ‌
simultaneously‌  ‌or‌  ‌separately.‌  ‌The‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌charges‌  ‌for‌‌  gainful‌‌employment‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌shall‌‌apply‌‌for‌‌AEP.‌  ‌
illegal‌  ‌recruitment‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌bar‌  ‌the‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌estafa,‌  ‌and‌‌  Exemption.‌  —‌  ‌The‌  ‌following‌  ‌categories‌  ‌of‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌nationals‌‌ 
vice‌‌   versa.‌‌  An‌‌ accused’s‌‌ acquittal‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ illegal‌‌ recruitment‌ 
E. Termination‌‌of‌‌contract‌‌of‌‌migrant‌‌worker‌  ‌
are‌‌exempt‌‌from‌‌securing‌‌an‌‌employment‌‌permit:‌‌   ‌
case‌‌does‌‌not‌‌prove‌‌that‌‌she‌‌is‌‌not‌‌guilty‌‌of‌‌estafa.‌‌   ‌ Takes‌‌place‌‌in‌‌the‌‌following‌‌instances:‌  ‌
a. All‌‌
  ‌members‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ diplomatic‌‌ service‌‌ and‌‌ foreign‌‌ 
Double‌  ‌jeopardy‌  ‌will‌  ‌not‌  ‌set‌  ‌in‌‌
  because‌‌  illegal‌‌
  recruitment‌‌   is‌‌  a. Pre-termination‌  ‌of‌  ‌employment‌  ‌contract‌  ‌with‌  ‌approval‌  ‌of‌‌  government‌‌officials‌s‌ ubject‌‌to‌‌reciprocity;‌  ‌
malum‌  ‌prohibitum‌, ‌ ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌necessity‌  ‌to‌‌
  prove‌‌  employer;‌  ‌
b. Officers‌  ‌and‌  ‌staff‌  ‌of‌  ‌international‌  ‌organizations‌‌   of‌‌ 
criminal‌  ‌intent,‌  ‌whereas‌  ‌estafa‌  ‌is‌  ‌malum‌  ‌in‌  ‌se‌, ‌ ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  b. Discharge‌‌for‌‌a‌‌valid‌‌cause;‌  ‌ which‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌government‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌member,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
prosecution‌‌   of‌‌
  which,‌‌
  proof‌‌   of‌‌ criminal‌‌ intent‌‌ is‌‌ necessary.‌‌ (‌Sy‌‌ 
c. Suffered‌‌injury‌‌or‌‌illness;‌‌or‌  ‌ their‌‌legitimate‌‌spouses‌‌‌desiring‌‌to‌‌work‌‌in‌‌PH;‌  ‌
v.‌‌People‌‌‌2010)‌  ‌
d. An‌‌OFW‌‌has‌‌died.‌  ‌ c. Owners‌  ‌and‌  ‌representatives‌‌   of‌‌
  foreign‌‌   principals‌‌ 
D. Liability‌‌of‌‌local‌‌recruitment‌‌agency‌‌and‌‌foreign‌‌  whose‌  ‌companies‌  ‌are‌  ‌accredited‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌POEA,‌  ‌who‌‌ 
Skippers‌‌United‌‌Pacific‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌Doza‌‌2
‌ 012‌  ‌
employer‌‌   ‌ come‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌   ‌
1. Solidary‌‌liability‌  ‌ The‌‌ OFW‌‌ can‌‌ pre‌‌ terminate‌‌ his‌‌ employment‌‌ contract‌‌ which‌‌ is‌‌ akin‌‌ to‌‌  i. for‌‌a‌‌limited‌‌period‌‌and‌‌   ‌
resignation.‌  ‌However,‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌failed‌  ‌to‌  ‌submit‌  ‌substantial‌‌ 
a) The‌  ‌liability‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌principal/employer‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  ii. solely‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌interviewing‌‌ 
evidence‌  ‌that‌  ‌indeed‌  ‌the‌  ‌OFW‌  ‌voluntarily‌  ‌pre-terminated‌  ‌his‌‌ 
recruitment/placement‌  ‌agency‌  ‌for‌  ‌any‌  ‌and‌  ‌all‌  ‌claims‌‌  Filipino‌‌applicants‌‌for‌‌employment‌‌abroad;‌  ‌
contract;‌‌then‌‌the‌‌OFW‌‌is‌‌deemed‌‌illegally‌‌dismissed.‌  ‌
under‌‌this‌‌section‌‌shall‌‌be‌j‌ oint‌‌and‌‌several‌.  ‌‌ ‌ d. Foreign‌  ‌nationals‌  ‌who‌  ‌come‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌to‌‌ 
The‌‌best‌‌proof‌‌of‌‌pre-termination‌‌is‌‌a‌w
‌ ritten‌‌resignation‌. ‌ ‌
b) Such‌‌  liabilities‌‌  ‌shall‌‌
  continue‌‌
  during‌‌   the‌‌ entire‌‌ period‌‌  teach,‌  ‌present‌  ‌and/or‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌research‌  ‌studies‌  ‌in‌‌ 
universities‌  ‌and‌  ‌colleges‌  ‌as‌  ‌visiting,‌  ‌exchange‌  ‌or‌‌ 
or‌‌
  duration‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  employment‌‌   contract‌‌   ‌and‌‌
  ‌shall‌‌
  not‌‌  F. Employment‌‌of‌‌non-resident‌‌aliens‌  ‌
be‌  ‌affected‌  ‌by‌  ‌any‌  ‌substitution,‌  ‌amendment‌  ‌or‌‌  adjunct‌‌   professors‌‌   ‌provided‌‌ ‌that‌‌ the‌‌ exemption‌‌ is‌‌ on‌‌ 
a) Only‌  ‌non-resident‌  ‌aliens‌  ‌are‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌  ‌secure‌  ‌employment‌‌  a‌‌reciprocal‌‌basis;‌  ‌
modification‌  ‌made‌  ‌locally‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌foreign‌‌
  country‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
permit.‌‌  For‌‌
  resident‌‌
  aliens‌‌  and‌‌  immigrants,‌‌ what‌‌ is‌‌ required‌‌ is‌‌ 
said‌‌contract.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌10,‌‌RA‌‌8042‌) ‌ ‌ e. Permanent‌  ‌resident‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌nationals‌  ‌and‌‌ 
an‌‌Alien‌‌Employment‌‌Registration‌‌Certificate‌‌(AERC)‌. ‌ ‌
c) In‌  ‌Sto.‌  ‌Tomas,‌  ‌et‌  ‌al.‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Salac‌  ‌2012‌  ‌En‌  ‌Banc‌, ‌‌however,‌‌   the‌‌  probationary‌‌or‌‌temporary‌‌resident‌‌visa‌‌holders‌; ‌ ‌
b) The‌  ‌latest‌  ‌department‌  ‌order‌  ‌issued‌  ‌about‌  ‌employment‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Court‌  ‌clarified‌  ‌that‌  ‌liability‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌imputed‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌  f. Refugees‌‌  and‌‌
  Stateless‌‌
  Persons‌‌
  recognized‌‌
  by‌‌ DOJ;‌‌ 
foreign‌‌workers‌‌is‌D ‌ O‌‌No‌‌146-15‌. ‌ ‌
corporate‌‌   officers‌‌  or‌‌  directors‌‌   only‌‌ if‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ proved‌‌ that‌‌ they‌‌  and‌‌   ‌
are‌  ‌personally‌  ‌involved‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌wrongful‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  c) A‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌national‌  ‌working‌  ‌in‌  ‌PH‌  ‌without‌  ‌the‌  ‌requisite‌‌ 
g. All‌‌foreign‌‌nationals‌‌granted‌‌exemption‌‌by‌‌law.‌  ‌
company.‌  ‌ employment‌  ‌permit‌  ‌may‌  ‌file‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌NLRC‌  ‌an‌  ‌illegal‌‌ 
dismissal‌  ‌complaint.‌  ‌The‌  ‌dismissal‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌declared‌  ‌invalid‌‌  Exclusion.‌‌  ‌— ‌‌The‌‌
  following‌‌
  categories‌‌
  of‌‌ foreign‌‌ nationals‌‌ are‌‌ 
d) The‌  ‌liability‌  ‌of‌  ‌corporate‌  ‌directors‌  ‌and‌  ‌officers‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌  excluded‌‌from‌‌securing‌‌an‌‌employment‌‌permit:‌  ‌
and‌‌   she‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌ recognized‌‌ as‌‌ an‌‌ employee‌‌ ‌but‌‌ she‌‌ cannot‌‌ be‌‌ 
automatic‌. ‌‌To‌‌ make‌‌ them‌‌ jointly‌‌ and‌‌ solidarily‌‌ liable‌‌ with‌‌ 
awarded‌  ‌claim‌  ‌for‌  ‌monetary‌  ‌benefits‌. ‌ ‌To‌  ‌do‌  ‌so‌  ‌will‌‌  a. Members‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  governing‌‌   board‌‌ with‌‌ voting‌‌ rights‌‌ 
their‌  ‌company,‌  ‌there‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌finding‌  ‌that‌  ‌they‌  ‌were‌‌ 
only‌  ‌and‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌intervene‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌management‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
remiss‌  ‌in‌  ‌directing‌  ‌the‌  ‌affairs‌  ‌of‌  ‌that‌  ‌company,‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌‌ 
sponsoring‌‌or‌‌tolerating‌‌the‌‌conduct‌‌of‌‌illegal‌‌activities.‌  ‌ 3
W
‌ PP‌‌Marketing,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌v.‌‌Galera‌‌2
‌ 010‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 145‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

corporation‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌day‌  ‌to‌  ‌day‌  ‌operation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Hours‌‌of‌‌work‌  ‌ 2. Execute‌‌management‌‌policies;‌  ‌
enterprise.‌  ‌
Rest‌‌Periods‌  ‌ 3. Impose‌‌disciplinary‌‌actions‌  ‌
b. President‌‌  and‌‌
  Treasurer‌, ‌‌who‌‌
  are‌‌
  part-owner‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
company.‌  ‌ Service‌‌Charge‌  ‌ Reason‌  ‌for‌  ‌exclusion‌  ‌Not‌  ‌usually‌  ‌employed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌hour,‌‌ 
but‌‌by‌‌their‌s‌ pecial‌‌training,‌‌experience‌‌or‌‌knowledge.‌  ‌
c. Those‌  ‌providing‌  ‌consultancy‌  ‌services‌  ‌who‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌‌  Wages‌  ‌
have‌‌employers‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌  ‌ 3) Field‌‌personnel‌‌—‌‌If‌‌they:‌  ‌
Prohibitions‌‌Regarding‌‌Wages‌  ‌
d. Intra-corporate‌‌transferee‌‌   ‌ a) Regularly‌  ‌perform‌  ‌duties‌  ‌away‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌principal‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Wage‌‌Determination‌  ‌
branch‌‌office‌‌or‌‌place‌‌of‌‌business‌‌of‌‌employer;‌a ‌ nd‌  ‌
i. who‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌manager,‌  ‌executive‌  ‌or‌  ‌specialist‌‌ 
Wage‌‌Order‌  ‌ b) Whose‌  ‌actual‌  ‌hours‌  ‌of‌  ‌work‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌field‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌‌ 
in‌‌accordance‌‌with‌‌Trade‌‌Agreements‌‌and‌‌   ‌
Wage‌‌Distortion‌  ‌ determined‌‌with‌‌reasonable‌‌certainty.‌  ‌
ii. an‌  ‌employee‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌service‌  ‌supplier‌‌ 
for‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌one‌  ‌(1)‌  ‌year‌  ‌continuous‌‌  Leaves‌  ‌ 4) Members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌family‌  ‌of‌  ‌employer‌  ‌who‌  ‌are‌‌ 
employment.‌  ‌ dependent‌  ‌upon‌  ‌him‌  ‌for‌  ‌support‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Employer‌  ‌has‌‌ 
Sexual‌‌harassment‌‌in‌‌the‌‌work‌‌environment‌  ‌
e. All‌  ‌other‌  ‌intra-corporate‌  ‌transferees‌  ‌not‌  ‌within‌  ‌these‌‌  already‌‌taken‌‌care‌‌of‌‌the‌‌employee’s‌‌sustenance.‌  ‌
Working‌‌conditions‌‌for‌‌special‌‌groups‌‌of‌‌employees‌  ‌
categories‌  ‌as‌  ‌defined‌  ‌above‌  ‌are‌‌
  required‌‌  to‌‌
  secure‌‌  an‌‌  5) Domestic‌‌helpers‌‌—‌‌covered‌‌in‌‌Kasambahay‌‌Law;‌  ‌
AEP‌‌prior‌‌to‌‌their‌‌employment‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌  ‌ Apprentices‌‌and‌‌learners‌  ‌
6) Persons‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌
  personal‌‌  service‌‌  of‌‌  another‌‌   — ‌‌‌Already‌‌ 
f. Contractual‌  ‌service‌  ‌supplier‌  ‌who‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌manager,‌‌  Disabled‌‌workers‌  ‌ provided‌‌ with‌‌ living‌‌ quarters;‌‌ nature‌‌ of‌‌ work;‌‌ plus‌‌ they‌‌ are‌‌ 
executive‌  ‌or‌‌
  specialist‌‌   ‌and‌‌
  an‌‌
  employee‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌foreign‌‌  not‌‌employed‌‌in‌‌a‌‌business‌‌undertaking.‌  ‌
Gender‌  ‌
service‌‌
  supplier‌‌ which‌‌ has‌‌ no‌‌ commercial‌‌ presence‌‌ in‌‌  7) Workers‌‌  paid‌‌
  by‌‌
  results‌‌
  whose‌‌ time‌‌ and‌‌ performance‌‌ 
the‌‌Philippines:‌  ‌ Minors‌  ‌
are‌‌NOT‌‌supervised‌‌—‌P ‌ iece‌‌rate‌‌or‌‌job‌‌or‌‌task‌‌based.‌  ‌
i. who‌  ‌enters‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌temporarily‌  ‌to‌‌  Kasambahays‌  ‌
supply‌‌a‌‌service‌‌pursuant‌‌to‌‌a‌‌contract;‌  ‌
1. Hours‌‌of‌‌work‌  ‌
Homeworkers‌  ‌
ii. must‌‌
  possess‌‌ the‌‌ appropriate‌‌ educational‌‌ and‌‌  a. Principles‌  ‌in‌  ‌determining‌  ‌hours‌  ‌worked‌  ‌and‌  ‌employees‌‌ 
Solo‌‌parents‌  ‌ exempted‌‌or‌‌not‌‌covered‌  ‌
professional‌‌qualifications;‌‌and‌  ‌
Night‌‌workers‌  ‌ 1) All‌  ‌hours‌  ‌are‌  ‌hours‌  ‌worked‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌is‌‌ 
iii. must‌  ‌be‌  ‌employed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌service‌‌ 
supplier‌  ‌for‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌one‌  ‌year‌  ‌prior‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  Migrant‌‌workers‌  ‌ required‌  ‌to‌  ‌give‌  ‌his‌  ‌employer‌, ‌ ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌‌ 
supply‌‌of‌‌service‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌  ‌ whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌such‌  ‌hours‌  ‌are‌  ‌spent‌  ‌in‌  ‌productive‌‌ 
Security‌‌guards‌  ‌
labor‌‌or‌‌involve‌‌physical‌‌or‌‌mental‌‌exertion.‌  ‌
g. Representative‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Foreign‌  ‌Principal/Employer‌‌ 
Summary‌‌of‌‌Minimum‌‌Labor‌‌Standards‌‌Benefits‌  ‌
assigned‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Office‌  ‌of‌  ‌Licensed‌  ‌Manning‌  ‌Agency‌‌  2) An‌  ‌employee‌  ‌need‌  ‌not‌  ‌leave‌  ‌the‌  ‌premises‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
(OLMA).‌  ‌ Summary‌‌of‌‌Special‌‌Benefits‌  ‌ workplace‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌that‌  ‌his‌  ‌rest‌  ‌period‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌‌
  be‌‌ 
counted,‌  ‌it‌  ‌being‌  ‌enough‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌stops‌  ‌working,‌‌   may‌‌ 
e) Working‌‌
  Permits‌‌  & ‌‌Visas.‌‌ — ‌‌‌See‌‌ DOLE,‌‌ DOJ,‌‌ BI‌‌ and‌‌ BIR‌‌ Joint‌‌  A. Conditions‌‌of‌‌Employment‌  ‌ rest‌  ‌completely‌  ‌and‌  ‌may‌  ‌leave‌  ‌his‌  ‌work‌  ‌place,‌  ‌to‌‌  go‌‌ 
Guidelines‌‌No.‌‌01,‌‌S.‌‌2019‌  ‌
Employees‌‌NOT‌‌covered‌  ‌ elsewhere,‌  ‌whether‌‌   within‌‌  or‌‌
  outside‌‌   the‌‌
  premises‌‌   of‌‌ 
1) Government‌‌employees‌  ‌ his‌‌work‌‌place.‌  ‌
III.‌‌LABOR‌‌STANDARDS‌  ‌ 3) If‌  ‌the‌  ‌work‌  ‌performed‌  ‌was‌  ‌necessary‌, ‌ ‌or‌  ‌it‌‌ 
2) Managerial‌‌EEs‌‌—‌‌Meet‌‌the‌‌following‌‌conditions:‌  ‌
benefited‌‌   the‌‌
  employer‌, ‌‌or‌‌  the‌‌
  employee‌‌  ‌could‌‌ not‌‌ 
Conditions‌‌of‌‌Employment‌  ‌ 1. Formulate‌‌policies;‌  ‌ abandon‌  ‌his‌  ‌work‌‌  ‌at‌‌
  the‌‌
  end‌‌  of‌‌
  his‌‌
  normal‌‌  working‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 146‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

hours‌  ‌because‌  ‌he‌  ‌had‌  ‌no‌  ‌replacement,‌  ‌all‌‌


  time‌‌
  spent‌‌  2. Domestic‌  ‌worker.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌entitled‌  ‌daily‌  ‌to‌  ‌at‌‌  d) Work‌  ‌is‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌to‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌loss‌  ‌or‌‌ 
for‌‌
  such‌‌
  work‌‌   shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  considered‌‌  as‌‌ hours‌‌ worked,‌‌ if‌‌  least‌‌8‌‌hours‌‌aggregate‌‌rest‌‌per‌‌day.‌  ‌ damage‌‌of‌‌perishable‌‌goods‌; ‌ ‌
the‌  ‌work‌  ‌was‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌knowledge‌‌   of‌‌
  his‌‌
  employer‌‌ 
3. Health‌‌personnel.‌‌—‌‌in‌  ‌ e) Completion‌  ‌or‌  ‌continuation‌  ‌of‌  ‌work‌‌ 
or‌‌immediate‌‌supervisor‌. ‌ ‌
a. Cities‌  ‌and‌  ‌municipalities‌  ‌with‌  ‌at‌‌  started‌‌  before‌‌
  the‌‌ 8th‌‌ hour‌‌ necessary‌‌ to‌‌ 
4) The‌  ‌time‌  ‌during‌  ‌which‌  ‌an‌  ‌employee‌  ‌is‌  ‌inactive‌  ‌by‌‌ 
least‌‌1M‌‌population;‌‌or‌  ‌ prevent‌  ‌serious‌  ‌obstruction‌  ‌or‌‌
  prejudice‌‌
  to‌‌ 
reason‌‌   of‌‌
  interruptions‌‌ in‌‌ his‌‌ work‌‌ beyond‌‌ his‌‌ control‌‌  the‌‌business;‌‌and‌  ‌
shall‌‌be‌‌considered‌‌working‌‌time‌‌either‌‌   ‌ b. Hospitals‌  ‌with‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌100‌  ‌bed‌‌ 
f) Necessary‌  ‌to‌  ‌avail‌  ‌of‌  ‌favorable‌  ‌weather‌‌ 
a) if‌  ‌the‌  ‌imminence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌resumption‌  ‌of‌‌
  work‌‌  capacity,‌  ‌
conditions.‌  ‌
requires‌‌   the‌‌
  employee's‌‌   presence‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌ place‌‌  Regular‌  ‌office‌  ‌hours‌  ‌for‌  ‌8 ‌ ‌hours‌  ‌a ‌ ‌day,‌  ‌5 ‌‌
Under‌  ‌Art‌  ‌88‌‌  ‌and‌‌
  jurisprudence,‌‌   ‌undertime‌‌   is‌‌ 
of‌‌work‌‌or‌‌   ‌ days‌  ‌a ‌ ‌week‌, ‌ ‌except‌  ‌where‌  ‌exigencies‌  ‌of‌‌ 
service‌‌ require‌‌ such‌‌ personnel‌‌ to‌‌ work‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌  strictly‌‌not‌‌offset‌‌by‌‌overtime.‌  ‌
b) if‌  ‌the‌  ‌interval‌  i‌ s‌  ‌too‌  ‌brief‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌utilized‌‌ 
effectively‌  ‌and‌  ‌gainfully‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee's‌‌  6th‌  ‌day,‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌case‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  Robina‌‌Farms‌‌Cebu‌‌v.‌‌Villa‌‌‌2016‌  ‌
own‌‌interest‌  ‌ 30%‌‌   premium‌‌   pay‌. ‌‌‌see‌‌
  ‌DOLE‌‌   D.O.‌‌ No.‌‌ 182‌‌ 
Firstly‌,‌  ‌entitlement‌  ‌to‌  ‌overtime‌  ‌pay‌  ‌must‌  ‌first‌  ‌be‌  ‌established‌  ‌by‌‌ 
s.‌‌2017‌. ‌ ‌
b. Compensable‌‌Time‌  ‌ proof‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌overtime‌  ‌work‌  ‌was‌  ‌actually‌  ‌performed‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌‌ 
ii. Night‌  ‌shift‌  ‌differential.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌additional‌‌  employee‌  ‌may‌  ‌properly‌  ‌claim‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefit.‌  ‌The‌  ‌burden‌  ‌of‌  ‌proving‌‌ 
i. Normal‌‌   hours‌‌
  of‌‌  work.‌‌ — ‌‌‌The‌‌ normal‌‌ hours‌‌ of‌‌ work‌‌ 
compensation‌  ‌of‌  ‌ten‌  ‌percent‌  ‌(10%)‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌  entitlement‌  ‌to‌  ‌overtime‌  ‌pay‌  ‌rests‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌because‌  ‌the‌‌ 
of‌‌
  any‌‌  employee‌‌   ‌shall‌‌
  not‌‌
  exceed‌‌   eight‌‌
  (8)‌‌
  hours‌‌ a ‌‌ employee’s‌  ‌regular‌  ‌wage‌  ‌for‌  ‌each‌  ‌hour‌  ‌of‌  ‌work‌‌  benefit‌‌is‌‌not‌‌incurred‌‌in‌‌the‌‌normal‌‌course‌‌of‌‌business.‌  ‌
day‌.‌‌It‌‌includes‌  ‌ performed‌‌between‌‌10‌‌p.m.‌‌and‌‌6‌‌a.m.‌  ‌
And,‌  ‌secondly‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌DTRs‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌substantially‌  ‌prove‌  ‌the‌  ‌actual‌‌ 
1. Hours‌‌worked‌‌under‌‌Art‌‌84‌  ‌ 1. 110%‌‌of‌‌Basic‌‌Hourly‌‌Rate;‌  ‌ performance‌‌   of‌‌
  overtime‌‌  work.‌‌   Any‌‌ employee‌‌ could‌‌ render‌‌ overtime‌‌ 
a. All‌‌
  time‌‌  during‌‌
  which‌‌   EE‌‌  is‌‌ required‌‌  2. Employees‌  ‌working‌  ‌between‌  ‌10‌  ‌PM‌  ‌- ‌ ‌6 ‌‌AM‌‌  work‌  ‌only‌  ‌when‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌a ‌ ‌prior‌  ‌authorization‌  ‌therefor‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
to‌‌
  be‌‌  on‌‌
  duty‌‌
  or‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ at‌‌ a ‌‌prescribed‌‌  of‌‌the‌‌next‌‌day;‌  ‌ management.‌‌   ‌Without‌‌  the‌‌
  prior‌‌  authorization,‌‌   therefore,‌‌   Villa‌‌
  could‌‌ 
workplace;‌  ‌ not‌‌
  validly‌‌ claim‌‌ having‌‌ performed‌‌ work‌‌ beyond‌‌ the‌‌ normal‌‌ hours‌‌ of‌‌ 
3. NOT‌‌waivable,‌‌founded‌‌on‌‌public‌‌policy.‌  ‌
b. All‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌during‌  ‌which‌  ‌an‌  ‌EE‌  ‌is‌‌  work‌. ‌ ‌
iii. Overtime‌‌work‌  ‌
suffered‌o ‌ r‌‌permitted‌t‌ o‌‌work;‌  ‌
(a) Compressed‌‌work‌‌week‌  ‌
2. Rest‌  ‌periods‌  ‌of‌  ‌short‌  ‌interval‌  ‌(5-20‌‌  GR‌:‌‌  ‌No‌  ‌employee‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌compelled‌  ‌to‌  ‌render‌‌ 
OT‌‌against‌‌his‌‌will;‌  ‌ 1. Normal‌‌ workweek‌‌ — ‌‌6 ‌‌consecutive‌‌ days,‌‌ 48‌‌ 
minutes)‌  ‌
hours‌‌per‌‌week;‌  ‌
3. Meal‌‌period‌‌of‌‌less‌‌than‌‌20‌‌minutes‌; ‌ ‌ EXC‌:‌‌  Art‌‌89‌  ‌
2. Compressed‌‌   — ‌‌less‌‌ than‌‌ 6 ‌‌days,‌‌ but‌‌ may‌‌ not‌‌ 
4. Reasonable‌  ‌time‌  ‌to‌  ‌withdraw‌  ‌wages‌  ‌from‌‌  a) Country‌  ‌is‌  ‌at‌  ‌war‌  ‌or‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌declared‌‌ 
exceed‌  ‌12‌  ‌hours‌  ‌per‌  ‌day.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌alternative‌‌ 
bank‌‌or‌‌ATM,‌‌or‌‌by‌‌check.‌  ‌ national‌‌or‌‌local‌‌emergency‌; ‌ ‌
arrangement‌  ‌whereby‌  ‌the‌  ‌normal‌  ‌workweek‌‌ 
Other‌‌hours‌‌of‌‌work‌  ‌ b) OT‌  ‌is‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌to‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌loss‌  ‌of‌‌   life‌‌  or‌‌  is‌  ‌reduced‌  ‌to‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌  ‌6 ‌ ‌days‌  ‌but‌  ‌the‌  ‌total‌‌ 
property‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌‌  case‌‌  of‌‌
  imminent‌‌   danger‌‌   to‌‌  number‌  ‌of‌  ‌normal‌  ‌work‌  ‌hours‌  ‌per‌  ‌week‌‌ 
1. Children.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌below‌  ‌15:‌  ‌20H/W,‌  ‌4H/D,‌  ‌not‌‌ 
public‌‌safety‌‌due‌‌to‌‌calamities;‌  ‌ remains‌  ‌at‌  ‌48.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌the‌  ‌workweek‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 
allowed‌‌between‌‌8pm‌‌to‌‌6am‌‌of‌‌next‌‌day;‌  ‌
c) There‌  ‌is‌  ‌urgent‌  ‌work‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌performed‌‌   on‌‌  compressed‌‌only‌‌up‌‌to‌4 ‌ ‌‌days‌. ‌ ‌
15-18:‌  ‌40H/W,‌  ‌8H/D,‌  ‌not‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌between‌‌ 
machineries‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌avoid‌  ‌serious‌‌   loss‌‌  3. CWW‌  ‌results‌  ‌from‌  ‌an‌  ‌express‌  ‌voluntary‌‌ 
10pm‌‌to‌‌6am‌‌the‌‌next‌‌day.‌  ‌ or‌‌damage‌‌to‌‌the‌‌employer;‌  ‌ agreement‌  ‌of‌  ‌majority‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌covered‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 147‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

employees‌  ‌or‌  ‌their‌  ‌duly‌  ‌authorized‌‌  i. Meal‌  ‌break.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌At‌  ‌least‌  ‌one-hour‌  ‌of‌‌  An‌  ‌on-call‌  ‌employee‌  ‌is‌  ‌considered‌  ‌working‌‌   if,‌‌  while‌‌ 
representatives.‌  ‌ non-compensable‌‌meal‌‌period.‌  ‌ required‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌  employer’s‌‌   premises‌‌
  or‌‌   so‌‌
  close‌‌ 
4. A‌‌
  three-day‌‌   work‌‌   week‌‌   is‌‌  illegal.‌‌  ‌— ‌‌Illegal‌  May‌‌
  be‌‌
  ‌shortened‌‌
  ‌(‌Book‌‌
  III‌‌
  Rule‌‌
  1 ‌‌Sec‌‌
  7)‌  ‌‌to‌‌ at‌‌ most,‌‌  thereto,‌‌  he‌‌  cannot‌‌   use‌‌  the‌‌
  time‌‌
  effectively‌‌ or‌‌ gainfully‌‌ 
compressed‌‌   workweek‌‌   when‌‌ work‌‌ days‌‌ were‌‌  20‌‌minutes‌‌‌provided‌: ‌ ‌ for‌‌his‌‌own‌‌purpose.‌  ‌
reduced‌‌   from‌‌   6 ‌‌to‌‌  3 ‌‌days‌‌   a ‌‌week,‌‌ resulting‌‌ to‌‌ 
a) Work‌‌is‌‌non-manual;‌  ‌ 2. Rest‌‌Periods‌  ‌
illegal‌  ‌reduction‌‌   of‌‌  work‌‌   hours,‌‌   as‌‌
  there‌‌   was‌‌ 
no‌‌  adequate‌‌   proof‌‌ of‌‌ losses.‌‌ ‌Financial‌‌ losses‌‌  b) Establishment‌  ‌regularly‌  ‌operates‌  ‌not‌  ‌less‌‌  Employees‌‌   working‌‌  for‌‌ 6‌‌ consecutive‌‌ days‌‌ are‌‌ entitled‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌rest‌‌ 
must‌  ‌be‌  ‌shown‌  ‌before‌  ‌a ‌ ‌company‌  ‌can‌‌  than‌‌16‌‌hours‌‌a‌‌day;‌  ‌ day‌‌of‌‌at‌‌least‌‌24‌‌consecutive‌‌hours.‌  ‌
validly‌‌   opt‌‌
  to‌‌   reduce‌‌   the‌‌ work‌‌ hours‌‌ of‌‌ its‌‌  c) In‌  ‌cases‌  ‌of‌  ‌actual‌  ‌or‌‌
  impending‌‌   emergencies‌‌  GR‌:‌‌  Employer‌‌schedules‌‌employee’s‌‌rest‌‌day.‌  ‌
employees.‌‌(L ‌ inton‌‌Commercial‌‌v.‌‌Hellera‌) ‌ ‌ or‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌urgent‌  ‌work‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌performed‌  ‌on‌‌  EXC‌:‌‌  Employee‌‌preference‌‌based‌‌on‌r‌ eligious‌‌ground‌;  ‌‌ ‌
5. Waiving‌‌
  of‌‌
  OT‌‌
  in‌‌
  CWW‌‌   is‌‌
  valid.‌‌  D.O.‌‌
  No.‌‌ 21‌‌  machineries;‌‌and‌  ‌
EE‌  ‌must‌  ‌make‌  ‌known‌  ‌his‌  ‌preference‌  ‌7 ‌ ‌days‌  ‌before‌‌ 
sanctions‌  ‌the‌  ‌waiver‌  ‌of‌  ‌overtime‌  ‌pay‌  ‌in‌‌  d) Work‌  ‌is‌  ‌necessary‌‌
  to‌‌
  prevent‌‌
  serious‌‌
  loss‌‌
  of‌‌  initial‌‌rest‌‌day.‌  ‌
consideration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌  perishable‌‌goods.‌  ‌
employees‌‌   will‌‌
  derive‌‌
  from‌‌   the‌‌
  adoption‌‌  of‌‌ a ‌‌ EXC‌‌to‌‌the‌‌EXC‌:  ‌‌ ‌
ii. Power‌‌interruptions‌‌or‌‌brownouts‌  ‌
compressed‌  ‌workweek‌  ‌scheme.‌  ‌(‌Bisig‌  ‌ng‌‌  When‌‌  it‌‌
  will‌‌
  cause‌‌
  serious‌‌  obstruction‌‌ or‌‌ prejudice‌‌ to‌‌ 
Manggagawa‌‌sa‌‌Tryco‌‌v.‌‌NLRC‌) ‌ ‌ a) If‌‌not‌‌exceeding‌‌20‌‌minutes,‌‌compensable;‌  ‌ the‌‌
  employer,‌‌   employer‌‌  shall‌‌
  schedule‌‌
  the‌‌
  rest‌‌
  day‌‌
  of‌‌ 
6. See‌‌DOLE‌‌DA‌‌No.‌‌2‌‌s.‌‌2004‌  ‌ b) If‌‌more‌‌than‌‌20‌‌minutes,‌‌not‌‌compensable‌‌if:‌  ‌ employee’s‌‌choice‌a ‌ t‌‌least‌‌2‌‌days‌‌in‌‌a‌‌month.‌  ‌
(b) Built-in‌‌overtime.‌  ‌ i) Employees‌‌can‌‌leave;‌‌or‌  ‌ GR‌:‌‌  Employer‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌compel‌  ‌employee‌‌
  to‌‌
  work‌‌
  on‌‌
  a ‌‌rest‌‌ 
day.‌  ‌
Engineering‌‌Equipment‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌Minister‌‌of‌‌Labor‌  ‌ ii) Employees‌  ‌can‌  ‌use‌  ‌time‌  ‌effectively‌  ‌for‌‌ 
their‌‌own‌‌interest.‌  ‌ EXC‌:‌‌  ‌Under‌‌Art‌‌92‌‌and‌‌Book‌‌III‌‌Rule‌‌III‌‌Sec‌‌6:‌  ‌
Aspera‌  ‌was‌  ‌one‌  ‌of‌  ‌several‌  ‌employees‌‌   who‌‌
  signed‌‌  written‌‌   contracts‌‌ 
with‌‌  a ‌‌‌"built-in"‌‌
  overtime‌‌   pay‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  ten-hour‌‌ working‌‌ day‌‌ and‌‌ that‌‌  c) In‌  ‌each‌  ‌case,‌  ‌employer‌  ‌may‌  ‌extend‌  ‌normal‌‌  a. In‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌actual‌  ‌or‌  ‌impending‌  ‌emergencies‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌‌ 
their‌  ‌basic‌  ‌monthly‌  ‌pay‌  ‌was‌  ‌adjusted‌  ‌to‌  ‌reflect‌  ‌the‌  ‌higher‌  ‌amount‌‌  working‌‌hours‌‌to‌‌make‌‌up‌‌for‌‌lost‌‌time.‌  ‌ calamities,‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌force‌  ‌majeure‌  ‌or‌  ‌imminent‌‌ 
covering‌  ‌the‌  ‌guaranteed‌  ‌two-hour‌  ‌extra‌  ‌time‌  ‌whether‌  ‌worked‌  ‌or‌‌  danger‌‌to‌‌public‌‌safety;‌  ‌
iii. Travel‌‌time‌  ‌
unworked.‌‌   Because‌‌   of‌‌ that‌‌ approval,‌‌ the‌‌ petitioner‌‌ acted‌‌ in‌‌ good‌‌ faith‌‌  b. Urgent‌‌
  work‌‌
  needs‌‌  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  performed‌‌ on‌‌ machineries‌‌ to‌‌ 
a) Home-to-work-work-to-home‌  ‌travel‌  ‌— ‌ ‌not‌‌ 
in‌‌enforcing‌‌the‌‌contract.‌  ‌ avoid‌‌serious‌‌loss;‌  ‌
considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌hours‌  ‌worked‌  ‌because‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌
Ilaw‌‌at‌‌Buklod‌‌ng‌‌Manggagawa‌‌v.‌‌NLRC‌  ‌ normal‌‌incident‌‌of‌‌employment.‌  ‌ c. Abnormal‌  ‌pressure‌  ‌of‌  ‌work‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌  ‌special‌‌ 
circumstance;‌  ‌
b) Considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌hours‌  ‌worked‌  ‌— ‌ ‌if‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌‌ 
The‌  ‌work‌  ‌schedule‌  ‌(with‌  ‌"‌built-in‌‌   overtime‌")‌‌   had‌‌  not‌‌
  been‌‌  forced‌‌ 
deviate‌  ‌from‌  ‌his‌  ‌normal‌‌  d. Prevent‌‌serious‌‌loss‌‌of‌‌perishable‌‌goods;‌ 
upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌workers;‌  ‌it‌  ‌had‌  ‌been‌  ‌agreed‌  ‌upon‌  ‌between‌  ‌SMC‌  ‌and‌  ‌its‌‌ 
workers‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌‌  Polo‌‌
  Plant‌‌   and‌‌
  indeed,‌‌   had‌‌  been‌‌  religiously‌‌   followed‌  home-to-work-work-to-home‌‌travel.‌  ‌ e. Nature‌  ‌of‌  ‌work‌  ‌requires‌  ‌7 ‌‌days‌‌
  continuous‌‌
  work,‌‌
  i.e.‌‌ 
with‌‌  mutually‌‌   beneficial‌‌   results‌‌  for‌‌
  the‌‌  past‌‌
  five‌‌  (5)‌‌
  years.‌‌
  Hence,‌‌  it‌‌  iv. Waiting‌  ‌time.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌spent‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌employee‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  crew‌‌members‌‌in‌‌vessels;‌  ‌
could‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌a‌  ‌matter‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌great‌  ‌prejudice‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  considered‌‌as‌‌working‌‌time‌‌if‌‌   ‌ f. Work‌  ‌is‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌to‌  ‌avail‌  ‌of‌  ‌favorable‌  ‌weather‌‌ 
workers‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌give‌  ‌rise‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌controversy‌  ‌between‌  ‌them‌  ‌and‌‌  a) it‌‌is‌‌integral‌‌to‌‌his‌‌work‌‌and‌‌   ‌ conditions.‌  ‌
management.‌‌   ‌
b) that‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌‌
  is‌‌
  required‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  employer‌‌
  to‌‌  NO‌‌rest‌‌day‌‌for‌  ‌
c. Non-compensable‌‌hours;‌‌when‌‌compensable‌  ‌ wait.‌  ‌ a. Employees‌‌excluded‌‌from‌‌labor‌‌standards‌‌(Art.‌‌82)‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 148‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Union‌  ‌members‌  ‌who‌  ‌are‌  ‌supervisory‌  ‌employees‌‌  c) which‌‌


  is‌‌
  ‌payable‌‌
  ‌by‌‌
  an‌‌
  employer‌‌
  to‌‌
  an‌‌
  employee‌‌
  under‌‌ a ‌‌ (Purpose‌‌Test)‌‌   ‌  ‌
considered‌‌   as‌‌
  officers‌‌
  and‌‌
  members‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ managerial‌‌  written‌‌or‌‌unwritten‌‌contract‌‌of‌‌employment‌‌   ‌ For‌‌the‌‌benefit‌‌of‌‌Employee‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌benefit‌‌of‌‌Employer‌  ‌
staff‌  ‌are‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌coverage‌  ‌of‌  ‌Article‌  ‌82.‌‌  i. for‌‌work‌‌done‌‌or‌‌to‌‌be‌‌done,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
Perforce,‌‌ they‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌ entitled‌‌ to‌‌ overtime,‌‌ rest‌‌ day‌‌ and‌‌  Part‌‌of‌‌Wage‌  ‌ Independent‌‌of‌‌Wage‌ 
ii. for‌‌services‌‌rendered‌‌or‌‌to‌‌be‌‌rendered‌‌   ‌
holiday.‌‌(N ‌ ational‌‌Sugar‌‌Refineries‌‌v.‌‌NLRC‌) ‌ ‌
Deductible‌‌from‌‌wage‌  ‌ Not‌‌deductible‌‌from‌‌wage‌  ‌
b. Shift‌  ‌engineer,‌  ‌no‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌‌   overtime‌‌
  and‌‌
  premium‌‌   pay‌‌  d) and‌  ‌includes‌  ‌the‌  ‌fair‌  ‌and‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌value‌  ‌of‌  ‌board,‌‌ 
as‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌officer‌  ‌or‌  ‌member‌  ‌of‌  ‌managerial‌  ‌staff‌‌  lodging,‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌facilities‌  ‌customarily‌  ‌furnished‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  1) Facilities.‌‌—‌‌Requisites‌‌for‌‌Deductibility:‌  ‌
(‌Peñaranda‌‌v.‌‌Baganga‌‌Plywood‌) ‌ ‌ employer‌‌to‌‌the‌‌employee.‌‌   ‌ a) Must‌‌be‌‌customarily‌‌furnished‌‌‌by‌‌the‌‌employer;‌  ‌
"‌Fair‌  ‌and‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌value‌" ‌‌‌shall‌‌
  not‌‌
  include‌‌
  any‌‌
  profit‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌ 
3. Service‌‌Charge‌  ‌ b) Must‌‌be‌‌charged‌‌at‌‌a‌f‌ air‌‌and‌‌reasonable‌‌value;‌‌‌and‌  ‌
employer,‌‌or‌‌to‌‌any‌‌person‌‌affiliated‌‌with‌‌the‌‌employer.‌  ‌
a. as‌‌amended‌‌by‌R‌ A‌‌No.‌‌11360‌,‌‌effective‌‌on‌‌September‌‌  c) Must‌  ‌be‌  ‌voluntarily‌  ‌accepted‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌in‌‌ 
Basic‌  ‌Wage.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌All‌  ‌the‌  ‌remuneration‌  ‌or‌  ‌earnings‌  ‌paid‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌‌ 
4,‌‌2019‌‌per‌D
‌ OLE‌‌Labor‌‌Advisory‌‌No.‌‌10,‌‌S.‌‌2020‌;  ‌‌ ‌ writing.‌  ‌
employer‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌worker‌  ‌for‌  ‌services‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌on‌  ‌normal‌  ‌working‌‌ 
b. see‌‌DOLE‌‌D.O.‌‌No.‌‌206,‌‌S.‌‌2019‌; ‌ ‌ days‌‌and‌‌hours‌‌b ‌ ut‌‌does‌‌not‌‌include‌:‌  2) Meals‌  ‌and‌  ‌lodging‌  ‌provided‌  ‌to‌  ‌employees‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌‌ 
maintain‌‌   their‌‌
  efficiency‌‌
  and‌‌
  health‌‌  while‌‌ working‌‌ at‌‌ their‌‌ 
c. see‌‌DOLE‌‌Labor‌‌Advisory‌‌No.‌‌14,‌‌S.‌‌2019‌. ‌ ‌ a) COLA;‌  ‌
respective‌  ‌project‌  ‌sites,‌  ‌are‌  ‌supplements‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌not‌‌ 
All‌  ‌service‌  ‌charges‌  ‌actually‌  ‌collected‌  ‌by‌  ‌covered‌‌  b) Profit‌‌sharing‌‌payments;‌  ‌ facilities‌  ‌(‌SLL‌  ‌International‌  ‌Cable‌  ‌Specialists‌  ‌v.‌  ‌NLRC‌‌ 
establishments‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌distributed‌  ‌COMPLETELY‌  ‌and‌‌  2011)‌  ‌
c) Premium‌‌pay;‌  ‌
EQUALLY‌, ‌ ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌actual‌  ‌hours‌  ‌or‌  ‌days‌  ‌of‌  ‌work‌  ‌or‌  ‌service‌‌ 
d) 13th‌‌month‌‌pay;‌‌or‌  ‌ 3) Supplements.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Constitute‌  ‌extra‌  ‌remuneration‌  ‌or‌‌ 
rendered‌  ‌among‌  ‌the‌  ‌covered‌  ‌employees‌, ‌ ‌including‌  ‌those‌‌ 
special‌  ‌privileges‌  ‌or‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌given‌  ‌to‌  ‌or‌  ‌received‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
already‌‌receiving‌‌the‌‌benefit‌‌of‌‌sharing‌‌in‌‌the‌‌service‌‌charges.‌  ‌ e) Other‌‌monetary‌‌benefits.‌  ‌
laborers‌o ‌ ver‌‌and‌‌above‌‌‌their‌‌ordinary‌‌earnings‌‌or‌‌wages‌  ‌
Covered‌‌  employees‌‌   refer‌‌ to‌‌ all‌‌ employees,‌‌ ‌except‌‌ managerial‌‌  a. Wage‌‌vs.‌‌salary‌  ‌
c. Bonus,‌‌13th‌‌month‌‌pay‌  ‌
employees‌, ‌ ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌direct‌  ‌employ‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌covered‌‌ 
Wage‌  ‌ Salary‌  ‌ 1) Resigned‌‌or‌‌separated‌‌employees‌‌to‌‌be‌‌paid‌‌pro‌‌rata;‌ 
establishment.‌  ‌
Compensation‌  ‌paid‌  ‌for‌  ‌manual‌‌  Compensation‌  ‌for‌  ‌higher‌  ‌or‌‌  2) Non-payment‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌treated‌‌as‌m
‌ oney‌‌claims‌. ‌ ‌
B. Wages‌  ‌
skilled‌‌or‌‌unskilled‌‌labor‌  ‌ superior‌‌level‌‌of‌‌employment‌  3) Employees‌  ‌paid‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fixed‌  ‌or‌  ‌guaranteed‌  ‌wage‌  ‌plus‌‌ 
1. Definition,‌‌components,‌‌and‌‌exclusions‌  ‌ commission‌  ‌are‌  ‌entitled‌‌
  based‌‌  on‌‌
  their‌‌
  total‌‌
  earnings‌‌
  for‌ 
Compensation‌‌for‌‌labor‌  ‌ Relates‌‌to‌‌a‌‌position‌‌or‌‌office‌  ‌
Wage‌‌p
‌ aid‌‌to‌‌an‌‌employee‌‌shall‌‌mean‌‌   ‌ the‌‌calendar‌‌year.‌  ‌
a) the‌‌remuneration‌o
‌ r‌‌earnings,‌‌however‌‌designated,‌‌   ‌ Shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌execution,‌‌  NOT‌‌exempt‌  ‌ 4) Basic‌  ‌salary‌  ‌means‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌actually‌  ‌received‌‌
  by‌‌ 
attachment‌  ‌or‌  ‌garnishment‌  ‌except‌‌  an‌  ‌employee,‌  ‌but‌  ‌1/12‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  ‌standard‌  ‌monthly‌  ‌wage‌‌ 
b) capable‌‌   of‌‌
  being‌‌
  expressed‌‌   in‌‌ terms‌‌ of‌‌ money,‌‌ whether‌‌  for‌  ‌debts‌  ‌incurred‌  ‌for‌  ‌food,‌  ‌shelter,‌‌ 
multiplied‌  ‌by‌  ‌their‌  ‌length‌  ‌of‌  ‌service‌  ‌within‌  ‌a ‌ ‌given‌‌ 
fixed‌‌or‌‌ascertained‌‌on‌‌a  ‌‌ ‌ clothing‌‌and‌‌medical‌‌attendance.‌  ‌
calendar‌‌year.‌  ‌
i. time,‌‌   ‌ b. Distinguish‌‌facilities‌‌and‌‌supplements‌  ‌ R&E‌‌Transport‌‌v.‌‌Latag‌  ‌
ii. task,‌‌   ‌ Facilities‌  Supplements‌  ‌ Since‌‌
  Pedro‌‌  was‌‌
  paid‌‌
  according‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌ "‌boundary‌" ‌‌system,‌‌ he‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ 
iii. piece,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ entitled‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  13th‌‌
  month‌‌  and‌‌
  the‌‌  service‌‌
  incentive‌‌
  pay;‌‌ hence,‌‌ his‌‌ 
Necessary‌‌expenses‌‌of‌‌laborer‌‌and‌‌  Extra‌‌benefit‌‌or‌‌special‌‌ 
iv. commission‌‌basis,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ his‌‌family‌  ‌ privilege‌  ‌ retirement‌‌pay‌‌should‌‌be‌‌computed‌‌on‌‌the‌‌sole‌‌basis‌‌of‌‌his‌‌salary.‌  ‌
v. other‌‌method‌‌of‌‌calculating‌‌the‌‌same,‌‌   ‌
Reyes‌‌v.‌‌NLRC‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 149‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Sales‌  ‌commissions‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌effectively‌  ‌an‌‌   integral‌‌   portion‌‌   of‌‌  a) Private‌  ‌school‌  t‌ eachers:‌  ‌during‌  s‌ emestral‌‌ 
Since‌  ‌a ‌‌worker‌‌   is‌‌
  entitled‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  enjoyment‌‌   of‌‌
  ten‌‌
  paid‌‌
  regular‌ 
the‌‌
  basic‌‌   salary‌‌  structure‌‌   of‌‌
  an‌‌   employee,‌‌   shall‌‌  be‌‌
  included‌‌   in‌‌  vacations‌  ‌— ‌ ‌not‌  ‌entitled‌; ‌ ‌Christmas‌  ‌breaks‌  ‌— ‌
holidays,‌‌   the‌‌
  fact‌‌  that‌‌
  two‌‌
  holidays‌‌ fall‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ same‌‌ date‌‌ should‌‌ 
determining‌  ‌the‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌pay.‌‌   ‌In‌‌
  fine,‌‌
  the‌‌  commissions‌‌   which‌‌  entitled‌. ‌ ‌
not‌  ‌operate‌  ‌to‌  ‌reduce‌  ‌to‌  ‌nine‌  ‌the‌  ‌ten‌  ‌holiday‌  ‌pay‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌a ‌‌
petitioner‌  ‌received‌‌   were‌‌  ‌not‌‌
  part‌‌
  of‌‌   his‌‌  salary‌‌   structure‌‌   but‌‌
  were‌‌  b) Paid‌  ‌by‌  ‌results‌  ‌or‌  ‌output‌  ‌= ‌ ‌entitled‌‌   ‌to‌‌
  not‌‌  less‌‌  worker‌‌is‌‌entitled‌‌to‌‌receive.‌  ‌
profit-sharing‌  ‌payments‌  ‌and‌  ‌had‌  ‌no‌  ‌clear,‌  ‌direct‌  ‌or‌  ‌necessary‌‌  than‌  ‌the‌  ‌average‌  ‌of‌  ‌daily‌  ‌earnings‌  ‌of‌  ‌last‌  ‌7 ‌ ‌days‌‌ 
relation‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  amount‌‌   of‌‌
  work‌‌ he‌‌ actually‌‌ performed.‌‌ The‌‌ collection‌‌  actually‌  ‌worked‌  ‌preceding‌  ‌the‌  ‌holiday,‌  ‌provided‌‌   it‌‌  2. Principles‌  ‌
made‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌salesmen‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌sale‌  ‌transactions‌  ‌was‌  ‌the‌  ‌profit‌  ‌of‌‌  is‌‌not‌‌less‌‌than‌‌the‌‌statutory‌‌minimum‌‌wage.‌  ‌
private‌‌  respondent‌‌   from‌‌  which‌‌ petitioner‌‌ had‌‌ a ‌‌share‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ form‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌ a. No‌‌work,‌‌no‌‌pay‌  ‌
c) Seasonal‌  ‌workers:‌  ‌during‌  ‌off-season‌  ‌— ‌ ‌not‌‌ 
commission.‌  ‌ GR‌:‌‌  ‌If‌‌the‌‌worker‌‌does‌‌not‌‌work,‌‌he‌‌earns‌‌no‌‌pay.‌  ‌
entitled‌. ‌ ‌
Letran‌‌Calamba‌‌Faculty‌‌&‌‌Employees‌‌Association‌‌v.‌‌NLRC‌  ‌ EX‌:‌‌  Worker‌‌is‌‌still‌‌entitled‌‌to‌‌be‌‌paid‌‌if:‌  ‌
d) Workers‌  ‌with‌  ‌no‌  ‌regular‌  ‌working‌  ‌days‌  ‌— ‌‌
entitled.‌  ‌ 1. Employer‌‌   unduly‌‌ prevented‌‌ him‌‌ from‌‌ working‌‌ despite‌‌ 
ON‌  ‌OVERLOAD‌  ‌PAY.‌  ‌Overload‌  ‌pay‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌excluded‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
his‌‌ableness,‌‌willingness‌‌and‌‌readiness;‌  ‌
computation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌13th-month‌  ‌pay‌  ‌because‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌being‌  ‌paid‌  ‌for‌‌  4) Successive‌  ‌Holiday‌  ‌Rule.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Not‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌for‌  ‌both‌‌ 
additional‌‌work‌‌performed‌‌in‌‌excess‌‌of‌‌the‌‌regular‌‌teaching‌‌load.‌  ‌ holiday‌  ‌pay‌  ‌if‌  ‌absent‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌day‌  ‌preceding‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌‌  2. He‌  ‌is‌  ‌legally‌  ‌locked‌  ‌out‌  ‌or‌  ‌illegally‌  ‌suspended‌  ‌or‌‌ 
holiday,‌  ‌unless‌  ‌working‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌holiday,‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌‌  dismissed;‌  ‌
Overload‌‌  pay‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  integrated‌‌
  with‌‌ a ‌‌teacher's‌‌ basic‌‌ salary‌‌ for‌‌ his‌‌ or‌‌ 
her‌‌regular‌‌teaching‌‌load.‌‌   ‌ case,‌‌he‌‌is‌‌entitled‌‌holiday‌‌pay‌‌for‌‌the‌‌2nd.‌  ‌ 3. He‌‌is‌‌illegally‌‌prevented‌‌from‌‌working.‌  ‌
5) Double‌‌Holiday‌‌Rule‌  ‌ In‌  ‌Odango‌‌
  v.‌‌
  NLRC‌, ‌‌SC‌‌
  held‌‌
  that‌‌
  ‌no‌‌
  work‌‌
  no‌‌
  pay‌‌
  also‌‌
  applies‌‌ 
d. Holiday‌‌   pay.‌‌
  — ‌‌‌refers‌‌
  to‌‌ the‌‌ payment‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ regular‌‌ daily‌‌ wage‌ 
a) If‌‌unworked‌‌=‌2
‌ 00‌%;‌  ‌ to‌‌monthly-paid‌‌workers,‌‌if‌‌absent‌‌without‌‌pay.‌  ‌
for‌‌any‌‌unworked‌‌regular‌‌holiday.‌  ‌
b) If‌‌worked‌‌=‌3
‌ 00‌%;‌  ‌ b. Equal‌‌pay‌‌for‌‌equal‌‌work‌  ‌
1) Effect‌‌of‌a
‌ bsences‌: ‌ ‌
c) If‌‌falls‌‌on‌‌a‌‌rest‌‌day‌‌=‌3
‌ 90‌% ‌ ‌ International‌‌School‌‌Alliance‌‌of‌‌Educators‌‌v.‌‌Quisumbing‌  ‌
a) On‌‌leave‌‌with‌‌pay‌‌—‌e
‌ ntitled‌; ‌ ‌
6) Flexi-holiday‌  ‌Schedule‌  ‌— ‌ ‌employee‌  ‌agrees‌  ‌to‌‌
  avail‌‌   of‌‌  Persons‌  ‌who‌  ‌work‌  ‌with‌  ‌substantially‌  ‌equal‌  ‌qualifications,‌  ‌skill,‌‌ 
b) On‌  ‌leave‌  ‌without‌  ‌pay‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌day‌  ‌immediately‌‌ 
holidays‌  ‌at‌  ‌some‌  ‌other‌  ‌days‌  ‌provided‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌‌  effort‌  ‌and‌  ‌responsibility,‌  ‌under‌  ‌similar‌  ‌conditions,‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌paid‌‌ 
preceding‌‌  — ‌‌‌not‌‌
  entitled‌, ‌‌‌unless‌‌
  ‌worked‌‌  on‌‌
  regular‌‌  similar‌‌salaries.‌  ‌
diminution‌‌of‌‌existing‌‌benefits‌‌resulting‌‌therefrom.‌  ‌
holiday;‌  ‌
7) Supervised‌  ‌workers‌  ‌paid‌  ‌by‌  ‌results‌  ‌are‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌‌  The‌  ‌School‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌invoke‌  ‌the‌  ‌need‌  ‌to‌  ‌entice‌  ‌foreign-hires‌  ‌to‌  ‌leave‌‌ 
c) On‌‌leave‌‌while‌‌on‌‌SSS‌‌or‌‌EC‌‌benefits‌‌—‌e
‌ ntitled‌. ‌ ‌ their‌  ‌domicile‌  ‌to‌  ‌rationalize‌  ‌the‌  ‌distinction‌  ‌in‌  ‌salary‌  ‌rates‌  ‌without‌‌ 
holiday‌‌pay.‌  ‌
d) If‌  ‌day‌  ‌preceding‌  ‌holiday‌  ‌is‌  ‌nonworking‌  ‌day‌  ‌— ‌‌ violating‌‌the‌‌principle‌‌of‌‌equal‌‌work‌‌for‌‌equal‌‌pay.‌  ‌
Asian‌‌Transmission‌‌Corp‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
entitled‌  ‌if‌  ‌worked‌  ‌the‌  ‌day‌  ‌immediately‌  ‌preceding‌‌ 
c. Non-diminution‌‌of‌‌benefits‌  ‌
the‌‌nonworking‌‌day.‌  ‌ Holiday‌  ‌pay‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌legislated‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌enacted‌  ‌as‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Constitutional‌  ‌imperative‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌shall‌  ‌afford‌  ‌protection‌  ‌to‌‌  1) Benefits‌  ‌given‌  ‌to‌  ‌employees‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌taken‌  ‌back‌  ‌or‌‌ 
2) Effect‌‌of‌b
‌ usiness‌‌closure‌  ‌
labor.‌‌
  Its‌‌ purpose‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ merely‌‌ "to‌‌ prevent‌‌ diminution‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ monthly‌‌  reduced‌  ‌unilaterally‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌because‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefit‌‌ 
a) In‌‌case‌‌of‌‌temporary‌‌shutdown‌‌—‌e
‌ ntitled‌; ‌ ‌ has‌‌become‌‌part‌‌of‌‌the‌‌employment‌‌contract.‌  ‌
income‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌workers‌  ‌on‌  ‌account‌  ‌of‌  ‌work‌  ‌interruptions.‌  ‌In‌  ‌other‌‌ 
b) If‌  ‌cessation‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌  ‌business‌  ‌reverses‌  ‌as‌  ‌authorized‌‌  words,‌‌   although‌‌   the‌‌  worker‌‌   is‌‌
  forced‌‌  to‌‌
  take‌‌  a ‌‌rest,‌‌
  he‌‌
  earns‌‌
  what‌‌ he‌‌  2) Applicable‌‌if‌‌the‌‌following‌‌conditions‌‌are‌‌met:‌  ‌
by‌‌SOLE‌‌—‌n ‌ ot‌‌entitled‌. ‌ ‌ should‌‌   earn,‌‌  that‌‌
  is,‌‌
  his‌‌
  holiday‌‌   pay."‌‌
  It‌‌
  is‌‌
  also‌‌ intended‌‌ to‌‌ enable‌‌ the‌‌ 
a) The‌  ‌grant‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌is‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌an‌  ‌express‌ 
3) Holiday‌‌pay‌‌of‌‌certain‌‌employees‌  ‌ worker‌‌   to‌‌
  participate‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ national‌‌ celebrations‌‌ held‌‌ during‌‌ the‌‌ days‌‌ 
policy‌  ‌or‌  ‌has‌  ‌ripen‌  ‌into‌  ‌practice‌  ‌over‌  ‌a ‌ ‌long‌‌ 
identified‌‌as‌‌with‌‌great‌‌historical‌‌and‌‌cultural‌‌significance.‌‌   ‌
period‌‌of‌‌time;‌  ‌
b) Practice‌‌is‌c‌ onsistent‌‌‌and‌‌deliberate;‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 150‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

c) It‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌  ‌error‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌construction‌  ‌or‌‌  Estimated‌‌Equivalent‌‌Monthly‌‌Rate‌‌(EEMR)‌  ‌
application‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌doubtful‌  ‌or‌  ‌difficult‌  ‌question‌  ‌of‌‌ 
NO‌. ‌ ‌As‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌failed‌  ‌to‌  ‌apply‌  ‌for‌  ‌an‌  ‌exemption,‌  ‌and‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌‌ 
a) For‌M
‌ onthly‌p
‌ aid:‌‌(365)‌  ‌ undisputed‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  respondents‌‌
  are‌‌
  MPRB's‌‌  employees‌‌  and‌‌ are‌‌ paid‌‌ 
law‌‌or‌‌provision‌‌in‌‌the‌‌CBA;‌  ‌
Applicable Daily Rate (ADR) x 365 less‌‌
  than‌‌
  the‌‌  prescribed‌‌   minimum‌‌   wage,‌‌
  the‌‌
  petitioner's‌‌ liability‌‌ for‌‌ 
d) The‌  ‌diminution‌  ‌is‌  ‌done‌  ‌unilaterally‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  E EM R  = 12 months  ‌ wage‌‌differential‌‌cannot‌‌be‌‌denied.‌  ‌
employer.‌  ‌ b) For‌D
‌ aily‌p
‌ aid:‌  ‌ Petitioner‌  ‌is‌  ‌employing‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌ten‌  ‌(10)‌  ‌employees‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌‌ 
3) Company‌  ‌practice‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌custom‌  ‌or‌  ‌habit‌  ‌shown‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌‌  i) Required‌‌to‌‌work‌‌everyday‌‌(393.5)‌  ‌ establishment.‌  ‌To‌  ‌be‌  ‌sure,‌  ‌employment‌‌
  status‌‌
  is‌‌
  determined‌‌
  by‌‌  the‌‌ 
employer’s‌  ‌repeated,‌‌   habitual‌‌   customary‌‌   or‌‌  succession‌‌   of‌‌  four-fold‌‌test,‌‌and‌‌the‌‌attendant‌‌circumstances‌‌of‌‌each‌‌case.‌  ‌
Applicable Daily Rate (ADR) x 393.5
acts‌‌   of‌‌
  similar‌‌
  kind‌‌
  by‌‌
  reason‌‌   of‌‌
  which,‌‌  it‌‌ gains‌‌ the‌‌ status‌‌  E EM R  = 12 months  ‌
of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌company‌  ‌policy‌  ‌that‌  ‌can‌  ‌no‌  ‌longer‌  ‌be‌  ‌disturbed‌  ‌or‌‌ 
4. Payment‌‌of‌‌Wages‌  ‌
ii) Do‌  ‌not‌  ‌work‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌considered‌  ‌paid‌  ‌on‌‌ 
withdrawn.‌  ‌ GR‌:‌‌  ‌Legal‌  ‌Tender‌  ‌(Art‌  ‌102,‌  ‌LC;‌  ‌Art‌  ‌1705‌  ‌NCC)‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌‌ 
Sundays‌‌or‌‌rest‌‌days‌‌(313)‌  ‌
4) The‌  ‌rule‌  ‌on‌  ‌company‌  ‌practice‌  ‌is‌  ‌generally‌  ‌used‌  ‌with‌‌  currency‌  ‌which‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌made‌  ‌suitable‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Applicable Daily Rate (ADR) x 313
respect‌‌  to‌‌  grant‌‌
  of‌‌
  additional‌‌
  benefits‌‌  to‌‌ employees,‌‌ not‌‌ to‌‌  E EM R  = 12 months  ‌ purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌tender‌  ‌of‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌debts,‌  ‌i.e.‌  ‌coins‌  ‌and‌‌ 
issues‌  ‌involving‌  ‌diminution‌  ‌of‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌(‌2011‌  ‌University‌‌  notes‌‌issued‌‌by‌‌BSP.‌  ‌
iii) Do‌  ‌not‌  ‌work‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌considered‌  ‌paid‌  ‌on‌‌ 
of‌‌East‌) ‌ ‌ Strictly‌‌
  not‌‌
  allowed‌‌
  — ‌‌‌other‌‌
  objects‌‌
  other‌‌
  than‌‌
  legal‌‌
  tender‌, ‌‌even‌‌ 
weekends‌‌or‌‌rest‌‌days‌‌(261)‌  ‌
when‌‌expressly‌‌requested‌‌by‌‌EE.‌  ‌
3. Minimum‌‌Wage‌  ‌ Applicable Daily Rate (ADR) x 261
E EM R  = 12 months  ‌
Exceptions‌  ‌
The‌  ‌minimum‌  ‌wage‌  ‌rates‌  ‌prescribed‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌  ‌basic‌‌ 
cash‌  ‌wages‌  ‌without‌  ‌deduction‌  ‌therefrom‌  ‌of‌  ‌whatever‌  ‌benefits,‌‌  b. Payment‌‌   by‌‌   results.‌‌ — ‌‌‌All‌‌ workers‌‌ ‌paid‌‌ by‌‌ result‌, ‌‌including‌‌  a) Bank‌‌Check‌‌   ‌
supplements‌  ‌or‌  ‌allowances‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌employees‌  ‌enjoy‌  ‌free‌  ‌of‌‌  those‌‌   who‌‌  are‌‌  paid‌‌
  on‌‌   piecework,‌‌   takay,‌‌
  pakyaw‌‌   or‌‌ task‌‌ basis,‌‌ 
b) Money‌‌Order‌  ‌
charge‌‌aside‌‌from‌‌the‌‌basic‌‌pay.‌  ‌ shall‌  ‌receive‌  ‌not‌  ‌less‌‌   than‌‌  the‌‌   prescribed‌‌   wage‌‌
  rates‌‌   per‌‌
  eight‌‌ 
(8)‌  ‌hours‌  ‌of‌  ‌work‌  ‌a ‌ ‌day,‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌proportion‌  ‌thereof‌  ‌for‌‌   working‌‌  c) Postal‌‌Checks‌,‌‌provided‌  ‌
Regional‌‌   Minimum‌‌ Wage‌‌ Rates.‌‌ — ‌‌‌The‌‌ ‌lowest‌‌ basic‌‌ wage‌‌ rates‌‌ 
less‌‌than‌‌eight‌‌(8)‌‌hours.‌  ‌ a. It‌‌is‌‌customary‌‌practice‌‌on‌‌the‌‌date‌‌of‌‌effectivity;‌‌or‌  ‌
that‌  ‌an‌  ‌employer‌  ‌can‌  ‌pay‌  ‌his‌  ‌workers,‌  ‌as‌  ‌fixed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Regional‌‌ 
Tripartite‌‌   Wages‌‌  and‌‌   Productivity‌‌   Boards‌‌   (RTWPB)‌‌   and‌‌ which‌‌  Other‌‌Wage‌‌Rates‌  ‌ b. So‌‌stipulated‌‌in‌‌CBA;‌‌and‌‌the‌‌following‌‌are‌‌met:‌  ‌
shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌lower‌  ‌than‌  ‌the‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌statutory‌  ‌minimum‌  ‌wage‌‌  a. Of‌  ‌apprentices‌  ‌or‌  ‌learners‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌75%‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  statutory‌‌  c. There‌‌is‌‌a‌‌bank‌‌within‌‌1‌‌KM‌‌radius;‌  ‌
rates.‌  ‌ minimum‌‌wage.‌  ‌
d. Employer‌  ‌or‌  ‌agents‌‌
  do‌‌
  not‌‌
  receive‌‌
  pecuniary‌‌
  benefits‌‌ 
a) Includes‌C
‌ OLA‌‌‌as‌‌fixed‌‌by‌‌RTWPB.‌  ‌ b. Of‌‌PWDs‌,‌‌100%‌‌of‌‌the‌‌applicable‌‌minimum‌‌wage.‌  ‌ from‌‌such‌‌arrangement;‌  ‌
b) Excludes‌o
‌ ther‌‌wage-related‌‌benefits.‌  ‌ Pablico‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌v.‌‌Cerro‌‌‌2019‌  ‌ e. Employee‌‌ given‌‌ reasonable‌‌ time‌‌ to‌‌ withdraw‌‌ and‌‌ shall‌‌ 
a. Payment‌‌   by‌‌
  hours‌‌ worked.‌‌ — ‌‌‌Once‌‌ an‌‌ agreed‌‌ period‌‌ of‌‌ work‌‌  constitute‌‌
  compensable‌‌  hours‌‌  if‌‌
  done‌‌  within‌‌
  working‌‌ 
In‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌exempted‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Wage‌  ‌Rationalization‌  ‌Act,‌  ‌two‌‌ 
is‌‌completed,‌‌compensation‌‌is‌‌earned‌‌regardless‌‌of‌‌result.‌  ‌ elements‌‌must‌‌concur‌‌-—‌  ‌ hours;‌‌and‌  ‌
1) Daily-paid‌  ‌employees‌  ‌are‌  ‌paid‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌days‌‌   actually‌‌  f. With‌‌written‌‌consent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌employee‌‌if‌‌without‌‌CBA.‌  ‌
first‌, ‌ ‌it‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌shown‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌establishment‌  ‌is‌  ‌regularly‌ 
worked‌  ‌except‌‌   unworked‌‌   regular‌‌   holidays‌‌
  when‌‌   they‌‌ 
employing‌‌not‌‌more‌‌than‌‌ten‌‌‌(10)‌‌workers,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ Place‌‌and‌‌Medium‌‌of‌‌Payment‌  ‌
are‌‌
  paid‌‌
  their‌‌  basic‌‌   wage‌‌
  if‌‌
  they‌‌
  are‌‌
  present‌‌ or‌‌ a ‌‌leave‌‌ 
with‌  ‌pay‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌working‌  ‌day‌  ‌preceding‌  ‌the‌  ‌regular‌‌  second‌, ‌ ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌establishment‌  ‌had‌  ‌applied‌  ‌for‌  ‌and‌  ‌was‌‌  GR‌:‌‌  At‌‌or‌‌near‌‌place‌‌of‌‌undertaking;‌  ‌
granted‌‌exemption‌‌‌by‌‌the‌‌appropriate‌‌Regional‌‌Board..‌  ‌
holiday.‌  ‌ EXC‌:‌‌  (‌Book‌‌III‌‌Rule‌‌VIII‌‌Sec‌‌4)‌  ‌ ‌
2) Monthly-paid‌  ‌employees‌  ‌are‌  ‌paid‌  ‌every‌  ‌day‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  WON‌‌petitioner‌‌is‌‌exempt‌‌from‌‌the‌‌Minimum‌‌Wage‌‌Law.‌  ‌
a. Deterioration‌‌of‌‌peace‌‌and‌‌order;‌  ‌
month,‌‌including‌‌unworked‌‌days.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 151‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

b. Actual‌‌or‌‌impending‌‌emergencies‌‌due‌‌to‌‌calamities;‌  ‌ b. Worker‌‌   has‌‌


  died,‌‌
  in‌‌
  which‌‌ case,‌‌ paid‌‌ to‌‌ heirs‌‌ without‌‌ need‌‌  3. Discharging‌‌him‌‌from‌‌employment;‌‌or‌  ‌
c. Employer‌‌provides‌‌free‌‌transportation‌‌back‌‌and‌‌forth;‌‌and‌  ‌ of‌‌intestate‌‌proceedings,‌‌only‌a ‌ ffidavit‌‌of‌‌heirship‌. ‌ ‌ 4. Discriminate‌‌
  against‌‌
  him‌‌
  in‌‌
  any‌‌
  manner.‌‌ (Art‌‌ 
d. Other‌‌analogous‌‌circumstance,‌p
‌ rovided‌  ‌ Time‌‌and‌‌Frequency‌  ‌ 118)‌  ‌

Time‌  ‌spent‌  ‌collecting‌  ‌wages‌  ‌is‌  ‌considered‌  ‌compensable‌‌  GR‌:‌‌  At‌  ‌least‌  ‌every‌  ‌2 ‌ ‌weeks‌  ‌or‌  ‌twice‌  ‌a ‌ ‌month‌  ‌at‌  ‌intervals‌‌
  not‌‌  iv) False‌‌reporting‌‌(Art‌‌119)‌  ‌
hours‌‌worked.‌  ‌ exceeding‌‌16‌‌days.‌  ‌ c) Non-interference‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌disposal‌‌   of‌‌
  wages.‌‌
  ‌— ‌‌‌Art‌‌
  112.‌‌
  No‌‌ 
e. Prohibited‌  ‌places:‌  ‌bar,‌  ‌club,‌  ‌drinking‌  ‌establishment,‌‌  EXC‌:‌‌  Force‌‌majeure.‌  ‌ employer‌  ‌is‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌to‌  ‌limit‌  ‌or‌  ‌otherwise‌‌  interfere‌‌   with‌‌
  how‌‌ 
similar‌  ‌places‌  ‌where‌  ‌games‌  ‌are‌  ‌played‌  ‌with‌  ‌stakes‌  ‌of‌‌  an‌‌employee‌‌should‌‌dispose‌‌or‌‌make‌‌use‌‌of‌‌the‌‌latter’s‌‌wages.‌‌   ‌
5. Prohibitions‌‌Regarding‌‌Wages‌  ‌
money,‌  ‌except‌  ‌if‌  ‌employee‌  ‌employed‌  ‌in‌  ‌such‌‌  He‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌manner‌  ‌force,‌  ‌compel,‌  ‌or‌  ‌oblige‌  ‌his‌‌ 
establishment.‌  ‌ a) From‌‌the‌‌Civil‌‌Code‌  ‌ employees‌‌ to‌‌ purchase‌‌ merchandise,‌‌ commodities‌‌ or‌‌ any‌‌ other‌‌ 
Payment‌‌thru‌B
‌ anks‌‌allowed‌‌(RA‌‌6727)‌p
‌ rovided‌  ‌ i) Art‌  ‌1705‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌laborer's‌  ‌wages‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌
  paid‌‌
  in‌‌
  legal‌‌  property.‌  ‌
currency.‌  ‌
a. With‌‌written‌‌permission‌‌of‌‌majority‌‌of‌‌employees;‌  ‌ Wage‌‌Deduction‌  ‌
ii) Art‌‌
  1706‌. ‌‌Withholding‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  wages,‌‌ except‌‌ for‌‌ a ‌‌debt‌‌ 
b. In‌‌all‌‌private‌‌establishments‌‌of‌a
‌ t‌‌least‌‌25‌‌EEs‌; ‌ ‌ GR‌:‌‌  No‌‌
  employer,‌‌
  in‌‌
  his‌‌
  own‌‌
  behalf‌‌
  or‌‌
  in‌‌ behalf‌‌ of‌‌ any‌‌ person,‌‌ 
due,‌‌shall‌‌not‌‌be‌‌made‌‌by‌‌the‌‌employer.‌  ‌
shall‌  ‌make‌  ‌any‌  ‌deduction‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌wages‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌ 
c. Located‌‌within‌‌1KM‌‌radius‌‌to‌‌a‌‌bank;‌  ‌
iii) Art‌  ‌1707.‌  ‌The‌  ‌laborer's‌  ‌wages‌  ‌shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  a ‌‌lien‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌  employees.‌  ‌
d. Within‌‌the‌‌period‌‌of‌‌payment‌‌of‌‌wages‌‌fixed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌LC.‌  ‌ goods‌‌manufactured‌‌or‌‌the‌‌work‌‌done.‌ 
EXC‌: ‌ ‌
Payment‌‌thru‌A
‌ TM‌‌‌allowed‌p
‌ rovided‌: ‌ ‌ iv) Art‌‌  1708‌. ‌‌The‌‌
  laborer's‌‌
  wages‌‌   shall‌‌
  ‌NOT‌‌
  be‌‌ subject‌‌ 
a) Facilities;‌  ‌
a. With‌‌written‌‌consent‌‌of‌‌employees‌‌concerned;‌  ‌ to‌  ‌execution‌  ‌or‌  ‌attachment,‌  ‌except‌  ‌for‌  ‌debts‌‌ 
incurred‌  ‌for‌  ‌food,‌  ‌shelter,‌  ‌clothing‌  ‌and‌  ‌medical‌‌  b) Amount‌  ‌paid‌  ‌by‌  ‌ER‌  ‌as‌  ‌premiums‌  ‌on‌  ‌insurance,‌‌ 
b. Given‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌time‌  ‌to‌‌
  withdraw‌‌
  during‌‌
  working‌‌
  hours‌‌  consented‌t‌ o‌‌by‌‌EE;‌  ‌
attendance.‌  ‌
and‌‌is‌‌considered‌‌compensable;‌  ‌
v) Art‌‌
  1709.‌‌   The‌‌
  employer‌‌   shall‌‌ neither‌‌ seize‌‌ nor‌‌ retain‌‌  c) For‌  ‌union‌  ‌dues‌, ‌ ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌EE‌  ‌or‌  ‌his‌  ‌union‌  ‌to‌‌ 
c. Within‌‌period‌‌of‌‌payment‌‌of‌‌wages‌‌fixed‌‌by‌‌LC;‌  ‌ checkoff‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌ER‌‌   or‌‌
  authorized‌‌   in‌‌ 
any‌‌tool‌‌or‌‌other‌‌articles‌‌belonging‌‌to‌‌the‌‌laborer.‌  ‌
d. There‌‌is‌‌a‌‌bank‌‌or‌‌ATM‌‌within‌‌1KM‌‌radius;‌  ‌ writing‌‌by‌‌the‌‌EE‌‌concerned;‌  ‌
b) Other‌‌prohibitions‌  ‌
e. Payslip‌‌be‌‌provided,‌‌upon‌‌request;‌  ‌ d) Where‌  ‌ER‌  ‌is‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌or‌  ‌regulations‌  ‌issued‌  ‌by‌‌ 
i) Kickbacks‌  ‌— ‌ ‌induce‌  ‌a ‌ ‌worker‌  ‌to‌‌
  give‌‌
  up‌‌
  any‌‌
  part‌‌
  of‌‌  SOLE;‌  ‌
f. No‌  ‌additional‌  ‌expenses‌  ‌and‌  ‌diminution‌  ‌of‌  ‌benefits‌‌ 
his‌‌wages‌‌by‌‌force,‌‌stealth,‌‌intimidation,‌‌threat;‌  ‌
resulting‌‌from‌‌the‌‌scheme;‌  ‌ e) For‌  ‌loss‌  ‌or‌  ‌damage‌‌
  under‌‌
  ‌Art‌‌
  114‌‌
  LC‌; ‌‌‌DOLE‌‌
  LA‌‌
  11-14‌, ‌‌
ii) Deduction‌‌to‌‌ensure‌‌employment‌‌(Art‌‌117);‌  ‌ Private‌‌Security‌‌Agencies‌: ‌ ‌
g. Employer‌  ‌shall‌  ‌assume‌  ‌responsibility‌  ‌in‌  ‌case‌  ‌the‌  ‌wage‌‌ 
protection‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌  ‌regulations‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌‌  iii) Retaliate‌‌against‌‌an‌‌employee‌‌who‌‌has‌  ‌ i) Following‌‌must‌‌be‌‌observed:‌  ‌
complied‌‌with‌‌under‌‌the‌‌arrangement.‌  ‌ 1) Filed‌‌any‌‌complaint,‌‌or‌  ‌ 1) EE‌‌is‌‌clearly‌‌responsible‌‌for‌‌the‌‌loss‌‌or‌‌damage;‌  ‌
Payee‌  ‌ 2) Instituted‌‌proceedings,‌‌or‌  ‌ 2) He‌‌
  is‌‌
  given‌‌
  reasonable‌‌ opportunity‌‌ to‌‌ show‌‌ cause‌‌ 
GR‌:‌ Direct‌‌to‌‌Employee;‌  ‌ 3) Has‌  ‌testified‌  ‌or‌  ‌is‌  ‌about‌  ‌to‌  ‌testify‌  ‌in‌  ‌said‌‌  why‌‌deductions‌‌should‌‌not‌‌be‌‌made;‌  ‌
proceedings;‌  ‌ 3) Deduction‌  ‌is‌  ‌fair‌  ‌and‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌and‌  ‌should‌  ‌not‌‌ 
EXC‌: ‌ ‌
by:‌‌   ‌ exceed‌‌the‌‌actual‌‌loss‌‌or‌‌damage;‌‌and‌  ‌
a. Force‌‌  majeure,‌‌
  in‌‌
  which‌‌
  case‌‌
  worker‌‌  may‌‌  be‌‌
  paid‌‌
  through‌‌ 
1. Refusing‌‌to‌‌pay‌‌the‌‌wages;‌‌or‌  ‌ 4) Does‌‌not‌‌exceed‌2
‌ 0%‌‌of‌‌EE’s‌‌wages‌‌in‌‌a‌‌week.‌  ‌
another‌‌   person‌‌  under‌‌
  written‌‌  authority‌‌
  for‌‌ such‌‌ purpose;‌‌ 
or‌  ‌ 2. Reducing‌‌such‌‌wages;‌‌or‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 152‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

ii) Cash‌  ‌Deposit‌  ‌— ‌ ‌must‌  ‌not‌  ‌exceed‌‌  one‌‌


  month's‌‌   basic‌‌  l) Under‌  ‌the‌  ‌PH‌  ‌Cooperative‌  ‌Act‌  ‌of‌  ‌2008.‌  ‌RA‌  ‌9520‌  ‌- ‌ ‌A ‌‌ b) New‌  ‌business‌  ‌enterprises‌  ‌(NBEs)‌  ‌— ‌ ‌refers‌  ‌to‌‌ 
salary‌  ‌of‌  ‌EE.‌  ‌May‌  ‌be‌  ‌deducted‌  ‌from‌  ‌wages‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌‌  member‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌cooperative‌‌
  may‌‌  ‌execute‌‌   an‌‌  instrument‌‌   ‌in‌‌  establishments,‌  ‌including‌  ‌non-profit‌  ‌institutions,‌‌ 
amount‌‌not‌‌to‌‌exceed‌‌20%‌‌of‌‌EE’s‌‌wages‌‌in‌‌a‌‌week.‌  ‌ favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌cooperative‌  ‌authorizing‌  ‌his‌  ‌employer‌  ‌to‌‌  established‌  ‌within‌  ‌two‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌years‌  ‌from‌  ‌effectivity‌  ‌of‌‌ 
iii) Refund‌  ‌— ‌ ‌within‌  ‌10‌  ‌days‌  ‌from‌  ‌separation‌  ‌from‌‌  deduct‌‌  from‌‌ his‌‌ wages‌‌ and‌‌ remit‌‌ such‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ cooperative‌‌ to‌‌  the‌  ‌Wage‌  ‌Order‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌latest‌‌
  registration‌‌  with‌‌ 
service.‌  ‌ satisfy‌‌any‌‌incurred‌‌debt‌‌or‌‌other‌‌demands.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌appropriate‌  ‌government‌  ‌agency‌‌   such‌‌  as‌‌
  SEC,‌‌
  DTI,‌‌ 
m) DO‌  ‌No.‌  ‌195,‌  ‌S.‌  ‌2018‌, ‌ ‌Amending‌‌
  Sec.‌‌
  10,‌‌
  Rule‌‌
  VIII,‌‌
  Book‌‌  CDA‌‌and‌‌Mayor's‌‌Office.‌  ‌
Jardin‌‌v.‌‌NLRC‌  ‌
III,‌‌IRR.‌  ‌ c) Retail/Service‌  ‌establishments‌  ‌employing‌  ‌not‌‌ 
With‌‌  regard‌‌  to‌‌ the‌‌ amount‌‌ deducted‌‌ daily‌‌ by‌‌ private‌‌ respondent‌‌ from‌‌  more‌‌than‌‌ten‌‌(10)‌‌workers.‌  ‌
⭐SECTION‌  ‌10.‌  ‌Wages‌  ‌deduction.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Deductions‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
petitioners‌  ‌for‌‌  ‌washing‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  taxi‌‌
  units‌, ‌‌we‌‌
  view‌‌  the‌‌
  same‌‌
  as‌‌
  not‌ 
wages‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  employees‌‌  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  made‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  employer‌‌
  in‌‌
  any‌‌  i) Retail‌  ‌establishment‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌entity‌‌ 
illegal‌‌in‌‌the‌‌context‌‌of‌‌the‌‌law.‌  ‌
of‌‌the‌‌following‌‌cases:‌  ‌ principally‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods‌  ‌to‌‌ 
Niña‌‌Jewelry‌‌Manufacturing‌‌of‌‌Metal‌‌Arts‌‌v.‌‌Montecillo‌‌2
‌ 011‌  ‌ (b)‌  ‌When‌  ‌the‌‌
  deductions‌‌   are‌‌
  with‌‌   the‌‌
  written‌‌
  authorization‌‌   of‌‌  end‌  ‌users‌  ‌for‌  ‌personal‌  ‌or‌  ‌household‌  ‌use.‌  ‌A ‌‌
the‌‌ employees‌‌ for‌‌ payment‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ ‌EMPLOYER‌‌ ‌or‌‌ a ‌‌third‌‌ person‌‌  retail‌  ‌establishment‌‌   that‌‌
  regularly‌‌   engages‌‌   in‌‌ 
Employers‌‌   should‌‌   first‌‌
  establish‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  making‌‌ of‌‌ deductions‌‌ from‌‌  wholesale‌‌activities‌‌loses‌‌its‌‌retail‌‌character.‌  ‌
the‌‌   salaries‌‌  is‌‌
  ‌authorized‌‌ by‌‌ law,‌‌ or‌‌ regulations.‌‌ Further,‌‌ the‌‌ posting‌‌  and‌‌   the‌‌ employer‌‌ agrees‌‌ to‌‌ do‌‌ so;‌‌ ‌Provided‌, ‌‌That‌‌ the‌‌ latter‌‌ does‌‌ 
not‌  ‌receive‌  ‌any‌  ‌pecuniary‌  ‌benefit,‌  ‌directly‌  ‌or‌‌   indirectly,‌‌   from‌‌  ii) Service‌  ‌Establishment‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌entity‌‌ 
of‌  ‌cash‌  ‌bonds‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌proven‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌recognized‌  ‌practice‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
jewelry‌  ‌manufacturing‌  ‌business,‌  ‌or‌  ‌alternatively,‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌‌  the‌‌transaction.‌  ‌ principally‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌in‌‌   the‌‌
  sale‌‌  of‌‌
  services‌‌
  to‌‌ 
should‌  ‌seek‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌determination‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌SOLE‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌policy‌  ‌the‌‌  individuals‌  ‌for‌  ‌their‌  ‌own‌  ‌or‌  ‌household‌  ‌use‌‌ 
6. Wage‌‌Determination‌  ‌
former‌  ‌seeks‌  ‌to‌‌   implement‌‌   is‌‌
  necessary‌‌   or‌‌
  desirable‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  conduct‌‌  and‌‌is‌‌generally‌‌recognized‌‌as‌‌such.‌  ‌
Two‌‌Methods‌‌of‌‌Determining‌‌Wages‌  ‌
of‌‌business.‌  ‌ d) Establishments‌  ‌adversely‌  ‌affected‌  ‌by‌  ‌natural‌‌ 
a. Floor‌  ‌Wage‌  ‌Method‌  ‌which‌  ‌involves‌  ‌the‌  ‌fixing‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌ calamities.‌  ‌
f) For‌‌
  ‌Agency‌‌ Fees‌‌ from‌‌ non-union‌‌ members‌‌ who‌‌ accept‌‌ the‌‌  determinate‌‌
  amount‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌ added‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ prevailing‌‌ statutory‌‌ 
i) The‌‌
  establishment‌‌   must‌‌
  be‌‌
  located‌‌
  in‌‌ an‌‌ area‌‌ 
benefits‌‌
  under‌‌
  the‌‌
  CBA‌‌
  negotiated‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ bargaining‌‌ union.‌‌  minimum‌‌wage‌‌rates.‌ 
declared‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌competent‌  ‌authority‌  ‌as‌‌ 
Does‌‌not‌‌need‌‌authorization‌‌from‌‌concerned‌‌member;‌  ‌
b. Salary‌‌   Ceiling‌‌
  Method‌‌   wherein‌‌
  the‌‌
  wage‌‌
  adjustment‌‌ was‌‌  under‌‌a‌‌state‌‌of‌‌calamity.‌  ‌
g) Premiums‌  ‌for‌  ‌SSS,‌  ‌PhilHealth,‌‌
  employee’s‌‌
  compensation‌‌  to‌  ‌be‌  ‌applied‌  ‌to‌  ‌employees‌  ‌receiving‌  ‌a ‌ ‌certain‌‌ 
ii) The‌  ‌natural‌  ‌calamities,‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌earthquakes,‌‌ 
and‌‌Pag-IBIG;‌  ‌ denominated‌‌salary‌‌ceiling.‌U ‌ sed‌‌in‌‌RA‌‌6727.‌  ‌
lahar‌‌   flow,‌‌   typhoons,‌‌  volcanic‌‌ eruptions,‌‌ fire,‌‌ 
h) Withholding‌‌tax;‌  ‌ See‌E
‌ mployers‌‌Confederation‌‌of‌‌PH‌‌v.‌‌NWPC‌  ‌ floods‌  ‌and‌  ‌similar‌  ‌occurrences,‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌‌ 
i) Where‌  ‌EE‌  ‌is‌  ‌indebted‌  ‌to‌  ‌ER‌  ‌that‌  ‌has‌  ‌become‌  ‌due‌  ‌and‌‌  occurred‌  ‌within‌  ‌6 ‌ ‌months‌  ‌prior‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
a. Wage‌‌Order‌  ‌
demandable‌‌‌(Art‌‌1706‌‌CC);‌  ‌ effectivity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Order‌. ‌ ‌However,‌  ‌if‌  ‌based‌‌ 
1) See‌‌2020‌‌DOLE‌‌Handbook‌‌on‌‌Workers’‌‌Statutory‌‌  on‌  ‌the‌  ‌assessment‌‌   by‌‌
  a ‌‌competent‌‌   authority,‌‌ 
j) Pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌court‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌where‌  ‌wages‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Monetary‌‌Benefits‌. ‌ ‌ the‌  ‌damage‌  ‌to‌  ‌properties‌  ‌is‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌50%‌‌ 
subject‌  ‌of‌  ‌attachment‌  ‌or‌  ‌execution‌  ‌but‌  ‌only‌  ‌for‌  ‌debts‌‌ 
2) In‌  ‌Pag-asa‌‌
  Steel‌‌
  Works‌‌   v.‌‌
  CA‌, ‌‌there‌‌  is‌‌
  ‌no‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  a ‌‌wage‌‌  and‌  ‌the‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌recovery‌  ‌will‌  ‌exceed‌  ‌1 ‌‌
incurred‌‌for‌‌   ‌
increase‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌wage‌  ‌order‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌employees‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌‌  year‌, ‌‌the‌‌   6-month‌‌   period‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ extended‌‌ to‌‌ 
i) food,‌‌   ‌ 1‌‌
  year.‌‌   (‌As‌‌   amended‌‌  by‌‌ NWPC‌‌ Resolution‌‌ No‌‌ 
receiving‌‌salaries‌‌above‌‌the‌‌minimum‌‌wage.‌  ‌
ii) clothing,‌‌   ‌ 01-14‌)‌ 
3) Exemptions‌  ‌from‌  ‌Wage‌  ‌Orders‌  ‌as‌  ‌provided‌  ‌in‌  ‌NWPC‌‌ 
iii) shelter‌‌and‌‌   ‌ Guidelines‌‌
  02-07‌, ‌‌‌aab‌‌ ‌NWPC‌‌ Resolution‌‌ No.‌‌ 1,‌‌ S.‌‌ 2014‌. ‌ iii) Losses‌  ‌suffered‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌establishment‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌‌
Categories‌‌of‌‌Exemptible‌‌Establishments:‌  ‌ result‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌calamity‌  ‌that‌  ‌exceed‌  ‌the‌‌ 
iv) medical‌‌attendance;‌  ‌
insurance‌‌ coverage‌‌ should‌‌ amount‌‌ to‌‌ ‌20%‌‌ or‌‌ 
k) Ordered‌‌by‌‌the‌‌court.‌  ‌ a) Distressed‌‌establishments‌;  ‌‌ ‌
more‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌stockholders'‌‌equity.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 153‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

4) Exemptions‌‌Under‌‌the‌‌Labor‌‌Code‌  ‌ the‌‌
  employer’s‌‌
  receipt‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ NIR,‌‌ issue‌‌ a ‌‌‌compliance‌‌ 
order‌. ‌ ‌
a) Farm‌‌‌tenancy‌‌or‌‌leasehold‌; ‌ ‌
b) Complaint‌‌ inspection‌‌ — ‌‌RD‌‌ shall‌‌ call‌‌ for‌‌ a ‌‌summary‌‌ 
b) Domestic‌  ‌service‌  ‌— ‌ ‌already‌  ‌covered‌  ‌in‌  ‌Domestic‌‌ 
investigation‌  ‌and‌  ‌after‌‌
  due‌‌
  notice‌‌
  and‌‌
  hearing‌‌   issue‌‌
  a ‌‌
Workers‌‌Act‌‌or‌‌Batas‌‌Kasambahay,‌‌RA‌‌10361;‌  ‌ compliance‌‌order.‌  ‌
c) Persons‌  ‌working‌‌
  in‌‌
  their‌‌
  respective‌‌
  homes‌‌
  in‌‌
  ‌needle‌‌  Employer‌  ‌shall‌  ‌pay‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌due‌  ‌each‌  ‌worker‌‌ 
work‌; ‌ ‌ within‌‌
  ‌10‌‌
  days‌‌
  from‌‌
  receipt‌‌ of‌‌ such‌‌ order‌‌ and‌‌ submit‌‌ 
d) Persons‌  ‌working‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌cottage‌  ‌industry‌  ‌duly‌‌  proof‌‌of‌‌compliance.‌  ‌
registered‌‌in‌‌accordance‌‌with‌‌the‌‌law.‌  ‌ Upon‌  ‌finality‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌compliance‌  ‌order,‌  ‌the‌  ‌RD‌  ‌shall‌‌ 
5) Exemptions‌‌Under‌‌Special‌‌Laws‌  ‌ cause‌  ‌the‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌writ‌  ‌of‌  ‌execution‌  ‌for‌  ‌its‌‌ 
a) RA‌  ‌9178‌. ‌ ‌Barangay‌  ‌Micro‌  ‌Business‌  ‌Enterprises‌‌  enforcement.‌  ‌
Act‌  ‌of‌  ‌2002.‌  ‌BMBEs‌  ‌refer‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌business‌  ‌entity‌  ‌or‌‌  b. Wage‌‌Distortion‌  ‌
enterprise‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌production,‌  ‌processing‌  ‌or‌‌ 
1) A‌  ‌situation‌  ‌where‌  ‌an‌  ‌increase‌  ‌in‌  ‌prescribed‌  ‌wage‌  ‌rates‌‌ 
manufacturing‌  ‌of‌‌   products‌‌   or‌‌
  commodities,‌‌   including‌‌ 
results‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌elimination‌  ‌or‌  ‌severe‌  ‌contraction‌  ‌of‌‌ 
agro-processing,‌  ‌trading‌  ‌and‌  ‌services,‌  ‌whose‌  ‌total‌‌ 
intentional‌‌   quantitative‌‌
  differences‌‌   in‌‌
  wage‌‌   or‌‌
  salary‌‌ rates‌‌ 
assets‌‌ including‌‌ those‌‌ arising‌‌ from‌‌ loans‌‌ but‌‌ exclusive‌‌ 
between‌‌   and‌‌  among‌‌
  employee‌‌   groups‌‌   in‌‌
  an‌‌
  establishment‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌land‌  ‌on‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌particular‌  ‌business‌  ‌entity's‌‌ 
as‌  ‌to‌  ‌effectively‌  ‌obliterate‌  ‌the‌  ‌distinctions‌  ‌embodied‌  ‌in‌‌ 
office,‌  ‌plant‌  ‌and‌‌   equipment‌‌   are‌‌
  situated,‌‌
  shall‌‌
  ‌not‌‌
  be‌‌ 
such‌  ‌wage‌  ‌structure‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌skills,‌‌   length‌‌   of‌‌
  service,‌‌
  or‌‌ 
more‌‌than‌‌Three‌‌Million‌‌Pesos‌. ‌ ‌
other‌‌logical‌‌bases‌‌of‌‌differentiation.‌(‌ Art‌‌124‌‌LC)‌  ‌
b) RA‌‌10644‌.‌‌Go-Negosyo‌‌Act.‌  ‌
6) Violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌Wage‌  ‌Order.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Double‌  ‌Indemnity‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Imprisonment‌‌under‌‌RA‌‌6727‌. ‌ ‌
a) Fine‌‌of‌‌P25K-100K;‌‌OR‌  ‌
b) Non-probationable‌  ‌Imprisonment‌  ‌of‌  ‌2-4‌  ‌Years;‌‌
  (Filed‌‌   ‌
with‌‌the‌‌MTC);‌‌OR‌  ‌
2) Elements‌  ‌
c) Both,‌‌at‌‌the‌‌discretion‌‌of‌‌the‌‌court.‌  ‌
a) An‌  ‌existing‌  ‌hierarchy‌  ‌of‌  ‌positions‌  ‌with‌‌ 
d) Double‌  ‌indemnity‌  ‌— ‌ ‌paying‌  ‌double‌  ‌the‌  ‌unpaid‌‌  corresponding‌‌salary‌‌rates;‌  ‌
benefits/amounts‌‌   owing‌‌
  the‌‌
  employees,‌‌  ‌provided‌‌ that‌‌ 
b) A‌‌
  ‌significant‌‌
  change‌‌
  in‌‌  the‌‌
  salary‌‌ rate‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌lower‌‌ pay‌‌ 
such‌  ‌payment‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌absolve‌  ‌employer‌  ‌from‌‌ 
class‌‌   w/o‌‌
  concomitant‌‌  increase‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  salary‌‌   rate‌‌
  of‌‌ a ‌‌
criminal‌  ‌liability‌  ‌imposable‌  ‌under‌  ‌LC.‌  ‌See‌  ‌also‌‌ 
higher‌‌one;‌  ‌
Philippine‌‌Hoteliers‌‌v.‌‌NUWHRAIN-APL-IUF.‌  ‌
c) Elimination‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌distinction‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌two‌‌ 
7) Two‌‌types‌‌of‌‌inspection:‌  ‌
levels;‌  ‌
a) Routine‌  ‌inspection‌  ‌— ‌ ‌where‌‌   the‌‌   violation‌‌
  has‌‌
  been‌‌ 
d) Existence‌‌of‌‌the‌‌distortion‌‌in‌‌the‌s‌ ame‌‌region‌. ‌ ‌
established‌  ‌after‌  ‌due‌  ‌notice‌  ‌and‌  ‌hearing‌  ‌where‌‌ 
appropriate,‌‌
  the‌‌
  RD‌‌
  shall,‌‌
  after‌‌
  ‌7 ‌‌calendar‌‌ days‌‌ from‌‌  Prubankers‌‌Association‌‌v.‌‌Prudential‌‌Bank‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 154‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Wage‌‌   distortion‌‌   presupposes‌‌   an‌‌


  increase‌‌  in‌‌  the‌‌
  compensation‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌  5) In‌  ‌Bankard‌  ‌Employees‌  ‌Union‌  ‌v.‌  ‌NLRC‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌unilateral‌‌  2) The‌‌seven-day‌‌parental‌‌leave‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌non-cumulative.‌  ‌
lower‌‌   ranks‌‌
  in‌‌
  an‌‌
  office‌‌
  hierarchy‌‌   without‌‌   a ‌‌corresponding‌‌   raise‌‌
  for‌‌  adoption‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌‌  employer‌‌   of‌‌
  an‌‌
  upgraded‌‌   salary‌‌
  scale‌‌
  that‌‌  3) In‌  ‌the‌  ‌event‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌parental‌  ‌leave‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌availed‌  ‌of,‌‌ 
higher-tiered‌  ‌employees‌  ‌in‌‌   the‌‌
  same‌‌  region‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  country,‌‌
  resulting‌‌  increased‌  ‌the‌  ‌hiring‌  ‌rates‌  ‌of‌  ‌new‌  ‌employees‌  ‌without‌‌  said‌  ‌leave‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌convertible‌  ‌to‌  ‌cash‌  ‌unless‌‌ 
in‌  ‌the‌  ‌elimination‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌severe‌  ‌diminution‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌distinction‌  increasing‌  ‌the‌  ‌salary‌  ‌rates‌  ‌of‌  ‌old‌  ‌employees‌  ‌DOES‌  ‌NOT‌‌ 
between‌‌the‌‌two‌‌groups.‌‌   ‌ specifically‌‌agreed‌‌upon‌‌previously.‌  ‌
RESULT‌  ‌in‌  ‌wage‌  ‌distortion‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌contemplation‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Such‌‌   distortion‌‌   does‌‌  not‌‌
  arise‌‌ when‌‌ a ‌‌wage‌‌ order‌‌ gives‌‌ employees‌‌ in‌‌  Article‌  ‌124‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Labor‌  ‌Code,‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌increase‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  b. Expanded‌  ‌maternity‌  ‌leave‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌See‌  ‌105-Day‌‌ 
one‌  ‌branch‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌bank‌  ‌higher‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌than‌  ‌that‌  ‌given‌  ‌to‌  ‌their‌‌  wages‌‌ and‌‌ salaries‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ newly-hired‌‌ was‌‌ ‌not‌‌ due‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌ Expanded‌‌Maternity‌‌Leave‌‌Law‌  ‌
counterparts‌‌   in‌‌
  other‌‌  regions‌‌  occupying‌‌   the‌‌
  same‌‌  pay‌‌ scale,‌‌ who‌‌ are‌‌  prescribed‌‌law‌‌or‌‌wage‌‌order‌.‌  ‌ 1) Increased‌‌maternity‌‌leave‌‌with‌‌full‌‌pay;‌  ‌
not‌‌
  covered‌‌   by‌‌  said‌‌
  wage‌‌ order.‌‌ In‌‌ short,‌‌ the‌‌ implementation‌‌ of‌‌ wage‌‌ 
orders‌  ‌in‌  ‌one‌  ‌region‌  ‌but‌‌   not‌‌
  in‌‌
  others‌‌  does‌‌  not‌‌
  in‌‌
  itself‌‌
  necessarily‌‌  C. Leaves‌  ‌ a) 105‌‌days‌‌‌for‌‌natural‌‌or‌‌cesarean‌‌delivery;‌  ‌
result‌‌in‌‌wage‌‌distortion.‌  ‌ b) 60‌  ‌days‌  ‌for‌  ‌miscarriage‌  ‌or‌  ‌emergency‌‌ 
1. Labor‌‌Code‌  ‌
3) Wage‌‌Distortion‌‌Resolution‌  ‌ termination‌‌of‌‌pregnancy.‌  ‌
a. Service‌  ‌incentive‌  ‌leave.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Every‌  ‌employee‌  ‌who‌‌  has‌‌ 
2) Option‌  ‌to‌  ‌extend‌  ‌maternity‌  ‌leave‌  ‌for‌  ‌additional‌‌ 
rendered‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌one‌  ‌(1)‌  ‌year‌  ‌of‌  ‌service‌  ‌is‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌‌ 
thirty‌‌(30)‌‌days‌‌without‌‌pay‌; ‌ ‌
Service‌  ‌Incentive‌  ‌Leave‌  ‌(SIL)‌  ‌of‌  ‌five‌  ‌(5)‌  ‌days‌  ‌with‌‌ 
pay.‌  ‌ Notify‌  ‌ER‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌45‌  ‌days‌  ‌before‌  ‌end‌  ‌of‌  ‌maternity‌‌ 
leave‌‌to‌‌avail‌‌of‌‌extension.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌phrase‌‌
  “‌one‌‌  year‌‌
  of‌‌
  service‌” ‌‌of‌‌  the‌‌
  employee‌‌  means‌‌ 
service‌  ‌within‌‌   twelve‌‌
  (12)‌‌  months,‌‌   ‌whether‌‌   continuous‌‌  3) Additional‌  ‌fifteen‌  ‌(15)‌  ‌days‌  ‌with‌  ‌full‌  ‌pay‌  ‌for‌  ‌solo‌‌ 
or‌  ‌broken‌, ‌ ‌reckoned‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌date‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌‌
  started‌‌  parents;‌  ‌
working.‌  ‌The‌  ‌period‌  ‌includes‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌absences,‌‌  4) Combinations‌‌of‌‌prenatal‌‌and‌‌postnatal‌‌leave;‌  ‌
unworked‌‌weekly‌‌rest‌‌days,‌‌and‌‌paid‌‌regular‌‌holidays.‌  ‌
Compulsory‌‌postnatal‌‌at‌‌least‌‌60‌‌days‌. ‌ ‌
Tan‌‌v.‌‌Lagrama‌  ‌
5) Maternity‌‌leave‌r‌ egardless‌‌of‌‌frequency‌; ‌ ‌
If‌  ‌a ‌ ‌piece‌  ‌worker‌  ‌is‌  ‌supervised,‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌employer-employee‌‌ 
6) Allocation‌‌of‌‌maternity‌‌leave‌‌credits‌; ‌ ‌
relationship.‌‌   However,‌‌  such‌‌  an‌‌
  employee‌‌  is‌‌  ‌not‌‌
  entitled‌‌
  to‌‌ service‌‌ 
incentive‌‌   leave‌‌  pay‌‌
  since,‌‌ as‌‌ pointed‌‌ out‌‌ in‌‌ ‌Makati‌‌ Haberdashery‌‌ v.‌  a) allocate‌  ‌up‌  ‌to‌  ‌seven‌  ‌(7)‌  ‌days‌  ‌of‌  ‌said‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌to‌‌ 
NLRC‌  ‌and‌  ‌Mark‌  ‌Roche‌  ‌International‌  ‌v.‌  ‌NLRC‌, ‌ ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌paid‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fixed‌‌  the‌  ‌child's‌  ‌father‌, ‌ ‌whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌is‌‌ 
amount‌  ‌for‌  ‌work‌  ‌done,‌  ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌he‌  ‌spent‌  ‌in‌‌  married‌‌to‌‌the‌‌female‌‌worker.‌  ‌
accomplishing‌‌such‌‌work.‌  ‌ b) alternate‌‌ caregiver‌‌ who‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ a ‌‌relative‌‌ within‌‌ 
the‌  ‌fourth‌  ‌degree‌  ‌of‌  ‌consanguinity‌‌
  or‌‌
  the‌‌
  current‌‌ 
2. Special‌‌laws‌ 
partner‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌female‌  ‌worker‌  ‌sharing‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌‌ 
 ‌ a. Parental‌  ‌leave‌  ‌for‌  ‌solo‌  ‌parents.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌See‌  ‌RA‌  ‌8972‌. ‌‌ household.‌  ‌
4) Possible‌‌causes‌  ‌ Solo‌‌Parent‌‌Welfare‌‌Act‌‌and‌‌its‌I‌ RR‌. ‌ ‌ c) In‌‌
  the‌‌
  event‌‌  the‌‌
  beneficiary‌‌ female‌‌ worker‌‌ dies‌‌ or‌‌ 
a) Government‌‌decreed‌‌increase‌‌through‌‌WOs;‌  ‌ 1) In‌  ‌addition‌  ‌to‌  ‌leave‌  ‌privileges‌  ‌under‌  ‌existing‌  ‌laws,‌‌  is‌  ‌permanently‌  ‌incapacitated,‌  ‌the‌  ‌balance‌  ‌of‌  ‌her‌‌ 
b) Merger‌‌of‌‌establishments;‌  ‌ parental‌  ‌leave‌  ‌of‌  ‌not‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌seven‌  ‌(7)‌  ‌working‌‌  maternity‌‌   leave‌‌  benefits‌‌
  shall‌‌
  accrue‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌ father‌‌ 
days‌  ‌every‌  ‌year‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌granted‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌solo‌  ‌parent‌‌  of‌‌the‌‌child‌‌or‌‌to‌‌a‌‌qualified‌‌caregiver.‌  ‌
c) Increase‌‌granted‌‌by‌‌employers;‌  ‌
employee‌‌   who‌‌  has‌‌  rendered‌‌   service‌‌ of‌‌ at‌‌ least‌‌ one‌‌ (1)‌‌  7) Maternity‌‌leave‌a
‌ fter‌‌termination‌‌of‌‌service;‌  ‌
d) Passage‌‌of‌‌RA‌‌6727.‌  ‌ year.‌‌   ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 155‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

a) occurs‌  ‌not‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌fifteen‌  ‌(15)‌  ‌calendar‌‌  2) In‌  ‌the‌  ‌event‌  ‌that‌  ‌an‌  ‌extended‌  ‌leave‌  ‌is‌  ‌necessary,‌  ‌the‌‌  in‌  ‌the‌  ‌employment‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌or‌  ‌head‌  ‌of‌  ‌office‌  ‌is‌‌ 
days‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌  ‌termination‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌employee's‌‌  female‌  ‌employee‌  ‌may‌  ‌use‌  ‌her‌  ‌earned‌  ‌leave‌  ‌credits;‌‌  informed‌‌   of‌‌
  such‌‌
  acts‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  offended‌‌
  party‌‌
  and‌‌ no‌‌ immediate‌‌ 
service,‌‌as‌‌her‌‌right‌‌thereto‌‌has‌‌already‌‌accrued.‌  ‌ and‌‌   ‌ action‌‌is‌‌taken.‌  ‌

b) such‌  ‌period‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌‌  3) This‌  ‌special‌  ‌leave‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌non-cumulative‌  ‌and‌  ‌non-‌‌  3. Applicable‌‌laws‌  ‌
employment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌pregnant‌  ‌woman‌  ‌worker‌  ‌has‌‌  convertible‌‌to‌‌cash.‌  ‌ a. Sexual‌  ‌Harassment‌  ‌Act‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌Sexual‌  ‌harassment‌  ‌is‌‌ 
been‌‌terminated‌‌without‌‌just‌‌cause.‌  ‌ e. Battered‌  ‌woman‌  ‌leave.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌See‌  ‌RA‌  ‌9262‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌‌  committed‌‌when:‌  ‌
8) Voluntary‌  ‌working‌  ‌arrangement‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌maternity‌‌  Anti-VAWC‌  ‌Law.‌  ‌The‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌victim-employee‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  1) The‌‌‌sexual‌‌favor‌‌‌is‌‌made‌‌as‌‌a‌‌condition‌‌   ‌
leave‌‌period.‌  ‌ entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌leave‌  ‌of‌  ‌up‌  ‌to‌  ‌ten‌  ‌(10)‌  ‌days‌  ‌with‌  ‌full‌  ‌pay,‌‌  a) in‌  ‌the‌  ‌hiring‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌employment,‌‌ 
c. Paternity‌  ‌leave.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌RA‌‌  8187‌. ‌‌Is‌‌  granted‌‌  to‌‌  all‌‌  married‌‌  consisting‌‌   of‌‌  basic‌‌  salary‌‌   and‌‌ mandatory‌‌ allowances‌‌ fixed‌‌  re-employment‌  ‌or‌‌   continued‌‌
  employment‌‌
  of‌‌
  said‌ 
male‌  ‌employees‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌private‌  ‌sector,‌  ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌‌  by‌‌RTWPB.‌  ‌ individual,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
employment‌‌status.‌  ‌ Requirement.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌To‌  ‌be‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌leave‌  ‌benefit,‌  ‌the‌‌  b) in‌  ‌granting‌  ‌said‌  ‌individual‌  ‌favorable‌‌ 
Government‌  ‌employees‌  ‌are‌  ‌also‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌paternity‌‌  only‌  ‌requirement‌‌
  is‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  victim-employee‌‌   to‌‌
  present‌‌   to‌‌  compensation,‌  ‌terms‌  ‌of‌  ‌conditions,‌  ‌promotions,‌‌ 
leave‌‌benefit.‌  ‌ her‌‌employer‌‌a‌‌certification‌‌from‌‌the‌‌   ‌ or‌‌privileges;‌‌or‌‌   ‌
Entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌full‌  ‌pay,‌  ‌consisting‌  ‌of‌  ‌basic‌  ‌salary,‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌7 ‌‌ 1) barangay‌‌chairman‌‌or‌‌   ‌ the‌‌refusal‌‌to‌‌grant‌‌the‌‌sexual‌‌favor‌‌results‌‌   ‌
days‌  ‌of‌  ‌paternity‌  ‌leave,‌  ‌for‌  ‌up‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  first‌  ‌four‌  ‌(4)‌  2) barangay‌‌councilor‌‌or‌‌   ‌ c) in‌  ‌limiting,‌  ‌segregating‌  ‌or‌  ‌classifying‌  ‌the‌‌ 
deliveries‌. ‌ ‌
3) prosecutor‌‌or‌‌   ‌ employee‌  ‌which‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌way‌‌
  would‌‌
  discriminate,‌‌ 
1) A‌‌married‌‌male‌‌‌employee;‌  ‌ deprive‌‌  or‌‌ diminish‌‌ employment‌‌ opportunities‌‌ or‌‌ 
4) the‌‌Clerk‌‌of‌‌Court,‌‌as‌‌the‌‌case‌‌may‌‌be,‌‌   ‌
2) Cohabiting‌‌with‌‌spouse;‌  ‌ otherwise‌‌adversely‌‌affect‌‌said‌‌employee;‌  ‌
3) Has‌‌applied‌‌for‌‌PL;‌  ‌ that‌‌an‌‌action‌‌relative‌‌to‌‌the‌‌matter‌‌is‌p
‌ ending‌. ‌ ‌
2) The‌‌  above‌‌
  acts‌‌
  would‌‌
  ‌impair‌‌  the‌‌ employee's‌‌ rights‌‌ 
4) Legitimate‌‌spouse‌‌gave‌‌birth‌‌or‌‌had‌‌a‌‌miscarriage.‌  ‌ D. Sexual‌‌harassment‌‌in‌‌the‌‌work‌‌environment‌  ‌ or‌‌privileges‌‌‌under‌‌existing‌‌labor‌‌laws;‌‌or‌  ‌
In‌  ‌the‌  ‌event‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌paternity‌  ‌leave‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌availed‌  ‌of,‌  ‌it‌  3) The‌  ‌above‌  ‌acts‌  ‌would‌  ‌result‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌intimidating,‌‌ 
1. Definition.‌‌   — ‌‌‌Under‌‌ the‌‌ Anti-Sexual‌‌ Harassment‌‌ Act‌‌ of‌‌ 1995,‌‌ it‌‌ 
shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌convertible‌  ‌to‌  ‌cash‌  ‌and‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌‌  hostile,‌‌or‌‌offensive‌‌environment‌‌‌for‌‌the‌‌employee.‌  ‌
is‌  ‌committed‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌‌   employer,‌‌   employee,‌‌   manager,‌‌   supervisor,‌‌ 
cumulative‌. ‌ ‌
agent‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer,‌  ‌xxx,‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌  ‌person‌  ‌who,‌‌
  having‌‌  b. Safe‌  ‌Spaces‌  ‌Act‌. ‌ ‌—‌  ‌The‌‌
  crime‌‌
  of‌‌
  gender-based‌‌
  sexual‌‌ 
d. Gynecological‌  ‌leave.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Any‌  ‌female‌  ‌employee‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  authority,‌‌ influence‌‌ or‌‌ moral‌‌ ascendancy‌‌ over‌‌ another‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌ harassment‌‌in‌‌the‌‌workplace‌‌includes‌‌the‌‌following:‌  ‌
public‌‌   and‌‌  private‌‌   sector‌‌   regardless‌‌   of‌‌  age‌‌
  and‌‌ civil‌‌ status‌  work‌  ‌environment,‌  ‌demands,‌  ‌requests‌  ‌or‌  ‌otherwise‌  ‌requires‌‌ 
1) An‌‌act‌‌or‌‌series‌‌of‌‌acts‌‌involving‌  ‌
shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌special‌  ‌leave‌  ‌of‌  ‌two‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌months‌‌  any‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌favor‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌other,‌  ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌whether‌  ‌the‌‌ 
with‌  ‌full‌  ‌pay‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌her‌  ‌gross‌  ‌monthly‌  ‌compensation‌‌  demand,‌‌   request‌‌   or‌‌
  requirement‌‌   for‌‌
  submission‌‌ is‌‌ accepted‌‌ by‌‌  a) any‌  ‌unwelcome‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌advances,‌  ‌requests‌  ‌or‌‌ 
subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌existing‌  ‌laws,‌  ‌rules‌  ‌and‌  ‌regulations‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌‌  the‌‌object‌‌of‌‌said‌‌act.‌  ‌ demand‌‌for‌‌sexual‌‌favors‌‌or‌‌   ‌
surgery‌  ‌caused‌  ‌by‌  ‌gynecological‌  ‌disorders‌  ‌under‌  ‌such‌  2. Duties‌  ‌and‌  ‌liabilities‌  ‌of‌  ‌employers.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Employers‌  ‌or‌‌   other‌‌  b) any‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌nature,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌done‌  ‌verbally,‌‌ 
terms‌‌and‌‌conditions:‌  ‌ persons‌  ‌of‌  ‌authority,‌  ‌influence‌  ‌or‌  ‌moral‌  ‌ascendancy‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌‌ physically‌‌or‌‌through‌‌the‌‌use‌‌of‌‌technology,‌‌   ‌
1) She‌  ‌has‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌six‌  ‌(6)‌  ‌months‌  ‌continuous‌‌  workplace‌  ‌shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌duty‌‌
  to‌‌
  prevent,‌‌
  deter,‌‌
  or‌‌
  punish‌‌   the‌‌  that‌  ‌has‌  ‌or‌  ‌could‌  ‌have‌  ‌a ‌ ‌detrimental‌  ‌effect‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌ 
aggregate‌‌   employment‌‌   service‌‌   for‌‌  the‌‌
  last‌‌
  twelve‌‌ (12)‌‌  performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌‌
  gender-based‌‌   sexual‌‌
  harassment‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌  conditions‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌individual's‌  ‌employment‌  ‌or‌‌ 
months‌‌prior‌‌to‌‌surgery;‌‌   ‌ workplace.‌  ‌ education,‌‌job‌‌performance‌‌or‌‌opportunities;‌  ‌
The‌‌
  employer‌‌
  or‌‌
  head‌‌
  of‌‌
  office‌‌   be‌ ‌solidarily‌‌ liable‌ ‌for‌‌ 
  shall‌‌ 2) A‌‌
  conduct‌‌ of‌‌ sexual‌‌ nature‌‌ and‌‌ other‌‌ conduct-based‌‌ on‌‌ 
damages‌‌
  arising‌‌
  from‌‌
  the‌‌ acts‌‌ of‌‌ sexual‌‌ harassment‌‌ committed‌‌  sex‌  ‌affecting‌  ‌the‌  ‌dignity‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person,‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 156‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

unwelcome,‌  ‌unreasonable,‌  ‌and‌  ‌offensive‌  ‌to‌  t‌ he‌‌  d) Compulsory‌‌apprenticeship‌  ‌ six‌  ‌(6)‌  ‌months;‌  ‌thereafter,‌  ‌he‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌paid‌  ‌the‌  ‌full‌‌ 
recipient,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌done‌  ‌verbally,‌  ‌physically‌  o
‌ r‌‌  minimum‌  ‌wage,‌  ‌including‌  ‌the‌  ‌full‌  ‌cost‌  ‌of‌  ‌living‌‌ 
through‌‌the‌‌use‌‌of‌‌technology;‌  ‌ i) When‌  ‌grave‌  ‌national‌  ‌emergencies,‌‌ 
allowance.‌  ‌
particularly‌  ‌those‌  ‌involving‌  ‌the‌  ‌security‌  ‌of‌‌ 
3) A‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌that‌  ‌is‌  ‌unwelcome‌  ‌and‌  ‌pervasive‌  ‌and‌‌  j) Hours‌‌
  of‌‌ work.‌‌ — ‌‌‌An‌‌ apprentice‌‌ not‌‌ otherwise‌‌ barred‌‌ 
the‌  ‌state,‌  ‌arise‌  ‌or‌  ‌particular‌  ‌requirements‌‌
  of‌‌ 
creates‌  ‌an‌  ‌intimidating,‌  ‌hostile‌  ‌or‌  ‌humiliating‌‌  by‌  ‌law‌  ‌from‌  ‌working‌  ‌eight‌  ‌hours‌  ‌a ‌ ‌day‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 
economic‌‌development‌‌so‌‌demand.‌  ‌
environment‌‌for‌‌the‌‌recipient.‌  ‌ requested‌‌   by‌‌
  his‌‌
  employer‌‌
  to‌‌
  work‌‌
  overtime‌‌ and‌‌ paid‌‌ 
ii) Where‌  ‌services‌  ‌of‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌technicians‌  ‌are‌‌ 
This‌  ‌may‌  ‌also‌  ‌be‌  ‌committed‌  ‌between‌  ‌peers‌  ‌and‌  ‌those‌‌  accordingly,‌p ‌ rovided‌‌   ‌
committed‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌superior‌  ‌officer‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌subordinate,‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌ utilized‌  ‌by‌  ‌private‌  ‌companies‌  ‌in‌‌ 
i) there‌  ‌are‌  ‌no‌  ‌available‌  ‌regular‌  ‌workers‌  ‌to‌  ‌do‌‌ 
teacher‌‌by‌‌a‌‌student,‌‌or‌‌to‌‌a‌‌trainer‌‌by‌‌a‌‌trainee.‌  ‌ apprenticeable‌‌trades.‌  ‌
the‌‌job,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
e) Qualified‌  ‌Employers.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Only‌  ‌employers‌  ‌in‌  ‌highly‌‌ 
E. Working‌‌conditions‌‌for‌‌special‌‌groups‌‌of‌‌  ii) the‌  ‌overtime‌  ‌work‌  ‌thus‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌is‌  ‌duly‌‌ 
technical‌  ‌industries‌  ‌may‌  ‌employ‌  ‌apprentices‌  ‌and‌‌ 
employees‌  ‌ only‌  ‌in‌  ‌apprenticeable‌  ‌occupations‌  ‌approved‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  credited‌‌toward‌‌his‌‌training‌‌time.‌  ‌

1. Apprentices‌‌and‌‌learners‌  ‌ SOLE.‌  ‌ k) Learners‌  ‌are‌  ‌persons‌  ‌hired‌  ‌as‌  ‌trainees‌  ‌in‌‌ 


a) Apprenticeship‌  ‌means‌  ‌any‌  ‌training‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌job‌‌  f) Deductibility‌  ‌of‌  ‌Training‌  ‌Costs.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌An‌  ‌additional‌‌  semi-skilled‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌industrial‌  ‌occupations‌  ‌which‌‌ 
supplemented‌  ‌by‌  ‌related‌  ‌theoretical‌  ‌instructions‌‌  deduction‌  ‌from‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌income‌  ‌of‌  ‌one-half‌  ‌(1/2)‌  ‌of‌‌  are‌  ‌non-apprenticeable‌  ‌and‌  ‌which‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌learned‌‌ 
involving‌‌apprenticeable‌‌occupations‌‌and‌‌trades.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌value‌  ‌of‌  ‌labor‌  ‌training‌  ‌expenses‌  ‌incurred‌  ‌for‌‌  through‌  ‌practical‌  ‌training‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌job‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌relatively‌‌ 
developing‌  ‌the‌  ‌productivity‌  ‌and‌  ‌efficiency‌  ‌of‌‌  short‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌time‌  ‌which‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌exceed‌  ‌three‌‌ 
b) Coverage.‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌
apprentices.‌P ‌ rovided‌  ‌ (3)‌‌months.‌  ‌
i) Any‌  ‌enterprise‌  ‌duly‌  ‌registered‌  ‌with‌  ‌TESDA‌‌ 
i) such‌  ‌program‌  ‌is‌  ‌duly‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  l) Learners‌‌may‌‌be‌‌employed‌  ‌
with‌  ‌10‌  ‌or‌  ‌more‌  ‌regular‌  ‌workers‌. ‌ ‌The‌‌ 
DOLE;‌  ‌ i) when‌‌no‌‌experienced‌‌workers‌‌are‌‌available,‌‌   ‌
number‌  ‌of‌  ‌apprentices‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌more‌‌ 
than‌‌20%‌‌of‌‌its‌‌total‌‌regular‌‌workforce.‌  ‌ ii) such‌‌
  deduction‌‌
  shall‌‌
  not‌‌
  exceed‌‌ ten‌‌ (10%)‌‌  ii) the‌  ‌employment‌  ‌of‌  ‌learners‌  ‌is‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌to‌‌ 
percent‌‌of‌‌direct‌‌labor‌‌wage‌:‌‌and‌  ‌ prevent‌  ‌curtailment‌  ‌of‌  ‌employment‌‌ 
ii) Any‌  ‌unemployed‌  ‌person‌  ‌15‌  ‌years‌  ‌old‌  ‌and‌‌ 
above‌‌may‌‌apply.‌  ‌ iii) apprentices‌‌are‌‌paid‌‌the‌m
‌ inimum‌‌wage.‌  ‌ opportunities,‌‌and‌‌   ‌

c) Qualifications.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌To‌  ‌qualify‌  ‌as‌  ‌apprentice,‌  ‌an‌‌  g) Apprentices‌  ‌without‌  ‌Compensation.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌SOLE‌‌  iii) the‌  ‌employment‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌create‌  ‌unfair‌‌ 
applicant‌‌shall:‌  ‌ may‌  ‌authorize‌  ‌the‌  ‌hiring‌  ‌of‌  ‌apprentices‌  ‌without‌‌  competition‌‌  in‌‌
  terms‌‌
  of‌‌
  labor‌‌ costs‌‌ or‌‌ impair‌‌ 
compensation‌‌whose‌‌training‌‌on‌‌the‌‌job‌‌is‌‌   ‌ or‌‌lower‌‌working‌‌standards.‌  ‌
i) Be‌‌at‌‌least‌‌fifteen‌y
‌ ears‌‌of‌‌age;‌‌   ‌
i) required‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌school‌  ‌or‌  ‌training‌  ‌program‌‌  m) The‌  ‌wages‌  ‌or‌  ‌salary‌‌
  rates‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  learners‌‌
  which‌‌
  shall‌‌ 
provided‌  ‌those‌  ‌who‌  ‌are‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌‌
  fifteen‌‌
  years‌‌ 
curriculum‌‌or‌‌   ‌ begin‌‌at‌‌not‌‌less‌‌than‌‌75%‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌applicable‌‌MW.‌  ‌
of‌  ‌age‌  ‌but‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌‌
  eighteen‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  eligible‌‌ 
for‌  ‌apprenticeship‌  ‌only‌  ‌in‌  ‌non-hazardous‌‌  ii) as‌  ‌requisite‌  ‌for‌  ‌graduation‌  ‌or‌  ‌board‌‌   ‌ Learner‌  ‌ Apprentice‌  ‌
occupations;‌  ‌ examination.‌  ‌
Learnable‌‌occupations‌‌  Any‌‌trade,‌‌form‌‌of‌‌ 
ii) Be‌‌physically‌‌fit;‌  ‌ h) Apprenticeship‌  ‌period.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌‌  consisting‌‌of‌‌  employment‌‌or‌‌ 
Occupation‌  ‌
apprenticeship‌‌shall‌n
‌ ot‌‌exceed‌‌six‌‌(6)‌‌months.‌  ‌ semi-skilled‌‌and‌‌other‌‌  occupation‌‌approved‌‌for‌‌ 
iii) Possess‌‌vocational‌‌aptitude‌‌and‌‌capacity;‌‌and‌  ‌
industrial‌‌occupations‌  ‌ apprenticeship‌‌by‌‌SOLE‌  ‌
i) Wages.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌‌
  wage‌‌
  rate‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  apprentice‌‌
  shall‌‌
  start‌‌ 
iv) Possess‌‌
  the‌‌
  ability‌‌ to‌‌ comprehend‌‌ and‌‌ follow‌‌ 
at‌‌
  ‌75%‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ statutory‌‌ minimum‌‌ wage‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ first‌‌  Theoretical‌‌  Not‌‌required‌  ‌ Required‌  ‌
oral‌‌and‌‌written‌‌instructions.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 157‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

i. Private‌  ‌entities‌  ‌that‌  ‌employ‌  ‌disabled‌  ‌persons‌  ‌who‌‌  employed‌  ‌by‌  ‌him‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌preventing‌  ‌her‌‌ 
instruction‌  ‌
meet‌  ‌the‌  ‌required‌  ‌skills‌  ‌or‌  ‌qualifications,‌  ‌either‌  ‌as‌‌  from‌‌enjoying‌‌any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌benefits;‌  ‌
Competency-‌  regular‌  ‌employee,‌  ‌apprentice‌  ‌or‌  ‌learner,‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  2) To‌  ‌discharge‌  ‌such‌  ‌woman‌  ‌on‌  ‌account‌  ‌of‌  ‌her‌‌ 
based‌‌system‌  ‌
✔‌  ‌ ✘‌  ‌
entitled‌‌  to‌‌
  an‌‌
  additional‌‌ deduction,‌‌ from‌‌ their‌‌ gross‌‌  pregnancy,‌‌
  or‌‌
  while‌‌
  on‌‌
  leave‌‌
  or‌‌
  in‌‌
  confinement‌‌ due‌‌ to‌‌ 
income,‌  ‌equivalent‌  ‌to‌  ‌twenty-five‌  ‌percent‌‌  her‌‌pregnancy;‌  ‌
Duration‌  ‌ Not‌‌exceeding‌‌3‌‌months‌  ‌ 3-6‌‌months‌  ‌
(25%)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌total‌  ‌amount‌  ‌paid‌  ‌as‌  ‌salaries‌  ‌and‌‌  3) To‌  ‌discharge‌  ‌or‌  ‌refuse‌‌   the‌‌
  admission‌‌   of‌‌
  such‌‌
  woman‌‌ 
20%‌‌of‌‌total‌‌regular‌‌  wages‌‌to‌‌disabled‌‌persons‌. ‌ ‌ upon‌‌   returning‌‌
  to‌‌  her‌‌
  work‌‌   for‌‌ fear‌‌ that‌‌ she‌‌ may‌‌ again‌‌ 
Limitation‌  ‌ NONE‌  ‌
workforce‌  be‌‌pregnant.‌  ‌
ii. Private‌  ‌entities‌‌   that‌‌
  improve‌‌
  or‌‌
  modify‌‌
  their‌‌
  physical‌‌ 
Option‌‌to‌‌  ER‌‌Obliged‌‌to‌‌hire‌‌  facilities‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌provide‌  ‌reasonable‌‌  d. Facilities‌‌  for‌‌ women.‌‌ — ‌‌‌In‌‌ appropriate‌‌ cases,‌‌ the‌‌ SOLE‌‌ 
Optional‌  ‌ accommodation‌  ‌for‌  ‌disabled‌  ‌persons‌  ‌shall‌  ‌also‌  ‌be‌‌ 
employ‌  ‌ learner‌  ‌ shall,‌‌by‌‌regulations,‌‌require‌‌any‌‌employer‌‌to:‌  ‌
entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌additional‌  ‌deduction‌  ‌from‌  ‌their‌  ‌net‌‌ 
1) Provide‌  ‌seats‌  ‌proper‌  ‌for‌  ‌women‌  ‌and‌‌
  permit‌‌
  them‌‌
  to‌‌ 
Dispute‌‌  taxable‌  ‌income,‌  ‌equivalent‌  ‌to‌  ‌fifty‌  ‌percent‌‌ 
Labor‌‌Arbiter‌  ‌ DOLE‌‌Regional‌‌Director‌  ‌ use‌‌such‌‌seats‌‌when‌‌they‌‌are‌‌free‌‌from‌‌work;‌  ‌
Resolution‌  ‌
(50%)‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌‌  direct‌‌  costs‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ improvements‌‌ or‌‌ 
2) To‌  ‌establish‌  ‌separate‌  ‌toilet‌‌
  rooms‌‌
  ‌and‌‌
  lavatories‌‌
  for‌‌ 
2. Disabled‌‌workers‌  ‌ modifications.‌  ‌
men‌‌   and‌‌
  women‌‌
  and‌‌
  provide‌‌
  at‌‌
  least‌‌
  a ‌‌dressing‌‌ room‌‌ 
see‌‌
  also‌‌
  ‌RA‌‌
  7277‌‌
  or‌‌ the‌‌ ‌Magna‌‌ Carta‌‌ for‌‌ Disabled‌‌ Persons‌, ‌‌‌as‌‌  3. Gender‌  ‌ for‌‌women;‌  ‌
amended‌  ‌ a. Discrimination.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌following‌  ‌are‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌‌  3) To‌  ‌establish‌‌
  a ‌‌‌nursery‌‌
  ‌in‌‌
  a ‌‌workplace‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  benefit‌‌ 
Handicapped‌‌workers‌m
‌ ay‌‌be‌‌employed‌‌   ‌ discrimination:‌  ‌ of‌‌the‌‌women‌‌employees‌‌therein;‌‌and‌  ‌
1) when‌  ‌their‌  ‌employment‌  ‌is‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌to‌  ‌prevent‌‌  1) Payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌lesser‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌female‌‌ 
4) To‌  ‌determine‌  ‌appropriate‌  ‌minimum‌  ‌age‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌‌ 
curtailment‌‌of‌‌employment‌‌opportunities‌a‌ nd‌‌   ‌ employee‌  ‌as‌  ‌against‌  ‌a ‌ ‌male‌  ‌employee,‌  ‌for‌  ‌work‌  ‌of‌‌ 
standards‌  ‌for‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌or‌  ‌termination‌  ‌in‌  ‌special‌‌ 
equal‌‌value;‌‌and‌  ‌
2) when‌‌
  it‌‌
  ‌does‌‌
  not‌‌ create‌‌ unfair‌‌ competition‌‌ in‌‌ labor‌‌  occupations‌‌   such‌‌  as‌‌
  those‌‌
  of‌‌
  flight‌‌
  attendants‌‌  and‌‌
  the‌‌ 
costs‌‌or‌‌impair‌‌or‌‌lower‌‌working‌‌standards.‌‌   ‌ 2) Favoring‌  ‌a ‌ ‌male‌  ‌employee‌  ‌over‌  ‌a ‌ ‌female‌  ‌employee‌‌  like.‌  ‌
with‌  ‌respect‌  ‌to‌  ‌promotion,‌  ‌training‌  ‌opportunities,‌‌ 
a. Equal‌  ‌opportunity.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌No‌  ‌disabled‌  ‌persons‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  e. Women‌  ‌working‌  ‌in‌  ‌nightclubs.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Any‌  ‌woman‌  ‌who‌  ‌is‌‌ 
study‌  ‌and‌  ‌scholarship‌  ‌grants‌  ‌solely‌  ‌on‌  ‌account‌  ‌of‌‌ 
denied‌‌
  access‌‌  to‌‌
  opportunities‌‌  for‌‌ suitable‌‌ employment.‌‌ A ‌‌ permitted‌  ‌or‌  ‌suffered‌  ‌to‌  ‌work,‌  ‌with‌  ‌or‌  ‌without‌‌ 
their‌‌sexes.‌  ‌
qualified‌  ‌disabled‌  ‌employee‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌
  same‌  compensation,‌‌   in‌‌
  any‌‌  night‌‌
  club,‌‌
  cocktail‌‌   lounge,‌‌ massage‌‌ 
terms‌  ‌and‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌of‌  ‌employment‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌‌  b. Stipulation‌‌   against‌‌   marriage.‌‌   — ‌‌‌It‌‌
  shall‌‌ be‌‌ unlawful‌‌ for‌‌  clinic,‌  ‌bar‌  ‌or‌  ‌similar‌  ‌establishments‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌effective‌‌ 
compensation,‌  ‌privileges,‌  ‌benefits,‌  ‌fringe‌  ‌benefits,‌‌  an‌  ‌employer‌  ‌to‌  ‌require‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌condition‌  ‌of‌  ‌employment‌  ‌or‌‌  control‌  ‌or‌  ‌supervision‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌substantial‌‌ 
incentives‌‌or‌‌allowances‌‌as‌‌a‌‌qualified‌‌able-bodied‌‌person.‌  ‌ continuation‌‌   of‌‌
  employment‌‌   that‌‌  a ‌‌woman‌‌ employee‌‌ shall‌‌  period‌‌   of‌‌
  time,‌‌   shall‌‌ be‌‌ considered‌‌ as‌‌ an‌‌ employee‌‌ of‌‌ such‌‌ 
not‌  ‌get‌  ‌married,‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌  ‌stipulate‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌or‌  ‌tacitly‌  ‌that‌‌  establishment‌‌for‌‌purposes‌‌of‌‌labor‌‌and‌‌social‌‌legislation.‌  ‌
b. Discrimination‌  ‌on‌  ‌employment.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌No‌  ‌entity,‌  ‌whether‌‌ 
upon‌‌   getting‌‌
  married,‌‌   a ‌‌woman‌‌   employee‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ deemed‌‌ 
public‌  ‌or‌  ‌private,‌  ‌shall‌  ‌discriminate‌  ‌against‌  ‌a ‌ ‌qualified‌‌  4. Minors‌  ‌
resigned‌  ‌or‌  ‌separated,‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌  ‌actually‌  ‌dismiss,‌  ‌discharge,‌‌ 
disabled‌  ‌person‌  ‌by‌  ‌reason‌  ‌of‌  ‌disability‌  ‌in‌  ‌regard‌  ‌to‌  ‌job‌‌ 
discriminate‌  ‌or‌  ‌otherwise‌  ‌prejudice‌  ‌a ‌ ‌woman‌  ‌employee‌‌  1) See‌  ‌RA‌  ‌No.‌  ‌9231,‌  ‌amending‌‌   ‌RA‌‌
  7610‌; ‌‌‌DO‌‌  No.‌‌  65-04,‌‌
  S.‌‌ 
application‌‌ procedures,‌‌ the‌‌ hiring,‌‌ promotion,‌‌ or‌‌ discharge‌‌ 
merely‌‌by‌‌reason‌‌of‌‌her‌‌marriage.‌  ‌ 2004‌  ‌on‌  ‌Worst‌  ‌Forms‌  ‌of‌  ‌Child‌  ‌Labor;‌  ‌and‌  ‌DOLE‌  ‌Dept.‌‌ 
of‌  ‌employees,‌  ‌employee‌  ‌compensation,‌  ‌job‌  ‌training,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
other‌‌terms,‌‌conditions,‌‌and‌‌privileges‌‌of‌‌employment.‌  ‌ c. Prohibited‌  ‌acts.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌It‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌unlawful‌  ‌for‌  ‌any‌‌  Circular‌  ‌No.‌  ‌2,‌‌
  S.‌‌
  2017‌‌
  on‌‌
  Guidelines‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  Issuance‌‌  of‌‌ 
employer:‌  ‌ Work‌  ‌Permit‌  ‌for‌  ‌Children‌  ‌Below‌  ‌5 ‌ ‌Years‌  ‌Old‌  ‌Engaged‌  ‌in‌‌ 
c. Incentives‌‌for‌‌employers.‌‌— ‌ ‌
Public‌‌Entertainment‌‌or‌‌Information.‌  ‌
1) To‌  ‌deny‌  ‌any‌  ‌woman‌  ‌employee‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌provided‌‌ 
for‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌Chapter‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌  ‌discharge‌  ‌any‌  ‌woman‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 158‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

2) When‌  ‌a ‌ ‌child‌  ‌is‌  ‌15‌  ‌and‌  ‌above,‌  ‌but‌  ‌below‌  ‌18‌  ‌years‌  ‌of‌‌  i. Right‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌provided‌  ‌a ‌ ‌copy‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌employment‌‌  a) Parental‌‌leave‌‌of‌‌not‌‌more‌‌than‌7
‌ ‌‌days‌‌every‌‌year.‌  ‌
age‌‌
  — ‌‌‌Hours‌‌   of‌‌  Work.‌‌   up‌‌ to‌‌ 8H/D,‌‌ 40H/W;‌‌ 6am‌‌ to‌‌ 10pm‌‌  contract;‌  ‌ b) Flexible‌‌work‌‌schedule;‌  ‌
only.‌  ‌ j. Right‌‌to‌‌certificate‌‌of‌‌employment;‌‌and‌  ‌ c) Protection‌‌from‌‌work‌‌discrimination‌  ‌
GR‌:‌‌  ‌May‌‌be‌‌employed;‌  ‌ k. Right‌  ‌to‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌their‌  ‌own‌  ‌religious‌  ‌beliefs‌  ‌and‌‌  4) Who‌‌are‌‌considered‌‌solo‌‌parents?‌  ‌
EX‌:‌‌  I‌ n‌  ‌an‌  ‌undertaking‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌deleterious‌  ‌or‌‌  cultural‌‌practices.‌  ‌
a) Woman‌‌who‌‌gives‌‌birth‌‌resulting‌‌from‌‌rape;‌  ‌
hazardous‌‌in‌‌nature.‌  ‌
6. Homeworkers‌  ‌
3) When‌  ‌below‌  ‌15‌  ‌years‌  ‌of‌  ‌age‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Hours‌  ‌of‌  ‌Work.‌  ‌up‌  ‌to‌‌  b) Spouse‌‌died;‌  ‌
1) See‌‌DO‌‌No.‌‌5,‌‌S.‌‌1992‌‌‌on‌‌Industrial‌‌Homeworkers.‌  ‌
4H/D,‌‌20H/W;‌‌6am‌‌to‌‌8pm‌‌only.‌  ‌ c) Spouse‌‌detained‌‌for‌‌at‌‌least‌‌1‌‌year;‌  ‌
2) “Industrial‌  ‌Homework”‌‌   is‌‌
  a ‌‌system‌‌
  of‌‌
  production‌‌   under‌‌ 
GR‌:‌‌  ‌Shall‌‌NOT‌‌be‌‌employed;‌  ‌ d) Spouse‌  ‌is‌  ‌physically‌  ‌or‌  ‌mentally‌  ‌incapacitated‌  ‌as‌‌ 
which‌‌   work‌‌ for‌‌ an‌‌ employer‌‌ or‌‌ contractor‌‌ is‌‌ carried‌‌ out‌‌ by‌‌ 
EX‌:‌‌  ‌When‌‌a‌‌child‌‌works‌  ‌ certified‌‌by‌‌a‌‌public‌‌medical‌‌practitioner;‌  ‌
a‌‌
  homework‌‌ at‌‌ his/her‌‌ home.‌‌ Materials‌‌ may‌‌ or‌‌ may‌‌ not‌‌ be‌‌ 
a. Directly‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌sole‌  ‌responsibility‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌  furnished‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌or‌  ‌contractor.‌  ‌It‌  ‌differs‌  ‌from‌‌  e) Legally‌‌or‌‌de‌‌facto‌‌separated‌‌for‌‌at‌‌least‌‌one‌‌year;‌  ‌
parents/legal‌  ‌guardian‌  ‌and‌  ‌where‌  ‌only‌‌  regular‌  ‌factory‌  ‌production‌  ‌principally‌  ‌in‌  ‌that,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌ f) Marriage‌‌annulled;‌  ‌
members‌‌of‌‌his‌‌family‌‌are‌‌employed.‌  ‌ decentralized‌‌   form‌‌   of‌‌
  production‌‌   where‌‌ there‌‌ is‌‌ ordinarily‌‌ 
g) Abandoned‌‌by‌‌spouse‌‌for‌‌at‌‌least‌‌one‌‌year;‌  ‌
very‌‌little‌‌supervision‌‌or‌‌regulation‌‌of‌‌methods‌‌of‌‌work.‌  ‌
b. Or‌  ‌participates‌  ‌in‌  ‌public‌  ‌entertainment‌  ‌or‌‌  h) Unmarried‌‌parent;‌  ‌
information.‌‌   A ‌‌‌work‌‌ permit‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ secured‌‌  3) Exemption‌  ‌from‌  ‌minimum‌  ‌Wage‌  ‌if‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌in‌‌ 
needlework.‌  ‌The‌  ‌title‌  ‌on‌  ‌Wages‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌apply‌  ‌to‌  ‌farm‌‌  i) Any‌  ‌other‌  ‌person‌  ‌who‌  ‌solely‌  ‌provides‌  ‌for‌  ‌parental‌‌ 
from‌‌DOLE‌‌in‌‌both‌‌instances.‌  ‌
tenancy‌  ‌or‌  ‌leasehold,‌  ‌domestic‌  ‌service‌  ‌and‌  ‌persons‌‌  care;‌  ‌
5. Kasambahays‌  working‌‌ in‌‌ their‌‌ respective‌‌ homes‌‌ in‌‌ needle‌‌ work‌‌ or‌‌ in‌‌ any‌‌  j) Any‌  ‌family‌  ‌member‌  ‌who‌  ‌assumes‌  ‌role‌  ‌as‌  ‌head‌  ‌of‌‌ 
1) See‌  ‌Domestic‌  ‌Workers‌  ‌Act‌‌
  or‌‌
  Batas‌‌
  Kasambahay‌‌
  and‌‌
  its‌  ‌ cottage‌‌industry‌‌duly‌‌registered.‌  ‌ family.‌  ‌
IRR‌. ‌ ‌ 4) No‌‌homework‌‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌performed‌‌on‌‌the‌‌following:‌‌   ‌ 8. Night‌‌workers‌  ‌
2) The‌  ‌rights‌  ‌and‌  ‌privileges‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Kasambahay‌  ‌are‌  ‌as‌‌  a) explosives,‌  ‌fireworks‌  ‌and‌  ‌articles‌  ‌of‌  ‌like‌‌  1) see‌‌IRR‌‌DOLE‌‌DO‌‌No.‌‌119-12‌‌s.‌‌2012‌. ‌ ‌
follows:‌‌   ‌ character;‌‌   ‌
a. Minimum‌‌wage;‌  ‌ 2) Coverage‌  ‌and‌  ‌Exclusion.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Shall‌  ‌apply‌  ‌to‌  ‌all‌  ‌persons,‌‌ 
b) drugs‌‌and‌‌poisons;‌‌and‌  ‌
who‌‌   shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  employed‌‌   or‌‌ permitted‌‌ or‌‌ suffered‌‌ to‌‌ work‌‌ at‌‌ 
b. Other‌  ‌mandatory‌  ‌benefits,‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌daily‌  ‌and‌‌  c) other‌  ‌articles,‌  ‌the‌  ‌processing‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌requires‌‌  night,‌  ‌except‌  ‌those‌‌   employed‌‌   in‌‌
  agriculture,‌‌   stock‌‌
  raising,‌‌ 
weekly‌‌  rest‌‌
  periods,‌‌
  service‌‌
  incentive‌‌
  leave,‌‌   and‌‌
  13th‌‌  exposure‌‌to‌‌toxic‌‌substances.‌  ‌ fishing,‌  ‌maritime‌‌   transport‌‌   and‌‌  inland‌‌  navigation‌, ‌‌during‌‌ 
month‌‌pay;‌‌   ‌ a‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌not‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌  ‌seven‌  ‌(7)‌  ‌consecutive‌  ‌hours,‌‌ 
7. Solo‌‌parents‌  ‌
c. Coverage‌‌under‌‌the‌‌SSS,‌‌PhilHealth‌‌and‌‌Pag-IBIG‌‌laws;‌‌   ‌ including‌  ‌the‌‌   interval‌‌  from‌‌   midnight‌‌   to‌‌
  five‌‌
  o'clock‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌ 
1) See‌‌RA‌‌8972‌‌‌or‌‌the‌‌Solo‌‌Parent‌‌Welfare‌‌Act‌‌and‌‌its‌I‌ RR‌. ‌ ‌ morning.‌  ‌
d. Board,‌‌lodging‌‌and‌‌medical‌‌attendance;‌‌   ‌
2) Solo‌‌
  parent,‌‌
  or‌‌
  other‌‌
  person‌‌  who‌‌  solely‌‌
  provides‌‌
  parental‌‌  3) Right‌‌  to‌‌
  Health‌‌   Assessment.‌‌ — ‌‌‌At‌‌ their‌‌ request,‌‌ workers‌‌ 
e. Right‌‌to‌‌privacy;‌  ‌
care‌‌and‌‌support‌‌to‌‌a‌‌child‌‌or‌‌children.‌  ‌ shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌undergo‌  ‌a ‌ ‌health‌  ‌assessment‌‌ 
f. Access‌‌to‌‌outside‌‌communication;‌  ‌
a) Has‌‌rendered‌‌service‌‌for‌‌at‌‌least‌1
‌ ‌‌year‌; ‌ ‌ without‌  ‌charge‌  ‌and‌‌   to‌‌
  receive‌‌
  advice‌‌
  on‌‌  how‌‌
  to‌‌
  reduce‌‌
  or‌‌ 
g. Access‌‌to‌‌education‌‌and‌‌training;‌  ‌ avoid‌‌health‌‌problems‌‌associated‌‌with‌‌their‌‌work.‌  ‌
b) Notified‌‌employer;‌  ‌
h. Right‌‌to‌‌form,‌‌join,‌‌or‌‌assist‌‌labor‌‌organization;‌  ‌ 4) Right‌  ‌to‌  ‌Mandatory‌  ‌Facilities.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Mandatory‌  ‌facilities‌‌ 
c) Presented‌‌a‌‌Solo‌‌Parent‌‌ID.‌  ‌
shall‌‌
  be‌‌ made‌‌ available‌‌ for‌‌ workers‌‌ performing‌‌ night‌‌ work‌‌ 
3) Benefits‌‌include‌  ‌ which‌‌include‌‌the‌‌following:‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 159‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

a) Suitable‌‌first-aid‌‌and‌‌emergency‌‌facilities;‌‌   ‌ 2) In‌  ‌Sameer‌  ‌Overseas‌  ‌Placement‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Cabiles‌‌ 4


, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌‌ 
a. fit‌‌for‌‌repatriation;‌‌or‌‌   ‌
b) Lactation‌‌station‌‌in‌‌required‌‌companies;‌‌   ‌ declares,‌  ‌“Employees‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌stripped‌‌   of‌‌
  their‌‌  security‌‌  of‌‌ 
tenure‌‌   when‌‌
  they‌‌   move‌‌  to‌‌
  work‌‌
  in‌‌
  a ‌‌different‌‌ jurisdiction.‌‌  b. fit‌  ‌to‌  ‌work‌  ‌but‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌is‌  ‌unable‌  ‌to‌  ‌find‌‌ 
c) Separate‌‌toilet‌‌facilities‌‌for‌‌men‌‌and‌‌women;‌‌   ‌ employment‌‌for‌‌the‌‌seafarer‌‌despite‌‌efforts.‌  ‌
With‌‌   respect‌‌  to‌‌ the‌‌ rights‌‌ of‌‌ OFWs,‌‌ we‌‌ follow‌‌ the‌‌ principle‌‌ 
d) Facility‌‌for‌‌eating‌‌with‌‌potable‌‌drinking‌‌water;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ of‌‌lex‌‌loci‌‌contractus‌.”‌  ‌ 6. In‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌permanent‌  ‌total‌  ‌or‌  ‌partial‌  ‌disability‌, ‌ ‌the‌‌ 
e) Facilities‌‌ for‌‌ transportation‌‌ and/or‌‌ properly‌‌ ventilated‌‌  3) Disability‌‌Benefits‌‌for‌‌Injury‌‌or‌‌Illness.‌  ‌ seafarer‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌compensated‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌rates‌  ‌and‌  ‌rules‌‌ 
temporary‌  ‌sleeping‌  ‌or‌  ‌resting‌‌
  quarters,‌‌
  ‌except‌‌
  ‌where‌‌  applicable‌‌at‌‌the‌‌time‌‌illness‌‌or‌‌injury‌‌was‌‌contracted.‌  
Maunlad‌‌Trans.‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌Camoral‌2
‌ 015‌  ‌
any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following‌‌circumstances‌‌is‌‌present:‌‌   ‌
4) Permanent/Total‌‌Disability.‌  ‌
i) Where‌‌
  there‌‌
  is‌‌ an‌‌ existing‌‌ agreement‌‌ between‌‌  Section‌  ‌20‌  ‌of‌  ‌POEA-SEC‌, ‌ ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌written‌  ‌into‌  ‌the‌‌ 
seafarer’s‌  ‌contract,‌  ‌provides‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌minimum‌  ‌requirements‌  ‌before‌‌  Maersk‌‌Filipinas‌‌Crewing,‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌Mesina‌‌‌2013‌  ‌
management‌  ‌and‌  ‌workers‌  ‌providing‌  ‌for‌  ‌an‌‌ 
equivalent‌‌or‌‌superior‌‌benefit;‌‌or‌  ‌ deployment‌  ‌of‌  ‌Filipino‌  ‌seafarers.‌  ‌The‌  ‌two‌‌  elements‌‌
  required‌‌
  for‌‌
  an‌‌ 
Permanent‌‌   disability‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌  inability‌‌
  of‌‌ a ‌‌worker‌‌ to‌‌ perform‌‌ his‌‌ job‌‌ 
injury‌‌to‌‌be‌‌compensable‌‌are:‌  ‌
ii) Where‌‌   the‌‌
  start‌‌
  or‌‌
  end‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ night‌‌ work‌‌ does‌‌  for‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌‌   120‌‌
  days‌, ‌‌regardless‌‌   of‌‌
  whether‌‌   or‌‌
  not‌‌
  he‌‌
  loses‌‌
  the‌‌ 
not‌‌
  fall‌‌
  within‌‌  12‌‌
  midnight‌‌ to‌‌ 5 ‌‌o'clock‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌  a) The‌‌injury‌‌or‌‌illness‌‌is‌‌work-related‌,‌‌and‌  ‌ use‌‌of‌‌any‌‌part‌‌of‌‌his‌‌body.‌‌   ‌
morning;‌‌or‌‌   ‌ b) It‌‌occurred‌d
‌ uring‌‌the‌‌term‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌contract.‌  ‌ Total‌  ‌disability‌, ‌ ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand,‌  ‌means‌  ‌the‌  ‌disablement‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌ 
iii) Where‌‌ the‌‌ workplace‌‌ is‌‌ located‌‌ in‌‌ an‌‌ area‌‌ that‌‌  Pertinent‌‌portions‌‌of‌‌Section‌‌20‌‌reads:‌  ‌ employee‌  ‌to‌  ‌earn‌  ‌wages‌  ‌in‌‌   the‌‌  same‌‌
  kind‌‌
  of‌‌  work‌‌
  of‌‌
  similar‌‌   nature‌‌ 
is‌‌
  accessible‌‌
  twenty‌‌ four‌‌ (24)‌‌ hours‌‌ to‌‌ public‌‌  that‌  ‌he‌  ‌was‌  ‌trained‌  ‌for,‌  ‌or‌  ‌accustomed‌  ‌to‌  ‌perform,‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌  ‌kind‌  ‌of‌‌ 
1. Seafarer‌  ‌is‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌sickness‌  ‌allowance‌  ‌= ‌ ‌basic‌  ‌wage‌, ‌‌
transportation;‌‌   ‌ work‌  ‌which‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌mentality‌  ‌and‌  ‌attainments‌  ‌could‌‌   do.‌‌
  It‌‌ 
until‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌declared‌  ‌fit‌‌
  to‌‌
  work,‌‌
  or‌‌
  the‌‌
  degree‌‌
  of‌‌
  permanent‌‌ 
iv) Where‌  ‌the‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌  ‌employees‌  d
‌ oes‌  ‌not‌‌  does‌  ‌not‌  ‌require‌  ‌complete‌  ‌disability‌  ‌or‌  ‌total‌  ‌paralysis.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌‌ 
disability‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌assessed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌company-designated‌‌ 
exceed‌  ‌a ‌ ‌specified‌  ‌number‌  ‌as‌  m ‌ ay‌  ‌be‌‌  considered‌‌permanent‌‌if‌‌it‌‌lasts‌c‌ ontinuously‌‌‌for‌‌more‌‌than‌‌120‌‌days.‌  ‌
physician‌‌but‌‌‌in‌‌no‌‌case‌‌shall‌‌exceed‌‌‌120‌‌days.‌  ‌
provided‌‌for‌‌by‌‌the‌‌SOLE.‌  ‌
2. He‌‌ shall‌‌ submit‌‌ himself‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌post‌‌ employment‌‌ medical‌‌ exam‌‌  5) POEA-SEC,‌‌Labor‌‌Code,‌‌and‌‌AREC‌‌Harmonized‌  ‌
5) Right‌  ‌to‌‌   Transfer.‌‌  — ‌‌‌Night‌‌   workers‌‌   who‌‌   are‌‌  certified‌‌
  by‌‌  by‌‌
  a ‌‌company-designated‌‌   physician‌‌   within‌‌
  ‌3 ‌‌working‌‌ days‌‌  Vergara‌‌v.‌‌Hammonia‌‌Maritime‌‌Services,‌‌Inc.‌‌et‌‌al.‌  ‌
competent‌‌   physician,‌‌  as‌‌
  unfit‌‌
  to‌‌
  render‌‌   night‌‌   work,‌‌  due‌‌ to‌‌  upon‌‌his‌‌return,‌‌   ‌
health‌‌   reasons,‌‌   shall‌‌
  be‌‌  transferred‌‌   to‌‌
  a ‌‌job‌‌ for‌‌ which‌‌ they‌‌  a. The‌‌
  120‌‌   days‌‌ provided‌‌ in‌‌ Sec‌‌ 20-B(3)‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ POEA-SEC‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ 
except‌  ‌when‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌physically‌  ‌incapacitated,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌written‌‌ 
are‌‌fit‌‌to‌‌work‌‌whenever‌‌practicable.‌  ‌ period‌‌  given‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  employer‌‌  to‌‌  determine‌‌   the‌‌
  fitness‌‌  of‌‌ the‌‌ 
notice‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  agency‌‌  is‌‌
  deemed‌‌ as‌‌ compliance.‌‌ Failure‌‌ to‌‌ do‌‌ 
6) Women‌  ‌Night‌  ‌Workers.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Measures‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌taken‌  ‌to‌‌  so‌‌means‌‌waiver‌‌of‌‌such‌‌benefits.‌  ‌ seafarer‌‌   to‌‌
  work,‌‌   during‌‌
  which‌‌   the‌‌
  latter‌‌
  is‌‌
  deemed‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌   in‌‌ 
ensure‌  ‌that‌  ‌an‌  ‌alternative‌  ‌to‌  ‌night‌  ‌work‌  ‌is‌  ‌available‌  ‌to‌‌  state‌‌of‌‌total‌‌and‌‌temporary‌‌disability;‌ 
3. If‌  ‌a ‌ ‌doctor‌  ‌appointed‌‌
  by‌‌  him‌‌  disagrees‌‌   with‌‌
  the‌‌
  findings‌‌
  of‌‌ 
women‌  ‌workers‌  ‌who‌  ‌would‌  ‌otherwise‌  ‌be‌  ‌called‌  ‌upon‌  ‌to‌‌  b. The‌  ‌120‌  ‌days‌  ‌of‌  ‌total‌  ‌and‌  ‌temporary‌  ‌disability‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 
the‌‌ company‌‌ doctor,‌‌ a ‌‌‌third‌‌ doctor‌‌ ‌may‌‌ be‌‌ agreed‌‌ jointly‌‌ by‌‌ 
perform‌‌such‌‌work.‌  ‌ extended‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌maximum‌  ‌of‌  ‌120‌‌   days,‌‌
  or‌‌
  ‌up‌‌
  to‌‌
  240‌‌
  days‌, ‌‌
both,‌  ‌and‌  ‌his‌  ‌decision‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌final‌  ‌and‌  ‌binding‌  ‌to‌‌
  both‌‌ 
7) Criminal‌  ‌liability‌  ‌of‌  ‌Employer.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Any‌  ‌violation‌‌   of‌‌
  this‌‌  parties.‌  ‌ should‌‌the‌‌seafarer‌‌require‌‌further‌‌treatment;‌‌   ‌
Rule‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌punishable‌  ‌with‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fine‌  ‌of‌  ‌30K‌  ‌- ‌ ‌50K‌  ‌or‌‌  c. A‌‌total‌‌and‌‌temporary‌‌disability‌b
‌ ecomes‌‌permanent‌‌   ‌
4. Those‌  ‌illnesses‌  ‌not‌  ‌listed‌  ‌in‌  ‌Section‌  ‌32‌  ‌are‌  ‌presumed‌  ‌as‌‌ 
imprisonment‌‌   of‌‌
  ‌not‌‌
  less‌‌ than‌‌ six‌‌ (6)‌‌ months‌‌ or‌‌ both,‌‌ at‌‌ 
work-related.‌  ‌ i) when‌  ‌so‌  ‌declared‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌company-designated‌‌ 
the‌‌discretion‌‌of‌‌the‌‌court.‌  ‌
5. The‌  ‌employer‌  ‌shall‌  ‌bear‌  ‌cost‌  ‌for‌  ‌repatriation‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌event‌‌  physician‌‌   within‌‌  120‌‌
  days‌‌   or‌‌ 240‌‌ days‌‌ (‌Art‌‌ 192[c]‌‌ 
9. Migrant‌‌workers‌  ‌ seafarer‌‌is‌‌   ‌ LC)‌,‌‌as‌‌the‌‌case‌‌may‌‌be,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
1) Protection‌‌  of‌‌
  OFWs;‌‌
  ‌Lex‌‌
  Loci‌‌
  Contractus.‌‌
  ‌Does‌‌
  the‌‌ Labor‌‌  ii) upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌expiration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌said‌  ‌periods‌  ‌without‌‌ 
Code‌‌and‌‌the‌‌IRRs‌‌cover‌‌a‌‌Filipino‌‌working‌‌abroad?‌  ‌ declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌either‌  ‌fitness‌  ‌to‌  ‌work‌‌
  or‌‌
  permanent‌ 
4
‌GR‌‌No‌‌170139,‌‌August‌‌5,‌‌2014‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 160‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

disability‌‌   and‌‌
  the‌‌
  seafarer‌‌
  is‌‌
  still‌‌
  unable‌‌   to‌‌ resume‌‌  The‌  ‌phrase‌  ‌“death‌  ‌of‌  ‌seafarer‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌contract”‌  ‌in‌‌  b) An‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌or‌  ‌hearing‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌conducted‌‌ 
his‌  ‌regular‌  ‌seafaring‌  ‌duties‌  ‌(‌Sec‌  ‌2[b],‌  ‌Rule‌  ‌VII‌‌  Section‌  ‌20(A)(1)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌1996‌  ‌POEA-SEC‌  ‌should‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌strictly‌  ‌and‌‌  that‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌duly‌  ‌documented‌  ‌and‌  ‌entered‌  ‌into‌‌ 
AREC;‌  ‌Kestrel‌  ‌Shipping‌  ‌Co.,‌  ‌Inc.‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Munar‌  ‌2013‌, ‌‌ literally‌  ‌construed‌  ‌to‌  ‌mean‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌seafarer’s‌  ‌death‌  ‌should‌  ‌have‌‌  the‌‌ship’s‌‌logbook.‌  ‌
Alpha‌  ‌Ship‌  ‌Management‌  ‌Corporation‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Calo‌‌  occurred‌‌   during‌‌
  the‌‌
  term‌‌   of‌‌
  his‌‌
  employment;‌‌   ‌it‌‌
  is‌‌
  enough‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌  c) Should‌  ‌a ‌ ‌penalty‌  ‌be‌  ‌justified,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Master‌  ‌shall‌‌ 
2013‌).‌ ‌ ‌ work-related‌  ‌injury‌  ‌or‌  ‌illness‌  ‌which‌  ‌eventually‌  ‌caused‌  ‌his‌‌  issue‌  ‌a ‌ ‌written‌  ‌notice‌  ‌of‌  ‌penalty‌‌
  and‌‌
  its‌‌
  reason‌‌ 
death‌‌occurred‌‌during‌‌the‌‌term‌‌of‌‌his‌‌employment.‌  ‌ to‌‌the‌‌seafarer.‌  ‌
6) Need‌‌for‌‌Definite‌‌Assessment‌‌within‌‌120/240‌‌days.‌  ‌
9) Seafarer’s‌  ‌Protection;‌  ‌RA‌  ‌No‌  ‌10706‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌Seafarers‌‌  d) Dismissal‌‌   without‌‌
  notice‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  justified‌‌ if‌‌ there‌‌ 
Belchem‌‌Philippines,‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌Zafra‌‌‌2015‌  ‌
Protection‌  ‌Act‌  ‌declares‌  ‌ambulance‌  ‌chasing‌  ‌a ‌ ‌criminal‌‌  is‌  ‌clear‌  ‌and‌  ‌existing‌  ‌danger‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌ship‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Failure‌‌ to‌‌ do‌‌ so‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ seafarer’s‌‌ condition‌‌ remain‌‌ unresolved,‌‌  offense.‌E
‌ lements‌‌are:‌  ‌ crew.‌‌   ‌
the‌‌latter‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌deemed‌‌totally‌‌and‌‌permanently‌‌disabled.‌  ‌ a) A‌  ‌person‌  ‌or‌  ‌his‌  ‌agent‌  ‌solicits‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌‌seafarer‌‌
  or‌‌  Maersk-Filipinas‌‌Crewing,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌v.‌‌Avestruz‌‌‌2015‌ 
his‌  ‌heirs,‌  ‌the‌  ‌pursuit‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌claim‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌‌ 
7) Third-doctor‌‌Referral‌  ‌ A‌  ‌chief‌‌
  cook‌‌  and‌‌  the‌‌
  vessel’s‌‌
  captain‌‌
  had‌‌
  a ‌‌heated‌‌
  argument.‌‌   On‌‌
  the‌‌ 
employer‌‌of‌‌the‌‌seafarer;‌  ‌
same‌  ‌day,‌  ‌the‌  ‌cook‌  ‌was‌  ‌dismissed‌‌
  from‌‌  service.‌‌  Two‌‌  days‌‌
  later,‌‌
  he‌‌ 
Carcedo‌‌v.‌‌Maine‌‌Marine‌‌Philippines,‌‌Inc.‌‌‌2015‌  ‌ b) Such‌  ‌claim‌  ‌is‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌recovery‌  ‌of‌‌  disembarked‌‌to‌‌return‌‌to‌‌the‌‌PH.‌  ‌
monetary‌‌   award‌‌   or‌‌ benefits‌‌ arising‌‌ from‌‌ accident,‌‌ 
The‌‌  cook‌‌
  was‌‌
  not‌‌
  afforded‌‌
  procedural‌‌
  due‌‌
  process‌‌ for‌‌ not‌‌ observing‌‌ 
illness‌‌or‌‌death,‌‌including‌‌interest;‌‌and‌  ‌
the‌‌two‌‌notice‌‌rule‌. ‌ ‌
c) The‌  ‌pursuit‌  ‌is‌  ‌in‌  ‌exchange‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌amount‌  ‌or‌  ‌fee‌‌ 
which‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌retained‌  ‌or‌  ‌deducted‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌  13) Employment-at-will‌  ‌(EAW)‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌valid‌  ‌in‌  ‌Overseas‌‌ 
awarded‌‌or‌‌granted‌‌benefit.‌  ‌ Employment.‌  ‌EAW‌‌   is‌‌
  a ‌‌contract‌‌
  of‌‌
  employment‌‌   that‌‌
  may‌‌ 
10) Invalid‌  ‌Side‌  ‌Agreement.‌  ‌An‌  ‌agreement‌  ‌that‌  ‌diminishes‌‌  be‌  ‌terminated‌  ‌with‌  ‌or‌  ‌without‌  ‌cause.‌  ‌This‌  ‌is‌  ‌binding‌  ‌if‌‌ 
the‌  ‌employee’s‌  ‌pay‌  ‌and‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌is‌  ‌VOID‌, ‌ ‌unless‌  ‌such‌‌  freely‌  ‌and‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌stipulated‌  ‌in‌  ‌writing‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌‌ 
  subsequent‌‌   agreement‌‌   is‌‌ approved‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ POEA.‌‌ (‌Chavez‌‌ v.‌‌  foreign‌‌ employer‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ OFW.‌‌ ‌Termination‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌ in‌‌ 
Bonto-Perez,‌‌Rayala,‌‌et‌‌al‌) ‌ ‌ good‌‌faith.‌‌(‌GBMLT‌‌Manpower‌‌Services‌‌v.‌‌Malinao‌‌‌2015‌) ‌ ‌
Despite‌‌   the‌‌
  binding‌‌
  effect‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ third‌‌ doctor's‌‌ assessment,‌‌  14) EAW‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌valid‌  ‌in‌  ‌Local‌  ‌Employment.‌  ‌In‌  ‌local‌‌ 
11) Period‌  ‌to‌  ‌File‌  ‌OFW‌  ‌Claims.‌  ‌Art‌  ‌291‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Labor‌  ‌Code‌‌ 
a‌  ‌dissatisfied‌‌
  party‌‌
  may‌‌  institute‌‌   a ‌‌complaint‌‌
  with‌‌  the‌‌
  LA‌‌  employment,‌  ‌the‌‌   governing‌‌   law‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌security‌‌  of‌‌
  tenure‌‌ 
to‌‌contest‌‌the‌‌same‌‌on‌‌the‌‌ground‌‌of‌‌   ‌ provides‌‌   ‌3 ‌‌years‌ ‌from‌‌ the‌‌ date‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ seafarer’s‌‌ return‌‌ 
  for‌‌
principle‌  ‌inscribed‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌and‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Labor‌‌ 
to‌‌the‌‌point‌‌of‌‌hire.‌  ‌
a) evident‌‌partiality,‌  ‌ Code.‌  ‌One’s‌  ‌job‌  ‌is‌  ‌property‌  ‌and‌  ‌no‌  ‌employee‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌‌ 
12) Sec‌  ‌17‌  ‌of‌  ‌POEA-SEC.‌  ‌Disciplinary‌  ‌procedures‌. ‌ ‌The‌‌  dismissed‌‌without‌‌valid‌‌cause‌‌allowed‌‌by‌‌law.‌  ‌
b) corruption‌‌of‌‌the‌‌third‌‌doctor,‌‌   ‌
following‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌complied‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Master‌  ‌against‌  ‌an‌‌ 
c) fraud,‌‌other‌‌undue‌‌means,‌  ‌ 15) Pre-termination‌  ‌of‌  ‌Employment;‌  ‌Relief.‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌10‌  ‌RA‌  ‌No‌‌ 
erring‌‌seafarer:‌  ‌
8042‌‌entitled‌‌the‌‌employee‌‌to:‌  ‌
d) lack‌‌of‌‌basis‌‌to‌‌support‌‌the‌‌assessment,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ a) There‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌written‌  ‌notice‌  ‌containing‌  ‌the‌‌ 
a) Full‌  ‌reimbursement‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌placement‌  ‌fee‌  ‌with‌‌ 
e) being‌  ‌contrary‌  ‌to‌  ‌law‌  ‌or‌  ‌settled‌  ‌jurisprudence.‌‌  following:‌  ‌
12%‌‌interest‌‌per‌‌annum;‌  ‌
(‌Sunit‌‌v.‌‌OSM‌‌Maritime‌‌Services‌‌2 ‌ 017‌) ‌ ‌ i) Grounds‌‌for‌‌the‌‌charges;‌  ‌
b) His‌  ‌salaries‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌unexpired‌  ‌portion‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌ 
8) Seafarer’s‌‌Death‌‌Benefit:‌‌Death‌‌Need‌‌Not‌‌Have‌  ii) Date,‌  ‌time‌  ‌and‌  ‌place‌‌
  for‌‌
  a ‌‌formal‌‌  employment‌‌contract‌‌xxxx.‌  ‌
Occurred‌‌During‌‌Term‌‌of‌‌Employment‌  ‌ investigation.‌  ‌
C.F.‌‌Sharp‌‌Crew‌‌Management,‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌Heirs‌‌of‌‌Repiso‌‌‌2016‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 161‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

16) Termination‌‌   of‌‌


  employment‌‌   of‌‌
  Seafarers.‌‌   In‌‌
  a ‌‌nutshell,‌‌  period.‌  ‌ 2) see‌  ‌DOLE‌  ‌Labor‌  ‌Advisory‌  ‌No.‌  ‌15,‌  ‌S.‌  ‌2019‌  ‌dated‌‌ 
three‌  ‌(3)‌  ‌requirements‌  ‌are‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌complete‌‌  NO‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌joint‌  ‌and‌  ‌several‌  ‌liability‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌principal/employer,‌‌  December‌  ‌27,‌‌  2019,‌‌   Clarificatory‌‌
  Guidelines‌‌
  on‌‌
  DOLE‌‌
  DO‌‌ 
termination‌‌of‌‌the‌‌employment‌‌contract‌5:‌  ‌ recruitment/placement‌‌ agency,‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ corporate‌‌ officers‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ latter,‌‌  No.‌‌150,‌‌S.‌‌2016;‌‌   ‌
a) Due‌‌to‌‌expiration‌‌or‌‌other‌‌reasons/‌‌causes;‌  ‌ for‌  ‌the‌  ‌money‌  ‌claims‌  ‌and‌  ‌damages‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌OFW‌  ‌is‌  ‌absolute‌  ‌and‌‌ 
3) RA‌‌5487‌‌‌(Private‌‌Security‌‌Agency‌‌Law)‌  ‌
without‌  ‌qualification.‌  ‌TheOFW‌  ‌is‌  ‌given‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌seek‌  ‌recourse‌‌ 
b) Signing‌‌off‌‌from‌‌the‌‌vessel;‌‌and‌  ‌ against‌‌   the‌‌ only‌‌ link‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ country‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ foreign‌‌ principal/employer,‌‌  4) see‌  ‌also‌  ‌DOLE‌  ‌Labor‌  ‌Advisory‌  ‌No.‌  ‌01,‌  ‌S.‌  ‌2014‌  ‌for‌‌ 
c) Arrival‌‌at‌‌the‌‌point‌‌of‌‌hire.‌  ‌ i.e.,‌  ‌the‌  ‌recruitment/placement‌  ‌agency‌  ‌and‌  ‌its‌  ‌corporate‌‌  Contracting‌  ‌Arrangement‌  ‌Time‌  ‌& ‌ ‌Interval‌  ‌of‌  ‌Payment‌  ‌of‌‌ 
officers‌. ‌ ‌
17) Domestic‌  ‌seafarer.‌  ‌Under‌  ‌Art‌  ‌295,‌  ‌seafarers‌  ‌in‌‌  Wages.‌ 
ocean-going‌  ‌vessels‌‌   are‌‌  ‌contractual‌‌   employees.‌‌   Domestic‌‌  Augustin‌‌International‌‌Center‌‌v.‌‌Bartolome‌‌2 ‌ 019‌  ‌
Summary‌‌of‌‌Minimum‌‌Labor‌‌Standards‌‌Benefits‌  ‌
seafarers,‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand,‌  ‌are‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌‌ 
WON‌‌the‌L ‌ A‌‌had‌‌jurisdiction‌‌over‌‌the‌‌complaint.‌  ‌
security-of-tenure,‌  ‌as‌  ‌reiterated‌  ‌in‌  ‌DO‌  ‌No‌  ‌231,‌  ‌June‌  ‌7,‌‌  Benefit‌  ‌ How‌‌to‌‌avail‌  ‌ Exception‌  ‌ Notes‌  ‌
YES‌. ‌ ‌Section‌  ‌10‌  ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌8042,‌  ‌as‌  ‌amended‌  ‌by‌  ‌RA‌  ‌10022,‌  ‌explicitly‌‌ 
2013,‌‌and‌‌can‌‌become‌‌regular‌‌employees.‌  ‌
provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌LAs‌  ‌have‌  ‌original‌  ‌and‌  ‌exclusive‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌‌  Overtime‌‌Pay‌  ‌
Dagasdas‌‌v.‌‌Grand‌‌Placement‌‌&‌‌General‌‌Services‌‌Corp‌‌2 ‌ 017‌  ‌ claims‌  ‌arising‌  ‌out‌  ‌of‌  ‌employer-employee‌  ‌relations‌  ‌or‌  ‌by‌  ‌virtue‌  ‌of‌‌ 
any‌  ‌law‌  ‌or‌  ‌contract‌  ‌involving‌  ‌Filipino‌  ‌workers‌  ‌for‌  ‌overseas‌  OT‌‌Pay‌r‌ efers‌‌to‌‌ 
In‌  ‌this‌  ‌case,‌  ‌prior‌  ‌to‌  ‌his‌  ‌deployment‌  ‌and‌  ‌while‌  ‌still‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  ■ 125%‌‌of‌‌BHR‌‌ 
deployment,‌‌as‌‌in‌‌this‌‌case.‌  ‌ additional‌‌ 
Philippines,‌  ‌Dagasdas‌  ‌was‌  ‌made‌  ‌to‌  ‌sign‌  ‌a ‌ ‌POEA-approved‌  ‌contract‌‌  on‌‌ORDINARY‌‌ 
WON‌‌AICI‌‌is‌‌liable‌‌for‌‌respondents'‌‌illegal‌‌dismissal.‌  ‌ Overtime‌‌  Employees‌‌  compensation‌‌ 
with‌  ‌GPGS,‌‌   on‌‌
  behalf‌‌   of‌‌
  ITM;‌‌
  and,‌‌  upon‌‌   arrival‌‌
  in‌‌
  Saudi‌‌
  Arabia,‌‌   ITM‌‌  days;‌  ‌
Work‌-‌ ‌‌Work‌‌  not‌‌  for‌‌work‌‌ 
made‌  ‌him‌  ‌sign‌  ‌a ‌ ‌new‌  ‌employment‌  ‌contract.‌  ‌Nonetheless,‌  ‌this‌  ‌new‌‌  YES‌. ‌ ‌Section‌  ‌10‌  ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌8042‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌recruitment‌‌  ■ 130%‌‌of‌‌BHR‌‌ 
rendered‌‌after‌‌  covered‌‌  performed‌‌ 
contract,‌‌which‌‌was‌‌used‌‌as‌‌basis‌‌for‌‌dismissing‌‌Dagasdas,‌‌is‌v ‌ oid‌. ‌ ‌ agency‌  ‌is‌  ‌solidarily‌  ‌liable‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌employer‌  ‌for‌  ‌money‌‌  on‌‌Rest‌‌Days,‌‌ 
the‌‌normal‌‌8‌‌  under‌‌Art‌‌  beyond‌‌the‌‌8 ‌‌
First‌, ‌ ‌Dagasdas'‌  ‌new‌  ‌contract‌  ‌is‌  ‌in‌  ‌clear‌  ‌violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌‌  claims‌  ‌arising‌  ‌out‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee-employer‌  ‌relationship‌‌  Special‌‌and‌‌ 
hours‌‌of‌‌work.‌  ‌ 82‌  ‌ normal‌‌hours‌‌ 
security‌‌   of‌‌
  tenure.‌‌   To‌‌
  allow‌‌ employers‌‌ to‌‌ reserve‌‌ a ‌‌right‌‌ to‌‌ terminate‌‌  between‌‌the‌‌latter‌‌and‌‌the‌‌OFW.‌  ‌ Regular‌‌ 
of‌‌work‌‌‌on‌‌any‌‌ 
employees‌‌   without‌‌
  cause‌‌
  is‌‌
  violative‌‌
  of‌‌
  this‌‌
  guarantee‌‌
  of‌‌ security‌‌ of‌‌  Holidays‌  ‌
Aldovino‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌v.‌‌Gold‌‌&‌‌Green‌‌Manpower‌‌Management‌‌& ‌‌ given‌‌day.‌  ‌
tenure.‌  ‌
Development‌‌Services‌‌2 ‌ 019‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ Premium‌‌Pay‌  ‌
Second‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌new‌  ‌contract‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌shown‌  ‌to‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌processed‌‌ 
through‌‌the‌‌POEA.‌‌   ‌ The‌  ‌clause‌  ‌"or‌  ‌for‌  ‌three‌  ‌(3)‌‌
  months‌‌
  for‌‌
  every‌‌
  year‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  unexpired‌‌ 
term,‌‌  whichever‌‌ is‌‌ less"‌‌ as‌‌ reinstated‌‌ in‌‌ Section‌‌ 7 ‌‌of‌‌ Republic‌‌ Act‌‌ No.‌‌  Premium‌‌pay‌‌ 
Third‌, ‌ ‌under‌  ‌this‌  ‌new‌  ‌contract,‌  ‌Dagasdas‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌afforded‌‌  ■ 130%‌‌of‌‌ 
10022‌  ‌is‌  ‌unconstitutional‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌has‌  ‌no‌  ‌force‌  ‌and‌  ‌effect‌  ‌of‌  ‌law.‌  ‌It‌‌  refers‌‌to‌‌ 
procedural‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌‌  when‌‌
  he‌‌
  was‌‌
  dismissed‌‌
  from‌‌
  work.‌‌  He‌‌
  was‌‌  regular‌‌pay‌‌for‌‌ 
violates‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌deprives‌  ‌overseas‌  ‌workers‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌‌  additional‌‌ 
simply‌‌given‌‌a‌‌notice‌‌of‌‌termination.‌  ‌ work‌‌done‌‌  Art‌‌82‌‌+‌‌ 
monetary‌‌claims‌‌without‌‌any‌‌discernible‌‌valid‌‌purpose.‌  ‌ compensation‌‌ 
during‌‌special‌‌  those‌‌of‌‌ 
Lastly‌, ‌‌while‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  shown‌‌
  that‌‌
  Dagasdas‌‌
  executed‌‌ a ‌‌waiver‌‌ in‌‌ favor‌‌ of‌‌  Working‌‌on‌‌a ‌‌ required‌‌by‌‌law‌‌ 
W‌e ‌‌reiterate‌‌
  our‌‌  ruling‌‌ in‌‌ ‌Sameer‌‌ Overseas‌‌ Placement‌‌ v.‌‌ Cabiles‌6 ‌that‌‌  holiday‌‌or‌‌rest‌‌  retail‌‌and‌‌ 
his‌‌employer,‌‌the‌‌same‌‌does‌‌not‌‌preclude‌‌him‌‌from‌‌filing‌‌this‌‌suit.‌‌   ‌ special‌‌holiday‌‌  for‌‌work‌‌ 
the‌  ‌reinstated‌  ‌clause‌  ‌in‌  ‌Section‌‌
  7 ‌‌of‌‌
  Republic‌‌
  Act‌‌
  No.‌‌
  10022‌‌  has‌‌  no‌‌  day;‌  ‌ service‌‌ 
All‌‌
  told,‌‌
  the‌‌
  dismissal‌‌   of‌‌
  Dagasdas‌‌   was‌‌
  without‌‌
  any‌‌
  valid‌‌  cause‌‌ and‌‌  or‌‌a‌‌scheduled‌‌  performed‌‌ 
force‌‌and‌‌effect‌‌of‌‌law.‌I‌ t‌‌is‌‌unconstitutional‌. ‌ ‌ ■ 150%‌‌of‌‌  with‌‌less‌‌ 
due‌  ‌process‌  ‌of‌  ‌law.‌  ‌Hence,‌  ‌the‌  ‌NLRC‌  ‌properly‌  ‌ruled‌  ‌that‌  ‌Dagasdas‌‌  rest‌‌day.‌  ‌ within‌‌the‌‌8‌‌ 
regular‌‌pay‌‌for‌‌  than‌‌10‌‌ 
was‌‌illegally‌‌dismissed.‌  ‌ normal‌‌hours‌‌ 
10. Security‌‌guards‌  ‌ work‌‌done‌‌on‌‌a ‌‌ EEs‌  ‌
of‌‌work‌‌‌on‌‌ 
rest‌‌day‌‌falling‌‌ 
Princess‌‌Talent‌‌Center‌‌Production‌‌Inc‌‌v.‌‌Masagca‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌ 1) see‌  ‌DOLE‌  ‌DO‌  ‌No.‌  ‌150-16,‌  ‌S.‌  ‌2016‌  ‌(Revised‌  ‌Guidelines‌‌  non-working‌‌ 
on‌‌a‌‌holiday.‌  ‌
days.‌  ‌
WON‌  ‌only‌  ‌SAENCO‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌answerable‌  ‌for‌  ‌respondent's‌  ‌illegal‌‌  Governing‌  ‌the‌  ‌Employment‌  ‌and‌  ‌Working‌  ‌Conditions‌  ‌of‌‌ 
dismissal‌  ‌because‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌were‌  ‌not‌  ‌privy‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌extension‌  ‌of‌‌  Security‌‌  Guards‌‌  and‌‌ other‌‌ Private‌‌ Security‌‌ Personnel‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌  Service‌‌Incentive‌‌Leave‌  ‌
respondent's‌  ‌Employment‌  ‌Contract‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌the‌  ‌original‌  ‌six-month‌‌  Private‌‌Security‌‌Industry);‌  ‌
■ Five‌‌days‌‌  Rendered‌a
‌ t‌‌  Art‌‌82‌‌+‌‌  Commutable‌‌to‌‌ 
5 6
A
‌ po‌‌Ship‌‌Management‌‌Co.‌‌v.‌‌Casenas‌‌2
‌ 014‌  ‌ ‌2014‌E
‌ n‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 162‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

leave‌‌with‌‌pay‌  ‌ least‌‌1‌‌year‌‌  already‌‌  cash‌‌if‌‌not‌‌used.‌  ‌ Summary‌‌of‌‌Special‌‌Benefits‌  ‌ (30)‌‌days‌‌without‌‌  uninterrupted‌‌  pay.‌  ‌


service;‌  ‌ enjoying‌‌  pay‌  ‌ manner,‌‌not‌‌   ‌
 ‌ benefit;‌‌VL‌‌  Beneficiaries,‌‌  exceeding‌‌one‌‌  Adoptive‌‌parents,‌‌if‌‌the‌‌ 
Part‌‌time‌‌  with‌‌pay‌‌of‌‌  Provision‌  ‌ How‌‌to‌‌avail‌  ‌ Exemptions‌‌and‌‌  hundred‌‌five‌‌(105)‌‌  adoptee‌‌is‌b ‌ elow‌‌7‌‌years‌‌ 
workers‌‌may‌‌  at‌‌least‌‌5 ‌‌ Exclusions‌  ‌ days‌  ‌ old‌‌‌as‌‌of‌‌date‌‌he‌‌is‌‌placed‌‌ 
benefit.‌  ‌ days;‌l‌ ess‌‌  in‌‌Pre-Adoptive‌‌ 
than‌‌10‌‌  13th‌‌month‌‌pay‌[‌ ‌PD‌‌851‌‌‌as‌‌amended]‌  ‌ Placement‌‌Authority‌  ‌
EEs‌  ‌
Equivalent‌‌to‌‌  Worked‌‌for‌‌at‌‌least‌‌  1. Rank-and-file‌‌  Retirement‌‌Pay‌  ‌
Holiday‌‌Pay‌  ‌ 1/12‌‌of‌‌the‌‌total‌‌  1‌‌month‌‌‌during‌‌a‌‌  employees;‌  ‌
basic‌‌salary‌‌  calendar‌‌year‌  ‌ 2. Domestic‌‌helpers;‌  ‌ 1. All‌‌employees‌‌in‌‌ 
Jan‌‌1,‌‌Maundy‌‌  earned‌‌within‌‌a‌‌  3. Piece-rate‌‌employees;‌  ‌ private‌‌sector;‌  ‌
Thursday,‌‌Good‌‌  calendar‌‌year,‌‌to‌‌  4. Government;‌  ‌ 2. Part-timers;‌  ‌
Art‌‌82‌‌+ ‌‌ One-half‌‌month‌  ‌ Generally‌  
■ 100%‌‌of‌‌  Friday,‌‌Eidul‌‌Fitr,‌‌  be‌‌paid‌‌not‌‌later‌‌  5. Already‌‌paying‌‌13th‌‌  3. Employees‌‌of‌‌service‌‌ 
May‌‌be‌‌availed‌‌  those‌‌of‌‌  salary‌‌‌for‌‌every‌‌  1. Optional‌‌Age:‌‌ 
regular‌‌pay‌‌  Eidul‌‌Adha,‌‌Apr‌‌  than‌‌Dec‌‌24.‌  ‌ month‌‌pay‌‌or‌‌its‌‌  and‌‌other‌‌job‌‌ 
of‌‌regardless‌‌  retail‌‌and‌‌  year‌‌of‌‌service‌‌‌that‌‌  60‌;‌‌Compulsory:‌‌ 
even‌‌if‌‌  9,‌‌May‌‌1,‌‌Jun‌‌12,‌‌  equivalent;‌  ‌ contractors;‌  ‌
of‌‌whether‌‌  service‌‌  includes:‌  ‌ 65‌  ‌
unworked;‌  ‌ National‌‌Heroes‌‌  6. In‌‌the‌‌personal‌‌  4. Kasambahays‌‌or‌‌ 
worked‌‌or‌‌  with‌‌less‌‌  1.15‌‌days‌‌‌latest‌‌  2. 5‌‌year‌‌ 
■ 200%‌‌if‌‌  Day,‌‌Nov‌‌1,‌‌Nov‌‌  service‌‌of‌‌another;‌  ‌ persons‌‌in‌‌the‌‌personal‌‌ 
unworked.‌  ‌ than‌‌10‌‌  salary‌‌rate;‌‌and‌‌  minimum‌‌ 
worked‌  ‌ 30,‌‌Dec‌‌25,‌‌Dec‌‌  7. Commission-‌‌based,‌‌  service‌‌of‌‌another;‌  ‌
EEs‌  ‌ if‌‌entitled‌‌to‌  ‌ service;‌  ‌
30,‌‌Dec‌‌31,‌‌  boundary‌‌or‌‌task‌‌  5. Underground‌‌mine‌‌ 
2. Cash‌‌equivalent‌‌  3. Eligible‌‌for‌‌ 
Election‌‌Day‌  ‌ basis,‌‌paid‌‌by‌‌result.‌  ‌ workers;‌  ‌
of‌‌service‌‌  retirement;‌  ‌
incentive‌‌leave‌‌    ‌ 6. Employees‌‌in‌‌GOCCs‌‌ 
Night-‌‌shift‌‌Differential‌  ‌ Paternity‌‌Leave‌‌[R
‌ A‌‌8187‌.‌‌Paternity‌‌Leave‌‌Act‌‌of‌‌1996‌‌and‌‌its‌I‌ RR‌] ‌ ‌ organized‌‌under‌‌Corp‌‌ 
=‌‌5‌‌days;‌  ‌ Surface‌‌Mine‌‌ 
3.1/12‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌  Code.‌  ‌
Art‌‌82‌‌+ ‌‌ Entitled‌‌to‌‌full‌‌pay,‌‌  1. An‌‌employee;‌  ‌ Married‌‌male‌‌employee,‌‌  Workers‌  ‌
13th‌‌month‌‌pay‌‌  Optional:‌‌50‌; ‌ ‌ 7. National‌‌Gov,‌‌LGCs,‌‌ 
Employees‌‌  those‌‌of‌‌  consisting‌‌of‌‌basic‌‌  2. Cohabiting‌‌with‌‌  provided‌‌‌he‌‌is,‌‌during‌‌  GOCCs‌‌under‌‌Civil‌‌ 
=‌‌2.5‌‌days;‌  ‌ Compulsory:‌‌60‌. ‌ ‌
working‌‌  retail‌‌and‌‌  Not‌‌waivable,‌‌  salary,‌‌for‌‌the‌7‌  ‌‌ spouse;‌  ‌ delivery‌‌or‌‌miscarriage:‌  ‌ Service‌‌Law;‌  ‌
 ‌  ‌
■ 110%‌‌of‌‌BHR‌  ‌ between‌1 ‌ 0‌‌  service‌‌of‌‌  founded‌‌on‌‌  days‌‌‌of‌‌paternity‌‌  3. Has‌‌applied‌‌for‌‌   ‌ 8. Retail,‌‌service,‌‌agri‌‌ 
1/2MS‌‌=‌‌  Racehorse‌‌ 
PM‌‌-‌‌6‌‌AM‌‌of‌‌  NOT‌‌more‌‌  public‌‌policy‌  ‌ leave,‌‌for‌‌up‌‌to‌‌the‌‌  PL;‌  ‌ establishments‌‌ 
first‌‌four‌‌(4)‌‌  4. Legitimate‌‌  15+5+2.5‌‌=‌‌22.5‌‌   Jockeys‌  ‌
the‌‌next‌‌day‌  ‌ than‌‌5 ‌‌ regularly‌‌employ‌n ‌ ot‌‌ 
EEs‌. ‌ ‌ deliveries‌. ‌ ‌ spouse‌‌gave‌‌  days‌  ‌ Compulsory:‌‌55‌. ‌ ‌
more‌‌than‌‌10‌. ‌ ‌
birth‌‌or‌‌had‌‌a‌‌  9. Dismissed‌‌from‌‌work‌‌ 
Service‌‌Charges‌  ‌ miscarriage.‌  ‌ due‌‌to‌‌just‌‌cause.‌  ‌

Employees‌‌  Maternity‌‌Leave‌‌[R ‌ A‌‌11210‌.‌‌105-Day‌‌Expanded‌‌Maternity‌‌Leave‌‌  Parental‌‌Leave‌‌[R


‌ A‌‌8972‌.‌‌Solo‌‌Parent‌‌Welfare‌‌Act‌‌and‌‌its‌I‌ RR‌] ‌ ‌
working‌‌in‌‌  Service‌‌charges‌‌  Law‌‌‌and‌‌its‌I‌ RR‌] ‌ ‌
establishments‌‌  are‌‌not‌‌in‌‌the‌‌  Parental‌‌leave‌‌of‌‌  1. Has‌‌rendered‌‌  Solo‌‌parent,‌‌or‌‌other‌‌ 
collecting‌‌  nature‌‌of‌‌profit‌‌  one‌‌hundred‌‌five‌‌  Cannot‌‌be‌‌deferred‌‌  Female‌‌employee;‌  ‌ not‌‌more‌‌than‌7‌ ‌‌  service‌‌for‌‌at‌‌  person‌‌who‌‌solely‌‌ 
■ 100%‌‌  (105)‌‌days‌‌  but‌‌should‌‌be‌‌  in‌‌case‌‌the‌‌worker‌‌ 
service‌‌  Art‌‌82‌  ‌ share‌‌and,‌‌  days‌‌‌every‌‌year.‌  least‌‌1‌‌year‌; ‌ ‌ provides‌‌parental‌‌care‌‌ 
rank-and-file‌  ‌ maternity‌‌leave‌‌  availed‌‌of‌‌either‌‌  qualifies‌‌as‌‌a‌‌solo‌‌parent‌‌ 
charges,‌‌i.e.‌‌  therefore,‌‌cannot‌‌   ‌ 2. Notified‌‌  and‌‌support‌‌to‌‌a‌‌child‌‌or‌‌ 
hotels,‌‌clubs,‌‌  be‌‌deducted‌‌  with‌‌full‌‌pay‌‌and‌‌  before‌‌or‌‌after‌‌the‌‌  the‌‌worker‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌  Flexible‌‌work‌‌  employer;‌  ‌ children.‌  ‌
bars,‌‌casinos,‌‌  from‌‌wage.‌  ‌ an‌‌option‌‌to‌‌  actual‌‌period‌‌of‌‌  granted‌‌an‌‌additional‌‌  schedule;‌  ‌ 3. Presented‌‌a‌‌Solo‌‌ 
restaurants‌  ‌ extend‌‌for‌‌an‌‌  delivery‌‌in‌‌a ‌‌ fifteen‌‌(15)‌‌days‌‌   ‌ Parent‌‌ID.‌  ‌
additional‌‌thirty‌‌  continuous‌‌and‌‌  maternity‌‌leave‌‌with‌‌full‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Books‌‌of‌‌C
‌ ruz‌,‌B
‌ ernas,‌‌Largo,‌‌Gujilde,‌‌Sarmiento,‌‌K
‌ ato,‌‌Azucena‌  ‌ By‌‌RGL‌  ‌ 163‌o
‌ f‌‌‌216‌ 
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌xL
‌ AB‌  ‌ PRE-WEEK‌‌NOTES‌  ‌ For‌W ‌ f‌‌the‌‌2020_21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
‌ EEK‌‌1‌o
 ‌

Protection‌‌from‌‌  Termination‌‌by‌‌Employer‌  ‌ Economic‌‌Reality‌‌or‌‌the‌‌Two-Tiered‌‌Test‌  ‌


work‌‌  Requisites‌‌for‌‌validity‌  ‌ This‌  ‌test‌  ‌is‌  ‌used‌  ‌when‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌existing‌  ‌employment‌‌ 
discrimination.‌  ‌
Substantive‌‌due‌‌process‌  ‌ contract.‌  ‌
Battered‌‌Woman’s‌‌Leave‌  ‌ 1) The‌  ‌putative‌  ‌employer’s‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌control‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Just‌‌causes‌  ‌
employee

You might also like