Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dewa Asset Managemnt
Dewa Asset Managemnt
Abstract--“In the race for excellence there is no finish line [1]”, and from the Utilities Operators/Managers view point the race for
excellence is solely a race for an optimum Asset Life-Cycle Management. Especially for Distribution network operators/managers,
having an intensive portfolio of assets, with all the related costs, risks & performance involved in the whole life cycle management
process. Nowadays, Asset Management teams are facing an uphill challenge, with continual (on daily basis) increase in an already
huge asset portfolio, and with the recent economic crisis adding yet another stone to hurdle the efforts of the Asset Management
approach adopted by many utilities worldwide. Challenges, led by the ageing infrastructure and the increase in their failures, are two
of the most arguable and debatable topics. Theft of copper is yet a new risk which is to be either controlled or eliminated as per the
organizations strategy, and this is another task for the Asset Management team. Invisible assets, such as cables are a critical part of
the infrastructure which needs to be addressed & condition monitored under the RCM philosophy. Asset Management is to optimize
the three pillars of the whole life cycle activities of assets: risk, cost & performance, and this can be done within the guidelines of the
PAS 55. This paper will highlight the best practice model of the Distribution Power Asset Management under the Dubai Electricity &
Water Authority in view of PAS 55.
Index Terms-- Asset Management, Condition Monitoring, Crisis Management, Failure Investigation, Life-Cycle, Publically Available
Specification (PAS), Risk Management.
processes and activities help drive performance improvement below (figure-8) highlights one of the Condition Monitoring
[4], thus, leading to proper change management practices. practices done through thermal imaging.
Change management cycle is elaborated in the below
figure (figure-7) in which adoption should start from the
senior management as to adopt the Asset Management
practice [5] or to transform their existing practices to be in line
with PAS55.
(a)
identify risks related to: (RCA) is essential to tackle the above situations, in which it
will highlight all preventive measures that will be taken and
Physical Assets failures (i.e. functional failures, ageing,
consider the recommendations that are most relevant to
damage, terrorism acts, etc.),
control & improve Asset conditions and the Asset
Operational related risks (i.e. level of control, human Management Systems in practice.
actions, performance monitoring, safety, etc.),
Environmental related risks (i.e. wind storm, earthquake, In an asset intensive organizations, such as electrical
flood, etc.) utilities, RCA is required to provide on-time and credible
Scarcity of external supplies/services (e.g. spare parts. remedial & preventive measures that will serve the decision
Stakeholder requirements (e.g. regulatory). making / improvements in favor of providing reliable and
Life-Cycle related risks (e.g. maintenance vs. replacement uninterrupted supply of electricity through proper asset life
decisions). cycle management.
At the methodology stage, we shall consider the below in RCA is done based on good judgment of the facts collected
the formulation of the framework: from site of failure, system sequence of events, protection
data, etc. If confidence is high on the RCA results, then most
To be proportionate with the risks identified. of the preventive & corrective measures produced from these
Be defined (i.e. scope, nature, criticality, timing), and thus studies will be beneficial in reduction of failures or non-
allow for proactive measures rather than reactive ones. conformities. System performance and KPIs will indicate the
Assessed properly for identifying any changes or improvements seen in the above as a measure. The figure
cascading of the risk. below highlights one of the consequences of cable termination
Risks to be classified in such way that we identify which related failures where an extensive damage is seen in the cable
risks we need to, either; control, eliminate or avoid in the compartment and total shutdown of the whole bus bar was a
first place. cascading-effect, leading to an interruption of 300 consumers.
Risks handled should be up to the level of our
capabilities.
The methodology should be monitored for its three key
elements: implementation, effectiveness, and timeliness.
An outcome of proper application of Risk Management is a
contingency plan, wherein an organization will identify the
risks and come up with most applicable scenarios of crisis that
they might encounter and put an equivalent contingency plan
to mitigate them, and control the consequences as much as
possible. For that, any organization should have:
An established plan/procedure to be implemented in case
of crisis.
Segregation between Assets related risks from activities
related risks. Fig. 9. Failure of 11kV Cable termination
Segregation between actions related to mitigation of crisis Investigation findings should be communicated to all
to those related to response to crisis. relevant stakeholders with the findings and the preventive &
Competent & trained personnel in contingency planning Corrective actions taken/to-be-taken. Most importantly is the
& crisis management. feedback cycle of the investigation findings towards the
List of stakeholders affected or required for response on improvement of the Condition Monitoring tasks (refer Section
crisis. “V” above). As it will serve to highlight the failure root-cause,
Contacts of relevant personnel, services, external thus assisting the Condition Monitoring groups to focus or
agencies, etc. required for action. improve on the detection of such causes (or parts of the
Resources location & availability. equipment).
Communication hierarchy. Based on failure investigations, many opt-to-fail assets
A recording/reporting team. were safeguarded and proactive measures were taken to avoid
the extensive damages that might be incurred if failure took
VII. INVESTIGATION place. Figure-10 below highlights one case of 11kV cable
Any Asset is vulnerable to failure during the utilization termination in which it was Condition Monitored at an earlier
period of the life cycle or at its expected end-of-life, and thus stage and shutdown was taken for only one panel for
comes the importance of having an investigation process or rectifying the defect observed. Unless this was done, a
procedure in place to take proactive actions to mitigate any possible failure would have taken place, and the consequences
failure or incident or non-conformity. Root-Cause Analysis or cascading effects might be more devastating.
7