Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table 6.11: 25 Years Traffic Projection (Section 8)
Table 6.11: 25 Years Traffic Projection (Section 8)
PAVRON, Islamabad 65 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
The capacity of a facility is the maximum hourly rate at which persons or vehicles reasonably can
be expected to traverse a point or a uniform section of a lane or roadway during a given time period
under prevailing roadway, traffic, and control conditions. Vehicle capacity is the maximum
number of vehicles that can pass a given point during a specified period under prevailing roadway,
traffic, and control conditions. Capacity is a probabilistic measure and it varies with respect to time
and position and therefore total length of Swat motorway phase II is 75.26 km was split into 8
different sections given in Figure 7.1 for traffic estimation on each link.
PAVRON, Islamabad 66 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
Traffic data was estimated for all the 8 sections shown in Table 7.1. It may be noted that amongst
all the 8 sections, section with maximum average annual daily traffic (ADT) is taken to perform
design capacity analysis, while operational analysis was performed for each section, to predict the
service year in which an additional lane shall be required to maintain minimum Level of Service
“C”. For capacity analysis traffic is taken in terms of Passenger Car Units (PCU) or Passenger
Car Equivalents (PCE). For purpose of this report a heterogeneous traffic mix including several
classes of truck traffic were converted into Passenger Car Units (PCU) using factors as shown in
Table 7.2. Section 3 (i.e. Barikot to Mingora Section) with maximum PCUs was used to predict
minimum number of lanes required to maintain LOS “C” and data is shown in Table 7.3 and
Table 7.4.
Table 7.1: Sections of Swat Motorway Extension Phase II for LOS Analysis
Traffic Movement RD
Section No. Length
From To From To (km)
Section 1 Chakdara Shamozai 00+000 00+000 10.37
Section 2 Shamozai Barikot 10+370 10+370 7.14
Section 3 Barikot Mingora 17+510 17+510 13.15
Section 4 Mingora Kanju 30+660 30+660 3.59
Section 5 Kanju Malam Jabba-Uni. of Swat 34+250 45+020 12.85
Section 6 Malam Jabba-Uni. of Swat Sher Palam 47+100 47+100 6.6
Section 7 Sher Palam Matta 53+700 53+700 5.63
Section 8 Matta Madyan-Fatehpur 59+330 75+260 15.93
PCU
Sr # Vehicle Class
Factors
1 Cars/Jeeps/Pickups 1
Hiaces / Mini Buses /
2 1.5
Wagons
3 Large Passenger Buses 2.5
4 2 Axle Trucks 1.5
5 3 Axle Trucks 2.5
6 4 Axle Trucks 3.5
7 ≥5 Axle Trucks 4
PAVRON, Islamabad 67 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
7.1.2 Directional Design Hourly Volume (DDHV) and Minimum Number of Lanes
It is not economically sound to design a facility to be congestion free every hour throughout the
year. However, it has been established that each year the traffic volume often reaches that of the
30th heaviest hour, which is the hourly volume exceeded only 29 hours per year. As a rule, it is
considered sound practice to design roads to carry this volume, called the '30th -Hour-Volume' or
30th HV. Design hourly volume is then expressed as:
𝑫𝑫𝑫𝑫𝑫𝑫 = 𝑨𝑨𝑨𝑨𝑨𝑨𝑨𝑨 𝒙𝒙 𝑲𝑲 𝒙𝒙 𝑫𝑫
Where "K" is the proportion of daily traffic occurring during the peak hour and estimated from the
ratio of the 30th HV to the AADT. For urban roads, value of K ranges from 0.07-0.12. So, value
of K has been taken as 0.12 to be on the safer side. While “D” is the proportion of the traffic
travelling in the peak direction of flow. For suburban roads, value of “D” ranges between 0.55-
0.65, and value of D for the proposed facility has been taken as 0.55 for the peak direction.
Calculated Design Hourly volume of section 3 for the peak direction are given in Table 7.4 and
similar volume data of each section was used for the purpose of LOS analysis. Two (02) lanes are
required (in one direction) for proposed facility to operate at least at LOS “C”. Number of lanes
were determined using the following Equation:
𝑫𝑫𝑫𝑫𝑫𝑫𝑫𝑫
𝑵𝑵𝑵𝑵 =
𝑷𝑷𝑷𝑷𝑷𝑷 ∗ 𝑴𝑴𝑴𝑴𝑴𝑴𝑴𝑴 ∗ 𝒇𝒇𝒇𝒇𝒇𝒇 ∗ 𝒇𝒇𝒇𝒇
Ni = Number of lanes (in one direction) required to provide level of service “i”
PAVRON, Islamabad 68 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
MSF i = Maximum service flow rate for level of service “i”, pc/hr/ln
ƒp = Driver familiarity, ranges from 0.85 to 1.0 (very familiar drivers = 1.0)
Every facility type has levels of service defined in terms of a specific measure of effectiveness. In
our case the measure of effectiveness (MOE) stated by Highway Capacity Manual 2000 for a
freeway (motorway) basic sections is “Flow Rate-(Pc/hr/ln)” measured by speed flow curves
generated and presented in HCM 2000 as shown in Figure 7.2. To evaluate LOS for proposed
Swat motorway extension phase II an operational analysis given in HCM 2000 has been conducted
using Highway Capacity Software (HCS 2000, 4.1) based on the following equations in
background.
PAVRON, Islamabad 69 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
PAVRON, Islamabad 70 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
Sensitivity analysis was performed for each of 8 sections to predict the year wise level of service
and further to predict year of construction of additional lane(s) to maintain minimum level of
service “C”. LOS results for all 8 sections are presented graphically in Figure 7.3 to Figure 7.18.
PAVRON, Islamabad 71 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
PAVRON, Islamabad 72 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
PAVRON, Islamabad 73 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
PAVRON, Islamabad 74 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
PAVRON, Islamabad 75 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
PAVRON, Islamabad 76 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
PAVRON, Islamabad 77 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
PAVRON, Islamabad 78 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
PAVRON, Islamabad 79 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
The above graphical representation of Figure 7.3 to Figure 7.18 is summarized in tabulated format
in Table 7.5, highlighting the year for each section where additional lane(s) will be required to
enhance the capacity of motorway to maintain level of service “C”.
PAVRON, Islamabad 80 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
Table 7.5: Summary of Level of Service (LOS) Analysis and Requirement of Additional Lanes
Service Years Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8
(Kanju) (Malam Jabba/ (Matta)
(Chakdara) (Shamozai) (Barikot) University of Swat) (Sher Palam)
(Mingora) to to
Calendar Year
to to To to to
No of Years
PAVRON, Islamabad 81 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
Vehicle and load distributions grouped by axle type are used to transform mixed traffic into a
unified traffic parameter that can be used in the design equation. Traffic loading is a heterogeneous
mix of vehicles, axle types, and axle loads with distributions that vary with time throughout the
day. The mixed traffic is converted into one parameter called the Equivalent Single Axle Load
(ESAL). ESALs are defined as the number of 18-kip single axles that causes the same pavement
damage as caused by the actual mixed axle load and axle configuration traffic. The damage
associated with the equivalent axle can be defined in numerous ways; in the 1993 AASHTO Guide
it is defined in terms of serviceability. The 18-kip single axle load was chosen because it was the
maximum legal load permitted in many states at the time of the AASHO Road Test. The Equation
Based on AASHTO Design Guide used for the computation of ESALs is as follows:
G = Growth rate
Y = Design Life
An equivalent axle load factor (EALF) defines the damage per pass to a pavement by the axle in
question relative to the damage per pass of a standard axle load usually 18-kip single axle load. In
AAHTO method, EALF is based on type of pavement, type of axle, SN of pavement, terminal
serviceability index (Pt) of pavement. Under heavy axle loads with an equivalent factor much
greater than unity, the EALF increases as Pt or SN decreases. This is expected because heavy axle
loads are more destructive to poor and weaker pavements than to good and stronger ones.
Practically, EALF is not very sensitive to pavement thickness and a SN of 5 may be used for most
cases. Most of the major highway designs have structural number of 5, therefore, it was considered
appropriate to assume SN as 5. EALF’s of different trucks carrying maximum allowed load and
actual loads have been computed and are presented in Table 8.1 below:
PAVRON, Islamabad 82 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
Loaded and Unloaded ratio of 80:20 is taken for calculation of ESALs. Directional distribution
factor is taken as 0.50 for two directional traffic flows. Directional distribution factor is taken as
1.0 for unidirectional traffic flow. Lane distribution factor is adopted according to the number of
lanes (80% of 18kips ESALs is taken) as given in Table 8.2 below:
1 100
2 80 – 100
3 60 – 80
ESALs calculated for Swat motorway extension phase II are presented in Table 8.3 to Table 8.10.
ESALs for the service life of 20-years (in-service excluding construction) are represented in the
tables however it is recommended to design pavement for a design life for a period of 10 years
with 5-years subsequent pavement management plan such as rehabilitation and maintenance
including lane additions/ overlay etc.
PAVRON, Islamabad 83 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
Table 8.3: ESALs Calculations for Swat Motorway Extension Phase II (Section 1)
PAVRON, Islamabad 84 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
Table 8.4: ESALs Calculations for Swat Motorway Extension Phase II (Section 2)
PAVRON, Islamabad 85 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
Table 8.5: ESALs Calculations for Swat Motorway Extension Phase II (Section 3)
PAVRON, Islamabad 86 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
Table 8.6: ESALs Calculations for Swat Motorway Extension Phase II (Section 4)
PAVRON, Islamabad 87 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
Table 8.7: ESALs Calculations for Swat Motorway Extension Phase II (Section 5)
PAVRON, Islamabad 88 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
Table 8.8: ESALs Calculations for Swat Motorway Extension Phase II (Section 6)
PAVRON, Islamabad 89 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
Table 8.9: ESALs Calculations for Swat Motorway Extension Phase II (Section 7)
PAVRON, Islamabad 90 | P a g e
FEASIBILITY STUDY & DETAILED DESIGN OF SWAT MOTORWAY Traffic Study
EXTENSION PHASE-II Report
Table 8.10: ESALs Calculations for Swat Motorway Extension Phase II (Section 8)
PAVRON, Islamabad 91 | P a g e