Professional Documents
Culture Documents
03-OBO200040 ODN Planning Design (S N)
03-OBO200040 ODN Planning Design (S N)
ODN is the optical fiber link between the Optical Line Terminal (OLT) and Optical
Network Terminal (ONT) . It consists of 2 points and 3 sections.
The 2 points are : Optical distribution point & Customer access point.
The 3 section are: Feeder cable, distribution cable and drop cable.
4
5
Three basic network topologies can be considered when designing an ODN. These
topologies are Star (Tree) , the Ring (Loop) and the Bus topology.
Star topology is the most cost effective network topology for ODN of FTTx deploying PON.
Because of its ease of flexibility in network expansion, ODN designer can carry out the high
level design of the ODN for the proposed service area and commence the low level design
until the development of the area is confirmed. This will enable the Network Infrastructure
Provider to minimize the initial investment cost. Star topology is suitable for new built ODN
in rural area where customer distribution is uncertain or in existing area where customers
are scattered populated.
The ring topology features a ring configuration of the physical cable network without
reducing the fibre-count in the “feeder” cable.High count feeder cable terminated on the
ODF of the Exchange is split into two other feeder cables at the splice closure just outside
the Exchange. The size of each split cable is equal to half of that terminated on the ODF.
The first feeder cable is installed along a dedicated cable route. The second feeder cable is
installed along another route away from the first one. The two cables are jointed together
at an appropriate point, forming a ring topology.
This figure shows how the fibre are connected to the branch cables in the ring topology.
The main feature of the ring topology is that it provides a resilience path for the feeder
cable network. Each customer building ( in which ONU are installed) is served by fibres
coming from two separate cable routes. Any fibre breakdown in one path will have the
fibres from the diversified path as backup.
Similar to the ring counterpart, the Bus topology adopts a high count fibre cable as the
feeder cable linking two exchanges to form a bus-like configuration. This topology has the
following advantages:
Fibres can be provided to the same customer building from two different
exchanges, thus providing resilience path for the customer building.
There is flexibility in the provision of both trunk fibre (junction fibres) and
distribution fibres for FTTx.
The main feature of the Bus topology is that dual set of exchange equipment (e.g. OLT,
Internet Switch ) are installed in the Exchanges in order to provide the protection. The
OLTs between the two Exchanges cannot synchronize so even if there is breakdown of
service due to cable cut, manual change-over is required. As such this topology is not
suitable for residential FTTx customers.
If route diversity is of top priority, the bus network topology can be considered because it
provides flexibility in fibre assignment and enhances the completed diversity requirement.
This type of layout is particularly suitable for strategic customers such as large corporate
data centres, international finance investment banks or Government buildings where direct
fibres are used for the ODN.
Both OLT and ONT provide two GPON interfaces. The GPON interfaces on OLT work in the
1:1 mode.
One port stays in the idle state all the time, causing low bandwidth utilization.
When the primary PON port on the ONT or the user line fails, ONT automatically transfers
the services to the secondary PON port. In this way, services go upstream through the
secondary line and secondary port on the OLT. Basically, service interruption will not occur.
OLT provides two GPON interfaces. The GPON interfaces work in the 1 + 1 mode.
This type is a type of whole-network protection. Two routes are provided between OLT
and ONT, ensuring recovery of various faults, including faults occurring on optical splitters
or the line.
This protection mode is different from preceding four protection schemes of an ODN. The
preceding protection schemes are implemented through different PON ports of the OLT.
The OLT dual-homing protection mode, however, is implemented through the PON pots of
different OLTs. Therefore, if one OLT is faulty, the system still works normally. This
protection mode is generally used for P2P users.
Course Name P-29
Optical Splitter deployment strategy is critical in ODN design for FTTx network. Using
splitting strategy in planning for an area would greatly affect the efficient deployment of
the passive equipment network and the scalability of the system.
Depending on the types of FTTx deployed, different splitting stages can be used to cover
areas in different strategies. In general, maximum of two (2) stages of optical splitting is
recommended for Optical Distribution Network (ODN) for all FTTx architectures. Three (3)
stages of optical splitting is not recommended.
Centralized optical splitting is particularly suitable for FTTx architectures where the feeder
and distribution fibre resources are sufficient enough for the optical links between the OLT
and ONUs. It is also suitable for FTTx where bandwidth for each ONU may be quite large.
The advantage of this design is that the outputs of the splitter is fully utilized as service
provision will only be provided upon receiving service request from customer.
The disadvantage is that there is a limitation of the length of the drop cable to be pulled.
Thus the number of storey recommended for this kind of design is recommended not more
than 10-storey.
The following factors needed to be considered when designing the location of the
centralized optical splitter :
If the optical splitter is located close to the customer, more feeder and
distribution fibres can be saved, hence cost of provision per customer is less.
If the optical splitter is getting close to the Exchange, the area to be served by the
ODN is larger, hence the coverage of FTTx is larger. This will help to increase the
utilization of the resources , especially at the initial stage of FTTx provision.
The 1st optical splitter in the Exchange is usually 1:4 and that the 2nd optical splitter is
usually 1:8 or 1:16.The 2nd optical splitter can be located on the pole–mounted
distribution box or splice closure (underground or aerial) close to the customer.
This design is widely adopted in Japan for the provision of FTTH.
FAT will be the fibre termination box installed in the telephone room of the customer
building. TB will be the Terminal box installed on various floors of the customer building.
The FAT is a roadside fibre cross-connected cabinet while the FAT may be an
underground or aerial splice closure. It may also be a small fibre termination box at the
ground floor of a low rise building.
The 1st stage optical splitter may be a 1:4 splitter and the 2nd stage optical splitter may be
1:8 splitter.
Due to the flexibility of the FDT, its area of coverage is large as compared with other
design. Service provision can be offered upon receiving customer’s request. This means
that the last mile of drop cable ( underground/ aerial) can be installed upon receiving firm
customer order.
Typical deployment of this design is in Malaysia.
In some case Network Provider may want to monitor the stability of the OLT at the
Exchange. In this case an uneven optical splitter can be used for this monitoring
application. The splitting ratio of this uneven optical splitter should be configured in such
as a way that that minimum output power of the OLT should be used for this monitoring
purpose. A typical example is to use 3% ~5% of the output power of the OLT for
monitoring and the remaining 95%- ~97% of the output power of the OLT is for normal
use.
This special splitter is not a common product in the market and has to be special ordered
from the manufacturer.
Before selecting the type of optical splitter, ODN Designer should realize that the closer the
optical splitter is located to the customer, the more fibre resource can be saved. However,
ODN designer need to consider the maximum utilization of the OLT ports. He should take
into account the density of the customers and its distribution of the area he planned for
the provision of FTTx. He should select the best combination of optical splitting.
Originally, the 1:2 splitter unit is cascaded with the 1:32 splitter unit in the FDT. When the
user demands the higher bandwidth, the 1:2 splitter unit can be removed from the FDT,
but the 1:32 module is reserved. In this case, the former pigtail which splices with the
feeder cable can plug in the 1:32 rack-mounted splitter unit as its input. Therefore, the
conversion between the former 64-channel share one GPON port to now 32-channel share
one is implemented, and the bandwidth upgrade is implemented.
Attention points are listed as follows:
Feeder cables should be reserved twice as many as actually needed, and the 1:2
splitter unit should be removed when upgrading. In addition, twice feeder cables
are needed according to the number of users.
The FDT remain unchanged, the splicing tray need to be added, and the number of
the needed splicing trays can be calculated according to the number of the
increased feeder cables.
The distribution section, FAT, and drop cable remain unchanged.
Adding other small ratio splitter unit from far away (FAT)
Attention points as follows:
Feeder cable need as twice as former, if want to upgrade in future.
Need adding 1:2 splitter unit according to the quantity of higher bandwidth
requirement users.
Splicing tray no great change, as once use 1:16 instead of 1:32, the space of FDT
will be saved, splicing tray can be reused.
Quantity for distribution cable will be reduced, saving fiber can used for
redundancy.
DP use 1:16 outdoor splitter unit instead of the former division box. Needs higher
cost for splicing or mechanical splicing, labor cost and project difficulty also added.
2. Large capacity , less location so as to reduce backbone cable requirement ; also reduce mini
OLT active points.
4. If new location is selected, check for room spaces, duct route spaces .
5. The OLT location best can provide coverage to 10km, (theoretically can reach 20km).
7. For high density user region (>1k users), consider installing OLT equipment outside CO and
close to the customer to save feeder cables.
60
1. It is the termination point for both external fibre cable and indoor cable from exchange
equipment, usually placed in the same room in the CO.
2. In remote user site, it is the termination point for both lead-in cable and in-building cable.
Jumper function can be provided.
1. Shall close to the existing copper cable cabinet, can share use the existing duct route
resources.
4. FDT should be placed in the center of covered area to save construction cost.
5. Better close to the feeder cable routing, so as easily get access to the main cable and duct
62
You can see that underground optical fiber cable length of this design configuration is 6
Km radius coverage. The design configuration is suggested to include one more S0 uneven
splitter (97% / 3% with 0.5dB insertion loss) for O&M consideration. If the broadband
circuit (ONT) service demand in one residential building (or site) is near to, or greater than
64, Splitter S1 should be skipped in design case. Splitter S2 can be installed inside building
TBE room and /or Splitter S3 installed at vertical cable raiser duct room of upper floors for
first or second stage splitting.
Practice
Calculate the link attenuation on 1490nm wavelength
Above figure has indicated the power budget calculation methodology. It is a simply
calculation method by adding insertion loss of each network component per ODN design.
Total optical path length can be changed by (a) selection of different splitter ratio (b)
splitter installation location (c) number of Splitter stage.
No redundancy loss is included. The result is in theory.