Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Efecto de Estatinas en Recurrenca
Efecto de Estatinas en Recurrenca
2151
2152 Stroke July 2008
not performed or was missing in 46/795 (6%), and other data were Table 1. Baseline Characteristics According to Presence of
missing in 19/795 subjects (3%), leaving 730 subjects with complete Statin Use Before ICH
baseline information.
Death within 30 days occurred in 251/730, leaving 479/730 Statin No Statin
30-day survivors. Consenting survivors or a proxy informant (to- Characteristic n⫽149, % n⫽480, % P
gether representing 273/479 of the 30-day survivors, 57%), were Age 72.4⫾9.4 71.9⫾12.7 0.65
interviewed by telephone at 90 days to determine the Glasgow
Outcome Scale (GOS) score. To reduce bias we also retrospectively Male 64 50 0.005
determined GOS at ⱖ90 days from the medical records of 105/206 Hypertension 89 75 0.0003
nonparticipating ICH survivors. The 101/206 registry subjects with- CHD 47 15 ⬍0.0001
out follow-up information had similar baseline characteristics as
subjects with follow-up information, except fewer had lobar ICH Diabetes 32 15 ⬍0.0001
location (P⫽0.02). Therefore, in sum, 90-day GOS was determined Atrial fibrillation 29 18 0.005
in a total of 629/730 potential subjects (86%).
Pre-ICH cognitive impairment 15 15 0.99
Table 2. Multivariable Models of the Effect of Statin Use Table 3. Multivariable Cox Regression Model of ICH
Before ICH on 90-Day Independent Status (GOS 4 or 5) Recurrence
OR 95% CI P Predictor OR 95% CI P
Model A 1.22 0.76 to 1.95 0.40 Post-ICH statin use 0.82 0.34 to 1.99 0.66
Adjusted for baseline characteristics Lobar ICH location 2.40 1.04 to 5.57 0.04
(see legend) Additional history of ICH before index event 3.26 1.12 to 9.55 0.03
Model B 1.16 0.65 to 2.10 0.62 Exposure to statin was entered as a time-dependent covariate to account for
Model A⫹adjusted for ICH statin use during only part of the follow-up period in some subjects. ICH
characteristics (see legend) indicates intracerebral hemorrhage.
Model C 1.24 0.62 to 2.49 0.54
Model B but restricted to This main limitation of our study is that statin use was not
supratentorial ICH volume ⬍60 randomly assigned, and therefore associations between statins
cm3, without deep coma or pre-ICH
and either ICH outcome or recurrent ICH may be confounded
cognitive impairment (n⫽314)
by other factors associated with statin use, even though we
Three logistic regression models were constructed. In Model A variables in
adjusted for recognized confounders using regression models.
addition to pre-ICH statin use were the pre-ICH characteristics also associated
with independent status in univariate analysis (P⬍0.20): age, coronary heart Our analysis of the dose-response effect of statins on ICH
disease, ischemic stroke, pre-ICH cognitive impairment, atrial fibrillation, and outcome uses the simplistic assumption that maximum dose
pre-ICH warfarin use. Model B includes the same variables as Model A with the strengths are equipotent across different drugs.
addition of characteristics of the hemorrhagic stroke associated with indepen- These data come from a relatively large series of consec-
dent status in univariate analysis (P⬍0.20): GCS, ICH volume, and presence of utive ICH cases with functional outcome data and prospective
intraventricular hemorrhage. The 2 models were constructed separately
follow-up and therefore provide a best estimate of the effect
because hemorrhagic stroke characteristics may themselves have been
affected by pre-ICH statin use. Finally a third model was constructed with the of statins on ICH outcome in the absence of large trials. We
same variables as the model B, but excluding subjects with negative prognostic calculated that a trial of statins to improve 90-day outcome
features: deep coma (GCS 3 to 5), pre-ICH cognitive impairment, brainstem or would need to include 1026 subjects (randomized 1:1 to statin
cerebellar location, or ICH volume ⬎60 cm3. The subject population of the or placebo) to have 90% power to detect an OR ⱖ1.24,
Model C was therefore similar to that studied in recent clinical trials of ICH. derived from Model C (Table 3), for independent status in the
GOS indicates Glasgow Outcome Scale; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage.
statin arm. Our study suggests that patients already taking
statins for prevention of cardiovascular disease may safely
(HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.86, P⫽0.56) or when adjusting
continue them during and after ICH. For ICH survivors our
for other predictors (Table 3).
data suggest that post-ICH statin exposure is not associated
with a large increase in risk of recurrence, at least with the
Discussion
statin types and dosages used in community practice.
We did not detect a difference in outcomes in patients taking
statins before ICH, even after adjustment for medical comor-
bidities. By contrast, treatment with statins improved senso-
Sources of Funding
Dr Smith is supported by a grant from the National Institute of
rimotor recovery in 2 animal models of ICH.3,4 There may be Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K23 NS046327). Dr Rosand has
biological differences, however, between animals and hu- received research support from the National Institute of Neurological
mans in the type of injury that occurs after ICH. In contrast to Disorders and Stroke and the American Heart Association. Dr
the animal studies, our subjects were taking various types and Greenberg has received research support from the National Institute
doses of statins. A recent study suggested that statins are of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the National Institute of
Aging.
associated with decreased 30-day mortality but not improved
functional outcome.14 In our larger study pre-ICH statin use Disclosures
had no effect on 30-day mortality. Whether the different None.
results occurred because of the play of chance, or differences
in the populations studied, is not clear. References
A randomized trial in persons with stroke showed that 80 1. Sacco RL, Liao JK. Drug insight: Statins and stroke. Nat Clin Pract
mg of atorvastatin per day increased the risk of ICH.9 We did Cardiovasc Med. 2005;2:576 –584.
2. Endres M, Laufs U, Huang Z, Nakamura T, Huang P, Moskowitz MA,
not, however, find an increased risk of recurrence in ICH
Liao JK. Stroke protection by 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA
survivors treated with statins, but note that the current study reductase inhibitors mediated by endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Proc
has only modest power to detect a small increase in recur- Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:8880 – 8885.
rence risk. In our study various statins were used, at lower 3. Jung KH, Chu K, Jeong SW, Han SY, Lee ST, Kim JY, Kim M, Roh JK.
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin, promotes sensorimotor
dosages than in the SPARCL trial,9 which could have led to
recovery, suppressing acute inflammatory reaction after experimental
different results. The relationship between cholesterol levels intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2004;35:1744 –1749.
and ICH recurrence could not be determined in our study 4. Seyfried D, Han Y, Lu D, Chen J, Bydon A, Chopp M. Improvement in
because there was no systematic assessment of lipid levels. neurological outcome after administration of atorvastatin following
experimental intracerebral hemorrhage in rats. J Neurosurg. 2004;101:
Our results are consistent with a population-based case- 104 –107.
control study of ICH that concluded statin use in community 5. Marti-Fabregas J, Gomis M, Arboix A, Aleu A, Pagonabarraga J, Belvis
practice was not associated with an increased risk of ICH.15 R, Cocho D, Roquer J, Rodriguez A, Garcia MD, Molina-Porcel L,
2154 Stroke July 2008
Diaz-Manera J, Marti-Vilalta JL. Favorable outcome of ischemic stroke cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from
in patients pretreated with statins. Stroke. 2004;35:1117–1121. 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet. 2005;366:
6. Tseng MY, Hutchinson PJ, Czosnyka M, Richards H, Pickard JD, Kirk- 1267–1278.
patrick PJ. Effects of acute pravastatin treatment on intensity of rescue 11. Flibotte JJ, Hagan N, O’Donnell J, Greenberg SM, Rosand J. Warfarin,
therapy, length of inpatient stay, and 6-month outcome in patients after hematoma expansion, and outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology.
aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2007;38:1545–1550. 2004;63:1059–1064.
7. Yokoyama S, Ikeda H, Haramaki N, Yasukawa H, Katoh A, Imaizumi T. 12. Viswanathan A, Rakich SM, Engel C, Snider R, Rosand J, Greenberg SM,
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor protects against in vivo arterial thrombosis Smith EE. Antiplatelet use after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2006;
66:206–209.
by augmenting platelet-derived nitric oxide release in rats. J Cardiovasc
13. Blanco M, Nombela F, Castellanos M, Rodriguez-Yanez M, Garcia-Gil
Pharmacol. 2005;45:375–381.
M, Leira R, Lizasoain I, Serena J, Vivancos J, Moro MA, Davalos A,
8. Asahi M, Huang Z, Thomas S, Yoshimura S, Sumii T, Mori T, Qiu J,
Castillo J. Statin treatment withdrawal in ischemic stroke: a controlled
Amin-Hanjani S, Huang PL, Liao JK, Lo EH, Moskowitz MA. Protective randomized study. Neurology. 2007;69:904 –910.
effects of statins involving both eNOS and tPA in focal cerebral ischemia. 14. Naval NS, Abdelhak TA, Zeballos P, Urrunaga N, Mirski MA, Car-
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005;25:722–729. huapoma JR. Prior statin use reduces mortality in intracerebral hemor-
9. Amarenco P, Bogousslavsky J, Callahan A III, Goldstein LB, Hennerici rhage. Neurocrit Care. 2007.
M, Rudolph AE, Sillesen H, Simunovic L, Szarek M, Welch KM, Zivin 15. Woo D, Kissela BM, Khoury JC, Sauerbeck LR, Haverbusch MA,
JA. High-dose atorvastatin after stroke or transient ischemic attack. Szaflarski JP, Gebel JM, Pancioli AM, Jauch EC, Schneider A, Klein-
N Engl J Med. 2006;355:549 –559. dorfer D, Broderick JP. Hypercholesterolemia, HMG-CoA reductase in-
10. Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, Blackwell L, Buck G, Pollicino C, hibitors, and risk of intracerebral hemorrhage: a case-control study.
Kirby A, Sourjina T, Peto R, Collins R, Simes R. Efficacy and safety of Stroke. 2004;35:1360 –1364.