Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How To Write The Results and Figure Legends - F - Modified
How To Write The Results and Figure Legends - F - Modified
Figure Legends
Shu-Hui Juan, Ph.D.
Department of Physiology
Taipei Medical University
Tel: 02-2736-1661 Ext. 3178
E-mail: juansh@tmu.edu.tw
• Introduction (I)
• Materials and Methods (M)
• Results (R)
• Analysis (A)
• Discussion or Conclusion (D)
The Results section
• report only results pertinent to the question
posed in the Introduction.
• Include whether or not they support your
hypothesis.
• Include both experimental and control
results.
Many authors think of
• The results section as the heart of the
paper, so they try to put the whole paper
into the results section-methods, figure,
legends, table titles, results, data,
comparisons with the literature-in fact,
everything except the Introduction. This
temptation should be resisted. The results
section should be as brief and uncluttered
as possible so that the reader can see the
forest for the trees.
Studies in which all experiments
are designed in advance
• A study design subsection in Methods.
• Results section simply describes the
results, one topic per paragraph.
• Organized either chronologically or from
most to least important.
(i.e., whether pulmonary hypertension is
progressive in patients with systemic lupus
erythematosus.)
Studies in which one experiment
determines the next experiment
• Question
• Overview of the experiments
• Results
• Answer to the question
This four-part pattern is a miniature version
of the story line that runs through the
paper.
Studies in which one experiment
determines the next experiment
• Make the story line clear by providing
stronger continuity in paragraphs.
• Supply the missing information.
• Continuity requires repeating key terms.
• Notice the question of the paper.
Results
• your data
A. form:
figure (graph), table, or text
B. Content:
1. subjective information
2. control experiments
- observations that are not presented
in a formal figure or table
- baseline of percentage
3. negative results
How to start writing a result section?
5. provide a context
such as by describing the question
that was addressed by making a
particular observation.
Include or exclude?
• identify your major findings
present representative data rather than all of
it
Revision
Continuous positive airway pressure (7.5 cm H2O) in
newborn goats decreased urine flow, sodium excretion,
and the glomerular filtration rate.
(A result is a more powerful topic sentence than is a figure
legend or a table title)
• Method as a topic sentence (undesirable)
In three of the cats in the second series, the
inhibitory effect of 1 ug isoproterenol was
examined when baseline tension was induced
exclusively by either cholinergic
neurotransmission, exogenous acetylcholine, or
exogenous 5-hydroxytryptamine.
Injection of 1 ug isoproterenol evoked a
differential inhibitory response, relaxation
being greater when tension was induced by
cholinergic neurotransmission or exogenous
5-hydroxytryptamine than by exogenous
acetylcholine (Fig. 5).
• Method as a topic sentence (undesirable)
• We administrered propranolol during
normal ventilation. This beta-blocker
decreased phospholipid (Fig. 1).
• Propranolol administered during normal
ventilation decreased phospholipid (Fig. 1).
• After administration of propranolol during
normal ventilation, phospholipid decreased
(Fig. 1).
• When propranolol was administered
during normal ventilation, phospholipid
decreased (Fig. 1).
Verb tense
Results of hypothesis-testing studies
are reported in past tense, because
they are discrete events that occurred
in the past.
Examples are “Pulmonary artery constriction
was reduced” and “imidazole inhibited
the increase in pulmonary arterial pressure
induced by lipid infusion.”
Verb tense
Results of descriptive studies are reported in
present tense, because the description
continues to be true.
Examples are “In most tissues, the leptin
receptor mRNA appears as a single band
slightly larger than 5 kb” and “Type III and
IV receptor genes have extra introns in the
extracellular domain.”
Comparisons
• When comparing results, use “than, ” not
“compared with.”
• Avoid ambiguous statements such as “X
was increased compared with Y.”
• Instead write “X was greater than Y.” “X
increased more than Y.”
Precise Word Choice
• Ability versus Actuality
Ability: We could not demonstrate high
affinity, low-capacity DHE binding sites in
heart particulates prepared from three
adult sheep.
Actuality: There were no high-affinity….
Circulation.
2001 Sep 25;104(13):1519-25.
Figure legends