Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Phase Delay Experiment: Course Name: RF and Microwave Engineering Lab (Course Code: EEE476)
Phase Delay Experiment: Course Name: RF and Microwave Engineering Lab (Course Code: EEE476)
Submitted by:-
Mubassar Ahammed
Reg. No: 2016338022
Department of EEE, SUST
Submitted to:-
Md Rasedujjaman
Assistant Professor
Dept. of EEE, SUST
Introduction
It is well known that the phase difference between any two port network is measured
by forming Lissajous figure using an oscilloscope (C R O ).Most of the time,such mea-
surements do not compare well with the expected values, at least for some frequency
regions. This is analyzed in detail here, as this is not only a pedagogical problem but
also a perturbing issue for us as we are doing the experiments on phase shifts. Very
sim ple circuits are considered here for experiment and analysis.
Multipath propagation is a phenomenon in radio communications that occurs
when radio signals travel along two or more paths to reach the receiving antenna.
Interference and phase shifting can occur when the same signal is received over
multiple pathways. Fading is caused by destructive interference, and it can render a
radio signal too weak to receive without distortion. Fading is caused by attenuation of
the radio signal as it travels from the transmitter to the receiver, as well as reflection
and dispersion of the transmitted signal [1] A schematic illustration of multipath
propagation by various techniques is shown below.
3
Figure 0.2: phase delay
The received signal power is proportional to the distance between the transmitter
and the receiver. The power loss is easily compensated for by increasing the broadcast
power by the same amount, and the receiver performance is unaffected. On the other
hand, shadowing, dispersion, and reflections create significant power variations in
the received signal. These inconsistencies could lead to severe receiver performance
loss [2].
The multipath characteristic of a mobile communications channel is measured by
delay spread. The time difference between the arrival of the earliest component (e.g.,
the line-of-sight wave if one exists) and the arrival of the latest multipath component
is generally referred to as the delay,[3]. There is simply a phase difference between
two waves E 1 and E 2 , where E 1 is a direct wave and E 2 is a reflected wave, both of
which have the same amplitude but have traveled different distances. We generate the
following waveform by superposing both waves:
4
Figure 0.3: Different Lissajous Figures
5
Equipment
1. WATS-2002 Wave and Antenna Training System
2. RF Coaxial Cable
4. Antenna Mounter
6
Experimental Data
Combined Wave power:
From different phase delay value,system is receiving different combined wave power.
No. Phase delay [Degree] Fading level [dBm] Direct Received level [dBm]
01 0 -38.7 -40.3
02 10 -38.7.5 -37.5
03 20 -37.3 -38.9
04 30 -35.6 -42
05 40 -35.4 -40.3
06 50 -40.4 -37.5
07 60 -38.7 -37.1
08 70 -45.3 -38.7
09 80 -43.6 -41
10 90 -43 -39.7
11 100 -41.2 -38.5
12 110 -44.9 -38.9
13 120 -44.2 -38.7
14 130 -45.9 -40.4
15 140 -42.6 -37.7
16 150 -52.8 -42.2
17 160 -46.1 -38.9
18 170 -52 -37.3
19 180 -52.5 -40.3
7
Experimental Graph
Lissajous figure:
Figure 0.5: Lissajous figure for 0, 60, 90, 120 & 180 Degree.
8
Direct, Reflection & Fading wave :
Figure 0.6: Wave Pattern for 0, 60, 90, 120 & 180 Degree.
9
Calculation
For "0" Degree calculation :
Direct wave power : -40.3 [dBm]
Fading level power : -38.7 [dBm]
= −38.7 − (−40.3)[d B m]
= 1.6[d B m]
F ad i ng power
Si g nal Si zeRat i o = Di r ect w avepower ∗ 10 < (r /20)
−38.7
= ∗ 10
−40.3
= 9.602978
= −53.5 − (−40.3)[d B m]
= −13.2[d B m]
F ad i ng power
Si g nal Si zeRat i o = Di r ect w avepower ∗ 10 < (r /20)
−53.5
= ∗ 10
−40.3
= 13.27543
10
Discussion
Figure 0.8: Lissajous figure we got from the rc circuit at 90 degree phase difference
In general, the phase diference measured using the the method of Lissajous figure
does not agree well with the expected values (from theory) and the deviation is appre-
ciable in some frequencies. When we analysed this, we found that most of the tim e
this is due to the measuring device.But we were happy to find our expected graph.The
best way to avoid this is to choose a good oscilloscope by checking its performance.
But this may not be possible always.
11
Conclusion
The discrepancy between the observed and expected values of phase shifts, by Lis-
sajous method, is now solved. How the measuring device, namely the oscilloscope,
can show lissajous phase shift.
Although there was some deflects in our experiment.They are:
3. Our system is vary much old because of shutting down for a long time.
4. Our antenna was old and the components efficiency was not good enough.
12
Bibliography
[1] “Introduction to Fading Channels”. In: Coded Modulation Systems. Ed. by Jack Keil
Wolf et al. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002, pp. 363–413. ISBN: 978-0-306-47792-8.
DOI : 10.1007/0-306-47792-0_7. URL : https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-
47792-0_7 (cit. on p. 3).
[2] Wikipedia contributors. Multipath propagation — Wikipedia, The Free Ency-
clopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Multipath_
propagation&oldid=1049586488. [Online; accessed 29-March-2022]. 2021 (cit.
on p. 4).
[3] Wikipedia contributors. Delay spread — Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. [On-
line; accessed 29-March-2022]. 2019. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/
index.php?title=Delay_spread&oldid=904873204 (cit. on p. 4).
[4] Kwang Wook, Jung Che Young, and Kim. “Wave Propagation and Antenna Experi-
ments by using WATS-2002”. In: (2002) (cit. on pp. 4, 5).
13