How Georgia Election Results Were Electronically Manipulated Legislators

A Historic Press Conference of National Significance
How Georgia 2020 Election Results

Were Electronically Manipulated
With Safe, Secure and Honest elections…
None of the following would have occurred.
Garland Favorito, VoterGA Research Team
VoterGA Press Conference March 7th, 2022 – Roswell, GA

A non-partisan, non-profit Georgia Election Integrity leader for 16 years. Copyright © 2022 - VoterGA.org 1
Introduction Points
I. SB202 made ballot images public record after our lobbying efforts in 2021
II. Our volunteer team performed a statewide analysis of Nov. 2020 ballot images
III. Our findings based on original ballot images obtained via ORR & legal discovery
IV. Fulton Co. is our example but other counties appear to have similar problems
V. Anyone can verify our findings based on ballot images available at GAballots.com,
other sites or through their own separate ORRs
VI. SOS Raffensperger could have done the same analysis and reached the same
conclusions we will reach today before he certified the 2020 election
How Ballot Image Creation Works
➢ Ballots are scanned to automatically

produce digital images and cast vote Mail-in
records that are tabulated

In Person
➢ Scans produce a .TIF image and a High Speed

.SHA signature file for the image
➢ In person images are stored on

redundant compact flash cards
Network Connect
➢ Mail-in ballot images are stored on
memory sticks and loaded to election
management server (EMS) or loaded
directly to the EMS Sealed EMS (.TIF, .SHA)
How Ballot is Processed
1. Scanning –
2020 Election Paper Ballots are scanned Auditmark
Ballot Image (.TIF) was created in two pages
2. Cast Vote Creation –

Ballot Image is analyzed using OCR
Cast vote record is created on Page 3 w/ Auditmark
signature file (.SHA) is created
3. Adjudication (Optional) –
If ballot has questionable marks it goes to adjudication
3-Member Review Panel should review & approve the
vote changes confirming the Voter’s intent
Adjudication section is created on Page# 3 Adjudication
Process Sequence
Scan Adjudicate Verify Publish
Results Publishing
Results
Results
Results Results GA SOS Office
Results
County Elections County Web Server SOE Software
Management Server (Scytl)
Edison Media Line Feed
Fulton Co. 15 point Election Manipulation Evidence
1. 17,724 final certified Fulton votes have no ballot images
2. All 374,128 in-person ballot images for the original count are missing
3. 132,284 mail-in ballot images cannot be authenticated due to missing .SHA files
4. 4,000+ tabulator images have impossible duplicate time stamps
5. 104,994 image files in 1,096 batches have impossible, duplicate time stamps
6. All ballot batches were improperly forced to adjudication to facilitate tampering
7. 10 ballots were impossibly adjudicated in one minute by one user
8. 941 Image files were backdated prior to adjudication
9. All 16,034 mail-in image signature files were added days after scanning
10. Same 12 tabulators closed 148 early voting polls masking identity of scanning tabulator
11. One tabulator serial# impossibly closed two polls in same overlapping times
12. One tabulator was never closed and could have added many illegitimate votes
13. Images in 288 batches have backfilled time stamps out of scanning chronological order
14. 85 closing tapes for 12,024 Election Day ballots are unsigned or missing
15. All but two tabulator closing tapes for early voting are unsigned
Why don’t 17,724 final certified Fulton votes have ballot images? 1
➢ The Dominion system requires a ballot image to tabulate results

➢ 17,724 certified Fulton Co. Presidential recount votes have no ballot images
IMPACT: 13,303 extra Bidens votes and 4,279 Trump votes cannot be substantiated
Why are all 374,128 original in-person votes missing ballot images? 2
➢ Federal and state law require election records to be retained for two years
➢ All 374,128 in-person ballot images from the original election count are missing
➢ Federal law: 22 Months - USC 52 20701

➢ State law: 24 Months - O.C.G.A. 21-2-500, O.C.G.A. 21-2-73
IMPACT: None of the 374,128 in person votes cast can be authenticated

Why are 132,284 Mail-in Ballot Images missing signature files? 3
➢Each ballot must be scanned to Present Missing

created a .TIF ballot image file and
.SHA signature file
➢Only 16,034 SHA files exist for
148,318 TIF ballot images
➢IMPACT: 132,284 Fulton mail-in

ballot images cannot be
authenticated
How could 4,000+ mail-in ballots have duplicate time stamps? 4
➢Canon and Fulton confirmed scanning a mail-in ballot takes one second or more
➢4,000+ mail-in tabulator ballots have duplicate scan time stamps to the second
3-8 ballots were scanned in

one second many times
IMPACT: 4000+ ballot images from impossible scan speeds cannot be authenticated
How could 104,994 ballots have duplicate file modified time stamps? 5
➢Batches contain about 100 ballots each with a unique modified time stamp
➢1,096 batches have duplicate file modified time stamps to the second
➢IMPACT: Over 104,994 ballot image files electronically manipulated

Why were all ballots, in all batches, inerrantly forced into adjudication? 6
➢Only questionably marked ballots should be sent to adjudication holding area

➢Adjudication logs say all batches were sent to adjudication unnecessarily
➢IMPACT: All ballots incurred extra risk of electronic manipulation while in adjudication
How could one person adjudicate 10 ballots in one minute? 7
➢One person typically takes more than a minute to adjudicate a ballot

➢Logs show up to 10 ballots adjudicated in one minute by same person
➢IMPACT: Impossible adjudication speeds indicate potential electronic manipulation

How could 941 images be adjudicated without being modified? 8
➢The time stamp of a ballot image is always updated if it is adjudicated

➢941 images have file modification timestamp BEFORE Image Adjudication timestamp
➢IMPACT: 941 images appear to been manipulated by tampering
How could non-adjudicated images be modified days after scanning? 9
➢The file modified date should match scan date unless ballot was adjudicated
➢16,034 non adjudicated image files were modified 3-8 days after image scan date
➢IMPACT: All 16,034 authenticated image files were subjected to tampering

Why did the same 12 tabulators close 148 early voting polls? 10
➢ Each early voting tabulator should have been closed out for audit purposes
➢ All 148 early voting tabulators were closed out using 12 other tabulators
IMPACT: Original scanning tabulator for most early votes cannot be identified, vote counts cannot be verified
using tabulator protective counter, chain of custody for votes is broken
How could a tabulator close two polls at once? 11
➢A tabulator can close only one poll at a

time
➢Several tabulators closed multiple
locations concurrently
➢ Ex: Tabulator serial# AAFAJJY0174 used on

11/03/20 to close:
➢ Georgia Intl. Convention Center poll
location from 9:27pm to 9:35pm
➢ Metropolitan Library poll location closing
time OVERLAPS from 9:29pm to 9:30pm
➢IMPACT: Votes on tabulator appear to

be generated by tampering
Why wasn’t one tabulator ever closed as required? 12
➢Each poll location tabulator must be closed after it is opened to accept

votes
➢Closing Poll tape for AV East Point Library shows poll opened on
October 12th 2020 but was not closed afterwards
(Last close date December 5th , 2019

before voting system was purchased)
➢IMPACT: Tabulator may have added many uncertified votes into the
election results
Why do scanned images in 288 batches have wrong file modified timestamps? 13
➢Ballot image file names and their modified timestamps must increment chronologically
as scanned
➢288 batches contain images that have file modified timestamps out of chronological
sequence after scanning
IMPACT: Image files in 288 batches appear to have been electronically inserted
Why are 85 Election Day closing tapes unsigned or missing? 14
➢Election Day tabulator closing tapes

must be signed by the poll manager
and two witnesses as required by
Georgia law
➢59 tabulator closing tapes for 6,429

ballots are unsigned and 26
tabulator closing tapes for 5,695
ballots are missing
➢IMPACT: 12,024 Election Day votes were not certified by poll managers and
Fulton Co. should have never certified those votes into the Election Day results
Why are nearly all early voting closing tapes unsigned? 15
➢Early voting tabulator closing tapes

must be signed by the poll manager
and two witnesses as required by
Georgia law
.
➢All tabulator closing tapes from
early voting except two were
unsigned
➢IMPACT: Nearly all 315,000 early votes were not certified by poll managers and Fulton
Co. should have never certified the early voting election results
Conclusion
➢Only one or two individuals with extensive voting system expertise needed to manipulate images
➢These manipulation activities were performed without ability for most officials to detect them
➢Fulton Co. allowed contractor and third party resources to run technical aspects or their election
➢Those resources were not sworn to uphold the GA Constitution and were not monitored properly
➢This evidence proves we must have an independent election audit. If not, why are we voting?
➢There is currently no mechanism for accountability and a bizarre double standard of justice

How Georgia Election Results Were Electronically Manipulated Legislators

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

How Georgia Election Results Were Electronically Manipulated Legislators

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

How Georgia Election Results Were Electronically Manipulated Legislators

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A Historic Press Conference of National Significance

How Georgia 2020 Election Results

Garland Favorito, VoterGA Research Team

VoterGA Press Conference March 7th, 2022 – Roswell, GA

➢ Ballots are scanned to automatically

records that are tabulated

➢ Scans produce a .TIF image and a High Speed

➢ In person images are stored on

2. Cast Vote Creation –

Scan Adjudicate Verify Publish

Edison Media Line Feed

➢ The Dominion system requires a ballot image to tabulate results

➢ Federal law: 22 Months - USC 52 20701

IMPACT: None of the 374,128 in person votes cast can be authenticated

➢Each ballot must be scanned to Present Missing

➢IMPACT: 132,284 Fulton mail-in

3-8 ballots were scanned in

➢IMPACT: Over 104,994 ballot image files electronically manipulated

➢Only questionably marked ballots should be sent to adjudication holding area

➢One person typically takes more than a minute to adjudicate a ballot

➢IMPACT: Impossible adjudication speeds indicate potential electronic manipulation

➢The time stamp of a ballot image is always updated if it is adjudicated

➢IMPACT: 941 images appear to been manipulated by tampering

➢IMPACT: All 16,034 authenticated image files were subjected to tampering

➢A tabulator can close only one poll at a

➢ Ex: Tabulator serial# AAFAJJY0174 used on

➢IMPACT: Votes on tabulator appear to

➢Each poll location tabulator must be closed after it is opened to accept

(Last close date December 5th , 2019

➢Election Day tabulator closing tapes

➢59 tabulator closing tapes for 6,429

➢Early voting tabulator closing tapes

You might also like