Professional Documents
Culture Documents
11 Vietnam Special Report - APAC Consumer Survey 2014 March 2015
11 Vietnam Special Report - APAC Consumer Survey 2014 March 2015
11 Vietnam Special Report - APAC Consumer Survey 2014 March 2015
APAC CONSUMER
SURVEY 2014
VIETNAM
CONTENTS
4 Introduction
6 How do consumers value the improvements of shopping centre?
7 What makes a shopping centre/high-street attractive?
10 How do shoppers reach their destination?
12 How do consumers see the interaction between ONLINE and IN-STORE?
PRESENT FUTURE
CONSUMERS CONSUMERS*
78% travel up
to 30 minutes to reach their
preferred shopping centre
73% will visit
physical shopping centres
57% prefer
45% will prefer a large
regional shopping centre
to shop in a large
shopping centre
TOP TIPS
Be online retail-savvy
Be sustainable
Build your brand
32%
More/ better catering facilities 9%
Renovation of the centre 400%
Bigger in size with more shops open 28%
47% 9%
Addition of new international brands 21%
More/ better loyalty program
44%
More entertainment facilities 18%
Introduction of free parking 45%
58% 24%
More events
None of these 52%
300% 33%
42%
66%
46%
63%
64%
56%
62%
200%
Many consumers have 55%
52%
seen improvements in their 38%
shopping centre experience
55% 50%
Consumers were asked about the improvements 43%
43%
that they have witnessed in large malls, small malls,
and high-street retail over the last three years.
More than 60% report that the centre that they 100%
visited most frequently have a new design, better 62% 59%
60%
layout and services and improved public places. 51%
More than 50% also observed the addition of more
international brands and entertainment facilities.
$ Convenience
$
Offer of free parking
4.0 Security
Hosting of events
3.5
VE
Range of
RY
Pressence of
coffee shops 3.0 retailers
IM
PO
RTA
FA
Having an
Entertainment 2.5
NT
IRL
of catering facilities
MP
NOT V
2.0
ORT
E
Environmental
RY
Being a good
ANT
business
IMPORTA N
place to meet
practices
1.5 friends/spend time
Presence
i Presence of
T
of foreign information
brand/retailers points / clear signs
Free Being
WiFi covered
Presence of
one or two
large fashion shops Presence of
hypermarket/
supermarket
According to CBRE survey, in the next 2 years, 25% of will have to integrate this platform into their overall
respondents expect to shop less often in a store. Store visits strategy to remain competitive and reach their customers
still dominate when buying non-food products, with nearly in order to counter the growth of the online retail market.
71% of consumers reporting visiting a shopping centre.
Although the outlook of the brick-and-mortar format still This is crucial for shopping centre management and
remains upbeat, shopping centre operators must be aware related areas such as marketing because it is suggested
of the challenges posed by online retail. 45% - 50% of that retailers and landlords should take advantage of
respondents said that they would shop online via desktop/ this trend and do more online selling and advertising
laptop or smartphone/tablet more often than they do via social media and their well customized Business
now. It is surprising that an even greater proportion of to Customer (B2C) websites. In addition, CBRE
consumers (69%) aged from 55 to 64 actually think that recommends landlords to adapt their strategy to boost
they would use their smartphone/tablet more frequently to both e-commerce and offline business activities by
buy non-food items. leveraging big data, which can track levels of consumer
engagement, implement Online to Offline(O2O)
An increasing amount of Vietnamese nowadays use their strategies, and create simple and useful applications for
high-tech personal devices frequently as around 87% of those who want to shop via their smartphone/tablet. This
respondents claimed that they own at least a smartphone can be a competitive advantage to shopping centres
according to our survey. The use of online shopping which successfully adopt such a strategy as about two
is increasing rapidly across Asia Pacific with 85% of third of APAC survey respondents admit to using mobile
respondents saying that apart from visiting shop, they applications designed specifically for shopping centres.
would also do shopping online. Therefore, retail landlords
100%
90%
8% 80%
70% 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64
60% 5% 11% 8% 9% 6%
45% 50%
32% 42% 51% 51% 54%
40%
30%
47% 20%
10%
Desktop/laptop 0% 63% 47% 41% 40% 40%
Low Mid High
Income Income Income
100%
18% 90%
80%
70% 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64
29% 60% 19% 16% 20% 18% 12%
50%
40% 34% 31% 27% 26% 19%
30%
20%
54% 10%
0% 47% 53% 53% 56% 55%
Smartphone/ Tablet Low Mid High
Income Income Income
100%
33%
90%
80%
18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64
70%
38% 38% 37% 31% 30% 19%
60%
50%
40% 36% 37% 36% 38% 51%
29% 30%
20%
Catalogue/ Mail order 10%
26% 25% 32% 32% 34%
0%
© CBRE Ltd. 2015 Low Mid High
Income Income Income Source: CBRE Asia Pacific Consumer Survey, 2014.
For more information about this regional major report, please contact
RESEaRCh RESEaRCh RETaIl SERvICES
Follow CBRE
All materials presented in this report, unless specifically indicated otherwise, is under copyright and proprietary to CBRE. Information contained herein,
including projections, has been obtained from materials and sources believed to be reliable at the date of publication. While we do not doubt its accuracy, we
have not verified it and make no guarantee, warranty or representation about it. Readers are responsible for independently assessing the relevance, accuracy,
completeness and currency of the information of this publication. This report is presented for information purposes only exclusively for CBRE clients
and professionals, and is not to be used or considered as an offer or the solicitation of an offer to sell or buy or subscribe for securities or other financial
instruments. All rights to the material are reserved and none of the material, nor its content, nor any copy of it, may be altered in any way, transmitted to,
copied or distributed to any other party without prior express written permission of CBRE. Any unauthorized publication or redistribution of CBRE research
reports is prohibited. CBRE will not be liable for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of any person using or relying on information
in this publication.