This counter-affidavit denies accusations of estafa that were made in a complaint. It provides several key details in defense:
1) The respondent denies all wrongdoing and requests dismissal, stating they did not have any agreement to pay the complainant's electricity bills.
2) Photos and affidavits are provided as evidence that the respondent built their own small house on the property and used solar energy, not connecting to the complainant's electricity.
3) The case appears to be brought as harassment in retaliation for an unrelated case the respondent filed against the complainant's relative.
4) Documents from various offices are attached to support the respondent's claims.
This counter-affidavit denies accusations of estafa that were made in a complaint. It provides several key details in defense:
1) The respondent denies all wrongdoing and requests dismissal, stating they did not have any agreement to pay the complainant's electricity bills.
2) Photos and affidavits are provided as evidence that the respondent built their own small house on the property and used solar energy, not connecting to the complainant's electricity.
3) The case appears to be brought as harassment in retaliation for an unrelated case the respondent filed against the complainant's relative.
4) Documents from various offices are attached to support the respondent's claims.
This counter-affidavit denies accusations of estafa that were made in a complaint. It provides several key details in defense:
1) The respondent denies all wrongdoing and requests dismissal, stating they did not have any agreement to pay the complainant's electricity bills.
2) Photos and affidavits are provided as evidence that the respondent built their own small house on the property and used solar energy, not connecting to the complainant's electricity.
3) The case appears to be brought as harassment in retaliation for an unrelated case the respondent filed against the complainant's relative.
4) Documents from various offices are attached to support the respondent's claims.
City of Tagum )ss x-----------------------------------x
COUNTER-AFFIDAVIT
I,________,46years old, Filipino, marriedand a resident of
_____________, afterhaving been sworn to in accordance with law, dohereby depose and declare that:
1. I am the Respondent in__________for Estafa now pending
before the City Prosecutors Office; 2. I deny all the imputations of wrongdoing against me in the complaint for being groundless and unmeritorious, thus, I hereby pray for the dismissal of the present complaint maliciously filed against me; 3. The truth of the matter is that I previously lived at ____ from June 2009 to May 2014. Attached is a copy of Barangay Certificate as proof of my residence. 4. On the last week of May 2014, my house located at ______ had collapsed. As a result, I asked the Complainant if I could build a small house in her property beside her old house. Hereto attached is a machine cope of Service Memorandum issued by ______ evidencing that my house has collapse; 5. Before I built a small house beside her property,we do not have any agreement whether written or verbal that I will shoulder the expenses of the electricity of her old house; 6. I never put up any connections of electricity from her old house to my house. In fact, I have been using solar energy since the time I built a house and lived at the property. Attached is a copy of affidavit of witness executed by the _____ and photographs to prove such claim; 7. In truth, after years of using solar energy I decided to apply for my house a special connection of electrical meter under my name before _____ and the CITY Engineering Office. However, complainant’s daughter protested and brought the task force ____ to cut-off my electrical connection from the post to my house. Complainant’s daughter action has caused harassments to me and my family but I just it pass. 8. In order to avoid any further disagreements with the complainant’s family, I decided to transfer my residence at ______ 9. I know for a fact that the complainant’s old house has been rented by other persons from the year 2008 to 2018 and that she has received rental payments from them but did not pay the electric bill; 10. As such, the case filed against me is just pure harassment to force me to withdraw the case I filed against her nephew, who is the son of the complainant’s older sister _____ , for physical injury in relation to R.A 7610 for hurting my daughter. Attached is a copy of the Resolution to prove such claim; 11. I also filed a case against the mentioned person for trespassing and slight physical injuries. Attached hereto is a copy of the Investigation Data Form of the Office of the City Prosecutor and Resolution as evidence of filing; 12. I am executing this counter - affidavit to refute all the imputations of wrongdoings against me, to inform the concerned authorities and this Honorable Office of the foregoing facts and to attest to the truth thereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my
hand this _____ at ______ , Philippines. Affiant
SUSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ______ at
_______, Philippines. I hereby certify that I have examined the affiant personally and that I am satisfied that’s he voluntarily executed this affid For Complaint of Syndicated Estafa, to set the record straight the respondents officer denied such an accusation, the law provides that money must have to be received by the respondents being one of the elements of estafa Records from the --Treasurer revealed no collection of monthly dues paid and received by the complainants to the association through its collectors, which was fraudulently disbursed. Reynaldo Ronquillo and Arnold Granada haveno membershiprecords to the association. Copies of OHAI Receipts presented by the complainants were illegally obtained and nopermission from the payee regarding his intention to use it as evidence , and complainants have no personality representing them. Homeowners manifesto is hereto attached as Annex 7 . 7. Complainants cer tification to file action has a Serious Error. Reynaldo Ronquillo and Arnold Granada cannot railroad their way in filing their cases. Certification of Lupong Tagapamaya from Barangay Sto. Tomas has no basis. There is no invita tion nor summon to the respondents to appear before them. Copy of Certification to file action and a handwritten appeal of Darrel Du r an requesting for an understanding are hereto attached as Annexes 8 and 9, respectivel