CHAPTER !
Ethics:
Its Meaning, Nature and Scope
Chapter Obje:
At the end of this ¢hapter, the students should be able to:
1. define and e: lain the nature and scope of ethics as a
philosophical discipline;
2. articulate the importance of studying ethics;
3. discuss and distinguish the different norms or standards
pertaining to right and wrong/good and bad;
4. describe the moral dimension of human existence; and
5. identify the various characteristics of moral principles.
Etymological Meaning of Ethics
interchangeably, not just in ordinary discourse and in
popular media but also in academic discussions and fora.
But are these two terms exactly the same, or, is there a shade of
difference between them?
| er and morality are two words which are oftentimes used
‘Etymologically, the word ERHHES” is derived from the /Greek
word {g{Hid8” which can be roughly translated in English as’
Leer yen moran nse mea Thee
custom would also mean here as a form of behavior or character.
The (BEA) equivalent (fGRRGHSO is It is from
this root word that the term or is derived
(Agapay 2008:1). The two terms, ethics and morality, in this sense,
therefore, have literally the same meaning. That is why ethics is
leyymous with morality. Also because of this,
aa te calcd morality, x more precisely, the ober name of
ethics is morality.
in many instances, we often hear people say: “What he
ortho dis worl or ethical” “His or her conduct shows slack of
cthics/morals;” “The problem of that person is that he or she
doesn’t have a sense of morality and ethics.” “Our primary concen
‘as a people should be how to become moral or ethical in our
behavior”
Ethics and Moratity Distingutshed
‘Though ethics and morality, by virtue of their etymological
construction, and on how they are used in people's daily
conversations, share practically the same meaning, ther is, stil, a
slight distinction between them.
‘Generally, both ethics and morality deal with the goodness or
badness, rightness or wrongness of the human act or human
‘conduct. omy
te rected of whether enact la good or bed RGM or wrong
(Sambajon 2007.7)
Ethics: A Philosophy of Action
‘While’
‘automatically happen that, 2s a person knows, then he/she does.
does not necessarily follow that knowledge leads or results
Practical action. «
i
{
|
1
White" ethics (the theory) =
Seiden 2:10 hat 5 goad
one Ethics. as one
particular author beautflly puts i the word while morality is
the es. Morality. therefore. is here pty understood as the
application (praxis) of ethics (theory) (Babor 1999:8).
Hence, we can say that both of them—ethics and
‘morality ~truly need and complement each other. “As ethics
‘outlines theories of right and wrong and good or bad actions
‘morality translates these theories into real actions. Tiaaeamonaliiy
(Babor 1999:
9%
Ethics: A Practical Discipline
i may happen that some of those involved in the teaching of
thics or morality may regard it as a purely academic endeavor,
‘There is always the temptation, at least for some teachers, to just
‘resent the ethical theories and concepts as if they are the nda
‘tnd be-all ofthe subject.
There may be slso others, whose manner of instilling ethics
‘nd morality to students is through fear and intimidation, even
though it has been long proven that it just doesn't work. Today's
young generation are practically brought up to question and
challenge almost everything. particularly on how one ought to
behave morally.
imei. sige wipsdy. we dare say 1 confine bis to a purely
exercise, just like mathematics or any other theoretical
‘nd abstract disciplines. Ethical theories and principles may. if
3—E
antes, we camestly believe, should be taken not just as an
academic study, but as fundamentally, ‘uttwmmpeatilifey” Ethics
“should be shown as a discipline which has an intimate connection
with the daily lives of man....To be vital, the teaching must be
something more than the presentation of exacting moral
theories...there [should be} a proper interaction between
knowledge and practice. Knowledge serves practice, for each new
truth learned is a new reason for a better life” (Baldemeca et al
1984: 85).
‘One must be 80
convicted ofthe correctness of one's thinking that it leads to a real
and concrete transformation in one’s daily attitude and behavior, or
it becomes, at the very least, the most basic and fundamental
motive behind one’s day to. day conduct”
((htnp://en. wikipedia org/wiki/christian_ethics).
While Ethics is a subject that can be approached only
‘academically, the learner miay be tempted to study it simply for the
sake of obtaining a high grade. One may become so adept at the
‘various theories and principles concerning morality without one
ever becoming moral. One may have a thorough grasp and
‘mastery of ethical principles, yet, still at a loss as to their relevance
al of the good life itself (GihiesBenigrUe
c to
Realty would ehode (the person}. (One] would not know the
ing poe nas fome) weld ent know show “akemson ot
‘The Importance of Stadying Ethics
With what has been said so far, itis now clear why the study
‘of Ethics is very important to buman
4
SreROWIEaRE a wl
creme eaaetertinccininnnasiioes,
ae
(Agapay 1991:3).
The living of the (gOSMNNET has always been one of
‘mankind's most noble and enduring
is is evident in the various works of Literature,
Thi
SBN rumnises in genera most cab in Philosophy, and
in Theology ot Religious Studies.
In fact, the idea of right and wrong, good and evil, though
viewed and applied differently at different times by different
‘groups of people all throughout the ages, has been a major and
dominant theme of the various religions, cultures, and societies in
the entire history of human civilization. Every era, regardless
‘whether it is aware of it oF not, has its own Yeabgg” that defines its
Sater cd ol eons
“foundation of every buman society.
en
right and wrong, good and bed in relation to their conduct and
Sqawdyomrow Wier onl foncio of onion
Big
‘small, the choices and decisions that we make in our individual and
‘collective lives affect also the kind of life we live to a considerable
extent. Henceywerbecome,goodand bad-persons ‘through -the
“choices we make.
end
ets, 9 gains ‘‘Another important reason why there is a need in studying
“@thics is the fact that making moral decisions: is oftentimes:
Gfficalt. This is very true when we are confronted and come face
to face with wwordPemmas: In here, there is a need for us 10
pause and reflect as to what particular course of action to take
‘The stay of Bthies can provide us with certain moral paradigms or
‘perspectives: that will'in a way, guide us’ i “determininig what's
‘ght and what's wrong under such condition.
‘The study of Ethics will also enable us to reason out our moral
beliefs and of why we hold them. It is not enough to have certain
beliefs on what's good and bad. We also have to know the reason
‘why we accept them inthe first place.
anyone pty attention to them? More important, why should you
‘yourself pay attention to them, if you do not have good reasons for
holding them” (Ellin 1995: 6)? Ethics, as a rational enterprise,
‘will enable us to critically examine the ground and foundation of
‘our moral beliefS and claims, whether they are valid or not.
‘Stil another important reason of studying ethics is that W Will
‘eid us to widen our horizon 8 to'what is good and bad. An
‘exposure to the wide array of ethical paradigms and perspectives
‘that a course in ethics provides, will naturally allow us to broaden
‘our understanding and make us appreciate the richness and
versity of ethical views held by various thinkers of different
persuasions throughout the ages. “[A]n appreciation of the
‘adhere to the values of our [own] specific peer groups” (Pojman &
Fieser 2017:3).
Having stated all of the above reasons of why studying ethics
is valuable, itis also worth saying that
(Pojman & Fieser 2017:3). Kmawingahesgnodsieygoodeininette
(Though “doing” the good is even much better than “just knowing”
the good.)
Relatedly and more specifically, apart from its practical
benefits, ethiesean {also} deepen our teMtsctionrenthve-utimatc
qustioneOPGS YuisisofamlueriNNNeH ... “(Gensler 2011:4).”
ifemutimatenwestionssiavolve questions regarding the qeaning
ee! “ieltnanaarieheeeeninnes? These and other
similar questions necessarily deal in one way or the other, 10 a
significant degree, with the question of what kind of life is worth
living? As the great
The Difference between Ethics and Law
But, why do we still need Ethics if we have laws to guide us
‘on how to be good? Are the laws that we have not enough to tell
tus what’s right and wrong? Is it not that Ethics essentially consists
‘of rules conceming right and wrong, on what we ought to do and
‘not do?
Ethical rules are necessary even if we have the laws that are
implemented by civil ashore since legality is not identical with
morality. We ean be good in terms of what the law requires but we
‘may sil fal short of becoming a "moral" o¢ “ethical” person. At
times, what is legal is not always moral, AAtotherstimesnihabeitie
‘Tuoraddemotelays legs: Rahs isnot identical withbedaw-
Another reason why morality is still important even if we have
Jaws to guide us in our daily conduct is that danmesnescnhyat a
¥ Bum ame VP * St!
SINGS ~ Sens
ok ay clechix. aagyernent
vw ¥ fs pi 04 socio tec
Fun
eg a6 HOY, 07
ot just their extemabcondoctandactions; and subject
moral analysis and evaluation.
‘earner BORE BEFORE enyeinethisarespest, Eien,
‘ug, gihersoneven-ourseives. ‘Here, our innermost motives and
SSoatins ove ey wet cared out conte, A weer
the scope of morality.
aM
‘ay that something is
Individuals favor and decide that a certain act is right or wrong,
“Morality is much deeper than that.
What is:
er
even thowgh no one is:
Lastly, we still need Ethics éven if we have laws because
“fli is because of
cthics...that we have laws in the first place, and we continue to
‘need ethics in order to refine and perfect our legal system”
(Ruggiero 2001:9).
Tous, jaws, mn a sense, are not morally sensible without ethics
‘The only way for 4 liw to be enacted or repealed is for more
people 10 make a mature, conscious and reflective discussion and
ecision about right and wrong. Making a decision as to what's
ood and bad is nota popularity contest.
i
yore 9 BS
i=
si
gnicg 4 RG Becn renee
ax \ow
‘The Distinction Between Ethics and-Retigiom
jon that has to be made regarding,
that of
‘Another important di
Ethics as a normative discipline is it intimate relation with
religion or theology. an area of knowledge
While many people identify morality
ligion, both being concerned with right and wrong behaviour “Hi
(Mackinnon & Fiala 2015:26),
-‘Ethicwas"a"phitosophical'diseipline, as mentioned, sey
Serenata coger ne one anes
on the other hand, relies
Primacy and mainly on ‘that ie—divie
Moreover.
‘& Fieser 2017:3). Again,
‘wisdom of human experience, not om the supposed authority of any
‘holy book and sacred writings.
Asa
en ‘morality is religiously based may {also} want to
seflection and.
‘examine some of their views using reason...
‘common sense.... (Also a lot of]..religious believers...want to be
lable to engage in constructive dialogue with nonbelievers and
evaluate their {moral} claims. In fact even religious believers
{themselves} regularly make moral judgments that are not based
Strictly on their religious views but rather on reflection and
common sense” (Mackinnon & Fiala 2015:26).
matter of fact,er orott ly
Biics reson roe pararoes 199
% Con
¢
pater a Anis, * Horna aandnd $08
eqies av HO Yow Bie.
o|
«Guo
urmamacondaet sshich the science of thics
|
|
mainly deals with,
Semele ranch or Philosophy. also | aaasblee x
‘as AgrabPiftonopiny. “[It} is that ul i
ieser 201731).
As wajor
Formal Object of Eis
i (Peja & ‘The formal object of any science is the special or particular
1 ay tnd viewport tate once employs ean wih
ite cae mater
area of the philosophical enterprise, thicssniemtay
vtealy well as syteratcaly
Principles and codes yhether his/her actions conform to right reason which 1
|B immedite norm of meray
\
i
Due this paricular and special concer, Ethic fers from
all othe fis of study which also del with human conductor
man at, such as fe sience of Paycholgy, Antronology.
Speuogy Coons andthe Ihe, Pater aeeeoce mee ae
with te way Humane octal behave, without tling and jing
the Aghiness and ronpmess goodness and. badness, of thet
sctions. whi
_Sbove mentioned fields : "
the facts as they are and do not make any evaluative judgments on
ca : judgments
(Divisions of Ethics
Ethics, as a specific field or branch of philosophy, is
traditionally divided into two general areas or major parts:
mal ‘major parts
Saciote tor oxigen gees OS
kagas * Genera a
Pasha AE ed REOY OHS een) :
2 oy, tach (aw fncigteg &
eMrice - THE NOME north, og BBO
caeextl 6eeBKe GUANA 6 TT darter 4
_eaestererestieoesoeoarsetthosendyobihies. (The fist par
Sf tis book it acully under this particular heading) Generar
as mamly deals withthe morabty of-buman act (i major
Sesec weer mcnronmancetneinn,
“gpecesof morality). |
‘Tee, second part, which is Special or Applied Ethics,
heemasocutemes, nch as nte en of gmmnaesine,
vg sane |
See
‘Richard Gula defines norm os ‘Wamiunatdementebont
‘peta (0 cited in Apapey 2008-77)
‘Seepeieammemation: This is precicly the very reason
cram scone molly good and he nt
se considered
‘morally tad (Montemayor 1994:17)
‘The cones of good and bad, right and wrong, mora and
imme ple ep sone a ad
or a ere
the primary concem and focus of ethics as a philosophical
soins Hwee cy am olan she
Sonn a ‘in ane way or the other,
clarity how cach area specifically employed the above concepts
What follows, in relation 19 the above point, comes from
Ramon Reyes in his bok The Ground and Norm of Moraliy.
Toes
According to Reyes, upon closer analysis of the various
‘meanings ofthe expression “what i proper,” of “wha is good and
tight” and other similar expressions, “we can [idenfy and
different) at leas four types of norms or standards within [what
hecalls 2s) he QaeRROPSSOMNGS
|. echnical Norm “This refers mainly toqgmmigenesss
hich come from his bodily space-time limitations.
This norm has to do with qumak Geaidh and elle
Ceol
‘Thus, this]... norm is
concerned withthe techniques of
“Tigh” way of preparing the fed for planting rice the
“correct” way of constructing the roof of a house, [etc.).
because of this technical norm certain community
members are considered ‘good,’ meaning good
worker, efficient and productive. Otters” we
considered lazy, good-fr-nothing...”
‘Some specific examples where this kind of nom is evident
tr found inthe following statement: that's wot the proper way to
‘ash the dies, “your manner of dribbling the bale ba” “your
namy= ic undersind 4 Med, tanndard £ yiequure , Be
Sa i name according td Richarch ula.
Devtandard a ight £ 610 Crom @ anclare)
(jarani, i)‘way of fixing that broken door knob is not good,” “you ought to do
the PowerPoint presentation this way,” “her approach in solving
that math problem is wrong.”
‘Societal Norm - “This (particular type of norm!
Some specific examples of the above type of norm are
“found in such expressions as: “you ought to knock first before you
‘open the door,” “one should not pick one's nose in public.” “it’s
‘not right to talk that way in the presence of vistors,” “one must not
talk while one's mouth is full,” “one ought to follow the rituals set
forth by her fratemity whea it comes to accepting new members.”
‘These and other similar examples belong to the category of
etiquette oF what is known as “GMRC™ (Bulaong Jr. etal. 2018:2).
Some specific xgammples of this type of norm are found in
such expressions as: "gquntnemunienimamegs.”