6.0 Analysis of Survey & Investigation Data Pkg-2A

Analysis &
Consultancy Services for preparation of Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Report for Interpretatio
Amdura Shikajiwadi Rohi pimpalgaon Vasantwadi Road (MDR 104) n of Survey
Data
CHAPTER - 6
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF SURVEY &
INVESTIGATION DATA
6.1. GENERAL
The project road starts from Amdura at chainage 0.00 while marking a Y-junction with
Nanded Malkautha road (SH-3) but 0.595 Km length of project road i.e Chainage 0.00 to
chainage 0.595 is already included in Pkg 1B of Nila junction to start boarder road (MDR-
83). Thus the new starting point of the road is at chainage 0.595. The project road connects
Shikajiwadi, Rohi pimpalgaon,Vasantwadi village and finally terminate at chainage 10.670
making a T junction with Mudkhed malkota road near vasantwadi village. The total length of
project is 10.075 Km. The project road traverses through Nanded district of Maharastra.
The consultancy services for the same is to include design of best possible alignment and
pavement composition, design of bridges, culverts and other structures in addition to analysis
of costs, determining project feasibility, preparation of Land Acquisition Plan, if any, and
obtaining of all requisite clearances.
The design standards adopted for widening/ improvement of the project section are IRC-SP-
73-2018 (2-lane manual) for 2-lanning of the project highway.
6.2. ALIGNMENT & GEOMETRY
As discussed earlier, the existing horizontal alignment of the road consists of many sub-
standard/ sharp horizontal curves/right angle bends. It is observed that the project stretch
needs to be realigned at many locations if the horizontal alignment is upgraded as per the
design standard stipulated in 2-lane manual. As a result huge land acquisition, resettlements,
forest diversions etc. will be involved and it will incur additional cost. As such the total
project cost will be increased unnecessarily.
As such, the design standards have been adhered to with a realistic compatibility
without/ with bare minimum land acquisition. Considering the above factors and traffic
scenario on the project section and the unnecessary delay in project completion due to
involvement of different clearance activities, the Department has instructed to follow
the existing alignment as it is. Also, the existing horizontal geometry is proposed to be
improved as far as possible with in the existing ROW without acquiring any additional
land. In case, it is not possible or any black spot is there, proper safety measures
including speed calming measures as per codal provisions have been proposed to
enhance traffic safety.
Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page: 1

Analysis &
Data
Table: Chainagewise details of proposed Horizontal Alignment

HI Hand Speed Δ (in Lc/ arc Extra
HIP Radiu
P Easting Northing of Kmp Degree length e% Widt
Chainage s (m)
No. Arc h ) m h (m)
1 0+016.225 753473.744 2116786.929 Left 18 10 49.42 15.524 2.50% 1.50
2 0+045.086 753501.263 2116775.432 Left 100 30 3.49 6.098 4.00% 0.90
3 0+166.102 753619.987 2116752.073 Left 450 80 4.50 35.308 6.32% 0.00
4 0+366.909 753820.230 2116738.194 Right 80 30 14.54 20.303 5.00% 0.90
5 0+439.709 753883.465 2116702.036 Left 300 60 5.45 28.534 5.33% 0.60
6 0+504.527 753940.816 2116672.722 Right 22 10 37.91 14.557 2.50% 1.50
7 0+613.825 753931.032 2116564.006 Left 24 10 73.61 30.833 2.50% 1.50
8 0+725.624 754047.218 2116554.963 Right 500 80 3.47 30.288 5.69% 0.00
9 0+843.823 754164.556 2116540.673 Right 400 70 9.60 67.007 5.44% 0.00
10 0+927.629 754244.734 2116515.752 Left 400 70 2.43 16.987 5.44% 0.00
11 1+002.357 754317.539 2116498.910 Right 800 80 1.93 26.916 3.56% 0.00
12 1+128.390 754439.029 2116465.402 Left 400 70 3.33 23.211 5.44% 0.00
13 1+499.598 754806.279 2116411.383 Left 600 80 4.92 51.522 4.74% 0.00
14 1+599.857 754906.470 2116406.932 Right 1200 80 2.20 46.035 2.50% 0.00
15 1+658.661 754965.090 2116402.212 Left 1200 80 2.81 58.893 2.50% 0.00
16 1+739.984 755046.356 2116399.126 Right 100 30 8.63 15.059 4.00% 0.90
17 1+846.291 755148.660 2116370.159 Left 500 80 1.21 10.527 5.69% 0.00
18 1+896.309 755195.278 2116353.733 Right 18 10 40.55 12.738 2.50% 1.50
19 2+026.965 755172.615 2116225.241 Right 2000 80 1.63 56.896 2.50% 0.00
20 2+081.895 755159.587 2116171.875 Left 1200 80 1.92 40.234 2.50% 0.00
21 2+196.311 755136.193 2116059.872 Right 1200 80 3.59 75.129 2.50% 0.00
22 2+470.091 755058.233 2115797.773 Right 90 30 29.77 46.755 4.44% 0.90
23 2+690.149 754862.640 2115695.390 Left 50 20 28.59 24.95 3.56% 1.20
24 2+744.701 754838.331 2115646.008 Right 250 50 5.94 25.915 4.44% 0.60
25 2+790.867 754814.150 2115606.660 Left 150 40 1.76 4.6 4.74% 0.60
26 2+907.369 754763.824 2115501.598 Right 250 50 20.26 88.393 4.44% 0.60
27 3+003.580 754696.180 2115432.227 Left 50 20 35.14 30.662 3.56% 1.20
28 3+066.048 754703.539 2115369.443 Left 150 40 2.06 5.403 4.74% 0.60
29 3+131.419 754721.554 2115306.609 Right 150 40 4.53 11.848 4.74% 0.60
30 3+432.758 754764.035 2115008.282 Right 100 30 2.65 4.618 4.00% 0.90
31 3+473.057 754765.471 2114968.075 Left 30 20 18.11 9.483 5.93% 1.50
32 3+536.222 754799.900 2114915.168 Right 40 20 53.40 37.281 4.44% 1.50
33 3+603.210 754768.608 2114852.739 Left 40 20 38.37 26.79 4.44% 1.50
34 3+674.077 754794.567 2114785.827 Left 120 30 25.50 53.41 3.33% 0.60
35 3+768.104 754868.153 2114725.934 Right 40 20 11.71 8.176 4.44% 1.50
36 3+812.698 754889.745 2114686.912 Left 50 20 50.33 43.919 3.56% 1.20
37 3+934.406 755013.160 2114668.751 Right 1500 80 4.84 126.761 2.50% 0.00
38 4+031.456 755107.960 2114647.624 Left 800 80 2.32 32.443 3.56% 0.00
39 4+158.715 755233.371 2114626.001 Right 200 50 12.42 43.347 5.56% 0.60
40 4+243.808 755311.423 2114591.710 Right 150 40 13.37 35.013 4.74% 0.60
41 4+299.639 755354.619 2114556.092 Left 140 40 17.27 42.198 5.08% 0.60
42 4+365.540 755414.810 2114528.934 Right 25 10 50.40 21.991 2.50% 1.50
43 4+430.689 755412.171 2114462.519 Right 400 70 4.92 34.349 5.44% 0.00
44 4+503.613 755398.510 2114390.866 Left 1200 80 3.31 69.277 2.50% 0.00
45 4+602.972 755384.810 2114292.441 Right 400 70 2.80 19.568 5.44% 0.00
46 4+738.395 755354.526 2114160.447 Left 800 80 6.06 84.674 3.56% 0.00

Analysis &
Data

HIP Radiu
Chainage s (m)
No. Arc h ) m h (m)
47 4+858.090 755345.083 2114041.513 Left 20 10 23.19 8.093 2.50% 1.50
48 4+931.225 755406.613 2114002.548 Right 1200 80 2.24 46.962 2.50% 0.00
49 5+051.177 755509.991 2113941.813 Left 150 40 30.39 79.567 4.74% 0.60
50 5+171.097 755631.525 2113949.896 Right 220 50 15.83 60.784 5.05% 0.60
51 5+292.149 755749.389 2113920.723 Left 250 50 10.62 46.344 4.44% 0.60
52 5+342.744 755800.048 2113918.136 Right 100 30 1.98 3.447 4.00% 0.90
53 5+417.475 755873.765 2113905.894 Left 600 80 0.52 5.477 4.74% 0.00
54 5+488.014 755942.368 2113892.194 Right 20 10 42.48 14.828 2.50% 1.50
55 5+579.611 755942.966 2113800.495 Left 400 70 6.12 42.741 5.44% 0.00
56 5+646.696 755946.860 2113733.512 Right 120 30 9.78 20.474 3.33% 0.60
57 5+768.387 755918.225 2113615.224 Left 500 80 11.76 102.607 5.69% 0.00
58 5+871.772 755919.586 2113511.875 Left 35 10 53.78 32.851 2.50% 1.50
59 6+000.411 756045.683 2113476.691 Right 450 80 8.41 66.02 6.32% 0.00
60 6+076.603 756116.169 2113447.454 Left 400 70 3.33 23.268 5.44% 0.00
61 6+173.314 756207.657 2113416.089 Right 800 80 6.36 88.806 3.56% 0.00
62 6+355.974 756369.397 2113331.666 Right 40 20 40.93 28.574 4.44% 1.50
63 6+473.908 756377.757 2113213.137 Left 25 10 47.36 20.663 2.50% 1.50
64 6+532.372 756433.094 2113191.167 Right 150 40 1.63 4.267 4.74% 0.60
65 6+571.350 756469.235 2113176.578 Left 100 30 1.16 2.016 4.00% 0.90
66 6+660.269 756554.853 2113152.591 Left 2000 80 1.12 39.168 2.50% 0.00
67 6+739.368 756631.407 2113132.682 Right 450 80 5.13 40.273 6.32% 0.00
68 6+802.549 756690.590 2113110.492 Left 1200 80 1.70 35.608 2.50% 0.00
69 6+849.347 756735.147 2113096.237 Left 140 40 7.16 17.501 5.08% 0.60
70 6+942.809 756828.305 2113088.704 Right 800 80 7.21 100.693 3.56% 0.00
71 7+075.043 756957.969 2113062.103 Right 150 40 1.12 2.919 4.74% 0.60
72 7+121.321 757002.489 2113049.480 Left 350 70 3.15 19.269 6.22% 0.00
73 7+251.949 757131.194 2113027.258 Left 300 60 12.67 66.351 5.33% 0.60
74 7+348.531 757227.716 2113034.891 Right 180 40 6.62 20.787 3.95% 0.60
75 7+468.829 757346.498 2113015.991 Left 1200 80 4.10 85.852 2.50% 0.00
76 7+589.596 757466.694 2113003.886 Right 1400 80 5.05 123.502 2.50% 0.00
77 7+713.042 757588.058 2112980.878 Left 800 80 6.78 94.641 3.56% 0.00
78 7+797.011 757671.943 2112975.176 Right 700 80 3.32 40.587 4.06% 0.00
79 7+902.217 757776.380 2112962.534 Left 320 60 7.86 43.881 5.00% 0.00
80 8+013.924 757887.847 2112970.631 Right 380 70 9.05 60.051 5.73% 0.00
81 8+144.019 758017.187 2112955.693 Right 400 70 7.52 52.485 5.44% 0.00
82 8+239.094 758108.714 2112929.745 Left 250 50 4.43 19.313 4.44% 0.60
83 8+344.518 758213.341 2112916.933 Right 120 30 22.18 46.451 3.33% 0.60
84 8+394.820 758256.972 2112890.752 Left 100 30 5.54 9.67 4.00% 0.90
85 8+438.577 758297.228 2112873.619 Right 80 30 14.49 20.227 5.00% 0.90
86 8+597.658 758416.604 2112768.471 Left 170 40 22.41 66.48 4.18% 0.60
87 8+819.091 758634.285 2112724.026 Right 2000 80 3.14 109.61 2.50% 0.00
88 9+059.515 758868.436 2112669.416 Left 700 80 13.39 163.585 4.06% 0.00
89 9+340.279 759149.772 2112678.703 Right 400 70 4.61 32.156 5.44% 0.00
90 9+438.769 759247.225 2112665.841 Right 60 20 21.59 22.605 2.96% 1.20
91 9+530.959 759306.544 2112596.086 Right 60 20 34.96 36.608 2.96% 1.20
92 9+631.985 759277.954 2112498.472 Left 500 80 3.81 33.262 5.69% 0.00
93 9+720.846 759254.783 2112412.677 Right 500 80 3.62 31.56 5.69% 0.00
94 9+844.979 759214.141 2112295.392 Left 250 50 24.19 105.535 4.44% 0.60

Analysis &
Data

HIP Radiu
Chainage s (m)
No. Arc h ) m h (m)
95 10+024.554 759239.061 2112116.031 Left 50 20 16.40 14.314 3.56% 1.20
96 10+071.718 759267.446 2112078.416 Left 40 20 29.76 20.778 4.44% 1.50
97 10+144.846 759339.158 2112062.174 Right 160 40 9.42 26.293 4.44% 0.60
98 10+260.567 759441.253 2112007.675 Left 300 60 13.64 71.421 5.33% 0.60
99 10+393.281 759570.810 2111977.434 Right 800 80 2.17 30.241 3.56% 0.00
100 10+523.016 759696.044 2111943.595 Left 300 60 17.25 90.332 5.33% 0.60
Table: Chainagewise details of proposed Vertical Alignment

% Type
Gradie Gradien Curve
Sl. VIP Level Change of K
nt (%) t (%) at Length
No. Chainage (m) in Curv Value
at Start end (m)
grade e
1 0+330.674 291.983 2.177 -0.539 -2.716 Hog 225.711 83.094
2 0+654.632 290.237 -0.539 0.930 1.469 Sag 131.316 89.417
3 1+091.791 294.301 0.930 3.464 2.535 Sag 142.848 56.354
4 1+829.699 319.865 3.464 -0.939 -4.403 Hog 470.744 106.911
5 2+409.736 314.421 -0.939 -2.869 -1.930 Hog 228.374 118.341
6 3+030.500 296.614 -2.869 -0.194 2.675 Sag 207.745 77.675
7 3+512.394 295.679 -0.194 4.555 4.749 Sag 183.593 38.662
8 3+680.645 303.342 4.555 -1.436 -5.991 Hog 74.32 12.406
9 3+806.119 301.540 -1.436 6.335 7.771 Sag 71.815 9.242
10 4+008.580 314.365 6.335 -3.450 -9.784 Hog 297.895 30.446
11 4+584.411 294.500 -3.450 0.000 3.450 Sag 141.197 40.929
12 4+835.000 294.500 0.000 3.194 3.194 Sag 152.31 47.692
13 5+135.236 304.088 3.194 1.321 -1.872 Hog 125.591 67.081
14 5+480.879 308.656 1.321 -1.763 -3.084 Hog 299.263 97.024
15 6+230.452 295.440 -1.763 -1.286 0.477 Sag 233.079 488.339
16 7+074.675 284.586 -1.286 -0.427 0.859 Sag 303.947 353.865
17 7+798.709 281.496 -0.427 -0.073 0.354 Sag 223.726 632.315
18 8+355.000 281.090 -0.073 0.665 0.738 Sag 86.005 116.585
19 8+717.583 283.500 0.665 0.000 -0.665 Hog 101.986 153.426
20 8+951.208 283.500 0.000 -0.568 -0.568 Hog 118.433 208.491
21 9+143.523 282.408 -0.568 -0.011 0.557 Sag 129.12 231.68
22 9+409.849 282.379 -0.011 2.806 2.817 Sag 114.16 40.523
23 9+579.585 287.143 2.806 -0.837 -3.643 Hog 100.104 27.478
24 9+944.828 284.087 -0.837 1.946 2.782 Sag 159.371 57.278
25 10+129.188 287.674 1.946 -1.964 -3.909 Hog 60.812 15.556
26 10+404.599 282.266 -1.964 -0.229 1.735 Sag 195.803 112.873
6.3. CROSS SECTIONAL ELEMENTS
Two lane has been proposed for the project stretch in general. Cross sectional details of the
proposed road are as described below-

Analysis &
Data
6.3.1. Lane Width
 Width of carriageway for 2-lane road is 2 x 3.5m = 7.0m.
6.3.2. Shoulders
In open country earthen shoulders has been proposed along with as per requirement of traffic
analysis. In built-ups, PCC shoulders/ paver block floorings have been proposed.
Details of proposed carriageway, shoulders & roadway is shown in the following Table.
Table: TCS-wise details of proposed carriageway & roadway

Paver Block
Total
Paved Earthen Floorings/
TCS Carriage Carriage Footpath Median if Roadway
Shoulde Shoulde CC
No way Type way (m) (m) any Width
rs (m) rs (m) Shoulders
(m)
(m)
TCS-I
2-Lane 7.0 - 2 X 1.5 - - - 10.0
(A-C)
TCS-II
2-Lane 7.0 - 2 X 1.5 - - - 10.0
(A-D)
TCS-III 2Lane 7.0 - - 2 X 1.5 - - 10.0
6.3.3. Side Slopes
For fill sections, the following side slopes are proposed:

 Embankment height up to 3.0 m - 2H : 1V
 Embankment height from 3.0 m to 6.0 m - 1.5H : 1V
 Embankment height exceeding 6.0 m -To be designed based on IRC-75.
Cut slopes will be as follows:

 Soil - 2H : 1V
 Rock - 0.5H : 1V
6.3.4. Camber/Cross-fall
The carriageway will have bidirectional cross-fall except at super-elevated sections on

horizontal curves and on service roads. The cross-fall for the pavement and paved shoulders
will be 2.0% for rigid pavement. For earthen shoulders the corresponding value will be 3.5 %
and for paver block flooring, it will be 4.0%.
6.4. PROPOSED TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS (TCS)
Chainagewise schedule of the proposed Typical Cross Sections for widening & improvement
of the Project Section is shown in the following Table.

Analysis &
Data
Table: Chainage-wise schedule of Proposed Typical Cross Sections-

Chainage Length
Sr.No Chainage to Ref.TCS Remarks
from (Km)
Already Included in
1 0.000 0.595 0.595 PKg-1B of Nila Jn road
MDR-83
2 0.595 1.100 0.505 TCS-I-A
3 1.100 1.300 0.200 TCS-I-B
4 1.300 1.350 0.050 TCS-II-A
5 1.350 1.550 0.200 TCS-II-B
6 1.550 1.800 0.250 TCS-II-A
7 1.800 2.400 0.600 TCS-I-A
8 2.400 2.550 0.150 TCS-II-A
9 2.550 2.650 0.100 TCS-I-A
10 2.650 2.700 0.050 TCS-I-B
11 2.700 2.980 0.280 TCS-I-A
12 2.980 3.050 0.070 TCS-I-B
13 3.050 3.500 0.450 TCS-I-A
14 3.500 3.600 0.100 TCS-I-C
15 3.600 3.700 0.100 TCS-II-C
16 3.700 3.750 0.050 TCS-II-A
17 3.750 3.850 0.100 TCS-I-C
18 3.850 3.950 0.100 TCS-II-D
19 3.950 4.250 0.300 TCS-II-A
20 4.250 4.350 0.100 TCS-I-C
21 4.350 5.000 0.650 TCS-I-B
22 5.000 5.150 0.150 TCS-II-A
23 5.150 5.700 0.550 TCS-I-A
24 5.700 5.800 0.100 TCS-I-B
25 5.800 7.180 1.380 TCS-I-A
26 7.180 8.300 1.120 TCS-I-C
27 8.300 8.400 0.100 TCS-I-B
28 8.400 8.550 0.150 TCS-I-A
29 8.550 9.000 0.450 TCS-I-B
30 9.000 9.400 0.400 TCS-I-A
31 9.400 9.500 0.100 TCS-I-B
32 9.500 10.030 0.530 TCS-I-C
33 10.030 10.250 0.220 TCS-III Vasant Wadi
34 10.250 10.670 0.420 TCS-I-A
Total
10.670
Length

Analysis &
Data
Table: Summary of Proposed Typical Cross Sections-
Str.
Summary Length Net Length
TCS Length
(Km) (Km)
(Km)
Already Included in PKg-1B of Nila Jn road MDR-83 0.595 0.000 0.595
TCS-I: Reconstruction of existing single lane carriageway to 2-
TCS-I Lane carriageway with Rigid pavement in open country (TCS-A 8.505 0.082 8.423
to C)
TCS-II-:Reconstruction (in cutting) of existing single lane
TCS-II carriageway to 2-Lane carriageway with Rigid pavement in open 1.350 0.000 1.350
country (TCS-A to D)
TCS-III:Reconstruction and widening of existing single lane
TCS-III flexible pavement to 2-Lane Rigid pavement including paver 0.220 0.000 0.220
block flooring and RCC drains in built-ups
Total length of Project Road 10.670 0.082 10.588

Analysis &
Consultancy Services for preparation of Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Report for Amdura Shikajiwadi Rohi pimpalgaon
Interpretation of
Vasantwadi Road (MDR 104)
Survey Data

Analysis &
Interpretation of
Survey Data

Analysis &
Interpretation of
Survey Data

Analysis &
Interpretation of
Survey Data

Analysis &
Interpretation of
Survey Data

Analysis &
Interpretation of
Survey Data

Analysis &
Interpretation of
Survey Data

Analysis &
Interpretation of
Survey Data

Consultancy Services for preparation of Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Report for Improvemen
Amdura Shikajiwadi Rohi pimpalgaon Vasantwadi Road (MDR 104) t proposal
6.5. PAVEMENT DESIGN
Pavement is the most significant component of a road and therefore its design strengths must
be assured to support the projected traffic loading throughout the design period. Its cost
represents a major proportion of the total construction cost.
The existing road has flexible pavement in complete length. However, considering the
following factors rigid pavement has been proposed all along the road-
 Large numbers of heavy sand carrying truck ply on the road

 The project road submerges at many locations due to back water of Godawari river
barrage.
 Condition of the existing flexible pavement due to presence of BC soil.
6.5.1. Design Traffic
Summary of the present traffic and the design traffic after projection including proposed lane
configuration is shown in the following Table.
Table: Summary of Present & Projected traffic for lane configuration

Lane
AADT at the Proposed
Homogeneou AADT Requirement at
end of design Lane Remarks
s Section (2021) the end of
period (2042) Config.
design period
4395
At Km 1+00 14816 PCU 2-lane 2-lane -
PCU
6.5.2. Design Life
For the design of pavement, the design life is defined in terms of the cumulative number of
standard axles that can be carried before strengthening of the pavement is necessary. As per
IRC-58-2015, the design life of rigid pavement is considered as 30 years.
6.5.3. CBR Value of Subgrade
CBR tests of the existing subgrade as well as the borrow area soils have been conducted for
the project road which indicates a wide range of variations in the CBR values. However, the
pavement has been designed for a minimum CBR value of 8%.
6.5.4. Design of Rigid Pavement
Rigid pavement has been designed as per IRC-58-2015. Summary of proposed crust
thickness of the Rigid Pavement is as follows:
Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page 16

Table: Pavement Crust of Rigid Pavement in new construction

CVPD after Required Pavement Crust Compositions
Design completion
CBR
Period of Type PQC DLC GSB Total
(%) Remarks
(Years) constructio (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
n
With
280 150 150 580 doweled
joint
Proposed Pavement Crust Compositions
30 814 8.0 2-L PQC DLC GSB Total
Remarks
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
With
270# 150 150 570 doweled
joint
#- PQC thickness has been increased by 10mm for 2 time texturing in its life time.
6.6. JUNCTIONS IMPROVEMENT
Road junction/intersection is a key element of highway design. The efficiency, safety, speed,
cost of operation and capacity of road system very much depends on the intersection design.
The choice between an at-grade and grade separated junctions at a particular site depends
upon various factors such as traffic, economy, safety, aesthetic delay etc. Grade separated
junctions generally are more expensive initially and are justified in certain situations from
safe operation of traffic (IRC: 62 – 1976). The main objective of intersection design is to
reduce the severity of potential conflicts between motor vehicles, buses, trucks, bicycles,
pedestrians and facilities while facilitating the convenience, ease and comfort of people
traversing the intersections. The design should be fitted closely to the natural transitional
paths and operating characteristics of the users.
There are 1 major junction & 8 minor junctions on the project road. Minor junctions are
mostly with village roads. No grade separated intersections are proposed on the proposed
alignment.
Table: List of Junctions to be improved
Sr Design
Typ
no Ch. Direction CW (m) Major/ Minor
e
. (Km)
1 1.900 T LHS-Wadi Mukataji 3.75 Minor
2 2.970 Y RHS-Basri 3.75 Minor
3 3.550 T LHS-Shikajiwadi 3.75 Minor
4 3.800 Y RHS-Basri 3.75 Minor
5 4.870 T RHS-Devapur 3.75 Minor
6 7.870 T RHS-Rohi Pimpalgaon 3.75 Minor
7 8.260 T RHS- Rohi Pimpalgaon 3.75 Minor
8 8.480 Y RHS-Rohi Pimpalgaon 3.75 Minor
LHS-Mudkhed
9 10.670 T 10.00 Major
RHS-Malkautha

6.7. STRUCTURE PROPOSAL
It is an objective to retain maximum structures which satisfy with required standards or can
be brought to required standards after certain strengthening / rehabilitation measures.
Treatments for existing cross drainage structures are proposed considering –
Table: Cross Drainage Structures Proposed Considering

Geometric Adequacy To match the existing cross section to selected standard cross-
section and dimensions as per MoRT&H standards
Functional Adequacy Availability of required carriageway & space for crash barrier,
railing etc.
Structural Adequacy Consideration to structural condition of the existing structure
(distress / damages etc.)
Hydraulic Adequacy Hydraulic adequacy i.e. vertical clearance above water level,
vent way availability etc.
At present, there are 1 minor bridge and 13 Culverts (11 HPC, 1VCW, 2 RCC solid slab)
on the project section. All poorly seen structures as per visual inspection are proposed to be
replaced with new structures and structures in sound condition are proposed be retained or
widened. Minor repairing works of the retained structures has been proposed as per
requirement. Beside s additional structures have been proposed as per requirement of the
site. The improvement proposal of structures are listed the following table-
Table: Chainage-wise list of proposed structures

Location (Km) Detail of Existing Structure Details of Proposed structure
Overal
Sr. Span Type of Span
Existin Design Type of l Widt
No Arrange Proposal Structur Arrangeme
g Ch. Ch. Structure Width h (m)
ment (m) e nt
(m)
Reconstructio
1 1.275 1.275 HPC 2x1 20.10 HPC 2x1 20
n
Reconstructio
2 2.950 2.945 HPC 1x1 11.50 HPC 1 X 1.0 17.5
n
3 3.570 3.565 HPC 1x1 15.00 Retain
RCC
Reconstructio
4 4.720 4.715 VCW 1x1 7.50 Slab 1 X 6.0 12.00
n
Culvert
Reconstructio
5 4.870 4.860 HPC 2 x 0.9 8.00 HPC 2 x 1.20 15.00
n
Reconstructio
6 6.060 6.050 HPC 3 x 1.2 20.60 HPC 3 x 1.2 20.00
n
Reconstructio
7 7.040 7.050 HPC 1x1 7.50 HPC 2 x 1.20 15.00
n
Reconstructio
8 7.160 7.150 HPC 1x1 7.60 HPC 2 x 1.20 15.00
n
RCC Reconstructio RCC Box
9 7.550 7.560 1 x 1.5 7.60 1 X 3.0 12.00
SLAB n Culvert
Reconstructio RCC Box
10 8.360 8.350 HPC 5 x 0.9 7.60 2 x 4.0 12.00
n Bridge
11 8.650 8.645 HPC 1 x 0.9 7.60 Reconstructio RCC Box 2 x 4.0 12.00

Location (Km) Detail of Existing Structure Details of Proposed structure

Overal
Sr. Span Type of Span
Existin Design Type of l Widt
No Arrange Proposal Structur Arrangeme
g Ch. Ch. Structure Width h (m)
ment (m) e nt
(m)
n Bridge
RCC
RCC Solid Reconstructio
12 8.830 8.830 6x5 8 Slab 3 X 15.0 12.00
Slab n
Bridge
Reconstructio
13 9.550 9.540 HPC 2x1 15.20 HPC 2x1 17.50
n
Reconstructio
14 10.585 10.520 HPC 2 x 0.9 7.60 HPC 2 X 1.20 15.00
n
Table: Summary of the Structure Proposal

Reconstructed as
Slab/ Total
Existing New
Type of Str Retained Box Minor Major Proposed
Nos. HPC Proposed
Cul/ Bridge Bridge Nos.
Barrel
HPC 11 1 8 0 2 - 4 15
Slab/ Box
1 - - 1 - - - 1
Culvert
Causeways 1 - - 1 - - - 1
Minor Bridge 1 - - - 1 - - 1
Total 14 1 8 2 3 - 4 18
Table: List of Proposed HPC at Junctions

List of Proposed HPC at Junctions
Sr. Design Ch. Type of
Side Nos. Span
No. (Km) Junction
1 3.550 LHS T 1 1 ROW 1000
2 7.870 RHS T 1 1 ROW 1000
3 8.260 RHS T 1 1 ROW 1000
4 8.480 RHS T 1 1 ROW 1000
Total 4
Sr. Type of Details of proposed Structure

Nos.
No. Junction Span Width (m)
As per Type Junction
1 T/Y-junction 1x4=4 1 Row 1000
improvement (IRC-SP-41)
As per Type Junction
2 +-junction 2x0=0 1 Row 1000
improvement (IRC-SP-41)
Total 4
6.8. DRAINAGE & PROTECTION WORKS

The following drainage & protection works have been proposed for the project section.
6.8.1. RCC Drains

RCC drains have been proposed at the following locations-

Table: Proposed locations of RCC Drains

Chainagewise List of Proposed RCC Drains
Design Design Total Overall
Sr. Length Ref.
Ch. Ch. Side Length Width Remarks Type
No (Km) TCS
(From) (To) (Km) (m)
1 10.030 10.250 0.220 Bothsides 0.440 TCS-III 0.90 Vasantwadi Covered
Total 0.220 0.440
Note: in 10% length of Drains, heavy duty section is to be proposed to withstand vehicle
load at side road crossing locations.

Table: Summary of Proposed Drains

Total Length of Length of
Type Overall Width (m) Length Normal Heavy Duty
(Km) Section (Km) Section (Km)
Type-1 0.9m Covered 0.440 0.400 0.040
Total Length = 0.440 0.400 0.040
6.8.2. PCC Drains

PCC drains have been proposed at the following locations-
Table: Proposed locations of PCC Drains
Design
Sr. Design Length Total Length
Ch. Side Remarks
No Ch. (To) (Km) (Km)
(From)
Nil
6.8.3. Retaining Wall
RCC retaining walls have been proposed at the following locations-

Table: Proposed locations of Retaining Wall
Design Total Avg. height
Design Length
Ch. Side Length above GL Remarks
Ch. (To) (Km)
(From) (Km) (m)
To Restrict embankment toe
1.350 1.550 0.200 Bothsides 0.400 2.5
in cutting
3.600 3.700 0.100 RHS 0.100 2.5
in cutting
3.850 3.950 0.100 LHS 0.100 2.5
in cutting
4.600 4.650 0.050 Bothsides 0.100 2.0 To Restrict embankment toe
4.650 4.680 0.030 Bothsides 0.060 2.5 ,,
4.680 4.710 0.030 Bothsides 0.060 3.0 ,,
4.720 4.730 0.010 Bothsides 0.020 3.0 ,,
4.730 4.750 0.020 Bothsides 0.040 2.5 ,,
4.750 4.800 0.050 Bothsides 0.100 2.0 ,,
8.550 8.630 0.080 Bothsides 0.160 2.0 ,,
8.630 8.660 0.030 Bothsides 0.060 2.5 ,,
8.660 8.710 0.050 Bothsides 0.100 3.0 ,,
8.710 8.800 0.090 Bothsides 0.180 3.5 ,,
8.860 8.900 0.040 Bothsides 0.080 3.5 ,,
8.900 8.920 0.020 Bothsides 0.040 3.0 ,,
8.920 8.940 0.020 Bothsides 0.040 2.5 ,,
8.940 8.960 0.020 Bothsides 0.040 2.0 ,,
9.700 9.800 0.100 RHS 0.100 2.0 ,,
9.800 9.900 0.100 RHS 0.100 2.5
Total 1.140 1.880
6.8.4. Toe Wall
RCC toe walls have been proposed at the following locations-

Table: Proposed locations of Toe Wall

Design Total Avg. height

Design Length
Ch. Side Length above GL Remarks
Ch. (To) (Km)
(From) (Km) (m)
3.500 3.600 0.100 RHS 0.100 1.5 To Restrict embankment toe
7.180 8.300 1.120 RHS 1.120 1.5 Nala Running Parallel
8.960 9.000 0.040 Bothsides 0.080 1.5 ,,
9.400 9.500 0.100 Bothsides 0.200 1.5 ,,
9.550 9.700 0.150 RHS 0.150 1.5 ,,
9.900 10.000 0.100 RHS 0.100 1.5 ,,
Total 2.810 3.900
6.8.5. Kerbs
a) RCC Kerbs have been proposed for footpaths at the following location:- Nil
6.9. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES & ROAD SAFETY WORKS
The following project facilities have been proposed for the project section.
6.9.1. Traffic Signs
Cautionary, mandatory and informatory signs have been provided depending on the situation
and function they perform in accordance with the IRC: 67-2012 guidelines for Road Signs.
Table: List of Traffic Signages on Project Highway
IRC-67 2012
Sr.No Type Dimension Chainage / Location Nos Remarks
Specification
MANDATORY/ REGULATORY SIGNS
at the beginning of the
600mm section of the road or area Each in start
1 Speed Limit fig 14.37 18
Cicular covered by a speed & end
restriction
Horn 600mm @ 2per
2 fig 14.18 School, Hospital etc. 6
prohibited Cicular location
WARNING/ CAUTIONARY SIGNS
Approach of curve where
reduction of speed due to
Left/ Right fig 15.01 / 900 mm @ 2 per
1 change in direction and 38
Curve 15.02 Triangular curve
radius of curvature is
below specified limt
Right/ Left fig 15.03 / 900 mm Approach of Hairpin @ 2 per
2 0
Hairpin Bend 15.04 Triangular Bends bend
3 Right/ Left fig 15.05/ 900 mm Approach of Reverse 8 @ 2 per
Reverse Bend 15.06 Triangular Bends (two curves in bend
opposite direction

IRC-67 2012
Specification
separated by a tangent less
than 120m in plain & 30m
in hill)
fig 15.09 to
Side Road/ 900 mm Approach of intersection/ @ 2 per
4 15.15, 15.17 18
Intersection Triangular side roads intersection
to 15.21
Approach of Padestrian
crossings (In place of
Pedestain 900 mm @ 2per
5 fig 15.33 School, 12
Crossing Triangular location
Hospital,Busbay,Temple
etc)
900 mm @ 2per
11 School fig 15.34 Approach of School 2
Triangular School
900 mm Each in start
12 Built-up area fig 15.35 Start & end of built-up 6
Triangular & end
Overhead
900 mm Approach of Overhead @ 2per
13 Cable fig 15.57 4
Triangular Cable Crossing crossing
Crossing
600x500
As per IRC-
14 Chevron Sign fig 15.72 mm Outer edge of curves 1014
67-2012
rectangular
Object
900x300 Tree, Culvert, Bridge,
Hazard fig 15.76 & @ 4 per
15 mm ROB & other structure 56
Marker (one 15.77 structure
rectangular coming in the roadway
way)
Information
800x600
Sign at built- Built-up & Junction
19 mm 12
up & Location
Rectangular
Junction
20 Delineators 706
FACILITY INFORMATION SIGNS
Eating Place/
fig 17.01/ 800x600 @ 2per
1 Light 0
17.02 rectangular location
Refreshment
800x600 @ 2per
2 Fuel Pump fig 17.06 2
rectangular location
800x600 @ 2per
3 Hospital fig 17.07 2
800x600 @ 2per
4 Bus Stop fig 17.35 10
800x600 @ 2per
5 Toliets fig 17.05 10
ROUTE MARKER SIGNS
100-150m ahead & after
of all major junctions, in
Route Marker fig 20.01 to 450x600
1 built-ups and other 4
Sign 20.04 rectangular
locations necessary to
guide through traffic
Direction In place of minor
2 <.0.9 sqm 24
Sign intersection, built up area

IRC-67 2012
Specification
Direction
3 >0.9 sqm Bridge location
Sign
RUMBLE STRIPS (TRANSVERSE BAR MARKING)
fig. 2.7 & fig.
Tranverse Start & end of Built-ups, @ 2per
1 2.8 of IRC 99 16
Bar Marking Sharp Curves location
2018
List of Tublar Gantry Mounted Overhead/Cantilever Gantry Signs

S. No. Location (Design Ch.) Type of Sign Nos. Remarks
1 0.600 Cantilever Gantry 1 Junction/ Bypass Crossing
2 1.900 Cantilever Gantry 1 Junction
3 10.670 Overhead Gantry 1 End Point/ Major Junction
Table: Summary of Proposed Traffic Signs etc.

Sl No Size Nos
1 90 cm Equilateral Triangle (Warning Sign) 88
2 90 cm High Octagon (Stop Sign) -
3 60 cm Circular (Speed Restriction) 24
4 800mm X 600mm Rectangular (Information & Facility) 36
5 600mm X 500mm Rectangular (Chevron Sign) 1014
6 900mm X 300mm Rectangular (Object Hazard Marker) 56
7 Route Marker Signs 4
8 Rumble Strips (Transverse bar marking) 16
9 Overhead Gantry Sign 1
10 Cantilever Gantry Sign 2
11 Reflective Pavement Markers (Road Studs) 4638
12 Direction signs 24
13 Road delineators 706
Summary of Proposed Traffic Signs etc. for Junction

Sr.N
Size Nos
o
3 90 cm High Octagon (Stop Sign) 9
4 60 cm Circular (Speed Restriction) 3
Informatory sign board rectangular/Square in shape having area less
5 13
than 0.9 square meter
6 Reflective Pavement Markers (Road Studs) 352
Table: Summary of Proposed Traffic Signs for Temporary Diversion at

Structures
Sr.N
Size Nos
o
2 800mm X 600mm Rectangular (Information & Facility) 6
3 1200mm X 900mm rectangular (Board displaying information) 6

Sr.N
Size Nos
o
6.9.2. Road Markings

Road markings perform the important function of guiding and controlling traffic on a
highway. The markings serve as psychological barriers and signify the delineation of traffic
paths and their lateral clearance from traffic hazards for safe movement of traffic. Road
markings are therefore essential to ensure smooth and orderly flow of traffic and to promote
road safety. The Code of Practice for Road Markings, IRC: 35-2015 has been used in the
study as the design basis. The location and type of marking lines, material and colour is
followed using IRC: 35-2015 – “Code of Practice for Road Markings”. The road markings
were carefully planned on carriageways, intersections, and bridge locations.
6.9.3. Reflective Pavement Markers (Road Studs)

Road studs for the entire Project Highway have been proposed at the locations in accordance
with the provisions of the Manuals which includes all Pedestrian cross walks along the
alignment, at all Major Junction locations and at curve locations where curve radius not
confirming to minimum radius as per design standards and any other locations specified in
relevant manual.
Table: Summary of Proposed nos of Road Studs along the project highway
Sr.
Description Nos Spacing
No
1 Curve Radii upto 450m 3354 6
2 Curve Radii 451m to 750m 411 9
Curve Radii 751m to 2000m &
3 495 18
critical Section
4 Structure Location 24 9
5 Approaches Location 18 18
6 Pedestrian Crossing 336 0.5
Total 4638
6.9.4. Delineators and Object Markers
Roadway delineators are intended to mark the edges of the roadway so as to guide drivers on
the alignment ahead. Object markers are used to indicate hazards and obstructions within the
vehicle flow path, for example, channeling islands close to the intersections.
Delineators and object markers are provided as per the details given in the drawings and are
provided in accordance with the provisions of IRC: 79-2019. They are basically driving aids
and should not be regarded as substitutes for warning signs, road markings or barriers.
Delineators are provided for all curves of radius less than 600m. They are not provided at
locations where Chevron sign boards are provided.
6.9.5. Safety Barriers
Metal Beam Crash Barriers are proposed on both edges of road where height of embankment
exceeds 3.0 m and outer edges of curves have sharp curvature. These shall consists of W-

Beam fixed on posts (ISMB-150) placed at 15 m c/c. with spacers (ISM-150). Suitable
refectories are proposed to be provided and fixed on beam @ 3 m c/c for proper delineation
of barrier line. The locations of crash barrier are given below:

Table: Location of Metal Beam (W-Beam) Crash Barrier

Design Total
Sr. Design Length
Ch. Side Length Remarks
No Ch. (To) (Km)
(From) (Km)
High Embkt. with both
1 1.100 1.300 0.200 Bothsides 0.400
side Toe Wall
2 1.880 1.890 0.010 LHS 0.010 Sharp curve
3 1.910 1.920 0.010 RHS 0.010 Sharp curve
4 2.450 2.490 0.040 LHS 0.040 Sharp curve
Sharp Curve + High
5 2.650 2.710 0.060 Bothsides 0.120
Embkt.
6 2.920 2.960 0.040 LHS 0.040 Lake side
Sharp Curve + High
7 2.980 3.050 0.070 Bothsides 0.140
Embkt.
8 3.500 3.680 0.180 RHS 0.180 Valley side
9 3.750 3.850 0.100 RHS 0.100 Valley side
10 4.250 4.350 0.100 RHS 0.100 Valley side
11 4.350 4.400 0.050 LHS 0.050 Sharp Curve
12 4.400 4.620 0.220 Bothsides 0.440
side Toe Wall
13 4.620 4.680 0.060 Bothsides 0.120 High Embkt.
14 4.680 4.710 0.030 Bothsides 0.060 Bridge Approach
16 4.750 4.800 0.050 Bothsides 0.100 High Embkt.
17 4.840 4.870 0.030 RHS 0.030 Sharp curve
18 4.870 5.000 0.130 Bothsides 0.260
side Toe Wall
19 5.480 5.510 0.030 LHS 0.030 Sharp Curve
20 5.630 5.660 0.030 LHS 0.030 Sharp Curve
21 5.700 5.800 0.100 Bothsides 0.200
side Toe Wall
22 5.860 5.900 0.040 RHS 0.040 Sharp curve
23 6.340 6.380 0.040 LHS 0.040 Sharp curve
24 6.460 6.500 0.040 RHS 0.040 Sharp curve
25 6.840 6.870 0.030 RHS 0.030 Sharp curve
Sharp Curve / High
26 7.180 8.400 1.220 Bothsides 2.440
Embkt.
27 8.400 8.450 0.050 LHS 0.050 Sharp curve
28 8.550 8.750 0.200 Bothsides 0.400
side Toe Wall
31 8.910 9.000 0.090 Bothsides 0.180
side Toe Wall
Sharp Curve / High
32 9.400 9.500 0.100 Bothsides 0.200
Embkt.
33 9.500 9.550 0.050 LHS 0.050 Sharp curve
Sharp curve / High
34 9.550 10.030 0.480 RHS 0.480
Embkt./ Valley Side
35 10.510 10.550 0.040 RHS 0.040 Sharp curve

Total 4.050 6.710
6.9.6. Temporary Diversion
Temporary diversion works at structure locations proposed to be reconstructed has been

proposed as per IRC guide lines.
6.10. PROJECT FACILITIES
The following project facilities have been proposed for the project section.
6.10.1. Toll Plaza
Nil
6.10.2. Truck Lay Byes
Nil
6.10.3. Bus lay bays & Passenger shelters
Passenger shelters (solar lights, toilets & ramp facility) have been proposed at the following
locations-
Table: List of Proposed Locations of Passenger Shelters (Bus stops) with Ramp
Facility
Sr. Design Ch. Nos. of Bus
Side Remarks
No (Km) Stops
1 1.890 LHS 1 Junction
2 3.820 RHS 1 Built-up + Junction
4 10.125 LHS 1 Built-up
5 10.670 RHS 1 Junction
Total Nos. 5
Table: List of Proposed Locations of Toilet Facility (3 units at a location with Ramp
Facility)
Sr. Design Ch. Nos. of Toilets
Side Remarks
No (Km) Locations
1 3.800 LHS 1 Built-up + Junction
3 10.100 LHS 1 Built-up
Total Nos. 3
6.10.4. Kilometer Stone
The details of kilometre stones are in accordance with IRC: 8-1980 guidelines. 5 th Km stone
& ordinary kilometre stones are provided as per the schedule given in tender drawings.
Kilometre stones are located on the left-hand side of the road as one proceeds from the station

from which the Kilometre count starts. Kilometre stones shall be fixed at right angles to the
centre line of the carriageway.
6.10.5. 200m Stones and Boundary Stones
The details of 200m stones and boundary stones conform to IRC: 26-1967 and IRC: 25-1967.
200m stones are located on the same side of the road as the kilometre stones. The inscription
on the stones shall be the numerals 2, 4, 6 and 8 marked in an ascending order in the direction
of increasing kilometerage away from the starting station. The numerals shall be 80mm high.
The colour of the numerals shall be black on a white background. Boundary stones shall be
located on either side of the road opposite every 200m stone and kilometre stone. In addition
these shall be fixed at all angular points of the boundary.
6.10.6. Roadside/ Avenue Tree Plantation
Tree shall be planted with in the Right of Way and in the ear marked by the authority for
afforestation keeping in view the IRC guidelines on landscaping & tree plantation. The
numbers of trees to be planted shall be the 3 times of trees proposed to be cut with
similar Indian species like Albizzia procera (Safed Siris), Albizzia amara (Cyclone siris),
Dalbergia latifolia (Black Shisham/ Rosewood), Mengifera india (Desi Mango) & etc
with maintenance upto 5 years with survival rate of minimum 95%. Otherwise the
contractor shall be penalized @ Rs. 5000 per tree.
6.10.7. Pedestrian Facilities
6.10.7.1. Pedestrian Crossings
Pedestrian crossings has been proposed near road intersections, schools, colleges, hospitals
etc. locations as per IRC guide lines.
6.10.7.2. Footpath:- Nil
6.10.7.3. Foot Over Bridge (FOB):- Nil
6.10.8. Miscellaneous
6.10.8.1. Cross Utility Ducts
2X300mm pipe have been proposed @ 100m intervals in built-ups & 1X600mm dia pipe @
500m intervals in open country for crossing of different utility services across the road shall
be provided as per IRC: 98 – 1997. Cross Utility duct shall be proposed at the following
locations.
Table: Summary of Proposed Cross Utility Ducts & Utility Chamber
Sr Total C/C
Width Total
No TCS Length Land use Spacing Type
(m) Nos.
. (m) (m)
Open 1R600mm dia
1 TCS-I 8265 500 15.0 17
Country NP3
Open
2 TCS-II 1590 Country - - - -
(Cutting)

2R300mm dia
3 TCS-III 220 Built-up 100 10.0 2
NP3
Grand Total Nos 19
Table: Summary of Proposed Cross Utility Ducts
Type Width (m) Total Nos.
1R600mm dia NP3 15.0 17
2R300mm dia NP3 10.0 2
Total Nos = 19
For proper approaches to adjoining agricultural fields (900mm dia NP3 pipe) of 5.0m wide
Width of
Sr. Minimum Total Length
Length (m) Spacing (m) 900mm dia NP3
No Locations (m)
Pipe (m)
500m C/C
staggered
1 8265 17 5.0 85.0
spacing in
open country
Total length of 900mm dia NP3 Pipes = 85.0
Reuse of pipes from existing HPC to be reconstructed = -21.0
Grand Total length of 900mm dia NP3 Pipes = 64.0
6.10.8.2. Longitudinal Utility Duct

Single Row for utility duct with reinforced cement concrete pipe of diameter 600 mm across
the road shall be provided as per IRC: 98 – 1997 @ 50m c/c in built-up area. Longitudinal
Utility duct shall be proposed at the following locations.
Dia of
Total Total nos
Sr. Length Utility
TCS Side Length of Utility
No. (Km) Duct
(Km) Chamber
(mm)
1 TCS-III 0.220 600 Bothsides 0.440 18
Total 0.220 0.440 18
Summary of Pipe
Length
Sr. No. Dia of Pipe
(Km)
1 600mm dia pipes 0.440
6.10.8.3. Street Lights

Street lights have been proposed at the following locations in built-ups. Except this locations,
street lights have been proposed at passenger shelter locations and High mast lightings have
been proposed at major junctions.
Summary of Proposed Solar Street Lighting
Sr Total Nos Total Nos
Length
No Ref. TCS Spacing (m) Side (Oneside (Bothsides
(m)
. overhang) overhang)
25m c/c staggered spacing
1 TCS-III 220 Bothsides 9 -
on bothsides
Total 9 0

Other Types of Lights Nos

Total nos of Solar Lights at Bus Stop Locations (2 no at each Bus stop) 10
High Mast Lighting at Major Junctions (1 no at each Major junction) 1
6.10.8.4. Rain Water Harvesting

Rain water harvesting with recharge pit is proposed to recharged ground water at the
following locations on the project stretch.
Table: Proposed locations of Rain Water Harvesting
Nos Location
Recharge pit with bore near HPC/Culvert location and Other suitable locations
9
except in Built-ups, Cutting sections, Forest etc.
9 Total Nos of Rain Water Harvesting
6.10.8.5. Steel Railings :- Nil
6.11. LAND ACQUISITION

No land acquisition is proposed for the project section since all improvements have been
proposed within existing ROW as per the instruction of the department.
6.12. FOREST DIVERSION

The project section does not pass through forest land.
6.13. UTILITY SHIFTING & RELOCATIONS

Different utility services like electric lines, OFC cables, hand pumps, wells etc. exists along
the project highway which is required to be relocated. The detailed estimates of shifting of
such utilities have been collected from the concerned departments.

6.0 Analysis of Survey &amp; Investigation Data Pkg-2A

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

6.0 Analysis of Survey &amp; Investigation Data Pkg-2A

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Analysis &

6.2. ALIGNMENT & GEOMETRY

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page: 1

Table: Chainagewise details of proposed Horizontal Alignment

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page: 2

HI Hand Speed Δ (in Lc/ arc Extra

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page: 3

HI Hand Speed Δ (in Lc/ arc Extra

Table: Chainagewise details of proposed Vertical Alignment

6.3. CROSS SECTIONAL ELEMENTS

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page: 4

6.3.1. Lane Width

 Width of carriageway for 2-lane road is 2 x 3.5m = 7.0m.

Table: TCS-wise details of proposed carriageway & roadway

6.3.3. Side Slopes

For fill sections, the following side slopes are proposed:

Cut slopes will be as follows:

The carriageway will have bidirectional cross-fall except at super-elevated sections on

6.4. PROPOSED TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS (TCS)

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page: 5

Table: Chainage-wise schedule of Proposed Typical Cross Sections-

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page: 6

Table: Summary of Proposed Typical Cross Sections-

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page: 7

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page: 8

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page: 9

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page: 10

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page: 11

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page: 12

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page: 13

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page: 14

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page: 15

6.5. PAVEMENT DESIGN

 Large numbers of heavy sand carrying truck ply on the road

6.5.1. Design Traffic

Table: Summary of Present & Projected traffic for lane configuration

6.5.2. Design Life

6.5.3. CBR Value of Subgrade

6.5.4. Design of Rigid Pavement

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page 16

Table: Pavement Crust of Rigid Pavement in new construction

6.6. JUNCTIONS IMPROVEMENT

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page 17

6.7. STRUCTURE PROPOSAL

Table: Cross Drainage Structures Proposed Considering

Table: Chainage-wise list of proposed structures

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page 18

Location (Km) Detail of Existing Structure Details of Proposed structure

Table: Summary of the Structure Proposal

Table: List of Proposed HPC at Junctions

Sr. Type of Details of proposed Structure

6.8. DRAINAGE & PROTECTION WORKS

6.8.1. RCC Drains

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page 19

Table: Proposed locations of RCC Drains

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page 20

Table: Summary of Proposed Drains

6.8.2. PCC Drains

6.8.3. Retaining Wall

RCC retaining walls have been proposed at the following locations-

6.8.4. Toe Wall

RCC toe walls have been proposed at the following locations-

Dec-2021 Revision: R0 Page 21

6.0 Analysis of Survey & Investigation Data Pkg-2A

6.0 Analysis of Survey & Investigation Data Pkg-2A