Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
sex of the student *
the opinion of student
on effect of large nu 109 100.0% 0 .0% 109 100.0%
of students

sex of the student * the opinion of student on effect of large nu of students Crosstabulation

% within the opinion of student on effect of large nu of students

the opinion of student on
effect of large nu of
students

yes no Total
sex of the male 79.8% 70.0% 78.0%
student female 20.2% 30.0% 22.0%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
sex of the student * the
availability of library 109 100.0% 0 .0% 109 100.0%

sex of the student * the availability of library Cross tabulation

% within the availability of library

the availability of library

agree disagree Total

sex of the male 80.4% 76.2% 78.0%
student female 19.6% 23.8% 22.0%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Case Processing Summary

Cases
 Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
sex of the student *
the sufficiency of cafe 109 100.0% 0 .0% 109 100.0%

sex of the student * the sufficiency of cafe Crosstabulation

% within the sufficiency of cafe

the sufficiency of cafe
agree disagree Total
sex of the male 76.1% 79.4% 78.0%
student female 23.9% 20.6% 22.0%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
the bach of the student *
number of students in 109 100.0% 0 .0% 109 100.0%
one section

sex of the student * the sufficiency of cafe Crosstabulation

% within the sufficiency of cafe

the sufficiency of cafe
agree disagree Total
sex of the male 76.1% 79.4% 78.0%
student female 23.9% 20.6% 22.0%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
the sufficiency of
dormotory * placement 109 100.0% 0 .0% 109 100.0%
of the dorm of student

the sufficiency of dormotory * placement of the dorm of student Crosstabulation

Count
placement of the dorm of student
locust block whitehouse Total
the sufficiency agree 13 45 15 73
of dormotory disagree 21 9 6 36
Total 34 54 21 109

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 19.417(a) 2 .000
Likelihood Ratio 19.272 2 .000
Linear-by-Linear
9.607 1 .002
Association
N of Valid Cases
109
a 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.94.

Symmetric Measures

Asymp.
Std. Approx.
Value Error(a) T(b) Approx. Sig.
Ordinal by Ordinal Gamma -.500 .148 -3.089 .002
N of Valid Cases 109
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
 the sufficiency of
dormotory * the 109 100.0% 0 .0% 109 100.0%
sufficiency of toilet

the sufficiency of dormotory * the sufficiency of toilet Crosstabulation

Count
the sufficiency of toilet
agree disagree Total
the sufficiency agree 33 40 73
of dormotory disagree 10 26 36
Total 43 66 109

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.066(b) 1 .080
Continuity
2.379 1 .123
Correction(a)
Likelihood Ratio 3.148 1 .076
Fisher's Exact Test .097 .060
Linear-by-Linear
Association 3.038 1 .081
N of Valid Cases 109
a Computed only for a 2x2 table
b 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.20.

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
the sufficiency of
dormotory * the 109 100.0% 0 .0% 109 100.0%
sufficiency of water

the sufficiency of dormotory * the sufficiency of water Crosstabulation

the sufficiency of dormotory * the sufficiency of toilet Crosstabulation

Count
the sufficiency of toilet
agree disagree Total
 the sufficiency agree 33 40 73
of dormotory disagree 10 26 36
Total 43 66 109

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.662(b) 1 .197
Continuity
1.179 1 .278
Correction(a)
Likelihood Ratio 1.668 1 .197
Fisher's Exact Test .226 .139
Linear-by-Linear
Association 1.647 1 .199
N of Valid Cases 109
a Computed only for a 2x2 table
b 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17.83.

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
the sufficiency of
dormotory * the opinion
of student on effect of 109 100.0% 0 .0% 109 100.0%
large nu of students

the sufficiency of dormotory * the opinion of student on effect of large nu of students

Crosstabulation

Count
 the opinion of student on
effect of large nu of
students

yes no Total
the sufficiency agree 58 15 73
of dormotory disagree 31 5 36
Total 89 20 109

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .714(b) 1 .398
Continuity
.338 1 .561
Correction(a)
Likelihood Ratio .741 1 .389
Fisher's Exact Test .445 .285
Linear-by-Linear
Association .707 1 .400
N of Valid Cases 109
a Computed only for a 2x2 table
b 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.61.
Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
the site of food service
of the students * the 109 100.0% 0 .0% 109 100.0%
sufficiency of cafe

the site of food service of the students * the sufficiency of cafe Crosstabulation

Count
the sufficiency of cafe
agree disagree Total
the site of food noncafe 6 6 12
service of the Muslim cafe 10 11 21
students
senior cafe 13 31 44
GC cafe 8 11 19
others 9 4 13
Total 46 63 109

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 7.335(a) 4 .119
Likelihood Ratio 7.419 4 .115
Linear-by-Linear
.464 1 .496
Association
 N of Valid Cases
109
a 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.06.

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
number of students in
one section * the 109 100.0% 0 .0% 109 100.0%
availeability of library

number of students in one section * the availeability of library Crosstabulation

Count

the availeability of library

agree disagree Total

number of students in <60 16 7 23
one section >=60 30 56 86
Total 46 63 109

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.948(b) 1 .003
Continuity
7.583 1 .006
Correction(a)
Likelihood Ratio 8.940 1 .003
Fisher's Exact Test .004 .003
Linear-by-Linear
Association 8.866 1 .003
N of Valid Cases 109
a Computed only for a 2x2 table
b 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.71.

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
number of students in one
section * the opinion of
student on effect of large 109 100.0% 0 .0% 109 100.0%
nu of students
number of students in one section * the opinion of student on effect of large nu of students
Crosstabulation

Count
the opinion of student on
effect of large nu of
students

yes no Total
number of students in <60 19 4 23
one section >=60 70 16 86
Total 89 20 109

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .018(b) 1 .894
Continuity
.000 1 1.000
Correction(a)
Likelihood Ratio .018 1 .893
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .582
Linear-by-Linear
Association .018 1 .894
N of Valid Cases 109
a Computed only for a 2x2 table
b 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.22.

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
number of students
in one section * the 109 100.0% 0 .0% 109 100.0%
sufficient class

number of students in one section * the sufficient class Crosstabulation

Count
the sufficient class
agree disagree Total
number of students in <60 19 4 23
one section >=60 37 49 86
 Total 56 53 109

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 11.383(b) 1 .001
Continuity
9.854 1 .002
Correction(a)
Likelihood Ratio 12.228 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .001 .001
Linear-by-Linear
Association 11.279 1 .001
N of Valid Cases 109
a Computed only for a 2x2 table
b 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.18.

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
number of students
in one section * the 109 100.0% 0 .0% 109 100.0%
sufficiency of cafe

number of students in one section * the sufficiency of cafe Crosstabulation

Count
the sufficiency of cafe
agree disagree Total
number of students in <60 15 8 23
one section >=60 31 55 86
Total 46 63 109

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6.331(b) 1 .012
Continuity
5.191 1 .023
Correction(a)
Likelihood Ratio 6.290 1 .012
Fisher's Exact Test .017 .012
Linear-by-Linear
Association 6.273 1 .012
N of Valid Cases 109
a Computed only for a 2x2 table
b 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.71.

Case Processing Summary

 Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
the CGPA of the student
* number of students in 109 100.0% 0 .0% 109 100.0%
one section

the CGPA of the student * number of students in one section Crosstabulation

% within number of students in one section

number of students in
one section

<60 >=60 Total

the CGPA of <2.75 60.9% 55.8% 56.9%
the student >=2.75 39.1% 44.2% 43.1%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .189(b) 1 .664
Continuity
.039 1 .843
Correction(a)
Likelihood Ratio .190 1 .663
Fisher's Exact Test .813 .424
Linear-by-Linear
Association .187 1 .665
N of Valid Cases 109
a Computed only for a 2x2 table
b 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.92.

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 1 Step 24.322 9 .004
Block 24.322 9 .004
Model 24.322 9 .004

Model Summary
 -2 Log Cox & Snell Nagelkerke R
Step likelihood R Square Square
1 88.011(a) .200 .311
a Estimation terminated at iteration number 6 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.

Classification Table(a)

Observed Predicted
number of students in
one section
Percentage
<60 >=60 Correct
Step 1 number of students in <60
6 17 26.1
one section
>=60 3 83 96.5
Overall Percentage 81.7
a The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step effectoflargenu .824 .709 1.350 1 .245 2.279
1(a) library 1.180 .581 4.125 1 .042 3.253
teacher .332 .608 .299 1 .585 1.394
class 1.356 .639 4.504 1 .034 3.879
cafe .940 .559 2.834 1 .092 2.561
water .276 .588 .219 1 .639 1.317
healthstatus -.086 .410 .044 1 .834 .918
studyingstyle -.680 .476 2.041 1 .153 .507
CGPA .082 .554 .022 1 .883 1.085
Constant .971 1.397 .483 1 .487 2.640
a Variable(s) entered on step 1: effectoflargenu, library, teacher, class, cafe, water, healthstatus,
studyingstyle, CGPA.