LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY

Academic Task-III

Mittal School of Business Faculty of Business and Applied Arts

Name of the Faculty Member: Megha Singh

Course Code: HRM302 Course Title: Conflict Management and Negotiation

Section: KOM68/DOM56/EOM56/COM54/MOM5 Max. Marks: 30

Date of Allotment: 29th March 2022

Date of Submission (write- up): 18th April 2022

Date of Conduction (Business Game) : 11th April 2022

S. Roll No Objectives of Topic Evaluation

No Academic Activity Parameters
1 Individual Having a hands-on Group of 5 students will be working on the business As per rubric
experience of simulation game named as leader Today. attached
managing a The aim is to run a company in simulated competitive
company in a business environment by taking different functional Total Marks
competitive responsibilities using classroom concepts in devising 30
business simulation appropriate business strategies and tactics.
environment. The game will run for 3 rounds. Performance
Assignment will conclude at the end of round 3. in Game-15
Evaluation will be based on: Marks
1) Scores mentioned in Leader Board in round-3 - 15 Marks Report
2) Report submission - 15 Marks Submission
The report shall focus on: 15 Marks
a) On the basis of notes prepared in round I - 5 Marks
b) Case Understanding and Discussion in round II - 5 Marks
c) Clear learning outcomes of right and wrong strategic
decisions- 5 Marks
Rubrics for Case Write Up

Criteria Exceeds the Fully Meets the Minimally Meets Doesn’t Meet Rating
Standards Standards the Standards the Standards
Ability to Has a very clear Properly identifies Although various Missed all of
clearly identify understanding of the various aspects of the important
the case the problem and aspects problem are aspects of the
challenges is able to of the problem Identified, but the problem and is
incorporate and is able to description fails unable to clearly 05
his/her clearly point out to clearly define identify the
knowledge/ the nature of the the case problem.
insights in Case challenges challenges.
addressing the
Case challenges

05 points
3 points 2 points No point
Ability to Discussion and Discussion and Discussion and Inappropriate
initiate and Proposal were Proposal were Proposal were Discussion and
propose sufficiently adequately confusing, Proposal and
discussion that specific, clear, identified and incomplete or does not align 05
can be and appropriate described. lacked relevance with the case
implemented given the case to the case problem.
problem. problem

05 points 2 points
3 points
No points
Ability to Able to clearly Shows minimal Show no
comprehend relate the Shows the clear understanding of understanding
various decisions to understanding decisions taken of
learning various learning of decisions taken and various decisions taken
outcomes of the outcomes and and various learning outcomes and various
right and shows evidence learning outcomes learning 05
wrong of depth and and is outcomes and is
decisions taken breadth of able to clearly unable to relate
applying related relate the the
Knowledge to the challenge to problem to
issue. various various
concepts concepts
. 02 points
05 points
03 points
No points
TOTAL 15