An insurance company provides auto insurance and is analysing the data obtained from fatal crashes.

A
sample of the motor vehicle deaths is randomly selected for a two year period . The number of fatalities is
listed below fot he different days of the week. At the 0.05 significance level, test the claim that accidents
occur on different days with equal frequency.

Day Monday Tuesday WednesdaThursday Friday Saturday Sunday

No. of
fatalities 31 20 20 22 22 29 36

H0: There is no significant differerce between the proportion of fatalities on different week days
H0:p1=p2=p3=p4=p5=p6=p7=1/7
H1: At least one of these proportions is incorrect
 No. of
Day fatalities

Monday 31
Tuesday 20
Wednesda 20
Thursday 22
Friday 22
Saturday 29
Sunday 36
A sample of 870 tranees was subjected to different types of training classified as intensive, good and average and their
performance was noted as above average, average and poor. The resulting data is presented in the table below. Use a
5% level of significance to examine whether there is any relationship between the type of training and performance

Training
Perforamce Intensive Good Average Total
Above Average 100 150 40 290
Average 100 100 100 300
Poor 50 80 150 280
Total 250 330 290 870

Ho: Attribute performance and the training are independent.

H1: Attribute performance and the training are not independent.
and average and their
he table below. Use a
g and performance

PreformanTraining Frequency
1 1 100
1 2 150
1 3 40
2 1 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
3 1 50
3 2 80
3 3 150
Test for Randomness
A researcher conducts a survey to find out whether the inhabitants of a metro town are in favour of capital
punishment (F) or against it (A). The sequence of responses to the question asked is given below. Use the
run test at 5% level of significance to test whether the responses are random.

F F A F F F A A A A
A F F A A A F F A A
A A A A F F A A A A
A A F F F A A A F A
F F A A A A F F F A
A A F F

h0: The sequence of the responses is random

H1: The sequence of the responses is not random
Response
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
Replacement of one sample t-test

The interest is to test the hypothesis that the median value of a distribution is 19 against the alternative
hypothesis that it is greater than 19. A sample of 24 observations is taken with the following results:
18 24 20 26 23 17 24 21
22 20 16 27 25 25 14 20
15 18 22 21 24 26 27 29
you may use a 5% level of significance

H0: p=1/2
H1: p>1/2
Score Median
18 19
24 19
20 19
26 19
23 19
17 19
24 19
21 19
22 19
20 19
16 19
27 19
25 19
25 19
14 19
20 19
15 19
18 19
22 19
21 19
24 19
26 19
27 19
29 19
Replacement of independent t-test
Two psychology professors have developed their own version of an IQ test. A psychologist adminstered them
on 17 individuals. The results are presented below. Using 5% level of significance, test the claim that there is
no significant difference between two versions

Individuals Version 1 Version 2 H0: There is no significant difference between the two versions
1 96 102 H1: There is a significant difference between the two versions
2 110 106
3 105 105
4 109 97
5 98 102
6 104 103
7 96 97
8 111 112
9 88 85
10 109 107
11 110 112
12 96 94
13 89 91
14 88 95
15 100 103
16 106 104
17 99 102
Independent samples

The table below represents the number of bounced cheques in two banks -Bank A and Bank B- on
randomly chosen 12 days for bank A and 15 days fro bank B. Use Mann-Whitney U test to examine at a 5
percent level of significance whether Bank A has more bounced cheques a scompared to Bank B.

Bank A 42 65 38 55 71 60 47 59 68
Bank B 22 17 35 19 8 24 42 14 28

H0: Two populations have identical probability distributions

H1: There is significant difference in the probability distribution of both the population
57 76 42 Score Bank
17 10 15 20 45 50 42 A
65 A
38 A
55 A
71 A
60 A
47 A
59 A
68 A
57 A
76 A
42 A
22 B
17 B
35 B
19 B
8B
24 B
42 B
14 B
28 B
17 B
10 B
15 B
20 B
45 B
50 B
Replacement of paired t-test

A sample of 16 salemen was selected in an organization and their score on performance appraisal was
noted. The salesmen were sent for a three- week training programme and in the next appraisal, their
scores, again, were noted. The appraisal scores before and after the training are given below:

Salesmen 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Scores
Before
Training 85 76 64 59 72 68 43 54 57

Scores
After
Training 82 79 68 52 75 69 40 53 50

use a 5 % level of significance to test the hypothesis that the training has not caused any change in the performance appraisal

H0: There is no difference in the appraisal score because of training

H1: There is a difference in the appraisal score because of training
 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

61 71 82 39 51 54 57

67 74 83 54 59 51 58

in the performance appraisal score

 Scores Scores
Before After
Salesmen Training Training

1 85 82

2 76 79
3 64 68
4 59 52
5 72 75
6 68 69
7 43 40
8 54 53
9 57 50
10 61 67
11 71 74
12 82 83
13 39 54
14 51 59
15 54 51
16 57 58
Replacement of One way ANOVA

Three machines are used in the packaging of 10 kg of wheat flour. Each machine is designed so as to pack on
an average 10 kg of flour per bag. Samples of six bags were selected from each machine and the amount of
wheat packaged in each bag is shown below:

Machine 1 15.8 15.9 16.2 15.7 16.3 15.8

Machine 2 16.5 16 15.4 15.9 16.2 16.1
Machine 3 15.7 16.4 16.2 15.9 15.7 16.3
Use a 5% level of significance to test the hypothesis that the amount of wheat packaged by the three
machines is the same

H0: Amount of wheat packaged by the three machines is same

H1: Amount of wheat packaged by at least two machines is different.
Amount Machine
15.8 A
15.9 A

16.2 A
15.7 A
16.3 A
15.8 A
16.5 B
16 B
15.4 B
15.9 B
16.2 B
16.1 B
15.7 C
16.4 C
16.2 C
15.9 C
15.7 C
16.3 C