Page 1

1
2
3 Mr Greg Hunt Minister for Health 19-4-2022
4 Minister.Hunt@health.gov.au
5
6 COMPLAINT
7
8 Sir,
9 Hereby I file a complaint against “Closewatch Pty Ltd trading as Think Hearing [(03) 9497
10 1600]
11
12 I have been provided with hearing services for about 35 years by various service providers.
13 A few years ago I elected to change to Think Hearing (Heidelberg).
14
15 https://www.abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View/49102992727
16 Current details for ABN 49 102 992 727
17 22 Sept 2020 ... Entity name: CLOSEWATCH PTY LTD. ABN status: Active from 01
18 Mar 2003. Entity type: Australian Private Company. Goods & Services Tax (GST): ...
19
20 Regretfully, since early 2020 it basically has been a disaster. This, because of COVID issues
21 the service facilities were closed for months on end. At one stage resulting I transferred to
22 Doncaster hearing as to finally be able to obtain some service. Then in early 2021 I reverted
23 back to Think Hearing and the person testing me made clear that the closure was due to
24 insufficient clients attending. I explained that I was NOT VACCINATED with the alleged
25 COVID-19 vaccine and was advised that was not an issue. I was then provided with a
26 hearing test. I was informed that I did not require to pay the about 445 yearly fee due to the
27 lack of service during the closedown.
28 During the latter part of 2021 Think Hearing forwarded via Australia Post my new molds
29 (as the old once were broken) but refused to fit them in-house because I was told not being
30 vaccinated.
31 In January 2022 I attended to Think Hearing (Heidelberg) as I my hearing aids new molds
32 could not be used unless staff fitted them. a female desk staff member then started to attend
33 to me when the male staff member entered the lobby and made it very clear that because I
34 was not vaccinated I could not have any service other than via Australian Post for batteries.
35 The female in my view sought to do the job but since then my hearing aids keep falling out
36 because the molds tubes were not properly cut to length.
37 I am not denied any in-house service unless I accept to be vaccinated, this allegedly because
38 of state government (Victoria) mandates.
39
40 I am a constitutionalist and well aware that no state can interfere with Commonwealth
41 services. Indeed Quick & Garran did set out that if needed the Commonwealth could even
42 use the military of for example there was an obstruction to Commonwealth services, such as
43 transport.
44
19-4-2022 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 2

1 Because Think Hearing is contracted by the Commonwealth then any state mandates cannot
2 be enforced against any businesses providing Commonwealth services. Still I noticed that
3 even Australian Post offices would enforce mask mandates, etc.
4 ALBEIT I DID NOT WEAR A MASK IN 2020, 2021 OR 2022.
5 On 10 August 2020 the Victorian Police made known intending to issue a summons against
6 me for not wearing a mask, however I made clear I was ready to go to court and
7 subsequently nothing came from this.
8
9 The Commonwealth has within its legislative powers QUARANTINE and the framers of the
10 Constitution made clear this related to:
11
12 Hansard 2-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
13 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-
14 The record of these debates may fairly be expected to be widely read, and the observations to which I
15 allude might otherwise lead to a certain amount of misconception.
16 END QUOTE
17
18 Hansard 7-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
19 Convention)
20 QUOTE Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-
21 I do not think the word quarantine, for instance, which is used in the sub-section of the 52nd clause, is
22 intended to give the Commonwealth power to legislate with regard to any quarantine. That simply applies to
23 quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind.
24 END QUOTE
25
26 They also stated:
27
28 Hansard 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
29 QUOTE
30 Mr. BARTON.-I was going to explain when I was interrupted that the moment the Commonwealth
31 legislates on this subject the power will become exclusive.
32 END QUOTE
33
34 Hansard 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
35 QUOTE
36 Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-If this is left as an exclusive power the laws of the states will
37 nevertheless remain in force under clause 100.

38 Mr. TRENWITH.-Would the states still proceed to make laws?

39 Mr. BARTON.-Not after this power of legislation comes into force. Their existing laws will, however,
40 remain. If this is exclusive they can make no new laws, but the necessity of making these new laws will be
41 all the more forced on the Commonwealth.
42 END QUOTE
43
44 Hansard 7-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
45 QUOTE
46 My only desire is to give power to the Federal Parliament to achieve a scheme for old-age
47 pensions if it be practicable, and if the people require it. No power would be taken away
48 from the states. The sub-section would not interfere with the right of any state to act in
49 the meantime until the Federal Parliament took the matter in hand.
50 END QUOTE
51
52 By this, once the Commonwealth commenced to legislate Quarantine Act 1908 (Cth) the
53 States/Territories had to retire from this field. The concurrent legislative powers was no
54 more. An example is where the High Court of Australia held that when the Commonwealth
55 commenced to legislate as to Income Tax the States no longer could do so.
19-4-2022 Page 2 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 3

1
2 The Commonwealth subsequently legislated for the Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth) and by this
3 provided a regime how to deal with “man-kind” (infectious) disease issues. While the States
4 had continued since 1908 to deal with “man-kind” “infectious” diseases it was actually
5 unconstitutional.
6
7 QUOTE
8 Common expressions such as: 'The Courts have declared a statute invalid'," says Chief
9 Justice Latham, "sometimes lead to misunderstanding. A pretended law made in excess of
10 power is not and never has been a law at all. Anybody in the country is entitled to
11 disregard it. Naturally, he will feel safer if he has a decision of a court in his favor, but
12 such a decision is not an element, which produces invalidity in any law. The law is not
13 valid until a court pronounces against it - and thereafter invalid. If it is beyond power it is
14 invalid ab initio.
15 END QUOTE
16
17 Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally; Re Wakim; Ex parte Darvall; Re Brown; Ex parte Amann; Spi [1999] HCA
18 27 (17 June 1999)
19 QUOTE
20 For constitutional purposes, they are a nullity. No doctrine of res judicata or issue
21 estoppel can prevail against the Constitution. Mr Gould is entitled to disregard the
22 orders made in Gould v Brown. No doubt, as Latham CJ said of invalid legislation, "he
23 will feel safer if he has a decision of a court in his favour". That is because those relying
24 on the earlier decision may seek to enforce it against Mr Gould.
25 END QUOTE
26
27 I have on 6 August 2021 filed a complaint with the Australian Federal Police
28
29 Scott Morrison requested the Australian Federal Police to investigate regarding
30 COVID issues, and well, let the AFP do its job and do a proper investigation as I now
31 have requested in this COMPLAINT.
32
33 This document can be downloaded from:
34 https://www.scribd.com/document/518990686/20210806-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
35 B-to-Reece-Kershaw-Chief-Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-
36 COMPLAINT-2
37
38 since then I added 63 supplements, which also extensively deals with the Commonwealth
39 failing to have any legislative powers to compel anyone to be jabbed unless it applies to the
40 Court of competent jurisdiction regarding a person to be ordered to be jabbed on medical
41 advice due to being assessed in a medical manner to be suffering of a “man -kind” infectious
42 disease and needs for this to be placed in quarantine, etc. The Commonwealth cannot use
43 some backdoor manner to fund the states/territories to mandate jabbing because as set out
44 above the states no longer had concurrent legislative powers and by this lack legislative,
45 executive and administrative powers to compel anyone to be jabbed (injected) regarding an
46 “infectious” ”man-kind” disease.
47 Hence despite s51(xxiiia) that provides for the Commonwealth to fund medical services, it
48 lacks this power to circumvent the embedded legal provisions of the Commonwealth of
49 Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) and hence all and any such funding was
50 unconstitutional
51
52 Moreover,
19-4-2022 Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 4

1 Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

2 QUOTE
3 Mr. ISAACS.-I should hope that the expenditure caused by a bush fire would not be part of an
4 annual service.

5 Mr. MCMILLAN.-Would it not into the Appropriation Bill?

6 Mr. ISAACS.-Yes; but not as an annual service.

7 Mr. MCMILLAN.-The annual services of the Government are those which we distinguish from
8 special grants and from loan services. The difficulty is that we have got rid of the phraseology to which
9 we are accustomed, and instead of the words Appropriation Bill, we are using the word law.

10 Mr. ISAACS.-A difficulty arises in connexion with the honorable members proposal to place
11 expenditure incurred for bush fires in the ordinary, it would not be annual, and it would not be a
12 service.
13 END QUOTE
14
15 Meaning that any purchase by the Commonwealth of any vials from any pharmaceutical
16 company not being ordinary yearly expenditure had to be first approve by the Federal
17 Parliament. This I understand never eventuated.
18
19 Also, as the TGA only provided “provisional approval” for “clinical trials” and this clearly
20 excludes any commercial purchased vial then all any such usage of the vials would also
21 have been unconstitutional/unlawful. As the vials contain biological weapon items then also
22 for this the distribution of the vials to unauthorized person who were doing the jabbing also
23 was unlawful.
24
25 There is a lot more to it and the ongoing additions to my 6 August 2021 complaint may be
26 checked for those set outs.
27
28 For the record the AEC (Commonwealth) charged me for FAILING TO VOTE in the 2001
29 federal election and also for FAILING TO VOTE in the 2004 federal election. Represen ting
30 myself throughout the 5 years of litigation I comprehensively defeated the commonwealth
31 and all 9 Attorney-Generals (they had been served with a NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL
32 MATTER) on 19 July 2006. At times I do vote but when I view there is a candidate
33 standing I desire to vote for, and otherwise I do not vote. That is my constitutional right and
34 the Court upheld this.
35
36 Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
37 Australasian Convention)
38 QUOTE
39 Mr. GORDON.-Well, I think not. I am sure that if the honorable member applies his mind to the subject he
40 will see it is not abstruse. If a statute of either the Federal or the states Parliament be taken into court
41 the court is bound to give an interpretation according to the strict hyper-refinements of the law. It may
42 be a good law passed by "the sovereign will of the people," although that latter phrase is a common one
43 which I do not care much about. The court may say-"It is a good law, but as it technically infringes on the
44 Constitution we will have to wipe it out." As I have said, the proposal I support retains some remnant of
45 parliamentary sovereignty, leaving it to the will of Parliament on either side to attack each other's laws.
46 END QUOTE
47
48 Hansard 9-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
49 Australasian Convention)
50 QUOTE
51 Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-The position of my honorable and learned friend (Mr. [start page 2092] Higgins)
52 may be perfectly correct. It may be that without any special provision the practice of the High Court, when
53 declaring an Act ultra vires, would be that such a declaration applied only to the part which trespassed
19-4-2022 Page 4 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 5

1 beyond the limits of the Constitution. If that were so, it would be a general principle applicable to the
2 interpretation of the whole of the Constitution.
3 END QUOTE
4 .
5 Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
6 QUOTE
7 Mr. GLYNN.-I think they would, because it is fixed in the Constitution. There is no special court, but the
8 general courts would undoubtedly protect the states. What Mr. Isaacs seeks to do is to prevent the question of
9 ultra vires arising after a law has been passed.
10 [start page 2004]
11 Mr. ISAACS.-No. If it is ultra vires of the Constitution it would, of course, be invalid.
12 END QUOTE
13
14 It ought to be clear that any State/Territory mandates regarding COVID-19 (being a claimed
15 “man-kind” infectious disease is ultra vires.
16 I could expand upon it all but as I indicated I filed so far 2501 pages complaint!
17
18 While the Australian Federal Police has yet to response to any of it, in the end if and when
19 comes to litigation then it all can be used as evidence. I used this so to say tactic in past
20 litigation. Then when an opponent lawyers sought an adjournment to respond I successfully
21 opposed it as they had sufficient time to have appropriately dealt with it.
22
23 I did write to Think Hearing (Heidelberg) in the past, albeit in a limited manner, but to no
24 avail.
25 As the Commonwealth lacks legislative, executive and administrative powers to compel
26 anyone to be jabbed (so called vaccinated) in regard of any “man-kind” infectious disease
27 unless a court of competent jurisdiction has heard both parties and handed down a judgment
28 to authorize a certain persons to be jabbed, the Commonwealth is prohibited from jabbing
29 anyone, in particular using a bioweapon/poison, and neither can fund the States/Territories
30 to do so.
31
32 https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-04-17-science-breathing-fights-respiratory-viruses-
33 masks-block.html
34 New science proves that merely BREATHING fights off respiratory viruses – now we
35 know why they push masks
36
37 https://naturalnews.com/2021-12-13-studies-prove-lockdowns-mask-mandates-harmful-
38 health.html
39 More than 400 studies prove that lockdowns, mask mandates are harmful to human health
40
41 https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/lancet-article-demolishes-vaccination?s=r
42 Lancet Letter Demolishes Vaccination
43 Says vaccination does not even slow down the pandemic
44
45 https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/aids-like-chronic-covid-is-taking?s=r
46 AIDS-Like "Chronic Covid" is Taking Over Europe, Australia and NZ
47 The Boosted Cannot Clear Covid Easily and Keep Getting Reinfected
48
49 https://www.theepochtimes.com/fda-and-pfizer-knew-covid-shot-caused-
50 immunosuppression_4404366.html?utm_source=healthnoe&utm_campaign=health-2022-04-
51 16&utm_medium=email&est=avYgmPdhnQ88aKNHgPkApiL7tsqYpG5s9GZ%2Bsa3ka05T
52 MYpMNOLcza6K8S4%2Fh8OECG8LpQfV2neR
53 FDA and Pfizer Knew COVID Shot Caused Immunosuppression
54 QUOTE
19-4-2022 Page 5 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 6

1 And, finally, there is a comparison of the death rates, based on pages 44 and 45 of the
2 UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report for week 13, 2022.[12] Anyone over the age of 40
3 who has been double jabbed is now more likely to die of COVID than an unvaccinated
4 person of the same age.

5
6 Negative Vaccine Effectiveness in the Real World
7 The Daily Expose goes on to calculate and graph the real-world effectiveness rate of the
8 COVID jab, and it’s dire news:[13]
9 “If the rates per 100,000 are higher among the vaccinated, which they are, then this
10 means the COVID-19 injections are proving to have a negative effectiveness in the
11 real-world. And by using Pfizer’s vaccine effectiveness formula we can accurately
12 decipher what the real-world effectiveness among each age group actually is.
13 END QUOTE
14
15 In my view I am wrongly discrimi9nated against, not because of being in ill health or suffer
16 any infectious disease that unduly would place others at risk but to the contrary that because
17 I desire to maintain my health and immune system in a natural manner I have been denied
18 the services I was entitled upon and this continue to this date as such. Hence I view this
19 matter needs to be addressed as a matter of urgency, this as for example Olga my wife (89)
20 on eastern Sunday 17 April 2022 nearly bled to death, as she called out to me and without
21 proper functioning hearing aids this is a problem. I when hearing her call immediately
22 attended to her, and the bathroom was covered in blood due to a vein had burst in her leg.
23 She had a considerable blood loss and at one stage seemed to have passed away, but I was
24 finally getting her to respond. In such situation every part of a second counts and I simply
25 cannot have this nonsense about some state mandates that I view are a violation of the
26 hearing services to be provided. Appropriate action needs to be taken against Think
27 Hearing! (See also my correspondence to them, on their records.)
28
29 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal
30 constitution!
31
32 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
33 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

34 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

35 (Our name is our motto!)
19-4-2022 Page 6 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati