Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UNIT-I Project Management and Selection Criteria
UNIT-I Project Management and Selection Criteria
Projects are bundled together into a program when the benefits of managing the collection
outweigh the benefits of managing them as individual units. A related concept here is project
portfolio management, a method for organizations to manage and evaluate a large number of
projects by grouping them into strategic portfolios. Portfolios are then analyzed for overall
effectiveness, how their estimates compare with actual costs, and whether they align with the
larger, strategic objectives of the organization.
Large: Programs deal with big, overall company goals rather than smaller targets
and deliverables
A program manager’s role is to coordinate all projects within a program to align with the
strategies and long-term objectives of an organization. They oversee programs and assess
deliverables to ensure that every project goal is reached.
Program managers are not to be confused with project managers, who focus on the
individual, short-term deliverables of specific projects.
Clarity: A program aligns multiple projects together towards one shared goal.
This means project managers are clear on their individual deliverables and can
plan their activities according to the program’s strategic objectives.
A 'project' is a set of agreed activities with a definite start, middle and end. Together these
activities produce business products or services in line with an approved business case which
is sponsored by senior managers within the organisation.
'Project management' provides structure and control of the project environment so that the
agreed activities will produce the right products or services to meet the customer’s
expectations.
Projects are temporary structures which must be properly managed and controlled in order to
meet their stated objectives. They are usually delivered in an environment where both
funding and resources are constrained and subject to competition.
Traditionally, a successful project is one that has delivered its products or services according
to the project plan, meeting overall business objectives.
Project success is now seen more and more in terms of delivering projected
business benefits or the capability required for benefits delivery within the business.
Some of the key documents usually associated with a properly managed project are:
The main roles, and their associated responsibilities, in project management are:
project board; comprising representatives from both user and supplier sides -
representatives with authority to make decisions and commit resources; the board is
chaired by the SRO and has overall accountability for project success
senior responsible owner (SRO); chairs the board with overall accountability for the
project; the SRO is the key decision maker responsible for continuation of the
business case, project structures and plans, controlling and monitoring progress,
problem referral and resolution, formal closure and post implementation review
senior user; the board member responsible for providing user resources, ensuring
project products or services meet user expectations and deliver expected benefits
senior supplier; the board member representing the interests of those designing,
developing, facilitating, procuring and implementing. Is also responsible for
the quality of products or services supplied
project manager (PM); responsible for day-to-day project management, the PM has
been given authority by the board to run the project within agreed constraints
project team; responsible for the production of products or services defined by the
project manager within the time, cost and quality constraints set by the board; the
team reports to the project manager
project assurance; owned by the board but often delegated, it must be independent of
the project manager; project assurance provides assurance that the project is being
properly managed and includes frequent checking of the quality of the project’s
products or services
project support; the role can include administrative help for the project manager and
board but may extend to administration of planning, control and configuration
systems. Depending on skills and experience the role may extend to advice, guidance
and limited support on a range of project areas.
Projects are part and parcel of our professional life. In the world of ever-changing technology
and business trends, project management is in great demand. In this Topic, we are going to
learn about the Project management life cycle.
According to PMI, a project is defined as temporary with a definite beginning and end in
time. Also, the project is unique without routine operation and meant to meet the singular
goal with a specific set of operations. PMI further defines project management as the
application of knowledge, skills, tools, and techniques to project activities to meet the project
requirements.
Whether the project is software development, or new product launch, or even a movie, its
management will progress through five life cycle phases.
The project idea is either created or the client approaches the idea. The idea can be the
solution to an existing problem or a new opportunity in business (e.g., new
smartphone model launch)
A business case document is created providing the solution to implement the idea
after the brainstorming sessions consisting of the team, client, and project managers.
Project managers and concerned teams check the feasibility of implementing the
project in terms of profits, cost, timeline, resources, etc.
Once the project has passed this feasibility test, it is proposed for approval from the
leadership team of the company/business unit.
During approval, SOW for the project is signed, and the budget is allocated.
After the successful completion of the above steps, the project is moved to the planning
phase.
2. Planning Phase
This is the second phase of project management. During this phase, a detailed project plan is
created. This plan includes tasks, resources required, timelines, cost, etc. In addition, further
planning for prioritizing requirements is done. Gantt chart, which indicates timelines for the
various task, is one of the important documents created for planning. Different plans that are
created depending on the type of project are:
Post the completion of various plans; risk management is carried out depending on the
criticality of the project. Identifying the potential threats and analyzing the impact of such
threats occur from the part of this sub-phase. A risk management report is prepared with a
plan to mitigate future threats.
3. Execution Phase
Done with the project idea finalization and planning. Now it’s time to set to work. In this
phase, previous planning is put into action. This phase depends highly on planning. Better the
plan better will be the execution. Project managers follow the below steps in this process:
Here the entire team comes to the picture as it starts with actual work (e.g. development of
software, manufacturing). Daily targets are set; the team has to ensure to meet them; in case
of delay, they have to report to project managers.
So above are the project life cycle phases. Although initiating a new project may seem a
gigantic task but by breaking it into phases ensures the achievable target. But these phases
aren’t mutually exclusive; they may overlap in practice. The execution and control phases
that we have seen above occur at the same time. Likewise, the same thing can happen in other
phases too.
Project selection is the process of evaluating and choosing projects that both align with an
organization’s objectives and maximize its performance.
Prioritization refers to ranking or scoring projects, based on certain criteria, to determine the
order of execution. However, the terms “prioritization” and “selection” are often used
interchangeably, as the two processes are intertwined.
Selection and prioritization are important elements of project portfolio management (PPM),
an approach that connects the execution of projects with high-level business strategy. As per
the 2017 PMI report, 37% of project failures are attributed to a lack of clearly defined
objectives and discipline when implementing strategy. This demonstrates how crucial the
PPM function is.
Project selection and prioritization are all about having a game plan that accounts for both
capacity and strategy. Let’s take a look at the benefits that companies stand to gain when
these are balanced right.
Better ROI: The fundamental outcome of any project selection process is to increase the
ROI. Several selection criteria and prioritization methods, discussed later in the article, can be
used to weigh projects against each other, based on their returns.
Increased efficiencies: By investing effort upfront to evaluate the project pool, companies
weed out inefficiencies that may creep up later due to not having enough capacity for
execution.
Strategic alignment: A project that does not cater to organizational goals, even if executed
flawlessly, is a waste of time. The right selection helps companies stay on track with their
goals.
Consistency and transparency: A standard selection approach helps the PMO benchmark
projects against well-defined criteria rather than use ad-hoc processes that lead to inconsistent
approvals. The upside of this consistent approach is transparent downstream communication,
as project managers get clarity on why a certain project was approved or rejected.
Successful project delivery: When organizations have good project selection and
prioritization processes in place, it leads to the successful delivery of projects.
Ideally, deciding whether to go ahead with a project or not should be straightforward. But, in
reality, it’s not. The difficulty often lies in leaving projects off the table, and it takes strong
leaders with a clear vision to do that.
For example, if there are two projects—one that extends capacity or flexibility of a plant, and
another that improves efficiency and expected lifespan of that facility—which one do you
select?
The answer is not simple. It depends on which promises better ROI, the long-term goals for
the organization, etc. If there is an aim to expand the plant,, the former is a sensible option.
However, if the goal is to cut costs and increase longevity, the latter option may be preferred.
Project prioritization is easier to manage with a small list of say, five projects. However, as
this number grows significantly, the complexity can be difficult to handle, requiring more
concrete methods.
1. Ranking Method
The ranking method is a simple approach that arranges the projects on a scale of, say, one to
ten, based on their importance. Before assigning the rank, it’s important to ask the right
questions.
The advantage of this method is its quick approach that enables identification of top
priorities. It works effectively when there are limited criteria to evaluate and it’s easy to
assess the factors involved.
However, since it considers only one or two selection criteria, it could work out to be too
simplistic for complex project evaluations. In such cases, the scoring model may be a better
fit.
2. Scoring Model
The scoring model works when there are many selection criteria to consider and projects
being compared are significantly different, making the process harder. Rather than selecting
one or two criteria as in the ranking method, the scoring model considers one or two groups
of factors, such as strategic alignment, benefits, ROI, risk, etc.
In addition to assigning a rating to each criterion, every group is given a weight. For example,
benefits may have a factor of 1.5, whereas risk may have 0.75. The weighted average score is
then computed to arrive at the final project score.
The challenge with the scoring model is that its attempt to accommodate a long catalog of
criteria not only makes it more work for the PMO team, but it can also blur scoring. Along
with that, the chance of biases and guesswork in the rating and weight criteria assignments
makes it debatable whether the final score aptly reflects the project’s priority. One way to
design the model is to test against existing projects and see how accurate the score is.
Usually, the PMO tends to take a middle ground by applying the scoring model on a shorter
list of weighted criteria.
AHP combines subjective elements with mathematical models to provide a more holistic
technique than the ranking or scoring methods. Used commonly in many decision-making
scenarios, it lends particularly well to complex project evaluations.
Similar to the scoring model, AHP works with a long list of selection criteria. However, it
does a pairwise comparison, pitting every two criteria against each other, which reduces the
possibility of errors and biases. After this apples-to-apples type of comparison, values are
normalized, and the weighted score is computed. (For more details on this approach, review
this detailed example from PMI).
AHP is definitely a more mature and recommended approach for complex decisions than the
other two methods—it aims to understand the relative importance between two criteria rather
than rank everything in absolute terms.
There is the possibility of guesswork in this technique, though. Factoring in multiple expert
opinions and testing against existing projects for accuracy helps improve the model.
Project prioritization is usually perceived as an initial step, a decision point that leads to the
actual execution of the project. However, many variables may impact the selection criteria as
the project progresses. Project prioritization should instead be an ongoing process where
project scores are reviewed and updated during project development and at designated stage
gates. As project definition increases, the scoring becomes more accurate and definite.
Even after a project has begun, a new industry regulation may impact resources, processes,
etc. All dynamic factors need to be continuously monitored by the PMO to re-prioritize as
needed.
Ultimately, the goal is to strike a balance between constant disruption in schedules and
adapting to stay aligned to the business objectives by having PPM tools and processes in
place to manage the project portfolio.
UNIT-II