Facts: 

Petitioner Alice Reyes Van Dorn is a citizen of the Philippines while private
respondent Richard Upton is a citizen of the United States. They were married in
Hongkong in 1972 and established their residence in the Philippines. They begot two
children born on April 4, 1973 and December 18, 1975, respectively. But the parties
were divorced in Nevada, United States, in 1982 and the petitioner had remarried also
in Nevada, this time to Theodore Van Dorn.

On July 8, 1983, Richard Upton filed a suit against petitioner, asking that Alice Van
Dorn be ordered to render an accounting of her business in Ermita, Manila and be
declared with right to manage the conjugal property.

Issue:
Whether or not the foreign divorce between the petitioner and private respondent in
Nevada is binding in the Philippines where petitioner is a Filipino citizen.

Held:
As to Richard Upton, the divorce is binding on him as an American Citizen. Owing to
the nationality principle embodied in Article 15 of the Civil Code, only Philippine
nationals are covered by the policy against absolute divorces the same being
considered contrary to our concept of public policy and morality. However, aliens
may obtain divorces abroad, which may be recognized in the Philippines, provided
they are valid according to their national law. The divorce is likewise valid as to the
petitioner.

As such, pursuant to his national law, private respondent Richard Upton is no longer
the husband of petitioner. He would have no standing to sue Alice Van Dorn to
exercise control over conjugal assets. He was bound by the Decision of his own
country’s Court, which validly exercised jurisdiction over him, and whose decision he
did not repudiate, he is estopped by his own representation before said Court from
asserting his right over the alleged conjugal property.