Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 07 Hydraulics
Chapter 07 Hydraulics
INTRODUCTION
The application of hydraulics in rotary drilling is simultaneously simple in concept and difficult to
achieve on the rig. Simplicity results from the purity of the mathematics involved in the study of
hydraulics.
Few components of the overall drilling system offer the possibility of concise, arithmetic
conclusions. Analysis of the various parts of a hydraulics program, however, can lead drilling
engineers to clear conclusions.
Unfortunately, things clear to engineers are not always clear to other drilling personnel.
Consequently, most rigs drill with mediocre bit cleaning (hydraulics). Rig supervisors often are
reluctant to participate in or even accept the thesis that improved hydraulics will always result in
an increase in drilling efficiency.
CLASSIC HYDRAULICS
Various approaches to hydraulics have been developed since early work done circa 1948. To
include a summary of the principal, workable methods would be overly burdensome and
potentially confusing. A simple and practical method exists which is termed "classical" by some
in drilling. Commonly, bit hydraulic horsepower is optimized, or rather maximized, in order to
improve bit cleaning. Hydraulic horsepower can be computed by the following equation:
PQ
Hp = Equation 7-1
1714
Pbit Q
Hp bit = Equation 7-2
1714
In virtually all drilling situations, pump pressure or standpipe pressure is limited by either
equipment design or arbitrarily limited by someone on the rig. In either case, the following
procedure has been used to maximize Hpbit :
2. Differentiate the equation with respect to independent variables and set the first
differential equal to zero.
Example 7-1
Given: Equations 7-1 and 7-2.
Pc = KQ s Equation 7-4
Also:
⎛ 1 ⎞
Pc hp = ⎜ ⎟Ps max Equation 7-13
⎝ s + 1⎠
Therefore, a maximum value of hydraulic horsepower at the bit develops when Pc hp is a defined
fraction of Ps max , so long as Ps max is also at the maximum selected pressure. If the common
value of s = 1.86 is used, then Hp bit is maximum when:
It is then clear that the only way to increase Hpbit in any fixed situation is to increase the
maximum allowable standpipe pressure, Ps max . It is also clear that any arbitrary decisions to
limit pump pressure is also a decision to limit hydraulic horsepower at the bit (bit cleaning) and
is also a decision to reduce drilling rate. Credit for such a decision should certainly be borne by
the individual responsible for making it.
Hydraulic impact force at the bit can be maximized to promote bit cleaning as a reasonable
alternative to maximizing Hp bit . The procedure used in Example 7-2 in maximizing impact force
is similar to that used in Example 7-1. Equation 7-16 is used to define impact force.
ρ mVn Q
IF = Equation 7-16
1932
Example 7-2
Given: Equation 7-16 and the data in Example 7-1.
Solution: Step 1. Equation 7-17 can be used to calculate the pressure drop across
the bit nozzles.
ρ mVn2
Pbit = Equation 7-17
1120
ρ mVn2
= Ps max − KQ s Equation 7-18
1120
1
⎡ ⎤ 2
⎢P (
Vn = ⎢ s max
− KQ s )⎥
⎥ Equation 7-19
⎢ ρm ⎥
⎣ 1120 ⎦
1/ 2
⎡ ⎤
IF = ⎢
(
ρ mQ ⎢ Ps max − KQ s )⎥
⎥ Equation 7-20
1932 ⎢ ρm ⎥
⎣ 1120 ⎦
Simplifying:
[
IF = APs maxQ 2 − AKQ s + 2 ]
1/ 2
Equation 7-21
ρm
A=
3333
[
d (IF ) d APs maxQ 2 − AKQ s + 2
=
]
1/ 2
dQ dQ
0=
1
2
[APs maxQ 2 − AKQ s + 2 ] [2AP
−1 / 2
s maxQ − (s + 2)AKQ s +1 ]
0 = 2 APs maxQ − A(s + 2)KQ s +1
Step 3.
⎛ 2 ⎞
Pc if = ⎜ ⎟Ps max Equation 7-22
⎝s + 2⎠
Similar to bit horsepower, the maximum impact force possible is seen to be dependent upon the
maximum standpipe pressure used. Figure 7-1 shows a plot of horsepower and impact force
versus flow rate. At some flow rate, the horsepower and impact force are a maximum. The
maximum surface pressure in Figure 7-1 is 3000 psi. Note that the maximum impact force will
always be at a higher flow rate than the maximum horsepower.
1400
1200
IMPACT FORCE
1000
800
Hp or IF
600
400
HORSEPOWER
200
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Flow Rate, Q
Example 7-3 illustrates methods for hydraulics planning and compares the results for two values
of allowable standpipe pressures. In the planning phase, pressure losses are calculated at
various depths and nozzle sizes are determined for various depth ranges.
Example 7-3
Given: Hole size is 8½"
Table 7-1. Liner Ratings and Output Volumes for an F-800 Pump
Determine: Nozzle sizes to be used at 9000, 12,000 and 15,000 feet using two cases.
Solution: Case 1 : In Case 1 the maximum surface pressure will be 2500 psi.
The liner with a 2500 psi rating is 6 inches. The maximum flow rate is
calculated as follows:
First, calculate the pressure losses in the circulating system using the
equations given in Chapter 6: "Pressure Losses in the Circulating
System." Since this is for planning purposes, the pressure losses in the
surface connections will be ignored. Calculate the pressure losses in the
drill pipe. The length of drill pipe at a total depth of 9000 feet will be 8400
feet, which is the total depth less the length of the drill collars. Assume a
flow rate of 200 gpm. Note: any arbitrary flow rate can be used.
Pdp =
( )
7.68 × 10 −5 ρ m
0.81
Q 1.81PV 0.19 l
D 4.83
Pdp =
( )
7.68 × 10 −5 (16 )
0.81
(200 )1.81 (25 )0.19 (8,400 ) = 252 psi
(3.826 )4.83
Calculate the pressure losses in the drill collars:
Pdc =
( )
7.68 × 10 −5 ρm 0.81Q1.81PV 0.19l
D 4.83
Pdc =
(
7.68 × 10 −5 (16 ) ) (200 )1.81 (25 )0.19 (600 ) = 233 psi
0.81
(2.25)4.83
Calculate the pressure losses in the drill collar annulus. The rheology
constants ‘n’ and ‘k’ must be calculated first.
⎛ 2PV + Yp ⎞
n = 3.32 log⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
⎝ PV + Yp ⎠
⎡ (2)(25) + 12 ⎤
n = 3.32 log⎢ ⎥ = 0.7743
⎣ 25 + 12 ⎦
PV + Yp
k=
511n
25 + 12
k = = 0.3567
5110.7743
24.5Q
v =
(D 2
h − D p2 )
(24.5)(200 )
v =
(8.5 2
− 6.5 2 ) = 163 fpm
Calculate pressure losses in the drill collar annulus.
n
⎡⎛ 2.4v ⎞ ⎛ 2n + 1 ⎞⎤ kl
= ⎢⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎥
⎟ ⎝ 3n ⎟⎠⎥ 300 (Dh − D p )
Pdca
⎜D D
⎣⎢⎝ h − p ⎠ ⎦
0.7743
⎧⎡ (2.4)(163 ) ⎤ ⎡ (2)(0.7743 ) + 1⎤ ⎫ ⎡ (0.3567 )(600) ⎤
Pdca = ⎨⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎬ ⎢ ⎥ = 20 psi
⎩⎣ 8.5 − 6.5 ⎦ ⎣ (3)(0.7743 ) ⎦ ⎭ ⎣ 300(8.5 − 6.5 ) ⎦
(24.5)(200 )
v =
(8.5 2
− 4.5 2 ) = 94 fpm
0.7743
⎧⎡ (2.4)(94 ) ⎤ ⎡ (2)(0.7743 ) + 1⎤ ⎫ ⎡ (0.3567 )(8,400 ) ⎤
Pdpa = ⎨⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎬ ⎢ 300(8.5 − 4.5 ) ⎥ = 55 psi
⎩⎣ 8.5 − 4.5 ⎦ ⎣ (3)(0.7743 ) ⎦ ⎭ ⎣ ⎦
Calculate the pressure losses in the circulating system (everything but the
bit).
The same calculations are made at one other flow rate. In this case, an
arbitrary flow rate of 500 gpm was selected. Any reasonable flow rate will
suffice. Table 7-2 shows the calculated results at 9000 feet.
The same calculations are made at 12,000 and 15,000 feet. The results
of those calculations are presented in Table 7-3 and Table 7-4.
Pc hp = 0.35Ps max
The same calculations are made where impact force is maximized using
Equation 7-23 and Equation 7-24.
Pc if = 0.52Ps max
For the horsepower method, the pressure losses in the circulating system
where the horsepower at the bit is maximized (Pc hp) will be 875 psi. For
the impact force method, the pressure losses in the circulating system
(Pc if) will be 1300 psi. Figure 7-2 can be plotted with the previously
determined data. It is a plot of flow rate versus pressure losses in the
circulating system. The pressure losses in the circulating system include
all pressure losses except pressure drop across the bit. The graph is
used to determine the flow rate at, which Pc is equivalent to 875 and
1300 psi. In the graph, plot the pressure losses at 9000, 12,000 and
15,000 feet from Table 7-2 through Table 7-4. Plot the pressure losses in
the circulating system where horsepower and impact force will be
maximized. In addition, the maximum flow rate can be placed on the
graph. The point where the Pc hp and the Pc if lines for horsepower and
impact force crosses the Pc line for each depth is the desired flow rate.
The desired flow rates can also be determined mathematically. The slope
of the Pc line can be determined from the information in Table 7-2.
log(Pc 2 ) − log(Pc1 )
s= Equation 7-25
log(Q2 ) − log(Q1 )
log(2,734 ) − log(560 )
s= = 1.7304
log(500 ) − log(200 )
The slope can also be determined by measuring the rise and run on the
graph in Figure 7-2.
10000
15,000'
12,000'
294 9,000'
270 325
Circulating Pressure Loss, psi
Pc Max IF = 1300
214 259
234
Q Max = 363
100
100 1000
Flow Rate, Q
Figure 7-2. Plot of Flow Rate versus Circulating Pressure Loss for Case 1
For the horsepower method, the flow rate where Pc hp is equal to 875 psi
can be calculated.
log(875 ) − log(560 )
1.7304 =
log(Q2 ) − log(200 )
Q2 = 259 gpm
This can be done for each depth using both methods: impact force and
horsepower. Table 7-5 and Table 7-6 show the results for Case 1.
The nozzle sizes are calculated based on (Pbit) and the flow rate as
follows using the equation from Chapter 6: Pressure Losses in the
Circulating System:
Pbit hp =
(
9.14 10 −5 ρ m Q 2 )
An2
1625 =
(
9.14 10 −5 (16)(259)2 )
An2
An = 0.2457in2
Nozzle diameters are available in 32nd's of an inch and most roller cone
bits are run with three nozzles. PDC bits may have six to eight nozzles.
Equation 7-26 can be used to calculate the average nozzle diameters
with any number of nozzles.
1304 An
Sn = Equation 7-26
Nn
Sn =
(1304 )(0.2457 ) = 10.33
3
The pressure losses in the system would remain the same, so Table 7-2
through Table 7-4 are applicable for Case 2 also. However, Pc for both
methods will be different because they are a function of the maximum
allowable surface pressure.
Pc if = (0.52)(3590 ) = 1867psi
Figure 7-3 is a graphical plot of the data for Case 2. Table 7-7 and Table
7-9 show the results of the analysis.
The jet sizes are calculated the same way as in Case 1. Note in Figure
7-3 that the circulation rate at 9000 and 12,000 feet exceed the maximum
flow rate with 5 inch liners. Therefore, Table 7-9 shows the maximum
flow rate of 343 gpm at these depths.
Comparison of the results computed for Case 1 and Case 2, leads to several noteworthy
conclusions for the 5" liner situation:
1. Case 2 results in a bit horsepower gain from 3.58 Hp/in2 to 6.34 Hp/in.2 at 15,000
feet. This represents an increase of 77%.
2. Case 2 requires a total output of only 555 HP at 15,000 feet. (P=3590 psi, Q=265
GPM) for maximized Hpbit . This would require only 77% of rated input power or 617
HP at 90% mechanical efficiency.
4. Any gains seen in Case 2 are realized without exceeding design limits of the rig's
pumps. If the contractor pays for a stated capacity and the operator contracts for a
stated capacity, how can either reasonably justify using less? Remember, 77% of
rated capacity is all that is needed to gain a significant level of bit hydraulic
horsepower in this example.
10000
15,000'
362
12,000'
333 401
9,000'
Pc Max IF = 1867
Circulating Pressure Loss, psi
Pc Max Hp = 1256
1000
264 319
288
Q Max = 343
100
100 1000
Flow Rate, Q
Figure 7-3. Plot of Flow Rate versus Circulating Pressure Loss for Case 2
1. On a log Q versus log Pc plot, mark equipment limitations, i.e., maximum volumes for
liners selected. If used, an arbitrarily selected maximum standpipe pressure should
also be shown.
2. Predict pressure/volume behavior at various depths of interest. The depths used can
be arbitrarily selected or selected based on anticipated trips from the bit program.
3. Mark lines representing the desired system pressure loss (Pc), which is dependent
upon the hydraulic design criterion (maximized Hpbit or maximized IF).
4. From the intercepts of desired Pc and Pc 's predicted, determine flow rates, Q, to be
used at various depths.
5. The difference between the selected maximum pressure, Ps, and the desired
circulating pressure, Pc, is the bit nozzle pressure loss, Pbit, to be used at a specific
depth and circulating rate. Select nozzles that most nearly provide the Pbit needed at
the Q selected for each bit run.
Hydraulic slide rules or charts provided by bit manufacturers have simplified hydraulics
planning. Approximately one hour of engineering time would be required to plan hydraulics for a
typical 15,000 foot well with the use of charts or hydraulic slide rules. Hand-held calculators and
computers can reduce the planning time to approximately 15 minutes for a typical 15,000 ft.
well. Further, the use of well written programs with such calculators places the power for good
planning in the hands of rig personnel. The industry no longer must tolerate mediocre
hydraulics in drilling operations.
Classical hydraulics will remain useful to the overall drilling operations. Such utility will be
indispensable in the planning phase of drilling, as well as in lending conceptual clarity to the
methods of increasing bit cleaning. Once drilling operations have commenced, however,
additional work can fine-tune the hydraulics plan.
Earlier, it was shown that the frictional pressure losses in a system are functions of flow rates,
rheological values, hole and pipe diameters, lengths of pipes and mud densities. If, however,
the flow rate, Q , is considered to be the only variable which can be changed rapidly and at will,
then the system pressure loss is frequently written as Equation 7-4.
Pc = KQ s
Equation 7-4 was used in the derivation of Pc versus Ps ratios for maximum Hpbit and for
maximum IF . If Equation 7-4 is written in logarithmic form, then Equation 7-27 results:
Historically, the value of s has been taken to be 1.86. This value may have been statistically
correct over many situations when it was given to the industry decades ago; however, the use of
s = 1.86 often results in errors that can be avoided if s can be determined correctly. That the
value of s is easy to determine on the rig is shown in Example 7-4.
Example 7-4 also demonstrates a method of improving hydraulics performance on the rig as a
result of improved knowledge of the flow characteristics of a specific rig at a certain time.
Example 7-4
Given: The rig is drilling at 8430 feet and is preparing to trip for bit. The following
information is given:
The following standpipe pressure (Ps) versus flow rate (Q) data is also
given:
Table 7-10. Pressure and Flow Rate Data for Example 7-4
Q Ps
(gpm) (psi)
487 1800
255 650
Determine: The flow rate, nozzle sizes and pressures for the next bit run.
Solution: First determine the bit nozzle pressure losses from the given data.
π ⎡⎛ S1 ⎞ ⎛S ⎞ ⎤
2 2 2 2 2 2
⎛S ⎞ ⎛S ⎞ ⎛S ⎞ ⎛S ⎞
An = ⎢⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ + ⎜⎜ 2 ⎟⎟ + ⎜⎜ 3 ⎟⎟ + ⎜⎜ 4 ⎟⎟ + ⎜⎜ 5 ⎟⎟ + ⎜⎜ 6 ⎟⎟ ⎥ Equation 7-28
4 ⎢⎝ 32 ⎠ ⎝ 32 ⎠ ⎝ 32 ⎠ ⎝ 32 ⎠ ⎝ 32 ⎠ ⎝ 32 ⎠ ⎥⎦
⎣
π ⎡⎛ 14 ⎞
2 2 2 2 2 2⎤
⎛ 14 ⎞ ⎛ 14 ⎞ ⎛ 14 ⎞ ⎛ 14 ⎞ ⎛ 14 ⎞
An = ⎢⎜ ⎟ + ⎜ ⎟ + ⎜ ⎟ + ⎜ ⎟ + ⎜ ⎟ + ⎜ ⎟ ⎥ = 0.9020 in 2
4 ⎢⎝ 32 ⎠ ⎝ 32 ⎠ ⎝ 32 ⎠ ⎝ 32 ⎠ ⎝ 32 ⎠ ⎝ 32 ⎠ ⎥⎦
⎣
Calculate the pressure drop across the bit nozzles at the two flow rates
given in Table 7-10.
Pbit =
( )
9.14 10 −5 ρ m Q 2
An2
Pbit =
( )
9.14 10 −5 (12)(487 )
2
= 320 psi
(0.9020 )2
Pbit =
( )
9.14 10 −5 (12)(255 )
2
= 88 psi
(0.9020 )2
The pressure losses in the circulating system, Pc, can be calculated as
shown in Table 7-11, where Ps – Pbit = Pc
Q Ps - Pbit = PC
Next, the slope of the circulating pressure (Pc) versus flow rate (Q) line
must be determined.
log(Pc 2 ) − log(Pc1 )
s=
log(Q2 ) − log(Q1 )
log(1480 ) − log(562 )
s= = 1.50
log(487 ) − log(255 )
⎛ 1 ⎞
Pc hp = ⎜ ⎟Ps max
⎝ s + 1⎠
⎛ 1 ⎞
Pc hp = ⎜ ⎟(3200 ) = 1280 psi
⎝ 1.50 + 1 ⎠
Pbit hp = Ps max − Pc hp
The value of Pc if where the impact force at the bit is a maximum must be
determined from Equation 7-22:
⎛ 2 ⎞
Pc if = ⎜ ⎟Ps max
⎝s + 2⎠
⎛ 2 ⎞
Pc if = ⎜ ⎟(3200 ) = 1829 psi
⎝ 1 . 50 + 2 ⎠
Pbit if = Ps max − Pc if
The data in Table 7-11 and the above calculations can be used to
construct Figure 7-4. This figure can be used to determine the flow rate
where horsepower or impact force will be a maximum. For the
horsepower method, the calculated circulating pressure (Pc hp) of 1280 psi
crosses the circulating pressure line at 441 gpm. For the impact force
method, the calculated circulating pressure (Pc if) of 1829 psi crosses the
circulating pressure line at 560 gpm.
10000
P c for IF = 1829
P c for Hp = 1280
1000
100 441 560 1000
Fow Rate (Q ), gpm
Figure 7-4. Plot of Flow Rate versus Circulating Pressure Loss for Example 7-4
Alternatively, the flow rates can be calculated based on the slope of the
Pc versus Q line and the desired circulating pressure losses. Making the
calculations for the horsepower method:
log(Pc 2 ) − log(Pc1 )
s=
log(Q2 ) − log(Q1 )
log(1280 ) − log(562 )
1.50 =
log(Q2 ) − log(255 )
⎡ log(1280 )−log(562 ) ⎤
⎢ +log(255 )⎥
Q2 = 10 ⎣ 1.50 ⎦ = 441 gpm
The area of the jet nozzles and the average jet nozzle size can be
calculated.
Pbit hp =
(
9.14 10 −5 ρ m Q 2 )
An2
An =
(
9.14 10 −5 (12 ) 4412 ) (
= 0.3333 in 2
)
1920
1304 An
Sn =
Nn
Sn =
(1304 )(0.3333 ) = 8.51
6
24.5Q
v =
(D 2
h − D p2 )
v =
(24.5)(441)
(9.875 2
− 4.5 2 ) = 140 fpm
The horsepower per square inch at the bit would be:
Pbit Q
Hpbit
= 1714
in 2 π
4
( )
Dh 2
(1920 )(441)
Hpbit 1714
= = 6.45 Hp/in 2
in 2 π
4
(9.875 )
2
Vn =
(0.321)Q
An
Vn =
(0.321)(441) = 425 ft/sec
0.3333
The impact force per square inch of bit diameter can be calculated.
⎛ ρ mVn Q ⎞
⎜ ⎟
IF ⎝ 1932 ⎠
=
in 2 π
4
Dh ( )
2
⎡ (12)(425 )(441) ⎤
IF ⎢ ⎥
= ⎣ 1932 ⎦ = 15.20 lb /in 2
π
( )
2 f
in 9.875 2
4
Ps Q
Hpt =
1714
Hpt =
(3200 )(441) = 823 Hp
1714
log(Pc 2 ) − log(Pc1 )
s=
log(Q2 ) − log(Q1 )
log(1829 ) − log(562 )
1.50 =
log(Q2 ) − log(255 )
⎡ log(1829 )−log(562 ) ⎤
⎢ +log(255 )⎥
Q2 = 10 ⎣ 1.50 ⎦ = 560 gpm
The area of the jet nozzles and the average jet nozzle size can be
calculated.
Pbit if =
(
9.14 10 −5 ρ mQ 2 )
An2
An =
(
9.14 10 −5 (12) 560 2 ) (
= 0.5009 in 2
)
1371
1304 An
Sn =
Nn
Sn =
(1304 )(0.5009 ) = 10.43
6
24.5Q
v =
(D 2
h − D p2 )
v =
(24.5)(560 )
(9.875 2
− 4.5 2 ) = 178 fpm
The horsepower per square inch at the bit would be:
Pbit Q
Hpbit
= 1714
in 2 π
4
Dh 2 ( )
(1371)(560 )
Hpbit 1714
= = 5.85 Hp/in 2
in 2 π
4
(9.875 ) 2
Vn =
(0.321)Q
An
Vn =
(0.321)(560 ) = 359 ft/sec
0.5009
The impact force per square inch of bit diameter can be calculated.
⎛ ρ mVn Q ⎞
⎜ ⎟
IF ⎝ 1932 ⎠
=
in 2 π
4
Dh
2
( )
⎡ (12)(359 )(560 ) ⎤
IF ⎢ ⎥
⎣ 1932 ⎦
= = 16.30 lb f /in 2
in 2 π
4
(9.875 ) 2
Ps Q
Hpt =
1714
Hpt =
(3200 )(560 ) = 1046 Hp
1714
Table 7-12 shows the results of maximizing the hydraulics on the drilling
rig.
Before Trip 487 1480 320 1800 173 14-14-14- 1.19 173 6.84 511
14-14-14
Max. Hp 441 1280 1920 3200 140 8-8-8-9- 6.45 425 15.20 823
9-9
Max. IF 560 1829 1371 3200 178 10-10-10- 5.85 359 16.30 1048
10-11-11
As seen from Example 7-4, improving the hydraulics parameters on the rig results in the
following improvements:
1. Bit hydraulic horsepower per square inch, Hp bit /in2, is increased by 442% (1.19 Hp
to 6.45 Hp).
2. By adjusting for maximum impact force, a gain of 138% is realized (6.84 lbf /in2 to
16.30 lbf /in2).
3. In this example, rig personnel were working their heart out to do a good job, but they
were not getting full benefits of their efforts.
Over the past 60 years, various methods of hydraulics planning and conceptual developments
have been published and discussed. Some of the work has been good; some has been either
incorrect or of little value to the industry. The methods described in this chapter have been
effective under a variety of applications. Properly applied, these procedures are totally
satisfactory for all situations.
PROBLEMS
1. Given the following information, calculate the jet nozzles sizes for both the horsepower
and impact force methods using three nozzles.
2. The rig is preparing to trip for a bit and the standpipe pressure has been measured at
two flow rates. What jet nozzle sizes should the next bit have if the impact force is maximized
using three nozzles?
3. The rig is preparing to trip for a bit and the standpipe pressure has been measured at
two flow rates. What jet nozzle sizes should the next bit have if the impact force is maximized
using three nozzles?
NOMENCLATURE
A = Constant
An = Area of the nozzles, in2
D = Inside diameter of pipe or drill collar, inches
Dh = Diameter of hole, inches
Dp = Outside diameter of pipe or drill collar, inches
Hp = Horsepower, Hp
Hpbit = Horsepower at the bit, Hp
Hpc = Horsepower in circulating system, Hp
Hps = Horsepower at the surface (pump hydraulic horsepower), Hp
Hpt = Total horsepower required at the pump fluid end, Hp
IF = Impact force, lbf
K = Constant
k = Power Law constant, lbf/100ft2
l = Length of pipe or drill collars, feet
n = Power Law constant, normally the slope of shear stress-shear rate diagram
on log-log plot
Nn = Number of nozzles in the bit
P = Pressure, psi
Pbit = Pressure drop at the bit (through jet nozzles), psi
Pbit hp = Pressure drop at the bit when horsepower is maximized, psi
Pbit if = Pressure drop at the bit when the impact force is maximized, psi
Pc = Pressure loss in the circulating system ( Ps − Pbit ), psi
Pc hp = Pressure loss in the circulating system when horsepower is maximized, psi
Pc if = Pressure loss in the circulating system when impact force is maximized, psi
Pc1 = Circulating pressure loss corresponding to flow rate Q1 , psi
Pc 2 = Circulating pressure loss corresponding to flow rate Q2 , psi
Pdc = Pressure loss in the drill collars, psi
Pdca = Pressure loss in the drill collar annulus, psi
Pdp = Pressure loss in the drill pipe, psi
Pdpa = Pressure loss in the drill pipe annulus, psi
Ps = Pressure at the surface (standpipe pressure), psi
Ps max Maximum allowable standpipe pressure, psi
Ps1 = Pressure at the surface (standpipe pressure) corresponding to Q1, psi
Ps 2 Pressure at the surface (standpipe pressure) corresponding to Q2, psi
PV = Plastic viscosity, cp
Q = Flow rate, gpm
Q1 = Flow rate corresponding to circulating pressure loss Pc1 , gpm
Q2 = Flow rate corresponding to circulating pressure loss Pc 2 , gpm
Qmax = Maximum flow rate, gpm
s = Slope of circulating pressure versus flow rate on log-log paper
S1 = Diameter of nozzle 1, 32nd's of an inch
S2 = Diameter of nozzle 2, 32nd's of an inch
S3 = Diameter of nozzle 3, 32nd's of an inch
S4 = Diameter of nozzle 4, 32nd's of an inch
S5 = Diameter of nozzle 5, 32nd's of an inch
S6 = Diameter of nozzle 6, 32nd's of an inch
Sn = Average nozzle size, 32nd's of an inch
v = Average fluid velocity (annular or pipe), fpm
Vn = Nozzle velocity, ft/sec
Yp = Yield point, lbf/100 ft2
ρm = Mud weight, ppg
SI UNITS
PQ
Equation 7-1: Hp = Equation 7-29
60
Pbit Q
Equation 7-2: Hpbit = Equation 7-30
60
ρ mVn Q
Equation 7-16: IF = Equation 7-31
60
ρ mVn2
Equation 7-17: Pbit = Equation 7-32
1810
1.27 An
Equation 7-26: Sn = Equation 7-33
Nn
Equation 7-28: An =
π
4
[(S )
1
2
+ (S 2 )2 + (S3 )2 ] Equation 7-34
A = Constant
An = Area of the nozzles, mm2
D = Inside diameter of pipe or dill collar, mm
Dh = Diameter of hole, mm
Dp = Outside diameter of pipe or drill collar, mm
Hp = Horsepower, kWatts
Hp bit = Horsepower at the bit, kWatts
Hp c = Horsepower mm circulating system, kWatts
Hp s = Horsepower at the surface (pump hydraulic horsepower), kWatts
Hp t = Total horsepower required at the pump fluid end, kWatts
IF = Impact force, Nt
K = Constant
k = Consistency index, Pa secn
l = Length of pipe or drill collars, meters
n = Power Law constant, normally the slope of shear stress-shear rate diagram
on log-log plot
Nn = Number of nozzles mm the bit
P = Pressure, kPa
Pbit = Pressure drop at the bit (through jet nozzles), kPa
Pbit hp = Pressure drop at the bit when horsepower is maximized, kPa
Pbit if = Pressure drop at the bit when impact force is maximized, kPa
Pc = Pressure loss mm the circulating system ( Ps − Pbit ), kPa
Pc hp = Pressure loss in the circulating system when horsepower is maximized, kPa
Pc if = Pressure loss in the circulating system when impact force is maximized,
kPa
Pc1 = Circulating pressure loss corresponding to flow rate Q1 , kPa
Pc 2 = Circulating pressure loss corresponding to flow rate Q2 , kPa
Pdc = Pressure loss mm the drill collars, kPa
Pdca = Pressure loss mm the drill collar annulus, kPa
Pdp = Pressure loss mm the drill pipe, kPa
Pdpa = Pressure loss mm the drill pipe annulus, kPa
Reference
1
Scott, K. F.; "A New Practical Approach to Rotary Drilling Hydraulics," SPE 3530, 1971.